Pancreatic leak after left pancreatectomy is reduced following main pancreatic duct ligation

Use of a falciform ligament pedicle flap to decrease pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy

OBJECTIVES

Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) remains a significant source of morbidity after distal pancreatectomy (DP). We describe a technique for coverage of the pancreatic stump after DP using a pedicled falciform ligament flap with a low POPF rate.

METHODS

A retrospective review of clinical, radiographic, and pathologic variables of patients undergoing open DP between November 2005 and August 2009 was performed. After standardized DP, the pancreatic stump was closed using a pedicled falciform ligament flap. Postoperative pancreatic fistula was defined using the International Study Group classification for pancreatic fistula definition.

RESULTS

Twenty-three consecutive patients underwent open DP and splenectomy with closure of the pancreatic stump using a pedicled falciform ligament flap. Pancreatic transection and stump closure was performed in a uniform fashion in all patients. Eight patients (35%) had additional organs resected. Two patients (8.7%) developed grade C POPFs, which were successfully managed with percutaneous drain placement. No additional patients developed a POPF or abdominal abscess. The median length of stay was 5 days. There were no perioperative mortalities.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that use of a pedicled falciform ligament flap for coverage of the pancreatic stump is associated with a low incidence of POPF. Continued investigation of this technique is warranted.

Efficacy of stapler versus hand-sewn closure after distal pancreatectomy (DISPACT): a randomised, controlled multicentre trial

BACKGROUND

The ideal closure technique of the pancreas after distal pancreatectomy is unknown. We postulated that standardised closure with a stapler device would prevent pancreatic fistula more effectively than would a hand-sewn closure of the remnant.

METHODS

This multicentre, randomised, controlled, parallel group-sequential superiority trial was done in 21 European hospitals. Patients with diseases of the pancreatic body and tail undergoing distal pancreatectomy were eligible and were randomly assigned by central randomisation before operation to either stapler or hand-sewn closure of the pancreatic remnant. Surgical performance was assessed with intraoperative photo documentation. The primary endpoint was the combination of pancreatic fistula and death until postoperative day 7. Patients and outcome assessors were masked to group assignment. Interim and final analysis were by intention to treat in all patients in whom a left resection was done. This trial is registered, ISRCTN18452029.

FINDINGS

Between Nov 16, 2006, and July 3, 2009, 450 patients were randomly assigned to treatment groups (221 stapler; 229 hand-sewn closure), of whom 352 patients (177 stapler, 175 hand-sewn closure) were analysed. Pancreatic fistula rate or mortality did not differ between stapler (56 [32%] of 177) and hand-sewn closure (49 [28%] of 175; OR 0·84, 95% CI 0·53–1·33; p=0·56). One patient died within the fi rst 7 days after surgery in the hand-sewn group; no deaths occurred in the stapler group. Serious adverse events did not differ between groups.

INTERPRETATION

Stapler closure did not reduce the rate of pancreatic fistula compared with hand-sewn closure for distal pancreatectomy. New strategies, including innovative surgical techniques, need to be identified to reduce this adverse outcome.

FUNDING

German Federal Ministry of Education and Research.

Advances in diagnosis, treatment and palliation of pancreatic carcinoma: 1990-2010

Several advances in genetics, diagnosis and palliation of pancreatic cancer (PC) have occurred in the last decades. A multidisciplinary approach to this disease is therefore recommended. PC is relatively common as it is the fourth leading cause of cancer related mortality. Most patients present with obstructive jaundice, epigastric or back pain, weight loss and anorexia. Despite improvements in diagnostic modalities, the majority of cases are still detected in advanced stages. The only curative treatment for PC remains surgical resection. No more than 20% of patients are candidates for surgery at the time of diagnosis and survival remains quite poor as adjuvant therapies are not very effective. A small percentage of patients with borderline non-resectable PC might benefit from neo-adjuvant chemoradiation therapy enabling them to undergo resection; however, randomized controlled studies are needed to prove the benefits of this strategy. Patients with unresectable PC benefit from palliative interventions such as biliary decompression and celiac plexus block. Further clinical trials to evaluate new chemo and radiation protocols as well as identification of genetic markers for PC are needed to improve the overall survival of patients affected by PC, as the current overall 5-year survival rate of patients affected by PC is still less than 5%. The aim of this article is to review the most recent high quality literature on this topic.

Comparison of Different Surgical Techniques in Distal Pancreatectomy

Aims. Different surgical transection methods have been used for distal pancreatectomy (DP), but none of them has yet achieved perfect results. This study compares 2 standard transection techniques with the alternative LigaSure technique. Methods. Forty-eight pigs underwent a DP. Sixteen animals were operated on with a scalpel followed by hand suturing. Sixteen pigs received a DP using an Endo GIA, and the pancreas of 16 pigs was transected with LigaSure. The transection surface of remnant pancreas was observed for liquid collection and abscess on postoperative day 7. Results. Operating time on the day of DP was significantly different, with a shorter operating time in the stapler and LigaSure groups. The morbidity on postoperative day 7 was similar in all groups. Conclusion. In the present experimental animal study, LigaSure seems to be fast and safe as well as comparable with the standard transection and closure techniques in DP.

Pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy: incidence, risk factors and management

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic fistulae post distal pancreatectomy still leads to significant morbidity and if not properly managed, may lead to mortality. The identification of risk factors and effective management of patients with pancreatic fistulae is important in the prevention of these complications.

METHODS

There were 75 open consecutive distal pancreatectomies in the Department of Surgery, Changi General Hospital from May 2001 to May 2007.

RESULTS

The indications for operation were neuroendocrine tumours (n= 15), adenocarcinoma (n= 20), Intraductal papillary mucinous tumour (IPMT) (n= 20), serous cysts (n= 15) and trauma (n= 5). There were 20 patients (27%) who developed pancreatic fistulae in the whole series. On univariate analysis, the patients with pancreatic fistulae had significantly more pre-morbidities, softer pancreas and use of staplers as a method of closure of the pancreatic remnant. On multivariate analysis, the use of staplers and soft pancreas were significant independent risk factors for the development of pancreatic fistulae in our patient population. All of the patients with pancreatic fistulae were successfully treated non-surgically with no mortality in the whole series.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of stapler on soft pancreas leads to a higher risk for pancreatic fistulae after distal pancreatectomies. Most pancreatic fistulae can be managed non-surgically with good outcome.

Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy: a UK experience and a systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Advances in operative techniques and technology have facilitated laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) and laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD).

METHODS

All distal pancreatectomies were attempted laparoscopically, while selected patients underwent LPD. The literature was systematically reviewed.

RESULTS

Between 2002 and 2008, 21 patients underwent LDP (n=14) or LPD (n = 7). The mean operating time, blood loss, and hospital stay after LDP were 265 min, 262 ml, and 7.7 days, respectively, and after LPD they were 628 min, 350 ml, and 11.1 days, respectively. The conversion, morbidity, pancreatic fistula, readmission, reoperation, and mortality after LDP were 7.1, 35.7, 28.4, 28.4, 0, and 7.1% respectively, and after LPD they were 0, 28.6, 14.3, 28.6, 0, and 0% respectively. The literature review identified 987 LDP and 126 LPD. Most LDP were for benign disease (83.9%) while most LPD were for malignancy (91.5%). The mean operating time, morbidity, pancreatic fistula, mortality, and hospital stay after LDP were 221.5 min, 24.7%, 16.4%, 0.4%, and 7.7 days, respectively, and after LPD they were 448.3 min, 28.6%, 11.6%, 2.1%, and 16 days, respectively.

CONCLUSION

LDP, particularly for benign disease and low-grade malignancy, is increasingly becoming the gold standard approach in experienced hands. In selected patients, LPD is feasible and safe. Long-term follow-up data are needed.

Risk stratification for distal pancreatectomy utilizing ACS-NSQIP: preoperative factors predict morbidity and mortality

BACKGROUND

Evaluation of risk factors for adverse outcomes following distal pancreatectomy (DP) has been limited to data collected from retrospective, primarily single-institution studies. Using a large, multi-institutional prospectively collected dataset, we sought to define the incidence of complications after DP, identify the preoperative and operative risk factors for the development of complications, and develop a risk score that can be utilized preoperatively.

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program participant use file was utilized to identify patients who underwent DP from 2005 to 2008 by Current Procedural Terminology codes. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify variables associated with 30-day morbidity and mortality. A scoring system was developed to allow for preoperative risk stratification.

RESULTS

In 2,322 patients who underwent DP, overall 30-day complication and mortality were 28.1% and 1.2%, respectively. Serious complication occurred in 22.2%, and the most common complications included sepsis (8.7%), surgical site infection (5.9%), and pneumonia (4.7%). On multivariate analysis, preoperative variables associated with morbidity included male gender, high BMI, smoking, steroid use, neurologic disease, preoperative SIRS/sepsis, hypoalbuminemia, elevated creatinine, and abnormal platelet count. Preoperative variables associated with 30-day mortality included esophageal varices, neurologic disease, dependent functional status, recent weight loss, elevated alkaline phosphatase, and elevated blood urea nitrogen. Operative variables associated with both morbidity and mortality included high intraoperative transfusion requirement (≥3 U) and prolonged operation time (>360 min). Weighted risk scores were created based on the preoperatively determined factors that predicted both morbidity (p < 0.001) and mortality (p < 0.001) after DP.

DISCUSSION

The rate of serious complication after DP is 22%. The DP-specific preoperative risk scoring system described in this paper may be utilized for patient counseling and informed consent discussions, identifying high-risk patients who would benefit from disease optimization, and risk adjustment when comparing outcomes between institutions.

LigaSure for pancreatic sealing during distal pancreatectomy

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic fistula is an unresolved problem after distal pancreatectomy. The current study investigated the safety of LigaSure for distal pancreatic resection in a porcine model.

METHODS

A distal pancreatectomy was performed in 22 pigs. Animals were randomly assigned to undergo conventional scalpel transection with hand-sewn closure of the pancreatic remnant or pancreatic transection and sealing by LigaSure. Closed-suction drainage was collected daily. Animals were sacrificed on postoperative day (POD) 7 and the pancreatic remnant was sampled for histology.

RESULTS

Two grade A postoperative temporary pancreatic fistulas (ISGPF definition) developed after hand suturing but none after LigaSure sealing. Amylase and lipase levels in drainage fluid were higher in the suture group during the first postoperative days but showed no differences after the fourth day. All but two animals that had to be euthanized because of small bowel invagination survived until POD 7. No significant differences were found in macroscopic changes between groups at reexploration. Histology demonstrated focal, chronic granulating inflammation with minor necrosis in all animals.

CONCLUSIONS

The LigaSure sealing device provides a safe alternative to conventional hand-sewn closure of the pancreatic stump in distal pancreatectomy. This is the first study that investigated this effective and highly applicable technique for pancreatic transection.

Stapler vs suture closure of pancreatic remnant after distal pancreatectomy: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Suture closure and stapler closure of the pancreatic remnant after distal pancreatectomy are the techniques used most often. The ideal choice remains a matter of debate.

METHODS

Five bibliographic databases covering 1970 to July 2009 were searched.

RESULTS

Sixteen articles met the inclusion criteria. Stapler closure was performed in 671 patients, while suture closure was conducted in 1,615 patients. The pancreatic fistula rate ranged from 0% to 40.0% for stapler closure of the pancreatic stump and from 9.3% to 45.7% for the suture closure technique. There were no significant difference between the stapler and suture closure groups with respect to the pancreatic fistula formation rate (22.1% vs 31.2%; odds ratio, .85; 95% confidence interval, .66-1.08), although there was a trend toward favoring stapler closure. In 4 studies including 437 patients, stapler closure was associated with a trend (not statistically significant) toward a reduction in intra-abdominal abscess (odds ratio, .53; 95% confidence interval, .24-1.15).

CONCLUSIONS

No significant differences occur between suture and stapler closure with respect to the pancreatic fistula or intra-abdominal abscess after distal pancreatectomy, though there is a trend favoring stapler closure.

Optimal technical management of stump closure following distal pancreatectomy: a retrospective review of 215 cases

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic fistula (PF) is a major source of morbidity following distal pancreatectomy (DP). Our aim was to identify risk factors related to PF following DP and to determine the impact of technique of transection and stump closure.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of 215 consecutive patients who underwent DP. Perioperative and postoperative data were collected and analyzed with attention to PF as defined by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula.

RESULTS

PF developed in 36 patients (16.7%); fistulas were classified as Grade A (44.4%), B (44.4%), or C (11.1%). The pancreas was transected with stapler (n = 139), cautery (n = 70), and scalpel (n = 3). PF developed in 19.8% of remnants which were stapled/oversewn and 27.7% that were stapled alone (p = 0.4). Of the 69 pancreatic remnants transected with cautery and oversewn, a fistula developed in 4.3% (p = 0.004 compared to stapled/oversewn; p = 0.006 compared to stapled/not sewn). The median length of postoperative hospital stay was significantly increased in patients who developed PF (10 vs. 6 days, p = 0.002)

CONCLUSION

The method of transection and management of the pancreatic remnant plays a critical role in the formation of PF following DP. This series suggests that transection using electrocautery followed by oversewing of the pancreatic remnant has the lowest risk of PF.

Laparoscopic surgery for pancreatic tumors

The rapid growth of minimally invasive technology and experience in recent decades has revolutionized many aspects of oncologic surgery. Adoption of laparoscopic pancreatectomy has been slow due to the inherent anatomic complexity of pancreatic surgery, as well as concerns of perioperative complications and compromised oncologic results. With increasing surgeon experience and growing data, laparoscopic pancreatic resection is generating considerable attention and enthusiasm. This article provides an overview of laparoscopic pancreatic tumor surgery with respect to tumor biology and technical approaches. Current applications of laparoscopic approaches to left pancreatectomy, tumor enucleation, central pancreatectomy, and pancreaticoduodenectomy for treatment of pancreatic tumors are considered in light of available evidence demonstrating feasibility, safety, and oncologic efficacy. Future directions in minimally invasive pancreatic surgery are explored.

Risk factors for clinical pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy: analysis of consecutive 100 patients

BACKGROUND

The mortality associated with distal pancreatectomy (DP) has declined to <5% in recent years in high-volume centers. However, morbidity remains high, ranging from 32% to 57%. Pancreatic fistula (PF) is the most common complication after DP. The aim of this study was to analyze factors associated with the occurrence of clinical PF.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of the medical records of 100 patients who underwent DP in our institution between May 2001 and January 2009.

RESULTS

There was no mortality, but morbidity was occurred in 65 patients (65%), with major complications occurring in 9 patients (9%). PF occurred in 50 patients (50%) and clinical PF occurred in 23 patients (23%). Multivariate analysis indicated that independent risk factors for clinical PF were: age younger than 65 years (P = 0.049; odds ratio (OR) 2.958; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.007-8.688), not ligating the main pancreatic duct (MPD) (P = 0.02; OR 4.933; 95% CI 1.283-18.967), and extended lymphadenectomy (P = 0.008; OR 4.773; 95% CI 1.504-15.145).

CONCLUSIONS

Age < 65 years, not ligating the MPD, and extended lymphadenectomy are independent risk factors for clinical PF.

Application of polyethylene glycolic acid felt with fibrin sealant to prevent postoperative pancreatic fistula in pancreatic surgery

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this nonrandomized retrospective study was to report our new procedures using polyethylene glycolic acid (PGA) felt with fibrin sealant to prevent severe pancreatic fistula in patients undergoing pancreatic surgery.

METHODS

From 2000 to 2008, 54 and 63 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and distal pancreatectomy (DP), respectively. Of those patients, we applied PGA felt with fibrin sealant to 18 PD patients and 26 DP patients. In PD patients, the PGA felt was wrapped around the pancreatic suture site, while in DP patients, the PGA felt was wrapped around the predictive division site. The pancreaticojejunostomy site in PD patients and the cut stump in DP patients were coated with fibrin sealant. We compared the occurrence rates for severe postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) that occurred after PD or DP both with and without our new procedures.

RESULTS

Before introduction of our procedures, severe POPF developed in 14 of 36 PD patients (39%) and 10 of 37 DP patients (27%). In contrast, after introduction of our procedures, the incidence of POPF was only one in both of 18 PD (6%; P = 0.016) and 26 DP (4%; P = 0.017) patients.

CONCLUSION

In summary, our procedure using PGA felt with fibrin sealant may reduce the risk of severe POPF.

Increased Incidence of Pancreatic Fistulas after the Introduction of a Bioabsorbable Staple Line Reinforcement in Distal Pancreatic Resections

Pancreatic fistula is a major cause of morbidity after distal pancreatic resection. When resections are performed with linear stapling devices, the use of bioabsorbable staple line reinforcement has been suggested to decrease the rate of pancreatic fistula. Our objective was to investigate the incidence of pancreatic fistula when using the Gore Seamguard® staple line reinforcement in stapled distal pancreatic resections. A retrospective review of 30 consecutive patients with stapled distal pancreatectomy was conducted. A broad definition of pancreatic fistula was used. Clinicopathologic factors and outcomes were compared between groups. Pancreatic fistula was diagnosed in 11 of 15 patients (73%) and three of 15 patients (20%) in the Seamguard® and non-Seamguard® groups, respectively ( P = 0.002). Pancreatic parenchymal transection at the neck of the gland was associated with pancreatic fistula, whereas laparoscopic procedures, splenic preservation, or additional organ resection were not. On multivariate analysis, the association between Seamguard® use and pancreatic fistula was significant ( P = 0.005). In conclusion, after introduction of the Gore Seamguard® bioabsorbable staple line reinforcement, we experienced a significant increase in the rate of pancreatic fistula. This experience raises concern about the efficacy of this device in limiting pancreatic fistula after stapled distal pancreatic resection.

Risk factors for pancreatic leak after distal pancreatectomy

INTRODUCTION

Pancreatic leak (PL) remains a major cause of postoperative morbidity in patients undergoing pancreatic resection. We sought to evaluate the incidence of and identify risk factors for the development of PL in patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy (DP) at a single high-volume institution.

METHODS

All patients who underwent primary open DP (excluding completion pancreatectomy and debridement) between January 1, 1984 and July 1, 2006 were identified, and their medical records were reviewed. chi and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors for PL.

RESULTS

In a cohort of 704 patients undergoing primary DP, the indications for DP were benign pancreatic neoplasm (34%), malignant pancreatic neoplasm (31%), other neoplasm (15%), chronic pancreatitis (14%), pseudocyst (3%), and trauma (3%). The pancreatic remnant was sutured alone in 83%, stapled alone in 5%, and both stapled and sutured in 9% of cases. Ligation of the pancreatic duct was performed in 22% of cases. Perioperative mortality was <1%, but overall morbidity was 33%, most commonly PL (12% clinically significant, 21% biochemical). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that neither the method of closure of the pancreatic remnant (P = 0.41) nor ligation of the pancreatic duct (P > 0.05) affected the risk of clinically significant PL.

CONCLUSIONS

This largest reported series of DP demonstrates that this procedure can be performed with low mortality but still carries a substantial risk of morbidity, particularly PL. In contrast to some previous studies, this analysis found that surgical management of the pancreatic remnant has no effect on the incidence of clinically significant PL.

Pancreatic Stent Placement is Associated with Resolution of Refractory Grade C Pancreatic Fistula after Left-Sided Pancreatectomy

Pancreatic fistula have been a source of significant morbidity and mortality after left-sided pancreatectomy. The majority of fistulas are classified as Grade A and resolve quickly with no intervention. Grade C pancreatic fistulas, which require percutaneous or operative drainage, are less common and may be associated with morbidity and mortality. We used postoperative endoscopic pancreatic stent placement as an adjunctive strategy in the management of refractory Grade C pancreatic fistulas. Patients undergoing endoscopic pancreatic stent placement for persistent, refractory peripancreatic fluid collections/pancreatic fistula after left-sided pancreatectomy were identified. Eight patients underwent endoscopic pancreatic stent placement for refractory Grade C pancreatic fistulas. Six patients had percutaneous catheter placement; two patients had trans-gastric drainage. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) showed extravasation of contrast from the distal end of the pancreatic duct in seven patients. Pancreatic stents were placed in all patients at a median time of 48 days postoperation and left for a median of 47 days. Before stent removal, ERCP demonstrated pancreatic fistula closure. Median time to complete resolution of the fistula was 41 days after stent placement. Endoscopic pancreatic stents were associated with resolution of Grade C fistulas. After distal pancreatectomy, pancreatic stent placement should be considered in the postoperative period for refractory pancreatic fistulas.

Randomized clinical trial of techniques for closure of the pancreatic remnant following distal pancreatectomy

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic fistula and intra-abdominal fluid collection are the commonest complications after distal pancreatectomy. Several techniques have been described to achieve perfect closure of the stump.

METHODS

In this randomized clinical trial the stapler technique was compared with stapling combined with a seromuscular patch. Seventy patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy were randomized between January 2002 and December 2006 to either closure of the pancreatic stump by stapler (35 patients) or closure by stapler and covering with a seromuscular patch of jejunum (35). The primary endpoint was the rate of postoperative fistula and/or intra-abdominal fluid collections.

RESULTS

The overall rate of these pancreas-related complications was higher in the stapling-alone group. However, rates of clinically relevant postoperative complications (grade B or C fistula and/or fluid collection requiring treatment) were comparable. The reintervention rate and median hospital stay were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Covering the stapled pancreatic remnants with a seromuscular patch is a simple method that decreased overall pancreas-related complications such as fistula. This technique did not affect clinically relevant outcomes as severe complications requiring treatment were similar with both techniques.

Distal pancreatectomy: what is the standard for laparoscopic surgery?

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Distal pancreatectomy (DP) is performed for a range of benign and malignant lesions. Accurate pre-operative diagnosis can be unreliable and morbidity remains high. This study evaluates a 12-year, single-centre experience with open DP to review indications, diagnoses and associated morbidity.

METHODS

Retrospective review of patients who underwent DP at a UK-based tertiary referral centre between 1994 and 2006.

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients (mean age 49.9 years) had final diagnoses of chronic pancreatitis +/- pseudocyst (n= 22), benign cystadenoma (n= 15), neuroendocrine tumour (n= 8), primary pancreatic carcinoma (n= 6) and 14 other conditions. DP performed for presumed cystic neoplasm (n= 24) revealed a correct pre-operative diagnosis in 71% of patients. Histological examination confirmed that 59% of resected cystic tumours were either malignant or had malignant potential. When DP was undertaken for presumed pseudocyst (n= 12), 83% of cases were correctly diagnosed pre-operatively. Overall mortality and morbidity rates were 3% and 39%, respectively, with five patients (8%) developing a clinically significant pancreatic fistula. Ten (17%) patients developed diabetes mellitus and nine (14%) required long-term pancreatic exocrine supplementation.

CONCLUSIONS

Open DP can be performed with acceptable morbidity, low mortality and preservation of pancreatic function in the majority of cases, setting the standard for laparoscopic techniques.

Secure placement of a peripancreatic drain after a distal pancreatectomy

BACKGROUND

A peripancreatic drain that is placed after a distal pancreatectomy sometimes migrates and becomes ineffective postoperatively. We devised a new drainage method with fixation of the tip of a peripancreatic drain using a loose loop of an absorbable suture.

METHODS

This retrospective study was performed on 84 consecutive patients who underwent a distal pancreatectomy followed by peripancreatic drainage with (n = 31) or without (n = 53) fixation.

RESULTS

The fixed drain remained in place postoperatively and was removed easily when the drainage became unnecessary. Pancreatic fistula developed in 4 patients with and 11 patients without drain fixation, the incidence between the patients. None with and 7 patients without fixation required additional drainage (interventional or surgical) for pancreatic fistula, the difference being significant. Time to resolution of pancreatic fistula tended to be shorter after drain fixation than after nonfixation.

CONCLUSIONS

Fixation of the tip of a peripancreatic drain is a simple but useful technique for effective drainage after distal pancreatectomy.

DISPACT trial: a randomized controlled trial to compare two different surgical techniques of DIStal PAnCreaTectomy - study rationale and design

BACKGROUND

Surgery is of increasing importance in the treatment and outcome of diseases of the pancreas worldwide. The incidence of pancreatic cancer (7-11/ 100,000 per year) has risen over the last years and surgical resection remains the only option for definite cure. Twenty-five percent of all resections are left of the superior mesenteric vein (distal pancreatectomy) and the appropriate closure technique for the pancreatic remnant remains unclear. Pancreatic fistulas are the most common (0-40%) and relevant postoperative complication. The optimal surgical strategy for pancreatic resection needs to be identified from the large number of surgical procedures available today.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness of the two most common surgical techniques for distal pancreatectomy: stapler versus hand-sewn closure of the pancreatic remnant.

METHODS

In order to account for the uncertainty and clinical heterogeneity in the management of the pancreatic remnant following distal pancreatectomy, a study protocol is developed on the basis of a retrospective survey of patients in a center of excellence for pancreatic surgery and a systematic review with meta-analysis.

RESULTS

The DISPACT trial is a multicentered, randomized, controlled and patient-and observer-blinded trial using a two-group parallel group-sequential superiority design to compare the two techniques mentioned above. It will include approximately 336 randomized patients at up to 20 centers of excellence in pancreatic surgery, who are undergoing elective distal pancreatectomy for resectable benign, malign, and neuroendocrine tumors, chronic pancreatitis and pseudocysts of the pancreatic body and tail. The combination of the rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula and mortality will be evaluated as the primary endpoint. In addition, a set of general and surgical parameters will be analyzed. Pre-specified treatment manuals and continuous intra-operative (photo-documentation of surgical procedures and blinded evaluation thereafter) and on-site monitoring will assure that the treatment of the study patients conforms to protocol and will minimize clinical heterogeneity. Due to uncertainties about the effect sizes of the primary endpoint, an a priori planned interim analysis of the primary endpoint will be conducted after 224 evaluable patients are selected in order to reassess the initially planned sample size.

LIMITATIONS

Since pre-existing evidence was limited our initial sample size calculation is based on uncertain assumptions and may need to be modified in a planned interim analysis. Moreover, since surgical experience remains a potential confounder in surgical trials, learning curve bias has to be taken into account when analyzing the results. Given the participating trial sites, standardization of peri-and postoperative treatment represents a major issue of trial conduct.

CONCLUSIONS

A group-sequential study design accounts for the uncertainty of pre-existing evidence. Also, standardization of surgical and postoperative care and blinded outcome assessment as well as adjustment for varying surgical expertise will contribute to a high validity and generalizability of the results.

The effect of mesh reinforcement of a stapled transection line on the rate of pancreatic occlusion failure after distal pancreatectomy: review of a single institution's experience

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic occlusion failure (POF) after distal pancreatectomy remains a common source of morbidity. Here, we review our experience with distal pancreatectomy and attempt to identify factors which influence POF rates.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred sixty-nine distal pancreatectomies were performed between 2002 and 2007. Review of the computerized medical records and physician office records was performed for all patients. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine factors which might influence the incidence of POF. The data set was analysed for factors which might influence the pancreatic occlusion rate. Analysis included patient and disease characteristics including: age, gender, body mass index (BMI), diagnosis, consistency of the pancreas and history of pancreatitis, as well as intra-operative variables including: surgeon, absorbable mesh reinforcement and operative approach.

RESULTS

POF was the most common peri-operative complication. POF was identified in 32 out of 169 patients (19%). Transection technique (hand sewn, stapled, stapled with mesh) and procedure complexity were factors associated with differences in POF rates by both univariate and multivariate analyses. POF was identified in 7 out of 70 patients (10%) when an absorbable mesh was utilized, and 25 of 99 patients (25%) when mesh was not utilized (P < 0.02).

DISCUSSION

These data suggest that a randomized controlled trial will be required to determine if mesh reinforcement reduces the rate and severity of POF after distal pancreatectomy.

Prevention and management of pancreatic fistula

Despite significant improvements in the safety and efficacy of pancreatic surgery, post-operative pancreatic fistulae remain an unsolved dilemma. These occur when the transected pancreatic gland, pancreatic-enteric anastomosis, or both, leak rendering the patient at significant risk. They are especially important today since indications for resection (IPMN, carcinoma) continue to increase. This review considers definitions and classifications of pancreatic fistulae, risk factors, preventative approaches and offers management strategies for when they do occur. Key citations from the past seventeen years have been scrutinized, and together with personal experience, provide the basis for this review.

Clinical outcome of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy

BACKGROUND

Few studies have compared laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (Lap-DP) and open distal pancreatectomy (open-DP). The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of Lap-DP and compare it to that of open-DP.

METHODS

A total of 37 patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy (Lap-DP, 21 patients; open-DP, 16 patients) between January 2000 and March 2007 were enrolled in this study. Prior to January 2004, open-DP was the standard procedure for patients with a lesion in the distal pancreas without invasive ductal cancer; thereafter, Lap-DP was also an approved procedure. All 16 open-DP procedures were performed prior to January 2004.

RESULTS

The operating times for the Lap-DP and open-DP patients were 308.4 +/- 124.6 and 281.5 +/- 83.3 min, respectively, and these were not significantly different (P = 0.4635). Blood loss for the Lap-DP group (249.0 +/- 239.8 ml) was significantly smaller than that for the open-DP group (714.1 +/- 650.4 ml) (P = 0.0055), and none of the patients in the Lap-DP group received transfusions. The frequency of complications for the Lap-DP and open-DP groups was 0 and 18.8%, respectively, which is not significantly different (P = 0.0784). The average hospital stay for the Lap-DP group was significantly shorter than that for the open-DP group (10.0 +/- 2.6 vs. 25.8 +/- 8.8 days; P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

In pancreatic diseases, other than invasive ductal cancer, arising in the distal pancreas, Lap-DP might be a more feasible and safer than open-DP.

Distal pancreatectomy is not associated with increased perioperative morbidity when performed as part of a multivisceral resection

PURPOSE

To evaluate the indications for and the outcomes from distal pancreatectomy.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of 171 patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy at Brigham and Women's Hospital between January 1996 and August 2005.

RESULTS

Nearly one-third of distal pancreatectomies were performed as part of an en bloc resection for a contiguous or metastatic tumor. Fifty-six percent of the patients underwent a standard distal pancreatectomy +/- splenectomy (group 1), whereas 44% of distal pancreatic resections included additional organs or contiguous intraperitoneal or retroperitoneal tumor (group 2). The overall post-operative complication rate was 37%; the most common complication was pancreatic duct leak (23%). When compared to patients undergoing standard distal pancreatectomy, those with a more extensive resection including multiple viscera and/or metastatic or contiguous tumor resection had no significant difference in overall complication rate (35% v. 39%, p = 0.75), leak rate (25% v. 20%, p = 0.47), new-onset insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (3% v. 4%, p = 1.0), and mortality (2% v. 4%, p = 0.656).

CONCLUSION

This series includes a large number of patients in whom distal pancreatectomy was performed as part of a multivisceral resection or with en bloc resection of contiguous tumor. Complications were no different in these patients when compared to patients undergoing straightforward distal pancreatectomy.

Distal pancreatectomy: incidence of postoperative diabetes

INTRODUCTION

Distal pancreatectomy is an accepted and safe procedure for lesions of the body and tail of the pancreas. Limited resections, including central pancreatectomy, have recently been advocated as possible strategies to preserve pancreatic endocrine function. The true rate of diabetes after distal pancreatectomy is not known, but we hypothesize that the risk is nominal.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed 125 consecutive patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy between January 1, 1992, and March 31, 2006.

RESULTS

Of these 125 patients, 27 (21.6%) had an islet cell tumor, 25 (20%) adenocarcinoma, 24 (18.4%) serous cystic neoplasm, 19 (15.2%) mucinous cystic neoplasm, 11 (8.8%) chronic pancreatitis, and eight (6.4%) intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm. In addition to the distal pancreatectomy, 105 (84%) of the patients underwent splenectomy and 12 (9.6%) a concomitant liver resection. The median operative time was 232 min and median blood loss 250 cc. Postoperative complications occurred in 44 (35.2%) patients (12% fistula), and there was one death. Fourteen patients had known type 2 diabetes preoperatively.

DISCUSSIONS

With a median follow-up of 21 months, 10 (9%) of previously nondiabetic patients developed new onset diabetes. There was a trend toward increased risk of new onset diabetes among patients with pancreatitis (odds ratio, 2.9). In the absence of pancreatitis, the rate was 7.5%. Length of hospitalization was greater for patients with new onset diabetes (9.4 vs 7.5, P < .05). Neither demographics, diagnosis, nor operative statistics impacted the risk of postoperative diabetes.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that the rate of clinically apparent new onset diabetes after distal pancreatectomy is minimal. Alternative pancreatic resections aimed at preserving pancreatic mass are likely to be unwarranted.

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: indication, extent, and results of surgery

In intraductal and papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) of the pancreas, the aims of surgery differ according to the presence of malignancy. For malignant IPMN and especially for invasive malignancy, radical resection is essential, but entails a substantial operative risk and long-term pancreatic insufficiency. For benign IPMN, in theory, the operative risk and the loss of pancreatic function should be minimal. Thus, surgery for malignant and benign IPMN differs in patient selection, surgical technique, and accepted risk of long-term functional disorders. This article details the indications, surgical techniques, and results of surgery in IPMN.

Preoperative endoscopic pancreatic stenting: a novel prophylactic measure against pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

The prevention of pancreatic fistula is still a major problem in distal pancreatectomy (DP). We have recently adopted preoperative endoscopic pancreatic stenting with the aim of preventing the leakage of pancreatic juice from the resection plane of the remnant pancreas after DP. We reviewed ten patients who underwent this intervention.

METHODS

One to 6 days before surgery, the patients underwent an endoscopic transpapillary pancreatic stent (7 Fr., 3 cm) placement. The perioperative short-term outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

Preoperative endoscopic pancreatic stenting was successfully performed in all ten patients. Two (20%) patients, both with intraductal papillary mucinous tumor, developed mild acute pancreatitis after the stent placement. None of the ten patients developed pancreatic fistula. The pancreatic stent was removed 8-28 days (mean, 11 days) postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative endoscopic pancreatic stenting may be an effective prophylactic measure against pancreatic fistula development following DP.

Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: the Brisbane experience of forty-six cases

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) is a safe alternative to conventional open distal pancreatectomy, with advantages that include smaller incisions, less pain, and shorter postoperative recovery. Despite these apparent advantages, however, uptake of the procedure has been slow, with only a handful of series published.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All LDPs performed in Brisbane, Australia, over a 10-year period (May 1996 to June 2006) were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Forty-six consecutive LDPs were performed. A variety of lesions were resected, including nine cancers. Twelve patients were converted for oncological (6) or technical reasons (6). The spleen was retained in 14/29 patients, either by main splenic vessel preservation (9) or solely supported by the short gastric vessels (5), resulting in inferior pole infarction in 2 patients. Overall morbidity was 39%, including 15% pancreatic fistula. All fistulas resolved after a median of 6 weeks without re-operation. A non-significant trend toward fewer fistulas with stapled rather than sutured stump closure was observed (13% vs 19%; p=0.43). Median operative duration and hospital stay were 157 min and 7 days, respectively. There was no mortality.

CONCLUSION

LDP is a safe alternative to conventional resection for a wide range of lesions. As with open resection, pancreatic fistula is the dominant morbidity, but is generally indolent. While spleen preservation is often possible, care must be taken to avoid infarction of the inferior pole if the Warshaw technique is utilized.

Fistulojejunostomy for the management of refractory pancreatic fistula

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic fistula (PF) formation is a known complication of pancreatic surgery, pancreatitis, and pancreatic injury. When medical or endoscopic interventions fail to resolve PF, operation remains the only viable treatment option. Unfortunately, operation for the correction of PF is often difficult and associated with significant morbidity.

METHODS

Herein, we report on our experience with a previously described technique for the management of PF that is performed easily and is associated with reduced morbidity. During the period of 2003-2006, 8 patients (males = 6, female = 2) with PF were treated with prolonged percutaneous drainage. Once a mature scar tract formed around the percutaneous drain, patients underwent a fistulojejunostomy.

RESULTS

The age of these patients ranged from 43 to 61 years. Of the 8 patients, 5 had fistulas secondary to necrotizing pancreatitis. The remaining 3 patients had fistulas resulting from previous pancreatic surgery. The average interval between drain placement and fistulojejunostomy was 6 months (range, 4-7 months). The average duration of operation was 2.5 h (range, 1-4.5 h). The average blood loss was 280 mL (range, 50-600 mL). Average duration of stay was 9 days (average, 4-14 days). At a mean follow-up of 17 months (range, 2-58 months), 6 of 8 patients had resolution of their pancreatic fistulas, could resume regular diet, and were free of narcotic use. One patient developed a recurrent pseudocyst and required a distal pancreatectomy, and the final patient was lost to follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Fistulojejunostomy is an effective therapy for the definitive treatment of pancreatic fistulas.

Curative laparoscopic resection for pancreatic neoplasms: a critical analysis from a single institution

Laparoscopic pancreatic surgery (LPS) has seen significant development but much of the knowledge refers to small and benign pancreatic tumors. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and long-term outcome of the laparoscopic approach in patients with benign, premalignant, and overt malignant lesions of the pancreas. This study, currently, is the largest single center experience worldwide. One hundred twenty-three consecutive patients underwent laparoscopic pancreatic surgery from April 1998 to April 2007, 20 patients with cysts or pseudocysts for acute and chronic pancreatitis, laparoscopic pancreatic drainage was performed, and were excluded from the analysis. The 103 patients were divided based on preoperative diagnosis: group I, inflammatory tumors for chronic pancreatitis (eight patients); group II, cystic pancreatic neoplasms (29 patients); group III, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (10 patients); group IV, neuroendocrine pancreatic tumors (NETs) (43 patients); and group V ductal adenocarcinoma (13 patients). The median tumor size was 5.3 cm. Pathologic data include R(0) or R(1) resection (transection margins on the specimen were inked). Perioperative data, postoperative complications, and resection modalities were compared using statistical analysis. Long-term outcomes were analysed by tumor recurrence and patient survival. The overall conversion rate was 7%. Laparoscopic distal pancreatic resection was performed in 82 patients (79.6%). Laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (Lap SPDP) was performed in 52 patients (63.7%), but with splenic vessels preservation in 22% and without splenic vessels preservation in 41.5%. Laparoscopic en-bloc splenopancreatectomy (Lap SxDP) was performed in 30 patients (36.6%) and laparoscopic enucleation (Lap En) in 20 patients (19.4%). There was no mortality. The overall complication rate was 25.2, 16.7, and 40% after Lap SPDP, Lap SxDP, and Lap En, respectively. The overall morbidity rate was significantly higher (p>0.05) in the group of Lap SPDP without splenic vessels preservation comparing with Lap SPDP with splenic vessels preservation because of the occurrence of splenic complications (20.6%). The overall pancreatic fistulas was 7.7, 10, and 35% after Lap SPDP, Lap SxDP, and Lap En, respectively; the severity of fistula was significantly higher in the Lap En group (p>0.05). The mean hospital stay was within 1 week in all groups, except in the group of ductal adenocarcinoma, which is 8 days. In this series, 27 patients (26.2%) had malignant disease. R(0) resection was achieved in 90% of ductal adenocarcinoma and 100% for other malignant tumors. The median survival for ductal adenocarcinoma patients was 14 months. This series demonstrates that LPS is feasible and safe in benign-appearing and malignant lesions of the pancreas.

Risk factors associated with pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy, which technique of pancreatic stump closure is more beneficial?

AIM: To identify risk factors related to pancreatic fistula in patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy (DP) and to determine the effectiveness of using a stapled and a sutured closed of pancreatic stump.

METHODS: Sixty-four patients underwent DP during a 10-year period. Information regarding diagnosis, operative details, and perioperative morbidity or mortality was collected. Eight risk factors were examined.

RESULTS: Indications for DP included primary pancreatic disease (n = 38, 59%) and non-pancreatic malignancy(n = 26, 41%). Postoperative mortality and morbidity rates were 1.5% and 37% respectively; one patient died due to sepsis and two patients required a reoperation due to postoperative bleeding. Pancreatic fistula was developed in 14 patients (22%); 4 of fistulas were classified as Grade A, 9 as Grade B and only 1 as Grade C. Incidence of pancreatic fistula rate was significantly associated with four risk factors: pathology, use of prophylactic octreotide therapy, concomitant splenectomy, and texture of pancreatic parenchyma. The role that technique (either stapler or suture) of pancreatic stump closure plays in the development of pancreatic leak remains unclear.

CONCLUSION: The pancreatic fistula rate after DP is 22%. This is reduced for patients with non-pancreatic malignancy, fibrotic pancreatic tissue, postoperative prophylactic octreotide therapy and concomitant splenectomy.

Nutritional status affects the rate of pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy: a multivariate analysis of 132 patients

BACKGROUND

Although malnutrition was found to increase the risk of intraabdominal and systemic complications in surgical patients, data for distal pancreatic resections are scarce.

STUDY DESIGN

Data on 132 consecutive patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy as the primary procedure for pancreatic pathology, between 1996 and 2005, were reviewed to identify risk factors for postoperative complications and determine the impact of nutritional status. Nutritional assessment was performed with clinical and laboratory variables, including unintentional weight loss, body mass index, blood albumin level, lymphocyte count, and Nutritional Risk Index (NRI) and Instant Nutritional Assessment (INA) scores.

RESULTS

Seventy-five (56.8%) patients developed 1 or more complications, including 18 (13.6%) cases of pancreatic fistula. The median values of NRI were significantly lower in patients with pancreatic fistula (96.9; 95% CI, 89.8 to 101.0) compared with those in the remaining subjects (102.5; 95% CI, 101.5 to 105.5; p=0.014). In the univariate analysis, the incidence of malnutrition defined by NRI (61% versus 30%, p=0.019) and the Instant Nutritional Assessment (67% versus 34%, p=0.017) was significantly higher in patients who developed pancreatic fistula. In the multivariate analysis, malnutrition characterized as NRI of 100 or less was the only factor that significantly increased the risk of pancreatic fistula, with an odds ratio of 8.12 (95% CI, 1.06 to 22.30).

CONCLUSIONS

Malnutrition, as defined by composite nutritional assessment scales consisting of clinical and laboratory parameters, is a major risk factor for pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy.

Laparoscopic and open distal pancreatic resection for benign pancreatic disease

The aim of the study is to provide comparisons of the perioperative outcomes between open and laparoscopic distal pancreatic resection (DPR) for benign pancreatic disease. From 2002 and 2005, there were 28 patients (16 open, 12 laparoscopic) with a mean age of 52 who had presumptive diagnoses of benign pancreatic lesions. Pathology was neuroendocrine tumor (nine and five), mucinous cystic neoplasm (three and three), symptomatic pancreatic pseudocyst (two and two), and others (two and two). The mean operative time was 278 vs 212 min (p = 0.05), the estimated blood lost was 609 vs 193 ml (p = 0.01), and the success rate of preoperative intent for splenic preservation was 17 vs 62% (p = 0.08) in the open and laparoscopic groups, respectively. Two patients (16%) were converted to an open procedure. There was no perioperative mortality. The mean hospital stay and total perioperative morbidity were 10.6 vs 6.2 days (p = 0.001) and nine vs two events (p = 0.03) in the open and laparoscopic groups, respectively. Ten of 12 patients (83%) with laparoscopic DPR had adequate oral intake within 72 h post operatively in contrast to 2 of 16 (12.5%) patients in the open DPR group (p = 0.0001). Laparoscopic DPR is technically feasible, safe, and associated with less perioperative morbidity and a shorter hospital stay than open DPR. In centers with the appropriate expertise, laparoscopic DPR should be considered the procedure of choice for putative benign lesions of the pancreatic body and tail.

Distal pancreatectomy for chronic pancreatitis: risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula

One of the most common complications after distal pancreatectomy is a fistula from the pancreatic remnant. Factors influencing the development of a pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy have not been clearly elucidated. The records of 91 patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy for chronic pancreatitis between 1995 and 2003 were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. Average daily volume and amylase concentration between postoperative days 2 and 20 from drains located at the pancreatic resection site were compared to clinical variables. Out of 137 pre- and intraoperative clinical variables, multivariate analysis showed serum creatinine (t = 3.05, p = 0.004), history of intraabdominal operation (t = -2.68, p = 0.01), right-sided pancreatic duct dilation (t = 2.65, p = 0.01), synchronous cholecystectomy (t = 2.53, p = 0.02), and serum albumin (t = -2.19, p = 0.04) to be independently associated with drain volume. Drain amylase concentration was linked to serum creatinine (t = 8.55, p < 0.001), blood urea nitrogen (t = -3.43, p = .001), preoperative parenteral nutrition (t = 2.56, p = .01), and serum alkaline phosphatase (t = 2.51, p = 0.01). There was no correlation between the degree of fibrosis and drain output. Technique of pancreatic transection and presence of suture closure of the pancreatic duct did not affect drain output. In conclusion, the amount and amylase concentration of postsurgical drainage after distal pancreatectomy for chronic pancreatitis is dependent on markers of renal dysfunction, malnutrition, biliary disease, and possibly inflammation. These factors, if medically reversible, should be addressed in patients who are candidates for distal pancreatectomy for chronic pancreatitis.

Decreasing pancreatic leak after distal pancreatectomy: saline-coupled radiofrequency ablation in a porcine model

Despite marked improvements in pancreatic surgery, the high incidence and morbidity of pancreatic leak after resection has remained unchanged. The objective of this study was to evaluate the role of saline-coupled radiofrequency ablation (TissueLink) as an alternative to traditional methods of stump closure in an animal model of distal pancreatectomy. Forty swine were randomized after pancreatic transection and remnant stump was either oversewn in a traditional fashion (control) or treated with the device alone (TissueLink). Animals were killed and necropsied at 3 or 5 weeks postoperatively. Primary endpoints were the development of a pancreatic fistula defined as dye extravasation from the remnant duct, presence of undrained amylase-rich fluid collections/abscess, and greater than threefold drain/serum amylase after the third postoperative day. The incidence of pancreatic leak in the TissueLink group was 5.5 vs 42% in the control group (p = 0.01). There were no differences in operative time or other clinical parameters measured. Histologic analysis of the remnant pancreatic stumps confirmed our results. These data support our hypothesis that saline-coupled radiofrequency ablation leads to obliteration of ducts with a resultant decrease in pancreatic leak and subsequent complications. This technology may play a substantial role in preventing this dreaded complication in the clinical setting.

Wrapping of skeletonized and divided vessels using the falciform ligament in distal pancreatectomy

BACKGROUND

A pancreatic fistula is a major cause of morbidity in patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy (DP). A pancreatic fistula may expose skeletonized or divided vessels directly to pancreatic juice, creating a setting for vessel erosion and delayed intra-abdominal hemorrhage (DIH). With the aim of protecting vessels near the pancreatic stump from potential pancreatic fistulas, we have adopted a surgical option by which these vessels are wrapped using a pedicled falciform ligament.

METHODS

After completing DP, the pedicled falciform ligament is spread out widely on major vessels exposed during resection near the pancreatic stump, and fixed to the surrounding retroperitoneal connective tissue. These procedures allow the complete separation of these vessels from the pancreatic stump. We reviewed the cases of 8 patients who underwent DP including these procedures.

RESULTS

The mobilization of the falciform ligament and the wrapping of the vessels were successfully performed without any complications. Although 2 patients (14.5%) developed pancreatic fistulas, DIH did not occur in any of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The wrapping of the skeletonized and divided vessels using a pedicled falciform ligament is simple and easy, and may be an effective prophylactic measure against DIH following DP.

Distal pancreatectomy: risk factors for surgical failure in 302 consecutive cases

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to identify potential risk factors for mortality and morbidity after distal pancreatectomy, with special focus on the formation of pancreatic fistula.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Distal pancreatectomy can be performed with low mortality and acceptable morbidity rates. Pancreatic fistulas, occurring in 10% to 20% of cases, remain a problem that contributes significantly to morbidity, length of stay, and overall costs.

METHODS

From November 1993 to February 2006, perioperative and postoperative data of 302 consecutive patients were recorded. Univariate and multivariate analyses of potential risk factors for morbidity and for the formation of pancreatic fistula were performed. The surgical techniques used for closure were categorized into 4 groups: 1) anastomosis, 2) seromuscular patch, 3) closure by suture, and 4) closure using a stapling device.

RESULTS

Indications for resection were pancreatic tumors in 62% of patients, nonpancreatic tumors in 23%, chronic pancreatitis in 12%, and others in 3%. The spleen was preserved in 24% of patients. The morbidity and mortality rates for distal pancreatectomy in this series were 35% and 2%, respectively. The prevalence of pancreatic fistula was 12%. Univariate and multivariate analyses indicated that closure using a stapling device and an operating time >or=480 minutes were associated with a higher incidence of pancreatic fistula (odds ratio = 2.6 and 4.2, respectively). Overall morbidity was mainly influenced by the extent of resection (multivisceral vs. conventional; odds ratio = 1.7).

CONCLUSION

Pancreatic leak remains a common complication after distal pancreatectomy. Our series suggests that stapler closure of the pancreatic remnant is associated with a significantly higher fistula rate.

Staple line reinforcement reduces postoperative pancreatic stump leak after distal pancreatectomy

Pancreatic stump leak is the major source of morbidity after stapled distal pancreatectomy. We hypothesized that reinforcement of the stapler system with a buttress mat can improve leak rates when compared to standard stapling alone. We performed 13 consecutive distal pancreatectomies using our reinforced stapler system, forming our experimental group. A historical control group was composed of 18 patients undergoing stapled pancreatic closure without reinforcement. The main outcome measure was pancreatic leak in the postoperative period. Pancreatic leaks included fistulas and fluid collections (sterile or infected). Hospital length of stay was recorded as a secondary measure. Postoperative pancreatic leak rate was zero in the experimental group, but 39% in the control group (P = 0.025). Development of a pancreatic leak resulted in prolonged hospital stays: 13.6 vs 8.3 days (P < 0.03). We conclude that staple line reinforcement is a simple and effective method of reducing pancreatic stump leakage after distal pancreatectomy. The economic impact of lower leak rates is reflected in significantly shorter hospital stays. The results of our study should be validated in a randomized controlled trial.