Immunohistochemical test for MLH1 and MSH2 expression predicts clinical outcome in stage II and III colorectal cancer patients

hMSH2 and hMLH1 gene expression patterns differ between lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma: correlation with patient survival and response to adjuvant chemotherapy treatment

BACKGROUND

We recently showed that the mRNA levels of mismatch repair (MMR) proteins in non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) tissue specimens and the phenotypic translation of molecular MMR data refines the biology of the MMR system with consequent diagnostic implications in the clinical assessment of lung cancer patients.

METHODS

hMLH1 and hMSH2 mRNA expression was previously evaluated by qPCR for 29 NSCLC patients (13 with squamous cell carcinoma [SQC] and 16 with adenocarcinoma [ADC]) and MMR mRNA levels were converted into clinically distinct phenotypic entities. In this study, we evaluated the correlation of the hMSH2 and hMLH1 mRNA phenotypes with patient survival and their response to adjuvant chemotherapy.

RESULTS

hMSH2 and hMLH1 mRNA phenotypic distribution differed between SQC and ADC. The MMR phenotypes differed also between advanced and early stage SQC. SQC patients with an increased hMSH2 expression had a better outcome than patients with a reduced hMSH2 expression. However, ADC patients with an increased hMSH2 expression had a poor outcome compared to those with low hMSH2 levels. SQC patients with a high hMSH2 expression exhibited a better response to adjuvant chemotherapy, whereas ADC patients with high hMSH2 levels had a poor response. ADC patients with low hMSH2 levels showed good response to adjuvant chemotherapy compared to SQC patients bearing the same phenotypic profile.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings show that MMR mRNA phenotypes may be added to the known biological differences between SQC and ADC. hMLH1 and hMSH2 phenotypes distributed differently according to the NSCLC stage. Distinct MMR mRNA phenotypes in SQC and ADC corresponded to patient response to adjuvant chemotherapy.

Prostate cancer screening in BRCA and Lynch syndrome mutation carriers

Prostate cancer (PrCa) remains a major public health burden worldwide. Screening programs have been established using the most efficient biomarker to date-prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-with the goal of earlier detection of this disease, which is thought to translate to a reduction in PrCa mortality. However, these screening programs have proved to be controversial following the publication of the two large, randomized, population-based studies in the United States and Europe. There is a recognized need for more refined screening strategies to address some of the deficiencies highlighted in these trials, which include the overdiagnosis and overtreatment of clinically indolent disease. One such strategy could be to include inherited genetic variants in population risk stratification to identify those at higher risk who might benefit more from screening. The genetic component for PrCa risk has been documented from case control and twin studies. The genetic variants include common variants discovered by genome-wide association studies (GWAS). However, their clinical application-including their utility in screening programs-is as yet undefined. There are, however, moderate to rare genetic variants, which confer a much higher risk of PrCa (e.g., BRCA1/2 and mismatch repair [MMR] repair genes). There is more research evidence on the clinical effect of germ-line mutations in these genes; mutation carriers are more likely to develop aggressive PrCa with worse survival. A targeted screening approach might be beneficial if earlier diagnosis, and hence treatment, was to translate into improved outcomes. Clinical trials are currently underway to investigate this further.

Microsatellite instability has a positive prognostic impact on stage II colorectal cancer after complete resection: results from a large, consecutive Norwegian series

Background

Microsatellite instability (MSI) was suggested as a marker for good prognosis in colorectal cancer in 1993 and a systematic review from 2005 and a meta-analysis from 2010 support the initial observation. We here assess the prognostic impact and prevalence of MSI in different stages in a consecutive, population-based series from a single hospital in Oslo, Norway.

Patients and methods

Of 1274 patients, 952 underwent major resection of which 805 were included in analyses of MSI prevalence and 613 with complete resection in analyses of outcome. Formalin-fixed tumor tissue was used for PCR-based MSI analyses.

Results

The overall prevalence of MSI was 14%, highest in females (19%) and in proximal colon cancer (29%). Five-year relapse-free survival (5-year RFS) was 67% and 55% (P = 0.030) in patients with MSI and MSS tumors, respectively, with the hazard ratio (HR) equal to 1.60 (P = 0.045) in multivariate analysis. The improved outcome was confined to stage II patients who had 5-year RFS of 74% and 56% respectively (P = 0.010), HR = 2.02 (P = 0.040).

Examination of 12 or more lymph nodes was significantly associated with proximal tumor location (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

MSI has an independent positive prognostic impact on stage II colorectal cancer patients after complete resection.

Recent approaches to identifying biomarkers for high-risk stage II colon cancer

The use of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer remains controversial. The accurate assessment of the risk factors associated with recurrence in patients with stage II disease is the key to identifying the patients that are most likely to benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. Recent guidelines advocate that adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk stage II colon cancer should take into account factors such as the T stage, number of lymph nodes examined, tumor differentiation, and tumor perforation. In addition to these clinicopathological factors, there has also been intense interest in the identification of new prognostic or predictive biomarkers that can improve outcomes through better patient classification and selection for adjuvant chemotherapy. Recent advances in the field of molecular genetics have led to the identification of specific biomarkers involved in colorectal cancer progression, whereas gene expression microarray technology has led to the identification of molecular profiles able to predict recurrence or benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. However, none of these has yet been validated in large prospective clinical trials. In this article, we review the current status of prognostic and predictive biomarkers for stage II colon cancer and provide an update on the most recent developments.

Clinicopathologic features and prognostic analysis of MSI-high colon cancer

PURPOSE

The objectives of the study were to estimate the incidence and clarify the clinicopathologic feature of sporadic microsatellite instability (MSI)-high (MSI-H) colon cancer. Furthermore, the role of MSI in colon cancer prognosis was also investigated.

METHODS

Microsatellite status was identified by genotyping. The clinicopathologic differences between two groups (MSI-H vs. MSI-L/S) and the prognostic value of MSI were analyzed.

RESULTS

From 1993 to 2006, 709 sporadic colon cancer patients were enrolled. MSI-H colon cancers showed significant association with poorly differentiated (28.3% vs. 7.2%, p = 0.001), proximally located (76.7% vs. 34.5%, p = 0.001), more high mucin-containing tumor (10.0% vs. 5.1%, p = 0.001) and female predominance (56.7% vs. 30.2%, p = 0.001). In multivariate analysis, MSI-H is an independent factor for better overall survival (HR, 0.459; 95% CI, 0.241-0.872, p = 0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the hospital-based study, MSI-H colon cancers demonstrated distinguished clinicopathologic features from MSI-L/S colon cancers. MSI-H is an independent favorable prognostic factor for overall survival in colon cancer.

Relevance, pathogenesis, and testing algorithm for mismatch repair-defective colorectal carcinomas: a report of the association for molecular pathology

Loss-of-function defects in DNA mismatch repair (MMR), which manifest as high levels of microsatellite instability (MSI), occur in approximately 15% of all colorectal carcinomas (CRCs). This molecular subset of CRC characterizes patients with better stage-specific prognoses who experience no benefit from 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy. Most MMR-deficient (dMMR) CRCs are sporadic, but 15% to 20% are due to inherited predisposition (Lynch syndrome). High penetrance of CRCs in germline MMR gene mutation carriers emphasizes the importance of accurate diagnosis of Lynch syndrome carriers. Family-based (Amsterdam), patient/family-based (Bethesda), morphology-based, microsatellite-based, and IHC-based screening criteria do not individually detect all germline mutation carriers. These limitations support the use of multiple concurrent tests and the screening of all patients with newly diagnosed CRC. This approach is resource intensive but would increase detection of inherited and de novo germline mutations to guide family screening. Although CRC prognosis and prediction of 5-fluorouracil response are similar in both the Lynch and sporadic dMMR subgroups, these subgroups differ significantly with regard to the implications for family members. We recommend that new CRCs should be classified into sporadic MMR-proficient, sporadic dMMR, or Lynch dMMR subgroups. The concurrent use of MSI testing, MMR protein IHC, and BRAF c.1799T>A mutation analysis would detect almost all dMMR CRCs, would classify 94% of all new CRCs into these MMR subgroups, and would guide secondary molecular testing of the remainder.

Association of obesity with DNA mismatch repair status and clinical outcome in patients with stage II or III colon carcinoma participating in NCCTG and NSABP adjuvant chemotherapy trials

PURPOSE

Although the importance of obesity in colon cancer risk and outcome is recognized, the association of body mass index (BMI) with DNA mismatch repair (MMR) status is unknown.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

BMI (kg/m(2)) was determined in patients with TNM stage II or III colon carcinomas (n = 2,693) who participated in randomized trials of adjuvant chemotherapy. The association of BMI with MMR status and survival was analyzed by logistic regression and Cox models, respectively.

RESULTS

Overall, 427 (16%) tumors showed deficient MMR (dMMR), and 630 patients (23%) were obese (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m(2)). Obesity was significantly associated with younger age (P = .021), distal tumor site (P = .012), and a lower rate of dMMR tumors (10% v 17%; P < .001) compared with normal weight. Obesity remained associated with lower rates of dMMR (odds ratio, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.79; P < .001) after adjusting for tumor site, stage, sex, and age. Among obese patients, rates of dMMR were lower in men compared with women (8% v 13%; P = .041). Obesity was associated with higher recurrence rates (P = .0034) and independently predicted worse disease-free survival (DFS; hazard ratio [HR], 1.37; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.64; P = .0010) and overall survival (OS), whereas dMMR predicted better DFS (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.74; P < .001) and OS. The favorable prognosis of dMMR was maintained in obese patients.

CONCLUSION

Colon cancers from obese patients are less likely to show dMMR, suggesting obesity-related differences in the pathogenesis of colon cancer. Although obesity was independently associated with adverse outcome, the favorable prognostic impact of dMMR was maintained among obese patients.

Mismatch repair status in sporadic colorectal cancer: immunohistochemistry and microsatellite instability analyses

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The aim of the present study was to evaluate associations between mismatch repair (MMR) status and clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and microsatellite instability (MSI) analyses in a prospective cohort of a large number of accumulated samples.

METHODS

Tumor tissue samples obtained during curative surgery (n = 2028) were analyzed using both MLH1/MSH2 IHC and MSI assays. Clinicopathological parameters and survival outcomes were compared according to IHC and MSI results. The median follow-up period was 43 months (range: 1-85 months).

RESULTS

IHC identified 207 tumor samples (10.2%) with a loss of either MLH1 or MSH2 expression. The MSI analysis identified 203 tumor samples (10%) with high-frequency MSI (MSI-H). Patients with MMR defects were younger, and had tumors characterized by right-colon predilection; large-size, infrequent lymph node metastasis; poorly-differentiated or mucinous histology, and synchronous adenomas (P < 0.001-0.008). Patients with MSI-H status had higher 4-year disease-free survival rates than patients with microsatellite stable status (90.8% vs 80.6%, P = 0.001). A multivariate analysis showed that MSI-H status was a good prognostic factor for recurrence (hazard ratio: 0.48, 95% confidence interval: 0.30-0.83, P = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with MMR defects had distinct clinicopathological characteristics, including a lower risk of recurrence. IHC and MSI analyses provided complementary information regarding specific clinicopathological parameters and prognosis.

Identification of cancer patients with Lynch syndrome: clinically significant discordances and problems in tissue-based mismatch repair testing

Tissue-based microsatellite instability (MSI) analysis and immunohistochemistry for DNA mismatch repair proteins are accepted screening tools to evaluate patients with cancer for Lynch syndrome. These laboratory analyses are thus important tools in cancer prevention. Quality assurance review was conducted to identify test discordances and problems. These results were then analyzed in conjunction with genetic testing outcomes. Six hundred and forty-six consecutive tumors from 2002 to 2010 were examined. MSI-low tumors were excluded so that 591 tumors comprised the final analyses. Discordance was defined as a discrepancy between immunohistochemical and MSI analysis. Problem was defined as indeterminate or questionable immunohistochemical or MSI results. All results and clinical and family histories were centrally reviewed by two pathologists and one genetics counselor. Discordances and problems were identified in 23 of 591 (3.9%) of the tumors. Twelve of 102 MSI-high carcinomas (11.8%) and one of 489 microsatellite stable tumors had discordant immunohistochemistry. Of these 13 tumors, 11 were from patients who had personal and/or family cancer histories concerning for a germline mismatch repair gene mutation. In addition to discordances, 10 tumors with problematic immunohistochemical profiles were identified. Accurate evaluation of MSI was possible in all tumors. In summary, concordance between immunohistochemistry and MSI was high, particularly for tumors that are microsatellite stable. Greater frequency of test discordance was identified in the tumors that were MSI-high. Thus, a major consequence of the use of immunohistochemistry by itself as a screen is the failure to identify colorectal and endometrial cancer patients who likely have Lynch syndrome.

What can the molecular pathologist offer for optimal decision making?

As a consequence of new innovative therapies and therapeutic combinations, the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer is becoming increasingly complex. Validated molecular biomarkers could contribute to patient management, but until recently, none has been routinely used. With the recognition that activating mutations of the KRAS oncogene can predict resistance to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor agents, the clinical value of biomarkers in advanced colorectal cancer has been brought to the fore. Prognostic and predictive biomarkers that reflect the molecular and therapeutic complexities of advanced colorectal cancer may provide valuable information regarding likely clinical outcome and therapeutic response and thus may improve patient management and therapeutic agent selection. Such biomarkers are discussed herein.

Prognostic and predictive impact of DNA mismatch repair in the management of colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancers develop via two major pathways that include chromosomal instability and microsatellite instability. Microsatellite instability occurs due to deficient DNA mismatch repair (MMR), which can be caused by epigenetic silencing of the MLH1 MMR gene in sporadic colorectal cancers or germline mutations in MMR genes that result in Lynch syndrome. While the molecular origin of deficient MMR differs, sporadic and Lynch syndrome tumors share similar pathological features and have a more favorable stage-adjusted prognosis compared with MMR-proficient cases. While controversy remains, there is evidence to suggest that deficient MMR may predict a lack of benefit from 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy. The focus of this article is on the MMR phenotype and its prognostic and predictive implications for the management of patients with colorectal cancer.

Review of histopathological and molecular prognostic features in colorectal cancer

Prediction of prognosis in colorectal cancer is vital for the choice of therapeutic options. Histopathological factors remain paramount in this respect. Factors such as tumor size, histological type and subtype, presence of signet ring morphology and the degree of differentiation as well as the presence of lymphovascular invasion and lymph node involvement are well known factors that influence outcome. Our understanding of these factors has improved in the past few years with factors such as tumor budding, lymphocytic infiltration being recognized as important. Likewise the prognostic significance of resection margins, particularly circumferential margins has been appreciated in the last two decades. A number of molecular and genetic markers such as KRAS, BRAF and microsatellite instability are also important and correlate with histological features in some patients. This review summarizes our current understanding of the main histopathological factors that affect prognosis of colorectal cancer.

Microsatellite instability in the management of colorectal cancer

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a form of genetic instability caused by alterations in the DNA mismatch repair system. Approximately 15% of colorectal cancers display MSI due to a germline mutation in one of the mismatch repair genes (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2) or to epigenetic silencing of MLH1. Colorectal cancers with MSI have distinctive features, including a tendency to arise in the proximal colon, poor differentiation, lymphocytic infiltration and mucinous or signet-ring histology. Patients with MSI tumors appear to have a better prognosis than those with microsatellite stable tumors, but curiously the responses to 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy regimens are poorer with MSI tumors. Preliminary data suggest possible advantages of irinotecan-based regimens, but these findings need validation in well-designed clinical trials.

DNA mismatch repair status and colon cancer recurrence and survival in clinical trials of 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant therapy

BACKGROUND

Approximately 15% of colorectal cancers develop because of defective function of the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) system. We determined the association of MMR status with colon cancer recurrence and examined the impact of 5-fluorouracil (FU)-based adjuvant therapy on recurrence variables.

METHODS

We included stage II and III colon carcinoma patients (n = 2141) who were treated in randomized trials of 5-FU-based adjuvant therapy. Tumors were analyzed for microsatellite instability by polymerase chain reaction and/or for MMR protein expression by immunohistochemistry to determine deficient MMR (dMMR) or proficient MMR (pMMR) status. Associations of MMR status and/or 5-FU-based treatment with clinicopathologic and recurrence covariates were determined using χ(2) or Fisher Exact or Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Time to recurrence (TTR), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using univariate and multivariable Cox models, with the latter adjusted for covariates. Tumors showing dMMR were categorized by presumed germline vs sporadic origin and were assessed for their prognostic and predictive impact. All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

In this study population, dMMR was detected in 344 of 2141 (16.1%) tumors. Compared with pMMR tumors, dMMR was associated with reduced 5-year recurrence rates (33% vs 22%; P < .001), delayed TTR (P < .001), and fewer distant recurrences (22% vs 12%; P < .001). In multivariable models, dMMR was independently associated with delayed TTR (hazard ratio = 0.72, 95% confidence interval = 0.56 to 0.91, P = .005) and improved DFS (P = .035) and OS (P = .031). In stage III cancers, 5-FU-based treatment vs surgery alone or no 5-FU was associated with reduced distant recurrence for dMMR tumors (11% vs 29%; P = .011) and reduced recurrence to all sites for pMMR tumors (P < .001). The dMMR tumors with suspected germline mutations were associated with improved DFS after 5-FU-based treatment compared with sporadic tumors where no benefit was observed (P = .006).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with dMMR colon cancers have reduced rates of tumor recurrence, delayed TTR, and improved survival rates, compared with pMMR colon cancers. Distant recurrences were reduced by 5-FU-based adjuvant treatment in dMMR stage III tumors, and a subset analysis suggested that any treatment benefit was restricted to suspected germline vs sporadic tumors.

DNA mismatch repair status and colon cancer recurrence and survival in clinical trials of 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant therapy

BACKGROUND

Approximately 15% of colorectal cancers develop because of defective function of the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) system. We determined the association of MMR status with colon cancer recurrence and examined the impact of 5-fluorouracil (FU)-based adjuvant therapy on recurrence variables.

METHODS

We included stage II and III colon carcinoma patients (n = 2141) who were treated in randomized trials of 5-FU-based adjuvant therapy. Tumors were analyzed for microsatellite instability by polymerase chain reaction and/or for MMR protein expression by immunohistochemistry to determine deficient MMR (dMMR) or proficient MMR (pMMR) status. Associations of MMR status and/or 5-FU-based treatment with clinicopathologic and recurrence covariates were determined using χ(2) or Fisher Exact or Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Time to recurrence (TTR), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using univariate and multivariable Cox models, with the latter adjusted for covariates. Tumors showing dMMR were categorized by presumed germline vs sporadic origin and were assessed for their prognostic and predictive impact. All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

In this study population, dMMR was detected in 344 of 2141 (16.1%) tumors. Compared with pMMR tumors, dMMR was associated with reduced 5-year recurrence rates (33% vs 22%; P < .001), delayed TTR (P < .001), and fewer distant recurrences (22% vs 12%; P < .001). In multivariable models, dMMR was independently associated with delayed TTR (hazard ratio = 0.72, 95% confidence interval = 0.56 to 0.91, P = .005) and improved DFS (P = .035) and OS (P = .031). In stage III cancers, 5-FU-based treatment vs surgery alone or no 5-FU was associated with reduced distant recurrence for dMMR tumors (11% vs 29%; P = .011) and reduced recurrence to all sites for pMMR tumors (P < .001). The dMMR tumors with suspected germline mutations were associated with improved DFS after 5-FU-based treatment compared with sporadic tumors where no benefit was observed (P = .006).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with dMMR colon cancers have reduced rates of tumor recurrence, delayed TTR, and improved survival rates, compared with pMMR colon cancers. Distant recurrences were reduced by 5-FU-based adjuvant treatment in dMMR stage III tumors, and a subset analysis suggested that any treatment benefit was restricted to suspected germline vs sporadic tumors.

Prognostic and predictive markers in stage II colon cancer: is there a role for gene expression profiling?

Conventional clinical and pathologic risk factors in stage II colon cancer provide limited prognostic information and do not predict response to adjuvant 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. New prognostic and predictive biomarkers are needed to identify patients with highest recurrence risk who will receive the greatest absolute risk reduction from adjuvant chemotherapy. We review below the evidence for conventional risk factors in patients with node-negative colon cancer, followed by a discussion of promising new molecular and genetic markers in this malignancy. Gene expression profiling is an emerging tool with both prognostic and predictive potential in oncology. For patients with stage II colon cancer, the Oncotype DX Colon Cancer test is now commercially available as a prognostic marker, and the ColoPrint assay is expected to be released later this year. Current evidence for both of these assays is described below, concluding with a discussion of potential future directions for gene expression profiling in colon cancer risk stratification and treatment decision making.

SPARCL1, Shp2, MSH2, E-cadherin, p53, ADCY-2 and MAPK are prognosis-related in colorectal cancer

AIM: To investigate the expression of markers that are correlated with the prognosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients.

METHODS: One hundred and fifty-six CRC patients were followed up for more than 3 years after radical surgery. Immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis was performed to detect the expression of 14 pathway-related markers (p53, APC, p21ras, E-cadherin, endothelin-B receptor, Shp2, ADCY-2, SPARCL1, neuroligin1, hsp27, mmp-9, MAPK, MSH2 and rho) in specimens from these patients. Bioinformatics analysis involving a Support Vector Machine (SVM) was used to determine the best prognostic model from combinations of these markers.

RESULTS: Seven markers (SPARCL1, Shp2, MSH2, E-cadherin, p53, ADCY-2 and MAPK) were significantly related to the prognosis and clinical pathological features of the CRC patients (P < 0.05). Prognostic models were established through SVM from combinations of these 7 markers and proved able to differentiate patients with dissimilar survival, especially in stage II/III patients. According to the best prognostic model, the p53/SPARCL1 model, patients having high p53 and low SPARCL1 expression had about 50% lower 3-year survival than others (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION: SPARCL1, Shp2, MSH2, E-cadherin, p53, ADCY-2 and MAPK are potential prognostic markers in CRC. A p53/SPARCL1 bioinformatics model may be used as a supplement to tumor-nodes-metastasis staging.

Microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer: from molecular oncogenic mechanisms to clinical implications

BACKGROUND

Microsatellite instability (MSI) constitutes an important oncogenic molecular pathway in colorectal cancer (CRC), representing approximately 15% of all colorectal malignant tumours. In roughly one third of the cases, the underlying DNA mismatch repair (MMR) defect is inherited through the transmission of a mutation in one of the genes involved in MMR, predominantly MSH2 and MLH1, or less frequently, MSH6 or PMS2. In the overwhelming number of sporadic cases, MSI results from epigenetic MLH1 silencing through hypermethylation of its promoter. MMR deficiency promotes colorectal oncogenesis through the accumulation of numerous mutations in crucial target genes harbouring mononucleotide repeats, notably in those involved in the control of cell proliferation and differentiation, as well as DNA damage signalling and repair.

DESIGN

In this review, we describe the molecular aspects of the MMR system and the biological consequences of its defect on the oncogenic process, and we discuss the various experimental systems used to evaluate the efficacy of cytotoxic drugs on MSI colorectal cells lines. There is increasing evidence showing that MSI CRCs differ from all CRCs in terms of prognosis and response to the treatment. We report the clinical studies that have evaluated the prognostic and predictive value of MSI status on clinical outcome in patients treated with various chemotherapy regimens used in the adjuvant setting or for advanced CRCs.

CONCLUSION

In view of this, the opportunity of a systematic MSI phenotyping in the clinical management of patients with CRC is further discussed.

Value of mismatch repair, KRAS, and BRAF mutations in predicting recurrence and benefits from chemotherapy in colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

It is uncertain whether modest benefits from adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II colorectal cancer justify the toxicity, cost, and inconvenience. We investigated the usefulness of defective mismatch repair (dMMR), BRAF, and KRAS mutations in predicting tumor recurrence and sensitivity to chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Immunohistochemistry for dMMR and pyrosequencing for KRAS/BRAF were performed for 1,913 patients randomly assigned between fluorouracil and folinic acid chemotherapy and no chemotherapy in the Quick and Simple and Reliable (QUASAR) trial.

RESULTS

Twenty-six percent of 695 right-sided colon, 3% of 685 left-sided colon, and 1% of 407 rectal tumors were dMMR. Similarly, 17% of right colon, 2% of left colon, and 2% of rectal tumors were BRAF mutant. KRAS mutant tumors were more evenly distributed: 40% right colon, 28% left colon, and 36% rectal tumors. Recurrence rate for dMMR tumors was half that for MMR-proficient tumors (11% [25 of 218] v 26% [438 of 1,695] recurred; risk ratio [RR], 0.53; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.70; P < .001). Risk of recurrence was also significantly higher for KRAS mutant than KRAS wild-type tumors (28% [150 of 542] v 21% [219 of 1,041]; RR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.12 to 1.74; P = .002) but did not differ significantly between BRAF mutant and wild-type tumors (P = .36). No marker predicted benefit from chemotherapy with efficacy not differing significantly by MMR, KRAS, or BRAF status. The prognostic value of MMR and KRAS was similar in the presence and absence of chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

MMR assays identify patients with a low risk of recurrence. KRAS mutational analysis provides useful additional risk stratification to guide use of chemotherapy.

Colorectal tumors: the histology report

Epithelial colorectal tumors are common pathologic entities. Their histology report should be comprehensive of a series of pathologic parameters essential for the correct clinical management of the patients. Diagnostic histologic criteria of adenomatous, serrated, inflammatory, and hamartomatous polyps and of polyposis syndromes are discussed. In addition, the pathologic features of early and advanced colorectal cancer are described and a checklist is given. Finally, molecular prognostic and predictive factors currently employed in the treatment of colorectal cancer are discussed.

Personalized medicine and oncology practice guidelines: a case study of contemporary biomarkers in colorectal cancer

Predictive and prognostic biomarkers offer a potential means to personalize cancer medicine, although many reach the market-place before they have been validated, and their adoption is often hindered by variable clinical evidence. Because of this variability in supporting evidence, clinical practice guidelines formulated by panels of subspecialty experts may be particularly important in guiding stakeholders' acceptance and use of new personalized medicine biomarker tests and other nascent technologies. This article provides a structured review of the clinical evidence supporting 4 contemporary biomarker tests in colorectal cancer: K-ras and B-raf mutation analyses, mismatch repair protein testing, and the Oncotype DX Colon Cancer Assay. All 4 tests have been evaluated for guideline inclusion by the NCCN Guidelines Panel for Colon Cancer. This case study shows significant variability in the level of clinical evidence associated with these tests. In the cases of B-raf and mismatch repair protein testing, the available evidence is also inconsistent as it pertains to the specific NCCN Guideline recommendation. Based on this uncertainty in the evidence base, the authors conclude that expert clinical judgment, experience, and consensus may be more heavily weighted than published clinical trial data in the evaluation of new personalized medicine biomarker tests. Potential implications of this conclusion and future directions for research are discussed.

Immunophenotypic evaluation of DNA mismatch repair markers in 2 cases of synchronous histomorphologically distinct gastric adenocarcinomas with gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the proximal small bowel

OBJECTIVES

To assess the prognostic value of combined mismatch DNA repair (MMR) phenotyping in 2 synchronous histomorphologically distinct gastric adenocarcinomas (GADCs), each accompanied by gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) of the proximal small bowel.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

A 72-year-old female and a 55-year-old male patient were submitted to partial and total gastrectomy, respectively, with synchronous resection of a GIST in the proximal small bowel. The 2 patients attained contrasting survival outcomes. The female survives disease-free 20 months after surgery having received no chemotherapy. The male who received adjuvant chemotherapy developed metastases in liver and lung, and died 18 months after surgery.

METHODS

We phenotype MSH2 and MLH1 protein expression in tumor relative to matched normal tissue by immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

Immunohistochemistry analysis revealed different combined MMR phenotypes for the 2 histomorhologically distinct GADCs and similar for both GISTs studied.

CONCLUSIONS

Good and bad prognosis for disease-free survival of patients based on reduced and elevated combined MMR phenotypic expression of the 2 histomorphologically distinct GADCs, could be explained by disease-associated emergence of genomic MMR alterations in the tumor. The impact of synchronous GISTs with common intermediate MMR phenotypes on patient survival is rather incidental and secondary to predominating GADCs.

TTD consensus document on the diagnosis and management of hereditary colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer is the first cause of cancer in occidental countries if we consider both male and females tumours. In Spain, 26,000 new cases are diagnosed every year. The possibilities of cure are higher if the tumour is diagnosed early. One of the most important risk factors for colorectal cancer is inheritance. Some hereditary syndromes, such as familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), increase the risk by almost 100% and at a young age. Other more prevalent syndromes, such Lynch syndrome, increase the risk 10-12 times more than in the general population. This article aims at summarising the most important aspects in hereditary colorectal cancer and to be a useful tool to oncologists who work with these patients and their families.

Mismatch repair protein expression is an independent prognostic factor in sporadic colorectal cancer

Abstract Background. Mismatch repair (MMR) status has been reported as a prognostic and predictive factor in sporadic colorectal cancer (CRC). The purpose of this study was to determine the prognostic and predictive value of MMR protein expression in the adjuvant setting. Patients and methods. The MMR status in the primary tumor was retrospectively assessed on paraffin-embedded formalin-fixed samples from 1 006 patients with sporadic CRC (488 stage II and 518 stage III) using immunohistochemical analysis (IHC) of MLH1 and MSH2 expression. The patients were included in adjuvant Nordic trials between 1991 and 1996 randomly assigned to surgery alone or surgery plus adjuvant 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy. Data was censored at 120 months after surgery. Results. One hundred fifty-seven patients (15.6%) showed a loss of MMR protein expression (139 MLH1 negative, 15 MSH2 negative and 3 MLH1 and MSH2 negative) and were classified as MMR protein negative. A normal MMR protein expression was found in 849 patients who were defined as MMR protein positive. MMR protein expression was a significant prognostic marker in the entire study group with a better overall survival (OS) among patients with MMR protein negative tumors compared to patients with MMR protein positive tumors (p=0.01). In a multivariate analysis the MMR protein expression was significantly associated with OS, (HR 0.70 [95% CI, 0.40 to 0.99]; p=0.01). The MMR status did not predict survival benefit from adjuvant 5-FU-based chemotherapy. Conclusion. This study reveals that IHC of MLH1 and MSH2 expression can yield important prognostic information but is not a predictive factor for adjuvant 5-FU-based chemotherapy in sporadic CRC.

TNM staging system of colorectal carcinoma: a critical appraisal of challenging issues

CONTEXT

Colorectal cancer is the leading cause of morbidity and death among gastrointestinal tumors and ranks fourth after lung, breast, and ovarian cancers. Despite a continuous refinement of the T (tumor), N (node), and M (metastasis) staging system to express disease extent and define prognosis, and eventually to guide treatment, the outcome of patients with colorectal cancer may vary considerably even within the same tumor stage. Therefore, the need for new factors, either morphologic or molecular, that could more precisely stratify patients into different risk categories is clearly warranted.

OBJECTIVES

To present the state of the art with regard to the colorectal cancer staging system and to discuss confusing and/or challenging issues, including the assessment of peritoneal membrane involvement, vascular invasion, tumor deposits, and pathologic tumor response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

DATA SOURCES

Literature review of relevant articles indexed in PubMed (US National Library of Medicine) and primary material from the authors' institutions.

CONCLUSIONS

Two emerging needs exist for the TNM system, namely, further stratification of patients with the same tumor stage and incorporation of nonanatomic factors, the latter including molecular and treatment factors. The identification and classification of morphologic features encountered in the pathologic examination of colorectal cancer specimens may be difficult and a source of subjective variability. Enhanced pathologic analysis, agreed-upon standard protocols, and standardization should improve the completeness and accuracy of pathology reports.

Defective mismatch repair as a predictive marker for lack of efficacy of fluorouracil-based adjuvant therapy in colon cancer

PURPOSE

Prior reports have indicated that patients with colon cancer who demonstrate high-level microsatellite instability (MSI-H) or defective DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) have improved survival and receive no benefit from fluorouracil (FU) -based adjuvant therapy compared with patients who have microsatellite-stable or proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) tumors. We examined MMR status as a predictor of adjuvant therapy benefit in patients with stages II and III colon cancer.

METHODS

MSI assay or immunohistochemistry for MMR proteins were performed on 457 patients who were previously randomly assigned to FU-based therapy (either FU + levamisole or FU + leucovorin; n = 229) versus no postsurgical treatment (n = 228). Data were subsequently pooled with data from a previous analysis. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

Overall, 70 (15%) of 457 patients exhibited dMMR. Adjuvant therapy significantly improved DFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.67; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.93; P = .02) in patients with pMMR tumors. Patients with dMMR tumors receiving FU had no improvement in DFS (HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.42 to 2.91; P = .85) compared with those randomly assigned to surgery alone. In the pooled data set of 1,027 patients (n = 165 with dMMR), these findings were maintained; in patients with stage II disease and with dMMR tumors, treatment was associated with reduced overall survival (HR, 2.95; 95% CI, 1.02 to 8.54; P = .04).

CONCLUSION

Patient stratification by MMR status may provide a more tailored approach to colon cancer adjuvant therapy. These data support MMR status assessment for patients being considered for FU therapy alone and consideration of MMR status in treatment decision making.

Combination therapy in high-risk stage II or stage III colon cancer: current practice and future prospects

Colon cancer represents the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths. For patients who have undergone curative surgery, adjuvant therapy can reduce the risk of recurrence and death from relapsed or metastatic disease. Postoperative chemotherapy with a 5-fluorouracil-based regimen combined with oxaliplatin is the current standard of care for stage III patients. However, there is still controversy in stage II disease about the real impact of adjuvant monotherapy or combined therapy on survival. Better identification of a subgroup of patients with a higher risk of recurrence can select patients who might benefit from adjuvant therapy. For the elderly population, there is a well-established role for postoperative therapy, although the most appropriate regimen remains to be defined. Targeted agents for combined adjuvant therapy in stage II and III colon cancer is a promising area, but to date, there is no evidence supporting its use in this setting. Results from large prospective trials with targeted therapy have been disappointing and new drugs and strategies are needed to define the role of these types of agents in the adjuvant scenario of colon cancer.

Absence of hMLH1 or hMSH2 expression as a stage-dependent prognostic factor in sporadic colorectal cancers

BACKGROUND

The predictive role of mismatch repair (MMR) status for survival after sporadic colorectal cancer remains a point of controversy. This study was designed to test the prognostic value of MMR status in sporadic colorectal cancers.

METHODS

The study included 318 patients with sporadic colorectal cancer who underwent primary tumor resection. MMR status was determined by the immunohistochemical analysis of hMLH1 and hMSH2 expression.

RESULTS

Thirty-six carcinomas (11.3%) showed abnormal MMR protein expression (22 hMLH1 negative and 14 hMSH2 negative) and were classified as MMR-defective tumors. An MMR defect was strongly associated with a reduced likelihood of lymph node (odds ratio, 0.32; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.13-0.75) or distant organ metastases at diagnosis (odds ratio, 0.07; 95% CI, 0.01-0.62), independent of the clinicopathological features. Overall survival was significantly better in patients with MMR-defective tumors than in those with MMR-intact tumors (P = 0.013). In the subgroup analysis by stage, adjusted for other potential confounding variables, MMR status was not a statistically significant prognostic factor in stage I and II patients, while the MMR defect predicted a significantly better overall survival in stage III and IV patients (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.06-0.97; P = 0.045).

CONCLUSIONS

At initial diagnosis, metastases were found at lower rates in MMR-defective tumors. MMR status may be a stage-dependent prognostic factor in patients with sporadic colorectal cancer.

Microsatellite instability as a marker of prognosis and response to therapy: a meta-analysis of colorectal cancer survival data

BACKGROUND AND METHODS

We have reviewed and pooled data from published studies to evaluate the relationship between microsatellite instability (MSI) and colorectal cancer (CRC) prognosis. Thirty-one eligible studies reporting survival in 12782 patients characterised for MSI were pooled using a fixed- or random-effects model.

RESULTS

The summary odds ratio (OR) estimate for overall survival (OS) associated with MSI was 0.6 (95%CI 0.53-0.69, p<0.0001), with no evidence of heterogeneity. The effect was similar for disease-free survival (DFS) (OR=0.58, 95%CI 0.47-0.72, p<0.0001). In a subset of patients treated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy a significant improved prognosis was found for microsatellite stable (MSS) tumours (OR=0.52, 95%CI 0.4-0.6, p<0.0001) with no heterogeneity (p=0.53; I(2)=0%). By contrast a large heterogeneity characterised the data relative to 396 patients with MSI tumours (OR=0.69, 95%CI 0.3-1.5, p=0.1; heterogeneity: p=0.03; I(2)=58%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirmed the association between MSI and favourable prognosis as determined by both OS and DFS of CRC patients. A significant beneficial effect of 5-FU therapy was found for MSS tumours whilst no clear conclusion was reached for MSI tumours due to the high inter-study heterogeneity. We propose that this inconclusive result is due to the use of a single marker, such as MSI, that cannot account alone for the complexity of the mechanisms underlying 5-FU cytotoxicity. Future studies to predict response to 5-FU chemotherapy should include additional genome stability markers.

DNA mismatch repair and adjuvant chemotherapy in sporadic colon cancer

Defective DNA mismatch repair (MMR) occurs in approximately 15% of sporadic colorectal cancers (CRCs). Multiple retrospective studies have shown that patients with MMR-deficient CRCs have a more favorable stage-adjusted prognosis compared with those who have MMR-proficient tumors. Evidence also indicates that patients with MMR-deficient colon cancers do not benefit from treatment with adjuvant 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy. Furthermore, recent studies, including a pooled analysis, have validated the prognostic and predictive impact of MMR status in patients with stage II and III colon cancer who were treated in adjuvant chemotherapy trials. Given these data, it can be recommended that MMR status be determined and used to inform clinical decision-making for adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage II colon cancer.

Microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a hypermutable phenotype caused by the loss of DNA mismatch repair activity. MSI is detected in about 15% of all colorectal cancers; 3% are of these are associated with Lynch syndrome and the other 12% are caused by sporadic, acquired hypermethylation of the promoter of the MLH1 gene, which occurs in tumors with the CpG island methylator phenotype. Colorectal tumors with MSI have distinctive features, including a tendency to arise in the proximal colon, lymphocytic infiltrate, and a poorly differentiated, mucinous or signet ring appearance. They have a slightly better prognosis than colorectal tumors without MSI and do not have the same response to chemotherapeutics. Discovery of MSI in colorectal tumors has increased awareness of the diversity of colorectal cancers and implications for specialized management of patients.

Defective mismatch repair as a predictive marker for lack of efficacy of fluorouracil-based adjuvant therapy in colon cancer

PURPOSE

Prior reports have indicated that patients with colon cancer who demonstrate high-level microsatellite instability (MSI-H) or defective DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) have improved survival and receive no benefit from fluorouracil (FU) -based adjuvant therapy compared with patients who have microsatellite-stable or proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) tumors. We examined MMR status as a predictor of adjuvant therapy benefit in patients with stages II and III colon cancer.

METHODS

MSI assay or immunohistochemistry for MMR proteins were performed on 457 patients who were previously randomly assigned to FU-based therapy (either FU + levamisole or FU + leucovorin; n = 229) versus no postsurgical treatment (n = 228). Data were subsequently pooled with data from a previous analysis. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

Overall, 70 (15%) of 457 patients exhibited dMMR. Adjuvant therapy significantly improved DFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.67; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.93; P = .02) in patients with pMMR tumors. Patients with dMMR tumors receiving FU had no improvement in DFS (HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.42 to 2.91; P = .85) compared with those randomly assigned to surgery alone. In the pooled data set of 1,027 patients (n = 165 with dMMR), these findings were maintained; in patients with stage II disease and with dMMR tumors, treatment was associated with reduced overall survival (HR, 2.95; 95% CI, 1.02 to 8.54; P = .04).

CONCLUSION

Patient stratification by MMR status may provide a more tailored approach to colon cancer adjuvant therapy. These data support MMR status assessment for patients being considered for FU therapy alone and consideration of MMR status in treatment decision making.

Model-based prediction of defective DNA mismatch repair using clinicopathological variables in sporadic colon cancer patients

BACKGROUND

: Colon cancers with defective DNA mismatch repair (MMR) have a favorable prognosis and may lack benefit from 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy. The authors developed models to predict MMR deficiency in sporadic colon cancer patients using routine clinical and pathological data.

METHODS

: TNM stage II and III colon carcinomas (n = 982) from 6 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant therapy trials were analyzed for microsatellite instability and/or MMR protein expression. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were quantified (n = 326). Logistic regression and a recursive partitioning and amalgamation analysis were used to identify predictive factors for MMR status.

RESULTS

: Defective MMR was detected in 147 (15%) cancers. Tumor site and histologic grade were the most important predictors of MMR status. Distal tumors had a low likelihood of defective MMR (3%; 13 of 468); proximal tumors had a greater likelihood (26%; 130 of 506). By using tumor site, grade, and sex, the logistic regression model showed excellent discrimination (c statistic = 0.81). Proximal site, female sex, and poor differentiation showed a positive predictive value (PPV) of 51% for defective MMR. In a patient subset (n = 326), a model including proximal site, TILs (>2/high-power field), and female sex showed even better discrimination (c statistic = 0.86), with a PPV of 81%.

CONCLUSIONS

: Defective MMR is rare in distal, sporadic colon cancers, which should generally not undergo MMR testing. Proximal site, poor differentiation, and female sex detect 51% of tumors with defective MMR; substituting TILs for grade increases the PPV to 81%. These data can increase the efficiency of MMR testing to assist in clinical decisions. Cancer 2010. (c) 2010 American Cancer Society.

Association of microRNA expression with microsatellite instability status in colorectal adenocarcinoma

MicroRNAs (miRNA), small noncoding RNAs, are potential diagnostic and prognostic markers, as well as therapeutic targets. miRNA profiles of colorectal carcinomas have not been studied extensively in the context of microsatellite instability (MSI) status. We therefore evaluated 55 paired colorectal adenocarcinomas (CRC) and non-neoplastic mucosa samples using a panel of 24 miRNAs selected by literature review and prior studies in our laboratory. Stem-loop reverse transcriptase quantitative (real-time) polymerase chain reaction assays were done on RNA extracted from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue of resection specimens. When miRNA expression was compared with clinicopathologic features and MSI status, eleven miRNAs (miR-183, -31, -20, -25, -92, -93, -17, -135a, -203, -133b, and -223) were over-expressed in CRC relative to mucosa, and nine (miR-192, -215, -26b, -143, -145, -191, -196a, -16, and let-7a) were under-expressed in CRC. Relative expression of miR-92, -223, -155, -196a, -31, and -26b were significantly different among MSI subgroups, and miR-31 and miR-223 were overexpressed in CRC of patients with hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer syndrome (Lynch syndrome). Our findings indicate that miRNA expression in CRC is associated with MSI subgroups, including low MSI and HNPCC-associated cancers, and that miRNAs may have posttranscriptional gene regulatory roles in these MSI subgroups and possible effects on the clinicopathologic and biomarker characteristics.

Colorectal cancer in Iran: immunohistochemical profiles of four mismatch repair proteins

PURPOSE

The aim of the present study was to determine the profile of mismatch repair (MMR) defects in Iranian colorectal cancer patients by using immunohistochemical staining for products of four MMR genes: MLH1, MSH2, PMS2, and MSH6.

METHODS

Tissue samples of 343 patients were immunostained for MLH1, MSH2, PMS2, and MSH6. Clinical and family history and survival data were compared between normal and abnormal staining patterns.

RESULTS

Fourteen percent of the patients had abnormal nuclear staining for MMR proteins. MLH1 was absent in four, MLH1/PMS2 in 15, PMS2 in five, MSH2 in 12, and MSH2/MSH6 in 12 patients. These tumors were more proximal, had a nonsignificant better survival, and were more associated with positive family history. Estimation of this study of prevalence of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer in Iran was 5.5% of the total colorectal cancers.

CONCLUSIONS

Along with the recommendations of the National Institute of Cancer, we recommend immunohistochemistry staining for MLH1, MSH2, PMS2, and MSH6 for determining the eligibility of patients for mutation analysis of MMR genes.

Value of the identification of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVE

Recent studies defend a possible prognostic and therapeutic value of the identification of microsatellite instability (MSI) in colorectal cancer. This work tries to assess the impact that the identification of MSI tumours can have in clinical practice.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We recovered tumour samples from 92 of the 143 patients operated on for colorectal cancer in our institution between 1995 and 2000. Five MSI markers (BAT 25, BAT 26, D2S123, D5S346 and D17S250) were studied on them. The rate and clinicopathologic characteristics of MSI tumours were investigated along with their impact on the global and disease-free survival as compared with microsatellite stable (MSS) tumours.

RESULTS

All 5 microsatellite markers' status were established in 73 patients (79.3% of the samples). Among them, 7 tumours showed instability in just one marker (low microsatellite instability [MSI-L]) whereas 5 tumours had mutations in 2 or more markers (high microsatellite instability [MSI-H]), for a total 15.4% rate of MSI tumours. All MSI-H tumours were located in the right colon. We could not fi nd any impact from MSI detection on global or disease-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

MSI determination did not identify groups of patients with a different prognosis. Moreover, with such low incidence its determination can only be justified in those cases that fulfill Bethesda's criteria to identify families with Lynch's syndrome.

Clinical implications of microsatellite instability in sporadic colon cancers

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review data demonstrating the prognostic and predictive impact of microsatellite instability (MSI) in human colon carcinomas.

RECENT FINDINGS

MSI is a molecular marker of defective DNA mismatch repair that is detected in approximately 15% of sporadic colon cancers. Most, but not all retrospective studies, have shown that colon cancers with MSI have better stage-adjusted survival rates compared with non-MSI tumors. Furthermore, analyses of colon cancers from participants in randomized adjuvant therapy trials have suggested that MSI tumors do not benefit from treatment with 5-fluorouracil. Recent studies, including a pooled analysis, validate prior data demonstrating the prognostic and predictive impact of MSI status in colon cancer.

SUMMARY

MSI is a molecular marker that can provide valuable prognostic and predictive information in colon cancer patients. In the appropriate clinical setting, MSI data can be used in clinical decision-making. Specifically, the favorable outcome of stage II colon cancers with MSI indicates that such patients should not receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Although data for stage III colon cancers with MSI suggest a lack of benefit from 5-fluorouracil alone, the benefit of the current standard treatment, 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin, in this subgroup remains unknown and awaits further study.

Does microsatellite instability predict the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in colorectal cancer? A systematic review with meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Microsatellite instability (MSI) status in predicting the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in colorectal cancer remains controversial.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Studies were identified through PubMed, Embase and ASCO proceedings with a combination of keywords (colorectal cancer, chemotherapy and MSI).

RESULTS

A MA was performed for treated and non-treated MSI population on seven studies. Statistical calculations were performed on 7 studies representing 3690 patients; mean age: 65.5 years; 810 stage II and 2444 stage III (75%). MSI-high (MSI-H) was found in 454 patients (14% of the global population), and microsatellite stable (MSS) in 2871. A total of 1444 patients received 5-fluorouracil (5FU)-based chemotherapy, whereas 1518 patients did not. For MSI-H patients, there was no statistically significant difference for RFS whether or not they received chemotherapy (5 studies); HR RFS: 0.96 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.62-1.49); HR OS (6 studies): 0.70 (95% CI: 0.44-1.09; p=0.12). Elsewhere, we found a significant interaction between MSI status (MSI-H or MSS) and therapeutic status suggesting a lesser benefit for MSI-H than for MSS patients (HR interaction RFS: 0.77 (95% CI: 0.67-0.87)).

CONCLUSION

We found similar RFS for treated and untreated MSI-H patients, showing that MSI-H status, in addition to being a good prognostic factor is also a predictive factor of non response.