Isolated tumor cells identified by sentinel lymph node mapping in endometrial cancer: Does adjuvant treatment matter?

A guided tour of selected issues pertaining to metastatic carcinomas involving or originating from the gynecologic tract

Epithelial metastases originating from the gynecologic tract or secondarily involving it frequently display a different morphology when compared to the primary tumor. Furthermore, issues such as modes of metastasis, appropriate nomenclature and prognostic significance remain subjects of discussion and some skepticism. In this review, we will discuss: metastases to uterine adnexa; serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC); serous borderline tumors; metastases from the uterine corpus; and “synchronous” endometrial and ovarian tumors. Three additional themes that will run through the discussions are those that are peculiar, although not restricted to the gynecologic tract: metastasis from non-invasive primary tumors, metastases that look benign and metastases that are benign or clinically indolent.

The utility of sentinel lymph node mapping in the management of endometrial atypical hyperplasia

OBJECTIVES

To determine the risk of endometrial cancer (EC) and lymph node involvement in patients with a preoperative diagnosis of "AH-only" versus "AH - cannot rule out carcinoma" and to study the value of SLN mapping.

METHODS

We reviewed all patients with a preoperative diagnosis of atypical hyperplasia, who underwent primary surgery with SLN mapping followed by pelvic lymphadenectomy. Sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) of SLN and rates of endometrial cancer were calculated.

RESULTS

Overall, 64/120 (53.3%) patients were found to have EC on final pathology: 58 stage IA, 3 IB, and 3 IIIC1. In patients with preoperative diagnosis of "AH", 44.3% (31/70) had EC on final pathology compared to 66% (33/50) in patients with "AH - cannot rule out cancer" (p=0.02). Overall, 3.3% of the patients (4/120) had lymph node involvement. In patients with EC with a pre-operative diagnosis of "AH", none had lymph node metastasis (0/31), compared to 12.1% (4/33) in patients with "AH - cannot rule out cancer" (p=0.06). Elevated preoperative CA125 levels (>25U/mL) were statistically associated with the risk of lymph node metastasis on final pathology (p=0.024). Unilateral and bilateral SLN detection occurred in 93.7% and 78.1% respectively. In patients with EC and bilateral SLN mapping, sensitivity and NPV were respectively 66.6% and 97.9%. There was one false negative (ITCs in non-SLN).

CONCLUSION

Our data indicate that the risk of lymph node involvement in patients with a preoperative diagnosis of "AH-only" is null. Lymph node assessment could be omitted in those patients. Conversely this risk is significant in patients with "AH - cannot rule out cancer". SLN mapping could be a valuable staging procedure in these patients.

[Primary management of endometrial carcinoma. Joint recommendations of the French society of gynecologic oncology (SFOG) and of the French college of obstetricians and gynecologists (CNGOF)]

OBJECTIVES

The management of endometrial carcinoma is constantly evolving. The SFOG and the CNGOF decided to jointly update the previous French recommendations (Institut national du cancer 2011) and to adapt to the French practice the 2015 recommendations elaborated at the time of joint European consensus conference with the participation of the three concerned European societies (ESGO, ESTRO, ESMO).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A strict methodology was used. A steering committee was put together. A systematic review of the literature since 2011 has been carried out. A first draft of the recommendations has been elaborated, with emphasis on high level of evidence. An external review by users representing all the concerned discipines and all kinds of practice was completed. Three hundred and four comments were sent by 54 reviewers.

RESULTS

The management of endometrial carcinoma requires a precise preoperative workup. A provisional estimate of the final stage is provided. This estimation impact the level of surgical staging. Surgery should use a minimal invasive approach. The final pathology is the key of the decision concerning adjuvant therapy, which involves surveillance, radiation therapy, brachytherapy, or chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

The management algorithms allow a fast, state of the art based, answer to the clinical questions raised by the management of endometrial cancer. They must be used only in the setting of a multidisciplinary team at all stages of the management.