Second transplant for acute and chronic leukemia relapsing after first HLA-identical sibling transplant

NCI First International Workshop on the Biology, Prevention, and Treatment of Relapse after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Report from the Committee on Treatment of Relapse after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Relapse is a major cause of treatment failure after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT). Treatment options for relapse have been inadequate, and the majority of patients ultimately die of their disease. There is no standard approach to treating relapse after alloHSCT. Withdrawal of immune suppression and donor lymphocyte infusions are commonly used for all diseases; although these interventions are remarkably effective for relapsed chronic myelogenous leukemia, they have limited efficacy in other hematologic malignancies. Conventional and novel chemotherapy, monoclonal antibody therapy, targeted therapies, and second transplants have been utilized in a variety of relapsed diseases, but reports on these therapies are generally anecdotal and retrospective. As such, there is an immediate need for well-designed, disease-specific trials for treatment of relapse after alloHSCT. This report summarizes current treatment options under investigation for relapse after alloHSCT in a disease-specific manner. In addition, recommendations are provided for specific areas of research necessary in the treatment of relapse after alloHSCT.

NCI First International Workshop on the Biology, Prevention, and Treatment of Relapse after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: report from the Committee on the Epidemiology and Natural History of Relapse following Allogeneic Cell Transplantation

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) is increasingly being used for treatment of hematologic malignancies, and the immunologic graft-versus-tumor effect (GVT) provides its therapeutic effectiveness. Disease relapse remains a cause of treatment failure in a significant proportion of patients undergoing alloHSCT without improvements over the last 2-3 decades. We summarize here current data and outline future research regarding the epidemiology, risk factors, and outcomes of relapse after alloHSCT. Although some factors (eg, disease status at alloHSCT or graft-versus-host disease [GVHD] effects) are common, other disease-specific factors may be unique. The impact of reduced-intensity regimens on relapse and survival still need to be assessed using contemporary supportive care and comparable patient populations. The outcome of patients relapsing after an alloHSCT generally remains poor even though interventions including donor leukocyte infusions can benefit some patients. Trials examining targeted therapies along with improved safety of alloHSCT may result in improved outcomes, yet selection bias necessitates prospective assessment to gauge the real contribution of any new therapies. Ongoing chronic GVHD (cGVHD) or other residual post-alloHSCT morbidities may limit the applicability of new therapies. Developing strategies to promptly identify patients as alloHSCT candidates, while malignancy is in a more treatable stage, could decrease relapses rates after alloHSCT. Better understanding and monitoring of minimal residual disease posttransplant could lead to novel preemptive treatments of relapse. Analyses of larger cohorts through multicenter collaborations or registries remain essential to probe questions not amenable to single center or prospective studies. Studies need to provide data with detail on disease status, prior treatments, biologic markers, and posttransplant events. Stringent statistical methods to study relapse remain an important area of research. The opportunities for improvement in prevention and management of post-alloHSCT relapse are apparent, but clinical discipline in their careful study remains important.

Diagnosis and management of acute myeloid leukemia in adults: recommendations from an international expert panel, on behalf of the European LeukemiaNet

In 2003, an international working group last reported on recommendations for diagnosis, response assessment, and treatment outcomes in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Since that time, considerable progress has been made in elucidating the molecular pathogenesis of the disease that has resulted in the identification of new diagnostic and prognostic markers. Furthermore, therapies are now being developed that target disease-associated molecular defects. Recent developments prompted an international expert panel to provide updated evidence- and expert opinion–based recommendations for the diagnosis and management of AML, that contain both minimal requirements for general practice as well as standards for clinical trials. A new standardized reporting system for correlation of cytogenetic and molecular genetic data with clinical data is proposed.

Outcome of 93 patients with relapse or progression following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

Relapse/progression after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remains the major cause of treatment failure. In this study, the subsequent clinical outcome was overviewed in 292 patients with leukemia/myelodysplastic syndrome who received allo-HCT. Among them, 93 (32%) showed relapse/progression. Cohort 1 was chosen to receive no interventions with curative intent (n = 25). Cohort 2 received reinduction chemotherapy and/or donor lymphocyte infusion (n = 48), and Cohort 3 underwent a second allo-HCT (n = 20). Sixty-three patients received reinduction chemotherapy, and 27 (43%) achieved subsequent complete remission (CR). The incidence of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) was similar among the three cohorts (4, 15, and 5%). The 1-year overall survival (OS) after relapse was significantly better in patients with a second HCT (58%) than in others (14%, Cohorts 1 and 2; P <.001). However, the 2-year OS did not differ between the two groups, which suggests that it is difficult to maintain CR after the second HCT. Multivariate analysis showed that reinduction chemotherapy, CR after intervention, second HCT, and longer time to post-transplant relapse were associated with improved survival. In conclusion, for patients with relapse after allo-HCT, successful reinduction chemotherapy and a second HCT may be effective for prolonging survival without excessive NRM. However, effective measures to prevent disease progression after a second HCT clearly need to be developed.

Management of relapse after allo-SCT for AML and the role of second transplantation

Relapse after allo-SCT for AML carries very poor prognosis. Second allo-SCT, although curative, is not an appropriate treatment option for a large number of relapsing patients (only 2-20% patients receive a second allo-SCT), and efforts to increase the number of patients who may benefit from a second allo-SCT are ongoing. In addition, understanding the varied biological processes that are operative in disease relapse has encouraged the development of novel therapies, and could be beneficial to patients who are currently managed conservatively with supportive care for relapsed disease. Incorporating novel combinations of drugs with immunomodulation, although theoretically attractive, should be tested in the setting of clinical trials. In this review, we discuss the currently available approaches for relapsed AML after allo-SCT.

Relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic cell therapy

Disease relapse remains a major cause of mortality following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Over the past decade, our understanding of the biology underlying the graft-versus-tumor/leukemia (GVT) effect has increased greatly; however, several other factors affect the occurrence and outcome of relapse, including conditioning regimen, type of allograft, and the histology, status, and sensitivity to chemotherapy of the disease being treated. The mainstay of relapse treatment is donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI), but the efficacy of DLI is quite variable depending on disease histology and state. As such, there is a significant need for novel therapies and strategies for relapse following allogeneic HCT, particularly in patients for whom DLI is not an option. The National Cancer Institute is sponsoring an international workshop to address issues and research questions relative to the biology, natural history, prevention, and treatment of relapse following allogeneic HCT.

Second hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in myeloid malignancies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Hematopoietic stem cell and umbilical cord blood transplantation can be a life-saving procedure for many patients with myeloid malignancies. The posttransplant period, however, can be complicated by graft failure and disease relapse, prompting the need for further therapy. Herein, we review and examine the data of second allogeneic stem cell transplant after autologous, allogeneic and umbilical cord blood transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although large, prospective, multicenter trials are lacking, certain factors such as younger patient age, lower disease burden and a longer interval between first transplantation and relapse appear to portend a better prognosis for second transplant.

SUMMARY

Currently, only a selected group of patients without important comorbidities should be considered for second allogeneic transplantation. Strategies such as new immunosuppressive agents, antileukemia monoclonal antibodies, graft modification and use of molecularly targeted therapy are needed to decrease the morbidity and increase the efficacy of transplantation.

Efficacy of a 3-day, low-dose treatment with 5-azacytidine followed by donor lymphocyte infusions in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia relapsed after allografting

We have piloted a low-dose schedule of 5-azacytidine followed by donor lymphocyte infusions (DLIs) in patients with relapse of AML or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMMoL) after allografting. Of the 26 patients (median age 62 years, range 28-75) with relapsed AML (n=24) or CMMoL (n=2), 11 (42%) had poor-risk cytogenetics. Twenty-three patients had received fludarabine-based reduced-toxicity conditioning regimens, and three had received conventional myeloablative conditioning. Patients received 5-azacytidine s.c., at a total daily dose of 100 mg, on days 1-3, to be followed by DLI on day 10, with the next course of treatment to be started on day 22. A total of 60 courses of 5-azacytidine were administered, with a median of 2 courses (range: 1-10). In 44 courses, 5-azacytidine was followed by DLI, and thus 19/26 (73%) patients received at least one course of this combined treatment. Clinically relevant neutropenic infections not associated with progressive disease developed in four patients, one of them succumbing to sepsis. Only two patients developed de novo acute GvHD after the combination of 5-azacytidine and DLI. Overall, 66% of the patients benefited from this treatment, with continued CRs achieved in 4 (16%) patients, lasting a median of 525 days (range: 450+ to 820+), and a 50% rate of temporary disease control with stable mixed chimerism (median duration 72 days). The median survival from the start of 5-azacytidine treatment was 136 days (range: 23 to 873+), with an estimated 2-year survival probability of 16%. In conclusion, this non-intensive outpatient regimen of 5-azacytidine followed by DLI is feasible, with a very low aGVHD rate. Objective responses, including continuous complete donor chimerism, occurred also in patients with poor-risk cytogenetics.

Reduced-intensity allogeneic transplantation in pediatric patients ineligible for myeloablative therapy: results of the Pediatric Blood and Marrow Transplant Consortium Study ONC0313

The role of reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens in pediatric cancer treatment is unclear. To define the efficacy of a busulfan/fludarabine/antithymocyte globulin RIC regimen in pediatric patients ineligible for myeloablative transplantation, we completed a trial at 23 institutions in the Pediatric Blood and Marrow Transplant Consortium. Forty-seven patients with hematologic malignancies were enrolled. Sustained engraftment occurred in 98%, 89%, and 90%, and full donor chimerism was achieved in 88%, 76%, and 78% of evaluable related bone marrow/peripheral blood stem cells (BM/PBSCs), unrelated BM/PBSCs, and unrelated cord blood recipients. With a median follow-up of 24 months (range, 11-53 months), 2-year event-free survival, overall survival (OS), transplantation-related mortality, and relapse were 40%, 45%, 11%, and 43%, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed an inferior outcome when patients had undergone previous total body irradiation (TBI)-containing myeloablative transplantation (2-year OS, 23% vs 63% vs 52%, previous TBI transplantation vs no TBI transplantation vs no transplantation, P = .02) and when patients not previously treated with TBI had detectable disease at the time of the RIC procedure (2-year OS, 0% vs 63%, detectable vs nondetectable disease, P = .01). Favorable outcomes can be achieved with RIC approaches in pediatric patients in remission who are ineligible for myeloablative transplantation. This study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00795132.

Low-dose azacitidine after allogeneic stem cell transplantation for acute leukemia

BACKGROUND

: The authors hypothesized that low doses of the hypomethylating agent 5-azacitidine may maximize the graft-versus-leukemia effect and may be tolerated well after allogeneic transplantation (HSCT).

METHODS

: The drug was given to 17 patients with acute leukemia as salvage for disease recurrence after HSCT (n = 9 patients) or as maintenance therapy (n = 8 patients). 5-Azacitidine was given subcutaneously daily for 5 days and was repeated every 4 weeks at doses of 16 mg/m(2) (n = 4 patients), 24 mg/m(2) (n = 9 patients), and 40 mg/m(2) (n = 4 patients). A median of 8 cycles was delivered. The median follow-up was 16 months and 11 months after HSCT and 5-azacitidine treatment, respectively.

RESULTS

: Five of 9 patients with recurrent disease responded. Four of 13 responding patients developed disease recurrence while they were receiving 5-azacitidine after a median of 10 months. The actuarial 1-year event-free and overall survival rates were 55% and 90%, respectively. There were no extramedullary toxicities, and no graft-versus-host disease exacerbation was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

: Low-dose 5-azacitidine may induce durable remissions for patients who develop disease recurrence after HSCT. Further follow-up and a larger group of patients will be necessary to confirm these observations. Cancer 2009. (c) 2009 American Cancer Society.

Survival after cord blood transplantation from unrelated donor as a second hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for recurrent pediatric acute myeloid leukemia

The Japan Cord Blood Bank Network (JCBBN) reports the treatment of 22 children with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who received umbilical cord blood transplantation from unrelated donors (CBT) as their second hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Provided by the JCBBN, between February 1997 and September 2006, 22 patients had CBT as a second HSCT. In the initial HSCT, eight received autologous, seven received CBT, and the remaining had allogenic BMT. At the time of CBT as a second HSCT, seven were in the second complete remission (CR2), two in the third CR (CR3), the remaining were not in remission. Reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) conducted for 10 cases and myeloablative conditioning (MAC) for 12 cases. The overall survival rate was 31.3%, 5 years after CBT. Second complete remission at second transplantation was favorable prognosis (58.3 +/- 18.6%, compared with 17.1 +/- 10.8% for the non-CR group. Mortality after CBT as a second HSCT accounted for 15 cases, 8 from treatment-related mortality. In conclusion, CBT combined with RIC as second HSCT may be useful against a recurrence of AML in children after the initial HSCT.

Risk factors for lymphoproliferative disorders after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

We evaluated 26 901 patients who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) at 271 centers worldwide to define patterns of posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLDs). PTLDs developed in 127 recipients, with 105 (83%) cases occurring within 1 year after transplantation. In multivariate analyses, we confirmed that PTLD risks were strongly associated (P < .001) with T-cell depletion of the donor marrow, antithymocyte globulin (ATG) use, and unrelated or HLA-mismatched grafts (URD/HLA mismatch). Significant associations were also confirmed for acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease. The increased risk associated with URD/HLA-mismatched donors (RR = 3.8) was limited to patients with T-cell depletion or ATG use (P = .004). New findings were elevated risks for age 50 years or older at transplantation (RR = 5.1; P < .001) and second transplantation (RR = 3.5; P < .001). Lower risks were found for T-cell depletion methods that remove both T and B cells (alemtuzumab and elutriation, RR = 3.1; P = .025) compared with other methods (RR = 9.4; P = .005 for difference). The cumulative incidence of PTLDs was low (0.2%) among 21 686 patients with no major risk factors, but increased to 1.1%, 3.6%, and 8.1% with 1, 2, and more than 3 major risk factors, respectively. Our findings identify subgroups of patients who underwent allogeneic HCT at elevated risk of PTLDs for whom prospective monitoring of Epstein-Barr virus activation and early treatment intervention may be particularly beneficial.

ASH evidence-based guidelines: is there a role for second allogeneic transplant after relapse?

A 35-year-old male with a FLT3(+) AML underwent allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplant using a myeloablative non-total body irradiation (TBI) conditioning regimen from his HLA-matched sibling donor. Following transplantation, he developed grade II acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) that resolved with increasing immunosuppression. The medications were subsequently discontinued, and he did not develop any evidence of chronic GVHD. Eighteen months after transplant, while off all immunosuppression, he developed fatigue and a blood count showed circulating blasts consistent with relapse of his disease. Among the various therapeutic questions is whether there is a role for a second allogeneic transplant to treat his disease and if so, at what time, with what conditioning, and with which type of donor.

Bone-marrow relapse in paediatric acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

Marrow relapse is the major obstacle to cure for 10-15% of young patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). Recent investigations into the biology of minimal residual disease indicate that many early relapses derive from residual cells present at first diagnosis, but some late relapses might represent new mutations in leukaemic cells not eliminated by conventional therapy. Treatment of marrow relapse involves higher doses and more intensive schedules of the drugs used for initial therapy with or without haemopoietic stem cell transplantation. In most reports, transplantation is better than continuation chemotherapy in early marrow relapse, but its role in later relapse is less clear. Current therapy cures 10% of patients with early marrow relapses and 50% of those with late relapses, but outcomes have changed little in the past two decades. Understanding the molecular biology of ALL underlies development of improved risk stratification and new therapies. Although better drugs are needed, introduction of new agents into clinical trials in paediatric disease has been difficult. Innovative trial designs and use of valid surrogate endpoints may expedite this process.

Outcome of second allogeneic transplants using reduced-intensity conditioning following relapse of haematological malignancy after an initial allogeneic transplant

Disease relapse following an allogeneic transplant remains a major cause of treatment failure, often with a poor outcome. Second allogeneic transplant procedures have been associated with high TRM, especially with myeloablative conditioning. We hypothesized that the use of reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) would decrease the TRM. We performed a retrospective national multicentre analysis of 71 patients receiving a second allogeneic transplant using RIC after disease relapse following an initial allogeneic transplant. The majority of patients had leukaemia/myelodysplasia (MDS) (N=57), nine had lymphoproliferative disorders, two had myeloma and three had myeloproliferative diseases. A total of 25% of patients had unrelated donors. The median follow-up was 906 days from the second allograft. The predicted overall survival (OS) and TRM at 2 years were 28 and 27%, respectively. TRM was significantly lower in those who relapsed late (>11 months) following the first transplant (2 years: 17 vs 38% in early relapses; P=0.03). Two factors were significantly associated with a better survival: late relapse (P=0.014) and chronic GVHD following the second transplant (P=0.014). These data support our hypothesis that the second RIC allograft results in a lower TRM than using MA. A proportion of patients achieved a sustained remission even when relapsing after a previous MA transplant.

The role of cytotoxic therapy with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the therapy of acute myelogenous leukemia in adults: an evidence-based review

Clinical research examining the role of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in the therapy of acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) in adults is presented and critically evaluated in this systematic evidence-based review. Specific criteria were used for searching the published literature and for grading the quality and strength of the evidence and the strength of the treatment recommendations. Treatment recommendations based on the evidence are presented in Table 3, entitled Summary of Treatment Recommendations Made by the Expert Panel for Adult Acute Myelogenous Leukemia, and were reached unanimously by a panel of AML experts. The identified priority areas of needed future research in adult AML include: (1) What is the role of HSCT in treating patients with specific molecular markers (eg, FLT3, NPM1, CEBPA, BAALC, MLL, NRAS, etc.) especially in patients with normal cytogenetics? (2) What is the benefit of using HSCT to treat different cytogenetic subgroups? (3) What is the impact on survival outcomes of reduced intensity or nonmyeloablative versus conventional conditioning in older (>60 years) and intermediate (40-60 years) aged adults? (4) What is the impact on survival outcomes of unrelated donor HSCT vesus chemotherapy in younger (<40 years) adults with high risk disease?

A fludarabine, thiotepa reduced toxicity conditioning regimen designed specifically for allogeneic second haematopoietic cell transplantation after failure of previous autologous or allogeneic transplantation

We present a phase II study of fludarabine 5 x 30 mg/m(2), thiotepa 3 x 5 mg/kg as preparative regimen specifically for allogeneic second haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) after failure of previous HCT. Forty-nine patients (median age 52 years, range 27-68) received an allogeneic second HCT after failed autologous (n=29) or allogeneic (n=20) HCT. Diagnoses were AML (n=18), ALL (n=3), multiple myeloma (n=11), lymphoma (n=16) and CML (n=1). GVHD prophylaxis consisted of CYA and mainly low dose alemtuzumab (40 mg). The median follow-up for patients alive is 528 days (range 217-1344). In 43 of 49 (88%) evaluable patients response rates were CR=19, PR=14 and SD=10 at one month. At one year, the probability (95% confidence interval) of relapse is 55.1 (38.2-72)% and the nonrelapse mortality (NRM) is 29 (14.2-44.4)%. Estimated survival at one year is 42.6 (28.7-56.6)% and event free survival is 38.1 (24.4-51.8)%. Survival was significantly better for patients experiencing relapse beyond one year, than for patients relapsing within one year from first transplantation (51.2 (33.5-68.9)% vs 27 (7-48.5)%; P=0.013). We conclude that this regimen is feasible and well tolerated for allogeneic second HCT.

Old and new cancers after hematopoietic-cell transplantation

Relapse of primary disease and occurrence of new cancers can cause significant morbidity and mortality in recipients of autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic-cell transplantation (HCT). Treatment options for relapse are generally limited and can include disease-specific chemotherapy or targeted therapy. Additional relapse-directed therapies that are available for allogeneic HCT recipients include withdrawal of immunosuppression and donor lymphocyte infusion. Selected patients can be offered a second transplant procedure. Newer strategies to eliminate minimal residual disease and, in allogeneic HCT recipients, to augment the graft-versus-tumor effect are needed for patients who are at high risk for relapse after HCT. Second cancers after HCT include post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder, hematologic malignancies and new solid cancers. The incidence of second solid cancers continues to rise without a plateau with increasing follow up of HCT survivors. Secondary myelodysplastic syndrome and acute leukemia are almost exclusively seen in autologous HCT recipients while post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders complicate recipients of allogeneic HCT. Appropriate screening evaluations should be performed in HCT survivors to facilitate early detection and treatment of second cancers.

Donor Lymphocyte Infusion in the Treatment of First Hematological Relapse After Allogeneic Stem-Cell Transplantation in Adults With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Retrospective Risk Factors Analysis and Comparison With Other Strategies by the EBMT Acute Leukemia Working Party

Purpose

To evaluate the role of donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) in the treatment of relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the data of 399 patients with AML in first hematological relapse after HSCT whose treatment did (n = 171) or did not (n = 228) include DLI. After correction for imbalances and established risk factors, the two groups were compared with respect to overall survival. Further, a detailed analysis of risk factors for survival among DLI recipients was performed.

Results

Median follow-up was 27 and 40 months, respectively. Estimated survival at 2 years (± standard deviation) was 21% ± 3% for patients receiving DLI and 9% ± 2% for patients not receiving DLI. After adjustment for differences between the groups, better outcome was associated with age younger than 37 years (P = .008), relapse occurring more than 5 months after HSCT (P < .0001), and use of DLI (P = .04). Among DLI recipients, a lower tumor burden at relapse (< 35% of bone marrow blasts; P = .006), female sex (P = .02), favorable cytogenetics (P = .004), and remission at time of DLI (P < .0001) were predictive for survival in a multivariate analysis. Two-year survival was 56% ± 10%, if DLI was performed in remission or with favorable karyotype, and 15% ± 3% if DLI was given in aplasia or with active disease.

Conclusion

Although further evidence for a graft-versus-leukemia effect by DLI is provided, our results confirm, that the clinical benefit is limited to a minority of patients. Strategies to reduce tumor burden before DLI, as well as alternative treatment options should be investigated in adults with relapsed AML after HSCT.

Results of donor lymphocyte infusions for relapsed myelodysplastic syndrome after hematopoietic cell transplantation

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) represents a potentially curative approach for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs). While a large proportion of HCT recipients become long-term disease-free survivors, recurrence of MDS remains the leading cause of mortality after HCT. The role of donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) in patients with relapsed MDS after HCT is unclear. We report results among 16 patients treated with DLI for relapsed MDS after HCT at a single institution between March 1993 and February 2004. The cohort contained 10 men and 6 women with a median age of 49 (range, 22-67) years. CR with resolution of cytopenias and prior disease markers occurred in 3 of 14 patients who could be evaluated. Two patients survived without MDS for 68 and 65 months after DLI, respectively, but died with pneumonia. Grades II-IV acute GVHD and chronic GVHD occurred after DLI in 6 (43%) and 5 (36%) patients, respectively. All three responders developed grades III-IV acute GVHD and extensive chronic GVHD after DLI. Our results confirm prior reports that DLI can result in CR in some patients with recurrent MDS after transplant, but long-term survival is infrequent.

Outcomes among patients with recurrent high-risk hematologic malignancies after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

We retrospectively analyzed outcomes among 307 consecutive patients who had recurrent or persistent acute leukemia (n = 244), chronic myelogenous leukemia in blast phase (CML; n = 28), or advanced myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS; n = 35) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation and who received at least 1 relapse-directed intervention: withdrawal of immunosuppression, chemotherapy, or donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI). Transplants were performed at a single institution between 1995 and 2004, and outcomes were analyzed according to time intervals from transplantation to detection of malignancy: "early," <100 days (n = 111); "intermediate," 100-200 days (n = 73); and "late," >200 days (n = 123). The overall remission rate was 30%. Compared to early recurrence, intermediate recurrence and late recurrence were associated with increasing probabilities of remission (hazard ratios, 1.89 and 2.16; P = .05 and .02) and decreasing risks of overall mortality (hazard ratios, 0.73 and 0.33; P = .05 and <.0001). The 2-year overall survival (OS) estimates for patients with early, intermediate, and late recurrence were 3%, 9%, and 19%, respectively. Remission was associated with a median survival prolongation of 9.5 months. Individual types or combinations of these nonrandomly assigned relapse-directed interventions were not associated with higher or lower probabilities of remission or survival. More effective intervention strategies are needed for treatment of recurrent high-risk hematologic malignancies after hematopoietic cell transplantation. In the absence of innovative clinical trials, patients with early recurrence might wish to forego further interventions in favor of palliative care.

Viewpoint: What is the role of allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation in the era of reduced-intensity conditioning--is there still an upper age limit? A focus on myeloid neoplasia

Allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is the most effective curative therapy in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Incidence of AML and MDS increases with age, peaking in the seventh decade. Despite improved Ara-C and anthracyclin-based chemotherapy regimens, the prognosis of AML in patients beyond 60 years of age is dismal. The introduction of peripheral blood-derived stem cell grafts into allogeneic HCT and the known anti-leukaemic effect of donor lymphocyte infusions paved the way for reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) allogeneic stem-cell transplantation, which makes transplant in advanced age possible and significantly reduces transplant-related organ toxicity and mortality. The success of RIC HCT relies on the alloreactivity of the donor immune system and the graft-versus-leukaemia effect. We try to answer the following questions in this paper: who should receive RIC HCT? when and how should the transplant be performed? is there an upper age limit and what is the future of RIC HCT?

Improved outcome after relapse in children with acute myeloid leukaemia

In the Nordic Society for Paediatric Haematology and Oncology paediatric study acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) 93, event-free survival was 50% and overall survival was 66%, indicating that many patients were cured following relapse. Factors influencing outcome in children with relapsed AML were investigated. The study included all 146 children in the Nordic countries diagnosed with AML between 1988 and 2003, who relapsed. Data on disease characteristics and relapse treatment were related to outcome. Sixty-six percentage achieved remission with survival after relapse (5 years) 34 +/- 4%. Of 122 patients who received re-induction therapy, 77% entered remission with 40 +/- 5% survival. Remission rates were similar for different re-induction regimens but fludarabine, cytarabine, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-based therapy had low treatment-related mortality. Prognostic factors for survival were duration of first complete remission (CR1) and stem cell transplantation (SCT) in CR1. In early relapse (<1 year in CR1), survival was 21 +/- 5% compared with 48 +/- 6% in late relapse. For children receiving re-induction therapy, survival in early relapse was 29 +/- 6% and 51 +/- 6% in late. Patients treated in CR1 with SCT, autologous SCT or chemotherapy had a survival of 18 +/- 9, 5 +/- 5 and 41 +/- 5%, respectively. Survival was 62 +/- 6% in 64 children given SCT as part of their relapse therapy. A significant proportion of children with relapsed AML can be cured, even those with early relapse. Children who receive re-induction therapy, enter remission and proceed to SCT can achieve a cure rate of 60%.

Treatment of Relapsed Acute Leukemia after Allogeneic Transplantation: A Single Center Experience

Relapsed acute leukemia after allogeneic transplantation has a poor prognosis and most reports have focused on the role of second transplantations in relapsed patients. We report our single-institution experience on the management of relapsed acute leukemia after allogeneic transplantation. We aimed to describe the outcome of relapsed acute leukemia after allogeneic transplantation at our institution and investigate whether maneuvers intended to augment donor T cell allogeneic reactivity were associated with durable graft-versus-leukemia effects. We analyzed 310 patients with acute leukemia who received allogeneic hematopoietic progenitor cell transplants from HLA-matched donors between 1982 and 2005 (229 with acute myelogenous leukemia, 81 with acute lymphoblastic leukemia). Mean post-transplant follow-up was 5 years (range, 0.5-22 years). Factors associated with relapse incidence, therapy for relapse, response to treatment, and post-relapse survival were assessed. One hundred of 310 patients (32%) with acute leukemia relapsed after transplantation, including 28 of 81 patients (35%) with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and 72 of 229 (31%) with acute myelogenous leukemia at a median of 136 days after transplantation. Median post-relapse survival periods were 51 days for the 69 patients who received chemotherapy/supportive care, 84 days for 11 recipients of donor lymphocyte infusions, 303 days for 13 recipients of second transplants, and 442 days for 7 patients treated with interferon-alpha and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor. A multivariable Cox regression analysis indicated that a longer time to relapse after transplantation, peripheral blood as source of stem cells, and initial post-relapse therapy with cytokines, donor lymphocyte infusions, or second transplants were associated with improved post-relapse survival (P <.001, <.001, and .025). The outlook for patients with post-transplant relapse of acute leukemia is extremely poor; currently, no single therapy consistently results in durable remissions. Our study highlights the need for clinical trials in this area. Therapy with granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor and interferon-alpha-2b is promising and will be pursued in a prospective trial at our center.

Three consecutive related bone marrow transplants for juvenile myelomonocytic leukaemia

Allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is the only cure for juvenile myelomonocytic leukaemia (JMML), but relapse remains the major cause of failure. A second transplant may be considered a way to induce the graft vs. leukaemia effect in patients who relapse after their first HSCT. We describe a 7-month-old girl with JMML who relapsed after a first, related allo-HSCT, and who again relapsed 8 months after the second transplant, despite discontinuation of immusuppressive therapy. She underwent a third allogeneic transplant from another related donor. At the time of this report the patient is in complete remission 26 months after the third transplant. We suggest that a third allo-HSCT may be taken into consideration for JMML patients who experience relapse, even after two previous transplants.

Disease burden may identify patients more likely to benefit from second allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation to treat relapsed acute myelogenous leukemia

The major cause of failure after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) is disease relapse or progression. We analyzed the outcome of second HSCT for treatment of patients with relapsed, refractory AML/myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) at our institution. A total of 72 patients were eligible for this analysis. In all, 25 (35%) patients received salvage chemotherapy prior to the second transplant procedure and only two (3%) patients were in complete remission at the time of the second transplant. A total of 20 patients (28%) had low leukemia burden as measured by the absence of peripheral blood blasts and <or=5% blasts in the bone marrow at the time of the second transplant. Although, the overall median survival after the second transplant was 6 months, a subset of patients who had low leukemia burden at the time of the second transplant had a 5-year survival of 25 vs 12% in those with a high leukemia burden. Thus, a second transplant may offer the possibility of long-term disease control in a subset of patients who have a 'low bulk' disease at the time of transplantation.