Pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch predisposes to adjacent segment disease after lumbar spinal fusion

Surgical Treatment of Flat Back Syndrome With Anterior Hyperlordotic Cages

BACKGROUND

Traditional correction for flat back syndrome is performed with a posterior-based surgery or combined approaches in revision cases.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate outcome from anterior surgery with the use of hyperlordotic cages (HLCs) in patients with flat back syndrome.

METHODS

All patients operated with or without prior posterior lumbar surgery were studied. Pre- to postoperative sagittal alignment was analyzed. Radiographic parameters were analyzed including T1 pelvic angle (T1PA), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI), lumbar lordosis (LL), sacral slope (SS), pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis (PI-LL), and T4-12TK.

RESULTS

All 50 patients (mean age of 58 yr, 72% female with mean body mass index of 28) demonstrated significant radiographic alignment difference in their spinopelvic and global parameters from pre- to postoperative standing: LL (-37.04° vs -59.55°, P < .001), SS (35.12 vs 41.13, P < .001), PI-LL (23.55 vs 6.46), T4-12 TK (30.59 vs 41.67), PT (28.22 vs 22.13), SVA in mm (80.94 vs 37.39), and T1PA (28.70° vs 18.43°, P < .001). Using linear regression analysis, predicted pre- to postoperative change in standing LL corresponded to a pre- to postoperative changes in standing PI-LL mismatch, T1PA, TK, SS, PT, and SVA (R2 = 0.59, 0.38, 0.25, 0.16, 0.12, and 0.17, respectively). Five degrees of pre- to postoperative change in T1PA translates to -4.15° change in LL.

CONCLUSION

Anterior surgery with HLCs followed by posterior instrumentation is an effective technique to treat flat back syndrome. HLCs are effective to maximize LL up to 30°, which is equivalent in magnitude to a pedicle subtraction osteotomy, but associated with less blood loss, quicker recovery, lower complications, and good surgical outcome.

Topping-Off Technology versus Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Meta-Analysis

The treatment effects of topping-off technique were still controversial. This study compared all available data on postoperative clinical and radiographic outcomes of topping-off technique and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane were systematically reviewed. Variations included radiographical adjacent segment disease (RASD), clinical adjacent segment disease (CASD), global lumbar lordosis (GLL), visual analogue scale (VAS) of back (VAS-B) and leg (VAS-L), Oswestry disability index (ODI), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, duration of surgery, estimated blood loss (EBL), reoperation rates, and complication rates. Sixteen studies, including 1372 cases, were selected for the analysis. Rates of proximal RASD (P=0.0004), distal RASD (P=0.03), postoperative VAS-B (P=0.0001), postoperative VAS-L (P=0.02), EBL (P=0.007), and duration of surgery (P=0.02) were significantly lower in topping-off group than those in PLIF group. Postoperative ODI after 3 years (P=0.04) in the topping-off group was significantly less than that in the PLIF group. There was no significant difference in the rates of CASD (P=0.06), postoperative GLL (P=0.14), postoperative ODI within 3 years (P=0.24), and postoperative JOA (P=0.70) and in reoperation rates (P=0.32) and complication rates (P=0.27) between topping-off group and PLIF. The results confirmed that topping-off technique could effectively prevent ASDs after lumbar internal fixation. However, this effect is effective in preventing RASD. Topping-off technique is more effective in improving the subjective feelings of patients rather than objective motor functions compared with PLIF. With the development of surgical techniques, both topping-off technique and PLIF are safe.

Comparison between topping-off technology and posterior lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of chronic low back pain: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The difference between topping-off technique and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in postoperative outcomes is still controversial. The aim of this study is to compare all available data on outcomes of topping-off technique and PLIF in the treatment of chronic low back pain.

METHODS

Articles in PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane were reviewed. Parameters included radiographical adjacent segment disease (RASD), clinical adjacent segment disease, range of motion (ROM), global lumbar lordosis (GLL), visual analog scale (VAS), visual analog scale of back, (VAS-B) and visual analog scale leg (VAS-L), Oswestry disability index, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, duration of surgery, estimated blood loss (EBL), reoperation rates, complication rates.

RESULTS

Rates of proximal RASD (P = .001) and CASD (P = .03), postoperative VAS-B (P = .0001) were significantly lower in topping-off group than that in PLIF group. There was no significant difference in distal RASD (P = .07), postoperative GLL (P = .71), postoperative upper intervertebral ROM (P = .19), postoperative VAS-L (P = .08), DOI (P = .30), postoperative JOA (P = .18), EBL (P = .21) and duration of surgery (P = .49), reoperation rate (P = .16), complication rates (P = .31) between topping-off group and PLIF.

CONCLUSIONS

Topping-off can effectively prevent the adjacent segment disease from progressing after lumbar internal fixation, which is be more effective in proximal segments. Topping-off technique was more effective in improving subjective feelings of patents rather than objective motor functions. However, no significant difference between topping-off technique and PLIF can be found in the rates of complications.

Sagittal Spinal and Pelvic Parameters in Patients With Scheuermann's Disease: A Preliminary Study

Background

Sagittal spinopelvic parameters remain poorly defined in patients with Scheuermann disease (SD). For example, although pelvic incidence (PI) should approximate lumbar lordosis (LL) by 10°, this is not true in patients with SD. This retrospective radiographic study was conducted to propose a new mathematical relationship between sagittal spinopelvic parameters in skeletally mature patients with SD.

Methods

The following formula (Δ) was proposed [(thoracic kyphosis - 45°) + (thoracolumbar kyphosis - 0°) + (PI - LL) = ± 10°] and validated with standard spino pelvic parameters in patients with skeletally mature SD without prior spine surgery at 2 centers between 2006 and 2015. The T1 pelvic angle (TPA) was used as a measure of global balance with normal maximum of 15°. Subgroup analysis was performed to compare Δ between balanced (TPA ≤ 15°) and unbalanced (TPA > 15°) patients with SD.

Results

In patients with SD (n = 30), half were female (n = 15), the average age was 39 years, and the average Δ was 2.4°. A significant correlation was discovered between Δ and both TPA (R ² = 0.75) and PI (R ² = 0.69). At TPA of 15°, average Δ was 9.2°. There was also a significant difference between balanced and unbalanced patients (-8.7° ± 11.6° versus 28.2° ± 19.7°, P = .0003).

Conclusions

This study of a new formula (Δ) to evaluate global sagittal balance in patients with SD found that accounting for the kyphosis maintained Δ within ± 10°. Further study is planned to determine whether maintaining and/or restoring a normal Δ is associated with improved outcomes in patients with SD after surgery.

Minimal invasive surgical algorithm for revision lumbar spinal surgery

BACKGROUND

Revision spinal surgery following primary spinal fusion procedure occurs in 8-45% of cases. Reasons for revision include recurrence of stenosis, non-union, implant failure, infection, adjacent segment degeneration and flat back fusion. With the rise in elective lumbar fusion rates, it is expected that the rate for revision spinal surgery will also increase with time. The use of minimal invasive surgical techniques for revision spinal surgery is controversial. Careful patient and technique selection is important in achieving satisfactory outcome in revision spinal surgery.

METHODS

This article outlines our algorithm for selecting the appropriate minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques for revision lumbar spinal surgery. Surgical options range from decompression employing MIS techniques to open osteotomies, but the optimal approach comes down to two deciding factors: (I) nature of previous surgery and (II) spinopelvic parameters.

RESULTS

Representative revision cases managed using MIS techniques based on proposed revision algorithm are presented.

CONCLUSIONS

Our proposed algorithm provides surgeons with a systematic approach in selecting the appropriate combination of MIS techniques for revision lumbar spinal surgery based on pathology and sagittal alignment.

Full-spine radiographs: what others are reporting-a survey of Society of Skeletal Radiology members

OBJECTIVE

Full-spine radiographs are frequently ordered by spinal deformity surgeons to assess spinal imbalance. The radiologist interpretation of these films varies amongst providers. Detailed numeric measurements of the deformity are time-consuming. In this study, we hoped to better define current practice patterns for interpretation of spinal deformity films amongst musculoskeletal radiologists in North America.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An anonymous online survey was conducted amongst Society of Skeletal Radiology members.

RESULTS

Only 26.5% of respondents (n = 57) routinely report pelvic tilt, 23.2% (n = 52) for sagittal vertical axis and 5.1% (n = 11) for Pelvic Incidence Lumbar Lordosis mismatch in adult spinal deformity. Furthermore, the majority of musculoskeletal radiologists (84.96%) dictate the same type of report for both adult and pediatric cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority (n = 199, 70%) of 283 respondents state that no institutional standard template for full-spine dictations exists. The development of such templates listing appropriate parameters to include in the dictation may be useful in order to ensure that the radiologist's effort and clinical utility for the ordering provider are optimized.

Imaging in Spine Surgery: Current Concepts and Future Directions

OBJECTIVE

To review and highlight the historical and recent advances of imaging in spine surgery and to discuss current applications and future directions.

METHODS

A PubMed review of the current literature was performed on all relevant articles that examined historical and recent imaging techniques used in spine surgery. Studies were examined for their thoroughness in description of various modalities and applications in current and future management.

RESULTS

We reviewed 97 articles that discussed past, present, and future applications for imaging in spine surgery. Although most historical approaches relied heavily upon basic radiography, more recent advances have begun to expand upon advanced modalities, including the integration of more sophisticated equipment and artificial intelligence.

CONCLUSIONS

Since the days of conventional radiography, various modalities have emerged and become integral components of the spinal surgeon's diagnostic armamentarium. As such, it behooves the practitioner to remain informed on the current trends and potential developments in spinal imaging, as rapid adoption and interpretation of new techniques may make significant differences in patient management and outcomes. Future directions will likely become increasingly sophisticated as the implementation of machine learning, and artificial intelligence has become more commonplace in clinical practice.

Changes in Sagittal Alignment Following Short-Level Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Comparison between Posterior and Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusions

Study Design

Retrospective case-control study.

Purpose

We aimed to compare radiologic outcomes between posterior (PLIF) and lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) in short-level spinal fusion surgeries.

Overview of Literature

Although LLIF enables surgeons to insert large lordotic cages, it is unknown whether LLIF more effectively corrects local and global sagittal alignments compared with PLIF in short-level spinal fusion surgeries.

Methods

Radiographic data acquired from patients with lumbar interbody fusion (≤3 levels) using PLIF or LLIF for degenerative lumbar diseases were analyzed. The following radiographic parameters were evaluated preoperatively and at 2 years postoperatively: segmental lordotic angle, disk height, lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic tilt (PT), C7 sagittal vertical axis, and thoracic kyphosis (TK).

Results

In total, 144 patients with PLIF (193 fused levels) and 101 with LLIF (159 fused levels) were included. Patients’ backgrounds and preoperative radiographic parameters for any level of fusion did not differ significantly between PLIF and LLIF procedures. The LLIF group exhibited significantly greater changes at 1-level fusion compared to the PLIF group in the parameters of segmental lordotic angle (5.1°±5.8° vs. 2.1°±5.0°, p<0.001), disk height (4.2±2.3 mm vs. 2.2±2.0 mm, p<0.001), LL (7.8°±7.6° vs. 3.9°±8.6°, p=0.004), and PI–LL (−6.9°±6.8° vs. −3.6°±10.1°, p=0.03). While, a similar trend was observed regarding 2-level fusion, significantly greater changes were only observed in LL (12.1°±11.1° vs. 4.2°±9.1°, p=0.047) and PI–LL (−11.2°±11.3° vs. −3.0°±9.3°, p=0.043), PT (−6.4°±4.9° vs. −2.5°±5.3°, p=0.049) and TK (7.8°±11.8° vs. −0.3°±9.7°, p=0.047) in the LLIF group at 3-level fusion.

Conclusions

LLIF provides significantly better local sagittal alignment than PLIF in 1- or 2-level fusion cases and improves spinopelvic alignment and local alignment for 3-level fusion cases. Thus, LLIF was demonstrated to be a useful lumbar interbody fusion technique, constituting a powerful tool for achieving sagittal realignment with minimal surgical invasiveness.

Prevention of Adjacent Segmental Disease after Fusion in Degenerative Spinal Disorder: Correlation between Segmental Lumbar Lordosis Ratio and Pelvic Incidence-Lumbar Lordosis Mismatch for a Minimum 5-Year Follow-up

Study Design

Retrospective study.

Purpose

Associations among risk factors related to adjacent segmental disease (ASD) remain unclear. We evaluated the risk factors and segmental lordosis ratio to prevent ASD developing after lumbar spinal fusion.

Overview of Literature

Risk factors related to ASD development are age, sex, obesity, pre-existing degeneration, number of fusion segments, and decreased postoperative lumbar lordosis (LL). However, the associations among these factors are still unclear and should be clearly identified.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed data on 274 patients who underwent lumbar spinal fusion of three segments or below for lumbar degenerative disease from January 2010 to December 2012, with over 5 years of follow-up. Patients with preoperative sagittal vertical axis (SVA) >5 cm were excluded due to sagittal imbalance. A total of 37 patients with ASD and 40 control patients (CTRL) were randomly selected in a similar distribution of matching variables: age, sex, and preoperative degenerative changes. Sex, age, number of fusion segments, radiologic measurements, L4–5–S1/L1–S1 LL ratio, and spinopelvic parameters (pelvic incidence [PI], pelvic tilt [PT], sacral slope [SS], and SVA) were analyzed. Logistic regression was used to analyze the correlation between PI–LL mismatch and L4–5–S1 segmental lordosis rate.

Results

No significant difference was found between ASDs and CTRL groups regarding age, sex, number of fusion segments, fusion method, and preoperative and postoperative spinopelvic parameters (PI, SS, PT, and LL). However, regarding the L4–5–S1/L1–S1 lordosis ratio, 50% (p=0.045), 60% (p=0.031), 70% (p=0.042), 80% (p=0.023), and 90% (p=0.023) were statistically significant; <20% (p=0.478), 30% (p=0.223), and 40% (p=0.089) were not statistically significant. In the postoperative PI–LL <10 group, ASD occurred less frequently than in the PI–LL >10 group, and the difference was statistically significant (p=0.048).

Conclusions

Patients with a postoperative L4–5–S1/L1–S1 lordosis ratio >50% had less occurrence of ASD. Correcting LL according to PI and physiologic segmental lordosis ratio is important in preventing ASD.

Risk factors for upper adjacent segment degeneration after multi-level posterior lumbar spinal fusion surgery

BACKGROUND

Posterior lumbar spinal fusion has been widely used in degenerative lumbar stenosis, but adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) was common. Researchers have found many risk factors for ASD after one or two levels of surgery, but few clinical studies focused on multi-level surgery. The purpose of this study was to clarify risk factors for upper ASD after multi-level posterior lumbar spinal fusion.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed on the clinical data of 71 patients with degenerative lumbar stenosis who underwent multi-level (at least 3 levels) posterior lumbar spinal fusion from January 2013 to December 2016. Two groups were divided according to lamina and posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) maintenance of proximal fixed vertebrae in surgery. In the 22 patients of group A, the proximal fixed vertebral lamina and PLC were not resected, and in the 49 patients of group B, the proximal fixed vertebral lamina and PLC were resected completely. Age, sex, body mass index (BMI), number of fixed vertebrae and fused levels, spinopelvic parameters, coronal Cobb angle, and modified Pfirrmann grading system were measured for each patient. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyze risk factors for upper ASD.

RESULTS

No symptomatic ASD was found during the follow-up period. Patients who underwent proximal fixed vertebral lamina and PLC resection had a significantly higher percentage of radiographic ASD (P = 0.042). The Cox proportional hazards model showed that age, sex, BMI, preoperative lumbar lordosis, sacral slope, pelvic tilt, coronal Cobb angle, number of fixed vertebrae, and interbody fusion levels had no significant differences for radiographic ASD. But a preoperative modified Pfirrmann grade higher than 3, a high degree of preoperative pelvic incidence, and more decompressed levels had statistical significance (P = 0.024, 0.041, and 0.008, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

A preoperative modified Pfirrmann grade higher than 3, a high degree of preoperative pelvic incidence, and more decompressed levels might be risk factors for upper radiographic ASD after multi-level posterior lumbar spinal fusion surgery.

Comparison of Segmental Lordosis and Global Spinopelvic Alignment After Single-Level Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion or Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

BACKGROUND

Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) has steadily increased in popularity. Compared with the traditional transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), LLIF is thought to allow for greater improvement in lordosis. However, there are limited direct comparison data on the degree of regional and global alignment change after single-level LLIF and TLIF procedures. This study compared the changes in spinal sagittal alignment in patients who underwent either procedure.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent LLIF or TLIF for lumbar degenerative disease at a single institution was performed. Twenty patients who underwent single-level LLIF were matched to 20 patients who underwent single-level TLIF by gender and level of interbody fusion. All included patients had preoperative and postoperative standing scoliosis radiographs. Changes in segmental lordosis (SL) at the fused level, lumbar lordosis (LL), sagittal vertical axis, and pelvic incidence-LL mismatch (PI-LL) were measured. Statistical analysis was performed using paired and unpaired Student's t-tests. Means were reported with standard error.

RESULTS

Within each group, 2, 4, and 14 patients had cages placed at L2-3, L3-4, and L4-5, respectively. The LLIF group demonstrated significantly increased SL compared with the TLIF group (+4.9° ± 3.0 vs. +2.6° ± 1.7, P = 0.01). LL, sagittal vertical axis, and PI-LL changes did not differ significantly between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

LLIF achieved greater improvements in SL than TLIF. However, regionally and globally, there were no significant differences with either procedure after a single-level intervention. The increased lordosis from LLIF compared with TLIF may be more impactful globally in multilevel fusions.

Dependence of lumbar loads on spinopelvic sagittal alignment: An evaluation based on musculoskeletal modeling

Still little is known about how spinopelvic alignment affects spinal load distribution. Musculoskeletal modeling can potentially help to discover associations between spine alignment and risk factors of spinal disorders (e.g. disc herniation, vertebral fracture, spondylolisthesis, low back pain). The present study exploited the AnyBody full-body musculoskeletal model to assess the relation between lumbar loads and spinopelvic alignment in the sagittal plane. The model was evaluated in the standing position. The simulated postures were set using spinopelvic parameters gleaned from the literature and characterizing the healthy adult population. The parameters were: sagittal vertical axis, Roussouly lumbar type, sacral slope, and pelvic incidence. A total of 2772 configurations were simulated based on the following measurements: compression force and anterior shear at levels L4L5 and L5S1; multifidus, longissimus spinae, and rectus abdominis muscle forces. Changes in global sagittal alignment, lumbar typology, and sacral inclination, but not in pelvic incidence, were found to affect intervertebral loads in the lumbar spine and spinal muscle activation. Considering these changes would be advantageous for clinical evaluation, due to the recognized relation between altered loads and risk of disc herniation, vertebral fracture, spondylolisthesis, and low back pain. Musculoskeletal modeling proved to be a valuable biomechanical tool to non-invasively investigate the relation between internal loads and anatomical parameters.

Sagittal Alignment After Surgical Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis-Application of the Roussouly Classification

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate spinopelvic alignment and spine shape in patients surgically treated for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and to assess the distribution and clinical applicability of the Roussouly classification.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

How spinopelvic alignment is affected in AIS patients is not well established. Roussouly et al. proposed a classification based on the sagittal spinal profile and spinopelvic alignment that may have clinical utility in these patients.

METHODS

A consecutive cohort of 134 surgically treated AIS patients were included. Whole-spine standing lateral radiographs were analyzed preoperatively, one-week postoperatively and at two-year follow-up. Patients were categorized using the modified Roussouly classification and analyzed for sagittal alignment.

RESULTS

Postoperatively, global thoracic kyphosis (TK) decreased by 2.6° and lumbar lordosis (LL) decreased by 6.2°(p ≤ .012) while Pelvic tilt (PT) increased 1.4° (p = .024). At two-year follow-up, TK and LL had returned to preoperative values (p ≥ .346) while PT had decreased from preoperative 9.7 ± 7.6° to 7.0 ± 7.5° (p > .001). Proximal junctional angle increased from 8.4 ± 5.0° preoperatively to 12.8 ± 8.9 (p < .001). Preoperatively, Roussouly curve types were distributed equally apart from a lower rate of type 1 (12%). At final follow-up, 30% were categorised as type 3 with pelvic anteversion which is considerably higher than the normal adolescent population. Only three patients were type 1 at the final follow-up. Overall, we found a high rate of proximal junctional kyphosis (16%), PI-LL mismatch (60%) and pelvic anteversion (38%). In preoperative type 1 patients, the rate was 50%, 82% and 64%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

We found that immediate postoperative changes in lordosis and kyphosis were reversed at final follow-up and found evidence of proximal junctional kyphosation and pelvic anteversion as the main compensatory mechanisms. Poor sagittal alignment was frequent in type 1 curves, and surgical treatment may need to be individualized according to the sagittal profile.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

[The impact of spinopelvic parameters on the rate of adjacent segment instability after short-segment spinal fusion]

AIM

The objective of this study is to determine the impact of postoperative spinopelvic parameters on the development of adjacent segment instability after single-level lumbar fusion.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 116 patients with degenerative spine conditions after lumbar fusion were enrolled in this study and subdivided into two groups. Group I consisted of 24 patients with signs of adjacent segment instability; Group II included 92 patients without signs of instability. The minimal follow-up period was 24 months.

RESULTS

The mean postoperative lumbar lordotic (LL) angle in both groups was within the normal range (-60.9±12); no statistically significant intergroup differences were revealed (56.6±12.1 and 58.4±11.2 for Groups I and II, respectively; p=0.314). In Group I patients, the mean pelvic incidence (PI) angle differed significantly from the mean PI values in Group II patients (70.4±7.6 and 53.2±8.4, respectively; p=0.006) and from the normal PI values (51.9±10). Therefore, the mean difference between PI and LL (PI-LL) angles in the Group I patients was significantly higher than in Group II (16.2±5.4 and 4.8±8.6, respectively; p=0.004). Significant PI-LL mismatch (PI-LL ≥10°) was observed in 22 (91.7%) patients in Group I and in 11 (11.95%) patients in Group II. According to regression analysis data, the PI-LL mismatch was identified as a risk factor for adjacent segment instability; the odds ratio =4.2; 95% confidence interval 1.46-12.25; and p=0.007.

CONCLUSION

Patients with the high PI value and low LL value have a significantly higher risk of adjacent segment instability after short-segment spinal fusion.

Location of correction within the lumbar spine impacts acute adjacent-segment kyphosis

OBJECTIVEThe surgical correction of adult spinal deformity (ASD) often involves modifying lumbar lordosis (LL) to restore ideal sagittal alignment. However, corrections that include large changes in LL increase the risk for development of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK). Little is known about the impact of cranial versus caudal correction in the lumbar spine on the occurrence of PJK. The goal of this study was to investigate the impact of the location of the correction on acute PJK development.METHODSThis study was a retrospective review of a prospective multicenter database. Surgically treated ASD patients with early follow-up evaluations (6 weeks) and fusions of the full lumbosacral spine were included. Radiographic parameters analyzed included the classic spinopelvic parameters (pelvic incidence [PI], pelvic tilt [PT], PI-LL, and sagittal vertical axis [SVA]) and segmental correction. Using Glattes' criteria, patients were stratified into PJK and noPJK groups and propensity matched by age and regional lumbar correction (ΔPI-LL). Radiographic parameters and segmental correction were compared between PJK and noPJK patients using independent t-tests.RESULTSAfter propensity matching, 312 of 483 patients were included in the analysis (mean age 64 years, 76% women, 40% with PJK). There were no significant differences between PJK and noPJK patients at baseline or postoperatively, or between changes in alignment, with the exception of thoracic kyphosis (TK) and ΔTK. PJK patients had a decrease in segmental lordosis at L4-L5-S1 (-0.6° vs 1.6°, p = 0.025), and larger increases in segmental correction at cranial levels L1-L2-L3 (9.9° vs 7.1°), T12-L1-L2 (7.3° vs 5.4°), and T11-T12-L1 (2.9° vs 0.7°) (all p < 0.05).CONCLUSIONSAlthough achievement of an optimal sagittal alignment is the goal of realignment surgery, dramatic lumbar corrections appear to increase the risk of PJK. This study was the first to demonstrate that patients who developed PJK underwent kyphotic changes in the L4-S1 segments while restoring LL at more cranial levels (T12-L3). These findings suggest that restoring lordosis at lower lumbar levels may result in a decreased risk of developing PJK.

Adjacent Segment Disease After Single Segment Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: Minimum 10 Years Follow-up

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of adjacent segment disease (ASD) at 2, 5, and 10 years after primary posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), and clinical features of ASD.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Few reports have examined ASD after PLIF with more than 10 years of follow-up. Furthermore, no reports have examined limited conditions of preoperative pathology, fusion segment, and fusion method with long follow-up.

METHODS

Data were reviewed for 128 patients who underwent single-segment PLIF for L4 degenerative spondylolisthesis and could be followed for at least 10 years. Mean age at the time of surgery was 63 years, and mean follow-up was 12.4 years. Follow-up rate was 62.4%. ASD was defined as radiological ASD (R-ASD), radiological degeneration adjacent to the fusion segment by plain X-rays and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); symptomatic ASD (S-ASD), a symptomatic condition due to neurological deterioration at the adjacent segment degeneration; and operative ASD (O-ASD), S-ASD requiring revision surgery.

RESULTS

Incidences of each ASD at 2, 5, and 10 years after primary PLIF were 19%, 49%, and 75% for R-ASD, 6%, 14%, and 31% for S-ASD, and 5%, 9%, and 15% for O-ASD, respectively. O-ASD incidence was 24% at final follow-up. O-ASD peak was bimodal, at 2 and 10 years after primary PLIF. O-ASD was mainly observed at the cranial segment (77%), followed by the caudal segment (13%) and both cranial and caudal segments (10%). With respect to O-ASD pathology, degenerative spondylolisthesis was observed in 52%, spinal stenosis in 39%, and disc herniation in 10%.

CONCLUSION

Incidences of R-ASD, S-ASD, and O-ASD at 10 years after primary PLIF were 75%, 31%, and 15%, respectively. With respect to O-ASD pathology, degenerative spondylolisthesis at the cranial segment was the most frequent.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

[The disputes in the radiographic measurements of sagittal balance and how to deal with them]

Objective

To review the process of radiographic measurements of sagittal balance and offer reference for the clinical practice.

Methods

The related literature of spino-pelvic sagittal parameters and their clinical application was reviewed and analyzed from the aspects such as the clinical application, the advantages and disadvantages, and how to use them effectively.

Results

All parameters have their advantages and disadvantages, and they are influenced by age and race. Sagittal vertical axis can only reflect the global balance, and T 1 pelvic angle which accounts for both spinal inclination and pelvic tilt can't be controlled in the surgery. The correction goal for western people may be not suitable for Chinese.

Conclusion

The parameters should be used wisely when evaluating the sagittal balance, the global balance and local balance should be considered together and the different groups of people need different correction goals.

Does approach matter? A comparative radiographic analysis of spinopelvic parameters in single-level lumbar fusion

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Lumbar fusion is a popular and effective surgical option to provide stability and restore anatomy. Particular attention has recently been focused on sagittal alignment and radiographic spinopelvic parameters that apply to lumbar fusion as well as spinal deformity cases. Current literature has demonstrated the effectiveness of various techniques of lumbar fusion; however, comparative data of these techniques are limited.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to directly compare the impact of various lumbar fusion techniques (anterior lumbar interbody fusion [ALIF], lateral lumbar interbody fusion [LLIF], transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion [TLIF], and posterolateral fusion [PLF]) based on radiographic parameters.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

A single-center retrospective study examining preoperative and postoperative radiographs was carried out.

PATIENT SAMPLE

A consecutive list of lumbar fusion surgeries performed by multiple spine surgeons at a single institution from 2013 to 2016 was identified.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Radiographic measurements used included segmental lordosis (SL), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch, anterior and posterior disc height (DH-A, DH-P, respectively), and foraminal height (FH).

METHODS

Radiographic measurements were performed on preoperative and postoperative lateral lumbar radiographs on all single-level lumbar fusion cases. Demographic data were collected including age, gender, approach, diagnosis, surgical level, and implant lordosis. Paired sample t test, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), McNemar test, and independent sample t test were used to establish significant differences in the outcome measures. Multiple linear regression was performed to determine a predictive model for lordosis from implant lordosis, fusion technique, and surgical level.

RESULTS

There were 164 patients (78 men, 86 women) with a mean age of 60.1 years and average radiographic follow-up time of 9.3 months. These included 34 ALIF, 23 LLIF, 63 TLIF, and 44 PLF surgeries. ALIF and LLIF significantly improved SL (7.9° and 4.4°), LL (5.5° and 7.7°), DH-A (8.8 mm and 5.8 mm), DH-P (3.4 mm and 2.3 mm), and FH (2.8 mm and 2.5 mm), respectively (p≤.003). TLIF significantly improved these parameters, albeit to a lesser extent: SL (1.7°), LL (2.7°), DH-A (1.1 mm), DH-P (0.8 mm), and FH (1.1 mm) (p≤.02). PLF did not significantly alter any of these parameters while significantly reducing FH (-1.3 mm, p=.01). One-way ANOVA showed no significant differences between ALIF and LLIF other than ALIF with greater ΔDH-A (3.0 mm, p=.02). Both ALIF and LLIF significantly outperformed PLF in preoperative to postoperative changes in all parameters p≤.001. Additionally, ALIF significantly outperformed TLIF in the change in SL (6.2°, p<.001), and LLIF significantly outperformed TLIF in the change in LL (5.0°, p=.02). Both outperformed TLIF in ΔDH-A (7.7 mm and 4.7 mm) and ΔDH-P (2.6 mm and 1.5 mm), respectively (p≤.02). ALIF was the only fusion technique that significantly improved the proportion of patients with a PI-LL<10° (0.410.66, p=.02). Lordotic cages had superior improvement of all parameters compared with non-lordotic cages (p<.001). Implant lordosis (m=1.1), fusion technique (m=6.8), and surgical level (m=6.9) significantly predicted postoperative SL (p<.001, R²=0.56).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that these four lumbar fusion techniques yield divergent radiographic results. ALIF and LLIF produced greater improvements in radiographic measurements postoperatively compared with TLIF and PLF. ALIF was the most successful in improving PI-LL mismatch, an important parameter relating to sagittal alignment. Lordotic implants provided better sagittal correction and surgeons should be cognizant of the impact that these differing implants and techniques produce after surgery. Surgical technique is an important determinant of postoperative alignment and has ramifications upon sagittal alignment in lumbar fusion surgery.

Approach Selection: Multiple Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion to Recreate Lumbar Lordosis Versus Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy: When, Why, How?

Restoration of physiologic lumbar lordosis is a fundamental principle of spinal deformity surgery. Techniques using multilevel anterior lumbar interbody fusion or pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) are described. Multilevel anterior lumbar interbody fusion provides a gradual multilevel correction and avoids the morbidity associated with PSO but necessitates familiarity with the anterior approach or an approach surgeon. PSO provides a large angular correction at a single level, requires only one approach, and allows for simultaneous multiplanar correction and open posterior decompression. This article provides guidance on the appropriate use of each technique for restoration of lumbar lordosis in patients with degenerative lumbar deformity.

Progression of Adjacent-level Degeneration After Lumbar Total Disc Replacement: Results of a Post-hoc Analysis of Patients With Available Radiographs From a Prospective Study With 5-year Follow-up

STUDY DESIGN

Post-hoc analysis of 5-year follow-up data from a randomized, multicenter trial.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of progression in radiographic adjacent-level degeneration (ΔALD) from preoperative assessment to 5 years after total disc replacement (TDR) and the relationship of these changes with range of motion and clinical adjacent-level disease. A secondary objective was to compare adjacent-level degeneration (ALD) outcomes between TDR and fusion.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Fusion is associated with high rates of ALD in symptomatic lumbar disc degeneration. TDR may reduce this risk.

METHODS

In total, 175 patients with single-level, symptomatic, lumbar disc degeneration who had received activL or ProDisc-L and had a preoperative and 5-year postoperative radiograph available were included. Over 5-year follow-up, ΔALD was defined as an increase in ALD of ≥1 grade and clinical ALD was defined as surgical treatment at the level adjacent to an index TDR. Matching-adjusted indirect comparisons were conducted to compare ALD outcomes after TDR (current trial) with those after fusion (published trial).

RESULTS

At 5-year follow-up, 9.7% (17/175) of TDR patients had ΔALD at the superior level. In patients with preoperative ALD at the superior level, most (88% [23/26]) showed no radiographic progression over 5 years. The rate of clinical ALD was 2.3% (4/175) and none of these patients had ALD at baseline. For each degree of range of motion gained at the TDR level, there was a consistent decrease in the percentage of patients with ΔALD. After matching and adjustment of baseline characteristics, TDR had a significantly lower likelihood of ΔALD than fusion (odds ratio 0.32; 95% confidence interval 0.13, 0.76).

CONCLUSION

The rates of ΔALD and clinical ALD in this TDR population were similar to those previously reported in the literature for TDR at 5-year follow-up. TDR had a significantly lower rate of ΔALD than fusion.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Comparison of Stand-Alone, Transpsoas Lateral Interbody Fusion at L3-4 and Cranial vs Transforaminal Interbody Fusion at L3-4 and L4-5 for the Treatment of Lumbar Adjacent Segment Disease

Study Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Objective

To compare outcomes and complications of stand-alone minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion (LIF) vs revision posterior surgery for the treatment of lumbar adjacent segment disease.

Methods

Adults who underwent LIF or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for adjacent segment disease were compared. Exclusion criteria: >grade 1 spondylolisthesis, posterior approach after LIF, and L5/S1 surgery. Patient demographics, estimated blood loss, hospital length of stay, complications, reoperations, health-related quality of life measures, and radiographs were examined. Data were analyzed with the χ², Wilcoxon signed rank, and Mann-Whitney U tests.

Results

A total of 17 LIF and 16 TLIF patients were included. Demographics were similar. Follow up was similar (LIF: 22.9 ± 11.8 months vs TLIF: 22.0 ± 4.6 months; P = .86). The LIF patients had significantly less blood loss (LIF: 36 ± 16 mL vs TLIF: 700 ± 767 mL; P < .001) and shorter length of stay (LIF: 2.6 ± 2.9 days vs TLIF: 3.3 ± 0.9 days; P = .001). There were no intraoperative complications. Revision rate was 4 of 17 in LIF and 3 of 16 in TLIF (P = .73). Baseline health-related quality of life and radiographic measurements were similar. In both groups, back and leg pain scores significantly improved, and in LIF, the Owestry Disability Index, and EuroQol-5D significantly improved. The LIF had a significant increase in intervertebral height (LIF: 4.8 ± 2.9 mm, P < .001, TLIF: 1.3 ± 3.4 mm, P = .37), which was significantly greater for LIF than TLIF (P = .002). Similarly, LIF had a significant increase in segmental lordosis (LIF: 5.6° ± 4.9°, P < .001, TLIF: 3.6° ± 8.6°, P = .16), which was not significantly different between groups.

Conclusions

Patients with adjacent segment disease may receive significant benefit from stand-alone LIF or TLIF. The LIF offers advantages of less blood loss and a shorter hospital stay.

Level of Evidence

3.

The Amount of Proximal Lumbar Lordosis Is Related to Pelvic Incidence

BACKGROUND

Given that the pelvis is the pedestal on which the spine lies, its morphology has been observed to be associated with specific sagittal spinal shapes and should therefore be taken into account when dealing with pathologic conditions of the spine. However, the exact relationship between the pelvic morphology and lumbar lordosis still remains poorly defined. We hypothesized that the shape of the lumbar lordosis and its relationship with the pelvis could be described using anatomic parameters, independently of posture.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) What is the variation of lumbar segmental lordosis in an asymptomatic adult population? (2) Is there an association between increasing magnitude of pelvic incidence (PI) and segmental lordosis? (3) How does the position of the apex of lordosis change with increasing magnitude of PI value?

METHODS

This retrospective study used data drawn from a longitudinally maintained database; between March 2014 and January 2015, 119 asymptomatic volunteers between 18 and 79 years old were enrolled in the study. Mean age was 51 years; there were 81 women and 38 men. Both segmental and cumulative lordosis were measured and used to describe the shape of the lumbar spine. We defined cumulative lordosis as the angle between L1 and S1, proximal lordosis as the angle between L1 and the superior endplate of L4, and distal lordosis as the angle between the superior endplates of L4 and S1. PI is defined as the angle between the line passing through the center of the femoral head and the center of the sacral endplate and a line perpendicular to the sacral endplate. Pearson's correlation was performed to analyze the relationship among PI, proximal and distal lordosis. Stratification by PI was performed (low, < 45°; average, 45°-60°; and high, > 60°) and the proportions of distal and proximal lordosis were then compared using an analysis of variance test.

RESULTS

In the whole cohort, proximal lordosis accounted for 38% of total lordosis, whereas distal lordosis accounted for 62%. PI revealed a positive correlation with proximal lordosis (r = 0.546; p < 0.001). However, there was no correlation with distal lordosis (r = 0.087; p = 0.346). Stratification by PI showed that proximal lordosis increased across PI groups (16.6° [± 10] versus 21.6° [± 9] versus 30.1° [± 9]; p < 0.001), whereas distal lordosis remained relatively constant (34.8° [± 8] versus 36.7° [± 7] versus 35.9° [± 10]; p = 0.581). Apex position was overall more proximal as PI increased (r = -0.199; p = 0.034).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated that PI influences only the proximal part of the lordosis, but not the distal part in an asymptomatic adult population. The proximal part of the lumbar spine had the most variability across individuals and appeared to accommodate to pelvic morphology (incidence). Further studies using a larger cohort size are encouraged not only to refine this relationship, but also to investigate the effect of restoration of normal lordotic shape of the lumbar spine on the functional outcomes after spinal fusion.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Our findings may be useful for surgical planning in an era of patient-specific care. The findings suggest that surgeons should aim for a patient-specific lumbar shape rather than simple global lordosis matched to the PI.

Postoperative Radiographic Early-Onset Adjacent Segment Degeneration after Single-Level L4-L5 Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients without Preoperative Severe Sagittal Spinal Imbalance

Study Design

Retrospective study.

Purpose

To investigate the relationship between preoperative total spinal sagittal alignment and the early onset of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) after single-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in patients with normal sagittal spinal alignment.

Overview of Literature

Postoperative early-onset ASD is one of the complications after L4–L5 PLIF, a common surgical procedure for lumbar degenerative disease in patents without severe sagittal imbalance. A better understanding of the preoperative characteristics of total spinal sagittal alignment associated with early-onset ASD could help prevent the condition.

Methods

The study included 70 consecutive patients diagnosed with lumbar degenerative disease who underwent single-level L4–L5 PLIF between 2011 and 2015. They were divided into two groups based on the radiographic progression of L3–L4 degeneration after 1-year follow-up: the ASD and the non-ASD (NASD) group. The following radiographic parameters were preoperatively and postoperatively measured: sagittal vertebral axis (SVA), thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis, pelvic tilt, and pelvic incidence (PI).

Results

Eight of the 70 patients (11%) experienced ASD after PLIF (three males and five females; age, 64.4±7.7 years). The NASD group comprised 20 males and 42 females (age, 67.7±9.3 years). Six patients of the ASD group showed decreased L3–L4 disc height, one had L3–L4 local kyphosis, and one showed both changes. Preoperative SVA, PI, and TK were significantly smaller in the ASD group than in the NASD group (p <0.05).

Conclusions

A preoperative small SVA and TK with small PI were the characteristic alignments for the risk of early-onset ASD in patients without preoperative severe sagittal spinal imbalance undergoing L4–L5 single-level PLIF.

The influence of spinopelvic parameters on adjacent-segment degeneration after short spinal fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis

OBJECTIVE

Spinopelvic parameters, such as the pelvic incidence (PI) angle, sacral slope angle, and pelvic tilt angle, are important anatomical indices for determining the sagittal curvature of the spine and the individual variability of the lumbar lordosis (LL) curve. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of spinopelvic parameters and LL on adjacent-segment degeneration (ASD) after short lumbar and lumbosacral fusion for single-level degenerative spondylolisthesis.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively reviewed the records of all short lumbar and lumbosacral fusion surgeries performed between August 2003 and July 2010 for single-level degenerative spondylolisthesis in their orthopedic department.

RESULTS

A total of 30 patients (21 women and 9 men, mean age 64 years) with ASD after lower lumbar or lumbosacral fusion surgery comprised the study group. Thirty matched patients (21 women and 9 men, mean age 63 years) without ASD comprised the control group, according to the following matching criteria: same diagnosis on admission, similar pathologic level (≤ 1 level difference), similar sex, and age. The average follow-up was 6.8 years (range 5-8 years). The spinopelvic parameters had no significant influence on ASD after short spinal fusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Neither the spinopelvic parameters nor a mismatch of PI and LL were significant factors responsible for ASD after short spinal fusion due to single-level degenerative spondylolisthesis.

A Multicenter Radiographic Evaluation of the Rates of Preoperative and Postoperative Malalignment in Degenerative Spinal Fusions

STUDY DESIGN

Multicenter, retrospective, institutional-review-board -approved study at 18 institutions in the United States with 24 treating investigators.

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to retrospectively assess the prevalence of spinopelvic malalignment in patients who underwent one- or two-level lumbar fusions for degenerative (nondeformity) indications and to assess the incidence of malalignment after fusion surgery as well as the rate of alignment preservation and/or correction in this population.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Spinopelvic malalignment after lumbar fusion has been associated with lower postoperative health-related quality of life and elevated risk of adjacent segment failure. The prevalence of spinopelvic malalignment in short-segment degenerative lumbar fusion procedures from a large sample of patients is heretofore unreported and may lead to an under-appreciation of these factors in surgical planning and ultimate preservation or correction of alignment.

METHODS

Lateral preoperative and postoperative lumbar radiographs were retrospectively acquired from 578 one- or two-level lumbar fusion patients and newly measured for lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), and pelvic tilt. Patients were categorized at preop and postop time points as aligned if PI-LL < 10° or malaligned if PI-LL≥10°. Patients were grouped into categories based on their alignment progression from pre- to postoperative, with preserved (aligned to aligned), restored (malaligned to aligned), not corrected (malaligned to malaligned), and worsened (aligned to malaligned) designations.

RESULTS

Preoperatively, 173 (30%) patients exhibited malalignment. Postoperatively, 161 (28%) of patients were malaligned. Alignment was preserved in 63%, restored in 9%, not corrected in 21%, and worsened in 7% of patients.

CONCLUSION

This is the first multicenter study to evaluate the preoperative prevalence and postoperative incidence of spinopelvic malalignment in a large series of short-segment degenerative lumbar fusions, finding over 25% of patients out of alignment at both time points, suggesting that alignment preservation/restoration considerations should be incorporated into the decision-making of even degenerative lumbar spinal fusions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

L1 incidence reflects pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis mismatch in sagittal balance evaluation

Retrospective study.To investigate the radiologic and geometrical association between L1 incidence (L1I) with pelvic incidence/lumbar lordosis (PI/LL) mismatch and T1 incidence (T1I) with PI/LL/thoracic kyphosis (TK) mismatch.The relationship between PI and LL is not clear, and it might be because of the absence of a direct radiologic parameter to represent PI/LL mismatch. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on a direct radiologic parameter for representing PI/LL mismatch.This study is a retrospective review of 146 patients who underwent anteroposterior and lateral standing radiographs of the whole spine. L1I was defined as the angle between the line perpendicular to the L1 upper endplate and the line connecting the midpoint of the sacral endplate to the center of both femoral heads. T1I was defined as the angle between the line perpendicular to the T1 upper endplate and the line connecting the midpoint of the sacral endplate to the center of both femoral heads. Both were validated using the Pearson correlation coefficient and linear regression analysis.Radiologically measured L1I and T1I were coterminous with calculated measurements of ΔPI/LL and ΔPI/LL/TK in terms of means and standard deviations, respectively. Excellent correlations were found between L1I and ΔPI/LL, and T1I and ΔPI/LL/TK (R = 0.997, P < .01; R = 0.981, P < .01, respectively). In linear regression analysis, the slope and intercept of L1I were 0.991 and -0.041, with a predictability of 99.4% (R = 0.994), and those of T1I were 0.990 and -0.026, with a predictability of 99.0% (R = 0.990), respectively.L1I and T1I were strongly correlated with PI/LL mismatch and PI/LL/TK mismatch, respectively. L1I and T1I are direct parameters that represent PI/LL mismatch and PI/LL/TK mismatch. They would be useful in analyzing sagittal balance.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3.

Etiology, Evaluation, and Treatment of Failed Back Surgery Syndrome

The study aimed to review the etiology of failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) and to propose a treatment algorithm based on a systematic review of the current literature and individual experience. FBSS is a term that groups the conditions with recurring low back pain after spine surgery with or without a radicular component. Since the information on FBSS incidence is limited, data needs to be retrieved from old studies. It is generally accepted that its incidence ranges between 10% and 40% after lumbar laminectomy with or without fusion. Although the etiology of FBSS is not completely understood, it is possibly multifactorial, and the causative factors may be categorized into preoperative, operative, and postoperative factors. The evaluation of patients with FBSS symptoms should ideally initiate with reviewing the patients’ clinical history (observing “red flags”), followed by a detailed clinical examination and imaging (whole-body X-ray, magnetic resonance imaging, and computed tomography). FBSS is a complex and difficult pathology, and its accurate diagnosis is of utmost importance. Its management should be multidisciplinary, and special attention should be provided to cases of recurrent disc herniation and postoperative spinal imbalance.

Optimal Pelvic Incidence Minus Lumbar Lordosis Mismatch after Long Posterior Instrumentation and Fusion for Adult Degenerative Scoliosis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the influence of Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-Schwab sagittal modifiers of pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis mismatch (PI-LL) on clinical outcomes for adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS) after long posterior instrumentation and fusion.

METHODS

This was a single-institute, retrospective study. From 2012 to 2014, 44 patients with ADS who underwent posterior instrumentation and fusion treatment were reviewed. Radiological evaluations were investigated by standing whole spine (posteroanterior and lateral views) X-ray and all radiological measurements, including Cobb's angle, LL, PI, and the grading of vertebral rotation, were performed by two experienced surgeons who were blind to the operations. The patients were divided into three groups based on postoperative PI-LL and the classification of the SRS-Schwab: 0 grade PI-LL (<10°, n = 13); + grade PI-LL (10°-20°, n = 19); and ++ grade PI-LL (>20°, n = 12). The clinical outcomes were assessed according to Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Lumbar Stiffness Disability Index (LSDI), and complications. Other characteristic data of patients were also collected, including intraoperative blood loss, operative time, length of hospital stay, complications, number of fusion levels, and number of decompressions.

RESULTS

The mean operative time, blood loss, and hospital stay were 284.5 ± 30.2 min, 1040.5 ± 1207.6 mL, and 14.5 ± 1.9 day. At the last follow-up (2.6 ± 0.6 years), the radiological and functional parameters, except the grading of vertebral rotation, were all significantly improved in comparison with preoperative results (P < 0.05), but it was obvious that an ideal PI-LL (≤10°) was not achieved in some patients. Significant differences were only observed among the three groups in the ODI and LSDI. Patients with + grade PI-LL seemed to have the best surgical outcome compared to those with 0 and ++ grade PI-LL, with the lowest ODI score (+ grade vs 0 grade, 17.3 ± 4.9 vs 26.0 ± 5.4; + grade vs ++ grade, 17.3 ± 4.9 vs 32.4 ± 7.3; P < 0.05) and lower LSDI (+ grade vs 0 grade, 1.6 ± 1.0 vs 3.5 ± 0.5, P < 0.05; + grade vs ++ grade, 1.6 ± 1.0 vs 0.6 ± 0.5, P > 0.05). A Pearson correlation analysis further demonstrated that LSDI was negatively associated with PI-LL. Furthermore, the incidence rate of postoperative complications was lower in patients with + grade PI-LL (1/19, 5.26%) than that in patients with 0 (2/13, 15.4%) and ++ grade PI-LL (3/12, 25%).

CONCLUSION

Our present study suggest that the ideal PI-LL may be between 10° and 20° in ADS patients after long posterior instrumentation and fusion.

Alphabet Soup: Sagittal Balance Correction Osteotomies of the Spine-What Radiologists Should Know

Global sagittal malalignment has been demonstrated to have correlation with clinical symptoms and is a key component to be restored in adult spinal deformity. In this article, various types of sagittal balance-correction osteotomies are reviewed primarily on the basis of the 3 most commonly used procedures: Smith-Petersen osteotomy, pedicle subtraction osteotomy, and vertebral column resection. Familiarity with the expected imaging appearance and commonly encountered complications seen on postoperative imaging studies following correction osteotomies is crucial for accurate image interpretation.

Differences in Fundamental Sagittal Pelvic Parameters Based on Age, Sex, and Race

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether age, sex, and race have independent effects on sagittal pelvic parameters.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Pelvic parameters and sagittal balance correlate with health-related quality of life and are important for patient assessment and surgical planning. Age, sex, and race are 3 unalterable patient factors that may influence pelvic morphology.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of consecutive adult patients who presented to our radiology practice between 2010 and 2015 and had a standing, lateral lumbosacral radiograph. Any patients without both femoral heads and L1-S1 visible on the radiograph, and any patients presenting with traumatic injury, coronal deformity, prior instrumentation, spondylolisthesis, or neoplasm of the spine were excluded. Univariate analysis determined differences in measurements among African American, white, and Hispanic races, as well as between male and female sexes. Correlation analysis between age and different measurements was also conducted. Multivariable regression was then used to determine the independent effect of age, sex, and race on pelvic parameters.

RESULTS

We investigated 1801 adults (older than 18 y) and 1246 had a recorded race. There were 1165 women, 636 men, 525 whites, 404 African Americans, and 317 Hispanics. Multivariable regression demonstrated a statistically significant increase in pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI), and pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) with aging, and statistically significant decrease in sacral slope (SS) and LL with aging. Women had a statistically greater LL than men. African Americans had a statistically smaller PT and greater SS and PI-LL relative to whites, while Hispanics had a statistically smaller PT and PI-LL, and a statistically greater SS and LL relative to whites.

CONCLUSIONS

Pelvic parameters were different between sexes, among races, and changed with age. These findings are important for patient assessment and preoperative planning to obtain optimal sagittal balance.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3.

Effect of Lumbar Lordosis on the Adjacent Segment in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Finite Element Analysis

OBJECTIVE

We used a finite element (FE) analysis to investigate the biomechanical changes caused by transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) at the L4-L5 level by lumbar lordosis (LL) degree.

METHODS

A lumbar FE model (L1-S5) was constructed based on computed tomography scans of a 30-year-old healthy male volunteer (pelvic incidence,= 50°; LL, 52°). We investigated the influence of LL on the biomechanical behavior of the lumbar spine after TLIF in L4-L5 fusion models with 57°, 52°, 47°, and 40° LL. The LL was defined as the angle between the superior end plate of L1 and the superior end plate of S1. A 150-N vertical axial preload was imposed on the superior surface of L3. A 10-N/m moment was simultaneously applied on the L3 superior surface along the radial direction to simulate the 4 basic physiologic motions of flexion, extension, lateral bending, and torsion in the numeric simulations. The range of motion (ROM) and intradiscal pressure (IDP) of L3-L4 were evaluated and compared in the simulated cases.

RESULTS

In all motion patterns, the ROM and IDP were both increased after TLIF. In addition, the decrease in lordosis generally increased the ROM and IDP in all motion patterns.

CONCLUSIONS

This FE analysis indicated that decreased spinal lordosis may evoke overstress of the adjacent segment and increase the risk of the pathologic development of adjacent segment degeneration; thus, adjacent segment degeneration should be considered when planning a spinal fusion procedure.

Low incidence of adjacent segment disease after posterior lumbar interbody fusion with minimum disc distraction: A preliminary report

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective review of prospectively collected data.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the incidence of radiographic and symptomatic adjacent segment disease (ASD) and identify possible risk factors for ASD after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) with minimum disc distraction by selecting low-height interbody cages.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Excessive disc space distraction is reportedly 1 of the risk factors for ASD after PLIF; however, the incidence and other risk factors of ASD after PLIF with minimum disc distraction remain unclear.

METHODS

Forty-one consecutive patients who underwent PLIF at L4-L5 and were postoperatively followed up for a minimum of 2 years were included. The height and shape (box or bullet shape) of interbody cages was determined according to the disc height and morphology of the intervertebral space assessed on preoperative computed tomography scans to avoid excessive distraction. The incidence of radiographic and symptomatic ASD was evaluated and all demographic and radiographic parameters were compared between patients with and without ASD. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for ASD among the variables with P < .20 in univariate analysis.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of ASD was 12.2% (5/41 patients): radiographic ASD, 7.3% (3 patients); symptomatic ASD, 4.9% (2 patients). Multivariate analysis revealed preoperative retrolisthesis of L3 on extension as the sole risk factor for ASD after PLIF with minimum disc distraction (odds ratio, 2.13; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-4.05; P = .049).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of ASD in this study was lower than that of ASD in our previous study about PLIF with distraction of disc space (12.2% vs. 31.8%). Minimum disc distraction by selection of low-height interbody cages is a simple and effective method to prevent ASD at the surgeons' discretion, although preexisting retrolisthesis at the adjacent upper segment should be taken into consideration.

Orientation of the Upper-most Instrumented Segment Influences Proximal Junctional Disease Following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of a prospective database.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to define the role of sagittal orientation of the construct at the upper instrumented levels in the development of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) in adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

PJK following ASD surgery remains challenging. The final alignment of the upper instrumented vertebral segments has been proposed as a risk factor for PJK, but has not been fully investigated.

METHODS

ASD patients with 2-year follow-up and long posterior fusion to the pelvis were analyzed. Radiographic measurements included pelvic incidence (PI), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic tilt (PT), sagittal vertical axis, and two upper-most instrumented vertebra (UIV) parameters: UIV slope (UIV vs. horizontal) and inclination of the proximal-end of the construct. UIV parameters were secondarily evaluated with regard to the compensatory impact of post-PJK increased PT (PREF). A comparison between PJK and non-PJK patients was performed, according to the UIV location (upper thoracic [UT] or thoracolumbar).

RESULTS

A total of 252 patients (mean age, 61.5 years, 83% females) were included. PJK incidence was 56% at 2-years. PJK patients had a greater change in LL and thoracic kyphosis than non-PJK patients. In the UT group, there was no difference in UIV slope for PJK versus non-PJK. However, PJK patients had a smaller inclination of the upper instrumented segments versus vertical (P < 0.001) and the PREF (P = 0.005). Similarly, in the LT group, PJK patients had a posterior inclination versus the vertical (P < 0.001) and the PREF (P = 0.041).

CONCLUSION

Analysis revealed that a more posterior construct inclination was present in patients who developed PJK. These results support previous hypotheses suggesting that PJK may develop in response to excessive spinal realignment. Proper rod contouring, especially at the proximal end, may reduce the risk of PJK.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Risk Factors for Poor Patient-Reported Quality of Life Outcomes After Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An Analysis of 2-Year Follow-up

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective review of prospectively collected data.

OBJECTIVE

The present study aimed to identify risk factors for poor patient-reported quality of life (QOL) outcomes, based on five categories (pain-related disorders, lumbar spine dysfunction, gait disturbance, social life dysfunction, and psychological disorders) of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ), after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) at the 2-year follow-up.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Many studies have been reported on patient QOL outcomes after lumbar surgery; however, few reports have focused on risk factors for poor postoperative QOL outcomes in terms of the various disabilities and dysfunctions after PLIF.

METHODS

One hundred consecutive patients (39 men and 61 women; mean age 69.6 [44-84] yr) who underwent single- or two-level PLIF for degenerative spondylolisthesis and/or foraminal stenosis with a 2-year follow-up were included. The effectiveness of surgery in each category of the JOABPEQ was evaluated. Demographic and clinical data and radiographic parameters were reviewed. Risk factors for poor postoperative QOL outcomes in each category of the JOABPEQ were investigated by multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Older age and spinopelvic malalignment (preoperative high pelvic tilt or postoperative decrease in lumbar lordosis [=postoperative increase in the mismatch between pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis]) were risk factors for poor postoperative QOL outcomes in all categories of the JOABPEQ, except for lumbar spine dysfunction. In contrast, increase in number of PLIF segments, non-union, and radiographic adjacent segment degeneration were risk factors for poor postoperative QOL outcomes in lumbar spine dysfunction and gait disturbance.

CONCLUSION

The risk factors for poor QOL outcomes after PLIF differed among the five categories of the JOABPEQ. In particular, surgery-related factors (e.g., increase in number of PLIF segments, nonunion, and radiographic adjacent segment degeneration) had a negative effect on the improvement of lumbar spine dysfunction and gait disturbance.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Overpowering posterior lumbar instrumentation and fusion with hyperlordotic anterior lumbar interbody cages followed by posterior revision: a preliminary feasibility study

OBJECTIVE The authors' aim in this study was to evaluate whether sagittal plane correction can be obtained from the front by overpowering previous posterior instrumentation and/or fusion with hyperlordotic anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) cages in patients undergoing revision surgery for degenerative spinal conditions and/or spinal deformities. METHODS The authors report their experience with the application of hyperlordotic cages at 36 lumbar levels for ALIFs in a series of 20 patients who underwent revision spinal surgery at a single institution. Included patients underwent staged front-back procedures: ALIFs with hyperlordotic cages (12°, 20°, and 30°) followed by removal of posterior instrumentation and reinstrumentation from the back. Patients were divided into the following 2 groups depending on the extent of posterior instrumentation and fusion during the second stage: long constructs (≥ 6 levels with extension into thoracic spine and/or pelvis) and short constructs (< 6 levels). Preoperative and postoperative standing radiographs were evaluated to measure segmental lordosis (SL) along with standard sagittal parameters. Radiographic signs of pseudarthrosis at previously fused levels were also sought in all patients. RESULTS The average patient age was 54 years (range 30-66 years). The mean follow-up was 11.5 months (range 5-26 months). The mean SL achieved with 12°, 20°, and 30° cages was 13.1°, 19°, and 22.4°, respectively. The increase in postoperative SL at the respective surgically treated levels for 12°, 20°, and 30° cages that were used to overpower posterior instrumentation/fusion averaged 6.1° (p < 0.05), 12.5° (p < 0.05), and 17.7° (p < 0.05), respectively. No statistically significant difference was found in SL correction at levels in patients who had pseudarthrosis (n = 18) versus those who did not (n = 18). The mean overall lumbar lordosis increased from 44.3° to 59.8° (p < 0.05). In the long-construct group, the mean improvement in sagittal vertical axis was 85.5 mm (range 19-249.3 mm, p < 0.05). Endplate impaction/collapse was noted in 3 of 36 levels (8.3%). The anterior complication rate was 13.3%. No neurological complications or vascular injuries were observed. CONCLUSIONS ALIF in which hyperlordotic cages are used to overpower posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion can be expected to produce an increase in SL of a magnitude that is roughly half of the in-built cage lordotic angle. This technique may be particularly suited for lordosis correction from the front at lumbar levels that have pseudarthrosis from the previous posterior spinal fusion. Meticulous selection of levels for ALIF is crucial for safely and effectively performing this technique.

Beyond Pelvic Incidence-Lumbar Lordosis Mismatch: The Importance of Assessing the Entire Spine to Achieve Global Sagittal Alignment

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate which sagittal parameters contribute to a normal sagittal vertical axis (SVA) when there is a pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch >10° following adult spinal deformity (ASD) correction.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of ASD patients with >5 levels fused. Sagittal measurements between cohorts of postoperative PI-LL >10° and PI-LL<10° were compared. We correlated SVA to pelvic tilt (PT), thoracic kyphosis (TK), PI-LL, cervical lordosis (CL), and correlated the pre- to postoperative change in SVA to change in PT, change in TK, change in PI-LL, and change in CL. We also correlated SVA and the change in SVA to combined parameters of ((PI-LL) - PT + TK).

RESULTS

We analyzed 52 patients with a mean age of 59 ± 16 years. In patients with a postoperative SVA <5cm, a smaller TK was seen when PI-LL >10° than when PI-LL<10° (15.45° vs 33.04°, P = .0004). Additionally, PT was larger when PI-LL >10° than when PI-LL <10° (25.73° vs 19.07°, P = .006). SVA correlated better with ((PI-LL) - PT + TK) (R² = 0.51) than with PI-LL alone (R² = 0.33). Lastly, there was no significant correlation between change in pre- to postoperative SVA with change in TK for all cases (P = .73), but in cases where change in PI-LL was <10°, there was a significant correlation between change in TK and change in SVA (P = .009).

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrate that PT and TK, and not just PI-LL, play an important role in maintaining sagittal balance when there is a PI-LL mismatch >10°.

Pathoanatomic Risk Factors for Instability and Adjacent Segment Disease in Lumbar Spine: How to Use Topping Off?

PURPOSE

The goal of this review is to identify criteria indicating implantation of hybrid system into lumbar spine and to evaluate general benefits of use.

METHODS

A systematic review of literature was performed using current randomized clinical trials, reviews, and meta-analyses. Data sources included relevant literature of human studies identified through searches of Medline Library until May 2015.

RESULTS

Predisposing factors for Adjacent Segment Disease (ASDi) are discussed in literature: laminar horizontalization, insufficiency of fascia thoracolumbalis, facet tropism, and facet sagittalization. Currently there is no evidence for topping off. There are only 12 studies and these have no consistent statements about use of a hybrid system for avoidance of ASDi.

CONCLUSION

Hybrid instrumentation of lumbar spine, either with pedicle-based technique or additional spacer, might possibly prevent ASDi from developing in previously damaged segment adjacent to a fusion. Good clinical data proving effectiveness of this new implant technique is as yet unavailable. Thus, currently one must speak of an unevaluated procedure. Various radiological classifications can assist in making a reliable decision as to whether hybrid instrumentation is an appropriate choice of therapy. Pathoanatomical conditions of facet joints and laminae as well as preservation of sagittal balance must also be considered.

Radiographic Predictors for Mechanical Failure After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study in 138 Patients

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study at a single institution.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed at estimating the rate of revision procedures and identify radiographic predictors of mechanical failure after adult spinal deformity surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Mechanical failure rates after adult spinal deformity surgery range 12% to 37% in literature. Although the importance of spinal and spino-pelvic alignment is well documented for surgical outcome and ideal alignment has been proposed as sagittal vertical axis (SVA) < 5 cm, pelvic tilt < 20° and lumbar lordosis (LL) = pelvic incidence ± 9°, the role of radiographic sagittal spine parameters and alignment targets as predictors for mechanical failure remains uncertain.

METHODS

A consecutive cohort of adult spinal deformity patients who underwent corrective surgery with at least 5 levels of instrumentation between January 2008 and December 2012 at a single tertiary spine unit were followed for at least 2 years. Time to death or failure was recorded and cause-specific Cox regressions were applied to evaluate predictors for mechanical failure or death.

RESULTS

A total of 138 patients with median age of 61 years were included for analysis. Follow up ranged 2.1 to 6.8 years. In total 47% had revision and estimated failure rates were 16% at 1 year increasing to 56% at 5 years. A multivariate analysis adjusting for age at surgery showed increased hazard of failure from LL change > 30°, postoperative TK > 50°, and SS ≤30°. LL change was mostly because of 3-column osteotomy and ending the instrumentation at L5 or S1 increased the hazard of failure more than 6 fold compared with more cranial lumbar levels.

CONCLUSION

Mechanical failure rate was 47% after adult spinal deformity corrective surgery. LL change > 30°, postoperative TK > 50°, and postoperative SS ≤30° were independent radiographic predictors associated with increased hazard of failure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

The Ideal Cage Position for Achieving Both Indirect Neural Decompression and Segmental Angle Restoration in Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (LLIF)

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective radiographic analysis.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the ideal cage position for lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) together.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Achieving both indirect decompression and restoration of the segmental angle (SA) appear to be contrary to one another because the anteriorly located cage might be advantageous for restoring the SA, and posteriorly located cage might be favorable for achieving the indirect decompression effect. Little has been known about the significance of cage position in LLIF.

METHODS

Forty-one patients who underwent LLIF followed by percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for 94 levels were evaluated. Postoperative plain radiographs and magnetic resonance images were obtained 3 days after surgery. The cage position was determined by the anterior, middle, and posterior portions. The anterior and posterior disk heights, SA, cross-sectional area of the thecal sac (CSA), and the foraminal area (FA) were compared according to the cage position.

RESULTS

The cage was placed in the anterior area for 31 levels and middle for 63 levels. The cage height was 13.0±1.3 degrees. The increases in anterior disk height and SA were significantly greater in the anterior group (9.1 mm, 6.1 degrees) than those of the middle group (6.7 mm, 2.4 degrees). Posterior disk height increased by a mean of 4.5 mm, but its change did not differ according to the cage position. CSA and FA increased by 36.5% and 69.6%, respectively. There were no significant differences in the CSA and FA increases with respect to the cage position. Regression analysis showed that the increase of SA was affected by cage position, but the increase ratios of CSA and FA were not affected.

CONCLUSIONS

The cage position within the anterior 1/3 of disk space is better for achieving the restoration of the SA without compromising the indirect neural decompression, if the height of cage is large enough.