The Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Spine Surgeons Worldwide: A One Year Prospective Comparative Study

STUDY DESIGN

Survey.

OBJECTIVE

In March of 2020, an original study by Louie et al investigated the impact of COVID-19 on 902 spine surgeons internationally. Since then, due to varying government responses and public health initiatives to the pandemic, individual countries and regions of the world have been affected differently. Therefore, this follow-up study aimed to assess how the COVID-19 impact on spine surgeons has changed 1 year later.

METHODS

A repeat, multi-dimensional, 90-item survey written in English was distributed to spine surgeons worldwide via email to the AO Spine membership who agreed to receive surveys. Questions were categorized into the following domains: demographics, COVID-19 observations, preparedness, personal impact, patient care, and future perceptions.

RESULTS

Basic respondent demographics, such as gender, age, home demographics, medical comorbidities, practice type, and years since training completion, were similar to those of the original 2020 survey. Significant differences between groups included reasons for COVID testing, opinions of media coverage, hospital unemployment, likelihood to be performing elective surgery, percentage of cases cancelled, percentage of personal income, sick leave, personal time allocation, stress coping mechanisms, and the belief that future guidelines were needed (P<.05).

CONCLUSION

Compared to baseline results collected at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, significant differences in various domains related to COVID-19 perceptions, hospital preparedness, practice impact, personal impact, and future perceptions have developed. Follow-up assessment of spine surgeons has further indicated that telemedicine and virtual education are mainstays. Such findings may help to inform and manage expectations and responses to any future outbreaks.

Evaluation of Metastatic Potential in Esophageal and Gastroesophageal Junction (GEJ) Cancer with Adherence to Elective Nodal Volume Guidelines: A Retrospective Analysis of Elective Nodal Irradiation

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

In 2015, expert guidelines on esophageal/GEJ cancer contouring for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) were published in IJROBP, which delineate recommended elective nodal basins (celiac, para-aortic, gastrohepatic ligament, supraclavicular) to be irradiated depending on the primary tumor location. We hypothesize that incomplete coverage of these areas increases the risk of the development of distant failures.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Patients treated for non-metastatic esophageal or GEJ cancer with chemoradiotherapy pre-operatively or definitively from 2012 to 2021 were retrospectively identified from a single institution database. Radiation plans of eligible patients were then analyzed by tumor location. Plans were deemed guideline-compliant if radiation dose coverage, between 41.4 to 45 Gy, encompassed nodal basins recommended by the 2015 guidelines. The primary endpoint of this study was the overall rate of distant disease. Other endpoints included locoregional failures, defined as failures within the radiation field but outside of the primary tumor, and local failures within the gross tumor volume. Summary and descriptive statistics were used to define collected variables. Differences were measured using chi-square and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and two-sided t-tests for continuous measures. Assessment of distant, locoregional, and local failures were assessed using univariate logistic regression with statistical significance at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 25.0 months, 37 patients, with a median age of 66, were included in the study. Most patients were male (94.6%) with cT3 (54.1%), cN0 (43.2%), moderately differentiated (47.1%) adenocarcinoma (75.7%) located at the GEJ (56.8%). The median radiation dose used was 50.4 Gy, with the majority of patients receiving concurrent carboplatin and paclitaxel (83.8%). Four patients received induction chemotherapy and 20 (55.6%) underwent esophagectomy. When examining guideline compliance, 17 (46.0%) radiation plans demonstrated adequate ENI. The most common improperly covered nodal basin was para-aortic (65.0%), followed by gastrohepatic (30.0%). No patients with sufficient ENI coverage (0/17) developed distant failure compared to 45.0% (9/20) with insufficient coverage (p = 0.001). There were inappreciable differences in locoregional or local failure rates between those with and without complete ENI. Patients with complete ENI were more likely to be of larger craniocaudal length (p = 0.007) or have N2 disease (p = 0.003). When examining other tumor characteristics (histologic subtype, location, HER2 status, esophagectomy rate) of patients with and without complete ENI, no further differences were noted.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that proper coverage of nodal basins, when indicated by expert guidelines, could improve distant metastasis. ENI analysis of previous prospective CRT studies for esophageal cancer could validate these findings.

Development of a Screening Nomogram for Regional Lymph Node Metastasis Development in Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer after Multiagent Systemic Therapy

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

A reliable method of identifying clinically node negative bladder cancer patients at greater risk of developing lymph node metastasis and may require intensified therapy is needed. The purpose of this study was to create a nomogram to quantify the risk for regional lymphatic involvement in non-metastatic muscle invasive bladder cancer.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Usingthe National Cancer Database, patients with clinical T2-4N0M0 urothelial carcinoma of the bladder between the years of 2004 - 2020 were selected. All patients completed multiagent chemotherapy followed by surgery for pathologic nodal staging to determine presence or absence of nodal disease. No neoadjuvant radiation therapy was allowed and patients with history of prior malignancies were excluded. Following a 70:30 training to testing data split, baseline variables were assessed using univariate logistic regression. Variables were selected for inclusion in the multivariate logistic regression model using a combination of previously reported findings in the literature and/or if found to have a p-value < 0.05 on univariate analysis. A nomogram was constructed using this final model with assessment using calibration plots and the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC), respectively. An empiric cut point was chosen at 95% sensitivity to identify patients at "high" and "low" risk for pathologic nodal disease with overall assessment in both cohorts using chi-square.

RESULTS

A total of 6194patients were identified for study with a median age of 65 years (IQR = 58 - 71 years). Most patients were male (68.0%) with T2 disease (81.2%). The final multivariate model included age at time of diagnosis (OR = 0.99; 95% CI = 0.99 - 1.00; p = 0.172), time from diagnosis to initiation of chemotherapy (OR = 1.00; 95% CI = 1.00 - 1.01; p = 0.005), papillary histology (OR = 0.85; 95% CI = 0.72 - 1.01; p = 0.068), and clinical T stage (Table 1). Model calibration demonstrated excellent goodness-of-fit with good discrimination (AUC = 0.644). Within the training data, high risk patients were seen to have a twofold increase in pathologic nodal disease (N = 835/3924, 21.2%) when compared to those identified as low risk (N = 38/347, 9.9%) (p < 0.001). Validation within the testing data set demonstrated similar results with pathologic node rates of 22.8% and 7.8% for high- and low-risk patients, respectively (AUC = 0.645, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates a clinically applicable risk stratification tool for identifying patients at risk for developing lymphadenopathy in T2-4 bladder cancer and may help guide future research in selecting patients eligible for escalation of therapy. Future studies should aim to externally validate this tool within prospective cohorts, and seek to determine if this nomogram may provide further prognostic utility.

Prognostication of Overall Survival in Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: An Application of a Lymph Node Metastasis Nomogram

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

The purpose of this study was to determine if a previously developed nomogram predictive of developing pathologic lymph node metastasis after multiagent chemotherapy for clinical node-negative muscle invasive bladder cancer may also prognosticate overall survival (OS) in patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT).

MATERIALS/METHODS

Using the National Cancer Database, we identified all patients with cN0 muscle invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder treated with definitive CRT from 2004 to 2020. Patient probability of occult nodal disease was assessed using a previous nomogram developed from those treated with multiagent chemotherapy alone followed by pathologic nodal assessment. Following a 70:30 training and testing data split, variables were assessed for association with OS using the log-rank test, with those with p < 0.05 deemed eligible for inclusion within a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model. Patients were then stratified as high-, medium-, or low-risk for death using the hazard function's prognostic index. The proportional hazards assumption was checked using Schoenfeld residuals and discrimination assessed using dynamic area under the receiver operating characteristics curves (AUC). Validation was assessed within the testing and a retrospectively collected institutional cohort of 15 patients treated from 2014 - 2020 with CRT.

RESULTS

A total of 1047 patients were identified for this study with median age of 78 years (IQR = 70-83 years) and follow-up of 31.3 months (IQR = 16.0 - 56.6 months). Cox analysis revealed patient age (HR = 1.03; 95% CI = 1.02 - 1.04; p < 0.001), Charlson-Deyo Score, and predicted probability of developing future lymphadenopathy (HR = 4.47; 95% CI = 1.83 - 10.93; p = 0.001) were significantly associated with OS. Median OS for those identified as high, medium, and low risk for death on Cox analysis was 34.2 months (IQR = 21.3 - 40.6 months), 38.9 months (IQR = 31.4 - 47.2 months), and 77.8 months (IQR = 56.1 - 100.3 months), respectively (AUC range = 0.615 - 0.870) (p < 0.001). Similar discrimination was seen within the testing cohort as well with significant differences between median OS across each group (AUC range = 0.580 - 0.726) (p < 0.001). Notably, among patients within the institutional cohort, only one patient stratified as high (N = 1/2; 50.0%) or medium risk (N = 0/5; 0.0%) remained alive at time of final follow-up, whereas 88.9% (N = 7/8) of low-risk patients survived (p = 0.051). Similarly, significant differences in OS were again seen between risk groups, with a median OS of 51.3 months and 19.9 months for high- and medium-risk patients, respectively, while median OS for low-risk patients was not reached (p = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates the prognostic utility of a previously reported nomogram in predictions of OS. Investigation is warranted to explore how radiation and chemotherapy may offset worse OS in those at high risk for occult nodal disease progression.

Effect of Interval between Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy on Metastasis Risk for Inoperable Non-Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

In inoperable pancreatic cancer patients requiring radiotherapy (RT) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT), there can be delays in starting radiation due to multiple complications. However, pancreatic cancer can progress rapidly during short intervals without treatment. We hypothesize that longer intervals between neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation could expediate the development of metastatic disease.

MATERIALS/METHODS

We identified patients with inoperable non-metastatic borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic cancer treated with neoadjuvant CT followed by RT from 2011 to 2021 at a single institution. Patients who completed palliative RT as defined by a biologic effective dose (BED) of less than 50 Gy, or those who were lost to follow-up within 3 months after completing RT without documented disease progression were excluded. The interval between RT and CT was defined as the time between last date of CT administration and initiation of RT. The primary endpoint was metastasis-free survival (MFS) after RT completion. Differences in MFS between patients who started RT within or after 4, 6, and 8 weeks of completing CT were examined utilizing log rank analysis of MFS generated via the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 5.45 months, twenty-three patients were included. Most patients were male (61%) with cT4 (61%), cN0 (83%) pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Almost all patients completed combination neoadjuvant CT (91%) followed by either intensity modulated RT to 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions with capecitabine (n = 9) or stereotactic body RT to 33-40 Gy in 5 fractions (n = 14). Eleven (48%) patients received adjuvant CT after radiation therapy. The median time between last CT and RT initiation was 34 days (range 13-142). The MFS of patients who initiated RT within 4 weeks of CT compared to after was higher but not significant (16.8 vs 9.9 months, p = 0.144). Those who received RT within 6 or 8 weeks of completing CT exhibited significantly longer MFS compared to later than 6 (16.0 vs 6.9 mo, p = 0.016) or 8 weeks (15.1 vs 2.1 mo, p = 0.004). There was no statistical correlation between MFS and other variables (CA 19-9 before radiation, T-stage, receipt of adjuvant CT, BED).

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that a longer interval between CT and RT is associated with the risk of developing metastatic disease sooner but requires validation in a prospective cohort. Root causes of delays in starting radiation (e.g., insurance authorization) should be investigated as well.

Artificial intelligence in predicting early-onset adjacent segment degeneration following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

PURPOSE

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a common surgical treatment for degenerative disease in the cervical spine. However, resultant biomechanical alterations may predispose to early-onset adjacent segment degeneration (EO-ASD), which may become symptomatic and require reoperation. This study aimed to develop and validate a machine learning (ML) model to predict EO-ASD following ACDF.

METHODS

Retrospective review of prospectively collected data of patients undergoing ACDF at a quaternary referral medical center was performed. Patients > 18 years of age with > 6 months of follow-up and complete pre- and postoperative X-ray and MRI imaging were included. An ML-based algorithm was developed to predict EO-ASD based on preoperative demographic, clinical, and radiographic parameters, and model performance was evaluated according to discrimination and overall performance.

RESULTS

In total, 366 ACDF patients were included (50.8% male, mean age 51.4 ± 11.1 years). Over 18.7 ± 20.9 months of follow-up, 97 (26.5%) patients developed EO-ASD. The model demonstrated good discrimination and overall performance according to precision (EO-ASD: 0.70, non-ASD: 0.88), recall (EO-ASD: 0.73, non-ASD: 0.87), accuracy (0.82), F1-score (0.79), Brier score (0.203), and AUC (0.794), with C4/C5 posterior disc bulge, C4/C5 anterior disc bulge, C6 posterior superior osteophyte, presence of osteophytes, and C6/C7 anterior disc bulge identified as the most important predictive features.

CONCLUSIONS

Through an ML approach, the model identified risk factors and predicted development of EO-ASD following ACDF with good discrimination and overall performance. By addressing the shortcomings of traditional statistics, ML techniques can support discovery, clinical decision-making, and precision-based spine care.

High-Intensity Zones on MRI of the Cervical Spine in Patients: Epidemiology and Association With Pain and Disability

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to address the prevalence, distribution, and clinical significance of cervical high-intensity zones (HIZs) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with respect to pain and other patient-reported outcomes in the setting of patients that will undergo an anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) procedure.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of ACDF patients surgically treated at a single center from 2008 to 2015. Based on preoperative MRI, HIZ subtypes were identified as either traditional T2-hyperintense, T1-hypointense ("single-HIZs"), or combined T1- and T2-hyperintense ("dual-HIZs"), and their level-specific prevalence was assessed. Preoperative symptoms, patient-reported outcomes, and disc degeneration pathology were assessed in relation to HIZs and HIZ subtypes.

RESULTS

Of 861 patients, 58 demonstrated evidence of HIZs in the cervical spine (6.7%). Single-HIZs and dual-HIZs comprised 63.8% and 36.2% of the overall HIZs, respectively. HIZs found outside of the planned fusion segment reported better preoperative Neck Disability Index (NDI; P = .049) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Arm (P = .014) scores relative to patients without HIZs. Furthermore, patients with single-HIZs found inside the planned fusion segment had worse VAS Neck (P = .045) and VAS Arm (P = .010) scores. In general, dual-HIZ patients showed no significant differences across all clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to evaluate the clinical significance of HIZs in the cervical spine, noting level-specific and clinical outcome-specific variations. Single-HIZs were associated with significantly more pain when located inside the fusion segment, while dual-HIZs showed no associations with patient-reported outcomes. The presence of single-HIZs may correlate with concurrent spinal pathologies and should be more closely evaluated.

Revision Strategies for Harrington Rod Instrumentation: Radiographic Outcomes and Complications

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes following revision surgery following Harrington rod instrumentation.

METHODS

Patients who underwent revision surgery with a minimum of 1-year follow-up for flatback syndrome following Harrington rod instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis were identified from a multicenter dataset. Baseline demographics and intraoperative information were obtained. Preoperative, initial postoperative, and most recent spinopelvic parameters were compared. Postoperative complications and reoperations were subsequently evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 41 patients met the inclusion criteria with an average follow-up of 27.7 months. Overall, 14 patients (34.1%) underwent a combined anterior-posterior fusion, and 27 (65.9%) underwent an osteotomy for correction. Preoperatively, the most common lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) was at L3 and L4 (61%), whereas 85% had a LIV to the pelvis after revision. The mean preoperative pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch and C7 sagittal vertical axis were 23.7° and 89.6 mm. This was corrected to 8.1° and 28.9 mm and maintained to 9.04° and 34.4 mm at latest follow-up. Complications included deep wound infection (12.2%), durotomy (14.6%), implant related failures (14.6%), and temporary neurologic deficits (22.0%). Eight patients underwent further revision surgery at an average of 7.4 months after initial revision.

CONCLUSIONS

There are multiple surgical techniques to address symptomatic flatback syndrome in patients with previous Harrington rod instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. At an average of 27.7 months follow-up, pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch and C7 sagittal vertical axis can be successfully corrected and maintained. However, complication and reoperation rates remain high.

Spine Surgery and COVID-19: The Influence of Practice Type on Preparedness, Response, and Economic Impact

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional observational cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate preparation, response, and economic impact of COVID-19 on private, public, academic, and privademic spine surgeons.

METHODS

AO Spine COVID-19 and Spine Surgeon Global Impact Survey includes domains on surgeon demographics, location of practice, type of practice, COVID-19 perceptions, institutional preparedness and response, personal and practice impact, and future perceptions. The survey was distributed by AO Spine via email to members (n = 3805). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify differences between practice settings.

RESULTS

A total of 902 surgeons completed the survey. In all, 45.4% of respondents worked in an academic setting, 22.9% in privademics, 16.1% in private practice, and 15.6% in public hospitals. Academic practice setting was independently associated with performing elective and emergent spine surgeries at the time of survey distribution. A majority of surgeons reported a >75% decrease in case volume. Private practice and privademic surgeons reported losing income at a higher rate compared with academic or public surgeons. Practice setting was associated with personal protective equipment availability and economic issues as a source of stress.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study indicates that practice setting affected both preparedness and response to COVID-19. Surgeons in private and privademic practices reported increased worry about the economic implications of the current crisis compared with surgeons in academic and public hospitals. COVID-19 decreased overall clinical productivity, revenue, and income. Government response to the current pandemic and preparation for future pandemics needs to be adaptable to surgeons in all practice settings.

The Modic-endplate-complex phenotype in cervical spine patients: Association with symptoms and outcomes

This study describes a novel, combined Modic changes (MC) and structural endplate abnormality phenotype of the cervical spine, which we have termed the Modic-Endplate-Complex (MEC), and its association with preoperative symptoms and outcomes in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) patients. This was a retrospective study of prospectively collected data at a single institution. Preoperative cervical magnetic resonance imagings were used to assess the presence of MC and endplate abnormalities. Patients were divided into four groups: MC-only, endplate abnormality-only, the MEC and controls. The MEC was defined as the presence of both a MC and endplate abnormality in the cervical spine. Phenotypes were further stratified by location and compared to controls. Associations with patient-reported outcome measures were assessed using regression controlling for baseline characteristics. A total of 628 patients were included, with 84 MC-only, 166 endplate abnormality-only, and 187 MEC patients. Both MC (p < 0.001) and endplate abnormalities (p < 0.001) were independently associated with one another. MC at the adjacent level (p = 0.018), endplate abnormalities (regardless of location) (p = 0.001), and the MEC within the fusion segment (p = 0.027) were all associated with higher Neck Disability Index scores. Both MC within the fusion segment (p = 0.008) and endplate abnormalities within the fusion segment (p = 0.017) associated with lower Veteran's Rand 12-item scores. MC and structural endplate abnormalities commonly manifest concomitantly in patients indicated for ACDF for degenerative pathology. Patients with the endplate pathology, including the MEC phenotype, reported significantly higher levels of postoperative disability following ACDF. These findings add valuable data to the prognostic assessment of degenerative cervical spine patients.

Pediatric Back Pain: A Scoring System to Guide Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of back pain in the pediatric population is increasing, and the workup of these patients presents a clinical challenge. Many cases are selflimited, but failure to diagnose a pathology that requires clinical intervention can carry severe repercussions. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) carries a high cost to the patient and health care system, and may even require procedural sedation in the pediatric population. The aim of this study was to develop a scoring system based on pediatric patient factors to help determine when an MRI will change clinical management.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort analysis of consecutive pediatric patients who presented to clinic with a chief complaint of back pain between 2010 and 2018 at single orthopaedic surgery practice. Comprehensive demographic and presentation variables were collected. A predictive model of factors that influence whether MRI results in a change in management was then generated using cross-validation least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 729 patients were included, with a mean age of 15.1 years (range: 3 to 20 y). Of these, 344 (47.2%) had an MRI. A predictive model was generated, with nocturnal symptoms (5 points), neurological deficit (10 points), age (0.7 points per year), lumbar pain (2 points), sudden onset of pain (3.25 points), and leg pain (3.75 points) identified as significant predictors. A combined score of greater than 9.5 points for a given patient is highly suggestive that an MRI will result in a change in clinical management (specificity: 0.93; positive predictive value: 0.92).

CONCLUSIONS

A predictive model was generated to help determine when ordering an MRI may result in a change in clinical management for workup of back pain in the pediatric population. The main factors included the presence of a neurological deficit, nocturnal symptoms, sudden onset, leg pain, lumbar pain, and age. Care providers can use these findings to better determine if and when an MRI might be appropriate.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-diagnostic study.

Demographic, Surgical, and Radiographic Risk Factors for Symptomatic Adjacent Segment Disease After Lumbar Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Although multiple studies have investigated risk factors for symptomatic adjacent segment disease (ASD) after lumbar fusion, their findings were diverse and inconsistent. This review aimed to summarize risk factors for ASD in order to guide the management of ASD and future research.

METHODS

Six electronic databases were systematically searched from inception to December 2019. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full-text articles to identify studies investigating risk factors for ASD after lumbar fusion in humans. The methodological quality of the included studies and the strength of evidence regarding risk factors were evaluated.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies involving 3,553 patients were included. Meta-analyses revealed that high body mass index, facet joint violation, anterior shift of the preoperative and postoperative lumbosacral sagittal plumb line, decreased preoperative and postoperative lumbar lordosis, preoperative adjacent disc degeneration, decreased preoperative adjacent disc height, increased postoperative lumbopelvic mismatch, postoperative pelvic incidence, and postoperative pelvic tilt were significantly related to ASD.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis addressed the limitations of prior reviews and summarized evidence with regard to risk factors for ASD following lumbar fusion. Future prospective studies should investigate whether modification of these risk factors can reduce the ASD development.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Reasons for revision following stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion

OBJECTIVE

Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) and lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) are alternative and less invasive techniques to stabilize the spine and indirectly decompress the neural elements compared with open posterior approaches. While reoperation rates have been described for open posterior lumbar surgery, there are sparse data on reoperation rates following these less invasive procedures without direct posterior decompression. This study aimed to evaluate the overall rate, cause, and timing of reoperation procedures following anterior or lateral lumbar interbody fusions without direct posterior decompression.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of all consecutive patients indicated for an ALIF or LLIF for lumbar spine at a single academic institution. Patients who underwent concomitant posterior fusion or direct decompression surgeries were excluded. Rates, causes, and timing of reoperations were analyzed. Patients who underwent a revision decompression were matched with patients who did not require a reoperation, and preoperative imaging characteristics were analyzed to assess for risk factors for the reoperation.

RESULTS

The study cohort consisted of 529 patients with an average follow-up of 2.37 years; 40.3% (213/529) and 67.3% (356/529) of patients had a minimum of 2 years and 1 year of follow-up, respectively. The total revision rate was 5.7% (30/529), with same-level revision in 3.8% (20/529) and adjacent-level revision in 1.9% (10/529) of patients. Same-level revision patients had significantly shorter time to revision (7.14 months) than adjacent-level revision patients (31.91 months) (p < 0.0001). Fifty percent of same-level revisions were for a posterior decompression. After further analysis of decompression revisions, an increased preoperative canal area was significantly associated with a lower risk of further decompression revision compared to the control group (p = 0.015; OR 0.977, 95% CI 0.959-0.995).

CONCLUSIONS

There was a low reoperation rate after anterior or lateral lumbar interbody fusions without direct posterior decompression. The majority of same-level reoperations were due to a need for further decompression. Smaller preoperative canal diameters were associated with the need for revision decompression.

Success of Surgical Simulation in Orthopedic Training and Applications in Spine Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

This was a narrative review.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to review the current literature on surgical simulation in orthopedics and its application to spine surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

As orthopedic surgery increases in complexity, training becomes more relevant. There have been mandates in the United States for training orthopedic residents the fundamentals of surgical skills; however, few studies have examined the various training options available. Lack of funding, availability, and time are major constraints to surgical simulation options.

METHODS

A PubMed review of the current literature was performed on all relevant articles that examined orthopedic trainees using surgical simulation options. Studies were examined for their thoroughness and application of simulation options to orthopedic surgery.

RESULTS

Twenty-three studies have explored orthopedic surgical simulation in a setting that objectively assessed trainee performance, most in the field of trauma and arthroscopy. However, there was a lack of consistency in measurements made and skills tested by these simulators. There has only been one study exploring surgical simulation in spine surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

While there has been a growing number of surgical simulators to train orthopedic residents the fundamentals of surgical skills, most of these simulators are not feasible, reproducible, or available to the majority of training centers. Furthermore, the lack of consistency in the objective measurements of these studies makes interpretation of their results difficult. There is a need for more simulation in spine surgery, and future simulators and their respective studies should be reproducible, affordable, applicable to the surgical setting, and easily assembled by various programs across the world.

Duration of Symptoms Does Not Affect Clinical Outcome After Lumbar Arthrodesis

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study at a single institution.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effect of symptom duration on clinical outcomes after posterolateral lumbar fusion.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Nonoperative measures are generally exhausted before patients are indicated for surgical intervention, leaving patients with their symptomatology for varying lengths of time. It is unclear at what point in time surgical intervention may become less efficacious at alleviating preoperative symptoms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent primary elective open posterior lumbar spinal fusion at a single academic institution were included. Patient and operative characteristics were compared between symptom duration groups (group 1: <12 mo of pain, group 2: ≥12 mo of pain). Preoperative and final postoperative visual analog scale back/leg pain, and Oswestry Disability Index, were collected. Preoperative, immediate postoperative, and final radiographs were assessed to measure lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI), and the PI-LL difference was calculated.

RESULTS

In total, 167 patients were included in group 1, whereas 359 patients were included in group 2. Baseline demographics and operative characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. Both groups had similar changes in sagittal parameters and had no significant difference in rates of complication, reoperation, discharge to rehabilitation facility, or early adjacent segment degeneration. Both groups demonstrated similar improvement in clinical outcome measures.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite differences in symptom duration, patients who had pain for ≥12 months demonstrated similar improvement after posterolateral lumbar arthrodesis than those who had pain for <12 months. Extended effort of conservative treatments or delay of operative intervention does not appear to negatively impact the eventual outcome of surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Cervical spine MRI phenotypes and prediction of pain, disability and adjacent segment degeneration/disease after ACDF

Degenerative spine imaging findings have been extensively studied in the lumbar region and are associated with pain and adverse clinical outcomes after surgery. However, few studies have investigated the significance of these imaging "phenotypes" in the cervical spine. Patients with degenerative cervical spine pathology undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) from 2008 to 2015 were retrospectively and prospectively assessed using preoperative MRI for disc degeneration, narrowing, and displacement, high-intensity zones, endplate abnormalities, Modic changes, and osteophyte formation from C2-T1. Points were assigned for these phenotypes to generate a novel Cervical Phenotype Index (CPI). Demographics were evaluated for association with phenotypes and the CPI using forward stepwise regression. Bootstrap sampling and multiple imputations assessed phenotypes and the CPI in association with patient-reported outcomes (Neck Disability Index [NDI], Visual Analog Scale [VAS]-neck, VAS-arm) and adjacent segment degeneration (ASDeg) and disease (ASDz). Of 861 patients, disc displacement was the most common (99.7%), followed by osteophytes (92.0%) and endplate abnormalities (57.3%). Most findings were associated with age and were identified at similar cervical vertebral levels; at C5-C7. Imaging phenotypes demonstrated both increased and decreased associations with adverse patient-reported outcomes and ASDeg/Dz. However, the CPI consistently predicted worse NDI (P = .012), VAS-neck (P = .007), and VAS-arm (P = .013) scores, in addition to higher odds of ASDeg (P = .002) and ASDz (P = .004). The CPI was significantly predictive of postoperative symptoms of pain/disability and ASDeg/Dz after ACDF, suggesting that the totality of degenerative findings may be more clinically relevant than individual phenotypes and that this tool may help prognosticate outcomes after surgery.

COVID-19 and the rise of virtual medicine in spine surgery: a worldwide study

PURPOSE

The COVID-19 pandemic forced many surgeons to adopt "virtual medicine" practices, defined as telehealth services for patient care and online platforms for continuing medical education. The purpose of this study was to assess spine surgeon reliance on virtual medicine during the pandemic and to discuss the future of virtual medicine in spine surgery.

METHODS

A comprehensive survey addressing demographic data and virtual medicine practices was distributed to spine surgeons worldwide between March 27, 2020, and April 4, 2020.

RESULTS

902 spine surgeons representing seven global regions responded. 35.6% of surgeons were identified as "high telehealth users," conducting more than half of clinic visits virtually. Predictors of high telehealth utilization included working in an academic practice (OR = 1.68, p = 0.0015) and practicing in Europe/North America (OR 3.42, p < 0.0001). 80.1% of all surgeons were interested in online education. Dedicating more than 25% of one's practice to teaching (OR = 1.89, p = 0.037) predicted increased interest in online education. 26.2% of respondents were identified as "virtual medicine surgeons," defined as surgeons with both high telehealth usage and increased interest in online education. Living in Europe/North America and practicing in an academic practice increased odds of being a virtual medicine surgeon by 2.28 (p = 0.002) and 1.15 (p = 0.0082), respectively. 93.8% of surgeons reported interest in a centralized platform facilitating surgeon-to-surgeon communication.

CONCLUSION

COVID-19 has changed spine surgery by triggering rapid adoption of virtual medicine practices. The demonstrated global interest in virtual medicine suggests that it may become part of the "new normal" for surgeons in the post-pandemic era.

Does the Number of Levels Fused Affect Spinopelvic Parameters and Clinical Outcomes Following Posterolateral Lumbar Fusion for Low-Grade Spondylolisthesis?

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

OBJECTIVES

To determine how the number of fused intervertebral levels affects radiographic parameters and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing open posterolateral lumbar fusion (PLF) for low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study on patients who underwent open PLF for low-grade spondylolisthesis at a single institution from 2011 to 2018. Patients were divided into groups based on number of levels fused during their procedure (1, 2, or 3 or more). Preoperative and postoperative spinopelvic radiographic parameters, patient-reported outcomes (Visual Analog Scale [VAS]-back, VAS-leg, Oswestry Disability Index [ODI]), and postoperative complications were compared.

RESULTS

Of the 316 patients eligible (203 one-level, 95 two-level, 18 three or more levels), change in initial postoperative to final pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis was greatest in 2-level fusions (P = .039), while 3 or more level fusions had worse final pelvic tilt measures (P = .021). In addition, multilevel fusions had worse final VAS-back scores (2-level: P = .015; 3 or more levels: P = .011), higher rates of dural tears (2-level: P = .001), reoperation (2-level: P = .039), and discharge to facility (3 or more levels: P = .047) when compared with 1-level fusions.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients in multilevel fusions experienced less improvement in back pain, had more complications, and were more commonly discharged to a facility compared with single-level PLF patients. These findings are important for operative planning, for setting appropriate preoperative expectations, and for risk stratification in patients undergoing posterior lumbar fusion for low-grade spondylolisthesis.

COVID-19: Current and future challenges in spine care and education - a worldwide study

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted spine care around the globe. Much uncertainty remains regarding the immediate and long-term future of spine care and education in this COVID-19 era.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional, international study of spine surgeons.

METHODS

A multi-dimensional survey was distributed to spine surgeons around the world. A total of 73 questions were asked regarding demographics, COVID-19 observations, personal impact, effect on education, adoption of telemedicine, and anticipated challenges moving forward. Multivariate analysis was performed to assess factors related to likelihood of future conference attendance, future online education, and changes in surgical indications.

RESULTS

A total of 902 spine surgeons from seven global regions completed the survey. Respondents reported a mean level of overall concern of 3.7 on a scale of one to five. 84.0% reported a decrease in clinical duties, and 67.0% reported a loss in personal income. The 82.5% reported being interested in continuing a high level of online education moving forward. Respondents who personally knew someone who tested positive for COVID-19 were more likely to be unwilling to attend a medical conference 1 year from now (OR: 0.61, 95% CI: [0.39, 0.95], P = .029). The 20.0% reported they plan to pursue an increased degree of nonoperative measures prior to surgery 1 year from now, and respondents with a spouse at home (OR: 3.55, 95% CI: [1.14, 11.08], P = .029) or who spend a large percentage of their time teaching (OR: 1.45, 95% CI: [1.02, 2.07], P = .040) were more likely to adopt this practice.

CONCLUSIONS

The COVID-19 pandemic has had an adverse effect on surgeon teaching, clinical volume, and personal income. In the future, surgeons with family and those personally affected by COVID-19 may be more willing to alter surgical indications and change education and conference plans. Anticipating these changes may help the spine community appropriately plan for future challenges.

Development and validation of a novel scoring tool for predicting facility discharge after elective posterior lumbar fusion

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Discharge to acute/intermediate care facilities is a common occurrence after posterior lumbar fusion and can be associated with increased costs and complications after these procedures. This is particularly relevant with the growing popularity of bundled payment plans, creating a need to identify patients at greatest risk.

PURPOSE

To develop and validate a risk-stratification tool to identify patients at greatest risk for facility discharge after open posterior lumbar fusion.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Patients were queried using separate databases from the institution of study and the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) for all patients undergoing open lumbar fusion between 2011 and 2018.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Discharge to intermediate care and/or rehabilitation facilities.

METHODS

Using an 80:20 training and testing NSQIP data split, collected preoperative demographic and operative variables were used in a multivariate logistic regression to identify potential risk factors for postoperative facility discharge, retaining those with a p value <.05. A nomogram was generated to develop a scoring system from this model, with probability cutoffs determined for facility discharge. This model was subsequently validated within the NSQIP database, in addition to external validation at the institution of study. Overall model performance and calibration was assessed using the Brier score and calibration plots, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 11,486 patients (10,453 NSQIP, 1,033 local cohort) were deemed eligible for study, of which 16.1% were discharged to facilities (16.7% NSQIP, 9.6% local cohort). Utilizing training data, age (p<.001), body mass index (p<.001), female sex (p<.001), diabetes (p=.043), peripheral vascular disease (p=.001), cancer (p=.010), revision surgery (p<.001), number of levels fused (p<.001), and spondylolisthesis (p=.049) were identified as significant risk factors for facility discharge. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) indicated a strong predictive model (AUC=0.750), with similar predictive ability in the testing (AUC=0.757) and local data sets (AUC=0.773). Using this tool, patients identified as low- and high-risk had a 7.94% and 33.28% incidence of facility discharge in the testing data set, while rates of 4.44% and 16.33% were observed at the institution of study.

CONCLUSIONS

Using preoperative variables as predictors, this scoring system demonstrated high efficiency in risk-stratifying patients with an approximate four to fivefold difference in rates of facility discharge after posterior lumbar fusion. This tool may help inform medical decision-making and guide reimbursement under bundled-care repayment plans.

Cervical Spine Endplate Abnormalities and Association With Pain, Disability, and Adjacent Segment Degeneration After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study with prospectively-collected data.

OBJECTIVE

To determine how type, location, and size of endplate lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may be associated with symptoms and clinical outcomes after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Structural endplate abnormalities are important, yet understudied, phenomena in the cervical spine. ACDF is a common surgical treatment for degenerative disc disease; however, adjacent segment degeneration/disease (ASD) may develop.

METHODS

Assessed the imaging, symptoms and clinical outcomes of 861 patients who underwent ACDF at a single center. MRI and plain radiographs of the cervical spine were evaluated. Endplate abnormalities on MRI were identified and stratified by type (atypical, typical), location, relation to operative levels, presence at the adjacent level, and size. These strata were assessed for association with presenting symptoms, patient-reported, and postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 861 patients (mean follow-up: 17.4 months), 57.3% had evidence of endplate abnormalities, 39.0% had typical abnormalities, while 18.2% had atypical abnormalities. Patients with any endplate abnormality had greater odds of myelopathy irrespective of location or size, while sensory deficits were associated with atypical lesions (P = 0.016). Typical and atypical abnormalities demonstrated differences in patient-reported outcomes based on location relative to the fused segment. Typical variants were not associated with adverse surgical outcomes, while atypical lesions were associated with ASD (irrespective of size/location; P = 0.004) and reoperations, when a large abnormality was present at the proximal adjacent level (P = 0.025).

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to examine endplate abnormalities on MRI of the cervical spine, demonstrating distinct risk profiles for symptoms, patient-reported, and surgical outcomes after ACDF. Patients with typical lesions reported worsening postoperative pain/disability, while those with atypical abnormalities experienced greater rates of ASD and reoperation. This highlights the relevance of a degenerative spine phenotypic assessment, and suggests endplate abnormalities may prognosticate clinical outcomes after surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

The Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Spine Surgeons Worldwide

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional, international survey.

OBJECTIVES

The current study addressed the multi-dimensional impact of COVID-19 upon healthcare professionals, particularly spine surgeons, worldwide. Secondly, it aimed to identify geographical variations and similarities.

METHODS

A multi-dimensional survey was distributed to surgeons worldwide. Questions were categorized into domains: demographics, COVID-19 observations, preparedness, personal impact, patient care, and future perceptions.

RESULTS

902 spine surgeons representing 7 global regions completed the survey. 36.8% reported co-morbidities. Of those that underwent viral testing, 15.8% tested positive for COVID-19, and testing likelihood was region-dependent; however, 7.2% would not disclose their infection to their patients. Family health concerns were greatest stressor globally (76.0%), with anxiety levels moderately high. Loss of income, clinical practice and current surgical management were region-dependent, whereby 50.4% indicated personal-protective-equipment were not adequate. 82.3% envisioned a change in their clinical practice as a result of COVID-19. More than 33% of clinical practice was via telemedicine. Research output and teaching/training impact was similar globally. 96.9% were interested in online medical education. 94.7% expressed a need for formal, international guidelines to manage COVID-19 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In this first, international study to assess the impact of COVID-19 on surgeons worldwide, we identified overall/regional variations and infection rate. The study raises awareness of the needs and challenges of surgeons that will serve as the foundation to establish interventions and guidelines to face future public health crises.

Etiology-Based Classification of Adjacent Segment Disease Following Lumbar Spine Fusion

BACKGROUND

Adjacent segment disease (ASDz) is a potential complication following lumbar spinal fusion. A common nomenclature based on etiology and ASDz type does not exist and is needed to assist with clinical prognostication, decision making, and management.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

The objective of this study was to develop an etiology-based classification system for ASDz following lumbar fusion.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review of 65 consecutive patients who had undergone both a lumbar fusion performed by a single surgeon and a subsequent procedure for ASDz. We established an etiology-based classification system for lumbar ASDz with the following six categories: "degenerative" (degenerative disc disease or spondylosis), "neurologic" (disc herniation, stenosis), "instability" (spondylolisthesis, rotatory subluxation), "deformity" (scoliosis, kyphosis), "complex" (fracture, infection), or "combined." Based on this scheme, we determined the rate of ASDz in each etiologic category.

RESULTS

Of the 65 patients, 27 (41.5%) underwent surgery for neurogenic claudication or radiculopathy for adjacent-level stenosis or disc herniation and were classified as "neurologic." Ten patients (15.4%) had progressive degenerative disc pathology at the adjacent level and were classified as "degenerative." Ten patients (15.4%) had spondylolisthesis or instability and were classified as "instability," and three patients (4.6%) required revision surgery for adjacent-level kyphosis or scoliosis and were classified as "deformity." Fifteen patients (23.1%) had multiple diagnoses that included a combination of categories and were classified as "combined."

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to propose an etiology-based classification scheme of ASDz following lumbar spine fusion. This simple classification system may allow for the grouping and standardization of patients with similar pathologies and thus for more specific pre-operative diagnoses, personalized treatments, and improved outcome analyses.

Learning from the past: did experience with previous epidemics help mitigate the impact of COVID-19 among spine surgeons worldwide?

Purpose

Spine surgeons around the world have been universally impacted by COVID-19. The current study addressed whether prior experience with disease epidemics among the spine surgeon community had an impact on preparedness and response toward COVID-19.

Methods

A 73-item survey was distributed to spine surgeons worldwide via AO Spine. Questions focused on: demographics, COVID-19 preparedness, response, and impact. Respondents with and without prior epidemic experience (e.g., SARS, H1NI, MERS) were assessed on preparedness and response via univariate and multivariate modeling. Results of the survey were compared against the Global Health Security Index.

Results

Totally, 902 surgeons from 7 global regions completed the survey. 24.2% of respondents had prior experience with global health crises. Only 49.6% reported adequate access to personal protective equipment. There were no differences in preparedness reported by respondents with prior epidemic exposure. Government and hospital responses were fairly consistent around the world. Prior epidemic experience did not impact the presence of preparedness guidelines. There were subtle differences in sources of stress, coping strategies, performance of elective surgeries, and impact on income driven by prior epidemic exposure. 94.7% expressed a need for formal, international guidelines to help mitigate the impact of the current and future pandemics.

Conclusions

This is the first study to note that prior experience with infectious disease crises did not appear to help spine surgeons prepare for the current COVID-19 pandemic. Based on survey results, the GHSI was not an effective measure of COVID-19 preparedness. Formal international guidelines for crisis preparedness are needed to mitigate future pandemics.

Personal Health of Spine Surgeons Can Impact Perceptions, Decision-Making and Healthcare Delivery During the COVID-19 Pandemic - A Worldwide Study

OBJECTIVE

To determine if personal health of spine surgeons worldwide influences perceptions, healthcare delivery, and decision-making during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was performed by distributing a multidimensional survey to spine surgeons worldwide. Questions addressed demographics, impacts and perceptions of COVID-19, and the presence of surgeon comorbidities, which included cancer, cardiac disease, diabetes, obesity, hypertension, respiratory illness, renal disease, and current tobacco use. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify specific comorbidities that influenced various impact measures.

RESULTS

Across 7 global regions, 36.8% out of 902 respondents reported a comorbidity, of which hypertension (21.9%) and obesity (15.6%) were the most common. Multivariate analysis noted tobacco users were more likely to continue performing elective surgery during the pandemic (odds ratio [OR], 2.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.46-4.72; p = 0.001) and were less likely to utilize telecommunication (OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.31-0.86; p = 0.011), whereas those with hypertension were less likely to warn their patients should the surgeon become infected with COVID-19 (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.37-0.91; p = 0.017). Clinicians with multiple comorbidities were more likely to cite personal health as a current stressor (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.07-1.63; p = 0.009) and perceived their hospital's management unfavorably (OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.60-0.91; p = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to have mapped global variations of personal health of spine surgeons, key in the development for future wellness and patient management initiatives. This study underscored that spine surgeons worldwide are not immune to comorbidities, and their personal health influences various perceptions, healthcare delivery, and decision-making during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The Impact of Modic Changes on Preoperative Symptoms and Clinical Outcomes in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Patients

Objective

To assess the impact of Modic changes (MC) on preoperative symptoms, and postoperative outcomes in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) patients.

Methods

We performed a retrospective study of prospectively collected data of ACDF patients at a single institution. Preoperative magnetic resonance imagings were used to assess the presence of MC. MC were stratified by type and location, and compared to patients without MC. Associations with symptoms, patient-reported measures, and surgical outcomes were assessed.

Results

A total of 861 patients were included, with 356 patients with MC (41.3%). MC more frequently occurred at C5–6 (15.1%), and type II was the most common type (61.2%). MC were associated with advanced age (p < 0.001), more levels fused (p < 0.001), a longer duration of symptoms, but not with specific symptoms. MC at C7–T1 resulted in higher postoperative disability (p < 0.001), but did not increase risk of adjacent segment degeneration or reoperation.

Conclusion

This study is the first to systematically examine the impact of cervical MC, stratified by type and location, on outcomes in ACDF patients. Patients with MC were generally older, required larger fusions, and had longer duration of preoperative symptoms. While MC may not affect specific outcomes following ACDF, they may indicate a more debilitating preoperative state for patients.

Patients with predominantly back pain at the time of lumbar fusion for low-grade spondylolisthesis experience similar clinical improvement to patients with predominantly leg pain: mid-term results

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Patients with back pain predominance (BPP) have traditionally been thought to derive less predictable symptomatic relief from lumbar fusion surgery.

PURPOSE

To compare postoperative clinical outcomes as well as degree of improvement in clinical outcome measures between patients with BPP and patients with leg pain predominance (LPP) undergoing open posterior lumbar fusion.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Analysis of patients who underwent an open posterior lumbar fusion for low-grade (Meyerding Grade I or II) degenerative or isthmic spondylolisthesis from 2011 to 2018 was conducted. Surgery was indicated after failure of conservative treatment to address radiculopathy and/or neurogenic claudication. Patients were excluded if they were under 18 years of age at the time of surgery, had less than 6 months of follow-up, presented with a lumbar vertebral body fracture, tumor, or infection, or underwent a fusion surgery that extended to the thoracic spine, high-grade spondylolisthesis, or concomitant deformity.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Radiographs obtained at preoperative, immediate postoperative, and final visits were evaluated for presence or absence of fusion. Patient-reported outcomes were recorded at preoperative and final clinic visits that included: visual analog scale (VAS) back/leg pain, and Oswestry disability index (ODI). Achievement of minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was analyzed, along with rates of postoperative complication and reoperation.

METHODS

Preoperative and final patient-reported outcomes were obtained. Achievement of MCID was evaluated using following thresholds: ODI 14.9, VAS-back pain 2.1, VAS-leg pain 2.8. For analysis, patients were divided into two groups based on predominant location of pain: predominantly VAS-back pain (BPP) and predominantly VAS-leg pain (LPP).

RESULTS

One hundred forty-one patients met inclusion criteria. Of these, 71 had LPP, and 70 had BPP. Patients with preoperative LPP experienced greater improvements in VAS-leg (p<.001) compared to those with BPP, whereas patients with preoperative BPP experienced greater improvements in VAS-back (p=.011) postoperatively compared to those with LPP. There were no differences in the final clinical outcomes. Additionally, LPP achieved MCID for VAS-leg (p=.027) at significantly higher proportion than BPP and BPP achieved MCID for VAS-back (p=.050) at significantly higher proportion than LPP.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with low-grade spondylolisthesis who underwent an open posterior lumbar fusion had improvement in symptoms regardless of presentation with BPP or LPP. In properly indicated patients, posterior spinal fusion is effective for those with BPP in the setting of experiencing both leg and back pain, and clinicians can use this information for perioperative discussions and surgical decision-making.

Multiple Concussions Increase Odds and Rate of Lower Extremity Injury in National Collegiate Athletic Association Athletes After Return to Play

BACKGROUND

Concussion in collegiate athletics is one of the most prevalent sport-related injuries in the United States, with recent studies suggesting persistent deficits in neuromuscular control after a concussion and an associated increase in risk of lower extremity injury.

PURPOSE

To expand on the relationship between concussion and lower extremity injury by examining the effect of multiple concussions (MC) on rate and odds of future lower extremity injury in collegiate athletes after return to play (RTP) compared with matched controls.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

From 2001 to 2016, 48 National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I athletes sustaining multiple concussions at a single institution were identified. Athletes with multiple concussions (MC) were matched directly to athletes with a single concussion (SC) and to athletes with no concussion history (NC) by sex, sport, position, and games played. Incidence of, time to, and location of lower extremity injury were recorded for each group after RTP from their first reported concussion until completion of their collegiate career. Logistic regression was used to analyze odds ratios (ORs) for sustaining lower extremity injury, whereas time to injury was summarized by use of Kaplan-Meier curves and log rank test analysis.

RESULTS

The incidence of lower extremity injury after RTP was significantly greater (P = .049) in the MC cohort (36/48, 75%) than in SC athletes (25/48 = 52%) and NC athletes (27/48 = 56%). Similarly, odds of lower extremity injury were significantly greater in the MC cohort than in SC athletes (OR, 3.00; 95% CI, 1.26-7.12; P = .01) and NC athletes (OR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.07-2.56; P = .02). Time to lower extremity injury was significantly shorter in the MC group compared with matched controls (P = .01). No difference was found in odds of lower extremity injury or time to lower extremity injury between SC and NC athletes.

CONCLUSION

Collegiate athletes with MC were more likely to sustain a lower extremity injury after RTP in a shorter time frame than were the matched SC and NC athletes. This may suggest the presence of a cohort more susceptible to neuromuscular deficits after concussion or more injury prone due to player behavior, and it may imply the need for more stringent RTP protocols for athletes experiencing MC.

Imaging in Spine Surgery: Current Concepts and Future Directions

OBJECTIVE

To review and highlight the historical and recent advances of imaging in spine surgery and to discuss current applications and future directions.

METHODS

A PubMed review of the current literature was performed on all relevant articles that examined historical and recent imaging techniques used in spine surgery. Studies were examined for their thoroughness in description of various modalities and applications in current and future management.

RESULTS

We reviewed 97 articles that discussed past, present, and future applications for imaging in spine surgery. Although most historical approaches relied heavily upon basic radiography, more recent advances have begun to expand upon advanced modalities, including the integration of more sophisticated equipment and artificial intelligence.

CONCLUSIONS

Since the days of conventional radiography, various modalities have emerged and become integral components of the spinal surgeon's diagnostic armamentarium. As such, it behooves the practitioner to remain informed on the current trends and potential developments in spinal imaging, as rapid adoption and interpretation of new techniques may make significant differences in patient management and outcomes. Future directions will likely become increasingly sophisticated as the implementation of machine learning, and artificial intelligence has become more commonplace in clinical practice.