Evaluation of telesurgical (robotic) NISSEN fundoplication

The Efficacy of Robot-assisted Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Vascular Anastomoses in an Experimental Model

BACKGROUND

Robot-assisted surgery is thought to facilitate complex laparoscopic movements, enhancing advanced laparoscopic procedures.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the benefit of robotic assistance for laparoscopic vascular surgery.

DESIGN

Experimental study using prosthetic conduits in a laparoscopic training box.

METHODS

Two surgeons each performed 40 laparoscopic vascular anastomoses alternating with and without robotic assistance. A Zeus-Aesop surgical Robotic system trade mark with 3-D visualisation was used. Each surgeon made 40 anastomoses in total, using different prostheses (5 mm PTFE and 16 mm Dacron) and suture material (Prolene and PTFE). A time-action analysis was performed to evaluate surgical performance. Primary efficacy parameters were quality and leakage of the anastomosis, total time and total number of actions.

RESULTS

Equal quality scores and anastomotic leakage were achieved with both techniques. Robotic assistance resulted in significant longer suture and knot tying time and significant more actions were needed compared to the manual laparoscopic procedures. Significant more failures occurred during the robot-assisted procedures.

CONCLUSION

In this study, robotic (Zeus-Aesop) assistance did not improve the laparoscopic performance of the surgeon whilst making vascular anastomoses.

Robotic surgery: a review

Minimally invasive techniques have revolutionized surgery by reducing surgical trauma and therefore hospital stay and subsequently cost. There are limitations, however. Robot-assisted surgery endeavours to minimize these technical hindrances and so allow better, more precise surgical practise while still minimizing surgical trauma.

Telerobotic foregut and esophageal surgery

Computer-assisted telerobotic surgery has many potential advantages over standard laparoscopy in foregut and esophageal surgery. The high-definition, three-dimensional images produced by the optics of these systems can facilitate identification of anatomy and dissection during surgery. The full range of motion afforded by the multiarticulated instruments can be beneficial in completing complex laparoscopic tasks such as suturing and intracorporeal knot tying. Tremor filtration and motion scaling allows for more precise movements during surgery. The remote console provides the operating surgeon with a comfortable ergonomic position during the sometimes long and complex procedures. Despite the many advantages of these systems, however, several limitations still exist. It is expected that the development and refinement of these technologies will address many of these issues. With continued progress, it is likely that this technology will disseminate widely throughout the surgical community.

Robotics and ergonomics

Industrial robotics have proven the benefit of using an untiring machine to perform precise repetitive tasks in uncomfortable or dangerous for humans environments. Highly skilled surgeons are trained to operate and adapt to difficult conditions. They are even capable of developing intelligent mechanisms to exploit a variety of tactile, visual, and other cues. The robotic systems, however, can enhance the surgeon's capability to perform a wide variety of tasks. They cannot replace the surgeon's problem-solving ability. Instead, they will redefine his role. They will significantly enhance the surgeon's skills and dexterity by providing their complementary capabilities and an ergonomically efficient and more user-friendly working environment.

Analysis of procedure time in robot-assisted surgery: comparative study in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

INTRODUCTION

Robotic surgery systems have been introduced to deal with the basic disadvantages of laparoscopic surgery. However, working with these systems may lead to time loss due to additional robot-specific tasks, such as set-up of equipment and sterile draping of the system. To evaluate loss of time in robot-assisted surgery, we compared 10 robot-assisted cholecystectomies to 10 standard laparoscopic cholecystectomies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The robot-assisted procedures were performed with the da Vinci telemanipulation system. The total time in the operating room (OR) was scored and divided into preoperative, operative, and postoperative phases. These phases were further divided into smaller time-frames to precisely define moments of time loss.

RESULTS

The most significant difference between the two groups was found in the preoperative phase. Robot-related tasks led to time loss in all time-frames of this phase. In the operative phase, the trocar entry time-frame was longer in robot-assisted cases than in standard procedures. Additionally, postoperative OR clearing was longer in the robot-assisted cases. Total operating time did not differ significantly between the two procedures.

CONCLUSION

Robot-assisted surgery leads to time loss during preparation of routine laparoscopic procedures.

Robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparative study

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC) was compared with robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy (RLC). Surgical trainees performed the LC to avoid the surgeon's experience bias.

METHODS

Two surgical trainees performed 10 CLCs and 10 RLCs at random with a Zeus-Aesop Surgical Robotic System. The primary efficacy parameters were the total time and the number of actions involved in the procedure. The secondary parameters were setup and dissection times, and the number of grasping and dissection actions. Surgical complications were evaluated.

RESULTS

For CLC and RLC, respectively, the total times were 95.4 +/- 28 min and 123.5 +/- 33.3 min and the total actions were 420 +/- 176.3 and 363.5 +/- 158.2. For CLC, the times required for setup (21 +/- 10.4 min) and dissection (50.2 +/- 17.7 min) were less than for RLC (33.8 +/- 11.3 min and 72 +/- 24.3 min, respectively). The numbers of grasping and dissection actions were not significantly different: 41.4 +/- 26.5 and 378 +/- 173.7, respectively, for CLC versus 48.9 +/- 27 and 314.6 +/- 141.9, respectively, for RLC.

CONCLUSION

Although feasible, RLC requires significantly more time than CLC because of slower performed actions.

Early experience in robot-assisted laparoscopic Heller myotomy

Heller myotomy for achalasia is routinely performed laparoscopically. This offers patients significant benefits compared to open surgery. Surgeons, however, are limited in their manipulation and visualization during laparoscopic interventions. Robotic telemanipulation systems were introduced with the objective of alleviating these limitations. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of performing a Heller myotomy with the use of a robotic telemanipulation system. Fourteen patients were operated on with the da Vinci robot system. Robotic system set-up time, per- and postoperative complications, blood loss, operating time and hospital stay were recorded. Follow-up included manometry and symptom score. The robotic system set-up time was 15 min (10-15). Thirteen procedures (13/14: 93%) were completed by laparoscopic surgery. One procedure was converted because of inadequate exposure. One peroperative mucosal perforation was closed laparoscopically. The median blood loss was 10 mL (10-200). Median operating time was 90 min (75-150). Hospitalization ranged from 2 to 8 days (median 3). No complications occurred during a 30-day postoperative period. Dysphagia was relieved in 12/14 patients (86%). Heartburn was present postoperatively in 2/14 patients (14%). Manometry showed a significant decrease in median lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) pressure from 2.9 preoperatively to 1 kPa postoperatively (P = 0.008). Robot-assisted laparoscopic Heller myotomy was demonstrated to be safe and effective in reducing basal LOS pressure and dysphagia. The results of this study clearly support the feasibility of the use of this system in performing a delicate laparoscopic surgical procedure. The use of a robotic system was experienced as being highly supportive in manipulation and visualization by the surgical team involved.

Robot-assisted laparoscopic choledochojejunostomy

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic stenting is the treatment of choice for palliative relief of biliary obstruction by a periampullary tumor. If treated surgically, a choledochojejunostomy and Roux-en-Y diversion is still performed by laparotomy in a large number of cases due to technical challenges of the biliodigestive anastomosis in the laparoscopic approach. Robotic systems may enhance dexterity and vision and might therefore support surgeons in delicate laparoscopic interventions. The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of performing a laparoscopic choledochojejunostomy and Roux-en-Y reconstruction with the aid of a robotic system.

METHODS

Ten laparoscopic procedures were performed in pigs with the da Vinci robotic system and compared to 10 procedures performed by laparotomy (controls). Operation room time, anastomoses time, blood loss, and complications were recorded. The effectiveness of the anastomoses was evaluated by postoperative observation for 14 days and by measuring passage, circumference, and number of stitches.

RESULTS

Operating room time was significantly longer for the robot-assisted group than for controls (140 vs 82 min, p < 0.05). The anastomoses times were longer in the robot-assisted cases but not statistically significant (biliodigestive anastomosis, 29 vs 20 min; intestinal anastomosis, 30 vs 15 min), Blood loss was less than 10 cc in all robot-assisted cases and 30 cc (10-50 cc) in the controls. In both groups, there were no intraoperative complications. In the control group, one pig died of gastroparesis on postoperative day 6. In the robot-assisted group, one pig died on postoperative day 7 due to a volvulus of the jejunum. At autopsy, a bilioma was found in one pig in the robot-assisted group. In all pigs, the biliodigestive and intestinal anastomoses were macroscopically patent with an adequate passage. Circumference and number of stitches were similar.

CONCLUSION

The safety and efficacy of robot-assisted laparoscopic choledochojejunostomy was proven in this study. The procedure can be performed within an acceptable time frame.

A performance study comparing manual and robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery using the da Vinci system

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of the da Vinci robotic system using both the three-dimensional view (3D) and two-dimensional (2D) view options with traditional manually assisted laparoscopic techniques in performing standardized exercises.

METHODS

To evaluate surgical efficiency in the use of robotically assisted and manual laparoscopic surgery for standardized exercises six, last-year medical students without any surgical experience were selected. The exercises consisted of placing rings over receptacles, grasping a free hanging suture and cutting three pieces of it, running a suture, and performing a surgical knot. Each student performed the exercise twice. The median times needed for completion of the exercises and the median number of errors in performing the tasks were noted.

RESULTS

The unexperienced students performed the standardized tasks significantly quicker and with fewer errors when assisted by the da Vinci robot in the 3D optical display mode, as compared with traditional manually assisted laparoscopic surgery. Even when the 2D mode was selected, a significant advantage favoring the da Vinci robotic system was seen both in time and efficacy for most exercises. When the 3D and 2D modes were compared, time differences in favor of the 3D mode remained, but a significant difference in efficacy favoring the 3D mode was seen only in one exercise (exercise 2: suture cutting).

CONCLUSIONS

The da Vinci robotic system permits standardized minimal invasive surgical exercises to be performed quicker and more efficiently than traditional minimally invasive techniques. Therefore, with the aid of this robotic system, difficult laparoscopic interventions may become easier to perform, and indications for minimal invasive surgery may be expanded.

Robotics and the pediatric surgeon

Surgical robots are enabling devices for minimally invasive (laparoscopic) surgery (MIS). They use a computer to enhance a surgeon's skills as hand movements are transmitted to robotic arms. The computer filters tremor, which becomes important at high magnifications of 10 to 15 times available in MIS. It also provides motion scaling so that large hand movements are converted to very small movements of the robotic arm. The robotic arms also have wrists that make suturing and knot tying far more accurate and efficient. Surgical robots are currently used clinically for procedures such as MIS Nissen fundoplication, cholecystectomy, and splenectomy. Laboratory experience indicates that they may provide advantages for newborn procedures such as portoenterostomy for biliary atresia and repair of esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula. They have a potential for making possible MIS procedures, which can only be done open now, and for introducing entirely new procedures as well as for the performance of procedures by operators distant from the patient.

Robot-assisted thoracoscopic resection of a benign mediastinal neurogenic tumor: technical note

OBJECTIVE

Robotic surgery systems were introduced recently with the objective of enhancing the dexterity and view during procedures that use a videoscope. The first case report of robot-assisted thoracoscopic removal of a benign neurogenic tumor in the thorax is presented.

METHODS

A 46-year-old woman presented with a history of paravertebral pain. A chest x-ray revealed a left paravertebral mass. A magnetic resonance imaging scan revealed a well-encapsulated mass that was suspected to be a neuroma at the level of T8-T9, separate from vascular structures, without extension in the foramina, and without a spinal canal component.

RESULTS

A left robot-assisted thoracoscopic resection of the tumor was performed. After placement of six trocars, the tumor was carefully dissected and removed through one of the trocar openings. The histopathological findings revealed an ancient schwannoma.

CONCLUSION

This case report demonstrates the feasibility of robot-assisted thoracoscopic extirpation of a thoracic neurogenic tumor. Robot-assisted surgery may prove to be of additional value in challenging thoracoscopic surgery, such as the delicate surgical removal of benign neurogenic tumors, because of the support in manipulation and visualization during videoscopic interventions.

Single cannula technique and robotic telescopic assistance in infants and children who require laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) is being utilized more extensively in the management of symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease in infants and children. The traditional approach utilizes 5 3- to 5-mm cannulas for telescope and instrument access to the peritoneal cavity. The purpose of this study is to report the technique and document the results using a single 5-mm umbilical cannula for LNF, stab incisions for placement of the instruments, and robotic telescope assistance.

METHODS

From November 1999 through March 2002, 154 patients underwent LNF by the senior author for pathologic gastroesophageal reflux disease. All operations were performed with a single 5-mm umbilical cannula through which a 4- or 5-mm telescope was placed for operative visualization. Four stab incisions were made through the upper/lateral abdominal wall under direct visualization avoiding the epigastric vessels. Through these stab incisions, instruments were inserted into the peritoneal cavity. The maximum insufflation pressure was 15 mm Hg in all cases. The ability to perform the procedure in the absence of additional operative cannula placement, complications during instrument insertion, the ability to maintain adequate pneumoperitoneum, the patient's age, weight, operating time, and the addition of a gastrostomy were recorded.

RESULTS

All but one of the 154 LNFs were completed successfully using this technique. The mean age at operation and mean operating time was 23.9 months (range, 3 weeks to 180 months) and 91 minutes (31 to 160 minutes), respectively. Patients weight ranged from 2.4 to 57 kg (mean, 10.4 kg). Gastrostomies were placed in 52 cases. There were no complications associated with the stab incisions or insertion of the operative instruments through the abdominal wall. Pneumoperitoneum was maintained adequately in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

LNF can be performed safely and effectively with a single umbilical cannula. We recommend its use for pediatric patients who require LNF.