Complications of elbow arthroscopy

Release of the stiff elbow with mini-open technique

BACKGROUND

Currently, there are many techniques used in the surgical release of elbow contracture, but no single technique has gained widespread acceptance. The purpose of this study was to report the outcomes of a lateral-column approach combined with a mini-open triceps-splitting technique for elbow contracture release.

METHODS

Thirty-six patients with a mean age of 39 years were included in the study. All patients underwent a combined lateral and minimal posterior triceps-splitting open elbow contracture release. Elbow range of motion and visual analog scale pain scores were recorded. The Mayo Elbow Performance Score was used to assess functional outcome.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 38 months. Mean pain levels decreased from 7.59 preoperatively to 0.44 postoperatively (P < .05). The total arc of elbow motion increased from 52° preoperatively to 109° postoperatively, with an improvement of 57° (P < .05). The Mayo Elbow Performance Score improved from 44.17 preoperatively to 90.83 postoperatively (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

This study shows that a combined lateral and mini-open triceps-splitting approach is a safe and effective alternative technique for the treatment of elbow contractures.

Effect of Obesity on Complication Rate After Elbow Arthroscopy in a Medicare Population

PURPOSE

To use a national insurance database to explore the association of obesity with the incidence of complications after elbow arthroscopy in a Medicare population.

METHODS

Using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) and International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision (ICD-9) procedure codes, we queried the PearlDiver database for patients undergoing elbow arthroscopy. Patients were divided into obese (body mass index [BMI] >30) and nonobese (BMI <30) cohorts using ICD-9 codes for BMI and obesity. Nonobese patients were matched to obese patients based on age, sex, tobacco use, diabetes, and rheumatoid arthritis. Postoperative complications were assessed with ICD-9 and Current Procedural Terminology codes, including infection, nerve injury, stiffness, and medical complications.

RESULTS

A total of 2,785 Medicare patients who underwent elbow arthroscopy were identified from 2005 to 2012; 628 patients (22.5%) were coded as obese or morbidly obese, and 628 matched nonobese patients formed the control group. There were no differences between the obese patients and matched control nonobese patients regarding type of elbow arthroscopy, previous elbow fracture or previous elbow arthroscopy. Obese patients had greater rates of all assessed complications, including infection (odds ratio [OR] 2.8, P = .037), nerve injury (OR 5.4, P = .001), stiffness (OR 1.9, P = .016) and medical complications (OR 6.9, P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Obesity is associated with significantly increased rates of all assessed complications after elbow arthroscopy in a Medicare population, including infection, nerve injury, stiffness, and medical complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III, case-control study.

Increased ROM and high patient satisfaction after open arthrolysis: a follow-up-study of 43 patients with posttraumatic stiff elbows

Background

Posttraumatic stiffness of the elbow is a common finding after elbow trauma. Restoration of motion in the posttraumatic stiff elbow is difficult, time consuming, and requires high patient compliance. We have evaluated the long-term effect of an open elbow arthrolysis in the posttraumatic stiff elbow.

Methods

We evaluated 43 patients (14 women, 29 men) with a median age of 47(16–78) years operated with open arthrolysis for a posttraumatic stiff elbow. The median follow-up time was 41(12–204) months. The patients were hospitalized median 12(4–14) days, with daily physiotherapy and NSAID. 36 patients tolerated continuous passive motion (CPM) for 11(0–42) days. 35 patients had a well-functioning brachial plexus anesthesia for median 7(1–18) days. We used the paired 2-tailed T-test in our statistical analysis.

Results

Preoperatively the patients had a median flexion of 110(30–160)°, extension 40(10–90)°, and the total flexion-extension sector (F/E) was 50(0–110)°. At follow-up the patients had a median flexion of 132(75–151)° and extension of 23(8–84)°, which indicate a median gain of 42(−50–114)°. The subjective functional scores (Mayo Elbow Score, EQ5D, Q-Dash, and VAS for pain) were satisfying, and most of the patients (81 %) would have done the operation once again knowing the outcome. We had 5 temporary ulnar neuropraxias, one became permanent and in addition ankylotic, one temporary radial neuropraxia, two superficial wound infections, and one transient hematoma.

Conclusion

Open arthrolysis of the posttraumatic stiff elbow is associated with reliable clinical and functional long-term outcomes.

Risk of nerve injury during arthroscopy portal placement in the elbow joint: A cadaveric study

BACKGROUND

Elbow arthroscopy has become a routine procedure now. However, placing portals is fraught with dangers of injuring the neurovascular structures around elbow. There are not enough data documenting the same amongst the Indians. We aimed to determine the relative distances of nerves around the elbow to the arthroscopy portals and risk of injury in different positions of the elbow.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Six standard elbow arthroscopy portals were established in 12 cadaveric upper limbs after joint distension. Then using standard dissection techniques all the nerves around the elbow were exposed, and their distances from relevant portals were measured using digital vernier caliper in 90° elbow flexion and 0° extension. Descriptive statistical analysis was used for describing distance of the nerves from relevant portal. Wilcoxon-signed rank test and Friedman's test were used for comparison.

RESULTS

There was no major nerve injury at all the portals studied in both positions of the elbow. The total incidence of cutaneous nerve injury was 8.3% (12/144); medial cutaneous nerve of forearm 10/48 and posterior cutaneous nerve of forearm 2/24. No significant changes were observed in the distance of a nerve to an individual portal at 90° flexion or 0° extension position of the elbow.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates the risk of injury to different nerves at the standard portals of elbow arthroscopy. In practice, the actual incidence of nerve injury may still be lower. We conclude that elbow arthroscopy is a safe procedure when all precautions as described are duly followed.

The incidence of neurologic complications and associated risk factors in elbow surgery: an analysis of 2759 cases

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of neurologic complications after elbow surgery and to provide perioperative tips and potential pitfalls for neurologic complications and how to cope with them.

METHODS

A single orthopedic surgeon performed 2759 elbow-related surgical procedures between January 2006 and October 2014. The surgical records and the postoperative follow-up of all 2759 patients were retrospectively reviewed to determine the preoperative diagnosis, the type of procedure, and postoperative neurologic complications.

RESULTS

Neurologic complications were very uncommon. Neurologic deficit occurred in 10 of 2759 elbow operations. A neurologic complication occurred 4 distal biceps tendon surgeries (5.3%), 4 elbow arthroscopies (0.4%), 2 ligament reconstructions (0.7%), and 2 total elbow prosthesis (1.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

A thorough understanding of the 3-dimensional anatomy of the elbow and surrounding nerves is needed to avoid neurologic complications. The neurologic complications we encountered in our series are well within the limits of earlier reports and show that elbow surgery is a relatively safe procedure to perform for a wide variety of indications.

POST-TRAUMATIC STIFFNESS OF THE ELBOW

Elbow stiffness is a common problem after joint trauma, causing functional impairment of the upper limb. The severity of the dysfunction depends on the nature of the initial trauma and the treatment used. Appropriate clinical evaluation and complementary examinations are essential for therapeutic planning. Several surgical techniques are now available and the recommendation must be made in accordance with patient characteristics, degree of joint limitation and the surgeon's skill. Joint incongruence and degeneration have negative effects on the prognosis, but heterotrophic ossification alone has been correlated with a favorable surgical prognosis.

Arthroscopic Management of Elbow Fractures

Several types of elbow fractures are amenable to arthroscopic or arthroscopic-assisted fracture fixation, including fractures of the coronoid, radial head, lateral condyle, and capitellum. Other posttraumatic conditions may be treated arthroscopically, such as arthrofibrosis or delayed radial head excision. Arthroscopy can be used for assessment of stability or intra-articular fracture displacement. The safest portals are the midlateral (soft spot portal), proximal anteromedial, and proximal anterolateral. Although circumstances may vary according to the injury pattern, a proximal anteromedial portal is usually established first. Arthroscopy enables a less invasive surgical exposure that facilitates visualization of the fracture fragments in select scenarios.

Elbow Positioning and Joint Insufflation Substantially Influence Median and Radial Nerve Locations

BACKGROUND

The median and radial nerves are at risk of iatrogenic injury when performing arthroscopic arthrolysis with anterior capsulectomy. Although prior anatomic studies have identified the position of these nerves, little is known about how elbow positioning and joint insufflation might influence nerve locations.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

In a cadaver model, we sought to determine whether (1) the locations of the median and radial nerves change with variation of elbow positioning; and whether (2) flexion and joint insufflation increase the distance of the median and radial nerves to osseous landmarks after correcting for differences in size of the cadaveric specimens.

METHODS

The median and radial nerves were marked with a radiopaque thread in 11 fresh-frozen elbow specimens. Three-dimensional radiographic scans were performed in extension, in 90° flexion, and after joint insufflations in neutral rotation, pronation, and supination. Trochlear and capitellar widths were analyzed. The distances of the median nerve to the medial and anterior edge of the trochlea and to the coronoid were measured. The distances of the radial nerve to the lateral and anterior edge of the capitulum and to the anterior edge of the radial head were measured. We analyzed the mediolateral nerve locations as a percentage function of the trochlear and capitellar widths to control for differences regarding the size of the specimens.

RESULTS

The mean distance of the radial nerve to the lateral edge of the capitulum as a percentage function of the capitellar width increased from 68% ± 17% in extension to 91% ± 23% in flexion (mean difference = 23%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5%-41%; p = 0.01). With the numbers available, no such difference was observed regarding the location of the median nerve in relation to the medial border of the trochlea (mean difference = 5%; 95% CI, -13% to 22%; p = 0.309). Flexion and joint insufflation increased the distance of the nerves to osseous landmarks. The mean distance of the median nerve to the coronoid tip was 5.4 ± 1.3 mm in extension, 9.1 ± 2.3 mm in flexion (mean difference = 3.7 mm; 95% CI, 2.04-5.36 mm; p < 0.001), and 12.6 ± 3.6 mm in flexion and insufflation (mean difference = 3.5 mm; 95% CI, 0.81-6.19 mm; p = 0.008). The mean distance of the radial nerve to the anterior edge of the radial head increased from 4.7 ± 1.8 mm in extension to 7.7 ± 2.7 mm in flexion (mean difference = 3.0 mm; 95% CI, 0.96-5.04 mm; p = 0.005) and to 11.9 ± 3.0 mm in flexion with additional joint insufflation (mean difference = 4.2 mm; 95% CI, 1.66-6.74 mm; p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

The radial nerve shifts medially during flexion from the lateral to the medial border of the inner third of the capitulum. The median nerve is located at the medial quarter of the joint. The distance of the median and radial nerves to osseous landmarks doubles from extension to 90° flexion and triples after joint insufflation.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Elbow arthroscopy with anterior capsulectomy should be performed cautiously at the medial aspect of the joint to avoid median nerve lesions. Performing arthroscopic anterior capsulectomy in flexion at the lateral aspect of the joint and in slight extension at the medial edge of the capitulum could enhance safety of this procedure.

Demographic Trends and Complication Rates in Arthroscopic Elbow Surgery

PURPOSE

To investigate demographic trends in elbow arthroscopy over time, as well as to query complication rates requiring reoperation associated with these procedures.

METHODS

The Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) billing codes of patients undergoing elbow arthroscopy were searched using a national insurance database. From the years 2007 to 2011, over 20 million orthopaedic patient records were present in the database with an orthopaedic International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision diagnosis code or CPT code. Our search for procedures and the corresponding CPT codes for the elbow included diagnostic arthroscopy, loose body removal, synovectomy, and debridement. The type of procedure, date, gender, and region of the country were identified for each patient. In addition, the incidence of reoperation for infection, stiffness, and nerve injury was examined.

RESULTS

There was a significant increase in arthroscopic elbow procedures over the study period. Male patients accounted for 71% of patients undergoing these procedures. Of the elbow arthroscopy patients, 22% were aged younger than 20 years, 25% were aged 20 to 39 years, 47% were aged 40 to 59 years, and 6% were aged 60 years or older. Other than synovectomy, there were regional variations in the incidence of each procedure type. The overall rate of reoperation was 2.2%, with specific rates of 0.26% for infection, 0.63% for stiffness, and 1.26% for nerve injury. It should be noted that because only the complications requiring reoperation are recorded in the database, these numbers are lower than the overall complication rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the incidence of elbow arthroscopy in this patient population is relatively low and appears to be increasing slightly over time. In the database used in this study, elbow arthroscopy procedures were most commonly performed in male patients and in patients aged 40 to 59 years, with regional variation in the incidence of the different procedures. Furthermore, the rate of complications requiring reoperation was low, with a nerve operation being the most common reoperation performed.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Inner Synovial Membrane Footprint of the Anterior Elbow Capsule: An Arthroscopic Boundary

Introduction. The purpose of this study is to describe the inner synovial membrane (SM) of the anterior elbow capsule, both qualitatively and quantitatively. Materials and Methods. Twenty-two cadaveric human elbows were dissected and the distal humerus and SM attachments were digitized using a digitizer. The transepicondylar line (TEL) was used as the primary descriptor of various landmarks. The distance between the medial epicondyle and medial SM edge, SM apex overlying the coronoid fossa, the central SM nadir, and the apex of the SM insertion overlying the radial fossa and distance from the lateral epicondyle to lateral SM edge along the TEL were measured and further analyzed. Gender and side-to-side statistical comparisons were calculated. Results. The mean age of the subjects was 80.4 years, with six male and five female cadavers. The SM had a distinctive double arched attachment overlying the radial and coronoid fossae. No gender-based or side-to-side quantitative differences were noted. In 18 out of 22 specimens (81.8%), an infolding extension of the SM was observed overlying the medial aspect of the trochlea. The SM did not coincide with the outer fibrous attachment in any specimen. Conclusion. The humeral footprint of the synovial membrane of the anterior elbow capsule is more complex and not as capacious as commonly understood from the current literature. The synovial membrane nadir between the two anterior fossae may help to explain and hence preempt technical difficulties, a reduction in working arthroscopic volume in inflammatory and posttraumatic pathologies. This knowledge should allow the surgeon to approach this aspect of the anterior elbow compartment space with the confidence that detachment of this synovial attachment, to create working space, does not equate to breaching the capsule. Alternatively, stripping the synovial attachment from the anterior humerus does not constitute an anterior capsular release.

Diagnostic arthroscopy in the treatment of minimally displaced lateral humeral condyle fractures in children

INTRODUCTION

In minimally displaced pediatric lateral humeral condyle fractures, plain radiography cannot be used for accurate differential diagnosis of the cartilage lesion, and other imaging methods have demerits in their accuracy and their accessibility. The purpose of this study was to investigate the usefulness of arthroscopy to diagnose cartilage displacement in minimally displaced fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Nine children with minimally displaced lateral humeral condyle fractures, an average of 6.6 years old, underwent combined arthroscopy and fixation surgery. Percutaneous fixation was performed with nondisplaced articular surface according to the arthroscopic findings, while in case of displaced fracture under arthroscopy, open fixation was preferred. The difference between the arthroscopic and radiographic findings was investigated.

RESULTS

Articular surface could be arthroscopically visualized in all patients. Under arthroscopy, cartilage hinges were maintained in seven cases and disrupted in two. Nondisplaced cartilage disruption was noted in one of these two cases, and percutaneous fixation was performed. A displaced articular surface was noted in the other one, where the patient underwent open surgery. At the last follow-up, an average of 14.7 months postoperatively, union and wide range of motion had been achieved without any complications.

CONCLUSION

Diagnosis of fracture displacement by merely using plain radiography was considered to be insufficient for minimally displaced cases. Diagnostic arthroscopy aided in the appropriate selection of either a percutaneous or open fixation method.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Arthroscopic joint debridement and capsular release in primary and post-traumatic elbow osteoarthritis: a retrospective blinded cohort study with minimum 24-month follow-up

BACKGROUND

Elbow osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative condition which in the advanced stage can severely impair joint mobility. Conservative treatment remains the first choice; surgery should be considered in case of failure in patients prepared to adhere to a demanding rehabilitation protocol. We assess the effectiveness of arthroscopic joint debridement and capsular release in a series of patients with primary and post-traumatic elbow arthritis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-eight subjects (40 males, eight females; mean age 48 years) with a preoperative diagnosis of primary (19, 40 %) or post-traumatic OA (29, 60 %) were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 44 months. Outcome measures were active range of motion (ROM), pain score, Oxford elbow score (OES), and Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS). OA severity was graded into three classes (I-III) based on X-ray findings. Statistical significance was set at 5 %.

RESULTS

At the final follow-up evaluation, active flexion/extension increased significantly (p < 0.01); pronation and supination improved, but the difference was not significant (p > 0.05). The pain score improved from 7.2 to 4.3 (p < 0.01). Both OES and MEPS improved significantly (p < 0.001). Patients with post-traumatic OA had better ROM (p = 0.0391) and clinical scores (OES, p = 0.011; MEPS, p = 0.010). ROM and clinical scores were lower but not significantly so in class II than in class I patients. A smooth coronoid and olecranon fossa was found in 38 (79 %) patients and a preserved ulnotrochlear joint space in 40 (80 %).

CONCLUSIONS

Elbow OA has become more common as a result of earlier diagnosis and an increased number of acute injuries involving the joint. Arthroscopy is an effective technique to treat OA which provides the best results with the correct indications. Prospective studies are needed to help develop guidelines enabling selection of the best treatment option.

Elbow Positioning and Joint Insufflation Substantially Influence Median and Radial Nerve Locations

BACKGROUND

The median and radial nerves are at risk of iatrogenic injury when performing arthroscopic arthrolysis with anterior capsulectomy. Although prior anatomic studies have identified the position of these nerves, little is known about how elbow positioning and joint insufflation might influence nerve locations.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

In a cadaver model, we sought to determine whether (1) the locations of the median and radial nerves change with variation of elbow positioning; and whether (2) flexion and joint insufflation increase the distance of the median and radial nerves to osseous landmarks after correcting for differences in size of the cadaveric specimens.

METHODS

The median and radial nerves were marked with a radiopaque thread in 11 fresh-frozen elbow specimens. Three-dimensional radiographic scans were performed in extension, in 90° flexion, and after joint insufflations in neutral rotation, pronation, and supination. Trochlear and capitellar widths were analyzed. The distances of the median nerve to the medial and anterior edge of the trochlea and to the coronoid were measured. The distances of the radial nerve to the lateral and anterior edge of the capitulum and to the anterior edge of the radial head were measured. We analyzed the mediolateral nerve locations as a percentage function of the trochlear and capitellar widths to control for differences regarding the size of the specimens.

RESULTS

The mean distance of the radial nerve to the lateral edge of the capitulum as a percentage function of the capitellar width increased from 68% ± 17% in extension to 91% ± 23% in flexion (mean difference = 23%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5%-41%; p = 0.01). With the numbers available, no such difference was observed regarding the location of the median nerve in relation to the medial border of the trochlea (mean difference = 5%; 95% CI, -13% to 22%; p = 0.309). Flexion and joint insufflation increased the distance of the nerves to osseous landmarks. The mean distance of the median nerve to the coronoid tip was 5.4 ± 1.3 mm in extension, 9.1 ± 2.3 mm in flexion (mean difference = 3.7 mm; 95% CI, 2.04-5.36 mm; p < 0.001), and 12.6 ± 3.6 mm in flexion and insufflation (mean difference = 3.5 mm; 95% CI, 0.81-6.19 mm; p = 0.008). The mean distance of the radial nerve to the anterior edge of the radial head increased from 4.7 ± 1.8 mm in extension to 7.7 ± 2.7 mm in flexion (mean difference = 3.0 mm; 95% CI, 0.96-5.04 mm; p = 0.005) and to 11.9 ± 3.0 mm in flexion with additional joint insufflation (mean difference = 4.2 mm; 95% CI, 1.66-6.74 mm; p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

The radial nerve shifts medially during flexion from the lateral to the medial border of the inner third of the capitulum. The median nerve is located at the medial quarter of the joint. The distance of the median and radial nerves to osseous landmarks doubles from extension to 90° flexion and triples after joint insufflation.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Elbow arthroscopy with anterior capsulectomy should be performed cautiously at the medial aspect of the joint to avoid median nerve lesions. Performing arthroscopic anterior capsulectomy in flexion at the lateral aspect of the joint and in slight extension at the medial edge of the capitulum could enhance safety of this procedure.

The course of the median and radial nerve across the elbow: an anatomic study

INTRODUCTION

Nerve transection has been described as complication of arthroscopic elbow arthrolysis. Therefore, the goal of this study was to define bony landmarks for intraoperative orientation regarding the location of the median and radial nerve.

METHODS

In 22 formalin-fixated upper extremities, the radial and median nerves were dissected and marked with respect to their native course. A 3D X-ray scan was performed. The distances of the radial nerve to the radial head (R1), the capitulum (R2), and its lateral border (RC) were measured. The location of the radial nerve in relation to the transversal diameter of the humeral condyle (HC) was calculated. Similarly, the distances of the median nerve to the trochlea (M1), the medial border of the trochlea (M2), and its relation to HC were calculated.

RESULTS

The mean value for R1 was 8 mm (±2.9 mm), for R2 was 11.3 mm (±3.8 mm), and for RC was 10.6 mm (±5.1 mm). RC/HC averaged 24 % (±11 %). M1 averaged 11.7 mm (±5.2 mm), and M2 was 2.4 mm (±4.1 mm). M2/HC averaged 6 % (±9 %).

CONCLUSIONS

The radial nerve is located ventral to the central third of the capitulum. The median nerve lies ventral to the medial quarter of the humeral condyle. When performing arthroscopic arthrolysis, this information should be kept in mind during anterior capsulectomy.

Elbow arthroscopy: An alternative to anteromedial portals

BACKGROUND

Elbow arthroscopy is considered to be a difficult procedure with a high complication rate. These two disadvantages are due to the proximity of neurovascular structures.

HYPOTHESIS

The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and complication rate of a new elbow arthroscopy technique without anteromedial portals. This approach was taken because of the high rate of ulnar nerve damage using the medial portal, and the difficulty of performing triangulation of opposite portals in a patient in the lateral decubitus position.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Fifteen patients were operated on by the same surgeon between 2010 and 2012. Range of motion and the "MEPS" elbow score were calculated preoperatively and at the final postoperative follow-up. The average age of patients was 38.3 years. The follow-up was 11.1 months. Personal portals (high anterolateral and intermediate anterolateral portals) were used instead of the anteromedial portals.

RESULTS

Elbow flexion increased from 113° preoperatively to 129° at the final follow-up (P=0.009). Extension increased from -33° to -10° (P<0.0001). The preoperative and final postoperative "MEPS" scores were 56.3 and 94 respectively (P<0.0001). Two patients (13.3%) had radial nerve palsy with complete recovery 6 and 9 months after surgery.

DISCUSSION

The rate of nerve complications following elbow arthroscopy varies from 0 to 14%. The rate in our series (13.3%) is comparable to the results of the literature. This rate should be placed in perspective (since one patient had multiple open surgery elbow operations before arthroscopy). All complications were transient. Improved elbow range of motion in our study is consistent with the results in literature.

Elbow arthroscopy: indications, techniques, outcomes, and complications

Elbow arthroscopy is a tool useful for the treatment of a variety of pathologies about the elbow. The major indications for elbow arthroscopy include débridement for septic elbow arthritis, synovectomy for inflammatory arthritis, débridement for osteoarthritis, loose body extraction, contracture release, treatment of osteochondral defects and selected fractures or instability, and tennis elbow release. Contraindications, technical considerations, and favorable outcomes following treatment with elbow arthroscopy require careful patient evaluation, a thorough understanding of anatomic principles, and proper patient positioning and portal selection to guide preoperative planning and overall patient care. Elbow arthroscopy is an effective procedure for the treatment of inflammatory arthritis, osteoarthritis, and lateral epicondylitis.

Delayed-onset ulnar neuritis after release of elbow contractures: clinical presentation, pathological findings, and treatment

BACKGROUND

Little information exists regarding delayed-onset ulnar neuritis (DOUN) after arthroscopic release of elbow contractures.

PURPOSE

To describe, in a large cohort of patients, the clinical presentation of and risk factors for developing DOUN after arthroscopic release of elbow contractures.

STUDY DESIGN

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 565 consecutive arthroscopic releases of elbow contractures was conducted. Essentially, DOUN was defined as ulnar neuritis or neuropathy, or worsening of pre-existing ulnar nerve symptoms, that developed postoperatively in patients with normal neurological examination findings immediately after surgery. After inclusion and exclusion criteria were met, 235 contracture releases in patients who had not undergone any ulnar nerve surgery remained and were used for the analysis of risk factors with a multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients (11%) developed DOUN. The patients fell into 1 of 3 distinct groups. Fifteen (58%) presented with rapidly progressive DOUN, characterized by rapidly progressive sensorimotor ulnar neuropathy, increasing pain at the cubital tunnel during end-range flexion and/or extension, and rapidly deteriorating range of motion within the first week after surgery. Urgent ulnar subcutaneous nerve transposition was performed within 1 or 2 days of diagnosis. Eight (31%) presented with nonprogressive DOUN, characterized by mild sensory ulnar neuropathy, neither motor weakness nor substantial pain at the cubital tunnel, or loss of motion. Three (12%) presented with slowly progressive DOUN, characterized by the insidious onset of mild ulnar neuropathy. Significant risk factors for DOUN included a diagnosis of heterotopic ossification (odds ratio, 31; 95% CI, 5-191; P < .001), preoperative neurological symptoms (odds ratio, 6; 95% CI, 2-19; P = .001), and preoperative arc of motion (odds ratio, 0.97 per degree of motion; 95% CI, 0.96-0.99; P = .02).

CONCLUSION

Delayed-onset ulnar neuritis is an important complication of arthroscopic release of elbow contractures. We recommend a high index of suspicion and monitoring patients with progressive loss of elbow motion and end-range pain for evidence of subclinical ulnar neuritis.

Delayed-onset ulnar neuritis after release of elbow contracture: preventive strategies derived from a study of 563 cases

PURPOSE

The purposes of this study were to determine whether delayed-onset ulnar neuritis (DOUN) after elbow contracture release can be prevented and to compare the efficacy of ulnar nerve decompression versus subcutaneous transposition.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 563 consecutive arthroscopic elbow contracture releases was conducted. The prophylactic efficacy of (1) subcutaneous transposition, (2) ulnar nerve decompression, (3) limited ulnar nerve decompression (7 to 8 cm), and (4) mini-decompression (4 to 6 cm) was assessed prospectively. The efficacy of prophylactic strategies (transposition, decompression, limited decompression, or mini-decompression) in preventing DOUN was compared by univariate survival analysis. Patients who underwent a subcutaneous transposition were matched with patients who underwent a standard open decompression or a limited decompression, according to gender, age (±10 years), diagnosis, and preoperative motion. This analysis was repeated after we excluded the patients who underwent associated open procedures (e.g., hardware removal).

RESULTS

DOUN occurred in 26 of 235 patients (11%) who did not undergo any prophylactic procedure versus 8 of 295 patients (3%) who underwent a prophylactic ulnar nerve decompression or transposition at the time of contracture release (P < .001). The neurologic impairment was significantly less severe after prophylactic decompression compared with patients without any prophylactic intervention (grade on Neuropathy Grading Scale, 2 vs. 4; P = .03). Ulnar nerve transposition and decompression were equally protective. The decompression length was the only factor significantly related to the failure of the prophylactic intervention (odds ratio, 0.19; P = .02). A mini-decompression was not as effective as a prophylactic procedure, whereas a limited decompression was equal to a standard decompression. The case-control analysis showed that the decompression and transposition had equal preventive effects but the transposition was associated with a higher rate of wound complications (19% vs. 4%, P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

DOUN is a complication of arthroscopic elbow contracture release. Its incidence and severity can be reduced by limited open ulnar nerve decompression or transposition.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, prospective comparative study with retrospective analysis.

Clinical results after arthroscopic treatment for septic arthritis of the elbow joint

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to examine clinical findings of septic arthritis of the elbow joint in a series of immunocompetent patients and to evaluate the outcomes after arthroscopic treatment.

METHODS

Between October 2006 and January 2012, 11 patients with septic arthritis of the elbow underwent arthroscopic surgery. History, laboratory findings, and radiologic findings were reviewed. Functional outcomes were evaluated using the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS).

RESULTS

The study included 5 men and 6 women with a mean age of 45 years. An underlying medical disease was present in 1 patient (diabetes). Staphylococcus aureus was the most common organism identified (5 patients). There was 1 reoperation and no complications related to the arthroscopic procedure. Eight of 11 patients had excellent results assessed by MEPS at the final follow-up. The mean MEPS was 94.5 at the final follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Septic arthritis of the elbow joint can occur in otherwise healthy patients without pre-existing elbow disease. Arthroscopic irrigation and synovectomy are safe and effective in patients with septic arthritis and result in good functional outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Elbow arthroscopy: early complications and associated risk factors

BACKGROUND

Elbow arthroscopy is increasingly used to treat complex pathology. The purpose of this study was to investigate early complication rates after elbow arthroscopy and identify risk factors for adverse events.

METHODS

Consecutive elbow arthroscopies performed during a 13-year period were reviewed, identifying early perioperative complications. Major complications included deep infection, permanent nerve injury, or complications requiring additional anesthesia. Minor complications included superficial wound complications and transient nerve palsies. Complications were compared with a surgical complexity scale based on the procedure performed, the number of arthroscopic portals, and tourniquet time.

RESULTS

Of 417 procedures, there were 37 minor (8.9%) and 20 major (4.8%) complications. The rates of superficial and deep infections were 6.7% and 2.2%, respectively. Major complications included 9 deep infections, 6 cases of heterotopic ossification requiring further surgery, and 4 manipulations under anesthesia. There were 7 transient sensory nerve complications, and no motor deficits. No differences in complication rates were seen between low-, moderate-, and high-complexity (10.2%, 16.3% and 14.4%, respectively) cases. Intraoperative steroid injections were strongly associated with postoperative superficial (14.1% vs 2.0%) and deep infection (4.9% vs 0.4%) in elbows receiving vs those not receiving steroid (P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Complications of elbow arthroscopy are seen in approximately 14% of cases. Most complications are minor, not affecting clinical outcome. Major complications occur in 5% of cases, often requiring repeat surgery. Intraoperative postsurgical steroid injections are associated with increased risk of perioperative infections. Case complexity does not appear to affect the rate of complications with modern surgical techniques.

Arthroscopic lateral epicondylitis release using the "bayonet" technique

Most patients diagnosed with lateral epicondylitis respond well to conservative management. For patients who do not respond to nonoperative modalities, surgical treatment represents a viable option for long-term symptomatic relief. The arthroscopic surgical technique described in this article has been consistently used by the senior author for the treatment of recalcitrant lateral epicondylitis for more than 5 years (198 patients) without the occurrence of any major complications and appears to be a safe, reliable, and efficacious surgical intervention for the management of lateral epicondylitis.

Elbow arthroscopy in stiff elbow

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate and review the functional outcomes after arthroscopic surgery in post-traumatic and degenerative elbow contractures.

METHODS

Between 2004 and 2008, 243 patients with post-traumatic or degenerative elbow stiffness were treated with arthroscopic surgery. A total of 212 patients were reviewed at an average of 58 months follow-up (SD ± 17.3). The patients were divided into two groups: group A with post-traumatic stiffness, and group B with degenerative stiffness. Arthroscopic procedures performed included: synovectomy, debridement of osteophytes, removal of loose bodies, anterior and posterior capsulectomy, radial head excision. Ulnar nerve neurolysis was usually performed. The following data were recorded and analysed: sex, age, paraesthesia, previous surgical treatment and complications. Patient outcome was assessed pre- and post-operatively by a visual analogue scale and by the Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI), which assesses pain, ROM, stability and function.

RESULTS

The total average ROM improved by 33° in group A and 20° in Group B. The MEPI improved from 60 to 81 in group A, and from 65 to 91 in group B.

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroscopic surgery in post-traumatic and degenerative elbow contractures can be considered a safe, useful, with a long learning curve procedure that offers important improvement of the ROM decreasing surgical morbidity.

Thromboembolic complications in arthroscopic surgery

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a relatively rare complication of arthroscopic surgery but has the potential to cause significant morbidity and even mortality. VTE has been reported after shoulder and knee arthroscopy prompting controversial guidelines to be proposed. More limited studies are available regarding hip and ankle arthroscopy and 1 case of deep venous thrombosis in the contralateral leg status after hip arthroscopy exists. No reports have been published regarding VTE after elbow or wrist arthroscopy to these authors' knowledge. In this article, a systematic review of the literature was conducted to analyze the incidence, treatment, and prevention of thromboembolic complications in arthroscopy.

Perioperative upper extremity peripheral nerve traction injuries

Peripheral nerve traction injuries may occur after surgical care and can involve any of the upper extremity large peripheral nerves. In this review, injuries after shoulder or elbow surgical intervention are discussed. Understanding the varying mechanisms of injury as well as classification is imperative for preoperative risk stratification as well as management.

Osteocapsular Arthroplasty of the Elbow: Surgical Technique

Introduction

Arthroscopic osteocapsular arthroplasty of the elbow is a procedure involving three-dimensional reshaping of the bones, removal of any loose bodies, and capsulectomy to restore motion and function as well as to reduce or eliminate pain.

Step 1 Get in and Establish a View

Visualize identifiable articular structures and confirm their anatomic orientation.

Step 2 Create a Space in Which to Work

Remove debris and loose bodies, as well as excise the fat pad and perform a synovectomy as necessary, so that you can see clearly.

Step 3 Bone Removal

Remove osteophytes and restore the olecranon to its normal shape.

Step 4 Capsulectomy

Release the capsule according to the severity of the flexion loss.

Step 1 Anterior Compartment Get in and Establish a View

As with the posterior compartment, the first step in the anterior compartment is to visualize the joint structures and to be sure of their anatomic orientation.

Step 2 Anterior Compartment Create a Space in Which to Work

The stripping of the capsule is usually extremely effective for improving or creating the space in which to work in the anterior joint compartment.

Step 3 Anterior Compartment Bone Removal

Remove osteophytes and reshape the coronoid and coronoid fossa to their normal shape.

Step 4 Anterior Compartment Capsulectomy

Meticulously excise the anterior aspect of the capsule following four consistent steps.

Closure

Close the wounds after drains have been placed anteriorly (through the arthroscope sheath into the proximal anterolateral portal) and posteriorly (through the posterolateral portal into the olecranon fossa, exiting proximally through a separate skin puncture).

Postoperative Regimen

Postoperatively, check the nerve function before performing a regional block and commencing continuous passive motion.

Results

A retrospective review of a consecutive series of 502 arthroscopic elbow contracture releases (including 388 osteocapsular arthroplasties) in 464 patients revealed twenty-four cases (4.8%) of transient nerve injury⁷.

What to Watch For

IndicationsContraindicationsPitfalls & Challenges.

Arthroscopic elbow surgery, is it safe?

BACKGROUND

During the past 10 years, the use of arthroscopic elbow surgery has increased tremendously. The proximity of neurovascular structures and narrow joint spaces make it a technically demanding procedure with many potential complications. The purpose of this study was to report the complications in a large series of patients and identify factors that might have contributed to their occurrence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

During an 8-year period, 200 elbow arthroscopies were performed by a single surgeon. All procedures were performed in a standardized fashion. Patient records were reviewed by independent observers. The minimum follow-up for all patients was 8 weeks.

RESULTS

The only major permanent complication (0.5%) identified was an ulnar nerve injury. Minor complications were identified in 14 patients (7%): 3 transient nerve palsies, 4 prolonged serous drainages or superficial wound infections, 6 persistent elbow contractures, and 1 mild increase in contracture. Of reported patients with complications, 9 (60%) had a history of trauma, fracture, or previous surgery. In 11 patients with direct surgery-related complications, 8 (73%) had a similar history.

CONCLUSION

The complications encountered in our series are well within the limits of earlier reports and show that with only a 0.5% rate of major complications, elbow arthroscopy is a relatively safe procedure for a wide variety of indications when performed in a standardized fashion. In patients with a history of trauma or previous surgery, the procedure is more challenging and, in less experienced hands, might lead to higher complication rates.

Medium-term results of arthroscopic debridement and capsulectomy for the treatment of elbow osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

We retrospectively reviewed 20 patients (21 elbows) after arthroscopic debridement and capsulectomy of the elbow for primary osteoarthritis. We aimed to see if there was an improvement in pain, function, and range of movement in the medium-term.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Outcomes of 20 patients (18 men, 2 women) with primary osteoarthritis of the elbow (21 elbows) operated on by the senior surgeon were reviewed at a mean of 5.5 years postoperatively. Inclusion criteria were patients with undergoing arthroscopic debridement and capsulectomy after failure of previous conservative treatment. Exclusion criteria were patients undergoing additional intra-articular procedures at surgery and patients with post-traumatic or inflammatory arthritis. Mean age was 42 years (range, 22-79 years). Preoperatively, osteoarthritis was classified based on plain x-ray images. Functional outcome was assessed using preoperative and postoperative Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores, Mayo scores, and range of movement.

RESULTS

Radiographically, osteoarthritis was assessed as class I in 9 elbows, class II in 10 elbows, and class III in 3 elbows. There was a mean significant improvement in DASH score from 34.0 to 12.7 (P < .05). This was true for all grades of osteoarthritis and significant for classes II and III (P < .05). Mayo scores postoperatively were "excellent" in 11 elbows, "good" in 5, "fair" in 4, and "poor" in 1. Nineteen of the 20 patients said they would have had the surgery again.

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic debridement and capsulectomy is an effective procedure for patients with primary osteoarthritis of the elbow. We propose this may work as a partial neurectomy to denervate pain sensation in the joint.

The first 100 elbow arthroscopies of one surgeon: analysis of complications

BACKGROUND

Elbow arthroscopy is technically challenging and prone to complications especially due to the close relation of nerves and vessels. Complication rates up to 20% are reported, depending on indication and how complications are defined. This study analyzes the complications of the first 100 elbow arthroscopies done by 1 fellowship- and cadaver-trained surgeon.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From September 2004 to April 2009, 100 consecutive elbow arthroscopies were performed, and thus consequently standardized, by 1 surgeon in 1 institution. The clinical data of all patients were retrospectively analyzed for indication-specific complications. Complications were divided into minor (transient) and major (persistent or infection).

RESULTS

Included were 65 male and 35 female patients (mean age, 41 years; range, 12-70 years) with a minimum follow-up of 12 months (clinical or telephone). The following indications were documented (several per patient were possible): osteoarthritis in 29, stiffness in 27, loose bodies in 27, tennis elbow in 24, traumatic sequelae in 19, and others in 24. No major complications occurred, but 6 minor complications occurred in 5 patients (5%), comprising 2 hematoma, 2 transient nerve lesions, 1 wound-healing problem, and 1 complex regional pain syndrome. No revision surgery was necessary. Complications were not significantly associated with the indication for operation or the surgeon's learning curve.

CONCLUSION

This study shows an acceptable complication rate of the first 100 elbow arthroscopies from a single surgeon. A profound clinical education, including cadaver training as well as standardization of patient position, portals, and surgery, help to achieve this.

Elbow arthroscopy: a new setup to avoid visual paradox and improve triangulation

Elbow arthroscopy is a useful diagnostic and therapeutic tool for various conditions. Conventional arthroscopy with the patient in the prone or lateral position where the screen is placed on the opposite side makes it difficult to interpret the image, results in visual paradox, and is associated with difficult triangulation. We present a modified setup for the operating room to help eliminate these problems and improve triangulation.

The contracted elbow: is ulnar nerve release necessary?

BACKGROUND

Prophylactic release of the ulnar nerve in patients undergoing capsular release for severe elbow contractures has been recommended, although there are limited data to support this recommendation. Our hypothesis was that more severely limited preoperative flexion and extension would be associated with a higher incidence of postoperative ulnar nerve symptoms in patients undergoing capsular release.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of 164 consecutive patients who underwent open or arthroscopic elbow capsular release for stiffness between 2003 and 2010. The ulnar nerve was decompressed if the patient had preoperative ulnar nerve symptoms or a positive Tinel test. Preoperative and postoperative range of motion and incidence of ulnar nerve symptoms were recorded.

RESULTS

The mean improvement in the arc of motion of was 36.7°. New-onset postoperative ulnar nerve symptoms developed in 7 of 87 patients (8.1%) who did not undergo ulnar nerve decompression; eventually, 5 of these patients with persistent symptoms underwent ulnar nerve decompression. The rate of developing postoperative symptoms was higher if patients had preoperative flexion ≤ 100° (15.2%) compared with those with preoperative flexion >100° (3.7%). There was no association between preoperative extension or gain in motion arc and postoperative symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall rate of ulnar nerve symptoms after elbow contracture release was low if ulnar nerve decompression was performed in patients with preoperative symptoms or a positive Tinel test. There was a higher rate of ulnar nerve symptoms in patients with more severe contractures (≤ 100° of preoperative flexion), which did not reach statistical significance.

The efficacy of intra-articular injections for pain control following the closed reduction and percutaneous pinning of pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this single-blinded, randomized, controlled trial was to compare the analgesic efficacy of intra-articular injections of bupivacaine or ropivacaine with that of no injection for postoperative pain control after the operative treatment of supracondylar humeral fractures in a pediatric population.

METHODS

Subjects (n=124) were randomized to treatment with 0.25% bupivacaine (Group B) (n=42), 0.20% ropivacaine (Group R) (n=39), or no injection (Group C) (n=43). The opioid doses and the times of administration as well as child-reported pain severity (Faces Pain Scale-Revised) and parent-reported pain severity (Total Quality Pain Management survey) were recorded.

RESULTS

The proportion of subjects who required morphine and/or fentanyl injections was significantly (p=0.004) lower in Group B (10%) as compared with Group R (36%) and Group C (44%). On the basis of the log-rank test, the opioid-free survival rates were significantly greater in Group B as compared to Groups C and R. Total opioid consumption (morphine equivalent mg/kg) in the first seventy-two hours postoperatively was significantly less in Group B as compared with Group C (mean difference, 0.225; [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.0152 to 0.435]; p=0.036). Parent-reported pain scores were also significantly lower in Group B as compared with both Group C (mean difference, 1.81 [95% CI, 0.38 to 3.25]; p=0.014) and Group R (mean difference, 1.66; 95% CI, 0.20 to 3.12; p=0.027). There were no significant differences across the three groups in terms of self-reported pain. Differences between Groups R and C were not significant for any of the outcome variables.

CONCLUSIONS

The intra-articular injection of 0.25% bupivacaine significantly improves postoperative pain control following the closed reduction and percutaneous pinning of supracondylar humeral fractures in pediatric patients.

Arthroscopic synovectomy for rheumatoid wrists and elbows

PURPOSE

To evaluate the treatment outcome of wrist and elbow arthroscopic synovectomy for patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

METHODS

3 men and 18 women aged 27 to 71 (mean, 54) years underwent arthroscopic synovectomy for rheumatoid arthritis of the wrist (n=12) and elbow (n=13). All patients had received multiple medications including non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, and steroids, as well as physiotherapy and splintage for 6 months, but the joint pain and disability persisted. The median duration of rheumatoid arthritis was 89 (range, 24-156) and 108 (range, 36-360) months for the wrist and elbow joints, respectively. According to the Larsen grading, the radiographic stages of the wrists and elbows were classified as grade 1 (n=4+4), grade 2 (n=4+5), and grade 3 (n=4+4). Visual analogue scale for pain, the wrist and elbow flexion-extension arcs, grip strength, key pinch strength, inflammatory markers, disability and symptoms were compared pre- and post-operatively.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period was 30 (range, 18-78) and 34 (range, 18-78) months for wrists and elbows, respectively. There was significant improvement in pain, joint motion, inflammatory markers, and disability score. All patients were satisfied with the surgery. There was no neurovascular or wound complication. No patient was taking longterm pain-control drugs. One patient underwent a second arthroscopic synovectomy after 15 months owing to exacerbation of arthritis.

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic synovectomy is recommended for patients with rheumatoid arthritis who fail conservative treatment.

High-resolution ultrasound accurately identifies the medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve at the midarm level: a clinical anatomic study

OBJECTIVES

The present prospective volunteer study was designed to describe a technique for ultrasound identification of the medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve (MACN) and a technique for ultrasound-guided blockade of this sensory nerve of the upper limb.

METHODS

Twenty male volunteers were included in this study. After cross-sectional ultrasound identification of the MACN at the upper arm, where it is closely adjacent to the basilic vein, a selective blockade via an in-plane needle guidance technique was performed with 0.3 mL of mepivacaine 1.5% under direct ultrasound visualization. Sensory loss to pinprick at the upper extremity was evaluated and compared with the contralateral side.

RESULTS

Constant ultrasound visualization of the MACN adjacent to the basilic vein at the upper arm level was possible in all cases. Blockade of the MACN under direct visualization was associated with a 100% success rate.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this investigation enable selective blockade of the MACN via ultrasound. Moreover, our data provide insight regarding the specific anatomic course and the integrity of this sensory nerve, which could be used for plastic and reconstructive surgical indications and for diagnosis of nerve injury.

Nerve injuries resulting from arthroscopic treatment of lateral epicondylitis: report of 2 cases

Arthroscopic management of lateral epicondylitis is a commonly performed procedure that has a good track record of efficacy and safety based on the current literature. Here, we report 2 cases of nerve injuries resulting from this operation: 1 posterior interosseous nerve transection and 1 partial median nerve laceration.

A review of modern management of lateral epicondylitis

Lateral epicondylitis, or tennis elbow, is the most common cause of elbow pain. This degenerative condition can manifest as an acute process lasting < 3 months or a chronic process often refractory to treatment. Symptom resolution occurs in 70% to 80% of patients within the first year. A "watch-and-wait" approach can be an appropriate treatment option, although physical therapy has been shown to be an effective first-line therapy. Corticosteroids, while providing relief of pain in the acute setting, may be detrimental to recovery in the long term. Platelet-rich plasma injections, although recently well publicized, have not been proven by well-controlled clinical trials to be effective therapy. For patients with symptoms refractory to conservative management, surgical intervention has shown to be a successful treatment modality.

ARTHROSCOPIC TREATMENT OF POST-TRAUMATIC ELBOW STIFFNESS

To evaluate patients undergoing arthroscopic release of a stiff elbow, with discussion of the technique, possible difficulties and risks. Methods: Twenty-four elbow arthroscopy procedures were performed. All the patients were evaluated using goniometry before the operation and six months afterwards and were rated using the Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS). Results: Fifteen men and nine women underwent surgery (14 right elbows and ten left elbows). Their mean age was 34.58 years and length of follow-up, 38.41 months. Their mean gain of range of motion was 43.3° and of MEPS, 85.4. Conclusion: Arthroscopic release might enable better intra-articular viewing and enhance the options for changing strategy during surgery, reducing surgical trauma and enabling early rehabilitation. This technique can reach similar or better results than open surgery. The disadvantages of arthroscopy are the long learning curve and higher cost of the procedure. Neurovascular complications are reported with both techniques. To avoid such problems, the protocol for portal construction must be rigorously followed. Arthroscopic release was shown to be a safe and effective option for achieving range-of-motion gains in cases of post-traumatic stiff elbow.

Arthroscopic ulnar nerve decompression in the setting of elbow osteoarthritis

PURPOSE

To present the technique and outcomes of arthroscopic ulnar nerve decompression at the elbow in a series of patients with associated osteoarthritis.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review identified all patients with symptomatic ulnar compression neuropathy and osteoarthritis at the elbow treated with arthroscopic decompression between March 2002 and June 2007. Information regarding preoperative symptom severity and function, associated arthritis and other disorders of the involved extremity, postoperative symptoms and function, complications, and reoperations were reviewed from the medical record. All patients were followed up for at least 12 months, and data collection included clinical evaluations and survey correspondence.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients (15 elbows) were available for review. The series consisted of patients with an average age of 51 years (range, 20-75 y). All patients had arthroscopic ulnar nerve decompression, osteophyte resection, and capsulectomy during the same procedure. An average postoperative follow-up of 47 months revealed 7 excellent, 5 good, 1 fair, and 2 poor results. Three patients had reoperations because of persistent or recurrent symptoms. These 3 patients had severe (Dellon classification) symptoms including muscular wasting on presentation.

CONCLUSIONS

This technique appears to be a useful procedure for treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome at the time of elbow arthroscopic debridement arthroplasty. Additional follow-up and prospective comparative studies are indicated to further evaluate this technique.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Mid-radial portal for operative arthroscopy of the elbow: cadaveric and clinical description of a new portal

We report a previously undescribed portal on the lateral aspect of the elbow-the mid-radial portal-and discuss the safety and use of this portal in a clinical practice via cadaveric dissection and retrospective review of 61 patients. It is located midway between the proximal anterolateral and the direct lateral portals at the level of the radiocapitellar joint and serves as a second portal on the lateral side of the elbow for use anteriorly or posteriorly. The portal penetrates the common extensor origin and courses between the radial and ulnar bands of the lateral collateral ligament complex prior to penetrating the joint capsule.In the clinical series, the mid-radial portal was used in 40 (66%) of 61 cases. The most common procedures involved removal of loose bodies and debridement in the radiocapitellar joint or posterolateral gutter. Follow-up in the clinical series averaged 6 months. No major and 2 minor complications, neither of which could be directly attributed to the use of the mid-radial portal, were found. Specifically, no cases of postoperative lateral instability existed. The previously undescribed mid-radial portal is a safe, effective option for arthroscopy on the lateral aspect of the elbow.

Capsulectomy and debridement for primary osteoarthritis of the elbow through a medial trans-flexor approach

PURPOSE

Debridement arthroplasty combined with capsulectomy for primary osteoarthritis of the elbow is a useful procedure to relieve pain and increase mobility. We have used a medial trans-flexor approach without tendon detachment for debridement arthroplasty of the elbow and evaluated the outcome of this procedure.

METHODS

Thirty-one elbows with primary osteoarthritis in 31 patients treated with debridement arthroplasty were available for follow-up at a mean of 19 ± 7 months. Twenty-four patients were men, and 7 were women. The mean age at the time of surgery was 59 ± 10 years. All elbows were painful only at the end points of motion. The anterior compartment of the elbow was accessed by splitting of the pronator flexor muscle group without tendon detachment. Routine anterior subcutaneous transposition of the ulnar nerve was used in all elbows. In 10 elbows, osteophytes or loose osseous bodies from the lateral compartment were removed through an additional lateral approach.

RESULTS

Twenty-three elbows had no pain, and 8 elbows had mild pain. The mean preoperative limitation of extension decreased from 29° ± 9° to 15° ± 9° and the mean preoperative flexion increased from 100° ± 10° to 126° ± 7°. Thus, the mean arc of elbow motion increased by 40° ± 13°. The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 94 ± 7 compared with 60 ± 5 before surgery. The results were excellent for 22 elbows and good for 9. Hematomas developed in 3 elbows, but they did not require surgical drainage.

CONCLUSIONS

Debridement arthroplasty using the medial trans-flexor approach without tendon detachment yields satisfactory short-term clinical results. This approach is associated with a low rate of complications and is safe and effective for the treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the elbow.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Paresthesia and forearm pain after phlebotomy due to medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve injury

BACKGROUND

Although phlebotomy is a common procedure, there is limited information concerning to documented complications of venipuncture.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 45 year old left- handed woman was refered for elecrodiagnostic study with dysesthesia and pain in left medial forearm. She noted these symptoms three weeks after phelebotomy. Electrodiagnostic study showed severe involvement of left side Medial Antebrachial Cutaneous nerve (MAC nerve).

CONCLUSION

Phelebotomy is a cause of MAC nerve injury. Electrodiagnostic testing can be helpful in evaluating cases of sensory disturbance after phlebotomy.

Arthroscopic treatment of stiff elbow

Contracture of the elbow represents a disabling condition that can impair a person's quality of life. Regardless of the event that causes an elbow contracture, the conservative or surgical treatment is usually considered technically difficult and associated with complications. When the conservative treatment fails to restore an acceptable range of motion in the elbow, open techniques have been shown to be successful options. More recently the use of arthroscopy has become more popular for several reasons. These reasons include better visualization of intra-articular structures, less tissue trauma from open incisions, and potentially the ability to begin early postoperative motion. The purpose of this paper is to review the indications, complications, and results of arthroscopic management of a stiff elbow.

Arthroscopic management of stiff elbow

Elbow stiffness is a common problem encountered by orthopedic surgeons. Various management options have been described in the literature, including conservative measures and open and arthroscopic surgery. Arthroscopic management of stiff elbow remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the functional results of arthroscopic management of stiff elbow.Thirty patients with stiff elbow underwent arthroscopic release surgery and were followed up for an average of 27.3 months. Surgery included anterior and posterior capsular release, coronoid process debridement, bony spur excision, and loose body removal. Postoperative outcome was assessed using the Mayo Elbow Performance Score and range of motion at the elbow. Mayo Elbow Performance Score increased from a mean 64.5 preoperatively to a mean 83.17 postoperatively. Range of motion also improved, from a mean preoperative extension and flexion of 22.83° and 96.83°, respectively, vs a mean 10.83° and 120.84°, respectively, at final follow-up. No intra- or postoperative complication was seen in any case. Underlying etiology and timing of surgery influenced the end result, with better results seen in patients with traumatic etiology and those with a shorter duration of symptoms.Arthroscopic release allows good visualization and rectification of intra-articular pathology and is a safe and effective tool for the management of stiff elbow.

Rheumatoid arthritis of the elbow

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is the most common form of inflammatory arthropathy. RA is considered a disease of synovial joints, although it can cause various extra-articular manifestations. The synovium appears to be the primary target; however, investigations are ongoing to determine the exact etiology and pathoanatomy.