MEK Inhibition, Alone or in Combination with BRAF Inhibition, Affects Multiple Functions of Isolated Normal Human Lymphocytes and Dendritic Cells

Immune Effects of Chemotherapy, Radiation, and Targeted Therapy and Opportunities for Combination With Immunotherapy

There have been significant advances in cancer treatment over the past several years through the use of chemotherapy, radiation therapy, molecularly targeted therapy, and immunotherapy. Despite these advances, treatments such as monotherapy or monomodality have significant limitations. There is increasing interest in using these strategies in combination; however, it is not completely clear how best to incorporate molecularly targeted and immune-targeted therapies into combination regimens. This is particularly pertinent when considering combinations with immunotherapy, as other types of therapy may have significant impact on host immunity, the tumor microenvironment, or both. Thus, the influence of chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and molecularly targeted therapy on the host anti-tumor immune response and the host anti-host response (ie, autoimmune toxicity) must be taken into consideration when designing immunotherapy-based combination regimens. We present data related to many of these combination approaches in the context of investigations in patients with melanoma and discuss their potential relationship to management of patients with other tumor types. Importantly, we also highlight challenges of these approaches and emphasize the need for continued translational research.

Combined BRAF and MEK inhibition for the treatment of BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma

Combined BRAF and MEK inhibition out-performed BRAF inhibitor monotherapy in 3 randomized Phase 3 studies for BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma patients and the combination of BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib with MEK inhibitor trametinib is now an FDA-approved treatment in this setting. Nevertheless, the majority of patients face progressive disease even when treated with the combination. Mechanisms of resistance to BRAF inhibition have been extensively investigated, whilst less is known about the specific mechanisms of resistance to combined therapy. The aim of this paper is to review the efficacy and safety of the combination of BRAF plus MEK inhibitors compared with BRAF inhibitor monotherapy and immunotherapy, as well as to discuss the existing evidence for the mechanisms of resistance to combined therapy and assess future treatment strategies to improve outcome based on data provided by clinical and translational research studies.

Improved antitumor activity of immunotherapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors in BRAF(V600E) melanoma

Combining immunotherapy and BRAF targeted therapy may result in improved antitumor activity with the high response rates of targeted therapy and the durability of responses with immunotherapy. However, the first clinical trial testing the combination of the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib and the CTLA4 antibody ipilimumab was terminated early because of substantial liver toxicities. MEK [MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase) kinase] inhibitors can potentiate the MAPK inhibition in BRAF mutant cells while potentially alleviating the unwanted paradoxical MAPK activation in BRAF wild-type cells that lead to side effects when using BRAF inhibitors alone. However, there is the concern of MEK inhibitors being detrimental to T cell functionality. Using a mouse model of syngeneic BRAF(V600E)-driven melanoma, SM1, we tested whether addition of the MEK inhibitor trametinib would enhance the antitumor activity of combined immunotherapy with the BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib. Combination of dabrafenib and trametinib with pmel-1 adoptive cell transfer (ACT) showed complete tumor regression, increased T cell infiltration into tumors, and improved in vivo cytotoxicity. Single-agent dabrafenib increased tumor-associated macrophages and T regulatory cells (Tregs) in tumors, which decreased with the addition of trametinib. The triple combination therapy resulted in increased melanosomal antigen and major histocompatibility complex (MHC) expression and global immune-related gene up-regulation. Given the up-regulation of PD-L1 seen with dabrafenib and/or trametinib combined with antigen-specific ACT, we tested the combination of dabrafenib, trametinib, and anti-PD1 therapy in SM1 tumors, and observed superior antitumor effect. Our findings support the testing of triple combination therapy of BRAF and MEK inhibitors with immunotherapy in patients with BRAF(V600E) mutant metastatic melanoma.

Combining targeted therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of metastatic melanoma

Melanoma is the deadliest form of skin cancer and has an incidence that is rising faster than any other solid tumor. Metastatic melanoma treatment has considerably progressed in the past five years with the introduction of targeted therapy (BRAF and MEK inhibitors) and immune checkpoint blockade (anti-CTLA4, anti-PD-1, and anti-PD-L1). However, each treatment modality has limitations. Treatment with targeted therapy has been associated with a high response rate, but with short-term responses. Conversely, treatment with immune checkpoint blockade has a lower response rate, but with long-term responses. Targeted therapy affects antitumor immunity, and synergy may exist when targeted therapy is combined with immunotherapy. This article presents a brief review of the rationale and evidence for the potential synergy between targeted therapy and immune checkpoint blockade. Challenges and directions for future studies are also proposed.

The BRAF and MEK Inhibitors Dabrafenib and Trametinib: Effects on Immune Function and in Combination with Immunomodulatory Antibodies Targeting PD-1, PD-L1, and CTLA-4

PURPOSE

To assess the immunologic effects of dabrafenib and trametinib in vitro and to test whether trametinib potentiates or antagonizes the activity of immunomodulatory antibodies in vivo.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Immune effects of dabrafenib and trametinib were evaluated in human CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells from healthy volunteers, a panel of human tumor cell lines, and in vivo using a CT26 mouse model.

RESULTS

Dabrafenib enhanced pERK expression levels and did not suppress human CD4(+) or CD8(+) T-cell function. Trametinib reduced pERK levels, and resulted in partial/transient inhibition of T-cell proliferation/expression of a cytokine and immunomodulatory gene subset, which is context dependent. Trametinib effects were partially offset by adding dabrafenib. Dabrafenib and trametinib in BRAF V600E/K, and trametinib in BRAF wild-type tumor cells induced apoptosis markers, upregulated HLA molecule expression, and downregulated certain immunosuppressive factors such as PD-L1, IL1, IL8, NT5E, and VEGFA. PD-L1 expression in tumor cells was upregulated after acquiring resistance to BRAF inhibition in vitro. Combinations of trametinib with immunomodulators targeting PD-1, PD-L1, or CTLA-4 in a CT26 model were more efficacious than any single agent. The combination of trametinib with anti-PD-1 increased tumor-infiltrating CD8(+) T cells in CT26 tumors. Concurrent or phased sequential treatment, defined as trametinib lead-in followed by trametinib plus anti-PD-1 antibody, demonstrated superior efficacy compared with anti-PD-1 antibody followed by anti-PD-1 plus trametinib.

CONCLUSION

These findings support the potential for synergy between targeted therapies dabrafenib and trametinib and immunomodulatory antibodies. Clinical exploration of such combination regimens is under way.

Immune checkpoint modulation: rational design of combination strategies

Immune recognition and elimination of malignant cells require a series of steps orchestrated by the innate and the adaptive arms of the immune system. The majority of tumors have evolved mechanisms that allow for successful evasion of these immune responses. Recognition of these evasive processes led to the development of immunotherapeutic antibodies targeting the co-stimulatory and co-inhibitory receptors on T cells, with the goal of enhancement of T cell activation or reversal of tumor-induced T cell inhibition. Several of these agents, such as antibodies targeting cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed death receptor 1 (PD-1) have already demonstrated significant promise in clinical trials. Clinical benefit of these antibodies as single agents, however, has been limited to a subset of patients and has not been observed in all tumor types. These limitations call for the development of rational combination strategies aiming to extend therapeutic benefit to a broader range of patients. These include: 1) modalities that enhance antigen presentation, such as radiation, cryotherapy, chemotherapy, targeted agents, vaccines, toll-like receptor (TLR) agonists, type I interferon, and oncolytic viruses; 2) additional agents aiming to reverse T cell dysfunction, such as other immune checkpoint inhibitors; and 3) agents targeting other immune inhibitory mechanisms, such as inhibitors of indoleamine dioxygenase (IDO), regulatory T cells, and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs). It is becoming increasingly evident that the efficacy of specific combinations will likely not be universal and that the choice of a treatment modality may need to be tailored to fit the needs of each individual patient.

RAF Inhibitor Therapy Promotes Melanocytic Antigen Expression and Enhanced Anti-Tumor Immunity in Melanoma

Melanoma remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, however tremendous advances have been made in its treatment over the past several years. The discovery of genomic alterations that contribute to oncogenicity has ushered in a new era of molecularly-targeted therapy. Importantly, over half of melanomas harbor a mutation in the BRAF gene that leads to constitutive signaling down the MAPK pathway and multiple subsequent deleterious effects. Pharmacologic agents targeting this mutation have been developed and several are now FDA-approved, having yielded high response rates to therapy although these are tempered by a short duration of response. Multiple molecular mechanisms of resistance have been identified; however until recently few studies had delved into the immune effects of BRAF inhibitors. The effect of BRAF inhibition on anti-tumor immunity will be discussed herein, as will potential implications of these findings in the treatment of melanoma.

The kinase inhibitors dabrafenib and trametinib affect isolated immune cell populations

Metastatic melanoma is frequently fatal. Optimal treatment regimens require both rapid and durable disease control, likely best achieved by combining targeted agents with immunotherapeutics. In order to accomplish this, a detailed understanding of the immune consequences of the kinase inhibitors used to treat melanoma is required.

Immune consequences of kinase inhibitors in development, undergoing clinical trials and in current use in melanoma treatment

Metastatic malignant melanoma is a frequently fatal cancer. In recent years substantial therapeutic progress has occurred with the development of targeted kinase inhibitors and immunotherapeutics. Targeted therapies often result in rapid clinical benefit however responses are seldom durable. Immune therapies can result in durable disease control but responses may not be immediate. Optimal cancer therapy requires both rapid and durable cancer control and this can likely best be achieved by combining targeted therapies with immunotherapeutics. To achieve this, a detailed understanding of the immune consequences of the various kinase inhibitors, in development, clinical trial and currently used to treat melanoma is required.