1
|
Freshman RD, Zhang AL, Benjamin Ma C, Feeley BT, Ortiz S, Patel J, Dunn W, Wolf BR, Hettrich C, Lansdown D, Baumgarten KM, Bishop JY, Bollier MJ, Brophy RH, Bravman JT, Cox CL, Cvetanovich GL, Grant JA, Frank RM, Jones GL, Kuhn JE, Mair SD, Marx RG, McCarty EC, Miller BS, Seidl AJ, Smith MV, Wright RW. Factors Associated With Humeral Avulsion of Glenohumeral Ligament Lesions in Patients With Anterior Shoulder Instability: An Analysis of the MOON Shoulder Instability Cohort. Orthop J Sports Med 2023; 11:23259671231206757. [PMID: 37900861 PMCID: PMC10612462 DOI: 10.1177/23259671231206757] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 05/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Humeral avulsion of the glenohumeral ligament (HAGL) lesions are an uncommon cause of anterior glenohumeral instability and may occur in isolation or combination with other pathologies. As HAGL lesions are difficult to detect via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and arthroscopy, they can remain unrecognized and result in continued glenohumeral instability. Purpose To compare patients with anterior shoulder instability from a large multicenter cohort with and without a diagnosis of a HAGL lesion and identify preoperative physical examination findings, patient-reported outcomes, imaging findings, and surgical management trends associated with HAGL lesions. Study Design Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods Patients with anterior glenohumeral instability who underwent surgical management between 2012 and 2020 at 11 orthopaedic centers were enrolled. Patients with HAGL lesions identified intraoperatively were compared with patients without HAGL lesions. Preoperative characteristics, physical examinations, imaging findings, intraoperative findings, and surgical procedures were collected. The Student t test, Kruskal-Wallis H test, Fisher exact test, and chi-square test were used to compare groups. Results A total of 21 HAGL lesions were identified in 915 (2.3%) patients; approximately one-third (28.6%) of all lesions were visualized intraoperatively but not identified on preoperative MRI. Baseline characteristics did not differ between study cohorts. Compared with non-HAGL patients, HAGL patients were less likely to have a Hill-Sachs lesion (54.7% vs 28.6%; P = .03) or an anterior labral tear (87.2% vs 66.7%; P = .01) on preoperative MRI and demonstrated increased external rotation when their affected arm was positioned at 90° of abduction (85° vs 90°; P = .03). Additionally, HAGL lesions were independently associated with an increased risk of undergoing an open stabilization surgery (odds ratio, 74.6 [95% CI, 25.2-221.1]; P < .001). Conclusion Approximately one-third of HAGL lesions were missed on preoperative MRI. HAGL patients were less likely to exhibit preoperative imaging findings associated with anterior shoulder instability, such as Hill-Sachs lesions or anterior labral pathology. These patients underwent open procedures more frequently than patients without HAGL lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan D. Freshman
- Investigation performed at the University of California–San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Alan L. Zhang
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California–San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - C. Benjamin Ma
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California–San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Brian T. Feeley
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California–San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | | | - Jhillika Patel
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Warren Dunn
- Fondren Orthopedic Group, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Brian R. Wolf
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California–San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | | | - Drew Lansdown
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California–San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | | | | | - Julie Y. Bishop
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | | | | | | | - Charles L. Cox
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | | | - John A. Grant
- MedSport, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Rachel M. Frank
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Grant L. Jones
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - John E. Kuhn
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | | | | | - Eric C. McCarty
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | | | - Adam J. Seidl
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | | | - Rick W. Wright
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jacobs CA, Ortiz SF, Baumgarten KM, Bishop JY, Bollier MJ, Bravman JT, Brophy RH, Cvetanovich GL, Feeley BT, Frank RM, Jones GL, Kuhn JE, Lansdown DA, Ma CB, Mair SD, Marx RG, McCarty EC, Seidl AJ, Wright RW, Zhang AL, Wolf BR, Hettrich CM. Development and Validation of a Short-Form Version of the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Scale (Short-WOSI). Am J Sports Med 2023; 51:2850-2857. [PMID: 37584514 DOI: 10.1177/03635465231188975] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have transitioned from primarily being used as research instruments to becoming increasingly used in the clinical setting to assess recovery and inform shared decision-making. However, there is a need to develop validated short-form PROM instruments to decrease patient burden and ease incorporation into clinical practice. PURPOSE To assess the validity and responsiveness of a shortened version of the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (Short-WOSI) when compared with the full WOSI and other shoulder-related PROM instruments. STUDY DESIGN Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. METHODS This study was a secondary analysis of data collected as part of an institutional review board-approved, multicenter cohort of 1160 patients undergoing surgical stabilization for shoulder instability. The following PROMs were captured preoperatively and 2 years after surgery: WOSI, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and 36-Item Health Survey (RAND-36). The cohort was split into 2 data sets: a training set to be used in the development of the Short-WOSI (n = 580) and a test set to be used to assess the validity and responsiveness of the Short-WOSI relative to the full WOSI, ASES, SANE, and RAND-36. RESULTS The Short-WOSI demonstrated excellent internal consistency before surgery (Cronbach α = .83) and excellent internal consistency at the 2-year follow-up (Cronbach α = .93). The baseline, 2-year, and pre- to postoperative changes in Short-WOSI and WOSI were closely correlated (r > 0.90), with both demonstrating large effect sizes (Short-WOSI = 1.92, WOSI = 1.81). Neither the Short-WOSI nor the WOSI correlated well with the other PROM instruments before (r = 0.21-0.33) or after (r = 0.25-0.38) surgery. The Short-WOSI, WOSI, and SANE scores were more responsive than ASES and RAND-36 scores. CONCLUSION The 7-item Short-WOSI demonstrated excellent internal consistency and a lack of floor or ceiling effects. The Short-WOSI demonstrated excellent cross-sectional and longitudinal construct validity and was similarly responsive over time as the full WOSI. Neither the Short-WOSI nor WOSI correlated with more general shoulder PROMs, underscoring the advantage of using instability-specific instruments for this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cale A Jacobs
- Mass General Brigham Sports Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Investigation performed at the University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Shannon F Ortiz
- University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
- Investigation performed at the University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Keith M Baumgarten
- Orthopedic Institute, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, USA
- Investigation performed at the University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Julie Y Bishop
- The Ohio State University Sports Medicine Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
- Investigation performed at the University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Matthew J Bollier
- University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
- Investigation performed at the University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Jonathan T Bravman
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
- Investigation performed at the University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Robert H Brophy
- Department of Orthopedics, Washington University Saint Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
- Investigation performed at the University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Gregory L Cvetanovich
- The Ohio State University Sports Medicine Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
- Investigation performed at the University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Brian T Feeley
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
- Investigation performed at the University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Rachel M Frank
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
- Investigation performed at the University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Grant L Jones
- The Ohio State University Sports Medicine Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
- Investigation performed at the University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - John E Kuhn
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Investigation performed at the University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Drew A Lansdown
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
- Investigation performed at the University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - C Benjamin Ma
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
- Investigation performed at the University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Scott D Mair
- University of Kentucky Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
- Investigation performed at the University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Robert G Marx
- Department of Sports Medicine, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
- Investigation performed at the University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Eric C McCarty
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
- Investigation performed at the University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Adam J Seidl
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
- Investigation performed at the University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Rick W Wright
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Investigation performed at the University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Alan L Zhang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
- Investigation performed at the University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Brian R Wolf
- University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
- Investigation performed at the University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Carolyn M Hettrich
- North Country Orthopaedics, Clayton, New York, USA
- Investigation performed at the University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Katz JN, Collins JE, Brophy RH, Cole BJ, Cox CL, Guermazi A, Jones MH, Levy BA, MacFarlane LA, Mandl LA, Marx RG, Selzer F, Spindler KP, Wright RW, Losina E, Chang Y. Radiographic Changes Five Years After Treatment of Meniscal Tear and Osteoarthritic Changes. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2023:10.1002/acr.25197. [PMID: 37474452 PMCID: PMC10799184 DOI: 10.1002/acr.25197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2023] [Revised: 06/20/2023] [Accepted: 07/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Meniscal tear in persons aged ≥45 years is typically managed with physical therapy (PT), and arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) is offered to those who do not respond. Prior studies suggest APM may be associated with greater progression of radiographic changes. METHODS We assessed changes between baseline and 60 months in the Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade and OARSI radiographic score (including subscores for joint space narrowing and osteophytes) in subjects aged 45-85 years enrolled into a seven-center randomized trial comparing outcomes of APM with PT for meniscal tear, osteoarthritis changes, and knee pain. The primary analysis classified subjects according to treatment received. To balance APM and PT groups, we developed a propensity score and used inverse probability weighting (IPW). We imputed a 60-month change in the OARSI score for subjects who underwent total knee replacement (TKR). In a sensitivity analysis, we classified subjects by randomization group. RESULTS We analyzed data from 142 subjects (100 APM, 42 PT). The mean ± SD weighted baseline OARSI radiographic score was 3.8 ± 3.5 in the APM group and 4.0 ± 4.9 in the PT group. OARSI scores increased by a mean of 4.1 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 3.5-4.7) in the APM group and 2.4 (95% CI 1.7-3.2) in the PT group (P < 0.001) due to changes in the osteophyte component. We did not observe statistically significant differences in the KL grade. Sensitivity analyses yielded similar findings to the primary analysis. CONCLUSION Subjects treated with APM had greater progression in the OARSI score because of osteophyte progression but not in the KL grade. The clinical implications of these findings require investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey N Katz
- Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jamie E Collins
- Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Robert H Brophy
- Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | | | | | - Ali Guermazi
- Boston Veteran's Medical Center and Boston University Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Morgan H Jones
- Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | - Lisa A Mandl
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
| | | | - Faith Selzer
- Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | - Elena Losina
- Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Yuchiao Chang
- Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sheean AJ, Jin Y, Huston LJ, Brophy RH, Cox CL, Flanigan DC, Jones MH, Kaeding CC, Magnussen RA, Marx RG, Matava MJ, McCarty EC, Parker RD, Wolcott ML, Wolf BR, Wright RW, Spindler KP. Predictors of Return to Activity at 2 Years After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Among Patients With High Preinjury Marx Activity Scores: A MOON Prospective Cohort Study. Am J Sports Med 2023; 51:2313-2323. [PMID: 37724692 DOI: 10.1177/03635465231172769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Predictors of return to activity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) among patients with relatively high preinjury activity levels remain poorly understood. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS The purpose of this study was to identify predictors of return to preinjury levels of activity after ACLR, defined as achieving a Marx activity score within 2 points of the preinjury value, among patients with Marx activity scores of 12 to 16 who had been prospectively enrolled in the Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) cohort. We hypothesized that age, sex, preinjury activity level, meniscal injuries and/or procedures, and concurrent articular cartilage injuries would predict return to preinjury activity levels at 2 years after ACLR. STUDY DESIGN Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS All unilateral ACLR procedures from 2002 to 2008 performed in patients enrolled in the MOON, with preinjury Marx activity scores ranging from 12 to 16, were evaluated with a specific focus on return to preinjury activity levels at 2 years postoperatively. Return to activity was defined as a Marx activity score within 2 points of the preinjury value. The proportion of patients able to return to preinjury activity levels was calculated, and multivariable modeling was performed to identify risk factors for patients' inability to return to preinjury activity levels. RESULTS A total of 1188 patients were included in the final analysis. The median preinjury Marx activity score was 16 (interquartile range, 12-16). Overall, 466 patients (39.2%) were able to return to preinjury levels of activity, and 722 patients (60.8%) were not able to return to preinjury levels of activity. Female sex, smoking at the time of ACLR, fewer years of education, lower 36-Item Short Form Health Survey Mental Component Summary scores, and higher preinjury Marx activity scores were predictive of patients' inability to return to preinjury activity levels. Graft type, revision ACLR, the presence of medial and/or lateral meniscal injuries, a history of meniscal surgery, the presence of articular cartilage injuries, a history of articular cartilage treatment, and the presence of high-grade knee laxity were not predictive of a patient's ability to return to preinjury activity level. CONCLUSION At 2 years after ACLR, most patients with high preinjury Marx activity scores did not return to their preinjury level of activity. The higher the preinjury Marx activity score that a patient reported at the time of enrollment, the less likely he/she was able to return to preinjury activity level. Smoking and lower mental health at the time of ACLR were the only modifiable risk factors in this cohort that predicted an inability to return to preinjury activity levels. Continued effort and investigation are required to maximize functional recovery after ACLR in patients with high preinjury levels of activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew J Sheean
- San Antonio Military Medical Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA
- Investigation performed at the Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, and Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Yuxuan Jin
- Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Investigation performed at the Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, and Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Laura J Huston
- Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Investigation performed at the Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, and Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Robert H Brophy
- Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
- Investigation performed at the Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, and Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Charles L Cox
- Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Investigation performed at the Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, and Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - David C Flanigan
- The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
- Investigation performed at the Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, and Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Morgan H Jones
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Investigation performed at the Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, and Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Christopher C Kaeding
- The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
- Investigation performed at the Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, and Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Robert A Magnussen
- The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
- Investigation performed at the Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, and Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Robert G Marx
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
- Investigation performed at the Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, and Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Matthew J Matava
- Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
- Investigation performed at the Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, and Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Eric C McCarty
- University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado, USA
- Investigation performed at the Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, and Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Richard D Parker
- Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Investigation performed at the Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, and Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Michelle L Wolcott
- University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado, USA
- Investigation performed at the Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, and Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Brian R Wolf
- University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
- Investigation performed at the Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, and Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Rick W Wright
- Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Investigation performed at the Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, and Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Kurt P Spindler
- Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Investigation performed at the Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, and Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wright RW, Huston LJ, Haas AK. Ten-Year Outcomes of Second-Generation, All-Inside Meniscal Repair in the Setting of ACL Reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2023; 105:908-914. [PMID: 37341691 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.22.01196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Meniscal repair is the goal, whenever possible, for the treatment of meniscal injury. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term clinical success of meniscal repair performed with a second-generation, all-inside repair device with a concomitant anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. METHODS This was a retrospective review of prospectively collected patients who underwent meniscal repair by a single surgeon using the all-inside FAST-FIX Meniscal Repair System (Smith & Nephew) in conjunction with a concurrent ACL reconstruction. Eighty-one meniscal repairs (81 patients) were identified: 59 medial repairs and 22 lateral repairs. Clinical failure was defined as repeat surgical intervention involving resection or revision repair. Clinical outcomes were assessed with the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, and Marx Activity Rating Scale score. RESULTS Ten-year follow-up was obtained for 85% (69) of 81 patients. Nine patients (13% of 69) underwent a failed meniscal repair (6 medial, 3 lateral), corresponding to a failure rate of 12% (6 of 50) for medial repairs and 16% (3 of 19) for lateral repairs. The mean time to failure was 2.8 years (range, 1.2 to 5.6 years) for the medial repairs and 5.8 years (range, 4.2 to 7.0 years) for the lateral repairs (p = 0.002). There was no difference in mean patient age, sex, body mass index, graft type, or number of sutures utilized between successful repairs and failures. Postoperative KOOS and IKDC outcome scores significantly improved over baseline scores (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in patient-reported outcomes at 10 years between the group with successful repairs and those who had a failed repair. CONCLUSIONS This report of long-term follow-up results of primary second-generation, all-inside meniscal repair demonstrates its relative success when it is performed with concurrent ACL reconstruction. After a minimum follow-up of 10 years, 84% to 88% of the patients continued to demonstrate successful repair. Failure of medial meniscal repairs occurred significantly earlier compared with lateral meniscal repairs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rick W Wright
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Laura J Huston
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Amanda K Haas
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Jewett CA, Reardon P, Cox C, Bowman E, Wright RW, Dickens J, LeClere L. Outcomes of Revision Arthroscopic Posterior Labral Repair and Capsulorrhaphy: A Systematic Review. Orthop J Sports Med 2023; 11:23259671231174474. [PMID: 37347017 PMCID: PMC10280524 DOI: 10.1177/23259671231174474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Failure rates up to 14% have been reported after arthroscopic posterior capsulolabral repair. It is unknown if revision arthroscopic posterior capsulolabral stabilization has inferior restoration of stability and return to sport when compared with primary repair. Optimal management of failed posterior capsulolabral stabilization is unknown. Purpose To report outcomes of revision posterior capsulolabral repair and factors that contribute to failure and to determine optimal management of failed posterior stabilization procedures. Study Design Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods A computerized search of the PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases and manual screening of selected article reference lists were performed in January 2022. Randomized controlled trial, cohort, case-control, and case series studies reporting clinical outcomes of revision arthroscopic posterior capsulolabral repair were eligible. Patient characteristics, indications for revision, intraoperative findings, surgical techniques, and patient-reported outcomes were recorded. Owing to heterogeneity of reported outcomes, data were summarized and presented without pooled statistics. Results Only 3 of the 990 identified studies met inclusion criteria. The included studies encompassed 26 revision arthroscopic posterior capsulolabral repairs, with follow-up ranging from 2.3 to 5.3 years. The failed index procedure was arthroscopic capsulolabral repair with suture anchors (n = 22) or posterior thermal capsulorrhaphy (n = 4). The primary indications for revision were recurrent instability and pain. Six patients experienced recurrent instability after revision. Patient satisfaction ranged from 15% to 25%. Conclusion This systematic review of 3 studies demonstrated that the incidence of persistent pain and recurrent instability after revision arthroscopic posterior shoulder stabilization is common, and despite slight improvement in patient-reported outcomes, many patients are dissatisfied with their clinical outcomes. Revision arthroscopic posterior shoulder stabilization appears to have a significant failure rate, and there is need for additional prospective studies to help determine the best intervention for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Callie A. Jewett
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Patrick Reardon
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Charles Cox
- Division of Sports Medicine, Department
of Orthopaedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee,
USA
| | - Eric Bowman
- Division of Sports Medicine, Department
of Orthopaedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee,
USA
| | - Rick W. Wright
- Division of Sports Medicine, Department
of Orthopaedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee,
USA
| | - Jonathan Dickens
- Division of Sports Medicine, Department
of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Lance LeClere
- Division of Sports Medicine, Department
of Orthopaedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee,
USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Heyworth BE, Ganley TJ, Liotta ES, Hergott KA, Miller PE, Wall EJ, Myer GD, Nissen CW, Edmonds EW, Lyon RM, Chambers HG, Milewski MD, Green DW, Weiss JM, Wright RW, Polousky JD, Nepple JJ, Carey JL, Kocher MS, Shea KG. Transarticular Versus Retroarticular Drilling of Stable Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Knee: A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial by the ROCK Group. Am J Sports Med 2023; 51:1392-1402. [PMID: 37039536 DOI: 10.1177/03635465231165290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND When stable osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) lesions of the femoral condyle in a skeletally immature patient fail to heal with nonoperative methods, the standard of care treatment is condylar OCD drilling. Two primary OCD drilling techniques have been described, but no prospective studies have compared their relative effectiveness. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS The purpose of this study was to compare the healing and function after transarticular drilling (TAD) with that after retroarticular drilling (RAD). It was hypothesized that there would be no difference in rate or time to healing, rate or time to return to sports, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), or secondary OCD-related surgery. STUDY DESIGN Randomized controlled clinical trial; Level of evidence, 1. METHODS Skeletally immature patients with magnetic resonance imaging-confirmed stable OCD lesions of the medial femoral condyle who did not demonstrate substantial healing after a minimum of 3 months of nonoperative treatment were prospectively enrolled by 1 of 17 surgeon-investigators at 1 of 14 centers. Patients were randomized to the TAD or RAD group. Tourniquet time, fluoroscopy time, and complications were compared between the treatment groups. Postoperatively, serial radiographs were obtained every 6 weeks to assess healing, and PROs were obtained at 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months. RESULTS A total of 91 patients were included, consisting of 51 patients in the TAD and 40 patients in the RAD group, who were similar in age, sex distribution, and 2-year PRO response rate. Tourniquet time and fluoroscopy time were significantly shorter with TAD (mean, 38.1 minutes and 0.85 minutes, respectively) than RAD (mean, 48.2 minutes and 1.34 minutes respectively) (P = .02; P = .004). In the RAD group, chondral injury from K-wire passage into the intra-articular space was reported in 9 of 40 (22%) patients, but no associated postoperative clinical sequelae were identified in these patients. No significant differences between groups were detected in follow-up Pediatric-International Knee Documentation Committee, Lysholm, Marx Activity Scale, or Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Quality of Life scores. Healing parameters were superior at 6 months and 12 months in the TAD group, compared with the RAD group, and secondary OCD surgery occurred in 4% of patients who underwent TAD and 10% of patients who underwent RAD (P = .40). Patients in the TAD group returned to sports earlier than those in the RAD group (P = .049). CONCLUSION TAD showed shorter operative time and fluoroscopy time and superior healing parameters at 6 and 12 months, but no differences were seen in 24-month healing parameters or PROs at all follow-up time points, when compared with RAD. REGISTRATION NCT01754298 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Theodore J Ganley
- The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Roger M Lyon
- Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Rick W Wright
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | | | - Jeffrey J Nepple
- Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - James L Carey
- Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Kevin G Shea
- Stanford University Hospital, Palo Alto, California, USA
- Investigation performed at Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sullivan JK, Gottreich JR, Imrey PB, Winalski CS, Li X, Spindler KP, Tomko PM, Cox CL, Wright RW, Jones MH. The Corticosteroid Meniscectomy Trial of Extended-Release Triamcinolone Injection After Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy: Protocol for a Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. Orthop J Sports Med 2023; 11:23259671231150812. [PMID: 37113139 PMCID: PMC10126624 DOI: 10.1177/23259671231150812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2022] [Accepted: 10/21/2022] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Meniscal tear in older adults often accompanies knee osteoarthritis and is commonly treated with arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) when patients have persistent pain after a trial of physical therapy. Cross-sectional evidence suggests that synovitis is associated with baseline pain in this patient population, but little is known about the relationship between synovitis and postoperative recovery or progression of knee osteoarthritis. Purpose/Hypothesis Intra-articular extended-release triamcinolone may reduce inflammation and thereby improve outcomes and slow disease progression. This article presents the rationale behind the Corticosteroid Meniscectomy Trial (CoMeT) and describes its study design and implementation strategies. Study Design Randomized controlled trial. Methods CoMeT is a 2-arm, 3-center, randomized placebo-controlled trial designed to establish the clinical efficacy of extended-release triamcinolone administered via intra-articular injection immediately after APM. The primary outcome is change in Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Pain subscore at 3-month follow-up. Synovial biopsy, joint fluid aspirate, and urine and blood sample analyses will examine the associations between various objective measures of baseline inflammation and pre- and postoperative outcome measures and clinical responses to triamcinolone intervention. Quantitative 3-T magnetic resonance imaging will evaluate cartilage and meniscal composition and 3-dimensional bone shape to detect early joint degeneration. Results We discuss methodologic innovations and challenges. Conclusion To our knowledge, this is the first randomized double-blind clinical trial that will analyze the effect of extended-release triamcinolone acetonide on pain, magnetic resonance imaging measures of structural change and effusion/synovitis, soluble biomarkers, and synovial tissue transcriptomics after APM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James K. Sullivan
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of
Medicine of Case Western Reserve School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Julia R. Gottreich
- Orthopaedic and Arthritis Center for
Outcomes Research, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Peter B. Imrey
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of
Medicine of Case Western Reserve School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Department of Quantitative Health
Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | | | - Xiaojuan Li
- Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic,
Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering,
Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Kurt P. Spindler
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
Sports Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Patrick M. Tomko
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
Sports Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Charles L. Cox
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Rick W. Wright
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Morgan H. Jones
- Orthopaedic and Arthritis Center for
Outcomes Research, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery,
Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Morgan H. Jones, MD, MPH,
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 75 Francis St,
Hale 5016, Boston, MA 02115, USA (
)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hettrich CM, Magnuson JA, Baumgarten KM, Brophy RH, Kattan M, Bishop JY, Bollier MJ, Bravman JT, Cvetanovich GL, Dunn WR, Feeley BT, Frank RM, Kuhn JE, Lansdown DA, Benjamin Ma C, Marx RG, McCarty EC, Neviaser AS, Ortiz SF, Seidl AJ, Smith MV, Wright RW, Zhang AL, Cronin KJ, Wolf BR. Predictors of Bone Loss in Anterior Glenohumeral Instability. Am J Sports Med 2023; 51:1286-1294. [PMID: 36939180 DOI: 10.1177/03635465231160286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anterior shoulder instability can result in bone loss of both the anterior glenoid and the posterior humerus. Bone loss has been shown to lead to increased failure postoperatively and may necessitate more complex surgical procedures, resulting in worse clinical outcomes and posttraumatic arthritis. HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to investigate predictors of glenoid and humeral head bone loss in patients undergoing surgery for anterior shoulder instability. It was hypothesized that male sex, contact sport participation, traumatic dislocation, and higher number of instability events would be associated with greater bone loss. STUDY DESIGN Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS A total of 892 patients with anterior shoulder instability were prospectively enrolled in the Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) Shoulder Instability cohort. The presence and amount of anterior glenoid bone loss and accompanying Hill-Sachs lesions were quantified. Descriptive information and injury history were used to construct proportional odds models for the presence of any bone defect, for defects >10% of the anterior glenoid or humeral head, and for combined bony defects. RESULTS Anterior glenoid bone loss and Hill-Sachs lesions were present in 185 (20.7%) and 470 (52.7%) patients, respectively. Having an increased number of dislocations was associated with bone loss in all models. Increasing age, male sex, and non-White race were associated with anterior glenoid bone defects and Hill-Sachs lesions. Contact sport participation was associated with anterior glenoid bone loss, and Shoulder Actitvity Scale with glenoid bone loss >10%. A positive apprehension test was associated with Hill-Sachs lesions. Combined lesions were present in 19.4% of patients, and for every additional shoulder dislocation, the odds of having a combined lesion was 95% higher. CONCLUSION An increasing number of preoperative shoulder dislocations is the factor most strongly associated with glenoid bone loss, Hill-Sachs lesions, and combined lesions. Early surgical stabilization before recurrence of instability may be the most effective method for preventing progression to clinically significant bone loss. Patients should be made aware of the expected course of shoulder instability, especially in athletes at high risk for recurrence and osseous defects, which may complicate care and worsen outcomes. REGISTRATION NCT02075775 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolyn M Hettrich
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | | | - Robert H Brophy
- Department of Orthopedics, Washington University Saint Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Michael Kattan
- Cleveland Clinic Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | | | - Julie Y Bishop
- The Ohio State University Sports Medicine Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | | | - Jonathan T Bravman
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | | | - Warren R Dunn
- Fondren Orthopedic Group, Orthopedic Surgery, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Brian T Feeley
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Rachel M Frank
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - John E Kuhn
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Drew A Lansdown
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - C Benjamin Ma
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Robert G Marx
- Department of Sports Medicine, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | - Eric C McCarty
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | | | - Shannon F Ortiz
- University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Adam J Seidl
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Matthew V Smith
- Department of Orthopedics, Washington University Saint Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Rick W Wright
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Alan L Zhang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | | | - Brian R Wolf
- University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.,Investigation performed at multicenter facilities and the primary site is at University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wright RW, Huston LJ, Haas AK, Pennings JS, Allen CR, Cooper DE, DeBerardino TM, Dunn WR, Lantz BBA, Spindler KP, Stuart MJ, Albright JP, Amendola AN, Andrish JT, Annunziata CC, Arciero RA, Bach BR, Baker CL, Bartolozzi AR, Baumgarten KM, Bechler JR, Berg JH, Bernas GA, Brockmeier SF, Brophy RH, Bush-Joseph CA, Butler JB, Campbell JD, Carey JL, Carpenter JE, Cole BJ, Cooper JM, Cox CL, Creighton RA, Dahm DL, David TS, Flanigan DC, Frederick RW, Ganley TJ, Garofoli EA, Gatt CJ, Gecha SR, Giffin JR, Hame SL, Hannafin JA, Harner CD, Harris NL, Hechtman KS, Hershman EB, Hoellrich RG, Johnson DC, Johnson TS, Jones MH, Kaeding CC, Kamath GV, Klootwyk TE, Levy BA, Ma CB, Maiers GP, Marx RG, Matava MJ, Mathien GM, McAllister DR, McCarty EC, McCormack RG, Miller BS, Nissen CW, O'Neill DF, Owens BD, Parker RD, Purnell ML, Ramappa AJ, Rauh MA, Rettig AC, Sekiya JK, Shea KG, Sherman OH, Slauterbeck JR, Smith MV, Spang JT, Svoboda LSJ, Taft TN, Tenuta JJ, Tingstad EM, Vidal AF, Viskontas DG, White RA, Williams JS, Wolcott ML, Wolf BR, York JJ. Meniscal and Articular Cartilage Predictors of Outcome After Revision ACL Reconstruction: A 6-Year Follow-up Cohort Study. Am J Sports Med 2023; 51:605-614. [PMID: 36734487 PMCID: PMC10338044 DOI: 10.1177/03635465231151389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Meniscal and chondral damage is common in the patient undergoing revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. PURPOSE To determine if meniscal and/or articular cartilage pathology at the time of revision ACL surgery significantly influences a patient's outcome at 6-year follow-up. STUDY DESIGN Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS Patients undergoing revision ACL reconstruction were prospectively enrolled between 2006 and 2011. Data collection included baseline demographics, surgical technique, pathology, treatment, and scores from 4 validated patient-reported outcome instruments: International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and Marx Activity Rating Scale. Patients were followed up at 6 years and asked to complete the identical set of outcome instruments. Regression analysis assessed the meniscal and articular cartilage pathology risk factors for clinical outcomes 6 years after revision ACL reconstruction. RESULTS An overall 1234 patients were enrolled (716 males, 58%; median age, 26 years). Surgeons reported the pathology at the time of revision surgery in the medial meniscus (45%), lateral meniscus (36%), medial femoral condyle (43%), lateral femoral condyle (29%), medial tibial plateau (11%), lateral tibial plateau (17%), patella (30%), and trochlea (21%). Six-year follow-up was obtained on 79% of the sample (980/1234). Meniscal pathology and articular cartilage pathology (medial femoral condyle, lateral femoral condyle, lateral tibial plateau, trochlea, and patella) were significant drivers of poorer patient-reported outcomes at 6 years (IKDC, KOOS, WOMAC, and Marx). The most consistent factors driving outcomes were having a medial meniscal excision (either before or at the time of revision surgery) and patellofemoral articular cartilage pathology. Six-year Marx activity levels were negatively affected by having either a repair/excision of the medial meniscus (odds ratio range, 1.45-1.72; P≤ .04) or grade 3-4 patellar chondrosis (odds ratio, 1.72; P = .04). Meniscal pathology occurring before the index revision surgery negatively affected scores on all KOOS subscales except for sports/recreation (P < .05). Articular cartilage pathology significantly impaired all KOOS subscale scores (P < .05). Lower baseline outcome scores, higher body mass index, being a smoker, and incurring subsequent surgery all significantly increased the odds of reporting poorer clinical outcomes at 6 years. CONCLUSION Meniscal and chondral pathology at the time of revision ACL reconstruction has continued significant detrimental effects on patient-reported outcomes at 6 years after revision surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Amanda K Haas
- Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - John P Albright
- University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | | | | | | | - Robert A Arciero
- University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut, USA
| | | | | | - Arthur R Bartolozzi
- 3B Orthopaedics, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | | | - Jeffrey H Berg
- Town Center Orthopaedic Associates, Reston, Virginia, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - J Brad Butler
- Orthopedic and Fracture Clinic, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - John D Campbell
- Bridger Orthopedic and Sports Medicine, Bozeman, Montana, USA
| | - James L Carey
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Brian J Cole
- Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Tal S David
- Synergy Specialists Medical Group, San Diego, California, USA
| | | | - Robert W Frederick
- The Rothman Institute/Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Theodore J Ganley
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Charles J Gatt
- University Orthopaedic Associates LLC, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
| | - Steven R Gecha
- Princeton Orthopaedic Associates, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
| | - James Robert Giffin
- Fowler Kennedy Sport Medicine Clinic, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sharon L Hame
- David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jo A Hannafin
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Ganesh V Kamath
- University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | | | | | - C Benjamin Ma
- University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - G Peter Maiers
- Methodist Sports Medicine Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Robert G Marx
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | | | | | | | - Eric C McCarty
- University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - Robert G McCormack
- University of British Columbia/Fraser Health Authority, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Carl W Nissen
- Connecticut Children's Medical Center, Hartford, Connecticut, USA
| | | | - Brett D Owens
- Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | | | | | - Arun J Ramappa
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Michael A Rauh
- State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | | | - Jon K Sekiya
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Jeffrey T Spang
- University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ltc Steven J Svoboda
- Keller Army Community Hospital, United States Military Academy, West Point, New York, USA
| | - Timothy N Taft
- University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Edwin M Tingstad
- Inland Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine Clinic, Pullman, Washington, USA
| | - Armando F Vidal
- University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Brian R Wolf
- University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - James J York
- Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Center, LLC, Pasedena, Maryland, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Yanik EL, Keener JD, Stevens MJ, Walker-Bone KE, Dale AM, Ma Y, Colditz GA, Wright RW, Saccone NL, Jain NB, Evanoff BA. Occupational demands associated with rotator cuff disease surgery in the UK Biobank. Scand J Work Environ Health 2023; 49:53-63. [PMID: 36228192 PMCID: PMC10549913 DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.4062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Physically-demanding occupations may increase rotator cuff disease (RCD) risk and need for surgery. We linked a job-exposure matrix (JEM) to the UK Biobank cohort study to measure physical occupational exposures and estimate associations with RCD surgery. METHODS Jobs and UK Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) codes were recorded during the UK Biobank verbal interview. Lifetime job histories were captured through a web-based survey. UK SOC codes were linked to a JEM based on the US O*NET database. O*NET-based scores [static strength, dynamic strength, general physical activities, handling/moving objects (range=1-7), time spent using hands, whole body vibration, and cramped/awkward positions (range=1-5)] were assigned to jobs. RCD surgeries were identified through linked national hospital inpatient records. Multivariable Cox regression was used to calculate hazard ratios (HR) as estimates of associations with RCD surgery. Among those with lifetime job histories, associations were estimated for duration of time with greatest exposure (top quartile of exposure). RESULTS Of 277 808 people reporting jobs, 1997 (0.7%) had an inpatient RCD surgery. After adjusting for age, sex, race, education, area deprivation, and body mass index, all O*NET variables considered were associated with RCD surgery (HR per point increase range=1.10-1.45, all P<0.005). A total of 100 929 people reported lifetime job histories, in which greater exposures were significantly associated with RCD surgery after >10 years of work (eg, HR for 11-20 versus 0 years with static strength score ≥4 = 2.06, 95% confidence interval 1.39-3.04). CONCLUSIONS Workplace physical demands are an important risk factor for RCD surgery, particularly for workers with more than a decade of exposure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth L Yanik
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Ave, Campus Box 8233, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Inclan PM, Wright RW, Smith MV, Brophy RH. Early-Career Sports Medicine Surgeons Perform a Large Volume of Non-Sports Medicine Procedures: American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery (ABOS) Part-II Data Regarding Orthopaedic Surgeons Specializing in Sports Medicine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2022; 104:e97. [PMID: 35777936 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.21.01129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to utilize the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery (ABOS) Part-II Case List database to (1) define the practice patterns of sports medicine-trained ABOS Part- II Oral Examination Candidates and (2) describe the frequency and practice patterns of individuals who are dual fellowship-trained sports medicine candidates. METHODS The ABOS Part-II Case List database was utilized to define all cases submitted by 3,298 applicants indicating completion of a sports medicine fellowship between January 1, 2003, and January 1, 2020. Cases were classified by subspecialty category and case type. The frequency and practice patterns of candidates pursuing additional fellowship training (i.e., "dual fellowship-trained") were recorded. Descriptive statistical methods were used to describe the annual and overall procedure volume and candidate case mix. Trends in the relative frequency of cases performed and fellowship training patterns were determined using linear regression analysis. RESULTS On average, sports medicine-trained candidates submitted 100.6 cases for review during the 6-month case collection period: 59.0 (58.6%) sports medicine/arthroscopy cases, 29.3 (29.1%) trauma/general cases, 4.5 (4.5%) adult reconstruction cases, and 7.8 (7.8%) "other" cases per candidate. Although candidates performed fewer total (r 2 = 0.84, p < 0.001) and sports medicine/arthroscopy (r 2 = 0.85, p < 0.001) cases over the study period, the proportion of sports medicine/arthroscopy cases did not change over the study period (p = 0.18). Dual fellowship training was indicated by 333 individuals (10.1%). The number of dual fellowship-trained candidates pursuing additional fellowship training in pediatrics and adult reconstruction increased over the study period, and the number of dual fellowship-trained candidates pursuing additional fellowship training in trauma decreased over the study period. CONCLUSIONS Early-career sports medicine candidates are likely to perform >40% of cases outside of the sports medicine subspecialty. Sports medicine trainees are increasingly likely to pursue a second fellowship in pediatrics or adult reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul M Inclan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Rick W Wright
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Matthew V Smith
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Robert H Brophy
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lawrie CM, Bartosiak KA, Barrack TN, Nunley RM, Wright RW, Barrack RL. James A. Rand Young Investigator's Award: Questioning the "Nickel Free" Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2022; 37:S705-S709. [PMID: 35378232 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.03.058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2021] [Revised: 03/14/2022] [Accepted: 03/15/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A study was performed to measure metal ions present in the knee joint after performing a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with standard cobalt chromium (CoCr) components as well as with "nickel-free" oxidized zirconium femoral and titanium tibial (OxZr/Ti) components. METHODS Knee joint fluid was collected prior to arthrotomy, and on postoperative day one to determine the amount of metal debris generated when performing a TKA with standard instrumentation from consecutive cases with CoCr components (n = 24) and OxZr/Ti components (n = 16). RESULTS CoCr implant patients had statistically higher levels of nickel (Ni) (29.7%, P = .033), cobalt (Co), (1,100.7%, P < .0001) and chromium (Cr) (118.9%, P < .0001) postoperatively. The cutting blocks and sawblades do not contain Co, which therefore must have come from the components. The metal ions generated from the sawblades and cutting blocks, therefore, could be discerned from the OxZr/Ti whose components don't contain Co, Cr, or Ni. The OxZr patients had significantly higher Cr (9.5×, P < .001) and Ni (5.1×, P < .001) post-TKA vs pre-TKA; Co levels were not significantly different as expected with the absence of Co in the components (P = .60). The Ni levels generated in performing an Oxinium TKA was 3.3 times higher than when performing a CoCr TKA (1.37 vs. 41 ppb, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS The substantial degree of Ni generation resulting from performing a hypoallergenic "nickel-free" TKA calls into questions the rationale of utilizing more expensive lower Ni components on the basis of known or suspected Ni or Cr allergy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles M Lawrie
- Miami Orthopedics and Sports Medicine Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida
| | - Kimberly A Bartosiak
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Toby N Barrack
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Ryan M Nunley
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Rick W Wright
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Robert L Barrack
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Nepple JJ, Block AM, Eisenberg MT, Palumbo NE, Wright RW. Meniscal Repair Outcomes at Greater Than 5 Years: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2022; 104:1311-1320. [PMID: 35856932 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.21.01303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The utilization of meniscal repair techniques continues to evolve in an effort to maximize the rate of healing. Meniscal repair outcomes at a minimum of 5 years postoperatively appear to better represent the true failure rates. Thus, a systematic review and meta-analysis of the current literature was conducted to assess the rate of failure at a minimum of 5 years after meniscal repair. METHODS We performed a systematic review of studies reporting the outcomes of meniscal repair at a minimum of 5 years postoperatively. A standardized search and review strategy was utilized. Failure was defined as recurrent clinical symptoms or a meniscal reintervention to repair or resect the meniscus in any capacity, as defined by the study. When reported, outcomes were assessed relative to anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) status, sex, age, and postoperative rehabilitation protocol. Meta-analyses were performed with a random-effects model. RESULTS A total of 27 studies of 1,612 patients and 1,630 meniscal repairs were included in this review and meta-analysis. The pooled overall failure rate was 22.6%, while the failure rate of modern repairs (excluding early-generation all-inside devices) was 19.5%. Medial repairs were significantly more likely to fail compared with lateral repairs (23.9% versus 12.6%, p = 0.04). Failure rates were similar for inside-out (14.2%) and modern all-inside repairs (15.8%). Early-generation all-inside devices had a significantly higher failure rate (30.2%) compared with modern all-inside devices (15.8%, p = 0.01). There was no significant difference in meniscal failure rate between repairs with concomitant ACL reconstruction (21.2%) and repairs in ACL-intact knees (23.3%, p = 0.54). CONCLUSIONS Modern meniscal repair had an overall failure rate of 19.5% at a minimum of 5 years postoperatively. Modern all-inside techniques appear to have improved the success rate of meniscal repair compared with use of early-generation all-inside devices. Lateral repairs were significantly more likely to be successful compared with medial repairs, while no difference was seen between patients undergoing meniscal repair with and without concomitant ACL reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Andrew M Block
- Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | | | - Noel E Palumbo
- Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
DeFroda SF, Owens BD, Wright RW, Huston LJ, Pennings JS, Haas AK, Allen CR, Cooper DE, DeBerardino TM, Dunn WR, Lantz BBA, Spindler KP, Stuart MJ, Albright JP, Amendola AN, Annunziata CC, Arciero RA, Bach BR, Baker CL, Bartolozzi AR, Baumgarten KM, Bechler JR, Berg JH, Bernas GA, Brockmeier SF, Brophy RH, Bush-Joseph CA, Butler JB, Carey JL, Carpenter JE, Cole BJ, Cooper JM, Cox CL, Creighton RA, David TS, Flanigan DC, Frederick RW, Ganley TJ, Garofoli EA, Gatt CJ, Gecha SR, Giffin JR, Hame SL, Hannafin JA, Harner CD, Harris NL, Hechtman KS, Hershman EB, Hoellrich RG, Johnson DC, Johnson TS, Jones MH, Kaeding CC, Kamath GV, Klootwyk TE, Levy BA, Ma CB, Maiers GP, Marx RG, Matava MJ, Mathien GM, McAllister DR, McCarty EC, McCormack RG, Miller BS, Nissen CW, O'Neill DF, Parker RD, Purnell ML, Ramappa AJ, Rauh MA, Rettig AC, Sekiya JK, Shea KG, Sherman OH, Slauterbeck JR, Smith MV, Spang JT, Svoboda SJ, Taft TN, Tenuta JJ, Tingstad EM, Vidal AF, Viskontas DG, White RA, Williams JS, Wolcott ML, Wolf BR, York JJ. Descriptive Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With and Without Tunnel Bone Grafting. Am J Sports Med 2022; 50:2397-2409. [PMID: 35833922 DOI: 10.1177/03635465221104470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lytic or malpositioned tunnels may require bone grafting during revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (rACLR) surgery. Patient characteristics and effects of grafting on outcomes after rACLR are not well described. PURPOSE To describe preoperative characteristics, intraoperative findings, and 2-year outcomes for patients with rACLR undergoing bone grafting procedures compared with patients with rACLR without grafting. STUDY DESIGN Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS A total of 1234 patients who underwent rACLR were prospectively enrolled between 2006 and 2011. Baseline revision and 2-year characteristics, surgical technique, pathology, treatment, and patient-reported outcome instruments (International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC], Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS], Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, and Marx Activity Rating Scale [Marx]) were collected, as well as subsequent surgery information, if applicable. The chi-square and analysis of variance tests were used to compare group characteristics. RESULTS A total of 159 patients (13%) underwent tunnel grafting-64 (5%) patients underwent 1-stage and 95 (8%) underwent 2-stage grafting. Grafting was isolated to the femur in 31 (2.5%) patients, the tibia in 40 (3%) patients, and combined in 88 patients (7%). Baseline KOOS Quality of Life (QoL) and Marx activity scores were significantly lower in the 2-stage group compared with the no bone grafting group (P≤ .001). Patients who required 2-stage grafting had more previous ACLRs (P < .001) and were less likely to have received a bone-patellar tendon-bone or a soft tissue autograft at primary ACLR procedure (P≤ .021) compared with the no bone grafting group. For current rACLR, patients undergoing either 1-stage or 2-stage bone grafting were more likely to receive a bone-patellar tendon-bone allograft (P≤ .008) and less likely to receive a soft tissue autograft (P≤ .003) compared with the no bone grafting group. At 2-year follow-up of 1052 (85%) patients, we found inferior outcomes in the 2-stage bone grafting group (IKDC score = 68; KOOS QoL score = 44; KOOS Sport/Recreation score = 65; and Marx activity score = 3) compared with the no bone grafting group (IKDC score = 77; KOOS QoL score = 63; KOOS Sport/Recreation score = 75; and Marx activity score = 7) (P≤ .01). The 1-stage bone graft group did not significantly differ compared with the no bone grafting group. CONCLUSION Tunnel bone grafting was performed in 13% of our rACLR cohort, with 8% undergoing 2-stage surgery. Patients treated with 2-stage grafting had inferior baseline and 2-year patient-reported outcomes and activity levels compared with patients not undergoing bone grafting. Patients treated with 1-stage grafting had similar baseline and 2-year patient-reported outcomes and activity levels compared with patients not undergoing bone grafting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
-
- Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Steven F DeFroda
- University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Brett D Owens
- Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Rick W Wright
- Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Laura J Huston
- Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Jacquelyn S Pennings
- Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Amanda K Haas
- Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Christina R Allen
- Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Daniel E Cooper
- W.B. Carrell Memorial Clinic, Dallas, Texas, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Thomas M DeBerardino
- The San Antonio Orthopaedic Group, San Antonio, Texas, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Warren R Dunn
- Texas Orthopedic Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Brett Brick A Lantz
- Slocum Research & Education Foundation, Eugene, Oregon, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Kurt P Spindler
- Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Michael J Stuart
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - John P Albright
- University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Annunziato Ned Amendola
- Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Christopher C Annunziata
- Commonwealth Orthopaedics & Rehabilitation, Arlington, Virginia, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Robert A Arciero
- University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Bernard R Bach
- Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Champ L Baker
- The Hughston Clinic, Columbus, Georgia, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Arthur R Bartolozzi
- 3B Orthopaedics, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Keith M Baumgarten
- Orthopedic Institute, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Jeffery R Bechler
- University Orthopaedic Associates LLC, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Jeffrey H Berg
- Town Center Orthopaedic Associates, Reston, Virginia, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Geoffrey A Bernas
- State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Stephen F Brockmeier
- University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Robert H Brophy
- Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Charles A Bush-Joseph
- Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - J Brad Butler
- Orthopedic and Fracture Clinic, Portland, Oregon, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - James L Carey
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - James E Carpenter
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Brian J Cole
- Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Jonathan M Cooper
- HealthPartners Specialty Center, St Paul, Minnesota, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Charles L Cox
- Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - R Alexander Creighton
- University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Tal S David
- Synergy Specialists Medical Group, San Diego, California, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - David C Flanigan
- The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Robert W Frederick
- Rothman Institute/Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Theodore J Ganley
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Garofoli
- Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Charles J Gatt
- University Orthopaedic Associates LLC, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Steven R Gecha
- Princeton Orthopaedic Associates, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - James Robert Giffin
- Fowler Kennedy Sport Medicine Clinic, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Sharon L Hame
- David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Jo A Hannafin
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Christopher D Harner
- University of Texas Health Center, Houston, Texas, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Norman Lindsay Harris
- Grand River Health-Rifle, Rifle, Colorado, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Keith S Hechtman
- UHZ Sports Medicine Institute, Coral Gables, Florida, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Elliott B Hershman
- Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Rudolf G Hoellrich
- Slocum Research & Education Foundation, Eugene, Oregon, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - David C Johnson
- National Sports Medicine Institute, Leesburg, Virginia, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Timothy S Johnson
- National Sports Medicine Institute, Leesburg, Virginia, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Morgan H Jones
- Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Christopher C Kaeding
- The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Ganesh V Kamath
- University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Thomas E Klootwyk
- Methodist Sports Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Bruce A Levy
- Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - C Benjamin Ma
- University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - G Peter Maiers
- Methodist Sports Medicine Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Robert G Marx
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Matthew J Matava
- Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Gregory M Mathien
- Knoxville Orthopaedic Clinic, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - David R McAllister
- David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Eric C McCarty
- University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, Colorado, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Robert G McCormack
- University of British Columbia/Fraser Health Authority, British Columbia, Canada.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Bruce S Miller
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Carl W Nissen
- Connecticut Children's Medical Center, Hartford, Connecticut, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Daniel F O'Neill
- Littleton Regional Healthcare, Littleton, New Hampshire, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Richard D Parker
- Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Mark L Purnell
- Aspen Orthopedic Associates, Aspen, Colorado, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Arun J Ramappa
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Michael A Rauh
- State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Arthur C Rettig
- Methodist Sports Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Jon K Sekiya
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Kevin G Shea
- Intermountain Orthopaedics, Boise, Idaho, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Orrin H Sherman
- NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, New York, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - James R Slauterbeck
- University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Matthew V Smith
- Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Jeffrey T Spang
- University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Steven J Svoboda
- Keller Army Community Hospital, United States Military Academy, West Point, New York, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Timothy N Taft
- University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Joachim J Tenuta
- Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Edwin M Tingstad
- Inland Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine Clinic, Pullman, Washington, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Armando F Vidal
- University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, Colorado, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Darius G Viskontas
- Royal Columbian Hospital, New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Richard A White
- Fitzgibbon's Hospital, Marshall, Missouri, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - James S Williams
- Cleveland Clinic, Euclid, Ohio, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Michelle L Wolcott
- University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, Colorado, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Brian R Wolf
- University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - James J York
- Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Center, LLC, Pasedena, Maryland, USA.,Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Bigouette JP, Owen EC, Lantz BBA, Hoellrich RG, Wright RW, Huston LJ, Haas AK, Allen CR, Cooper DE, DeBerardino TM, Dunn WR, Spindler KP, Stuart MJ, Albright JP, Amendola A(N, Annunziata CC, Arciero RA, Bach BR, Baker CL, Bartolozzi AR, Baumgarten KM, Bechler JR, Berg JH, Bernas GA, Brockmeier SF, Brophy RH, Bush-Joseph CA, Butler V JB, Carey JL, Carpenter JE, Cole BJ, Cooper JM, Cox CL, Creighton RA, David TS, Flanigan DC, Frederick RW, Ganley TJ, Garofoli EA, Gatt CJ, Gecha SR, Robert Giffin J, Hame SL, Hannafin JA, Harner CD, Harris NL, Hechtman KS, Hershman EB, Johnson DC, Johnson TS, Jones MH, Kaeding CC, Kamath GV, Klootwyk TE, Levy BA, Ma CB, Maiers GP, Marx RG, Matava MJ, Mathien GM, McAllister DR, McCarty EC, McCormack RG, Miller BS, Nissen CW, O’Neill DF, Owens BD, Parker RD, Purnell ML, Ramappa AJ, Rauh MA, Rettig AC, Sekiya JK, Shea KG, Sherman OH, Slauterbeck JR, Smith MV, Spang JT, Svoboda LTCSJ, Taft TN, Tenuta JJ, Tingstad EM, Vidal AF, Viskontas DG, White RA, Williams JS, Wolcott ML, Wolf BR, York JJ, York JJ. Returning to Activity After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Revision Surgery: An Analysis of the Multicenter Anterior Cruciate Ligament Revision Study (MARS) Cohort at 2 Years Postoperative. Am J Sports Med 2022; 50:1788-1797. [PMID: 35648628 PMCID: PMC9756873 DOI: 10.1177/03635465221094621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) revision report lower outcome scores on validated knee questionnaires postoperatively compared to cohorts with primary ACL reconstruction. In a previously active population, it is unclear if patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are associated with a return to activity (RTA) or vary by sports participation level (higher level vs. recreational athletes). HYPOTHESES Individual RTA would be associated with improved outcomes (ie, decreased knee symptoms, pain, function) as measured using validated PROs. Recreational participants would report lower PROs compared with higher level athletes and be less likely to RTA. STUDY DESIGN Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS There were 862 patients who underwent a revision ACL reconstruction (rACLR) and self-reported physical activity at any level preoperatively. Those who did not RTA reported no activity 2 years after revision. Baseline data included patient characteristics, surgical history and characteristics, and PROs: International Knee Documentation Committee questionnaire, Marx Activity Rating Scale, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index. A binary indicator was used to identify patients with same/better PROs versus worse outcomes compared with baseline, quantifying the magnitude of change in each direction, respectively. Multivariable regression models were used to evaluate risk factors for not returning to activity, the association of 2-year PROs after rACLR surgery by RTA status, and whether each PRO and RTA status differed by participation level. RESULTS At 2 years postoperatively, approximately 15% did not RTA, with current smokers (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 3.3; P = .001), female patients (aOR = 2.9; P < .001), recreational participants (aOR = 2.0; P = .016), and those with a previous medial meniscal excision (aOR = 1.9; P = .013) having higher odds of not returning. In multivariate models, not returning to activity was significantly associated with having worse PROs at 2 years; however, no clinically meaningful differences in PROs at 2 years were seen between participation levels. CONCLUSION Recreational-level participants were twice as likely to not RTA compared with those participating at higher levels. Within a previously active cohort, no RTA was a significant predictor of lower PROs after rACLR. However, among patients who did RTA after rACLR, approximately 20% reported lower outcome scores. Most patients with rACLR who were active at baseline improved over time; however, patients who reported worse outcomes at 2 years had a clinically meaningful decline across all PROs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Erin C. Owen
- Slocum Research & Education Foundation, Eugene, OR USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Tal S. David
- Synergy Specialists Medical Group, San Diego, CA USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - James Robert Giffin
- Fowler Kennedy Sport Medicine Clinic, University of Western Ontario, London Ontario, Canada
| | - Sharon L. Hame
- David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Ganesh V. Kamath
- University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, NC USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Eric C. McCarty
- University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, CO USA
| | - Robert G. McCormack
- University of British Columbia/Fraser Health Authority, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Brett D. Owens
- Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jeffrey T. Spang
- University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, NC USA
| | | | - Timothy N. Taft
- University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, NC USA
| | | | - Edwin M. Tingstad
- Inland Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine Clinic, Pullman, WA USA
| | - Armando F. Vidal
- University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, CO USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Brian R. Wolf
- University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA USA
| | - James J. York
- Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Center, LLC, Pasedena, MD
| | - James J York
- Investigation performed at Slocum Research and Education Foundation, Eugene, Oregon, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Brophy RH, Schafer KA, Knapik DM, Motley J, Haas A, Matava MJ, Wright RW, Smith MV. Changes in Dynamic Postural Stability After ACL Reconstruction: Results Over 2 Years of Follow-up. Orthop J Sports Med 2022; 10:23259671221098989. [PMID: 35722181 PMCID: PMC9201321 DOI: 10.1177/23259671221098989] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Accepted: 03/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is crucial for knee proprioception and
postural stability. While ACL reconstruction (ACLR) and rehabilitation
improve postural stability, the timing in improvement of dynamic postural
stability after ACLR remains relatively unknown. Purpose: To evaluate changes in dynamic postural stability after ACLR out to 24 months
postoperatively. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Patients undergoing ACLR were prospectively enrolled, and dynamic postural
stability was assessed within 2 days before surgery, at 3-month intervals
postoperatively to 18 months, then at 24 months. Measurements were made on a
multidirectional platform tracking the patient’s center of mass based on
pelvic motion. The amount of time the patient was able to stay on the
platform was recorded, and a dynamic motion analysis score, reflecting the
patient’s ability to maintain one’s center of mass, was generated overall
and in 6 independent planes of motion. Results: A total of 44 patients with a mean age of 19.7 ± 6.2 years completed the
study protocol. Overall mean dynamic postural stability improved
significantly at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after surgery, with continued
improvement out to 24 months. Notable improvements occurred in
medial/lateral and anterior/posterior stability from baseline to 6 months
postoperatively, while internal/external rotation and flexion/extension
stability declined initially after surgery from baseline to 3 months
postoperatively before stabilizing to the end of the study period. Conclusion: Overall dynamic postural stability significantly improved up to 12 months
after ACLR. Improvement in postural stability occurred primarily in the
medial/lateral and anterior/posterior planes of motion, with initial
decreases in the flexion/extension and internal/external rotational planes
of motion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert H Brophy
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.,School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Kevin A Schafer
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Derrick M Knapik
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.,School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - John Motley
- STAR Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Chesterfield, Missouri, USA
| | - Amanda Haas
- School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Matthew J Matava
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.,School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Rick W Wright
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Matthew V Smith
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.,School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Brophy RH, Dunn WR, Baumgarten KM, Bishop JY, Bollier MJ, Bravman JT, Feeley BT, Grant JA, Jones GL, Kuhn JE, Benjamin Ma C, Marx RG, McCarty EC, Ortiz SF, Smith MV, Wolf BR, Wright RW, Zhang AL, Hettrich CM. Factors Associated With Shoulder Activity Level at Time of Surgery and at 2-Year Follow-up in Patients Undergoing Shoulder Stabilization Surgery. Am J Sports Med 2022; 50:1503-1511. [PMID: 35442106 DOI: 10.1177/03635465221085978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients undergoing shoulder stabilization surgery have been shown to have elevated activity levels. Factors associated with shoulder activity in this patient population at baseline and after surgery are unknown. HYPOTHESIS Patient-specific variables are associated with shoulder activity level at baseline and at 2-year follow-up in a cohort of patients undergoing shoulder stabilization surgery. STUDY DESIGN Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS Patients undergoing shoulder stabilization surgery were prospectively enrolled. As part of the data collection process, patients completed a previously validated Shoulder Activity Scale. A regression analysis was performed to assess the association of patient characteristics with baseline and 2-year follow-up shoulder activity levels. RESULTS A total of 764 (n = 612 men, n = 152 women) out of 957 patients (80%) undergoing shoulder stabilization surgery with a median age of 25 years had baseline and 2-year follow-up data and were included in the current analysis. The baseline shoulder activity level was associated with race ( P < .0001) and preoperative duration of instability (P < .0001). At 2 years, 52% of the cohort had returned to the same or higher activity level after surgery. Predictors of higher shoulder activity level at 2-year follow-up included higher baseline activity level (P < .0001), male sex (P < .0001), younger age (P = .004), higher body mass index (BMI) (P = .03), more dislocations (P = .03), nonsmokers (P = .04), and race (P = .04). CONCLUSION A longer duration of preoperative symptoms was associated with a lower baseline activity in this cohort. High baseline preoperative shoulder activity, younger age, male sex, higher BMI, number of dislocations, and nonsmoking status predicted higher shoulder activity 2 years after shoulder stabilization surgery. REGISTRATION NCT02075775 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert H Brophy
- Investigation performed at the Washington University School of Medicine, Chesterfield, Missouri, USA
| | - Warren R Dunn
- Investigation performed at the Washington University School of Medicine, Chesterfield, Missouri, USA
| | -
- Investigation performed at the Washington University School of Medicine, Chesterfield, Missouri, USA
| | - Keith M Baumgarten
- Investigation performed at the Washington University School of Medicine, Chesterfield, Missouri, USA
| | - Julie Y Bishop
- Investigation performed at the Washington University School of Medicine, Chesterfield, Missouri, USA
| | - Matthew J Bollier
- Investigation performed at the Washington University School of Medicine, Chesterfield, Missouri, USA
| | - Jonathan T Bravman
- Investigation performed at the Washington University School of Medicine, Chesterfield, Missouri, USA
| | - Brian T Feeley
- Investigation performed at the Washington University School of Medicine, Chesterfield, Missouri, USA
| | - John A Grant
- Investigation performed at the Washington University School of Medicine, Chesterfield, Missouri, USA
| | - Grant L Jones
- Investigation performed at the Washington University School of Medicine, Chesterfield, Missouri, USA
| | - John E Kuhn
- Investigation performed at the Washington University School of Medicine, Chesterfield, Missouri, USA
| | - C Benjamin Ma
- Investigation performed at the Washington University School of Medicine, Chesterfield, Missouri, USA
| | - Robert G Marx
- Investigation performed at the Washington University School of Medicine, Chesterfield, Missouri, USA
| | - Eric C McCarty
- Investigation performed at the Washington University School of Medicine, Chesterfield, Missouri, USA
| | - Shannon F Ortiz
- Investigation performed at the Washington University School of Medicine, Chesterfield, Missouri, USA
| | - Matthew V Smith
- Investigation performed at the Washington University School of Medicine, Chesterfield, Missouri, USA
| | - Brian R Wolf
- Investigation performed at the Washington University School of Medicine, Chesterfield, Missouri, USA
| | - Rick W Wright
- Investigation performed at the Washington University School of Medicine, Chesterfield, Missouri, USA
| | - Alan L Zhang
- Investigation performed at the Washington University School of Medicine, Chesterfield, Missouri, USA
| | - Carolyn M Hettrich
- Investigation performed at the Washington University School of Medicine, Chesterfield, Missouri, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Giri A, Freeman TH, Kim P, Kuhn JE, Garriga GA, Khazzam M, Higgins LD, Matzkin E, Baumgarten KM, Bishop JY, Brophy RH, Carey JL, Dunn WR, Jones GL, Ma CB, Marx RG, McCarty EC, Poddar SK, Smith MV, Spencer EE, Vidal AF, Wolf BR, Wright RW, Jain NB. Obesity and sex influence fatty infiltration of the rotator cuff: the Rotator Cuff Outcomes Workgroup (ROW) and Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) cohorts. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2022; 31:726-735. [PMID: 35032677 PMCID: PMC8940702 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.12.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2021] [Revised: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 12/12/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fatty infiltration (FI) is one of the most important prognostic factors for outcomes after rotator cuff surgery. Established risk factors include advancing age, larger tear size, and increased tear chronicity. A growing body of evidence suggests that sex and obesity are associated with FI; however, data are limited. METHODS We recruited 2 well-characterized multicenter cohorts of patients with rotator cuff tears (Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network [MOON] cohort [n = 80] and Rotator Cuff Outcomes Workgroup [ROW] cohort [n = 158]). We used multivariable logistic regression to evaluate the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and the presence of FI while adjusting for the participant's age at magnetic resonance imaging, sex, and duration of shoulder symptoms, as well as the cross-sectional area of the tear. We analyzed the 2 cohorts separately and performed a meta-analysis to combine estimates. RESULTS A total of 27 patients (33.8%) in the Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) cohort and 57 patients (36.1%) in the Rotator Cuff Outcomes Workgroup (ROW) cohort had FI. When BMI < 25 kg/m2 was used as the reference category, being overweight was associated with a 2.37-fold (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77-7.29) increased odds of FI and being obese was associated with a 3.28-fold (95% CI, 1.16-9.25) increased odds of FI. Women were 4.9 times (95% CI, 2.06-11.69) as likely to have FI as men. CONCLUSIONS Among patients with rotator cuff tears, obese patients had a substantially higher likelihood of FI. Further research is needed to assess whether modifying BMI can alter FI in patients with rotator cuff tears. This may have significant clinical implications for presurgical surgical management of rotator cuff tears. Sex was also significantly associated with FI, with women having higher odds of FI than men. Higher odds of FI in female patients may also explain previously reported early suboptimal outcomes of rotator cuff surgery and higher pain levels in female patients as compared with male patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayush Giri
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA; Division of Quantitative Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Thomas H Freeman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Peter Kim
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - John E Kuhn
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Gustavo A Garriga
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA; Division of Quantitative Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Michael Khazzam
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
| | | | - Elizabeth Matzkin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Julie Y Bishop
- Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Robert H Brophy
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - James L Carey
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania and Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Warren R Dunn
- Department of Clinical Research, Fondren Orthopedic Group, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Grant L Jones
- Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - C Benjamin Ma
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Robert G Marx
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eric C McCarty
- Department of Orthopedic Sports Medicine, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Sourav K Poddar
- Department of Orthopedic Sports Medicine, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Matthew V Smith
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Edwin E Spencer
- Shoulder & Elbow Division, Knoxville Orthopaedic Clinic, Knoxville, TN, USA
| | - Armando F Vidal
- The Steadman Clinic and Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vial, CO, USA
| | - Brian R Wolf
- Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Rick W Wright
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Nitin B Jain
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA; Departments of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Orthopaedics, and Population & Data Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Collins JE, Shrestha S, Losina E, Marx RG, Guermazi A, Jarraya M, Jones MH, Levy BA, Mandl LA, Williams EE, Wright RW, Spindler KP, Katz JN. Five-Year Structural Changes in Patients with Meniscal Tear and Osteoarthritis: Data from an RCT of Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy vs. Physical Therapy. Arthritis Rheumatol 2022; 74:1333-1342. [PMID: 35245416 PMCID: PMC9339455 DOI: 10.1002/art.42105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2021] [Revised: 11/12/2021] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Data from long-term follow-up of several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) vs. non-operative therapy or sham have suggested that APM may be associated with increased risk of worsening in radiographic features of osteoarthritis (OA). Our objective was to estimate the risk of MRI-based OA structural changes using baseline, 18-month, and 60-month MRI data from an RCT of APM vs. physical therapy in participants with meniscal tear and OA. METHODS We used data from the MeTeOR (Meniscal Tear in Osteoarthritis Research) Trial. MRIs were read using the MRI OA Knee Score (MOAKS). We used linear mixed effects models to examine the association between treatment group and continuous MOAKS summary scores, and Poisson regression to assess categorical change in joint structure. Analyses assessed change from baseline to 18 months and 18-to-60 months. We performed both intention-to-treat and as-treated analyses. RESULTS The analytic sample included 302 participants. For both treatment groups, more change was seen over the earlier (baseline - 18 months) interval than the later interval. APM was associated with increased risk of any worsening in cartilage surface area damage score (relative risk 1.35, 95% CI 1.14-1.61), osteophytes, and effusion-synovitis over the earlier time period. Only change in osteophytes was significantly different between treatment groups in the later time period. CONCLUSION These findings suggest the association between APM and MRI-based changes is most apparent in the 18 months after surgery. The reason for the attenuation of this association over longer follow-up merits further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamie E Collins
- Orthopedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Swastina Shrestha
- Orthopedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Elena Losina
- Orthopedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.,Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Robert G Marx
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Ali Guermazi
- Quantitative Imaging Center, Department of Radiology, Boston University School of Medicine Boston, MA
| | - Mohamed Jarraya
- Quantitative Imaging Center, Department of Radiology, Boston University School of Medicine Boston, MA.,Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Morgan H Jones
- Orthopedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Bruce A Levy
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Lisa A Mandl
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Emma E Williams
- Orthopedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Rick W Wright
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Kurt P Spindler
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Jeffrey N Katz
- Orthopedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Nissen CW, Albright JC, Anderson CN, Busch MT, Carlson C, Carsen S, Chambers HG, Edmonds EW, Ellermann JM, Ellis HB, Erickson JB, Fabricant PD, Ganley TJ, Green DW, Grimm NL, Heyworth BE, Po JHH, Kocher MS, Kostyun RO, Krych AJ, Latz KH, Loveland DM, Lyon RM, Mayer SW, Meenen NM, Milewski MD, Myer GD, Nelson BJ, Nepple JJ, Nguyen JC, Pace JL, Paterno MV, Pennock AT, Perkins CA, Polousky JD, Saluan P, Shea KG, Shearier E, Tompkins MA, Wall EJ, Weiss JM, Willimon SC, Wilson PL, Wright RW, Zbojniewicz AM, Carey JL. Descriptive Epidemiology From the Research in Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Knee (ROCK) Prospective Cohort. Am J Sports Med 2022; 50:118-127. [PMID: 34818065 DOI: 10.1177/03635465211057103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) occurs most commonly in the knees of young individuals. This condition is known to cause pain and discomfort in the knee and can lead to disability and early knee osteoarthritis. The cause is not well understood, and treatment plans are not well delineated. The Research in Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Knee (ROCK) group established a multicenter, prospective cohort to better understand this disease. PURPOSE To provide a baseline report of the ROCK multicenter prospective cohort and present a descriptive analysis of baseline data for patient characteristics, lesion characteristics, and clinical findings of the first 1000 cases enrolled into the prospective cohort. STUDY DESIGN Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS Patients were recruited from centers throughout the United States. Baseline data were obtained for patient characteristics, sports participation, patient-reported measures of functional capabilities and limitations, physical examination, diagnostic imaging results, and initial treatment plan. Descriptive statistics were completed for all outcomes of interest. RESULTS As of November 2020, a total of 27 orthopaedic surgeons from 17 institutions had enrolled 1004 knees with OCD, representing 903 patients (68.9% males; median age, 13.1 years; range, 6.3-25.4 years), into the prospective cohort. Lesions were located on the medial femoral condyle (66.2%), lateral femoral condyle (18.1%), trochlea (9.5%), patella (6.0%), and tibial plateau (0.2%). Most cases involved multisport athletes (68.1%), with the most common primary sport being basketball for males (27.3% of cases) and soccer for females (27.6% of cases). The median Pediatric International Knee Documentation Committee (Pedi-IKCD) score was 59.9 (IQR, 45.6-73.9), and the median Pediatric Functional Activity Brief Scale (Pedi-FABS) score was 21.0 (IQR, 5.0-28.0). Initial treatments were surgical intervention (55.4%) and activity restriction (44.0%). When surgery was performed, surgeons deemed the lesion to be stable at intraoperative assessment in 48.1% of cases. CONCLUSION The multicenter ROCK group has been able to enroll the largest knee OCD cohort to date. This information is being used to further understand the pathology of OCD, including its cause, associated comorbidities, and initial presentation and symptoms. The cohort having been established is now being followed longitudinally to better define and elucidate the best treatment algorithms based on these presenting signs and symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carl W Nissen
- PRISM Sports Medicine, Hartford, Connecticut; Hartford Healthcare's Bone and Joint Institute, Hartford, Connecticut, USA
| | | | | | | | - Cathy Carlson
- College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA
| | - Sasha Carsen
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Henry G Chambers
- Rady Children's Hospital and UC San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Eric W Edmonds
- Rady Children's Hospital and UC San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | | | - Henry B Ellis
- Scottish Rite for Children Sports Medicine, Frisco, Texas, USA
| | - John B Erickson
- Children's Hospital of Wisconsin, Greenfield, Wisconsin, USA
| | | | - Theodore J Ganley
- The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Regina O Kostyun
- Hartford Healthcare's Bone and Joint Institute, Hartford, Connecticut, USA
| | | | | | | | - Roger M Lyon
- Children's Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | | | - Norbert M Meenen
- Asklepios Hospital St. George, Children's Sports Medicine, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Gregory D Myer
- Emory Sport Performance and Research Center, Flowery Branch, Georgia; Emory Sports Medicine Center, Atlanta, Georgia; Department of Orthopaedics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | | - Jeffrey J Nepple
- Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Jie C Nguyen
- The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - J Lee Pace
- Andrew's Institute, Children's Health, Plano, Texas, USA
| | - Mark V Paterno
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital and University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Andrew T Pennock
- Rady Children's Hospital and UC San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | | | - John D Polousky
- Akron Children's Hospital Department of Orthopedics, Akron, Ohio, USA
| | | | - Kevin G Shea
- Stanford Children's Hospital, Sunnyvale, California, USA
| | - Emily Shearier
- Hartford Healthcare's Bone and Joint Institute, Hartford, Connecticut, USA
| | - Marc A Tompkins
- Gillette Children's Specialty Healthcare; University of Minnesota; TRIA Orthopaedic Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Eric J Wall
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Jennifer M Weiss
- Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | | - Philip L Wilson
- Scottish Rite for Children Sports Medicine, Frisco, Texas, USA
| | - Rick W Wright
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Andrew M Zbojniewicz
- Michigan State University; Advanced Radiology Services, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA
| | - James L Carey
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | -
- Investigation performed at multiple sites
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Salem HS, Huston LJ, Zajichek A, McCarty EC, Vidal AF, Bravman JT, Spindler KP, Frank RM, Amendola A, Andrish JT, Brophy RH, Jones MH, Kaeding CC, Marx RG, Matava MJ, Parker RD, Wolcott ML, Wolf BR, Wright RW. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Concomitant Meniscal Repair: Is Graft Choice Predictive of Meniscal Repair Success? Orthop J Sports Med 2021; 9:23259671211033584. [PMID: 34541016 PMCID: PMC8445540 DOI: 10.1177/23259671211033584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2021] [Accepted: 03/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background When meniscal repair is performed during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR), the effect of ACL graft type on meniscal repair outcomes is unclear. Hypothesis The authors hypothesized that meniscal repairs would fail at the lowest rate when concomitant ACLR was performed with bone--patellar tendon--bone (BTB) autograft. Study Design Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods Patients who underwent meniscal repair at primary ACLR were identified from a longitudinal, prospective cohort. Meniscal repair failures, defined as any subsequent surgical procedure addressing the meniscus, were identified. A logistic regression model was built to assess the association of graft type, patient-specific factors, baseline Marx activity rating score, and meniscal repair location (medial or lateral) with repair failure at 6-year follow-up. Results A total of 646 patients were included. Grafts used included BTB autograft (55.7%), soft tissue autograft (33.9%), and various allografts (10.4%). We identified 101 patients (15.6%) with a documented meniscal repair failure. Failure occurred in 74 of 420 (17.6%) isolated medial meniscal repairs, 15 of 187 (8%) isolated lateral meniscal repairs, and 12 of 39 (30.7%) of combined medial and lateral meniscal repairs. Meniscal repair failure occurred in 13.9% of patients with BTB autografts, 17.4% of patients with soft tissue autografts, and 19.4% of patients with allografts. The odds of failure within 6 years of index surgery were increased more than 2-fold with allograft versus BTB autograft (odds ratio = 2.34 [95% confidence interval, 1.12-4.92]; P = .02). There was a trend toward increased meniscal repair failures with soft tissue versus BTB autografts (odds ratio = 1.41 [95% confidence interval, 0.87-2.30]; P = .17). The odds of failure were 68% higher with medial versus lateral repairs (P < .001). There was a significant relationship between baseline Marx activity level and the risk of subsequent meniscal repair failure; patients with either very low (0-1 points) or very high (15-16 points) baseline activity levels were at the highest risk (P = .004). Conclusion Meniscal repair location (medial vs lateral) and baseline activity level were the main drivers of meniscal repair outcomes. Graft type was ranked third, demonstrating that meniscal repairs performed with allograft were 2.3 times more likely to fail compared with BTB autograft. There was no significant difference in failure rates between BTB versus soft tissue autografts. Registration NCT00463099 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Laura J Huston
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Alexander Zajichek
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | | | | | | | - Kurt P Spindler
- Department of Orthopaedics, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Garfield Heights, Ohio, USA
| | | | | | - Annunziato Amendola
- CU Sports Medicine, Boulder, Colorado, USA.,Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.,Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.,Department of Orthopaedics, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Garfield Heights, Ohio, USA.,Investigation performed at Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA; and University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA
| | - Jack T Andrish
- CU Sports Medicine, Boulder, Colorado, USA.,Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.,Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.,Department of Orthopaedics, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Garfield Heights, Ohio, USA.,Investigation performed at Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA; and University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA
| | - Robert H Brophy
- CU Sports Medicine, Boulder, Colorado, USA.,Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.,Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.,Department of Orthopaedics, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Garfield Heights, Ohio, USA.,Investigation performed at Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA; and University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA
| | - Morgan H Jones
- CU Sports Medicine, Boulder, Colorado, USA.,Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.,Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.,Department of Orthopaedics, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Garfield Heights, Ohio, USA.,Investigation performed at Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA; and University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA
| | - Christopher C Kaeding
- CU Sports Medicine, Boulder, Colorado, USA.,Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.,Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.,Department of Orthopaedics, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Garfield Heights, Ohio, USA.,Investigation performed at Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA; and University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA
| | - Robert G Marx
- CU Sports Medicine, Boulder, Colorado, USA.,Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.,Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.,Department of Orthopaedics, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Garfield Heights, Ohio, USA.,Investigation performed at Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA; and University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA
| | - Matthew J Matava
- CU Sports Medicine, Boulder, Colorado, USA.,Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.,Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.,Department of Orthopaedics, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Garfield Heights, Ohio, USA.,Investigation performed at Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA; and University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA
| | - Richard D Parker
- CU Sports Medicine, Boulder, Colorado, USA.,Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.,Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.,Department of Orthopaedics, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Garfield Heights, Ohio, USA.,Investigation performed at Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA; and University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA
| | - Michelle L Wolcott
- CU Sports Medicine, Boulder, Colorado, USA.,Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.,Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.,Department of Orthopaedics, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Garfield Heights, Ohio, USA.,Investigation performed at Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA; and University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA
| | - Brian R Wolf
- CU Sports Medicine, Boulder, Colorado, USA.,Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.,Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.,Department of Orthopaedics, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Garfield Heights, Ohio, USA.,Investigation performed at Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA; and University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA
| | - Rick W Wright
- CU Sports Medicine, Boulder, Colorado, USA.,Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.,Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.,Department of Orthopaedics, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Garfield Heights, Ohio, USA.,Investigation performed at Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA; and University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Brophy RH, Huston LJ, Briskin I, Amendola A, Cox CL, Dunn WR, Flanigan DC, Jones MH, Kaeding CC, Marx RG, Matava MJ, McCarty EC, Parker RD, Vidal AF, Wolcott ML, Wolf BR, Wright RW, Spindler KP. Articular Cartilage and Meniscus Predictors of Patient-Reported Outcomes 10 Years After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Multicenter Cohort Study. Am J Sports Med 2021; 49:2878-2888. [PMID: 34324369 PMCID: PMC9112230 DOI: 10.1177/03635465211028247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Articular cartilage and meniscal damage are commonly encountered and often treated at the time of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Our understanding of how these injuries and their treatment relate to outcomes of ACLR is still evolving. HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to assess whether articular cartilage and meniscal variables are predictive of 10-year outcomes after ACLR. We hypothesized that articular cartilage lesions and meniscal tears and treatment would be predictors of the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) (all 5 subscales), and Marx activity level outcomes at 10-year follow-up after ACLR. STUDY DESIGN Cohort study (prognosis); Level of evidence, 1. METHODS Between 2002 and 2008, individuals with ACLR were prospectively enrolled and followed longitudinally using the IKDC, KOOS, and Marx activity score completed at entry, 2, 6, and 10 years. A proportional odds logistic regression model was built incorporating variables from patient characteristics, surgical technique, articular cartilage injuries, and meniscal tears and treatment to determine the predictors (risk factors) of IKDC, KOOS, and Marx outcomes at 10 years. RESULTS A total of 3273 patients were enrolled (56% male; median age, 23 years at time of enrollment). Ten-year follow-up was obtained on 79% (2575/3273) of the cohort. Incidence of concomitant pathology at the time of surgery consisted of the following: articular cartilage (medial femoral condyle [MFC], 22%; lateral femoral condyle [LFC], 15%; medial tibial plateau [MTP], 4%; lateral tibial plateau [LTP], 11%; patella, 18%; trochlea, 8%) and meniscal pathology (medial, 37%; lateral, 46%). Variables that were predictive of poorer 10-year outcomes included articular cartilage damage in the patellofemoral (P < .01) and medial (P < .05) compartments and previous medial meniscal surgery (7% of knees; P < .04). Compared with no meniscal tear, a meniscal injury was not associated with 10-year outcomes. Medial meniscal repair at the time of ACLR was associated with worse 10-year outcomes for 2 of 5 KOOS subscales, while a medial meniscal repair in knees with grade 2 MFC chondrosis was associated with better outcomes on 2 KOOS subscales. CONCLUSION Articular cartilage injury in the patellofemoral and medial compartments at the time of ACLR and a history of medial meniscal surgery before ACLR were associated with poorer 10-year ACLR patient-reported outcomes, but meniscal injury present at the time of ACLR was not. There was limited and conflicting association of medial meniscal repair with these outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert H Brophy
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Chesterfield, Missouri, USA
- Investigation performed at Washington University, Chesterfield, Missouri, USA, Vanderbilt, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, and Cleveland Clinic, Garfield Heights, Ohio, USA
| | - Laura J Huston
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Investigation performed at Washington University, Chesterfield, Missouri, USA, Vanderbilt, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, and Cleveland Clinic, Garfield Heights, Ohio, USA
| | - Isaac Briskin
- Cleveland Clinic Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Investigation performed at Washington University, Chesterfield, Missouri, USA, Vanderbilt, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, and Cleveland Clinic, Garfield Heights, Ohio, USA
| | - Annunziato Amendola
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Investigation performed at Washington University, Chesterfield, Missouri, USA, Vanderbilt, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, and Cleveland Clinic, Garfield Heights, Ohio, USA
| | - Charles L Cox
- Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Investigation performed at Washington University, Chesterfield, Missouri, USA, Vanderbilt, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, and Cleveland Clinic, Garfield Heights, Ohio, USA
| | - Warren R Dunn
- Fondren Orthopedic Research Institute, Houston, Texas, USA
- Investigation performed at Washington University, Chesterfield, Missouri, USA, Vanderbilt, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, and Cleveland Clinic, Garfield Heights, Ohio, USA
| | - David C Flanigan
- Department of Orthopaedics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
- Investigation performed at Washington University, Chesterfield, Missouri, USA, Vanderbilt, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, and Cleveland Clinic, Garfield Heights, Ohio, USA
| | - Morgan H Jones
- Department of Orthopaedics, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Garfield Heights, Ohio, USA
- Investigation performed at Washington University, Chesterfield, Missouri, USA, Vanderbilt, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, and Cleveland Clinic, Garfield Heights, Ohio, USA
| | - Christopher C Kaeding
- Department of Orthopaedics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
- Investigation performed at Washington University, Chesterfield, Missouri, USA, Vanderbilt, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, and Cleveland Clinic, Garfield Heights, Ohio, USA
| | - Robert G Marx
- Department of Orthopaedics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
- Investigation performed at Washington University, Chesterfield, Missouri, USA, Vanderbilt, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, and Cleveland Clinic, Garfield Heights, Ohio, USA
| | - Matthew J Matava
- Department of Orthopaedics, Washington University School of Medicine, Chesterfield, Missouri, USA
- Investigation performed at Washington University, Chesterfield, Missouri, USA, Vanderbilt, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, and Cleveland Clinic, Garfield Heights, Ohio, USA
| | - Eric C McCarty
- CU Sports Medicine, Boulder, Colorado, USA
- Investigation performed at Washington University, Chesterfield, Missouri, USA, Vanderbilt, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, and Cleveland Clinic, Garfield Heights, Ohio, USA
| | - Richard D Parker
- Department of Orthopaedics, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Garfield Heights, Ohio, USA
- Investigation performed at Washington University, Chesterfield, Missouri, USA, Vanderbilt, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, and Cleveland Clinic, Garfield Heights, Ohio, USA
| | - Armando F Vidal
- Investigation performed at Washington University, Chesterfield, Missouri, USA, Vanderbilt, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, and Cleveland Clinic, Garfield Heights, Ohio, USA
| | - Michelle L Wolcott
- CU Sports Medicine, Boulder, Colorado, USA
- Investigation performed at Washington University, Chesterfield, Missouri, USA, Vanderbilt, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, and Cleveland Clinic, Garfield Heights, Ohio, USA
| | - Brian R Wolf
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
- Investigation performed at Washington University, Chesterfield, Missouri, USA, Vanderbilt, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, and Cleveland Clinic, Garfield Heights, Ohio, USA
| | - Rick W Wright
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Investigation performed at Washington University, Chesterfield, Missouri, USA, Vanderbilt, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, and Cleveland Clinic, Garfield Heights, Ohio, USA
| | - Kurt P Spindler
- Department of Orthopaedics, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Investigation performed at Washington University, Chesterfield, Missouri, USA, Vanderbilt, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, and Cleveland Clinic, Garfield Heights, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Minaie A, Bernholt DL, Block AM, Patel RM, Wright RW, Matava MJ, Nepple JJ. Normative PROMIS Scores in Healthy Collegiate Athletes: Establishing a Target for Return to Function in the Young Adult Athlete. Orthop J Sports Med 2021; 9:23259671211017162. [PMID: 34409111 PMCID: PMC8366136 DOI: 10.1177/23259671211017162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2021] [Accepted: 01/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) computer-adaptive testing (CAT) has been shown to be a valid and reliable means of assessing patient-reported outcomes. However, normal scores and distributions for a subset of a healthy young athletic population have not been established. Purpose To establish normative PROMIS scores for the domains of Physical Function (PF-CAT), Mobility (M-CAT), Upper Extremity Function (UE-CAT), and Pain Interference (PI-CAT) and determine the frequency of floor and ceiling effects in a population of healthy collegiate athletes. Study Design Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods Healthy collegiate athletes (18-23 years of age) were prospectively enrolled to complete the 4 PROMIS CAT domains. Additionally, the athletes provided information regarding their age, sex, and sport(s). Mean scores (±SD) and identification of ceiling or floor effects were calculated. Ceiling and floor effects were considered significant if >15% of the participants obtained the highest or lowest possible score on a domain. Results A total of 194 healthy athletes (mean age, 19.1 years) were included in the study: 118 (60.8%) men and 76 (39.2%) women. Mean scores were 62.9 ± 6.7 for PF-CAT, 58.2 ± 4.1 for M-CAT, 57.4 ± 5.8 for UE-CAT, and 43.2 ± 6.2 for PI-CAT. Distributions of scores for M-CAT and UE-CAT indicated strong ceiling effects by 77.3% and 66.0% of the participants, respectively. In healthy athletes, the PF-CAT differed most from the expected population-based mean score (50), with the mean being >1 SD above (62.9), without a ceiling effect observed. There were no significant sex- or age-based differences on any of the PROMIS domain scores. Conclusion Healthy collegiate athletes scored nearly 1 SD from population-based means for all of the domains tested. M-CAT and UE-CAT demonstrated ceiling effects in more than two-thirds of healthy athletes, which may limit their utility in this population. The PF-CAT did not demonstrate floor or ceiling effects and demonstrated differences in a young adult athletic population from the population mean. The mean PF-CAT score of 62.9 can represent a target for return of function in injured athletes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arya Minaie
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - David L Bernholt
- Campbell Clinic Orthopaedics, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Andrew M Block
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Ronak M Patel
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Rick W Wright
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Matthew J Matava
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Jeffrey J Nepple
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Magnussen R, Reinke EK, Huston LJ, Spindler KP, Cox CL, Dunn WR, Flanigan DC, Jones MH, Kaeding CC, Matava MJ, Parker RD, Smith MV, Wright RW, Spindler KP. Neither Residual Anterior Knee Laxity Up to 6 mm nor a Pivot Glide Predict Patient-Reported Outcome Scores or Subsequent Knee Surgery Between 2 and 6 Years After ACL Reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2021; 49:2631-2637. [PMID: 34269610 PMCID: PMC9202674 DOI: 10.1177/03635465211025003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A primary goal of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is to reduce pathologically increased anterior and rotational laxity of the knee, but the effects of residual laxity on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after ACLR remain unclear. HYPOTHESIS Increased residual laxity at 2 years postoperatively is predictive of a higher risk of subsequent ipsilateral knee surgery and decreases in PRO scores from 2 to 6 years after surgery. STUDY DESIGN Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS From a prospective multicenter cohort, 433 patients aged <36 years were identified at a minimum 2 years after primary ACLR. These patients underwent a KT-1000 arthrometer assessment and pivot-shift test and completed PRO assessments with the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores. Patients completed the same PROs at 6 years postoperatively, and any subsequent ipsilateral knee procedures during this period were recorded. Subsequent surgery risk and change in PROs from 2 to 6 years postoperatively were compared based on residual side-to-side KT-1000 arthrometer differences (<-1 mm, -1 to 2 mm, 2 to 6 mm, and >6 mm) in laxity at 2 years postoperatively. Multiple linear regression models were built to determine the relationship between 2-year postoperative knee laxity and 2- to 6-year change in PROs while controlling for age, sex, body mass index, smoking status, meniscal and cartilage status, and graft type. RESULTS A total of 381 patients (87.9%) were available for follow-up 6 years postoperatively. There were no significant differences in risk of subsequent knee surgery based on residual knee laxity. Patients with a difference >6 mm in side-to-side anterior laxity at 2 years postoperatively were noted to have a larger decrease in PROs from 2 to 6 years postoperatively (P < .05). No significant differences in any PROs were noted among patients with a difference <6 mm in side-to-side anterior laxity or those with pivot glide (IKDC B) versus no pivot shift (IKDC A). CONCLUSION The presence of a residual side-to-side KT-1000 arthrometer difference <6 mm or pivot glide at 2 years after ACLR is not associated with an increased risk of subsequent ipsilateral knee surgery or decreased PROs up to 6 years after ACLR. Conversely, patients exhibiting a difference >6 mm in side-to-side anterior laxity were noted to have significantly decreased PROs at 6 years after ACLR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Magnussen
- Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43202
| | - Emily K Reinke
- Sports Medicine, Orthopaedic Surgery Research, Duke University Medical Center, Duke Sports Science Institute, DUMC Box 3615, 3475 Erwin Road
| | - Laura J Huston
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1215 21 Avenue South, MCE, South Tower, Suite 4200, Nashville, TN 37232
| | | | - Kurt P Spindler
- Department of Orthopaedics, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 5555 Transportation Blvd., Cleveland, OH 44125
| | - Charles L Cox
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.,Investigation performed at The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA; the Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA; and the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Warren R Dunn
- Texas Orthopedic Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA.,Investigation performed at The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA; the Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA; and the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - David C Flanigan
- The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.,Investigation performed at The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA; the Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA; and the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Morgan H Jones
- Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.,Investigation performed at The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA; the Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA; and the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Christopher C Kaeding
- The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.,Investigation performed at The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA; the Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA; and the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Matthew J Matava
- Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.,Investigation performed at The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA; the Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA; and the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Richard D Parker
- Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.,Investigation performed at The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA; the Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA; and the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Matthew V Smith
- Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.,Investigation performed at The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA; the Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA; and the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Rick W Wright
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.,Investigation performed at The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA; the Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA; and the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Kurt P Spindler
- Department of Orthopaedics, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.,Investigation performed at The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA; the Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA; and the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Wright RW, Huston LJ, Haas AK, Pennings JS, Allen CR, Cooper DE, DeBerardino TM, Dunn WR, Lantz BBA, Spindler KP, Stuart MJ, Albright JP, Amendola AN, Andrish JT, Annunziata CC, Arciero RA, Bach BR, Baker CL, Bartolozzi AR, Baumgarten KM, Bechler JR, Berg JH, Bernas GA, Brockmeier SF, Brophy RH, Bush-Joseph CA, Brad Butler V J, Campbell JD, Carey JL, Carpenter JE, Cole BJ, Cooper JM, Cox CL, Creighton RA, Dahm DL, David TS, Flanigan DC, Frederick RW, Ganley TJ, Garofoli EA, Gatt CJ, Gecha SR, Giffin JR, Hame SL, Hannafin JA, Harner CD, Harris NL, Hechtman KS, Hershman EB, Hoellrich RG, Johnson DC, Johnson TS, Jones MH, Kaeding CC, Kamath GV, Klootwyk TE, Levy BA, Ma CB, Maiers GP, Marx RG, Matava MJ, Mathien GM, McAllister DR, McCarty EC, McCormack RG, Miller BS, Nissen CW, O'Neill DF, Owens BD, Parker RD, Purnell ML, Ramappa AJ, Rauh MA, Rettig AC, Sekiya JK, Shea KG, Sherman OH, Slauterbeck JR, Smith MV, Spang JT, Svoboda LSJ, Taft TN, Tenuta JJ, Tingstad EM, Vidal AF, Viskontas DG, White RA, Williams JS, Wolcott ML, Wolf BR, York JJ. Association Between Graft Choice and 6-Year Outcomes of Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in the MARS Cohort. Am J Sports Med 2021; 49:2589-2598. [PMID: 34260326 PMCID: PMC9236596 DOI: 10.1177/03635465211027170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although graft choice may be limited in the revision setting based on previously used grafts, most surgeons believe that graft choice for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is an important factor related to outcome. HYPOTHESIS In the ACL revision setting, there would be no difference between autograft and allograft in rerupture rate and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) at 6-year follow-up. STUDY DESIGN Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS Patients who had revision surgery were identified and prospectively enrolled in this cohort study by 83 surgeons over 52 sites. Data collected included baseline characteristics, surgical technique and pathology, and a series of validated PRO measures. Patients were followed up at 6 years and asked to complete the identical set of PRO instruments. Incidence of additional surgery and reoperation because of graft failure were also recorded. Multivariable regression models were used to determine the predictors (risk factors) of PROs, graft rerupture, and reoperation at 6 years after revision surgery. RESULTS A total of 1234 patients including 716 (58%) men were enrolled. A total of 325 (26%) underwent revision using a bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) autograft; 251 (20%), soft tissue autograft; 289 (23%), BTB allograft; 302 (25%), soft tissue allograft; and 67 (5%), other graft. Questionnaires and telephone follow-up for subsequent surgery information were obtained for 809 (66%) patients, while telephone follow-up was only obtained for an additional 128 patients for the total follow-up on 949 (77%) patients. Graft choice was a significant predictor of 6-year Marx Activity Rating Scale scores (P = .024). Specifically, patients who received a BTB autograft for revision reconstruction had higher activity levels than did patients who received a BTB allograft (odds ratio [OR], 1.92; 95% CI, 1.25-2.94). Graft rerupture was reported in 5.8% (55/949) of patients by their 6-year follow-up: 3.5% (16/455) of patients with autografts and 8.4% (37/441) of patients with allografts. Use of a BTB autograft for revision resulted in patients being 4.2 times less likely to sustain a subsequent graft rupture than if a BTB allograft were utilized (P = .011; 95% CI, 1.56-11.27). No significant differences were found in graft rerupture rates between BTB autograft and soft tissue autografts (P = .87) or between BTB autografts and soft tissue allografts (P = .36). Use of an autograft was found to be a significant predictor of having fewer reoperations within 6 years compared with using an allograft (P = .010; OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.36-0.87). CONCLUSION BTB and soft tissue autografts had a decreased risk in graft rerupture compared with BTB allografts. BTB autografts were associated with higher activity level than were BTB allografts at 6 years after revision reconstruction. Surgeons and patients should consider this information when choosing a graft for revision ACL reconstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rick W Wright
- Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Laura J Huston
- Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Amanda K Haas
- Washington University in Saint Louis, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Jacquelyn S Pennings
- Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Christina R Allen
- Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Daniel E Cooper
- W.B. Carrell Memorial Clinic, Dallas, Texas, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Thomas M DeBerardino
- The San Antonio Orthopaedic Group, San Antonio, Texas, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Warren R Dunn
- Texas Orthopedic Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Brett Brick A Lantz
- Slocum Research and Education Foundation, Eugene, Oregon, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Kurt P Spindler
- Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Michael J Stuart
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - John P Albright
- University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Annunziato Ned Amendola
- Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Jack T Andrish
- Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Christopher C Annunziata
- Commonwealth Orthopaedics & Rehabilitation, Arlington, Virginia, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Robert A Arciero
- University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Bernard R Bach
- Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Champ L Baker
- The Hughston Clinic, Columbus, Georgia, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Arthur R Bartolozzi
- 3B Orthopaedics, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Keith M Baumgarten
- Orthopedic Institute, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Jeffery R Bechler
- University Orthopaedic Associates LLC, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Jeffrey H Berg
- Town Center Orthopaedic Associates, Reston, Virginia, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Geoffrey A Bernas
- State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Stephen F Brockmeier
- University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Robert H Brophy
- Washington University in Saint Louis, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Charles A Bush-Joseph
- Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - J Brad Butler V
- Orthopedic and Fracture Clinic, Portland, Oregon, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - John D Campbell
- Bridger Orthopedic and Sports Medicine, Bozeman, Montana, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - James L Carey
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - James E Carpenter
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Brian J Cole
- Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Jonathan M Cooper
- HealthPartners Specialty Center, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Charles L Cox
- Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - R Alexander Creighton
- University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Diane L Dahm
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Tal S David
- Synergy Specialists Medical Group, San Diego, California, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - David C Flanigan
- The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Robert W Frederick
- The Rothman Institute/Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Theodore J Ganley
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Garofoli
- Washington University in Saint Louis, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Charles J Gatt
- University Orthopaedic Associates LLC, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Steven R Gecha
- Princeton Orthopaedic Associates, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - James Robert Giffin
- Fowler Kennedy Sport Medicine Clinic, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Sharon L Hame
- David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Jo A Hannafin
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Christopher D Harner
- University of Texas Health Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Norman Lindsay Harris
- Grand River Health, Rifle, Colorado, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Keith S Hechtman
- UHZ Sports Medicine Institute, Coral Gables, Florida, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Elliott B Hershman
- Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Rudolf G Hoellrich
- Slocum Research and Education Foundation, Eugene, Oregon, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - David C Johnson
- National Sports Medicine Institute, Leesburg, Virginia, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Timothy S Johnson
- National Sports Medicine Institute, Leesburg, Virginia, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Morgan H Jones
- Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Christopher C Kaeding
- The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Ganesh V Kamath
- University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Thomas E Klootwyk
- Methodist Sports Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Bruce A Levy
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - C Benjamin Ma
- University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - G Peter Maiers
- Methodist Sports Medicine Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Robert G Marx
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Matthew J Matava
- Washington University in Saint Louis, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Gregory M Mathien
- Knoxville Orthopaedic Clinic, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - David R McAllister
- David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Eric C McCarty
- University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, Colorado, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Robert G McCormack
- University of British Columbia/Fraser Health Authority, New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Bruce S Miller
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Carl W Nissen
- Connecticut Children's Medical Center, Hartford, Connecticut, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Daniel F O'Neill
- Littleton Regional Healthcare, Littleton, New Hampshire, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Brett D Owens
- Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Richard D Parker
- Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Mark L Purnell
- Aspen Orthopedic Associates, Aspen, Colorado, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Arun J Ramappa
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Michael A Rauh
- State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Arthur C Rettig
- Methodist Sports Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Jon K Sekiya
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Kevin G Shea
- Intermountain Orthopaedics, Boise, Idaho, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Orrin H Sherman
- NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, New York, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - James R Slauterbeck
- University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Matthew V Smith
- Washington University in Saint Louis, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Jeffrey T Spang
- University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Ltc Steven J Svoboda
- Keller Army Community Hospital, United States Military Academy, West Point, New York, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Timothy N Taft
- University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Joachim J Tenuta
- Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Edwin M Tingstad
- Inland Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine Clinic, Pullman, Washington, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Armando F Vidal
- University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, Colorado, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Darius G Viskontas
- Royal Columbian Hospital, New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Richard A White
- Fitzgibbon's Hospital, Marshall, Missouri, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - James S Williams
- Cleveland Clinic, Euclid, Ohio, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Michelle L Wolcott
- University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, Colorado, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Brian R Wolf
- University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - James J York
- Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Center, LLC, Pasadena, Maryland, USA
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Yanik EL, Keener JD, Lin SJ, Colditz GA, Wright RW, Evanoff BA, Jain NB, Saccone NL. Identification of a Novel Genetic Marker for Risk of Degenerative Rotator Cuff Disease Surgery in the UK Biobank. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2021; 103:1259-1267. [PMID: 33979311 PMCID: PMC8282705 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.20.01474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While evidence indicates that familial predisposition influences the risk of developing degenerative rotator cuff disease (RCD), knowledge of specific genetic markers is limited. We conducted a genome-wide association study of RCD surgery using the UK Biobank, a prospective cohort of 500,000 people (40 to 69 years of age at enrollment) with genotype data. METHODS Cases with surgery for degenerative RCD were identified using linked hospital records. The cases were defined as an International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) code of M75.1 determined by a trauma/orthopaedic specialist and surgery consistent with RCD treatment. Cases were excluded if a diagnosis of traumatic injury had been made during the same hospital visit. For each case, up to 5 controls matched by age, sex, and follow-up time were chosen from the UK Biobank. Analyses were limited to European-ancestry individuals who were not third-degree or closer relations. We used logistic regression to test for genetic association of 674,405 typed and >10 million imputed markers, after adjusting for age, sex, population principal components, and follow-up. RESULTS We identified 2,917 RCD surgery cases and 14,158 matched controls. We observed 1 genome-wide significant signal (p < 5 × 10-8) for a novel locus tagged by rs2237352 in the CREB5 gene on chromosome 7 (odds ratio [OR] = 1.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.11 to 1.24). The single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs2237352 was imputed with a high degree of confidence (info score = 0.9847) and is common, with a minor allele frequency of 47%. After expanding the control sample to include additional unmatched non-cases, rs2237352 and another SNP in the CREB5 gene, rs12700903, were genome-wide significant. We did not detect genome-wide significant signals at loci associated with RCD in previous studies. CONCLUSIONS We identified a novel association between a variant in the CREB5 gene and RCD surgery. Validation of this finding in studies with imaging data to confirm diagnoses will be an important next step. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Identification of genetic RCD susceptibility markers can guide understanding of biological processes in rotator cuff degeneration and help inform disease risk in the clinical setting. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth L. Yanik
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO,Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - Jay D. Keener
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - Shiow J. Lin
- Department of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - Graham A. Colditz
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - Rick W. Wright
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - Bradley A. Evanoff
- Division of General Medical Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - Nitin B. Jain
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX
| | - Nancy L. Saccone
- Department of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Baron JE, Duchman KR, Hettrich CM, Glass NA, Ortiz SF, Baumgarten KM, Bishop JY, Bollier MJ, Bravman JT, Brophy RH, Carpenter JE, Cox CL, Feeley BT, Frank RM, Grant JA, Jones GL, Kuhn JE, Lansdown DA, Benjamin Ma C, Marx RG, McCarty EC, Miller BS, Neviaser AS, Seidl AJ, Smith MV, Wright RW, Zhang AL, Wolf BR. Beach Chair Versus Lateral Decubitus Position: Differences in Suture Anchor Position and Number During Arthroscopic Anterior Shoulder Stabilization. Am J Sports Med 2021; 49:2020-2026. [PMID: 34019439 DOI: 10.1177/03635465211013709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Arthroscopic shoulder capsulolabral repair using glenoid-based suture anchor fixation provides consistently favorable outcomes for patients with anterior glenohumeral instability. To optimize outcomes, inferior anchor position, especially at the 6-o'clock position, has been emphasized. Proponents of both the beach-chair (BC) and lateral decubitus (LD) positions advocate that this anchor location can be consistently achieved in both positions. HYPOTHESIS Patient positioning would be associated with the surgeon-reported labral tear length, total number of anchors used, number of anchors in the inferior glenoid, and placement of an anchor at the 6-o'clock position. STUDY DESIGN Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS This study was a cross-sectional analysis of a prospective multicenter cohort of patients undergoing primary arthroscopic anterior capsulolabral repair. Patient positioning in the BC versus LD position was determined by the operating surgeon and was not randomized. At the time of operative intervention, surgeon-reported labral tear length, total anchor number, anchor number in the inferior glenoid, and anchor placement at the 6-o'clock position were evaluated between BC and LD cohorts. Descriptive statistics and between-group differences (continuous: t test [normal distributions], Wilcoxon rank sum test [nonnormal distributions], and chi-square test [categorical]) were assessed. RESULTS In total, 714 patients underwent arthroscopic anterior capsulolabral repair (BC vs LD, 406 [56.9%] vs 308 [43.1%]). The surgeon-reported labral tear length was greater for patients having surgery in the LD position (BC vs LD [mean ± SD], 123.5°± 49° vs 132.3°± 44°; P = .012). The LD position was associated with more anchors placed in the inferior glenoid and more frequent placement of anchors at the 6-o'clock (BC vs LD, 22.4% vs 51.6%; P < .001). The LD position was more frequently associated with utilization of ≥4 total anchors (BC vs LD, 33.5% vs 46.1%; P < .001). CONCLUSION Surgeons utilizing the LD position for arthroscopic capsulolabral repair in patients with anterior shoulder instability more frequently placed anchors in the inferior glenoid and at the 6-o'clock position. Additionally, surgeon-reported labral tear length was longer when utilizing the LD position. These results suggest that patient positioning may influence the total number of anchors used, the number of anchors used in the inferior glenoid, and the frequency of anchor placement at the 6 o'clock position during arthroscopic capsulolabral repair for anterior shoulder instability. How these findings affect clinical outcomes warrants further study. REGISTRATION NCT02075775 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacqueline E Baron
- University of Iowa, UI Sports Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.,Investigation performed at University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Kyle R Duchman
- University of Iowa, UI Sports Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.,Investigation performed at University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Carolyn M Hettrich
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Investigation performed at University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Natalie A Glass
- University of Iowa, UI Sports Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.,Investigation performed at University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Shannon F Ortiz
- University of Iowa, UI Sports Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.,Investigation performed at University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | -
- Investigation performed at University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Keith M Baumgarten
- Orthopedic Institute, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, USA.,Investigation performed at University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Julie Y Bishop
- The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.,Investigation performed at University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Matthew J Bollier
- University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.,Investigation performed at University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Jonathan T Bravman
- University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.,Investigation performed at University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Robert H Brophy
- Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.,Investigation performed at University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - James E Carpenter
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.,Investigation performed at University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Charles L Cox
- Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.,Investigation performed at University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Brian T Feeley
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.,Investigation performed at University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Rachel M Frank
- University of Colorado, Denver, Denver, Colorado, USA.,Investigation performed at University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - John A Grant
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.,Investigation performed at University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Grant L Jones
- The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.,Investigation performed at University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - John E Kuhn
- Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.,Investigation performed at University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Drew A Lansdown
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.,Investigation performed at University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - C Benjamin Ma
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.,Investigation performed at University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Robert G Marx
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.,Investigation performed at University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Eric C McCarty
- University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.,Investigation performed at University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Bruce S Miller
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.,Investigation performed at University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Andres S Neviaser
- The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.,Investigation performed at University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Adam J Seidl
- University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.,Investigation performed at University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Matthew V Smith
- Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.,Investigation performed at University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Rick W Wright
- Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.,Investigation performed at University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Alan L Zhang
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.,Investigation performed at University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Brian R Wolf
- University of Iowa, UI Sports Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.,Investigation performed at University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Cronin KJ, Magnuson JA, Wolf BR, Hawk GS, Thompson KL, Jacobs CA, Hettrich CM, Bishop JY, Bollier MJ, Baumgarten KM, Bravman JT, Brophy RH, Cox CL, Feeley BT, Frank RM, Grant JA, Jones GL, Kuhn JE, Ma CB, Marx RG, McCarty EC, Miller BS, Neviaser AS, Seidl AJ, Smith MV, Wright RW, Zhang AL. Male Sex, Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index Score, and Sport as Predictors of Large Labral Tears of the Shoulder: A Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) Shoulder Instability Cohort Study. Arthroscopy 2021; 37:1740-1744. [PMID: 33460709 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Revised: 12/31/2020] [Accepted: 01/03/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To identify factors predictive of a large labral tear at the time of shoulder instability surgery. METHODS As part of the Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) Shoulder Instability cohort, patients undergoing open or arthroscopic shoulder instability surgery for a labral tear were evaluated. Patients with >270° tears were defined as having large labral tears. To build a predictive logistic regression model for large tears, the Feasible Solutions Algorithm was used to add significant interaction effects. RESULTS After applying exclusion criteria, 1235 patients were available for analysis. There were 222 females (18.0%) and 1013 males (82.0%) in the cohort, with an average age of 24.7 years (range 12 to 66). The prevalence of large tears was 4.6% (n = 57), with the average tear size being 141.9°. Males accounted for significantly more of the large tears seen in the cohort (94.7%, P = .01). Racquet sports (P = .01), swimming (P = .02), softball (P = .05), skiing (P = .04), and golf (P = .04) were all associated with large labral tears, as was a higher Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI; P = .01). Age, race, history of dislocation, and injury during sport were not associated with having a larger tear. Using our predictive logistic regression model for large tears, patients with a larger body mass index (BMI) who played contact sports were also more likely to have large tears (P = .007). CONCLUSIONS Multiple factors were identified as being associated with large labral tears at the time of surgery, including male sex, preoperative WOSI score, and participation in certain sports including racquet sports, softball, skiing, swimming, and golf. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I, prognostic study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin J Cronin
- University of Kentucky Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Sports Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky, U.S.A..
| | - Justin A Magnuson
- University of Kentucky Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Sports Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky, U.S.A
| | - Brian R Wolf
- University of Iowa Department of Orthopaedics, Iowa City, Iowa, U.S.A
| | - Gregory S Hawk
- University of Kentucky Department of Statistics, Lexington, Kentucky, U.S.A
| | | | - Cale A Jacobs
- University of Kentucky Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Sports Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky, U.S.A
| | | | | | - Julie Y Bishop
- The Ohio State University Sports Medicine Center, Columbus, OH
| | | | | | - Jonathan T Bravman
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO
| | - Robert H Brophy
- Department of Orthopedics, Washington University Saint Louis, St. Louis, MO
| | - Charles L Cox
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Brian T Feeley
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Rachel M Frank
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO
| | - John A Grant
- MedSport, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Grant L Jones
- The Ohio State University Sports Medicine Center, Columbus, OH
| | - John E Kuhn
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - C Benjamin Ma
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Robert G Marx
- Department of Sports Medicine, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Eric C McCarty
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO
| | - Bruce S Miller
- MedSport, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | | | - Adam J Seidl
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO
| | - Matthew V Smith
- Department of Orthopedics, Washington University Saint Louis, St. Louis, MO
| | - Rick W Wright
- Department of Orthopedics, Washington University Saint Louis, St. Louis, MO
| | - Alan L Zhang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
MacFarlane LA, Yang H, Collins JE, Brophy RH, Cole BJ, Spindler KP, Guermazi A, Jones MH, Mandl LA, Martin S, Marx RG, Levy BA, Stuart M, Safran-Norton C, Wright J, Wright RW, Losina E, Katz JN. Association Between Baseline "Meniscal symptoms" and Outcomes of Operative and Non-Operative Treatment of Meniscal Tear in Patients with Osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2021; 74:1384-1390. [PMID: 33650303 PMCID: PMC8408275 DOI: 10.1002/acr.24588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2020] [Revised: 02/06/2021] [Accepted: 02/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Patients with meniscal tears reporting "meniscal symptoms" such as catching or locking, have traditionally undergone arthroscopy. We investigated whether patients with meniscal tears who report "meniscal symptoms" have greater improvement with arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) than physical therapy (PT). METHODS We used data from the Meniscal Tear in Osteoarthritis Research (MeTeOR) trial, which randomized participants with knee osteoarthritis (OA) and meniscal tear to APM or PT. The frequency of each "meniscal symptom" (clicking, catching, popping, intermittent locking, giving way, swelling) was measured at baseline and 6-months. We used linear regression models to determine whether the difference in improvement in KOOS Pain at 6-months between those treated with APM versus PT was modified by the presence of each "meniscal symptom". We also determined the percent of participants with resolution of "meniscal symptoms" by treatment group. RESULTS We included 287 participants. The presence (vs. absence) of any of the "meniscal symptoms" did not modify the improvement in KOOS Pain between APM vs. PT by more than 0.5 SD (all p-interaction >0.05). APM led to greater resolution of intermittent locking and clicking than PT (locking 70% vs 46%, clicking 41% vs 25%). No difference in resolution of the other "meniscal symptoms" was observed. CONCLUSION "Meniscal symptoms" were not associated with improved pain relief. Although symptoms of clicking and intermittent locking had a greater reduction in the APM group, the presence of "meniscal symptoms" in isolation should not inform clinical decisions surrounding APM vs. PT in patients with meniscal tear and knee OA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsey A MacFarlane
- Orthopedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.,Division of Rheumatology, Inflammation and Immunity, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Heidi Yang
- Orthopedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Jamie E Collins
- Orthopedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Robert H Brophy
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, United States
| | - Brian J Cole
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University, Chicago, Illinois, United States
| | - Kurt P Spindler
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Ali Guermazi
- Department of Radiology, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Morgan H Jones
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Lisa A Mandl
- Division of Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, United States
| | - Scott Martin
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Robert G Marx
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, United States
| | - Bruce A Levy
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Michael Stuart
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Clare Safran-Norton
- Department of Physical Therapy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - John Wright
- Johnson& Johnson, Raynham, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Rick W Wright
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, United States
| | - Elena Losina
- Orthopedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Jeffrey N Katz
- Orthopedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.,Division of Rheumatology, Inflammation and Immunity, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Brophy RH, Wright RW, Huston LJ, Haas AK, Allen CR, Anderson AF, Cooper DE, DeBerardino TM, Dunn WR, Lantz BBA, Mann B, Spindler KP, Stuart MJ, Albright JP, Amendola AN, Andrish JT, Annunziata CC, Arciero RA, Bach BR, Baker CL, Bartolozzi AR, Baumgarten KM, Bechler JR, Berg JH, Bernas GA, Brockmeier SF, Bush-Joseph CA, Butler JBV, Campbell JD, Carey JL, Carpenter JE, Cole BJ, Cooper JM, Cox CL, Alexander Creighton R, Dahm DL, David TS, Flanigan DC, Frederick RW, Ganley TJ, Garofoli EA, Gatt CJ, Gecha SR, Giffin JR, Hame SL, Hannafin JA, Harner CD, Harris NL, Hechtman KS, Hershman EB, Hoellrich RG, Hosea TM, Johnson DC, Johnson TS, Jones MH, Kaeding CC, Kamath GV, Klootwyk TE, Levy BA, Benjamin Ma C, Peter Maiers G, Marx RG, Matava MJ, Mathien GM, McAllister DR, McCarty EC, McCormack RG, Miller BS, Nissen CW, O'Neill DF, Owens BD, Parker RD, Purnell ML, Ramappa AJ, Rauh MA, Rettig AC, Sekiya JK, Shea KG, Sherman OH, Li X, Slauterbeck JR, Smith MV, Spang JT, Svoboda LSJ, Taft TN, Tenuta JJ, Tingstad EM, Vidal AF, Viskontas DG, White RA, Williams JS, Wolcott ML, Wolf BR, York JJ. Rate of infection following revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and associated patient- and surgeon-dependent risk factors: Retrospective results from MOON and MARS data collected from 2002 to 2011. J Orthop Res 2021; 39:274-280. [PMID: 33002248 PMCID: PMC7854959 DOI: 10.1002/jor.24871] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2020] [Revised: 09/08/2020] [Accepted: 09/14/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Infection is a rare occurrence after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (rACLR). Because of the low rates of infection, it has been difficult to identify risk factors for infection in this patient population. The purpose of this study was to report the rate of infection following rACLR and assess whether infection is associated with patient- and surgeon-dependent risk factors. We reviewed two large prospective cohorts to identify patients with postoperative infections following rACLR. Age, sex, body mass index (BMI), smoking status, history of diabetes, and graft choice were recorded for each patient. The association of these factors with postoperative infection following rACLR was assessed. There were 1423 rACLR cases in the combined cohort, with 9 (0.6%) reporting postoperative infections. Allografts had a higher risk of infection than autografts (odds ratio, 6.8; 95% CI, 0.9-54.5; p = .045). Diabetes (odds ratio, 28.6; 95% CI, 5.5-149.9; p = .004) was a risk factor for infection. Patient age, sex, BMI, and smoking status were not associated with risk of infection after rACLR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert H Brophy
- Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | | | | | - Amanda K Haas
- Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Christina R Allen
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Robert A Arciero
- University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut, USA
| | | | | | - Arthur R Bartolozzi
- Bat Orthopaedics, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | | | - Jeffrey H Berg
- Town Center Orthopaedic Associates, Reston, Virginia, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - John D Campbell
- Bridger Orthopedic and Sports Medicine, Bozeman, Montana, USA
| | - James L Carey
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Brian J Cole
- Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Tal S David
- Synergy Specialists Medical Group, San Diego, California, USA
| | | | - Robert W Frederick
- The Rothman Institute/Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Theodore J Ganley
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Charles J Gatt
- University Orthopaedic Associates LLC, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
| | - Steven R Gecha
- Princeton Orthopaedic Associates, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
| | - James Robert Giffin
- Fowler Kennedy Sport Medicine Clinic, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sharon L Hame
- David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jo A Hannafin
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Timothy M Hosea
- University Orthopaedic Associates LLC, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Ganesh V Kamath
- University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Robert G Marx
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | | | | | | | - Eric C McCarty
- School of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - Robert G McCormack
- University of British Columbia/Fraser Health Authority, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Carl W Nissen
- Connecticut Children's Medical Center, Hartford, Connecticut, USA
| | | | - Brett D Owens
- Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | | | | | - Arun J Ramappa
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Michael A Rauh
- State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | | | - Jon K Sekiya
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | | | | | - Xulei Li
- Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - James R Slauterbeck
- Robert Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA
| | - Matthew V Smith
- Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Jeffrey T Spang
- University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ltc Steven J Svoboda
- Keller Army Community Hospital, United States Military Academy, West Point, New York, USA
| | - Timothy N Taft
- University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Edwin M Tingstad
- Inland Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine Clinic, Pullman, WA, USA
| | - Armando F Vidal
- School of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | | | | | | | - Michelle L Wolcott
- School of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - Brian R Wolf
- University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa, Iowa, USA
| | - James J York
- Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Center, LLC, Pasedena, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Wright RW, Huston LJ, Haas AK, Nwosu SK, Allen CR, Anderson AF, Cooper DE, DeBerardino TM, Dunn WR, Lantz BBA, Mann B, Spindler KP, Stuart MJ, Pennings JS, Albright JP, Amendola AN, Andrish JT, Annunziata CC, Arciero RA, Bach BR, Baker CL, Bartolozzi AR, Baumgarten KM, Bechler JR, Berg JH, Bernas GA, Brockmeier SF, Brophy RH, Bush-Joseph CA, Butler V JB, Campbell JD, Carey JL, Carpenter JE, Cole BJ, Cooper JM, Cox CL, Creighton RA, Dahm DL, David TS, Flanigan DC, Frederick RW, Ganley TJ, Garofoli EA, Gatt CJ, Gecha SR, Giffin JR, Hame SL, Hannafin JA, Harner CD, Harris NL, Hechtman KS, Hershman EB, Hoellrich RG, Hosea TM, Johnson DC, Johnson TS, Jones MH, Kaeding CC, Kamath GV, Klootwyk TE, Levy BA, Ma CB, Maiers GP, Marx RG, Matava MJ, Mathien GM, McAllister DR, McCarty EC, McCormack RG, Miller BS, Nissen CW, O'Neill DF, Owens BD, Parker RD, Purnell ML, Ramappa AJ, Rauh MA, Rettig AC, Sekiya JK, Shea KG, Sherman OH, Slauterbeck JR, Smith MV, Spang JT, Steven J Svoboda L, Taft TN, Tenuta JJ, Tingstad EM, Vidal AF, Viskontas DG, White RA, Williams JS, Wolcott ML, Wolf BR, York JJ. Meniscal Repair in the Setting of Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Results From the MARS Cohort. Am J Sports Med 2020; 48:2978-2985. [PMID: 32822238 PMCID: PMC8171059 DOI: 10.1177/0363546520948850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Meniscal preservation has been demonstrated to contribute to long-term knee health. This has been a successful intervention in patients with isolated tears and tears associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. However, the results of meniscal repair in the setting of revision ACL reconstruction have not been documented. PURPOSE To examine the prevalence and 2-year operative success rate of meniscal repairs in the revision ACL setting. STUDY DESIGN Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS All cases of revision ACL reconstruction with concomitant meniscal repair from a multicenter group between 2006 and 2011 were selected. Two-year follow-up was obtained by phone and email to determine whether any subsequent surgery had occurred to either knee since the initial revision ACL reconstruction. If so, operative reports were obtained, whenever possible, to verify the pathologic condition and subsequent treatment. RESULTS In total, 218 patients (18%) from 1205 revision ACL reconstructions underwent concurrent meniscal repairs. There were 235 repairs performed: 153 medial, 48 lateral, and 17 medial and lateral. The majority of these repairs (n = 178; 76%) were performed with all-inside techniques. Two-year surgical follow-up was obtained on 90% (197/218) of the cohort. Overall, the meniscal repair failure rate was 8.6% (17/197) at 2 years. Of the 17 failures, 15 were medial (13 all-inside, 2 inside-out) and 2 were lateral (both all-inside). Four medial failures were treated in conjunction with a subsequent repeat revision ACL reconstruction. CONCLUSION Meniscal repair in the revision ACL reconstruction setting does not have a high failure rate at 2-year follow-up. Failure rates for medial and lateral repairs were both <10% and consistent with success rates of primary ACL reconstruction meniscal repair. Medial tears underwent reoperation for failure at a significantly higher rate than lateral tears.
Collapse
|
33
|
Sullivan JP, Huston LJ, Zajichek A, Reinke EK, Andrish JT, Brophy RH, Dunn WR, Flanigan DC, Kaeding CC, Marx RG, Matava MJ, McCarty EC, Parker RD, Vidal AF, Wolf BR, Wright RW, Spindler KP. Incidence and Predictors of Subsequent Surgery After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A 6-Year Follow-up Study. Am J Sports Med 2020; 48:2418-2428. [PMID: 32736502 PMCID: PMC8359736 DOI: 10.1177/0363546520935867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The cause of subsequent surgery after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction varies, but if risk factors for specific subsequent surgical procedures can be identified, we can better understand which patients are at greatest risk. PURPOSE To report the incidence and types of subsequent surgery that occurred in a cohort of patients 6 years after their index ACL reconstruction and to identify which variables were associated with the incidence of patients undergoing subsequent surgery after their index ACL reconstruction. STUDY DESIGN Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS Patients completed a questionnaire before their index ACL surgery and were followed up at 2 and 6 years. Patients were contacted to determine whether any underwent additional surgery since baseline. Operative reports were obtained, and all surgical procedures were categorized and recorded. Logistic regression models were constructed to predict which patient demographic and surgical variables were associated with the incidence of undergoing subsequent surgery after their index ACL reconstruction. RESULTS The cohort consisted of 3276 patients (56.3% male) with a median age of 23 years. A 6-year follow-up was obtained on 91.5% (2999/3276) with regard to information on the incidence and frequency of subsequent surgery. Overall, 20.4% (612/2999) of the cohort was documented to have undergone at least 1 subsequent surgery on the ipsilateral knee 6 years after their index ACL reconstruction. The most common subsequent surgical procedures were related to the meniscus (11.9%), revision ACL reconstruction (7.5%), loss of motion (7.8%), and articular cartilage (6.7%). Significant risk factors for incurring subsequent meniscus-related surgery were having a medial meniscal repair at the time of index surgery, reconstruction with a hamstring autograft or allograft, higher baseline Marx activity level, younger age, and cessation of smoking. Significant predictors of undergoing subsequent surgery involving articular cartilage were higher body mass index, higher Marx activity level, reconstruction with a hamstring autograft or allograft, meniscal repair at the time of index surgery, or a grade 3/4 articular cartilage abnormality classified at the time of index ACL reconstruction. Risk factors for incurring subsequent surgery for loss of motion were younger age, female sex, low baseline Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score symptom subscore, and reconstruction with a soft tissue allograft. CONCLUSION These findings can be used to identify patients who are at the greatest risk of incurring subsequent surgery after ACL reconstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jaron P. Sullivan
- Vanderbilt Orthopaedic Institute, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Laura J. Huston
- Vanderbilt Orthopaedic Institute, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Alexander Zajichek
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
| | - Emily K. Reinke
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Jack T. Andrish
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
| | - Robert H. Brophy
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine at Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO
| | | | - David C. Flanigan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Ohio State University School of Medicine, Columbus, OH
| | - Christopher C. Kaeding
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Ohio State University School of Medicine, Columbus, OH
| | - Robert G. Marx
- Department of Orthopaedics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Matthew J. Matava
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine at Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO
| | - Eric C. McCarty
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO
| | - Richard D. Parker
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
| | | | - Brian R. Wolf
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Iowa School of Medicine, Iowa City, IA
| | - Rick W. Wright
- Vanderbilt Orthopaedic Institute, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Kurt P. Spindler
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Collins JE, Losina E, Marx RG, Guermazi A, Jarraya M, Jones MH, Levy BA, Mandl LA, Martin SD, Wright RW, Spindler KP, Katz JN. Early Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Changes in Patients With Meniscal Tear and Osteoarthritis: Eighteen-Month Data From a Randomized Controlled Trial of Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy Versus Physical Therapy. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2020; 72:630-640. [PMID: 30932360 DOI: 10.1002/acr.23891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2018] [Accepted: 03/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The present study was undertaken to evaluate changes in knee magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings over the course of 18 months in subjects with osteoarthritic change and meniscal tear treated with arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) or nonoperatively with physical therapy (PT). METHODS We used 18-month follow-up data from the Meniscal Tear in Osteoarthritis Research Trial. MRI results were read with reference to the MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score. We focused on 18-month change in bone marrow lesions (BMLs), cartilage thickness, cartilage surface area, osteophyte size, effusion-synovitis, and Hoffa-synovitis. We used multinomial logistic regression to assess associations between MRI-based changes in each feature and treatment type. RESULTS A total of 351 subjects were randomized, and 225 had both baseline and 18-month MRI results. In both treatment groups, patients experienced substantial changes in several MRI-based markers. In 60% of the APM group, versus 33% of the PT group, cartilage surface area damage advanced in ≥2 subregions (adjusted odds ratio 4.2 [95% confidence interval 2.0-9.0). Patients who underwent APM also had greater advancement in scores for osteophytes and effusion-synovitis. We did not find significant associations between treatment type and change in cartilage thickness, BMLs, or Hoffa-synovitis. CONCLUSION This cohort of patients with meniscal tear and osteoarthritis showed marked advancement in MRI-based features over 18 months. Patients treated with APM showed more advancement in some features compared to those treated nonoperatively. The clinical relevance of these early findings is unknown and requires further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamie E Collins
- Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Elena Losina
- Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Robert G Marx
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
| | - Ali Guermazi
- Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Mohamed Jarraya
- Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, and Mercy Catholic Medical Center, Darby, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | - Lisa A Mandl
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
| | | | - Rick W Wright
- Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | | | - Jeffrey N Katz
- Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Fabricant PD, Milewski MD, Kostyun RO, Wall EJ, Zbojniewicz AM, Albright JC, Bauer KL, Carey JL, Chambers HG, Edmonds EW, Ellis HB, Ganley TJ, Green DW, Grimm NL, Heyworth BE, Kocher MS, Krych AJ, Lyon RM, Mayer SW, Nepple JJ, Nissen CW, Pennock AT, Polousky JD, Saluan P, Shea KG, Tompkins MA, Weiss J, Clifton Willimon S, Wilson PL, Wright RW, Myer GD. Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Knee: An Interrater Reliability Study of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Characteristics. Am J Sports Med 2020; 48:2221-2229. [PMID: 32584594 DOI: 10.1177/0363546520930427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Imaging characteristics of osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) lesions quantified by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are often used to inform treatment and prognosis. However, the interrater reliability of clinician-driven MRI-based assessment of OCD lesions is not well documented. PURPOSE To determine the interrater reliability of several historical and novel MRI-derived characteristics of OCD of the knee in children. STUDY DESIGN Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. METHODS A total of 42 OCD lesions were evaluated by 10 fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeons using 31 different MRI characteristics, characterizing lesion size and location, condylar size, cartilage status, the interface between parent and progeny bone, and features of both the parent and the progeny bone. Interrater reliability was determined via intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) with 2-way random modeling, Fleiss kappa, or Krippendorff alpha as appropriate for each variable. RESULTS Raters were reliable when the lesion was measured in the coronal plane (ICC, 0.77). Almost perfect agreement was achieved for condylar size (ICC, 0.93), substantial agreement for physeal patency (ICC, 0.79), and moderate agreement for joint effusion (ICC, 0.56) and cartilage status (ICC, 0.50). Overall, raters showed significant variability regarding interface characteristics (ICC, 0.25), progeny (ICC range, 0.03 to 0.62), and parent bone measurements and qualities (ICC range, -0.02 to 0.65), with reliability being moderate at best for these measurements. CONCLUSION This multicenter study determined the interrater reliability of MRI characteristics of OCD lesions in children. Although several measurements provided acceptable reliability, many MRI features of OCD that inform treatment decisions were unreliable. Further work will be needed to refine the unreliable characteristics and to assess the ability of those reliable characteristics to predict clinical lesion instability and prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter D Fabricant
- Investigation performed at the Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA, and Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Matthew D Milewski
- Investigation performed at the Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA, and Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Regina O Kostyun
- Investigation performed at the Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA, and Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Eric J Wall
- Investigation performed at the Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA, and Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Andrew M Zbojniewicz
- Investigation performed at the Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA, and Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | -
- Investigation performed at the Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA, and Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Jay C Albright
- Investigation performed at the Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA, and Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Kathryn L Bauer
- Investigation performed at the Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA, and Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - James L Carey
- Investigation performed at the Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA, and Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Henry G Chambers
- Investigation performed at the Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA, and Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Eric W Edmonds
- Investigation performed at the Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA, and Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Henry B Ellis
- Investigation performed at the Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA, and Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Theodore J Ganley
- Investigation performed at the Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA, and Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Daniel W Green
- Investigation performed at the Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA, and Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Nathan L Grimm
- Investigation performed at the Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA, and Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Benton E Heyworth
- Investigation performed at the Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA, and Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Mininder S Kocher
- Investigation performed at the Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA, and Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Aaron J Krych
- Investigation performed at the Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA, and Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Roger M Lyon
- Investigation performed at the Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA, and Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Stephanie W Mayer
- Investigation performed at the Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA, and Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Jeffrey J Nepple
- Investigation performed at the Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA, and Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Carl W Nissen
- Investigation performed at the Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA, and Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Andrew T Pennock
- Investigation performed at the Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA, and Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - John D Polousky
- Investigation performed at the Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA, and Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Paul Saluan
- Investigation performed at the Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA, and Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Kevin G Shea
- Investigation performed at the Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA, and Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Marc A Tompkins
- Investigation performed at the Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA, and Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Jennifer Weiss
- Investigation performed at the Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA, and Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - S Clifton Willimon
- Investigation performed at the Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA, and Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Philip L Wilson
- Investigation performed at the Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA, and Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Rick W Wright
- Investigation performed at the Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA, and Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Gregory D Myer
- Investigation performed at the Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA, and Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Powers A, Gerull KM, Rothman R, Klein SA, Wright RW, Dy CJ. Race- and Gender-Based Differences in Descriptions of Applicants in the Letters of Recommendation for Orthopaedic Surgery Residency. JB JS Open Access 2020; 5:JBJSOA-D-20-00023. [PMID: 32803104 PMCID: PMC7386551 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.oa.20.00023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Letters of recommendation (LOR) are an important component of trainee advancement and assessment. Examination of word use in LOR has demonstrated significant differences in how letter writers describe female and male applicants. Given the emphasis on increasing both gender and racial diversity among orthopaedic surgeons, we aimed to study gender and racial differences in LOR for applicants to orthopaedic surgery residencies. Methods All applications submitted to a single, academic orthopaedic residency program in 2018 were included. Self-identified gender and race were recorded. The LOR were analyzed via a text analysis software program using previously described categories of communal, agentic, grindstone, ability, and standout words. We examined the relative frequency of word use in letters for (1) male and female applicants and (2) white and underrepresented in orthopaedics (UiO) applicants, with the subgroup analysis based on whether standardized (using the American Orthopaedic Association template) or traditional (narrative) LOR were used. Results Two thousand six hundred twenty-five LOR were submitted for 730 applicants (79% men). Fifty-nine percent of applicants were self-identified as white, and 34% were self-identified as UiO. In traditional LOR, standout words (odds ratio [OR] 1.07; p = 0.01) were more likely to be used in letters for women compared with men, with no difference in any other word-use category. In standardized LOR, there were no gender-based differences in any word category. In traditional LOR, grindstone words (OR = 0.96; p = 0.02) were more likely to be used in letters for UiO than white applicants, whereas standout words (OR = 1.05; p = 0.04) were more likely to be used in letters for white candidates. In standardized LOR, there were no race-based differences in any word category use. Conclusions Small differences were found in the categories of words used to describe male and female candidates and white and UiO candidates. These differences were not present in the standardized LOR compared with traditional LOR. It is possible that the use of standardized LOR may reduce gender- and race-based bias in the narrative assessment of applicants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexa Powers
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.,Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Katherine M Gerull
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Rachel Rothman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Sandra A Klein
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Rick W Wright
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Christopher J Dy
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Lawrie CM, Jo S, Barrack T, Roper S, Wright RW, Nunley RM, Barrack RL. Local delivery of tobramycin and vancomycin in primary total knee arthroplasty achieves minimum inhibitory concentrations for common bacteria causing acute prosthetic joint infection. Bone Joint J 2020; 102-B:163-169. [PMID: 32475280 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.102b6.bjj-2019-1639.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
AIMS The aim of this study was to determine if the local delivery of vancomycin and tobramycin in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can achieve intra-articular concentrations exceeding the minimum inhibitory concentration thresholds for bacteria causing acute prosthetic joint infection (PJI). METHODS Using a retrospective single-institution database of all primary TKAs performed between January 1 2014 and May 7 2019, we identified patients with acute PJI that were managed surgically within 90 days of the initial procedure. The organisms from positive cultures obtained at the time of revision were tested for susceptibility to gentamicin, tobramycin, and vancomycin. A prospective study was then performed to determine the intra-articular antibiotic concentration on postoperative day one after primary TKA using one of five local antibiotic delivery strategies with tobramycin and/or vancomycin mixed into the polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) or vancomycin powder. RESULTS A total of 19 patients with acute PJI after TKA were identified and 29 unique bacterial isolates were recovered. The mean time to revision was 37 days (6 to 84). Nine isolates (31%) were resistant to gentamicin, ten (34%) were resistant to tobramycin, and seven (24%) were resistant to vancomycin. Excluding one Fusobacterium nucleatum, which was resistant to all three antibiotics, all isolates resistant to tobramycin or gentamicin were susceptible to vancomycin and vice versa. Overall, 2.4 g of tobramycin hand-mixed into 80 g of PMMA and 1 g of intra-articular vancomycin powder consistently achieved concentrations above the minimum inhibitory concentrations of susceptible organisms. CONCLUSION One-third of bacteria causing acute PJI after primary TKA were resistant to the aminoglycosides commonly mixed into PMMA, and one-quarter were resistant to vancomycin. With one exception, all bacteria resistant to tobramycin were susceptible to vancomycin and vice versa. Based on these results, the optimal cover for organisms causing most cases of acute PJI after TKA can be achieved with a combination of tobramycin mixed in antibiotic cement, and vancomycin powder. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(6 Supple A):163-169.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles M Lawrie
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Sally Jo
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Toby Barrack
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Stephen Roper
- Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Rick W Wright
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Ryan M Nunley
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Robert L Barrack
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Wright RW, Armstrong AD, Azar FM, Bednar MS, Carpenter JE, Evans JB, Flynn JM, Garvin KL, Jacobs JJ, Kang JD, Lundy DW, Mencio GA, Murray PM, Nelson CL, Peabody T, Porter SE, Roberson JR, Saltzman CL, Sebastianelli WJ, Taitsman LA, Van Heest AE, Martin DF. The American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Response to COVID-19. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2020; 28:e465-e468. [PMID: 32324709 PMCID: PMC7195847 DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-20-00392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2020] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted every aspect of society in a way never previously experienced by our nation's orthopaedic surgeons. In response to the challenges the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery has taken steps to adapt our Board Certification and Continuous Certification processes. These changes were made to provide flexibility for as many Candidates and Diplomates as possible to participate while maintaining our high standards. The American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery is first and foremost committed to the safety and well-being of our patients, physicians, and families while striving to remain responsive to the changing circumstances affecting our Candidates and Diplomates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rick W Wright
- From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN (Dr. Wright), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA (Dr. Armstrong), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Biomedical Engineering, University of Tennessee/Campbell Clinic, Memphis, TN (Dr. Azar), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University-Chicago, Maywood, IL (Dr. Bednar), Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI (Dr. Carpenter), Public Member, Cedar Rapids, IA (Mr. Evans), Orthopaedic Surgery, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, The University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA (Dr. Flynn), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Nebraska, Omaha, NE (Dr. Garvin), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL (Dr. Jacobs), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (Dr. Kang), Resurgens Orthopaedics, Atlanta, GA (Dr. Lundy), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN (Dr. Mencio), Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL (Dr. Murray), Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA (Dr. Nelson), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL (Dr. Peabody), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Prisma Health-Upstate, Greenville, SC (Dr. Porter), Orthopaedics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (Dr. Roberson), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT (Dr. Saltzman), Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, Penn State Health System, State College, PA (Dr. Sebastianelli), University of Washington, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA (Dr. Taitsman), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN (Dr. Van Heest), and American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chapel Hill, NC (Dr. Martin), and Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC (Dr. Martin)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Su AW, Bogunovic L, Johnson J, Klein S, Matava MJ, McCormick J, Smith MV, Wright RW, Brophy RH. Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment of Acute Achilles Tendon Ruptures: A Pilot Economic Decision Analysis. Orthop J Sports Med 2020; 8:2325967120909918. [PMID: 32284940 PMCID: PMC7139191 DOI: 10.1177/2325967120909918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2019] [Accepted: 12/17/2019] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The operative treatment of Achilles tendon ruptures has been associated with lower rerupture rates and better function but also a risk of surgery-related complications compared with nonoperative treatment, which may provide improved outcomes with accelerated rehabilitation protocols. However, economic decision analyses integrating the updated costs of both treatment options are limited in the literature. Purpose To compare the cost-effectiveness of operative and nonoperative treatment of acute Achilles tendon tears. Study Design Economic and decision analysis; Level of evidence, 2. Methods An economic decision model was built to assess the cost-utility ratio (CUR) of open primary repair versus nonoperative treatment for acute Achilles tendon ruptures, based on direct costs from the practices of sports medicine and foot and ankle surgeons at a single tertiary academic center, with published outcome probabilities and patient utility data. Multiway sensitivity analyses were performed to reflect the range of data. Results Nonoperative treatment was more cost-effective in the average scenario (nonoperative CUR, US$520; operative CUR, US$1995), but crossover occurred during the sensitivity analysis (nonoperative CUR range, US$224-US$2079; operative CUR range, US$789-US$8380). Operative treatment cost an extra average marginal CUR of US$1475 compared with nonoperative treatment, assuming uneventful healing in both treatment arms. The sensitivity analysis demonstrated a decreased marginal CUR of operative treatment when the outcome utility was maximized, and rerupture rates were minimized compared with nonoperative treatment. Conclusion Nonoperative treatment was more cost-effective in average scenarios. Crossover indicated that open primary repair would be favorable for maximized outcome utility, such as that for young athletes or heavy laborers. The treatment decision for acute Achilles tendon ruptures should be individualized. These pilot results provide inferences for further longitudinal analyses incorporating future clinical evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alvin W Su
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA.,Nemours Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children, Wilmington, Delaware, USA
| | - Ljiljana Bogunovic
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Jeffrey Johnson
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Sandra Klein
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Matthew J Matava
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Jeremy McCormick
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Matthew V Smith
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Rick W Wright
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Robert H Brophy
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Lansdown DA, Cvetanovich GL, Zhang AL, Feeley BT, Wolf BR, Hettrich CM, Baumgarten KM, Bishop JY, Bollier MJ, Bravman JT, Brophy RH, Cox CL, Frank RM, Grant JA, Jones GL, Kuhn JE, Marx RG, McCarty EC, Miller BS, Ortiz SF, Smith MV, Wright RW, Ma CB. Risk Factors for Intra-articular Bone and Cartilage Lesions in Patients Undergoing Surgical Treatment for Posterior Instability. Am J Sports Med 2020; 48:1207-1212. [PMID: 32150443 DOI: 10.1177/0363546520907916] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with posterior shoulder instability may have bone and cartilage lesions (BCLs) in addition to capsulolabral injuries, although the risk factors for these intra-articular lesions are unclear. HYPOTHESIS We hypothesized that patients with posterior instability who had a greater number of instability events would have a higher rate of BCLs compared with patients who had fewer instability episodes. STUDY DESIGN Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS Data from the Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) Shoulder Group instability patient cohort were analyzed. Patients aged 12 to 99 years undergoing primary surgical treatment for shoulder instability were included. The glenohumeral joint was evaluated by the treating surgeon at the time of surgery, and patients were classified as having a BCL if they had any grade 3 or 4 glenoid or humeral cartilage lesion, reverse Hill-Sachs lesion, bony Bankart lesion, or glenoid bone loss. The effects of the number of instability events on the presence of BCLs was investigated by use of Fisher exact tests. Logistic regression modeling was performed to investigate the independent contributions of demographic variables and injury-specific variables to the likelihood of having a BCL. Significance was defined as P < .05. RESULTS We identified 271 patients (223 male) for analysis. Bone and cartilage lesions were identified in 54 patients (19.9%) at the time of surgical treatment. A glenoid cartilage injury was most common and was identified in 28 patients (10.3%). A significant difference was noted between the number of instability events and the presence of BCLs (P = .025), with the highest rate observed in patients with 2 to 5 instability events (32.3%). Multivariate logistic regression modeling indicated that increasing age (P = .019) and 2 to 5 reported instability events (P = .001) were significant independent predictors of the presence of BCLs. For bone lesions alone, the number of instability events was the only significant independent predictor; increased risk of bone lesion was present for patients with 1 instability event (OR, 6.1; P = .012), patients with 2 to 5 instability events (OR, 4.2; P = .033), and patients with more than 5 instability events (OR, 6.0; P = .011). CONCLUSION Bone and cartilage lesions are seen significantly more frequently with increasing patient age and in patients with 2 to 5 instability events. Early surgical stabilization for posterior instability may be considered to potentially limit the extent of associated intra-articular injury. The group of patients with more than 5 instability events may represent a different pathological condition, as this group showed a decrease in the likelihood of cartilage injury, although not bony injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Drew A Lansdown
- Investigation performed at University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Gregory L Cvetanovich
- Investigation performed at University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Alan L Zhang
- Investigation performed at University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Brian T Feeley
- Investigation performed at University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Brian R Wolf
- Investigation performed at University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Carolyn M Hettrich
- Investigation performed at University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | -
- Investigation performed at University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Keith M Baumgarten
- Investigation performed at University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Julie Y Bishop
- Investigation performed at University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Matthew J Bollier
- Investigation performed at University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Jonathan T Bravman
- Investigation performed at University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Robert H Brophy
- Investigation performed at University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Charles L Cox
- Investigation performed at University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Rachel M Frank
- Investigation performed at University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - John A Grant
- Investigation performed at University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Grant L Jones
- Investigation performed at University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - John E Kuhn
- Investigation performed at University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Robert G Marx
- Investigation performed at University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Eric C McCarty
- Investigation performed at University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Bruce S Miller
- Investigation performed at University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Shannon F Ortiz
- Investigation performed at University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Matthew V Smith
- Investigation performed at University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Rick W Wright
- Investigation performed at University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - C Benjamin Ma
- Investigation performed at University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Abstract
AIMS Few risk factors for rotator cuff disease (RCD) and corresponding treatment have been firmly established. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between numerous risk factors and the incidence of surgery for RCD in a large cohort. METHODS A population-based cohort of people aged between 40 and 69 years in the UK (the UK Biobank) was studied. People who underwent surgery for RCD were identified through a link with NHS inpatient records covering a mean of eight years after enrolment. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression was used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) as estimates of associations with surgery for RCD accounting for confounders. The risk factors which were considered included age, sex, race, education, Townsend deprivation index, body mass index (BMI), occupational demands, and exposure to smoking. RESULTS Of the 421,894 people who were included, 47% were male. The mean age at the time of enrolment was 56 years (40 to 69). A total of 2,156 people were identified who underwent surgery for RCD. Each decade increase in age was associated with a 55% increase in the incidence of RCD surgery (95% confidence interval (CI) 46% to 64%). Male sex, non-white race, lower deprivation score, and higher BMI were significantly associated with a higher risk of surgery for RCD (all p < 0.050). Greater occupational physical demands were significantly associated with higher rates of RCD surgery (HR = 2.1, 1.8, and 1.4 for 'always', 'usually', and 'sometimes' doing heavy manual labour vs 'never', all p < 0.001). Former smokers had significantly higher rates of RCD surgery than those who had never smoked (HR 1.23 (95% CI 1.12 to 1.35), p < 0.001), while current smokers had similar rates to those who had never smoked (HR 0.94 (95% CI 0.80 to 1.11)). Among those who had never smoked, the risk of surgery was higher among those with more than one household member who smoked (HR 1.78 (95% CI 1.08 to 2.92)). The risk of RCD surgery was not significantly related to other measurements of secondhand smoking. CONCLUSION Many factors were independently associated with surgery for RCD, including older age, male sex, higher BMI, lower deprivation score, and higher occupational physical demands. Several of the risk factors which were identified are modifiable, suggesting that the healthcare burden of RCD might be reduced through the pursuit of public health goals, such as reducing obesity and modifying occupational demands. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(3):352-359.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth L Yanik
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA; Assistant Professor, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Graham A Colditz
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Rick W Wright
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Nancy L Saccone
- Department of Genetics and Division of Biostatistics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Bradley A Evanoff
- Division of General Medical Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Nitin B Jain
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Ann Marie Dale
- Division of General Medical Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Jay D Keener
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Wright RW, Huston LJ, Nwosu S. Predictors of Patient-Reported Outcomes at 2 Years After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Response. Am J Sports Med 2020; 48:NP32. [PMID: 32109162 DOI: 10.1177/0363546520903676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
|
43
|
Wright RW. Editorial Commentary: Women and Men Fare Equally Well After Meniscal Repair. Arthroscopy 2020; 36:823. [PMID: 32139058 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.12.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2019] [Accepted: 12/28/2019] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Knee meniscal repair has a success rate of approximately 80% in both men and women, and meniscal repair is a critical procedure for maintaining long-term knee health.
Collapse
|
44
|
Cronin KJ, Wolf BR, Magnuson JA, Jacobs CA, Ortiz S, Bishop JY, Bollier MJ, Baumgarten KM, Bravman JT, Brophy RH, Cox CL, Feeley BT, Grant JA, Jones GL, Kuhn JE, Benjamin Ma C, Marx RG, McCarty EC, Miller BS, Seidl AJ, Smith MV, Wright RW, Zhang AL, Hettrich CM. The Prevalence and Clinical Implications of Comorbid Back Pain in Shoulder Instability: A Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) Shoulder Instability Cohort Study. Orthop J Sports Med 2020; 8:2325967119894738. [PMID: 32110679 PMCID: PMC7000858 DOI: 10.1177/2325967119894738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2019] [Accepted: 10/10/2019] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Understanding predictors of pain is critical, as recent literature shows that
comorbid back pain is an independent risk factor for worse functional and
patient-reported outcomes (PROs) as well as increased opioid dependence
after total joint arthroplasty. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether comorbid back pain would be
predictive of pain or self-reported instability symptoms at the time of
stabilization surgery. We hypothesized that comorbid back pain will
correlate with increased pain at the time of surgery as well as with worse
scores on shoulder-related PRO measures. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: As part of the Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) Shoulder
Instability cohort, patients consented to participate in pre- and
intraoperative data collection. Demographic characteristics, injury history,
preoperative PRO scores, and radiologic and intraoperative findings were
recorded for patients undergoing surgical shoulder stabilization. Patients
were also asked, whether they had any back pain. Results: The study cohort consisted of 1001 patients (81% male; mean age, 24.1 years).
Patients with comorbid back pain (158 patients; 15.8%) were significantly
older (28.1 vs 23.4 years; P < .001) and were more
likely to be female (25.3% vs 17.4%; P = .02) but did not
differ in terms of either preoperative imaging or intraoperative findings.
Patients with self-reported back pain had significantly worse preoperative
pain and shoulder-related PRO scores (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons
score, Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index) (P <
.001), more frequent depression (22.2% vs 8.3%; P <
.001), poorer mental health status (worse scores for the RAND 36-Item Health
Survey Mental Component Score, Iowa Quick Screen, and Personality Assessment
Screener) (P < .01), and worse preoperative expectations
(P < .01). Conclusion: Despite having similar physical findings, patients with comorbid back pain
had more severe preoperative pain and self-reported symptoms of instability
as well as more frequent depression and lower mental health scores. The
combination of disproportionate shoulder pain, comorbid back pain and mental
health conditions, and inferior preoperative expectations may affect not
only the patient’s preoperative state but also postoperative pain control
and/or postoperative outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin J Cronin
- Investigation performed at the University of Kentucky Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Sports Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Brian R Wolf
- Investigation performed at the University of Kentucky Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Sports Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Justin A Magnuson
- Investigation performed at the University of Kentucky Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Sports Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Cale A Jacobs
- Investigation performed at the University of Kentucky Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Sports Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Shannon Ortiz
- Investigation performed at the University of Kentucky Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Sports Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | | | - Julie Y Bishop
- Investigation performed at the University of Kentucky Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Sports Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Matthew J Bollier
- Investigation performed at the University of Kentucky Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Sports Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Keith M Baumgarten
- Investigation performed at the University of Kentucky Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Sports Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Jonathan T Bravman
- Investigation performed at the University of Kentucky Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Sports Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Robert H Brophy
- Investigation performed at the University of Kentucky Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Sports Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Charles L Cox
- Investigation performed at the University of Kentucky Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Sports Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Brian T Feeley
- Investigation performed at the University of Kentucky Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Sports Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - John A Grant
- Investigation performed at the University of Kentucky Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Sports Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Grant L Jones
- Investigation performed at the University of Kentucky Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Sports Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - John E Kuhn
- Investigation performed at the University of Kentucky Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Sports Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - C Benjamin Ma
- Investigation performed at the University of Kentucky Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Sports Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Robert G Marx
- Investigation performed at the University of Kentucky Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Sports Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Eric C McCarty
- Investigation performed at the University of Kentucky Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Sports Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Bruce S Miller
- Investigation performed at the University of Kentucky Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Sports Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Adam J Seidl
- Investigation performed at the University of Kentucky Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Sports Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Matthew V Smith
- Investigation performed at the University of Kentucky Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Sports Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Rick W Wright
- Investigation performed at the University of Kentucky Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Sports Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Alan L Zhang
- Investigation performed at the University of Kentucky Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Sports Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Carolyn M Hettrich
- Investigation performed at the University of Kentucky Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Sports Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Spindler KP, Huston LJ, Zajichek A, Reinke EK, Amendola A, Andrish JT, Brophy RH, Dunn WR, Flanigan DC, Jones MH, Kaeding CC, Marx RG, Matava MJ, McCarty EC, Parker RD, Vidal AF, Wolcott ML, Wolf BR, Wright RW. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in High School and College-Aged Athletes: Does Autograft Choice Influence Anterior Cruciate Ligament Revision Rates? Am J Sports Med 2020; 48:298-309. [PMID: 31917613 PMCID: PMC7319140 DOI: 10.1177/0363546519892991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Physicians' and patients' decision-making process between bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) and hamstring tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) may be influenced by a variety of factors in the young, active athlete. PURPOSE To determine the incidence of both ACL graft revisions and contralateral ACL tears resulting in subsequent ACLR in a cohort of high school- and college-aged athletes who initially underwent primary ACLR with either a BTB or a hamstring autograft. STUDY DESIGN Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS Study inclusion criteria were patients aged 14 to 22 years who were injured in sports, had a contralateral normal knee, and were scheduled to undergo unilateral primary ACLR with either a BTB or a hamstring autograft. All patients were prospectively followed for 6 years to determine whether any subsequent ACLR was performed in either knee after their initial ACLR. Multivariable regression modeling controlled for age, sex, ethnicity/race, body mass index, sport and competition level, baseline activity level, knee laxity, and graft type. The 6-year outcomes were the incidence of subsequent ACLR in either knee. RESULTS A total of 839 patients were eligible, of which 770 (92%) had 6-year follow-up for the primary outcome measure of the incidence of subsequent ACLR. The median age was 17 years, with 48% female, and the distribution of BTB and hamstring grafts was 492 (64%) and 278 (36%), respectively. The incidence of subsequent ACLR at 6 years was 9.2% in the ipsilateral knee, 11.2% in the contralateral normal knee, and 19.7% for either knee. High-grade preoperative knee laxity (odds ratio [OR], 2.4 [95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-3.9]; P = .001), autograft type (OR, 2.1 [95% CI, 1.3-3.5]; P = .004), and age (OR, 0.8 [95% CI, 0.7-1.0]; P = .009) were the 3 most influential predictors of ACL graft revision in the ipsilateral knee. The odds of ACL graft revision were 2.1 times higher for patients receiving a hamstring autograft than patients receiving a BTB autograft (95% CI, 1.3-3.5; P = .004). No significant differences were found between autograft choices when looking at the incidence of subsequent ACLR in the contralateral knee. CONCLUSION There was a high incidence of both ACL graft revisions and contralateral normal ACL tears resulting in subsequent ACLR in this young athletic cohort. The incidence of ACL graft revision at 6 years after index surgery was 2.1 times higher with a hamstring autograft compared with a BTB autograft.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kurt P. Spindler
- Investigation performed at Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA, and Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Laura J. Huston
- Investigation performed at Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA, and Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Alexander Zajichek
- Investigation performed at Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA, and Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Emily K. Reinke
- Investigation performed at Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA, and Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Annunziato Amendola
- Investigation performed at Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA, and Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Jack T. Andrish
- Investigation performed at Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA, and Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Robert H. Brophy
- Investigation performed at Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA, and Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Warren R. Dunn
- Investigation performed at Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA, and Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - David C. Flanigan
- Investigation performed at Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA, and Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Morgan H. Jones
- Investigation performed at Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA, and Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Christopher C. Kaeding
- Investigation performed at Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA, and Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Robert G. Marx
- Investigation performed at Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA, and Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Matthew J. Matava
- Investigation performed at Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA, and Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Eric C. McCarty
- Investigation performed at Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA, and Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Richard D. Parker
- Investigation performed at Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA, and Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Armando F. Vidal
- Investigation performed at Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA, and Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Michelle L. Wolcott
- Investigation performed at Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA, and Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Brian R. Wolf
- Investigation performed at Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA, and Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Rick W. Wright
- Investigation performed at Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA, and Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Su AW, Bogunovic L, Smith MV, Gortz S, Brophy RH, Wright RW, Matava MJ. Medial Tibial Slope Determined by Plain Radiography Is Not Associated with Primary or Recurrent Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears. J Knee Surg 2020; 33:22-28. [PMID: 30577053 DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1676456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Increased tibial slope may be associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries, although potential confounding effects from various patient characteristics and radiographic quantification methods have not been rigorously studied. The association of the slope of the lateral plateau with recurrent ACL injury after primary ACL reconstruction has recently been reported, but the role of medial slope is less well defined. The purpose of this study was to (1) assess medial tibial slope measurement reliability among examiners, (2) compare medial tibial slope values between patients undergoing primary ACL reconstruction, reinjured patients undergoing revision ACL reconstruction, and a control cohort with an intact ACL, (3) analyze if the medial tibial slope is an independent risk factor for noncontact ACL injury, and (4) assess how different anatomical references affect medial tibial slope values. A total of 206 patients were enrolled into one of three groups: (1) ACL-intact controls (CONTROL, n = 83), (2) first-time ACL-injured patients (PRIMARY, n = 77), and (3) patients undergoing revision ACL reconstruction (REVISION, n = 46). Three fellowship-trained sports medicine surgeons performed repeated measurements of plain lateral radiographs. The medial tibial slope was determined by three anatomical references: anterior tibial cortex (anterior tibial slope [ATS]), posterior tibial cortex (posterior tibial slope [PTS]), and the anatomical long axis of the tibia (composite tibial slope [CTS]). Substantial intra- and interobserver reliabilities were established by the intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.73 to 0.89. There was no difference in CTS, ATS, or PTS comparing the CONTROL, PRIMARY, and REVISION groups upon univariate analyses. Multivariable logistic regression model showed that none of the slope values was independently associated with ACL injury. The mean ATS for all 206 subjects was 4 and 8 degrees greater than the mean CTS and PTS, respectively. ATS correlated only moderately to PTS. We concluded that medial tibial slope measured on radiographs is not associated with primary or recurrent ACL injury, and has substantial variation and suboptimal correlation when using different anatomical references despite good inter- and intraobserver reliabilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alvin W Su
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Ljiljana Bogunovic
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Matthew V Smith
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Simon Gortz
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Robert H Brophy
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Rick W Wright
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Matthew J Matava
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Ramkumar PN, Tariq MB, Spindler KP, Andrish JT, Brophy RH, Dunn WR, Flanigan DC, Huston LJ, Jones MH, Kaeding CC, Kattan MW, Marx RG, Matava MJ, McCarty EC, Parker RD, Vidal AF, Wolcott ML, Wolf BR, Wright RW, Spindler KP. Risk Factors for Loss to Follow-up in 3202 Patients at 2 Years After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Implications for Identifying Health Disparities in the MOON Prospective Cohort Study. Am J Sports Med 2019; 47:3173-3180. [PMID: 31589465 PMCID: PMC7269366 DOI: 10.1177/0363546519876925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Understanding the risk factors for loss to follow-up in prospective clinical studies may allow for a targeted approach to minimizing follow-up bias and improving the generalizability of conclusions in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and other sports-related interventions. PURPOSE To identify independent risk factors associated with failure to complete (ie, loss to follow-up) patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) at 2 years after ACLR within a well-funded prospective longitudinal cohort. STUDY DESIGN Cohort study (prognosis); Level of evidence, 2. METHODS All patients undergoing primary or revision ACLR enrolled in the prospectively collected database of the multicenter consortium between 2002 and 2008 were included. Multivariate regression analyses were conducted to determine which baseline risk factors were significantly associated with loss to follow-up at a minimum of 2 years after surgery. Predictors assessed for loss to follow-up were as follows: consortium site, sex, race, marital status, smoking status, phone number provided (home or cell), email address provided (primary or secondary), years of school completed, average hours worked per week, working status (full-time, part-time, homemaker, retired, student, or disabled), number of people living at home, and preoperative PROMs (Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Marx Activity Rating Scale, and International Knee Documentation Committee). RESULTS A total of 3202 patients who underwent ACLR were enrolled. The 2-year PROM follow-up rate for this cohort was 88% (2821 of 3202). Multivariate analyses showed that patient sex (male: odds ratio [OR], 1.80) and race (black: OR, 3.64; other nonwhite: OR, 1.81) were independent predictors of 2-year loss to follow-up of PROMs. Education level was a nonconfounder. CONCLUSION While education level did not predict loss to follow-up, patients who are male and nonwhite are at increased risk of loss to follow-up of PROM at 2 years. Capturing patient outcomes with minimal loss depends on equitable, not equal, opportunity to maximize generalizability and mitigate potential population-level health disparities. REGISTRATION NCT00478894 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prem N. Ramkumar
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Muhammad B. Tariq
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA,Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | | | - Kurt P Spindler
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Jack T Andrish
- Investigation performed at Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Robert H Brophy
- Investigation performed at Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Warren R Dunn
- Investigation performed at Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - David C Flanigan
- Investigation performed at Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Laura J Huston
- Investigation performed at Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Morgan H Jones
- Investigation performed at Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | | | - Michael W Kattan
- Investigation performed at Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Robert G Marx
- Investigation performed at Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Matthew J Matava
- Investigation performed at Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Eric C McCarty
- Investigation performed at Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Richard D Parker
- Investigation performed at Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Armando F Vidal
- Investigation performed at Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | | | - Brian R Wolf
- Investigation performed at Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Rick W Wright
- Investigation performed at Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Kurt P Spindler
- Investigation performed at Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Jones MH, Oak SR, Andrish JT, Brophy RH, Cox CL, Dunn WR, Flanigan DC, Fleming BC, Huston LJ, Kaeding CC, Kolosky M, Kuyumcu G, Lynch TS, Magnussen RA, Matava MJ, Parker RD, Reinke EK, Scaramuzza EA, Smith MV, Winalski C, Wright RW, Zajichek A, Spindler KP. Predictors of Radiographic Osteoarthritis 2 to 3 Years After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Data From the MOON On-site Nested Cohort. Orthop J Sports Med 2019; 7:2325967119867085. [PMID: 31516911 PMCID: PMC6719483 DOI: 10.1177/2325967119867085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Multiple studies have shown that patients are susceptible to posttraumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA) after an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, even with ACL reconstruction (ACLR). Prospective studies using multivariable analysis to identify risk factors for PTOA are lacking. Purpose/Hypothesis: This study aimed to identify baseline predictors of radiographic PTOA after ACLR at an early time point. We hypothesized that meniscal injuries and cartilage lesions would be associated with worse radiographic PTOA using the Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) atlas criteria. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 421 patients who underwent ACLR returned on-site for standardized posteroanterior semiflexed knee radiography at a minimum of 2 years after surgery. The mean age was 19.8 years, with 51.3% female patients. At baseline, data on demographics, graft type, meniscal status/treatment, and cartilage status were collected. OARSI atlas criteria were used to grade all knee radiographs. Multivariable ordinal regression models identified baseline predictors of radiographic OARSI grades at follow-up. Results: Older age (odds ratio [OR], 1.06) and higher body mass index (OR, 1.05) were statistically significantly associated with a higher OARSI grade in the medial compartment. Patients who underwent meniscal repair and partial meniscectomy had statistically significantly higher OARSI grades in the medial compartment (meniscal repair OR, 1.92; meniscectomy OR, 2.11) and in the lateral compartment (meniscal repair OR, 1.96; meniscectomy OR, 2.97). Graft type, cartilage lesions, sex, and Marx activity rating scale score had no significant association with the OARSI grade. Conclusion: Older patients with a higher body mass index who have an ACL tear with a concurrent meniscal tear requiring partial meniscectomy or meniscal repair should be advised of their increased risk of developing radiographic PTOA. Alternatively, patients with an ACL tear with an articular cartilage lesion can be reassured that they are not at an increased risk of developing early radiographic knee PTOA at 2 to 3 years after ACLR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Morgan H Jones
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, and the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Sameer R Oak
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, and the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Jack T Andrish
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, and the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Robert H Brophy
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, and the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Charles L Cox
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, and the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Warren R Dunn
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, and the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - David C Flanigan
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, and the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Braden C Fleming
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, and the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Laura J Huston
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, and the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Christopher C Kaeding
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, and the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Michael Kolosky
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, and the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Gokhan Kuyumcu
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, and the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - T Sean Lynch
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, and the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Robert A Magnussen
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, and the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Matthew J Matava
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, and the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Richard D Parker
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, and the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Emily K Reinke
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, and the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Erica A Scaramuzza
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, and the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Matthew V Smith
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, and the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Carl Winalski
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, and the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Rick W Wright
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, and the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Alexander Zajichek
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, and the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Kurt P Spindler
- Investigation performed at Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, and the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Beason AM, Koehler RJ, Sanders RA, Rode BE, Menge TJ, McCullough KA, Glass NA, Hettrich CM, Cox CL, Bollier MJ, Wolf BR, Spencer EE, Grant JA, Bishop JY, Jones GL, Barlow JD, Baumgarten KM, Kelly JD, Sennett BJ, Zgonis M, Abboud JA, Namdari S, Allen C, Kuhn JE, Sullivan JP, Wright RW, Brophy RH, Smith MV, Dunn WR. Surgeon Agreement on the Presence of Pathologic Anterior Instability on Shoulder Imaging Studies. Orthop J Sports Med 2019; 7:2325967119862501. [PMID: 31448299 PMCID: PMC6689926 DOI: 10.1177/2325967119862501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In the setting of anterior shoulder instability, it is important to assess the reliability of orthopaedic surgeons to diagnose pathologic characteristics on the 2 most common imaging modalities used in clinical practice: standard plain radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Purpose To assess the intra- and interrater reliability of diagnosing pathologic characteristics associated with anterior shoulder instability using standard plain radiographs and MRI. Study Design Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. Methods Patient charts at a single academic institution were reviewed for anterior shoulder instability injuries. The study included 40 sets of images (20 radiograph sets, 20 MRI series). The images, along with standardized evaluation forms, were distributed to 22 shoulder/sports medicine fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeons over 2 points in time. Kappa values for inter- and intrarater reliability were calculated. Results The overall response rate was 91%. For shoulder radiographs, interrater agreement was fair to moderate for the presence of glenoid lesions (κ = 0.49), estimate of glenoid lesion surface area (κ = 0.59), presence of a Hill-Sachs lesion (κ = 0.35), and estimate of Hill-Sachs surface area (κ = 0.50). Intrarater agreement was moderate for radiographs (κ = 0.48-0.57). For shoulder MRI, interrater agreement was fair to moderate for the presence of glenoid lesions (κ = 0.44), glenoid lesion surface area (κ = 0.35), Hill-Sachs lesion (κ = 0.33), Hill-Sachs surface area (κ = 0.28), humeral head edema (κ = 0.41), and presence of a capsulolabral injury (κ = 0.36). Fair agreement was found for specific type of capsulolabral injury (κ = 0.21). Intrarater agreement for shoulder MRI was moderate for the presence of glenoid lesion (κ = 0.59), presence of a Hill-Sachs lesion (κ = 0.52), estimate of Hill-Sachs surface area (κ = 0.50), humeral head edema (κ = 0.51), and presence of a capsulolabral injury (κ = 0.53), and agreement was substantial for glenoid lesion surface area (κ = 0.63). Intrarater agreement was fair for determining the specific type of capsulolabral injury (κ = 0.38). Conclusion Fair to moderate agreement by surgeons was found when evaluating imaging studies for anterior shoulder instability. Agreement was similar for identifying pathologic characteristics on radiographs and MRI. There was a trend toward better agreement for the presence of glenoid-sided injury. The lowest agreement was observed for specific capsulolabral injuries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Austin M Beason
- Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Ryan J Koehler
- Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Rosemary A Sanders
- Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Brooke E Rode
- Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Travis J Menge
- Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Kirk A McCullough
- Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Natalie A Glass
- Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Carolyn M Hettrich
- Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | | | - Charles L Cox
- Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Matthew J Bollier
- Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Brian R Wolf
- Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Edwin E Spencer
- Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - John A Grant
- Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Julie Y Bishop
- Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Grant L Jones
- Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Jonathan D Barlow
- Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Keith M Baumgarten
- Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - John D Kelly
- Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Brian J Sennett
- Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Milt Zgonis
- Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Joseph A Abboud
- Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Surena Namdari
- Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Christina Allen
- Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - John E Kuhn
- Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Jaron P Sullivan
- Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Rick W Wright
- Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Robert H Brophy
- Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Matthew V Smith
- Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Warren R Dunn
- Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Wright RW, Huston LJ, Haas AK, Allen CR, Anderson AF, Cooper DE, DeBerardino TM, Dunn WR, Lantz BBA, Mann B, Spindler KP, Stuart MJ, Nwosu SK, Albright JP, Amendola AN, Andrish JT, Annunziata CC, Arciero RA, Bach BR, Baker CL, Bartolozzi AR, Baumgarten KM, Bechler JR, Berg JH, Bernas GA, Brockmeier SF, Brophy RH, Bush-Joseph CA, Brad Butler V J, Campbell JD, Carey JL, Carpenter JE, Cole BJ, Cooper JM, Cox CL, Creighton RA, Dahm DL, David TS, Flanigan DC, Frederick RW, Ganley TJ, Garofoli EA, Gatt CJ, Gecha SR, Giffin JR, Hame SL, Hannafin JA, Harner CD, Harris NL, Hechtman KS, Hershman EB, Hoellrich RG, Hosea TM, Johnson DC, Johnson TS, Jones MH, Kaeding CC, Kamath GV, Klootwyk TE, Levy BA, Ma CB, Maiers GP, Marx RG, Matava MJ, Mathien GM, McAllister DR, McCarty EC, McCormack RG, Miller BS, Nissen CW, O'Neill DF, Owens BD, Parker RD, Purnell ML, Ramappa AJ, Rauh MA, Rettig AC, Sekiya JK, Shea KG, Sherman OH, Slauterbeck JR, Smith MV, Spang JT, Svoboda LSJ, Taft TN, Tenuta JJ, Tingstad EM, Vidal AF, Viskontas DG, White RA, Williams JS, Wolcott ML, Wolf BR, York JJ. Predictors of Patient-Reported Outcomes at 2 Years After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2019; 47:2394-2401. [PMID: 31318611 PMCID: PMC7335592 DOI: 10.1177/0363546519862279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are a valid measure of results after revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Revision ACL reconstruction has been documented to have worse outcomes when compared with primary ACL reconstruction. Understanding positive and negative predictors of PROs will allow surgeons to modify and potentially improve outcome for patients. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS The purpose was to describe PROs after revision ACL reconstruction and test the hypothesis that patient- and technique-specific variables are associated with these outcomes. STUDY DESIGN Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS Patients undergoing revision ACL reconstruction were identified and prospectively enrolled by 83 surgeons over 52 sites. Data included baseline demographics, surgical technique and pathology, and a series of validated PRO instruments: International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, and Marx Activity Rating Scale. Patients were followed up at 2 years and asked to complete the identical set of outcome instruments. Multivariate regression models were used to control for a variety of demographic and surgical factors to determine the positive and negative predictors of PRO scores at 2 years after revision surgery. RESULTS A total of 1205 patients met the inclusion criteria and were successfully enrolled: 697 (58%) were male, with a median cohort age of 26 years. The median time since their most recent previous ACL reconstruction was 3.4 years. Two-year questionnaire follow-up was obtained from 989 patients (82%). The most significant positive predictors of 2-year IKDC scores were a high baseline IKDC score, high baseline Marx activity level, male sex, and having a longer time since the most recent previous ACL reconstruction, while negative predictors included having a lateral meniscectomy before the revision ACL reconstruction or having grade 3/4 chondrosis in either the trochlear groove or the medial tibial plateau at the time of the revision surgery. For KOOS, having a high baseline score and having a longer time between the most recent previous ACL reconstruction and revision surgery were significant positive predictors for having a better (ie, higher) 2-year KOOS, while having a lateral meniscectomy before the revision ACL reconstruction was a consistent predictor for having a significantly worse (ie, lower) 2-year KOOS. Statistically significant positive predictors for 2-year Marx activity levels included higher baseline Marx activity levels, younger age, male sex, and being a nonsmoker. Negative 2-year activity level predictors included having an allograft or a biologic enhancement at the time of revision surgery. CONCLUSION PROs after revision ACL reconstruction are associated with a variety of patient- and surgeon-related variables. Understanding positive and negative predictors of PROs will allow surgeons to guide patient expectations as well as potentially improve outcomes.
Collapse
|