Meta-analysis of predictive clinicopathologic factors for lymph node metastasis in patients with early colorectal carcinoma

pT1 Colorectal Cancer Detected in a Colorectal Cancer Mass Screening Program: Treatment and Factors Associated with Residual and Extraluminal Disease

Simple Summary

Our study has evaluated the burden of pT1 CRC (confined to submucosa) detected during the first round of a CRC screening program, the surgery related complications and the factors related to four relevant outcomes: initial endoscopic resection, surgery rescue and residual disease after endoscopic resection and, finally, extraluminal disease after surgical resection. 38% of the CRC were detected in this stage.74.9% were initially resected endoscopically and 43.8% did not require surgery. There were inhospital surgical complications in 30.7%, mainly mild with no death and complications after discharge in 16.3% of the patients Residual disease was detected in 12 (4.3%) after endoscopic resection and extraluminal disease in 18 (8.6%) patients after surgery. We have determined several variables independently associated with the four outcome variables evaluated.

Abstract

The aim of this study is to describe the treatment of pT1 colorectal cancer (CRC) in a mass screening program, the surgery-related complications and the factors associated with residual disease after endoscopic resection and extraluminal disease after surgery. We included in this retrospective analysis all the pT1 CRC detected in the Galician CRC screening program between May 2013 and June 2019. We determined which variables were independently associated with the outcomes of the study through a multivariable logistic regression analysis. We included 370–354 pT1 N0(X), 16 pT1N1- out of the 971 CRC detected; 277 (74.9%) were resected endoscopically and 162 (43.8%) were not referred to surgery. There were surgical complications in 30.7% and 16.3% of the patients during hospitalization and after discharge. Residual disease was detected in 12 (4.3%) after endoscopic resection and extraluminal disease in 18 (8.6%) patients after surgery. The variables independently associated with initial endoscopic resection were a pedunculated morphology (OR 33.1, 95% CI 4.3–254), a diameter ≥ 20 mm (OR 3.94, 95% CI 1.39–11.18) and a Site–Morphology–Size–Access score < 9 (OR 428, 95% CI 42–4263). The variables related with surgery rescue were a piecemeal resection (OR 4.48, 95% CI 1.48–13.6), an infiltrated/nonevaluable resection border (OR 7.44, 95% CI 2.12–26.0), a non-well-differentiated histology (OR 4.76, 95% CI 1.07–20.0), vascular infiltration (OR 8.24, 95% CI 2.72–25.0) and a Haggitt 4 infiltration of the submucosa (OR 5.68, 95% CI 2.62–12.3). Residual disease after endoscopic resection was associated with an infiltrated/nonevaluable resection border (OR 34.9, 95% CI 4.08–298), a non-well-differentiated histology (OR 6.67, 95% CI 1.05–50.0), and the vascular infiltration of the submucosa (OR 7.61, 95% CI 1.55–37.4). The variables related with extraluminal disease after surgical resection were no endoscopic resection (OR 4.34, 95% CI 1.26–14.28), a non-well-differentiated histology (OR 4.35, 95% CI 1.39–14.29) and the lymphatic infiltration of the submucosa (OR 4.8, 95% CI 1.32–17.8). In a CRC screening program, although most of pT1 CRC are candidates for endoscopic treatment, surgery is a safe procedure. We have defined some easy to evaluate variables that can be used in the decision-making process.

Risk factors and risk prediction models for colorectal cancer metastasis and recurrence: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies

BACKGROUND

There is a clear need for systematic appraisal of models/factors predicting colorectal cancer (CRC) metastasis and recurrence because clinical decisions about adjuvant treatment are taken on the basis of such variables.

METHODS

We conducted an umbrella review of all systematic reviews of observational studies (with/without meta-analysis) that evaluated risk factors of CRC metastasis and recurrence. We also generated an updated synthesis of risk prediction models for CRC metastasis and recurrence. We cross-assessed individual risk factors and risk prediction models.

RESULTS

Thirty-four risk factors for CRC metastasis and 17 for recurrence were investigated. Twelve of 34 and 4/17 risk factors with p < 0.05 were estimated to change the odds of the outcome at least 3-fold. Only one risk factor (vascular invasion for lymph node metastasis [LNM] in pT1 CRC) presented convincing evidence. We identified 24 CRC risk prediction models. Across 12 metastasis models, six out of 27 unique predictors were assessed in the umbrella review and four of them changed the odds of the outcome at least 3-fold. Across 12 recurrence models, five out of 25 unique predictors were assessed in the umbrella review and only one changed the odds of the outcome at least 3-fold.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides an in-depth evaluation and cross-assessment of 51 risk factors and 24 prediction models. Our findings suggest that a minority of influential risk factors are employed in prediction models, which indicates the need for a more rigorous and systematic model construction process following evidence-based methods.

Clinical Practice Guideline for Endoscopic Resection of Early Gastrointestinal Cancer

Although surgery was the standard treatment for early gastrointestinal cancers, endoscopic resection is now a standard treatment for early gastrointestinal cancers without regional lymph node metastasis. High-definition white light endoscopy, chromoendoscopy, and image-enhanced endoscopy such as narrow band imaging are performed to assess the edge and depth of early gastrointestinal cancers for delineation of resection boundaries and prediction of the possibility of lymph node metastasis before the decision of endoscopic resection. Endoscopic mucosal resection and/or endoscopic submucosal dissection can be performed to remove early gastrointestinal cancers completely by en bloc fashion. Histopathological evaluation should be carefully made to investigate the presence of risk factors for lymph node metastasis such as depth of cancer invasion and lymphovascular invasion. Additional treatment such as radical surgery with regional lymphadenectomy should be considered if the endoscopically resected specimen shows risk factors for lymph node metastasis. This is the first Korean clinical practice guideline for endoscopic resection of early gastrointestinal cancer. This guideline was developed by using mainly de novo methods and encompasses endoscopic management of superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, early gastric cancer, and early colorectal cancer. This guideline will be revised as new data on early gastrointestinal cancer are collected.

Clinical Practice Guideline for Endoscopic Resection of Early Gastrointestinal Cancer

Although surgery was the standard treatment for early gastrointestinal cancers, endoscopic resection is now a standard treatment for early gastrointestinal cancers without regional lymph node metastasis. High-definition white light endoscopy, chromoendoscopy, and image-enhanced endoscopy such as narrow band imaging are performed to assess the edge and depth of early gastrointestinal cancers for delineation of resection boundaries and prediction of the possibility of lymph node metastasis before the decision of endoscopic resection. Endoscopic mucosal resection and/or endoscopic submucosal dissection can be performed to remove early gastrointestinal cancers completely by <i>en bloc</i> fashion. Histopathological evaluation should be carefully made to investigate the presence of risk factors for lymph node metastasis such as depth of cancer invasion and lymphovascular invasion. Additional treatment such as radical surgery with regional lymphadenectomy should be considered if the endoscopically resected specimen shows risk factors for lymph node metastasis. This is the first Korean clinical practice guideline for endoscopic resection of early gastrointestinal cancer. This guideline was developed by using mainly de novo methods and encompasses endoscopic management of superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, early gastric cancer, and early colorectal cancer. This guideline will be revised as new data on early gastrointestinal cancer are collected.

A clinical-radiomics nomogram for the preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer

Background

Accurate lymph node metastasis (LNM) prediction in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients is of great significance for treatment decision making and prognostic evaluation. We aimed to develop and validate a clinical-radiomics nomogram for the individual preoperative prediction of LNM in CRC patients.

Methods

We enrolled 766 patients (458 in the training set and 308 in the validation set) with clinicopathologically confirmed CRC. We included nine significant clinical risk factors (age, sex, preoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) level, preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, tumor size, tumor location, histotype, differentiation and M stage) to build the clinical model. We used analysis of variance (ANOVA), relief and recursive feature elimination (RFE) for feature selection (including clinical risk factors and the imaging features of primary lesions and peripheral lymph nodes), established classification models with logistic regression analysis and selected the respective candidate models by fivefold cross-validation. Then, we combined the clinical risk factors, primary lesion radiomics features and peripheral lymph node radiomics features of the candidate models to establish combined predictive models. Model performance was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). Finally, decision curve analysis (DCA) and a nomogram were used to evaluate the clinical usefulness of the model.

Results

The clinical-primary lesion radiomics-peripheral lymph node radiomics model, with the highest AUC value (0.7606), was regarded as the candidate model and had good discrimination and calibration in both the training and validation sets. DCA demonstrated that the clinical-radiomics nomogram was useful for preoperative prediction in the clinical environment.

Conclusion

The present study proposed a clinical-radiomics nomogram with a combination of clinical risk factors and radiomics features that can potentially be applied in the individualized preoperative prediction of LNM in CRC patients.

Tumor Budding in Colorectal Carcinoma: Translating a Morphologic Score Into Clinically Meaningful Results

CONTEXT

- Tumor budding has received increasing recognition as an important independent prognostic factor in colorectal carcinoma. Prominent tumor budding in adenocarcinoma arising in a polyp has been shown to be a risk factor for lymph node involvement. The variability in methods used for evaluating tumor budding in different studies and lack of standardized guidelines have impeded routine inclusion of tumor budding in pathology reports. This changed last year with consensus guidelines based on the International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference (ITBCC). These guidelines have been included in the recent College of American Pathologists (CAPs) Colorectal Cancer Protocol. The consensus methodology will allow uniform reporting of this finding, but challenges in interpretation in the setting of intense inflammation, fibrosis, or gland fragmentation need to be addressed in future guidelines.

OBJECTIVE

- To provide a brief overview of the known clinical significance of tumor budding in colorectal carcinoma and discuss the practical aspects of its implementation on a routine basis.

DATA SOURCES

- English-language pathology literature.

CONCLUSIONS

- Tumor budding has been shown to be an independent prognostic marker in colorectal carcinomas and the routine reporting of tumor buds is now advocated by using the approach outlined by the ITBCC guidelines. Tumor budding is included in the CAP protocol as a recommended element. Presence of prominent tumor budding in an adenocarcinoma in a polyp may have implications for management, such as additional resection, while it serves as a prognostic factor in other settings.

Prognostic significance of lymphovascular invasion in colorectal cancer and its association with genomic alterations

BACKGROUND

Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) is suggested to be an early and important step in tumor progression toward metastasis, but its prognostic value and genetic mechanisms in colorectal cancer (CRC) have not been well investigated.

AIM

To investigate the prognostic value of LVI in CRC and identify the associated genomic alterations.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of 1219 CRC patients and evaluated the prognostic value of LVI for overall survival by the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate Cox regression analysis. We also performed an array-based comparative genomic hybridization analysis of 47 fresh CRC samples to examine the genomic alterations associated with LVI. A decision tree model was applied to identify special DNA copy number alterations (DCNAs) for differentiating between CRCs with and without LVI. Functional enrichment and protein-protein interaction network analyses were conducted to explore the potential molecular mechanisms of LVI.

RESULTS

LVI was detected in 150 (12.3%) of 1219 CRCs, and the presence was positively associated with higher histological grade and advanced tumor stage (both P < 0.001). Compared with the non-LVI group, the LVI group showed a 1.77-fold (95% confidence interval: 1.40-2.25, P < 0.001) increased risk of death and a significantly lower 5-year overall survival rate (P < 0.001). Based on the comparative genomic hybridization data, 184 DCNAs (105 gains and 79 losses) were identified to be significantly related to LVI (P < 0.05), and the majority were located at 22q, 17q, 10q, and 6q. We further constructed a decision tree classifier including seven special DCNAs, which could distinguish CRCs with LVI from those without it at an accuracy of 95.7%. Functional enrichment and protein-protein interaction network analyses revealed that the genomic alterations related to LVI were correlated with inflammation, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, angiogenesis, and matrix remodeling.

CONCLUSION

LVI is an independent predictor for survival in CRC, and its development may correlate with inflammation, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, angiogenesis, and matrix remodeling.

Complete endoscopic mucosal resection of malignant colonic sessile polyps and clinical outcome of 51 cases

Background

Meta-analyses and guidelines recommend that deep submucosal invasion (>1 mm) of malignant sessile colonic polyps is an important risk factor for lymph node metastasis. However, existing data are based on small retrospective studies with marked heterogeneity. We herein aimed to investigate the long-term outcomes of patients who underwent complete endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of malignant colonic sessile polyps invading the submucosal layer.

Methods

Endoscopy records for the period 2000-2016 were reviewed retrospectively. All enrolled patients exhibited an endoscopically resected malignant colonic sessile polyp. All patients were advised to undergo surgery, but some opted for conservative treatment and endoscopic follow up.

Results

Fifty-one patients with confirmed infiltrative submucosal adenocarcinoma in sessile colonic polyps that had undergone complete EMR were detected. A total of 32 (62.7%) patients opted for surgery after EMR and 19 (37.3%) chose endoscopic follow up. In 44 (86.3%) patients the submucosal invasion was >1 mm. Residual malignant disease was identified in the surgical pathological specimen of only 1 patient. During a median follow up of 23.41 months (interquartile range 33.45, range 1.84-144.92), no local recurrences or lymph node metastasis were identified. Forty-nine patients are alive without evidence of disease and 2 died of other causes (without evidence of local or metastatic disease at last follow up).

Conclusion

Our data suggest that complete EMR of cancerous colonic sessile polyps, even in cases of submucosal invasion >1 mm carries a low risk of recurrence and therefore may need further evaluation as an alternative strategy to surgical resection.

Endoscopic surveillance after colonic polyps and colorrectal cancer resection. 2018 update

There is limited scientific evidence available to stratify the risk of developing metachronous colorectal cancer after resection of colonic polyps and to determine surveillance intervals and is mostly based on observational studies. However, while awaiting further evidence, the criteria of endoscopic follow-up needs to be unified in our setting. Therefore, the Spanish Association of Gastroenterology, the Spanish Society of Family and Community Medicine, the Spanish Society of Digestive Endoscopy, and the Colorectal Cancer Screening Group of the Spanish Society of Epidemiology, have written this consensus document, which is included in chapter 10 of the "Clinical Practice Guideline for Diagnosis and Prevention of Colorectal Cancer. 2018 Update". Important developments will also be presented as regards the previous edition published in 2009. First of all, situations that require and do not require endoscopic surveillance are established, and the need of endoscopic surveillance of individuals who do not present a special risk of metachronous colon cancer is eliminated. Secondly, endoscopic surveillance recommendations are established in individuals with serrated polyps. Finally, unlike the previous edition, endoscopic surveillance recommendations are given in patients operated on for colorectal cancer. At the same time, it represents an advance on the European guideline for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening, since it eliminates the division between intermediate risk group and high risk group, which means the elimination of a considerable proportion of colonoscopies of early surveillance. Finally, clear recommendations are given on the absence of need for follow-up in the low risk group, for which the European guidelines maintained some ambiguity.

A Review of Current Challenges in Colorectal Cancer Reporting

Context.—

Pathologic assessment of colorectal cancer resection specimens plays an important role in postsurgical management and prognostication in patients with colorectal cancer. Challenges exist in the evaluation and reporting of these specimens, either because of difficulties in applying existing guidelines or related to newer concepts.

Objective.—

To address challenging areas in colorectal cancer pathology and to provide an overview of the literature, current guidelines, and expert recommendations for the handling of colorectal cancer resection specimens in everyday practice.

Data Sources.—

PubMed (US National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland) literature review; reporting protocols of the College of American Pathologists, the Royal College of Pathologists of the United Kingdom, and the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum; and classification manuals of the American Joint Committee on Cancer and the Union for International Cancer Control.

Conclusions.—

This review has addressed issues and challenges affecting quality of colorectal cancer pathology reporting. High-quality pathology reporting is essential for prognostication and management of patients with colorectal cancer.

Clinicopathological features of T1 colorectal carcinomas with skip lymphovascular invasion

With recent advances in endoscopic treatment, many T1 colorectal carcinomas (CRCs) are resected endoscopically with a negative margin. However, some lesions exhibit skip lymphovascular invasion (SLVI), which is defined as the discontinuous foci of the tumor cells within the colon wall. The aim of the present study was to reveal the clinicopathological features of T1 CRCs with SLVI and validate the Japanese guidelines regarding SLVI. A total of 741 patients with T1 CRCs that were resected surgically between April 2001 and October 2016 in our hospital were divided into two groups: With SLVI and without SLVI. Clinicopathological features compared between the two groups were patient's gender, age, tumor size, location, morphology, lymphovascular invasion, tumor differentiation, tumor budding and lymph node metastasis. The incidence of T1 CRCs with SLVI was 0.9% (7/741). All cases with SLVI were found in the sigmoid colon or rectum. T1 CRCs with SLVI showed significantly higher rates of lymphovascular invasion than those without SLVI (P<0.01). In conclusion, lymphovascular invasion was a significant risk factor for SLVI in T1 CRCs, and for which surgical colectomy was necessary. The Japanese guidelines are appropriate regarding SLVI. Registered in the University Hospital Medical Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000027097).

Malignant colorectal polyps: endoscopic polypectomy and watchful waiting is not inferior to subsequent bowel resection. A nationwide propensity score-based analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The optimal treatment of patients with malignant colorectal polyps is unsettled. The surgical dilemma following polypectomy is selecting between watchful waiting (WW) and subsequent bowel resection (SBR), but the long-term survival outcomes have not been established yet. This nationwide study compared survival of patients after WW or SBR.

METHODS

Danish nationwide study with 100% follow-up of all patients with malignant colorectal polyps (the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group database) in a 10-year period from 2001 to 2011. All patients' charts and histological reports were individually reviewed. Survival rates were calculated with Cox proportional hazard model after propensity score matching.

RESULTS

A total of 692 patients were included (WW, 424 (61.3%), SBR, 268 (38.7%)) with a mean follow-up of 7.5 years (3-188 months). Following propensity score matching, there was no significant difference in overall or disease-free survival (p = 0.344 and p = 0.184) or rate of local recurrence (WW, 7.2%, SBR, 2%, p = 0.052) or distant metastases (WW, 3.3%, SBR, 4.6%, p = 0.77). In the SBR group, there was no residual tumor or lymph node metastases in the resected specimen in 82.5% of the patients.

CONCLUSION

Subsequent bowel resection may not be superior to endoscopic polypectomy and watchful waiting with regard to overall and disease-free survival in patients with malignant colorectal polyps.

Recommendations for reporting tumor budding in colorectal cancer based on the International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference (ITBCC) 2016

Tumor budding is a well-established independent prognostic factor in colorectal cancer but a standardized method for its assessment has been lacking. The primary aim of the International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference (ITBCC) was to reach agreement on an international, evidence-based standardized scoring system for tumor budding in colorectal cancer. The ITBCC included nine sessions with presentations, a pre-meeting survey and an e-book covering the key publications on tumor budding in colorectal cancer. The 'Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation' method was used to determine the strength of recommendations and quality of evidence. The following 10 statements achieved consensus: tumor budding is defined as a single tumor cell or a cell cluster consisting of four tumor cells or less (22/22, 100%). Tumor budding is an independent predictor of lymph node metastases in pT1 colorectal cancer (23/23, 100%). Tumor budding is an independent predictor of survival in stage II colorectal cancer (23/23, 100%). Tumor budding should be taken into account along with other clinicopathological features in a multidisciplinary setting (23/23, 100%). Tumor budding is counted on H&E (19/22, 86%). Intratumoral budding exists in colorectal cancer and has been shown to be related to lymph node metastasis (22/22, 100%). Tumor budding is assessed in one hotspot (in a field measuring 0.785 mm2) at the invasive front (22/22, 100%). A three-tier system should be used along with the budding count in order to facilitate risk stratification in colorectal cancer (23/23, 100%). Tumor budding and tumor grade are not the same (23/23, 100%). Tumor budding should be included in guidelines/protocols for colorectal cancer reporting (23/23, 100%). Members of the ITBCC were able to reach strong consensus on a single international, evidence-based method for tumor budding assessment and reporting. It is proposed that this method be incorporated into colorectal cancer guidelines/protocols and staging systems.

Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: patient selection and special considerations

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) enables en bloc resection of large complex colorectal superficial neoplastic lesions, resulting in very low rates of local recurrence, high-quality pathologic specimens for accurate histopathologic diagnosis and potentially curative treatment of early adenocarcinoma without resorting to major surgical resection. The safety and efficacy of the technique, which was pioneered in the upper gastrointestinal tract, has been established by the consistently impressive outcomes from expert centers in Japan and some other eastern countries. However, ESD is challenging to perform in the colorectum and there is a significant risk of complications, particularly in the early stages of the learning curve. Early studies from western centers raised concerns about the high complication rates, and the impressive results from Japanese centers were not replicated. As a result, many western endoscopists are skeptical about the role of ESD and few centers have incorporated the technique into their practice. Nevertheless, although the distribution of expertise, referral centers and modes of practice may differ in Japan and western countries, ESD has an important role and can be safely and effectively incorporated into western practice. Key to achieving this is meticulous lesion assessment and selection, appropriate referral to centers with the necessary expertise and experience and application of the appropriate technique individualized to the patient. This review discusses the advantages, risks and benefits of ESD to treat colorectal lesions and the importance of preprocedure lesion assessment and in vivo diagnosis and outlines a pragmatic rationale for appropriate lesion selection as well as the patient, technical and institutional factors that should be considered.

Long-term Recurrence-free Survival After Standard Endoscopic Resection Versus Surgical Resection of Submucosal Invasive Colorectal Cancer: A Population-based Study

BACKGROUND & AIMS

There is controversy over the optimal management for T1 colorectal cancer (T1 CRC). This study compared initial endoscopic resection with or without additional surgery, or initial surgery for T1 CRC, and assessed risk factors for lymph node metastases (LNMs) and long-term recurrence.

METHODS

We performed a registration study that included all patients diagnosed with T1 CRC from 1995 through 2011 in the southeast area of The Netherlands (n = 1315). High-risk histology (with regard to LNM) was defined as the presence of poor differentiation, lymphangio-invasion, and/or deep submucosal invasion. The primary outcome measure was the combined rate of local and distant CRC recurrence during a mean follow-up period of 6.6 years. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed to evaluate independent risk factors for LNM and CRC recurrence, respectively.

RESULTS

Endoscopic resection was performed in 590 patients (44.9%); of these, 220 (16.7%) underwent additional surgery. Initial surgery was performed in 725 patients (55.1%). The risk of LNM was higher in T1 CRC with histologic risk factors (15.5% vs 7.1% without histologic risk factors; odds ratio, 2.21; 95% confidence interval, 1.33-3.70). Thirty-day mortality did not differ between patients who received additional surgery (0.9%) and those who underwent only endoscopic resection (1.4%; P = .631). Rates of CRC recurrence were 6.2% (9.8/1000 patient-years) after only endoscopic resection vs 6.4% (9.4/1000 patient-years) after additional surgery (P = .912), and 3.4% (5.2/1000 patient-years) after initial surgery (P = .031). In multivariate analysis, this difference was not significant. The only independent risk factor for long-term recurrence was a positive resection margin (hazard ratio, 6.88; 95% confidence interval, 2.27-20.87).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on a population analysis of patients diagnosed with T1 CRC, additional surgery after endoscopic resection should be considered only for patients with high-risk histology or a positive resection margin.

Patient gender as a factor associated with lymph node metastasis in T1 colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Approximately 10% of patients with T1 colorectal cancer have lymph node metastases (LNM), requiring node dissection along with surgical resection. Patient gender was recently reported to affect the occurrence of LNM. The aim of the present study was to assess whether patient gender was predictive of LNM in T1 colorectal cancer. Public databases, including PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched, using key terms related to 'T1 colorectal cancer' and 'lymph node'. All relevant studies reporting the adjusted odds ratio or risk ratio of LNM in relation to patient gender were included. The quality of the studies was classified according to the Quality in Prognostic Studies tool. A random-effects model was used and the quality of the evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. The initial database search identified 2,492 publications; of those, 36 studies reported unadjusted results. Of the 36 studies, 4 reported adjusted results and fulfilled the inclusion criteria for this meta-analysis: 3 studies were graded as having a moderate risk of bias, and 1 had a low risk of bias. The present meta-analysis demonstrated that female gender was associated with increased risk of LNM (risk ratio=2.45, 95% confidence interval: 1.03-3.88). The I² statistic was 0.901, classified as very low (+OOO) and was downgraded by the risk of bias, inconsistency and publication bias. In conclusion, female gender was found to be correlated with LNM in patients with T1 colorectal cancer.

Management of T1 colorectal cancers after endoscopic treatment based on the risk stratification of lymph node metastasis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Recent advances in endoscopic technology have allowed many T1 colorectal carcinomas to be resected endoscopically with negative margins. However, the criteria for curative endoscopic resection remain unclear. We aimed to identify risk factors for nodal metastasis in T1 carcinoma patients and hence establish the indication for additional surgery with lymph node dissection.

METHODS

Initial or additional surgery with nodal dissection was performed in 653 T1 carcinoma cases. Clinicopathological factors were retrospectively analyzed with respect to nodal metastasis. The status of the muscularis mucosae (MM grade) was defined as grade 1 (maintenance) or grade 2 (fragmentation or disappearance). The lesions were then stratified based on the risk of nodal metastasis.

RESULTS

Muscularis mucosae grade was associated with nodal metastasis (P = 0.026), and no patients with MM grade 1 lesions had nodal metastasis. Significant risk factors for nodal metastasis in patients with MM grade 2 lesions were attribution of women (P = 0.006), lymphovascular infiltration (P < 0.001), tumor budding (P = 0.045), and poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma or mucinous carcinoma (P = 0.007). Nodal metastasis occurred in 1.06% of lesions without any of these pathological factors, but in 10.3% and 20.1% of lesions with at least one factor in male and female patients, respectively. There was good inter-observer agreement for MM grade evaluation, with a kappa value of 0.67.

CONCLUSIONS

Stratification using MM grade, pathological factors, and patient sex provided more appropriate indication for additional surgery with lymph node dissection after endoscopic treatment for T1 colorectal carcinomas.