LRF is an essential downstream target of GATA1 in erythroid development and regulates BIM-dependent apoptosis

During EPO or anemia challenge, erythroid progenitor cells transit through a selectively expandable proerythroblast pool

Investigations of bone marrow (BM) erythroblast development are important for clinical concerns but are hindered by progenitor cell and tissue availability. We therefore sought to more specifically define dynamics, and key regulators, of the formation of developing BM erythroid cell cohorts. A unique Kit(-)CD71(high)Ter119(-) "stage E2" proerythroblast pool first is described, which (unlike its Kit(+) "stage E1" progenitors, or maturing Ter119(+) "stage E3" progeny) proved to selectively expand ∼ 7-fold on erythropoietin challenge. During short-term BM transplantation, stage E2 proerythroblasts additionally proved to be a predominantly expanded progenitor pool within spleen. This E1→E2→E3 erythroid series reproducibly formed ex vivo, enabling further characterizations. Expansion, in part, involved E1 cell hyperproliferation together with rapid E2 conversion plus E2 stage restricted BCL2 expression. Possible erythropoietin/erythropoietin receptor proerythroblast stage specific events were further investigated in mice expressing minimal erythropoietin receptor alleles. For a hypomorphic erythropoietin receptor-HM allele, major defects in erythroblast development occurred selectively at stage E2. In addition, stage E2 cells proved to interact productively with primary BM stromal cells in ways that enhanced both survival and late-stage development. Overall, findings reveal a novel transitional proerythroblast compartment that deploys unique expansion devices.

P-Glycoprotein/MDR1 regulates pokemon gene transcription through p53 expression in human breast cancer cells

P-glycoprotein (Pgp), encoded by the multidrug resistance 1 (MDR1) gene, is an efflux transporter and plays an important role in pharmacokinetics. In this study, we demonstrated that the pokemon promoter activity, the pokemon mRNA and protein expression can be significantly inhibited by Pgp. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assay showed that Pgp can bind the pokemon prompter to repress pokemon transcription activity. Furthermore, Pgp regulated pokemon transcription activity through expression of p53 as seen by use of p53 siRNA transfected MCF-7 cells or p53 mutated MDA-MB-231 cells. Moreover, p53 was detected to bind with Pgp in vivo using immunoprecipitation assay. Taken together, we conclude that Pgp can regulate the expression of pokemon through the presence of p53, suggesting that Pgp is a potent regulator and may offer an effective novel target for cancer therapy.

Erythropoietin receptor response circuits

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In 1985-1989, erythropoietin (EPO), its receptor (EPOR), and janus kinase 2 were cloned; established to be essential for definitive erythropoiesis; and initially intensely studied. Recently, new impetus, tools, and model systems have emerged to re-examine EPO/EPOR actions, and are addressed in this review. Impetus includes indications that EPO affects significantly more than standard erythroblast survival pathways, the development of novel erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, increasing evidence for EPO/EPOR cytoprotection of ischemically injured tissues, and potential EPO-mediated worsening of tumorigenesis.

RECENT FINDINGS

New findings are reviewed in four functional contexts: (pro)erythroblast survival mechanisms, new candidate EPO/EPOR effects on erythroid cell development and new EPOR responses, EPOR downmodulation and trafficking, and novel erythropoiesis-stimulating agents.

SUMMARY

As Current Opinion, this monograph seeks to summarize, and provoke, new EPO/EPOR action concepts. Specific problems addressed include: beyond (and before) BCL-XL, what key survival factors are deployed in early-stage proerythroblasts? Are distinct EPO/EPOR signals transduced in stage-selective fashions? Is erythroblast proliferation also modulated by EPO/EPOR signals? What functions are subserved by new noncanonical EPO/EPOR response factors (e.g. podocalyxin like-1, tribbles 3, reactive oxygen species, and nuclear factor kappa B)? What key regulators mediate EPOR inhibition and trafficking? And for emerging erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, to what extent do activities parallel EPOs (or differ in advantageous, potentially complicating ways, or both)?