Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults

Extracolonic findings at CT colonography

This review focuses on the detection of extracolonic findings at CT colonography (CTC). Since its introduction, it has been regarded as a promising alternative to conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps and cancers. Unlike conventional colonoscopy and barium enema, CTC allows evaluation not only of the colon but also visualization of the lung bases, the abdomen, and the pelvis. CTC is performed with thin sections (1-5 mm) and small intervals (0.5-2 mm), enabling superb image reconstruction. The ability to evaluate the extracolonic structures can present a clinical dilemma. On the one hand, CTC may incidentally demonstrate asymptomatic malignant diseases or other clinically important conditions, thus possibly reducing morbidity or mortality. On the other hand, CTC may reveal numerous findings of no clinical relevance; this could result in costly additional diagnostic examinations with an increase in morbidity and overall negative impact on patients' health. In this article, extracolonic findings at CTC will be reviewed and the potential benefits and disadvantages will be presented.

Spasmolysis at CT colonography: butyl scopolamine versus glucagon

PURPOSE

To retrospectively determine if the use of butyl scopolamine or glucagon in the supine patient improves colonic distention and reduces the number of collapsed intestinal segments at computed tomographic (CT) colonography.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study had institutional review board approval; subject informed consent was not required. CT colonography was performed without the administration of an intravenous spasmolytic in 80 asymptomatic subjects (group 1; 45 women, 35 men; age range, 48-77 years; mean, 61.9 years). These subjects were matched with two groups of 80 subjects who were similar in age but were premedicated with glucagon (group 2; 41 women, 39 men; age range, 43-76 years; mean, 63.1 years) or butyl scopolamine (group 3; 43 women, 37 men; age range, 34-77 years; mean, 63.4 years). All 240 subjects were examined in the supine position with multisection CT and a section thickness of 1 mm after intravenous contrast agent administration and rectal carbon dioxide insufflation. The colon was divided into seven segments, and the colon length, total volume, radial distensibility, and number of non-distended segments were calculated for each subject and compared among the three groups. Statistical analysis was performed with analysis of variance and chi2 testing.

RESULTS

Mean bowel length was not significantly different among the groups. Mean colon volumes and radial distensibilities, respectively, were 1.84 L and 3.69 cm in group 1, 2.14 L and 3.98 cm in group 2, and 2.35 L and 4.23 cm in group 3; differences in colon volume and radial distensibility were significant only between group 1 and group 3 (P < .001). At CT colonography, 29 segments in 20 group 1 subjects were collapsed, 23 segments in 12 group 2 subjects were collapsed, and 11 segments in six group 3 subjects were collapsed (P = .016).

CONCLUSION

Premedication with butyl scopolamine or, less effectively, glucagon improves colonic distention in the supine subject.

Polyp size at CT colonography after electronic subtraction cleansing in an anthropomorphic colon phantom

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of various bowel contrast material concentrations and subtraction software on size measurements of well-defined polyp lesions in a colon phantom at CT colonography.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Repeated scanning and a precise reference standard required the use of a colon phantom in which 21 polyps were randomly distributed. Two readers who had each reviewed computed tomographic (CT) colonographic images from more than 100 cases evaluated polyp size on images obtained when the phantom was partially filled with varying concentrations of contrast material, scanned by using CT colonography, and subjected to electronic subtraction cleansing. The single largest dimension was recorded for each reader for a randomized series of polyps. These measurements were compared with a reference standard that was based on a combination of the manufacturer's polyp size specifications and the subsequent verification of these sizes by an independent consensus panel. Six weeks after initial observations, readers evaluated images of the phantom scanned without the presence of contrast material. Polyp size estimations for the two readers for each series were compared with the reference standard to obtain a mean absolute measurement error for each reader for each series. Data for each reader were compared by using a nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance test. A pair-wise comparison of the experimental and control series was then performed by using the Dunn post hoc test.

RESULTS

Contrast material dilutions resulting in an average attenuation of less than 500 HU resulted in complete subtraction and the absence of streak artifacts. There was no statistically significant difference between the average measurement error for contrast attenuations between 300 and 500 HU when compared with that of control. Streak artifact was noticeable for the highest dilution (mean, 840 HU). No statistically significant differences were observed for series in which cleansing software was used in the absence of bowel contrast material.

CONCLUSION

The combination of electronic cleansing and bowel contrast enhancement in the range of 300-500 HU results in no substantial change in readers' estimations of polyp size at CT colonography.

A comparison of the immunochemical fecal occult blood test and total colonoscopy in the asymptomatic population

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The fecal occult blood test (FOBT) is recommended as a screening test for colorectal cancer, but there are few reliable studies on the accuracy of immunochemical FOBT. The aim of this study was to analyze the sensitivity of immunochemical FOBT and to compare the results with the findings from complete colonoscopy.

METHODS

Asymptomatic adults underwent 1-time immunochemical FOBT and total colonoscopy simultaneously. The prevalence and location of colorectal neoplasia were determined by colonoscopy. The results of immunochemical FOBT and the colonoscopic findings were compared.

RESULTS

Of 21,805 patients, immunochemical FOBT was positive in 1231 cases (5.6%). The sensitivity of 1-time immunochemical FOBT for detecting advanced neoplasia and invasive cancer was 27.1% and 65.8%, respectively. In addition, the sensitivity for invasive cancer according to Dukes' stage showed 50.0% for Dukes' stage A, 70.0% for Dukes' stage B, and 78.3% for Dukes' stages C or D. The sensitivity for detecting advanced neoplasia at the proximal colon was significantly lower than that detected in the distal colon (16.3% vs 30.7%, P = .00007).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the screening of asymptomatic patients with immunochemical FOBT can identify patients with colorectal neoplasia to a certain extent, the sensitivity is relatively low and different according to the tumor location. Therefore, programmatic and repeated screening by immunochemical FOBT may be necessary to increase sensitivity for colorectal cancer detection.

CT colonography after fecal tagging with a reduced cathartic cleansing and a reduced volume of barium

OBJECTIVE

The objective of our study was to assess the efficacy of fecal tagging with a small volume of barium in combination with a reduced cathartic cleansing before CT colonography.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study consists of a review of 200 patients examined in a clinical setting. Conventional colonoscopy and CT colonography or follow-up were used as the gold standard. All patients prepared for CT colonography the day before the examination with a dedicated low-residue diet. Fecal tagging was performed with 50 mL of barium. The residual feces and fluid were evaluated on a segmental basis. The residual feces was divided in two categories (< 6 mm and > or = 6 mm). The amount of fluid was assessed on the axial slices. The efficacy of tagging was evaluated visually.

RESULTS

For the study, 1,200 segments were evaluated. Residual feces was present in 413 segments (34.41%), with feces less than 6 mm in 210 segments (17.5%) and feces 6 mm or greater in 203 segments (16.92%). There was residual fluid in 527 segments (43.91%). Nontagged feces 6 mm or greater was present in 49 segments (4.08%) and nontagged fluid in 178 segments (14.83%). All nontagged feces 6 mm or greater was easy to assess. All fluid redistributed with dual positioning. A total of 65 lesions 6 mm or greater were correctly diagnosed on primary CT colonography. In two patients, two lesions adjacent to each other were misinterpreted as being only one. Another 8-mm lesion was missed.

CONCLUSION

In the present study, CT colonography after fecal tagging with 50 mL of barium combined with a reduced cathartic cleansing was feasible.

Screening and surveillance of colorectal cancer

Although colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States, it is preventable. Screening modalities include fecal occult blood testing, flexible sigmoidoscopy, double-contrast barium enema, and colonoscopy. Colonoscopy allows effective detection and removal of precursor adenomatous polyps and is the dominant CRC screening modality. Emerging technologies include CT and MR colonography and fecal DNA tests. Effective and cost-effective surveillance after polypectomy and curative CRC resection requires balancing the protective effect of polypectomy while maximizing intervals between examinations; thus, estimation of the risk of recurrence determines the intensity of surveillance for individual patients.

Colon imaging: computed tomographic colonography

Computed tomographic colonography (CTC, virtual colonoscopy) is an attractive modality with which to image the colon. Many different techniques are available; moreover, during the last several years, advances in hardware and software have been remarkable. Evidence to this date suggests that CTC has varying sensitivity for detection of large colonic lesions, largely dependent on technique and the method of study. A variety of issues related to CTC are reviewed, including evolution of CTC, sensitivity and specificity of CTC, patient experience, extracolonic lesions, advances in colon preparation, and training. It is clear that CTC has great promise, but also that many questions about its use remain to be answered.

Colorectal cancer in patients under close colonoscopic surveillance

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Colonoscopic polypectomy is considered effective for preventing colorectal cancer (CRC), but the incidence of cancer in patients under colonoscopic surveillance has rarely been investigated. We determined the incidence of CRC in patients under colonoscopic surveillance and examined the circumstances and risk factors for CRC and adenoma with high-grade dysplasia.

METHODS

Patients were drawn from 3 adenoma chemoprevention trials. All underwent baseline colonoscopy with removal of at least one adenoma and were deemed free of remaining lesions. We identified patients subsequently diagnosed with invasive cancer or adenoma with high-grade dysplasia. The timing, location, and outcome of all cases of cancer and high-grade dysplasia identified are described and risks associated with their development explored.

RESULTS

CRC was diagnosed in 19 of the 2915 patients over a mean follow-up of 3.7 years (incidence, 1.74 cancers/1000 person-years). The cancers were located in all regions of the colon; 10 were at or proximal to the hepatic flexure. Although most of the cancers (84%) were of early stage, 2 participants died of CRC. Seven patients were diagnosed with adenoma with high-grade dysplasia during follow-up. Older patients and those with a history of more adenomas were at higher risk of being diagnosed with invasive cancer or adenoma with high-grade dysplasia.

CONCLUSIONS

CRC is diagnosed in a clinically important proportion of patients following complete colonoscopy and polypectomy. More precise and representative estimates of CRC incidence and death among patients undergoing surveillance examinations are needed.

State-of-the-art computed tomographic and magnetic resonance imaging of the gastrointestinal system

Among the major innovations in radiology of the gastrointestinal (GI) system are the replacement of classic invasive diagnostic methods with noninvasive ones and the improvement in lesion characterization and staging of pancreatobiliary malignancies. Developments in imaging technology have led to many improvements in the field of diagnostic GI radiology. With its fast and thin-section scanning abilities, multidetector-row CT (MDCT) strengthens the place of CT as the most efficient tool to diagnose, characterize, and preoperatively stage pancreatic neoplasms. MR cholangiopancreatography has widely replaced endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatobiliary malignancies. MR imaging, using phased-array or endorectal coils, demonstrates local tumor invasion accurately in rectal cancers and thus allows an improved surgical planning. Virtual colonoscopy with MDCTs is an efficient screening method for colon cancer, and MDCT enterography is becoming the standard imaging technique for many small bowel disorders. The continuing developments in CT and MR technology will most probably further improve the accuracy of these and other imaging applications in the near future.

Mass screening with CT colonography: should the radiation exposure be of concern?

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Computed tomography colonography (CTC), particularly using noncathartic techniques, has the clear potential to increase compliance for colorectal cancer screening. Because the geometry for CTC is highly advantageous, it can be performed with lower radiation doses than almost any other CT examination. If CTC were to become a standard screening tool for the population age 50 years and older, the potential market in the United States would soon be over 100 million people. Therefore, it is pertinent to consider the radiation exposure and any potential radiation risk to the population from such a mass CTC screening program.

METHODS

Organ doses from CTC examinations can be estimated with standard techniques. These doses can be applied to organ- and dose-specific radiation cancer risk estimates to estimate the excess cancer risk resulting from the radiation from a paired (supine and prone) CTC examination.

RESULTS

The cancer risks associated with the radiation exposure from CTC are unlikely to be zero, but they are small. A best estimate for the absolute lifetime cancer risk associated with the radiation exposure using typical current scanner techniques is about 0.14% for paired CTC scans for a 50-year-old, and about half that for a 70-year-old. These values probably could be reduced by factors of 5 or 10 with optimized CTC protocols.

CONCLUSIONS

In terms of the radiation exposure, the benefit-risk ratio potentially is large for CTC.

Computed tomography colonography: automated diameter and volume measurement of colonic polyps compared with a manual technique--in vitro study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate inter- and intraobserver agreement of automated measurement of polyp diameter in vitro.

METHODS

Two phantoms ("QRM" and "Whiting") containing simulated polyps of known diameter and volume were scanned using 16-detector row computed tomography. Two observers estimated polyp diameter using 3 methods: software calipers ("manual"), freehand boundary identification ("semiautomatic"), and automated software segmentation ("fully automatic").

RESULTS

Intraobserver 95% limits of agreement for diameter were narrowest for the fully automatic method (QRM span: 0.39 mm, 0.48 mm; Whiting span: 0.24 mm, 0 mm). Manual estimates were approximately 10 times wider (QRM span: 3.57 mm, 3.21 mm; Whiting span: 3.2 mm, 2.02 mm). Volume estimates were narrowest for the fully automatic method (span: 24.2 mm, 24.1 mm vs. 97.9 mm, 102.9 mm for semiautomatic measurement). Interobserver agreement for diameter was narrowest for the fully automatic method (QRM span: 0.12 mm, Whiting span: 0.16 mm), with the manual method approximately 18 times wider (QRM span: 2.87 mm, Whiting span: 2.18 mm).

CONCLUSION

Fully automated measurement of polyp diameter and volume is technically feasible and results in superior inter- and intraobserver agreement.

Multimodal imaging and computer assisted diagnosis for functional tumour characterisation

Radiological modalities, especially CT, mainly provide morphological and structural information with high spatial resolution covering large volumes. Novel developments, which are predominantly MR-based, also deliver 'functional' information, which can be used for individual characterisation of tumour biology. Both aspects and modalities, additionally complemented by ultrasound, have to be combined in the radiological workflow of cancer patients including volumetric visualisation, information extraction from multimodal imaging, quantitative surrogates, intelligent interpretation assistance and image-guided procedures. Based on volumetric visualisation and the generation of 3D+t maps, CAD tools have to address registration of different image series from different modalities, and extraction of quantitative surrogates. The latter will then serve tumour characterisation, therapeutic decision-making, image-guided procedures and efficacy evaluation.

Importance of extracolonic findings at IV contrast medium-enhanced CT colonography versus those at non-enhanced CT colonography

To compare the clinical importance of extracolonic findings at intravenous (IV) contrast-enhanced CT colonography versus those at non-enhanced CT colonography. IV contrast medium-enhanced (n=72) and non-enhanced (n=30) multidetector CT colonography was performed in 102 symptomatic patients followed by conventional colonoscopy on the same day. The impact of extracolonic findings on further work up and treatment was assessed by a review of patient records. Extracolonic findings were divided into two groups: either leading to further work up respectively having an impact on therapy or not. A total of 303 extracolonic findings were detected. Of those, 71% (215/303) were found on IV contrast-enhanced CT, and 29% (88/303) were found on non-enhanced CT colonography. The extracolonic findings in 25% (26/102) of all patients led to further work up or had an impact on therapy. Twenty-two of these patients underwent CT colonography with IV contrast enhancement, and four without. The percentage of extracolonic findings leading to further work up or having an impact on therapy was higher for IV contrast-enhanced (31%; 22/72) than for non-enhanced (13%; 4/30) CT scans (P=0.12). IV contrast-enhanced CT colonography produced more extracolonic findings than non-enhanced CT colonography. A substantially greater proportion of findings on IV contrast-enhanced CT colonography led to further work up and treatment than did non-enhanced CT colonography.

CT colonography: comparison of a colon dissection display versus 3D endoluminal view for the detection of polyps

The purpose of this study was to compare sensitivity, specificity, and postprocessing time of a colon dissection approach to regular 3D-endoluminal workup of computed tomography (CT) colonography for the detection of polypoid lesions. Twenty-one patients who had received conventional colonoscopy after CT colonography were selected; 18 patients had either colon polyps or colon cancer and three had no findings. CT colonography was performed using a 4-channel multi-detector-row (MDR) CT in ten cases and a 16-channel MDR-CT in 11 cases. A blinded reader retrospectively evaluated all colonographies using both viewing methods in a randomized order. Thirty-seven polyps were identified by optical colonoscopy. An overall per-lesion sensitivity of 47.1% for lesions smaller than 5 mm, 56.3% for lesions between 5 mm and 10 mm, and 75.0% for lesion larger than 10 mm was calculated using the colon dissection approach. This compared to an overall per-lesion sensitivity of 35.3% (<5 mm), 81.5% (5-10 mm), and 100.0% (>10 mm) using the endoluminal view. The average time consumption for CT colonography evaluation with the colon dissection software was 10 min versus 38 min using the endoluminal view. A colon dissection approach may provide a significant time advantage for evaluation of CT colonography while obtaining a high sensitivity. It is especially superior in the detection of lesions smaller than 5 mm.

[Early diagnosis of colorectal tumors]

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common causes of cancer mortality in Western countries. Approximately six percent of the population will develop colorectal cancer during life. Individuals older than 50 years or with a family history for colorectal tumors as well as patients with an inflammatory bowel disease have an increased risk for CRC. A significant reduction of colorectal cancer mortality can be achieved by screening of asymptomatic patients and removal of premalignant adenomatous polyp precursors. Colonoscopy is recognized as the gold standard, but in future virtual colonoscopy might be a reasonable addition. Asymptomatic individuals with an average risk for CRC should be screened from the age of 50 and then every 10 years if the examination showed no pathological findings. When the individual or family history indicate a higher risk for a colorectal neoplasia, screening should begin at the age of 40 or 10 years before the earliest tumor occurrence in the family. Families with hereditary CRC require a special surveillance.

Imaging and Cancer: Research Strategy of the American College of Radiology Imaging Network

The American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ACRIN) is a cooperative group funded by the National Cancer Institute and dedicated to developing and conducting clinical trials of diagnostic imaging and image-guided treatment technologies. ACRIN's six disease site committees are responsible for developing scientific strategies and resultant trials within the framework of ACRIN's five key hypotheses: (a) Screening and early detection with imaging can reduce cancer-specific mortality. (b) Less invasive image-guided therapeutic methods can reduce the mortality and morbidity associated with treating cancer. (c) Molecular-based physiologic and functional imaging can improve the diagnosis and staging of cancer, thus improving treatment. (d) Functional imaging can portray the effectiveness of treatment earlier and more accurately, thus reducing mortality and improving the likelihood of a cure. (e) Informatics and other "smart systems" can improve the evaluation of patients with cancer, thus leading to better and more effective treatments. This article details ACRIN's research strategy according to disease site through the year 2007.

Region-based supine-prone correspondence for the reduction of false-positive CAD polyp candidates in CT colonography

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Radiologists often compare the supine and prone data sets of a patient to confirm potential polyp findings in computed tomographic (CT) colonography (CTC). We developed a new automated method that uses region-based supine-prone correspondence for the reduction of false-positive (FP) polyp candidates in computer-aided detection (CAD) for CTC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Up to six anatomic landmarks are established by use of the extracted region of the colonic lumen. A region-growing scheme with distance calculations is used to divide the colonic lumen into overlapping segments that match in the supine and prone data sets. Polyp candidates detected by means of a CAD scheme are eliminated in colonic segments that have sufficient diagnostic quality and contain polyp candidates in only one of the data sets of a patient. The method was evaluated with 121 CTC cases, including 42 polyps of 5 mm or greater in 28 patients, obtained by use of single- and multidetector CT scanners with standard pre-colonoscopy cleansing.

RESULTS

Complete or partial correspondence was established in 71% of cases. Based on a leave-one-patient-out evaluation, application of the method reduced 19% of FP results reported by our CAD scheme at a 90.5% by-polyp detection sensitivity, without loss of any true-positive results. The resulting CAD scheme yielded 2.4 FP results per patient, on average, with the use of the correspondence method, whereas it yielded 3.0 FP results per patient without the use of the method.

CONCLUSION

The correspondence method is potentially useful for improving the specificity of CAD in CTC.

CAD techniques, challenges, and controversies in computed tomographic colonography

Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) for computed tomographic colonography (CTC) automatically detects the locations of suspicious polyps and masses on CTC and provides radiologists with a second opinion. CAD has the potential to increase radiologists' diagnostic performance in the detection of polyps and masses and to decrease variability of the diagnostic accuracy among readers without significantly increasing the reading time. Technical developments have advanced CAD substantially during the past several years, and a fundamental scheme for the detection of polyps has been established. The most recent CAD systems based on this scheme produce a clinically acceptable high sensitivity and a low false-positive rate. However, CAD for CTC is still under active development, and the technology needs to be improved further. This report describes the expected benefits, the current fundamental scheme, the key techniques used for detection of polyps and masses on CTC, the current detection performance, as well as the pitfalls, challenges, controversies, and the future of CAD.

Nonradiologists as second readers for intraluminal findings at CT colonography

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Multiple trials have documented wide interobserver variability between radiologists interpreting computed tomography colonography (CTC) exams. We sought to determine if nonradiologists could learn to interpret intraluminal findings at CTC with a high degree of sensitivity to determine if they could play a role as second readers in interpreting CTC exams.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seven nonradiologists (five medical students, two radiologic technologists) undertook self-directed CTC training using a teaching file of 50 cases; thereafter, each reader blindly interpreted 50 cases with colonoscopic correlation (30 positive, 20 negative). Results were compared with a previously studied cohort of radiologists. The two technologists additionally repeated the exam after 6 weeks of clinical experience.

RESULTS

The sensitivity of nonradiologists for small (5-9 mm) polyps, large (>9 mm) lesions, and cancers was similar to that of radiologists (0.45 versus 0.63, 0.74 versus 0.71, and 0.80 versus 0.88, respectively). After 6 weeks of clinical experience as second readers, the accuracy of one technologist significantly improved (from 74% to 90%, P = .008), whereas accuracy of the other tended toward improvement (from 74% to 86%%, P = .25). Nonradiologists detected, on average, 6/36 additional polyps (17%) missed by any radiologist, and the sensitivity of 5/7 nonradiologists was significantly greater than at least one of the radiologists (P = .05).

CONCLUSION

Nonradiologists can perform similarly to radiologists in interpreting intraluminal findings at CTC, with nonradiologist performance improving even after experience with more than 100 cases. Skilled nonradiologists may play a vital role as a second reader of intraluminal findings or by performing quality control of examinations before patient dismissal.

Automated volumetry at CT colonography: a phantom study

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To assess the performance of a computer-aided detection (CAD) algorithm for measuring polyp-like structures on CT colonography (CTC) images of a phantom.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We constructed a Plexiglas phantom to which we affixed a series of idealized Plexiglas polyp-like objects, including spheres and hemispheres. We imaged the phantom in a four-channel detector CT scanner at a 1.3 mm slice thickness with a reconstruction interval of 0.6 mm, using combinations of 100 mAs, 30 mAs, horizontal and vertical orientation. For each set of CT images, the interior surface of the phantom was segmented. The CAD algorithm was applied to the resulting surface to identify the polypoid regions of interest and to calculate their volume and maximum linear dimension. Calculated values were then compared with actual values to yield percent error in each measurement.

RESULTS

The mean error in volume for the subgroups of spheres and hemispheres was 3% and 5% respectively. Mean error in linear dimension was approximately 2% for both shape subgroups. All CAD-calculated values were closely correlated with their respective actual values. Parameter selection did not significantly affect the accuracy of the calculated measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

Our CAD software accurately measured the greatest linear dimension and the volume of each of the polyp-like structures in our phantom. Results were largely independent of phantom orientation and the CT exposure factors.

Low-dose CT colonography in children: initial experience, technical feasibility, and utility

BACKGROUND

CT colonography (CTC) is utilized as a diagnostic tool in the detection of colon polyps and early colorectal cancer in adults. Large studies in the literature, although focused on adult populations, have shown CTC to be a safe, accurate, non-invasive technique.

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the technical feasibility of CTC in children using a low-dose technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From November 2001 to April 2004 we evaluated eight patients (3-17 years) with non-contrast CTC. Seven of the patients had CTC, followed by standard colonoscopy (SC) the same day; in one patient, CTC followed a failed SC. CTC results were compared to results of SC. The estimated effective dose from each CTC was calculated and compared to that of standard barium enema.

RESULTS

CTC results were consistent with those of SC. Sensitivity for polyps 5-10 mm was 100%, and sensitivity for polyps 10 mm and larger was 66.7%. The estimated mean effective dose was 2.17 mSv for CTC, compared to the 5-6 mSv for a standard air-contrast barium enema in a small child.

CONCLUSION

Our initial experience shows CTC in children is well-tolerated, safe, and useful. The procedure can be performed successfully with a low radiation dose, and preliminary results compare well with SC.

MR Imaging of the Large Bowel

MR colonography (MRC) is an accurate diagnostic tool for the detection of colorectal masses and inflammatory diseases. This article describes the underlying techniques of MRC that concern data acquisition and image interpretation. Indications for MRC are discussed, and technical developments are explained.

False-negative results at multi-detector row CT colonography: multivariate analysis of causes for missed lesions

PURPOSE

To determine causes of false-negative results at multi-detector row computed tomographic (CT) colonography and determine presumptive causes with logistic regression analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained. The study included 394 colonic segments in 31 men and 25 women at high risk for colorectal cancer (mean age +/- standard deviation, 60.2 years +/- 9.3 for men and 56.8 years +/- 13.3 for women). Multi-detector row CT colonography and colonoscopy (reference standard) were performed in a blinded manner, and the results were compared. CT colonographic findings were interpreted in consensus by two readers using a primary two-dimensional with three-dimensional problem-solving approach. Adequacy of colonic preparation and distention was recorded. Sensitivity and specificity were obtained with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Lesions missed at CT colonography were retrospectively reassessed to identify why they were missed, and, if the causes were not apparent, logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the presumptive causes.

RESULTS

Colonic preparation and distention were optimal in 17 patients (30%) but suboptimal in 37 (66%) and poor enough to make the results nondiagnostic in two (4%). Twenty-nine of 63 lesions were missed at CT colonography. When all flat, sessile, and pedunculated lesions (n = 63) were included, sensitivities were 75% (nine of 12; 95% CI: 48%, 100%) for lesions 10 mm or larger and 79% (19 of 24; 95% CI: 65%, 93%) for those 6 mm or larger. When only sessile and pedunculated lesions (n = 60) were included, corresponding sensitivities were 100% (nine of nine; 73%, 100%) and 90% (19 of 21; 78%, 100%), respectively. All three missed lesions larger than 10 mm were flat, and all three flat lesions were missed. Two 3-mm high lesions, including one invasive adenocarcinoma, were misinterpreted as feces at blinded image review; one 1-mm high tubular adenoma with adenocarcinoma foci could not be visualized even in retrospect. Sessile or pedunculated polyps 5 mm or smaller were significantly more likely to be missed than those 6 mm or larger (adjusted odds ratio, 11.6; P = .027).

CONCLUSION

Aside from inadequate bowel preparation and/or distention, flat lesions and small polyps are the two main causes for missed lesions at multi-detector row CT colonography.

CT colonography using different reconstruction modi

OBJECTIVE

Performing computed tomography (CT) colonography, we compared different reconstruction modi for the detection of colorectal polyps.

METHODS

The CT data of 48 patients using 16-slice helical CT were analysed in axial slices, virtual-endoscopy and colon-dissection modus.

RESULTS

The sensitivity (specificity) for the detection of colonic polyps was 94% (80%) if using "colonic-dissection" tool and 89% (80%) if using "virtual-endoscopy" tool. The difference between the virtual endoscopy and colon dissection, considering polyps up to 4.9 mm, was significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Reconstruction software colon dissection improves the sensitivity of CT colonography.

Consensus on current clinical practice of virtual colonoscopy

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of our study was to determine the current opinions regarding the performance, interpretation, reporting, and clinical role of virtual colonoscopy among a group of selected experts to develop a consensus statement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A questionnaire was sent to 33 selected experts in virtual colonoscopy. Responses were tabulated and results were used to develop a consensus statement. The results of the questionnaire and consensus statement were sent to respondents for comment and approval.

RESULTS

Thirty-one (93.9%) of 33 surveys were returned. Eighty-seven percent (27/31) of respondents believe virtual colonoscopy is a credible screening method. Oral sodium phosphate solution is the laxative preferred by more than 66% (18/27), whereas 62% (13/21) do not believe fecal tagging is necessary. All respondents (25/25) think that both prone and supine imaging is required, with most (81%, 21/26) believing IV contrast material is not necessary. The routine use of spasmolytics is suggested by only 15% (4/26). The largest acceptable slice thickness of 3 mm is agreed on by 88% (22/25). All respondents believe screening virtual colonoscopy should be performed at a lower dose per slice than conventional CT. Most (80%, 20/25) believe the optimum method of interpreting virtual colonoscopy should be primary axial review, with 3D used for problem solving. All but one respondent (96%, 26/27) agree there is a threshold size below which polyps are not clinically important. When reporting virtual colonoscopy results, 59% (16/27) believe polyps less than 4 mm need not be reported.

CONCLUSION

A consensus is developing among experts as to the appropriate manner in which virtual colonoscopy should be performed, interpreted, and reported.

Screening for colorectal cancer: virtually there

A national rollout of faecal occult-blood screening, federally funded, is the best approach.

Using the gastroscope for incomplete colonoscopy

PURPOSE

Reports of virtual colonoscopy demonstrate sensitivity similar to that of conventional colonoscopy for polyps 5 mm or larger, suggesting the validity of its use for colorectal cancer screening. Critical to the success of either procedure is the ability to evaluate the entire colon. Cecal intubation rates during diagnostic or screening colonoscopies vary from 53 to 99 percent. We describe the added value of using a gastroscope to perform a colonoscopic examination that would otherwise result in an incomplete colonoscopy.

METHODS

From January 1, 2002 to December 31, 2002 a total of 1,979 colonoscopies were performed. A gastroscope was used in 1.3 percent (n = 26) of these colonoscopies in an effort to complete the index examination initially started with a standard or pediatric colonoscope. The success rate was defined as intubating proximal to the initial area of impasse and entering the cecum.

RESULTS

Cecal intubation was achieved in 62 percent of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with incomplete conventional colonoscopy, the gastroscope can usually advance through the initial area of impasse with a cecal intubation rate of 62 percent.

Virtual colonography: identification and differentiation of colorectal lesions using multi-detector computed tomography

OBJECTIVE

Early detection of precancerous or malignant lesions may be decisive for prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer. In this prospective feasibility study, multi-detector spiral computed tomography (CT) colonography was compared with conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Seventy-eight patients underwent CT colonography (standard colonoscopy preparation, distension with room air, prone and supine position) immediately before colonoscopy. Sixty-five (83%) were asymptomatic screening subjects, while the rest had symptoms suggestive of colorectal disease. Presence, location, and size of lesions were prospectively assessed. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of CT colonography were calculated using conventional colonoscopy as the reference standard.

RESULTS

Conventional colonoscopy was normal in 52 patients. In 26 patients a total of 49 polyps and 3 carcinomas were identified. All three carcinomas and 39 polyps (80%) were identified by CT colonography. Seven of 7 polyps > or = 10 mm (100%), 13 of 16 polyps of 6 to 9 mm (81%), and 19 of 26 polyps < or = 5 mm (73%) in diameter were identified. Fourteen false-positive findings (10 of which were < or = 5 mm in diameter) were related to 8 patients (specificity at the patient level was 86%). In 10 patients, a total of 10 polyps were missed by CT colonography, 7 of which were < or = 5 mm in diameter.

CONCLUSIONS

In this feasibility study, multi-detector spiral CT colonography allows accurate detection of polyps > 5 mm in diameter, but at the expense of low specificity in the small size range.

Dark lumen magnetic resonance enteroclysis in combination with MRI colonography for whole bowel assessment in patients with Crohn's disease: first clinical experience

BACKGROUND

Magnetic resonance enteroclysis (MRE) is a recently introduced imaging technique that assesses the small bowel with similar sensitivity and specificity as the fluoroscopically performed conventional enteroclysis. Magnetic resonance imaging colonography (MRC) seems to be a promising technique for polyp assessment in the colon. In this feasibility study, we evaluated the combination of small bowel MRI with unprepared MRC as an integrative diagnostic approach of the whole bowel in patients with Crohn's disease.

METHODS

Thirty patients with known Crohn's disease were prospectively examined. No particular colonic preparation was applied. Applying the dark lumen technique in all patients, MRE and MRC were performed within 1 session using an integrative examination protocol. T2-weighted and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted sequences were acquired. Inflammation assessment (grades 0 to 2) of the colon was compared with conventional colonoscopy in 29 patient and with surgery in 1 patient. The entire colon was graded fair to good distended in all patients. In 11 of 210 evaluated colonic segments, feces hindered an adequate intraluminal bowel assessment. Twenty-three of 30 patients had complete colonoscopy as the gold standard. In 7 patients, complete colonoscopy could not be performed because of an inflamed stenosis.

RESULTS

Correct grading of colonic inflammation was performed with 55.1% sensitivity and 98.2% specificity in all segments. Considering only more extensive inflammation (grade 2), the sensitivity of MRC increased to 70.2% with a specificity of 99.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of MRE and MRC could improve the diagnostic value of abdominal MRI evaluation in patients with Crohn's disease. However, MRC can not replace conventional colonoscopy in subtle inflammation assessment.

Screening for colorectal cancer--now and the near future

When used appropriately, screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) can reduce disease-related morbidity and mortality. Current methods include fecal occult blood testing (FOBT), flexible sigmoidoscopy [FS], barium enema, and colonoscopy; all are cost-effective techniques. Unfortunately, offering an array of options has not increased screening utilization, which continues to lag behind that of other common cancers. Newer techniques, particularly virtual colonoscopy (VC) and stool DNA testing, may offer attractive alternatives for healthcare provider recommendation and patient use.

Incidental lesions found on CT colonography: their nature and frequency

CT colonography has been used to detect colonic polyps and cancers, but its effect in practice will also be influenced by the frequency with which extracolonic lesions of various types are detected. We performed a systematic review of the types of incidental lesions found on CT colonography. This is necessary to model the benefits and harms of detecting extracolonic lesions. Primary clinical studies of extracolonic findings on CT colonography were identified from electronic databases, scanning reference lists and hand searches of relevant journals and conference proceedings. A data collection proforma was used to collect information on extracolonic findings. 17 discreet studies were identified, involving 3488 patients. In total 40% of patients were recorded to have abnormalities and many had more than one abnormality. Nearly 14% of patients had further investigations and 0.8% were given immediate treatment. Extracolonic cancers were detected in 2.7% (0.9% had N0M0 cancers) and 0.9% had an aortic aneurysm. The number of extracolonic findings was high in all studies. While only a small population were judged "important", the prevalence of serious lesions outside the colon was nevertheless higher than in many other screening programs.

Analysis of colorectal cancer occurrence during surveillance colonoscopy in the dietary Polyp Prevention Trial

BACKGROUND

Interval colorectal cancer (CRC) occasionally is detected in patients who have recently undergone colonoscopy. Systematic evaluation of CRC detected after colonoscopy could identify ways to improve the quality and the outcome of colonoscopy.

METHODS

This study examined cancer diagnoses in the course of the dietary Polyp Prevention Trial, a randomized study of a dietary intervention on recurrence of adenomatous polyps. An algorithm was developed to classify each cancer into one of 4 etiologies: (1) incomplete removal (cancer at the site of previous adenoma), (2) failed biopsy detection (cancer in an area of suspected neoplasia with negative biopsy specimens), (3) missed cancer (large, advanced stage cancer found at a short interval after colonoscopy), or (4) new cancer (small, early stage cancer after a longer time interval).

RESULTS

Of 2079 patients, 13 had cancer detected over 5810 person years of observation (PYO) (2.2 cases/1000 PYO); 7/13 or 53.8% of patients had either a potentially "avoidable" cancer or one detectable at an earlier time interval because of incomplete removal (4/13) or missed cancer (3/13).

CONCLUSIONS

Interval cancer occurs despite colonoscopy. Improved quality of colonoscopy may have reduced cancer prevalence or resulted in earlier cancer detection in over 50% of prevalent cancers in the dietary Polyp Prevention Trial.

Outpatient colonoscopy by rural family physicians

PURPOSE

Five percent of family physicians offer colonoscopy services, either in the office or the hospital, often in rural areas that have no gastroenterologist. Two previous large series have shown the quality and safety of colonoscopy performed by family physicians. The purpose of this study was to verify these findings in an outpatient setting, as well as to obtain patient satisfaction data.

METHODS

Data were obtained from 731 colonoscopies performed between 1996 and 2001 in a rural Virginia family practice. These data included patients' age and sex, indications for the procedure, drug dosages for sedation, cecal intubation rates, pathologic findings, complications, and referral correlation findings compared with the original examination. A patient satisfaction survey was done.

RESULTS

The adenoma detection rate was 27.2% for men and 21.4% for women older than age 50 years. Six adenocarcinomas and 5 large (>2 cm) villous adenomas were detected, and the patients were referred for definitive surgical resection. A total of 29 patients (4%) were referred: 10 to colorectal surgery and 19 to gastroenterology for resection of large polyps. Correlation of findings at referral with the initial examination was excellent. Cecal intubation rates increased from 89.5% from 1996-1998 to 94.6% from 1999-2001. Minor sedation complications occurred in 5 cases (<1%), and patients responded to supportive care. A high degree of satisfaction was reported by patients, with a mean satisfaction score of 8.8 on a scale from 1 to 10.

CONCLUSIONS

Colonoscopy can be performed safely and competently by properly trained family physicians in an outpatient setting with a high degree of patient satisfaction.

Colorectal cancer in African Americans

Colorectal cancer in African Americans has an increased incidence and mortality relative to Whites. The mean age of CRC development in African Americans is younger than that of Whites. There is also evidence for a more proximal colonic distribution of cancers and adenomas in African Americans. African Americans are less likely to have undergone diagnostic testing and screening for colorectal cancer. Special efforts are needed to improve colorectal cancer screening participation rates in African Americans. Clinical gastroenterologists should play an active role in educating the public and primary care physicians about special issues surrounding colorectal cancer in African Americans. Community healthcare groups and gastrointestinal specialists should develop culturally sensitive health education programs for African Americans regarding colorectal cancer. The high incidence and younger age at presentation of colorectal cancer in African Americans warrant initiation of colorectal cancer screening at the age 45 yr rather than 50 yr.

Colorectal cancer screening: prospects for molecular stool analysis

Colorectal cancer is common. As many patients present with advanced disease, an effective screening test would have substantial clinical benefits. Recent progress in understanding the biology of colorectal cancer (and of cancer cells in general) has led to possible new approaches to screening. In particular, there are prospects of developing tests based on analysis of stool, which promise improved accuracy, safety, affordability and patient compliance.

From colonic polyps to colon cancer: pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and diagnosis

Epidemiologists, basic researchers, clinicians, and public health administrators unite! Develop and implement a simple, safe, and effective preventive and screening test for colon cancer. The public will willingly and enthusiastically accept such a test. Many thousands of lives are at stake every year.

18-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography has limited sensitivity for colonic adenoma and early stage colon cancer

BACKGROUND

18-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) is used clinically to detect recurrent colon cancer after surgical resection, but the sensitivity of PET for premalignant colon lesions and early stage colon cancer is not well defined.

METHODS

In a prospective study, 45 patients with a total of 58 colonic neoplasms, including premalignant polyps, premalignant, flat lesions, and early stage cancers, were evaluated by PET.

RESULTS

The sensitivity of PET for cancer was 62% (8/13). PET detected 100% (7/7) of cancers 2 cm or larger but only 17% (1/6) of cancers smaller than 2 cm. PET detected 23% (3/13) of flat, premalignant lesions; 70% (7/10) of protruded, premalignant lesions 3 cm or larger; 38% (3/8) of protruded, premalignant lesions between 2 and 2.9 cm; and 14% (2/14) of protruded, premalignant lesions between 1 and 1.9 cm. There was no false-positive PET reading.

CONCLUSIONS

PET has limited sensitivity for flat, premalignant lesions; protruded, premalignant lesions smaller than 3 cm; and colon cancers smaller than 2 cm.