Ambulatory blood pressure changes after renal sympathetic denervation in patients with resistant hypertension

Reverse cardiac remodeling after renal denervation: Atrial electrophysiologic and structural changes associated with blood pressure lowering

BACKGROUND

Hypertension is the most common modifiable risk factor associated with atrial fibrillation.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of blood pressure (BP) lowering after renal denervation on atrial electrophysiologic and structural remodeling in humans.

METHODS

Fourteen patients (mean age 64 ± 9 years, duration of hypertension 16 ± 11 years, on 5 ± 2 antihypertensive medications) with treatment-resistant hypertension underwent baseline 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring, echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and electrophysiologic study. Electrophysiologic study included measurements of P-wave duration, effective refractory periods, and conduction times. Electroanatomic mapping of the right atrium was completed using CARTO3 to determine local and regional conduction velocity and tissue voltage. Bilateral renal denervation was performed, and all measurements repeated after 6 months.

RESULTS

After renal denervation, mean 24-hour BP reduced from 152/84 mm Hg to 141/80 mm Hg at 6-month follow-up (P < .01). Global conduction velocity increased significantly (0.98 ± 0.13 m/s to 1.2 ± 0.16 m/s at 6 months, P < .01), conduction time shortened (32 ± 5 ms to 27 ± 6 ms, P < .01), and complex fractionated activity was reduced (37% ± 14% to 19% ± 12%, P = .02). Changes in conduction velocity correlated positively with changes in 24-hour mean systolic BP (R(2) = 0.55, P = .01). There was a significant reduction in left ventricular mass (139 ± 37 g to 120 ± 29 g, P < .01) and diffuse ventricular fibrosis (T1 partition coefficient 0.39 ± 0.07 to 0.31 ± 0.09, P = .01) on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

CONCLUSION

BP reduction after renal denervation is associated with improvements in regional and global atrial conduction and reductions in ventricular mass and fibrosis. Whether changes in electrical and structural remodeling are solely due to BP lowering or are due in part to intrinsic effects of renal denervation remains to be determined.

The effect of renal denervation on kidney oxygenation as determined by BOLD MRI in patients with hypertension

OBJECTIVES

Renal denervation (RDN) is a promising therapy for resistant hypertension. RDN is assumed to decrease sympathetic activity. Consequently, RDN can potentially increase renal oxygenation. Blood oxygen level-dependent MRI (BOLD-MRI) provides a non-invasive tool to determine renal oxygenation in humans. The aim of the current study was to investigate the effect of RDN on renal oxygenation as determined by BOLD-MRI.

METHODS

Patients with resistant hypertension or the inability to follow a stable drug regimen due to unacceptable side effects were included. BOLD-MRI was performed before and 12 months after RDN. Twenty-seven patients were imaged on 3 T and 19 on 1.5 T clinical MRI systems.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients were included, 46 patients (23 men, mean age 57 years) completed the study. Mean 24-h BP changed from 163(±20)/98(±14) mmHg to 154(±22)/92(±13) mmHg (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001). eGFR did not change after RDN [77(±18) vs. 79(±20) mL/min/1.73 m(2); p = 0.13]. RDN did not affect renal oxygenation [1.5 T: cortical R2*: 12.5(±0.9) vs. 12.5(±0.9), p = 0.94; medullary R2*: 19.6(±1.7) vs. 19.3(1.4), p = 0.40; 3 T: cortical R2*: 18.1(±0.8) vs. 17.8(±1.2), p = 0.47; medullary R2*: 27.4(±1.9) vs. 26.7(±1.8), p = 0.19].

CONCLUSION

The current study shows that RDN does not lead to changes in renal oxygenation 1 year after RDN as determined by BOLD-MRI.

KEY POINTS

• Renal denervation significantly decreased ambulatory blood pressure. • Renal denervation did not change renal oxygenation as determined by BOLD-MRI. • Absence of a change in renal oxygenation might be explained by autoregulation.

Innervation patterns may limit response to endovascular renal denervation

BACKGROUND

Renal denervation is a new interventional approach to treat hypertension with variable results.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to correlate response to endovascular radiofrequency ablation of renal arteries with nerve and ganglia distributions. We examined how renal neural network anatomy affected treatment efficacy.

METHODS

A multielectrode radiofrequency catheter (15 W/60 s) treated 8 renal arteries (group 1). Arteries and kidneys were harvested 7 days post-treatment. Renal norepinephrine (NEPI) levels were correlated with ablation zone geometries and neural injury. Nerve and ganglion distributions and sizes were quantified at discrete distances from the aorta and were compared with 16 control arteries (group 2).

RESULTS

Nerve and ganglia distributions varied with distance from the aorta (p < 0.001). A total of 75% of nerves fell within a circumferential area of 9.3, 6.3, and 3.4 mm of the lumen and 0.3, 3.0, and 6.0 mm from the aorta. Efficacy (NEPI 37 ng/g) was observed in only 1 of 8 treated arteries where ablation involved all 4 quadrants, reached a depth of 9.1 mm, and affected 50% of nerves. In 7 treated arteries, NEPI levels remained at baseline values (620 to 991 ng/g), ≤20% of the nerves were affected, and the ablation areas were smaller (16.2 ± 10.9 mm(2)) and present in only 1 to 2 quadrants at maximal depths of 3.8 ± 2.7 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

Renal denervation procedures that do not account for asymmetries in renal periarterial nerve and ganglia distribution may miss targets and fall below the critical threshold for effect. This phenomenon is most acute in the ostium but holds throughout the renal artery, which requires further definition.

Results of the ALSTER BP real-world registry on renal denervation employing the Symplicity system

AIMS

To prove the efficacy and safety of renal sympathetic denervation as a new treatment option for patients suffering from resistant hypertension in a real-world setting.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This single-centre real-world registry included 93 patients who underwent renal denervation employing the Symplicity system. Patients were followed for six months. The patient cohort was divided into early responders with a reduction of office systolic blood pressure >10 mmHg three months after the procedure (n=53, 57%), late responders (six months after the procedure, n=16, 17%) and non-responders (n=24, 26%). After six months, systolic blood pressure was lowered by 46±2.9 mmHg (mean±SEM, p<0.001), 31±3.4 mmHg (p<0.001) and 7.1±3.3 mmHg (p=0.79, ns), respectively. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring also showed a significant reduction in the early responder group (20±5.7 mmHg, p=0.002). We subjected eight patients to a re-do procedure which led to a significant reduction of blood pressure in another five patients after six months (63%). One patient in this cohort developed a one-sided renal artery stenosis associated with an increase in blood pressure.

CONCLUSIONS

This real-world analysis of renal sympathetic denervation confirms the procedure to be safe and efficient in the majority of patients. Non-responders may profit from a second ablation, arguing in favour of the hypothesis that the procedure did not destroy sufficient amounts of sympathetic innervation in these patients. However, repeated denervations may also increase side effects.

Renal Denervation After SYMPLICITY HTN-3: Where Do We Go?

Previous preclinical and clinical studies provide insight into the mechanisms that account for the chronic lowering of blood pressure (BP) during suppression of central and peripheral sympathetic outflow. From these mechanisms, novel and alternative approaches to BP control in patients with hypertension resistant to medical therapy have been proposed. Over the past 5 years, data from prospective cohorts and randomized studies showed that renal denervation therapy is a safe procedure associated with a significant reduction of office BP but only a modest reduction in ambulatory BP despite intensive ongoing medical therapy. Recently, the failure of the most rigourously designed randomized study, SYMPLICITY HTN-3, to meet its primary efficacy end point has raised several questions and unresolved methodological issues. Further prospective randomized controlled trials are required to further assess the efficacy, durability, and cost-effectiveness of renal denervation therapy and its effects on cardiovascular and renal outcomes in carefully selected patients with true treatment-resistant hypertension.

Is the failure of SYMPLICITY HTN-3 trial to meet its efficacy endpoint the "end of the road" for renal denervation?

Resistant hypertension is a common medical problem that is increasing with the advent of an increasingly older and heavier population. The etiology of resistant hypertension is almost always multifactorial, but the results of numerous studies indicate that renal sympathetic activation is a particularly common cause of resistance to antihypertensive treatment. Consistent with the belief in a pivotal role of renal sympathetic stimulation, there has been a growing interest in renal denervation (RDN) treatment strategies. The long-awaited results of SYMPLICITY HTN-3 study disclosed that the reduction in blood pressure by the SYMPLICITY device did not differ from that in the sham-procedure arm of the study. In the present article, we identify several factors that explain why the study failed to demonstrate any benefit from the intervention. The reasons are multifactorial and include inadequate screening at entry and frequent medication changes during the study. Additional problems include the lack of experience of many operators with the SYMPLICITY device and procedure variability, as attested to by a diminished number of ablation "quadrants." Also a factor was the inability of the first generation Medtronic device to allow four ablations to be performed simultaneously. We recommend that future RDN studies adhere to more rigorous screening procedures, and utilize newer multi-site denervation systems that facilitate four ablations simultaneously. Drug optimization should be achieved by monitoring adherence throughout the study. Nevertheless, we are optimistic about a future role of RDN. To optimize chances of success, increased efforts are necessary to identify the appropriate patients for RDN and investigators must use second and third generation denervation devices and techniques.

[New invasive therapies for management of resistant hypertension]

The failure of pharmacological approaches to treat resistant hypertension has stimulated interest in invasive device-based treatments. New catheter systems using radiofrequency or ultrasound energy have been developed, allowing a percutaneous endovascular approach to renal denervation for patients with resistant hypertension. To date, this technique has been evaluated only in a few open-label trials including small numbers and the available evidence suggests a favorable blood pressure-lowering effect in the short-term and a low incidence of immediate complications. All studies published to date have several limitations due to their open-label design. Carotid baroreceptor stimulation requires surgical implantation of electrodes connected to a stimulator. Preliminary results show a positive effect on blood pressure with a complication rate similar to the implantation of a pacemaker. In this context, there are arguments against an uncontrolled use of these procedures in routine practice: an unknown benefit/risk ratio, a variable blood pressure response, absence of cost-effectiveness evaluation. The indications of these procedures should follow the 2013 European Society of Hypertension guidelines. A strict follow-up of patients remains necessary at best by including them in clinical trials or international registries.

Renal Denervation After Symplicity HTN-3 - Back to Basics. Review of the Evidence

Renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) has been proposed as a new treatment modality in patients with apparent treatment resistant hypertension, a condition defined as office blood pressure elevation despite prescription of at least three antihypertensive drugs including a diuretic. However, the impressive fall in blood pressure reported after RDN in Symplicity HTN-2, the first randomised study, and multiple observational studies has not been confirmed in the US sham-controlled trial Symplicity HTN-3 and four subsequent prospective randomised studies, all published or presented in 2014. The blood pressure reduction documented in earlier studies may be largely due to non-specific effects such as improvement of drug adherence in initially poorly adherent patients (Hawthorne effect), placebo effect and regression to the mean. The overall blood pressure lowering effect of RDN seems rather limited and the characteristics of true responders remain largely unknown. Accordingly, RDN is not ready for clinical practice. In most patients with apparent drug-resistant hypertension, drug monitoring and subsequent improvement of drug adherence may prove more effective and cost-beneficial to achieve blood pressure control. In the meantime, research should aim at identifying characteristics of those few patients adherent to drug treatment and with true resistant hypertension who may respond to RDN.

Sympathetic neural activity to the cardiovascular system: integrator of systemic physiology and interindividual characteristics

The sympathetic nervous system is a ubiquitous, integrating controller of myriad physiological functions. In the present article, we review the physiology of sympathetic neural control of cardiovascular function with a focus on integrative mechanisms in humans. Direct measurement of sympathetic neural activity (SNA) in humans can be accomplished using microneurography, most commonly performed in the peroneal (fibular) nerve. In humans, muscle SNA (MSNA) is composed of vasoconstrictor fibers; its best-recognized characteristic is its participation in transient, moment-to-moment control of arterial blood pressure via the arterial baroreflex. This property of MSNA contributes to its typical "bursting" pattern which is strongly linked to the cardiac cycle. Recent evidence suggests that sympathetic neural mechanisms and the baroreflex have important roles in the long term control of blood pressure as well. One of the striking characteristics of MSNA is its large interindividual variability. However, in young, normotensive humans, higher MSNA is not linked to higher blood pressure due to balancing influences of other cardiovascular variables. In men, an inverse relationship between MSNA and cardiac output is a major factor in this balance, whereas in women, beta-adrenergic vasodilation offsets the vasoconstrictor/pressor effects of higher MSNA. As people get older (and in people with hypertension) higher MSNA is more likely to be linked to higher blood pressure. Skin SNA (SSNA) can also be measured in humans, although interpretation of SSNA signals is complicated by multiple types of neurons involved (vasoconstrictor, vasodilator, sudomotor and pilomotor). In addition to blood pressure regulation, the sympathetic nervous system contributes to cardiovascular regulation during numerous other reflexes, including those involved in exercise, thermoregulation, chemoreflex regulation, and responses to mental stress.

Efficacy and Safety of Catheter-Based Radiofrequency Renal Denervation in Stented Renal Arteries

Background—

In selected patients with hypertension, renal artery (RA) stenting is used to treat significant atherosclerotic stenoses. However, blood pressure often remains uncontrolled after the procedure. Although catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) can reduce blood pressure in certain patients with resistant hypertension, there are no data on the feasibility and safety of RDN in stented RA.

Methods and Results—

We report marked blood pressure reduction after RDN in a patient with resistant hypertension who underwent previous stenting. Subsequently, radiofrequency ablation was investigated within the stented segment of porcine RA, distal to the stented segment, and in nonstented RA and compared with stent only and untreated controls. There were neither observations of thrombus nor gross or histological changes in the kidneys. After radiofrequency ablation of the nonstented RA, sympathetic nerves innervating the kidney were significantly reduced, as indicated by significant decreases in sympathetic terminal axons and reduction of norepinephrine in renal tissue. Similar denervation efficacy was found when RDN was performed distal to a renal stent. In contrast, when radiofrequency ablation was performed within the stented segment of the RA, significant sympathetic nerve ablation was not seen. Histological observation showed favorable healing in all arteries.

Conclusions—

Radiofrequency ablation of previously stented RA demonstrated that RDN provides equally safe experimental procedural outcomes in a porcine model whether the radiofrequency treatment is delivered within, adjacent, or without the stent struts being present in the RA. However, efficacious RDN is only achieved when radiofrequency ablation is delivered to the nonstented RA segment distal to the stent.

Joint UK societies' 2014 consensus statement on renal denervation for resistant hypertension

Resistant hypertension continues to pose a major challenge to clinicians worldwide and has serious implications for patients who are at increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality with this diagnosis. Pharmacological therapy for resistant hypertension follows guidelines-based regimens although there is surprisingly scant evidence for beneficial outcomes using additional drug treatment after three antihypertensives have failed to achieve target blood pressure. Recently there has been considerable interest in the use of endoluminal renal denervation as an interventional technique to achieve renal nerve ablation and lower blood pressure. Although initial clinical trials of renal denervation in patients with resistant hypertension demonstrated encouraging office blood pressure reduction, a large randomised control trial (Symplicity HTN-3) with a sham-control limb, failed to meet its primary efficacy end point. The trial however was subject to a number of flaws which must be taken into consideration in interpreting the final results. Moreover a substantial body of evidence from non-randomised smaller trials does suggest that renal denervation may have an important role in the management of hypertension and other disease states characterised by overactivation of the sympathetic nervous system. The Joint UK Societies does not recommend the use of renal denervation for treatment of resistant hypertension in routine clinical practice but remains committed to supporting research activity in this field. A number of research strategies are identified and much that can be improved upon to ensure better design and conduct of future randomised studies.

Novel and nonpharmacologic approaches to cardio-protection in hypertension

Hypertension has wide (30-45 %) prevalence in the general population and is related to important increases in overall cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Despite lifestyle modifications and optimal medical therapy (three drugs, one being diuretic), about 5-20 % of hypertensives are affected by resistant hypertension. Chronic high blood pressure has adverse effects on the heart and other organs such as the kidneys and vasculature. Renal sympathetic denervation and baroreceptor stimulation are invasive approaches initially investigated to treat resistant hypertension. Their pleiotropic effects appear promising in cardiovascular remodeling, heart failure and arrhythmias and could potentially affect cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.

A novel method of selective ablation of afferent renal nerves by periaxonal application of capsaicin

Renal denervation has been shown to lower arterial pressure in some hypertensive patients, yet it remains unclear whether this is due to ablation of afferent or efferent renal nerves. To investigate the role of afferent renal nerves in arterial pressure regulation, previous studies have used methods that disrupt both renal and nonrenal afferent signaling. The present study was conducted to develop and validate a technique for selective ablation of afferent renal nerves that does not disrupt other afferent pathways. To do this, we adapted a technique for sensory denervation of the adrenal gland by topical application of capsaicin and tested the hypothesis that exposure of the renal nerves to capsaicin (renal-CAP) causes ablation of afferent but not efferent renal nerves. Renal-CAP had no effect on renal content of the efferent nerve markers tyrosine hydroxylase and norepinephrine; however, the afferent nerve marker, calcitonin gene-related peptide was largely depleted from the kidney 10 days after intervention, but returned to roughly half of control levels by 7 wk postintervention. Moreover, renal-CAP abolished the cardiovascular responses to acute pharmacological stimulation of afferent renal nerves. Renal-CAP rats showed normal weight gain, as well as cardiovascular and fluid balance regulation during dietary sodium loading. To some extent, renal-CAP did blunt the bradycardic response and increase the dipsogenic response to increased salt intake. Lastly, renal-CAP significantly attenuated the development of deoxycorticosterone acetate-salt hypertension. These results demonstrate that renal-CAP effectively causes selective ablation of afferent renal nerves in rats.

Effects of renal denervation on atrial arrhythmogenesis

ABSTRACT 

Atrial fibrillation is the most common sustained arrhythmia and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. In addition to mechanisms such as atrial stretch and atrial remodeling, the activity of the autonomic nervous system has also been suggested to contribute to the progression from paroxysmal to persistent atrial fibrillation. Catheter-based renal denervation was introduced as a minimally invasive approach to reduce renal and whole body sympathetic activation with accompanying blood pressure reduction and left-ventricular morphological and functional improvement in drug-resistant hypertension. This review focuses on the potential effects of renal denervation on different arrhythmogenic mechanisms in the atrium and discusses potential anti-remodeling effects in atrial fibrillation patients with hypertension, heart failure and sleep apnea.

Experimental Evidence Of The Role Of Renal Sympathetic Denervation For Treating Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. In addition to mechanisms such as atrial stretch and atrial remodeling, also the activity of the autonomic nervous system has been suggested to contribute to the progression from paroxysmal to persistent AF. Catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) was introduced as a minimally invasive approach to reduce renal and whole body sympathetic activation which may result in atrial antiarrhythmic effects under some pathophysiological conditions. This review focuses on the potential effects of RDN on different arrhythmogenic mechanisms in the atrium and discusses potential anti-remodeling effects in hypertension, heart failure, and sleep apnea.

Impact of baroreflex activation therapy on renal function--a pilot study

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Resistant hypertension and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are interlinked via sympathetic overdrive. Baroreflex activation therapy (BAT) has been shown to chronically reduce blood pressure (BP) in patients with resistant hypertension. The effect of BAT on renal function in CKD patients with resistant hypertension has not been reported. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of sympathetic inhibition on renal function in CKD patients.

METHODS

23 CKD patients with resistant hypertension were prospectively treated with BAT. Analyses were performed before and 6 months after the start of BAT. The renal function was analyzed by creatinine, cystatin C, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), renin, aldosterone, fractioned and 24-hour sodium excretion and analyses of urine marker proteins. The purpose of the control group was to investigate the influence of treating patients in a center for hypertension and regression to the mean on investigated variables.

RESULTS

The office mean BP decreased from 116.9 ± 20.9 mm Hg to 104.2 ± 22.2 mm Hg (p < 0.01), while the number of prescribed antihypertensive classes decreased from 6.6 ± 1.6 to 6.1 ± 1.7 (p = 0.02). Proteinuria and albuminuria decreased from a median of 283.9 and 47.7 to 136.5 (p = 0.01) and 45.0 mg/g creatinine (p = 0.01) with pronounced effects in higher CKD stage III + IV compared to I + II (p < 0.01). CKD-EPI cystatin C equation improved from 53.6 ± 22.7 to 60.4 ± 26.1 ml/min (p = 0.02). While creatinine and GFR were impaired after a period of 6 months, no changes of proteinuria, albuminuria, or BP were obtained in control patients.

CONCLUSION

The data of this prospective trial demonstrate potential nephroprotective effects of BAT in therapy-resistant hypertension in CKD patients by a reduction of BP, proteinuria and moreover, a stabilization of estimated GFR.

Reduced effect of percutaneous renal denervation on blood pressure in patients with isolated systolic hypertension

Renal denervation can reduce blood pressure in certain patients with resistant hypertension. The effect in patients with isolated systolic hypertension (ISH, ≥140/<90 mm Hg) is unknown. This study investigated the effects of renal denervation in 126 patients divided into 63 patients with ISH and 63 patients with combined hypertension (CH, ≥140/≥90 mm Hg) defined as baseline office systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥140 mm Hg despite treatment with ≥3 antihypertensive agents. Renal denervation significantly reduced office SBP and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) at 3, 6, and 12 months by 17/18/17 and 5/4/4 mm Hg in ISH and by 28/27/30 and 13/16/18 mm Hg in CH, respectively. The reduction in SBP and DBP in ISH was lower compared with patients with CH at all observed time points (P<0.05 for SBP/DBP intergroup comparison). The nonresponder rate (change in office SBP <10 mm Hg) after 6 months was 37% in ISH and 21% in CH (P<0.001). Mean 24-hour ambulatory SBP and DBP after 3, 6, and 12 months were significantly reduced by 10/13/15 and 6/6/9 mm Hg in CH, respectively. In patients with ISH the reduction in systolic ambulatory blood pressure was 4/8/7 mm Hg (P=0.032/P<0.001/P=0.009) and 3/4/2 mm Hg (P=0.08/P<0.001/P=0.130) in diastolic ambulatory blood pressure after 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. The ambulatory blood pressure reduction was significantly lower after 3 and 12 months in SBP and after 12 months in ambulatory DBP, respectively. In conclusion, renal denervation reduces office and ambulatory blood pressure in patients with ISH. However, this reduction is less pronounced compared with patients with CH.

Beneficial effects of renal sympathetic denervation on cardiovascular inflammation and remodeling in essential hypertension

BACKGROUND

Renal sympathetic denervation (RSD) represents a potential treatment option for certain patients with resistant arterial hypertension (HT). HT is associated with chronic vascular inflammation and remodeling, contributing to progressive vascular damage, and atherosclerosis. The present study aimed to evaluate the influence of RSD on cardiovascular inflammation and remodeling by determining serum levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6), high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP), matrix metalloproteinases (MMP), and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases (TIMP).

METHODS

A total of 60 consecutive patients (age 67.9 ± 9.6 years) undergoing RSD were included. A therapeutic response was defined as an office systolic blood pressure (SBP) reduction of >10 mmHg 6 months after RSD. Venous serum samples for measurement of hsCRP, IL-6, MMP-2, MMP-9, and TIMP-1 were collected prior to and 6 months after RSD.

RESULTS

A significant reduction in office SBP of 26.4 mmHg [SBPbaseline 169.3 mmHg (SD 11.3), p < 0.001] was documented 6 months after RSD. The serum levels of hsCRP (p < 0.001) and the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-6 (p < 0.001) were significantly decreased compared to baseline values. The levels of MMP-9 (p = 0.024) and MMP-2 (p < 0.01) were significantly increased compared to baseline values.

CONCLUSION

In addition to the effective blood pressure reduction in response to RSD, this study demonstrates a positive effect of RSD on biomarkers reflecting vascular inflammation and remodeling. These results suggest a possible prognostic benefit of RSD in high-risk patients for endothelial dysfunction and cardiovascular remodeling as well as end-organ damage.

Effect of long-term antihypertensive treatment on white-coat hypertension

Limited evidence is available on the extent and frequency by which antihypertensive treatment lowers office blood pressure (BP) in white-coat hypertension (WCH). Data are even more scanty and discrepant on the corresponding effect on ambulatory BP (ABP). In the hypertensive patients of the European Lacidipine Study on Atherosclerosis (ELSA), office and ABP were measured before treatment and at 6-month (office BP) or 12-month (ABP) intervals during the 4-year administration of calcium channel blocker-based or β-blocker-based treatment. The two groups were pooled and data were analyzed separately in patients with both office and ABP elevation (n=1670; sustained hypertension) or WCH (n=251; office BP elevation only). In sustained hypertension, office and 24-hour mean systolic BP were both markedly reduced through the treatment period, the mean change being -20.0±12.5 and -10.1±11.0 mm Hg, respectively (P<0.0001 for both). In striking contrast, in WCH the office BP reduction was almost as marked as in sustained hypertension (-19.1±11.2 mm Hg; P<0.0001), whereas 24-hour systolic BP values showed no fall or a slight progressive significant increase, its mean change during treatment being 1.6±8.6 mm Hg (P=0.007). Lowering of office BP occurred at a lower treatment intensity in WCH than in sustained hypertension. Similar findings were obtained for diastolic BP. In WCH, antihypertensive treatment should not be expected to have a lowering effect on ABP, even when office BP undergoes a concomitant marked and persistent reduction. The consequence of this contrasting effect on the incidence of hypertension-related outcomes remains to be established.

Catheter-Based Renal Denervation for Resistant Hypertension

Renal denervation has emerged as a novel approach for the treatment of patients with drug-resistant hypertension. To date, only limited data have been published using multielectrode radiofrequency ablation systems. In this article, we present the 12-month data of EnligHTN I, a first-in-human study using a multielectrode ablation catheter. EnligHTN I enrolled 46 patients (average age, 60±10 years; on average 4.7±1.0 medications) with drug-resistant hypertension. Eligible patients were on ≥3 antihypertensive medications and had a systolic blood pressure (BP) ≥160 mm Hg (≥150 mm Hg for diabetics). Bilateral renal artery ablation was performed using a percutaneous femoral approach and standardized techniques. The average baseline office BP was 176/96 mm Hg, average 24-hour ambulatory BP was 150/83 mm Hg, and average home BP was 158/90 mm Hg. The average reductions (mm Hg) at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months were as follows: office: −28/−10, −27/−10, −26/−10, and −27/−11 mm Hg ( P <0.001 for all); 24-hour ambulatory: −10/−5, −10/−5, −10/−6 ( P <0.001 for all), and −7/−4 for 12 months ( P <0.0094). Reductions in home measurements (based on 2-week average) were −9/−4, −8/−5,−10/−7, and −11/−6 mm Hg ( P <0.001 at 12 months). At 12 months, there were no signals of worsening renal function and no new serious or life-threatening adverse events. One patient with baseline nonocclusive renal artery stenosis progressed to 75% diameter stenosis, requiring renal artery stenting. The 12-month data continue to demonstrate safety and efficacy of the EnligHTN ablation system in patients with drug-resistant hypertension. Home BP measurements parallel measurements obtained with 24-hour ambulatory monitoring.

Renal sympathetic nervous system and the effects of denervation on renal arteries

Resistant hypertension is associated with chronic activation of the sympathetic nervous system resulting in various comorbidities. The prevalence of resistant hypertension is often under estimated due to various reasons. Activation of sympathetic nervous system at the renal- as well as systemic- level contributes to the increased level of catecholamines and resulting increase in the blood pressure. This increased activity was demonstrated by increased muscle sympathetic nerve activity and renal and total body noradrenaline spillover. Apart from the hypertension, it is hypothesized to be associated with insulin resistance, congestive heart failure and obstructive sleep apnea. Renal denervation is a novel procedure where the sympathetic afferent and efferent activity is reduced by various techniques and has been used successfully to treat drug-resistant hypertension improvement of various metabolic derangements. Renal denervation has the unique advantage of offering the denervation at the renal level, thus mitigating the systemic side effects. Renal denervation can be done by various techniques including radiofrequency ablation, ultrasound guided ablation and chemical ablation. Various trials evaluated the role of renal denervation in the management of resistant hypertension and have found promising results. More studies are underway to evaluate the role of renal denervation in patients presenting with resistant hypertension in different scenarios. Appropriate patient selection might be the key in determining the effectiveness of the procedure.

Detection, evaluation, and treatment of severe and resistant hypertension: proceedings from an American Society of Hypertension Interactive forum held in Bethesda, MD, U.S.A., October 10th 2013

The epidemiology, evaluation, and management of severe and resistant hypertension in the United States (US) are evolving. The American Society of Hypertension held a multi-disciplinary forum in October 2013 to review the available evidence related to the management of resistant hypertension with both drug and device therapies. There is strong evidence that resistant hypertension is an important clinical problem in the US and many other regions of the world. Complex drug therapy is effective in most of the patients with severe and resistant hypertension, but there are certain individuals who may be refractory to multiple-drug regimens or have adverse effects that make adherence to the regimen difficult. When secondary forms of hypertension and pseudo-resistance, such as medication nonadherence, or white-coat hypertension based on marked differences between clinic and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, have been excluded, the impact of device therapy is under evaluation through clinical trials in the US and from clinical practice registries in Europe and Australia. Clinical trial data have been obtained primarily in patients whose resistant hypertension is defined as systolic clinic blood pressures of ≥160 mm Hg (or ≥ 150 mm Hg in type 2 diabetes) despite pharmacologic treatment with at least three antihypertensive drugs (one of which is a thiazide or loop diuretic). Baroreceptor stimulation therapy has shown modest benefit in a moderately sized sham-controlled study in drug-resistant hypertension. Patients selected for renal denervation have typically been restricted to those with preserved kidney function (estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥ 45 mL/min/1.73 m2). The first sham-controlled safety and efficacy trial for renal denervation (SYMPLICITY HTN-3) did not show benefit in this population when used in addition to an average of five antihypertensive medications. Analyses of controlled clinical trial data from future trials with novel designs will be of critical importance to determine the effectiveness of device therapy for patients with severe and resistant hypertension and will allow for proper determination of patient selection and whether it will be acceptable for clinical practice. At present, the focus on the management of severe and resistant hypertension will be through careful evaluation for pseudo-resistance and secondary forms of hypertension, appropriate use of combination pharmacologic therapy, and greater utility of specialists in hypertension.

Catheter-based renal denervation for treatment of patients with treatment-resistant hypertension: 36 month results from the SYMPLICITY HTN-2 randomized clinical trial

AIM

The aim of this study was to determine long-term results of renal artery denervation for treatment of treatment-resistant hypertension in the SYMPLICITY HTN-2 study.

METHODS

SYMPLICITY HTN-2 randomized 106 subjects with treatment-resistant hypertension to renal denervation or medical therapy alone. At 6 months, 37 control subjects crossed over to renal denervation. Office blood pressure measurements, antihypertensive medication use, and safety events were followed every 6 months through 3 years.

RESULTS

Follow-up was available at 36 months in 40 of 52 subjects in the initial renal denervation group and at 30 months in 30 of 37 subjects who crossed over and received renal denervation at 6 months. Baseline blood pressure was 184 ± 19/99 ± 16 mmHg in all treated subjects. At 30-month post-procedure, systolic blood pressure decreased 34 mmHg (95% CI: -40, -27, P < 0.01) and diastolic blood pressure decreased 13 mmHg (95% CI: -16, -10, P < 0.01). The systolic and diastolic blood pressure reduction at 36 months for the initial renal denervation group was -33 mmHg (95% CI: -40, -25, P < 0.01) and -14 mmHg (95% CI: -17, -10, P < 0.01), respectively. Procedural complications included one haematoma, and one renal artery dissection before energy delivery that was treated successfully. Later complications included two cases of acute renal failure, which fully resolved, 15 hypertensive events requiring hospitalization, and three deaths.

CONCLUSION

Renal denervation resulted in sustained lowering of blood pressure at 3 years in a selected population of subjects with severe, treatment-resistant hypertension without serious safety concerns.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT00888433.

Renal sympathetic denervation: early impact on ambulatory resistant hypertension

Although guidelines recommend ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring (ABPM), few data are available regarding the effects of renal denervation (RDN) on 24-hour ABPM values. A total of 44 patients with mean systolic BP ≥135 mm Hg on ABPM despite adequate therapy were included. Basal systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) were 154±11 mm Hg and 86±12 mm Hg, respectively. At 1 month, SBP and DBP were reduced to 146±18 mm Hg (P=.01) and 82±14 mm Hg and showed no further decrease up to 6 months. Only 55% of the patients responded to RDN (≥-5 mm Hg SBP), with a mean responder rate drop of 21/11 mm Hg. Neither the number of ablation points nor the amount of impedance drop was predictive of response. Only approximately half of patients with resistant hypertension responded to RDN. However, in these responders, a remarkable reduction of 24-hour BP occurred as early as 1 month after RDN.