101
|
Sivaraju A, Hirsch L, Gaspard N, Farooque P, Gerrard J, Xu Y, Deng Y, Damisah E, Blumenfeld H, Spencer DD. Factors Predicting Outcome After Intracranial EEG Evaluation in Patients With Medically Refractory Epilepsy. Neurology 2022; 99:e1-e10. [PMID: 35508395 PMCID: PMC9259091 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000200569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2021] [Accepted: 03/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to identify predictors of a resective surgery and subsequent seizure freedom following intracranial EEG (ICEEG) for seizure-onset localization. METHODS This is a retrospective chart review of 178 consecutive patients with medically refractory epilepsy who underwent ICEEG monitoring from 2002 to 2015. Univariable and multivariable regression analysis identified independent predictors of resection vs other options. Stepwise Akaike information criteria with the aid of clinical consideration were used to select the best multivariable model for predicting resection and outcome. Discrete time survival analysis was used to analyze the factors predicting seizure-free outcome. Cumulative probability of seizure freedom was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and compared between resection and nonresection groups. Additional univariate analysis was performed on 8 select clinical scenarios commonly encountered during epilepsy surgical evaluations. RESULTS Multivariable analysis identified the presence of a lesional MRI, presurgical hypothesis suggesting temporal lobe onset, and a nondominant hemisphere implant as independent predictors of resection (p < 0.0001, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.80, 95% CI 0.73-0.87). Focal ICEEG onset and undergoing a resective surgery predicted absolute seizure freedom at the 5-year follow-up. Patients who underwent resective surgery were more likely to be seizure-free at 5 years compared with continued medical treatment or neuromodulation (60% vs 7%; p < 0.0001, hazard ratio 0.16, 95% CI 0.09-0.28). Even patients thought to have unfavorable predictors (nonlesional MRI or extratemporal lobe hypothesis or dominant hemisphere implant) had ≥50% chance of seizure freedom at 5 years if they underwent resection. DISCUSSION Unfavorable predictors, including having nonlesional extratemporal epilepsy, should not deter a thorough presurgical evaluation, including with invasive recordings in many cases. Resective surgery without functional impairment offers the best chance for sustained seizure freedom and should always be considered first. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE This study provides Class II evidence that the presence of a lesional MRI, presurgical hypothesis suggesting temporal lobe onset, and a nondominant hemisphere implant are independent predictors of resection. Focal ICEEG onset and undergoing resection are independent predictors of 5-year seizure freedom.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adithya Sivaraju
- From the Comprehensive Epilepsy Center (A.S., L.H., N.G., P.F., H.B.), Department of Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Service de Neurologie (N.G.), Université Libre de Bruxelles-Hôpital Erasme, Belgium; Comprehensive Epilepsy Center (J.G., E.D., D.D.S.), Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven; and Yale Center for Analytical Sciences (Y.X., Y.D.), Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT.
| | - Lawrence Hirsch
- From the Comprehensive Epilepsy Center (A.S., L.H., N.G., P.F., H.B.), Department of Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Service de Neurologie (N.G.), Université Libre de Bruxelles-Hôpital Erasme, Belgium; Comprehensive Epilepsy Center (J.G., E.D., D.D.S.), Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven; and Yale Center for Analytical Sciences (Y.X., Y.D.), Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT
| | - Nicolas Gaspard
- From the Comprehensive Epilepsy Center (A.S., L.H., N.G., P.F., H.B.), Department of Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Service de Neurologie (N.G.), Université Libre de Bruxelles-Hôpital Erasme, Belgium; Comprehensive Epilepsy Center (J.G., E.D., D.D.S.), Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven; and Yale Center for Analytical Sciences (Y.X., Y.D.), Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT
| | - Pue Farooque
- From the Comprehensive Epilepsy Center (A.S., L.H., N.G., P.F., H.B.), Department of Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Service de Neurologie (N.G.), Université Libre de Bruxelles-Hôpital Erasme, Belgium; Comprehensive Epilepsy Center (J.G., E.D., D.D.S.), Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven; and Yale Center for Analytical Sciences (Y.X., Y.D.), Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT
| | - Jason Gerrard
- From the Comprehensive Epilepsy Center (A.S., L.H., N.G., P.F., H.B.), Department of Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Service de Neurologie (N.G.), Université Libre de Bruxelles-Hôpital Erasme, Belgium; Comprehensive Epilepsy Center (J.G., E.D., D.D.S.), Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven; and Yale Center for Analytical Sciences (Y.X., Y.D.), Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT
| | - Yunshan Xu
- From the Comprehensive Epilepsy Center (A.S., L.H., N.G., P.F., H.B.), Department of Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Service de Neurologie (N.G.), Université Libre de Bruxelles-Hôpital Erasme, Belgium; Comprehensive Epilepsy Center (J.G., E.D., D.D.S.), Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven; and Yale Center for Analytical Sciences (Y.X., Y.D.), Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT
| | - Yanhong Deng
- From the Comprehensive Epilepsy Center (A.S., L.H., N.G., P.F., H.B.), Department of Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Service de Neurologie (N.G.), Université Libre de Bruxelles-Hôpital Erasme, Belgium; Comprehensive Epilepsy Center (J.G., E.D., D.D.S.), Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven; and Yale Center for Analytical Sciences (Y.X., Y.D.), Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT
| | - Eyiyemisi Damisah
- From the Comprehensive Epilepsy Center (A.S., L.H., N.G., P.F., H.B.), Department of Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Service de Neurologie (N.G.), Université Libre de Bruxelles-Hôpital Erasme, Belgium; Comprehensive Epilepsy Center (J.G., E.D., D.D.S.), Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven; and Yale Center for Analytical Sciences (Y.X., Y.D.), Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT
| | - Hal Blumenfeld
- From the Comprehensive Epilepsy Center (A.S., L.H., N.G., P.F., H.B.), Department of Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Service de Neurologie (N.G.), Université Libre de Bruxelles-Hôpital Erasme, Belgium; Comprehensive Epilepsy Center (J.G., E.D., D.D.S.), Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven; and Yale Center for Analytical Sciences (Y.X., Y.D.), Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT
| | - Dennis D Spencer
- From the Comprehensive Epilepsy Center (A.S., L.H., N.G., P.F., H.B.), Department of Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Service de Neurologie (N.G.), Université Libre de Bruxelles-Hôpital Erasme, Belgium; Comprehensive Epilepsy Center (J.G., E.D., D.D.S.), Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven; and Yale Center for Analytical Sciences (Y.X., Y.D.), Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT
| |
Collapse
|
102
|
Sun G, Zeng F, McCartin M, Zhang Q, Xu H, Liu Y, Chen ZS, Wang J. Closed-loop stimulation using a multiregion brain-machine interface has analgesic effects in rodents. Sci Transl Med 2022; 14:eabm5868. [PMID: 35767651 DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abm5868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Effective treatments for chronic pain remain limited. Conceptually, a closed-loop neural interface combining sensory signal detection with therapeutic delivery could produce timely and effective pain relief. Such systems are challenging to develop because of difficulties in accurate pain detection and ultrafast analgesic delivery. Pain has sensory and affective components, encoded in large part by neural activities in the primary somatosensory cortex (S1) and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), respectively. Meanwhile, studies show that stimulation of the prefrontal cortex (PFC) produces descending pain control. Here, we designed and tested a brain-machine interface (BMI) combining an automated pain detection arm, based on simultaneously recorded local field potential (LFP) signals from the S1 and ACC, with a treatment arm, based on optogenetic activation or electrical deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the PFC in freely behaving rats. Our multiregion neural interface accurately detected and treated acute evoked pain and chronic pain. This neural interface is activated rapidly, and its efficacy remained stable over time. Given the clinical feasibility of LFP recordings and DBS, our findings suggest that BMI is a promising approach for pain treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guanghao Sun
- Department of Psychiatry, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA.,Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Care and Pain Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA.,Interdisciplinary Pain Research Program, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Fei Zeng
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Care and Pain Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Michael McCartin
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Care and Pain Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Qiaosheng Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Care and Pain Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA.,Interdisciplinary Pain Research Program, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Helen Xu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Care and Pain Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Yaling Liu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Care and Pain Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Zhe Sage Chen
- Department of Psychiatry, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA.,Interdisciplinary Pain Research Program, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY 10016, USA.,Department of Neuroscience & Physiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA.,Neuroscience Institute, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Jing Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Care and Pain Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA.,Interdisciplinary Pain Research Program, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY 10016, USA.,Department of Neuroscience & Physiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA.,Neuroscience Institute, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| |
Collapse
|
103
|
Koubeissi MZ, Joshi S, Eid A, Emami M, Jaafar N, Syed T, Foreman PJ, Sheth A, Amdur R, Bou Nasif M, Puente AN, Aly R, Chen H, Becker A, Gholipour T, Makke Y, Elmashad A, Gagnon L, Durand DM, Gaillard WD, Shields DC. Low-frequency stimulation of a fiber tract in bilateral temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav 2022; 130:108667. [PMID: 35344808 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2022.108667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2022] [Revised: 03/07/2022] [Accepted: 03/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Pharmacoresistant bilateral mesial temporal lobe epilepsy often implies poor resective surgical candidacy. Low-frequency stimulation of a fiber tract connected to bilateral hippocampi, the fornicodorsocommissural tract, has been shown to be safe and efficacious in reducing seizures in a previous short-term study. Here, we report a single-blinded, within-subject control, long-term deep-brain stimulation trial of low-frequency stimulation of the fornicodorsocommissural tract in bilateral mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. Outcomes of interest included safety with respect to verbal memory scores and reduction of seizure frequency. METHODS Our enrollment goal was 16 adult subjects to be randomized to 2-Hz or 5-Hz low-frequency stimulation of the fornicodorsocommissural tract starting at 2 mA. The study design consisted of four two-month blocks of stimulation with a 50%-duty cycle, alternating with two-month blocks of no stimulation. RESULTS We terminated the study after enrollment of five subjects due to slow accrual. Fornicodorsocommissural tract stimulation elicited bilateral hippocampal evoked responses in all subjects. Three subjects underwent implantation of pulse generators and long-term low-frequency stimulation with mean monthly seizures of 3.14 ± 2.67 (median 3.0 [IQR 1-4.0]) during stimulation-off blocks, compared with 0.96 ± 1.23 (median 1.0 [IQR 0-1.0]) during stimulation-on blocks (p = 0.0005) during the blinded phase. Generalized Estimating Equations showed that low-frequency stimulation reduced monthly seizure-frequency by 0.71 per mA (p < 0.001). Verbal memory scores were stable with no psychiatric complications or other adverse events. SIGNIFICANCE The results demonstrate feasibility of stimulating both hippocampi using a single deep-brain stimulation electrode in the fornicodorsocommissural tract, efficacy of low-frequency stimulation in reducing seizures, and safety as regards verbal memory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamad Z Koubeissi
- Department of Neurology, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA.
| | - Sweta Joshi
- Department of Neurology, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA
| | - Alexandra Eid
- Department of Neurology, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA
| | - Mehrdad Emami
- Department of Neurology, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA
| | - Nadim Jaafar
- Department of Neurology, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA
| | | | - Perry J Foreman
- Department of Neurology, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, MD 21215, USA
| | - Anumeha Sheth
- Department of Neurology, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA
| | - Richard Amdur
- Department of Surgery, George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC 20052, USA
| | - Mei Bou Nasif
- Department of Neurology, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA
| | - Antonio N Puente
- Department of Psychiatry, George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC 20052, USA
| | - Radwa Aly
- Department of Neurology, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA
| | - Hai Chen
- Department of Neurology, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA
| | - Andrew Becker
- Department of Neurology, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA
| | - Taha Gholipour
- Department of Neurology, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA
| | - Yamane Makke
- Department of Neurology, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA
| | - Ahmed Elmashad
- Department of Neurology, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA
| | - Linda Gagnon
- Department of Neurology, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA
| | - Dominique M Durand
- Neural Engineering Center, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| | - William D Gaillard
- Center for Neuroscience and Behavioral Health, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC 20010, USA
| | - Donald C Shields
- Department of Neurosurgery, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA
| |
Collapse
|
104
|
Silverio AA, Silverio LAA. Developments in Deep Brain Stimulators for Successful Aging Towards Smart Devices—An Overview. FRONTIERS IN AGING 2022; 3:848219. [PMID: 35821845 PMCID: PMC9261350 DOI: 10.3389/fragi.2022.848219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2022] [Accepted: 03/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
This work provides an overview of the present state-of-the-art in the development of deep brain Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) and how such devices alleviate motor and cognitive disorders for a successful aging. This work reviews chronic diseases that are addressable via DBS, reporting also the treatment efficacies. The underlying mechanism for DBS is also reported. A discussion on hardware developments focusing on DBS control paradigms is included specifically the open- and closed-loop “smart” control implementations. Furthermore, developments towards a “smart” DBS, while considering the design challenges, current state of the art, and constraints, are also presented. This work also showcased different methods, using ambient energy scavenging, that offer alternative solutions to prolong the battery life of the DBS device. These are geared towards a low maintenance, semi-autonomous, and less disruptive device to be used by the elderly patient suffering from motor and cognitive disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelito A. Silverio
- Department of Electronics Engineering, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines
- Research Center for the Natural and Applied Sciences, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines
- *Correspondence: Angelito A. Silverio,
| | | |
Collapse
|
105
|
Beaudreault CP, Muh CR, Naftchi A, Spirollari E, Das A, Vazquez S, Sukul VV, Overby PJ, Tobias ME, McGoldrick PE, Wolf SM. Responsive Neurostimulation Targeting the Anterior, Centromedian and Pulvinar Thalamic Nuclei and the Detection of Electrographic Seizures in Pediatric and Young Adult Patients. Front Hum Neurosci 2022; 16:876204. [PMID: 35496067 PMCID: PMC9039390 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.876204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundResponsive neurostimulation (RNS System) has been utilized as a treatment for intractable epilepsy. The RNS System delivers stimulation in response to detected abnormal activity, via leads covering the seizure foci, in response to detections of predefined epileptiform activity with the goal of decreasing seizure frequency and severity. While thalamic leads are often implanted in combination with cortical strip leads, implantation and stimulation with bilateral thalamic leads alone is less common, and the ability to detect electrographic seizures using RNS System thalamic leads is uncertain.ObjectiveThe present study retrospectively evaluated fourteen patients with RNS System depth leads implanted in the thalamus, with or without concomitant implantation of cortical strip leads, to determine the ability to detect electrographic seizures in the thalamus. Detailed patient presentations and lead trajectories were reviewed alongside electroencephalographic (ECoG) analyses.ResultsAnterior nucleus thalamic (ANT) leads, whether bilateral or unilateral and combined with a cortical strip lead, successfully detected and terminated epileptiform activity, as demonstrated by Cases 2 and 3. Similarly, bilateral centromedian thalamic (CMT) leads or a combination of one centromedian thalamic alongside a cortical strip lead also demonstrated the ability to detect electrographic seizures as seen in Cases 6 and 9. Bilateral pulvinar leads likewise produced reliable seizure detection in Patient 14. Detections of electrographic seizures in thalamic nuclei did not appear to be affected by whether the patient was pediatric or adult at the time of RNS System implantation. Sole thalamic leads paralleled the combination of thalamic and cortical strip leads in terms of preventing the propagation of electrographic seizures.ConclusionThalamic nuclei present a promising target for detection and stimulation via the RNS System for seizures with multifocal or generalized onsets. These areas provide a modifiable, reversible therapeutic option for patients who are not candidates for surgical resection or ablation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Carrie R. Muh
- New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY, United States
| | | | | | - Ankita Das
- New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, United States
| | - Sima Vazquez
- New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, United States
| | - Vishad V. Sukul
- Department of Neurosurgery, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY, United States
| | - Philip J. Overby
- New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, United States
- Division of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, Maria Fareri Children’s Hospital, Valhalla, NY, United States
- Boston Children’s Hospital Physicians, Hawthorne, NY, United States
| | - Michael E. Tobias
- New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY, United States
| | - Patricia E. McGoldrick
- New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, United States
- Division of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, Maria Fareri Children’s Hospital, Valhalla, NY, United States
- Boston Children’s Hospital Physicians, Hawthorne, NY, United States
| | - Steven M. Wolf
- New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, United States
- Division of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, Maria Fareri Children’s Hospital, Valhalla, NY, United States
- Boston Children’s Hospital Physicians, Hawthorne, NY, United States
- *Correspondence: Steven M. Wolf,
| |
Collapse
|
106
|
Kochanski RB, Slavin KV. The future perspectives of psychiatric neurosurgery. PROGRESS IN BRAIN RESEARCH 2022; 270:211-228. [PMID: 35396029 DOI: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2022.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
The future of psychiatric neurosurgery can be viewed from two separate perspectives: the immediate future and the distant future. Both show promise, but the treatment strategy for mental diseases and the technology utilized during these separate periods will likely differ dramatically. It can be expected that the initial advancements will be built upon progress of neuroimaging and stereotactic targeting while surgical technology becomes adapted to patient-specific symptomatology and structural/functional imaging parameters. This individualized approach has already begun to show significant promise when applied to deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression and obsessive-compulsive disorder. If effectiveness of these strategies is confirmed by well designed, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical studies, further technological advances will continue into the distant future, and will likely involve precise neuromodulation at the cellular level, perhaps using wireless technology with or without closed-loop design. This approach, being theoretically less invasive and carrying less risk, may ultimately propel psychiatric neurosurgery to the forefront in the treatment algorithm of mental illness. Despite prominent development of non-invasive therapeutic options, such as stereotactic radiosurgery or transcranial magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound, chances are there will still be a need in surgical management of patients with most intractable psychiatric conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan B Kochanski
- Neurosurgery, Methodist Healthcare System, San Antonio, TX, United States
| | - Konstantin V Slavin
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States; Neurology Service, Jesse Brown Veterans Administration Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
107
|
Brown MG, Sillau S, McDermott D, Ernst LD, Spencer DC, Englot DJ, González HFJ, Datta P, Karakis I, Becker D, Rolston JD, Arain A, Rao VR, Doherty M, Urban A, Drees C. Concurrent brain-responsive and vagus nerve stimulation for treatment of drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav 2022; 129:108653. [PMID: 35305525 PMCID: PMC9339206 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2022.108653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2021] [Revised: 02/12/2022] [Accepted: 02/26/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Clinical trials of a brain-responsive neurostimulator, RNS® System (RNS), excluded patients with a vagus nerve stimulator, VNS® System (VNS). The goal of this study was to evaluate seizure outcomes and safety of concurrent RNS and VNS stimulation in adults with drug-resistant focal-onset seizures. METHODS A retrospective multicenter chart review was performed on all patients with an active VNS and RNS who were treated for a minimum of 6 months with both systems concurrently. Frequency of disabling seizures at baseline before RNS, at 1 year after RNS placement, and at last follow-up were used to calculate the change in seizure frequency after treatment. Data on adverse events and complications related to each device were collected. RESULTS Sixty-four patients from 10 epilepsy centers met inclusion criteria. All but one patient received RNS after VNS. The median follow-up time after RNS implantation was 28 months. Analysis of the entire population of patients with active VNS and RNS systems revealed a median reduction in seizure frequency at 1 year post-RNS placement of 43% with a responder rate of 49%, and at last follow-up a 64% median reduction with a 67% responder rate. No negative interactions were reported from the concurrent use of VNS and RNS. Stimulation-related side-effects were reported more frequently in association with VNS (30%) than with RNS (2%). SIGNIFICANCE Our findings suggest that concurrent treatment with VNS and RNS is safe and that the addition of RNS to VNS can further reduce seizure frequency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mesha-Gay Brown
- Centura Health Physician Group, Neuroscience and Spine, CO, United States
| | - Stefan Sillau
- University of Colorado, Department of Neurology, United States
| | | | - Lia D Ernst
- Oregon Health & Science University, Department of Neurology, United States
| | - David C Spencer
- Oregon Health & Science University, Department of Neurology, United States
| | - Dario J Englot
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Department of Neurological Surgery, United States
| | | | - Proleta Datta
- University of Nebraska Medical Center, Department of Neurology, United States
| | - Ioannis Karakis
- Emory University School of Medicine, Department of Neurology, United States
| | - Danielle Becker
- University of Pennsylvania, Department of Neurology, United States
| | - John D Rolston
- University of Utah, Departments of Neurosurgery and Biomedical Engineering, United States
| | - Amir Arain
- University of Utah, Department of Neurology, United States
| | - Vikram R Rao
- University of California, San Francisco, Department of Neurology and Weill Institute for Neurosciences, United States
| | - Michael Doherty
- Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Department of Neurology, Seattle, United States
| | - Alexandra Urban
- University of Pittsburgh, Department of Neurology, United States
| | - Cornelia Drees
- University of Colorado, Department of Neurology, United States; Mayo Clinic Arizona, Department of Neurology, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
108
|
Kerezoudis P, Gyftopoulos A, Alexander AY, Keith Starnes D, Nickels KC, Worrell GA, Wirrell EC, Lundstrom BN, Van Gompel JJ, Miller KJ. Safety and efficacy of responsive neurostimulation in the pediatric population: Evidence from institutional review and patient-level meta-analysis. Epilepsy Behav 2022; 129:108646. [PMID: 35299087 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2022.108646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Revised: 02/23/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Responsive neurostimulation (RNS) is a novel technology for drug-resistant epilepsy rising from bilateral hemispheres or eloquent cortex. Although recently approved for adults, its safety and efficacy for pediatric patients is under investigation. METHODS A comprehensive literature search (Pubmed/Medline, Scopus, Cochrane) was conducted for studies on RNS for pediatric epilepsy (<18 y/o) and supplemented by our institutional series (4 cases). Reduction in seizure frequency at last follow-up compared to preoperative baseline comprised the primary endpoint. RESULTS A total of 8 studies (49 patients) were analyzed. Median age at implant was 15 years (interquartile range [IQR] 12-17) and 63% were males. A lesional MRI was noted in 64% (14/22). Prior invasive EEG recording was performed in the majority of patients (90%) and the most common modality was stereoelectroencephalography (57%). The most common implant location (total of 94 RNS leads) was the frontal lobe (27%), followed by mesial temporal structures (23%) and thalamus (17%). At a median follow-up of 22 months, median seizure frequency reduction was 75% (IQR: 50-88%) and 80% were responders (>50% seizure reduction). Responses ranged from 50% for temporal lobe epilepsy to 81-93% for frontal, parietal, and multilobar epilepsy. Four infections were observed (8%) and there were no hematomas or postoperative neurological deficits. CONCLUSION Current evidence, albeit limited by potential publication bias, supports the promising safety and efficacy profile of RNS for medically refractory pediatric epilepsy. Randomized controlled trial data are needed to further establish the role of this intervention in preoperative discussions with patients and their families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Kai J Miller
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
109
|
Touma L, Dansereau B, Chan AY, Jetté N, Kwon CS, Braun KPJ, Friedman D, Jehi L, Rolston JD, Vadera S, Wong-Kisiel LC, Englot DJ, Keezer MR. Neurostimulation in People with Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis from the ILAE Surgical Therapies Commission. Epilepsia 2022; 63:1314-1329. [PMID: 35352349 DOI: 10.1111/epi.17243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2021] [Revised: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Summarize the current evidence on efficacy and tolerability of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), responsive neurostimulation (RNS), and deep brain stimulation (DBS) through a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS We followed the PRISMA reporting standards and searched Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. We included published randomized controlled trials (RCT) and their corresponding open-label extension studies, as well as prospective case series, with ≥ 20 participants (excluding studies limited to children). Our primary outcome was the mean (or median when unavailable) percentage decrease in frequency, as compared to baseline, of all epileptic seizures at last follow-up. Secondary outcomes included proportion of treatment responders and proportion with seizure freedom. RESULTS We identified 30 eligible studies, six of which were RCTs. At long-term follow-up (mean 1.3 years), five observational studies for VNS reported a pooled mean percentage decrease in seizure frequency of 34.7% (95% CI: -5.1, 74.5). In the open-label extension studies for RNS, the median seizure reduction was 53%, 66%, and 75% at two, five, and nine years of follow-up, respectively. For DBS, the median reduction was 56%, 65%, and 75% at two, five, and seven years, respectively. The proportion of individuals with seizure freedom at last follow-up increased significantly over time for DBS and RNS while a positive trend was observed for VNS. Quality of life was improved in all modalities. The most common complications included hoarseness, cough and throat pain for VNS and implant site pain, headache, and dysesthesia for DBS and RNS. SIGNIFICANCE Neurostimulation modalities are an effective treatment option for drug resistant epilepsy, with improving outcomes over time and few major complications. Seizure reduction rates among the three therapies were similar during the initial blinded phase. Recent long-term follow-up studies are encouraging for RNS and DBS but are lacking for VNS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lahoud Touma
- Research Centre of the Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montréal, QC, Canada.,Department of Neurosciences, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Bénédicte Dansereau
- Research Centre of the Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montréal, QC, Canada.,Department of Neurosciences, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Alvin Y Chan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA, USA
| | - Nathalie Jetté
- Department of Neurosurgery and Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, NY, USA
| | - Churl-Su Kwon
- Department of Neurosurgery and Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, NY, USA
| | - Kees P J Braun
- Department of Child Neurology, University Medical Center Utrecht, member of ERN EpiCARE, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Daniel Friedman
- Department of Neurology, New York University Langone Health, NY, USA
| | - Lara Jehi
- Department of Neurology, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - John D Rolston
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Sumeet Vadera
- Department of Neurological Surgery, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA, USA
| | | | - Dario J Englot
- Departments of Neurological Surgery, Neurology, Radiological, Electrical Engineering, and Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Mark R Keezer
- Research Centre of the Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montréal, QC, Canada.,Department of Neurosciences, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.,Honorary Researcher, Stichting Epilepsie Instellingen Nederland (SEIN), Heemstede, The Netherlands.,School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
110
|
Manzouri F, Zöllin M, Schillinger S, Dümpelmann M, Mikut R, Woias P, Comella LM, Schulze-Bonhage A. A Comparison of Energy-Efficient Seizure Detectors for Implantable Neurostimulation Devices. Front Neurol 2022; 12:703797. [PMID: 35317247 PMCID: PMC8934428 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.703797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
IntroductionAbout 30% of epilepsy patients are resistant to treatment with antiepileptic drugs, and only a minority of these are surgical candidates. A recent therapeutic approach is the application of electrical stimulation in the early phases of a seizure to interrupt its spread across the brain. To accomplish this, energy-efficient seizure detectors are required that are able to detect a seizure in its early stages.MethodsThree patient-specific, energy-efficient seizure detectors are proposed in this study: (i) random forest (RF); (ii) long short-term memory (LSTM) recurrent neural network (RNN); and (iii) convolutional neural network (CNN). Performance evaluation was based on EEG data (n = 40 patients) derived from a selected set of surface EEG electrodes, which mimic the electrode layout of an implantable neurostimulation system. As for the RF input, 16 features in the time- and frequency-domains were selected. Raw EEG data were used for both CNN and RNN. Energy consumption was estimated by a platform-independent model based on the number of arithmetic operations (AOs) and memory accesses (MAs). To validate the estimated energy consumption, the RNN classifier was implemented on an ultra-low-power microcontroller.ResultsThe RNN seizure detector achieved a slightly better level of performance, with a median area under the precision-recall curve score of 0.49, compared to 0.47 for CNN and 0.46 for RF. In terms of energy consumption, RF was the most efficient algorithm, with a total of 67k AOs and 67k MAs per classification. This was followed by CNN (488k AOs and 963k MAs) and RNN (772k AOs and 978k MAs), whereby MAs contributed more to total energy consumption. Measurements derived from the hardware implementation of the RNN algorithm demonstrated a significant correlation between estimations and actual measurements.DiscussionAll three proposed seizure detection algorithms were shown to be suitable for application in implantable devices. The applied methodology for a platform-independent energy estimation was proven to be accurate by way of hardware implementation of the RNN algorithm. These findings show that seizure detection can be achieved using just a few channels with limited spatial distribution. The methodology proposed in this study can therefore be applied when designing new models for responsive neurostimulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Farrokh Manzouri
- Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Center — University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Marc Zöllin
- Laboratory for Design of Microsystems, Department of Microsystems Engineering — IMTEK, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Simon Schillinger
- Laboratory for Design of Microsystems, Department of Microsystems Engineering — IMTEK, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Institute for Automation and Applied Informatics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany
| | - Matthias Dümpelmann
- Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Center — University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- *Correspondence: Matthias Dümpelmann
| | - Ralf Mikut
- Institute for Automation and Applied Informatics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany
| | - Peter Woias
- Laboratory for Design of Microsystems, Department of Microsystems Engineering — IMTEK, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Laura Maria Comella
- Laboratory for Design of Microsystems, Department of Microsystems Engineering — IMTEK, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Andreas Schulze-Bonhage
- Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Center — University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine, Center for Basics in NeuroModulation, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
111
|
Fleming JE, Kremen V, Gilron R, Gregg NM, Zamora M, Dijk DJ, Starr PA, Worrell GA, Little S, Denison TJ. Embedding Digital Chronotherapy into Bioelectronic Medicines. iScience 2022; 25:104028. [PMID: 35313697 PMCID: PMC8933700 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
|
112
|
Khan M, Paktiawal J, Piper RJ, Chari A, Tisdall MM. Intracranial neuromodulation with deep brain stimulation and responsive neurostimulation in children with drug-resistant epilepsy: a systematic review. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2022; 29:208-217. [PMID: 34678764 DOI: 10.3171/2021.8.peds21201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2021] [Accepted: 08/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In children with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE), resective, ablative, and disconnective surgery may not be feasible or may fail. Neuromodulation in the form of deep brain stimulation (DBS) and responsive neurostimulation (RNS) may be viable treatment options, however evidence for their efficacies in children is currently limited. This systematic review aimed to summarize the literature on DBS and RNS for the treatment of DRE in the pediatric population. Specifically, the authors focused on currently available data for reported indications, neuromodulation targets, clinical efficacy, and safety outcomes. METHODS PRISMA guidelines were followed throughout this systematic review (PROSPERO no. CRD42020180669). Electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, OpenGrey, and CINAHL Plus, were searched from their inception to February 19, 2021. Inclusion criteria were 1) studies with at least 1 pediatric patient (age < 19 years) who underwent DBS and/or RNS for DRE; and 2) retrospective, prospective, randomized, or nonrandomized controlled studies, case series, and case reports. Exclusion criteria were 1) letters, commentaries, conference abstracts, and reviews; and 2) studies without full text available. Risk of bias of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane ROBINS-I (Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions) tool. RESULTS A total of 35 studies were selected that identified 72 and 46 patients who underwent DBS and RNS, respectively (age range 4-18 years). Various epilepsy etiologies and seizure types were described in both cohorts. Overall, 75% of patients had seizure reduction > 50% after DBS (among whom 6 were seizure free) at a median (range) follow-up of 14 (1-100) months. In an exploratory univariate analysis of factors associated with favorable response, the follow-up duration was shorter in those patients with a favorable response (18 vs 33 months, p < 0.05). In the RNS cohort, 73.2% of patients had seizure reduction > 50% after RNS at a median (range) follow-up of 22 (5-39) months. On closer inspection, 83.3% of patients who had > 50% reduction in seizures actually had > 75% reduction, with 4 patients being seizure free. CONCLUSIONS Overall, both DBS and RNS showed favorable response rates, indicating that both techniques should be considered for pediatric patients with DRE. However, serious risks of overall bias were found in all included studies. Many research needs in this area would be addressed by conducting high-quality clinical trials and establishing an international registry of patients who have undergone pediatric neuromodulation, thereby ensuring robust prospective collection of predictive variables and outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehdi Khan
- 1University College London Medical School, London, United Kingdom
- 3Department of Neurosurgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, United Kingdom; and
| | - Jaber Paktiawal
- 2Medical University Pleven, Pleven, Bulgaria
- 3Department of Neurosurgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, United Kingdom; and
| | - Rory J Piper
- 3Department of Neurosurgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, United Kingdom; and
- 4Developmental Neuroscience, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Aswin Chari
- 3Department of Neurosurgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, United Kingdom; and
- 4Developmental Neuroscience, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Martin M Tisdall
- 3Department of Neurosurgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, United Kingdom; and
- 4Developmental Neuroscience, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
113
|
Mahajan UV, Ojukwu DI, Azagury DE, Safer DL, Cunningham T, Halpern CH. Can responsive deep brain stimulation be a cost-effective treatment for severe obesity? Obesity (Silver Spring) 2022; 30:338-346. [PMID: 35088556 DOI: 10.1002/oby.23324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2021] [Accepted: 09/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE A first-in-human responsive deep brain stimulation (rDBS) trial (NCT03868670) for obesity is under way, which is based on promising preclinical evidence. Given the upfront costs of rDBS, it is prudent to examine the success threshold for cost-effectiveness compared with laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). METHODS Efficacy and safety data on LRYGB and safety data on rDBS were collected for established indications through a literature search. The success threshold was defined as minimum BMI reduction. Treatment costs were calculated via Medicare national reimbursement data. RESULTS LRYGB had a mean BMI reduction of 13.75 kg/m2 . Based on adverse events, LRYGB was a less-preferred health state (overall adverse event utility of 0.96 [0.02]) than rDBS (0.98 [0.01]), but LRYGB ($14,366 [$6,410]) had a significantly lower treatment cost than rDBS ($29,951 [$4,490]; p < 0.0001). Therefore, for rDBS to be cost-effective compared with LRYGB, the multiple models yielded a success threshold range of 13.7 to 15.2 kg/m2 . CONCLUSIONS This study established a preliminary efficacy success threshold for rDBS to be cost-effective for severe obesity, and results from randomized controlled trials are needed. This analysis allows for interpretation of the economic impact of advancing rDBS for obesity in light of ongoing trial results and suggests an attainable threshold is needed for cost-effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uma V Mahajan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California, USA
- School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Disep I Ojukwu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Dan E Azagury
- Section of Minimally Invasive and Bariatric Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Debra L Safer
- Stanford Adult Eating and Weight Disorders Program, Department of Psychiatry, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Tricia Cunningham
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Casey H Halpern
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
114
|
Didato G, Chiesa V, Losito E, Amorim Leite R, Abel TJ. Editorial: Complex Scenarios of Drug-Resistant Epilepsies: Diagnostic Challenges and Novel Therapeutic Options. Front Neurol 2022; 13:908163. [PMID: 35572920 PMCID: PMC9100954 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.908163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Didato
- Epilepsy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
- *Correspondence: Giuseppe Didato
| | - Valentina Chiesa
- Epilepsy Center, San Paolo Hospital, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan, Italy
| | - Emma Losito
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Ricardo Amorim Leite
- Video-EEG Unit, Psychiatry Institute of São Paulo University—USP, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Taylor J. Abel
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
115
|
Gersner R, Oberman LM, Sanchez MJ, Chiriboga N, Kaye HL, Pascual-Leone A, Zangen A, Rotenberg A. Preliminary Report of the Safety and Tolerability of 1 Hz Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy. J Cent Nerv Syst Dis 2022; 14:11795735221088522. [PMID: 35572122 PMCID: PMC9092568 DOI: 10.1177/11795735221088522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2021] [Accepted: 03/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Low frequency (≤1 Hz) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been shown to suppress cortical excitability and is beginning to be trialed for the treatment of refractory epilepsy. Purpose As a step toward a larger trial, the current pilot study was aimed to test the tolerability and safety of temporal lobe rTMS using H-coil for the treatment of temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). Research Design 1800 pulses of active or sham rTMS were applied 5 days a week for 2 weeks over the temporal lobe of the affected hemisphere. Results Nine participants were enrolled and randomized to verum or sham stimulation. One participant dropped out from the sham group after 5 rTMS sessions. In-session, 3 patients had typical seizures during sham stimulation. One patient had seizures also during active stimulation (albeit fewer than during sham). Minor reported adverse events during stimulation otherwise included transient neck pain and headache, and were reported in equal numbers in both groups. Major adverse events were not reported. Our results indicate that H-coil rTMS was well-tolerated. Conclusion Given the relatively high prevalence of individuals with TLE who are treatment-resistant and the preliminary results of this study, we suggest that a larger safety and efficacy trial of 1 Hz rTMS for the treatment of TLE is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roman Gersner
- Neuromodulation Program, Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lindsay M Oberman
- Neuroplasticity and Autism Spectrum Disorder Program and Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, E.P. Bradley Hospital and Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Maria J Sanchez
- Neuromodulation Program, Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nicolas Chiriboga
- Neuromodulation Program, Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Harper L Kaye
- Neuromodulation Program, Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alvaro Pascual-Leone
- Berenson-Allen Center for Noninvasive Brain Stimulation, Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston MA, USA
| | - Abraham Zangen
- Department of Life Sciences, Ben-Gurion University, Beer-Sheva, Israel
| | - Alexander Rotenberg
- Neuromodulation Program, Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Berenson-Allen Center for Noninvasive Brain Stimulation, Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
116
|
Fan JM, Lee AT, Kudo K, Ranasinghe KG, Morise H, Findlay AM, Kirsch HE, Chang EF, Nagarajan SS, Rao VR. Network connectivity predicts effectiveness of responsive neurostimulation in focal epilepsy. Brain Commun 2022; 4:fcac104. [PMID: 35611310 PMCID: PMC9123848 DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcac104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2021] [Revised: 02/23/2022] [Accepted: 04/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Responsive neurostimulation is a promising treatment for drug-resistant focal epilepsy; however, clinical outcomes are highly variable across individuals. The therapeutic mechanism of responsive neurostimulation likely involves modulatory effects on brain networks; however, with no known biomarkers that predict clinical response, patient selection remains empiric. This study aimed to determine whether functional brain connectivity measured non-invasively prior to device implantation predicts clinical response to responsive neurostimulation therapy. Resting-state magnetoencephalography was obtained in 31 participants with subsequent responsive neurostimulation device implantation between 15 August 2014 and 1 October 2020. Functional connectivity was computed across multiple spatial scales (global, hemispheric, and lobar) using pre-implantation magnetoencephalography and normalized to maps of healthy controls. Normalized functional connectivity was investigated as a predictor of clinical response, defined as percent change in self-reported seizure frequency in the most recent year of clinic visits relative to pre-responsive neurostimulation baseline. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve quantified the performance of functional connectivity in predicting responders (≥50% reduction in seizure frequency) and non-responders (<50%). Leave-one-out cross-validation was furthermore performed to characterize model performance. The relationship between seizure frequency reduction and frequency-specific functional connectivity was further assessed as a continuous measure. Across participants, stimulation was enabled for a median duration of 52.2 (interquartile range, 27.0-62.3) months. Demographics, seizure characteristics, and responsive neurostimulation lead configurations were matched across 22 responders and 9 non-responders. Global functional connectivity in the alpha and beta bands were lower in non-responders as compared with responders (alpha, pfdr < 0.001; beta, pfdr < 0.001). The classification of responsive neurostimulation outcome was improved by combining feature inputs; the best model incorporated four features (i.e. mean and dispersion of alpha and beta bands) and yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.970 (0.919-1.00). The leave-one-out cross-validation analysis of this four-feature model yielded a sensitivity of 86.3%, specificity of 77.8%, positive predictive value of 90.5%, and negative predictive value of 70%. Global functional connectivity in alpha band correlated with seizure frequency reduction (alpha, P = 0.010). Global functional connectivity predicted responder status more strongly, as compared with hemispheric predictors. Lobar functional connectivity was not a predictor. These findings suggest that non-invasive functional connectivity may be a candidate personalized biomarker that has the potential to predict responsive neurostimulation effectiveness and to identify patients most likely to benefit from responsive neurostimulation therapy. Follow-up large-cohort, prospective studies are required to validate this biomarker. These findings furthermore support an emerging view that the therapeutic mechanism of responsive neurostimulation involves network-level effects in the brain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joline M Fan
- Department of Neurology and Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Anthony T Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Kiwamu Kudo
- Medical Imaging Center, Ricoh Company, Ltd., Kanazawa, Japan.,Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA
| | - Kamalini G Ranasinghe
- Department of Neurology and Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Hirofumi Morise
- Medical Imaging Center, Ricoh Company, Ltd., Kanazawa, Japan.,Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA
| | - Anne M Findlay
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA
| | - Heidi E Kirsch
- Department of Neurology and Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA
| | - Edward F Chang
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Srikantan S Nagarajan
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA
| | - Vikram R Rao
- Department of Neurology and Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
117
|
Riva A, Golda A, Balagura G, Amadori E, Vari MS, Piccolo G, Iacomino M, Lattanzi S, Salpietro V, Minetti C, Striano P. New Trends and Most Promising Therapeutic Strategies for Epilepsy Treatment. Front Neurol 2021; 12:753753. [PMID: 34950099 PMCID: PMC8690245 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.753753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2021] [Accepted: 10/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Despite the wide availability of novel anti-seizure medications (ASMs), 30% of patients with epilepsy retain persistent seizures with a significant burden in comorbidity and an increased risk of premature death. This review aims to discuss the therapeutic strategies, both pharmacological and non-, which are currently in the pipeline. Methods: PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE databases were screened for experimental and clinical studies, meta-analysis, and structured reviews published between January 2018 and September 2021. The terms “epilepsy,” “treatment” or “therapy,” and “novel” were used to filter the results. Conclusions: The common feature linking all the novel therapeutic approaches is the spasmodic rush toward precision medicine, aiming at holistically evaluating patients, and treating them accordingly as a whole. Toward this goal, different forms of intervention may be embraced, starting from the choice of the most suitable drug according to the type of epilepsy of an individual or expected adverse effects, to the outstanding field of gene therapy. Moreover, innovative insights come from in-vitro and in-vivo studies on the role of inflammation and stem cells in the brain. Further studies on both efficacy and safety are needed, with the challenge to mature evidence into reliable assets, ameliorating the symptoms of patients, and answering the challenges of this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonella Riva
- Pediatric Neurology and Muscular Diseases Unit, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy.,Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Alice Golda
- Pediatric Neurology and Muscular Diseases Unit, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy
| | - Ganna Balagura
- Department of Functional Genomics, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Elisabetta Amadori
- Pediatric Neurology and Muscular Diseases Unit, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy.,Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Maria Stella Vari
- Pediatric Neurology and Muscular Diseases Unit, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy
| | - Gianluca Piccolo
- Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Michele Iacomino
- Unit of Medical Genetics, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy
| | - Simona Lattanzi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Neurological Clinic, Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Salpietro
- Pediatric Neurology and Muscular Diseases Unit, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy.,Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Carlo Minetti
- Pediatric Neurology and Muscular Diseases Unit, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy.,Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Pasquale Striano
- Pediatric Neurology and Muscular Diseases Unit, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy.,Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
118
|
Abstract
Three neuromodulation therapies, all using implanted device and electrodes, have been
approved to treat adults with drug-resistant focal epilepsy, namely, the vagus nerve
stimulation in 1995, deep brain stimulation of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus
(ANT-DBS) in 2018 (2010 in Europe), and responsive neurostimulation (RNS) in 2014.
Indications for VNS have more recently extended to children down to age of 4. Limited or
anecdotal data are available in other epilepsy syndromes and refractory/super-refractory
status epilepticus. Overall, neuromodulation therapies are palliative, with only a
minority of patients achieving long-term seizure freedom, justifying favoring such
treatments in patients who are not good candidates for curative epilepsy surgery. About
half of patients implanted with VNS, ANT-DBS, and RNS have 50% or greater reduction in
seizures, with long-term data suggesting increased efficacy over time. Besides their
impact on seizure frequency, neuromodulation therapies are associated with various
benefits and drawbacks in comparison to antiseizure drugs. Yet, we lack high-level
evidence to best position each neuromodulation therapy in the treatment pathways of
persons with difficult-to-treat epilepsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philippe Ryvlin
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Lara E. Jehi
- Epilepsy Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
119
|
Provenza NR, Sheth SA, Dastin-van Rijn EM, Mathura RK, Ding Y, Vogt GS, Avendano-Ortega M, Ramakrishnan N, Peled N, Gelin LFF, Xing D, Jeni LA, Ertugrul IO, Barrios-Anderson A, Matteson E, Wiese AD, Xu J, Viswanathan A, Harrison MT, Bijanki KR, Storch EA, Cohn JF, Goodman WK, Borton DA. Long-term ecological assessment of intracranial electrophysiology synchronized to behavioral markers in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Nat Med 2021; 27:2154-2164. [PMID: 34887577 PMCID: PMC8800455 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-021-01550-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Accepted: 09/22/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Detection of neural signatures related to pathological behavioral states could enable adaptive deep brain stimulation (DBS), a potential strategy for improving efficacy of DBS for neurological and psychiatric disorders. This approach requires identifying neural biomarkers of relevant behavioral states, a task best performed in ecologically valid environments. Here, in human participants with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) implanted with recording-capable DBS devices, we synchronized chronic ventral striatum local field potentials with relevant, disease-specific behaviors. We captured over 1,000 h of local field potentials in the clinic and at home during unstructured activity, as well as during DBS and exposure therapy. The wide range of symptom severity over which the data were captured allowed us to identify candidate neural biomarkers of OCD symptom intensity. This work demonstrates the feasibility and utility of capturing chronic intracranial electrophysiology during daily symptom fluctuations to enable neural biomarker identification, a prerequisite for future development of adaptive DBS for OCD and other psychiatric disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole R Provenza
- Brown University School of Engineering, Providence, RI, USA
- Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Sameer A Sheth
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Raissa K Mathura
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yaohan Ding
- Intelligent Systems Program, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Gregory S Vogt
- Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michelle Avendano-Ortega
- Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Nithya Ramakrishnan
- Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Noam Peled
- MGH/HST Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | | | - David Xing
- Brown University School of Engineering, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Laszlo A Jeni
- Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Itir Onal Ertugrul
- Department of Cognitive Science and Artificial Intelligence, Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | | | - Evan Matteson
- Brown University School of Engineering, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Andrew D Wiese
- Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Psychology, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | - Junqian Xu
- Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ashwin Viswanathan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Kelly R Bijanki
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
- Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Eric A Storch
- Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jeffrey F Cohn
- Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Wayne K Goodman
- Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David A Borton
- Brown University School of Engineering, Providence, RI, USA.
- Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
- Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Rehabilitation R&D Service, Department of Veterans Affairs, Providence, RI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
120
|
Nagahama Y, Zervos TM, Murata KK, Holman L, Karsonovich T, Parker JJ, Chen JS, Phillips HW, Fajardo M, Nariai H, Hussain SA, Porter BE, Grant GA, Ragheb J, Wang S, O'Neill BR, Alexander AL, Bollo RJ, Fallah A. Real-World Preliminary Experience With Responsive Neurostimulation in Pediatric Epilepsy: A Multicenter Retrospective Observational Study. Neurosurgery 2021; 89:997-1004. [PMID: 34528103 DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyab343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2021] [Accepted: 07/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the well-documented utility of responsive neurostimulation (RNS, NeuroPace) in adult epilepsy patients, literature on the use of RNS in children is limited. OBJECTIVE To determine the real-world efficacy and safety of RNS in pediatric epilepsy patients. METHODS Patients with childhood-onset drug-resistant epilepsy treated with RNS were retrospectively identified at 5 pediatric centers. Reduction of disabling seizures and complications were evaluated for children (<18 yr) and young adults (>18 yr) and compared with prior literature pertaining to adult patients. RESULTS Of 35 patients identified, 17 were <18 yr at the time of RNS implantation, including a 3-yr-old patient. Four patients (11%) had concurrent resection. Three complications, requiring additional surgical interventions, were noted in young adults (2 infections [6%] and 1 lead fracture [3%]). No complications were noted in children. Among the 32 patients with continued therapy, 2 (6%) achieved seizure freedom, 4 (13%) achieved ≥90% seizure reduction, 13 (41%) had ≥50% reduction, 8 (25%) had <50% reduction, and 5 (16%) experienced no improvement. The average follow-up duration was 1.7 yr (median 1.8 yr, range 0.3-4.8 yr). There was no statistically significant difference for seizure reduction and complications between children and young adults in our cohort or between our cohort and the adult literature. CONCLUSION These preliminary data suggest that RNS is well tolerated and an effective off-label surgical treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy in carefully selected pediatric patients as young as 3 yr of age. Data regarding long-term efficacy and safety in children will be critical to optimize patient selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasunori Nagahama
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.,Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.,Department of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado Anschutz School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Thomas M Zervos
- Department of Neurosurgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Kristina K Murata
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Lynette Holman
- Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Primary Children's Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Torin Karsonovich
- Department of Neurosurgery, Carle BroMenn Medical Center, Normal, Illinois, USA
| | - Jonathon J Parker
- Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Jia-Shu Chen
- Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - H Westley Phillips
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Marytery Fajardo
- Division of Neurology, Brain Institute, Nicklaus Children's Hospital, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Hiroki Nariai
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Shaun A Hussain
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Brenda E Porter
- Division of Pediatric Neurology, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Gerald A Grant
- Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - John Ragheb
- Division of Neurosurgery, Brain Institute, Nicklaus Children's Hospital, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Shelly Wang
- Division of Neurosurgery, Brain Institute, Nicklaus Children's Hospital, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Brent R O'Neill
- Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.,Department of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado Anschutz School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Allyson L Alexander
- Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.,Department of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado Anschutz School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Robert J Bollo
- Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Primary Children's Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Aria Fallah
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
121
|
Vion-Bailly J, Suarez-Castellanos IM, Chapelon JY, Carpentier A, N'Djin WA. Neurostimulation success rate of repetitive-pulse focused ultrasound in an in vivo giant axon model: An acoustic parametric study. Med Phys 2021; 49:682-701. [PMID: 34796512 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2021] [Revised: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 10/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Focused ultrasound (FUS) is a promising tool to develop new modalities of therapeutic neurostimulation. The ability of FUS to stimulate the nervous system, in a noninvasive and spatiotemporally precise manner, has been demonstrated in animals and human subjects, but the underlying biomechanisms are not fully understood yet. The objective of the present study was to investigate the bioeffects involved in the generation of trains of action potentials (APs) by repetitive-pulse FUS stimuli in a simple invertebrate neural model. METHODS The respective influences of different acoustic parameters on the neurostimulation success rate (NSR), defined as the rate of FUS stimuli capable of evoking at least one AP, were explored using the system of afferent nerves and giant fibers of Lumbricus terrestris as neural model. Each parameter was studied independently by administering random FUS sequences while keeping all but one FUS parameter constant. The NSR was evaluated as a function of (i) the spatial-average pulse-average intensity (Isapa ); (ii) the pulse duration (PD); (iii) the pulse repetition frequency (PRF); iv) the number of cycles per pulse (Ncycles ); (v) two ultrasound frequencies, f0 = 1.1 MHz and f3 = 3.3 MHz, corresponding to the fundamental and third-harmonic resonant frequencies of the FUS transducer, respectively (spherical, radius of curvature: 50 mm); and (vi) levels of emerging stable cavitation and inertial cavitation. RESULTS The NSR associated to 1.1 MHz repetitive-pulse FUS stimuli was found to increase as a function of increasing Isapa , PD, PRF, and Ncycles . When evaluating each parameter at f = 1.1 MHz, it was observed that NSRs close to 100% were achieved when sufficiently elevating their respective values. When computing the NSR as a function of the spatial-average, temporal-average intensity (Isata ), defined as the product of PRF, PD, and Isapa , a significant elevation of the NSR from 0% to close to 100% was measured by increasing Isata from values approximate to 4 W/cm2 to values higher than 12 W/cm2 . No clear and consistent trend was observed in trials aimed at exploring the effects of different levels of stable and inertial acoustic cavitation on the NSR. Finally, the feasibility of inducing neural responses with 3.3 MHz repetitive-pulse FUS stimuli was also demonstrated with NSRs reaching up to 60%, in the range of FUS parameters studied. CONCLUSION The time-averaged value of the radiation force per unit volume of tissue is proportional to the acoustic intensity. As a result, the observations from this study suggest that the neural structure responding to the stimulus is sensitive to the mean radiation force carried by the FUS sequence, regardless of the combination of FUS parameters giving rise to such force. The results from this study further revealed the existence of a minimal activation threshold with regard to Isapa .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jérémy Vion-Bailly
- LabTAU, INSERM, Centre Léon Bérard, Université Lyon 1, Univ Lyon, F-69003, Lyon, France
| | | | - Jean-Yves Chapelon
- LabTAU, INSERM, Centre Léon Bérard, Université Lyon 1, Univ Lyon, F-69003, Lyon, France
| | - Alexandre Carpentier
- AP-HP, Neurosurgery department, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France.,Sorbonne University, GRC23, Interface Neuro Machine Team, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - W Apoutou N'Djin
- LabTAU, INSERM, Centre Léon Bérard, Université Lyon 1, Univ Lyon, F-69003, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
122
|
da Silva Fiorin F, de Araújo E Silva M, Rodrigues AC. Electrical stimulation in animal models of epilepsy: A review on cellular and electrophysiological aspects. Life Sci 2021; 285:119972. [PMID: 34560081 DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2021.119972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2021] [Revised: 09/02/2021] [Accepted: 09/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
Epilepsy is a debilitating condition, primarily refractory individuals, leading to the search for new efficient therapies. Electrical stimulation is an important method used for years to treat several neurological disorders. Currently, electrical stimulation is used to reduce epileptic crisis in patients and shows promising results. Even though the use of electricity to treat neurological disorders has grown worldwide, there are still many caveats that must be clarified, such as action mechanisms and more efficient stimulation treatment parameters. Thus, this review aimed to explore the comprehension of the main stimulation methods in animal models of epilepsy using rodents to develop new experimental protocols and therapeutic approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernando da Silva Fiorin
- Graduate Program in Neuroengineering, Edmond and Lily Safra International Institute of Neuroscience, Santos Dumont Institute, Brazil.
| | - Mariane de Araújo E Silva
- Graduate Program in Neuroengineering, Edmond and Lily Safra International Institute of Neuroscience, Santos Dumont Institute, Brazil
| | - Abner Cardoso Rodrigues
- Graduate Program in Neuroengineering, Edmond and Lily Safra International Institute of Neuroscience, Santos Dumont Institute, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
123
|
Abstract
SUMMARY Electrical brain stimulation is an established therapy for movement disorders, epilepsy, obsessive compulsive disorder, and a potential therapy for many other neurologic and psychiatric disorders. Despite significant progress and FDA approvals, there remain significant clinical gaps that can be addressed with next generation systems. Integrating wearable sensors and implantable brain devices with off-the-body computing resources (smart phones and cloud resources) opens a new vista for dense behavioral and physiological signal tracking coupled with adaptive stimulation therapy that should have applications for a range of brain and mind disorders. Here, we briefly review some history and current electrical brain stimulation applications for epilepsy, deep brain stimulation and responsive neurostimulation, and emerging applications for next generation devices and systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory A Worrell
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Bioelectronics and Neurophysiology Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
124
|
Ryvlin P, Rheims S, Hirsch LJ, Sokolov A, Jehi L. Neuromodulation in epilepsy: state-of-the-art approved therapies. Lancet Neurol 2021; 20:1038-1047. [PMID: 34710360 DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(21)00300-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 151] [Impact Index Per Article: 37.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2021] [Revised: 08/22/2021] [Accepted: 09/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Three neuromodulation therapies have been appropriately tested and approved in refractory focal epilepsies: vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), deep brain stimulation of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT-DBS), and closed-loop responsive neurostimulation of the epileptogenic zone or zones. These therapies are primarily palliative. Only a few individuals have achieved complete freedom from seizures for more than 12 months with these therapies, whereas more than half have benefited from long-term reduction in seizure frequency of more than 50%. Implantation-related adverse events primarily include infection and pain at the implant site. Intracranial haemorrhage is a frequent adverse event for ANT-DBS and responsive neurostimulation. Other stimulation-specific side-effects are observed with VNS and ANT-DBS. Biomarkers to predict response to neuromodulation therapies are not available, and high-level evidence to aid decision making about when and for whom these therapies should be preferred over other antiepileptic treatments is scant. Future studies are thus needed to address these shortfalls in knowledge, approve other forms of neuromodulation, and develop personalised closed-loop therapies with embedded machine learning. Until then, neuromodulation could be considered for individuals with intractable seizures, ideally after the possibility of curative surgical treatment has been carefully assessed and ruled out or judged less appropriate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philippe Ryvlin
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| | - Sylvain Rheims
- Department of Functional Neurology and Epileptology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon 1 University Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U1028/CNRS UMR 5292 Epilepsy Institute, Lyon, France
| | - Lawrence J Hirsch
- Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Arseny Sokolov
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Lara Jehi
- Epilepsy Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
125
|
Xu C, Gong Y, Wang Y, Chen Z. New advances in pharmacoresistant epilepsy towards precise management-from prognosis to treatments. Pharmacol Ther 2021; 233:108026. [PMID: 34718071 DOI: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2021.108026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2021] [Revised: 10/15/2021] [Accepted: 10/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Epilepsy, one of the most severe neurological diseases, is characterized by abrupt recurrent seizures. Despite great progress in the development of antiseizure drugs (ASDs) based on diverse molecular targets, more than one third of epilepsy patients still show resistance to ASDs, a condition termed pharmacoresistant epilepsy. The management of pharmacoresistant epilepsy involves serious challenges. In the past decade, promising advances have been made in the use of interdisciplinary techniques involving biophysics, bioinformatics, biomaterials and biochemistry, which allow more precise prognosis and development of drug target for pharmacoresistant epilepsy. Notably, novel experimental tools such as viral vector gene delivery, optogenetics and chemogenetics have provided a framework for promising approaches to the precise treatment of pharmacoresistant epilepsy. In this review, historical achievements especially recent advances of the past decade in the prognosis and treatment of pharmacoresistant epilepsy from both clinical and laboratory settings are presented and summarized. We propose that the further development of novel experimental tools at cellular or molecular levels with both temporal and spatial precision are necessary to make improve the management and drug development for pharmacoresistant epilepsy in the clinical arena.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cenglin Xu
- Key Laboratory of Neuropharmacology and Translational Medicine of Zhejiang Province, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yiwei Gong
- Institute of Pharmacology & Toxicology, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yi Wang
- Key Laboratory of Neuropharmacology and Translational Medicine of Zhejiang Province, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China; Institute of Pharmacology & Toxicology, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Zhong Chen
- Key Laboratory of Neuropharmacology and Translational Medicine of Zhejiang Province, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China; Institute of Pharmacology & Toxicology, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China; Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurology, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
126
|
Rao VR. Chronic electroencephalography in epilepsy with a responsive neurostimulation device: current status and future prospects. Expert Rev Med Devices 2021; 18:1093-1105. [PMID: 34696676 DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2021.1994388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Implanted neurostimulation devices are gaining traction as therapeutic options for people with certain forms of drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Some of these devices enable chronic electroencephalography (cEEG), which offers views of the dynamics of brain activity in epilepsy over unprecedented time horizons. AREAS COVERED This review focuses on clinical insights and basic neuroscience discoveries enabled by analyses of cEEG from an exemplar device, the NeuroPace RNS® System. Applications of RNS cEEG covered here include counting and lateralizing seizures, quantifying medication response, characterizing spells, forecasting seizures, and exploring mechanisms of cognition. Limitations of the RNS System are discussed in the context of next-generation devices in development. EXPERT OPINION The wide temporal lens of cEEG helps capture the dynamism of epilepsy, revealing phenomena that cannot be appreciated with short duration recordings. The RNS System is a vanguard device whose diagnostic utility rivals its therapeutic benefits, but emerging minimally invasive devices, including those with subscalp recording electrodes, promise to be more applicable within a broad population of people with epilepsy. Epileptology is on the precipice of a paradigm shift in which cEEG is a standard part of diagnostic evaluations and clinical management is predicated on quantitative observations integrated over long timescales.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vikram R Rao
- Associate Professor of Clinical Neurology, Chief, Epilepsy Division, Department of Neurology and Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
127
|
Sakellariou DF, Vakrinou A, Koutroumanidis M, Richardson MP. Neurocraft: software for microscale brain network dynamics. Sci Rep 2021; 11:20716. [PMID: 34671076 PMCID: PMC8528833 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-99195-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Accepted: 06/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
The brain operates at millisecond timescales but despite of that, the study of its functional networks is approached with time invariant methods. Equally, for a variety of brain conditions treatment is delivered with fixed temporal protocols unable to monitor and follow the rapid progression and therefore the cycles of a disease. To facilitate the understanding of brain network dynamics we developed Neurocraft, a user friendly software suite. Neurocraft features a highly novel signal processing engine fit for tracking evolving network states with superior time and frequency resolution. A variety of analytics like dynamic connectivity maps, force-directed representations and propagation models, allow for the highly selective investigation of transient pathophysiological dynamics. In addition, machine-learning tools enable the unsupervised investigation and selection of key network features at individual and group-levels. For proof of concept, we compared six seizure-free and non seizure-free focal epilepsy patients after resective surgery using Neurocraft. The network features were calculated using 50 intracranial electrodes on average during at least 120 epileptiform discharges lasting less than one second, per patient. Powerful network differences were detected in the pre-operative data of the two patient groups (effect size = 1.27), suggesting the predictive value of dynamic network features. More than one million patients are treated with cardiac and neuro modulation devices that are unable to track the hourly or daily changes in a subject's disease. Decoding the dynamics of transition from normal to abnormal states may be crucial in the understanding, tracking and treatment of neurological conditions. Neurocraft provides a user-friendly platform for the research of microscale brain dynamics and a stepping stone for the personalised device-based adaptive neuromodulation in real-time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitris Fotis Sakellariou
- Real World Solutions, IQVIA, London, N1 9JY, UK.
- Department of Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
- Department of Neurophysiology and Epilepsy, St Thomas' Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK.
| | - Angeliki Vakrinou
- Department of Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
- Department of Neurophysiology and Epilepsy, St Thomas' Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Mark Phillip Richardson
- Department of Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
128
|
Zhu B, Shin U, Shoaran M. Closed-Loop Neural Prostheses With On-Chip Intelligence: A Review and a Low-Latency Machine Learning Model for Brain State Detection. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS 2021; 15:877-897. [PMID: 34529573 PMCID: PMC8733782 DOI: 10.1109/tbcas.2021.3112756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
The application of closed-loop approaches in systems neuroscience and therapeutic stimulation holds great promise for revolutionizing our understanding of the brain and for developing novel neuromodulation therapies to restore lost functions. Neural prostheses capable of multi-channel neural recording, on-site signal processing, rapid symptom detection, and closed-loop stimulation are critical to enabling such novel treatments. However, the existing closed-loop neuromodulation devices are too simplistic and lack sufficient on-chip processing and intelligence. In this paper, we first discuss both commercial and investigational closed-loop neuromodulation devices for brain disorders. Next, we review state-of-the-art neural prostheses with on-chip machine learning, focusing on application-specific integrated circuits (ASIC). System requirements, performance and hardware comparisons, design trade-offs, and hardware optimization techniques are discussed. To facilitate a fair comparison and guide design choices among various on-chip classifiers, we propose a new energy-area (E-A) efficiency figure of merit that evaluates hardware efficiency and multi-channel scalability. Finally, we present several techniques to improve the key design metrics of tree-based on-chip classifiers, both in the context of ensemble methods and oblique structures. A novel Depth-Variant Tree Ensemble (DVTE) is proposed to reduce processing latency (e.g., by 2.5× on seizure detection task). We further develop a cost-aware learning approach to jointly optimize the power and latency metrics. We show that algorithm-hardware co-design enables the energy- and memory-optimized design of tree-based models, while preserving a high accuracy and low latency. Furthermore, we show that our proposed tree-based models feature a highly interpretable decision process that is essential for safety-critical applications such as closed-loop stimulation.
Collapse
|
129
|
Zawar I, Krishnan B, Mackow M, Alexopoulos A, Nair D, Punia V. The Efficacy, Safety, and Outcomes of Brain-responsive Neurostimulation (RNS® System) therapy in older adults. Epilepsia Open 2021; 6:781-787. [PMID: 34543516 PMCID: PMC8633477 DOI: 10.1002/epi4.12541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2021] [Revised: 09/12/2021] [Accepted: 09/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives The gold standard for the management of drug‐resistant focal epilepsy (DRE) is resection of epileptogenic zone. However, some patients may not be candidates for resection. Responsive neurostimulation is approved in patients above 18 years of age for such patients. We aimed to investigate whether RNS outcomes and safety varied based on age. Methods We performed a single‐center retrospective cohort study of patients with DRE who were treated with RNS between May 2008 and February 2020. We included patients who had been implanted with RNS for >6 months (N = 55), dividing them into older (N = 11) and younger adults (N = 44) depending on implantation age (≥50 and <50 years, respectively). Results Mean age at implantation in older adults was 54.9 ± 3.5 years. Seizure onset age, epilepsy duration, and comorbidities were significantly higher in older adults ( P < .01). Stimulation parameters, treatment duration, and median seizure frequency reduction (76% in older vs 50% in younger adults) were statistically comparable between the two cohorts. Posttreatment, antiseizure medication burden was significantly decreased in older compared with younger adults (P = .048). Postoperative and delayed adverse events among older adults were mild. Compared with three younger adults, none of the older adults required device explantation due to surgical site infection. Conclusion Our study suggests that older adults treated with the RNS System achieve seizure outcomes comparable to younger adults with the additional benefit of a significant postimplantation medication reduction. With efficacy and safety similar to younger adults, brain‐responsive neurostimulation was well‐tolerated in older adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ifrah Zawar
- Epilepsy Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.,Department of Neurology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Balu Krishnan
- Epilepsy Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Michael Mackow
- Epilepsy Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Andreas Alexopoulos
- Epilepsy Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Dileep Nair
- Epilepsy Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Vineet Punia
- Epilepsy Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
130
|
Sohanian Haghighi H, Markazi AHD. Control of epileptic seizures by electrical stimulation: a model-based study. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2021; 7. [PMID: 34488206 DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/ac240d] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2021] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
High frequency electrical stimulation of brain is commonly used in research experiments and clinical trials as a modern tool for control of epileptic seizures. However, the mechanistic basis by which periodic external stimuli alter the brain state is not well understood. This study provides a computational insight into the mechanism of seizure suppression by high frequency stimulation (HFS). In particular, a modified version of the Jansen-Rit neural mass model is employed, in which EEG signals can be considered as the input. The proposed model reproduces seizure-like activity in the output during the ictal period of the input signal. By applying a control signal to the model, a wide range of stimulation amplitudes and frequencies are systematically explored. Simulation results reveal that HFS can effectively suppress the seizure-like activity. Our results suggest that HFS has the ability of shifting the operating state of neural populations away from a critical condition. Furthermore, a closed-loop control strategy is proposed in this paper. The main objective has been to considerably reduce the control effort needed for blocking abnormal activity of the brain. Such an energy reduction could be of practical importance, to reduce possible side effects and increase battery life for implanted neurostimulators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Amir H D Markazi
- 1School of Mechanical Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran 16844, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
131
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Henoch-Schönlein purpura (HSP), also called IgA vasculitis, is a systemic vasculitis characterized by deposits of immunoglobulin A in blood vessels. Renal impairment of these patients is the main determinant of prognosis. The optimal treatment of HSP nephritis (HSPN) in children remains controversial, but many clinicians administer an immunosuppressive agent with a corticosteroid. A previous study reported that leflunomide (LEF) with a corticosteroid was effective for adult patients with HSPN and nephrotic proteinuria. However, data on this treatment in pediatric patients is limited. METHODS We described our experience at a single center on the use of LEF in 5 pediatric patients who had IgA vasculitis with proteinuria that was nearly 50 mg/kg (nephrotic range) and remained high despite administration of intravenous steroid, and biopsy-proven nephritis. All patients had class II to IIIb lesions based on the International Study of Kidney Disease in Children (ISKDC). RESULTS We successfully treated all 5 children who had IgA vasculitis with nephritis using LEF with a corticosteroid. Four patients achieved a complete remission of proteinuria, and 1 patient had significantly reduced proteinuria. The children received LEF for 6 months to 12 months, and none of them had severe adverse events. CONCLUSIONS To our knowledge, this is the first case series to report successful treatment of pediatric HSPN with LEF in combination with a corticosteroid.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ling Hou
- Department of Pediatrics, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, No. 36 Sanhao Street Heping District, 110004, Shenyang, China
| | - Zhou Zhang
- Department of Pediatrics, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, No. 36 Sanhao Street Heping District, 110004, Shenyang, China
| | - Yue Du
- Department of Pediatrics, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, No. 36 Sanhao Street Heping District, 110004, Shenyang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
132
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND A large number of patients have epilepsy that is intractable and adversely affects a child's lifelong experience with addition societal burden that is disabling and expensive. The last two decades have seen a major explosion of new antiseizure medication options. Despite these advances, children with epilepsy continue to have intractable seizures. An option that has been long available but little used is epilepsy surgery to control intractable epilepsy. METHODS This article is a review of the literature as well as published opinions. RESULTS Epilepsy surgery in pediatrics is an underused modality to effectively treat children with epilepsy. Adverse effects of medication should be weighed against risks of surgery as well as risks of nonefficacy. CONCLUSIONS We discuss an approach to selecting the appropriate pediatric patient for consideration, a detailed evaluation including necessary evaluation, and the creation of an algorithm to approach patients with both generalized and focal epilepsy. We then discuss surgical options available including outcome data. New modalities are also addressed including high-frequency ultrasound and co-registration techniques including magnetic resonance imaging-guided laser therapy.
Collapse
|
133
|
Youngerman BE, Mahajan UV, Dyster TG, Srinivasan S, Halpern CH, McKhann GM, Sheth SA. Cost-effectiveness analysis of responsive neurostimulation for drug-resistant focal onset epilepsy. Epilepsia 2021; 62:2804-2813. [PMID: 34458986 DOI: 10.1111/epi.17049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2020] [Revised: 08/08/2021] [Accepted: 08/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We evaluated the incremental cost-effectiveness of responsive neurostimulation (RNS) therapy for management of medically refractory focal onset seizures compared to pharmacotherapy alone. METHODS We created and analyzed a decision model for treatment with RNS therapy versus pharmacotherapy using a semi-Markov process. We adopted a public payer perspective and used the maximum duration of 9 years in the RNS long-term follow-up study as the time horizon. We used seizure frequency data to model changes in quality of life and estimated the impact of RNS therapy on the annual direct costs of epilepsy care. The model also included expected mortality, adverse events, and costs related to system implantation, programming, and replacement. We interpreted our results against societal willingness-to-pay thresholds of $50 000, $100 000, and $200 000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). RESULTS Based on three different calculated utility value estimates, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for RNS therapy (with continued pharmacotherapy) compared to pharmacotherapy alone ranged between $28 825 and $46 596. Multiple sensitivity analyses yielded ICERs often below $50 000 per QALY and consistently below $100 000/QALY. SIGNIFICANCE Modeling based on 9 years of available data demonstrates that RNS therapy for medically refractory epilepsy very likely falls within the range of cost-effectiveness, depending on method of utility estimation, variability in model inputs, and willingness-to-pay threshold. Several factors favor improved cost-effectiveness in the future. Given the increasing focus on delivering cost-effective care, we hope that this analysis will help inform clinical decision-making for this surgical option for refractory epilepsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brett E Youngerman
- Department of Neurosurgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Uma V Mahajan
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Timothy G Dyster
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Shraddha Srinivasan
- Department of Neurology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Casey H Halpern
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Guy M McKhann
- Department of Neurosurgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sameer A Sheth
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
134
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To review recent data on the epidemiology, microbiology, diagnosis, and management of central nervous system (CNS) infections associated with neurologic devices. RECENT FINDINGS The increasing use of implanted neurologic devices has led to an increase in associated infections. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) inflammation may be present after a neurosurgical procedure, complicating the diagnosis of CNS infection. Newer biomarkers such as CSF lactate and procalcitonin show promise in differentiating infection from other causes of CSF inflammation. Molecular diagnostic tests including next-generation or metagenomic sequencing may be superior to culture in identifying pathogens causing healthcare-associated ventriculitis and meningitis. SUMMARY Neurologic device infections are serious, often life-threatening complications. Rapid recognition and initiation of antibiotics are critical in decreasing morbidity. Device removal is usually required for cure.
Collapse
|
135
|
Charlebois CM, Caldwell DJ, Rampersad SM, Janson AP, Ojemann JG, Brooks DH, MacLeod RS, Butson CR, Dorval AD. Validating Patient-Specific Finite Element Models of Direct Electrocortical Stimulation. Front Neurosci 2021; 15:691701. [PMID: 34408621 PMCID: PMC8365306 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.691701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 07/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Direct electrocortical stimulation (DECS) with electrocorticography electrodes is an established therapy for epilepsy and an emerging application for stroke rehabilitation and brain-computer interfaces. However, the electrophysiological mechanisms that result in a therapeutic effect remain unclear. Patient-specific computational models are promising tools to predict the voltages in the brain and better understand the neural and clinical response to DECS, but the accuracy of such models has not been directly validated in humans. A key hurdle to modeling DECS is accurately locating the electrodes on the cortical surface due to brain shift after electrode implantation. Despite the inherent uncertainty introduced by brain shift, the effects of electrode localization parameters have not been investigated. The goal of this study was to validate patient-specific computational models of DECS against in vivo voltage recordings obtained during DECS and quantify the effects of electrode localization parameters on simulated voltages on the cortical surface. We measured intracranial voltages in six epilepsy patients during DECS and investigated the following electrode localization parameters: principal axis, Hermes, and Dykstra electrode projection methods combined with 0, 1, and 2 mm of cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) below the electrodes. Greater CSF depth between the electrode and cortical surface increased model errors and decreased predicted voltage accuracy. The electrode localization parameters that best estimated the recorded voltages across six patients with varying amounts of brain shift were the Hermes projection method and a CSF depth of 0 mm (r = 0.92 and linear regression slope = 1.21). These results are the first to quantify the effects of electrode localization parameters with in vivo intracranial recordings and may serve as the basis for future studies investigating the neuronal and clinical effects of DECS for epilepsy, stroke, and other emerging closed-loop applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chantel M Charlebois
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.,Scientific Computing and Imaging (SCI) Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - David J Caldwell
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.,Center for Neurotechnology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.,Medical Scientist Training Program, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Sumientra M Rampersad
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Andrew P Janson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.,Scientific Computing and Imaging (SCI) Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Jeffrey G Ojemann
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Dana H Brooks
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Rob S MacLeod
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.,Scientific Computing and Imaging (SCI) Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Christopher R Butson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.,Scientific Computing and Imaging (SCI) Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.,Department of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Alan D Dorval
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| |
Collapse
|
136
|
Miller C, Schatmeyer B, Landazuri P, Uysal U, Nazzaro J, Kinsman MJ, Camarata PJ, Ulloa CM, Hammond N, Pearson C, Shah V, Cheng JJ. sEEG for Expansion of a Surgical Epilepsy Program: Safety and Efficacy in 152 Consecutive Cases. Epilepsia Open 2021; 6:694-702. [PMID: 34388309 PMCID: PMC8633478 DOI: 10.1002/epi4.12535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2021] [Revised: 06/13/2021] [Accepted: 08/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG) is an intracranial encephalography method of expanding use. The need for increased epilepsy surgery access has led to the consideration of sEEG adoption by new or expanding surgical epilepsy programs. Data regarding safety and efficacy are uncommon outside of high‐volume, well‐established centers, which may be less applicable to newer or low‐volume centers. The objective of this study was to add to the sEEG outcomes in the literature from the perspective of a rapidly expanding center. Methods A retrospective chart review of consecutive sEEG cases from January 2016 to December 2019 was performed. Data extraction included demographic data, surgical data, and outcome data, which pertinently examined surgical method, progression to therapeutic procedure, clinically significant adverse events, and Engel outcomes. Results One hundred and fifty‐two sEEG procedures were performed on 131 patients. Procedures averaged 10.5 electrodes for a total of 1603 electrodes. The majority (84%) of patients progressed to a therapeutic procedure. Six clinically significant complications occurred: three retained electrodes, two hemorrhages, and one failure to complete investigation. Only one complication resulted in a permanent deficit. Engel 1 outcome was achieved in 63.3% of patients reaching one‐year follow‐up after a curative procedure. Significance New or expanding epilepsy surgery centers can appropriately consider the use of sEEG. The complication rate is low and the majority of patients progress to therapeutic surgery. Procedural safety, progression to therapeutic intervention, and Engel outcomes are comparable to cohorts from long‐established epilepsy surgery programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Miller
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Bryan Schatmeyer
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Patrick Landazuri
- Department of Neurology, The University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Utku Uysal
- Department of Neurology, The University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Jules Nazzaro
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Michael J Kinsman
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Paul J Camarata
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Carol M Ulloa
- Department of Neurology, The University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Nancy Hammond
- Department of Neurology, The University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Caleb Pearson
- Department of Neurology, The University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Vishal Shah
- Department of Neurology, The University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Jennifer J Cheng
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA
| |
Collapse
|
137
|
Adin ME, Spencer DD, Damisah E, Herlopian A, Gerrard JL, Bronen RA. Imaging of Neuromodulation and Surgical Interventions for Epilepsy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2021; 42:1742-1750. [PMID: 34353787 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a7222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2021] [Accepted: 04/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
About one-third of epilepsy cases are refractory to medical therapy. During the past decades, the availability of surgical epilepsy interventions has substantially increased as therapeutic options for this group of patients. A wide range of surgical interventions and electrophysiologic neuromodulation techniques are available, including lesional resection, lobar resection, thermoablation, disconnection, multiple subpial transections, vagus nerve stimulation, responsive neurostimulation, and deep brain stimulation. The indications and imaging features of potential complications of the newer surgical interventions may not be widely appreciated, particularly if practitioners are not associated with comprehensive epilepsy centers. In this article, we review a wide range of invasive epilepsy treatment modalities with a particular focus on their postoperative imaging findings and complications. A state-of-the-art treatment algorithm provides context for imaging findings by helping the reader understand how a particular invasive treatment decision is made.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M E Adin
- From the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (M.E.A., R.A.B.)
| | | | | | - A Herlopian
- Neurology (A.H.), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | | | - R A Bronen
- From the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (M.E.A., R.A.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
138
|
Factors Affecting Vagus Nerve Stimulation Outcomes in Epilepsy. Neurol Res Int 2021; 2021:9927311. [PMID: 34394987 PMCID: PMC8357517 DOI: 10.1155/2021/9927311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2021] [Revised: 07/06/2021] [Accepted: 07/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Epilepsy as a common neurological disease is mostly managed effectively with antiepileptic medications. One-third of patients do not respond to medical treatments requiring alternative therapies. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has been used in the last decades for the treatment of medically resistant epilepsy. Despite the extensive use of VNS in these patients, factors associated with clinical outcomes of VNS remain to be elucidated. In this study, we evaluated factors affecting VNS outcomes in epileptic patients to have a better understanding of patients who are better candidates for VNS therapy. Several databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar were searched through June 2020 for relevant articles. The following factors were assessed in this review: previous surgical history, age at implantation and gender, types of epilepsy, duration of epilepsy, age at epilepsy onset, frequency of attacks, antiepileptic drugs, VNS parameters, EEG findings, MRI findings, and biomarkers. Literature data show that nonresponder rates range between 25% and 65%. Given the complexity and diversity of factors associated with response to VNS, more clinical studies are needed to establish better paradigm for selection of patients for VNS therapy.
Collapse
|
139
|
Moraes MFD, de Castro Medeiros D, Mourao FAG, Cancado SAV, Cota VR. Epilepsy as a dynamical system, a most needed paradigm shift in epileptology. Epilepsy Behav 2021; 121:106838. [PMID: 31859231 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.106838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2019] [Revised: 11/22/2019] [Accepted: 12/01/2019] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
The idea of the epileptic brain being highly excitable and facilitated to synchronic activity has guided pharmacological treatment since the early twentieth century. Although tackling epilepsy's seizure-prone feature, by tonically modifying overall circuit excitability and/or connectivity, the last 50 years of drug development has not seen a substantial improvement in seizure suppression of refractory epilepsies. This review presents a new conceptual framework for epilepsy in which the temporal dynamics of the disease plays a more critical role in both its understanding and therapeutic strategies. The repetitive epileptiform pattern (characteristic during ictal activity) and other well-defined electrographic signatures (i.e., present during the interictal period) are discussed in terms of the sequential activation of the circuit motifs. Lessons learned from the physiological activation of neural circuitry are used to further corroborate the argument and explore the transition from proper function to a state of instability. Furthermore, the review explores how interfering in the temporally dependent abnormal connectivity between circuits may work as a therapeutic approach. We also review the use of probing stimulation to access network connectivity and evaluate its power to determine transitional states of the dynamical system as it moves towards regions of instability, especially when conventional electrographic monitoring is proven inefficient. Unorthodox cases, with little or no scalp electrographic correlate, in which ictogenic circuitry and/or seizure spread is temporally restricted to neurovegetative, cognitive, and motivational areas are shown as possible explanations for sudden death in epilepsy (SUDEP) and other psychiatric comorbidities. In short, this review presents a paradigm shift in the way that we address the disease and is aimed to encourage debate rather than narrow the rationale epilepsy is currently engaged in. This article is part of the Special Issue "NEWroscience 2018".
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Márcio Flávio Dutra Moraes
- Núcleo de Neurociências, Departamento de Fisiologia e Biofísica, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil; Centro de Tecnologia e Pesquisa em Magneto Ressonância, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Elétrica, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
| | - Daniel de Castro Medeiros
- Núcleo de Neurociências, Departamento de Fisiologia e Biofísica, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | - Flávio Afonso Gonçalves Mourao
- Núcleo de Neurociências, Departamento de Fisiologia e Biofísica, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil; Centro de Tecnologia e Pesquisa em Magneto Ressonância, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Elétrica, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | | | - Vinicius Rosa Cota
- Laboratório Interdisciplinar de Neuroengenharia e Neurociências, Departamento de Engenharia Elétrica, Universidade Federal de São João Del-Rei, São João Del-Rei, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
140
|
Abstract
Neuromodulation alters neuronal activity with electrical impulses delivered to the targeted neurologic sites. The various neuromodulation options available today for epilepsy management have proven efficacy primarily in adult trials. These include open-loop stimulation with invasive vagus nerve stimulation and deep brain stimulation, as well as closed-loop responsive neurostimulation. The use of neurostimulation therapy to treat intractable epilepsy in children is growing. This article reviews the literature, historical background, and current principles in pediatric patients.
Collapse
|
141
|
Abstract
Epilepsy is the fourth most common neurological disorder, but current treatment options provide limited efficacy and carry the potential for problematic adverse effects. There is an immense need to develop new therapeutic interventions in epilepsy, and targeting areas outside the seizure focus for neuromodulation has shown therapeutic value. While not traditionally associated with epilepsy, anatomical, clinical, and electrophysiological studies suggest the cerebellum can play a role in seizure networks, and importantly, may be a potential therapeutic target for seizure control. However, previous interventions targeting the cerebellum in both preclinical and clinical studies have produced mixed effects on seizures. These inconsistent results may be due in part to the lack of specificity inherent with open-loop electrical stimulation interventions. More recent studies, using more targeted closed-loop optogenetic approaches, suggest the possibility of robust seizure inhibition via cerebellar modulation for a range of seizure types. Therefore, while the mechanisms of cerebellar inhibition of seizures have yet to be fully elucidated, the cerebellum should be thoroughly revisited as a potential target for therapeutic intervention in epilepsy. This article is part of the Special Issue "NEWroscience 2018.
Collapse
|
142
|
Manzouri F, Meisel C, Kunz L, Dümpelmann M, Stieglitz T, Schulze-Bonhage A. Low-frequency electrical stimulation reduces cortical excitability in the human brain. Neuroimage Clin 2021; 31:102778. [PMID: 34375883 PMCID: PMC8358685 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102778] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2021] [Revised: 07/02/2021] [Accepted: 07/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Effective seizure control remains challenging for about 30% of epilepsy patients who are resistant to present-day pharmacotherapy. Novel approaches that not only reduce the severity and frequency of seizures, but also have limited side effects are therefore desirable. Accordingly, various neuromodulation approaches such as cortical electrical stimulation have been implemented to reduce seizure burden; however, the underlying mechanisms are not completely understood. Given that the initiation and spread of epileptic seizures critically depend on cortical excitability, understanding the neuromodulatory effects of cortical electrical stimulation on cortical excitability levels is paramount. Based on observations that synchronization in the electrocorticogram closely tracks brain excitability level, the effects of low-frequency (1 Hz) intracranial brain stimulation on the levels of cortical phase synchronization before, during, and after 1 Hz electrical stimulation were assessed in twelve patients. Analysis of phase synchronization levels across three broad frequency bands (1-45 Hz, 55-95 Hz, and 105-195 Hz) revealed that in patients with stimulation sites in the neocortex, phase synchronization levels were significantly reduced within the 55-95 Hz and 105-195 Hz bands during post-stimulation intervals compared to baseline; this effect persisted for at least 30 min post-stimulation. Similar effects were observed when phase synchronization levels were examined in the classic frequency bands, whereby a significant reduction was found during the post-stimulation intervals in the alpha, beta, and gamma bands. The anatomical extent of these effects was then assessed. Analysis of the results from six patients with intracranial electrodes in both hemispheres indicated that reductions in phase synchronization in the 1-45 Hz and 55-95 Hz frequency ranges were more prominent in the stimulated hemisphere. Overall, these findings demonstrate that low-frequency electrical stimulation reduces phase synchronization and hence cortical excitability in the human brain. Low-frequency stimulation of the epileptic focus may therefore contribute to the prevention of impending epileptic seizures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Farrokh Manzouri
- Epilepsy Center, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Department of Microsystems Engineering (IMTEK), University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; BrainLinks-BrainTools, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
| | - Christian Meisel
- Department of Neurology, Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany; Center for Stroke Research Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Lukas Kunz
- Epilepsy Center, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Spemann Graduate School of Biology and Medicine (SGBM), University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Faculty of Biology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Matthias Dümpelmann
- Epilepsy Center, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; BrainLinks-BrainTools, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Thomas Stieglitz
- Department of Microsystems Engineering (IMTEK), University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; BrainLinks-BrainTools, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Andreas Schulze-Bonhage
- Epilepsy Center, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; BrainLinks-BrainTools, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Spemann Graduate School of Biology and Medicine (SGBM), University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Center for Basics in NeuroModulation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
143
|
Brinkmann BH, Karoly PJ, Nurse ES, Dumanis SB, Nasseri M, Viana PF, Schulze-Bonhage A, Freestone DR, Worrell G, Richardson MP, Cook MJ. Seizure Diaries and Forecasting With Wearables: Epilepsy Monitoring Outside the Clinic. Front Neurol 2021; 12:690404. [PMID: 34326807 PMCID: PMC8315760 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.690404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2021] [Accepted: 06/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
It is a major challenge in clinical epilepsy to diagnose and treat a disease characterized by infrequent seizures based on patient or caregiver reports and limited duration clinical testing. The poor reliability of self-reported seizure diaries for many people with epilepsy is well-established, but these records remain necessary in clinical care and therapeutic studies. A number of wearable devices have emerged, which may be capable of detecting seizures, recording seizure data, and alerting caregivers. Developments in non-invasive wearable sensors to measure accelerometry, photoplethysmography (PPG), electrodermal activity (EDA), electromyography (EMG), and other signals outside of the traditional clinical environment may be able to identify seizure-related changes. Non-invasive scalp electroencephalography (EEG) and minimally invasive subscalp EEG may allow direct measurement of seizure activity. However, significant network and computational infrastructure is needed for continuous, secure transmission of data. The large volume of data acquired by these devices necessitates computer-assisted review and detection to reduce the burden on human reviewers. Furthermore, user acceptability of such devices must be a paramount consideration to ensure adherence with long-term device use. Such devices can identify tonic–clonic seizures, but identification of other seizure semiologies with non-EEG wearables is an ongoing challenge. Identification of electrographic seizures with subscalp EEG systems has recently been demonstrated over long (>6 month) durations, and this shows promise for accurate, objective seizure records. While the ability to detect and forecast seizures from ambulatory intracranial EEG is established, invasive devices may not be acceptable for many individuals with epilepsy. Recent studies show promising results for probabilistic forecasts of seizure risk from long-term wearable devices and electronic diaries of self-reported seizures. There may also be predictive value in individuals' symptoms, mood, and cognitive performance. However, seizure forecasting requires perpetual use of a device for monitoring, increasing the importance of the system's acceptability to users. Furthermore, long-term studies with concurrent EEG confirmation are lacking currently. This review describes the current evidence and challenges in the use of minimally and non-invasive devices for long-term epilepsy monitoring, the essential components in remote monitoring systems, and explores the feasibility to detect and forecast impending seizures via long-term use of these systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Philippa J Karoly
- Department of Medicine, Graeme Clark Institute and St Vincent's Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Fitzroy, VIC, Australia
| | - Ewan S Nurse
- Department of Medicine, Graeme Clark Institute and St Vincent's Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Fitzroy, VIC, Australia.,Seer Medical, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Mona Nasseri
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Foundation, Rochester, MN, United States.,School of Engineering, University of North Florida, Jacksonville, FL, United States
| | - Pedro F Viana
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Andreas Schulze-Bonhage
- Faculty of Medicine, Epilepsy Center, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | - Greg Worrell
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Foundation, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Mark P Richardson
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mark J Cook
- Department of Medicine, Graeme Clark Institute and St Vincent's Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Fitzroy, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
144
|
Rincon N, Barr D, Velez-Ruiz N. Neuromodulation in Drug Resistant Epilepsy. Aging Dis 2021; 12:1070-1080. [PMID: 34221550 PMCID: PMC8219496 DOI: 10.14336/ad.2021.0211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2020] [Accepted: 02/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Epilepsy affects approximately 70 million people worldwide, and it is a significant contributor to the global burden of neurological disorders. Despite the advent of new AEDs, drug resistant-epilepsy continues to affect 30-40% of PWE. Once identified as having drug-resistant epilepsy, these patients should be referred to a comprehensive epilepsy center for evaluation to establish if they are candidates for potential curative surgeries. Unfortunately, a large proportion of patients with drug-resistant epilepsy are poor surgical candidates due to a seizure focus located in eloquent cortex, multifocal epilepsy or inability to identify the zone of ictal onset. An alternative treatment modality for these patients is neuromodulation. Here we present the evidence, indications and safety considerations for the neuromodulation therapies in vagal nerve stimulation (VNS), responsive neurostimulation (RNS), or deep brain stimulation (DBS).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalia Rincon
- Department of Neurology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Donald Barr
- Department of Neurology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Naymee Velez-Ruiz
- Department of Neurology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| |
Collapse
|
145
|
Mortazavi A, Elliott RJS, Phan TN, Schreiber J, Gaillard WD, Oluigbo CO. Responsive neurostimulation for the treatment of medically refractory epilepsy in pediatric patients: strategies, outcomes, and technical considerations. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2021; 28:54-61. [PMID: 33930869 DOI: 10.3171/2020.11.peds20660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2020] [Accepted: 11/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Children with medically refractory partial-onset epilepsy arising from eloquent cortex present a therapeutic challenge, as many are not suitable for resective surgery. For these patients, responsive neurostimulation may prove to be a potential tool. Although responsive neurostimulation has demonstrated utility in adults, little has been discussed regarding its utility in the pediatric population. In this study, the authors present their institution's experience with responsive neurostimulation via the RNS System through a case series of 5 pediatric patients. METHODS A single-center retrospective study of patients who underwent RNS System implantation at Children's National Hospital was performed. RESULTS Five patients underwent RNS System implantation. The mean patient age at treatment was 16.8 years, and the average follow-up was 11.2 months. All patients were considered responders, with a seizure frequency reduction of 64.2% without adverse events. CONCLUSIONS All 5 patients experienced medium-term improvements in seizure control after RNS System implantation with decreases in seizure frequency > 50% from baseline preoperative seizure frequency. The authors demonstrated two primary configurations of electrode placement: hippocampal or amygdala placement via an occipitotemporal trajectory, as well as infratemporal surface electrodes and surface electrodes on the primary motor cortex. No adverse events were experienced in this case series.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Tiffany N Phan
- 3Department of Neurosurgery, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC
| | - John Schreiber
- 3Department of Neurosurgery, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC
| | - William D Gaillard
- 3Department of Neurosurgery, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC
| | - Chima O Oluigbo
- 3Department of Neurosurgery, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC
| |
Collapse
|
146
|
Epilepsy Surgery is a Viable Treatment for Lennox Gastaut Syndrome. Semin Pediatr Neurol 2021; 38:100894. [PMID: 34183143 DOI: 10.1016/j.spen.2021.100894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2021] [Revised: 04/09/2021] [Accepted: 04/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Lennox Gastaut Syndrome (LGS) is a severe developmental epileptic encephalopathy with onset in childhood characterized by multiple seizure types and characteristic electroencephalogram findings. The majority of patients develop drug resistant epilepsy, defined as failure of 2 appropriate anti-seizure medications used at adequate doses. Epilepsy surgery can reduce seizure burden, in some cases leading to seizure freedom, and improve neuro-developmental outcomes and quality of life. Epilepsy surgery should be considered for all patients with drug resistant LGS. Herein, we review current surgical treatment options for patients with LGS, both definitive and palliative, including: focal cortical resection, vagus nerve stimulation and corpus callosotomy. Newer neuromodulation techniques will be explored, as well as the concept of LGS as a secondary network disorder.
Collapse
|
147
|
Barry W, Arcot Desai S, Tcheng TK, Morrell MJ. A High Accuracy Electrographic Seizure Classifier Trained Using Semi-Supervised Labeling Applied to a Large Spectrogram Dataset. Front Neurosci 2021; 15:667373. [PMID: 34262426 PMCID: PMC8273175 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.667373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2021] [Accepted: 05/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The objective of this study was to explore using ECoG spectrogram images for training reliable cross-patient electrographic seizure classifiers, and to characterize the classifiers’ test accuracy as a function of amount of training data. ECoG channels in ∼138,000 time-series ECoG records from 113 patients were converted to RGB spectrogram images. Using an unsupervised spectrogram image clustering technique, manual labeling of 138,000 ECoG records (each with up to 4 ECoG channels) was completed in 320 h, which is an estimated 5 times faster than manual labeling without ECoG clustering. For training supervised classifier models, five random folds of data were created; with each fold containing 72, 18, and 23 patients’ data for model training, validation and testing respectively. Five convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures, including two with residual connections, were trained. Cross-patient classification accuracies and F1 scores improved with model complexity, with the shallowest 6-layer model (with ∼1.5 million trainable parameters) producing a class-balanced seizure/non-seizure classification accuracy of 87.9% on ECoG channels and the deepest ResNet50-based model (with ∼23.5 million trainable parameters) producing a classification accuracy of 95.7%. The trained ResNet50-based model additionally had 93.5% agreement in scores with an independent expert labeller. Visual inspection of gradient-based saliency maps confirmed that the models’ classifications were based on relevant portions of the spectrogram images. Further, by repeating training experiments with data from varying number of patients, it was found that ECoG spectrogram images from just 10 patients were sufficient to train ResNet50-based models with 88% cross-patient accuracy, while at least 30 patients’ data was required to produce cross-patient classification accuracies of >90%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wade Barry
- NeuroPace, Inc., Mountain View, CA, United States
| | | | | | - Martha J Morrell
- NeuroPace, Inc., Mountain View, CA, United States.,Department of Neurology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
148
|
Fattorusso A, Matricardi S, Mencaroni E, Dell'Isola GB, Di Cara G, Striano P, Verrotti A. The Pharmacoresistant Epilepsy: An Overview on Existent and New Emerging Therapies. Front Neurol 2021; 12:674483. [PMID: 34239494 PMCID: PMC8258148 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.674483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 126] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2021] [Accepted: 05/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Epilepsy is one of the most common neurological chronic disorders, with an estimated prevalence of 0. 5 - 1%. Currently, treatment options for epilepsy are predominantly based on the administration of symptomatic therapy. Most patients are able to achieve seizure freedom by the first two appropriate drug trials. Thus, patients who cannot reach a satisfactory response after that are defined as pharmacoresistant. However, despite the availability of more than 20 antiseizure medications (ASMs), about one-third of epilepsies remain drug-resistant. The heterogeneity of seizures and epilepsies, the coexistence of comorbidities, and the broad spectrum of efficacy, safety, and tolerability related to the ASMs, make the management of these patients actually challenging. In this review, we analyze the most relevant clinical and pathogenetic issues related to drug-resistant epilepsy, and then we discuss the current evidence about the use of available ASMs and the alternative non-pharmacological approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonella Fattorusso
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Pediatric Clinic, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Sara Matricardi
- Child Neurology and Psychiatry Unit, Children's Hospital “G. Salesi”, Ospedali Riuniti Ancona, Ancona, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Mencaroni
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Pediatric Clinic, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | | | - Giuseppe Di Cara
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Pediatric Clinic, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Pasquale Striano
- Pediatric Neurology and Muscular Diseases Unit, IRCCS “G. Gaslini” Institute, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Alberto Verrotti
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Pediatric Clinic, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
149
|
Dastin-van Rijn EM, Provenza NR, Calvert JS, Gilron R, Allawala AB, Darie R, Syed S, Matteson E, Vogt GS, Avendano-Ortega M, Vasquez AC, Ramakrishnan N, Oswalt DN, Bijanki KR, Wilt R, Starr PA, Sheth SA, Goodman WK, Harrison MT, Borton DA. Uncovering biomarkers during therapeutic neuromodulation with PARRM: Period-based Artifact Reconstruction and Removal Method. CELL REPORTS METHODS 2021; 1:100010. [PMID: 34532716 PMCID: PMC8443190 DOI: 10.1016/j.crmeth.2021.100010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2020] [Revised: 03/08/2021] [Accepted: 04/21/2021] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Advances in therapeutic neuromodulation devices have enabled concurrent stimulation and electrophysiology in the central nervous system. However, stimulation artifacts often obscure the sensed underlying neural activity. Here, we develop a method, termed Period-based Artifact Reconstruction and Removal Method (PARRM), to remove stimulation artifacts from neural recordings by leveraging the exact period of stimulation to construct and subtract a high-fidelity template of the artifact. Benchtop saline experiments, computational simulations, five unique in vivo paradigms across animal and human studies, and an obscured movement biomarker are used for validation. Performance is found to exceed that of state-of-the-art filters in recovering complex signals without introducing contamination. PARRM has several advantages: (1) it is superior in signal recovery; (2) it is easily adaptable to several neurostimulation paradigms; and (3) it has low complexity for future on-device implementation. Real-time artifact removal via PARRM will enable unbiased exploration and detection of neural biomarkers to enhance efficacy of closed-loop therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nicole R. Provenza
- Brown University School of Engineering, Providence, RI, USA
- Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | | | - Ro'ee Gilron
- Deparment of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Radu Darie
- Brown University School of Engineering, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Sohail Syed
- Department of Neurosurgery, Warren Alpert School of Medicine of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Evan Matteson
- Brown University School of Engineering, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Gregory S. Vogt
- Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Michelle Avendano-Ortega
- Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Ana C. Vasquez
- Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Nithya Ramakrishnan
- Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Denise N. Oswalt
- Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Kelly R. Bijanki
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Robert Wilt
- Deparment of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Philip A. Starr
- Deparment of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Sameer A. Sheth
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Wayne K. Goodman
- Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | | | - David A. Borton
- Brown University School of Engineering, Providence, RI, USA
- Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
- Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Rehabilitation R&D Service, Department of Veterans Affairs, Providence, RI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
150
|
Chiang CH, Wang C, Barth K, Rahimpour S, Trumpis M, Duraivel S, Rachinskiy I, Dubey A, Wingel KE, Wong M, Witham NS, Odell T, Woods V, Bent B, Doyle W, Friedman D, Bihler E, Reiche CF, Southwell DG, Haglund MM, Friedman AH, Lad SP, Devore S, Devinsky O, Solzbacher F, Pesaran B, Cogan G, Viventi J. Flexible, high-resolution thin-film electrodes for human and animal neural research. J Neural Eng 2021; 18:10.1088/1741-2552/ac02dc. [PMID: 34010815 PMCID: PMC8496685 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ac02dc] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2021] [Accepted: 05/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Objective.Brain functions such as perception, motor control, learning, and memory arise from the coordinated activity of neuronal assemblies distributed across multiple brain regions. While major progress has been made in understanding the function of individual neurons, circuit interactions remain poorly understood. A fundamental obstacle to deciphering circuit interactions is the limited availability of research tools to observe and manipulate the activity of large, distributed neuronal populations in humans. Here we describe the development, validation, and dissemination of flexible, high-resolution, thin-film (TF) electrodes for recording neural activity in animals and humans.Approach.We leveraged standard flexible printed-circuit manufacturing processes to build high-resolution TF electrode arrays. We used biocompatible materials to form the substrate (liquid crystal polymer; LCP), metals (Au, PtIr, and Pd), molding (medical-grade silicone), and 3D-printed housing (nylon). We designed a custom, miniaturized, digitizing headstage to reduce the number of cables required to connect to the acquisition system and reduce the distance between the electrodes and the amplifiers. A custom mechanical system enabled the electrodes and headstages to be pre-assembled prior to sterilization, minimizing the setup time required in the operating room. PtIr electrode coatings lowered impedance and enabled stimulation. High-volume, commercial manufacturing enables cost-effective production of LCP-TF electrodes in large quantities.Main Results. Our LCP-TF arrays achieve 25× higher electrode density, 20× higher channel count, and 11× reduced stiffness than conventional clinical electrodes. We validated our LCP-TF electrodes in multiple human intraoperative recording sessions and have disseminated this technology to >10 research groups. Using these arrays, we have observed high-frequency neural activity with sub-millimeter resolution.Significance.Our LCP-TF electrodes will advance human neuroscience research and improve clinical care by enabling broad access to transformative, high-resolution electrode arrays.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chia-Han Chiang
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
- These authors contributed equally to this work
| | - Charles Wang
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
- These authors contributed equally to this work
| | - Katrina Barth
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Shervin Rahimpour
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Michael Trumpis
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | | | - Iakov Rachinskiy
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Agrita Dubey
- Center for Neural Science, New York University, NY, NY, United States of America
| | - Katie E Wingel
- Center for Neural Science, New York University, NY, NY, United States of America
| | - Megan Wong
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Nicholas S Witham
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America
| | - Thomas Odell
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America
| | - Virginia Woods
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Brinnae Bent
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Werner Doyle
- Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York City, NY, United States of America
| | - Daniel Friedman
- Department of Neurology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, NY, NY, United States of America
| | | | - Christopher F Reiche
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America
| | - Derek G Southwell
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Michael M Haglund
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Allan H Friedman
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Shivanand P Lad
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Sasha Devore
- Department of Neurology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, NY, NY, United States of America
| | - Orrin Devinsky
- Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York City, NY, United States of America
- Department of Neurology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, NY, NY, United States of America
- Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, NYU Langone Health, NY, NY, United States of America
| | - Florian Solzbacher
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America
- Department of Materials Science & Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America
| | - Bijan Pesaran
- Center for Neural Science, New York University, NY, NY, United States of America
- Department of Neurology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, NY, NY, United States of America
| | - Gregory Cogan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
- Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
- Duke Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, Duke School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Jonathan Viventi
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America
- Department of Neurobiology, Duke School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America
- Duke Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, Duke School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|