Persistent Racial Disparities in Utilization Rates and Perioperative Metrics in Total Joint Arthroplasty in the U.S.: A Comprehensive Analysis of Trends from 2006 to 2015

Comparison of Utilization and Short-term Complications Between Technology-assisted and Conventional Total Hip Arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Although technology-assisted total hip arthroplasty (TA-THA) may improve implant positioning, it remains unknown whether TA-THA confers improved clinical outcomes. We sought to examine national TA-THA utilization trends and compare clinical outcomes between TA-THA and unassisted THA (U-THA).

METHODS

Patients who underwent primary, elective THA from 2010 to 2018 were identified using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Demographic, perioperative, and 30-day outcomes were queried and collected. Patients were stratified based on whether they underwent TA-THA, which included computer navigation or robotics, and U-THA. Propensity score matching paired patients undergoing TA-THA or U-THA on a 1:1 basis.

RESULTS

Of the 238,755 THA patients, 3,149 cases (1.3%) were done using TA-THA. Comparing the unmatched TA-THA and U-THA groups, race distribution (P < 0.001) and baseline functional status (P < 0.001) differed. Propensity score matching yielded 2,335 TA-THA and U-THA pairs. Perioperatively, the TA-THA cohort had longer mean surgical times (101.0 ± 34.0 versus 91.9 ± 38.8 minutes, P < 0.001), but lower transfusion rates (5.7% versus 7.8%, P = 0.005). As compared with the U-THA group, the TA-THA group had a shorter mean hospital length of stay (2.0 ± 1.1 versus 2.5 ± 2.0 days, P < 0.001) and a higher proportion of patients discharged home (85.8% versus 75.7%, P < 0.001). Notably, the TA-THA cohort had higher readmission rates (3.8% versus 2.4%, P < 0.001). Major complication and revision surgery rates did not markedly differ between groups.

DISCUSSION

TA-THA utilization rates remain low among orthopaedic surgeons. As compared with U-THA, TA-THA yield mixed perioperative and 30-day outcomes. Surgeons must consider the clinical benefits and drawbacks of TA-THA when determining the proper surgical technique and technology for each patient. Clinical trials assessing long-term functional and clinical outcomes between U-THA and TA-THA are required to further elucidate the utility of assistive technologies in THA.

LEVEL III EVIDENCE

Retrospective Cohort Study.

Availability of medical cannabis services by racial, social, and geographic characteristics of neighborhoods in New York: a cross-sectional study

Background

Within the United States (US), because racial/ethnic disparities in cannabis arrests continue, and cannabis legalization is expanding, understanding disparities in availability of legal cannabis services is important. Few studies report mixed findings regarding disparities in availability of legal cannabis services; none examined New York. We examined disparities in availability of medical cannabis services in New York. We hypothesized that New York census tracts with few Black or Hispanic residents, high incomes, high education levels, and greater urbanicity would have more medical cannabis services.

Methods

In this cross-sectional study, we used data from the 2018 US Census Bureau 5-year American Community Survey and New York Medical Marijuana Program. Main exposures were census tract characteristics, including urban–rural classification, percentage of Black and Hispanic residents, percentage of residents with bachelor’s degrees or higher, and median household income. Main outcomes were presence of at least one medical cannabis certifying provider and dispensary in each census tract. To compare census tracts’ characteristics with (vs. without) certifying providers and dispensaries, we used chi-square tests and t-tests. To examine characteristics independently associated with (vs. without) certifying providers, we used multivariable logistic regression.

Results

Of 4858 New York census tracts, 1073 (22.1%) had medical cannabis certifying providers and 37 (0.8%) had dispensaries. Compared to urban census tracts, suburban census tracts were 62% less likely to have at least one certifying provider (aOR = 0.38; 95% CI = 0.25–0.57). For every 10% increase in the proportion of Black residents, a census tract was 5% less likely to have at least one certifying provider (aOR = 0.95; 95% CI = 0.92–0.99). For every 10% increase in the proportion of residents with bachelor’s degrees or higher, a census tract was 30% more likely to have at least one certifying provider (aOR = 1.30; 95% CI = 1.21–1.38). Census tracts with (vs. without) dispensaries were more likely to have a higher percentage of residents with bachelor’s degrees or higher (43.7% vs. 34.1%, p < 0.005).

Conclusions

In New York, medical cannabis services are least available in neighborhoods with Black residents and most available in urban neighborhoods with highly educated residents. Benefits of legal cannabis must be shared by communities disproportionately harmed by illegal cannabis.

Analysis of Risk Factors for High-Risk Patients Undergoing Total Joint Arthroplasty

Background

The purpose of this study is to evaluate and redefine patients at high risk for increased resource utilization and complications after total joint arthroplasty (TJA), so interventions may focus on patients standing to receive the most benefit.

Material and methods

This is a retrospective study of 787 patients undergoing primary unilateral TJA from September 1, 2020, to September 31, 2021. Patients were deemed to be at “high risk” based on criteria derived from published literature and triaged to an enhanced preoperative education program. Patients that were discharged to a skilled nursing facility, had a length of stay ≥ 2 days, returned to the emergency department, or readmitted within 30 days were classified as having a composite outcome. A univariate analysis compared patients who did and did not experience the composite outcome, and multivariate regression was performed to evaluate predictors of this endpoint.

Results

Differences in rates of 5 of the 28 risk factors were present between patients who did and did not experience composite outcomes. After controlling for other factors, African American race, planned discharge to skilled nursing facility, mental health conditions or drug use, cardiac, and neurologic conditions were predictive of the composite outcome. Patients who were reclassified as “high risk” with 1 or more of these characteristics, experienced longer length of stay and lower rates of home discharge than the rest of the population.

Conclusion

This study presents a profile of high-risk TJA patients that can be incorporated into clinical practice for risk stratification and targeted intervention.

Growing Racial Disparities in the Utilization of Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: An Analysis of Trends From 2004 to 2014

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess trends in utilization rates of adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery, as well as perioperative surgical metrics between Black and White patients undergoing operative treatment for ASD in the United States.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Racial disparities in access to care, complications, and surgical selection have been shown to exist in the field of spine surgery. However, there is a paucity of data concerning racial disparities in the management of ASD patients.

METHODS

Adult patients undergoing ASD surgery from 2004 to 2014 were identified in the nationwide inpatient sample (NIS). Utilization rates, major complications rates, and length of stay (LOS) for Black patients and White patients were trended over time. Utilization rates were reported per 1,000,000 people and determined using annual census data among subpopulations stratified by race. All reported complication rates and prolonged hospital stay rates are adjusted for Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, income quartile by zip code, and insurance payer status.

RESULTS

From 2004 to 2014, ASD utilization for Black patients increased from 24.0 to 50.9 per 1,000,000 people, whereas ASD utilization for White patients increased from 29.9 to 73.1 per 1,000,000 people, indicating a significant increase in racial disparities in ASD utilization (P-trend < 0.001). There were no significant differences in complication rates or rates of prolonged hospital stay between Black and White patients across the time period studied (P > 0.05 for both).

CONCLUSION

Although Black and White patients undergoing ASD surgery do not differ significantly in terms of postoperative complications and length of hospital stay, there is a growing disparity in utilization of ASD surgery between White and Black patients from 2004 to 2014 in the United States. There is need for continued focus on identifying ways to reduce racial disparities in surgical selection and perioperative management in spine deformity surgery.Level of Evidence: 3.

Race, Utilization, and Outcomes in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review on Health-Care Disparities

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown that utilization and outcomes of total joint arthroplasty (TJA) are not equivalent across different patient cohorts. This systematic review was designed to evaluate the currently available evidence regarding the effect that patient race has, if any, on utilization and outcomes of lower-extremity arthroplasty in the United States.

METHODS

A literature search of the MEDLINE database was performed using keywords such as "disparities," "arthroplasty," "race," "joint replacement," "hip," "knee," "inequities," "inequalities," "health," and "outcomes" in all possible combinations. All English-language studies with a level of evidence of I through IV published over the last 20 years were considered for inclusion. Quantitative and qualitative analyses were performed on the collected data.

RESULTS

A total of 82 articles were included. There was a significantly lower utilization rate of lower-extremity TJA among Black, Hispanic, and Asian patients compared with White patients (p < 0.05). Black and Hispanic patients had lower expectations regarding postoperative outcomes and their ability to participate in various activities after surgery, and they were less likely than White patients to be familiar with the arthroplasty procedure prior to presentation to the orthopaedic surgeon (p < 0.05). Black patients had increased risks of major complications, readmissions, revisions, and discharge to institutional care after TJA compared with White patients (p < 0.05). Hispanic patients had increased risks of complications (p < 0.05) and readmissions (p < 0.0001) after TJA compared with White patients. Black and Hispanic patients reached arthroplasty with poorer preoperative functional status, and all minority patients were more likely to undergo TJA at low-quality, low-volume hospitals compared with White patients (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review shows that lower-extremity arthroplasty utilization differs by racial/ethnic group, and that some of these differences may be partly explained by patient expectations, preferences, and cultural differences. This study also shows that outcomes after lower-extremity arthroplasty differ vastly by racial/ethnic group, and that some of these differences may be driven by differences in preoperative functional status and unequal access to care.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Time to Reflect and Take Action on Health Disparities and Health Inequities

The United States healthcare system underperforms in healthcare access, quality, and cost resulting in some of the poorest health outcomes among comparable countries, despite spending more of its gross national product on healthcare than any other country in the world. Within the United States, there are significant healthcare disparities based on race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, education level, sexual orientation, gender identity, and geographic location. COVID-19 has illuminated the racial disparities in health outcomes. This article provides an overview of some of the main concepts related to health disparities generally, and in orthopaedics specifically. It provides an introduction to health equity terminology, issues of bias and equity, and potential interventions to achieve equity and social justice by addressing commonly asked questions and then introduces the reader to persistent orthopaedic health disparities specific to total hip and total knee arthroplasty.

Patient selection in the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement model

OBJECTIVE

To understand whether the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) program induces participating hospitals to (1) preferentially select lower risk patients, (2) reduce 90-day episode-of-care costs, (3) improve quality of care, and (4) achieve greater cost reduction during its second year, when downside financial risk was applied.

DATA SOURCES

We identified beneficiaries of age 65 years or older undergoing hip or knee joint replacement in the 100% sample of Medicare fee-for-service inpatient (Part A) claims from January 1, 2013 to August 31, 2017. Cases were linked to subsequent outpatient, Part B, home health agency, and skilled nursing facility claims, as well as publicly available participation status for CJR.

STUDY DESIGN

We estimated the effect of CJR for hospitals in the 67 metropolitan statistical areas (MSA) selected to participate in CJR (785 hospitals), compared to those in 104 non-CJR MSAs (962 hospitals; maintaining fee-for-service). A difference-in-differences approach was used to detect patient selection, as well as to compare 90-day episode-of-care costs and quality of care between CJR and non-CJR hospitals over the first two performance years.

DATA COLLECTION

We excluded 172 hospitals from our analysis due to their preexisting BPCI participation. We focused on elective admissions in the main analysis.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

While reductions in 90-day episode-of-care costs were greater among CJR hospitals (-$902, 95% CI: -$1305, -$499), largely driven by a 16.8% (p < 0.01) decline in 90-day spending in skilled nursing facilities, CJR hospitals significantly reduced the 90-day readmission rate (-3.9%; p < 0.05) and preferentially avoided patients aged 85 years or older (-5.9%; p < 0.01) and Black (-7.0%; p < 0.01). Cost reduction was greater in 2017 than in 2016, corresponding to the start of downside risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Participation in CJR was associated with a modest cost reduction and a reduction in 90-day readmission rates; however, we also observed evidence of preferential avoidance of older patients perceived as being higher risk among CJR hospitals.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Hip Fracture Surgery Care in the United States From 2006 to 2015: A Nationwide Trends Study

BACKGROUND

Racial and ethnic disparities in the surgical treatment of hip fractures have been previously reported, demonstrating delayed time to surgery and worse perioperative outcomes for minority patients. However, data are lacking on how these disparities have trended over time and whether national efforts have succeeded in reducing them. The aim of this study was to investigate temporal trends in racial and ethnic disparities in perioperative metrics for patients undergoing hip fracture surgery in the United States from 2006 to 2015.

METHODS

The National Inpatient Sample was queried for White, Black, Hispanic, and Asian patients who underwent hip fracture surgery between 2006 and 2015. Perioperative metrics, including delayed time to surgery (≥2 calendar days from admission to surgical intervention), length of stay (LOS), total inpatient complications, and mortality, were trended over time. Changes in racial and ethnic disparities were assessed using linear and logistic regression models.

RESULTS

During the study period, there were persistent disparities in delayed time to surgery for White versus Black, Hispanic, and Asian patients (eg, White versus Black: 30.1% versus 39.7% in 2006 and 22% versus 28.8% in 2015, Ptrend> 0.05 for all). Although disparities in total LOS remained consistent for White versus Black patients (Ptrend= 0.97), these disparities improved for White versus Hispanic and Asian patients (eg, White versus Hispanic: 4.8 days versus 5.3 in 2006 and 4.1 days versus 4.4 in 2015, Ptrend < 0.05 for both).

DISCUSSION

Racial and ethnic disparities were persistent in time to surgery and discharge disposition for hip fracture surgery between White and minority patients from 2006 to 2015 in the United States. These disparities particularly affected Black patients. Although there were encouraging signs of improving disparities in the LOS, these findings highlight the need for renewed orthopaedic initiatives and healthcare reform policies aimed at reducing perioperative disparities in orthopaedic trauma care.

Racial and Gender Shoulder Arthroplasty Utilization Disparities of High- and Low-Volume Centers in New York State

Introduction

The literature has consistently demonstrated utilization disparities in joint replacement procedures, though no studies have evaluated disparities in total shoulder arthroplasty with regard to operative volume.

Methods

We queried the New York (NY) Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) database for 32 410 total shoulder arthroplasties performed between 2009 and 2017. Patients were identified using Clinical Classifications Software code 154 for Non-Hip/Knee Arthroplasty and All Patient Refined-Diagnosis Related Group code 322 for Shoulder. Racial groups included Hispanic, non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, and Other. High-volume centers were facilities that performed 2 standard deviations above the mean annual procedures. Utilization rates were calculated by dividing total shoulder arthroplasties per group by the 2010 NY Census population of that group. The Fisher exact test was used to determine significance.

Results

Total shoulder arthroplasty utilization increased from 43/100 000 to 73/100 000, two-thirds of which was driven by an increase in white resident utilization. More White residents per 100 000 underwent shoulder arthroplasty than Black, Hispanic, and Other residents per 100 000 residents of their respective race. White residents were 90% more likely than Hispanic residents to undergo total shoulder arthroplasty at high-volume centers (P = .04). There were no differences in utilization rate regarding operative volume comparing Black or Other residents to White residents. More females underwent total shoulder arthroplasty than males, though there was no difference in utilization rate regarding operative volume.

Conclusion

Though total shoulder arthroplasty utilization nearly doubled, disparities persisted across gender and minority groups particularly in Hispanic utilization as White residents were 90% more likely than Hispanic residents to undergo shoulder arthroplasty at high-volume centers.

Racial Disparities in the Utilization of Shoulder Arthroplasty in the United States

As the incidence of shoulder arthroplasty rises at exponential rates, race is an important consideration, as racial disparities have been reported in lower-extremity arthroplasty in the United States. Our study sought to examine these disparities.

Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities in the Utilization of TKA Among Patients with Posttraumatic Knee Osteoarthritis

Advanced posttraumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA) of the knee is a cause of substantial disability, particularly in younger individuals, and the treatment of choice is total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Racial and socioeconomic disparities exist in the use of TKA, but, to our knowledge, there have been no studies examining these disparities among patients with PTOA.

Do Disparities in Wait Times to Operative Fixation for Pathologic Fractures of the Long Bones and 30-day Complications Exist Between Black and White Patients? A Study Using the NSQIP Database

BACKGROUND

Racial disparities in outcomes after orthopaedic surgery have been well-documented in the fields of arthroplasty, trauma, and spine surgery; however, little research has assessed differences in outcomes after surgery for oncologic musculoskeletal disease. If racial disparities exist in the treatment of patients with pathologic long bone fractures, then they should be identified and addressed to promote equity in patient care.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) How do wait times between hospital admission and operative fixation for pathologic fractures of long bones differ between Black and non-Hispanic white patients, after controlling for confounding variables using propensity score matching? (2) How does the proportion of patients with 30-day postoperative complication differ between these groups after controlling for confounding variables using propensity score matching?

METHODS

Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, we analyzed 828 patients who underwent fixation for pathologic fractures from 2012 to 2018. This database not only provides a large enough sample of pathologic long bone fracture patients to conduct the present study, but also it contains variables such as time from hospitalization to surgery that other national databases do not. After excluding patients with incomplete data (4% of the initial cohort), 775 patients were grouped by self-reported race as Black (12% [94]) or white (88% [681]). Propensity score matching using a 1:1 nearest-neighbor match was then used to match 94 Black patients with 94 white patients according to age, gender, BMI, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification, anemia, endstage renal disease, independence in performing activities of daily living, congestive heart failure, and pulmonary disease. The primary outcome of interest was the number of days between hospital admission and operative fixation, which we assessed using a Poisson regression and report as an incidence risk ratio. The secondary outcomes were the occurrences of major 30-day postoperative adverse events (failure to wean off mechanical ventilation, cerebrovascular events, renal failure, cardiovascular events, reoperation, death), minor 30-day adverse events (reintubation, wound complications, pneumonia, and thromboembolic events), and any 30-day adverse events (defined as the pooling of all adverse events, including readmissions). These outcomes were analyzed using a bivariate analysis and logistic regression with robust estimates of variance and are reported as odds ratios. Because any results on disparities rely on rigorous control of other baseline demographics, we performed this multivariable approach to ensure we were controlling for confounding variables as much as possible.

RESULTS

After controlling for potentially confounding variables such as age and gender, we found that Black patients had a longer mean wait time (incidence risk ratio 1.5 [95% CI 1.1 to 2.1]; p = 0.01) than white patients. After controlling for confounding variables, Black patients also had greater odds of having any postoperative adverse event (OR 2.1 [95% CI 1.1 to 3.8]; p = 0.02), including readmission (OR 3.3 [95% CI 1.5 to 7.6]; p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

The racial disparities in pathologic long bone fracture care found in our study may be attributed to fundamental racial biases, as well as systemic socioeconomic disparities in the US healthcare system. Identifying and eliminating the racial, socioeconomic, and sociocultural biases that drive these disparities would improve care for patients with orthopaedic oncologic conditions. One possible way to reduce these disparities would be to implement standardized surgical care pathways for pathological long bone fractures across different institutions to minimize variation in important aspects of care, such as time to surgical fixation. Further insight is needed on the types of standardized care pathways and the implementation mechanisms that are most effective.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Reporting and Analyzing Demographics in the Journal of Arthroplasty: Are We Making Progress?

BACKGROUND

Demographic factors, including age, sex, body mass index (BMI), race, and ethnicity have great effects on the outcomes of patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty. A portion of this data is included in nearly every study, but the completeness with which it is reported is variable. The purpose of this study is to investigate the frequency at which demographic information is reported and analyzed through formal statistical methods in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in the Journal of Arthroplasty (JOA).

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted of RCTs published in JOA between 2015 and 2019. For each study, we determined if age, sex, weight, height, BMI, race, and ethnicity were reported and/or analyzed. The overall frequency was assessed, along with the rates of reporting by individual year. Studies were evaluated using Cochrane risk-of-bias tool.

RESULTS

Age (96.7%), sex (96.7%), and BMI (80.4%) were reported by the majority of studies. There was very little information provided regarding race (6.2%) and ethnicity (3.8%); although both were reported at the highest frequency in 2019, the final year of articles reviewed. Sex was the most frequently analyzed variable at 11.5%. Only 1 study (0.5%) analyzed ethnicity and no studies analyzed race.

CONCLUSION

Although age, sex, and BMI are reported at a high rate, RCTs published in JOA rarely reported information on patient race and ethnicity. Demographics were infrequently included as part of statistical analysis. The importance of this information should be recognized and included in the analysis and interpretation of future studies.

Regional Implicit Bias Does Not Account for Racial Disparity in Total Joint Arthroplasty Utilization

BACKGROUND

Racial disparities surrounding the utilization of total hip and total knee arthroplasty (THA, TKA) are well documented. The Implicit Association Test (IAT) is a validated tool used to measure implicit and explicit bias. The purpose of this study is to evaluate if variations in IAT scores by geographical region in the United States (US) correspond with regional variations in THA and TKA utilization by blacks compared to whites.

METHODS

Data from the US Census and National Inpatient Sample from 2012 to 2014 were used to calculate THA and TKA utilization rates among Medicare-aged blacks and whites. Data were aggregated by US Census Bureau Division. Regional implicit bias was assessed by calculating a weighted average of IAT scores for each division.

RESULTS

Across all geographic regions and years, the surveyed population demonstrated an implicit bias favoring whites over blacks. The population adjusted ratio of white-to-black utilization of THA and TKA by geographic division varied between 0.86-1.85 and 0.87-2.01, respectively. The difference in utilization between geographic divisions reached statistical significance (P < .001). No correlation was found between the IAT scores and race-specific utilization ratios among geographic divisions.

CONCLUSION

Implicit bias as measured by regional IAT did not reflect THA and TKA utilization disparities. The racial disparity in utilization of THA and TKA significantly varied between divisions. The observed disparity was greater in divisions with a relatively higher proportion of blacks. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the impact of implicit bias on utilization of THA and TKA.

Racial Disparities in Total Joint Arthroplasty

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The primary aim of this review was to evaluate recently published total joint arthroplasty (TJA) studies in order to accurately summarize the current concepts regarding racial and ethnic disparities in total joint arthroplasty.

RECENT FINDINGS

Many studies found that racial and ethnic disparities in TJA are present in all phases of arthroplasty care including access to, utilization of, and postoperative outcomes after TJA. Factors that limit patient access to TJA-increased patient comorbidities, lower socioeconomic status, and Medicaid/uninsured status-are also disproportionately associated with underrepresented patient populations. Minority patients are more likely to require more intensive postoperative rehabilitation and non-home discharge placement. This in turn potentially adds additional concerns regarding hospital/provider reimbursement in light of the current Medicare/Medicaid model for arthroplasty surgeons, thus creating a recurrent cycle in which disparities in TJA reflect the complex interplay of overall health disparities and access inequalities associated with racial and ethnic biases. Literature demonstrating evidenced-based interventions to minimize these disparities is sparse, but the multifactorial cause of disparities in TJA highlights the need for multifaceted solutions on both a systemic and individual level.

Worsening racial disparities in patients undergoing anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in the United States

BACKGROUND

The most comprehensive health care policy changes aimed at reducing racial disparities were implemented in 2011 and continue today. It is unknown if these initiatives have led to a decrease in racial differences among patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this study is to examine racial differences in procedural rates, complications, and mortality in patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty.

METHODS

National rates of utilization of primary anatomic (TSA) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) were analyzed from 2012 to 2017. Population-adjusted and gender-adjusted procedural rates were trended over time and standardized based on insurance status. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine racial differences in complications and mortality.

RESULTS

In 2012, the incidence of TSA and RTSA among white patients was 18.7/100,000 compared to 5.1/100,000 among black patients (difference: 13.6/100,000) and increased to 36.9/100,000 in white patients and 10.8/100,000 in black patients in 2017 (difference: 26.1/100,000). This equated to an increase in the race disparity by 12.5/100,000 over the study period. Blacks underwent lower rates of TSA and RTSA than whites regardless of insurance status. Black patients had a longer length of hospital stay and a higher rate of discharge to facility. Black patients had increased odds of complications, including acute myocardial infarction (odds ratio [OR] 1.43), pulmonary embolism (OR 1.97), acute renal failure (OR 1.40), sepsis (OR 1.68), and surgical site infection (OR 2.19). Black patients had increased odds of mortality compared with white patients (OR 2.88).

CONCLUSION

Racial disparities in patients undergoing TSA and RTSA are worsening over time. Black patients undergo TSA and RTSA at lower rates than white patients regardless of insurance status and have increased odds of complications and mortality. Improved initiatives are needed to reduce these racial disparities and further research is warranted to understand their root causes.

The Impact of Race and Socioeconomic Status on Total Joint Arthroplasty Care

BACKGROUND

Racial minorities and patients from lower socioeconomic backgrounds are less likely to undergo total joint arthroplasty (TJA) for degenerative joint disease (DJD). However, when these patients do present for care, little is known about the overall severity of DJD and surgical wait times.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort of 407 patients (131 black and 276 white) who presented to an arthroplasty clinic and went on to receive TJA was established. Severity of osteoarthritis was assessed radiographically via Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade. Preoperative Knee Society Score (KSS) and Harris Hip Score (HHS) were used to measure joint pain and function. Multivariate regression modeling and analysis of covariance were used to examine racial and socioeconomic differences in KL grade, KSS, HHS, and time to surgery.

RESULTS

Black patients presented with significantly greater KL scores than white patients (P = .046, odds ratio = 1.65, 95% confidence interval [1.01, 2.70]). In contrast, there were no statistically significant racial differences in the mean preoperative KSS (P = .61) or HHS (P = .69). Black patients were also found to wait, on average, 35% longer for TJA (P = .03, hazard ratio = 1.35, 95% confidence interval [1.04, 1.75]). Low income was associated with higher KL grade (P = .002), lower KSS (P = .07), and lower HHS (P = .001).

CONCLUSION

Despite presenting with more advanced osteoarthritis, black patients reported similar levels of joint dysfunction and had longer surgical wait times when compared with white patients. Lower socioeconomic status was similarly associated with more severe DJD.

Temporal Trends in Revision Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty from 2008 to 2018: Gaps and Opportunities

BACKGROUND

An overall assessment of how patient demographic characteristics and comorbidities are improving or worsening can allow better understanding of the value of revision total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Therefore, the purpose of this study was to identify patient demographic characteristics and comorbidities trends and episode-of-care outcome trends from 2008 to 2018 in patients undergoing revision TJA.

METHODS

The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried to identify patient demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and episode-of-care outcomes in patients undergoing revision TJA from 2008 to 2018 (n = 45,706). Pairwise t tests and pairwise chi-square tests were performed on consecutive years with Bonferroni correction. Trends were assessed using the 2-tailed Mann-Kendall test of the temporal trend.

RESULTS

Among patients undergoing revision TJA, there was no clinically important difference, from 2008 to 2018, in age, body mass index (BMI), percentages with >40 kg/m2 BMI, diabetes (18.8% to 19%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (4.1% to 5.4%), congestive heart failure within 30 days (0% to 1%), or acute renal failure (0% to 0.2%). However, modifiable comorbidities including smoking status (14.7% to 12.0%; p = 0.01), hypertension (66% to 26.0%; p = 0.02), anemia (34.5% to 26.3%; p < 0.001), malnutrition (10.4% to 9.3%; p = 0.004), and overall morbidity or mortality probability have improved, with a decrease in the hospital length of stay and 30-day readmission and a significant increase in home discharge (p < 0.001 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

Time-difference analysis demonstrated that the overall health status of patients undergoing revision TJA improved from 2008 to 2018. However, formal time-trend analysis demonstrated improvements to a lesser degree. The multidisciplinary effort to improve value-based metrics including patient comorbidity optimization and episode-of-care outcomes for primary TJA has been shown to potentially have an impact on revision TJA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

To be mindful of the breath or pain: Comparing two brief preoperative mindfulness techniques for total joint arthroplasty patients

OBJECTIVE

Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) often reduces pain and improves function, but it is also a risk factor for the development of chronic pain and postoperative opioid use. To protect against these untoward postsurgical outcomes, TJA patients need better, non-pharmacological pain management strategies. This study compared two, promising, mindfulness-based pain management techniques.

METHOD

We conducted a single-site, three-arm, parallel-group randomized controlled study conducted at an orthopedic clinic among patients undergoing TJA of the knee or hip. TJA patients (N = 118, M age = 65, female = 73, Caucasian = 110) were randomized to either a preoperative mindfulness of breath (MoB), mindfulness of pain (MoP), or cognitive-behavioral pain psychoeducation (CB) intervention, approximately 3 weeks before surgery. Each intervention was delivered in a single, 20-min session during a 2-hr, preoperative education program. Change in pain intensity was the sole preoperative outcome. The postoperative outcomes, pain intensity, pain interference, and opioid use were assessed on the 2nd, 3rd, 7th, 14th, 21st, and 28th postoperative days.

RESULTS

MoB was found to most effectively decrease preoperative pain scores, F(2, 89) = 5.28, p = .007, while MoP resulted in the least amount of postoperative pain intensity, F(8, 94) = 3.21, p = .003, and interference, F(8, 94) = 2.52, p = .016). Both MoB and MoP decreased postoperative opioid use relative to CB, F(8, 83) = 16.66, p < .001.

CONCLUSION

A brief preoperative MBI may be able to prevent both postoperative pain and opioid use. Moreover, the MBIs used in this study are highly feasible, capable of being delivered by nearly any healthcare provider, and requiring minimal clinic time given their brevity. As such, embedding MBIs in surgical care pathways has considerable potential. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Comorbidity Burden Contributing to Racial Disparities in Outpatient Versus Inpatient Total Knee Arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Outpatient total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is increasingly common in the setting of early-recovery protocols, value-based care, and removal from the inpatient-only list by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Given the established racial disparities that exist in different aspects of total joint arthroplasty, we aimed to investigate whether racial and ethnic disparities exist in outpatient compared with inpatient TKA.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. We queried TKAs done in 2018. Demographics, inpatient (≥2 midnights) versus outpatient (≤1 midnight) status, comorbidities, and perioperative events/complications were recorded. We analyzed differences between racial/ethnic groups and predictors of inpatient versus outpatient surgery, and outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 54,582 patients were included (83.2% Caucasian, 9.2% African American [AA], 4.5% Hispanic, 2.4% Asian, and 0.6% Native American). AA had the highest mean body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, and comorbidity burden. AA had the lowest rate of outpatient TKA (18.3%) and Asians the highest rate of outpatient TKA (31.4%, P < 0.0001). AA had the highest postoperative transfusion rate (1.8%, P < 0.0001) and highest rate of discharge to acute rehab (8.4%). Asians had the highest rate of postoperative cardiac arrest and urinary tract infection. AA had the highest rate of acute kidney injury within 30 days. Regression analyses revealed that AAs were more likely to undergo inpatient surgery (odds ratio [OR], 2.58; confidence interval [CI], 1.57-4.23; P = 0.001) and discharge to rehab/skilled nursing facility [SNF] (OR, 2.86; CI, 1.66-4.92; P = 0.001). Asian patients were more likely to undergo outpatient surgery (OR, 2.48, CI, 1.47-4.18, P = 0.001) and discharged to rehab/SNF (OR, 2.41, CI, 1.36-4.25, P = 0.001). Caucasians were more likely to undergo outpatient surgery (OR, 1.62, CI, 1.34-1.97, P = 0.001) and less likely discharged to rehab/SNF (OR, 0.73, CI, 0.60-0.88, P = 0.001). When controlling for comorbidities, race was not an independent risk factor for 30-day complications or inpatient versus outpatient surgery.

DISCUSSION

Differences in indications for outpatient TKA between races/ethnicities seem to be highly associated with comorbidity burden and preoperative baseline differences, not race alone. Appropriate patient optimization for either outpatient or inpatient TKA may reduce disparities between groups in either care setting.

Editorial Commentary: Fixing Health Care Requires Us to Evaluate Policy Through an Ethical and Societal (And Not Just a Financial) Lens

Health care systems globally, including in the United States, continue to undergo a much-needed transformation focused on optimizing value-or health outcomes per dollar spent across a full cycle of care-for patients. Given the traditionally high cost and use of orthopaedic surgery services, the field is ripe for in-depth assessment and comparison of interventions to ensure that evidence-based, high-value care is prioritized. Cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs) provide an important framework from which to begin effective policy discussions, and a recent study suggests that current orthopaedic economic literature is of high quality. However, the same study demonstrated that no authors published CEAs that also provided commentary on how their work can actually guide policy decisions. Furthermore, the ethical implications of their research or insight into the larger consequences of their findings within and outside the health care sector was not discussed. We must be better at "connecting the dots" between CEAs and value-based health care research and practical policy initiatives while also considering how such proposals promote health equity and address systemic injustices currently found in our health care system.

Association of the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement Model With Disparities in the Use of Total Hip and Total Knee Replacement

Importance

The Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) model is Medicare's mandatory bundled payment reform to improve quality and spending for beneficiaries who need total hip replacement (THR) or total knee replacement (TKR), yet it does not account for sociodemographic risk factors such as race/ethnicity and income. Results of this study could be the basis for a Medicare payment reform that addresses inequities in joint replacement care.

Objective

To examine the association of the CJR model with racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in the use of elective THR and TKR among older Medicare beneficiaries after accounting for the population of patients who were at risk or eligible for these surgical procedures.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study used the 2013 to 2017 national Medicare data and multivariable logistic regressions with triple-differences estimation. Medicare beneficiaries who were aged 65 to 99 years, entitled to Medicare, alive at the end of the calendar year, and residing either in the 67 metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) mandated to participate in the CJR model or in the 104 control MSAs were identified. A subset of Medicare beneficiaries with a diagnosis of arthritis underwent THR or TKR. Data were analyzed from March to December 2020.

Exposures

Implementation of the CJR model in 2016.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Outcomes were separate binary indicators for whether a beneficiary underwent THR or TKR. Key independent variables were MSA treatment status, pre- or post-CJR model implementation phase, combination of race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, and Hispanic beneficiaries) and dual eligibility, and their interactions. Logistic regression models were used to control for patient characteristics, MSA fixed effects, and time trends.

Results

The 2013 cohort included 4 447 205 Medicare beneficiaries, of which 2 025 357 (45.5%) resided in MSAs with the CJR model. The cohort's mean (SD) age was 77.18 (7.95) years, and it was composed of 2 951 140 female (66.4%), 3 928 432 non-Hispanic White (88.3%), and 657 073 dually eligible (14.8%) beneficiaries. Before the CJR model implementation, rates were highest among non-Hispanic White non-dual-eligible beneficiaries at 1.25% (95% CI, 1.24%-1.26%) for THR use and 2.28% (95% CI, 2.26%-2.29%) for TKR use in MSAs with CJR model. Compared with MSAs without the CJR model and the analogous race/ethnicity and dual-eligibility group, the CJR model was associated with a 0.10 (95% CI, 0.05-0.15; P < .001) percentage-point increase in TKR use for non-Hispanic White non-dual-eligible beneficiaries, a 0.11 (95% CI, 0.004-0.21; P = .04) percentage-point increase for non-Hispanic White dual-eligible beneficiaries, a 0.15 (95% CI, -0.29 to -0.01; P = .04) percentage-point decrease for non-Hispanic Black non-dual-eligible beneficiaries, and a 0.18 (95% CI, -0.34 to -0.01; P = .03) percentage-point decrease for non-Hispanic Black dual-eligible beneficiaries. These CJR model-associated changes in TKR use were 0.25 (95% CI, -0.40 to -0.10; P = .001) percentage points lower for non-Hispanic Black non-dual-eligible beneficiaries and 0.27 (95% CI, -0.45 to -0.10; P = .002) percentage points lower for non-Hispanic Black dual-eligible beneficiaries compared with the model-associated changes for non-Hispanic White non-dual-eligible beneficiaries. No association was found between the CJR model and a widening of the THR use gap among race/ethnicity and dual eligibility groups.

Conclusions and Relevance

Results of this study indicate that the CJR model was associated with a modest increase in the already substantial difference in TKR use among non-Hispanic Black vs non-Hispanic White beneficiaries; no difference was found for THR. These findings support the widespread concern that payment reform has the potential to exacerbate disparities in access to joint replacement care.

Perception of Risk: A Poll of American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons Members

BACKGROUND

Providers of total hip and knee replacements are being judged regarding quality/cost by payers using competition-based performance measures with poor medical and no socioeconomic risk adjustment. Providers might assume that other providers shed risk and the perception of added risk can influence practice. A poll was collected to examine such perceptions.

METHODS

In 2019 a poll was sent to the 2800 surgeon members of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons using Survey Monkey while protecting respondent anonymity/confidentiality. The questions asked whether the perception of poorly risk-adjusted medical comorbidities and socioeconomic risk factors influence surgeons to selectively offer surgery.

RESULTS

There were 474 surgeon responses. Prior to elective total hip arthroplasty/total knee arthroplasty, 95% address modifiable risk factors; 52% require a body mass index <40, 64% smoking cessation, 96% an adequate hemoglobin A1C; 82% check nutrition; and 63% expect control of alcohol 2. Due to lack of socioeconomic risk adjustment, 83% reported feeling pressure to avoid/restrict access to patients with limited social support, specifically the following: Medicaid/underinsured, 81%; African Americans, 29%; Hispanics/ethnicities, 27%; and low socioeconomic status, 73%. Of the respondents, 93% predicted increased access to care with more appropriate risk adjustment.

CONCLUSION

Competition-based quality/cost performance measures influence surgeons to focus on medical risk factors in offering lower extremity arthroplasty. The lack of socioeconomic risk adjustment leads to perceptions of added risk from such factors as well. This leads to marginal loss of access for patients within certain medical and socioeconomic classes, contributing to existing healthcare disparities. This represents an unintended consequence of competition-based performance measures.

Racial Disparities in the Use of Surgical Procedures in the US

Importance

The largest US federal action plan to date for reducing racial disparities in health care was implemented in 2011 and continues today. It is not known whether this program, along with other initiatives, is associated with a decrease in racial disparities in the use of major surgical procedures in the US.

Objective

To analyze whether national initiatives are associated with improvement in racial disparities between White and Black patients in the use of surgical procedures in the US.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this case-control study, the national rates of use for 9 major surgical procedures previously shown to have racial disparities in rates of performance between White and Black adult patients (including angioplasty, spinal fusion, carotid endarterectomy, appendectomy, colorectal resection, coronary artery bypass grafting, total hip arthroplasty, total knee arthroplasty, and heart valve replacement) were analyzed from January 1, 2012, through December 31, 2017. Data analysis was conducted from May 1 to June 30, 2020. Population- and sex-adjusted procedural rates during the study period were examined and standardized based on all-payer insurance status. Racial changes were further analyzed by US census division and hospital teaching status for 4 selected procedures: coronary artery bypass grafting, carotid endarterectomy, total hip arthroplasty, and heart valve replacement.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Population- and race-adjusted procedural rates by year, US census division, hospital teaching status, and insurance status.

Results

This study included national inpatient data from 2012 to 2017. In 2012, the national incidence rate of all 9 major surgical procedures was higher in White than in Black individuals. For example, the incidence rate of total knee arthroplasty in 2012 for White males was 184.8 per 100 000 persons and for Black males was 79.8 per 100 000 persons. By 2017, these racial disparities persisted for all 9 procedures analyzed. For example, the incidence rate of total knee arthroplasty in 2017 for White males was 220.5 per 100 000 persons and for Black males was 95.6 per 100 000 persons. Although the disparity gap between White and Black patients narrowed for angioplasty (-20.1 per 100 000 persons in males, -4.2 per 100 000 persons in females), spinal fusion (-7.7 per 100 000 persons in males, -15.0 per 100 000 persons in females), carotid endarterectomy (-4.3 per 100 000 persons in males, -4.6 per 100 000 persons in females), appendectomy (-12.3 per 100 000 persons in males, -12.2 per 100 000 persons in females), and colorectal resection (-9.0 per 100 000 persons in males, -12.7 per 100 000 persons in females), the disparity remained constant for coronary artery bypass grafting and widened for 3 procedures, total hip arthroplasty (11.6 per 100 000 persons in males, 20.8 per 100 000 in females), total knee arthroplasty (19.9 per 100 000 persons in males, 12.0 per 100 000 persons in females), and heart valve replacement(12.4 per 100 000 persons in males, 9.2 per 100 000 persons in females). In 2017, racial differences persisted in all US census divisions and in both urban teaching and urban nonteaching hospitals. When rates were adjusted based on insurance status, Black patients with Medicare, Medicaid, and private insurance underwent lower rates of all procedures analyzed compared with White patients. For example, rate of spinal fusion in Black patients was 70.2% of the rate in White patients with Medicare, 56.5% to that of White patients with Medicaid, and 61.2% to that of White patients with private insurance.

Conclusions and Relevance

Results of this study suggest that despite national initiatives, racial disparities have persisted for all analyzed procedures and worsened for one-third of the analyzed procedures. These disparities were evident regardless of US census division, hospital teaching status, or insurance status. Renewed initiatives to help diminish racial disparities and improve health care equality are warranted.

Is Geographic Socioeconomic Disadvantage Associated with the Rate of THA in Medicare-aged Patients?

BACKGROUND

Disparities in THA use may lead to inequitable care. Prior research has focused on disparities based on individual-level and isolated socioeconomic and demographic variables. To our knowledge, the role of composite, community-level geographic socioeconomic disadvantage has not been studied in the United States. As disparities persist, exploring the potential underlying drivers of these inequities may help in developing more targeted recommendations on how to achieve equitable THA use.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Is geographic socioeconomic disadvantage associated with decreased THA rates in Medicare-aged patients? (2) Do these associations persist after adjusting for differences in gender, race, ethnicity, and proximity to hospitals performing THA?

METHODS

In a study with a cross-sectional design, using population-based data from five-digit ZIP codes in Maryland, USA, from July 1, 2012 to March 31, 2019, we included all inpatient and outpatient primary THAs performed in individuals 65 years of age or older at acute-care hospitals in Maryland, as reported in the Health Services Cost Review Commission database. This database was selected because it provided the five-digit ZIP code data necessary to answer our study question. We excluded THAs performed for nonelective indications. We examined the annual rate of THA in our study population for each Maryland ZIP code, adjusted for differences across areas in distributions of gender, race, ethnicity, and distance to the nearest hospital performing THAs. Four hundred fourteen ZIP codes were included, with an overall mean ± SD THA rate of 371 ± 243 per 100,000 persons 65 years or older, a rate similar to that previously reported in individuals aged 65 to 84 in the United States. Statistical significance was assessed at α = 0.05.

RESULTS

THA rates were higher in more affluent areas, with the following mean rates per 100,000 persons 65 years or older: 422 ± 259 in the least socioeconomically disadvantaged quartile, 339 ± 223 in the second-least disadvantaged, 277 ± 179 in the second-most disadvantaged, and 214 ± 179 in the most-disadvantaged quartile (p < 0.001). After adjustment for distributions in gender, race, ethnicity, and hospital proximity, we found that geographic socioeconomic disadvantage was still associated with THA rate. Compared with the least-disadvantaged quartile, the second-least disadvantaged quartile had 63 fewer THAs per 100,000 people (95% confidence interval 12 to 114), the second-most disadvantaged quartile had 136 fewer THAs (95% CI 62 to 211), and the most-disadvantaged quartile had 183 fewer THAs (95% CI 41 to 325).

CONCLUSION

Geographic socioeconomic disadvantage may be the underlying driver of disparities in THA use. Although our study does not determine the "correct" rate of THA, our findings support increasing access to elective orthopaedic surgery in disadvantaged geographic communities, compared with prior research and efforts that have studied and intervened on the basis of isolated factors such as race and gender. Increasing access to orthopaedic surgeons in disadvantaged neighborhoods, educating physicians about when surgical referral is appropriate, and educating patients from these geographic communities about the risks and benefits of THA may improve equitable orthopaedic care across neighborhoods. Future studies should explore disparities in rates of appropriate THA and the role of density of orthopaedic surgeons in an area.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Racial/Ethnic and Socioeconomic Disparities in Osteoarthritis Management

This article reviews the literature on racial and socioeconomic disparities in the management of osteoarthritis. Treatments investigated include arthritis education, dietary weight management, exercise/physical therapy, pharmacologic therapy with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and opioids, intra-articular steroid injections, and total joint replacement. The amount of evidence for each treatment modality varied, with the most evidence available for racial and socioeconomic disparities in total joint arthroplasty. Black patients, Hispanic patients, and patients with low socioeconomic status (SES) are less likely to undergo total joint replacement than white patients or patients with high SES, and generally have worse functional outcomes and more complications.

African American Patients Have Improved Functional Gains and Comparable Clinical Outcomes to Caucasian Patients After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

With the increasing popularity of alternative payment models, minorities who use more postacute care resources may face difficulties with access to quality total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) care. The purpose of this study is to compare differences in perioperative complications and functional outcomes between African American and Caucasian patients undergoing THA and TKA.

METHODS

We reviewed a consecutive series of all primary THA and TKA patients at our institution from 2015 to 2018. Demographics, comorbidities, 90-day complications, readmissions, Veterans Rand 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12), Hip disability Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (KOOS) were compared between African American and Caucasian patients. A multivariate analysis was performed to control for confounding variables.

RESULTS

Of the 5284 patients included in the study, 1041 were African American (24.5%). Although African American patients had lower preoperative HOOS/KOOS (33.5 vs 45.1, P < .001) and mental VR-12 scores (37.8 vs 51.5, P < .001) compared with Caucasian patients, there was no clinical difference at 1 year in HOOS/KOOS (50.2 vs 50.4), mental VR-12 (55.0 vs 52.6), or physical VR-12 scores (39.5 vs 39.8). When controlling for demographics and medical comorbidities, African American race was associated with increased rehabilitation facility discharge (odds ratio, 1.69; P < .001) but no difference in readmissions or complications.

CONCLUSION

Although African American patients had lower preoperative functional scores, they made improved postoperative gains when compared with Caucasian patients. Although there was no difference in postoperative complications, further studies should assess social causes for the increase in rehabilitation utilization rates in minority patients.

Disparities in Health Care for Black Patients in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation in the United States: A Narrative Review

Racial health disparities continue to disproportionately affect Black persons in the United States. Black individuals also have increased risk of worse outcomes associated with social determinants of health including socioeconomic factors such as income, education, and employment. This narrative review included studies originally spanning a period of approximately one decade (December 2009-December 2019) from online databases and with subsequent updates though June 2020. The findings to date suggest pervasive inequities across common conditions and injuries in physical medicine and rehabilitation for this group compared to other racial/ethnic groups. We found health disparities across several domains for Black persons with stroke, traumatic brain injury, spinal cord injury, hip/knee osteoarthritis, and fractures, as well as cardiovascular and pulmonary disease. Although more research is needed, some contributing factors include low access to rehabilitation care, fewer referrals, lower utilization rates, perceived bias, and more self-reliance, even after adjusting for hospital characteristics, age, disease severity, and relevant socioeconomic variables. Some studies found that Black individuals were less likely to receive care that was concordant with clinical guidelines per the reported literature. Our review highlights many gaps in the literature on racial disparities that are particularly notable in cardiac, pulmonary, and critical care rehabilitation. Clinicians, researchers, and policy makers should therefore consider race and ethnicity as important factors as we strive to optimize rehabilitation care for an increasingly diverse U.S. population.

Where Do We Stand Today on Racial and Ethnic Health Inequities? Analysis of Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty from a 2011-2017 National Database

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to present contemporary national data on the state of racial and ethnic disparities pertaining to primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in the USA.

METHODS

The 2011-2017 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was used to capture all patients who underwent primary TKA. The study outcomes were differences in demographic, comorbidity burden, perioperative factors, procedure utilization, hospital length of stay (LOS), and 30-day outcomes. The five major minority groups as defined by the National Institutes of Health were compared to non-Hispanic Whites.

RESULTS

In total, 262,954 patient records were analyzed, with racial identification available on 230,712 patients (87.7%). White patients accounted for 72.5% of all TKA procedures. There were higher rates of diabetes, hypertension, anemia, and prolonged surgery times among racial and ethnic minorities (p < 0.001). Baseline disparities were especially pronounced among non-Hispanic Blacks/African Americans who were also like to have higher rates of tobacco smoking and CHF (p < 0.001). After controlling for baseline differences, significant disparities in outcomes persisted, especially among Blacks/African Americans and Hispanics/Latinos who had higher odds for experiencing complications and readmissions (p < 0.001). All racial and ethnic groups, except Asians, had longer LOS (p < 0.001). Asian patients had significantly lower rates of readmissions, reoperations, and overall complications (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Racial and ethnic disparities remain a public health challenge for patients undergoing TKA. While initiatives aimed at improving preoperative disease-burden and comorbidity profiles represent an important step, they alone are insufficient to fully account for or eliminate the disparities in TKA outcomes.