Abrogation of anti-HLA antibodies via proteasome inhibition. Transplantation. 2009;87:1555-1561. [PMID: 19461494 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0b013e3181a4b91b]

Determinants of long-term graft outcome in transplant glomerulopathy

BACKGROUND

Transplant glomerulopathy (TG) is a renal allograft disease defined by glomerular basement membrane duplication with peritubular capillary basement membrane multilayering (PTCML), and associated with anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies and C4d. Outcome in TG is poor but variable, and prognostic factors, particularly those affecting long-term outcome, are not well known. We investigated several potentially prognostic clinical and pathologic factors in TG and evaluated estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) slopes to assess graft function and early decline.

METHODS

We examined all cases of TG from 2001 to 2005 with at least 4-year follow-up after biopsy, excluding those with a second confounding diagnosis.

RESULTS

Among 36 cases of pure TG, mean graft age at biopsy was 8.8±6 years. C4d stain was positive in 11 (33%) cases. Clinical characteristics at biopsy were not different based on C4d. C4d was associated with greater PTCML (P=0.03), peritubular capillaritis (P=0.04), and glomerulitis (P=0.03). Death-censored graft survival was significantly associated with interstitial fibrosis (P=0.001), PTCML (P=0.001), and arteriolar hyalinosis (P=0.007), and it showed a trend with proteinuria (P=0.07) and C4d positivity (P=0.08). C4d-positive cases also showed a trend toward rapid graft loss. Analysis of eGFR slopes showed a pattern of preserved, slightly negative slope from transplant until approximately 1 year before biopsy, at which point the slope became significantly more negative (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Interstitial fibrosis, PTCML, and arteriolar hyalinosis were significant predictors of graft survival in TG. C4d positivity was associated with a more rapid rate of function decline. eGFR slope data showed significant deterioration in graft function well before the diagnostic biopsy.

The (re)emergence of B cells in organ transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To outline recent advances in our understanding of the role of B cells in transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

While T-cell-mediated alloimmunity has been largely controlled using immunosuppression, the role of B cells in transplantation is just beginning to be understood. Recent studies have outlined some of the important clinical issues involving antibody including early acute humoral rejection and late transplant glomerulopathy. In addition, recent studies have identified bone-marrow-derived long-lived plasma cells that appear to be a major source of donor-specific alloantibody in sensitized renal transplant recipients. New agents are being tested that deplete these cells in vitro and in vivo. Memory B cells appear to be important in early acute humoral rejection, but few basic studies have been performed. Finally, recent studies involving patients undergoing tolerogenic regimens suggest that T-cell tolerance does not always convey tolerance in naive B cells.

SUMMARY

Several B cell types have clear and specific roles in transplant recipients. Although our understanding of B cells in transplantation has improved, important gaps remain.

Stability of unused reconstituted bortezomib in original manufacturer vials

Background. Bortezomib is a modified dipeptidyl boronic acid analogue used to treat multiple myeloma, mantle cell lymphoma, and, more recently, renal transplantation graft rejection. As per manufacturer recommendations, bortezomib is to be administered within 8 h of preparation or may be stored for up to 8 h in the vial or a syringe following reconstitution. Preserving unused reconstituted bortezomib beyond these 8 h may allow for cost savings. This study aims to examine the stability of unused reconstituted bortezomib when stored at 4°C for up to 15 days.

Methods. Using an LC-MS/MS assay, the concentration of reconstituted bortezomib was measured at predetermined time points following storage at 4°C in the manufacturer vial. Percent bortezomib remaining at a time point was calculated versus initial bortezomib concentration.

Results. The concentrations of bortezomib were found to be 51.93 ng/mL ± 4.60 after 1 day of storage, 57.40 ng/mL ± 4.77 after 8 days of storage, and 49.43 ng/mL ± 2.85 after 15 days of storage. The percent of bortezomib remaining was 110.53% and 95.19% after 8 days and 15 days, respectively.

Conclusion. Unused reconstituted bortezomib is stable for up to 15 days stored at 4°C in the original manufacturer vial. Such use of bortezomib may improve cost efficiency by reducing bortezomib waste.

Advances in diagnosing and managing antibody-mediated rejection

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is a unique, significant, and often severe form of allograft rejection that is not amenable to treatment with standard immunosuppressive medications. Significant advances have occurred in our ability to predict patients at risk for, and to diagnose, AMR. These advances include the development of newer anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-antibody detection techniques and assays for non-HLA antibodies associated with AMR. The pathophysiology of AMR suggests a prime role for antibodies, B cells and plasma cells, but other effector molecules, especially the complement system, point to potential targets that could modify the AMR process. An emerging and potentially larger problem is the development of chronic AMR (CAMR) resulting from de novo donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) that emerge more than 100 days posttransplantation. Therapeutic options include: (1) High-dose intravenously administered immunoglobulin (IVIG), which has many potential benefits. (2) The use of IVIG+rituximab (anti-CD20, anti-B cell). (3) The combination of plasmapheresis (PP)+low-dose IVIG with or without rituximab. Data support the efficacy of all of the above approaches. Newer approaches to treating AMR include using the proteosome inhibitor (bortezomib), which induces apoptosis in plasma cells, and eculizumab (anti-C5, anticomplement monoclonal antibody).

Bortezomib in kidney transplantation

Although current therapies for pretransplant desensitization and treatment of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) have had some success, they do not specifically deplete plasma cells that produce antihuman leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies. Bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma (a plasma cell neoplasm), induces plasma cell apoptosis. In this paper we review the current body of literature regarding the use of this biological agent in the field of transplantation. Although limited experience with bortezomib may seem to show promise in the realm of transplant recipients desensitization and treatment of AMR, there is also experience that may suggest otherwise. Bortezomib's role in desensitization protocols and treatment of AMR will be defined better as more clinical data and trials become available.

Bortezomib: a new player in pre- and post-transplant desensitization?

Several desensitization strategies have been investigated for the reversal of acute antibody-mediated rejection or for the removal of preformed anti-HLA antibodies, with the aim to promote access to renal transplantation. Today, their success appears limited or incomplete. Bortezomib, a selective inhibitor of the 26S proteasome, which is largely used in the treatment of multiple myeloma, could be a novel promising desensitizing agent. Its mechanism of action and preliminary clinical use in renal transplantation is reviewed here.

B-lymphocyte homeostasis and BLyS-directed immunotherapy in transplantation

Current strategies for immunotherapy after transplantation are primarily T-lymphocyte directed and effectively abrogate acute rejection. However, the reality of chronic allograft rejection attests to the fact that transplantation tolerance remains an elusive goal. Donor-specific antibodies are considered the primary cause of chronic rejection. When naive, alloreactive B-cells encounter alloantigen and are activated, a resilient "sensitized" state, characterized by the presence of high-affinity antibody, is established. Here, we will delineate findings that support transient B-lymphocyte depletion therapy at the time of transplantation to preempt sensitization by eliminating alloreactive specificities from the recipient B-cell pool (ie, "repertoire remodeling"). Recent advances in our understanding of B-lymphocyte homeostasis provide novel targets for immunomodulation in transplantation. Specifically, the tumor necrosis factor-related cytokine BLyS is the dominant survival factor for "tolerance-susceptible" transitional and "preimmune" mature follicular B-cells. The transitional phenotype is the intermediate through which all newly formed B-cells pass before maturing into the follicular subset, which is responsible for mounting an alloantigen-specific antibody response. Systemic BLyS levels dictate the stringency of negative selection during peripheral B-cell repertoire development. Thus, targeting BLyS will likely provide an opportunity for repertoire-directed therapy to eliminate alloreactive B-cell specificities in transplant recipients, a requirement for the achievement of humoral tolerance and prevention of chronic rejection. In this review, the fundamentals of preimmune B-cell selection, homeostasis, and activation will be described. Furthermore, new and current B-lymphocyte-directed therapy for antibody-mediated rejection and the highly sensitized state will be discussed. Overall, our objective is to propose a rational approach for induction of humoral transplantation tolerance by remodeling the primary B-cell repertoire of the allograft recipient.

Evaluation of low-dose rituximab induction therapy in living related kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Rrituximab has been used for desensitization of anti-blood type antibody and anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibody as an induction immunosuppressant in our hospital. After having used rituximab for more than 2 years, we performed a retrospective study to clarify the effectiveness and safety of rituximab.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed 144 kidney transplants between January 2005 and December 2007 at our hospital. Low-dose rituximab was administered to 78 of these transplant recipients as an induction immunosuppressant. A comparison of viral infection, leucopenia, and rejection incidence between patients administered (Rit group) and not administered (Non-Rit group) rituximab before kidney transplantation was performed.

RESULT

A comparison of Rit group and Non-Rit group revealed no significant difference in the incidence of cytomegalovirus infections (Rit: 26%, Non-Rit: 29%; P=1.00), BK virus infections (Rit: 2.6%, Non-Rit: 0%; P=0.53), or leukopenia (Rit:23%, Non-Rit: 14%; P=0.25) between the two groups of patients. The incidence of acute antibody-mediated rejection was also not significantly different between the two groups (Rit: 6.8%, Non-Rit: 8.3%; P=0.75). On the other hand, the incidence of acute T-cell-mediated rejection was significantly lower in the Rit group (Rit: 8.2%, Non-Rit: 23.3%; P<0.05). Anti-HLA antibodies belonging to HLA class 1 and class 2 were depleted by 70% and 83%, respectively, for more than 2 years after rituximab administration.

CONCLUSIONS

We could confirm the effectiveness and safety of rituximab more than 2-year follow-up period.

Effect of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib on humoral immunity in two presensitized renal transplant candidates

BACKGROUND

Recipient presensitization represents a major hurdle to successful renal transplantation. Previous case series have suggested that the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib directly affects the alloantibody-secreting plasma cells in rejecting allograft recipients. However, the ability of this agent to desensitize nonimmunosuppressed transplant candidates before transplantation is currently unknown.

METHODS

In this analysis, two sensitized hemodialysis patients were selected to receive two subsequent bortezomib cycles. Bortezomib was given at 1.3 mg/m(2) on days 1, 4, 8, and 11. Dexamethasone was added to the second cycle to enhance treatment efficiency. Serial immune monitoring included cytotoxic panel reactive antibody testing, Luminex single antigen testing for anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) IgG with or without C4d-fixing capability, and ABO antibody detection.

RESULTS

During a half-year follow-up period, cytotoxic panel reactive antibody decreased from 87% to 80% (patient 1) and 37% to 13% (patient 2). Patient 1 showed a 40% reduction in binding intensities of identified Luminex HLA single antigen reactivities and, in parallel, slight reductions in ABO blood group antibody and total immunoglobulin levels. In patient 2, bortezomib did not affect circulating antibody levels in a meaningful way. Both patients showed a more than 50% reduction in the levels of anti-HLA antibody-triggered C4d deposition to Luminex beads.

CONCLUSION

Our initial experience suggests that, without additional immunosuppressive measures, bortezomib has modest effects on circulating antibodies against HLA or blood group antigens. The reduced levels of antibody-triggered complement fixation, however, imply potential clinical relevance of proteasome inhibition for recipient desensitization.

Efficacy of induction therapy with ATG and intravenous immunoglobulins in patients with low-level donor-specific HLA-antibodies

Low-level donor-specific HLA-antibodies (HLA-DSA) (i.e. detectable by single-antigen flow beads, but negative by complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch) represent a risk factor for early allograft rejection. The short-term efficacy of an induction regimen consisting of polyclonal anti-T-lymphocyte globulin (ATG) and intravenous immunoglobulins (IvIg) in patients with low-level HLA-DSA is unknown. In this study, we compared 67 patients with low-level HLA-DSA not having received ATG/IvIg induction (historic control) with 37 patients, who received ATG/IvIg induction. The two groups were equal regarding retransplants, HLA-matches, number and class of HLA-DSA. The overall incidence of clinical/subclinical antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) was lower in the ATG/IvIg than in the historic control group (38% vs. 55%; p = 0.03). This was driven by a significantly lower rate of clinical AMR (11% vs. 46%; p = 0.0002). Clinical T-cell-mediated rejection (TCR) was significantly lower in the ATG/IvIg than in the historic control group (0% vs. 50%; p < 0.0001). Within the first year, allograft loss due to AMR occurred in 7.5% in the historic control and in 0% in the ATG/IvIg group. We conclude that in patients with low-level HLA-DSA, ATG/IvIg induction significantly reduces TCR and the severity of AMR, but the high rate of subclinical AMR suggests an insufficient control of the humoral immune response.

Proteasome inhibitor-based primary therapy for antibody-mediated renal allograft rejection

BACKGROUND

Rapid and complete elimination of donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies (DSA) during antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is rarely achieved with traditional antihumoral therapies. Proteasome inhibitor-based therapy has been shown to effectively treat refractory AMR, but its use as a primary therapy for AMR has not been presented. Our initial experience with proteasome inhibition as a first-line therapy for AMR is presented.

METHODS

Adult kidney transplant recipients with AMR, diagnosed by Banff criteria, received a bortezomib-based regimen as the primary therapy. Bortezomib therapy was administered per package insert with plasmapheresis performed immediately before each bortezomib dose, and a single rituximab dose (375 mg/m2) given with the first bortezomib dose. DSA were quantitated using single-antigen beads on a Luminex platform.

RESULTS

Two patients underwent bortezomib-based therapy for acute AMR occurring within the first 2 weeks after transplantation. High DSA levels and positive C4d staining of peritubular or glomerular capillaries were present at the time of diagnosis. Both patients experienced prompt AMR reversal and elimination of detectable DSA within 14 days of bortezomib-based therapy. Renal function remains excellent with normal urinary protein excretion at 5 and 6 months after AMR diagnosis. One patient experienced a repeated elevation of DSA (including two new human leukocyte antigen specificities) 2 months after initial bortezomib therapy, but without C4d deposition or histologic evidence of AMR. Retreatment with bortezomib provided prompt, complete, and durable DSA elimination.

CONCLUSIONS

Proteasome inhibitor-based combination therapy provides a potential means for rapid DSA elimination in early acute AMR in renal transplant recipients.

What should work, may not

When new agents such as bortezomib appear, it is important to maintain scientific rigor regarding off-label use of medications.

Bortezomib as the sole post-renal transplantation desensitization agent does not decrease donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies

Persistence of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) associated with antibody-mediated graft injuries following kidney transplantation predicts evolution toward chronic humoral rejection and reduced graft survival. Targeting plasma cells, the main antibody-producing cells, with the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib may be a promising desensitization strategy. We evaluated the in vivo efficacy of one cycle of bortezomib (1.3 mg/m(2)x 4 doses), used as the sole desensitization therapy, in four renal transplant recipients experiencing subacute antibody-mediated rejection with persisting DSA (>2000 [Mean Fluorescence Intensity] MFI). Bortezomib treatment did not significantly decrease DSA MFI within the 150-day posttreatment period in any patient. In addition, antivirus (HBV, VZV and HSV) antibody levels remained stable following treatment suggesting a lack of efficacy on long-lived plasma cells. In conclusion, one cycle of bortezomib alone does not decrease DSA levels in sensitized kidney transplant recipients in the time period studied. These results underscore the need to evaluate this new desensitization agent properly in prospective, randomized and well-controlled studies.

The yin and yang of B cells in graft rejection and tolerance

Various lineages of B cells are being increasingly recognized as important players in the etiology and prognosis of both acute and chronic graft rejection. The role of immature, chronically activated B cells, as efficient antigen-presenting cells, supporting recalcitrant cell-mediated graft rejection and late lineage B cells driving humoral rejections, is being increasingly recognized. This review captures the recent literature on this subject and discusses the various roles of the B cell in renal graft rejection and conversely, also in graft tolerance, both in animal and human studies. In addition, novel therapies targeting specific B-cell lineages in graft rejection are also discussed, with a view to developing more targeted therapies for graft rejection.

Proteasome inhibition for antibody-mediated rejection

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to describe the biochemistry and physiology of proteasome inhibition and to discuss recent studies with proteasome inhibitor therapy in organ transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Traditional antihumoral therapies do not deplete plasma cells, the source of antibody production. Proteasome inhibition depletes both transformed and nontransformed plasma cells in animal models and human transplant recipients. Bortezomib is a first in a class proteasome inhibitor that has been shown to effectively treat antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplant recipients. In this experience, bortezomib provided reversal of histologic changes and also induced a reduction in donor-specific anti-HLA antibody levels. Recent experiences have also shown that bortezomib reduces donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibody in the absence of rejection. Finally, evidence has been presented that bortezomib therapy depletes human leukocyte antigen-specific antibody producing plasma cells.

SUMMARY

Proteasome inhibition induces a complex series of biochemical events that results in pleiotropic effects on multiple cell populations, and plasma cells in particular. Initial clinical results have provided evidence that bortezomib effectively treats antibody-mediated rejection and acute cellular rejection and reduces or eliminates donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibody. Carefully designed clinical trials are needed to accurately define the role of proteasome inhibition in transplant recipients.

B-cell tolerance in transplantation: is repertoire remodeling the answer?

T lymphocytes are the primary targets of immunotherapy in clinical transplantation; however, B lymphocytes and their secreted alloantibodies are also highly detrimental to the allograft. Therefore, the achievement of sustained organ transplant survival will likely require the induction of B-lymphocyte tolerance. During development, acquisition of B-cell tolerance to self-antigens relies on clonal deletion in the early stages of B-cell compartment ontogeny. We contend that this mechanism should be recapitulated in the setting of alloantigens and organ transplantation to eliminate the alloreactive B-cell subset from the recipient. Clinically feasible targets of B-cell-directed immunotherapy, such as CD20 and B-lymphocyte stimulator (BLyS), should drive upcoming clinical trials aimed at remodeling the recipient B-cell repertoire.

Noninvasive methods to assess the risk of kidney transplant rejection

In current clinical practice, immune reactivity of kidney transplant recipients is estimated by monitoring the levels of immunosuppressive drugs, and by functional and/or histological evaluation of the allograft. The availability of assays that could directly quantify the extent of the recipient's immune response towards the allograft would help clinicians to customize the prescription of immunosuppressive drugs to individual patients. Importantly, these assays might provide a more in-depth understanding of the complex mechanisms of acute rejection, chronic injury, and tolerance in organ transplantation, allowing the design of new and potentially more effective strategies for the minimization of immunosuppression, or even for the induction of immunological tolerance. The purpose of this review is to summarize results from recent studies in this field.