Stereotactic radiotherapy of extracranial targets: CT-simulation and accuracy of treatment in the stereotactic body frame

Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy with and without transarterial chemoembolization for small hepatocellular carcinoma not eligible for other ablation therapies: Preliminary results for efficacy and toxicity

AIM

To investigate the efficacy and toxicity of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for the treatment of patients presenting with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in a single institutional setting.

METHODS

Sixteen patients who presented with solitary HCC, including two patients with a tumor thrombus of the portal veins, were treated with stereotactic radiotherapy with or without transarterial chemoembolization. The criteria for stereotactic radiotherapy were existence of technical difficulties for other ablation therapies, inoperable disease or refusal to undergo surgery, tumor staged as Grade A or B according to the Child-Pugh classification, and solitary tumor distant from the gastrointestinal tract and kidney with a tumor volume <100 cm(3). In 14 of 16 patients, a total dose of 35- 50 Gy was delivered in 5-7 fractions over 5-9 days.

RESULTS

At the end of a mean follow-up of 612 days (median 611 days; range 244-994 days), all patients were alive. Eight of 16 patients had complete responses and seven others were judged as stable with lipiodol accumulation. In one patient, local recurrence developed after 489 days. Intrahepatic recurrences developed outside the treated volume in six patients and no extrahepatic metastases developed during follow-up. No serious treatment-related toxic manifestations developed.

CONCLUSIONS

Stereotactic radiotherapy for HCC with or without transarterial chemoembolization is feasible therapy and provides good local control with a short treatment period. Stereotactic radiotherapy may be of clinical benefit in patients who are inoperable or for whom there are difficulties in other ablation therapies.

Innovations in image-guided radiotherapy

The limited ability to control for the location of a tumour compromises the accuracy with which radiation can be delivered to tumour-bearing tissue. The resultant requirement for larger treatment volumes to accommodate target uncertainty restricts the radiation dose because more surrounding normal tissue is exposed. With image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) these volumes can be optimized and tumoricidal doses can be delivered, achieving maximal tumour control with minimal complications. Moreover, with the ability of high-precision dose delivery and real-time knowledge of the target volume location, IGRT has initiated the exploration of new indications for radiotherapy, some of which were previously considered infeasible.

The North American experience with stereotactic body radiation therapy in non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

In North America, the majority of prospective investigation using stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for thoracic targets has been carried out treating medically inoperable patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

METHODS

Because SBRT involves constructing very compact high-dose volumes within the lung for targeting cancer deposits, tumor position must be accurately assessed throughout the respiratory cycle. Measures to account for this motion, either by tracking (chasing), gating, or inhibition (breath hold and abdominal compression) must be used to avoid large margins of error that would expose uninvolved normal tissues. Sophisticated image guidance and related treatment delivery technology have been used primarily for the purpose of targeting the tumor with as low a radiation dose to the surrounding normal tissue as possible.

RESULTS

Phase I dose escalation trials have been carried out in North America to achieve potent tumorcidal dose levels capable of eradicating tumors with high likelihood. These studies indicate a clear dose-response relationship for tumor control with escalating dose of SBRT. While late toxicity requires further careful assessment, acute and subacute toxicity are generally acceptable. Radiographic and local tissue effects consistent with bronchial or vascular damage and downstream collapse with fibrosis are common. While such radiographic changes are most often asymptomatic, more frequent and sometimes debilitating toxicity has been observed for patients with tumors near the central airways.

CONCLUSIONS

Prospective trials using SBRT in North America have been able to identify potent tolerant dose levels and confirm their efficacy in patients with medically inoperable disease. Although mechanisms of this injury remain elusive, ongoing prospective trials offer the hope of finding the ideal application for SBRT in treating pulmonary targets.

A REVIEW OF IMAGE-GUIDED INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY FOR SPINAL TUMORS

OBJECTIVE

A new paradigm for the radiotherapeutic management of paraspinal tumors has emerged. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) has gained wide acceptance as a way of delivering highly conformal radiation to tumors. IMRT is capable of sparing sensitive structures such as the spinal cord of high-dose radiation even if only several millimeters away from the tumor. Image-guided treatment tools such as cone beam computed tomography coupled with IMRT have reduced treatment errors associated with traditional radiotherapy, making highly accurate and conformal treatment feasible.

METHODS

This review discusses the physics of image-guided radiotherapy, including immobilization, the radiobiological implications of hypofractionation, as well as outcomes. Image-guided technology has improved the accuracy of IMRT to within 2 mm of error. Thus, the marriage of image guidance with IMRT (IG IMRT) has allowed the safe treatment of spinal tumors to a high dose without increasing the risk of radiation-related toxicity. With the use of near real-time image-guided verification, very-high-dose radiation has been given for tumors in standard fractionation, hypofractionated, and single fraction schedules to doses beyond levels traditionally believed safe in terms of spinal cord tolerance.

RESULTS

Clinical results, in terms of treatment-related toxicity and tumor control, have been very favorable. With follow-up periods extending beyond 30 months, tumor control rates with single fraction IG IMRT (1800–2400 cGy) are in excess of 90%, regardless of histology, and without serious sequelae such as radiation myelopathy. Patients also report correspondingly high rates of palliation. Excellent results, both in terms of tumor control and minimal toxicity, have been consistently reported in the literature.

CONCLUSION

IG IMRT represents a significant technological advance. Paraspinal IG IMRT is proof of principle, making it possible to give very-high-dose radiation within close proximity to the spinal cord. By reducing treatment-related uncertainties, margins around tumors can be shortened, thereby reducing the volume of normal tissue that must be irradiated to tumoricidal doses, reducing the likelihood of toxicity. Similarly, higher doses of radiation can be administered safely, improving the likelihood of eradication. Dose escalation can be done to increase the likelihood of tumor cell kill without increasing the dose given to nearby sensitive structures.

Clinical outcome of stereotactic body radiotherapy of 54 Gy in nine fractions for patients with localized lung tumor using a custom-made immobilization system

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical outcome of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of 54 Gy in nine fractions for patients with localized lung tumor using a custom-made immobilization system.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The subjects were 19 patients who had localized lung tumor (11 primaries, 8 metastases) between May 2003 and October 2005. Treatment was conducted on 19 lung tumors by fixed multiple noncoplanar conformal beams with a standard linear accelerator. The isocentric dose was 54 Gy in nine fractions. The median overall treatment time was 15 days (range 11-22 days). All patients were immobilized by a thermo-shell and a custom-made headrest during the treatment.

RESULTS

The crude local tumor control rate was 95% during the follow-up of 9.4-39.5 (median 17.7) months. In-field recurrence was noted in only one patient at the last follow-up. The Kaplan-Meier overall survival rate at 2 years was 89.5%. Grade 1 radiation pneumonia and grade 1 radiation fibrosis were observed in 12 of the 19 patients. Treatment-related severe early and late complications were not observed in this series.

CONCLUSION

The stereotactic body radiotherapy of 54 Gy in nine fractions achieved acceptable tumor control without any severe complications. The results suggest that SBRT can be one of the alternatives for patients with localized lung tumors.

Precision required for dose-escalated treatment of spinal metastases and implications for image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT)

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate the precision required in dose-escalated IMRT treatment of spinal metastases and paraspinal tumors.

METHODS

In IMRT treatment plans of nine patients with spinal metastases (n=7) and paraspinal tumors (n=2) translational patient positioning errors (0-10mm) and rotational errors (0-7.5 degrees ) were simulated. The dose to the spinal cord (D5(spine)) resulting from these simulations was evaluated and NTCP for spinal cord necrosis was calculated. All patient set-up errors observed during treatment were simulated and the influence on D5(spine) was investigated.

RESULTS

To keep the dose distribution to the spinal cord within +/-5% (+/-10%) of the prescribed dose, maximum tolerable errors of 1mm (2mm) in the transversal plane, 4mm (7mm) in superior-inferior direction and maximum rotations of 3.5 degrees (5 degrees ) were calculated on average. The translational and rotational component of clinically observed set-up errors increased D5(spine) by 23+/-14% and 3+/-2% on average, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Steep dose gradients of IMRT planning require very high precision. In selected patients correction of both translational and rotational errors may be beneficial.

Target coverage in image-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver tumors

PURPOSE

To determine the effect of image-guided procedures (with computed tomography [CT] and electronic portal images before each treatment fraction) on target coverage in stereotactic body radiotherapy for liver patients using a stereotactic body frame (SBF) and abdominal compression. CT guidance was used to correct for day-to-day variations in the tumor's mean position in the SBF.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

By retrospectively evaluating 57 treatment sessions, tumor coverage, as obtained with the clinically applied CT-guided protocol, was compared with that of alternative procedures. The internal target volume-plus (ITV(+)) was introduced to explicitly include uncertainties in tumor delineations resulting from CT-imaging artifacts caused by residual respiratory motion. Tumor coverage was defined as the volume overlap of the ITV(+), derived from a tumor delineated in a treatment CT scan, and the planning target volume. Patient stability in the SBF, after acquisition of the treatment CT scan, was evaluated by measuring the displacement of the bony anatomy in the electronic portal images relative to CT.

RESULTS

Application of our clinical protocol (with setup corrections following from manual measurements of the distances between the contours of the planning target volume and the daily clinical target volume in three orthogonal planes, multiple two-dimensional) increased the frequency of nearly full (> or = 99%) ITV(+) coverage to 77% compared with 63% without setup correction. An automated three-dimensional method further improved the frequency to 96%. Patient displacements in the SBF were generally small (< or = 2 mm, 1 standard deviation), but large craniocaudal displacements (maximal 7.2 mm) were occasionally observed.

CONCLUSION

Daily, CT-assisted patient setup may substantially improve tumor coverage, especially with the automated three-dimensional procedure. In the present treatment design, patient stability in the SBF should be verified with portal imaging.

Frame-Based Immobilization and Targeting for Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

Frame-based stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), such as that conducted with Elekta's Stereotactic Body Frame, can provide an extra measure of precision in the delivery of radiation to extracranial targets, and facilitates secure patient immobilization. In this paper, we review the steps involved in optimal use of an extra-cranial immobilization device for SBRT treatments. Our approach to using frame-based SBRT consists of 4 steps: patient immobilization, tumor and organ motion control, treatment/planning correlation, and daily targeting with pretreatment quality assurance. Patient immobilization was achieved with the Vac-Loc bag, which uses styrofoam beads to conform to the patient's shape comfortably within the body frame. Organ and motion control was assessed under fluoroscopy and controlled via a frame-mounted abdominal pressure plate. The compression screw was tightened until the diaphragmatic excursion range was < 1 cm. Treatment planning was performed using the Philips Pinnacle 6.2b system. In this treatment process, a 20 to 30 noncoplanar beam arrangement was initially selected and an inverse beam weight optimization algorithm was applied. Those beams with low beam weights were removed, leaving a manageable number of beams for treatment delivery. After planning, daily targeting using computed tomography (CT) to verify x-, y-, and z-coordinates of the treatment isocenter were used as a measure of quality assurance. We found our daily setup variation typically averaged < 5 mm in all directions, which is comparable to other published studies on Stereotactic Body Frame. Treatment time ranged from 30 to 45 minutes. Results demonstrate that patients have experienced high rates of local control with acceptable rates of severe side effects - by virtue of the tightly constrained treatment fields. The body frame facilitated comfortable patient positioning and quality assurance checks of the tumor, in relation to another set of independent set of coordinates defined by the body frame fiducials. The ability to impose abdominal compression proved to be a simple way to reduce target and tissue motion. SBRT with Stereotactic Body Frame enables comfortable patient immobilization and facilitates repeated registering and re-registering of the patient to the frame. With the body frame, large-dose-per fraction treatment is possible for localized tumor deposits with the aim of attaining a more therapeutic result.

Deep-inspiration breath-hold kilovoltage cone-beam CT for setup of stereotactic body radiation therapy for lung tumors: Initial experience

We report our initial experience with deep-inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) cone-beam CT (CBCT) on the treatment table, using the kilovoltage imager integrated into our linear accelerator, for setting up patients for DIBH stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for lung tumors. Nine patients with non-small cell lung cancer (seven stage I), were given 60Gy in three fractions. All nine patients could perform a DIBH for 35s. For each patient we used a diagnostic reference CT volume image acquired during a DIBH to design an SBRT plan consisting of 7-10 noncoplanar conformal beams. Four patients were setup by registering DIBH kilovoltage projection radiographs or megavoltage portal images on the treatment table to digitally reconstructed radiographs from the reference CT. Each of the last 14 fractions out of a total of 27 was setup by acquiring a CBCT volume image on the treatment table in three breath-holds. The CBCT and reference CT volume images were directly registered and the shift was calculated from the registration. The CBCT volume images contained excellent detail on soft tissue and bony anatomy for matching to the reference CT. Most importantly, the tumor was always clearly visible in the CBCT images, even when it was difficult or impossible to see in the radiographs or portal images. The accuracy of the CBCT method was confirmed by DIBH megavoltage portal imaging and each treatment beam was delivered during a DIBH. CBCT acquisition typically required five more minutes than radiograph acquisition but the overall setup time was often shorter using CBCT because repeat imaging was minimized. We conclude that for setting up SBRT treatments of lung tumors, DIBH CBCT is feasible, fast and may result in less variation among observers than using bony anatomy in orthogonal radiographs.

Registration of DRRs and portal images for verification of stereotactic body radiotherapy: a feasibility study in lung cancer treatment

Image guidance has become a pre-requisite for hypofractionated radiotherapy where the applied dose per fraction is increased. Particularly in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for lung tumours, one has to account for set-up errors and intrafraction tumour motion. In our feasibility study, we compared digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) of lung lesions with MV portal images (PIs) to obtain the displacement of the tumour before irradiation. The verification of the tumour position was performed by rigid intensity based registration and three different merit functions such as the sum of squared pixel intensity differences, normalized cross correlation and normalized mutual information. The registration process then provided a translation vector that defines the displacement of the target in order to align the tumour with the isocentre. To evaluate the registration algorithms, 163 test images were created and subsequently, a lung phantom containing an 8 cm(3) tumour was built. In a further step, the registration process was applied on patient data, containing 38 tumours in 113 fractions. To potentially improve registration outcome, two filter types (histogram equalization and display equalization) were applied and their impact on the registration process was evaluated. Generated test images showed an increase in successful registrations when applying a histogram equalization filter whereas the lung phantom study proved the accuracy of the selected algorithms, i.e. deviations of the calculated translation vector for all test algorithms were below 1 mm. For clinical patient data, successful registrations occurred in about 59% of anterior-posterior (AP) and 46% of lateral projections, respectively. When patients with a clinical target volume smaller than 10 cm(3) were excluded, successful registrations go up to 90% in AP and 50% in lateral projection. In addition, a reliable identification of the tumour position was found to be difficult for clinical target volumes at the periphery of the lung, close to backbone or diaphragm. Moreover, tumour movement during shallow breathing strongly influences image acquisition for patient positioning. Recapitulating, 2D/3D image registration for lung tumours is an attractive alternative compared to conventional CT verification of the tumour position. Nevertheless, size and location of the tumour are limiting parameters for an accurate registration process.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy in multiple organ sites

INTRODUCTION

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) uses advanced technology to deliver a potent ablative dose to deep-seated tumors in the lung, liver, spine, pancreas, kidney, and prostate.

METHODS

SBRT involves constructing very compact high-dose volumes in and about the tumor. Tumor position must be accurately assessed throughout treatment, especially for tumors that move with respiration. Sophisticated image guidance and related treatment delivery technologies have developed to account for such motion and efficiently deliver high daily dose. All this serves to allow the delivery of ablative dose fractionation to the target capable of both disrupting tumor mitosis and cellular function.

RESULTS

Prospective phase I dose-escalation trials have been carried out to reach potent tumoricidal dose levels capable of eradicating tumors with high likelihood. These studies indicate a clear dose-response relationship for tumor control with escalating dose of SBRT. Prospective phase II studies have been reported from several continents consistently showing very high levels of local tumor control. Although late toxicity requires further careful assessment, acute and subacute toxicities are generally acceptable. Patterns of toxicity, both clinical and radiographic, are distinct from those observed with conventionally fractionated radiotherapy as a result of the unique biologic response to ablative fractionation.

CONCLUSION

Prospective trials using SBRT have confirmed the efficacy of treatment in a variety of patient populations. Although mechanisms of ablative-dose injury remain elusive, ongoing prospective trials offer the hope of finding the ideal application for SBRT in the treatment arsenal.

Cone-beam computed tomography for on-line image guidance of lung stereotactic radiotherapy: localization, verification, and intrafraction tumor position

PURPOSE

Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in-room imaging allows accurate inter- and intrafraction target localization in stereotactic body radiotherapy of lung tumors.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Image-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy was performed in 28 patients (89 fractions) with medically inoperable Stage T1-T2 non-small-cell lung carcinoma. The targets from the CBCT and planning data set (helical or four-dimensional CT) were matched on-line to determine the couch shift required for target localization. Matching based on the bony anatomy was also performed retrospectively. Verification of target localization was done using either megavoltage portal imaging or CBCT imaging; repeat CBCT imaging was used to assess the intrafraction tumor position.

RESULTS

The mean three-dimensional tumor motion for patients with upper lesions (n = 21) and mid-lobe or lower lobe lesions (n = 7) was 4.2 and 6.7 mm, respectively. The mean difference between the target and bony anatomy matching using CBCT was 6.8 mm (SD, 4.9, maximum, 30.3); the difference exceeded 13.9 mm in 10% of the treatment fractions. The mean residual error after target localization using CBCT imaging was 1.9 mm (SD, 1.1, maximum, 4.4). The mean intrafraction tumor deviation was significantly greater (5.3 mm vs. 2.2 mm) when the interval between localization and repeat CBCT imaging (n = 8) exceeded 34 min.

CONCLUSION

In-room volumetric imaging, such as CBCT, is essential for target localization accuracy in lung stereotactic body radiotherapy. Imaging that relies on bony anatomy as a surrogate of the target may provide erroneous results in both localization and verification.

Internal movement, set-up accuracy and margins for stereotactic body radiotherapy using a stereotactic body frame

The aim of this study was to evaluate the uncertainty of patient immobilization within the Elekta body frame (SBF) used for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and to suggest margins sufficient to ensure dose coverage to the gross target volume (GTV). The study was based on the evaluation of repeated CT-scans of 30 patients treated by SBRT. The overall uncertainty was divided between uncertainty related to internal movement of the tumor and uncertainty in the patient set-up. Standard deviations of the overall tumor displacement were 2 mm, 3 mm and 4 mm in medial-lateral (m-l), anterior-posterior (a-p), and cranio-caudal (c-c) directions, respectively. In a model based on the data, an ellipsoid planned target volume (PTV) corresponding to the standard deviations in the orthogonal directions and a scaling factor, K defined a 3-dimentional (3-D) probability density. According to the model, a 90% probability of full dose coverage of the GTV was secured using margins of 9 mm (m-l), 9 mm (a-p) and 13 mm (c-c), respectively. The overall uncertainty was dominated by internal tumor movements whereas the set-up uncertainty of the patient in the SBF was less pronounced. It was concluded that the Elekta SBF is useful for immobilisation of patients for SBRT. However, due to internal movement conventional margins of 5 mm in m-l and a-p and 10 mm in the c-c directions may be insufficient for full dose coverage.

Cone-beam CT based image-guidance for extracranial stereotactic radiotherapy of intrapulmonary tumors

Cone-beam CT (CB-CT) based image-guidance was evaluated for extracranial stereotactic radiotherapy of intrapulmonary tumors. A total of 21 patients (25 lesions: prim. NSCLC n = 6; pulmonary metastases n = 19) were treated with stereotactic radiotherapy (1 to 8 fractions). Prior to every fraction a CB-CT was acquired in treatment position, errors between planned and actual tumor position were measured and corrected. Intra- and inter-observer variability of manual evaluation of tumor position error was investigated and this manual method was compared with automatic image registration. Based on CB-CTs from 66 fractions the discrepancy (3-D vector) between planned and actual tumor position was 7.7 mm +/-1.3 mm. Tumor position error relative to the bony anatomy was 5.3 mm +/-1.2 mm, the correlation between bony anatomy and tumor position was poor. Intra-observer and inter-observer variability of manual evaluation of tumor position error was 0.9 mm +/-0.8 mm and 2.3 mm +/-1.1 mm, respectively. Automatic image registration showed highly reproducible results (<1 mm). However, compared with manual registration a systematic error was found in direction of predominant tumor breathing motion (2.5 mm vs 1.4 mm). Image-guidance using CB-CT was validated for high precision radiotherapy of intrapulmonary tumors. It was shown that both the planning reference and the verification image study have to consider tumor breathing motion.

Lung tumor tracking during stereotactic radiotherapy treatment with the CyberKnife: Marker placement and early results

Lung tumor tracking during stereotactic radiotherapy with the CyberKnife requires the insertion of markers in or close to the tumor. To reduce the risk of pneumothorax, three methods of marker placement were used: 1) intravascular coil placement, 2) percutaneous intrathoracal, and 3) percutaneous extrathoracal placement. We investigated the toxicity of marker placement and the tumor response of the lung tumor tracking treatment. Markers were placed in 20 patients with 22 tumors: 13 patients received a curative treatment, seven a palliative. The median Charlson Comorbidity Score was 4 (range: 1-8). Platinum fiducials and intravascular embolisation coils were used as markers. In total, 78 markers were placed: 34 intrathoracal, 23 intravascular and 21 extrathoracal. The PTV equaled the GTV + 5 mm. A median dose of 45 Gy (range: 30-60 Gy, in 3 fractions) was prescribed to the 70-85% isodose. The response was evaluated with a CTscan performed 6-8 weeks after the last treatment and routinely thereafter. The median follow-up was 4 months (range: 2-11). No severe toxicity due to the marker placement was seen. Pneumothorax was not seen. The local control was 100%. Four tumors in four patients showed a complete response, 15 tumors in 14 patients a partial response, and three tumors in two patients with metastatic disease had stable disease. No severe toxicity of marker placement was seen due to the appropriate choice of one of the three methods. CyberKnife tumor tracking with markers is feasible and resulted in excellent tumor response. Longer follow-up is needed to validate the local control.

Stereotactic radiotherapy of primary liver cancer and hepatic metastases

The purpose was to evaluate the clinical results of stereotactic radiotherapy in primary liver tumors and hepatic metastases. Five patients with primary liver cancer and 39 patients with 51 hepatic metastases were treated by stereotactic radiotherapy since 1997. Twenty-eight targets were treated in a "low-dose"-group with 3 x 10 Gy (n = 27) or 4 x 7 Gy (n = 1) prescribed to the PTV-encl. 65%-isodose. In a "high-dose"-group patients were treated with 3 x 12 - 12.5 Gy (n = 19; same dose prescription) or 1 x 26 Gy/PTV-enclosing 80%-isodose (n = 9). Median follow-up was 15 months (2-48 months) for primary liver cancer and 15 months (2-85 months) for hepatic metastases. While all primary liver cancers were controlled, nine local failures (3-19 months) of 51 metastases were observed resulting in an actuarial local control rate of 92% after 12 months and 66% after 24 months and later. A borderline significant correlation between dose and local control was observed (p = 0.077): the actuarial local control rate after 12 and 24 months was 86% and 58% in the low-dose-group versus 100% and 82% in the high-dose-group. In multivariate analysis high versus low-dose was the only significant factor predicting local control (p = 0.0089). Overall survival after 1 and 2 years was 72% and 32% for all patients and was impaired due to systemic progression of disease. No severe acute or late toxicity exceeding RTOG/EORTC-score 2 were observed. Stereotactic irradiation of primary liver cancer and hepatic metastases offers a locally effective treatment without significant complications in patients, who are not amenable for surgery. Patient selection is important, because those with low risk for systemic progression are more likely to benefit from this approach.

Intra-fractional uncertainties in cone-beam CT based image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) of pulmonary tumors

PURPOSE

Intra-fractional variability of tumor position and breathing motion was evaluated in cone-beam CT (CB-CT) based image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) of pulmonary tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-four patients (27 lesions: prim. NSCLC n=6; metastases n=21) were treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) (one to eight fractions). Prior to every treatment fraction (n=66) and immediately after treatment a CB-CT was acquired. Patient motion, absolute drift and drift of the tumor relative to the bony anatomy were measured. Tumor motion was investigated based on the density distribution in the CB-CT.

RESULTS

Absolute intra-fractional drift (3D vector) of the tumor position was 2.8 mm+/-1.6 mm (mean +/- SD), maximum 7.2 mm. Poor correlation between patient motion and absolute tumor drift was observed. Changes of the tumor position due to patient motion and due to drifts independently from the bony anatomy were of similar magnitude with 2.1 mm +/- 1.4 mm and 2.3 mm +/- 1.6 mm, respectively. No systematic increase or decrease of breathing motion was seen. The intra-fractional change of breathing motion was more than 2 mm and 3 mm in 39% and 16%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Intra-fractional tumor position and breathing motion were stable. In IGRT of pulmonary tumors we suggest an ITV-to-PTV margin of 5 mm to compensate intra-fractional changes.

The management of respiratory motion in radiation oncology report of AAPM Task Group 76

This document is the report of a task group of the AAPM and has been prepared primarily to advise medical physicists involved in the external-beam radiation therapy of patients with thoracic, abdominal, and pelvic tumors affected by respiratory motion. This report describes the magnitude of respiratory motion, discusses radiotherapy specific problems caused by respiratory motion, explains techniques that explicitly manage respiratory motion during radiotherapy and gives recommendations in the application of these techniques for patient care, including quality assurance (QA) guidelines for these devices and their use with conformal and intensity modulated radiotherapy. The technologies covered by this report are motion-encompassing methods, respiratory gated techniques, breath-hold techniques, forced shallow-breathing methods, and respiration-synchronized techniques. The main outcome of this report is a clinical process guide for managing respiratory motion. Included in this guide is the recommendation that tumor motion should be measured (when possible) for each patient for whom respiratory motion is a concern. If target motion is greater than 5 mm, a method of respiratory motion management is available, and if the patient can tolerate the procedure, respiratory motion management technology is appropriate. Respiratory motion management is also appropriate when the procedure will increase normal tissue sparing. Respiratory motion management involves further resources, education and the development of and adherence to QA procedures.

Excessive toxicity when treating central tumors in a phase II study of stereotactic body radiation therapy for medically inoperable early-stage lung cancer

PURPOSE

Surgical resection is standard therapy in stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, many patients are inoperable due to comorbid diseases. Building on a previously reported phase I trial, we carried out a prospective phase II trial using stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in this population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients included clinically staged T1 or T2 (< or = 7 cm), N0, M0, biopsy-confirmed NSCLC. All patients had comorbid medical problems that precluded lobectomy. SBRT treatment dose was 60 to 66 Gy total in three fractions during 1 to 2 weeks.

RESULTS

All 70 patients enrolled completed therapy as planned and median follow-up was 17.5 months. The 3-month major response rate was 60%. Kaplan-Meier local control at 2 years was 95%. Altogether, 28 patients have died as a result of cancer (n = 5), treatment (n = 6), or comorbid illnesses (n = 17). Median overall survival was 32.6 months and 2-year overall survival was 54.7%. Grade 3 to 5 toxicity occurred in a total of 14 patients. Among patients experiencing toxicity, the median time to observation was 10.5 months. Patients treated for tumors in the peripheral lung had 2-year freedom from severe toxicity of 83% compared with only 54% for patients with central tumors.

CONCLUSION

High rates of local control are achieved with this SBRT regimen in medically inoperable patients with stage I NSCLC. Both local recurrence and toxicity occur late after this treatment. This regimen should not be used for patients with tumors near the central airways due to excessive toxicity.

Benefit of three-dimensional image-guided stereotactic localization in the hypofractionated treatment of lung cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate the benefit of image-guided stereotactic localization in the hypofractionated treatment for medically inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A stereotactic body localizer (SBL) system was used for patient immobilization, reliable image registration among multiphase computed tomography (CT) scanning, and image-guided stereotactic localization. Three sets of CT scans were taken (free breathing, and breath holding at the end-tidal inspiration and expiration, respectively) to contrast target motion. Target delineation was performed on all 3 sets of images and the combination of the targets forms an internal target volume (ITV). In this retrospective study of treatment dose verification, we performed image fusion between the simulation CT scan and each pretreatment CT scan to obtain the same target and critical structure information. The same treatment plans were reloaded onto each pretreatment CT scan with their respective stereotactic coordinate system. The changes in dose distributions were assessed by dose-volume histograms of the planning target volume (PTV) and the critical structures before and after isocenter corrections which were prompted by image-guided stereotactic localization. We compared D95, D99, and V95 for the PTV and internal target volume, and V20 and V30 for the ipsilateral lung.

RESULTS

Our retrospective study for 10 patients with 40 dose reconstructions showed that the average D95, D99, and V95 of the PTVs are 92.1%, 88.1%, and 95.8% of the planned values before isocenter corrections. With the corrections, all of these values are improved to 100% of the planned values.

CONCLUSIONS

Three-dimensional image guidance is crucial for stereotactic radiotherapy of lung tumors.

Accuracy of single-session extracranial radiotherapy for simple shaped lung tumor or metastasis using fast 3-D CT treatment planning

BACKGROUND

This study is situated in the area of measuring set-up accuracy and time periods of single-session extracranial radiotherapy (SSRT) for simple-shaped targets (e.g., spherical or rotational symmetrical) definitively located in the peripheral lung.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

After adaptation of the stereotactic body frame, the patient has to remain in the vacuum pillow during planning computed tomography (CT), fast three-dimensional (3-D) treatment planning, and direct irradiation after verification. Fast preplanning is performed by using virtual simulation software to accelerate the method.

RESULTS

In our new procedure, SSRT is applied in approximately 1.5 h. The mean setup accuracy vector was 2.4+/-0.7 mm in the range of 1.34 to 4 mm. Mean intrafractional patient movement in the stereotactic body frame before and after radiation was 0.70 mm+/-0.5 mm and 0.76+/-0.76 mm in the range of 0 to 2.8 mm. Mean time period steps were measured at (1) planning CT with 3-D treatment planning: 76+/-12 min; (2) irradiation and verification: 33+/-7 min; and (3) complete procedure duration: 109+/-11 min (range, 89-169).

CONCLUSIONS

The main difference between the positioning technique of SSRT and that of conventional extracranial radiosurgery is the tighter patient fixation, which guarantees minimal patient movement. The main advantages are procedure acceleration and omission of CT simulation. SSRT is a preliminary stage of real-time treatment.

Dosimetric comparison of stereotactic body radiotherapy in different respiration conditions: A modeling study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the dosimetric consequences for irradiated lung tissue for different respiration conditions for hypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Thirteen patients with lung lesion undergoing SBRT treatment in shallow breathing with abdominal compression (SB+AP) underwent additional multislice CT studies in free breathing (FB), deep inspiration and expiration breath hold (DIBH, DEBH). For each patient 6 different treatment plans were designed for the various respiration conditions applying standard (7/7/10 mm), reduced (5/5/5 mm) and individual margins. The FB plan with standard margins was used as a reference. The percentage of volume of the ipsilateral lung receiving total doses > or=12, 15> or= and > or=18 Gy, mean lung dose (D(mean)), NTCP corrected for fractionation effects and the total monitor units (MU) were evaluated.

RESULTS

With DIBH it was possible to reduce all lung dose parameters by about 20%. Applying reduced margins in DIBH, this reduction was even increased to about 40%. The standard technique (SB+AP) with individual margins showed similar results as DIBH with standard margins. DEBH showed some improvement over FB only when reduced margins were applied. Only for 5/13 patients NTCP values >1% were obtained. For these patients a significant NTCP reduction was achieved with DIBH techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

In SBRT shallow breathing with abdominal compression produces acceptable results concerning lung DVHs. DIBH, especially with reduced margins, showed the best lung sparing. For the clinical implementation of such a technique some form of gating is advisable. However, there are some practical limitations due to high fractional doses.

Development and application of a real-time monitoring and feedback system for deep inspiration breath hold based on external marker tracking

Respiration can cause tumor movements in thoracic regions of up to 3 cm. To minimize motion effects several approaches, such as gating and deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH), are still under development. The goal of our study was to develop and evaluate a noninvasive system for gated DIBH (GDIBH) based on external markers. DIBH monitoring was based on an infrared tracking system and an in-house-developed software. The in-house software provided the breathing curve in real time and was used as on-line information for a prototype of a feedback device. Reproducibility and stability of the breath holds were evaluated without and with feedback. Thirty-five patients undergoing stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) performed DIBH maneuvers after each treatment. For 16 patients dynamic imaging sequences on a multislice CT were used to determine the correlation between tumor and external markers. The relative reproducibility of DIBH maneuvers was improved with the feedback device (74.5% +/- 17.1% without versus 93.0% +/- 4.4% with feedback). The correlation between tumor and marker was good (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.83 +/- 0.17). The regression slopes showed great intersubject variability but on average the internal margin in a DIBH treatment situation could be theoretically reduced by 3 mm with the feedback device. DIBH monitoring could be realized in a noninvasive manner through external marker tracking. We conclude that reduction of internal margins can be achieved with a feedback system but should be performed with great care due to the individual behavior of target motion.

Extracranial Radiosurgery (Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy) for Oligometastases

Extracranial radiosurgery, also known as stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), is an increasingly used method of treatment of limited cancer metastases located in a variety of organs/sites including the spine, lungs, liver, and other areas in the abdomen and pelvis. The techniques used to perform SBRT were initially modeled after intracranial radiosurgery, although considerable evolution in technique and conduct has occurred for extracranial applications. Unlike intracranial radiosurgery, SBRT requires characterization and accounting for inherent organ movement including breathing motion. Potent dose hypofractionation schedules have been used with SBRT such that the treatment is generally both ablative and convenient. Because the treatment is severely damaging to tissues within and about the target, the volume of adjacent normal tissue must be strictly minimized to avoid toxic late effects. Outcomes in various sites show very high rates of local control with toxicity mostly related to tubular tissues like the airways and bowels. With proper conduct though, SBRT can be an extremely effective treatment option for oligometastases.

Technical note: gold marker implants and high-frequency jet ventilation for stereotactic, single-dose irradiation of liver tumors

With reference to radiosurgery of the liver, we describe techniques designed to solve the methodological problem of striking targets subject to respiratory motion with the necessary precision. Implanting a gold marker in the vicinity of the liver tumor was the first step in ensuring the reproducibility of the isocenter's position. An 18-karat gold rod measuring 1.9 x 3 mm was implanted approximately 2 cm from the edge of the tumor as this was displayed in the spiral, thin-slice CT with contrast media. Both the implantation of the marker and the required, CT-controlled biopsy of the liver tumor can be achieved simultaneously with the same puncture needle. The efficiency of high-frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) in neutralizing the targeted organ's respiratory motion during stereotactic single-dose irradiation was evaluated. The procedure was carried out on ten patients without any complications. In the time between treatment planning and irradiation (3 days), no significant marker migration was observable. In all cases, the gold marker (volume: 7.5 mm(3)) was readily observable in the treatment beam using portal imaging. HFJV provided reliable immobilization. The liver motion in each anesthetized patient was limited to under 3.0 mm in all directions. Thus, the correct field settings and target reproducibility were able to be analyzed and documented during the irradiation. The combination of marker and HFJV enables the determination of stereotactic coordinates directly related to the liver itself and, in this way, stereotactic radiation treatment of liver tumors is freed from the uncertainties involved in orientation to bony landmarks, in respiratory motion, and in changes of position in the stereotactic body frame. The method is feasible and can improve the accuracy of stereotactic body radiation therapy.

Importing measured field fluences into the treatment planning system to validate a breathing synchronized DMLC-IMRT irradiation technique

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Recalculating dose distributions using measured IMRT fluence fields imported into the treatment planning system (TPS) to evaluate the technical feasibility of a prototype developed for breathing synchronized irradiation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

DMLC-IMRT fluence patterns acquired on radiographic film, generated by the linac in non-gated and gated mode, have been imported into the TPS. The effect of dose blurring and possible interplay between organ motion and leaf motion, and the efficacy of a breathing synchronized irradiation technique (an adapted version of a commercially available image-guidance system: NOVALIS BODY/ExacTrac4.0, BrainLAB AG) have been evaluated using radiographic film mounted to a simple phantom simulating a breathing pattern of 16 cycles per minute and covering a distance of 4 cm to obtain the resulting fluence maps. Two situations have been investigated to illustrate this principle: (a) a tumor located close to the diaphragm to assess the influence of organ motion on the dose to the target volume as well as to the gastro-intestinal tract that presents a high risk at intersecting with the beam during the breathing cycle. (b) A mediastinal lesion requiring complicated fluence patterns.

RESULTS

Importing measured fluence maps yielded highly disturbed reconstructed dose distributions in case of the non-gated delivery with the phantom in motion (both orthogonal and parallel to the leaf direction), whereas the measurements from the static (film fixed in space) and the gated delivery showed good agreement with the original theoretical dose distribution. These findings have been confirmed by the dose-volume histograms, corresponding tumor control probabilities, conformity index and dose heterogeneity values. The normal tissue complication probabilities investigated in this study seem to be affected to a lesser degree, which concurs with the observation that the motion effects result in a dose spread in the direction of motion. The applied breathing synchronization technique introduced an increased treatment time with a factor 3-4.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of measured fluence fields, delivered by the linac in non-gated and gated mode, as imported fluence maps for the treatment planning system is an interesting quality assurance tool and revealed the dramatic impact of dose blurring and interplay between DMLC-IMRT dose delivery and organ motion, as well as the potential of breathing synchronization to resolve this issue. The possible advantage of breathing synchronized irradiation is compromised with an increased treatment time.

Speed and amplitude of lung tumor motion precisely detected in four-dimensional setup and in real-time tumor-tracking radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

To reduce the uncertainty of registration for lung tumors, we have developed a four-dimensional (4D) setup system using a real-time tumor-tracking radiotherapy system.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

During treatment planning and daily setup in the treatment room, the trajectory of the internal fiducial marker was recorded for 1 to 2 min at the rate of 30 times per second by the real-time tumor-tracking radiotherapy system. To maximize gating efficiency, the patient's position on the treatment couch was adjusted using the 4D setup system with fine on-line remote control of the treatment couch.

RESULTS

The trajectory of the marker detected in the 4D setup system was well visualized and used for daily setup. Various degrees of interfractional and intrafractional changes in the absolute amplitude and speed of the internal marker were detected. Readjustments were necessary during each treatment session, prompted by baseline shifting of the tumor position.

CONCLUSION

The 4D setup system was shown to be useful for reducing the uncertainty of tumor motion and for increasing the efficiency of gated irradiation. Considering the interfractional and intrafractional changes in speed and amplitude detected in this study, intercepting radiotherapy is the safe and cost-effective method for 4D radiotherapy using real-time tracking technology.

Commissioning and quality assurance of a commercial stereotactic treatment-planning system for extracranial IMRT

A 3D treatment‐planning system (TPS) for stereotactic intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) using a micro‐multileaf collimator has been made available by Radionics. In this work, we report our comprehensive quality assurance (QA) procedure for commissioning this TPS. First, the accuracy of stereotaxy established with a body frame was checked to ensure accurate determination of a target position within the planning system. Second, the CT‐to‐electron density conversion curve used in the TPS was fitted to our site‐specific measurement data to ensure the accuracy of dose calculation and measurement verification in a QA phantom. Using the QA phantom, the radiological path lengths were verified against known geometrical depths to ensure the accuracy of the ray‐tracing algorithm. We also checked inter‐ and intraleaf leakage/transmission for adequate jaw settings. Measurements for dose verification were performed in various head/neck and prostate IMRT treatment plans using the patient‐specific optimized fluence maps. Both ion chamber and film were used for point dose and isodose distribution verifications. To ensure that adjacent organs at risk receive dose within the expectation, we used the Monte Carlo method to calculate dose distributions and dose‐volume histograms (DVHs) for these organs at risk. The dosimetric accuracy satisfied the published acceptability criteria. The Monte Carlo calculations confirmed the measured dose distributions for target volumes. For organs located on the beam boundary or outside the beam, some differences in the DVHs were noticed. However, the plans calculated by both methods met our clinical criteria. We conclude that the accuracy of the XKnife™ RT2 treatment‐planning system is adequate for the clinical implementation of stereotactic IMRT.

PACS numbers: 87.53.Xd, 87.53.Ly, 87.53.Wz

3D optoelectronic analysis of interfractional patient setup variability in frameless extracranial stereotactic radiotherapy

PURPOSE

To investigate size and frequency of interfractional patient setup variability in hypofractionated stereotactic extracranial radiotherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Infrared optical 3D tracking of surface markers was applied to quantify setup variability on 51 patients. Isocenter position repeatability was assessed by means of frameless anatomic calibration and was compared with portal image evaluation. Specific data analysis allowed for compensation of patients' breathing movements and for separation of the effects of operator-dependent misalignments and respiration-induced displacements. Effects of patient position (supine vs. prone) and treatment table configuration were investigated.

RESULTS

Patient positioning assisted by the optical tracking device allowed reducing displacements of surface control points within the 3-mm range. Errors in isocenter localization were in the range of a few millimeters. This was in agreement with the portal image evaluation. Breathing motion introduced appreciable errors, which increased control points and isocenter 3D variability. This effect was significantly higher than those related to other investigated factors.

CONCLUSIONS

The role of infrared optical tracking devices for patient positioning is assessed on a large patient population. Their use in the frame of high-precision radiotherapy is emphasized by the application of related methodologies for breathing phase detection and frameless isocenter localization.

Comparison of two dose calculation methods applied to extracranial stereotactic radiotherapy treatment planning

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Lung tissue is a special challenge for a dose calculation algorithm, especially in the case of extracranial stereotactic radiotherapy (ESRT) due to small field sizes in combination with large variations in tissue density. The present study investigates the choice of dose calculation algorithm for 18 patients with a single lung tumor and 8 patients with a single liver tumor. The dose calculation is performed with both the pencil beam convolution algorithm and the collapsed cone convolution algorithm with the same number of monitor units in both cases. In addition, the dose calculation with the collapsed cone convolution algorithm is also performed with modified field sizes in order to match the Planning Target Volume (PTV) peripheral dose of the pencil beam based treatment.

RESULTS

For liver tumors, the mean Clinical Target Volume (CTV) dose calculated by the collapsed cone convolution algorithm and the pencil beam convolution algorithm is almost identical. For lung tumors, the mean CTV dose determined by the collapsed cone convolution algorithm differs up to 20%. Plans obtained by the two algorithms have field sizes which differ up to 8mm for the same number of monitor units and minimum dose to the lung PTV.

CONCLUSIONS

The choice of dose calculation algorithm can have a large influence on a treatment plan for ESRT of the lungs.

Accurate setup of paraspinal patients using a noninvasive patient immobilization cradle and portal imaging

Because of the proximity of the spinal cord, effective radiotherapy of paraspinal tumors to high doses requires highly conformal dose distributions, accurate patient setup, setup verification, and patient immobilization. An immobilization cradle has been designed to facilitate the rapid setup and radiation treatment of patients with paraspinal disease. For all treatments, patients were set up to within 2.5 mm of the design using an amorphous silicon portal imager. Setup reproducibility of the target using the cradle and associated clinical procedures was assessed by measuring the setup error prior to any correction. From 350 anterior/posterior images, and 303 lateral images, the standard deviations, as determined by the imaging procedure, were 1.3 m, 1.6 m, and 2.1 in the ant/post, right/left, and superior/inferior directions. Immobilization was assessed by measuring patient shifts between localization images taken before and after treatment. From 67 ant/post image pairs and 49 lateral image pairs, the standard deviations were found to be less than 1 mm in all directions. Careful patient positioning and immobilization has enabled us to develop a successful clinical program of high dose, conformal radiotherapy of paraspinal disease using a conventional Linac equipped with dynamic multileaf collimation and an amorphous silicon portal imager.

Immobilization effect of air-injected blanket (AIB) for abdomen fixation

A new device for reducing the amplitude of breathing motion by pressing a patient's abdomen using an air-injected blanket (AIB) for external beam radiation treatments has been designed and tested. The blanket has two layers sealed in all four sides similar to an empty pillow made of urethane. The blanket is spread over the patient's abdomen with both ends of the blanket fixed to the sides of the treatment couch or a baseboard. The inner side, or patient side, of the blanket is thinner and expands more than the outer side. When inflated, the blanket balloons and effectively puts an even pressure on the patient's abdomen. Fluoroscopic observation was performed to verify the usefulness of AIB for patients with lung, breast cancer, or abdominal cancers. Internal organ movement due to breathing was monitored and measured with and without AIB. With the help of AIB, the average range of diaphragm motion was reduced from 2.6 to 0.7 cm in the anterior-to-posterior direction and from 2.7 to 1.3 cm in the superior-to-inferior direction. The motion range in the right-to-left direction was negligible, for it was less than 0.5 cm. These initial testing demonstrated that AIB is useful for reducing patients' breathing motion in the thoracic and abdominal regions comfortably and consistently.

Dose-response in stereotactic irradiation of lung tumors

The dose-response for local tumor control after stereotactic radiotherapy of 92 pulmonary tumors (36 NSCLC and 56 metastases) was evaluated. Short course irradiation of 1-8 fractions with different fraction doses was used. After a median follow-up of 14 months (2-85 months) 11 local recurrences were observed with significant advantage for higher doses. When normalization to a biologically effective dose (BED) is used a dose of 94Gy at the isocenter and 50Gy at the PTV-margin are demonstrated to give 50% probability of tumor control (TCD50). Multivariate analysis revealed the dose at the PTV-margin as the only significant factor for local control.

Combination of longitudinal and circumferential three-dimensional esophageal dose distribution predicts acute esophagitis in hypofractionated reirradiation of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer treated in stereotactic body frame

PURPOSE

To evaluate dosimetric predictors of acute esophagitis (AE) and clinical outcome of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving reirradiation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Seventeen patients with NSCLC received reirradiation to the lung tumors/mediastinum, while immobilized in stereotactic body frame (SBF). CT simulation and hypofractionated three-dimensional radiotherapy were used. Two axial segments of esophagus contours merged together were defined as esophagus disc (ED). For each ED, the percentage (%) of the volume of esophageal circumference treated to % of prescribed dose (PD) was assessed. Number of EDs with 50% or any % of volume (V) of esophageal circumference receiving more than or equal to (>/=) 50%, 80%, and 100% of PD (50% V >/=50% PD; 50% V >/=80% PD; any % V >/=100% PD) were calculated. These dosimetric variables and the length of the esophagus within the radiation therapy (RT) port were correlated with AE using exact Wilcoxon test.

RESULTS

A median RT dose was 32 Gy with a median fraction size of 4 Gy. Eleven of 13 patients presenting with pain and/or shortness of breath had complete or partial resolution of symptoms. Median survival time from the start of reirradiation in SBF until death was 5.5 months. AE was observed in 7 patients and resolved within 3 months of RT completion. No Grade 3 or higher events were noticed. The length of the esophagus within RT port did not predict for AE (p = 0.71). However, an increased number of EDs predicted for AE for the following dosimetric variables: 50% V >/=50% PD (p = 0.023), 50% V >/=80% PD (p = 0.047), and any % V >/=100% PD (p = 0.004). Patients with at least 2 EDs receiving >/=100% PD to any % V of circumference had AE compared to those with zero EDs.

CONCLUSIONS

Reirradiation using hypofractionated three-dimensional radiotherapy and SBF immobilization is an effective strategy for palliation of symptoms in selected patients with recurrent NSCLC. The length of the esophagus in the RT field does not predict for AE. However, an increasing number of EDs displaying the combination of longitudinal and circumferential three-dimensional dose distribution along the esophagus is a valuable predictor for AE.

Extracranial Stereotactic Radiation Delivery

Extracranial stereotactic radiation delivery, also known as stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), involves delivering very potent doses of radiation to well-demarcated tumors in the neck, spine, chest, abdomen, and pelvis. Beyond just stereotactic targeting, it represents a formalism of treatment planning and conduct that facilitates the delivery of the most potent dose fractionation schedules ever considered in the field of radiation oncology. In doing so, it uses the most modern technologies to simultaneously hit the target and avoid normal innocent tissues. Clinical results already show that SBRT constitutes a new paradigm in cancer treatment that deserves careful implementation and assessment for the improvement in patient outcomes.

Stereotaktische Strahlentherapie von Lebermetastasen

Advances in radiation oncology made possible the locally curative treatment approach of stereotactically guided radiation therapy of liver tumours. Results of this highly focussed therapy were published by only a few centres. The radiation dose is delivered in one or a few fractions with high single doses. All published results show high local tumour control with low treatment morbidity. The treatment results of this noninvasive technique are similar to those of minimally invasive ablative therapies. Our own and other published data are summarized and discussed. The long-term results of this technique are currently being evaluated in a prospective multicentre trial.

Impact of IMRT and leaf width on stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver and lung lesions

PURPOSE

The present study explored the impact of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) on stereotactic body RT (SBRT) of liver and lung lesions. Additionally, because target dose conformity can be affected by the leaf width of a multileaf collimator (MLC), especially for small targets and stereotactic applications, the use of a micro-MLC on "uniform intensity" conformal and intensity-modulated SBRT was evaluated.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The present study included 10 patients treated previously with SBRT in our institution (seven lung and three liver lesions). All patients were treated with 3 x 12 Gy prescribed to the 65% isodose level. The actual MLC-based conformal treatment plan served as the standard for additional comparison. In total, seven alternative treatment plans were made for each patient: a standard (actual) plan and an IMRT plan, both calculated with Helax TMS (Nucletron) using a pencil beam model; and a recalculated standard and a recalculated IMRT plan on Helax TMS using a point dose kernel approach. These four treatment plans were based on a standard MLC with 1-cm leaf width. Additionally, the following micro-MLC (central leaf width 3 mm)-based treatment plans were calculated with the BrainSCAN (BrainLAB) system: standard, IMRT, and dynamic arc treatments. For each treatment plan, various target parameters (conformity, coverage, mean, maximal, and minimal target dose, equivalent uniform doses, and dose-volume histogram), as well as organs at risk parameters (3 Gy and 6 Gy volume, mean dose, dose-volume histogram) were evaluated. Finally, treatment efficiency was estimated from monitor units and the number of segments for IMRT solutions.

RESULTS

For both treatment planning systems, no significant difference could be observed in terms of target conformity between the standard and IMRT dose distributions. All dose distributions obtained with the micro-MLC showed significantly better conformity values compared with the standard and IMRT plans using a regular MLC. Dynamic arc plans were characterized by the steepest dose gradient and thus the smallest V(6 Gy) values, which were on average 7% smaller than the standard plans and 20% lower than the IMRT plans. Although the Helax TMS IMRT plans show about 18% more monitor units than the standard plan, BrainSCAN IMRT plans require approximately twice the number of monitor units relative to the standard plan. All treatment plans optimized with a pencil beam model but recalculated with a superposition method showed significant qualitative, as well as quantitative, differences, especially with respect to conformity and the dose to organs at risk.

CONCLUSION

Standard conformal treatment techniques for SBRT could not be improved with inversely planned IMRT approaches. Dose calculation algorithms applied in optimization modules for IMRT applications in the thoracic region need to be based on the most accurate dose calculation algorithms, especially when using higher energy photon beams.

Multifractionated image-guided and stereotactic intensity-modulated radiotherapy of paraspinal tumors: A preliminary report

PURPOSE

The use of image-guided and stereotactic intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) techniques have made the delivery of high-dose radiation to lesions within close proximity to the spinal cord feasible. This report presents clinical and physical data regarding the use of IMRT coupled with noninvasive body frames (stereotactic and image-guided) for multifractionated radiotherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (Memorial) stereotactic body frame (MSBF) and Memorial body cradle (MBC) have been developed as noninvasive immobilizing devices for paraspinal IMRT using stereotactic (MSBF) and image-guided (MBC) techniques. Patients were either previously irradiated or prescribed doses beyond spinal cord tolerance (54 Gy in standard fractionation) and had unresectable gross disease involving the spinal canal. The planning target volume (PTV) was the gross tumor volume with a 1 cm margin. The PTV was not allowed to include the spinal cord contour. All treatment planning was performed using software developed within the institution. Isocenter verification was performed with an in-room computed tomography scan (MSBF) or electronic portal imaging devices, or both. Patients were followed up with serial magnetic resonance imaging every 3-4 months, and no patients were lost to follow-up. Kaplan-Meier statistics were used for analysis of clinical data.

RESULTS

Both the MSBF and MBC were able to provide setup accuracy within 2 mm. With a median follow-up of 11 months, 35 patients (14 primary and 21 secondary malignancies) underwent treatment. The median dose previously received was 3000 cGy in 10 fractions. The median dose prescribed for these patients was 2000 cGy/5 fractions (2000-3000 cGy), which provided a median PTV V100 of 88%. In previously unirradiated patients, the median prescribed dose was 7000 cGy (5940-7000 cGy) with a median PTV V100 of 90%. The median Dmax to the cord was 34% and 68% for previously irradiated and never irradiated patients, respectively. More than 90% of patients experienced palliation from pain, weakness, or paresthesia; 75% and 81% of secondary and primary lesions, respectively, exhibited local control at the time of last follow-up. No cases of radiation-induced myelopathy or radiculopathy have thus far been encountered.

CONCLUSIONS

Precision stereotactic and image-guided paraspinal IMRT allows the delivery of high doses of radiation in multiple fractions to tumors within close proximity to the spinal cord while respecting cord tolerance. Although preliminary, the clinical results are encouraging.

Nonsurgical Therapy for Stages I and II Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

For patients who have stages I and II non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and who are unable or unwilling to undergo surgical resection, nonsurgical treatment modalities have been used with curative intent. Conventionally fractionated radiotherapy has been the mainstay of nonsurgical therapy; however, advances in technology and the clinical application of radiobiologic principles have allowed more accurately targeted treatment that delivers higher effective doses to the tumor, while respecting the tolerance of surrounding normal tissues. This article discusses nonsurgical approaches to the treatment of early-stage NSCLC, including several promising techniques, such as radiation dose escalation, altered radiation fractionation, stereotactic radiotherapy, and radiofrequency ablation.

Influence of calculation model on dose distribution in stereotactic radiotherapy for pulmonary targets

PURPOSE

To compare the pencil beam (PB) and collapsed cone (CC)-based three-dimensional dose calculation used for stereotactic irradiation of pulmonary targets.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Three-dimensional conformal dose distributions (using 6-MV and 18-MV photon beams) were generated for 33 pulmonary targets using the PB algorithm implemented in the Helax-TMS treatment planning system and then recalculated with the CC algorithm of TMS using an identical beam setup and parameters. The differences were analyzed by evaluating the dose-volume histograms for the planning target volume (PTV) and clinical target volume (CTV) and evaluating the computed absolute monitor units (MUs). The influence of the photon energy was also studied. For three cases, the results were compared with Monte-Carlo calculations.

RESULTS

Use of the CC model typically showed increased dose inhomogeneity. Owing to a more accurate modeling of secondary charged particle disequilibrium at the tumor-lung interface, the beam penumbra is broadened. The median and mean target dose decreased by 13.9% and 11.2% for the PTV and 9.2% and 9.4% for the CTV, respectively, using the CC algorithm. Consequently, the average PTV dose coverage decreased by 7.1% (SD, 6.5%). On average, the MUs calculated to achieve the prescribed dose were 5.4% (SD, 5.8%) greater for the CC algorithm. The difference in MUs between the PB and CC increased with decreasing PTV size and high photon energy (18 MV; r = -0.68), reaching 26% at the maximum.

CONCLUSION

The absorbed dose at the lung-tumor interface calculated by the PB algorithm was considerably greater than the dose calculated using the CC algorithm. In small targets (PTV < or = 100 cm(3)) and for 18-MV photons, the MUs calculated with PB may lead to an insufficient dose to the target volume.

Percutaneous Placement of Marking Coils before Stereotactic Radiation Therapy of Malignant Lung Lesions

PURPOSE

To evaluate a technique for implantation of radiopaque markers in lung nodules as an aid in extracranial stereotactic radiation therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An implantation technique was developed for marking intrapulmonary lung lesions by introducing a vascular coil through a coaxial needle in or near the target tumor. The markers were placed percutaneously through 15- or 20-gauge coaxial needles in 41 lesions (25 patients) under computed tomographic fluoroscopic guidance. Two different types of vascular helical coils where used.

RESULTS

All lesions were accessible for puncture and coils could be placed in all lesions. Four types of complications were observed, some as a result of the learning curve in the technique: (i) coil misplacement subcutaneously (5%); (ii) small needle trajectory bleeding in the lung (10%); (iii) pneumothorax, for which one patient (10%) in whom the coil was placed through a 15-gauge coaxial needle needed chest tube drainage and required hospitalization; and (iv) one subcutaneous metastasis probably unrelated to the puncture (2.5%).

CONCLUSION

With this technique, lung nodules can be marked with radiopaque implants in a safe and accurate way.

How can we further improve radiotherapy for stage-III non-small-cell lung cancer?

Combined modality treatment in advanced NSCLC has produced some gain in treatment outcome. Local control as addressed by radiotherapy is still a significant site of failure. Doses higher than achieved by conventional conformal radiotherapy are shown to result in better control rates. Volume restriction seems to be the most important issue in dose escalation. Integration of PET imaging into target definition, omission of clinically uninvolved lymph-node areas and measures to decrease set-up and movement uncertainties are explored. Introduction of risk estimation based on dose-volume analysis for dose prescription may further optimise individual treatment.

Stereotactic radiotherapy for primary lung cancer and pulmonary metastases: a noninvasive treatment approach in medically inoperable patients

PURPOSE

The clinical results of dose escalation using stereotactic radiotherapy to increase local tumor control in medically inoperable patients with Stage I-II non-small-cell lung cancer or pulmonary metastases were evaluated.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Twenty patients with Stage I-II non-small-cell lung cancer and 41 patients with 51 pulmonary metastases not amenable to surgery were treated with stereotactic radiotherapy at 3 x 10 Gy (n = 19), 3 x 12-12.5 Gy to the planning target volume enclosing 100%-isodose, with normalization to 150% at the isocenter; n = 26) or 1 x 26 Gy to the planning target volume enclosing 80%-isodose (n = 26). The median follow-up was 11 months (range, 2-61 months) for primary lung cancer patients and 9 months (range, 2-37 months) for patients with metastases.

RESULTS

The actuarial local control rate was 92% for lung cancer patients and 80% for metastasis patients > or =1 year after treatment and was significantly improved by increasing the dose from 3 x 10 Gy to 3 x 12-12.5 Gy or 1 x 26 Gy (p = 0.038). The overall survival rate after 1 and 2 years was 52% and 32%, respectively, for lung cancer patients and 85% and 33%, respectively, for metastasis patients, impaired because of systemic disease progression. After 12 months, 60% of patients with primary lung cancer and 35% of patients with pulmonary metastases were without systemic progression. No severe acute or late toxicity was observed, and only 2 patients (3%) developed symptomatic Grade 2 pneumonitis, which was successfully treated with oral steroids.

CONCLUSION

Stereotactic radiotherapy for lung tumors offers a very effective treatment option locally without significant complications in medically impaired patients who are not amenable to surgery. Patient selection is important, because those with a low risk of systemic progression are more likely to benefit from this approach.

Radiation and intensity-modulated radiotherapy for metastatic spine tumors

Although promising, many questions remain regarding spinal IMRT. The challenge of patient immobilization must be surmounted before a radiation facility can safely offer spinal IMRT. At many institutions, the increased expense and time requirements from physicists, therapists, and physicians preclude the routine use of IMRT for spinal lesions. Finally, there are no randomized data comparing the safety or efficacy of IMRTwith more conventional means of spinal radiation. Nonetheless, IMRT is one of the most important recent technologic advancements in radiation therapy. For complex treatment problems, such as spinal tumors, in which the surrounding organs at risk traditionally place significant constraints on the prescription dose, IMRT has great potential to provide the ideal solution.

Daily ultrasound-based image-guided targeting for radiotherapy of upper abdominal malignancies

PURPOSE

Development and implementation of a strategy to use a stereotactic ultrasound (US)-based image-guided targeting device (BAT) to align intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) target volumes accurately in the upper abdomen. Because the outlines of such targets may be poorly visualized by US, we present a method that uses adjacent vascular guidance structures as surrogates for the target position. We assessed the potential for improvement of daily repositioning and the feasibility of daily application.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 62 patients were treated by sequential tomotherapeutic IMRT between October 2000 and June 2003 for cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder carcinoma (n = 10), hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 10), liver metastases (n = 11), pancreatic carcinoma (n = 20), neuroblastoma (n = 3), and other abdominal and retroperitoneal tumors (n = 8). The target volumes (TVs) and organs at risk were delineated in contrast-enhanced CT data sets. Additionally, vascular guidance structures in close anatomic relation to the TV, or within the TV, were delineated. Throughout the course of IMRT, US BAT images were acquired during daily treatment positioning. In addition to the anatomic structures typically used for US targeting (e.g., the TV and dose-limiting organs at risk), CT contours of guidance structures were superimposed onto the real-time acquired axial and sagittal US images, and target position adjustments, as indicated by the system, were performed accordingly. We report the BAT-derived distribution of shifts in the three principal room axes compared with a skin-mark-based setup, as well as the time required to perform BAT alignment. The capability of the presented method to improve target alignment was assessed in 15 patients by comparing the organ and fiducial position between the respective treatment simulation CT with a control CT study after US targeting in the CT suite.

RESULTS

A total of 1,337 BAT alignments were attempted. US images were not useful in 56 setups (4.2%), mainly because of limited visibility due to daily variations in colonic and gastric air. US imaging was facilitated in intrahepatic tumors and asthenic patients. The mean +/- SD shift from the skin mark position was 4.9 +/- 4.35, 6.0 +/- 5.31, and 6.0 +/- 6.7 mm in the x, y, and z direction, respectively. The mean magnitude vector of three-dimensional alignment correction was 11.4 +/- 7.6 mm. The proportion of daily alignments corrected by a magnitude of >10, >15, and >20 mm was 48.9%, 25.1%, and 12.7%, respectively. The magnitude of shifts in the principal directions, as well as the three-dimensional vector of displacement, was statistically significant (test against the zero hypothesis) at p <0.0001. The guidance structures that were the most valuable for identification of the TV position were the branches of the portal vein, hepatic artery, and dilated bile ducts in intrahepatic lesions and the aorta, celiac trunk, superior mesenteric artery, and extrahepatic aspects of the portal vein system in retroperitoneal and extrahepatic lesions. The mean total setup time was 4.6 min. The correlation of BAT targeting with target setup error assessment in the control CT scans in 15 patients revealed setup error reduction in 14 of 15 alignments. The average setup error reduction, assessed as a reduction in the length of setup error three-dimensional magnitude vector, was 54.4% +/- 26.9%, with an observed mean magnitude of residual setup error of 4.6 +/- 3.4 mm. The sole worsening of an initial setup was by a magnitude of <2 mm. US targeting resulted in statistically significant improvements in patient setup (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Daily US-guided BAT targeting for patients with upper abdominal tumors was feasible in the vast majority of attempted setups. This method of US-based image-guided tumor targeting has been successfully implemented in clinical routine. The observed improved daily repositioning accuracy might allow for individualized reduction of safety margins and optional dose escalation. Compared with the established application of the BAT device for prostate radiotherapy, in which the target can be directly visualized, the TV in the present study was predominantly positioned relative to guidance vascular structures in close anatomic relation. We perceived an enormous potential in improved and individualized patient positioning for fractionated radiotherapy and also for stereotactic extracranial radiotherapy and radiosurgery, especially for tumors of the liver and pancreas.