Protein biomarkers and alternatively methylated cell-free DNA detect early stage pancreatic cancer

OBJECTIVE

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is commonly diagnosed at an advanced stage. Liquid biopsy approaches may facilitate detection of early stage PDAC when curative treatments can be employed.

DESIGN

To assess circulating marker discrimination in training, testing and validation patient cohorts (total n=426 patients), plasma markers were measured among PDAC cases and patients with chronic pancreatitis, colorectal cancer (CRC), and healthy controls. Using CA19-9 as an anchor marker, measurements were made of two protein markers (TIMP1, LRG1) and cell-free DNA (cfDNA) pancreas-specific methylation at 9 loci encompassing 61 CpG sites.

RESULTS

Comparative methylome analysis identified nine loci that were differentially methylated in exocrine pancreas DNA. In the training set (n=124 patients), cfDNA methylation markers distinguished PDAC from healthy and CRC controls. In the testing set of 86 early stage PDAC and 86 matched healthy controls, CA19-9 had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.88 (95% CI 0.83 to 0.94), which was increased by adding TIMP1 (AUC 0.92; 95% CI 0.88 to 0.96; p=0.06), LRG1 (AUC 0.92; 95% CI 0.88 to 0.96; p=0.02) or exocrine pancreas-specific cfDNA methylation markers at nine loci (AUC 0.92; 95% CI 0.88 to 0.96; p=0.02). In the validation set of 40 early stage PDAC and 40 matched healthy controls, a combined panel including CA19-9, TIMP1 and a 9-loci cfDNA methylation panel had greater discrimination (AUC 0.86, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.95) than CA19-9 alone (AUC 0.82; 95% CI 0.72 to 0.92).

CONCLUSION

A combined panel of circulating markers including proteins and methylated cfDNA increased discrimination compared with CA19-9 alone for early stage PDAC.

The Clinical Implications of Reversions in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer and Pathogenic Variants in BRCA1, BRCA2, or PALB2 after Progression on Rucaparib

PURPOSE

PARP inhibitors (PARPi) provide an effective maintenance option for patients with BRCA- or PALB2-mutated pancreatic cancer. However, mechanisms of PARPi resistance and optimal post-PARPi therapeutic strategies are poorly characterized.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We collected paired cell-free DNA samples and post-PARPi clinical data on 42 patients with advanced, platinum-sensitive pancreatic cancer who were treated with maintenance rucaparib on NCT03140670, of whom 32 developed progressive disease.

RESULTS

Peripherally detected, acquired BRCA or PALB2 reversion variants were uncommon (5/30; 16.6%) in patients who progressed on rucaparib. Reversions were significantly associated with rapid resistance to PARPi treatment (median PFS, 3.7 vs. 12.5 months; P = 0.001) and poor overall survival (median OS, 6.2 vs. 23.0 months; P < 0.0001). All patients with reversions received rechallenge with platinum-based chemotherapy following PARPi progression and experienced faster progression on this therapy than those without reversion variants (real-world time-to-treatment discontinuation, 2.4 vs. 5.8 months; P = 0.004). Of the patients who progressed on PARPi and received further chemotherapy, the OS from initiation of second-line therapy was significantly lower in those with reversion variants than in those without (5.5 vs. 12.0 months, P = 0.002). Finally, high levels of tumor shedding were independently associated with poor outcomes in patients who received rucaparib.

CONCLUSIONS

Acquired reversion variants were uncommon but detrimental in a population of patients with advanced BRCA- or PALB2-related pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who received maintenance rucaparib. Reversion variants led to rapid progression on PARPi, rapid failure of subsequent platinum-based treatment, and poor OS of patients. The identification of such variants in the blood may have both predictive and prognostic value. See related commentary by Tsang and Gallinger, p. 5005.

Advancements in Systemic Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer

Outcomes for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer have improved in the past 12 years, mainly because of progress made in systemic therapies. New treatment strategies for advanced pancreatic cancer include switch maintenance with cytotoxic therapies, induction maintenance, and the utilization of targeted agents for patients with actionable variants, as well as ongoing development of cytotoxic regimens, such as NALIRIFOX. The activity of immunotherapy has been disappointing to date, but novel combinations and identifying appropriate patient populations may further unlock its potential.

Abstract 1043: Liquid biopsy signature combining copy number instability and mutant KRAS detection is associated with survival for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer

Introduction: In the setting of metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPDAC), lower baseline plasma KRAS mutation levels have been associated with improved survival. While tissue-agnostic, plasma-based copy number instability (CNI) has been demonstrated as an early indicator of response to immunotherapy for some solid tumors, it has not been assessed for patients with mPDAC, nor in combination with KRAS mutations for patients receiving standard of care chemo/radiotherapy. Here we evaluate the combination of mutant KRAS (mKRAS) and CNI detection in plasma as a predictor of overall and progression-free survival (OS/PFS) in mPDAC patients who received standard of care therapy.

Methods: Cell-free DNA was extracted from plasma and libraries prepared at baseline (Week 0) and weeks 8, 16 and 24 on therapy, and analyzed by next-generation sequencing (CNI) and droplet digital PCR (mKRAS). Descriptive statistics were computed for variables including CNI (score is a measure of circulating tumor DNA) and mKRAS variant allele fraction. Detection was defined as above the limit of detection (mKRAS=0.13%) and above the 95th percentile of the value in normal individuals (CNI=24). Therapy response was assessed by OS and PFS.

Results: 196 plasma samples from 64 mPDAC patients were analyzed. When dichotomized as detectable vs undetectable, CNI alone was significantly associated with OS at all on-therapy timepoints but not baseline, whereas mKRAS was significantly associated with OS for all 4 timepoints (Table 1). Detection of both CNI and mKRAS in combination was strongly associated with worse OS at all timepoints, yielding the highest HR. Similar results were obtained when mKRAS and CNI were dichotomized at their respective median values or with PFS as the clinical endpoint.

Conclusions: Combined CNI and mKRAS detection at baseline and on-therapy may provide a strong and early indication of worse prognosis for patients with mPDAC.

Table 1. Association of CNI and mKRAS with Overall Survival (HazardRatio [95% CI], log-rank p-value) Timepoint CNI mKRAS CNI and KRAS Baseline/Week 0 1.54 [0.89-2.68], 0.1 2.05 [1.12-3.78], 0.02 2.50 [1.46-4.28], 0.0006 Week 8 1.78 [0.99-3.18], 0.05 2.21 [1.19-4.08], 0.01 9.81 [3.40-28.28], &lt;0.0001 Week 16 1.91 [1.03-3.53], 0.04 3.26 [1.60-6.62], 0.0006 11.11 [4.28-28.83], &lt;0.0001 Week 24 2.55 [1.28-5.09], 0.006 4.55 [2.03-10.23], &lt;0.0001 6.42 [2.61-15.84], &lt;0.0001

Citation Format: Samuele Cannas, Jacob E. Till, Kristine Kim, Michael J. LaRiviere, Charles M. Vollmer, Jennifer R. Eads, Thomas B. Karasic, Peter J. O'Dwyer, Charles J. Schneider, Ursina R. Teitelbaum, Kim A. Reiss Binder, Mark H. O'Hara, Douglas T. Ross, Kim McGregor, Kirsten Bornemann-Kolatzki, Ekkehard Schütz, Julia Beck, Erica L. Carpenter. Liquid biopsy signature combining copy number instability and mutant KRAS detection is associated with survival for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 1043.

Clinical benefit of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (GCSF) use during chemoimmunotherapy treatment for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPDAC)

757

Background: GCSF is used for primary/secondary prophylaxis of chemotherapy(chemo)-associated neutropenia in patients (pts) with mPDAC. GCSF may also increase the populations of healthy, naïve immune cells in an otherwise immunologically dysregulated and cold environment, potentially augmenting therapy outcome with immunomodulatory (IO) agents. Here, we describe the impact of GCSF administration on OS, PFS, and time on treatment (TOT) in the setting of mPDAC for (1) a trial in which pts were administered chemo-IO combinations and (2) a synthetic control arm using retrospective real-world data from pts who received standard-of-care (SOC) chemo (PASCAL). Methods: PRINCE is a ph1b/2 study evaluating gemcitabine (gem) and nab-paclitaxel (NP) ± sotigalimab (sotiga; CD40 agonist) ± nivolumab (nivo; anti-PD1) for pts with mPDAC (NCT0324250), where prophylactic GCSF use was prohibited. PASCAL pts received SOC gem/NP and primary/secondary GCSF use was allowed. In this retrospective analysis, GCSF use was defined as receiving at least 1 dose of GCSF anytime during treatment. OS, PFS, and TOT and associated HRs and CIs were calculated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox methods. PFS data not available for PASCAL. Results: 32/123 (26%) and 16/68 (24%) pts received GCSF in PRINCE and PASCAL, with 84% and 88% of pts receiving at least 1 dose within the first 3 cycles, respectively. In PRINCE, GCSF use was associated with significant improvements in OS (HR [95% CI]: 0.62 [0.40-0.97]), PFS (0.71 [0.47-1.08]), and TOT (0.67 [0.45-1.01]). These improvements were most notable in the sotiga-containing arms (table). In the absence of IO treatment, however, no statistical significance was observed in PASCAL (HR [95% CI]: OS = 0.81 [0.44-1.51]; TOT = 0.90 [0.51-1.58]). Additional work is ongoing to understand the association of GCSF usage with known prognostic factors. Conclusions: These analyses suggest that GCSF use may enhance the clinical benefits of chemo-IO in mPDAC. These potential benefits of GCSF usage warrant further evaluation in other chemo-IO trials as well as prospective evaluation in pre-clinical and clinical settings. Clinical trial information: NCT03214250 . [Table: see text]

Abstract A016: Phase 1 study of hypofractionated radiation in combination with tremelimumab and durvalumab in refractory metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have limited clinical activity in pancreatic cancer. Based on preclinical data, we hypothesized that hypofractionated radiation may cooperate with dual checkpoint inhibition in patients (Rech AJ, et al, Cancer Research, 2018). We therefore designed a phase 1 study to evaluate the safety and feasibility of two schedules of hypofractionated radiation with durvalumab (anti-PDL1) and tremelimumab (anti-CTLA-4) in patients with metastatic pancreatic, lung, and breast cancers and melanoma. Here, we present the data for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Methods: Patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer treated with at least one prior line of therapy with measurable disease by RECIST in addition to an index lesion amenable to hypofractionated radiation were enrolled sequentially to two cohorts – cohort A evaluating 3 fractions of 8 Gy or cohort B evaluating 1 fraction of 17 Gy. Patients received 4 cycles of tremelimumab 1 mg/kg IV and durvalumab 20 mg/kg IV every 4 weeks for 4 doses followed by durvalumab 10 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks until progression. Radiation was given in week 2 of treatment. Patients were replaced if they did not receive week 5 of therapy on trial, but were included in safety/feasibility analysis. Blood and, when feasible, baseline and on-treatment biopsies were obtained for exploratory biomarker evaluation. Results: 10 patients were treated in cohort A and 21 patients in cohort B. All patients were included in the safety and feasibility assessment. Overall, treatment was well tolerated in both cohorts. The most common adverse events were grade 1 or 2 fatigue (A 30%, B 23.8%), diarrhea (A 10%, B 14.3%), pruritis (A 10%, B 14.3%), AST/ALT elevation and constipation (each A 10%, B 9.5%). Grade 3 diarrhea, elevated bilirubin, pneumonitis, and syncope were noted in 1 patient each, all in cohort B. Grade 5 pneumothorax occurred after baseline biopsy in 1 patient. Grade 2 hyperthyroidism (A) and pneumonitis (B) were noted each in 1 patient. 8 patients in cohort A and 13 patients in cohort B were evaluable for response. In cohort A, 50% of patients had stable disease as best response, and median overall survival was 4.9 months. In cohort B, 23.1% had PR and 30.8% had SD as best response and mOS was 5.2 months. Responses occurred more frequently when metastatic lung nodules were radiated – SD in 3/5 (60%) patients in cohort A, PR in 3/10 (30%) and SD in 4/10 (40%) patients in cohort B, compared to SD in 1/3 (33%) patients in cohort A and 0/3 (0%) patients in cohort B who underwent radiation to a liver lesion. Biomarker analysis will be presented. Conclusions: The combination of durvalumab, tremelimumab with hypofractionated radiation is safe and feasible in a refractory pancreatic adenocarcinoma patient population. Encouraging clinical activity warrants further evaluation, especially when hypofractionated radiation is delivered to lung nodules.

Citation Format: Mark H. O'Hara, Adham S. Bear, Max M. Wattenberg, Ursina R. Teitelbaum, Kim A. Reiss, Thomas B. Karasic, Charles J. Schneider, Peter J. O'Dwyer, Edgar H. Ben-Josef, Andrzej P. Wojcieszynski, Amit H. Maity, Rosemarie H. Mick, Robert H. Vonderheide. Phase 1 study of hypofractionated radiation in combination with tremelimumab and durvalumab in refractory metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Pancreatic Cancer; 2022 Sep 13-16; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(22 Suppl):Abstract nr A016.

Abstract A030: Pancreas-specific circulating cell-free DNA for detection of occult metastases and prognosis in resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Up to 85% of patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) experience metastatic relapse after curative intent surgery with many recurring early. Detection of such occult metastases (those thought to be below the level of detection of standard of care imaging at the time of resection) could steer patients to a different treatment course rather than delaying systemic therapy until after recovery from inappropriate surgery. Here we investigate the potential of pancreas-specific circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) as a biomarker for the detection of occult metastatic disease and as a prognostic biomarker. Blood specimens were collected from 53 patients (15 negative control healthy subjects, 11 positive control metastatic PDAC patients, and 27 resectable PDAC patients prior to resection), processed to plasma, and banked. Plasma cfDNA was extracted, quantified, treated with bisulfite, and used as template for PCR amplification of 9 marker loci that are uniquely unmethylated in DNA of pancreatic acinar or duct cells. Following deep sequencing of PCR products, the fraction of cfDNA molecules derived from the pancreas was determined and multiplied by the total cfDNA concentration to yield pancreas-specific cfDNA. Recurrence and survival data were abstracted from the medical record and receiver operator curve analysis was utilized to determine statistical significance. Metastases were categorized as overt (present at diagnosis), occult (discovered during or within 4 months of curative intent surgery), or two-year (discovered during or within two years of curative intent surgery). Pancreas-derived cfDNA was significant for the detection of occult or overt metastases in our full cohort (18 of 52 evaluable subjects) with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.86 (95% Confidence Interval, 0.74-0.80) and 0.91 (0.83-1.00) for liver-specific occult or overt metastases (15 of 52). It was borderline significant for the detection of occult metastases in the resectable sub-cohort (7 of 27) with an AUC of 0.71 (0.47-0.96) but significant for the detection of occult liver-specific metastases (5 of 27) with an AUC of 0.79 (0.62-0.96). Further, detection of overt metastases or two-year metastases (28 of 50) was significant with an AUC of 0.85 (0.74-0.96). In the resectable sub-cohort, it was also significant for the detection of two-year metastases (17 of 25) with an AUC of 0.79 (0.60-0.97) and prognostic for 2-year overall survival (12 of 24) with an AUC of 0.81 (0.62-1.00) in the resectable sub-cohort. Liver-derived cfDNA was also analyzed and was always outperformed by pancreas-specific cfDNA. In this pilot cohort, enumeration of pancreas-specific cfDNA shows promise as biomarker of occult metastatic disease, two-year metastatic progression, and two-year overall survival in resectable PDAC. Further investigation of a larger cohort and potential combination with other known markers like CA19-9 and tumor size is underway; results for an additional ~40 patients will be available by the time of the meeting.

Citation Format: Jacob E. Till, Roni Ben-Ami, Ruth Shemer, Kristine Kim, Aseel Abdalla, Samuele Cannas, Charles M. Vollmer, Mark H. O'Hara, Ben Z. Stanger, Yuval Dor, Erica L. Carpenter. Pancreas-specific circulating cell-free DNA for detection of occult metastases and prognosis in resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Pancreatic Cancer; 2022 Sep 13-16; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(22 Suppl):Abstract nr A030.

Multianalyte Prognostic Signature Including Circulating Tumor DNA and Circulating Tumor Cells in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is associated with a poor prognosis. Multianalyte signatures, including liquid biopsy and traditional clinical variables, have shown promise for improving prognostication in other solid tumors but have not yet been rigorously assessed for PDAC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a prospective cohort study of patients with newly diagnosed locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) or metastatic PDAC (mPDAC) who were planned to undergo systemic therapy. We collected peripheral blood before systemic therapy and assessed circulating tumor cells (CTCs), cell-free DNA concentration (cfDNA), and circulating tumor KRAS (ctKRAS)-variant allele fraction (VAF). Association of variables with overall survival (OS) was assessed in univariate and multivariate survival analysis, and comparisons were made between models containing liquid biopsy variables combined with traditional clinical prognostic variables versus models containing traditional clinical prognostic variables alone.

RESULTS

One hundred four patients, 40 with LAPC and 64 with mPDAC, were enrolled. CTCs, cfDNA concentration, and ctKRAS VAF were all significantly higher in patients with mPDAC than patients with LAPC. ctKRAS VAF (cube root; 0.05 unit increments; hazard ratio, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.21; P = .01), and CTCs ≥ 1/mL (hazard ratio, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.34 to 3.69; P = .002) were significantly associated with worse OS in multivariate analysis while cfDNA concentration was not. A model selected by backward selection containing traditional clinical variables plus liquid biopsy variables had better discrimination of OS compared with a model containing traditional clinical variables alone (optimism-corrected Harrell's C-statistic 0.725 v 0.681).

CONCLUSION

A multianalyte prognostic signature containing CTCs, ctKRAS, and cfDNA concentration outperformed a model containing traditional clinical variables alone suggesting that CTCs, ctKRAS, and cfDNA provide prognostic information complementary to traditional clinical variables in advanced PDAC.

A descriptive study on the treatment and outcomes of patients with platinum-sensitive, advanced, BRCA- or PALB2-related pancreatic cancer who have progressed on rucaparib

4131

Background: We recently reported the results of a single arm phase II study of maintenance rucaparib in patients with platinum-sensitive advanced pancreatic cancer and a pathogenic variant in BRCA1, BRCA2, or PALB2 (NCT 03140670; Reiss, JCO 2021). However, optimal treatment following progression on PARP inhibitors (PARPi) has not been defined. Here, we report a descriptive study of post-progression treatment and outcomes of this patient population. Methods: Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer and germline or somatic BRCA1, BRCA2, or PALB2mutations treated with at least 16 weeks of platinum-based chemotherapy without progression were enrolled and treated with rucaparib until progression or unacceptable toxicity. At the time of progression, patients were treated with physician-choice chemotherapy. Here we evaluate the objective response rates (ORR) by RECIST 1.1. Overall survival (OS) and time to second progression (PFS2) calculated from trial enrollment and progression free survival on chemotherapy (PFS) by regimen were secondary endpoints. Time-to-event was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and censored at date of last clinic visit, with a cutoff date of 12/10/21. Results: The trial enrolled 42 patients; 31 patients had progressed. Of these, 22 received second-line chemotherapy: nine were treated with an oxaliplatin-based regimen, nine were treated with a cisplatin-based regimen, and four were treated with non-platinum regimens. Demographics were balanced between those who received platinum versus non-platinum. All patients who received second-line chemotherapy regimens met the PFS2 endpoint and all but one patient had died at time of data cutoff. No patients had a complete response, five patients had a partial response (PR). By regimen, 1/9 patients treated with cisplatin had a PR, 3/9 treated with oxaliplatin had a PR, and 1/4 patients treated with non-platinum had a PR. OS, PFS2, PFS, and ORR results by regimen are shown in the table. Conclusions: In this small sample of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer with progressive disease on PARPi, chemotherapy retains some activity. Further study to identify predictors of response and/or resistance to post-PARPi treatment are underway. [Table: see text]

Circulating KRAS variant-specific shedding and association with survival in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) receiving chemoimmunotherapy

2548

Background: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is increasingly used as a prognostic marker with high ctDNA shedding associated with poor survival. Gene-, but not variant-specific, differences in ctDNA shedding have been reported. Tumor burden, mitotic rate, and cell death rate have been proposed as contributors to ctDNA shedding. Here we investigate associations of ctDNA shedding for the two most common mPDAC KRAS variants, G12D and G12V, with tumor burden, mitotic score, and overall survival (OS). Methods: Pretreatment (baseline) ctDNA was analyzed by droplet digital PCR for 86 (including 44 G12D, 30 G12V) patients with mPDAC receiving front-line chemoimmunotherapy in a randomized open-label Phase II study (NCT03214250). Baseline tumor burden in total, within the pancreas, and distally, was assessed by sum of RECIST target lesion diameters. Tumor tissue variant allele fraction (tVAF) and mitotic score (geometric mean expression of 65 mitosis-associated genes) were calculated from DNA and RNA sequencing. Results: ctKRAS shedding (dichotomized at median mutant copies/mL) was associated with OS for G12D bearing tumors (p = 0.03) but not G12V (p = 0.17, log-rank test). To identify variant-specific features of shedding, we examined the Spearman correlation for total tumor burden and ctKRAS shedding; G12D but not G12V shedding was correlated with tumor burden (p = 0.01 and p = 0.22 respectively). However, the higher tVAF in G12V compared to G12D tumors (p = 0.048, Mann-Whitney test) could result from differences in purity, ploidy, and KRAS copy number. Thus, we used tVAF as a scalar to calculate an adjusted tumor burden which was significantly correlated with both G12D and G12V ctDNA shedding (p = 0.004 and 0.02, respectively). When a patient’s distal vs. pancreatic lesions were analyzed separately, pancreatic tumor burden was not correlated with G12D or G12V shedding (p = 0.10 and 0.33, respectively) but distal burden was correlated with both (p = 0.001 and 0.02, respectively). While there was no difference by KRAS variant for the correlation between adjusted tumor burden and shedding, these results do suggest that, in patients with mPDAC, distal rather than primary tumor burden may drive ctDNA shedding. Finally, tumor mitotic rate was combined with adjusted total tumor burden in a linear regression model; both were significant for predicting G12D shedding (p = 0.007 and p < 0.0001, respectively) but not for G12V (p = 0.045 and p = 0.16, respectively). Conclusions: These data suggest that ctDNA shedding and survival associations may be KRAS variant-specific in mPDAC. Tumor mitotic score and location of tumors may explain some variant-specific differences in shedding. As clinical ctDNA tests become more widely used, further investigation of variant-specific shedding in KRAS and other genes may be key for proper interpretation of ctDNA tests.

Distinct biosignatures associate with survival after chemoimmunotherapy in a randomized, three-arm phase II study in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer

4010

Background: Preclinical and small clinical studies of chemoimmunotherapy for metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) point to a yet unrealized potential of clinically significant immune activation. In our phase II study of the CD40 agonist antibody sotigalimab (sotiga) and/or nivolumab (nivo) with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (chemo), we observed promising improvements in overall survival (OS) in 105 patients with newly diagnosed mPDAC (NCT03214250); the primary endpoint of 1-year OS rate was 57.7% (p = 0.006) in the nivo/chemo arm, 48.1% (p = 0.062) in the sotiga/chemo arm and 41.3% (p = 0.233) in the nivo/sotiga/chemo arm (O’Hara, ASCO 2021) as compared to a historical control of 35%. Here, we report results of multi-omic translational analyses designed to identify signatures predictive of OS benefit. Methods: Longitudinal blood and tumor tissue samples were collected for immune and tumor biomarker analysis. Tumor samples underwent RNA sequencing and multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF). Peripheral blood was analyzed by mass cytometry time of flight (CyTOF), high parameter flow cytometry, and proteomics. Machine learning (ML) algorithms were applied to the data to identify biosignatures related to OS in each arm. Results: Comprehensive multi-omic, multi-parameter immune and tumor biomarker analyses identified distinct pretreatment immune signatures predictive of longer OS specific to nivo/chemo or sotiga/chemo (Table, representative examples). Because patients in each arm received chemotherapy, these and other arm-unique biomarkers suggest a relationship to the immunotherapy rather than chemotherapy in this randomized study. There was evidence of immune exhaustion in the sotiga/nivo/chemo arm that may explain the lack of survival benefit. Conclusions: From in-depth translational and ML analyses of randomized phase II trial of first-line chemoimmunotherapy in mPDAC patients, we identified novel biomarkers that associated with OS distinctly in each arm. Clinical trials in first-line mPDAC exploiting these previously unappreciated biomarkers and aiming to enrich patients for response, are warranted to further advance chemoimmunotherapy in this disease. Clinical trial information: NCT03214250. [Table: see text]

Sotigalimab and/or nivolumab with chemotherapy in first-line metastatic pancreatic cancer: clinical and immunologic analyses from the randomized phase 2 PRINCE trial

Chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy has improved the treatment of certain solid tumors, but effective regimens remain elusive for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). We conducted a randomized phase 2 trial evaluating the efficacy of nivolumab (nivo; anti-PD-1) and/or sotigalimab (sotiga; CD40 agonistic antibody) with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (chemotherapy) in patients with first-line metastatic PDAC ( NCT03214250 ). In 105 patients analyzed for efficacy, the primary endpoint of 1-year overall survival (OS) was met for nivo/chemo (57.7%, P = 0.006 compared to historical 1-year OS of 35%, n = 34) but was not met for sotiga/chemo (48.1%, P = 0.062, n = 36) or sotiga/nivo/chemo (41.3%, P = 0.223, n = 35). Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival, objective response rate, disease control rate, duration of response and safety. Treatment-related adverse event rates were similar across arms. Multi-omic circulating and tumor biomarker analyses identified distinct immune signatures associated with survival for nivo/chemo and sotiga/chemo. Survival after nivo/chemo correlated with a less suppressive tumor microenvironment and higher numbers of activated, antigen-experienced circulating T cells at baseline. Survival after sotiga/chemo correlated with greater intratumoral CD4 T cell infiltration and circulating differentiated CD4 T cells and antigen-presenting cells. A patient subset benefitting from sotiga/nivo/chemo was not identified. Collectively, these analyses suggest potential treatment-specific correlates of efficacy and may enable biomarker-selected patient populations in subsequent PDAC chemoimmunotherapy trials.

A randomized phase Ib/II study of niraparib (nira) plus nivolumab (nivo) or ipilimumab (ipi) in patients (pts) with platinum-sensitive advanced pancreatic cancer (aPDAC)

4021

Background: Establishing alternatives to perpetual chemotherapy for pts with aPDAC has been proposed to address inevitable chemotherapy resistance and cumulative toxicity. Poly (ADP ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have shown clinical efficacy in this setting, and preclinical data suggest that the addition of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) may offer synergistic tumor control. We performed a randomized, phase Ib/II study of nira plus anti-PD-1 (nivo) or nira plus anti-CTLA-4 (ipi) maintenance for pts with aPDAC who had not progressed after >4 mo of platinum-based therapy. Methods: After discontinuation of chemotherapy, pts were randomized 1:1 to nira 200mg PO daily plus either nivo 240mg IV q2 weeks (later amended to 480mg IV q4 weeks) or ipi 3mg/kg IV q3 weeks for four doses. Nira could be escalated to 300mg PO daily if tolerated. Pts were treated until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression free survival at six months (PFS6) in each arm. Secondary endpoints included safety, OS, ORR, and outcomes by DNA damage repair (DDR) deficiencies. Pts were evaluable for safety if they had received > 1 dose of study treatment and for efficacy if they had also received > 1 follow-up imaging study. Based on historical data, the null hypothesis of PFS6 = 44% vs a 2-sided alternative hypothesis of PFS ≠ 44% was tested. 42 pts per arm provided 81% power for testing at a 5% significance level to detect inferior PFS6 < 27% or superior PFS6 > 61%. Results: As of Oct 2021, 91 pts were enrolled, of whom 84 were evaluable for efficacy (44 nira/nivo; 40 nira/ipi). The median potential follow-up was 23 mos. Most common treatment-related AEs were nira/nivo: thrombocytopenia (28%), arthralgia (25%), nausea (23%), and fatigue (23%) and nira/ipi: thrombocytopenia (45%), anemia (43%), fatigue (43%), nausea, (41%), AST increase (36%), rash (34%) and ALT increase (29%). 88% of AEs were grade 1-2. Efficacy results were: nira/nivo: PFS6 20.6% (95% CI 8.3-32.9, p = 0.0002), mPFS 1.9 mo and nira/ipi: PFS6 59.6% (95% CI 44.3-74.9, p = 0.045), mPFS 8.1 mo. Fifteen pts (8 nira/nivo; 7 nira/ipi) had pathogenic variants in BRCA or PALB2 . Excluding these: mPFS on nira/nivo was 1.9 mo (95% CI 1.8-1.9) and mPFS on nira/ipi was 7.6 mo (95% CI 4.0 – 11.1). Conclusions: In a randomized phase 1B/II study, nira/ipi as maintenance therapy met the primary endpoint of superior PFS6 while nira/nivo yielded inferior PFS6 for pts with aPDAC who had not progressed on first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. The benefit of nira/ipi maintenance persisted in pts without known DDR variants. Clinical trial information: NCT03404960. [Table: see text]

An NK-like CAR T cell transition in CAR T cell dysfunction

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has achieved remarkable success in hematological malignancies but remains ineffective in solid tumors, due in part to CAR T cell exhaustion in the solid tumor microenvironment. To study dysfunction of mesothelin-redirected CAR T cells in pancreatic cancer, we establish a robust model of continuous antigen exposure that recapitulates hallmark features of T cell exhaustion and discover, both in vitro and in CAR T cell patients, that CAR dysregulation is associated with a CD8+ T-to-NK-like T cell transition. Furthermore, we identify a gene signature defining CAR and TCR dysregulation and transcription factors, including SOX4 and ID3 as key regulators of CAR T cell exhaustion. Our findings shed light on the plasticity of human CAR T cells and demonstrate that genetic downmodulation of ID3 and SOX4 expression can improve the efficacy of CAR T cell therapy in solid tumors by preventing or delaying CAR T cell dysfunction.

THSB2 as a prognostic biomarker for patients diagnosed with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Patients newly diagnosed with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma generally have poor survival, with heterogeneous rates of progression. Biomarkers that could predict progression and/or survival would help inform patients and providers as they make care decisions. In a previous retrospective study, we discovered that circulating thrombospondin-2 (THBS2) could, in combination with CA19-9, better distinguish patients with PDAC versus healthy controls. Here we evaluated whether THBS2 levels, previously not known to be prognostic, were associated with outcome in 68 patients at time of diagnosis of metastatic PDAC. Specifically, we interrogated the association of THBS2 level, alone or in combination with CA19-9, with progression by 90 days and/or survival to 180 days. The results indicate that elevated THBS2 levels alone, at the time of a metastatic PDAC diagnosis, can identify patients with a shorter time to death and thus help patients and providers when planning treatment.

Optimization of Sources of Circulating Cell-Free DNA Variability for Downstream Molecular Analysis

Circulating cell-free DNA (ccfDNA) is used increasingly as a cancer biomarker for prognostication, as a correlate for tumor volume, or as input for downstream molecular analysis. Determining optimal blood processing and ccfDNA quantification are crucial for ccfDNA to serve as an accurate biomarker as it moves into the clinical realm. Whole blood was collected from 50 subjects, processed to plasma, and used immediately or frozen at -80°C. Plasma ccfDNA was extracted and concentration was assessed by real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR), fluorimetry, and droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). For the 24 plasma samples from metastatic pancreatic cancer patients, the variant allele fractions (VAF) of KRAS G12/13 pathogenic variants in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) were measured by ddPCR. Using a high-speed (16,000 × g) or slower-speed (4100 × g) second centrifugation step showed no difference in ccfDNA yield or ctDNA VAF. A two- versus three-spin centrifugation protocol also showed no difference in ccfDNA yield or ctDNA VAF. A higher yield was observed from fresh versus frozen plasma by qPCR and fluorimetry, whereas a higher yield was observed for frozen versus fresh plasma by ddPCR, however, no difference was observed in ctDNA VAF. Overall, our findings suggest factors to consider when implementing a ccfDNA extraction and quantification workflow in a research or clinical setting.

Neoadjuvant Selicrelumab, an Agonist CD40 Antibody, Induces Changes in the Tumor Microenvironment in Patients with Resectable Pancreatic Cancer

PURPOSE

CD40 activation is a novel clinical opportunity for cancer immunotherapy. Despite numerous active clinical trials with agonistic CD40 monoclonal antibodies (mAb), biological effects and treatment-related modulation of the tumor microenvironment (TME) remain poorly understood.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Here, we performed a neoadjuvant clinical trial of agonistic CD40 mAb (selicrelumab) administered intravenously with or without chemotherapy to 16 patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) before surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy and CD40 mAb.

RESULTS

The toxicity profile was acceptable, and overall survival was 23.4 months (95% confidence interval, 18.0-28.8 months). Based on a novel multiplexed immunohistochemistry platform, we report evidence that neoadjuvant selicrelumab leads to major differences in the TME compared with resection specimens from treatment-naïve PDAC patients or patients given neoadjuvant chemotherapy/chemoradiotherapy only. For selicrelumab-treated tumors, 82% were T-cell enriched, compared with 37% of untreated tumors (P = 0.004) and 23% of chemotherapy/chemoradiation-treated tumors (P = 0.012). T cells in both the TME and circulation were more active and proliferative after selicrelumab. Tumor fibrosis was reduced, M2-like tumor-associated macrophages were fewer, and intratumoral dendritic cells were more mature. Inflammatory cytokines/sec CXCL10 and CCL22 increased systemically after selicrelumab.

CONCLUSIONS

This unparalleled examination of CD40 mAb therapeutic mechanisms in patients provides insights for design of subsequent clinical trials targeting CD40 in cancer.

Biochemical and functional characterization of mutant KRAS epitopes validates this oncoprotein for immunological targeting

Activating RAS missense mutations are among the most prevalent genomic alterations observed in human cancers and drive oncogenesis in the three most lethal tumor types. Emerging evidence suggests mutant KRAS (mKRAS) may be targeted immunologically, but mKRAS epitopes remain poorly defined. Here we employ a multi-omics approach to characterize HLA class I-restricted mKRAS epitopes. We provide proteomic evidence of mKRAS epitope processing and presentation by high prevalence HLA class I alleles. Select epitopes are immunogenic enabling mKRAS-specific TCRαβ isolation. TCR transfer to primary CD8⁺ T cells confers cytotoxicity against mKRAS tumor cell lines independent of histologic origin, and the kinetics of lytic activity correlates with mKRAS peptide-HLA class I complex abundance. Adoptive transfer of mKRAS-TCR engineered CD8⁺ T cells leads to tumor eradication in a xenograft model of metastatic lung cancer. This study validates mKRAS peptides as bona fide epitopes facilitating the development of immune therapies targeting this oncoprotein.

KRAS is commonly mutated at codon 12 in several cancer types, offering a unique opportunity for the development of neoantigen-targeted immunotherapy. Here the authors present a pipeline for the prediction, identification and validation of HLA class-I restricted mutant KRAS G12 peptides, leading to the generation of mutant KRAS-specific T cell receptors for adoptive T cell immunotherapy.

Abstract 60: Induction of T cell dysfunction and NK-like T cell differentiation in vitro and in patients after CAR T cell treatment

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has achieved remarkable success in hematological malignancies but remains largely ineffective in solid tumors. A major factor leading to the reduced efficacy of CAR T cell therapy is T cell dysfunction, and the mechanisms mediating this dysfunction are under investigation. Here we establish a robust model to study dysfunction of mesothelin-redirected CAR T cells in pancreatic cancer. Continuous antigen exposure results in hallmark features of exhaustion including reduced proliferation capacity and cytotoxicity, and severe defects in cytokine production. Here we identified a transcriptional signature at both population and single-cell levels in CAR T cells after continuous antigen exposure. In addition, TCR lineage tracing revealed a CD8+ T-to-NK-like T cell plasticity that results in reduced tumor cell killing. The transcription factors SOX4 and ID3 are specifically expressed in the dysfunctional CAR NK-like T cells and are predicted to be master regulators of the dysfunction gene expression signature and the post-thymic acquisition of an NK-like T cell fate. Finally, we identified the emergence of NK-like CAR T cells in a subset of patients after infusion of CAR T cells. The findings gleaned from this study shed light on the plasticity of human CAR T cells and suggest new approaches to improve the efficacy of CAR T cell therapy in solid tumors by preventing or revitalizing CAR T cell dysfunction.

Citation Format: Charly R. Good, Shunichiro Kuramitsu, Parisa Samareh, Greg Donahue, Kenichi Ishiyama, Yujie Ma, Nils Wellhausen, Lifeng Tian, Sangya Agarwal, Sonia Guedan, M. Angela Aznar, Katherine A. Alexander, Zhen Zhang, Nathan Singh, Max W. Richardson, Keisuke Watanabe, Janos L. Tanyi, Mark H. O'Hara, Marco Ruella, Simon F. Lacey, Edmund K. Moon, Stephen J. Schuster, Steven M. Albelda, Lewis L. Lanier, Regina M. Young, Shelley L. Berger, Carl H. June. Induction of T cell dysfunction and NK-like T cell differentiation in vitro and in patients after CAR T cell treatment [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 60.

Abstract CT005: T cell inflammation in the tumor microenvironment after agonist CD40 antibody: Clinical and translational results of a neoadjuvant clinical trial

Deploying CD40 activation to stimulate T cell responses upstream of immune checkpoint molecules is a novel clinical opportunity for cancer immunotherapy. Despite numerous active clinical trials with agonistic CD40 monoclonal antibodies (mAb), biological treatment effects especially treatment-related modulation of the tumor microenvironment (TME), remain poorly understood. Here, we performed a neoadjuvant clinical trial of agonistic CD40 mAb (selicrelumab) administered intravenously with or without chemotherapy (gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel) to 16 resectable patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) prior to surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy and CD40 mAb. The toxicity profile was acceptable, including only grade 1 or 2 cytokine release syndrome and expected toxicities from chemotherapy. Disease-free survival was 13.8 months (95% CI 2.9 - 24.8 months) and median overall survival was 23.4 months (95% CI 18.0 - 28.8), with 8 patients alive at a median of 20.0 months after surgery (follow-up range 12.2 to 34.8 months). Neoadjuvant selicrelumab induced major pharmacodynamic differences in the TME, as revealed by a multiplex imaging platform auditing the immune ecosystem, compared to resection specimens from PDAC patient previously untreated or given neoadjuvant chemotherapy/chemoradiotherapy only. For tumors resected after selicrelumab, 82% (9/11) were T-cell enriched, compared to 37% (38/104) (p=0.004) of untreated tumors and 23% (93/13) of chemotherapy/chemoradiation-treated tumors (p=0.012). Moreover, for selicrelumab tumors, tumor-associated fibrosis was less, “M2” macrophages were fewer, dendritic cells were more mature, and T cells were activated and proliferative, compared to the non-selicrelumab groups. In the periphery, CD8+ and CD4+ T cells were more activated and proliferative, and serum inflammatory cytokines CXCL10 and CCL22 increased after treatment. This study provides proof-of-concept in patients that agonistic CD40 mAb alters the TME, enhances T-cell infiltration, and modulates systemic inflammatory responses. These findings inform design of next-generation CD40 clinical trials.

Citation Format: Katelyn T. Byrne, Courtney B. Betts, Rosemarie Mick, Shamilene Sivagnanam, David L. Bajor, Daniel A. Laheru, E. Gabriela Chiorean, Mark H. O'Hara, Shannon M. Liudahl, Craig Newcomb, Cécile Alanio, Ana P. Ferreira, Byung S. Park, Takuya Ohtani, Austin P. Huffman, Sara A. Väyrynen, Andressa Dias Costa, Judith C. Kaiser, Andreanne M. Lacroix, Colleen Redlinger, Martin Stern, Jonathan A. Nowak, E. John Wherry, Martin A. Cheever, Brian M. Wolpin, Emma E. Furth, Elizabeth M. Jaffee, Lisa M. Coussens, Robert H. Vonderheide. T cell inflammation in the tumor microenvironment after agonist CD40 antibody: Clinical and translational results of a neoadjuvant clinical trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr CT005.

Abstract 1899: Biochemical and functional characterization of mutant KRAS epitopes validates this oncoprotein for immunological targeting

Activating missense mutations within RAS oncogenes are among the most prevalent genomic alterations observed in human cancers and drive oncogenesis in the three most lethal tumor types. Emerging evidence suggests mutant KRAS (mKRAS) may be targeted immunologically, but mKRAS epitopes remain poorly defined. Here, we employ multi-omic approaches to characterize optimal HLA class I-restricted mKRAS epitopes. Using in silico epitope prediction, we identify candidate mKRAS G12 epitopes with high predicted binding affinity to prevalent HLA class I alleles. We utilize biochemical approaches to identify mKRAS epitopes with high measured binding affinity and stability to HLA-A*03:01, -A*11:01 and -B*07:02. Furthermore, we provide proteomic validation of epitope processing and presentation by these alleles. We report mKRAS G12V and G12R epitopes are immunogenic as evidenced by the isolation of mKRAS G12V- and G12R-specific TCRαβ from healthy donors. The transfer of mKRAS-TCRs to primary CD8+ T cells serves as sensitive probes to validate mKRAS epitope processing and presentation by tumor cells and confers cytotoxicity against mKRAS human tumor cell lines of various histologies. The kinetics of lytic activity correlate with measured TCR avidity and mKRAS/HLA class I complex abundance expressed on the tumor cell surface. Finally, the adoptive transfer of mKRAS-TCR engineered primary CD8+ T cells to NOD scid gamma mice leads to tumor eradication in an orthotopic mKRAS lung cancer model. This study validates mKRAS as a bona fide tumor neoantigen and supports strategies to identify recurrent driver alterations for immunological targeting. Based on this work, clinical studies targeting mKRAS in cancer patients using vaccines and adoptive T cell therapy are under active investigation.

Citation Format: Adham S. Bear, Tatiana Blanchard, Mark H. O'Hara, John Scholler, Robert H. Vonderheide, Gerald P. Linette, Beatriz M. Carreno. Biochemical and functional characterization of mutant KRAS epitopes validates this oncoprotein for immunological targeting [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 1899.

Gemcitabine (Gem) and nab-paclitaxel (NP) ± nivolumab (nivo) ± CD40 agonistic monoclonal antibody APX005M (sotigalimab), in patients (Pts) with untreated metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPDAC): Phase (Ph) 2 final results

4019

Background: Results from a ph1b trial evaluating gem/NP with CD40 agonistic monoclonal antibody APX005M ± nivo demonstrated promising clinical activity in pts with untreated mPDAC (O’Hara 2021). Herein, we report results from the follow-on, randomized (rand) ph2 trial evaluating gem/NP ± nivo ± APX005M. Methods: Pts with untreated mPDAC were rand to 1 of 3 open-label arms: gem/NP/nivo (A), gem/NP/APX005M (B), gem/NP/nivo/APX005M (C). All pts were treated with 1000 mg/m2 gem and 125 mg/m2 NP. Patients received 240 mg nivo in arms A and C and 0.3 mg/kg APX005M (RP2D) IV in arms B and C. Ph1b pts were included in ph2 analyses. 1° endpoint: 1-year OS rate of each arm, compared to a 35% historical OS rate for gem/NP (Von Hoff 2013). Key 2° endpoints: ORR, DCR, DOR, PFS and safety. Tumor and blood were collected for biomarker analysis. Planned enrollment of 35 pts/arm provided 81% power for testing the alternative of 58% OS rate vs 35%, using a 1-sided, 1-sample Z test with 5% type I error. Trial was not powered for cross-arm comparison. Results: 93 pts were rand in ph2 (N = 34, 30, 29 to A, B, C); when ph1b pts included, a total of 105 pts (34, 36, 35) were analyzed for efficacy and 108 pts (36, 37, 35) for safety. Min follow-up was 14 months (mos). Baseline characteristics were balanced across arms, inclusive of tumor burden, presence of liver metastases and stage at initial diagnosis (stage 1-3 vs 4). 1-year OS rate was 57% (1-sided p = 0.007 vs 35% historical rate, 95% lower CI bound = 41%) for A, 51% (p = 0.029, 95% bound = 36%) for B and 41% (p = 0.236, 95% bound = 27%) for C. Median OS and secondary endpoints are listed in Table. TRAE rates were similar across arms and to ph1b. 8 (7%) pts experienced an AE leading to tx discontinuation (6, 1, 1 in A, B, C), 40 (37%) pts experienced a serious TRAE (14, 15, 11 in A, B, C) and 2 pts died due to TRAEs; 1 each in B (acute hepatic failure) and C (intracranial hemorrhage). Conclusions: In this ongoing, seamless ph1b/2 trial of gem/NP ± nivo ± APX005M in pts with mPDAC, antitumor activity was observed in all arms. 1° endpoint of 1-year OS > 35% was met when combining gem/NP with either nivo or APX005M; however, not the combination. Safety was manageable; consistent with ph1b. Detailed multiomic immune and tumor biomarker analyses are underway to elucidate mechanisms of action and inform pt subsets that benefit most from these combinations. Clinical trial information: NCT03214250. [Table: see text]

Final results of a phase I “RadVax” trial of hypofractionated radiation combined with pembrolizumab in patients with metastatic solid tumors

2576

Background: Many patients treated with anti-PD-1 therapy do not show a clinical response. Preclinical studies suggest that adding hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) to anti-PD1 can increase the efficacy of immunotherapy through several mechanisms including increased antigen presentation. We conducted a prospective trial testing the combination of pembrolizumab and HFRT in patients with metastatic solid tumors. Methods: This prospective single-institution phase I trial tested pembrolizumab in combination with HFRT in patients with metastatic cancers (NSCLC, melanoma, pancreas, breast, others) and an ECOG performance status of 0-1. Melanoma and NSCLC patients were required to have progression of disease on anti-PD1, having received ≥ 2 doses of anti-PD1 and progression documented by RECIST v1.1. Patients were required to have an index lesion ≥1 cm that was amenable to HFRT and at least one other lesion that was not irradiated and could be followed for response using RECIST criteria. Pembrolizumab 200 mg IV every 3 weeks was administered beginning 1 week prior to the first fraction of radiation. The HFRT dose was 8 Gy x 3 fractions or 17 Gy x 1 fraction, determined by randomization during the Expansion phase. The primary objective was the safety of HFRT combined with pembrolizumab, with dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) defined as Grade ≥ 3 non-hematological toxicity related to the combination of Pembrolizumab and HFRT. The secondary objective was the radiographic response of metastatic lesions outside the radiation field as measured by RECIST. Results: 59 patients aged 27-90 years (median 60) were enrolled from March 2015 to December 2018 (24 in the Safety Phase and 35 in Expansion Phase). 40 patients (67.7%) had treatment-related AEs, of which 4 were grade 3 and none were grade 4. One patient experienced hepatitis, classified as DLT. While most patients did not have a radiologic response, in patients with metastatic melanoma, 7 of 16 (43.8%, exact 95% CI 19.8-70.1%) had an objective response to HFRT + pembrolizumab, including 3 complete and 4 partial responses. Responses are durable with 3/3 complete responders alive with no progression, and 3/4 partial responders alive with 2 having no evidence of progression. Among melanoma patients, only 2 of 7 (29%) responders received ipilimumab prior to enrollment, compared to 8 of 9 (89%) non-responders (p = 0.035). An increase in Ki67+ PD-1+ non-naïve CD8 T-cells was observed in the blood 2 weeks after HFRT, but the magnitude did not correlate with likelihood of response. Responses were observed after either 17 Gy x 1 fraction or 8 Gy x 3 fractions, with no difference in response rate by fractionation. Conclusions: This study suggests that HFRT administered with concurrent pembrolizumab is associated with acceptable toxicity and that in patients with metastatic melanoma progressing on anti-PD-1 therapy, this approach yields an ORR of 44%. Clinical trial information: NCT02303990.

Baseline level and early on-treatment clearance of circulating mutant KRAS in metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma treated with chemotherapy with or without immunotherapy

4122

Background: Traditional imaging-guided therapeutic decision-making for patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) may lag and, on occasion, be misleading. The concept of liquid biopsy-based molecular response holds promise for proximate and accurate therapy monitoring and assessment of emerging resistance to therapy. Here we investigate the association between baseline (pre-treatment) level and early, on-treatment changes in plasma circulating cell-free DNA (ccfDNA) mutant KRAS (ctKRAS) with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in mPDAC. Methods: 189 plasma samples were analyzed from 123 total patients with mPDAC. An initial cohort included 54 patients treated at the University of Pennsylvania who received first-line standard of care (SOC) regimens and had a baseline plasma sample. Of these, 21 also had an on-therapy sample collected at ̃8 weeks. We also analyzed an independent cohort of 69 patients enrolled in the PRINCE trial (NCT03214250) who had a baseline sample, of which 45 also had an on-treatment sample at ̃8 weeks. PRINCE trial patients received gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel with immunotherapy (I/O) agents (APX005M and/or nivolumab). ctKRAS variant allele fraction (VAF) was quantified by droplet digital PCR on pre-amplified ccfDNA. Baseline ctKRAS was dichotomized at 5% VAF. ctKRAS clearance was defined as detectable ctKRAS at baseline followed by ctKRAS becoming undetectable in the on-treatment sample. Results: Baseline ctKRAS (above/below 5% VAF) and ctKRAS clearance were associated with PFS and OS in both cohorts (Table). Further, in a multivariate cox regression model, ctKRAS clearance associated with improved PFS (HR 3.8, 1.4-10.9 or 3.6, 1.8-7.2) in both the SOC and I/O cohorts, respectively, and OS in the SOC cohort (HR 5.5, 1.5-20.8) after adjusting for baseline VAF. Conclusions: Baseline ctKRAS is significantly associated with OS and PFS in mPDAC in both independent cohorts. Further, early on-treatment ctKRAS clearance is strongly associated with improved PFS and OS, independent of baseline ctKRAS VAF. These data strongly support further investigation of ccfDNA as a biomarker of response and resistance to therapy.[Table: see text]

Phase I trial of regorafenib, hydroxychloroquine, and entinostat in metastatic colorectal cancer

e15580

Background: The antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitor regorafenib provides a survival benefit in patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer. Antiangiogenic therapy causes hypoxic stress within tumor cells, which activate autophagy as a survival mechanism. Entinostat, a histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor, increases dependence on autophagy through epigenetic mechanisms. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) blocks autophagy by blunting lysosomal acidification and is synergistic with antiangiogenic therapies. We hypothesized that HCQ and entinostat would be tolerable with regorafenib and potentiate the antitumor response. Methods: This was a 3+3 phase I trial to find the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of HCQ and entinostat with regorafenib in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer previously treated with a fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan. No prior regorafenib or HDAC inhibitor therapy was permitted. Regorafenib was dosed at 160mg daily on days 1-21 of 28-day cycles, with provision to lower the starting dose to 80mg if toxicity was excessive. Entinostat was dosed at 3mg weekly in dose level 1 and at 5mg weekly in dose levels 2 and 3 while HCQ was dosed at 200mg qAM and 400mg qPM in dose levels 1 and 2 and at 600mg BID at dose level 3. Expansion was planned at the RP2D with a primary endpoint of objective response rate. Results: Twenty-eight patients were screened, and 20 patients were enrolled from November 2017 to January 2020. Six patients were treated at dose level 1 with no dose-limiting toxicity. The starting regorafenib dose was reduced to 80mg after 3 patients discontinued therapy early due to fatigue or rash due to regorafenib. At dose level 2, 7 patients were enrolled to achieve 6 evaluable patients. One DLT (G3 fatigue) was noted and one patient withdrew consent after 14 days due to fever and tumor pain flare possibly related to treatment. Six patients enrolled at dose level 3; no DLTs were seen. One additional patient received HCQ 400mg BID instead of 600mg BID due to a clerical error. Weight loss (60%), fatigue (50%), and anorexia (50%) were the most common toxicities. Thirteen grade 3 toxicities were noted, with rash (15%), fatigue (10%), and alkaline phosphatase elevation (10%) the most common. No grade 4 toxicities were observed. Seven patients discontinued therapy early due to toxicity. Nearly all patients experienced rapid weight loss, with a range of 1.5 lbs to 27.1 lbs and a median weight loss of 9.5 lbs at two weeks. No objective responses were observed. The median PFS was 1.8 months, the median OS was 5.2 months, and no patient remained on study longer than 4 months. Expansion was not pursued due to toxicity and lack of efficacy. Conclusions: The combination of regorafenib, HCQ, and entinostat was poorly tolerated without evident activity in metastatic colorectal cancer. The substantial weight loss suggests a potential adverse metabolic interaction between these drugs. Clinical trial information: NCT03215264.

Phase II Study of Maintenance Rucaparib in Patients With Platinum-Sensitive Advanced Pancreatic Cancer and a Pathogenic Germline or Somatic Variant in BRCA1, BRCA2, or PALB2

PURPOSE

Olaparib, a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor (PARPi), is approved as maintenance therapy for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (PC) and a germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variant (PV). This investigator-initiated, single-arm phase II study assessed the role of the PARPi rucaparib as maintenance therapy in advanced PC with germline or somatic PV in BRCA1, BRCA2, or PALB2.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients had advanced PC; germline (g) or somatic (s) PVs in BRCA1, BRCA2, or PALB2, and received at least 16 weeks of platinum-based chemotherapy without evidence of platinum resistance. Chemotherapy was discontinued and patients received rucaparib 600 mg orally twice a day until progression. The primary end point was the progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 6 months (PFS6). Secondary end points included safety, ORR, disease control rate, duration of response, and overall survival.

RESULTS

Of 46 enrolled patients, 42 were evaluable (27 gBRCA2, seven gBRCA1, six gPALB2, and two sBRCA2). PFS6 was 59.5% (95% CI, 44.6 to 74.4), median PFS was 13.1 months (95% CI, 4.4 to 21.8), and median overall survival was 23.5 months (95% CI, 20 to 27). The PFS at 12 months was 54.8%. ORR of the 36 patients with measurable disease was 41.7% (3 complete responses; 12 partial responses; 95% CI, 25.5 to 59.2), and disease control rate was 66.7% (95% CI, 49.0 to 81.4). Median duration of response was 17.3 months (95% CI, 8.8 to 25.8). Responses occurred in patients with gBRCA2 (41%, 11 out of 27), gPALB2 (50%, 3 out of 6), and sBRCA2 (50%, 1 out of 2). No new safety signals were noted.

CONCLUSION

Maintenance rucaparib is a safe and effective therapy for platinum-sensitive, advanced PC with a PV in BRCA1, BRCA2, or PALB2. The finding of efficacy in patients with gPALB2 and sBRCA2 PVs expands the population likely to benefit from PARPi beyond gBRCA1/2 PV carriers.

CD40 agonistic monoclonal antibody APX005M (sotigalimab) and chemotherapy, with or without nivolumab, for the treatment of metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: an open-label, multicentre, phase 1b study

BACKGROUND

Standard chemotherapy remains inadequate in metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Combining an agonistic CD40 monoclonal antibody with chemotherapy induces T-cell-dependent tumour regression in mice and improves survival. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the safety of combining APX005M (sotigalimab) with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel, with and without nivolumab, in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma to establish the recommended phase 2 dose.

METHODS

This non-randomised, open-label, multicentre, four-cohort, phase 1b study was done at seven academic hospitals in the USA. Eligible patients were adults aged 18 years and older with untreated metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0-1, and measurable disease by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. All patients were treated with 1000 mg/m² intravenous gemcitabine and 125 mg/m² intravenous nab-paclitaxel. Patients received 0·1 mg/kg intravenous APX005M in cohorts B1 and C1 and 0·3 mg/kg in cohorts B2 and C2. In cohorts C1 and C2, patients also received 240 mg intravenous nivolumab. Primary endpoints comprised incidence of adverse events in all patients who received at least one dose of any study drug, incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in all patients who had a DLT or received at least two doses of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel and one dose of APX005M during cycle 1, and establishing the recommended phase 2 dose of intravenous APX005M. Objective response rate in the DLT-evaluable population was a key secondary endpoint. This trial (PRINCE, PICI0002) is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03214250 and is ongoing.

FINDINGS

Between Aug 22, 2017, and July 10, 2018, of 42 patients screened, 30 patients were enrolled and received at least one dose of any study drug; 24 were DLT-evaluable with median follow-up 17·8 months (IQR 16·0-19·4; cohort B1 22·0 months [21·4-22·7], cohort B2 18·2 months [17·0-18·9], cohort C1 17·9 months [14·3-19·7], cohort C2 15·9 months [12·7-16·1]). Two DLTs, both febrile neutropenia, were observed, occurring in one patient each for cohorts B2 (grade 3) and C1 (grade 4). The most common grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were lymphocyte count decreased (20 [67%]; five in B1, seven in B2, four in C1, four in C2), anaemia (11 [37%]; two in B1, four in B2, four in C1, one in C2), and neutrophil count decreased (nine [30%]; three in B1, three in B2, one in C1, two in C2). 14 (47%) of 30 patients (four each in B1, B2, C1; two in C2) had a treatment-related serious adverse event. The most common serious adverse event was pyrexia (six [20%] of 30; one in B2, three in C1, two in C2). There were two chemotherapy-related deaths due to adverse events: one sepsis in B1 and one septic shock in C1. The recommended phase 2 dose of APX005M was 0·3 mg/kg. Responses were observed in 14 (58%) of 24 DLT-evaluable patients (four each in B1, C1, C2; two in B2).

INTERPRETATION

APX005M and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel, with or without nivolumab, is tolerable in metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma and shows clinical activity. If confirmed in later phase trials, this treatment regimen could replace chemotherapy-only standard of care in this population.

FUNDING

Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Cancer Research Institute, and Bristol Myers Squibb.

Comparative Effectiveness of Total Neoadjuvant Therapy Versus Standard Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

INTRODUCTION

The use of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) for locally advanced rectal cancer has been increasing in recent years, but the long-term overall survival characteristics of this approach is currently unknown.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of patients with clinical stage II/III rectal cancer within the National Cancer Database. Patients who received TNT (defined as chemotherapy, followed by CRT, followed by surgery) were propensity score matched to patients who received adjuvant therapy (defined as CRT, followed by surgery, followed by chemotherapy). We compared overall survival (OS) and rates of pathologic complete response (pCR) between the 2 arms.

RESULTS

Of the 4300 patients in our cohort, 3502 (81%) received adjuvant therapy and 798 (19%) received TNT. At baseline, patients who received TNT were more likely to have higher clinical T and N stages (P< .001). The 5-year OS was 77% for both TNT and adjuvant therapy patients (hazard ratio [HR] 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88-1.28, P = .57). After propensity score matching and adjusting for potential confounders, there were no significant differences in OS (HR_adj 1.00, 95% CI, 0.71-1.40, P = .99). After propensity score matching, there were higher pCR rates among TNT patients (16.1%) compared to adjuvant therapy patients (12.0%) (P = .037).

CONCLUSION

In this observational study, we found TNT was not associated with a lower OS compared to standard adjuvant chemotherapy. This finding potentially reassures clinicians choosing TNT as an alternative to adjuvant chemotherapy. However, future prospective data are needed to confirm these findings.

Challenges and Opportunities for Pancreatic Cancer Immunotherapy

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) is among the most immune-resistant tumor types. Its unique genomic landscape shaped by oncogenic drivers promotes immune suppression from the earliest stages of tumor inception to subvert adaptive T cell immunity. Single-agent immune modulators have thus far proven clinically ineffective, and multi-modal therapies targeting mechanisms of immunotherapy resistance are likely needed. Here, we review novel immunotherapy strategies currently under investigation to (1) confer antigen specificity, (2) enhance T cell effector function, and (3) neutralize immunosuppressive elements within the tumor microenvironment that may be rationally combined to untangle the web of immune resistance in PDA and other tumors.

Phase II Trial of Palbociclib in Patients with Advanced Esophageal or Gastric Cancer

LESSONS LEARNED

Palbociclib monotherapy demonstrated minimal clinical activity in patients with previously treated gastroesophageal cancers. Further clinical evaluation of palbociclib monotherapy is not warranted in gastroesophageal cancers, but improved understanding of resistance mechanisms may permit rational combination approaches.

BACKGROUND

Dysregulation of the cell cycle is a hallmark of cancer. Progression through the G1/S transition requires phosphorylation of retinoblastoma (RB) by cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) 4 and 6, which are regulated by cyclins D and E. Amplifications of cyclin D loci and activating mutations in CDKs are frequent molecular aberrations in gastroesophageal malignancies. We conducted a phase II trial of the CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib as an initial test of efficacy.

METHODS

Patients with previously treated metastatic gastroesophageal cancers with intact RB nuclear expression by immunohistochemistry were treated with 125 mg daily of palbociclib for days 1-21 of 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint was overall response rate.

RESULTS

We screened 29 patients and enrolled 21 patients: 5 with gastric adenocarcinoma, 3 with gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, 8 with esophageal adenocarcinoma, and 5 with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. All 29 tumors screened had intact nuclear RB expression, and four treated patients tested positive for CCND1 overexpression. No objective responses were seen. Median progression-free survival was 1.8 months, and median overall survival was 3.0 months. All recurrent grade 3 or 4 toxicities were hematologic, with neutropenia in eight patients (38%), anemia in four patients (19%), and thrombocytopenia in two patients (10%).

CONCLUSION

Palbociclib has limited single-agent activity in gastroesophageal tumors.

Early treatment-related neutropenia predicts response to palbociclib

BACKGROUND

Palbociclib is highly active in oestrogen-receptor positive (ER+) metastatic breast cancer, but neutropenia is dose limiting. The goal of this study was to determine whether early neutropenia is associated with disease response to single-agent palbociclib.

METHODS

Blood count and disease-response data were analysed from two Phase 2 clinical trials at different institutions using single-agent palbociclib: advanced solid tumours positive for retinoblastoma protein and advanced liposarcoma. The primary endpoint was PFS. The primary exposure variable was the nadir absolute neutrophil count (ANC) during the first two cycles of treatment.

RESULTS

One hundred and ninety-six patients (61 breast, 135 non-breast) were evaluated between the two trials. Development of any grade neutropenia was significantly associated with longer median PFS in both the breast cancer (HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.11-0.74, p = 0.010) and non-breast cancer (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.38-0.85, p = 0.006) cohorts. Grade 3-4 neutropenia was significantly associated with prolonged PFS in the non-breast cohort (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.38-0.85, p = 0.006) but not in the breast cohort (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.51-1.47, p = 0.596). Multivariate analysis yielded similar results.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment-related neutropenia in the first two cycles was significantly and independently associated with prolonged PFS, suggesting that neutropenia may be a useful pharmacodynamic marker to guide individualised palbociclib dosing.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION INFORMATION

Basket Trial: NCT01037790; Sarcoma Trial: NCT01209598.

A Multianalyte Panel Consisting of Extracellular Vesicle miRNAs and mRNAs, cfDNA, and CA19-9 Shows Utility for Diagnosis and Staging of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

To determine whether a multianalyte liquid biopsy can improve the detection and staging of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We analyzed plasma from 204 subjects (71 healthy, 44 non-PDAC pancreatic disease, and 89 PDAC) for the following biomarkers: tumor-associated extracellular vesicle miRNA and mRNA isolated on a nanomagnetic platform that we developed and measured by next-generation sequencing or qPCR, circulating cell-free DNA (ccfDNA) concentration measured by qPCR, ccfDNA KRAS G12D/V/R mutations detected by droplet digital PCR, and CA19-9 measured by electrochemiluminescence immunoassay. We applied machine learning to training sets and subsequently evaluated model performance in independent, user-blinded test sets.

RESULTS

To identify patients with PDAC versus those without, we generated a classification model using a training set of 47 subjects (20 PDAC and 27 noncancer). When applied to a blinded test set (N = 136), the model achieved an AUC of 0.95 and accuracy of 92%, superior to the best individual biomarker, CA19-9 (89%). We next used a cohort of 20 patients with PDAC to train our model for disease staging and applied it to a blinded test set of 25 patients clinically staged by imaging as metastasis-free, including 9 subsequently determined to have had occult metastasis. Our workflow achieved significantly higher accuracy for disease staging (84%) than imaging alone (accuracy = 64%; P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Algorithmically combining blood-based biomarkers may improve PDAC diagnostic accuracy and preoperative identification of nonmetastatic patients best suited for surgery, although larger validation studies are necessary.

Tumor-informed assessment of molecular residual disease and its incorporation into practice for patients with early and advanced-stage colorectal cancer (CRC-MRD Consortia)

4108

Background: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing can be used for the assessment of molecular residual disease (MRD) in patients with early-stage or advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). Prospective evaluation of this methodology in clinical practice has been limited to-date. Methods: A personalized and tumor-informed multiplex PCR assay (Signatera 16-plex bespoke mPCR NGS assay) was used for the detection and quantification of ctDNA for MRD assessment. We analyze and present results from an ongoing early adopter program of ctDNA testing across the spectrum of CRC management. Results: Here we present a total of 250 patients with colon (n=200), rectal (n=40), and other lower gastrointestinal cancers (n =10; anal, appendiceal, small bowel). MRD positivity rates and ctDNA quantification (mean tumor molecules/mL) are shown in Table. ctDNA detection was significantly associated with stage of disease (p<0.0001 Chi-square: 70.33). Additionally, in patients with radiologically measurable active metastatic disease, ctDNA detection rate was 100%. On the contrary, patients with advanced/metastatic disease who had partial response to treatment or no evidence of disease (NED) showed 28.5% and 19.2% of ctDNA-positivity, respectively. Conclusions: This is the first large, real-world study reporting on the results from a clinically validated MRD assay. For the first time we delineate MRD rates and quantify ctDNA concentration in patients with early-stage and advanced CRC. Furthermore, we provide an initial readout that effective ongoing treatment in patients with CRC may be correlated with ctDNA clearance. Ongoing analysis expanded to a cohort of 1200 clinical cases including correlation with genomic and serial testing will be presented. [Table: see text]

Safety and Pharmacokinetics of CXCR4 Peptide Antagonist, LY2510924, in Combination with Durvalumab in Advanced Refractory Solid Tumors

Purpose: This was an open-label phase 1a study assessing the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, and tolerability of CXCR4 peptide antagonist, LY2510924, administered in combination with durvalumab in patients with advanced refractory solid tumors.

Methods: Patients received LY2510924 at 20, 30, or 40 mg subcutaneous (SC) once daily in combination with durvalumab at 1500 mg intravenously (IV) on day 1 of each 28-day cycle. The primary objective was to assess the MTD and safety of LY2510924 SC daily in combination with durvalumab in patients with advanced (metastatic and/or unresectable) solid tumors. Secondary objectives included pharmacokinetics (PK) and the antitumor activity of LY2510924 in combination with durvalumab. Exploratory objectives were biomarker analysis, including pharmacodynamic markers, relevant to LY2510924 and durvalumab, including immune functioning, drug targets, cancer-related pathways, and the disease state.

Results: Nine patients (three each at 20, 30, and 40 mg) were enrolled in the study (eight patients with pancreatic cancer and one patient with rectal cancer). The majority of patients completed one or two cycles (100.0% ≥ 1 cycle; 88.9% ≥ 2 cycles) of LY2510924 and durvalumab. No dose limiting toxicities were reported. Most common (>10%) treatment-emergent adverse events were injection-site reaction (44.4%), fatigue (33.3%), and increased white blood cell count (33.3%). PK parameters for combination were similar to those reported in previous studies when given as monotherapy. Best overall response of stable disease was observed in four (44.4%) patients and one patient had unconfirmed partial response.

Conclusion: The recommended phase 2 dose is 40 mg SC once-daily LY2510924 in combination with durvalumab 1500 mg IV and showed acceptable safety and tolerability in patients with advanced refractory tumors.

Effect of Gemcitabine and nab-Paclitaxel With or Without Hydroxychloroquine on Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Autophagy is a mechanism of treatment resistance to chemotherapy that has a role in the maintenance of pancreatic cancer. Hydroxychloroquine sulfate (HCQ) is an inhibitor of autophagy that inhibits the fusion of the autophagosome to the lysosome.

Objective

To determine whether HCQ improves overall survival at 1 year in combination with gemcitabine hydrochloride and nab-paclitaxel (GA) among patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Open-label, phase 2 randomized clinical trial conducted between March 18, 2013, and November 16, 2017, at the University of Pennsylvania, HonorHealth, and The Johns Hopkins University among 112 patients with previously untreated metastatic or advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and adequate marrow and organ function. All efficacy analyses were performed for the intention-to-treat population.

Interventions

Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive GA with or without HCQ. All patients received standard doses of GA, and those randomized to receive HCQ were treated continuously with 600 mg orally twice daily.

Main Outcome and Measure

Overall survival at 1 year.

Results

A total of 112 patients (45 women and 67 men; median age, 65 years; range, 43-86 years) were enrolled; 55 were randomized to receive GA plus HCQ, and 57 to receive GA. Overall survival at 12 months was 41% (95% CI, 27%-53%) in the HCQ group and 49% (95% CI, 35%-61%) in the non-HCQ group. Median progression-free survival was 5.7 months (95% CI, 4.0-9.3 months) in the HCQ group and 6.4 months (95% CI, 4.5-7.6 months) in the non-HCQ group. Median overall survival was 11.1 months (95% CI, 9.0-14.2 months) in the HCQ group and 12.1 months (95% CI, 9.3-15.5 months) in the non-HCQ group. Overall response rate was 38.2% (n = 21) in the HCQ group and 21.1% (n = 12) in the non-HCQ group (P = .047). Treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events that differed between the HCQ and non-HCQ groups were neutropenia (23 of 54 [42.6%] vs 12 of 53 [22.6%]), anemia (2 of 54 [3.7%] vs 9 of 53 [17.0%]), fatigue (4 of 54 [7.4%] vs 0), nausea (5 of 54 [9.3%] vs 0), peripheral neuropathy (7 of 54 [13.0%] vs 3 of 53 [5.7%]), visual changes (3 of 54 [5.6%] vs 0), and neuropsychiatric symptoms (3 of 54 [5.6%] vs 0).

Conclusions and Relevance

The addition of HCQ to block autophagy did not improve the primary end point of overall survival at 12 months. These data do not support the routine use of GA plus HCQ for metastatic pancreatic cancer in the absence of a biomarker. However, improvement seen in the overall response rate with HCQ may indicate a role for HCQ in the locally advanced setting, where tumor response may permit resection.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01506973.

Abstract B04: Identification of T-cell receptors targeting mutant KRAS in pancreatic cancer

Pathologic somatic gene mutations within the KRAS proto-oncogene occur in greater than 90% of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDA). These mutations are often conserved involving the codon 12 position and most frequently result in G12D, G12V, or G12R transitions. Unfortunately, no mutant KRAS (mKRAS)-targeted therapies exist to date. We hypothesize conserved hot-spot KRAS mutations may serve as cancer neoantigens for targeted immune-based therapeutic approaches. Using a validated in silico epitope prediction pipeline, we identified mKRAS epitopes with predicted strong binding affinity to the highly prevalent MHC class I alleles HLA-A*03:01, HLA-A*11:01, and HLA-B*07:02. We then confirmed the processing, presentation, and binding of putative mKRAS epitopes using HPLC-tandem mass spectrometry and competitive peptide-binding assays. The immunogenicity of bona fide mKRAS epitopes was confirmed by the in vitro generation of mKRAS-specific CD8+ T cell responses using healthy donor blood samples that were restricted to HLA-A*03:01, -A*11:01, or -B*07:02 as determined by cytokine release assay and peptide/MHC multimer staining. Following T-cell receptor (TCR) sequencing, transgenic expression of mKRAS-specific TCRs on primary CD8+ T cells conferred cytotoxic potential against KRAS-mutated tumor cell lines expressing target HLA/mKRAS combinations. Importantly, mKRAS-specific CD8+ T cells did not cross-react with wild-type or alternatively mutated KRAS epitopes as measured by cytokine release or cytotoxicity assays. Based on these data, we initiated an adjuvant vaccine clinical study at the University of Pennsylvania Abramson Cancer Center targeting mKRAS in patients with resected PDA. The objective of this clinical study is to identify further mKRAS-specific TCR sequences for future adoptive T-cell therapy applications. To date, a total of 7 subjects have been enrolled, and 3 subjects have been vaccinated against targeted mKRAS short peptides utilizing a dendritic cell-based platform. Results from the first vaccinated subject have demonstrated the generation of a KRAS G12V-specific CD8+ T-cell response restricted to HLA-A*11:01 following vaccination with &gt;10% mKRAS-specific T cells isolated following primary in vitro expansion of CD8+ T cells using antigen-pulsed dendritic cells as measured by peptide/MHC multimer staining. TCR sequencing has been completed and functional studies to validate antigen specificity and tumor cytotoxicity are in process. The results of these studies will serve to develop a widely applicable T-cell therapy for PDA patients, and will have implications for the large number of patients with other KRAS-mutated cancers.

Citation Format: Adham S. Bear, Andrew J. Rech, Lee P. Richman, Mark H. O'Hara, Gerald P. Linette, Beatriz M. Carreno, Robert H. Vonderheide. Identification of T-cell receptors targeting mutant KRAS in pancreatic cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Pancreatic Cancer: Advances in Science and Clinical Care; 2019 Sept 6-9; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(24 Suppl):Abstract nr B04.

Phase I Study of Lentiviral-Transduced Chimeric Antigen Receptor-Modified T Cells Recognizing Mesothelin in Advanced Solid Cancers

This phase I study investigated the safety and activity of lentiviral-transduced chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-modified autologous T cells redirected against mesothelin (CART-meso) in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma, ovarian carcinoma, and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Fifteen patients with chemotherapy-refractory cancer (n = 5 per indication) were treated with a single CART-meso cell infusion. CART-meso cells were engineered by lentiviral transduction with a construct composed of the anti-mesothelin single-chain variable fragment derived from the mouse monoclonal antibody SS1 fused to intracellular signaling domains of 4-1BB and CD3zeta. Patients received 1-3 × 10⁷ or 1-3 × 10⁸ CART-meso cells/m² with or without 1.5 g/m² cyclophosphamide. Lentiviral-transduced CART-meso cells were well tolerated; one dose-limiting toxicity (grade 4, sepsis) occurred at 1-3 × 10⁷/m² CART-meso without cyclophosphamide. The best overall response was stable disease (11/15 patients). CART-meso cells expanded in the blood and reached peak levels by days 6-14 but persisted transiently. Cyclophosphamide pre-treatment enhanced CART-meso expansion but did not improve persistence beyond 28 days. CART-meso DNA was detected in 7/10 tumor biopsies. Human anti-chimeric antibodies (HACA) were detected in the blood of 8/14 patients. CART-meso cells were well tolerated and expanded in the blood of all patients but showed limited clinical activity. Studies evaluating a fully human anti-mesothelin CAR are ongoing.

Radiomic profiles via machine learning to predict response, overall survival, and KRAS status in metastatic colorectal tumors treated with FOLFOX/bevacizumab/hydroxychloroquine

e15125

Background: Autophagy is a resistance mechanism to chemotherapy that is inhibited by hydroxychloroquine (HCQ). We have reported a phase II trial of FOLFOX/bevacizumab/HCQ in 28 evaluable patients with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Overall response rate was 68%, with 11% complete response (CR) and 57% partial response (PR), while stable disease (SD) was seen in 30%. We hypothesize that analysis of CT imaging features via machine learning (ML) will enhance subtle yet important radiographic characteristics, and reveal imaging signatures determinant of outcome and mutational status. Methods: Baseline CT images were collected and 1265 quantitative imaging (QI) features extracted across all the metastatic sites – liver, lung, and lymph nodes – including descriptors of size, morphology, texture, and intensity. Cross-validated sequential feature selection coupled with support vector machine (SVM) was used to determine the most discriminative QI features for our integrative predictor of response and mutational status, and support vector regression (SVR) was used to derive imaging predictors of overall survival. The model predictions were compared with actual clinical results, including response, survival, and genomic aberrations. Results: Various QI features, primarily descriptive of texture and tumor volume, were determined as most important by the ML predictor. Using this signature, our predictor classified “Responder (PR+CR) vs Non-responder (SD)” with an accuracy of 85% [sensitivity(se) = 0.84, specificity(sp) = 0.71, AUC = 0.85]. The QI features were also able to detect KRAS and TP53 mutational status with an accuracy of 88% [se = 0.92, sp = 0.85, AUC = 0.87] and 86% [se = 0.80, sp = 0.90, AUC = 0.84], respectively. The SVM model predicted overall survival greater than the median (32 mo) with an accuracy of 86% [se = 0.93, sp = 0.79, AUC = 0.87]. The Pearson correlation coefficient between the SVR score and overall survival was estimated to be 0.73 (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Radiomic analysis of baseline CT imaging features analyzed by ML yielded an imaging signature predictive of response, survival, and KRAS and TP53 mutational status. If validated in a larger clinical data set, machine learning may offer a predictive biomarker to aid clinical decision making for mCRC patients.

A randomized phase II trial of niraparib plus either nivolumab or ipilimumab in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer whose cancer has not progressed on platinum-based therapy

TPS4161

Background: The treatment paradigm for advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) typically involves ongoing chemotherapy until either disease progression or clinical deterioration. A subset of patients with advanced PDAC have exceptional responses to platinum-based chemotherapy. We hypothesized that durable platinum sensitivity in patients with advanced PDAC might be indicative of a DNA repair deficiency, and that these patients may respond to a combination of niraparib, a PARP inhibitor, plus immune checkpoint blockade. Methods: We have enrolled 25 of 84 planned patients on study NCT 03404960. Eligibility criteria include inoperable PDAC and stability on platinum-based chemotherapy for ≥16 weeks without evidence of progressive disease. Patients who have progressed on platinum-based treatment or who have received prior therapy with PARP inhibitors are excluded. Patients are randomized to receive oral niraparib 200mg PO daily plus nivolumab 240mg IV every two weeks in continuous 28 day cycles or oral niraparib 200mg PO daily plus ipilimumab 3mg/kg IV every three weeks for four doses in continuous 21 day cycles. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival at 6 months. Secondary endpoints include response rate, duration of response and overall survival. Paired biopsies are obtained, as well as serial blood collections for circulating tumor cells (CTCs), circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Correlative assays will include germline whole exome sequencing and analyses of serially collected PBMCs, CTCs and ctDNA to identify genomic and immunologic innate and adaptive resistance mechanisms. Clinical trial information: NCT 03404960.

Hepatocytes direct the formation of a pro-metastatic niche in the liver

The liver is the most common site of metastatic disease1. Although this metastatic tropism may reflect the mechanical trapping of circulating tumour cells, liver metastasis is also dependent, at least in part, on the formation of a 'pro-metastatic' niche that supports the spread of tumour cells to the liver2,3. The mechanisms that direct the formation of this niche are poorly understood. Here we show that hepatocytes coordinate myeloid cell accumulation and fibrosis within the liver and, in doing so, increase the susceptibility of the liver to metastatic seeding and outgrowth. During early pancreatic tumorigenesis in mice, hepatocytes show activation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) signalling and increased production of serum amyloid A1 and A2 (referred to collectively as SAA). Overexpression of SAA by hepatocytes also occurs in patients with pancreatic and colorectal cancers that have metastasized to the liver, and many patients with locally advanced and metastatic disease show increases in circulating SAA. Activation of STAT3 in hepatocytes and the subsequent production of SAA depend on the release of interleukin 6 (IL-6) into the circulation by non-malignant cells. Genetic ablation or blockade of components of IL-6-STAT3-SAA signalling prevents the establishment of a pro-metastatic niche and inhibits liver metastasis. Our data identify an intercellular network underpinned by hepatocytes that forms the basis of a pro-metastatic niche in the liver, and identify new therapeutic targets.

A randomized phase II study of cabiralizumab (cabira) + nivolumab (nivo) ± chemotherapy (chemo) in advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC)

TPS465

Background: Treatment options for PDAC are limited; thus, new therapies that can improve outcomes and extend survival are needed. PDAC is associated with high infiltration by tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) that inhibit antitumor T-cell activity. Blocking colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF-1R) signaling—which supports the recruitment, differentiation, and maintenance of immunosupressive macrophages in tumors—may lead to depletion of TAMs and upregulation of T-cell checkpoints. Cabira, a humanized IgG4 monoclonal antibody, binds to CSF-1R and blocks its signaling, a key determinant of TAM activation and survival. By reducing TAMs and promoting a proinflammatory microenvironment, cabira may stimulate T-cell responses, thereby sensitizing PDAC to therapy with nivo (anti‒PD-1). In a phase 1a/b study cabira + nivo was tolerable and showed evidence of on-target tumor immune modulation and durable clinical benefit in heavily pretreated patients (pts) with advanced PDAC (Wainberg et al. J Immunother Cancer. 2017 [abst O42]; Carleton et al. J Clin Oncol. 2018 [abst 3020]). Here we describe a randomized, open-label, phase 2 study evaluating the safety and efficacy of cabira + nivo ± chemo in advanced PDAC. Methods: Pts aged ≥18 y with locally advanced/metastatic PDAC that progressed on/after first-line chemo (gemcitabine [gem] or 5-fluorouracil [5-FU] based) will be enrolled. Pts with active/suspected autoimmune disease, uncontrolled/significant cardiovascular disease, or prior exposure to select immune cell–modulating antibodies are not eligible. Depending on prior chemo received, pts will be randomized to 1 of 4 arms (n≈40 each): cabira + nivo; cabira + nivo + gem/nab-paclitaxel; cabira + nivo + oxaliplatin/5-FU/leucovorin; or investigator’s choice of standard-of-care chemo. Endpoints include median progression-free survival (primary), overall survival rate, objective response rate, median duration of response, pharmacokinetics, and safety. In a completed preliminary safety cohort, 12 pts were treated with cabira + nivo + chemo and monitored for 4 wk; competitive enrollment is open, with 32 pts enrolled. (NCT03336216, NCT02526017) Clinical trial information: NCT03336216.

Abstract CT085: Randomized phase II trial of hydroxychloroquine in combination with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel to inhibit autophagy in pancreatic cancer: A SU2C-funded trial

Autophagy, a regulated metabolic process that enables energy conservation in adverse environmental circumstances, has been shown in animal models to confer resistance to chemotherapy, which can be reversed by hydroxychloroquine (HCQ). After establishing safety in a Phase I run-in, 112 patients were randomized to receive standard gemcitabine (1000mg/m2) and nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/m2) weekly x 3 every 4 weeks, with (n=55 evaluable) or without (n=55 evaluable) HCQ 600mg bid. Median age was 65 (range 43-86) of whom 47% were aged &gt; 65, 40% were female, 93% Caucasian, ECOG PS 0/1 51%/49%, and did not differ between the arms. Treatment-related side-effects were consistent with prior studies, and were balanced by arm, except for Grade 3/4 neutropenia (42 vs 23%), nausea (9 vs 0%), and fatigue (7 vs 0%), all higher with HCQ. Partial responses were observed in 21/46 (46%) with HCQ, and 8/48 (17%) without HCQ. The primary endpoint, overall survival at 12 months, was 41% (95% CI 27-53%) in the HCQ arm and 51% (95% CI 36-63%) in the non-HCQ arm. Median progression-free survival was 5.7 months (95% CI 4.0-9.3) in the HCQ arm and 6.4 months in the non-HCQ arm (95% CI 4.5-7.6). Median overall survival was 11.1 months (95% CI 9.0-14.2) in the HCQ arm and 14.4 months (95% CI 9.5-15.6) in the non-HCQ arm. Genomic testing was performed on a subset of the patients (41%), in whom outcomes did not differ by p53 mutational status. We conclude that based on the primary endpoint, the addition of the autophagy reversal agent HCQ did not improve the survival of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Response rates in patients who received HCQ were higher, and toxicity was tolerable. Autophagy reversal might be explored in the management of locally-advanced disease.

Citation Format: Thomas B. Karasic, Mark H. O'Hara, Arturo Loaiza-Bonilla, Kim A. Reiss-Binder, Ursina R. Teitelbaum, Erkut Borazanci, Ana M. De Jesus-Acosta, Colleen Redlinger, Jessica A. Burrell, Daniel D. Von Hoff, Daniel A. Laheru, Ravi K. Amaravadi, Jeffrey A. Drebin, Peter J. O'Dwyer. Randomized phase II trial of hydroxychloroquine in combination with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel to inhibit autophagy in pancreatic cancer: A SU2C-funded trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT085.

A single arm phase II study of rucaparib maintenance in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma and a known deleterious BRCA1, BRCA2 or PALB2 mutation who have achieved stability on platinum therapy

TPS531

Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly lethal malignancy with a median overall survival of < 1 year. A subset of PDAC is characterized by a homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). The most well-defined patients within this group are those with deleterious mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2 and PALB2. This subset of tumors respond exceptionally well to treatment with platinum agents, leading to durable responses. However, cumulative toxicity can complicate or even prevent continued therapy, and there is an unmet need to establish maintenance strategies for such patients.Prior studies have shown that BRCA1 and BRCA2 associated PDACs respond to PARP inhibitors. Cross-resistance to platinum and PARP inhibitors exists, so initiating PARP inhibitor therapy after the development of platinum-resistance is an inferior approach. In this setting, we have designed a phase II trial of rucaparib as maintenance therapy for patients with deleterious BRCA1, BRCA2 or PALB2 who have sustained stability on platinum-based treatment. Methods: We have enrolled 2 of 42 planned patients on study NCT03140670. Eligibility criteria include inoperable PDAC, a known somatic or germline deleterious mutation in BRCA1, BRCA2 or PALB2 and stability on platinum-based chemotherapy for ≥16 weeks. Patients who have progressed on platinum-based treatment or who have received prior therapy with PARP inhibitors are excluded. Patients will receive oral rucaparib twice daily continuously in 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival at 6 months. Secondary endpoints include response rate, duration of response and overall survival. A pre-treatment tumor biopsy and biopsy at progression will be obtained, as well as serial blood collections for circulating tumor material. Correlative assays will include tumor and circulating tumor DNA sequencing to identify genomic predictors of outcome and study resistance mechanisms. Clinical trial information: NCT03140670.

A pilot study of galunisertib (LY2157299) plus stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)

TPS528

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common and lethal malignancy with few effective treatment options. Inherently aggressive disease biology combined with the immunosuppressive hepatic microenvironment creates a unique therapeutic challenge. TGF-β, the strongest known immunosuppressive cytokine [1, 2], modulates the hepatic immune response to various antigens and to ionizing radiation [3, 4]. TGF-β is constitutively released by liver cells and plays a key role in the early and late pathogenesis of HCC [5-7] by dampening the local T-cell response to the oncogenic hepatitis B and –C viruses [4, 8-11]. TGF-β is activated by ionizing radiation, where it blocks the effector T-cell response to cellular destruction and the release of tumor-specific antigens [4]. Preclinical data demonstrate that neutralizing TGF-β during radiation therapy effectively generates a CD8+ T-cell response to multiple endogenous tumor antigens [4], thereby generating an in-situ vaccine against a tumor [12-17]. We hypothesize that the combination of TGF-β receptor inhibition plus radiation therapy will produce a potent and clinically effective antitumor immune response against HCC. Methods: We have enrolled 9 of 15 planned patients on study NCT02906397. Eligibility criteria include inoperable HCC, Childs Pugh score of ≤7, and either failure of or refusal to take sorafenib. Patients must be 4 weeks from prior therapy and may not be taking immunosuppressants. Patients with major cardiac disease or abnormalities or a predisposition toward aneurysm development are excluded. Patients receive galunisertib on days 1-14 of 28 day cycles. SBRT will be delivered in a single fraction of 18 Gy between days 15-28 of C1. Pre-treatment and on-treatment biopsies are obtained, as well as serial blood collections for circulating tumor material. Immunologic evaluation will include TCR deep sequencing to track T-cell receptor clones, analysis of serum inflammatory cytokines, analysis of myeloid and B cell activation, multiplex flow cytometry of PBMCs to measure percentages and absolute counts of T-cell subsets and tissue assessment of immune markers. Peripheral and tissue levels of TGF-β will be assessed. Clinical trial information: NCT02906397.

Phase II trial of palbociclib in patients with advanced esophageal or gastric cancer

68

Background: Dysregulation of the cell cycle is a hallmark of cancer. Progression through the G1/S transition requires phosphorylation of retinoblastoma (RB) by cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6), which are regulated by cyclins D and E. A positive feedback loop between apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 (ASK1), a member of the MAP kinase pathway, and cyclin D1 has been shown to drive cell proliferation in gastric cancer. In addition, amplification of cyclin D loci and/or activating mutations in CDKs are frequent molecular aberrations in gastroesophageal malignancies. We hypothesized that palbociclib, a potent inhibitor of CDK4/6 would disrupt proliferative signaling, and arrest the growth of gastric cancer. We conducted a phase II trial of palbociclib in gastric and esophageal cancers as an initial test of efficacy. Methods: We screened 38 subjects with gastric, GE junction, or esophageal cancer for RB nuclear expression by immunohistochemistry, and 38/38 (100%) were positive. We enrolled 21 subjects, of whom 5 had gastric adenocarcinoma, 3 had GE junction adenocarcinoma, 8 had esophageal adenocarcinoma, and 5 had esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Four of 19 subjects tested positive for CCND1 overexpression by FISH. Patients received 125mg daily of palbociclib for days 1-21 of 28-day cycles. Results: Subjects remained on treatment for a median of 1.7 months. By the initial 2-month assessment, 5 of 21 subjects had stable disease, and 16 subjects had progressive disease by imaging and/or clinical progression. No objective responses were seen. The maximum duration of therapy was 5.5 months in two subjects. One of these subjects had progressing HER2-amplified gastric adenocarcinoma, and continued concurrent trastuzumab with palbociclib, while the other had squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Grade 3 or 4 cytopenias occurred in 9 of 21 subjects (43%), with neutropenia in 8 (38%), anemia in 4 (19%), and thrombocytopenia in 1 (5%). One subject discontinued therapy due to grade 4 thrombocytopenia with GI bleed. All other subjects discontinued therapy due to disease progression. Conclusions: Palbociclib has modest single-agent activity in gastroesophageal tumors despite universal RB expression. Clinical trial information: NCT01037790.

Phase II trial of the autophagy inhibitor hydroxychloroquine with FOLFOX and bevacizumab in front line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer

3545

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) cells can become resistant to chemotherapy and anti-angiogenic therapy through autophagy. The antimalarial agent hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is a potent inhibitor of autophagy, and in vivo studies in CRC cell models show significant decrease tumor volume when these autophagy inhibitors were combined with oxaliplatin and bevacizumab. We previously reported safety with HCQ 600mg BID in combination with standard front-line FOLFOX and bevacizumab in a Phase I study in metastatic CRC patients. We report the results of a single-arm phase II trial of patients with previously untreated stage IV CRC with good performance status and adequate hematologic and biochemical indices. Methods: Patients were treated with standard doses of mFOLFOX6 and bevacizumab with HCQ 600mg BID. Imaging was obtained every 2 months. Results: 37 patients were enrolled, 62% male, 89% Caucasian, median age 61, 65% ECOG PS 0, and 73% colon primary. Twenty-eight patients were evaluable for response as 2 patients did not start therapy and 7 patients withdrew prior to first response assessment. The ORR was 68% with an 11% CR rate. The median time to response was 3.1 months. Responses were independent of genomic aberrations within tumor tissue, specifically KRAS, TP53, BRAF, and PIK3CA. Median PFS and duration of response were not interpretable given that only 25% of patients came off trial for progression; all other patients withdrew to pursue surgery or liver embolization therapy, to receive therapy elsewhere, or due to toxicity associated with chemotherapy. The 1 year OS rate was 74%, and median OS has not been reached. The most common G3 or higher adverse events included neutropenia (31%), fatigue (11%), thromboembolism (9%), and cardiac events (9%). HCQ-attributable side effects included G1-3 insomnia (26%), G1-3 anxiety (20%), G1 visual disturbances (11%) and G3 allergy (3%). The majority of patients had increase in both LC3 and p62 in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and exhibited an increase in autophagosomes within the cytosol by electron microscopy. Conclusions: These data are promising and further evaluation in a randomized controlled trial is planned. Clinical trial information: NCT01206530.

Molecular Triage Trials in Colorectal Cancer

Advances in the understanding of genomic alterations in cancer, and the various therapies targeted to these alterations have permitted the design of trials directed to bringing this science to the clinic, with the ultimate goal of tailoring therapy to the individual. There is a high need for advances in targeted therapy in colorectal cancer, a disease in which only 2 classes of targeted therapies are approved for use in colorectal cancer, despite the majority of colorectal cancers containing a potentially targetable mutation. Here we outline the key elements to the design of these clinical trials and summarize the current active molecular triage trials in colorectal cancer.