Treg-therapy allows mixed chimerism and transplantation tolerance without cytoreductive conditioning

Rapamycin as immunosuppressant in murine transplantation model

The potent immunosuppressive action of rapamycin has been described in many different mouse models of transplantation. In these models, rapamycin prevent or delay allograft rejection. In several models, rapamycin allowed mixed donor-recipient hematopoietic chimerism to develop facilitating tolerance induction. In our own experience, we observed that rapamycin synergized with CD8(+) T cell depletion and coreceptor/costimulation blockade to induce long-term survival of Balb/C to C57Bl/6 heterotopic limb allograft. Herein, we describe immunosuppression cocktails containing rapamycin and methods to evaluate several read outs associated with tolerance induction such as mixed donor-recipient hematopoietic chimerism and in vitro or in vivo recipient alloreactivity.

Hematopoietic chimerism and transplantation tolerance: a role for regulatory T cells

The immunosuppressive regimens currently used in transplantation to prevent allograft destruction by the host's immune system have deleterious side effects and fail to control chronic rejection processes. Induction of donor-specific non-responsiveness (i.e., immunological tolerance) to transplants would solve these problems and would substantially ameliorate patients' quality of life. It has been proposed that bone marrow or hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation, and resulting (mixed) hematopoietic chimerism, lead to immunological tolerance to organs of the same donor. However, a careful analysis of the literature, performed here, clearly establishes that whereas hematopoietic chimerism substantially prolongs allograft survival, it does not systematically prevent chronic rejection. Moreover, the cytotoxic conditioning regimens used to achieve long-term persistence of chimerism are associated with severe side effects that appear incompatible with a routine use in the clinic. Several laboratories recently embarked on different studies to develop alternative strategies to overcome these issues. We discuss here recent advances obtained by combining regulatory T cell infusion with bone-marrow transplantation. In experimental settings, this attractive approach allows development of genuine immunological tolerance to donor tissues using clinically relevant conditioning regimens.

Belatacept: from rational design to clinical application

Gradually improved immunosuppression has contributed significantly to the progress achieved in transplantation medicine so far. Nevertheless, current drug regimens are associated with late graft loss--in particular as a result of immunologic damage or drug toxicity--and substantial morbidity. Recently, the costimulation blocker belatacept (marketed under the name Nulojix®) has been approved for immunosuppression in renal transplantation. Belatacept (a mutated version of CTLA4Ig) is a fusion protein rationally designed to block CD28, a critical activating receptor on T cells, by binding and saturating its ligands B7-1 and B7-2. In phase II and III trials, belatacept was compared with cyclosporine (in combination with basiliximab, MMF, and steroids). Advantages observed with belatacept include superior graft function, preservation of renal structure and improved cardiovascular risk profile. Concerns associated with belatacept are a higher frequency of cellular rejection episodes and more post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) cases especially in EBV seronegative patients, who should be excluded from belatacept-based regimens. Thus, after almost three decades of calcineurin inhibitors as mainstay of immunosuppression, belatacept offers a potential alternative. In this article, we will provide an overview of belatacept's preclinical development and will discuss the available evidence from clinical trials.

Learning to live together: harnessing regulatory T cells to induce organ transplant tolerance

The discovery of immune cells with regulatory effects has created considerable excitement for their potential use in inducing tolerance to transplanted tissues. Despite the fact that these cells possess essential functions in vivo, attempts to translate them into effective clinical therapies has proved challenging due to a number of unanticipated complexities in their behavior. This article provides a broad summary of research done to understand the largest of the regulatory cell subtypes, namely CD4+Foxp3+ Regulatory T cells (T(Regs)). Special attention will be paid to current and future difficulties in using T(Regs) clinically, as well as room for improvement and innovation in this field.

Dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPPIV/CD26) inhibition does not improve engraftment of unfractionated syngeneic or allogeneic bone marrow after nonmyeloablative conditioning

In order to develop minimally toxic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) protocols suitable for use in a wider range of indications, it is important to identify ways to enhance BM engraftment at a given level of recipient conditioning. CXCL12/stromal cell-derived factor-1α plays a crucial physiological role in homing of hematopoietic stem cells to BM. It is regulated by the ectopeptidase dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPPIV; DPP4) known as CD26, which cleaves dipeptides from the N-terminus of polypeptide chains. Blocking DPPIV enzymatic activity had a beneficial effect on hematopoietic stem cell engraftment in various but very specific experimental settings. Here we investigated whether inhibition of DPPIV enzymatic activity through Diprotin A or sitagliptin (Januvia) improves BM engraftment in nonmyeloablative murine models of syngeneic (i.e., CD45-congenic) and allogeneic (i.e., Balb/c to B6) BMT (1 Gy total body irradiation, 10–15 × 10⁶ unseparated BM cells/mouse). Neither Diprotin A administered in vivo at the time of BMT and/or used for in vitro pretreatment of BM nor sitagliptin administered in vivo had a detectable effect on the level of multilineage chimerism (follow-up >20 weeks). Similarly, sitagliptin did not enhance chimerism after allogeneic BMT, even though DPPIV enzymatic activity measured in serum was profoundly inhibited (>98% inhibition at peak exposure). Our results provide evidence that DPPIV inhibition via Diprotin A or sitagliptin does not improve engraftment of unseparated BM in a nonmyeloablative BMT setting.

Therapeutic efficacy of polyclonal tregs does not require rapamycin in a low-dose irradiation bone marrow transplantation model

BACKGROUND

Mixed chimerism is an effective strategy for the induction of transplantation tolerance but the toxicity of recipient conditioning makes current bone marrow (BM) transplantation (BMT) protocols unsuitable for widespread clinical application. Therapies promoting BM engraftment under minimal conditioning would facilitate translation of this concept to the clinic. Recently, we have shown that regulatory T cell (Treg) therapy has potent engraftment-enhancing effects in an irradiation-free noncytotoxic BMT protocol, but only if it is combined with rapamycin treatment.

METHODS

Here, we investigated whether polyclonal Treg therapy is effective in promoting chimerism and tolerance in an otherwise unsuccessful BMT protocol using low-dose total body irradiation (1 Gy) and costimulation blockade and determined whether Tregs do so on their own without rapamycin.

RESULTS

The application of polyclonal FoxP3-transduced recipient Tregs led to durable multilineage chimerism and donor-specific skin graft tolerance whereas recipients receiving costimulation blockade alone or green flourescent protein (GFP)-transduced cells failed to develop chimerism. Infused Tregs had a limited life span as indicated by polymerase chain reaction analysis but rather contribute to de novo induction of subsequent Treg generations. Deletion of donor-reactive T cells was observed but progressed more slowly over time compared with recipients of a nonmyeloablative BMT protocol using 3 Gy total body irradiation.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, Treg therapy promotes BM engraftment on its own in a low-dose irradiation BMT protocol, leading to chimerism and tolerance maintained through deletional and nondeletional mechanisms.

Costimulatory pathways in transplantation

Secondary, so-called costimulatory, signals are critically required for the process of T cell activation. Since landmark studies defined that T cells receiving a T cell receptor signal without a costimulatory signal, are tolerized in vitro, the investigation of T cell costimulation has attracted intense interest. Early studies demonstrated that interrupting T cell costimulation allows attenuation of the alloresponse, which is particularly difficult to modulate due to the clone size of alloreactive T cells. The understanding of costimulation has since evolved substantially and now encompasses not only positive signals involved in T cell activation but also negative signals inhibiting T cell activation and promoting T cell tolerance. Costimulation blockade has been used effectively for the induction of tolerance in rodent models of transplantation, but turned out to be less potent in large animals and humans. In this overview we will discuss the evolution of the concept of T cell costimulation, the potential of 'classical' and newly identified costimulation pathways as therapeutic targets for organ transplantation as well as progress towards clinical application of the first costimulation blocking compound.

Differential outcomes in prediabetic vs. overtly diabetic NOD mice nonmyeloablatively conditioned with costimulatory blockade

OBJECTIVE

Autoimmune diabetes can be reversed with mixed chimerism. However, the myelotoxic agents currently required to establish chimerism have prevented the translation of this approach to the clinic. Here, we investigated whether multimodal costimulatory blockade would enhance chimerism and promote islet allograft tolerance in spontaneously diabetic nonobese diabetic (NOD) mice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Prediabetic and spontaneously diabetic NOD mice were preconditioned with anti-CD8 monoclonal antibody before conditioning with 500 cGy total body irradiation and transplantation with 30 × 10(6) B10.BR bone marrow cells. Overtly diabetic animals were conditioned similarly and transplanted with 300 to 400 B10.BR islets. After irradiation, both groups of recipients were treated with anti-CD154, anti-OX40L, and anti-inducible T-cell costimulatory monoclonal antibodies. Urine, blood glucose levels, and chimerism were monitored.

RESULTS

Conditioning of NOD mice with costimulatory blockade significantly enhanced engraftment, with 61% of mice engrafting at 1 month. Eleven of 12 chimeric animals with engraftment at 1 month remained diabetes-free over a 12-month follow-up, whereas nonchimeric animals progressed to diabetes. In contrast, similar conditioning prolonged islet allograft survival in only 2 of 11 overtly diabetic NOD recipients. Chimerism levels in the 9 islet rejector animals were 0%.

CONCLUSIONS

Although nonmyeloablative conditioning reversed the autoimmune process in prediabetic NOD mice, the same regimen was significantly less effective in establishing chimerism and reversing autoimmune diabetes in spontaneously diabetic NOD mice.

Regulatory T cells and IL-17-producing cells in graft-versus-host disease

Graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), a major complication following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, is mediated by donor-derived T cells. On activation with alloantigens expressed on host antigen-presenting cells, naive CD4+ T cells differentiate into T-helper cell subsets of effector T cells expressing distinct sets of transcriptional factors and cytokines. Classically, acute GvHD was suggested to be predominantly related to Th1 responses. However, we now face a completely different and complex scenario involving possible roles of newly identified Th17 cells as well as Tregs in GvHD. Accumulating data from experimental and clinical studies suggest that the fine balance between Th1, Th2, Th17 and Tregs after transplantation may be an important determinant of the severity, manifestation and tissue distribution of GvHD. Understanding the dynamic process of reciprocal differentiation of regulatory and T-helper cell subsets as well as their interactions will be important in establishing novel strategies for preventing and treating GvHD.

Requirements for prolongation of allograft survival with regulatory T cell infusion in lymphosufficient hosts

BACKGROUND

For the clinical applicability of regulatory T cells (Tregs) in transplantation, it is critical to determine if donor antigen specificity is required for their immunosuppressive function. We developed an allospecific CD4(+) T cell receptor transgenic (TCR-tg) mouse as a source for large numbers of Tregs with defined allospecificity and tested whether they are more effective than polyclonal Tregs at suppressing allograft rejection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

CD4(+)CD25(+)CD62L(hi) T cells were sorted from the spleen and peripheral lymph nodes of wild-type (WT-Tregs) and TCR-tg (Allo-Tregs) mice, and expanded using IL-2 and anti-CD3/anti-CD28 conjugated magnetic beads. Tregs were tested for their ability to suppress the proliferation and cytokine production of alloreactive CD4(+)CD25(-) T cells in mixed leukocyte assays. Syngeneic WT hosts were adoptively transferred 5 × 10(6) Tregs and transplanted with allogeneic hearts.

RESULTS

Using anti-CD3/anti-CD28 conjugated beads, Tregs were expanded in vitro 100-fold and maintained their suppressor phenotype and function. Allo-Tregs were 6-8 times more potent on a cell-for-cell basis than WT-Tregs in suppressing allospecific proliferation in vitro. Allo-Tregs were unable to suppress in the absence of allo-antigen. Adoptive transfer of expanded Allo-Tregs into WT recipients prolonged the graft survival in a F1 heart transplant model compared with WT-Treg or no treatment [20.0 ± 4.4 d (n = 6) versus 10.4 ± 1.2 (n = 8) and 9.7 ± 1.6 d (n = 6)].

CONCLUSIONS

Unlike polyclonal Tregs, allospecific Tregs are able to prolong allograft survival. However, large numbers of Allo-Tregs were unable to induce tolerance, suggesting that Treg therapy in immunocompetent recipients will require conditioning and/or additional immunomodulation for the induction of tolerance.

Immunoregulation and tolerance

T-regulatory cells (Tregs), a subset of CD4(+)CD25(+) lymphocytes, have the functional ability to suppress alloimmune responses in vitro and in vivo. Conditions that promote their development and enhance their biological function may be attractive for promoting unresponsiveness to organ transplants. Among the various mechanistic influences of sirolimus, one of its properties as an in vivo agent is to enhance Treg development and function. Therefore, sirolimus is being evaluated as a component of strategies to promote tolerance in organ transplant recipients. On the other hand, Treg promotion by sirolimus may be offset by other properties such as its influence on T-memory cells and B-cell activation. Other immunosuppressive agents will likely need to be used in combination with sirolimus to control the B-cell response. The development of novel genotypic markers of tolerance for liver and kidney transplant recipients should enhance our ability to measure the impact of immunosuppressive strategies with respect to their ability to promote tolerance in the clinical setting.

Transplantation tolerance: Clinical potential of regulatory T cells

The major challenge in transplantation medicine remains long-term allograft acceptance, with preserved allograft function under minimal chronic immunosuppression. To safely achieve the goal of sustained donor-specific T and B cell non-responsiveness, research efforts are now focusing on therapies based on cell subsets with regulatory properties. In particular the transfusion of human regulatory T cells (Treg) is currently being evaluated in phase I/II clinical trials for the treatment of graft versus host disease following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and is also under consideration for solid organ transplantation. The purpose of this review is to recapitulate current knowledge on naturally occurring as well as induced human Treg, with emphasis on their specific phenotype, suppressive function and how these cells can be manipulated in vitro and/or in vivo for therapeutic purposes in transplantation medicine. We highlight the potential but also possible limitations of Treg-based strategies to promote long-term allograft survival. It is evident that the bench-to-beside translation of these protocols still requires further understanding of Treg biology. Nevertheless, current data already suggest that Treg therapy alone will not be sufficient and needs to be combined with other immunomodulatory approaches in order to induce allograft tolerance.

Cell-based therapy in allergy

IgE-mediated allergy is an immunological disorder occurring in response to otherwise harmless environmental antigens (i.e., allergens). Development of effective therapeutic or preventive approaches inducing robust tolerance toward allergens remains an unmet goal. Several experimental tolerance approaches have been described. The therapeutic use of regulatory T cells (Tregs) and the establishment of molecular chimerism are two cell-based strategies that are of particular interest. Treg therapy is close to clinical application, but its efficacy remains to be fully defined. Recent proof-of-concept studies demonstrated that transplantation of syngeneic hematopoietic stem cells modified in vitro to express a major allergen leads to molecular chimerism and robust allergen-specific tolerance. Here we review cell-based tolerance strategies in allergy, discussing their potentials and limitations.

Infusion of Lin- bone marrow cells results in multilineage macrochimerism and skin allograft tolerance in minimally conditioned recipient mice

Donor-specific immunological tolerance using high doses of donor bone marrow cells (BMC) has been demonstrated in mixed chimerism-based tolerance induction protocols; however, the development of graft versus host disease (GVHD) remains a risk. In the present study, we demonstrate that the infusion of low numbers of donor Lin(-) bone marrow cells (Lin(-) BMC) 7 days post allograft transplantation facilitates high level macrochimerism induction and graft tolerance. Full-thickness BALB/c skin allografts were transplanted onto C57BL/6 mice. Mice were treated with anti-CD4 and anti-CD8 mAbs on day 0, +2, +5, +7 and +14 along with low dose busulfan on day +5. A low dose of highly purified Lin(-) BMC from BALB/c donor mice was infused on day +7. Chimerism and clonal cell deletion were evaluated using flow cytometry. Donor-specific tolerance was tested by donor and third-party skin grafting and mixed leukocyte reaction (MLR). Lin(-) BMC infusion with minimal immunosuppression led to stable, mixed, multilineage macrochimerism and long-term allograft survival (>300 days). Mixed donor-recipient macrochimerism was observed. Donor-reactive T cells were clonally deleted and a 130% increase in CD4(+)CD25(+)Foxp3(+) regulatory T cells (Tregs) was observed in the spleen. Tolerant mice subsequently accepted second donor, but not third-party (C3H), skin grafts and recipient splenocytes failed to react with allogeneic donor cells indicating donor-specific immunological tolerance was achieved. We conclude that the infusion of donor Lin(-) BMC without cytoreductive recipient conditioning can induce indefinite survival of skin allografts via mechanisms involving the establishment of a multilineage macrochimeric state principally through clonal deletion of alloreactive T cells and peripherally induced CD4(+)Foxp3(+) Tregs.