A multivariate analysis of potential risk factors for intra- and postoperative complications in 1316 elective laparoscopic colorectal procedures. Ann Surg. 2008;248:259-265. [PMID: 18650636 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0b013e31817bbe3a]

Perirenal fat surface area as a risk factor for morbidity after elective colorectal surgery

BACKGROUND

Visceral obesity appears to be an emerging parameter affecting postoperative outcome after abdominal surgery. However, total visceral fat remains time consuming to calculate, and there is still a lack of data about its value as an independent risk factor in colorectal surgery.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to validate the simple measurement of perirenal fat surface as a surrogate of visceral obesity, and to test the value of perirenal fat surface as a risk factor for morbidity in colorectal surgery and to compare it with the predictive value of other obesity parameters such as BMI and waist-hip ratio.

DESIGN

This is a prospective observational cohort study.

SETTING

The study was conducted at a tertiary university hospital.

PATIENTS

Two hundred twenty-four consecutive patients (130 male) undergoing elective colorectal surgery with a mean age of 65.2 years (SD, ±12.9) were identified.

INTERVENTION

Elective colorectal resections were performed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

We assessed complications as the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures were the conversion rates, duration of operation, and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

Perirenal fat surface was validated as a surrogate of visceral fat and a strong correlation between the 2 was confirmed (Spearman correlation coefficient ρ = 0.96). The overall postoperative complication rate was 22.8% (51/224) with 14.7% moderate complications (grade I and II) and 7.6% severe complications (grade III-IV), with a mortality rate of 0.5%. Multivariate analysis confirmed perirenal fat surface as an independent risk factor for postoperative complications (OR, 3.87; 95% CI, 1.73-8.64; p = 0.001), whereas BMI and waist-hip ratio were not statistically associated with postoperative complications (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.51-2.66; p = 0.72).

LIMITATIONS

This study was limited by its sample size.

CONCLUSION

Perirenal fat surface is an excellent and easy-to-reproduce indicator of visceral fat volume. Furthermore, perirenal fat surface is an independent risk factor for postoperative outcome in colorectal surgery that appears to be of higher predictive value than BMI and waist-hip ratio.

Fast-track rehabilitation vs conventional care in laparoscopic colorectal resection for colorectal malignancy: a meta-analysis

AIM

To evaluate the fast-track rehabilitation protocol and laparoscopic surgery (LFT) vs conventional care strategies and laparoscopic surgery (LCC).

METHODS

Studies and relevant literature comparing the effects of LFT and LCC for colorectal malignancy were identified in MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and EMBASE. The complications and re-admission after approximately 1 mo were assessed.

RESULTS

Six recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in this meta-analysis, which related to 655 enrolled patients. These studies demonstrated that compared with LCC, LFT has fewer complications and a similar incidence of re-admission after approximately 1 mo. LFT had a pooled RR of 0.60 (95%CI: 0.46-0.79, P < 0.001) compared with a pooled RR of 0.69 (95%CI: 0.34-1.40, P > 0.5) for LCC.

CONCLUSION

LFT for colorectal malignancy is safe and efficacious. Larger prospective RCTs should be conducted to further compare the efficacy and safety of this approach.

Grading of complications and risk factor evaluation in laparoscopic colorectal surgery

BACKGROUND

A grading system for postoperative complications is important for quality control and comparison among investigations. The objective of the current study was to evaluate complications associated with laparoscopic colorectal surgery according to a standardized grading system, and to examine risk factors associated with different complication grades.

METHODS

Data of all patients who underwent elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery at two medical centers between September 2003 and January 2011 were collected prospectively. Complications were graded retrospectively into five categories based on a previously proposed grading system for colorectal operations. Age, gender, BMI, Charlson comorbidity score, indication for surgery, pathology site, conversion rate, learning curve, operative times, previous abdominal surgery, concurrent surgical procedures performed, and length of hospital stay were evaluated as risk factors and outcome measures for complications.

RESULTS

A total of 501 patients were included in the study. Of them, 30.5 % suffered at least one complication and 6.5 % more than one. Complications that were mainly medical or surgical site infections requiring minor intervention (grades 1 and 2) occurred in 22.9 % of patients. Surgical complications requiring invasive interference (grades 3 and 4) occurred in 7.4 % of patients and mortality (grade 5) occurred in 0.2 % (1 patient). Length of hospital stay was directly related to complication grade. Average hospital stay was 6.8 ± 3.5, 10.5 ± 5.1, and 20.2 ± 12.3 days for patients with no complications, grade 1-2 complications, and grade 3-4 complications, respectively (p < 0.01). Minor complications (grades 1-2) were associated with conversion (p < 0.01), high Charlson score (p = 0.004), and additional surgical procedures (p = 0.04). Major complications (grades 3-4) were associated solely with conversion (p < 0.01) and rectal pathology (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates the use of a uniform grading system for complications in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Conversion was found to be associated with all grades of complications.

Supervised surgical training and its effect on the short-term outcome in laparoscopic colorectal surgery

AIM

Laparoscopic colorectal surgery requires supervised training. In this paper we examine the short-term outcome following a component-based training in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

METHOD

Surgical outcome following laparoscopic colorectal resection was recorded on a prospective database. Patients were divided into three groups, including those performed by the fellows, those completed by the consultant and those completed by a combination of both. Analysis of data was carried out for all colorectal resections and the subgroup with colorectal cancer.

RESULTS

511 operations were examined between June 2006 and January 2011. There was no statistically significant difference in operating time between fellows and consultants but it was significantly longer for procedures where consultants and fellows performed components. Conversion rate, postoperative morbidity, recovery and length of stay were similar for all three groups for the whole patient cohort and also the subgroup of cancer patients. In the cancer subgroup, there was no difference in the pathological stage in the three groups.

CONCLUSION

Closely supervised training in laparoscopic colorectal surgery is not associated with any adverse effect on the short-term outcome.

Is competency assessment at the specialist level achievable? A study for the national training programme in laparoscopic colorectal surgery in England

OBJECTIVES

To develop, validate, and implement a competency assessment tool (CAT) for technical surgical performance in the context of a summative assessment process for the National Training Programme in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery (NTP).

BACKGROUND

The NTP is an educational initiative by the National Cancer Action Team in England to safely increase the uptake of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. It is the first competency-based national educational initiative for specialist surgeons (consultants), and performance assessment is an integral part of the program.

METHODS

Content validity was sought using expert opinion by semistructured interviews and the Delphi method. For validity and reliability studies, NTP apprentices and experts were asked to submit video-recorded cases. Construct validity was established between delegates who passed the assessment and those who failed. Concurrent validity was tested by comparing scores with error counts as identified by observational clinical human reliability analysis. A fully crossed design, using generalizability theory methods and D-studies, was used for reliability.

FINDINGS

Interviews and the Delphi method revealed a list of characteristics for assessment. A hybrid structure combining task-specific and generic items was used to include important characteristics into the assessment format. Fifty-four cases were submitted. Overall reliability reached G(ACI) = 0.803 when using 2 cases and 2 assessors. Experts scored significantly better than apprentices (3.19 vs 2.60; P = 0.004), and apprentices who passed had better scores than those who failed (2.95 vs 2.28; P < 0.001). There was an inverse correlation between CAT scores and observational clinical human reliability analysis error counts (ρ = -0.520, P < 0.001). The combination of both methods reached overall sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 83.3%, a positive predictive value of 93.8%, and a negative predictive value of 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

The CAT can reliably assess technical performance in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. The use of CATs to judge specialist technical performance before embarking on independent practice of new procedures is achievable on a national scale and can be adapted by other specialties.

Laparoscopic versus open Hartmann procedure for the emergency treatment of diverticulitis: a propensity-matched analysis

BACKGROUND

A laparoscopic approach has been proposed to reduce the high morbidity and mortality associated with the Hartmann procedure for the emergency treatment of diverticulitis.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of our study was to determine whether a laparoscopic Hartmann procedure reduces early morbidity or mortality for patients undergoing an emergency operation for diverticulitis.

DESIGN

This is a comparative effectiveness study. A subset of the entire American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program patient sample matched on propensity for undergoing their procedure with the laparoscopic approach were used to compare postoperative outcomes between laparoscopic and open groups.

SETTING

This study uses data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Participant User Files from 2005 through 2009.

PATIENTS

All patients who underwent an emergency laparoscopic or open partial colectomy with end colostomy for colonic diverticulitis were reviewed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The main outcome measures were 30-day mortality and morbidity.

RESULTS

Included in the analysis were 1186 patients undergoing emergency partial colectomy with end colostomy for diverticulitis. Among the entire cohort, the laparoscopic group had fewer overall complications (26% vs 41.7%, p = 0.008) and shorter mean length of hospitalization (8.9 vs 11.6 days, p = 0.0008). Operative times were not significantly different between groups. When controlling for potential confounders, a laparoscopic approach was not associated with a decrease in morbidity or mortality. In comparison with a propensity-match cohort, the laparoscopic approach did not reduce postoperative morbidity or mortality.

LIMITATIONS

This study is limited by its retrospective nature and the absence of pertinent variables such as postoperative pain indices, time for return of bowel function, and rates of readmission.

CONCLUSIONS

A laparoscopic approach to the Hartmann procedure for the emergency treatment of complicated diverticulitis does not significantly decrease postoperative morbidity or mortality in comparison with the open technique.

Learning curve and case selection in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: systematic review and international multicenter analysis of 4852 cases

BACKGROUND

The learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery has not been conclusively analyzed. No reliable framework for case selection during training is available.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to analyze the length of the learning curve of laparoscopic colorectal surgeons and to recommend a case selection framework at the early stage of independent practice.

DATA SOURCES

Medline (1988-2010, October week 4) and Embase (1988-2010) were used for the literature review, databases were retrieved from the authors, and expert opinion was surveyed.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies describing the learning curve of laparoscopic or laparoscopically assisted colorectal surgery were selected.

INTERVENTION

No interventions were performed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Learning curves were analyzed by using risk-adjusted, bootstrapped cumulative sum curves. Conversions and complications were independent variables in a multilevel random-effects regression model. Recommendations are based on analysis of ORs and a structured expert opinion gauging process.

RESULTS

Twenty-three studies were identified, showing great disparity on the length of the learning curve. Seven studies, representing 4852 cases (19 surgeons), were analyzed. Risk-adjusted cumulative sum charts demonstrated the length of the learning curves to be 152 cases for conversions, 143 for complications, 96 for operating time, 87 for blood loss, and 103 for length of stay. Body mass index and pelvic dissection (rectum), especially in male patients, independently increased the risk of complication and conversion. The expert survey revealed that increasing T stage and complicated inflammatory disease are likely to increase the complexity of the case. Based on this evidence, a framework for case selection in training was proposed.

LIMITATIONS

The generalizability of the study results maybe reduced because of inconsistent data quality and individual variations in the length of the learning curve

CONCLUSIONS

This multicenter database suggests a length of the learning curve of 88 to 152 cases. The use of the suggested framework may prevent high conversion and complication rates during the learning curve.

Evaluating the Association of Preoperative Functional Status and Postoperative Functional Decline in Older Patients Undergoing Major Surgery

This prospective cohort study sought to identify predictors of functional decline in patients aged 65 years or older who underwent major, nonemergent abdominal or thoracic surgery in our tertiary hospital from 2006 to 2008. We used the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire–Disability Index (HAQ-DI) to evaluate functional decline; a 0.1 or greater increase was used to indicate a clinically significant decline. The preoperative Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) and a physical function score (PFS), assessing gait speed, grip strength, balance, and standing speed, were evaluated as predictors of decline. We enrolled 215 patients (71.2 ± 5.2 years; 56.7% female); 204 completed follow-up HAQ assessments (71.1 ± 5.3 years; 57.8% female). A significant number of patients had functional decline out to 1 year. Postoperative HAQ-DI increases of 0.1 or greater occurred in 45.3 per cent at 1 month, 30.1 per cent at 3 months, and 28.3 per cent at 1 year. Pre-operative DASI and PFS scores were not predictors of functional decline. Male sex at 1 month (odds ratio [OR], 3.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.41 to 6.85); American Society of Anesthesiologists class (OR, 3.41; 95% CI, 1.31 to 8.86), smoking (OR, 3.15; 95% CI, 1.27 to 7.85), and length of stay (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.16) at 3 months; and cancer diagnosis at 1 year (OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.14 to 5.96) were associated with functional decline.

Assessment for frailty is useful for predicting morbidity in elderly patients undergoing colorectal cancer resection whose comorbidities are already optimized

BACKGROUND

The clinical syndrome of frailty identified through the assessment of weight loss, gait speed, grip strength, physical activity, and physical exhaustion has been used to identify patients with reduced reserves. We hypothesized that frailty is useful in predicting adverse outcomes in optimized elective elderly colorectal surgery patients.

METHODS

A prospective study was conducted at 2 centers (Singapore and Japan). All patients over 75 years of age undergoing colorectal resection were assessed for the presence of the syndrome of frailty. All these patients had already had their comorbidities optimized for surgery. The outcome measure was postoperative major complications (defined as Clavien-Dindo type II and above complications).

RESULTS

Eighty-three patients were studied from February 2008 to April 2010. The mean age was 81.5 years (range 75-93 years). The mean comorbidity index was 3.37 (range 0-11). Twenty-six (31.3%) patients were an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score of 3 and above. Chi-square analysis revealed that the odds ratio of postoperative major complications was 4.083 (95% confidence interval, 1.433-11.638) when the patient satisfied the criteria for frailty. Albumin <35, ASA >3, comorbidity index >5, and Physiologic and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and Morbidity (POSSUM) scores were not predictive of postoperative major complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Preliminary findings show that frailty is a potent adjunctive tool of predicting postoperative morbidity. Frailty can be used to identify elderly patients needing further optimization before major surgery.

Which fast track elements predict early recovery after colon cancer surgery?

AIM

It is questioned whether all separate fast track elements are essential for enhanced postoperative recovery. We aimed to determine which baseline characteristics and which fast track elements are independent predictors of faster postoperative recovery in patients undergoing resection for colon cancer.

METHOD

Data from the LAFA trial database were used. In this trial, fast track care was compared with standard perioperative care in 400 patients undergoing laparoscopic or open surgery for colonic cancer. During admission 19 fast track elements per patient were prospectively evaluated and scored whether or not they were successfully applied. To identify predictive factors six baseline characteristics and those fast track items that were successfully achieved were entered in a univariate and multivariate linear regression analysis with total postoperative hospital stay (THS) as the primary outcome.

RESULTS

In 400 patients, two baseline characteristics and two fast track elements were found to be significant independent predictors of THS: female sex [B = 0.85; 95% CI 0.75-0.96; reduction of 15% (CI 14-25%) in THS], laparoscopic resection [B = 0.85; 95% CI 0.75-0.96; reduction of 15% (CI 14-25%) in THS], 'normal diet at postoperative days 1, 2 and 3' [B = 0.70; 95% CI 0.61-0.81; reduction of 30% (CI 19-39%) in THS] and 'enforced mobilization at postoperative days 1, 2 and 3' [B = 0.68; 95% CI 0.59-0.80; reduction of 32% (CI 20-41%) in THS].

CONCLUSION

Evaluating only those fast track elements that were successfully achieved, enforced advancement of oral intake, early mobilization, laparoscopic surgery and female sex were independent determinants of early recovery.

Factors predicting hospital length-of-stay and readmission after colorectal resection: a population-based study of elective and emergency admissions

BACKGROUND

The impact of developments in colorectal cancer surgery on length-of-stay (LOS) and re-admission have not been well described. In a population-based analysis, we investigated predictors of LOS and emergency readmission after the initial surgery episode.

METHODS

Incident colorectal cancers (ICD-O2: C18-C20), diagnosed 2002-2008, were identified from the National Cancer Registry Ireland, and linked to hospital in-patient episodes. For those who underwent colorectal resection, the associated hospital episode was identified. Factors predicting longer LOS (upper-quartile, > 24 days) for elective and emergency admissions separately, and whether LOS predicted emergency readmission within 28 days of discharge, were investigated using logistic regression.

RESULTS

8197 patients underwent resection, 63% (n = 5133) elective and 37% (n = 3063) emergency admissions. Median LOS was 14 days (inter-quartile range (IQR) = 11-20) for elective and 21 (15-33) for emergency admissions. For both emergency and elective admissions, likelihood of longer LOS was significantly higher in patients who were older, had co-morbidities and were unmarried; it was reduced for private patients. For emergency patients only the likelihood of longer LOS was lower for patients admitted to higher-volume hospitals. Longer LOS was associated with increased risk of emergency readmission.

CONCLUSIONS

One quarter of patients stay in hospital for at least 25 days following colorectal resection. Over one third of resected patients are emergency admissions and these have a significantly longer median LOS. Patient- and health service-related factors were associated with prolonged LOS. Longer LOS was associated with increased risk of emergency readmission. The cost implications of these findings are significant.

The impact of practice environment on laparoscopic colectomy utilization following colorectal residency: a survey of the ASCRS Young Surgeons

AIM

It is often thought that practice patterns are different in private (PP) vs university hospital (UH) settings. We aimed to describe the impact of practice environment on the type of laparoscopic colectomy procedures performed by graduating colorectal surgeons.

METHOD

A review was carried out of prospectively gathered self-reported questionnaire data. Graduates of American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons' (ASCRS)-approved colorectal residencies from 2004 to 2008 underwent an on-line survey, developed by the ASCRS Young Surgeons' Committee.

RESULTS

About 177 (52%) of 342 graduates surveyed responded. Practice setting data were available for 157 (89%) surgeons. Gender, geographical location and age were similar in both cohorts. PP surgeons utilized a laparoscopic approach more often for rectal cancer (37% vs 19%; P=0.003). There was no significant difference in the rate of laparoscopic surgery in colon cancer, diverticular disease, inflammatory bowel disease, Clostridium difficile or emergency surgery. PP surgeons operated more often with a partner (43% vs 8%) or surgical assistant (13% vs 4%; both P<0.001), while UH surgeons had a colorectal resident (10% vs 21%) or general surgery resident (15% vs 55%; both P<0.001). Impediments to performing laparoscopic surgery for PP surgeons included a perceived lack of hospital equipment (33% vs 20%) and support (29% vs 17%; both P<0.05). Perception of personal experience, access to trained assistants, financial reimbursement, length of surgery and patient availability were equivalent in both groups.

CONCLUSION

While differences such as type of assistant and impediments to laparoscopic utilization exist between PP- and UH-based practices, early laparoscopic practice patterns remain similar. PP surgeons more frequently perform laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer and with hand-assistance. Despite differences, newly trained colorectal surgeons in both settings utilize and require laparoscopic skills.

Postgame analysis: using video-based coaching for continuous professional development

BACKGROUND

The surgical learning curve persists for years after training, yet existing continuing medical education activities targeting this are limited. We describe a pilot study of a scalable video-based intervention, providing individualized feedback on intraoperative performance.

STUDY DESIGN

Four complex operations performed by surgeons of varying experience--a chief resident accompanied by the operating senior surgeon, a surgeon with less than 10 years in practice, another with 20 to 30 years in practice, and a surgeon with more than 30 years of experience--were video recorded. Video playback formed the basis of 1-hour coaching sessions with a peer-judged surgical expert. These sessions were audio recorded, transcribed, and thematically coded.

RESULTS

The sessions focused on operative technique--both technical aspects and decision-making. With increasing seniority, more discussion was devoted to the optimization of teaching and facilitation of the resident's technical performance. Coaching sessions with senior surgeons were peer-to-peer interactions, with each discussing his preferred approach. The coach alternated between directing the session (asking probing questions) and responding to specific questions brought by the surgeons, depending on learning style. At all experience levels, video review proved valuable in identifying episodes of failure to progress and troubleshooting alternative approaches. All agreed this tool is a powerful one. Inclusion of trainees seems most appropriate when coaching senior surgeons; it may restrict the dialogue of more junior attendings.

CONCLUSIONS

Video-based coaching is an educational modality that targets intraoperative judgment, technique, and teaching. Surgeons of all levels found it highly instructive. This may provide a practical, much needed approach for continuous professional development.

A comparison of nurses' perceptions of elective laparoscopic or elective open colorectal resections

The purpose of this study was to develop an instrument to measure the perceived benefits nurses observe in the recovery of patients who have undergone elective laparoscopic colorectal resections vs. traditional open elective colorectal resections. Secondly, to determine if there are perceived differences in the intensity of nursing required to care for these patients. A twenty-three-point questionnaire was developed and distributed to 23 colorectal nurses working in a single tertiary referral hospital. There was an 83.6% response rate. The findings demonstrate that the participants believe there are significantly better outcomes for the laparoscopic patients in the postoperative period. These benefits include more rapid resumption of independence, decreased pain and fewer complications. The nurses also perceived less time and effort was required when caring for these patients.

Outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients

Laparoscopic colorectal surgery appears to be feasible and safe in elderly patients with increased comorbidity.

Objective:

To evaluate the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cancer in the elderly compared with younger patients.

Methods:

We retrospectively considered a consecutive unselected series of 159 patients who underwent elective laparoscopic procedures for colorectal cancer at our institution between January 2007 and December 2009. Of these patients, 101 (63.5%) were ≤70 years of age (Group A), and 58 (36.5%) were >70 (Group B). Operative steps and instrumentation were standardized. Demographics, disease-related, operative, and short-term data were analyzed for each group, and an appropriate statistical comparison was made. Comorbidity was quantified by using the Charlson Comorbidity Index.

Results:

We reviewed right colectomies (29.5%), left colectomies (44.7%), rectal resections (19.5%), and other procedures (6.3%). There was no significant difference in sex ratio, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiology score, type of surgical procedures, and tumor stage between Group A and Group B. A statistically higher comorbidity according to the Charlson index characterized Group B (2.2 vs 3.8; P=.034). Median operative time (228±78.1min vs 224.3±97.6min; NS), estimated blood loss (50.0±94.8mL vs 31.2±72.7mL; NS), conversion rate (2.0% vs 1.7%; NS), and timing to canalization (4.5±1.7dd vs 4.4±1.3dd; NS) were statistically comparable in both Groups. Group B was associated with a significantly longer length of hospital stay compared with Group A (8.1±2.8dd vs 10.8±6.6dd; P<.01) There was no statistically significant difference in major postoperative complications (3.8% vs 3.4%; NS), reoperations (0.9% vs 1.7%; NS), and 30-day mortality (0% vs 1.7%; NS).

Conclusions:

Laparoscopic colorectal surgery appears feasible and safe in elderly patients with increased comorbidity.

Congestive heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease predict poor surgical outcomes in older adults undergoing elective diverticulitis surgery

BACKGROUND

Diverticulitis is a common medical condition that disproportionately affects older adults. The ideal management of recurrent diverticulitis, including the role of prophylactic colectomy, remains uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the outcomes among older patients undergoing elective surgery for diverticulitis and examine subgroups of patients with comorbid congestive heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease to determine whether outcomes in these patients are worse than in other groups.

DESIGN

This article reports a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing elective surgery for diverticulitis.

SETTING

Data were derived from the 100% Medicare Provider Analysis and Review inpatient files from 2004 to 2007.

PATIENTS

Included were 22,752 patients, age 65 years and older, with a primary diagnosis of diverticulitis that underwent elective left-colon resection, colostomy, or ileostomy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The primary outcome measure was in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcome measures were intestinal diversion rates (colostomy and ileostomy) and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Overall mortality, intestinal diversion (colostomy and ileostomy), and postoperative complication rate were 1.2%, 11.3%, and 22.1%. Patients with congestive heart failure had increased odds of in-hospital mortality (OR 3.5, 95% CI 2.59-4.63), colostomy (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.69-2.27), and all postoperative complications, including hemorrhagic (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.01-2.11), wound (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.50-2.39), pulmonary (OR 4.2, 95% CI 3.59-4.85), cardiac (OR 4.6, 95% CI 3.68-5.74), postoperative shock/sepsis (OR 3.2, 95% CI 2.53-4.35), renal (OR 4.1, 95% CI 3.22-5.12), and thromboembolic (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.00-2.43) complications. Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease had significantly increased odds of wound (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.19-1.67) and pulmonary (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.94-2.50) complications. Advancing age, congestive heart failure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were significantly associated with increased morbidity and mortality.

LIMITATIONS

Medicare data are limited by the potential for lack of generalizability to patients <65 years and the potential for coding errors.

CONCLUSIONS

Elective diverticular surgery in older patients carries substantial morbidity, especially in those patients with comorbid congestive heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The rate of perioperative complications that we document in this patient population may attenuate some of the expected benefit of surgery.

Determinants for postoperative complications after laparoscopic intestinal resection for Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND

There is lack of studies that define parameters predictive of complications following laparoscopic resection for Crohn's disease.

METHODS

Between 1998 and 2008, 182 patients underwent laparoscopic intestinal resection for Crohn's disease at a single institution. Conversion occurred in 12 patients (6.6%). We aimed to identify risk factors for short-term postoperative complications (<30 days) by using univariate and multiple regression tests. Complications were defined according to the Clavien-Dindo classification (grades I-V). Data were obtained from an institutional database and individual chart review retrospectively.

RESULTS

There were 25 (13.7%) complications after surgery. According to the Clavien-Dindo classification, complications were classified as grade I in 9 patients, grade II in 9 patients, and grade IIIb in 7 patients. There were no deaths after laparoscopic surgery. A low level of hemoglobin after surgery (r (s )= -0.15, P = 0.0441) and an elevated CRP before surgery (r (s )= -0.16, P = 0.0346) seemed to increase the likelihood of postoperative complications.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic surgery can be performed safely in Crohn's disease patients. An increased inflammation process before operation seems to be associated an eventful postoperative course.

Laparoscopic colorectal anastomosis using the novel Chex(®) circular stapler: a case-control study

AIM

The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of a new cost-effective circular stapler for colorectal anastomosis, the Chex(®) CS.

METHOD

From 2007 to 2009, a case-control study was conducted of 54 patients who underwent left colectomy with stapled anastomosis using the Chex stapler. The patients were matched to 64 patients in whom the anastomoses were performed using the CDH(®) stapler or the EEA(®) stapler. The following criteria were matched: sex, age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiology grade, diagnosis, formation of a temporary stoma and surgical approach. Primary end-points were postoperative mortality and morbidity. The surgeon was asked to fill out a questionnaire to assess the ergonomics of the device using an analogue visual scale. A cost analysis was performed to compare the cost of the different devices.

RESULTS

There were no postoperative deaths. Morbidity, including anastomotic leakage (9%vs 8%, P = 1.000), was similar in the two groups. The surgeon's overall appreciation was scored at 8.1/10 (3-9.5), including the best score for stapler removal (9.5). No major device failure was observed during the study. Mean surgical costs were significantly lower in the Chex group: € 903 ± 73 (885-1192) vs the control group € 971 ± 61 (956-1263) (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that colorectal anastomosis using the Chex circular stapler is safe and does not increase overall morbidity. In particular, this device did not have a higher rate of anastomotic leakage in our patients than more expensive models currently used in our hospital.

Laparoscopic colectomy: does the learning curve extend beyond colorectal surgery fellowship?

Colorectal fellowship training adequately surpasses the learning curve with regard to safety and outcome; however, the surgeon continues to increase operative efficiency during the first year of practice.

Background and Objectives:

As minimally invasive colon and rectal resection has become increasingly prevalent over the past decade, the role that fellowship training plays has become an important question. This analysis examines the learning curve of one fellowship-trained colorectal surgeon in his first 100 cases.

Methods:

This was a prospectively collected retrospective analysis of the first 100 laparoscopic colon and rectal resections performed between July 2007 and July 2008 by a colorectal (CRS) fellowship trained surgeon at a Veteran's Administration (VA) and county hospital. Included were all emergent and nonemergent laparoscopic cases.

Results:

Mean age was 63(range, 36 to 91). The 100 resections included 42 right, 6 left, 32 sigmoid, 13 rectal, and 7 total abdominal colectomies. Indications were 55% cancer, 20% unresectable polyp, 18% diverticular, 4% inflammatory, and 3% other. Overall mortality was 3%. Overall morbidity including wound infection was 24%. Early and late groups were similar in age, ASA score, and indication. Conversion rate was 4%. No statistical difference was seen in mortality, morbidity, EBL, LOS, margin, lymph nodes, or conversions between the first and second 50 cases (P<0.05). Right and sigmoid colectomy operative time decreased by 40.0% and 19.6%, respectively.

Conclusion:

Prior investigators have demonstrated a significant learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. In the first 100 cases, there is no difference in mortality or morbidity between early and late cases. Alternatively, operative times decreased with experience. Laparoscopic training during CRS fellowship surpasses the learning curve in regard to safety and outcome, whereas operative efficiency improves over the first year of practice.

Pathogenesis of morbidity after fast-track laparoscopic colonic cancer surgery

AIM

Analysis of the nature and time course of early complications after laparoscopic colonic surgery is required to allow rational strategies for their prevention and management.

METHOD

One hundred and four consecutive patients who underwent elective fast-track laparoscopic colonic cancer surgery were analysed prospectively from the Danish Colorectal Cancer Database, supplemented by data from the medical records. We studied in detail the time course of morbidity and reasons for prolonged stay (> 3 days).

RESULTS

Seventeen (16.3%) patients had one or more complications. Surgical complications occurred in 14 patients, of which four were preceded by medical complications. Three patients had only medical complications. Median length of stay was 3 days (range 1-44).

CONCLUSION

Further improvement of outcomes after fast-track laparoscopic colonic surgery might be obtained by improved surgical performance.

Human fibrinogen patches application reduces intra-abdominal infectious complications in pancreas transplant with enteric drainage

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to analyze the incidence of intra-abdominal infectious complications after the application of a fibrinogen sealant to the duodenojejunal anastomosis in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants (SPK) with enteric drainage.

METHODS

Results of 68 SPKs with enteric drainage were prospectively assessed. A fibrinogen and thrombin sheet was applied to the duodenojejunal anastomosis in 34 patients, who were compared to a control group of 34 patients. The incidence and severity of intra-abdominal infectious complications and the 1-year patient and grafts survival were analyzed.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients experienced intra-abdominal infectious complications. Grade 1a complications occurred in the study group, whereas surgery was required only in patients from the control group: complications grade 3a (15%) and complications grade 3b (18%) (p = 0.003 vs. study group, respectively). The overall rate of anastomotic leakage (complications grade 2b and 3b) was 10%, all of which occurred in the control group. The length of hospital stay was higher in the control group was 34.6 ± 11.3 days vs. 22.8 ± 11.1 days (p = 0.03). There were no significant differences in 1-year patient and graft survival between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, the application of fibrinogen and thrombin sheets was associated to a decrease in the number and severity of intra-abdominal infectious complications.

Laparoscopic colorectal surgery in elderly patients: a case-control study of 15 years of experience

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to review the impact of age (≥75 years) on the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

METHODS

Three hundred seventy-nine patients under 70 years of age and 91 patients 75 years and older were analyzed. Quantification of comorbidities was performed using the Charlson Weighted Comorbidity Index. Outcome measures were postoperative complications and 30-day mortality.

RESULTS

There was no difference in the occurrence of postoperative complications between the younger and older patients. Bivariate analysis revealed that patient age was not a risk factor of major complications (odds ratio = 1.2; 95% confidence interval, .6-2.3). Although bivariate analysis revealed that older age had a statistically significant odds ratio for 30-day mortality (odds ratio = 12.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-125.4), multivariate analysis revealed that it was a weighted comorbidity index score of 5 or more (P = .02) and long operative time (P = .01) that were independent predictors of 30-day mortality and not age per se.

CONCLUSIONS

Age is not an independent predictor of morbidity and mortality in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery.

Laparoscopic Colectomy: Complications Causing Reoperation or Emergency Room/Hospital Readmissions

The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of complications causing reoperation or emergency room(ER)/hospital readmission after laparoscopic colectomy (LC). We retrospectively reviewed a prospectively managed database of 358 patients undergoing LC. Nonhand assisted LC was jointly performed by two surgeons assisted by a general surgery resident. Trochar site fascial wounds larger than 5 millimeters were not closed for the first 283 cases, mesenteric defects were not closed. Forty-one patients (11%) required reoperation. Of the 19 hernias (17 incisional, 2 mesenteric), seven caused early postoperative obstructions either within the first week of surgery or within 4 days after discharge. Twelve hernias presented in a delayed fashion and were repaired months later. Eight hernias occurred at trochar sites, nine at specimen extraction sites, and two were in the mesenteric defect. There were eight adhesive small bowel obstructions, five were treated with early reoperation. Other causes included perforations in six cases (2%), anastomotic leak in seven cases (2%) and bleeding in two cases (0.5%). Fifty-nine (16%) separate patients required evaluation in the ER. Fifty-three patients had one ER visit, six patients had two. Causes included nausea and vomiting in 19 cases (5%), wound infection in 16 cases (4%), pain in 13 cases (4%), fever in five cases (1%), thrombosis in four cases (1%); 46 were admitted to the hospital, 70 per cent were discharged within 4 days. Eleven per cent of patients required reoperation after LC, usually for hernias or adhesive small bowel obstruction. Fifty-three per cent of the hernias could have been avoided by routine closure of the fascia. An additional 16 per cent of patients required ER evaluation for complications. Of these, 78 per cent were admitted, 70 per cent were discharged within 4 days. LC is not without potential complications and is not necessarily a less morbid operation.

Endoscopic intraoperative anastomotic testing may avoid early gastrointestinal anastomotic complications. A prospective study

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal anastomotic complications represent serious events; methods to evaluate anastomotic integrity seem to be suboptimal. Since endoscopic intraoperative anastomotic testing allows direct visualization of anastomosis, complication rates may be theoretically reduced by the use of this technique.

METHODS

A prospective study involving 118 consecutive oncologic patients undergoing endoscopically tested gastrointestinal stapled anastomoses was carried out. As controls, 148 historical patients without anastomotic testing were used for comparisons.

RESULTS

In the study group, anastomotic testing revealed 16 defects: 11 (9.3%) air leaks and five (4.3%) bleeding anastomoses. All leaks were oversewn and secured. Bleeding anastomoses were managed under direct visualization, and one non-patent anastomosis was redone. Forty-one (15.4%) postoperative anastomotic complications were observed: eight (3%) bleeding anastomoses, seven (2.6%) stenoses, and 26 (9.8%) clinical leaks. No early dehiscence or bleeding occurred if anastomoses were intraoperatively checked, while these complications were significantly more frequent in non-checked anastomoses (6.1% and 5.4%, respectively). Conversely, late leak and stenosis rates were similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic anastomotic testing was a safe and reliable method to assess integrity of gastrointestinal anastomoses, to correct any defect under direct visualization, and to avoid early complications. However, this method seemed inadequate to predict late anastomotic complications.

Systematic review on mentoring and simulation in laparoscopic colorectal surgery

OBJECTIVE

To identify and evaluate the influence of mentoring and simulated training in laparoscopic colorectal surgery (LCS) and define the key components for learning advanced technical skills.

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic colorectal surgery is a complex procedure, often being self-taught by senior surgeons. Educational issues such as inadequate training facilities or a shortfall of training fellowships may result in a slow uptake of LCS. The effectiveness of mentored and simulated training, however, remains unclear.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search, using Ovid databases. Four study categories were identified: mentored versus nonmentored cases, training case selection, simulation, and assessment. We performed a meta-analysis and a mixed model regression on the difference of the main outcome measures (conversion rates, morbidity, and mortality) for mentored trainees and expert surgeons. We also compared conversion rates of mentored and nonmentored. Meta-analysis of risk factors for conversion was performed using published and unpublished data sets requested from various investigators. For studies on simulation, we compared scores of surveys on the perception of different training courses.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven studies were included. Pooled weighted outcomes of mentored cases (n = 751) showed a lower conversion rate (13.3% vs 20.5%, P = 0.0332) compared with nonmentored cases (n = 695). Compared to expert case series (n = 5313), there was no difference in conversion (P = 0.2835), anastomotic leak (P = 0.8342), or mortality (P = 0.5680). A meta-analysis of training case selection data (n = 4444) revealed male sex (P < 0.0001), previous abdominal surgery (P = 0.0200), a BMI greater than 30 (P = 0.0050), an ASA of less than 2 (P < 0.0001), colorectal cancer (P < 0.0001) and intra-abdominal fistula (P < 0.0001), but not older than 64 years (P = 0.4800), to significantly increase conversion risk. Participants on cadaveric courses were highly satisfied with the teaching value yet trainees on an animal course gave less positive feedback. Structured assessment for LCS has been partially implemented.

CONCLUSION

This review and meta-analysis supports evidence that trainees can obtain similar clinical results like expert surgeons in laparoscopic colorectal surgery if supervised by an experienced trainer. Cadaveric models currently provide the best value for training in a simulated environment. There remains a need for further research into technical skills assessment and the educational value of simulated training.

Predicting the risk of anastomotic leakage in left-sided colorectal surgery using a colon leakage score

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic leakage following colorectal surgery still occurs all too frequently, and this complication is difficult to predict. A nonfunctional stoma may reduce the risk of clinically relevant leaks but is overtreatment for most patients. More accurate assessments of the risk of anastomotic leakage would be very helpful in tailoring treatment in colorectal surgery. Therefore, a Colon Leakage Score (CLS) was developed and tested.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The CLS was developed based on information from the literature and expert opinions. It was tested in a retrospective cohort of consecutive patients undergoing left-sided colorectal surgery with primary anastomosis in a teaching hospital in The Netherlands.

RESULTS

In the test cohort, 10 of 121 patients who were not treated with a nonfunctional stoma experienced anastomotic leakage. The mean CLS in the leakage group was 16 versus eight in the group that did not have a leak (P < 0.01). Using receiver-operating characteristics, the area under the curve (AUC) showed that the CLS was a good predictor (AUC = 0.95, CI 0.89-1.00) of anastomotic leakage. Furthermore, logistic regression analysis with CLS as a predictor for anastomotic leakage showed an odds ratio of 1.74 (95% CI 1.32-2.28, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The CLS can predict the risk of anastomotic leakage following left-sided colorectal surgery. After further validation, this score may help the surgeon make a more individualized, safer decision regarding whether to perform an anastomosis or make a (nonfunctional) stoma.

Optimizing the management of elderly colorectal surgery patients

With the ever increasing number of geriatric surgical patients, there is a need to develop efficient processes that address all of the potential issues faced by patients during the perioperative period. This article explores the physiological changes in elderly surgical patients and the outcomes achieved after major abdominal surgery. Perioperative management strategies for elderly surgical patients in line with the practices of the Geriatric Surgical Team of Alexandra Health, Singapore, are also presented. A coordinated transdisciplinary approach best tackles the complexities encountered in these patients.

Single-port laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a safe alternative to conventional laparoscopy

PURPOSE

Single-port laparoscopic surgery has evolved from an effort to minimize tissue trauma, limit morbidity, and maximize cosmesis. Limited data exist comparing single-port with conventional laparoscopy for right colectomy. Our aim is to compare single-port with laparoscopic colectomy with regard to safety and feasibility. We assert that this approach can be adopted in a safe and efficacious manner while using standard laparoscopic instrumentation.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively gathered data regarding 16 single-port and 27 conventional laparoscopic right hemicolectomies performed by a single surgeon between January 2008 and February 2009. Demographics, operative outcomes, and morbidity were included and analyzed using either Student t test or Fisher exact probability test.

RESULTS

Single-port and conventional laparoscopic groups were similar with regard to age, gender, body mass index, prior abdominal surgery, and co-morbidity. Seventy-five percent and 70% of the operations were performed for malignancy in the single-port and the conventional laparoscopy group, respectively (P = .69). Operative duration was 106 minutes in the single-port group vs 100 minutes in the conventional group (P = .64). Blood loss was 54 mL and 90 mL, respectively (P = .07). No conversions or additions of ports occurred. Hospital stay was 5.3 days in the single-port group vs 6 days in the conventional group (P = .53). Margins were negative in both groups. Mean lymph node number was 18 and 16 nodes (P = .92). There was one death in the conventional group (P = .44). Morbidity including wound infection was 18.8% and 14.9%, respectively (P = .73).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings support single-port right colectomy as a safe and efficacious approach to right colon resections in patients eligible for laparoscopy with minimal additional equipment or learning curve for experienced laparoscopic colorectal surgeons. The single port was undertaken without an increase in morbidity or mortality. There was no increase in operative time with use of the single-port approach. Finally, adequate lymph node harvest and margin clearance was maintained.

Complications in colorectal surgery: risk factors and preventive strategies

BACKGROUND

Open or laparoscopic colorectal surgery comprises of many different types of procedures for various diseases. Depending upon the operation and modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors the intra- and postoperative morbidity and mortality rate vary. In general, surgical complications can be divided into intraoperative and postoperative complications and usually occur while the patient is still in the hospital.

METHODS

A literature search (1980-2009) was carried out, using MEDLINE, PubMed and the Cochrane library.

RESULTS

This review provides an overview how to identify and minimize intra- and postoperative complications. The improvement of different treatment strategies and technical inventions in the recent decade has been enormous. This is mainly attributable to the increase in the laparoscopic approach, which is now well accepted for many procedures. Training of the surgeon, hospital volume and learning curves are becoming increasingly more important to maximize patient safety, surgeon expertise and cost effectiveness. In addition, standardization of perioperative care is essential to minimize postoperative complications.

CONCLUSION

This review summarizes the main perioperative complications of colorectal surgery and influencable and non-influencable risk factors which are important to the general surgeon and the relevant specialist as well. In order to minimize or even avoid complications it is crucial to know these risk factors and strategies to prevent, treat or reduce intra- and postoperative complications.

Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic rectal surgery for primary rectal cancer in elderly patients: is it safe and beneficial?

PURPOSE

The role of laparoscopic resection in management of rectal cancer is still controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether laparoscopic rectal resection for rectal cancer could be safely performed in elderly patients.

METHODS

Forty-four elderly patients (> or =75 years) undergoing laparoscopic rectal resection (group A) were compared with 228 younger patients (<75 years) undergoing laparoscopic rectal resection (group B) and 43 elderly patients (> or =75 years) undergoing open rectal resection (group C).

RESULTS

The American Society of Anesthesiologists' status was significantly higher in group A than in group B. Operative procedure, operating time, and estimated blood loss were comparable, and overall postoperative complications did not differ significantly between groups A and B (13.6% vs. 11.8%). Operating time was longer (256 vs. 196 min), but estimated blood loss was significantly less (25 vs. 241 ml) in group A than in group C. The rate of postoperative complications was lower (13.6% vs. 25.6%) in group A than in group C, but the difference was not statistically significant. Time to flatus (1.3 vs. 3.7 days), time to liquid diet (2.2 vs. 7.0 days), and hospital stay (19 vs. 22 days) were significantly shorter in group A than in group C.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic rectal resection for elderly patients can be safely performed with similar postoperative outcomes as in younger patients and may have advantages in terms of faster gastrointestinal recovery and shorter length of hospital stay compared with open surgery.

After-hours colorectal surgery: a risk factor for anastomotic leakage

PURPOSE

This study aims to increase knowledge of colorectal anastomotic leakage by performing an incidence study and risk factor analysis with new potential risk factors in a Dutch tertiary referral center.

METHODS

All patients whom received a primary colorectal anastomosis between 1997 and 2007 were selected by means of operation codes. Patient records were studied for population description and risk factor analysis.

RESULTS

In total 739 patients were included. Anastomotic leakage (AL) occurred in 64 (8.7%) patients of whom nine (14.1%) died. Median interval between operation and diagnosis was 8 days. The risk for AL was higher as the anastomoses were constructed more distally (p = 0.019). Univariate analysis showed duration of surgery (p = 0.038), BMI (p = 0.001), time of surgery (p = 0.029), prophylactic drainage (p = 0.006) and time under anesthesia (p = 0.012) to be associated to AL. Multivariate analysis showed BMI greater than 30 kg/m(2) (p = 0.006; OR 2.6 CI 1.3-5.2) and "after hours" construction of an anastomosis (p = 0.030; OR 2.2 CI 1.1-4.5) to be independent risk factors.

CONCLUSION

BMI greater than 30 kg/m(2) and "after hours" construction of an anastomosis were independent risk factors for colorectal anastomotic leakage.