A 12-week, placebo-controlled study (6002-US-006) of istradefylline in Parkinson disease

A(2A) Receptor Antagonism and Dyskinesia in Parkinson's Disease

Dyskinesia, a major complication of treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD), involves two phases: induction, which is responsible for dyskinesia onset, and expression, which underlies its clinical manifestation. The unique cellular and regional distribution of adenosine A(2A) receptors in basal ganglia areas that are richly innervated by dopamine, and their antagonistic role towards dopamine receptor stimulation, have positioned A(2A) receptor antagonists as an attractive nondopaminergic target to improve the motor deficits that characterize PD. In this paper, we describe the biochemical characteristics of A(2A) receptors and the effects of adenosine A(2A) antagonists in rodent and primate models of PD on L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia, together with relevant biomarker studies. We also review clinical trials of A(2A) antagonists as adjuncts to L-DOPA in PD patients with motor fluctuations. These studies have generally demonstrated that the addition of an A(2A) antagonist to a stable L-DOPA regimen reduces OFF time and mildly increases dyskinesia. However, limited clinical data suggest that the addition of an A(2A) antagonist along with a reduction of L-DOPA might maintain anti-Parkinsonian benefit and reduce dyskinesia. Whether A(2A) antagonists might reduce the development of dyskinesia has not yet been tested clinically.

Istradefylline for the treatment of Parkinson's disease

INTRODUCTION

Despite several available therapeutic options to treat the symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD), there are currently no agents that halt or slow the progression of disease. Istradefylline is a selective adenosine A(2A) antagonist that is currently of interest for the treatment of motor complications in PD.

AREAS COVERED

This paper reviews the limitations of currently available treatment options and discusses the results seen in both animal models and human clinical trials that have explored the benefits of istradefylline in PD.

EXPERT OPINION

The studies outlined continue to suggest that istradefylline may be a promising non-dopaminergic therapy for the treatment of PD. It has not been proven to be more efficacious than other currently available dopaminergic drugs, nor has it been shown to be of significant benefit as monotherapy; however, it seems to be a safe and well-tolerated drug that may help with wearing-off fluctuations. Istradefylline is not yet an FDA-approved drug. At this time, the potential for approval in the US or through the European Medical Agency remains unknown.

New pharmacological avenues for the treatment of L-DOPA-induced dyskinesias in Parkinson's disease: targeting glutamate and adenosine receptors

INTRODUCTION

Parkinson's disease (PD) therapy is still centered on the use of L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA), which is hampered by numerous side effects, including abnormal involuntary movements known as L-DOPA-induced dyskinesias (LIDs). LIDs are the result of pre- and postsynaptic changes at the corticostriatal level, induced by chronic and pulsatile stimulation of striatal dopaminergic receptors. These changes impact on synaptic plasticity and involve also selected, nondopaminergic receptors expressed by striatal projection neurons.

AREAS COVERED

Among nondopaminergic receptors, glutamate receptors - NMDA and mGluR5 subtypes in particular - and adenosine A(2A) receptors are those most likely involved in LIDs. The aim of the present review is to summarize results of studies undertaken with specific antagonists of these receptors, first conducted in animal models of LIDs, which in selected cases have been translated into clinical trials.

EXPERT OPINION

Selected antagonists of glutamate and adenosine receptors have been proposed as anti-dyskinetic agents. Promising results have been obtained in preclinical investigations and in initial clinical trials, but long-term safety, tolerability and efficacy studies in patients are still required. The current development of novel antagonists, including tools able to act on receptor mosaics, may provide innovative tools for LIDs management in the next future.

Parkinson's disease therapeutics: new developments and challenges since the introduction of levodopa

The demonstration that dopamine loss is the key pathological feature of Parkinson's disease (PD), and the subsequent introduction of levodopa have revolutionalized the field of PD therapeutics. This review will discuss the significant progress that has been made in the development of new pharmacological and surgical tools to treat PD motor symptoms since this major breakthrough in the 1960s. However, we will also highlight some of the challenges the field of PD therapeutics has been struggling with during the past decades. The lack of neuroprotective therapies and the limited treatment strategies for the nonmotor symptoms of the disease (ie, cognitive impairments, autonomic dysfunctions, psychiatric disorders, etc.) are among the most pressing issues to be addressed in the years to come. It appears that the combination of early PD nonmotor symptoms with imaging of the nigrostriatal dopaminergic system offers a promising path toward the identification of PD biomarkers, which, once characterized, will set the stage for efficient use of neuroprotective agents that could slow down and alter the course of the disease.

Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis of istradefylline in patients with Parkinson disease

This model-based analysis quantifies the population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic efficacy and safety/tolerability relationships of orally administered istradefylline, a selective adenosine A(2A) receptor antagonist, in healthy participants and patients with Parkinson disease. Data from 6 phase 2/3 clinical trials comprised the population database, with 1760 and 1798 patients contributing to the efficacy and safety/tolerability analyses, respectively. The relationship between istradefylline area under the curve at steady state and percentage OFF time was described by a nonlinear model (Emax) based on time for the disease progression/placebo response component and an Emax model for the effect of istradefylline. The typical maximum decrease in percentage OFF time due to istradefylline exposure would be 5.79% (95% confidence interval = 4.09%-7.49%) with one-half of the maximum effect reached at an exposure of 1690 ng × hr/mL (95% confidence interval = 199-3180 ng × hr/mL). The pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships for dyskinesia and dizziness were described by an Emax model, and for nausea, a power model was used. The probabilities of dyskinesia and dizziness are expected to plateau at a dose of 40 mg/d, and the probability of nausea is expected to continually rise as the dose is increased. Collectively, these results support a starting istradefylline dose of 20 to 40 mg/d.

Treatment of motor symptoms in advanced Parkinson's disease: a practical approach

Patients with advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) are known to develop motor complications after a few years of levodopa (L-dopa) therapy. Motor fluctuations develop with increasing severity of the disease, owing to loss of dopaminergic neurons and loss of the buffering capacity of the neurons to fluctuating dopamine levels. Dyskinesias develop as a result of pulsatile stimulation of the receptors and alterations in neuronal firing patterns. L-dopa remains the gold standard medication for the treatment of patients with advanced PD. However, once motor complications on L-dopa therapy emerge, clinicians may add on other classes of antiparkinsonian drugs such as dopamine agonists, catechol-O-methyl transferase inhibitors (COMTIs) or monoamine oxidase type B inhibitors (MAOBIs). The individualisation of the treatment seems to be the key for the best approach of advanced PD patients. The present review provides the most important current clinical data in the pharmacological treatment of motor symptoms in advanced PD and provides the clinician a simple algorithm in order to determine the best suitable treatment to advanced parkinsonian patients.

Istradefylline for Parkinson's disease patients experiencing motor fluctuations: results of the KW-6002-US-018 study

BACKGROUND

Istradefylline (KW-6002) is a selective adenosine A(2A) receptor antagonist investigated as adjunctive therapy to levodopa in PD patients with motor response complications. In Phase 2b/3 studies, Istradefylline reduced OFF time without worsening troublesome dyskinesia and was well tolerated.

METHODS

A randomized, 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel-group study evaluated the efficacy of 10, 20, and 40 mg/day of Istradefylline in patients on levodopa therapy with motor response complications. The primary outcome measure was change from baseline to endpoint in the percentage of awake time/day spent in the OFF state as determined by patient diary.

RESULTS

Six hundred and ten patients were randomized. Five hundred and eighty four patients were included in the Intent-to-treat (ITT) group-146 placebo patients and 149 in the 10 mg, 144 in the 20, and 145 patients in the 40 mg Istradefylline groups. Baseline demographics were similar between groups. Treatment cohorts had been diagnosed an average of 9 years diagnosis and 3.6 years from the onset of motor fluctuations; at baseline they had an average of 6.7 h of OFF time and an average UPDRS motor score of 22 when ON. At endpoint, the amount and percentage of OFF time did not differ between Istradefylline and placebo, however a dose-ordering response was observed. Changes from baseline in the UPDRS motor score in the on state for the 40 mg were modest but significant compared to placebo (2.9 vs. 0.8; p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Although Istradefylline did not impact OFF time duration, it significantly improved motor score at 40 mg/day.

Caffeine in Parkinson's disease: a pilot open-label, dose-escalation study

INTRODUCTION

Epidemiologic studies consistently find an inverse association between caffeine use and PD. Numerous explanations exist, but are difficult to evaluate as caffeine's symptomatic effect and tolerability in PD are unknown.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We designed an open-label, 6-week dose-escalation study of caffeine to establish dose tolerability and evaluate potential motor/nonmotor benefits. Caffeine was started at 200 mg daily and was increased to a maximum of 1,000 mg.

RESULTS

Of 25 subjects, 20 tolerated 200 mg, 17 tolerated 400 mg, 7 tolerated 800 mg, and 3 tolerated 1,000 mg. The most common adverse events were gastrointestinal discomfort, anxiety, and worsening/emerging tremor. At 400 mg daily, we found potential improvements in motor manifestations and somnolence (UPDRS III: -4.5 ± 4.6, P = 0.003; Epworth: -2.0 ± 3.0, P = 0.015).

CONCLUSION

Maximum dose tolerability for caffeine in PD appears to be 100 to 200 mg BID. We found pilot preliminary evidence that caffeine may improve some motor and nonmotor aspects of PD, which must be confirmed in longer term, placebo-controlled, clinical trials.

Past, present and future of A(2A) adenosine receptor antagonists in the therapy of Parkinson's disease

Several selective antagonists for adenosine A(2A) receptors (A(2A)R) are currently under evaluation in clinical trials (phases I to III) to treat Parkinson's disease, and they will probably soon reach the market. The usefulness of these antagonists has been deduced from studies demonstrating functional interactions between dopamine D₂ and adenosine A(2A) receptors in the basal ganglia. At present it is believed that A(2A)R antagonists can be used in combination with the dopamine precursor L-DOPA to minimize the motor symptoms of Parkinson's patients. However, a considerable body of data indicates that in addition to ameliorating motor symptoms, adenosine A(2A)R antagonists may also prevent neurodegeneration. Despite these promising indications, one further issue must be considered in order to develop fully optimized antiparkinsonian drug therapy, namely the existence of (hetero)dimers/oligomers of G protein-coupled receptors, a topic that is currently the focus of intense debate within the scientific community. Dopamine D₂ receptors (D₂Rs) expressed in the striatum are known to form heteromers with A(2A) adenosine receptors. Thus, the development of heteromer-specific A(2A) receptor antagonists represents a promising strategy for the identification of more selective and safer drugs.

Pharmacological and physiological characterization of the tremulous jaw movement model of parkinsonian tremor: potential insights into the pathophysiology of tremor

Tremor is a cardinal symptom of parkinsonism, occurring early on in the disease course and affecting more than 70% of patients. Parkinsonian resting tremor occurs in a frequency range of 3-7 Hz and can be resistant to available pharmacotherapy. Despite its prevalence, and the significant decrease in quality of life associated with it, the pathophysiology of parkinsonian tremor is poorly understood. The tremulous jaw movement (TJM) model is an extensively validated rodent model of tremor. TJMs are induced by conditions that also lead to parkinsonism in humans (i.e., striatal DA depletion, DA antagonism, and cholinomimetic activity) and reversed by several antiparkinsonian drugs (i.e., DA precursors, DA agonists, anticholinergics, and adenosine A(2A) antagonists). TJMs occur in the same 3-7 Hz frequency range seen in parkinsonian resting tremor, a range distinct from that of dyskinesia (1-2 Hz), and postural tremor (8-14 Hz). Overall, these drug-induced TJMs share many characteristics with human parkinsonian tremor, but do not closely resemble tardive dyskinesia. The current review discusses recent advances in the validation of the TJM model, and illustrates how this model is being used to develop novel therapeutic strategies, both surgical and pharmacological, for the treatment of parkinsonian resting tremor.

Epidemiology and etiology of Parkinson's disease: a review of the evidence

The etiology of Parkinson's disease (PD) is not well understood but likely to involve both genetic and environmental factors. Incidence and prevalence estimates vary to a large extent-at least partly due to methodological differences between studies-but are consistently higher in men than in women. Several genes that cause familial as well as sporadic PD have been identified and familial aggregation studies support a genetic component. Despite a vast literature on lifestyle and environmental possible risk or protection factors, consistent findings are few. There is compelling evidence for protective effects of smoking and coffee, but the biologic mechanisms for these possibly causal relations are poorly understood. Uric acid also seems to be associated with lower PD risk. Evidence that one or several pesticides increase PD risk is suggestive but further research is needed to identify specific compounds that may play a causal role. Evidence is limited on the role of metals, other chemicals and magnetic fields. Important methodological limitations include crude classification of exposure, low frequency and intensity of exposure, inadequate sample size, potential for confounding, retrospective study designs and lack of consistent diagnostic criteria for PD. Studies that assessed possible shared etiological components between PD and other diseases show that REM sleep behavior disorder and mental illness increase PD risk and that PD patients have lower cancer risk, but methodological concerns exist. Future epidemiologic studies of PD should be large, include detailed quantifications of exposure, and collect information on environmental exposures as well as genetic polymorphisms.

Available and emerging treatments for Parkinson's disease: a review

Parkinson's disease is a commonly encountered neurodegenerative disorder primarily found in aged populations. A number of medications are available to control symptoms, although these are less effective in advanced disease. Deep brain stimulation provides a practicable alternative at this stage, although a minority of patients meet the strict criteria for surgery. Novel medications that provide enhanced symptomatic control remain in developmental demand. Both gene and cell-based therapies have shown promise in early clinical studies. A major unmet need is a treatment that slows or stops disease progression.

Preladenant in patients with Parkinson's disease and motor fluctuations: a phase 2, double-blind, randomised trial

BACKGROUND

Preladenant is an adenosine 2A (A₂(A)) receptor antagonist. In animal models of Parkinson's disease, preladenant monotherapy improves motor function without causing dyskinesia and, as an adjunct to levodopa, it improves motor function without worsening dyskinesia. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of preladenant in patients with Parkinson's disease and motor fluctuations who were receiving levodopa and other antiparkinsonian drugs.

METHODS

In this phase 2, dose-finding trial, patients with Parkinson's disease who were receiving levodopa were enrolled and treated at 44 sites in 15 countries between December, 2006, and November, 2008. Assignment to treatment was done centrally with an interactive voice response system, according to a block randomisation schedule that was computer generated by the sponsor. Patients were assigned to receive 1, 2, 5, or 10 mg oral preladenant twice daily, or matching placebo for 12 weeks. Patients, study staff, investigators, and all sponsor personnel were masked to treatment assignment. The primary outcome was change in mean daily off time from baseline to week 12, as assessed by home diaries. Efficacy analysis included all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had data for assessments after baseline. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00406029.

FINDINGS

253 patients were randomised to receive preladenant (1 mg [n=49], 2 mg [n=49], 5 mg [n=49], 10 mg [n=57]) or placebo (n=49), of whom 234 on preladenant (1 mg [n=47], 2 mg [n=48], 5 mg [n=45], 10 mg [n=49]) and placebo (n=45) were eligible for the efficacy analysis. Mean daily off time from baseline to week 12 was reduced versus placebo in patients on 5 mg preladenant (difference -1·0 h, 95% CI -2·1 to 0·0; p=0·0486) and 10 mg preladenant (-1·2 h, -2·2 to -0·2; p=0·019). Changes in mean daily off time versus placebo were not significant for 1 mg preladenant (0·2 h, -0·9 to 1·2; p=0·753) or 2 mg preladenant (-0·7 h, -1·7 to 0·3; p=0·162). The most common adverse events in the combined preladenant group versus placebo were worsening of Parkinson's disease (22 [11%] vs 4 [9%]), somnolence (20 [10%] vs 3 [6%]), dyskinesia (18 [9%] vs 6 [13%]), nausea (17 [9%] vs 5 [11%]), constipation (15 [8%] vs 1 [2%]), and insomnia (15 [8%] vs 4 [9%]).

INTERPRETATION

5 and 10 mg preladenant twice daily might be clinically useful to reduce off time in patients with Parkinson's disease and motor fluctuations.

FUNDING

Schering-Plough, a subsidiary of Merck.

International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. LXXXI. Nomenclature and classification of adenosine receptors--an update

In the 10 years since our previous International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology report on the nomenclature and classification of adenosine receptors, no developments have led to major changes in the recommendations. However, there have been so many other developments that an update is needed. The fact that the structure of one of the adenosine receptors has recently been solved has already led to new ways of in silico screening of ligands. The evidence that adenosine receptors can form homo- and heteromultimers has accumulated, but the functional significance of such complexes remains unclear. The availability of mice with genetic modification of all the adenosine receptors has led to a clarification of the functional roles of adenosine, and to excellent means to study the specificity of drugs. There are also interesting associations between disease and structural variants in one or more of the adenosine receptors. Several new selective agonists and antagonists have become available. They provide improved possibilities for receptor classification. There are also developments hinting at the usefulness of allosteric modulators. Many drugs targeting adenosine receptors are in clinical trials, but the established therapeutic use is still very limited.

New small molecules for the treatment of Parkinson's disease

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Parkinson's disease (PD) is characterized by a slowly ongoing neuronal death, which affects neurotransmitter metabolism and causes a wide variety of motor and non-motor features. Until now, therapy approaches have predominantly focused on motor behavior associated with dopamine substitution.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

This review aims to discuss putative reasons for recent failures of investigated treatment approaches, and to introduce currently tested and future compounds.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

We will describe how development programs of novel molecules now additionally consider non-motor features of PD as promising targets in order to obtain regulatory approval. Regulatory authorities increasingly exert influence on trial designs, demanding therapeutic effects that are not always clinically feasible given the variety of manifestations of the disease entity known as PD.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

In the past, research pitfalls have resulted in the failure of promising new compounds. Among the many reasons for this are massive placebo responses; the participation of too many investigators, with consequent wide variations of efficacy assessments; and a misconception of preclinical drug development, with models of PD that do not mimic its clinical nature. A few compounds are now being tested that have modes of action indirectly modulating the dopamine system; however, critical analysis of the preclinical and clinical research concept and drug approval is warranted to prevent further frustration in this field.

Striatal pre- and postsynaptic profile of adenosine A(2A) receptor antagonists

Striatal adenosine A(2A) receptors (A(2A)Rs) are highly expressed in medium spiny neurons (MSNs) of the indirect efferent pathway, where they heteromerize with dopamine D(2) receptors (D(2)Rs). A(2A)Rs are also localized presynaptically in cortico-striatal glutamatergic terminals contacting MSNs of the direct efferent pathway, where they heteromerize with adenosine A(1) receptors (A(1)Rs). It has been hypothesized that postsynaptic A(2A)R antagonists should be useful in Parkinson's disease, while presynaptic A(2A)R antagonists could be beneficial in dyskinetic disorders, such as Huntington's disease, obsessive-compulsive disorders and drug addiction. The aim or this work was to determine whether selective A(2A)R antagonists may be subdivided according to a preferential pre- versus postsynaptic mechanism of action. The potency at blocking the motor output and striatal glutamate release induced by cortical electrical stimulation and the potency at inducing locomotor activation were used as in vivo measures of pre- and postsynaptic activities, respectively. SCH-442416 and KW-6002 showed a significant preferential pre- and postsynaptic profile, respectively, while the other tested compounds (MSX-2, SCH-420814, ZM-241385 and SCH-58261) showed no clear preference. Radioligand-binding experiments were performed in cells expressing A(2A)R-D(2)R and A(1)R-A(2A)R heteromers to determine possible differences in the affinity of these compounds for different A(2A)R heteromers. Heteromerization played a key role in the presynaptic profile of SCH-442416, since it bound with much less affinity to A(2A)R when co-expressed with D(2)R than with A(1)R. KW-6002 showed the best relative affinity for A(2A)R co-expressed with D(2)R than co-expressed with A(1)R, which can at least partially explain the postsynaptic profile of this compound. Also, the in vitro pharmacological profile of MSX-2, SCH-420814, ZM-241385 and SCH-58261 was is in accordance with their mixed pre- and postsynaptic profile. On the basis of their preferential pre- versus postsynaptic actions, SCH-442416 and KW-6002 may be used as lead compounds to obtain more effective antidyskinetic and antiparkinsonian compounds, respectively.

Impacts of methylxanthines and adenosine receptors on neurodegeneration: human and experimental studies

Neurodegenerative disorders are some of the most feared illnesses in modern society, with no effective treatments to slow or halt this neurodegeneration. Several decades after the earliest attempt to treat Parkinson's disease using caffeine, tremendous amounts of information regarding the potential beneficial effect of caffeine as well as adenosine drugs on major neurodegenerative disorders have accumulated. In the first part of this review, we provide general background on the adenosine receptor signaling systems by which caffeine and methylxanthine modulate brain activity and their role in relationship to the development and treatment of neurodegenerative disorders. The demonstration of close interaction between adenosine receptor and other G protein coupled receptors and accessory proteins might offer distinct pharmacological properties from adenosine receptor monomers. This is followed by an outline of the major mechanism underlying neuroprotection against neurodegeneration offered by caffeine and adenosine receptor agents. In the second part, we discuss the current understanding of caffeine/methylxantheine and its major target adenosine receptors in development of individual neurodegenerative disorders, including stroke, traumatic brain injury Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, Huntington's disease and multiple sclerosis. The exciting findings to date include the specific in vivo functions of adenosine receptors revealed by genetic mouse models, the demonstration of a broad spectrum of neuroprotection by chronic treatment of caffeine and adenosine receptor ligands in animal models of neurodegenerative disorders, the encouraging development of several A(2A) receptor selective antagonists which are now in advanced clinical phase III trials for Parkinson's disease. Importantly, increasing body of the human and experimental studies reveals encouraging evidence that regular human consumption of caffeine in fact may have several beneficial effects on neurodegenerative disorders, from motor stimulation to cognitive enhancement to potential neuroprotection. Thus, with regard to neurodegenerative disorders, these potential benefits of methylxanthines, caffeine in particular, strongly argue against the common practice by clinicians to discourage regular human consumption of caffeine in aging populations.

Normal and abnormal functions of adenosine receptors in the central nervous system revealed by genetic knockout studies

Endogenous adenosine is a widely distributed upstream regulator of a broad spectrum of neurotransmitters, receptors, and signaling pathways that converge to contribute to the expression of an array of important brain functions. Over the past decade, the generation and characterization of genetic knockout models for all four G-protein coupled adenosine receptors, the A1 and A2A receptors in particular, has confirmed and extended the neuromodulatory and integrated role of adenosine receptors in the control of a broad spectrum of normal and abnormal brain functions. After a brief introduction of the available adenosine receptor knockout models, this review focuses on findings from the genetic knockout approach, placing particular emphasis on the most recent findings. This review is organized into two sections to separately address (i) the role of adenosine receptors in normal brain processes including neuroplasticity, sleep-wake cycle, motor function, cognition, and emotion-related behaviors; and (ii) their role in the response to various pathologic insults to brain such as ischemic stroke, neurodegeneration, or brain dysfunction/disorders. We largely limit our overview to the prominent adenosine receptor subtypes in brain-the A1 and A2A receptors-for which numerous genetic knockout studies on brain function are available. A1 and A2A receptor knockouts have provided significant new insights into adenosine's control of complex physiologic (e.g., cognition) and pathologic (e.g., neuroinflammation) phenomena. These findings extend and strengthen the support for A1 and A2A receptors in brain as therapeutic targets in several neurologic and psychiatric diseases. However, they also emphasize the importance of considering the disease context-dependent effect when developing adenosine receptor-based therapeutic strategies.

Clinical efficacy of istradefylline (KW-6002) in Parkinson's disease: a randomized, controlled study

The objectives of this study were to evaluate the efficacy of istradefylline at an oral dose of 20 mg or 40 mg once daily for 12 weeks in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients with motor complications on levodopa therapy based on the change in the daily OFF time compared with placebo and to assess the safety at these doses. A total of 363 subjects were randomly assigned to receive 20 mg/day istradefylline (n = 119), 40 mg/day istradefylline (n = 125), or placebo (n = 119). The primary outcome variable was the change from baseline at endpoint in daily OFF time based on patients' ON/OFF diaries. At endpoint, the daily OFF time reduced from baseline by 1.31 hours for 20 mg/day istradefylline (P = 0.013 as compared to the placebo), 1.58 hours for 40 mg/day istradefylline (P < 0.001), and 0.66 hours for placebo; istradefylline significantly reduced the daily OFF time compared with placebo. The UPDRS Part III subscale score (ON state) reduced by 5.7 at endpoint in both istradefylline groups and 3.7 in the placebo group (P = 0.006 for 20 mg/day and P = 0.006 for 40 mg/day group as compared with placebo). The most commonly reported drug-related treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE) was dyskinesia, which occurred in 2.5% (3/119) of subjects receiving placebo, 8.5% (10/118) receiving 20 mg/day istradefylline, and 6.4% (8/125) receiving 40 mg/day istradefylline. We conclude that istradefylline at 20 mg and 40 mg once daily is effective in relieving wearing-off fluctuations of PD patients. In addition, istradefylline was well tolerated at both doses.

Adenosine A2A receptor signaling and golf assembly show a specific requirement for the gamma7 subtype in the striatum

The adenosine A(2A) receptor (A(2A)R) is increasingly recognized as a novel therapeutic target in Parkinson disease. In striatopallidal neurons, the G-protein α(olf) subtype is required to couple this receptor to adenylyl cyclase activation. It is now well established that the βγ dimer also performs an active role in this signal transduction process. In principal, sixty distinct βγ dimers could arise from combinatorial association of the five known β and 12 γ subunit genes. However, key questions regarding which βγ subunit combinations exist and whether they perform specific signaling roles in the context of the organism remain to be answered. To explore these questions, we used a gene targeting approach to specifically ablate the G-protein γ(7) subtype. Revealing a potentially new signaling paradigm, we show that the level of the γ(7) protein controls the hierarchial assembly of a specific G-protein α(olf)β(2)γ(7) heterotrimer in the striatum. Providing a probable basis for the selectivity of receptor signaling, we further demonstrate that loss of this specific G-protein heterotrimer leads to reduced A(2A)R activation of adenylyl cyclase. Finally, substantiating an important role for this signaling pathway in pyschostimulant responsiveness, we show that mice lacking the G-protein γ(7) subtype exhibit an attenuated behavioral response to caffeine. Collectively, these results further support the A(2A)R G-protein α(olf)β(2)γ(7) interface as a possible therapeutic target for Parkinson disease.

An open-label, positron emission tomography study to assess adenosine A2A brain receptor occupancy of vipadenant (BIIB014) at steady-state levels in healthy male volunteers

OBJECTIVE

Adenosine A2A receptor antagonists are potential new treatments for Parkinson disease. We used positron emission tomography (PET) of the A2A receptor radiotracer, [C]SCH442416, to assess binding of the novel A2A antagonist, vipadenant (previously known as BIIB014), to human brain A2A receptors and to investigate the relationship among dose, steady-state plasma levels, and receptor occupancy.

METHODS

We used PET to compare [C]SCH442416 uptake before and after blockade with daily oral vipadenant (2.5-100 mg/d for 10 or 11 days) in healthy volunteers (n = 15). We estimated receptor occupancy in brain regions of interest, particularly the putamen, by kinetic modeling of PET data. We estimated the dose, minimal plasma concentration at steady state (Cmin), and area under the plasma concentration curve (AUC0-tau) at the steady state required for saturation (> or =90% receptor occupancy) using Bayesian Emax and logistic regression models.

RESULTS

The estimated receptor occupancy of vipadenant in the brain regions of interest varied from 74% to 94% at the lowest daily dose (2.5 mg) and reached saturation in all regions at 100 mg. In the putamen, the estimated minimal daily dose, steady-state Cmin, and steady-state AUC0-tau required for receptor saturation were 10.2 mg (interquartile range, 28%), 0.097 microg/mL (27%), and 6 microg h/mL (21%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides the first evidence that vipadenant occupies A2A receptors in the human brain. Receptor occupancy was related to both dose and plasma levels of vipadenant. These results, coupled with previous efficacy results in animals, justify continued development of vipadenant as a potential treatment for Parkinson disease.

Population pharmacokinetic analysis of istradefylline in healthy subjects and in patients with Parkinson's disease

This model-based analysis quantifies the population pharmacokinetics (PK) of orally administered istradefylline, a selective adenosine A(2A) receptor antagonist, in healthy subjects and patients with Parkinson's disease, including the estimation of covariate effects on istradefylline PK parameters. Istradefylline plasma concentration data from 8 phase 1 and 8 phase 2/3 studies conducted in 1449 patients and normal, healthy volunteers aged from 18 to 87 years were best described by a 2-compartment model with first-order absorption parameterized in terms of apparent oral clearance (CL/F), apparent central volume of distribution (V2/F), apparent intercompartmental clearance (Q/F), apparent peripheral volume of distribution (V3/F) and a first-order absorption rate-constant (Ka). The typical population PK parameters were CL/F (5.76 L/h), V2/F (198 L), Q (21.6 L/h), V3/F (307 L), and Ka (0.464 h(-1)) for a 70-kg, nonsmoking Caucasian who had 55.6 kg of lean body mass, no presence of CYP3A4 inhibitors, and unknown food status. Smoking and CYP3A4 inhibitors as concomitant medications were important predictors of istradefylline exposure. Istradefylline area under the concentration-time curve at steady-state increased 35% (95% confidence interval, 18%-55%) in the presence of CYP3A4 inhibitors and decreased 38% (95% confidence interval, 26%-50%) in smokers. The population PK model described the observed concentration data well and was deemed appropriate for further evaluation of the istradefylline exposure-response relationship in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Pathophysiological roles for purines: adenosine, caffeine and urate

The motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD) are primarily due to the degeneration of the dopaminergic neurons in the nigrostriatal pathway. However, several other brain areas and neurotransmitters other than dopamine such as noradrenaline, 5-hydroxytryptamine and acetylcholine are affected in the disease. Moreover, adenosine because of the extensive interaction of its receptors with the dopaminergic system has been implicated in the pathophysiology of the disease. Based on the involvement of these non-dopaminergic neurotransmitters in PD and the sometimes severe adverse effects that limit the mainstay use of dopamine-based anti-parkinsonian treatments, recent assessments have called for a broadening of therapeutic options beyond the traditional dopaminergic drug arsenal. In this review we describe the interactions between dopamine and adenosine receptors that underpin the pre-clinical and clinical rationale for pursuing adenosine A(2A) receptor antagonists as symptomatic and potentially neuroprotective treatment of PD. The review will pay particular attention to recent results regarding specific A(2A) receptor-receptor interactions and recent findings identifying urate, the end product of purine metabolism, as a novel prognostic biomarker and candidate neuroprotectant in PD.

Istradefylline as monotherapy for Parkinson disease: results of the 6002-US-051 trial

OBJECTIVE

6002-US-051 was a 12-week, double-blind study evaluating the safety and efficacy of istradefylline, a selective A(2A) adenosine receptor antagonist, as monotherapy in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD).

METHODS

Patients with Hoehn-Yahr stages 1-2.5 who had not received dopaminergic drugs in the past 30 days or levodopa for >30 days at anytime were randomized to 40 mg/day istradefylline or placebo. The primary efficacy outcome was the change from Baseline to Endpoint in the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Subscale III score. Safety was assessed by physical examination, laboratory tests, electrocardiograms, and adverse event monitoring.

RESULTS

176 patients comprised the intent-to-treat population. Although istradefylline showed numerically greater improvements in UPDRS Subscale III at each time point and reached statistical significance at Week 2 (LS mean difference = -1.47), it did not show statistically significant improvement from placebo for the primary endpoint (least square [LS] mean difference = -1.11). Similar proportions of patients in each group experienced treatment-emergent adverse events (63% istradefylline, 65% placebo).

CONCLUSIONS

Istradefylline, as monotherapy in patients with PD, is safe and well tolerated. However, efficacy in improving motor symptoms in early PD was not statistically demonstrated by this study.

Parkinson's disease

Parkinson's disease is a common progressive bradykinetic disorder that can be accurately diagnosed. It is characterised by the presence of severe pars-compacta nigral-cell loss, and accumulation of aggregated alpha-synuclein in specific brain stem, spinal cord, and cortical regions. The main known risk factor is age. Susceptibility genes including alpha-synuclein, leucine rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK-2), and glucocerebrosidase (GBA) have shown that genetic predisposition is another important causal factor. Dopamine replacement therapy considerably reduces motor handicap, and effective treatment of associated depression, pain, constipation, and nocturnal difficulties can improve quality of life. Embryonic stem cells and gene therapy are promising research therapeutic approaches.

Parkinson's disease: emerging pharmacotherapy

Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disease. The prevalence is increasing with age and averages approximately 0.3% in the entire population. The clinical picture is dominated by the cardinal motor symptoms such as tremor at rest, bradykinesia, muscular rigidity, stooped posture and postural instability. Psychiatric comorbidity is common, comprising dementia, depression, anxiety and psychosis. Although many drugs have been developed and introduced into the market to provide symptomatic treatment, there is still no cure for PD and not even solid evidence for disease-modifying strategies. In addition, motor complications in advanced stages of the disease, side effects of the dopaminergic therapy, and non-motor symptoms remain huge challenges during long-term therapy. Thus, new therapeutic agents are desperately needed. Here, we describe current therapies and possible future developments that we hope will contribute to sustaining quality of life in patients suffering from Parkinson's disease for many years.

Adenosine A2A receptors and Parkinson's disease

The drug treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD) is accompanied by a loss of drug efficacy, the onset of motor complications, lack of effect on non-motor symptoms, and a failure to modify disease progression. As a consequence, novel approaches to therapy are sought, and adenosine A(2A) receptors (A(2A)ARs) provide a viable target. A(2A)ARs are highly localized to the basal ganglia and specifically to the indirect output pathway, which is highly important in the control of voluntary movement. A(2A)AR antagonists can modulate gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and glutamate release in basal ganglia and other key neurotransmitters that modulate motor activity. In both rodent and primate models of PD, A(2A)AR antagonists produce alterations in motor behavior, either alone or in combination with dopaminergic drugs, which suggest that they will be effective in the symptomatic treatment of PD. In clinical trials, the A(2A)AR antagonist istradefylline reduces "off" time in patients with PD receiving optimal dopaminergic therapy. However, these effects have proven difficult to demonstrate on a consistent basis, and further clinical trials are required to establish the clinical utility of this drug class. Based on preclinical studies, A(2A)AR antagonists may also be neuroprotective and have utility in the treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders. We are only now starting to explore the range of potential uses of A(2A)AR antagonists in central nervous system disorders, and their full utility is still to be uncovered.