Intracoronary Doppler guide wire versus stress single-photon emission computed tomographic thallium-201 imaging in assessment of intermediate coronary stenoses

Correlations between coronary flow reserve measured with a Doppler guide wire and treadmill exercise testing

We compared exercise test results to a physiologic depiction of stenosis severity, coronary flow reserve (CFR), measured with a Doppler guide wire in 35 patients with single-vessel coronary disease. Group 1 (n = 21) had abnormal CFR, and group 2 (n = 14) had normal CFR. In group 1, 14 of 21 had ST-segment depression versus 3 of 14 in group 2 (p < 0.01). Exercise treadmill time (Bruce protocol) was normalized to the age- and sex-predicted time. Exercise time and normalized exercise time were less in group 1 (5.6 +/- 2.3 vs 9.9 +/- 1.8 min and 0.82 +/- 0.32 vs 1.25 +/- 0.23, p < 0.00001). Having either ST-segment depression or a normalized exercise time <1 during exercise had a 95% sensitivity, 71% specificity, and 86% predictive accuracy in identifying abnormal CFR. Coronary stenoses and minimal lumen diameter were similar in groups 1 and 2. By using stepwise logistical regression analysis, exercise time and ST-segment depression predicted CFR with a total r2 of 0.51. Minimal lumen diameter did not significantly add to the model. Exercise test variables, ST-segment depression, and exercise time are predictive of the physiologic significance of coronary lesions.

Culprit lesion and jeopardized myocardium: correlation between coronary angiography and single-photon emission computed tomography

BACKGROUND

The term "culprit lesion" is used to designate the coronary stenosis responsible for the symptoms of the patient with coronary artery disease. Its detection is essential when partial revascularization is contemplated. The term "jeopardized myocardium" is commonly used to mean the amount of myocardium put in danger by all the stenotic lesions; however, it should be restricted to the amount of myocardium that could become infarcted if only the most severe stenoses were occluded.

HYPOTHESIS

The aim of this study was to investigate (1) the agreement between coronary myocardial single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and coronary angiography for the identification of the culprit lesion, and (2) the correlation of the two studies in the quantification of jeopardized myocardium.

METHODS

In all, 159 patients with coronary artery disease without previous myocardial infarction were included in the study. A score for myocardial SPECT was correlated with the angiographic scores by Califf and Gensini and with the authors' score which includes adjustment for collateral circulation.

RESULTS

The agreement between coronary angiography and SPECT for the diagnosis of the culprit lesion was 84% (87/104). The correlations between the scores of angiography and SPECT to assess jeopardized myocardium when all coronary stenoses were taken into account were significant (p < 0.0001), but their coefficients were suboptimal (r = 0.48 for Califf, r = 0.48 for Gensini, and r = 0.65 for the authors' score). When only the jeopardized myocardium resulting from the culprit lesion was considered, the correlation clearly improved (r = 0.85).

CONCLUSION

Thus, in 84% of patients with multivessel disease, an agreement between coronary angiography and myocardial SPECT for the diagnosis of the culprit lesion was observed. The correlation between these techniques for the quantification of jeopardized myocardium from the culprit lesion was satisfactory.

Practical coronary physiology. Clinical application of the Doppler flow velocity guide wire

Coronary angiography incompletely delineates the physiologic consequences of many epicardial stenoses. Intracoronary translesional flow velocity measurements using the Doppler flow wire during cardiac catheterization provide immediate data discriminating the physiologic significance of coronary stenoses. The validity and accuracy of the flow wire for analyzing lesion hemodynamic significance have been confirmed in multiple studies. Flow velocity analysis provides objective criteria for refining the selection of cases for revascularization, and prospective clinical data have confirmed the safety of deferring intervention on lesions with normal physiologic assessment. Translesional and distal coronary flow velocity dynamics during procedures also provide immediate data assessing the physiologic adequacy of intervention. Impaired postintervention distal coronary flow velocity and vasodilator reserve can predict subsequent clinical events, and comparisons of flow velocity indices prestenting and poststenting suggest that physiologically inadequate results of angioplasty may be improved by additional intervention. Flow velocity assessment may also have utility in profiling the adequacy of infarct artery reperfusion following acute myocardial infarction. Evidence has been accumulated to support use of Doppler flow velocity analysis as a clinically relevant technique for improving both diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of cardiovascular medicine.

Clinical application of coronary flow reserve using an intracoronary Doppler guide wire

Coronary flow reserve (CFR) is a critical measurement in the assessment of the coronary circulation. The development of this physiologic variable in animal and human studies is reviewed. Human studies documenting the limitations of coronary angiography, especially in the setting of severe diffuse coronary artery disease, are analyzed. Furthermore, the important variables that must be accounted for when CFR is measured are examined. With this background, the application of CFR in a variety of clinical settings and the development and use of the Doppler FloWire for its measurement are discussed.

Coronary flow reserve during coronary angioplasty in patients with a recent myocardial infarction: relation to stenosis and myocardial viability

OBJECTIVES

In the present study, we examined post-stenotic coronary flow before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) in patients with and without a recent myocardial infarction (MI) and related it to stenosis severity and residual viability.

BACKGROUND

Post-stenotic coronary blood flow velocity reserve (CFVR) has been used with success to estimate functional stenosis severity in patients with stable angina. However, in patients with a recent MI, the impaired coronary vasodilator response of the reperfused myocardium may substantially alter the flow dynamics of the infarct-related artery.

METHODS

Distal coronary flow velocities were recorded before and after PTCA in 36 patients at day 13 +/- 7 (mean +/- SD) after acute MI and in 38 patients without MI. The CFVR was assessed by the ratio of distal hyperemic to baseline average peak velocity, using a 0.014-in. Doppler guide wire. Stenosis severity was analyzed by quantitative coronary angiography, and infarct size was assessed scintigraphically.

RESULTS

For similar angiographic stenosis severity, pre- and post-PTCA values of CFVR were significantly lower in patients with than without MI: 1.22 +/- 0.26 versus 1.50 +/- 0.45 before PTCA (p < 0.05) and 1.72 +/- 0.43 versus 2.21 +/- 0.74 after PTCA, respectively (p < 0.01). Although CFVR increased significantly (p < 0.0001) after angiographically successful PTCA in both study groups, abnormal CFVR (< or = 2.0) was still observed in 80% of patients with MI and in 44% of those without MI (MI vs. no MI, p = 0.001). Patients with an extensive infarction (relative infarct size > or = 50%) and those with a small infarction (relative infarct size < 50%) had comparable levels of post-PTCA CFVR (1.6 +/- 0.3 vs. 1.8 +/- 0.5, p = NS). Among a variety of factors, angiographic stenosis severity was the most important determinant of CFVR in both study groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with a recent MI, CFVR was significantly lower than in those without MI, both before and after PTCA. Besides the presence of this postreperfusion-related impairment of the coronary vasodilating response, CFVR was mainly influenced by stenosis severity and not by residual viability.

Variations in normal coronary vasodilatory reserve stratified by artery, gender, heart transplantation and coronary artery disease

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of the study was to assess the spectrum of coronary vasodilatory reserve values in patients with angiographically normal arteries who had atypical chest pain syndromes or remote coronary artery disease or were heart transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND

The measurement of post-stenotic coronary vasodilatory reserve, now possible in a large number of patients in the cardiac catheterization laboratory, is increasingly used for decision making. Controversy exists regarding the range of normal values obtained in angiographically normal coronary arteries in patients with different clinical presentations.

METHODS

Quantitative coronary arteriography was performed in 214 patients classified into three groups: 85 patients with chest pain syndromes and angiographically normal arteries (group 1); 21 patients with one normal vessel and at least one vessel with > 50% diameter lumen narrowing (group 2); and 108 heart transplant recipients (group 3). Coronary vasodilatory reserve (the ratio of maximal to basal average coronary flow velocity) was measured in 416 arteries using a 0.018-in. (0.04 cm) Doppler-tipped angioplasty guide wire. Intracoronary adenosine (8 to 18 micrograms) was used to produce maximal hyperemia.

RESULTS

Coronary vasodilatory reserve was higher in angiographically normal arteries in patients with chest pain syndromes (group 1:2.80 +/- 0.6 [group mean +/- SD]) than in normal vessels in patients with remote coronary artery disease (group 2: 2.5 +/- 0.95, p = 0.04); both values were significantly higher than those in the post-stenotic segment of the diseased artery (1.8 +/- 0.6, p < 0.007). Coronary vasodilatory reserve in transplant recipients (group 3) was higher than that in the other groups (3.1 +/- 0.9, p < 0.05 vs. groups 1 and 2) as a group and for individual arteries. When stratified by vessel, coronary vasodilatory reserve was similar among the left anterior descending, left circumflex and right coronary arteries. There were no differences between coronary vasodilatory reserve values on the basis of gender for patients with coronary artery disease and transplant recipients. In group 1 (chest pain), there was a trend toward higher coronary vasodilatory reserve in men than in women (2.9 +/- 0.6 vs 2.7 +/- 0.6, p = 0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings identify a normal reference range for studies assessing the coronary circulation and post-stenotic coronary vasodilatory reserve in patients with and without coronary artery disease encountered in the cardiac catheterization laboratory.

Intracoronary papaverine induced myocardial lactate production in patients with angiographically normal coronary arteries

Although intracoronary papaverine has been widely used for the measurement of coronary flow reserve, little is known concerning whether papaverine may produce deleterious metabolic changes in humans. We investigated the effect of papaverine on lactate metabolism in 28 patients with normal coronary arteries. We continuously monitored phasic coronary flow velocity in the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery using Doppler guidewire. We also obtained paired samples of arterial and coronary sinus blood for the measurement of lactate at control and at 1 min after administration of 10 mg of intracoronary papaverine. There were no serious side effects during papaverine infusion. Sixteen patients showed ST-T abnormalities after papaverine. The QTc interval increased from 450 +/- 42 msec to 571 +/- 58 msec (P < 0.001). Average peak velocity increased significantly (% increase: 198.5 +/- 87.8%, range: 27.8-374.1%) after papaverine. Although intracoronary papaverine produced no significant change in arterial lactate levels (8.5 +/- 4.0-8.8 +/- 5.0 mg/ml), it induced a significant increase in coronary sinus lactate levels (5.4 +/- 3.2-15.3 +/- 8.2 mg/ml, P < 0.001). Lactate extraction ratio decreased significantly (36.4 +/- 18.4--82.2 +/- 58.4%, P < 0.001), and all patients showed net lactate production (-3.9--198.0%) after papaverine. There was weak but significant correlation between lactate extraction ratio after papaverine and coronary flow reserve (R2 = 0.15, P < 0.05). There was no correlation between lactate extraction ratio and QTc interval after papaverine. The mean value of lactate extraction ratio was not different in patients with ST-T abnormalities induced by papaverine compared to those without. These results demonstrate that intracoronary papaverine induces myocardial lactate production irrespective of the degree of coronary flow reserve and electrocardiographic changes in patients with normal coronary arteries. A safer and more reliable agent is needed for the measurement of coronary flow reserve.

Alternation in the coronary blood flow velocity pattern in patients with no reflow and reperfused acute myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

Experimental and clinical evidence indicates that myocardial ischemia often damages the coronary microvasculature ("no-reflow" phenomenon). In this study, we examined the effect of this phenomenon on the coronary blood flow velocity pattern in patients with reperfused acute myocardial infarction.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We measured coronary blood flow velocity after coronary angioplasty in 42 patients with acute myocardial infarction using a Doppler guidewire. Myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) was also performed before and after angioplasty. Thirty-one patients showed good contrast reperfusion (MCE reflow), whereas the other 11 showed no reflow (MCE no reflow). Peak velocity and duration of systolic coronary flow were significantly less in patients with MCE no reflow than in those with MCE reflow (8 +/- 4 versus 17 +/- 10 cm/s and 207 +/- 79 versus 289 +/- 55 ms, respectively; P < .01). Early systolic retrograde flow was frequently observed in patients with MCE no reflow, whereas it was observed in only 1 patient among those with MCE reflow (95% versus 3%; P < .001). Although peak diastolic flow velocity was similar between the two subsets, diastolic deceleration rate was significantly higher in patients with MCE no reflow than in those with MCE reflow (107 +/- 76 versus 56 +/- 31 cm/s2; P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

The coronary flow velocity pattern in patients with the no-reflow phenomenon was characterized by the appearance of systolic retrograde flow, diminished systolic antegrade flow, and rapid deceleration of diastolic flow. Thus, the Doppler guidewire allows us to assess the presence of microvascular dysfunction in AMI.

Does coronary flow reserve assessed by blood flow velocity analysis reflect absolute coronary flow reserve?

Doppler guidewire enables us to measure phasic coronary velocity and has been used for the measurement of coronary flow reserve (CFR). Although CFR is usually calculated by the quotient of peak flow velocity during papaverine infusion and flow velocity at rest, this assumption is true only if conduit vessel size is constant. To determine the accuracy of measurement of CFR using average peak velocity (APV) with Doppler guidewire, we investigated the influence of intracoronary papaverine on coronary flow velocity and coronary arterial diameter (CAD) and examined the correlation between CFR derived using APV and that derived using coronary blood flow (CBF) in 26 patients with normal coronary arteries. We measured phasic coronary flow velocity, and performed quantitative coronary angiography in the proximal left coronary artery at control and during 10 mg of intracoronary papaverine. Compared to control value, papaverine induced a significant increase in APV (% increase: 182 +/- 101%; P < 0.001). Papaverine also significantly increased CAD (16 +/- 10%; P < 0.001). Thus, CFR derived from APV was significantly lower than that derived from CBF (2.8 +/- 1.0 vs. 4.0 +/- 1.5, P < 0.001). Although there was a significantly strong positive correlation between these two methods (R2 = 0.83, P < 0.001), there was also considerable variability with regard to predicting one variable from the other. These results suggest the importance of standardizing the conditions in which coronary flow velocity is measured with regard to either controlling or measuring changes in epicardial coronary arterial diameter during changes in distal resistance vessel tone.

Periprocedural Doppler coronary blood flow predictors of myocardial perfusion abnormalities and cardiac events after successful coronary interventions

Thirty-four consecutive patients had coronary flow velocity assessed under basal and hyperemic conditions in the proximal and distal coronary artery, followed by rest-stress technetium 99m sestamibi myocardial tomography within 3 months of successful coronary angioplasty. In spite of significant angiographic improvement, 29% of patients had a persistent reversible myocardial perfusion defect associated with a residual abnormality of the proximal-to-distal coronary average peak velocity ratio (p/d APV = 2.2 +/- 1.5 vs 1.1 +/- 0.6; p = 0.02). Patients with an abnormal p/d APV ratio (>1.7) had more numerous angioplasty-zone perfusion defects (4.2 +/- 3.3 vs 0.8 +/- 2.0; p = 0.005). Multivariable analysis of clinical, angiographic, coronary flow, and scintigraphic data demonstrated that the relative risk of cardiac events (n = 11) was greatest in patients with a reversible angioplasty-zone perfusion defect (relative risk, 5.5), poststenotic coronary flow reserve <2.0 (relative risk, 8.3) and p/d APV ratio >1.7 (relative risk, 6.2). Residual basal coronary flow-velocity abnormalities are significant physiologic correlates of stress-induced myocardial perfusion defects and are a prognostic covariable associated with future ischemic cardiac events.

Utilization of translesional hemodynamics: comparison of pressure and flow methods in stenosis assessment in patients with coronary artery disease

Aim of this study is the assessment of feasibility and clinical usefulness of a new index of stenosis severity, the slope of the instantaneous transstenotic pressure gradient/velocity relationship. Twenty-one patients scheduled for percutaneous revascularization procedures were studied with simultaneous measurement of poststenotic coronary pressure and flow velocity, in basal condition and during maximal hyperemia induced with intracoronary papaverine. Reliable measurements of the transstenotic pressure gradient/velocity relationship could be obtained in 11 patients. In 64% of the cases, a quadratic equation showed the best fit for the data. Steeper increases of the transstenotic pressure gradient at any given velocity increase were observed in the lesions with the smallest cross-sectional area measured with quantitative angiography. A comparison of this new index with coronary flow reserved, maximal hyperemic velocity, stenosis flow reserve derived from quantitative angiography, basal and hyperemic transstenotic pressure gradient and fractional flow reserve is presented and the relative merits of all these parameters are discussed. This pilot experience suggests that the instantaneous relationship between pressure gradient and flow velocity changes during the cardiac cycle can accurately characterize the stenosis hemodynamics in the catheterization laboratory.

Coronary flow velocity changes after intravenous dipyridamole infusion: measurements using intravascular Doppler guide wire. A documentation of flow inhomogeneity

OBJECTIVES

This study assessed changes in coronary flow velocity measured distal to a significant stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery and at the adjacent normal left circumflex coronary artery, produced by intravenous administration of dipyridamole, in patients undergoing coronary angioplasty with a documented perfusion defect on dipyridamole-thallium-201 scintigraphy.

BACKGROUND

Significant flow inhomogeneity is believed to develop during coronary vasodilation induced by dipyridamole, causing a defect in the thallium-201 scintigram. The recently developed intracoronary Doppler guide wire permits assessment of flow velocity variables in normal and stenotic arteries.

METHODS

In 17 patients with stable angina we studied changes in time-averaged peak velocity and the diastolic/systolic velocity ratio simultaneously using two 0.014-in. (0.36-mm) Doppler guide wires at baseline and after 4 min of dipyridamole infusion (0.56 mg/kg body weight). Coronary flow velocity reserve and relative flow reserve were correlated with the degree of stenosis on coronary angiography and quantitative analysis of thallium-201 images.

RESULTS

No changes in distal flow velocity was observed in the stenotic vessel (5.5 +/- 33.7% [mean +/- SD]), in contrast to a significant increase observed in the adjacent normal vessel (162.4 +/- 39.8%). Poststenotic coronary flow velocity reserve correlated with percent lumen diameter stenosis (r = -0.66, p < 0.05). A correlation was also observed between the relative flow reserve/thallium-201 relative perfusion ratio (r = 0.90, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, these findings represent the first direct proof of dipyridamole-induced flow inhomogeneity producing a perfusion defect on thallium-201 imaging. The degree of inhomogeneity is related to the extent of the perfusion defect.

Assessing the physiologic significance of coronary artery disease: role of Doppler methodology

It is important to define both anatomic and functional significance of coronary artery stenoses. Quantitative angiography has decreased the inter- and intraobserver variability in interpreting the coronary angiogram, but it is less clinically applicable in assessing functional significance. The coronary Doppler catheter and guidewire can provide considerable information regarding the functional effects and pathophysiology of coronary stenosis in humans at the time of cardiac catheterization. Clinically, it is a simple and safe technique which makes it feasible in a clinical setting to use it as a tool to assess the physiologic significance of an intermediate stenosis or the functional result of an interventional procedure. Other uses for the intravascular Doppler method, such as the evaluation of cardiac transplant vasculopathy and rejection and evaluation of patients with chest pain syndromes and normal coronary angiograms, are being studied. However, the usefulness of this technique in decision-making has yet to be fully clarified. Future clinical studies should be directed toward comparing this method with noninvasive methods, that is, exercise treadmill test and thallium studies, and attempt to answer questions regarding its prognostic value.