Knee injury outcomes measures

Is triaxial accelerometer reliable in the evaluation and grading of knee pivot-shift phenomenon?

PURPOSE

Dynamic laxity is clinically demonstrated with the pivot-shift (PS) test. Recently, a new system that measures the acceleration of the tibia during the PS test was validated. The goal of the present study was to use the accelerometer "KiRA" to evaluate the efficacy of measuring PS.

METHODS

Between 2010 and 2011, a total of 100 patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) lesions were enrolled. They underwent surgical reconstruction of the ACL. Among them, 30 patients were re-evaluated at least 6 months after surgery. Each patient underwent a clinical examination (Lachman test, anterior drawer test, and PS test) and then was subjected to an instrumental examination: KT1000 evaluation to quantify the Lachman test and KiRA to quantify the PS test.

RESULTS

The accelerometer found a positive acceleration difference in favour of the pathologic knee. In the 100 patients evaluated preoperatively, the analysed acceleration parameters on the pathologic knee were found to be significantly different with respect to the contralateral joint. Correlating the clinical subjective data with numerical data, we identified mean reference values for every grade of the PS test (negative, glide, and clunk).

CONCLUSION

Our experience showed us that the use of KiRA accelerometer for quantitative measurement of the PS is both promising and reliable. The efficacy of this instrument is strictly related to an inevitable learning curve and to proper execution of the test. It has the value of being easy to set up and easy to use in both the clinic and the operating room.

Development of a computer-adaptive version of the forgotten joint score

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are an important endpoint in orthopedics providing comprehensive information about patients' perspectives on treatment outcome. Computer-adaptive test (CAT) measures are an advanced method for assessing PROs using item sets that are tailored to the individual patient. This provides increased measurement precision and reduces the number of items. We developed a CAT version of the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), a measure of joint awareness in everyday life. CAT development was based on FJS data from 580 patients after THA or TKA (808 assessments). The CAT version reduced the number of items by half at comparable measurement precision. In a feasibility study we administered the newly developed CAT measure on tablet PCs and found that patients actually preferred electronic questionnaires over paper-pencil questionnaires.

Normative values for the KOOS and WOMAC in a young athletic population: history of knee ligament injury is associated with lower scores

BACKGROUND

The use of patient-reported outcome measures to assess clinical outcomes after injury and surgery has become common in treating young athletes with orthopaedic injuries; however, normative data for these measures are limited and often include a wide range of ages and activity levels.

PURPOSE

To provide normative data for the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) in a young and athletic population, and to compare scores between participants with a history of knee ligament injury and those with no history.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

We administered the KOOS and WOMAC to 1177 college freshmen entering the United States Military Academy in June 2011. All participants were healthy and had been medically screened to meet the physical induction standards for military service. We calculated means, standard deviations, percentiles, ranges, and interquartile ranges for the KOOS and WOMAC by sex and injury history. We also compared median scale scores for those with a history of knee ligament injury with those with no history using the Kruskal-Wallis test.

RESULTS

Among the 1177 participants, 971 were male (age, 18.8 ± 0.9 years), and the remaining 206 were female (age, 18.7 ± 0.8 years). Normative median values and interquartile ranges (IQRs) for the KOOS scale scores among men with no history of knee ligament injury were the following: Symptoms (96.4; IQR, 10.7), Pain (100; IQR, 2.8), Functional Activities of Daily Living (ADL) (100; IQR, 0.0), Sports and Recreation Function (100; IQR, 5.0), and Knee-Related Quality of Life (QOL) (100; IQR, 12.5). For women with no history of knee ligament injury, the KOOS scale scores were the following: Symptoms (92.9; IQR, 14.3), Pain (100; IQR, 5.6), Functional ADL (100; IQR, 2.9), Sports and Recreation Function (100; IQR, 10.0), and Knee-Related QOL (93.8; IQR, 18.8). Among the men, 139 (14%) reported a history of knee ligament injury, while 33 (16%) women also reported a history of injury. All KOOS scale scores and the WOMAC Stiffness and Function scale scores were significantly lower (P < .05) for men who reported a history of knee ligament injury. Similarly, Symptoms, Pain, and Knee-Related QOL on the KOOS and Pain on the WOMAC were significantly lower among women with a history of knee ligament injury.

CONCLUSION

Normative values for all KOOS scales suggest a high level of functioning among participants with no history of knee ligament injury. Despite meeting the medical standards for military service, participants with a history of knee ligament injury had significantly lower KOOS and WOMAC scores upon entry to military service.

Comparison of osteochondral autologous transplantation, microfracture, or debridement techniques in articular cartilage lesions associated with anterior cruciate ligament injury: a prospective study with a 3-year follow-up

PURPOSE

To compare the concomitant treatment of articular cartilage damage in the medial femoral condyle with osteochondral autologous transplantation (OAT), microfracture, or debridement procedures at the time of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

METHODS

Between 2006 and 2009, 102 patients with a mean age of 34.1 years and with an ACL rupture and articular cartilage damage in the medial femoral condyle of the knee were randomized to undergo OAT, microfractures, or debridement at the time of ACL reconstruction. A matched control group was included, comprising 34 patients with intact articular cartilage at the time of ACL reconstruction. There were 34 patients in the OAT-ACL group, 34 in the microfracture (MF)-ACL group, 34 in the debridement (D)-ACL group, and 34 in the control group with intact articular cartilage (IAC-ACL group). The mean time from ACL injury to operation was 19.32 ± 3.43 months, and the mean follow-up was 36.1 months (range, 34 to 37 months). Patients were evaluated with the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Tegner activity score, and clinical assessment.

RESULTS

Of 102 patients, 97 (95%) were available for the final follow-up. According to the subjective IKDC score, all 4 groups fared significantly better at the 3-year follow-up than preoperatively (P < .005). The OAT-ACL group's IKDC subjective knee evaluation was significantly better than that of the MF-ACL group (P = .024) and D-ACL group (P = .018). However, the IKDC subjective score of the IAC-ACL group was significantly better than the OAT-ACL group's IKDC evaluation (P = .043). There was no significant difference between the MF-ACL and D-ACL groups' IKDC subjective scores (P = .058). Evaluation of manual pivot-shift knee laxity according to the IKDC knee examination form showed similar findings for the 4 groups immediately postoperatively and at 3-year follow-up, and the findings were rated as normal or nearly normal (IKDC grade A or B) in 29 of 33 patients (88%) in the OAT-ACL group, 28 of 32 patients (88%) in the MF-ACL group, 27 of 32 patients (84%) in the D-ACL group, and 31 of 34 patients (91%) in the IAC-ACL group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that intact articular cartilage during ACL reconstruction yields more favorable IKDC subjective scores compared with any other articular cartilage surgery type. However, if an articular defect is present, the subjective IKDC scores are significantly better for OAT versus microfracture or debridement after a mean period of 3 years. Anterior knee stability results were not significantly affected by the different articular cartilage treatment methods.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, prospective comparative study.

The current evidence for treatment of ACL injuries in children is low: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus on the management of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries in skeletally immature children, and the methodological quality of published studies is questionable. The transphyseal reconstructions, physeal-sparing reconstructions, and nonoperative treatment algorithms that are advocated have little support in the literature. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the methodological quality of the literature on the management of ACL injuries in skeletally immature children.

METHODS

We performed a literature search with use of PubMed to identify prospective or retrospective studies whose primary aim was to assess the outcome after operative or nonoperative treatment of ACL injuries in skeletally immature children. To be included in the analysis, a study had to have a mean duration of follow-up of at least two years and a minimum of ten children in the study had to be verified to be skeletally immature. The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated with use of the Coleman Methodology Score.

RESULTS

No randomized controlled trials, two prospective cohort studies, and twenty-nine retrospective studies met the inclusion criteria. The Coleman Methodology Score averaged 44.7 ± 9.2 out of 100 (range, 28 to 62). The methodological deficiencies were most evident with regard to the number of included children, the study design, and the description of rehabilitation protocols, outcome criteria, and outcome assessments.

CONCLUSIONS

Caution is necessary when interpreting the results of studies on the treatment of ACL injuries in skeletally immature children because of widespread methodological deficiencies. There is a need for appropriately sized prospective studies and detailed descriptions of rehabilitation programs.

Global doctor opinion versus a patient questionnaire for the outcome assessment of treated temporomandibular disorder patients

PURPOSE

Accurately assessing treatment outcomes has become increasingly important for maintaining hospital privileges. When these assessments are based on the judgment of the treating doctor, there is often an inherent positive bias. As a result, there has been increased interest in using patient-based assessments. The purpose of this study was to compare doctor's and patient's assessments of the outcomes of treatment in a series of patients with various temporomandibular disorders (TMDs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-two consecutive TMD patients were initially given a questionnaire designed to evaluate their pain, problems eating and sleeping, the occurrence of headache and earache, the presence of temporomandibular joint pain and/or jaw stiffness in the morning, and interference with daily activity. The patients then filled out the same questionnaire at each post-treatment visit, and the findings were compared with the baseline information. At each visit, the treating doctor also recorded a global evaluation of the patient's progress as excellent, good, fair, or poor.

RESULTS

Comparison of the doctor's global evaluation with the patient's evaluation based on the questionnaire showed a discrepancy in 44% of the cases. When there was a discrepancy, the doctor scored the improvement better than the patient 54.5% of the time and worse than the patient 45.5% of the time.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study confirm the unreliability of using a global opinion by the treating doctor for outcome assessment in patients with various TMDs.

Outcome of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is believed to have an inferior outcome compared with primary ACL reconstruction. The available literature on the outcome of revision ACL reconstruction is sparse compared with that for primary reconstruction. The purpose of this systematic review was to test the hypothesis that the outcome of revision ACL reconstruction compares unfavorably with the historical outcome of primary ACL reconstruction.

METHODS

A systematic review of studies evaluating the outcome of revision ACL reconstructions with a minimum of two years of follow-up was performed. Pooled data were collected when appropriate and a mixed-effect-model meta-analysis was performed for important outcome measures that were reported in several studies (objective graft failure, Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC] subjective score, and IKDC objective score). Objective failure was defined as repeat revision, a side-to-side difference of &gt;5 mm measured with use of a KT1000 arthrometer, or a pivot-shift grade of 2+ or 3+.

RESULTS

Twenty-one studies were included, and 863 of the 1004 patients in these studies had a minimum of two years of follow-up and were analyzed. The pooled mean age of the patients at the time of the revision procedure was 30.6 years, and 66% were male. Objective failure occurred in 13.7% ± 2.7% of the patients (95% confidence interval, 8.0% to 19.4%). The mean Lysholm score in 491 patients was 82.1 ± 3.3 (95% confidence interval, 74.6 to 89.5) according to a mixed-model meta-analysis. The mean IKDC subjective score in 202 patients was 74.8 ± 4.4 (95% confidence interval, 62.5 to 87.0).

CONCLUSIONS

Revision ACL reconstruction resulted in a worse outcome compared with primary ACL reconstruction. Patient-reported outcome scores were inferior to previously published results of primary ACL reconstruction, but these differences may not be clinically important. A dramatically elevated failure rate was noted after revision ACL reconstruction; this rate was nearly three to four times the failure rate in prospective series of primary ACL reconstructions.

Lower extremity-specific measures of disability and outcomes in orthopaedic surgery

Outcome measures may be simple questions or complex measures that assess multiple interrelated domains affecting treatment outcomes. Outcome measures should be relevant to patients, easy to use, reliable, valid, and responsive to clinical changes. Joint and disease-specific outcome measures have been developed for the hip, knee, and foot and ankle. Many of these measures would benefit from further research into their validity, reliability, and optimal applicability. General health measures and activity level scores should be included in outcome assessments after treatment for orthopaedic conditions.

Single- versus double-bundle ACL reconstruction: is there any difference in stability and function at 3-year followup?

BACKGROUND

Despite a number of studies comparing postoperative stability and function after anatomic double-bundle and single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), it remains unclear whether double-bundle reconstruction improves stability or function.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We therefore asked whether patients having single- and double-bundle ACLR using semitendinosus (ST) alone differed with regard to (1) postoperative stability; (2) ROM; and (3) five functional scores.

METHODS

We prospectively followed 60 patients with an isolated anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. Thirty patients underwent single-bundle and 30 patients underwent double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Clinically we assessed stability and range of motion (ROM); anteroposterior stability was assessed by Rolimeter and rotational stability by a pivot shift test. Function was assessed by IKDC, Noyes, Lysholm, Marx, and Tegner activity scales. The minimum followup was 36 months (mean, 46.2 months; range, 36-60 months).

RESULTS

Residual anteroposterior laxity at 3 years postoperatively was similar in both groups: 1.4 ± 0.3 mm versus 1.4 ± 0.2 mm, respectively. We observed no difference in the pivot shift test. ROM was similar in both groups, although double-bundle patients required more physical therapy sessions to gain full ROM. IKDC, Noyes, Lysholm, Marx, and Tegner scores were similar at final followup.

CONCLUSION

Double-bundle reconstruction of the ACL did not improve function or stability compared with single-bundle reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Upper extremity-specific measures of disability and outcomes in orthopaedic surgery

Outcome measures may consist of simple questions or they may be more complex instruments that evaluate multiple interrelated domains that influence patient function. Outcome measures should be relevant to patients, easy to use, reliable, valid, and responsive to clinical changes. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score can be used to measure disability for any region of the upper limb. Joint and disease-specific outcome measures have been developed for the shoulder, the elbow, and the wrist and hand. Many of these measures would benefit from further research into their validity, reliability, and optimal applicability.

Validity and reliability of the SPORTS score

PURPOSE

Successful outcomes for an athlete usually consist of returning to their sport. The Subjective Patient Outcome for Return to Sports (SPORTS) score has been recently proposed as an easy to use score for evaluating an athlete's ability to return to their sport. The aim of this study was to test the reliability and validity of the SPORTS score in athletes 5-10 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

METHODS

A total of 47 athletes (average age 30, range 15-45), 5-10 years, after an anterior cruciate reconstruction were included in this study. Athletes were asked to complete the SPORTS score with an intermediate period of 2 weeks in order to measure reliability by using the Bland-Altman method and the ICC score. The criterion validity was assessed by calculating the Spearman correlation coefficient between the SPORTS score and Lysholm score, KOOS score and the SF-36.

RESULTS

The SPORTS score showed excellent reliability (ICC = 0.967). The systematic error was 0 points (95% upper limit of agreement = 1.8 points). A strong correlation was found between the SPORTS score and the sports and recreation component on the KOOS score (r = 0.55, P < 0.001). The floor effect was 9% and the ceiling effect 32%.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that the SPORTS score is a valid and reliable tool to assess and quantify return to sport.

Hop tests correlate with IKDC and KOOS at minimum of 2 years after primary ACL reconstruction

PURPOSE

The hypothesis of this study was that single-legged horizontal hop test ratios would correlate with IKDC, KOOS, and Marx activity level scores in patients 2 years after primary ACL reconstruction.

METHODS

Individual patient-reported outcome tools and hop test ratios on 69 ACL reconstructed patients were compared using correlations and multivariable modeling. Correlations between specific questions on the IKDC and KOOS concerning the ability to jump and hop ratios were also performed.

RESULTS

The triple-hop ratio was moderately but significantly correlated with the IKDC, KOOS Sports and Recreation subscale, and the KOOS Knee Related Quality of Life subscale, as well as with the specific questions related to jumping. Similar but weaker relationship patterns were found for the single-hop ratio and timed hop. No significant correlations were found for the Marx activity level or crossover-hop ratio. Multivariable modeling showed almost no significant additional contribution to predictability of the IKDC or KOOS subscores by gender, BMI, or the number of faults on either leg.

CONCLUSIONS

The triple-hop test is most significantly correlated with patient-reported outcome scores. Multivariable modeling indicates that less than a quarter of the variability in outcome scores can be explained by hop test results. This indicates that neither test can serve as a direct proxy for the other; however, assessment of patient physical function by either direct report using validated outcome tools or by the hop test will provide relatively comparable data.

An original clinical methodology for non-invasive assessment of pivot-shift test

Even if pivot-shift (PS) test has been clinically used to specifically detect anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, the main problem in using this combined test has been yet associated with the difficulty of clearly quantifying its outcome. The goal of this study was to describe an original non-invasive methodology used to quantify PS test, highlighting its possible clinical reliability. The method was validated on 66 consecutive unilateral ACL-injured patients. A commercial triaxial accelerometer was non-invasively mounted on patient's tibia, the corresponding 3D acceleration was acquired during PS test execution and a set of specific parameters were automatically identified on the signal to quantify the test. PS test was repeated three times on both injured and controlateral limbs. Reliability of the method was found to be good (mean intra-rater intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.79); moreover, we found that ACL-deficient knees presented statistically higher values for the identified parameters--than the controlateral healthy limbs, averagely reporting also large effect size.

Outcomes after patellar realignment surgery for recurrent patellar instability dislocations: a minimum 3-year follow-up study of children and adolescents

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to report early outcomes after patellar realignment surgery (PRS) was performed for patellar instability in children and adolescents.

METHODS

The study cohort consisted of 23 patients (27 knees) who had PRS between March 1, 2000 and July 30, 2004, by a single surgeon, with a minimum 3-year follow-up and validated outcome measures. Preoperative diagnoses were dislocations in 22 knees and subluxations in 5 knees. The mean age was 14 years and 1 month.

RESULTS

Postoperatively, 2 knees had possible recurrent dislocation/subluxation episodes; neither required surgery. Persistent patellofemoral mechanical symptoms have been reported in 10 knees. At a mean follow-up of 5 years and 1 month, the mean Lysholm score was 69.3 and the mean International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score was 65.6. The mean Tegner activity level was 5.4. Patients reported improvement in knee function and pain in 26 of 28 knees (93%). Significant group differences were identified for age at surgery, preoperative diagnosis, and length of preoperative knee symptoms. The group with scores ≥ 70 were younger (13.1 vs. 14.9 y), were all patellar dislocators (vs. 66% in the < 70 group), and with shorter length of symptoms (13 mo vs. 24 mo). In the ≥ 70 groups the Tegner activity levels were higher at 6.8 versus the < 70 group at 4.3.

CONCLUSIONS

At a mean of 5 years after PRS, 93% of patients reported persistent improvement in knee function and pain, and recurrent patellar dislocation/subluxation episodes were infrequent (7%). Despite the low rate of postoperative patellar instability the patients' subjective opinion of knee function was less than expected (mean IKDC 65.5). Further investigation is warranted to identify causes for this suboptimal outcome at a mean of 5 years postoperatively.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

These data reinforce the recurring theme documented in other areas of orthopaedics of a disconnection between the "surgical" success (93% improved) and patient's subjective outcome (mean IKDC of 65.6).

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Mid-term results of Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis for treatment of focal cartilage defects in the knee

Articular cartilage defects heal poorly. Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis (AMIC) is an innovative treatment for localized full-thickness cartilage defects combining the well-known microfracturing with collagen scaffold and fibrin glue. The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the medium-term results of this enhanced microfracture technique for the treatment of chondral lesions of the knee. Thirty-two chondral lesions in 27 patients were treated with AMIC. Within the context of clinical follow-up, these patients were evaluated for up to 5 years after the intervention. Five different scores (Meyer score, Tegner score, Lysholm score, ICRS score, Cincinnati score) as well as radiographs were used for outcome analysis. Articular resurfacing was assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The average age of patients (11 females, 16 males; mean body mass index 26, range 20-32) was 37 years (range 16-50 years). The mean defect size of the chondral lesions was 4.2 cm(2) (range 1.3-8.8 cm(2)). All defects were classified as grade IV according to the Outerbridge classification. The follow-up period was between 24 and 62 months with a mean of 37 months. Twenty out of 23 individuals (87%) questioned were subjectively highly satisfied with the results after surgery. Significant improvement (P < 0.05) of all scores was observed as early as 12 months after AMIC, and further increased values were notable up to 24 months postoperatively. MRI analysis showed moderate to complete filling with a normal to incidentally hyperintense signal in most cases. Results did not show a clinical impact of patient's age at the time of operation, body mass index and number of previous operations (n.s.). In contrast, males showed significant higher values in the ICRS score compared to their female counterparts. AMIC is an effective and safe method of treating symptomatic full-thickness chondral defects of the knee in appropriately selected cases. However, further studies with long-term follow-up are needed to determine whether the grafted area will maintain structural and functional integrity over time.

Posterolateral corner reconstruction of the knee: evaluation of a technique with clinical outcomes and stress radiography

BACKGROUND

Injuries to the posterolateral corner of the knee remain a challenging problem and have been cited frequently as a reason for failure of anterior and posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Although several reconstructive techniques currently exist, there are relatively few clinical outcomes data after reconstruction of the posterolateral corner.

PURPOSE

The study was undertaken to examine the clinical outcomes and provide objective data using arthrometry and stress radiography of a posterolateral corner reconstruction technique.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of a consecutive series of patients who underwent posterolateral corner reconstruction of the knee was evaluated. The surgery featured dual femoral tunnels, a transfibular tunnel, and a free graft to reconstruct the posterolateral corner of the knee. All patients had concomitant reconstruction of one or both cruciate ligaments. Outcomes were assessed using the Short Form-12, Lysholm, and Tegner knee scores. A clinical examination, KT-2000 arthrometry measurements, single-legged hop quotient, and varus and posterior Telos stress radiographs were obtained and compared with results for the contralateral, uninjured knees.

RESULTS

Twenty-four (83%) of 29 consecutive patients were evaluated at a mean 39 months postoperatively (range, 24-81 months). The mean Lysholm and Tegner knee scores were 83 and 6, respectively. The mean difference (+/- standard deviation) in total anterior-posterior side-to-side KT arthrometry measurements was 1.4 +/- 1.3 mm. The varus stress radiographic mean side-to-side difference measured at 20 degrees of flexion was 0.2 +/- 1.9 mm. The mean radiographic posterior tibial displacement with a 15-kg stress at 90 degrees of flexion was 3.2 +/- 4.5 mm in patients undergoing posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

CONCLUSION

This reconstruction of the posterolateral corner of the knee with concomitant cruciate ligament reconstruction restores varus and rotational stability at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively.

Gender differences in the correlation between symptom and radiographic severity in patients with knee osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

The effects of gender on the relationship between symptom manifestations and radiographic grades of knee osteoarthritis are not well understood.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We therefore determined the increments of symptom progression with regard to radiographic grades of knee osteoarthritis and asked if those increments differed by gender and whether symptom severity was differentially manifested by gender within the same grade.

METHODS

We recruited 660 community residents; 368 (56%) women and 292 (44%) men. The mean subject age was 71.5 years (range, 65-91 years). Severity of symptoms was measured using the WOMAC and SF-36 scales, and the radiographic severity using Kellgren-Lawrence grades. Incremental changes in WOMAC and SF-36 scores were compared between adjacent Kellgren-Lawrence grades separately in men and women, and in the overall population. We compared symptom severity between men and women with the same radiographic grade.

RESULTS

For the entire cohort, the mean incremental change in symptom severity was not gradual between the adjacent radiographic grades but was greater between Kellgren-Lawrence Grades 1 and 2 and Grades 2 and 3 than between Grades 0 and 1 or Grades 3 and 4. The patterns of incremental changes in symptom severity differed between men and women: women had more severe symptom progression between Kellgren-Lawrence Grades 2 and 3 and Grades 3 and 4 than men. Furthermore, women had worse mean WOMAC and SF-36 scores than men with the same radiographic grade of knee osteoarthritis.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest symptom progression is not gradual between adjacent radiographic grades, and for the same radiographic grade, symptoms are worse in women.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, diagnostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Anatomic reconstruction of the posterolateral corner of the knee: a case series with isolated reconstructions in 27 patients

PURPOSE

This study presents clinical results of a case series of isolated reconstruction of the posterolateral corner (PLC) with a new technique that aims to reconstruct the lateral collateral ligament (LCL), popliteus tendon, and popliteofibular ligament.

METHODS

From 1997 to 2005, 27 patients available for follow-up with isolated posterolateral instability were treated with primary reconstruction of the LCL and PLC. The median age was 28 years, and there were 16 male patients. Of the patients, 26% had remaining instability after anterior or posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. All underwent reconstruction with a novel technique addressing both the LCL and the PLC by use of hamstring autografts. Follow-up was more than 24 months, and patients were examined by an independent observer using the International Knee Documentation Committee objective measures and subjective Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores.

RESULTS

In our series 95% of patients with isolated lateral rotatory instability had rotatory stability after PLC reconstruction. On the basis of International Knee Documentation Committee scoring, 71% were normal or nearly normal. Subjective Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores were comparable to scores in patients after meniscectomy. One patient had a deep infection, but none had any peroneal nerve injury.

CONCLUSIONS

This case series presents a new method for combined reconstruction of the LCL and the PLC. Despite the extensiveness of procedure, complications were low. The technique restores lateral stability clinically at 2 years' follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Shoulder outcomes measures

General health as well as disease- or condition-specific outcome measures have long been used to assess patients with shoulder conditions. Currently, a variety of validated measures is available. Shoulder outcomes measures may be general (eg, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons; Constant; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand), disease-specific (eg, Rotator Cuff Quality of Life, Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index), or condition-specific (eg, Oxford Shoulder Instability Questionnaire). The results of shoulder arthroplasty and arthritis treatment can be assessed with the Hospital for Special Surgery score and the validated Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder Index. Combining a general health outcome measure, a general shoulder measure, a disease- or condition-specific shoulder measure, and an activity measure allows for broad patient assessment.

Knee pain and mobility impairments: meniscal and articular cartilage lesions

The Orthopaedic Section of the American Physical Therapy Association presents this fifth set of clinical practice guidelines on knee pain and mobility impairments, linked to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). The purpose of these practice guidelines is to describe evidence-based orthopaedic physical therapy clinical practice and provide recommendations for (1) examination and diagnostic classification based on body functions and body structures, activity limitations, and participation restrictions, (2) interventions provided by physical therapists, (3) and assessment of outcome for common musculoskeletal disorders.

Management of articular cartilage defects of the knee

Articular cartilage has a poor intrinsic capacity for healing. The goal of surgical techniques to repair articular cartilage injuries is to achieve the regeneration of organized hyaline cartilage. Microfracture and other bone marrow stimulation techniques involve penetration of the subchondral plate in order to recruit mesenchymal stem cells into the chondral defect. The formation of a stable clot that fills the lesion is of paramount importance to achieve a successful outcome. Mosaicplasty is a viable option with which to address osteochondral lesions of the knee and offers the advantage of transplanting hyaline cartilage. However, limited graft availability and donor site morbidity are concerns. Transplantation of an osteochondral allograft consisting of intact, viable articular cartilage and its underlying subchondral bone offers the ability to address large osteochondral defects of the knee, including those involving an entire compartment. The primary theoretical advantage of autologous chondrocyte implantation is the development of hyaline-like cartilage rather than fibrocartilage in the defect, which presumably leads to better long-term outcomes and longevity of the healing tissue. Use of synthetic scaffolds is a potentially attractive alternative to traditional cartilage procedures as they are readily available and, unlike allogeneic tissue transplants, are associated with no risk of disease transmission. Their efficacy, however, has not been proven clinically.

A comparison of early and delayed arthroscopically-assisted reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament using hamstring autograft

Delayed rather than early reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament is the current recommended treatment for injury to this ligament since it is thought to give a better functional outcome. We randomised 105 consecutive patients with injury associated with chondral lesions no more severe than grades 1 and 2 and/or meniscal tears which only required trimming, to early (< two weeks) or delayed (> four to six weeks) reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament using a quadrupled hamstring graft. All operations were performed by a single surgeon and a standard rehabilitation regime was followed in both groups. The outcomes were assessed using the Lysholm score, the Tegner score and measurement of the range of movement. Stability was assessed by clinical tests and measurements taken with the KT-1000 arthrometer, with all testing performed by a blinded uninvolved experienced observer. A total of six patients were lost to follow-up, with 48 patients assigned to the delayed group and 51 to the early group. None was a competitive athlete. The mean interval between injury and the surgery was seven days (2 to 14) in the early group and 32 days (29 to 42) in the delayed group. The mean follow-up was 32 months (26 to 36).

The results did not show a statistically significant difference for the Lysholm score (p = 0.86), Tegner activity score (p = 0.913) or the range of movement (p = 1). Similarly, no distinction could be made for stability testing by clinical examination (p = 0.56) and measurements with the KT-1000 arthrometer (p = 0.93).

Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament gave a similar clinical and functional outcome whether performed early (< two weeks) or late at four to six weeks after injury.

Analysis of evidence-based medicine for shoulder instability

Clinical research has become a major influencing factor in the determination of treatment choice in our society. Outcome data have been requested by third-party payers, patients, and administrators alike. Currently, there are over 10 different scoring systems that have been used to evaluate the efficacy of treatment for shoulder instability. Some of these scoring systems are based on the specific condition of shoulder instability; however, other systems are broadly based to incorporate a spectrum of shoulder conditions. This review summarizes the process of proper development and testing of the scoring systems, discusses their role in clinical research with respect to shoulder instability, and explains the dichotomy of postoperative recurrence of instability and high shoulder scores. The Shoulder Rating Questionnaire (SRQ), Melbourne Instability Shoulder Score (MISS), Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI), Oxford Instability Score (OIS), and Simple Shoulder Test were shown to be reliable for patients with instability. The SRQ, MISS, WOSI, OIS, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score have all been shown to be largely responsive. There are 2 shoulder scoring systems, the WOSI and the MISS, that we recommend be used to evaluate shoulder instability. The SRQ and OIS were found to be less responsive for patients with instability compared with patients with other shoulder dysfunctions. Other scoring systems lack inter-rater reliability, validity, and/or responsiveness for patients in the instability population. The optimal scoring system for patients with upper extremity problems other than those with shoulder instability has yet to be determined; however, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score may be considered, because this instrument has been proven to be valid, reliable, and responsive.