Streptozocin alone compared with streptozocin plus fluorouracil in the treatment of advanced islet-cell carcinoma

Everolimus: a new treatment option for advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

OBJECTIVE

To present the current clinical evidence on everolimus for use in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNET).

DATA SOURCES

A literature search was performed using PubMed and MEDLINE (1946-March 2012). Search terms were everolimus, RAD001, mTOR inhibitor, and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Abstracts from the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2000-2012 meetings and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reviews were searched to obtain otherwise unpublished data. The national clinical trials registry was searched for current and future studies of everolimus in pNET.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Clinical studies available in the English language describing the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical activity, and safety of everolimus in pNET were included. All peer-reviewed, clinically relevant publications were reviewed for inclusion.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Everolimus is an oral mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor approved by the FDA in May 2011 for the treatment of progressive, advanced pNET. Everolimus exerts its effect by inhibiting multiple downstream pathways of mTOR, which decreases cell proliferation, survival, and angiogenesis. Its pNET indication was based on the results of RADIANT-3, a Phase 3 trial demonstrating increased median progression-free survival (11 months) with everolimus 10 mg orally once daily compared to placebo (4.6 months). Everolimus was well tolerated in clinical trials. The most commonly reported adverse events included stomatitis, rash, diarrhea, fatigue, infections, nausea, and decreased appetite. Grade 3/4 events including anemia, thrombocytopenia, pneumonitis, and hyperglycemia occurred in approximately 5% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on review of the available literature, everolimus is a safe and effective treatment option for patients with low- to intermediate-grade, unresectable or metastatic pNET that have progressed on prior therapies. Until results of head-to-head, randomized controlled trials are conducted to compare everolimus to other treatment options, it cannot be said whether everolimus is more efficacious or tolerable than other treatment options.

Sunitinib in advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: latest evidence and clinical potential

Based on preclinical data available in the RIP1-Tag2 transgenic mouse model, sunitinib is an inhibitor of angiogenesis in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors blocking vascular endothelial growth factor receptors and platelet-derived growth factor receptors in endothelial cells and pericytes, respectively. Evidence of objective response in phase I trials justified the initiation of a large phase II/III program using sunitinib in patients with advanced/metastatic well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. In the phase II study, sunitinib showed potent antitumor activity and a safe toxicity profile. In a recent double-blind placebo-controlled randomized phase III trial, sunitinib doubled the progression-free survival of patients, induced objective responses, and reduced the risk of death of patients with advanced/metastatic well-differentiated tumors. These data allowed the approval of sunitinib in several countries including Europe and the United States of America. These recent data provide hope for patients with well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and will change standards of care in this disease.

FDA approval summary: sunitinib for the treatment of progressive well-differentiated locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

On May 20, 2011, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved sunitinib malate capsules (Sutent®; Pfizer, Inc., New York) for the treatment of progressive, well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) in patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic disease. In a phase III randomized trial, 171 patients received either sunitinib (37.5 mg) or placebo once daily. The progression-free survival (PFS) interval was the primary efficacy endpoint. Secondary endpoints included the overall survival (OS) time, objective response rate (ORR), patient-reported outcomes, and safety. Based on early results favoring sunitinib, the independent data monitoring committee recommended trial termination prior to the prespecified interim analysis. This premature analysis may have led to an overestimate of the treatment effect. In the FDA analysis of investigator-assessed PFS times, the median values for the sunitinib and placebo arms were 10.2 months and 5.4 months, respectively. The ORRs were 9.3% and 0% in the sunitinib and placebo arms, respectively. The OS data were not mature at the time of approval and were confounded by 69% crossover. Common adverse reactions in patients receiving sunitinib included diarrhea, nausea, asthenia, fatigue, neutropenia, hypertension, and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome. Two patients on sunitinib died as a result of cardiac failure. The Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee voted eight to two that, despite residual uncertainty about the magnitude of the PFS effect because of early trial termination, sunitinib demonstrated a favorable benefit-risk profile in pNET patients. The FDA concurred with the committee's assessment and granted sunitinib regular approval for this rare malignancy with few available therapies.

Treatment options for unresectable neuroendocrine liver metastases

Hepatic metastases develop in 85% of patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Radical surgery, which involves resection of the primary and liver metastases, is the mainstay of treatment, with 60-70% 5-year survival and 35% 10-year survival rates. However, less than 15% of neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases (NETLMs) are resectable, owing either to multifocality or the inability to preserve sufficient parenchyma following resection. This article deals with the therapeutic modalities available for nonresectable liver metastases, and the therapeutic options available for management of nonresectable NETLMs are discussed. Targeted therapies for NETLMs include hepatic artery embolization, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, radiolabeled/drug-eluting microspheres, radiofrequency ablation, cryoablation and phenol injection. Hepatic artery embolization/transcatheter arterial chemoembolization is associated with 75-100% symptom relief and an objective tumor response varying from 33 to 80%. Other modalities, such as biotherapy, peptide receptor therapy and chemotherapy, target both the primary and metastatic disease. Their effects on NETLMs as a subgroup have not been evaluated. Various therapeutic options are available for the treatment of unresectable NETLMs. Most offer significant symptomatic relief, with only a few comparative studies showing survival benefit. Most of the available evidence is based on retrospective and prospective case series rather than randomized controlled trials. Well-designed studies on existing treatment modalities and the search for newer therapeutic options are required.

Hitting the target: where do molecularly targeted therapies fit in the treatment scheduling of neuroendocrine tumours?

Neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) are a rare and heterogeneous group of tumours whose incidence is increasing and their prevalence is now greater than that of any other upper gastrointestinal tumour. Diagnosis can be challenging, and up to 25% of patients present with metastatic disease. Following the recent FDA approval of two new molecularly targeted therapies for the treatment of advanced pancreatic NETs (pNETs), the first in 25 years, we review all systemic therapies and suggest where these newer targeted therapies fit in the treatment schedule for these challenging tumours. Clinical trial data relating to the routine use of sunitinib and everolimus in low-intermediate-grade pNETs are summarised alongside newer molecularly targeted agents undergoing clinical assessment in NETs. We particularly focus on the challenge of optimal scheduling of molecularly targeted treatments around existing systemic and localised treatment such as chemotherapy or radiotargeted therapy. We also discuss application of current evidence to subgroups of patients who have not so far been directly addressed such as those with poorer performance status or patients receiving radical surgery who may benefit from adjuvant treatment.

[Endogenous hyperinsulinism: review and follow-up of 24 cases]

Hypoglycemia due to endogenous hyperinsulinism (EH) is diagnosed in a symptomatic patient with low levels of plasma glucose concomitant with elevated plasma insulin and C-peptide. Causes of EH are pancreatic islet-cells disease, use of insulin secretagogues, and autoimmune hypoglycemia. In this review, the authors studied 24 patients with hypoglycemia due to endogenous hyperinsulinism in order to describe aspects of diagnosis and treatment. Our study demonstrated that after 12 hours of fasting (mini-fasting test; at least three samples), all patients presented the diagnostic criteria for EH. Additionally, we found that 11 of 12 patients (91.7%) who underwent glucagon test achieved glucose levels less than 50 mg/dL and below baseline after 120 minutes. Mini-fasting (3 samples) and glucagon test may be useful to prevent prolonged fasting test to clarify the diagnosis of endogenous hyperinsulinism.

Sunitinib for advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Recent recognition of the high prevalence of neuroendocrine tumors in combination with a sustained failure to improve outcomes for patients with advanced disease has elevated their priority for research and drug development. Sunitinib (SU11248, Sutent; Pfizer Inc. NY, USA) potently inhibits multiple-receptor tyrosine kinases, resulting in antiangiogenic effects. A growing body of evidence indicates angiogenesis is a clinically relevant therapeutic target in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, culminating in a Phase III randomized study of sunitinib in patients with advanced progressive pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Sunitinib has recently gained regulatory approval as a single agent in this setting, and future studies will investigate most appropriate patient selection, and sequencing and combination with other targeted and cytotoxic agents. Here, we discuss in detail the molecular properties, clinical efficacy and safety of sunitinib in the context of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

A new era for the systemic therapy of neuroendocrine tumors

Carcinoids and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are becoming increasingly common, with the majority of patients presenting with either lymph node involvement or metastatic disease. An improved understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in these tumors has implicated several pathways that have led to new therapeutic approaches. In this manuscript, we describe the biology of neuroendocrine tumors and approaches to systemic therapy. We review early data regarding the use of cytotoxics and several recent studies employing more targeted approaches that promise to change the standard of care. Specifically, phase III studies indicate that pharmacologic inhibition of the vascular endothelial growth factor pathway with sunitinib, and of the mammalian target of rapamycin pathway with everolimus, appears to have altered the natural history of these diseases. These successes set the stage for further advances in the management of patients with neuroendocrine tumors.

Medical treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Treatment of the clinically and prognostically heterogeneous neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) should be based on a multidisciplinary approach, including surgical, interventional, medical and nuclear medicine-based therapeutic options. Medical therapies include somatostatin analogues, interferon-α, mTOR inhibitors, multikinase inhibitors and systemic chemotherapy. For the selection of the appropriate medical treatment the hormonal activity, primary tumor localization, tumor grading and growth behaviour as well as the extent of the disease must be considered. Somatostatin analogues are mainly indicated in hormonally active tumors for symptomatic relief, but antiproliferative effects have also been demonstrated, especially in well-differentiated intestinal NET. The efficacy of everolimus and sunitinib in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNET) has been demonstrated in large placebo-controlled clinical trials. pNETs are also chemosensitive. Streptozocin-based chemotherapeutic regimens are regarded as current standard of care. Temozolomide in combination with capecitabine is an alternative that has shown promising results that need to be confirmed in larger trials. Currently, no comparative studies and no molecular markers are established that predict the response to medical treatment. Therefore the choice of treatment for each pNET patient is based on individual parameters taking into account the patient’s preference, expected side effects and established response criteria such as proliferation rate and tumor load. Platin-based chemotherapy is still the standard treatment for poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas. Clearly, there is an unmet need for new systemic treatment options in patients with extrapancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: from genetics to therapy

Well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) comprise ∼1-3% of pancreatic neoplasms. Although long considered as reasonably benign lesions, PanNETs have considerable malignant potential, with a 5-year survival of ∼65% and a 10-year survival of 45% for resected lesions. As PanNETs have a low incidence, they have been understudied, with few advances made until the completion of their exomic sequencing in the past year. In this Review, we summarize some of the latest insights into the genetics of PanNETs, and their probable implications in the context of prognosis and therapy. In particular, we discuss two genes (DAXX and ATRX) that have collectively been identified as mutated in >40% of PanNETs, and the biological and prognostic implications of these novel mutations. The identification of recurrent somatic mutations within the mTOR signaling pathway and the therapeutic implications for personalized therapy in patients with PanNETs are also discussed. Finally, this Review outlines state-of-the-art advances in the biology of PanNETs that are of emerging translational importance.

Emerging therapeutic options for advanced enteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

INTRODUCTION

Several chemotherapy agents and combinations have proven effective in the therapy of advanced enteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (EP-NETs). However, their toxicity can be significant. Recent understanding of the molecular mechanisms of these tumors, especially the central role of tumor angiogenesis, has led to the identification of new therapeutic targets and agents directed at the molecular level.

AREAS COVERED

This paper gives a comprehensive evaluation of the existing therapeutic armamentarium for EP-NETs. Narrated in a historical perspective, this review analyzes the available information on traditional chemotherapy agents, interferon-α and somatostatin analogs, as well as newer therapies and experimental agents.

EXPERT OPINION

Despite recent advances, a curative approach for metastatic EP-NETs is yet to be discovered. To date, sunitinib and everolimus have been shown to impact progression-free survival only in pancreatic NETs, and the duration of this benefit has not yet been established. Further research is necessary to determine whether a combination of these drugs, either together or with other therapies, may yield superior outcomes. Moreover, sequential use of these agents should be explored in an attempt to improve survival. Efficacy of a variety of experimental agents is also being tested in clinical trials.

Safety and efficacy of everolimus in adult patients with neuroendocrine tumors

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) consist of a diverse family of tumors which are derived from the neuroendocrine system. Most NETs are well or moderately differentiated tumors with a relatively indolent growth pattern. However, these tumors can cause significant clinical disease due to release of functional products that mediate the carcinoid syndrome and other diverse sequela. They also can grow progressively and cause symptoms from local invasion or distant metastasis. NETs are optimally treated with surgery and somatosatin analogs (SSA’s) to control symptoms but are relatively insensitive to systemic chemotherapy. As a result, patients with advanced unresectable NETs have a poor prognosis. In 2011, two targeted therapies, sunitinib and everolimus were approved in the subset of progressive pancreatic NETs (pNETs). Everolimus is an oral inhibitor of the growth stimulatory mTOR pathway. In Phase 2 trials in NETs and pNETs, everolimus was well tolerated and associated with some response and widespread disease stabilization. In follow-up, randomized Phase 3 trials, everolimus was compared to placebo. In the RADIANT-2 trial, everolimus and a somatostatin analog were used in patients with functional NETs and treatment was associated with an an improvement in progression-free survival (PFS). In the RADIANT-3 trial, patients with pNET were randomized to receive everolimus or placebo along with best supportive care. Everolimus was again associated with improvement in PFS compared to placebo and it has been approved by the FDA for patients with progressive pNET. Everolimus is associated with frequent low grade toxicity but is also notable for increased rates of infection as well as non-infectious pneumonitis. mTOR inhibition with everolimus represents a significant advance in the treatment of advanced neuroendocrine tumors.

A multimodal approach to the management of neuroendocrine tumour liver metastases

Neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) are often indolent malignancies that commonly present with metastatic disease in the liver. Surgical, locoregional, and systemic treatment modalities are reviewed. A multidisciplinary approach to patient care is suggested to ensure all therapeutic options explored.

Therapeutic management of patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours

Patients with neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) are best managed in a specialist centre as part of a multidisciplinary team comprising gastroenterologists, oncologists, endocrinologists, gastrointestinal and hepatopancreaticobiliary surgeons, pathologists, nuclear medicine physicians and technicians, radiologists, specialist nurses, pharmacists, biochemists and dieticians. This should ideally be led by a clinician with experience and interest in NETs. Although the number of medical treatments and clinical trials has increased in the decade, there is still a lack of prospective randomised trials; thus, management is mainly based on limited often single-centre studies, although there are now formal guidelines based on consensus expert opinion. We have outlined the current optimal management of patients with NETs. We have reviewed therapeutic options including surgery, somatostatin analogues and other biotherapies and peptide receptor-targeted therapy. We have discussed the challenge in managing hepatic metastases including hepatic artery embolisation, ablation and orthotopic liver transplant. In addition, we have briefly reviewed the emerging therapies such as the mammalian target of rapamycin and angiogenic inhibitors and the newer somatostatin analogues.

New therapeutic options for metastatic malignant insulinomas

Insulinomas are the most common, functioning, pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. The great majority (>90%) of insulinomas are nonmetastatic at presentation and can be surgically cured. The <10% patients with distant (liver-bone) metastases have a median survival of < 2 years. Everolimus and sunitinib have been recently introduced as targeted therapies for metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. An additional advantage of everolimus in the treatment of patients with metastatic insulinomas is its capability to increase blood glucose levels. Peptide receptor radiotherapy using radiolabelled somatostatin analogues has also been shown to be successful in controlling tumour growth of metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. In patients with metastatic insulinomas, this therapeutic modality was also effective in controlling hypoglycaemia, even in the presence of tumour regrowth. With the introduction of these new therapeutic modalities, the therapeutic arsenal for the 'tailor-made' approach of patients with metastatic insulinomas is further expanded.

The liver receptor homolog-1 (LRH-1) is expressed in human islets and protects {beta}-cells against stress-induced apoptosis

Liver receptor homolog (LRH-1) is an orphan nuclear receptor (NR5A2) that regulates cholesterol homeostasis and cell plasticity in endodermal-derived tissues. Estrogen increases LRH-1 expression conveying cell protection and proliferation. Independently, estrogen also protects isolated human islets against cytokine-induced apoptosis. Herein, we demonstrate that LRH-1 is expressed in islets, including β-cells, and that transcript levels are modulated by 17β-estradiol through the estrogen receptor (ER)α but not ERβ signaling pathway. Repression of LRH-1 by siRNA abrogated the protective effect conveyed by estrogen on rat islets against cytokines. Adenoviral-mediated overexpression of LRH-1 in human islets did not alter proliferation but conferred protection against cytokines and streptozotocin-induced apoptosis. Expression levels of the cell cycle genes cyclin D1 and cyclin E1 as well as the antiapoptotic gene bcl-xl were unaltered in LRH-1 expressing islets. In contrast, the steroidogenic enzymes CYP11A1 and CYP11B1 involved in glucocorticoid biosynthesis were both stimulated in transduced islets. In parallel, graded overexpression of LRH-1 dose-dependently impaired glucose-induced insulin secretion. Our results demonstrate the crucial role of the estrogen target gene nr5a2 in protecting human islets against-stressed-induced apoptosis. We postulate that this effect is mediated through increased glucocorticoid production that blunts the pro-inflammatory response of islets.

Neuroendocrine carcinoma of unknown primary: a systematic review of the literature and a comparative study with other neuroendocrine tumors

INTRODUCTION

Neuroendocrine carcinomas of unknown primary (NCUP) represent a specific subset with relatively favorable prognosis. Data on biology, management and outcome of NCUP patients have not been systematically reviewed neither compared to those of neuroendocrine tumors of known primary.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We systematically reviewed all publications studying neuroendocrine CUP patients and presented a single center retrospective patient series. In addition, we analyzed and specified the similarities and/or differences between NCUP and other neuroendocrine malignancies.

RESULTS

Five hundred patients with NCUP constituted a heterogeneous cohort in terms of histology, grade, anatomic site and tumor biology in published series and were managed mostly with platinum-based regimens. Among 294 patients with available outcome data, a median survival of 15.5 months (range 11.6-40) was observed. Comparative analysis with neuroendocrine solid tumors (NET) revealed that poorly-differentiated NCUP share an aggressive natural history and a dismal prognosis similar to high grade pulmonary and extrapulmonary neuroendocrine carcinomas (Large Cell Neuroendocrine bronchial Carcinomas, LCNEC and poorly differentiated gastroenteropancreatic tumors, GEP-NET). Well differentiated NCUP reveal a more indolent course with a survival range resembling that of typical and atypical pulmonary carcinoids, well differentiated gastrointestinal NETs and limited small cell lung carcinomas.

CONCLUSION

No evidence for distinct biology or outcome of NCUP patients emerged when histological grade was matched for known primary NETs. The high heterogeneity of the NCUP subgroup limits the potential for identification of reliable prognosticators and hinders development of novel targeted therapies.

Prognostic factors and survival in patients with neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) are uncommon malignancies. The purpose of this study was to identify the prognostic factors of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors at a single center in China. Clinical data of 27 patients with PNETs treated at the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center between January 1995 and December 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. Survival was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier methodology. Twenty-three patients (85.2%) had nonfunctional tumors and four patients (14.8%) had functional tumors. The majority of PNETs located in the body and/or tail of the pancreas in 20 patients (74.1%). All Patients with functional tumors cause syndromes related to hormone overproduction. Anorexia, nausea, vomiting, obstructive jaundice, weight loss, and incidental mass were more common in patients with nonfunctional tumors. The median follow-up time was 40 months. The overall 1-, 2-, and 5-year accumulative survival rates were 91%, 81%, and 81%, respectively. In univariate analysis, factors associating with significantly better survival included macroscopically radical resection of the primary tumor, tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging, World Health Organization (WHO) classification, and palliative chemotherapy. Macroscopically radical resection of the primary tumor, TNM staging, WHO classification, and palliative chemotherapy were prognostic variables which may emerge as a practical clinical tool to predict survival.

Evaluation of the combination 5-fluorouracil, dacarbazine, and epirubicin in patients with advanced well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyze the efficacy and safety of the combination of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), dacarbazine, and epirubicin (FDE) in 39 patients with advanced, well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The primary sites of the disease were the pancreas (16 cases), gastrointestinal tract (12 cases), and extradigestive sites (11 cases). Out of these, 54% of the patients were chemotherapy naive and 74% were progressive. The treatment was a combination of 5-FU 500 mg/m²/day, dacarbazine 250 mg/m²/day for 5 days, and epirubicin 50 mg/m² on day 1, administered every 21 days. Tumoral response was assessed with response evaluation criteria in solid tumors.

RESULTS

Partial response was seen in 17 out of the 39 patients (44%) and the median response duration was 12 months. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 11 and 21 months, respectively. Disease control was achieved in 83% of the 29 patients in progression at the beginning of the treatment. Objective responses were 58%, 25%, and 36%, for pancreatic, gastrointestinal, and extradigestive NETs, respectively. The sole grade 3/4 toxicity was hematologic.

CONCLUSION

The FDE regimen is effective in advanced well-differentiated NETs and represents an interesting alternative to streptozocin-based regimens as first- or second-line therapy.

Everolimus for advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

BACKGROUND

Everolimus, an oral inhibitor of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), has shown antitumor activity in patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, in two phase 2 studies. We evaluated the agent in a prospective, randomized, phase 3 study.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 410 patients who had advanced, low-grade or intermediate-grade pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors with radiologic progression within the previous 12 months to receive everolimus, at a dose of 10 mg once daily (207 patients), or placebo (203 patients), both in conjunction with best supportive care. The primary end point was progression-free survival in an intention-to-treat analysis. In the case of patients in whom radiologic progression occurred during the study, the treatment assignments could be revealed, and patients who had been randomly assigned to placebo were offered open-label everolimus.

RESULTS

The median progression-free survival was 11.0 months with everolimus as compared with 4.6 months with placebo (hazard ratio for disease progression or death from any cause with everolimus, 0.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.27 to 0.45; P<0.001), representing a 65% reduction in the estimated risk of progression or death. Estimates of the proportion of patients who were alive and progression-free at 18 months were 34% (95% CI, 26 to 43) with everolimus as compared with 9% (95% CI, 4 to 16) with placebo. Drug-related adverse events were mostly grade 1 or 2 and included stomatitis (in 64% of patients in the everolimus group vs. 17% in the placebo group), rash (49% vs. 10%), diarrhea (34% vs. 10%), fatigue (31% vs. 14%), and infections (23% vs. 6%), which were primarily upper respiratory. Grade 3 or 4 events that were more frequent with everolimus than with placebo included anemia (6% vs. 0%) and hyperglycemia (5% vs. 2%). The median exposure to everolimus was longer than exposure to placebo by a factor of 2.3 (38 weeks vs. 16 weeks).

CONCLUSIONS

Everolimus, as compared with placebo, significantly prolonged progression-free survival among patients with progressive advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and was associated with a low rate of severe adverse events. (Funded by Novartis Oncology; RADIANT-3 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00510068.).

Sunitinib malate for the treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

BACKGROUND

The multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib has shown activity against pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in preclinical models and phase 1 and 2 trials.

METHODS

We conducted a multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial of sunitinib in patients with advanced, well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. All patients had Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors-defined disease progression documented within 12 months before baseline. A total of 171 patients were randomly assigned (in a 1:1 ratio) to receive best supportive care with either sunitinib at a dose of 37.5 mg per day or placebo. The primary end point was progression-free survival; secondary end points included the objective response rate, overall survival, and safety.

RESULTS

The study was discontinued early, after the independent data and safety monitoring committee observed more serious adverse events and deaths in the placebo group as well as a difference in progression-free survival favoring sunitinib. Median progression-free survival was 11.4 months in the sunitinib group as compared with 5.5 months in the placebo group (hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26 to 0.66; P<0.001). A Cox proportional-hazards analysis of progression-free survival according to baseline characteristics favored sunitinib in all subgroups studied. The objective response rate was 9.3% in the sunitinib group versus 0% in the placebo group. At the data cutoff point, 9 deaths were reported in the sunitinib group (10%) versus 21 deaths in the placebo group (25%) (hazard ratio for death, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.89; P=0.02). The most frequent adverse events in the sunitinib group were diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, asthenia, and fatigue.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuous daily administration of sunitinib at a dose of 37.5 mg improved progression-free survival, overall survival, and the objective response rate as compared with placebo among patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. (Funded by Pfizer; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00428597.).

Pancreatic endocrine tumors

Pancreatic endocrine tumors have been steadily growing in incidence and prevalence during the last two decades, showing an incidence of 4-5/1,000,000 population. They represent a heterogeneous group with very varying tumor biology and prognosis. About half of the patients present clinical symptoms and syndromes related to substances released from the tumors (Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, insulinoma, glucagonoma, etc) and the other half are so-called nonfunctioning tumors mainly presenting with symptoms such as obstruction, jaundice, bleeding, and abdominal mass. Ten percent to 15% of the pancreatic endocrine tumors are part of an inherited syndrome such as multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN-1), von Hippel-Lindau (VHL), neurofibromatosis, or tuberousclerosis. The diagnosis is based on histopathology demonstrating neuroendocrine features such as positive staining for chromogranin A and specific hormones such as gastrin, proinsulin, and glucagon. Moreover, the biochemical diagnosis includes measurement of chromogranins A and B or specific hormones such as gastrin, insulin, glucagon, and vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) in the circulation. In addition to standard localization procedures, radiology (computed tomography [CT] scan, magnetic resonance imaging [MRI], ultrasound [US]), somatostatin receptor scintigraphy, and most recently positron emission tomography with specific isotopes such as (11)C-5 hydroxytryptamin ((11)C-5-HTP), fluorodopa and (68)Ga-1,4,7,10-tetra-azacyclododecane-N,N',N″,N‴-tetra-acetic acid (DOTA)-octreotate are performed. Surgery is still one of the cornerstones in the management of pancreatic endocrine tumors, but curative surgery is rarely obtained in most cases because of metastatic disease. Debulking and other cytoreductive procedures might facilitate systemic treatment. Cytotoxic drugs, biological agents, such as somatostatin analogs, alpha interferons, mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors are routinely used. Tumor-targeted radioactive treatment is available in many centres in Europe and is effective in patients with tumors that express high content of somatostatin receptors type 2 and 5. In the future, treatment will be based on tumor biology and molecular genetics with the aim of so-called personalized medicine.

Novel anticancer agents in clinical trials for well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are rare malignancies that arise from endocrine cells located in various anatomic locations, with a dramatic increase in incidence during the last 30 years. Limited therapeutic options are currently available for patients with advanced well-differentiated NETs, including carcinoids and pancreatic NETs. Streptozotocin-based chemotherapy and somatostatin analogues are drugs that are currently used for the treatment of progressive metastatic NETs. Recently, sunitinib demonstrating efficacy in pancreatic islet cell carcinomas has opened a new avenue for the treatment of NETs, and further trials shall be considered in NET types such as carcinoids, poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas, and several other endocrine tumors that depend on vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)/VEGF receptor for angiogenesis. In addition, drugs with distinct mechanisms of action, such as mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, currently investigated in phase 3 trials, may also supply novel options to control tumor growth and metastasis. Although acknowledged as rare tumors, recent data demonstrated the feasibility of large randomized trials in this disease. Furthermore, data from large trials also showed the importance of selecting an appropriate patient population when designing randomized studies. This review focuses on novel therapeutic approaches in the treatment of well-differentiated NETs. Based on recent data, novel strategies may now be designed using those anticancer agents to optimize the current treatment of patients with NETs.

Advances in the therapy of gastroenteropancreatic-neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NETs)

Neuroendocrine tumours (NET) of the digestive tract comprise a broad range of malignancies. The therapeutic approach to these tumours has not evolved as it did in other tumour types in the last two decades. The deeper knowledge of the underlying molecular biology behind the growth of neuroendocrine cells has brought much information to light. We now know that somatostatin analogues may not only be considered as symptomatic treatment but also as antitumour agents. Sunitinib, a tyrosine kinase (TK) inhibitor with antiangiogenic and antitumoural properties, has been shown to induce significant improvement in progression-free survival in a randomised trial conducted in well-differentiated pancreatic islet-cell NETs. The relevance of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase B/mammalian target of rapamycin (PI3K/Akt/mTOR) pathway seems to be crucial in gastroenteropancreatic (GEP)-NETs. In fact, mTOR inhibitors have shown activity in uncontrolled trials, and large, randomised trial results will be available shortly. In this article, we summarise the most recent available data on medical therapy for GEPNETs.

First-line chemotherapy with capecitabine and temozolomide in patients with metastatic pancreatic endocrine carcinomas

BACKGROUND

Temozolomide is an active agent in metastatic pancreatic endocrine carcinomas. In vitro data indicate that the combination of capecitabine and temozolomide is synergistic for induction of apoptosis in neuroendocrine tumor cell lines. The authors retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of capecitabine and temozolomide in 30 patients with metastatic pancreatic endocrine carcinomas to assess response rate, progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

METHODS

Patients with metastatic, well, or moderately differentiated pancreatic endocrine carcinomas who had not received prior systemic chemotherapy were treated with capecitabine (750 mg/m² twice daily, days 1-14) and temozolomide (200 mg/m² once daily, days 10-14) every 28 days.

RESULTS

Among 30 patients treated, 21 (70%) patients achieved an objective radiographic response. Median progression-free survival was 18 months. The rate of survival at two years was 92%. Only 4 patients (12%) experienced grade 3 or 4 adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of capecitabine and temozolomide is associated with an exceptionally high and durable response rate in metastatic endocrine carcinomas of the pancreas. Clinical endpoints, including response rate, survival, and toxicity, are superior to those observed with streptozocin-based regimens.

Biological characteristics and treatment outcomes of metastatic or recurrent neuroendocrine tumors: tumor grade and metastatic site are important for treatment strategy

BACKGROUND

Studies about the biology, treatment pattern, and treatment outcome of metastatic/recurrent neuroendocrine tumor (NET) have been few.

METHODS

We enrolled patients with metastatic/recurrent NET diagnosed between January 1996 and July 2007 and retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 103 patients were evaluated. Twenty-six patients (25.2%) had pancreatic NET, 27 (26.2%) had gastrointestinal NET, 2 (1.9%) had lung NET, 28 (27.2%) had NET from other sites, and 20 (19.4%) had NET from unknown origin. The liver was the most common metastatic site (68.9%). Thirty-four patients had grade 1 disease, 1 (1.0%) had grade 2 disease, 15 (14.6%) had grade 3 disease, 9 (8.7%) had large cell disease, and 7 (6.8%) had small cell disease.Sixty-six patients received systemic treatment (interferon, somatostatin analogues or chemotherapy), 64 patients received local treatment (TACE, radiofrequency ablation, metastasectomy, etc.). Thirty-six patients received both systemic and local treatments.Median overall survival (OS) was 29.0 months (95% confidence interval, 25.0-33.0) in the 103 patients. OS was significantly influenced by grade (p = .001). OS was 43.0, 23.0, and 29.0 months in patients who received local treatment only, systemic treatment only, and both treatments, respectively (p = .245). The median time-to-progression (TTP) was 6.0 months. Overall response rate was 34.0% and disease-control rate was 64.2%. TTP was influenced by the presence of liver metastasis (p = .011).

CONCLUSIONS

OS of metastatic/recurrent NET was different according to tumor grade. TTP was different according to metastasis site. Therefore, development of optimal treatment strategy based on the characteristics of NET is warranted.

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Somatostatin receptor imaging with [(111)In-DTPA(0))octreotide has proven its role in the diagnosis and staging of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Treatment with radiolabeled somatostatin analogues is a promising new tool in the management of patients with inoperable or metastasized, well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors. Symptomatic improvement may occur with all (111)In, (90)Y, or (177)Lu-labeled somatostatin analogues that have been used for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. The results that were obtained with [(90)Y-DOTA(0), Tyr(3)]octreotide and [(177)Lu-DOTA(0), Tyr(3)]octreotate are very encouraging in terms of tumor regression. Also, if kidney protective agents are used, the side effects of this therapy are few and mild, and the median duration of the therapy response for these radiopharmaceuticals is 30 and 40 months, respectively. The patients' self-assessed quality of life increases significantly after treatment with [(177)Lu-DOTA(0), Tyr(3)]octreotate. Finally, compared with historical controls, there is a benefit in overall survival of several years from time of diagnosis in patients treated with [(177)Lu-DOTA(0), Tyr(3)]octreotate. These data compare favorably with the limited number of alternative treatment approaches. If more widespread use of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy can be guaranteed, such therapy may well become the therapy of first choice in patients with metastasized or inoperable gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin and streptozocin for neuroendocrine tumours

Background:

The role of chemotherapy for neuroendocrine tumours remains controversial and there is no standard regimen.

Method:

We report the outcome for a consecutive series of chemonaive patients with metastatic or locally advanced neuroendocrine tumours treated with a combination of 5-fluorouracil (500 mg m⁻²), cisplatin (70 mg m⁻²) and streptozocin (1000 mg m⁻²) (FCiSt) administered three weekly for up to six cycles. Patients were assessed for radiological response, toxicity and survival.

Results:

In the 79 patients assessable for response, treatment with FCiSt was associated with an overall response rate of 33% (38% for pancreatic primary sites and 25% for non-pancreatic primary sites). Stable disease occurred in a further 51%, with progression in 16%. The median time to progression was 9.1 months and median overall survival was 31.5 months. The most common grade 3–4 toxicity was neutropaenia (28% patients) but grade 3–4 infection was rare (7%). The most frequent non-haematological grade 3–4 toxicity was nausea and vomiting (17%). Prognostic factors included Ki-67, mitotic index, grade and chromogranin A, whereas response to chemotherapy was predicted by mitotic index, grade and α-fetoprotein.

Conclusions:

FCiSt is an effective regimen for neuroendocrine tumours with an acceptable toxicity profile. Grade and mitotic index are the best predictors of response.

Islet cell tumours

Pancreatic endocrine tumours can cause hormonal symptoms by over-secretion of hormones. They are less aggressive than exocrine pancreatic cancer, but carry a variable prognosis. The tumours are either sporadic or hereditary, as part of the multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 syndrome. Despite the rarity of these tumours, they evoke significant interest in the research community and important advances have been made over the past years. This chapter provides an overview of the tumours and recent advances in the field. Hereditary forms of pancreatic endocrine tumours are caused by mutations in the MEN1 gene. Menin, the protein encoded by this gene, has been shown to interact with numerous transcription factors and proteins involved in cell-cycle control, shedding some light on the importance of the protein. Several genes have been shown to be up- or down-regulated, suggesting candidates to be further evaluated for a role in tumourigenesis. Several advances have been made in prognostication; a tumour-node-metastasis system has been evaluated and seems to have prognostic value, and several new molecular prognostic markers are under evaluation. It is hoped that the tumour-node-metastasis system and other prognostic markers will be adopted in clinical routine and improve prognostication and treatment choices. Surgery is still the only cure, but several new palliative drugs and interventions are in use or under investigation. Radiofrequency ablation is increasingly used for liver metastases, and a number of new chemotherapy drugs are being tested. Despite improvements in treatment, no clear improvement in survival has been demonstrated.

Daily oral everolimus activity in patients with metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors after failure of cytotoxic chemotherapy: a phase II trial

PURPOSE No established treatment exists for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (NET) progression after failure of chemotherapy. Everolimus (RAD001), an oral inhibitor of mammalian target of rapamycin, in combination with octreotide has demonstrated encouraging antitumor activity in patients with NETs. PATIENTS AND METHODS This open-label, phase II study assessed the clinical activity of everolimus in patients with metastatic pancreatic NETs who experienced progression on or after chemotherapy. Patients were stratified by prior octreotide therapy (stratum 1: everolimus 10 mg/d, n = 115; stratum 2: everolimus 10 mg/d plus octreotide long-acting release [LAR], n = 45). Tumor assessments (using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) were performed every 3 months. Chromogranin A (CgA) and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) were assessed monthly if elevated at baseline. Trough concentrations of everolimus and octreotide were assessed. Results By central radiology review, in stratum 1, there were 11 partial responses (9.6%), 78 patients (67.8%) with stable disease (SD), and 16 patients (13.9%) with progressive disease; median progression-free survival (PFS) was 9.7 months. In stratum 2, there were two partial responses (4.4%), 36 patients (80%) with SD, and no patients with progressive disease; median PFS was 16.7 months. Patients with an early CgA or NSE response had a longer PFS compared with patients without an early response. Coadministration of octreotide LAR and everolimus did not impact exposure to either drug. Most adverse events were mild to moderate and were consistent with those previously seen with everolimus. CONCLUSION Daily everolimus, with or without concomitant octreotide LAR, demonstrates antitumor activity as measured by objective response rate and PFS and is well tolerated in patients with advanced pancreatic NETs after failure of prior systemic chemotherapy.

Treatment of endocrine pancreatic tumors

Endocrine pancreatic tumors are rare with an incidence of 4 per million inhabitants. Most tumors are malignant except for insulinomas that usually are benign. They are slowly growing in the majority of cases but there are exceptions with rapidly progressing malignant carcinomas. Because of the rarity of these tumors large randomized trials are difficult to accomplish. However, most physicians treating these patients agree that surgery should be considered in all cases and that medical treatment with chemotherapy and biotherapy is well established for this group of patients.

Survival and prognostic factor analysis in patients with metastatic pancreatic endocrine carcinomas

OBJECTIVES

Pancreatic endocrine carcinomas (PECAs) are uncommon, with an incidence of 1 per 100,000. Past studies of chemotherapy and hepatic arterial embolization have described median survival durations of approximately 2 to 3 years. Overall survival from time of diagnosis of metastases has never been reported in a large cohort of patients. Our objective was to evaluate the stage-specific prognosis of patients with metastatic PECAs and to assess the impact of clinical and pathologic prognostic factors.

METHODS

We evaluated all cases of differentiated, metastatic PECAs seen at the H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center between the years 1999 and 2003, measuring survival from time of diagnosis of metastases.

RESULTS

Ninety cases of metastatic PECAs were identified. Median overall survival was 70 months, and the 5-year survival rate was 56%. Age, sex, and tumor type (functional vs nonfunctional) did not impact prognosis. Tumor grade, however, was highly prognostic for survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Median overall survival is 70 months (5.8 years) among patients with metastatic PECAs. This prolonged survival duration may reflect the impact of multimodality treatments. Tumor grade (low vs intermediate grade) represents a highly significant prognostic factor.

Treatment of advanced disease in patients with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors

Well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), which are also referred to as well-differentiated endocrine carcinoma according to WHO terminology, are usually slow-growing cancers, even when they exhibit gross local invasion and/or metastases. The survival of patients with metastatic NET is often measured in years to decades. Once NET progresses or becomes symptomatic the patient's prognosis is poor. An important challenge for clinicians is to distinguish at an early stage those patients who will die with the disease, from those who will succumb because of it, so that the appropriate level of care can be administered. Reliable genomic predictors could provide substantial advancements in prognosis and, possibly, treatment; however, such markers are currently unavailable. Early literature on the treatment of NETs is confounded by a lack of formal objective response criteria. Somatostatin analogs can control symptoms and can stabilize some slow-growing tumors, but rarely result in tumor regression. Surgery is curative in only a minority of patients, and systemic chemotherapy is minimally effective. Advances in the understanding of tumor biology have led to the identification of important cellular processes involved in the pathogenesis of NETs, and agents that target these processes have now entered clinical trials. We will discuss the data on therapies currently used to treat well-differentiated NETs, and the strategies being used in clinical trials.

Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors: pancreatic endocrine tumors

Pancreatic endocrine tumors (PETs) have long fascinated clinicians and investigators despite their relative rarity. Their clinical presentation varies depending on whether the tumor is functional or not, and also according to the specific hormonal syndrome produced. Tumors may be sporadic or inherited, but little is known about their molecular pathology, especially the sporadic forms. Chromogranin A appears to be the most useful serum marker for diagnosis, staging, and monitoring. Initially, therapy should be directed at the hormonal syndrome because this has the major initial impact on the patient's health. Most PETs are relatively indolent but ultimately malignant, except for insulinomas, which predominantly are benign. Surgery is the only modality that offers the possibility of cure, although it generally is noncurative in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome or nonfunctional PETs with multiple endocrine neoplasia-type 1. Preoperative staging of disease extent is necessary to determine the likelihood of complete resection although debulking surgery often is believed to be useful in patients with unresectable tumors. Once metastatic, biotherapy is usually the first modality used because it generally is well tolerated. Systemic or regional therapies generally are reserved until symptoms occur or tumor growth is rapid. Recently, a number of newer agents, as well as receptor-directed radiotherapy, are being evaluated for patients with advanced disease. This review addresses a number of recent advances regarding the molecular pathology, diagnosis, localization, and management of PETs including discussion of peptide-receptor radionuclide therapy and other novel antitumor approaches. We conclude with a discussion of future directions and unsettled problems in the field.

Diagnosis and treatment of gastrinoma in the era of proton pump inhibitors

The Zollinger-Ellison syndrome is characterized pathophysiologically by a significant hypergastrinemia derived from a gastrin-secreting neuroendocrine tumor with a primary location in the pancreas or duodenum. Chronic hypergastrinemia in turn triggers gastric acid hypersecretion yielding in chronic or recurrent or refractory peptic ulcer disease and/or chronic diarrhea. One half of patients with ZES will have distant metastases in the liver by the time the diagnosis is established and one half of all patients with ZES will experience chronic diarrhea as chief complaint rather than peptic ulcer-related symptoms and signs. Gastrinomas have been reported to either manifest sporadically or to occur in conjunction with the genetic background of the MEN-I syndrome. Diagnosis is based on the patients history which is typically characterized by recurrent episodes of peptic ulcer disease or by severe reflux esophagitis and/or diarrhea or by acid-related symptoms which fail to respond to standard treatment regimens. Upper gastrointestinal tract endoscopy will provide evidence for peptic ulcer disease in anatomical regions located aborally the duodenal bulb within the descending part of the duodenum or even farther distally within the jejunum. Peptic ulcers frequently occur in groups indicating some substantial acid hypersecretion. A gastric pH > 2 is mutually exclusive for ZES. Increased serum gastrin levels confirm the diagnosis biochemically. Gastrin secretion can be determined in the basal state or following stimulation with secretin or calcium. High sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of ZES is provided by determining the ratio of basal versus pentagastrin-stimulated gastric acid secretion: The ratio of BAO / MAO > 0.6 is highly specific for gastrinoma. To localize the gastrin-secreting tumor computer-assisted tomography, endoscopic ultrasound, and somatostatin receptor scintigraphy provide useful help but most recently, endoscopic ultrasound with high resolution transducers appear to improve preoperative site localization. If modern imaging techniques fail to elucidate the site of the tumor, intraoperative diaphany may help to detect gastrinomas within the duodenal wall. Definitive treatment will only be achieved by total surgical resection of the gastrin-producing tumor in the pancreas or duodenum including dissection of the regional lymph nodes. Control of symptoms will have to be achieved by administration of highly potent proton pump inhibitors in up to 2-3-fold increased standard doses to inhibit gastric acid hypersecretion. Elevation of gastric pH > 4 will be the therapeutic target to protect the mucosa of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Basal acid output should be reduced to less than 10 mEq H(+) per hour which requires administration of highly potent proton pump inhibitors with a recommended starting dose of 60 mg omeprazole equivalents per day.