A double-blind trial of metoprolol in acute myocardial infarction. Effects on ventricular tachyarrhythmias

Parasympathetic muscarinic stimulation limits noradrenaline induced myocardial creatine kinase release: a study in the isolated perfused working rat heart

It has long been known that high concentrations of catecholamines may induce myocardial damage, and aggravate ischaemic injury. It has also been shown that beta-blockade may protect the myocardium from ischaemic damage. Stimulation of muscarinic receptors modulates beta-adrenergic receptor affinity for isoproterenol and attenuates isoproterenol induced adenylyl cyclase activation. Effects of muscarinic receptor stimulation were therefore investigated in isolated anterogradely perfused rat hearts under different experimental conditions. One group of hearts was perfused with noradrenaline, 10(-6) mol l-1 for 45 min, and another group was perfused with different carbachol concentrations (3 x 10(-7)-10(-5) mol l-1) with or without noradrenaline 10(-6) mol l-1, for 45 min. Release of creatine kinase to the perfusion buffer was taken as a sign of cell damage. Heart rate, left ventricular maxdP/dt and left ventricular pressure were measured throughout the perfusion time by insertion of a 20 gauge cannula through the left ventricular wall near the base. Carbachol (3 x 10(-7) mol l-1) alone induced a decrease of heart rate by 25% and maxdP/dt by 13%. Noradrenaline produced a 20% increase in heart rate, whereas the combination of noradrenaline plus carbachol induced a minor decrease in heart rate. Muscarinic receptor stimulation alone decreased myocardial contractility. However, when combined with noradrenaline no decrease in contractility was seen. Also, the release of creatine kinase to the perfusion buffer containing the combination of carbachol plus noradrenaline was reduced. Thus, muscarinic receptor stimulation protected the myocardium from catecholamine induced damage at concentrations where no change in contractility was seen.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Osmotic release oral drug delivery system of metoprolol in hypertensive asthmatic patients. Pharmacodynamic effects on beta 2-adrenergic receptors

This study investigated the effects of an osmotic release oral drug delivery system of metoprolol on the changes induced by cumulative doses of inhaled salbutamol on bronchomotor tone, skeletal muscle, and the circulatory system after single (day 1) and multiple (day 7) dosing in 18 hypertensive asthmatic patients (forced expiratory volume in 1 second > 50% predicted; diastolic blood pressure > 90 mm Hg). The patients were given 14/190 mg metoprolol, 100 mg atenolol, and placebo once daily for a 7-day period each in a randomized, double-blind, crossover design. At the estimated time of peak plasma concentrations, cumulative doses of salbutamol (12.5, 37.5, 112.5, 412.5, 812.5, and 1612.5 micrograms) were applied every 20 minutes. Specific airway conductance, finger tremor amplitude, heart rate, and blood pressure were registered at baseline and at each dose increment. The slopes of the salbutamol dose-response curves of specific airway conductance did not differ on day 1 (P > .05). On day 7, atenolol caused a shift of the dose-response curves of specific airway conductance to the right (P < .05), whereas metoprolol was indistinguishable from placebo (P > .05). The median cumulative salbutamol concentrations causing a 50% increase in specific airway conductance were 416 and 384 micrograms (days 1 and 7, respectively) for placebo, 594 and 444 micrograms for metoprolol, and 562 and 1419 micrograms for atenolol. The median cumulative salbutamol concentrations causing a 35% increase in tremor were 732 and 706 micrograms for placebo, 812 and 1213 micrograms for metoprolol, and 797 and 1323 micrograms for atenolol.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Ventricular arrhythmias in the acute and chronic phases after acute myocardial infarction. Effect of intervention with captopril

BACKGROUND

Ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) are independent predictors of mortality in survivors of myocardial infarction (MI), and they are more likely to be induced in dilated hearts with increased wall stress. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have been shown to prevent progressive dilation of the left ventricle after MI.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The effects of captopril were evaluated in 58 patients with left ventricular (LV) dysfunction after MI. Patients were randomized on day 7 to either placebo or captopril (50 mg daily) in a double-blind parallel study over a period of 6 months. Patients were followed up by means of ambulatory ECG monitoring and echocardiography. There was a significant increase in VA in the placebo group (P < .05) in contrast to a significant decrease in the captopril group (P < .05). As a consequence, there was a significant between-group difference after 6 months (P < .05). Furthermore, the number of patients without VA at baseline who presented with this at the completion of the study was 6% in the captopril group versus 38% in the placebo group (P < .05). At baseline as well as at the termination of the study, LV end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVI) and LV end-systolic volume index (LVESVI) were significantly increased among patients with VA (P < .01). On day 180, both myocardial ischemia and an increase in the LVEDVI were independent predictors of VA; however, progressive dilation of the left ventricle was confined to the placebo patients with significant increases in the LVEDVI compared with the captopril group: 17% versus 0%, respectively (P < .01). Furthermore, the duration of ambulatory ST-segment depression was significantly longer in this group compared with the captopril group (P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Dilation of the left ventricle and myocardial ischemia predict VA during both the acute and chronic phases after MI. In post-MI patients with LV dysfunction, captopril has a beneficial effect on both the number of complex VAs as well as the number of patients who develop VA during the chronic phase. This is in all probability mediated through effects on both LV remodeling, LV function, and myocardial ischemia in patients who are exposed to an increased risk of undergoing progressive dilation of the left ventricle.

Empiric therapy with beta-blockers

The only class of drugs with significant effects on ventricular fibrillation and sudden death in humans is that of beta-blockers. The exact mechanisms for these prophylactic effects are not known but may be related to both antiischemic or antiarrhythmic influences. It seems reasonable to suggest that one should use a beta-blocker with proven effect on total mortality and sudden cardiac death after myocardial infarction as prophylaxis. Therefore, propranolol, timolol, or metoprolol, should be instituted in order to improve prognosis when there are no contraindications. In addition to possible effects on survival one would also expect to reduce the risk for new ischemic events with angina or reinfarction. In contrast, class I antiarrhythmic agents are useful for symptomatic ventricular arrhythmias but there is no proof for any effect on ventricular fibrillation and sudden cardiac death.

Significance of arrhythmias during the first 24 hours of acute myocardial infarction treated with alteplase and effect of early administration of a beta-blocker or a bradycardiac agent on their incidence

BACKGROUND

Although early intravenous beta-blocker therapy during acute myocardial infarction (AMI) reduces the incidence of fatal arrhythmias in patients not treated with thrombolytic agents, its antiarrhythmic effect in thrombolysed patients remains controversial. We investigated prospectively the arrhythmia incidence in 244 patients with AMI receiving alteplase and a double-blind randomized adjunctive therapy with intravenous atenolol, alinidine, or placebo. Moreover, the characteristics and prognostic significance of early arrhythmias and their relation with infarct size and coronary patency were evaluated.

METHODS AND RESULTS

All patients underwent 24-hour Holter monitoring on day 1 and were clinically followed in the hospital for 10 to 14 days. Coronary angiography was performed on day 10 to 14. Atenolol and alinidine significantly decreased the basic heart rate without causing more sinus arrest or higher-degree atrioventricular block. The prevalence of atrial fibrillation in alinidine patients was lower than in the atenolol patients (P = .007) but not lower than in placebo patients (P = .11). There was no effect of either agent on the incidence and frequency distribution of ventricular or supraventricular premature beats or on the incidence and characteristics of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia, accelerated idioventricular rhythm, sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT), or ventricular fibrillation (VF). On day 1, seven VF episodes were recorded in six patients (2.5%) and five VT episodes in five patients (2%). VF always started at < 2.5 hours after start of thrombolytic treatment and VT always at > 2.5 hours (average of 6 hours). Five of the seven VF and three of the five VT episodes started with an R-on-T. However, for all VT, the morphology of the first beat was the same as that of the following beats, suggesting that the sustained arrhythmia was not induced by an extrasystole. After day 1 and before hospital discharge, VF and VT developed in one and six patients, respectively. Three of the seven patients who developed VF during the first 2 weeks underwent coronary angiography; all three had an occluded infarct-related artery. In contrast, only one of nine patients with early or late VT had an occluded vessel. Patients with VT and VF on day 1 had a significantly larger enzymatic infarct size than those without the arrhythmia (P = .02), and a similar trend was noted for VT or VF after day 1 (P = .19). However, none of the patients with VT or VF on day 1 developed a life-threatening arrhythmia later during the hospital stay. Also, none of the seven patients with VT or VF after day 1 had experienced a major rhythm disturbance during the first 24 hours.

CONCLUSIONS

(1) Our data do not support the hypothesis that beta-blockers or bradycardiac agents might reduce the incidence of major arrhythmias when used in conjunction with thrombolytic therapy. (2) The pathogeneses of VT and VF early during AMI are clearly distinct. (3) VT or VF during the first 2 weeks is a marker for a larger infarct. (4) We could not detect a relation between malignant arrhythmias on day 1 and recurrences within the following 2 weeks.

Beta-blockers in heart failure: promising or proved?

Despite recent improvements in the management of congestive heart failure, the prognosis of many patients with this condition remains poor. The level of neurohormonal activation appears to be predictive of survival, and clinical studies indicate that inhibition of overactivated neurohormonal systems may be beneficial. Activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system is well documented in heart failure, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition now has an established role in treatment based on evidence of hemodynamic, symptomatic and mortality benefit. Sympathetic nervous system activation also occurs as a compensatory mechanism in heart failure but with long-term deleterious effects. Increasing evidence suggests that beta-adrenergic blockade can produce hemodynamic and symptomatic improvement in heart failure of idiopathic or ischemic etiology. Trials of beta-adrenergic blocking agents in patients after myocardial infarction suggest a beneficial effect on mortality, even among those with heart failure. However, there remains uncertainty as to how generalizable are the results from the postinfarction trials, particularly in the current therapeutic environment with routine angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy. Appropriately powered randomized, controlled trials are required to determine precisely the balance of benefit and risk resulting from long-term beta-blocker therapy in patients with heart failure of ischemic and other etiology.

Early intravenous beta blockade and thrombolytics in acute myocardial infarction

This article discusses therapy with beta blockade and thrombolytic agents in acute myocardial infarction. In large and well-controlled studies both treatment strategies have been shown to increase survival. Both therapies have also been demonstrated to be safe in acute myocardial infarction. Historically, the 2 different treatment strategies have been tested during different time periods, resulting in few studies with the main objective to study the combined effects of the 2 agents. From the data that are presently available, however, there is a clear suggestion of additive beneficial effect and the 2 treatments given in combination are well tolerated.

Sudden cardiac death and the potential role of beta-adrenoceptor-blocking drugs

Sudden cardiac death is a major health problem in the industrially developed countries. The risk of sudden cardiac death may be reduced by early detection of coronary heart disease, elimination of the risk factors, treatment of the ischaemia in patients known to have coronary heart disease and suppression of ventricular arrhythmias. Of all the therapeutic measures currently available to reduce the risk of sudden cardiac death, beta-adrenoceptor-blocking drugs (beta blockers) appear to be the most effective. In this paper their actions are reviewed and evidence for their efficacy is presented.

Direct effect of dobutamine on action potential duration in ischemic compared with normal areas in the human ventricle

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The arrhythmogenic effect of beta-adrenoceptor stimulation is complex and may differ in ischemic and normal myocardium. In this study we examined the differential effect of beta-adrenergic stimulation on ventricular action potential duration and, hence, dispersion of repolarization in potentially ischemic versus nonischemic human ventricular myocardium.

METHODS

Simultaneous biventricular monophasic action potentials were recorded in 14 patients (28 recording sites) during infusion of dobutamine in incremental doses (low dose 5 micrograms/kg per min, high dose 10 to 15 micrograms/kg per min) during atrial pacing. Perfusion at the action potential recording site was assessed by incorporating myocardial perfusion scintigraphy with injection of technetium-99m hexakis-2-methoxy-2-methylpropyl-isonitrile during the recording at peak doses of dobutamine. Action potential duration during dobutamine infusion was compared with that during atrial pacing to identical rates in the absence of dobutamine.

RESULTS

In 21 normal zone recordings, dobutamine produced a variable effect over that produced by atrial pacing to identical heart rates, either lengthening or shortening the action potential duration. The mean (+/- SEM) value for the additional effect of dobutamine was 0.9 +/- 2.5 ms with low doses and -4 +/- 2.6 ms with high doses (p = NS). In seven recordings from potentially ischemic zones, low dose dobutamine had a similar effect (mean change -3.4 +/- 6.5 ms; p = NS vs. normal zone values). However, the high dose dobutamine invariably shortened the action potential duration by a mean of -22.9 +/- 2.9 ms. (p less than 0.05 vs. low dose in ischemic areas, p less than 0.01 vs. normal zone recordings). Pacing alone or the addition of dobutamine had no significant effect on the normal dispersion of action potential duration between two nonischemic recording sites. In recordings in a normal and an abnormally perfused site, high dose dobutamine significantly altered the dispersion of action potential duration.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest a different effect of beta adrenergic stimulation in potentially ischemic compared with nonischemic human ventricular myocardium. The abnormal dispersion of repolarization thus created may well be important in beta-receptor-mediated arrhythmogenesis during myocardial ischemia.

Adjuvant metoprolol improves efficacy of class I antiarrhythmic drugs in patients with inducible sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia

Inducible ventricular tachycardia frequently persists despite solitary class I antiarrhythmic drug therapy. To determine the effect of metoprolol as adjuvant therapy, 19 patients with clinical ventricular tachycardia with baseline inducible sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia and persistently inducible ventricular tachycardia despite class I drugs were evaluated. Eight of 19 patients (42%) became noninducible when metoprolol was added to class I drug therapy. Sixteen of 19 patients (84%) were harder to induce or noninducible on a regimen of adjuvant metoprolol therapy. In evaluating the clinical characteristics of the 19 patients, no significant differences were found between patients who were persistently inducible and those rendered noninducible. In evaluating the electrophysiologic characteristics, the group eventually rendered noninducible had a significantly shorter baseline induced cycle length (259 +/- 27 vs 305 +/- 53 msec). Combination class I drug and metoprolol therapy significantly lengthened the ventricular effective refractory period in both groups compared with baseline. The long-term follow-up was excellent in all patients remaining on metoprolol in the noninducible group. Therefore adjuvant metoprolol therapy creates a significant improvement in a number of patients with persistently inducible ventricular tachycardia despite class I drug therapy.

Declining incidence of ventricular fibrillation in myocardial infarction. Implications for the prophylactic use of lidocaine

BACKGROUND

The purposes of the present investigation were 1) to track the incidence of primary ventricular fibrillation (VF) in the control and lidocaine-treated groups in the randomized control trials (RCTs) of lidocaine prophylaxis against primary VF in acute myocardial infarction, with particular emphasis on the time frame of the randomized trial, and 2) to estimate the number of patients who must receive lidocaine currently to prevent one episode of VF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The following variables from RCTs published between 1969 and 1988 were entered into logistic regression models to predict the percent of patients developing VF: year of publication of the RCT, method of data analysis used in the RCT, route and technique of lidocaine administration, duration of monitoring for VF, and exclusion criteria before randomization (congestive heart failure/cardiogenic shock, ventricular tachycardia/VF, or bradycardia/atrioventricular block). Year of publication was a significant predictor of VF in both the control and lidocaine groups (p less than or equal to 0.002) even after adjusting for other covariates. Based on a univariate logistic regression model with year as the predictor variable, it was estimated that the incidence of primary VF in the control group fell from 4.51% in 1970 to 0.35% in 1990 and from 4.32% down to 0.11% for the lidocaine group over the same time period. Thus, about 400 patients would currently need prophylaxis with lidocaine to prevent one episode of VF.

CONCLUSIONS

Present estimates of the risk:benefit ratio of lidocaine prophylaxis should consider the low risk of VF in control patients and the large number who need lidocaine prophylaxis to prevent one episode of VF. When added to the previously reported trend toward excess mortality in lidocaine-treated patients, these data argue against the routine prophylactic use of lidocaine in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Arrhythmias during the acute phase of reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction: Effects of β-adrenergic blockade

In 107 patients with acute myocardial infarction, the incidence of ventricular arrhythmias during the acute phase of thrombolysis was examined by means of Holter monitoring. In patients with a patient infarct-related artery as assessed angiographically at 90 minutes, the occurrence of accelerated idioventricular rhythms was noted significantly more frequently than in patients with a permanent occluded vessel. This arrhythmia peaked in the first 180 minutes after the start of thrombolysis. In addition, single ventricular premature beats and runs of ventricular tachycardia were also more common in patients with successful reperfusion. The effects of acute intravenous administration of beta-blockers were examined in 66 patients without contraindications to this therapeutic approach. There were no differences in the occurrence of any type of rhythm disorders in patients with (n = 43) or without beta-blockade (n = 23). Thus ventricular arrhythmias particularly accelerated idioventricular rhythms, and single ventricular premature beats occur more frequently in patients with a patent infarct artery within the first 24 hours after thrombolysis. Acute intravenous beta-blockade does not appear to exert significant antiarrhythmic effects during this period.

Reducing the risk for coronary heart disease and stroke in hypertensives--comments on mechanisms for coronary protection and quality of life

The four most popular classes of antihypertensive drugs may all be considered suitable choices when initiating treatment for hypertension. The practitioner must decide which agent is appropriate for each individual patient. The main goal of treatment should be to prevent coronary events and stroke, while preserving quality of life. A 40% reduction in stroke can probably be achieved with any antihypertensive treatment, a reduction in coronary events is much harder to achieve. Available evidence from studies in men, summarized in this review, indicates that beta-blockade is superior to thiazide diuretics for the prevention of coronary events. Clinical trials have not yet produced long-term prognostic data on the effects of ACE-inhibitors or calcium antagonists on coronary events in hypertensive patients. A recent review on calcium antagonists in post-MI patients concluded that the results were disappointing, as pooled data actually showed a trend towards increased mortality with calcium antagonists as compared with placebo. Because of the large number of hypertensive patients at increased risk for coronary events in the community, the difference observed in coronary events between beta-blockade and other first-line drugs in hypertension (24%) may have important implications for clinical practice. This overall conclusion, however, has to be accepted with some reservations in view of the following observations. Firstly, no reduction in sudden death has been observed with the hydrophilic beta-blockers. Secondly, no reduction in coronary mortality in the smoking subgroup has been observed with the non-selective beta-blockers. Thus, it seems that the prevention of coronary events is more likely to be observed in patients given beta-blockers with certain pharmacological characteristics: relative lipophilicity, which enables passage of the beta-blocker through the blood-brain barrier to exert effects on pertinent central nervous beta 1-receptors. This is potentially useful in reducing the risk of sudden death. The addition of beta 1-selectivity is important for the risk reduction in smokers. Cardioselectivity is also an advantage in relation to side-effects and quality of life. The reduced risk for coronary events with certain beta-blockers is probably independent of the reduction in blood pressure: possible mechanisms studied are cardiac anti-ischaemic effects, antifibrillatory effects, antiatherosclerotic and anti-thrombotic effects.

Controlled release metoprolol. Clinical pharmacokinetic and therapeutic implications

Metoprolol is a relatively beta 1-selective beta-blocker used extensively to treat hypertension and angina and as a prophylaxis after myocardial infarction. Conventional formulations are usually administered twice daily and the drug has a tendency to lose its selectivity of action at higher plasma concentrations. Two controlled release formulations, metoprolol CR and metoprolol 'Oros', have made it possible to achieve sustained beta 1-blockade over an entire 24h period and to minimise the loss of selectivity associated with higher plasma concentrations. The CR formulation has been extensively investigated and is the major subject of this review. The 'Oros' formulation is pharmaceutically different from the CR, yet both produce similar plasma concentration profiles and comparable beta 1-blocking effects. The availability of these preparations occurs at a time when increasingly persuasive data are becoming available on the cardioprotective or coronary preventive action of metoprolol.

Long-term prognosis after early intervention with metoprolol in suspected acute myocardial infarction: experiences from the MIAMI Trial. The MIAMI Trial Research Group

A total of 5778 patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction were randomized to early intravenous metoprolol followed by oral treatment for 15 d, or to placebo. Thereafter, the two groups were treated similarly. During a 1-year follow-up period the mortality in patients who were randomized to early metoprolol was 10.6% compared to 10.7% for placebo (P greater than 0.2). Among patients with a higher risk of death, the tendency towards a reduced mortality in the metoprolol group that was observed after 15 d remained similar after 1 year. It is concluded that early intervention with metoprolol in suspected acute myocardial infarction did not improve the long-term prognosis compared to placebo treatment.

Effects of beta-adrenoceptor antagonism upon delayed reperfusion arrhythmias in conscious dogs

Whereas isolated heart preparations or anesthetized animals have been used to assess the actions of beta-adrenoceptor antagonists upon reperfusion-induced arrhythmias, this study evaluated the possible antiarrhythmic effects of beta-adrenoceptor antagonism in conscious animals. Conscious, chronically instrumented dogs were subjected to a temporary occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery for 4 h. After the first hour of reperfusion, flestolol (N-(1,1-dimethyl-2- ureidoethyl)-2-hydroxy-3-(O-fluorobenzoyloxy)-propylamine sulfate), an ultra short-acting beta-adrenoceptor antagonist, was administered i.v. at infusion rates of 1 and 2.6 micrograms/kg per min. A control group received the equivalent volume of saline during this period. Delayed reperfusion-induced arrhythmias were evaluated by using a computerized analysis system. Treatment with flestolol did not affect the total number of beats, the number of normal and ectopic beats, and the arrhythmic ratio, i.e. the ratio of ectopic beats to the total number of beats. Hence, beta-adrenoceptor antagonism does not appear to suppress delayed ectopic activity during coronary reperfusion in conscious dogs.

Metoprolol versus thiazide diuretics in hypertension. Morbidity results from the MAPHY Study

The present study in hypertensive men (40-64 years old) with untreated diastolic blood pressure above 100 mm Hg was aimed at investigating whether metoprolol (n = 1,609) given as initial treatment would lower the risk for coronary events (sudden death and myocardial infarction) more effectively than thiazide diuretics (n = 1,625). A substantial part of this study was the metoprolol arm of the Heart Attack Primary Prevention in Hypertension (HAPPHY) study. The HAPPHY study was a pooling of the effect of different beta-blockers, mainly metoprolol and atenolol, in which no favorable effect in relative risk was observed for atenolol as compared with diuretics. In the present study, 255 patients suffered definite coronary events during follow-up; 25% of these events were fatal, 39% were acute myocardial infarctions, and 36% were silent myocardial infarctions. The risk for coronary events was significantly lower in patients on metoprolol than in patients on diuretics (111 versus 144 cases, p = 0.001, corresponding to 14.3 versus 18.8 cases/1,000 patient years and a relative risk of 0.76 at the end of the trial; 95% confidence interval 0.58-0.98). This difference in risk has potentially important implications for clinical practice because of the large number of hypertensive patients who are at increased risk for coronary events. Because a placebo group, for ethical reasons, could not be included, relative risk can only be expressed in relation to diuretics. There was no difference between the two treatment groups in baseline characteristics, blood pressure during follow-up, or stroke rates. Thus, the difference in risk for coronary events is probably mediated via mechanisms other than blood pressure control. However, present data might suggest that different beta-blockers may have different efficacy in preventing coronary events. The reasons for this possibility are as yet unknown.

Do antiarrhythmic drugs work? Some reflections on the implications of the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial

Despite major advances in our understanding of the mechanisms of cardiac arrhythmias and how antiarrhythmic drugs appear to work, there remains much doubt whether these agents reduce arrhythmic mortality except in certain subsets of patients. The results of the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST) have indicated that certain antiarrhythmic drugs not only "fail to work" but may substantially increase mortality. The effects of Class Ic agents in CAST and the meta-analysis of randomized antiarrhythmic trials in the survivors of acute infarction suggest that drugs that act primarily by delaying conduction are particularly deleterious in the survivors of acute infarction. Whether these data have a wide applicability in terms of all ventricular arrhythmias is unclear, but beta-blockers remain the only class of agents that in control trials have been shown to reduce sudden death. The effect appears to be related to beta-blockade and not to suppression of premature ventricular contractions (PVCs). Beta blockers appear to act by preventing ventricular fibrillation. It is reasonable to assume that PVC suppression per se is unlikely to produce a reduction in sudden death. Uncontrolled data with amiodarone suggests that it has the potential to prolong survival by controlling arrhythmias. The effects of amiodarone and beta blockers, both significantly attenuating adrenergic stimulation, provide pharmacologic probes to define the crucial determinants of efficacy of a compound for mortality reduction in high risk survivors of myocardial infarction. The focus must now shift from antiectopic and antiarrhythmic agents that delay conduction to those that exert antifibrillatory actions by sympathetic antagonism and those that exhibit the added property of lengthening myocardial refractoriness.

Advantages of beta blockers versus antiarrhythmic agents and calcium antagonists in secondary prevention after myocardial infarction

Patients who have sustained greater than or equal to 1 myocardial infarcts are at high risk for sudden death or reinfarction; the risk is highest for those with lowest ventricular ejection fraction, continuing myocardial ischemia and asymptomatic high-density and complex premature ventricular contractions. At present, beta blockers when given prophylactically are the only agents that reduce the incidence of sudden death and reinfarction in survivors of myocardial infarction (MI) in the first 2 years. The beneficial effect was shown to correlate with a reduction in heart rate, the effect being absent or deleterious with beta blockers with marked sympathomimetic activity. The effects of beta blockers on ventricular fibrillation appeared to be dissociated from those on premature ventricular contractions. Trials with calcium antagonists indicate that these drugs had no effect or increased the mortality rate. The divergent effect of beta blockers and calcium antagonists is unexplained but may be due in part to a lack of bradycardiac effect of calcium antagonists; there were no differences in effect among different calcium antagonists. Data from trials involving class I antiarrhythmic agents indicate that agents acting by depression of cardiac conduction are either devoid of effect or produce a modest increase in mortality. Results of the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial, employing the newer class I agents flecainide and encainide, were used to determine whether the suppression of premature ventricular contractions in the survivors of acute MI reduces mortality. Flecainide and encainide suppressed premature ventricular contractions greater than 80%, but resulted in an increased mortality rate undoubtedly due to a marked proarrhythmic effect. Whether these data can be extrapolated to all class I agents is uncertain. Preliminary data with class III antiarrhythmic agents suggest that these agents, especially amiodarone, similarly to beta blockers, have the potential to reduce mortality in survivors of MI. Evolving data suggest that in the secondary prevention of morbid events in the survivors of acute MI, the focus must shift away from antiarrhythmic agents that delay conduction and toward beta blockers and antifibrillatory actions resulting from a prolongation of refractoriness.

Prevention of sudden death by beta-blockade

Beta-adrenoreceptor blocking agents have been used to relieve symptoms mainly in patients with ischemic heart disease. Prophylactic use of beta blockade in patients after acute myocardial infarction has shown a reduction in total mortality and also in sudden death. The overall total mortality reduction amounts to about 30%, whereas the reduction in the sudden death rate is 50%. The mechanisms behind this reduction in sudden death are probably manifold. Antiarrhythmic effects in ischemic myocardium, prevention of new ischemia, and also perhaps other factors may play a role. Apart from the prevention effect in chronic ischemic heart disease, beta blockers have also been able to reduce the sudden death rate in the long QT syndrome and are suggested for use in congestive cardiomyopathy.

Protection of the myocardium during myocardial infarction: pharmacologic protection during thrombolytic therapy

The most effective way to protect injured myocardium during the early phases of evolving myocardial infarction is with reperfusion. However, reperfusion may induce further myocardial injury. Alterations in the major determinants of myocardial oxygen demand, including increases in heart rate, contractile state and myocardial wall tension may also increase infarct size. An understanding of the basic mechanisms involved in the evolution of myocardial injury during myocardial infarction is important to the development of protective strategies that may reduce infarct size or attenuate reperfusion-induced myocardial injury, or both. Selective calcium antagonists, beta blockers, and phospholipase antagonists or inhibitors may reduce infarct size in association with early reperfusion. Reperfusion injury may be attenuated by free radical scavengers and calcium antagonists. Reinfarction, after the initial event, may ultimately be reduced in frequency by pharmacologic strategies that interfere with platelet adhesion, aggregation, and mediator release from activated platelets and white cells that promote further platelet aggregation or induce coronary artery vasoconstriction. Included among protective strategies are thromboxane receptor antagonists and synthesis inhibitors, serotonin receptor antagonists, possibly leukotriene synthesis inhibitors or receptor antagonists, and aspirin. Future clinical trials should test the combined efficacy of reperfusion and selected pharmacologic strategies that alter calcium accumulation in the injured myocardium, diminish the injurious effects of beta- and alpha-adrenergic mechanisms and oxygen-derived free radicals on injured myocytes, and prevent reocclusion mediated by platelets and platelet mediators.

Arrhythmias and mortality in congestive heart failure

The extent and severity of myocardial dysfunction and risk of dying are associated with the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias. However, there is a dissociation between the frequency of ventricular arrhythmias and the prevalence of sudden death among patients with congestive heart failure. Sudden death occurs in 8 to 10% of New York Heart Association functional class I patients and in 20% of class II, III and IV patients, despite increased frequency of malignant arrhythmias and functional deterioration. Yearly mortality rates increase from 12 to 15% in class I and II and is 60% in class IV. Sudden death in class I and II is 50 to 60% of all deaths, whereas in class IV it amounts to only 20 to 30%. The most important cause of death in class IV is progressive congestive heart failure. Ventricular arrhythmia is a trigger event in the development of fatal arrhythmia which depends on a substrate of myocardial scar tissue, hypertrophy and aberrant conducting pathways. However, regional myocardial ischemia, transmembrane electrolyte differences and myocardial stores of catecholamines are important modulators. Depletion of myocardial catecholamines and down-regulation of myocardial beta-adrenergic receptors in the myocardium may explain tolerance to ventricular tachyarrhythmias observed in patients with severe congestive heart failure and intolerance to conventional antiarrhythmic drugs. Although angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors may reduce ventricular arrhythmias, the important role of ACE inhibitors in severe congestive heart failure is to prevent progression of myocardial dysfunction and congestive heart failure. To date, however, ACE inhibitors have not been demonstrated to have a significant effect on the incidence of sudden death. This does not preclude an effect on fatal arrhythmias among patients with milder heart failure and intact stores of myocardial catecholamines.

Long-term cardiovascular effects of metoprolol therapy: a review article

Long-term studies in primary and secondary prevention using metoprolol have showed improvement in prognosis. This review summarizes the clinical results of such studies, and puts these results into the perspective of findings in mechanistic and explanatory studies. Many possible factors may have contributed to explain the beneficial effects on prognosis. The antihypertensive action, cardiac anti-ischemic action, antifibrillatory action, antiatherogenic and antithrombotic actions of metoprolol are discussed. The additive effects of these actions may explain the clinically observed beneficial effects. In the evaluation of a specific intervention, it is important to realize the multiple actions that may contribute, and not only discuss single factors.

Treatment of ventricular arrhythmias in the coronary patient: what sort of patient? For which rhythm disorder? With which procedure?

In the patient with coronary artery disease, complex ventricular arrhythmias and frequent ventricular arrhythmias appear to be independent risk factors for subsequent death, particularly in patients who have had myocardial infarction. In patients with symptomatic arrhythmias, treatment must be instituted and tested during rigorous supervision of the patient. Using both the noninvasive Holter monitoring/exercise test procedure and invasive electrophysiologic testing, a beneficial antiarrhythmic response after institution of antiarrhythmic agents indicates improved prognosis. However, a negative treatment response during programmed stimulation does not necessarily indicate bad prognosis. This is particularly true for testing during amiodarone treatment. For unselected patients, routine antiarrhythmic treatment cannot currently be recommended. Continuing studies will show whether screening for electrical instability of the myocardium, and institution of antiarrhythmic therapy thereafter, will improve overall survival. If patients tolerate beta-blocking treatment, this should probably be instituted because reductions in mortality have been found, particularly in high-risk patients.

Efficacy of intravenous propranolol for suppression of inducibility of ventricular tachyarrhythmias with different electrophysiologic characteristics in coronary artery disease

The efficacy of intravenous propranolol for suppression of inducibility of sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VT) was studied in 24 patients who had failed greater than or equal to 1 membrane-active antiarrhythmic drug (mean 2.2 +/- 1.2 drugs/patient). The response to propranolol was compared in 13 patients who had only stable monomorphic VTs inducible at baseline and another 11 patients who had greater than or equal to 1 episode of electrically unstable VTs (polymorphic VT, ventricular flutter or ventricular fibrillation) at baseline. Seven patients (29%) became noninducible (responders) and 17 patients (71%) remained inducible to sustained VT (nonresponders) after propranolol. The basal heart rate was faster in responders than in nonresponders (101 +/- 14 vs 86 +/- 11 beats/min, p less than 0.01). The magnitude of heart rate reduction was also greater after propranolol in responders (from 101 +/- 14 to 80 +/- 9 beats/min, p less than 0.001) than in nonresponders (from 86 +/- 11 to 74 +/- 9 beats/min, p less than 0.01) (p less than 0.05 between the groups), despite equal plasma propranolol concentrations (84 +/- 50 vs 88 +/- 43 ng/ml, difference not significant). Seven of 11 patients (64%) who had greater than or equal to 1 episode of unstable VTs inducible at baseline responded to intravenous propranolol, whereas none of the patients with only stable monomorphic VTs became noninducible after beta blockade (p less than 0.001). Responders had shorter cycle length of inducible VTs than nonresponders (225 +/- 38 vs 302 +/- 66 ms, p less than 0.001). Thus, intravenous propranolol appears to be efficacious in suppressing fast, electrically unstable VTs, compared to monomorphic VTs with slower rates.

Antiarrhythmic efficacy of solitary beta-adrenergic blockade for patients with sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias

To assess the efficacy and predictability of solitary beta-adrenergic blocker (BB) therapy for ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VT), 30 patients (16 men and 14 women) with a mean age of 55 years, who initially had sustained ventricular tachycardia (70%) or ventricular fibrillation (30%), were studied. Results of baseline arrhythmia tests showed VT on ECG monitoring in 57% of the patients, during exercise in 50%, induced by programmed stimulation in 69%, increasing to 86% during isoproterenol. BB therapy prevented inducible VT during programmed stimulation in 37% of the patients, prevented VT on ECG monitoring in 54%, and prevented VT during exercise in 83%. Long-term BB therapy was given to 24 of 30 patients, whereas six other patients with hemodynamically unstable VT during BB therapy received other long-term treatment. During a mean follow-up of 824 days, 6 of 24 patients had recurrent VT. BB therapy was discontinued in two patients because of side effects. Long-term success was predicted by left ventricular ejection fraction greater than 45%, absence of coronary disease, and age less than 60 years (all p less than 0.02). Neither suppression of arrhythmia during exercise testing, nor results of programmed stimulation or ECG monitoring were predictive of outcome. Thus beta-adrenergic blockers can be effective as solitary antiarrhythmic therapy in selected patients with VT.

Decreased coronary heart disease in hypertensive smokers. Mortality results from the MAPHY study

The present primary prevention study aimed at investigating whether metoprolol given as initial antihypertensive treatment would lower cardiovascular complications of high blood pressure to a greater extent than thiazide diuretics. Patients were randomized to metoprolol (n = 1,609, 8,110 patient-years) or a thiazide diuretic (n = 1,625, 8,070 patient-years). At randomization, 535 patients in the metoprolol group and 524 patients in the diuretic group were classified as smokers. Blood pressure control during follow-up was equally effective regardless of smoking habits at randomization. Cardiovascular and coronary heart disease mortality was three to four times higher in smokers than in nonsmokers, underlining the importance of smoking as a risk factor. Total and cardiovascular mortality were significantly lower for the metoprolol group than for the thiazide diuretic group in the whole study population (p = 0.028 and p = 0.012), as well as in smokers (p = 0.013 and p = 0.016). Coronary heart disease mortality was significantly lower for patients on metoprolol than for patients on diuretics in the whole study population (p = 0.048) as well as in smokers (p = 0.021). The results suggest that initial antihypertensive therapy with metoprolol is associated with a lesser incidence of total, cardiovascular, and coronary heart disease mortality as compared with initial diuretic treatment, both in the whole study population and in smokers. The favorable effect of metoprolol must be mediated via mechanisms other than the blood pressure-lowering effect of metoprolol because equal blood pressure control was achieved with both types of medication, irrespective of smoking habits at randomization.

Early use of metoprolol and serum potassium in suspected acute myocardial infarction

In 1350 patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction, serum potassium was analysed in the emergency ward. The effect of metoprolol was compared with placebo in a double-blind randomized trial. Metoprolol increased serum potassium from 4.11 +/- 0.02 mmol/l to 4.27 +/- 0.02 mmol/l (P less than 0.001) during the 1st day after hospital admission, whereas serum potassium levels remained fairly constant in patients given placebo during the same time (4.11 +/- 0.02 to 4.14 +/- 0.02 mmol/l; P greater than 0.2). Similar results were obtained when analysing patients with a confirmed myocardial infarction separately. The effects appeared homogeneously distributed in subgroups related to sex, clinical history, infarct site, infarct size and delay time from onset of symptoms to start of treatment. We conclude that early treatment with the beta-1-selective blocker metoprolol in patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction increases serum potassium.

Increased efficacy and toxicity of lidocaine in patients on beta-blockers

The greatest differences in ventricular arrhythmias and adverse effects of lidocaine observed in this study were between patients on both lidocaine and a beta-adrenoceptor blocking agent and those on neither drug. Although free fractions of lidocaine and methylglycylxylidine tended to be higher in patients on beta-adrenoceptor blocking agents, this difference was not significant nor were any other differences in serum drug levels observed.

Does acute-phase beta-blockade reduce mortality in acute myocardial infarction by limiting infarct size?

The mechanism by which early intervention with beta-blockers reduces mortality in acute myocardial infarction is unclear. Therefore the effects of intravenous, followed by oral, metoprolol on indices of infarct size were studied in a double-blind fashion with a median delay of 6.75 hours from onset of symptoms. In 129 patients peak enzyme release and QRS score on the electrocardiogram were assessed, while myocardial perfusion score on thallium-201 scintigraphy was studied in 45 patients. There was a close correlation between all the indices of infarct size. While the correlation coefficients did not appear to be influenced by metoprolol treatment, the slope of the regression was affected. Peak aspartate aminotransferase and lactic dehydrogenase were lower by 11 and 7%, respectively, in the metoprolol-treated group, but no reduction was noted in QRS score or in thallium-201 perfusion defect size in the actively treated group. Thus, it seems likely that early intervention with metoprolol in acute myocardial infarction reduces mortality, not by limiting infarct size, but by some other mechanism.

Sympathetic neural and alpha-adrenergic modulation of arrhythmias

alpha 1-Adrenergic stimulation of the neonatal heart may induce either an increase or a decrease in ventricular automaticity, with the latter response predominating as age increases. We used isolated tissues from the hearts of neonatal and adult dogs and rats, as well as rat myocytes in tissue culture alone or in coculture with sympathetic nerves, to study the role of sympathetic innervation in modulating the alpha-adrenergic response. In the absence of sympathetic innervation, alpha-adrenergic stimulation uniformly increases automaticity. As the myocyte is innervated, an increased quantity of a GTP regulatory protein is detectable. That this protein is an essential transducer of alpha-adrenergic inhibition of automaticity is evidenced by the conversion of the alpha response from excitatory to inhibitory as the protein develops. ADP-ribosylation of the protein with pertussis toxin causes the alpha response to revert to excitation in both adult canine hearts and innervated myocytes in tissue culture. Hence, we have evidence for sympathetic modulation of cardiac rhythm via a regulatory protein whose function depends on normal neuronal development. Abnormal development of innervation may predispose to arrhythmogenesis via persistence of a primitive response to alpha stimulation.

Prognostic significance of ventricular ectopic activity in survivors of acute myocardial infarction who receive propranolol

Beta blockers are frequently prescribed for survivors of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Although ventricular ectopic activity was found to be associated with mortality in several cohorts, there are no data on the relation of ventricular ectopic activity to mortality in patients with AMI who receive beta blockers. One thousand six hundred and fifty participants in the Beta-Blocker Heart Attack Trial who were randomized to receive propranolol (60 or 80 mg 3 times daily) had 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiography at baseline. By multivariate analysis considering 16 variables, ventricular ectopic activity was independently associated with sudden death (p = 0.02 to 0.001) and total mortality (p = 0.04 to 0.0001) for an average follow-up of 25 months. By univariate analysis, ventricular ectopic activity was associated with increased total mortality (odds ratios 2.13 to 3.54) and sudden death mortality (odds ratio 2.26 to 3.93). The association of ventricular ectopic activity with mortality was observed in both high- and low-risk patient subsets with odds ratios similar to the placebo group. Thus, treatment with propranolol does not alter the relation between ventricular ectopic activity and mortality.

Ultra-short-acting beta-adrenergic blockers

The ultra-short-acting beta-adrenergic blockers are parenteral agents that can be rapidly titrated in clinical situations where immediate beta-adrenergic blockade is warranted. The effects of those drugs rapidly dissipate after termination of treatment, providing an important safety feature. Esmolol, the prototype drug of this class, is approved for treatment of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias but also has potential use in treatment of patients with perioperative hypertension and acute myocardial ischemia.

Effects of beta-adrenergic blockade on verapamil-responsive and verapamil-irresponsive sustained ventricular tachycardias

To assess effects of beta-adrenergic blockade on ventricular tachycardia (VT) of various mechanisms, electrophysiology studies were performed before and after intravenous infusion of propranolol (0.2 mg/kg) in 33 patients with chronic recurrent VT, who had previously been tested with intravenous verapamil (0.15 mg/kg followed by 0.005 mg/kg/min infusion). In the verapamil-irresponsive group, 10 patients (group IA) had VT that could be initiated by programmed ventricular extrastimulation and terminated by overdrive ventricular pacing, and 11 patients (group IB) had VT that could be provoked by isoproterenol infusion (3-8 micrograms/min) but not by programmed electrical stimulation, and that could not be converted to a sustained sinus rhythm by overdrive ventricular pacing. Notably, in the group IA patients, all 10 patients had structural heart disease (coronary arteriosclerosis or idiopathic cardiomyopathy); beta-adrenergic blockade accelerated the VT rate in one patient but exerted no effects on the VT rate in the remaining 9 patients, and VT remained inducible in all 10 patients. By contrast, in the group IB patients, 7 of the 11 patients had no apparent structural heart disease; beta-adrenergic blockade completely suppressed the VT inducibility during isoproterenol infusion in all 11 patients. There were 12 patients with verapamil-responsive VT (group II). 11 of the 12 patients had no apparent structural heart disease. In these patients, the initiation of VT was related to attaining a critical range of cycle lengths during sinus, atrial-paced or ventricular-paced rhythm; beta-adrenergic blockade could only slow the VT rate without suppressing its inducibility. Of note, 14 of the total 33 patients had exercise provocable VT: two in group IA, five in group IB, and seven in group II. Thus, mechanisms of VT vary among patients, and so do their pharmacologic responses. Although reentry, catecholamine-sensitive automaticity, and triggered activity related to delayed afterdepolarizations are merely speculative, results of this study indicate that beta-adrenergic blockade is only specifically effective in a subset group (group IB) of patients with VT suggestive of catecholamine-sensitive automaticity.

Prophylaxis of post-myocardial infarction dysrhythmias by long-term timolol therapy

The antiarrhythmic efficacy of timolol maleate was assessed in 94 patients with acute myocardial infarction. No significant differences were noted between early treatment with timolol and placebo in the mean and peak hourly ventricular premature complex rates, ventricular premature complex couplets, or runs. However, compared to the placebo treatment, there was a significant (p less than 0.001) 66% reduction in the relative fraction of early-cycle ventricular premature complexes 7 to 9 days after initiation of timolol therapy and a more prolonged significant (p less than 0.001) 73% reduction in the fraction of early-cycle supraventricular complexes throughout the 28-day timolol and placebo comparison period. The frequency distribution of QRS duration was significantly different between the placebo- and timolol-treated patients, with the mean duration 8 msec longer in the placebo-treated patients (p = 0.008). Adverse effects from early administration of timolol did not differ from those in the placebo-treated patients.

Beta-adrenergic blockers

beta-Adrenergic blocking drugs have been available for several years to treat ischemic heart disease and other cardiovascular and noncardiovascular disorders. There are multiple drugs in this class with various pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties that may be important in specific clinical situations and in avoiding certain adverse reactions. These drugs have been shown to be efficacious in relieving anginal symptoms and prolonging exercise tolerance, in reducing high blood pressure, for treating various arrhythmias, in therapy of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and for prolonging life in many survivors of acute myocardial infarction.