The specious art of single-cell genomics

Mapping oto-pharyngeal development in a human inner ear organoid model

Inner ear development requires the coordination of cell types from distinct epithelial, mesenchymal and neuronal lineages. Although we have learned much from animal models, many details about human inner ear development remain elusive. We recently developed an in vitro model of human inner ear organogenesis using pluripotent stem cells in a 3D culture, fostering the growth of a sensorineural circuit, including hair cells and neurons. Despite previously characterizing some cell types, many remain undefined. This study aimed to chart the in vitro development timeline of the inner ear organoid to understand the mechanisms at play. Using single-cell RNA sequencing at ten stages during the first 36 days of differentiation, we tracked the evolution from pluripotency to various ear cell types after exposure to specific signaling modulators. Our findings showcase gene expression that influences differentiation, identifying a plethora of ectodermal and mesenchymal cell types. We also discern aspects of the organoid model consistent with in vivo development, while highlighting potential discrepancies. Our study establishes the Inner Ear Organoid Developmental Atlas (IODA), offering deeper insights into human biology and improving inner ear tissue differentiation.

Biophysically Interpretable Inference of Cell Types from Multimodal Sequencing Data

Multimodal, single-cell genomics technologies enable simultaneous capture of multiple facets of DNA and RNA processing in the cell. This creates opportunities for transcriptome-wide, mechanistic studies of cellular processing in heterogeneous cell types, with applications ranging from inferring kinetic differences between cells, to the role of stochasticity in driving heterogeneity. However, current methods for determining cell types or 'clusters' present in multimodal data often rely on ad hoc or independent treatment of modalities, and assumptions ignoring inherent properties of the count data. To enable interpretable and consistent cell cluster determination from multimodal data, we present meK-Means (mechanistic K-Means) which integrates modalities and learns underlying, shared biophysical states through a unifying model of transcription. In particular, we demonstrate how meK-Means can be used to cluster cells from unspliced and spliced mRNA count modalities. By utilizing the causal, physical relationships underlying these modalities, we identify shared transcriptional kinetics across cells, which induce the observed gene expression profiles, and provide an alternative definition for 'clusters' through the governing parameters of cellular processes.

Unsupervised Deep Learning Can Identify Protein Functional Groups from Unaligned Sequences

Interpreting protein function from sequence data is a fundamental goal of bioinformatics. However, our current understanding of protein diversity is bottlenecked by the fact that most proteins have only been functionally validated in model organisms, limiting our understanding of how function varies with gene sequence diversity. Thus, accuracy of inferences in clades without model representatives is questionable. Unsupervised learning may help to ameliorate this bias by identifying highly complex patterns and structure from large datasets without external labels. Here we present DeepSeqProt, an unsupervised deep learning program for exploring large protein sequence datasets. DeepSeqProt is a clustering tool capable of distinguishing between broad classes of proteins while learning local and global structure of functional space. DeepSeqProt is capable of learning salient biological features from unaligned, unannotated sequences. DeepSeqProt is more likely to capture complete protein families and statistically significant shared ontologies within proteomes than other clustering methods. We hope this framework will prove of use to researchers and provide a preliminary step in further developing unsupervised deep learning in molecular biology.

Navigating the Statistical Minefield of Model Selection and Clustering in Neuroscience

Model selection is often implicit: when performing an ANOVA, one assumes that the normal distribution is a good model of the data; fitting a tuning curve implies that an additive and a multiplicative scaler describes the behavior of the neuron; even calculating an average implicitly assumes that the data were sampled from a distribution that has a finite first statistical moment: the mean. Model selection may be explicit, when the aim is to test whether one model provides a better description of the data than a competing one. As a special case, clustering algorithms identify groups with similar properties within the data. They are widely used from spike sorting to cell type identification to gene expression analysis. We discuss model selection and clustering techniques from a statistician's point of view, revealing the assumptions behind, and the logic that governs the various approaches. We also showcase important neuroscience applications and provide suggestions how neuroscientists could put model selection algorithms to best use as well as what mistakes should be avoided.