1
|
Lee H, Kipnis ST, Niman R, O’Brien SR, Eads JR, Katona BW, Pryma DA. Prediction of 177Lu-DOTATATE Therapy Outcomes in Neuroendocrine Tumor Patients Using Semi-Automatic Tumor Delineation on 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 16:200. [PMID: 38201627 PMCID: PMC10778298 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16010200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Revised: 12/28/2023] [Accepted: 12/29/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment of metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (NET) with 177Lu-DOTATATE peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) results in favorable response only in a subset of patients. We investigated the prognostic value of quantitative pre-treatment semi-automatic 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT analysis in NET patients treated with PRRT. METHODS The medical records of 94 NET patients who received at least one cycle of PRRT at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. On each pre-treatment 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT, the total tumor volume (TTV), maximum tumor standardized uptake value for the patient (SUVmax), and average uptake in the lesion with the lowest radiotracer uptake (SUVmin) were determined with a semi-automatic tumor delineation method. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) among the patients were compared based on optimal cutoff values for the imaging parameters. RESULTS On Kaplan-Meier analysis and univariate Cox regression, significantly shorter PFS was observed in patients with lower SUVmax, lower SUVmin, and higher TTV. On multivariate Cox regression, lower SUVmin and higher TTV remained predictive of shorter PFS. Only higher TTV was found to be predictive of shorter OS on Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses. In a post hoc Kaplan-Meier analysis, patients with at least one high-risk feature (low SUVmin or high TTV) showed shorter PFS and OS, which may be the most convenient parameter to measure in clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS The tumor volume and lowest lesion uptake on 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT can predict disease progression following PRRT in NET patients, with the former also predictive of overall survival. NET patients at risk for poor outcomes following PRRT can be identified with semi-automated quantitative analysis of 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hwan Lee
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Sarit T. Kipnis
- Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20007, USA
| | - Remy Niman
- MIM Software Inc., Cleveland, OH 44122, USA
| | - Sophia R. O’Brien
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Jennifer R. Eads
- Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Bryson W. Katona
- Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Daniel A. Pryma
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Eads JR, Halfdanarson TR, Asmis T, Bellizzi AM, Bergsland EK, Dasari A, El-Haddad G, Frumovitz M, Meyer J, Mittra E, Myrehaug S, Nakakura E, Raj N, Soares HP, Untch B, Vijayvergia N, Chan JA. Expert Consensus Practice Recommendations of the North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society for the management of high grade gastroenteropancreatic and gynecologic neuroendocrine neoplasms. Endocr Relat Cancer 2023; 30:e220206. [PMID: 37184955 PMCID: PMC10388681 DOI: 10.1530/erc-22-0206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 05/16/2023]
Abstract
High-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms are a rare disease entity and account for approximately 10% of all neuroendocrine neoplasms. Because of their rarity, there is an overall lack of prospectively collected data available to advise practitioners as to how best to manage these patients. As a result, best practices are largely based on expert opinion. Recently, a distinction was made between well-differentiated high-grade (G3) neuroendocrine tumors and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas, and with this, pathologic details, appropriate imaging practices and treatment have become more complex. In an effort to provide practitioners with the best guidance for the management of patients with high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract, pancreas, and gynecologic system, the North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society convened a panel of experts to develop a set of recommendations and a treatment algorithm that may be used by practitioners for the care of these patients. Here, we provide consensus recommendations from the panel on pathology, imaging practices, management of localized disease, management of metastatic disease and surveillance and draw key distinctions as to the approach that should be utilized in patients with well-differentiated G3 neuroendocrine tumors vs poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer R Eads
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Tim Asmis
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrew M Bellizzi
- Department of Pathology, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Emily K Bergsland
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Arvind Dasari
- Division of Gastrointestinal Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ghassan El-Haddad
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Michael Frumovitz
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Joshua Meyer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Erik Mittra
- Division of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Sten Myrehaug
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Eric Nakakura
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Nitya Raj
- Department of Medicine, Gastrointestinal Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Heloisa P Soares
- Division of Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Brian Untch
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Namrata Vijayvergia
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jennifer A Chan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cannas S, Till JE, Kim K, LaRiviere MJ, Vollmer CM, Eads JR, Karasic TB, O'Dwyer PJ, Schneider CJ, Teitelbaum UR, Binder KAR, O'Hara MH, Ross DT, McGregor K, Bornemann-Kolatzki K, Schütz E, Beck J, Carpenter EL. Abstract 1043: Liquid biopsy signature combining copy number instability and mutant KRAS detection is associated with survival for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2023-1043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/07/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction: In the setting of metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPDAC), lower baseline plasma KRAS mutation levels have been associated with improved survival. While tissue-agnostic, plasma-based copy number instability (CNI) has been demonstrated as an early indicator of response to immunotherapy for some solid tumors, it has not been assessed for patients with mPDAC, nor in combination with KRAS mutations for patients receiving standard of care chemo/radiotherapy. Here we evaluate the combination of mutant KRAS (mKRAS) and CNI detection in plasma as a predictor of overall and progression-free survival (OS/PFS) in mPDAC patients who received standard of care therapy.
Methods: Cell-free DNA was extracted from plasma and libraries prepared at baseline (Week 0) and weeks 8, 16 and 24 on therapy, and analyzed by next-generation sequencing (CNI) and droplet digital PCR (mKRAS). Descriptive statistics were computed for variables including CNI (score is a measure of circulating tumor DNA) and mKRAS variant allele fraction. Detection was defined as above the limit of detection (mKRAS=0.13%) and above the 95th percentile of the value in normal individuals (CNI=24). Therapy response was assessed by OS and PFS.
Results: 196 plasma samples from 64 mPDAC patients were analyzed. When dichotomized as detectable vs undetectable, CNI alone was significantly associated with OS at all on-therapy timepoints but not baseline, whereas mKRAS was significantly associated with OS for all 4 timepoints (Table 1). Detection of both CNI and mKRAS in combination was strongly associated with worse OS at all timepoints, yielding the highest HR. Similar results were obtained when mKRAS and CNI were dichotomized at their respective median values or with PFS as the clinical endpoint.
Conclusions: Combined CNI and mKRAS detection at baseline and on-therapy may provide a strong and early indication of worse prognosis for patients with mPDAC.
Table 1. Association of CNI and mKRAS with Overall Survival (HazardRatio [95% CI], log-rank p-value) Timepoint CNI mKRAS CNI and KRAS Baseline/Week 0 1.54 [0.89-2.68], 0.1 2.05 [1.12-3.78], 0.02 2.50 [1.46-4.28], 0.0006 Week 8 1.78 [0.99-3.18], 0.05 2.21 [1.19-4.08], 0.01 9.81 [3.40-28.28], <0.0001 Week 16 1.91 [1.03-3.53], 0.04 3.26 [1.60-6.62], 0.0006 11.11 [4.28-28.83], <0.0001 Week 24 2.55 [1.28-5.09], 0.006 4.55 [2.03-10.23], <0.0001 6.42 [2.61-15.84], <0.0001
Citation Format: Samuele Cannas, Jacob E. Till, Kristine Kim, Michael J. LaRiviere, Charles M. Vollmer, Jennifer R. Eads, Thomas B. Karasic, Peter J. O'Dwyer, Charles J. Schneider, Ursina R. Teitelbaum, Kim A. Reiss Binder, Mark H. O'Hara, Douglas T. Ross, Kim McGregor, Kirsten Bornemann-Kolatzki, Ekkehard Schütz, Julia Beck, Erica L. Carpenter. Liquid biopsy signature combining copy number instability and mutant KRAS detection is associated with survival for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 1043.
Collapse
|
4
|
Karasic TB, Eads JR, Goyal L. Precision Medicine and Immunotherapy Have Arrived for Cholangiocarcinoma: An Overview of Recent Approvals and Ongoing Clinical Trials. JCO Precis Oncol 2023; 7:e2200573. [PMID: 37053534 PMCID: PMC10309532 DOI: 10.1200/po.22.00573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 04/15/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas B. Karasic
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Jennifer R. Eads
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Lipika Goyal
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Stanford Cancer Center, Palo Alto, CA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) are the most common type of neuroendocrine tumors and are being increasingly identified in clinical practice. The diagnosis, staging, management, and surveillance of GEP-NETs rely heavily on endoscopy, and consequently, it is important for gastroenterologists to have a solid understanding of these tumors. This article reviews the presentation, diagnosis, and management of both localized and advanced GEP-NETs, with increased emphasis on the role of endoscopy, to enable gastroenterologists and other practitioners to have the necessary tools for the care of patients with these tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Conrad J Fernandes
- Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard, 751 South Pavilion, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Galen Leung
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard, 751 South Pavilion, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Jennifer R Eads
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard, 751 South Pavilion, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Bryson W Katona
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard, 751 South Pavilion, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tarhini AA, Eads JR, Moore KN, Tatard-Leitman V, Wright J, Forde PM, Ferris RL. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy of locoregionally advanced solid tumors. J Immunother Cancer 2022; 10:jitc-2022-005036. [PMID: 35973745 PMCID: PMC9386211 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2022-005036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Definitive management of locoregionally advanced solid tumors presents a major challenge and often consists of a combination of surgical, radiotherapeutic and systemic therapy approaches. Upfront surgical treatment with or without adjuvant radiotherapy carries the risks of significant morbidities and potential complications that could be lasting. In addition, these patients continue to have a high risk of local or distant disease relapse despite the use of standard adjuvant therapy. Preoperative neoadjuvant systemic therapy has the potential to significantly improve clinical outcomes, particularly in this era of expanding immunotherapeutic agents that have transformed the care of patients with metastatic/unresectable malignancies. Tremendous progress has been made with neoadjuvant immunotherapy in the treatment of several locoregionally advanced resectable solid tumors leading to ongoing phase 3 trials and change in clinical practice. The promise of neoadjuvant immunotherapy has been supported by the high pathologic tumor response rates in early trials as well as the durability of these responses making cure a more achievable potential outcome compared with other forms of systemic therapy. Furthermore, neoadjuvant studies allow the assessment of radiologic and pathological responses and the access to biospecimens before and during systemic therapy. Pathological responses may guide future treatment decisions, and biospecimens allow the conduct of mechanistic and biomarker studies that may guide future drug development. On behalf of the National Cancer Institute Early Drug Development Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy Working Group, this article summarizes the current state of neoadjuvant immunotherapy of solid tumors focusing primarily on locoregionally advanced melanoma, gynecologic malignancies, gastrointestinal malignancies, non-small cell lung cancer and head and neck cancer including recent advances and our expert recommendations related to future neoadjuvant trial designs and associated clinical and translational research questions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmad A Tarhini
- Cutaneous Oncology and Immunology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Jennifer R Eads
- Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Kathleen N Moore
- Gynecologic Oncology, The University of Oklahoma Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| | | | - John Wright
- National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Patrick M Forde
- Oncology, Johns Hopkins University Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Robert L Ferris
- Otolaryngology and Immunology, University of Pittsburgh & UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Chapin WJ, Till JE, Hwang WT, Eads JR, Karasic TB, O'Dwyer PJ, Schneider CJ, Teitelbaum UR, Romeo J, Black TA, Christensen TE, Redlinger Tabery C, Anderson A, Slade M, LaRiviere M, Yee SS, Reiss KA, O'Hara MH, Carpenter EL. Multianalyte Prognostic Signature Including Circulating Tumor DNA and Circulating Tumor Cells in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. JCO Precis Oncol 2022; 6:e2200060. [PMID: 35939771 PMCID: PMC9384952 DOI: 10.1200/po.22.00060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Revised: 03/24/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is associated with a poor prognosis. Multianalyte signatures, including liquid biopsy and traditional clinical variables, have shown promise for improving prognostication in other solid tumors but have not yet been rigorously assessed for PDAC. MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed a prospective cohort study of patients with newly diagnosed locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) or metastatic PDAC (mPDAC) who were planned to undergo systemic therapy. We collected peripheral blood before systemic therapy and assessed circulating tumor cells (CTCs), cell-free DNA concentration (cfDNA), and circulating tumor KRAS (ctKRAS)-variant allele fraction (VAF). Association of variables with overall survival (OS) was assessed in univariate and multivariate survival analysis, and comparisons were made between models containing liquid biopsy variables combined with traditional clinical prognostic variables versus models containing traditional clinical prognostic variables alone. RESULTS One hundred four patients, 40 with LAPC and 64 with mPDAC, were enrolled. CTCs, cfDNA concentration, and ctKRAS VAF were all significantly higher in patients with mPDAC than patients with LAPC. ctKRAS VAF (cube root; 0.05 unit increments; hazard ratio, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.21; P = .01), and CTCs ≥ 1/mL (hazard ratio, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.34 to 3.69; P = .002) were significantly associated with worse OS in multivariate analysis while cfDNA concentration was not. A model selected by backward selection containing traditional clinical variables plus liquid biopsy variables had better discrimination of OS compared with a model containing traditional clinical variables alone (optimism-corrected Harrell's C-statistic 0.725 v 0.681). CONCLUSION A multianalyte prognostic signature containing CTCs, ctKRAS, and cfDNA concentration outperformed a model containing traditional clinical variables alone suggesting that CTCs, ctKRAS, and cfDNA provide prognostic information complementary to traditional clinical variables in advanced PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William J. Chapin
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Jacob E. Till
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Wei-Ting Hwang
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Jennifer R. Eads
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Thomas B. Karasic
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Peter J. O'Dwyer
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Charles J. Schneider
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Ursina R. Teitelbaum
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Janae Romeo
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Taylor A. Black
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Theresa E. Christensen
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Colleen Redlinger Tabery
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | - Michael LaRiviere
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Stephanie S. Yee
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Kim A. Reiss
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Mark H. O'Hara
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Erica L. Carpenter
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lee H, Nakamoto R, Moore SE, Pantel AR, Eads JR, Aparici CM, Pryma DA. Response to Letter to Editor re: "Combined Quantification of 18F-FDG and 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT for Prognosis in High-Grade Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms". Acad Radiol 2022; 29:1453. [PMID: 35227613 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2022.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2022] [Accepted: 02/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
9
|
Lau-Min KS, Li Y, Eads JR, Mamtani R, Getz KD. Association between timely targeted treatment and outcomes in patients with metastatic HER2-overexpressing gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. Cancer 2022; 128:1853-1862. [PMID: 35119688 PMCID: PMC9007872 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2021] [Revised: 12/21/2021] [Accepted: 12/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Timely targeted treatment initiation can be challenging because additional biomarker testing is needed for eligibility. The authors hypothesized that timely targeted treatment improves survival relative to nontimely initiation in metastatic HER2+ gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA). METHODS The authors performed a retrospective cohort study of metastatic HER2+ GEA treated with first-line (1L) systemic therapy from January 2011 to December 2017 using a nationwide electronic health record-derived deidentified database. Timely targeted treatment-trastuzumab initiation within 14 days after starting 1L chemotherapy-was assessed as a time-varying exposure. Nontimely targeted treatment included patients who initiated trastuzumab after 14 days or who lacked documentation of receiving trastuzumab. Extended Cox regressions compared overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) between timely and nontimely groups. RESULTS A total of 320 patients were included; 59.1% received timely trastuzumab. Relative to nontimely initiation, timely trastuzumab was associated with significantly higher OS (2-year OS, 32.1% vs 15.3%; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.67; 95% CI, 0.51-0.88) and PFS (2-year PFS, 9.2% vs 3.7%; adjusted HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.55-0.93). Results remained similar in sensitivity analyses 1) using alternative "timeliness" definitions up to 70 days after starting 1L chemotherapy, 2) comparing any trastuzumab, regardless of timing of initiation, to no trastuzumab, and 3) excluding patients lacking documentation of receiving trastuzumab. CONCLUSIONS Improved survival was observed among metastatic HER2+ GEA patients treated with trastuzumab versus those who were not, regardless of timing of initiation. Although these results reassure clinicians that modest targeted treatment delays may not be detrimental to outcomes, efforts should still ensure that all metastatic HER2+ GEA patients receive trastuzumab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelsey S Lau-Min
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Penn Center for Cancer Care Innovation, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Yimei Li
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Division of Oncology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jennifer R Eads
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Ronac Mamtani
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Penn Center for Cancer Care Innovation, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Kelly D Getz
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Center for Pediatric Clinical Effectiveness, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Eads JR. Is it Time Yet for Adjuvant Immunotherapy for Patients with DNA Mismatch Repair Deficient Gastric Cancer? Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:2141-2143. [PMID: 35084626 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-11141-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2021] [Accepted: 11/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer R Eads
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Chapin WJ, Massa RC, Eads JR. Evolving standards of care for neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy in esophageal, gastroesophageal junction, and gastric cncer. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol 2021; 19:784-793. [PMID: 34928934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Multimodality therapy, which can include systemic therapy, radiation therapy, and surgery, is the preferred approach for most localized, clinical T2 to T4, and/or node-positive esophageal, gastroesophageal junction, and gastric cancers. The optimal content and sequence of perioperative treatment of patients with different sites of disease and tumor histologic types continue to evolve. This review highlights the current standard-of-care approaches and areas of ongoing clinical research, including biomarker-directed therapy, pertaining to the treatment of esophageal, gastroesophageal junction, and gastric cancers in patients who are candidates for therapy with curative intent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William J Chapin
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Ryan C Massa
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jennifer R Eads
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Eads JR. Cardiovascular Concerns in the Management of Esophageal Cancer Patients. JACC CardioOncol 2021; 3:722-724. [PMID: 34988481 PMCID: PMC8702797 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccao.2021.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer R. Eads
- University of Pennsylvania, Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lee H, Nakamoto R, Moore SE, Pantel AR, Eads JR, Aparici CM, Pryma DA. Combined Quantification of 18F-FDG and 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT for Prognosis in High-Grade Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms. Acad Radiol 2021; 29:1308-1316. [PMID: 34836776 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2021.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2021] [Revised: 10/04/2021] [Accepted: 10/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES High-grade gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (G3 GEP-NENs) are pathologically classified into well differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (G3 NETs) and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (G3 NECs). Using a novel parameter, we examined the prognostic value of 18F-FDG and 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT quantification in comparison to pathologic assessment in G3 GEP-NENs. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 31 patients with G3 GEP-NENs were reviewed. For each patient, the SUVmax on 18F-FDG and 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT were used to calculate the FDG-DOTATATE-Z (FDZ) score: a continuous parameter that increases with 68Ga-DOTATATE uptake and decreases with 18F-FDG uptake. The variation in the FDZ score with respect to pathologic variables was examined. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were performed to evaluate the effect of FDZ score on overall survival. An external cohort of 21 patients was used for validation. RESULTS The FDZ score was significantly higher in G3 NETs compared to G3 NECs (p<0.001), and was inversely correlated with Ki67 index (R2=0.33, p<0.001). Patients in the FDZ>0.05 group showed significantly longer survival compared to those in the FDZ≤0.05 group, with median of 34.9 vs. 12.0 months (p<0.001). On univariate regression, FDZ>0.05 (p=0.005), well differentiated disease (p=0.044), and lower Ki67 index (p=0.042) were predictors of survival. On multivariate regression, only FDZ>0.05 could independently predict longer survival with HR=0.16 (p=0.018), which was reproduced in the external validation cohort. CONCLUSION Combined quantification of 18F-FDG and 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT into a novel parameter, the FDZ score, reflects the pathologic characteristics of G3 GEP-NENs and is a prognostic indicator of overall survival independent of differentiation.
Collapse
|
14
|
Eads JR, Haller DG. Primary Chemoradiotherapy for Older Patients With Esophageal Cancer. JAMA Oncol 2021; 7:1451-1452. [PMID: 34351378 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.2668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer R Eads
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Daniel G Haller
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lau-Min KS, Li Y, Eads JR, Wang X, Meropol NJ, Mamtani R, Getz KD. Adherence to and determinants of guideline-recommended biomarker testing and targeted therapy in patients with gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: Insights from routine practice. Cancer 2021; 127:2562-2570. [PMID: 33730386 PMCID: PMC8249344 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2020] [Revised: 01/22/2021] [Accepted: 02/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anti human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (anti-HER2) therapy with trastuzumab improves overall survival in patients with advanced, HER2-positive gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA) and is now incorporated into national guidelines. However, little is known about adherence to and determinants of timely HER2 testing and trastuzumab initiation in routine practice. METHODS The authors performed a cross-sectional study of patients who had advanced GEA diagnosed between January 2011 and June 2019 in a nationwide electronic health record-derived database. The annual prevalences of both timely HER2 testing (defined within 21 days after advanced diagnosis) and timely trastuzumab initiation (defined within 14 days after a positive HER2 result) were calculated. Log-binomial regressions estimated adjusted prevalence ratios comparing timely HER2 testing and trastuzumab initiation by patient and tumor characteristics. RESULTS In total, the cohort included 6032 patients with advanced GEA of whom 1007 were HER2-positive. Between 2011 and 2019, timely HER2 testing increased from 22.4% to 44.5%, whereas timely trastuzumab initiation remained stable at 16.3%. No appreciable differences in timely testing or trastuzumab initiation were noted by age, sex, race, or insurance status. Compared with patients who had metastatic disease at diagnosis, patients who had early stage GEA who did not undergo surgery were less likely to receive timely HER2 testing and trastuzumab initiation (testing prevalence ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.64-0.75; treatment prevalence ratio, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.18-0.56), as were patients with early stage disease who subsequently developed a distant recurrence (testing prevalence ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.47-0.65; treatment prevalence ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.24-1.55). CONCLUSIONS In patients with advanced GEA, guideline-recommended HER2 testing and anti-HER2 therapy remain underused. Uptake may improve with universal HER2 testing regardless of stage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelsey S. Lau-Min
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Penn Center for Cancer Care Innovation, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Yimei Li
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Jennifer R. Eads
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | - Ronac Mamtani
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Penn Center for Cancer Care Innovation, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Kelly D. Getz
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kipnis ST, Hung M, Kumar S, Heckert JM, Lee H, Bennett B, Soulen MC, Pryma DA, Mankoff DA, Metz DC, Eads JR, Katona BW. Laboratory, Clinical, and Survival Outcomes Associated With Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy in Patients With Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e212274. [PMID: 33755166 PMCID: PMC7988364 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.2274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is approved in the US for treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), but data on PRRT outcomes within US populations remain scarce. OBJECTIVE To analyze the first 2 years of PRRT implementation at a US-based NET referral center. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cohort study was conducted using medical records of patients with metastatic NET receiving PRRT from 2018 through 2020 in a NET program at a tertiary referral center. Included patients were those at the center with metastatic NETs who received at least 1 dose of PRRT over the study period. Laboratory toxic effects were assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Tumor response was determined using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1. Survival analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival. Data were analyzed from August 2018 through August 2020. EXPOSURES Receiving 4 cycles of lutetium-177-dotatate infusion, separated by 8-week intervals targeted to 7.4 GBq (200 mCi) per dose. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Data were compared from before and after PRRT to determine hematologic, liver, and kidney toxic effects and to assess tumor progression and patient survival. RESULTS Among 78 patients receiving at least 1 dose of PRRT, median (interquartile range) age at PRRT initiation was 59.8 (53.5-69.2) years and 39 (50.0%) were men. The most common primary NET sites included small bowel, occurring in 34 patients (43.6%), and pancreas, occurring in 22 patients (28.2%). World Health Organization grade 1 or 2 tumors occurred in 62 patients (79.5%). Among all patients, 56 patients underwent pretreatment with tumor resection (71.8%), 49 patients received nonsomatostatin analogue systemic therapy (62.8%), and 49 patients received liver-directed therapy (62.8%). At least 1 grade 2 or greater toxic effect was found in 47 patients (60.3%). Median PFS was 21.6 months for the study group, was not reached by 22 months for patients with small bowel primary tumors, and was 13.3 months for patients with pancreatic primary tumors. Having a small bowel primary tumor was associated with a lower rate of progression compared with having a pancreatic primary tumor (hazard ratio, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.07-0.55; P = .01). Median overall survival was not reached. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This cohort study of patients with metastatic NETs found that PRRT was associated with laboratory-measured toxic effects during treatment for most patients and an overall median PFS of 21.6 months. Patients with small bowel NETs had longer PFS after PRRT compared with patients with pancreatic NETs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarit T. Kipnis
- Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Matthew Hung
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Shria Kumar
- Division of Gastroenterology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Jason M. Heckert
- Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Hwan Lee
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Bonita Bennett
- Division of Gastroenterology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Michael C. Soulen
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Daniel A. Pryma
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - David A. Mankoff
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - David C. Metz
- Division of Gastroenterology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Jennifer R. Eads
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Bryson W. Katona
- Division of Gastroenterology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Dreyfuss AD, Barsky AR, Wileyto EP, Eads JR, Kucharczuk JC, Williams NN, Karasic TB, Metz JM, Ben-Josef E, Plastaras JP, Wojcieszynski AP. The efficacy and safety of definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy for non-operable esophageal cancer. Cancer Med 2021; 10:1275-1288. [PMID: 33474812 PMCID: PMC7926027 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3724] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2020] [Revised: 12/16/2020] [Accepted: 12/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To report outcomes and toxicity in patients who received definitive concurrent chemoradiation (DCCRT) for non‐operable esophageal cancer (EC) in the modern era, and to identify markers of overall and disease‐free survival (OS/DFS). Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with unresectable EC who received DCCRT at our institution between 1/2008 and 1/2019. Descriptive statistics were used to report disease‐control outcomes and CTCAE v4.0–5.0 toxicities. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression, and stepwise regression were used to identify associations with survival. Results At a median follow‐up of 19.5 months, 130 patients with adenocarcinoma (AC) (62%) or squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (38%) were evaluable (Stage II‐III: 92%). Patients received carboplatin/paclitaxel (75%) or fluorouracil‐based (25%) concurrent chemotherapy. Median total RT dose was 50.4 Gy (range, 44.7–71.4 Gy) delivered in 28 fractions (24–35). Locoregional and distant recurrence occurred in 30% and 35% of AC, and 24% and 33% of SCC, respectively. Median OS and DFS were 22.9 and 10.7 months in AC, and 25.7 and 20.2 months in SCC, respectively. On stepwise regression, tumor stage, feeding tube during DCCRT, and change in primary tumor PET/CT SUVmax were significantly associated with OS and DFS. Most severe toxicities were acute grade 4 hematologic cytopenia (6%) and radiation dermatitis (1%). Most common acute grade 3 toxicities were hematologic cytopenia (35%), dysphagia (23%), and anorexia (19%). Conclusions Treatment of non‐operable EC with DCCRT has acceptable toxicity and can provide multi‐year disease control for some patients, even in AC. Continued follow‐up and investigation in large studies would be useful.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra D Dreyfuss
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Andrew R Barsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - E Paul Wileyto
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jennifer R Eads
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - John C Kucharczuk
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Noel N Williams
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Thomas B Karasic
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - James M Metz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Edgar Ben-Josef
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - John P Plastaras
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Andrzej P Wojcieszynski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Lee H, Eads JR, Pryma DA. 68 Ga-DOTATATE Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography Quantification Predicts Response to Somatostatin Analog Therapy in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors. Oncologist 2021; 26:21-29. [PMID: 32886441 PMCID: PMC7794177 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2020-0165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2020] [Accepted: 08/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Somatostatin analogs (SSAs) are the frontline antitumor therapy in advanced well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs). A subset of patients demonstrate early disease progression on SSA therapy, yet the currently known predictors for treatment failure lack specificity to affect therapeutic decision. SSAs target tumor somatostatin receptors, the level of which can be quantitatively assessed with 68 Ga-DOTATATE positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT). We investigated the ability of 68 Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT to predict response to SSA therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS The records of 108 consecutive patients with well-differentiated grade 1-2 GEP-NETs on SSA monotherapy who received 68 Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT scans were retrospectively reviewed to obtain baseline characteristics, 68 Ga-DOTATATE maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), and progression-free survival (PFS) data. The optimal SUVmax cutoff for patient stratification was obtained with receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. PFS in the high versus low SUVmax groups was compared with Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. The effects of baseline characteristics and SUVmax on PFS were examined with univariate and multivariate Cox regression. RESULTS 68 Ga-DOTATATE SUVmax predicted therapeutic failure with sensitivity and specificity of 39% and 98%, respectively. SUVmax of <18.35 was associated with shorter PFS, which was reproduced in the subgroup analysis of SSA-naïve patients. Low SUVmax was the only predictor of early treatment failure (hazard ratio, 6.85) in multivariate analysis, as well as in the subgroup analysis of grade 2 GEP-NETs. CONCLUSION Low SUVmax on 68 Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT independently predicts early failure on SSA monotherapy in patients with well-differentiated grade 1-2 GEP-NET. Patients with lack of expected benefit from SSA therapy can be readily identified using routine 68 Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT with very high specificity. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Based on 68 Ga-DOTATATE positron emission tomography-computed tomography imaging, clinicians can better inform patients on the expected benefit of somatostatin analog therapy for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, especially when access to the therapy is difficult, and offer proactive discussion on alternative management options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hwan Lee
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of MedicinePhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Jennifer R. Eads
- Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of MedicinePhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Daniel A. Pryma
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of MedicinePhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Eads JR, Reidy-Lagunes D, Soares HP, Chan JA, Anthony LB, Halfdanarson TR, Naraev BG, Wolin EM, Halperin DM, Li D, Pommier RF, Zacks JS, Morse MA, Metz DC. Differential Diagnosis of Diarrhea in Patients With Neuroendocrine Tumors. Pancreas 2020; 49:1123-1130. [PMID: 32991344 DOI: 10.1097/mpa.0000000000001658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and carcinoid syndrome experience diarrhea that can have a debilitating effect on quality of life. Diarrhea also may develop in response to other hormonal syndromes associated with NETs, surgical complications, medical comorbidities, medications, or food sensitivities. Limited guidance on the practical approach to the differential diagnosis of diarrhea in these patients can lead to delays in appropriate treatment. This clinical review and commentary underscore the complexity in identifying the etiology of diarrhea in patients with NETs. Based on our collective experience and expertise, we offer a practical algorithm to guide medical oncologists and other care providers to expedite effective management of diarrhea and related symptoms in patients with NETs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer R Eads
- From the Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Diane Reidy-Lagunes
- Department of Medicine, Division of Solid Tumor, Gastrointestinal Malignancies, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Heloisa P Soares
- Division of Medical Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Jennifer A Chan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Lowell B Anthony
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY
| | | | - Boris G Naraev
- Division of Cancer Medicine, Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, AZ
| | - Edward M Wolin
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine, Center for Carcinoid and Neuroendocrine Tumors, Tisch Cancer Institute, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Daniel M Halperin
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Daneng Li
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA
| | - Rodney F Pommier
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
| | - Jerome S Zacks
- Department of Medicine (Cardiology), The Mount Sinai School of Medicine, The Carcinoid Heart Center, New York, NY
| | - Michael A Morse
- Department of Medical Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - David C Metz
- Division of Gastroenterology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Zhao Y, Feng X, Chen Y, Selfridge JE, Gorityala S, Du Z, Wang JM, Hao Y, Cioffi G, Conlon RA, Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Saltzman J, Krishnamurthi SS, Vinayak S, Veigl M, Xu Y, Bajor DL, Markowitz SD, Meropol NJ, Eads JR, Wang Z. 5-Fluorouracil Enhances the Antitumor Activity of the Glutaminase Inhibitor CB-839 against PIK3CA-Mutant Colorectal Cancers. Cancer Res 2020; 80:4815-4827. [PMID: 32907836 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-20-0600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2020] [Revised: 07/06/2020] [Accepted: 09/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PIK3CA encodes the p110α catalytic subunit of PI3K and is frequently mutated in human cancers, including ∼30% of colorectal cancer. Oncogenic mutations in PIK3CA render colorectal cancers more dependent on glutamine. Here we report that the glutaminase inhibitor CB-839 preferentially inhibits xenograft growth of PIK3CA-mutant, but not wild-type (WT), colorectal cancers. Moreover, the combination of CB-839 and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) induces PIK3CA-mutant tumor regression in xenograft models. CB-839 treatment increased reactive oxygen species and caused nuclear translocation of Nrf2, which in turn upregulated mRNA expression of uridine phosphorylase 1 (UPP1). UPP1 facilitated the conversion of 5-FU to its active compound, thereby enhancing the inhibition of thymidylate synthase. Consistently, knockout of UPP1 abrogated the tumor inhibitory effect of combined CB-839 and 5-FU administration. A phase I clinical trial showed that the combination of CB-839 and capecitabine, a prodrug of 5-FU, was well tolerated at biologically-active doses. Although not designed to test efficacy, an exploratory analysis of the phase I data showed a trend that PIK3CA-mutant patients with colorectal cancer might derive greater benefit from this treatment strategy as compared with PIK3CA WT patients with colorectal cancer. These results effectively demonstrate that targeting glutamine metabolism may be an effective approach for treating patients with PIK3CA-mutant colorectal cancers and warrants further clinical evaluation. SIGNIFICANCE: Preclinical and clinical trial data suggest that the combination of CB-839 with capecitabine could serve as an effective treatment for PIK3CA-mutant colorectal cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yiqing Zhao
- Department of Genetics and Genome Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.,Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Xiujing Feng
- Department of Genetics and Genome Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.,Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Yicheng Chen
- Department of Genetics and Genome Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.,Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - J Eva Selfridge
- Department of Genetics and Genome Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.,Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.,Seidman Cancer Center, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | - Zhanwen Du
- Department of Genetics and Genome Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.,Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Janet M Wang
- Department of Genetics and Genome Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Yujun Hao
- Department of Genetics and Genome Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.,Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Gino Cioffi
- Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Ronald A Conlon
- Department of Genetics and Genome Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.,Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.,Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Joel Saltzman
- Seidman Cancer Center, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio.,Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Smitha S Krishnamurthi
- Seidman Cancer Center, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio.,Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Shaveta Vinayak
- Seidman Cancer Center, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio.,Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Martina Veigl
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.,Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Yan Xu
- Department of Chemistry, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - David L Bajor
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.,Seidman Cancer Center, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio.,Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Sanford D Markowitz
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.,Seidman Cancer Center, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio.,Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Neal J Meropol
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.,Seidman Cancer Center, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio.,Flatiron Health, New York, New York
| | - Jennifer R Eads
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio. .,Seidman Cancer Center, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio.,Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Zhenghe Wang
- Department of Genetics and Genome Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio. .,Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Goyal L, Sirard C, Schrag M, Kagey MH, Eads JR, Stein S, El-Khoueiry AB, Manji GA, Abrams TA, Khorana AA, Miksad R, Mahalingam D, Zhu AX, Duda DG. Phase I and Biomarker Study of the Wnt Pathway Modulator DKN-01 in Combination with Gemcitabine/Cisplatin in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2020; 26:6158-6167. [DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-1310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2020] [Revised: 06/08/2020] [Accepted: 08/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
22
|
Eads JR, Krishnamurthi SS, Saltzman J, Bokar JA, Savvides P, Meropol NJ, Gibbons J, Koon H, Sharma N, Rogers L, Pink JJ, Xu Y, Beumer JH, Riendeau J, Fu P, Gerson SL, Dowlati A. Phase I clinical trial of temozolomide and methoxyamine (TRC-102), an inhibitor of base excision repair, in patients with advanced solid tumors. Invest New Drugs 2020; 39:142-151. [PMID: 32556884 DOI: 10.1007/s10637-020-00962-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2020] [Accepted: 06/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Temozolomide (TMZ) generates DNA adducts that are repaired by direct DNA and base excision repair mechanisms. Methoxyamine (MX, TRC-102) potentiates TMZ activity by binding to apurinic and apyrimidinic (AP) sites after removal of N3-methyladenine and N7-methylguanine, inhibiting site recognition of AP endonuclease. We conducted a phase I trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of intravenous MX when given with oral TMZ. Patients with advanced solid tumors and progression on standard treatment were enrolled to a standard 3 + 3 dose escalation trial assessing escalating doses of TMZ and MX. Tumor response was assessed per RECIST and adverse events (AEs) by CTCAEv3. Pharmacokinetics (PK) of MX and COMET assays on peripheral blood mononuclear cells were performed. 38 patients were enrolled-median age 59.5 years (38-76), mean number of cycles 2.9 [1-13]. No DLTs were observed. Cycle 1 grade 3 AEs included fatigue, lymphopenia, anemia, INR, leukopenia, neutropenia, allergic reaction, constipation, psychosis and paranoia. Cycle 2-13 grade 4 AEs included thrombocytopenia and confusion. A partial response was seen in 1 patient with a pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PNET) and six additional patients, each with different tumor types, demonstrated prolonged stable disease. MX PK was linear with dose and was not affected by concomitant TMZ. TMZ 200 mg/m2 daily × 5 may be safely administered with MX 150 mg/m2 intravenously once on day 1 with minimal toxicity. Further studies assessing this drug combination in select tumor types where temozolomide has activity may be warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer R Eads
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Lakeside 1200, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Smitha S Krishnamurthi
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Lakeside 1200, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Joel Saltzman
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Lakeside 1200, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Joseph A Bokar
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Lakeside 1200, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Panos Savvides
- St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, University of Arizona Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Neal J Meropol
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Flatiron Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Joseph Gibbons
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Lakeside 1200, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Henry Koon
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Lakeside 1200, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Neelesh Sharma
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA
| | - Lisa Rogers
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Lakeside 1200, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - John J Pink
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Yan Xu
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Jan H Beumer
- UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - John Riendeau
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Lakeside 1200, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Pingfu Fu
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Stanton L Gerson
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Lakeside 1200, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Afshin Dowlati
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Lakeside 1200, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Heckert JM, Kipnis ST, Kumar S, Botterbusch S, Alderson A, Bennett B, Creamer C, Eads JR, Soulen MC, Pryma DA, Mankoff DA, Metz DC, Katona BW. Abnormal Pretreatment Liver Function Tests Are Associated with Discontinuation of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy in a U.S.-Based Neuroendocrine Tumor Cohort. Oncologist 2020; 25:572-578. [PMID: 32141667 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2019] [Accepted: 02/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is effective for treating midgut neuroendocrine tumors (NETs); however, incorporation of PRRT into routine practice in the U.S. is not well studied. Herein we analyze the first year of PRRT implementation to determine tolerance of PRRT and factors that increase risk of PRRT discontinuation. MATERIALS AND METHODS Medical records were reviewed and data were abstracted on all patients with NETs scheduled for PRRT during the first year of PRRT implementation at a U.S. NET referral center (August 2018 through July 2019). Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with PRRT discontinuation. RESULTS Fifty-five patients (56% male) were scheduled for PRRT over the study period. The most common primary NET location was small bowel (47%), followed by pancreas (26%), and 84% of the NETs were World Health Organization grade 1 or 2. The cohort was heavily pretreated with somatostatin analog (SSA) therapy (98%), non-SSA systemic therapy (64%), primary tumor resection (73%), and liver-directed therapy (55%). At the time of analysis, 52 patients completed at least one PRRT treatment. Toxicities including bone marrow suppression and liver function test (LFT) abnormalities were comparable to prior publications. Eleven patients (21%) prematurely discontinued PRRT because of toxicity or an adverse event. Pretreatment LFT abnormality was associated with increased risk of PRRT cancellation (odds ratio: 12; 95% confidence interval: 2.59-55.54; p < .001). CONCLUSION PRRT can be administered to a diverse NET population at a U.S. NET referral center. Baseline liver function test abnormality increases the likelihood of PRRT discontinuation. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) can be successfully implemented at a U.S. neuroendocrine tumor (NET) referral center in a NET population that is diverse in tumor location, grade, and prior treatment history. Toxicity and adverse effects of PRRT are comparable to prior reports; however, 21% of individuals prematurely discontinued PRRT. Patients with baseline liver function test abnormalities were more likely to discontinue PRRT than patients with normal liver function tests, which should be taken into consideration when selecting treatment options for NETs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason M Heckert
- Division of Internal Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Sarit T Kipnis
- Division of Internal Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Shria Kumar
- Division of Gastroenterology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Samuel Botterbusch
- Division of Gastroenterology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Alice Alderson
- Division of Gastroenterology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Bonita Bennett
- Division of Gastroenterology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Caroline Creamer
- Division of Gastroenterology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jennifer R Eads
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Michael C Soulen
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Daniel A Pryma
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - David A Mankoff
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - David C Metz
- Division of Gastroenterology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Bryson W Katona
- Division of Gastroenterology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is a relatively uncommon malignancy associated with a high rate of cancer-related mortality despite best efforts to perform curative surgery. Adjuvant therapy in patients after surgical resection is associated with improved overall survival. Adjuvant treatment approaches may include either chemotherapy alone or a combination of chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Neoadjuvant approaches, also including either chemotherapy alone or a combination of chemotherapy and radiation therapy, are under investigation. Periampullary cancers constitute a rare and heterogeneous group of tumors that are typically treated as pancreatic cancers given their histologic similarities and tumor location.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie M Kim
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Lakeside 1200, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| | - Jennifer R Eads
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Lakeside 1200, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Balaban EP, Mangu PB, Khorana AA, Shah MA, Mukherjee S, Crane CH, Javle MM, Eads JR, Allen P, Ko AH, Engebretson A, Herman JM, Strickler JH, Benson AB, Urba S, Yee NS. Locally Advanced, Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Oncol 2016; 34:2654-68. [PMID: 27247216 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.67.5561] [Citation(s) in RCA: 248] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To provide evidence-based recommendations to oncologists and others for treatment of patients with locally advanced, unresectable pancreatic cancer. METHODS American Society of Clinical Oncology convened an Expert Panel of medical oncology, radiation oncology, surgical oncology, gastroenterology, palliative care, and advocacy experts and conducted a systematic review of the literature from January 2002 to June 2015. Outcomes included overall survival, disease-free survival, progression-free survival, and adverse events. RESULTS Twenty-six randomized controlled trials met the systematic review criteria. RECOMMENDATIONS A multiphase computed tomography scan of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis should be performed. Baseline performance status and comorbidity profile should be evaluated. The goals of care, patient preferences, psychological status, support systems, and symptoms should guide decisions for treatments. A palliative care referral should occur at first visit. Initial systemic chemotherapy (6 months) with a combination regimen is recommended for most patients (for some patients radiation therapy may be offered up front) with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 or 1 and a favorable comorbidity profile. There is no clear evidence to support one regimen over another. The gemcitabine-based combinations and treatments recommended in the metastatic setting (eg, fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin and gemcitabine plus nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel) have not been evaluated in randomized controlled trials involving locally advanced, unresectable pancreatic cancer. If there is local disease progression after induction chemotherapy, without metastasis, then radiation therapy or stereotactic body radiotherapy may be offered also with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤ 2 and an adequate comorbidity profile. If there is stable disease after 6 months of induction chemotherapy but unacceptable toxicities, radiation therapy may be offered as an alternative. Patients with disease progression should be offered treatment per the ASCO Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Treatment Guideline. Follow-up visits every 3 to 4 months are recommended. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/guidelines/LAPC and www.asco.org/guidelines/MetPC and www.asco.org/guidelineswiki.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward P Balaban
- Edward P. Balaban, Cancer Care Partnership, State College; Edward P. Balaban and Nelson S. Yee, Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA; Pamela B. Mangu, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alok A. Khorana, Cleveland Clinic; Jennifer R. Eads, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Manish A. Shah, The Weill Cornell Medical Center; Peter Allen, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Somnath Mukherjee, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Christopher H. Crane and Milind M. Javle, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Andrew H. Ko, University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA; Anitra Engebretson, Patient Representative, Portland, OR; Joseph M. Herman, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; John H. Strickler, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Al B. Benson III, Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern, Chicago, IL; and Susan Urba, University of Michigan Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Pamela B Mangu
- Edward P. Balaban, Cancer Care Partnership, State College; Edward P. Balaban and Nelson S. Yee, Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA; Pamela B. Mangu, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alok A. Khorana, Cleveland Clinic; Jennifer R. Eads, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Manish A. Shah, The Weill Cornell Medical Center; Peter Allen, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Somnath Mukherjee, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Christopher H. Crane and Milind M. Javle, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Andrew H. Ko, University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA; Anitra Engebretson, Patient Representative, Portland, OR; Joseph M. Herman, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; John H. Strickler, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Al B. Benson III, Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern, Chicago, IL; and Susan Urba, University of Michigan Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Alok A Khorana
- Edward P. Balaban, Cancer Care Partnership, State College; Edward P. Balaban and Nelson S. Yee, Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA; Pamela B. Mangu, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alok A. Khorana, Cleveland Clinic; Jennifer R. Eads, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Manish A. Shah, The Weill Cornell Medical Center; Peter Allen, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Somnath Mukherjee, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Christopher H. Crane and Milind M. Javle, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Andrew H. Ko, University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA; Anitra Engebretson, Patient Representative, Portland, OR; Joseph M. Herman, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; John H. Strickler, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Al B. Benson III, Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern, Chicago, IL; and Susan Urba, University of Michigan Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Manish A Shah
- Edward P. Balaban, Cancer Care Partnership, State College; Edward P. Balaban and Nelson S. Yee, Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA; Pamela B. Mangu, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alok A. Khorana, Cleveland Clinic; Jennifer R. Eads, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Manish A. Shah, The Weill Cornell Medical Center; Peter Allen, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Somnath Mukherjee, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Christopher H. Crane and Milind M. Javle, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Andrew H. Ko, University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA; Anitra Engebretson, Patient Representative, Portland, OR; Joseph M. Herman, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; John H. Strickler, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Al B. Benson III, Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern, Chicago, IL; and Susan Urba, University of Michigan Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Somnath Mukherjee
- Edward P. Balaban, Cancer Care Partnership, State College; Edward P. Balaban and Nelson S. Yee, Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA; Pamela B. Mangu, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alok A. Khorana, Cleveland Clinic; Jennifer R. Eads, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Manish A. Shah, The Weill Cornell Medical Center; Peter Allen, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Somnath Mukherjee, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Christopher H. Crane and Milind M. Javle, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Andrew H. Ko, University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA; Anitra Engebretson, Patient Representative, Portland, OR; Joseph M. Herman, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; John H. Strickler, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Al B. Benson III, Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern, Chicago, IL; and Susan Urba, University of Michigan Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Christopher H Crane
- Edward P. Balaban, Cancer Care Partnership, State College; Edward P. Balaban and Nelson S. Yee, Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA; Pamela B. Mangu, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alok A. Khorana, Cleveland Clinic; Jennifer R. Eads, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Manish A. Shah, The Weill Cornell Medical Center; Peter Allen, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Somnath Mukherjee, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Christopher H. Crane and Milind M. Javle, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Andrew H. Ko, University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA; Anitra Engebretson, Patient Representative, Portland, OR; Joseph M. Herman, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; John H. Strickler, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Al B. Benson III, Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern, Chicago, IL; and Susan Urba, University of Michigan Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Milind M Javle
- Edward P. Balaban, Cancer Care Partnership, State College; Edward P. Balaban and Nelson S. Yee, Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA; Pamela B. Mangu, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alok A. Khorana, Cleveland Clinic; Jennifer R. Eads, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Manish A. Shah, The Weill Cornell Medical Center; Peter Allen, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Somnath Mukherjee, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Christopher H. Crane and Milind M. Javle, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Andrew H. Ko, University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA; Anitra Engebretson, Patient Representative, Portland, OR; Joseph M. Herman, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; John H. Strickler, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Al B. Benson III, Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern, Chicago, IL; and Susan Urba, University of Michigan Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Jennifer R Eads
- Edward P. Balaban, Cancer Care Partnership, State College; Edward P. Balaban and Nelson S. Yee, Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA; Pamela B. Mangu, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alok A. Khorana, Cleveland Clinic; Jennifer R. Eads, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Manish A. Shah, The Weill Cornell Medical Center; Peter Allen, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Somnath Mukherjee, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Christopher H. Crane and Milind M. Javle, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Andrew H. Ko, University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA; Anitra Engebretson, Patient Representative, Portland, OR; Joseph M. Herman, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; John H. Strickler, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Al B. Benson III, Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern, Chicago, IL; and Susan Urba, University of Michigan Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Peter Allen
- Edward P. Balaban, Cancer Care Partnership, State College; Edward P. Balaban and Nelson S. Yee, Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA; Pamela B. Mangu, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alok A. Khorana, Cleveland Clinic; Jennifer R. Eads, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Manish A. Shah, The Weill Cornell Medical Center; Peter Allen, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Somnath Mukherjee, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Christopher H. Crane and Milind M. Javle, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Andrew H. Ko, University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA; Anitra Engebretson, Patient Representative, Portland, OR; Joseph M. Herman, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; John H. Strickler, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Al B. Benson III, Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern, Chicago, IL; and Susan Urba, University of Michigan Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Andrew H Ko
- Edward P. Balaban, Cancer Care Partnership, State College; Edward P. Balaban and Nelson S. Yee, Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA; Pamela B. Mangu, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alok A. Khorana, Cleveland Clinic; Jennifer R. Eads, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Manish A. Shah, The Weill Cornell Medical Center; Peter Allen, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Somnath Mukherjee, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Christopher H. Crane and Milind M. Javle, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Andrew H. Ko, University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA; Anitra Engebretson, Patient Representative, Portland, OR; Joseph M. Herman, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; John H. Strickler, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Al B. Benson III, Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern, Chicago, IL; and Susan Urba, University of Michigan Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Anitra Engebretson
- Edward P. Balaban, Cancer Care Partnership, State College; Edward P. Balaban and Nelson S. Yee, Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA; Pamela B. Mangu, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alok A. Khorana, Cleveland Clinic; Jennifer R. Eads, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Manish A. Shah, The Weill Cornell Medical Center; Peter Allen, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Somnath Mukherjee, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Christopher H. Crane and Milind M. Javle, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Andrew H. Ko, University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA; Anitra Engebretson, Patient Representative, Portland, OR; Joseph M. Herman, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; John H. Strickler, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Al B. Benson III, Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern, Chicago, IL; and Susan Urba, University of Michigan Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Joseph M Herman
- Edward P. Balaban, Cancer Care Partnership, State College; Edward P. Balaban and Nelson S. Yee, Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA; Pamela B. Mangu, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alok A. Khorana, Cleveland Clinic; Jennifer R. Eads, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Manish A. Shah, The Weill Cornell Medical Center; Peter Allen, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Somnath Mukherjee, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Christopher H. Crane and Milind M. Javle, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Andrew H. Ko, University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA; Anitra Engebretson, Patient Representative, Portland, OR; Joseph M. Herman, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; John H. Strickler, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Al B. Benson III, Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern, Chicago, IL; and Susan Urba, University of Michigan Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - John H Strickler
- Edward P. Balaban, Cancer Care Partnership, State College; Edward P. Balaban and Nelson S. Yee, Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA; Pamela B. Mangu, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alok A. Khorana, Cleveland Clinic; Jennifer R. Eads, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Manish A. Shah, The Weill Cornell Medical Center; Peter Allen, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Somnath Mukherjee, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Christopher H. Crane and Milind M. Javle, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Andrew H. Ko, University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA; Anitra Engebretson, Patient Representative, Portland, OR; Joseph M. Herman, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; John H. Strickler, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Al B. Benson III, Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern, Chicago, IL; and Susan Urba, University of Michigan Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Al B Benson
- Edward P. Balaban, Cancer Care Partnership, State College; Edward P. Balaban and Nelson S. Yee, Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA; Pamela B. Mangu, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alok A. Khorana, Cleveland Clinic; Jennifer R. Eads, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Manish A. Shah, The Weill Cornell Medical Center; Peter Allen, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Somnath Mukherjee, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Christopher H. Crane and Milind M. Javle, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Andrew H. Ko, University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA; Anitra Engebretson, Patient Representative, Portland, OR; Joseph M. Herman, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; John H. Strickler, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Al B. Benson III, Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern, Chicago, IL; and Susan Urba, University of Michigan Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Susan Urba
- Edward P. Balaban, Cancer Care Partnership, State College; Edward P. Balaban and Nelson S. Yee, Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA; Pamela B. Mangu, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alok A. Khorana, Cleveland Clinic; Jennifer R. Eads, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Manish A. Shah, The Weill Cornell Medical Center; Peter Allen, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Somnath Mukherjee, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Christopher H. Crane and Milind M. Javle, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Andrew H. Ko, University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA; Anitra Engebretson, Patient Representative, Portland, OR; Joseph M. Herman, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; John H. Strickler, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Al B. Benson III, Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern, Chicago, IL; and Susan Urba, University of Michigan Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Nelson S Yee
- Edward P. Balaban, Cancer Care Partnership, State College; Edward P. Balaban and Nelson S. Yee, Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA; Pamela B. Mangu, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alok A. Khorana, Cleveland Clinic; Jennifer R. Eads, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Manish A. Shah, The Weill Cornell Medical Center; Peter Allen, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Somnath Mukherjee, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Christopher H. Crane and Milind M. Javle, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Andrew H. Ko, University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA; Anitra Engebretson, Patient Representative, Portland, OR; Joseph M. Herman, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; John H. Strickler, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Al B. Benson III, Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern, Chicago, IL; and Susan Urba, University of Michigan Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
|
27
|
Eads JR, Meropol NJ, Spivak JL. Update in hematology and oncology: evidence published in 2012. Ann Intern Med 2013; 158:755-60. [PMID: 23580059 DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-10-201305210-00105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer R Eads
- University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
Carcinoids and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are becoming increasingly common, with the majority of patients presenting with either lymph node involvement or metastatic disease. An improved understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in these tumors has implicated several pathways that have led to new therapeutic approaches. In this manuscript, we describe the biology of neuroendocrine tumors and approaches to systemic therapy. We review early data regarding the use of cytotoxics and several recent studies employing more targeted approaches that promise to change the standard of care. Specifically, phase III studies indicate that pharmacologic inhibition of the vascular endothelial growth factor pathway with sunitinib, and of the mammalian target of rapamycin pathway with everolimus, appears to have altered the natural history of these diseases. These successes set the stage for further advances in the management of patients with neuroendocrine tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer R. Eads
- University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Neal J. Meropol
- University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|