1
|
Gong J, Mita AC, Wei Z, Cheng HH, Mitchell EP, Wright JJ, Ivy SP, Wang V, Gray RC, McShane LM, Rubinstein LV, Patton DR, Williams PM, Hamilton SR, Tricoli JV, Conley BA, Arteaga CL, Harris LN, O'Dwyer PJ, Chen AP, Flaherty KT. Phase II Study of Erdafitinib in Patients With Tumors With Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor Mutations or Fusions: Results From the NCI-MATCH ECOG-ACRIN Trial (EAY131) Subprotocol K2. JCO Precis Oncol 2024; 8:e2300407. [PMID: 38603650 DOI: 10.1200/po.23.00407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Revised: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Subprotocol K2 (EAY131-K2) of the NCI-MATCH platform trial was an open-label, single-arm, phase II study designed to evaluate the antitumor efficacy of the oral FGFR1-4 inhibitor, erdafitinib, in patients with tumors harboring FGFR1-4 mutations or fusions. METHODS Central confirmation of tumor FGFR1-4 mutations or fusions was required for outcome analysis. Patients with urothelial carcinoma were excluded. Enrolled subjects received oral erdafitinib at a starting dose of 8 mg daily continuously until intolerable toxicity or disease progression. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) with key secondary end points of safety, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Thirty-five patients were enrolled, and 25 patients were included in the primary efficacy analysis as prespecified in the protocol. The median age was 61 years, and 52% of subjects had received ≥3 previous lines of therapy. The confirmed ORR was 16% (4 of 25 [90% CI, 5.7 to 33.0], P = .034 against the null rate of 5%). An additional seven patients experienced stable disease as best-confirmed response. Four patients had a prolonged PFS including two with recurrent WHO grade IV, IDH1-/2-wildtype glioblastoma. The median PFS and OS were 3.6 months and 11.0 months, respectively. Erdafitinib was manageable with no new safety signals. CONCLUSION This study met its primary end point in patients with several pretreated solid tumor types harboring FGFR1-3 mutations or fusions. These findings support advancement of erdafitinib for patients with fibroblast growth factor receptor-altered tumors outside of currently approved indications in a potentially tumor-agnostic manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Gong
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Zihan Wei
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute-ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | | | - Edith P Mitchell
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - John J Wright
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - S Percy Ivy
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Victoria Wang
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute-ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | - Robert C Gray
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute-ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | - Lisa M McShane
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Larry V Rubinstein
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - David R Patton
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | | | | | - James V Tricoli
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Barbara A Conley
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | | | - Lyndsay N Harris
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | | | - Alice P Chen
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chen MF, Song Z, Yu HA, Sequist LV, Lovly CM, Mitchell EP, Moscow JA, Gray RJ, Wang V, McShane LM, Rubinstein LV, Patton DR, Williams PM, Hamilton SR, Umemura Y, Tricoli JV, Conley BA, Arteaga CL, Harris LN, O'Dwyer PJ, Chen AP, Flaherty KT. Phase II Study of Osimertinib in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations: Results From the NCI-MATCH ECOG-ACRIN (EAY131) Trial Subprotocol E. JCO Precis Oncol 2024; 8:e2300454. [PMID: 38591867 PMCID: PMC10896470 DOI: 10.1200/po.23.00454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2023] [Revised: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/10/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The National Cancer Institute Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice trial is a signal-finding genomically driven platform trial that assigns patients with any advanced refractory solid tumor, lymphoma, or myeloma to targeted therapies on the basis of next-generation sequencing results. Subprotocol E evaluated osimertinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with EGFR mutations. METHODS Eligible patients had EGFR mutations (T790M or rare activating) and received osimertinib 80 mg once daily. Patients with lung cancer with EGFR T790M were excluded. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR), and the secondary end points were 6-month progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and toxicity. RESULTS A total of 19 patients were enrolled: 17 were evaluable for toxicity and 13 for efficacy. The median age of the 13 included in the efficacy analysis was 63 years, 62% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 1, and 31% received >three previous systemic therapies. The most common tumor type was brain cancers (54%). The ORR was 15.4% (n = 2 of 13; 90% CI, 2.8 to 41.0) and 6-month PFS was 16.7% (90% CI, 0 to 34.4). The two confirmed RECIST responses were observed in a patient with neuroendocrine carcinoma not otherwise specified (EGFR exon 20 S768T and exon 18 G719C mutation) and a patient with low-grade epithelial carcinoma of the paranasal sinus (EGFR D770_N771insSVD). The most common (>20%) treatment-related adverse events were diarrhea, thrombocytopenia, and maculopapular rash. CONCLUSION In this pretreated cohort, osimertinib did not meet the prespecified end point threshold for efficacy, but responses were seen in a neuroendocrine carcinoma with an EGFR exon 20 S768T and exon 18 G719C mutation and an epithelial carcinoma with an EGFR D770_N771insSVD mutation. Osimertinib was well tolerated and had a safety profile consistent with previous studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Zihe Song
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute—ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | - Helena A. Yu
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | - Edith P. Mitchell
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Jeffrey A. Moscow
- Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Robert J. Gray
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute—ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | - Victoria Wang
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute—ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | - Lisa M. McShane
- Biometric Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Larry V. Rubinstein
- Biometric Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - David R. Patton
- Center for Biomedical Informatics & Information Technology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | | | | | - Yoshie Umemura
- University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - James V. Tricoli
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Barbara A. Conley
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | | | - Lyndsay N. Harris
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | | | - Alice P. Chen
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gong J, Mita AC, Wei Z, Cheng HH, Mitchell EP, Wright JJ, Ivy SP, Wang V, Gray RC, McShane LM, Rubinstein LV, Patton DR, Williams PM, Hamilton SR, Alva AS, Tricoli JV, Conley BA, Arteaga CL, Harris LN, O'Dwyer PJ, Chen AP, Flaherty KT. Phase II Study of Erdafitinib in Patients With Tumors With FGFR Amplifications: Results From the NCI-MATCH ECOG-ACRIN Trial (EAY131) Subprotocol K1. JCO Precis Oncol 2024; 8:e2300406. [PMID: 38603651 DOI: 10.1200/po.23.00406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Revised: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Despite fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitors being approved in tumor types with select FGFR rearrangements or gene mutations, amplifications of FGFR represent the most common FGFR alteration across malignancies. Subprotocol K1 (EAY131-K1) of the National Cancer Institute-MATCH platform trial was designed to evaluate the antitumor efficacy of the oral FGFR1-4 inhibitor, erdafitinib, in patients with tumors harboring FGFR1-4 amplification. METHODS EAY131-K1 was an open-label, single-arm, phase II study with central confirmation of presence of FGFR1-4 amplification in tumors. Patients with urothelial carcinoma were excluded. Enrolled patients received oral erdafitinib at a starting dose of 8 mg once daily continuously with escalation to 9 mg once daily continuously, on the basis of predefined time point assessments of phosphate levels, until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary end point was centrally assessed objective response rate (ORR), with key secondary end points being 6-month progression-free survival (PFS6), PFS, overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS Thirty-five patients were enrolled into this study with 18 included in the prespecified primary efficacy analysis. The median age of the 18 patients was 60 years, and 78% had received ≥3 previous lines of therapy. There were no confirmed responses to erdafitinib; however, five patients experienced stable disease (SD) as best response. One patient with an FGFR1-amplified breast cancer had a prolonged PFS >168 days (5.5 months). The median PFS was 1.7 months (90% CI, 1.1 to 1.8 months) and the median OS was 4.2 months (90% CI, 2.3 to 9.3 months). The estimated PFS6 rate was 13.8% (90% CI, 3.3 to 31.6). The majority of toxicities were grade 1 to 2 in nature, although there was one grade 5 treatment-related adverse event. CONCLUSION Erdafitinib did not meet its primary end point of efficacy as determined by ORR in treatment-refractory solid tumors harboring FGFR1-4 amplifications. Our findings support that rearrangements and gene mutations, but not amplifications, of FGFR remain the established FGFR alterations with approved indications for FGFR inhibition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Gong
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Zihan Wei
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute-ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | | | - Edith P Mitchell
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - John J Wright
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - S Percy Ivy
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Victoria Wang
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute-ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | - Robert C Gray
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute-ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | - Lisa M McShane
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Larry V Rubinstein
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - David R Patton
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | | | | | - Ajjai S Alva
- University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - James V Tricoli
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Barbara A Conley
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | | | - Lyndsay N Harris
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | | | - Alice P Chen
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Connolly RM, Wang V, Hyman DM, Grivas P, Mitchell EP, Wright JJ, Sharon E, Gray RJ, McShane LM, Rubinstein LV, Patton DR, Williams PM, Hamilton SR, Wang J, Wisinski KB, Tricoli JV, Conley BA, Harris LN, Arteaga CL, O'Dwyer PJ, Chen AP, Flaherty KT. Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab in Patients with Non-Breast/Gastroesophageal HER2-Amplified Tumors: Results from the NCI-MATCH ECOG-ACRIN Trial (EAY131) Subprotocol J. Clin Cancer Res 2024; 30:1273-1280. [PMID: 38433347 PMCID: PMC10984755 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-0633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2023] [Revised: 07/05/2023] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE NCI-MATCH assigned patients with advanced cancer and progression on prior treatment, based on genomic alterations in pretreatment tumor tissue. Arm J (EAY131-J) evaluated the combination of trastuzumab/pertuzumab (HP) across HER2-amplified tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligible patients had high levels of HER2 amplification [copy number (CN) ≥7] detected by central next-generation sequencing (NGS) or through NCI-designated laboratories. Patients with breast/gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma and those who received prior HER2-directed therapy were excluded. Enrollment of patients with colorectal cancer was capped at 4 based on emerging data. Patients received HP IV Q3 weeks until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR); secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Thirty-five patients were enrolled, with 25 included in the primary efficacy analysis (CN ≥7 confirmed by a central lab, median CN = 28). Median age was 66 (range, 31-80), and half of all patients had ≥3 prior therapies (range, 1-11). The confirmed ORR was 12% [3/25 partial responses (colorectal, cholangiocarcinoma, urothelial cancers), 90% confidence interval (CI) 3.4%-28.2%]. There was one additional partial response (urothelial cancer) in a patient with an unconfirmed ERBB2 copy number. Median PFS was 3.3 months (90% CI 2.0-4.1), and median OS 9.4 months (90% CI 5.0-18.9). Treatment-emergent adverse events were consistent with prior studies. There was no association between HER2 CN and response. CONCLUSIONS HP was active in a selection of HER2-amplified tumors (non-breast/gastroesophageal) but did not meet the predefined efficacy benchmark. Additional strategies targeting HER2 and potential resistance pathways are warranted, especially in rare tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roisin M Connolly
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
- Cancer Research @UCC, College of Medicine and Health, University College Cork, Ireland
| | - Victoria Wang
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David M Hyman
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Petros Grivas
- University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Edith P Mitchell
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - John J Wright
- Investigational Drug Branch, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Elad Sharon
- Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Robert J Gray
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lisa M McShane
- Biometric Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Larry V Rubinstein
- Biometric Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - David R Patton
- Center for Biomedical Informatics and Information Technology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - P Mickey Williams
- Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland
| | | | - Jue Wang
- UT Southwestern Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Kari B Wisinski
- University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - James V Tricoli
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Barbara A Conley
- Cancer Diagnosis Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Lyndsay N Harris
- Cancer Diagnosis Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Carlos L Arteaga
- UT Southwestern Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas
| | | | - Alice P Chen
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Keith T Flaherty
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Harris LN, Blanke CD, Erba HP, Ford JM, Gray RJ, LeBlanc ML, Hu-Lieskovan S, Litzow MR, Luger SM, Meric-Bernstam F, O'Dwyer PJ, Othus MK, Politi K, Shepherd LE, Allegra CJ, Chen HX, Ivy SP, Korde LA, Little RF, McShane LM, Moscow JA, Patton DR, Thurin M, Yee LM, Doroshow JH. The New NCI Precision Medicine Trials. Clin Cancer Res 2023; 29:4728-4732. [PMID: 37531248 PMCID: PMC10690084 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-0917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Revised: 06/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/20/2023] [Indexed: 08/04/2023]
Abstract
Basket, umbrella, and platform trial designs (master protocols) have emerged over the last decade to study precision medicine approaches in oncology. First-generation trials like NCI-MATCH (Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice) have proven the principle that studying targeted therapies on a large scale is feasible both from the laboratory and clinical perspectives. However, single-agent targeted therapies have shown limited ability to control metastatic disease, despite careful matching of drug to target. As such, newer approaches employing combinations of targeted therapy, or targeted therapy with standard therapies, need to be considered. The NCI has recently embarked on three second-generation precision medicine trials to address this need: ComboMATCH, iMATCH, and myeloMATCH. The design of these trials and necessary infrastructure are discussed in the following perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Charles D. Blanke
- SWOG Cancer Research Network, OHSU Knight Cancer Center, Portland, Oregon
| | - Harry P. Erba
- Department of Medicine, Duke Cancer Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - James M. Ford
- Division of Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Robert J. Gray
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Michael L. LeBlanc
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Siwen Hu-Lieskovan
- Department of Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Mark R. Litzow
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Selina M. Luger
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Funda Meric-Bernstam
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Peter J. O'Dwyer
- ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Megan K.D. Othus
- Biostatistics, Public Health Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Katerina Politi
- Section of Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Lois E. Shepherd
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Helen X. Chen
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, NCI, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - S. Percy Ivy
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, NCI, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Larissa A. Korde
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, NCI, Bethesda, Maryland
| | | | - Lisa M. McShane
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, NCI, Bethesda, Maryland
| | | | - David R. Patton
- Clinical and Translational Research Branch, Center for Biomedical Informatics and Information Technology, NCI, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Magdalena Thurin
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, NCI, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Laura M. Yee
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, NCI, Bethesda, Maryland
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Oh DY, Maqueda MA, Quinn DI, O'Dwyer PJ, Chau I, Kim SY, Duran I, Castellano D, Berlin J, Mellado B, Williamson SK, Lee KW, Marti F, Mathew P, Saif MW, Wang D, Chong E, Hilger-Rolfe J, Dean JP, Arkenau HT. Ibrutinib combination therapy for advanced gastrointestinal and genitourinary tumours: results from a phase 1b/2 study. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:1056. [PMID: 37919668 PMCID: PMC10623721 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11539-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2022] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ibrutinib, a first-in-class inhibitor of Bruton's tyrosine kinase, is approved for the treatment of various B-cell malignancies and chronic graft-versus-host disease. Based on encouraging preclinical data, safety and efficacy of ibrutinib combined with companion drugs for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC), gastric/gastroesophageal junctional adenocarcinoma (GC), and colorectal adenocarcinoma (CRC) were evaluated. METHODS Ibrutinib 560 mg or 840 mg once daily was administered with standard doses of everolimus for RCC, docetaxel for GC, and cetuximab for CRC. Endpoints included determination of the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of ibrutinib in phase 1b and efficacy (overall response rate [ORR] for GC and CRC; progression-free survival [PFS] for CRC) in phase 2. RESULTS A total of 39 (RCC), 46 (GC), and 50 (RCC) patients were enrolled and received the RP2D. Safety profiles were consistent with the individual agents used in the study. Confirmed ORRs were 3% (RCC), 21% (GC), and 19% (CRC). Median (90% CI) PFS was 5.6 (3.9-7.5) months in RCC, 4.0 (2.7-4.2) months in GC, and 5.4 (4.1-5.8) months in CRC. CONCLUSIONS Clinically meaningful increases in efficacy were not observed compared to historical controls; however, the data may warrant further evaluation of ibrutinib combinations in other solid tumours. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02599324.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Do-Youn Oh
- Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Graduate School, Seoul, South Korea.
| | | | - David I Quinn
- University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Ian Chau
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust-Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - Sun Young Kim
- Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Ignacio Duran
- Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla, IDIVAL, Santander, Spain
| | | | | | - Begona Mellado
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Clinic i Provincial de Barcelona, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Keun-Wook Lee
- Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea
| | | | | | - Muhammad Wasif Saif
- Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
- Orlando Health Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL, USA
| | - Ding Wang
- Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Elizabeth Chong
- Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - James P Dean
- Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Hendrik-Tobias Arkenau
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute - United Kingdom (SCRI-UK) and University College London, Cancer Institute, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
El-Khoueiry AB, Clarke J, Neff T, Crossman T, Ratia N, Rathi C, Noto P, Tarkar A, Garrido-Laguna I, Calvo E, Rodón J, Tran B, O'Dwyer PJ, Cuker A, Abdul Razak AR. Phase 1 study of GSK3368715, a type I PRMT inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors. Br J Cancer 2023; 129:309-317. [PMID: 37237172 PMCID: PMC10338470 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02276-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2022] [Revised: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 04/06/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND GSK3368715, a first-in-class, reversible inhibitor of type I protein methyltransferases (PRMTs) demonstrated anticancer activity in preclinical studies. This Phase 1 study (NCT03666988) evaluated safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary efficacy of GSK3368715 in adults with advanced-stage solid tumors. METHODS In part 1, escalating doses of oral once-daily GSK3368715 (50, 100, and 200 mg) were evaluated. Enrollment was paused at 200 mg following a higher-than-expected incidence of thromboembolic events (TEEs) among the first 19 participants, resuming under a protocol amendment starting at 100 mg. Part 2 (to evaluate preliminary efficacy) was not initiated. RESULTS Dose-limiting toxicities were reported in 3/12 (25%) patients at 200 mg. Nine of 31 (29%) patients across dose groups experienced 12 TEEs (8 grade 3 events and 1 grade 5 pulmonary embolism). Best response achieved was stable disease, occurring in 9/31 (29%) patients. Following single and repeat dosing, GSK3368715 maximum plasma concentration was reached within 1 h post dosing. Target engagement was observed in the blood, but was modest and variable in tumor biopsies at 100 mg. CONCLUSION Based on higher-than-expected incidence of TEEs, limited target engagement at lower doses, and lack of observed clinical efficacy, a risk/benefit analysis led to early study termination. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03666988.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony B El-Khoueiry
- University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1441 Eastlake Ave, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - James Clarke
- GSK, Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2NY, UK
| | - Tobias Neff
- GSK, 1250 S Collegeville Road, Collegeville, PA, USA
- Merck&Co, North Wales, PA, USA
| | - Tim Crossman
- GSK, Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2NY, UK
| | - Nirav Ratia
- GSK, Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2NY, UK
| | - Chetan Rathi
- GSK, 1250 S Collegeville Road, Collegeville, PA, USA
| | - Paul Noto
- GSK, 1250 S Collegeville Road, Collegeville, PA, USA
- Adaptimmune LLC, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Aarti Tarkar
- GSK, 1250 S Collegeville Road, Collegeville, PA, USA
| | | | - Emiliano Calvo
- START Madrid-CIOCC, Centro Integral Oncológico Clara Campal, Calle Oña, 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jordi Rodón
- Investigational Cancer Therapeutics Department, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Holcombe Blvd Unit 455, 8th Floor, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ben Tran
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre (PMCC), 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia
| | - Peter J O'Dwyer
- University of Pennsylvania, Abramson Cancer Center, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Adam Cuker
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Albiruni R Abdul Razak
- Phase 1 Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Ave, Toronto, M5G2M9, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Giantonio BJ, Catalano PJ, Meropol NJ, O'Dwyer PJ, Mitchell EP, Alberts SR, Schwartz MA, Benson AB. Bevacizumab in Combination With Oxaliplatin, Fluorouracil, and Leucovorin (FOLFOX4) for Previously Treated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Results From the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study E3200. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:3670-3675. [PMID: 37459754 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.02761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/20/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer mortality in the United States. Antiangiogenic therapy with bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy improves survival in previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. This study was conducted to determine the effect of bevacizumab (at 10 mg/kg) on survival duration for oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eight hundred twenty-nine metastatic colorectal cancer patients previously treated with a fluoropyrimidine and irinotecan were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups: oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFOX4) with bevacizumab; FOLFOX4 without bevacizumab; or bevacizumab alone. The primary end point was overall survival, with additional determinations of progression-free survival, response, and toxicity. RESULTS The median duration of survival for the group treated with FOLFOX4 and bevacizumab was 12.9 months compared with 10.8 months for the group treated with FOLFOX4 alone (corresponding hazard ratio for death = 0.75; P = .0011), and 10.2 months for those treated with bevacizumab alone. The median progression-free survival for the group treated with FOLFOX4 in combination with bevacizumab was 7.3 months, compared with 4.7 months for the group treated with FOLFOX4 alone (corresponding hazard ratio for progression = 0.61; P < .0001), and 2.7 months for those treated with bevacizumab alone. The corresponding overall response rates were 22.7%, 8.6%, and 3.3%, respectively (P < .0001 for FOLFOX4 with bevacizumab v FOLFOX4 comparison). Bevacizumab was associated with hypertension, bleeding, and vomiting. CONCLUSION The addition of bevacizumab to oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin improves survival duration for patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruce J Giantonio
- From the University of Pennsylvania; Fox Chase Cancer Center; Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami, FL; and Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Paul J Catalano
- From the University of Pennsylvania; Fox Chase Cancer Center; Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami, FL; and Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Neal J Meropol
- From the University of Pennsylvania; Fox Chase Cancer Center; Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami, FL; and Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Peter J O'Dwyer
- From the University of Pennsylvania; Fox Chase Cancer Center; Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami, FL; and Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Edith P Mitchell
- From the University of Pennsylvania; Fox Chase Cancer Center; Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami, FL; and Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Steven R Alberts
- From the University of Pennsylvania; Fox Chase Cancer Center; Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami, FL; and Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Michael A Schwartz
- From the University of Pennsylvania; Fox Chase Cancer Center; Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami, FL; and Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Al B Benson
- From the University of Pennsylvania; Fox Chase Cancer Center; Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami, FL; and Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
O'Dwyer PJ, Gray RJ, Flaherty KT, Chen AP, Li S, Wang V, McShane LM, Patton DR, Tricoli JV, Williams PM, Iafrate AJ, Sklar J, Mitchell EP, Takebe N, Sims DJ, Coffey B, Fu T, Routbort M, Rubinstein LV, Little RF, Arteaga CL, Marinucci D, Hamilton SR, Conley BA, Harris LN, Doroshow JH. The NCI-MATCH trial: lessons for precision oncology. Nat Med 2023; 29:1349-1357. [PMID: 37322121 PMCID: PMC10612141 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-023-02379-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
The NCI-MATCH (Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice) trial ( NCT02465060 ) was launched in 2015 as a genomically driven, signal-seeking precision medicine platform trial-largely for patients with treatment-refractory, malignant solid tumors. Having completed in 2023, it remains one of the largest tumor-agnostic, precision oncology trials undertaken to date. Nearly 6,000 patients underwent screening and molecular testing, with a total of 1,593 patients (inclusive of continued accrual from standard next-generation sequencing) being assigned to one of 38 substudies. Each substudy was a phase 2 trial of a therapy matched to a genomic alteration, with a primary endpoint of objective tumor response by RECIST criteria. In this Perspective, we summarize the outcomes of the initial 27 substudies in NCI-MATCH, which met its signal-seeking objective with 7/27 positive substudies (25.9%). We discuss key aspects of the design and operational conduct of the trial, highlighting important lessons for future precision medicine studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Robert J Gray
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute - ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Alice P Chen
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Shuli Li
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute - ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Victoria Wang
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute - ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lisa M McShane
- Biometric Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - David R Patton
- Center for Biomedical Informatics & Information Technology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - James V Tricoli
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - P Mickey Williams
- Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, USA
| | - A John Iafrate
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Naoko Takebe
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - David J Sims
- Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, USA
| | - Brent Coffey
- Center for Biomedical Informatics & Information Technology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Tony Fu
- Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, USA
| | - Mark Routbort
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Larry V Rubinstein
- Biometric Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Richard F Little
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Carlos L Arteaga
- UT Southwestern Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | | | | | - Barbara A Conley
- Cancer Diagnosis Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Lyndsay N Harris
- Cancer Diagnosis Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - James H Doroshow
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Meric-Bernstam F, Ford JM, O'Dwyer PJ, Shapiro GI, McShane LM, Freidlin B, O'Cearbhaill RE, George S, Glade-Bender J, Lyman GH, Tricoli JV, Patton D, Hamilton SR, Gray RJ, Hawkins DS, Ramineni B, Flaherty KT, Grivas P, Yap TA, Berlin J, Doroshow JH, Harris LN, Moscow JA. National Cancer Institute Combination Therapy Platform Trial with Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice (ComboMATCH). Clin Cancer Res 2023; 29:1412-1422. [PMID: 36662819 PMCID: PMC10102840 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-3334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2022] [Revised: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
Over the past decade, multiple trials, including the precision medicine trial National Cancer Institute-Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice (NCI-MATCH, EAY131, NCT02465060) have sought to determine if treating cancer based on specific genomic alterations is effective, irrespective of the cancer histology. Although many therapies are now approved for the treatment of cancers harboring specific genomic alterations, most patients do not respond to therapies targeting a single alteration. Further, when antitumor responses do occur, they are often not durable due to the development of drug resistance. Therefore, there is a great need to identify rational combination therapies that may be more effective. To address this need, the NCI and National Clinical Trials Network have developed NCI-ComboMATCH, the successor to NCI-MATCH. Like the original trial, NCI-ComboMATCH is a signal-seeking study. The goal of ComboMATCH is to overcome drug resistance to single-agent therapy and/or utilize novel synergies to increase efficacy by developing genomically-directed combination therapies, supported by strong preclinical in vivo evidence. Although NCI-MATCH was mainly comprised of multiple single-arm studies, NCI-ComboMATCH tests combination therapy, evaluating both combination of targeted agents as well as combinations of targeted therapy with chemotherapy. Although NCI-MATCH was histology agnostic with selected tumor exclusions, ComboMATCH has histology-specific and histology-agnostic arms. Although NCI-MATCH consisted of single-arm studies, ComboMATCH utilizes single-arm as well as randomized designs. NCI-MATCH had a separate, parallel Pediatric MATCH trial, whereas ComboMATCH will include children within the same trial. We present rationale, scientific principles, study design, and logistics supporting the ComboMATCH study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Funda Meric-Bernstam
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - James M. Ford
- Department of Medicine – Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Peter J. O'Dwyer
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Geoffrey I. Shapiro
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lisa M. McShane
- Biometric Research Program, DCTD, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Boris Freidlin
- Biometric Research Program, DCTD, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Roisin E. O'Cearbhaill
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Suzanne George
- Sarcoma and Bone Oncology Division, Medical Oncology Department, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Julia Glade-Bender
- Department of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Gary H. Lyman
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and the University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - James V. Tricoli
- Diagnostic Biomarkers and Technology Branch, Cancer Diagnosis Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland
| | - David Patton
- Center for Biomedical Informatics and Information Technology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Stanley R. Hamilton
- Department of Pathology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California
| | - Robert J. Gray
- Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Douglas S. Hawkins
- Department of Pediatrics, Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Bhanumati Ramineni
- Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, Regulatory Affairs Branch, DCTD, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Keith T. Flaherty
- Division of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Petros Grivas
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, Washington
| | - Timothy A. Yap
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jordan Berlin
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - James H. Doroshow
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Lyndsay N. Harris
- Cancer Diagnosis Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Jeffrey A. Moscow
- Investigational Drug Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Clark AS, Hong F, Finn RS, DeMichele AM, Mitchell EP, Zwiebel J, Arnaldez FI, Gray RJ, Wang V, McShane LM, Rubinstein LV, Patton D, Williams PM, Hamilton SR, Copur MS, Kasbari SS, Thind R, Conley BA, Arteaga CL, O'Dwyer PJ, Harris LN, Chen AP, Flaherty KT. Phase II Study of Palbociclib (PD-0332991) in CCND1, 2, or 3 Amplification: Results from the NCI-MATCH ECOG-ACRIN Trial (EAY131) Subprotocol Z1B. Clin Cancer Res 2023; 29:1477-1483. [PMID: 36853016 PMCID: PMC10102836 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-2150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2022] [Revised: 10/07/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Cyclin D/CDK4/6 is critical in controlling the G1 to S checkpoint. CCND, the gene encoding cyclin D, is known to be amplified in a variety of solid tumors. Palbociclib is an oral CDK4/6 inhibitor, approved in advanced breast cancer in combination with endocrine therapy. We explored the efficacy of palbociclib in patients with nonbreast solid tumors containing an amplification in CCND1, 2, or 3. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with tumors containing a CCND1, 2, or 3 amplification and expression of the retinoblastoma protein were assigned to subprotocol Z1B and received palbociclib 125 mg once daily for 21 days of a 28-day cycle. Tumor response was assessed every two cycles. RESULTS Forty patients were assigned to subprotocol Z1B; 4 patients had outside assays identifying the CCND1, 2, or 3 amplification and were not confirmed centrally; 3 were ineligible and 2 were not treated (1 untreated patient was also ineligible), leaving 32 evaluable patients for this analysis. There were no partial responses; 12 patients (37.5%) had stable disease as best response. There were seven deaths on study, all during cycle 1 and attributable to disease progression. Median progression-free survival was 1.8 months. The most common toxicities were leukopenia (n = 21, 55%) and neutropenia (n = 19, 50%); neutropenia was the most common grade 3/4 event (n = 12, 32%). CONCLUSIONS Palbociclib was not effective at treating nonbreast solid tumors with a CCND1, 2, or 3 amplification in this cohort. These data do not support further investigation of single-agent palbociclib in tumors with CCND1, 2, or 3 amplification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy S. Clark
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Fangxin Hong
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute – ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Richard S. Finn
- University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | | | - Edith P. Mitchell
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - James Zwiebel
- Investigational Drug Branch, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, NCI, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Fernanda I. Arnaldez
- Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, NCI, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Robert J. Gray
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute – ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Victoria Wang
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute – ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lisa M. McShane
- Biometric Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, NCI, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Larry V. Rubinstein
- Biometric Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, NCI, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - David Patton
- Center for Biomedical Informatics and Information Technology, NCI, Bethesda, Maryland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Alice P. Chen
- Early Clinical Trials Development Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, NCI, Bethesda, Maryland
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Unger JM, LeBlanc M, George S, Wolmark N, Curran WJ, O'Dwyer PJ, Schnall MD, Mannel RS, Mandrekar SJ, Gray RJ, Zhao F, Bah M, Vaidya R, Blanke CD. Population, Clinical, and Scientific Impact of National Cancer Institute's National Clinical Trials Network Treatment Studies. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:2020-2028. [PMID: 36480773 PMCID: PMC10082246 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.01826] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2022] [Revised: 10/12/2022] [Accepted: 10/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE In the United States, the National Cancer Institute National Cancer Clinical Trials Network (NCTN) groups have conducted publicly funded oncology research for 50 years. The combined impact of all adult network group trials has never been systematically examined. METHODS We identified randomized, phase III trials from the adult NCTN groups, reported from 1980 onward, with statistically significant findings for ≥ 1 clinical, time-dependent outcomes. In the subset of trials in which the experimental arm improved overall survival, gains in population life-years were estimated by deriving trial-specific hazard functions and hazard ratios to estimate the experimental treatment benefit and then mapping this trial-level benefit onto the US cancer population using registry and life-table data. Scientific impact was based on citation data from Google Scholar. Federal investment costs per life-year gained were estimated. The results were derived through December 31, 2020. RESULTS One hundred sixty-two trials comprised of 108,334 patients were analyzed, representing 29.8% (162/544) of trials conducted. The most common cancers included breast (34), gynecologic (28), and lung (14). The trials were cited 165,336 times (mean, 62.2 citations/trial/year); 87.7% of trials were cited in cancer care guidelines in favor of the recommended treatment. These studies were estimated to have generated 14.2 million (95% CI, 11.5 to 16.5 million) additional life-years to patients with cancer, with projected gains of 24.1 million (95% CI, 19.7 to 28.2 million) life-years by 2030. The federal investment cost per life-year gained through 2020 was $326 in US dollars. CONCLUSION NCTN randomized trials have been widely cited and are routinely included in clinical guidelines. Moreover, their conduct has predicted substantial improvements in overall survival in the United States for patients with oncologic disease, suggesting they have contributed meaningfully to this nation's health. These findings demonstrate the critical role of government-sponsored research in extending the lives of patients with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph M. Unger
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Michael LeBlanc
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Suzanne George
- Office of the Alliance Group Chair, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Norman Wolmark
- NRG Oncology, Philadelphia, PA
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | - Peter J. O'Dwyer
- Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Mitchell D. Schnall
- Department of Genetics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Robert S. Mannel
- Stephenson Cancer Center, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK
| | - Sumithra J. Mandrekar
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Robert J. Gray
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group–American College of Radiology Imaging Network Biostatistics Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Fengmin Zhao
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group–American College of Radiology Imaging Network Biostatistics Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Mariama Bah
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Riha Vaidya
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Charles D. Blanke
- SWOG Cancer Research Group Chair's Office, Oregon Health and Science University Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, OR
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Cannas S, Till JE, Kim K, LaRiviere MJ, Vollmer CM, Eads JR, Karasic TB, O'Dwyer PJ, Schneider CJ, Teitelbaum UR, Binder KAR, O'Hara MH, Ross DT, McGregor K, Bornemann-Kolatzki K, Schütz E, Beck J, Carpenter EL. Abstract 1043: Liquid biopsy signature combining copy number instability and mutant KRAS detection is associated with survival for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2023-1043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/07/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction: In the setting of metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPDAC), lower baseline plasma KRAS mutation levels have been associated with improved survival. While tissue-agnostic, plasma-based copy number instability (CNI) has been demonstrated as an early indicator of response to immunotherapy for some solid tumors, it has not been assessed for patients with mPDAC, nor in combination with KRAS mutations for patients receiving standard of care chemo/radiotherapy. Here we evaluate the combination of mutant KRAS (mKRAS) and CNI detection in plasma as a predictor of overall and progression-free survival (OS/PFS) in mPDAC patients who received standard of care therapy.
Methods: Cell-free DNA was extracted from plasma and libraries prepared at baseline (Week 0) and weeks 8, 16 and 24 on therapy, and analyzed by next-generation sequencing (CNI) and droplet digital PCR (mKRAS). Descriptive statistics were computed for variables including CNI (score is a measure of circulating tumor DNA) and mKRAS variant allele fraction. Detection was defined as above the limit of detection (mKRAS=0.13%) and above the 95th percentile of the value in normal individuals (CNI=24). Therapy response was assessed by OS and PFS.
Results: 196 plasma samples from 64 mPDAC patients were analyzed. When dichotomized as detectable vs undetectable, CNI alone was significantly associated with OS at all on-therapy timepoints but not baseline, whereas mKRAS was significantly associated with OS for all 4 timepoints (Table 1). Detection of both CNI and mKRAS in combination was strongly associated with worse OS at all timepoints, yielding the highest HR. Similar results were obtained when mKRAS and CNI were dichotomized at their respective median values or with PFS as the clinical endpoint.
Conclusions: Combined CNI and mKRAS detection at baseline and on-therapy may provide a strong and early indication of worse prognosis for patients with mPDAC.
Table 1. Association of CNI and mKRAS with Overall Survival (HazardRatio [95% CI], log-rank p-value) Timepoint CNI mKRAS CNI and KRAS Baseline/Week 0 1.54 [0.89-2.68], 0.1 2.05 [1.12-3.78], 0.02 2.50 [1.46-4.28], 0.0006 Week 8 1.78 [0.99-3.18], 0.05 2.21 [1.19-4.08], 0.01 9.81 [3.40-28.28], <0.0001 Week 16 1.91 [1.03-3.53], 0.04 3.26 [1.60-6.62], 0.0006 11.11 [4.28-28.83], <0.0001 Week 24 2.55 [1.28-5.09], 0.006 4.55 [2.03-10.23], <0.0001 6.42 [2.61-15.84], <0.0001
Citation Format: Samuele Cannas, Jacob E. Till, Kristine Kim, Michael J. LaRiviere, Charles M. Vollmer, Jennifer R. Eads, Thomas B. Karasic, Peter J. O'Dwyer, Charles J. Schneider, Ursina R. Teitelbaum, Kim A. Reiss Binder, Mark H. O'Hara, Douglas T. Ross, Kim McGregor, Kirsten Bornemann-Kolatzki, Ekkehard Schütz, Julia Beck, Erica L. Carpenter. Liquid biopsy signature combining copy number instability and mutant KRAS detection is associated with survival for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 1043.
Collapse
|
14
|
Vasilevskaya IA, Selvakumaran M, Roberts D, O'dwyer PJ. Data from JNK1 Inhibition Attenuates Hypoxia-Induced Autophagy and Sensitizes to Chemotherapy.. [DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.c.6540160.v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
<div>Abstract<p>Inhibition of hypoxia-induced stress signaling through JNK potentiates the effects of oxaliplatin. The JNK pathway plays a role in both autophagy and apoptosis; therefore, it was determined how much of the effect of JNK inhibition on oxaliplatin sensitivity is dependent on its effect on autophagy. We studied the impact of JNK isoform downregulation in the HT29 colon adenocarcinoma cell line on hypoxia- and oxaliplatin-induced responses. Electron microscopic analyses demonstrated that both oxaliplatin- and hypoxia-induced formations of autophagosomes were reduced significantly in HT29 cells treated with the JNK inhibitor SP600125. The role of specific JNK isoforms was defined using HT29-derived cell lines stably expressing dominant-negative constructs for JNK1 and JNK2 (HTJ1.3 and HTJ2.2, respectively). These cell lines demonstrated that functional JNK1 is required for hypoxia-induced autophagy and that JNK2 does not substitute for it. Inhibition of autophagy in HTJ1.3 cells also coincided with enhancement of intrinsic apoptosis. Analysis of Bcl2-family proteins revealed hyperphosphorylation of Bcl-X<sub>L</sub> in the HTJ1.3 cell line, but this did not lead to the expected dissociation from Beclin 1. Consistent with this, knockdown of Bcl-X<sub>L</sub> in HT29 cells did not significantly affect the induction of autophagy, but abrogated hypoxic resistance to oxaliplatin due to the faster and more robust activation of apoptosis.</p><p><b>Implications:</b> These data suggest that balance between autophagy and apoptosis is shifted toward apoptosis by downregulation of JNK1, contributing to oxaliplatin sensitization. These findings further support the investigation of JNK inhibition in colorectal cancer treatment. <i>Mol Cancer Res; 14(8); 753–63. ©2016 AACR</i>.</p></div>
Collapse
|
15
|
Vasilevskaya IA, Selvakumaran M, Roberts D, O'dwyer PJ. Supplemental Figures 1-6 from JNK1 Inhibition Attenuates Hypoxia-Induced Autophagy and Sensitizes to Chemotherapy.. [DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.22512190.v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
<p>Figure S1. Oligonucleotide pairs containing portions of human JNK1 and JNK2 were used to create retroviral vectors for delivery of shRNAs into HT29 cells. Target sequences (underlined) were taken from Hui et al ( J Clin Invest, 2008,118:3943-53). Oligonucleotide pairs were synthesized, annealed at equimolar concentration, diluted and ligated into pSUPER-RetroPuro-DR, a modified form of pSUPER-RetroPuro (OligoEngine, Seattle, WA). The resulting vectors were transfected into Phoenix-Ampho packaging cell line, kindly provided by Dr. Anil Rustgi (University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA) using Fugene 6 reagent (Roche). Viruses were collected, purified, aliquoted and stored at -80oC. Figure S2. Functional JNK1 in necessary for induction of autophagy in HT29 cells. Cells were subjected to hypoxia and oxaliplatin (5 mM) for 24 hours. Acridine orange (AO) staining was performed as follows: cells were washed twice with PBS, stained with 1 μm/ml acridine orange for 15 min at 37 {degree sign}C, washed again thrice and observed under microscope in PBS solution. Custom light cube for AO staining was used with blue (ca. 450 nm) excitation and red (ca. 650 nm) emission filters. Under AO staining, the cytoplasm and nucleus fluoresce green, whereas the acidic compartments fluoresce bright red or orange-red Our results show lesser content and size of acidic vesicles (including autolysosomes) in HTJ1.3 cells, as compared to control and HTJ2.2 lines. Scale bar - 100 mm. Figure S3. Results of MTT assays in HT29-derived cell lines after retroviral introduction of shRNA for JNK1 (sJ1) or JNK2 (sJ2). Shown are the average values of IC50 derived from three independent experiments in triplicate. Bars represent standard deviation; ***, P <0.001. Figure S4. Apoptosis is maximally enhanced by hypoxia and CQ in the HTJ1.3 cell line. A, Cells were seeded on glass slides and subjected to hypoxia for 24 hours with or without chloroquine (3 mM), followed by staining using Apoptosis and Necrosis Quantification Kit (Biotium). Apoptotic cells were labeled with FITS-Annexin V (green), necrotic - with Ethidium Homodimer III (red). The whole width of each image corresponds to 100 mm. B, Apoptosis was quantified by manual count of stained cells in several fields (n=5). Graph represents the percentage of cells stained with Annexin. EtBr-stained nuclei showed lower count and almost always coincided with Annexin stain (suggesting late apoptosis), and only showed slighter higher count (1-2% more cells with only EtBr staining) where marked by a dot. *, P<0.05. Figure S5. Following hypoxia/reoxygenation treatment (24+24 hours, 5 mM of oxaliplatin), autophagy still inhibited in JNK1-deficient cell line, but apoptosis is activated equivalently in all cell lines, most likely due to persistent stress, exacerbated by ROS formation, after oxygen supply is restored. Figure S6. Acridine orange staining of Bcl-XL-deficient HT29 cells shows slightly lower accumulation of acidic vesicles, when compared to parental cell line, earlier during hypoxia. By 24 hours of hypoxic exposure, however, this difference is no longer detectable. Scale bar - 100 mm. Table S1. Cytotoxic interactions between autophagy inhibitor (CQ) and JNK inhibitor (CC-401) in colon cancer cells.</p>
Collapse
|
16
|
Vasilevskaya IA, Selvakumaran M, Roberts D, O'dwyer PJ. Supplemental Figures 1-6 from JNK1 Inhibition Attenuates Hypoxia-Induced Autophagy and Sensitizes to Chemotherapy.. [DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.22512190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
<p>Figure S1. Oligonucleotide pairs containing portions of human JNK1 and JNK2 were used to create retroviral vectors for delivery of shRNAs into HT29 cells. Target sequences (underlined) were taken from Hui et al ( J Clin Invest, 2008,118:3943-53). Oligonucleotide pairs were synthesized, annealed at equimolar concentration, diluted and ligated into pSUPER-RetroPuro-DR, a modified form of pSUPER-RetroPuro (OligoEngine, Seattle, WA). The resulting vectors were transfected into Phoenix-Ampho packaging cell line, kindly provided by Dr. Anil Rustgi (University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA) using Fugene 6 reagent (Roche). Viruses were collected, purified, aliquoted and stored at -80oC. Figure S2. Functional JNK1 in necessary for induction of autophagy in HT29 cells. Cells were subjected to hypoxia and oxaliplatin (5 mM) for 24 hours. Acridine orange (AO) staining was performed as follows: cells were washed twice with PBS, stained with 1 μm/ml acridine orange for 15 min at 37 {degree sign}C, washed again thrice and observed under microscope in PBS solution. Custom light cube for AO staining was used with blue (ca. 450 nm) excitation and red (ca. 650 nm) emission filters. Under AO staining, the cytoplasm and nucleus fluoresce green, whereas the acidic compartments fluoresce bright red or orange-red Our results show lesser content and size of acidic vesicles (including autolysosomes) in HTJ1.3 cells, as compared to control and HTJ2.2 lines. Scale bar - 100 mm. Figure S3. Results of MTT assays in HT29-derived cell lines after retroviral introduction of shRNA for JNK1 (sJ1) or JNK2 (sJ2). Shown are the average values of IC50 derived from three independent experiments in triplicate. Bars represent standard deviation; ***, P <0.001. Figure S4. Apoptosis is maximally enhanced by hypoxia and CQ in the HTJ1.3 cell line. A, Cells were seeded on glass slides and subjected to hypoxia for 24 hours with or without chloroquine (3 mM), followed by staining using Apoptosis and Necrosis Quantification Kit (Biotium). Apoptotic cells were labeled with FITS-Annexin V (green), necrotic - with Ethidium Homodimer III (red). The whole width of each image corresponds to 100 mm. B, Apoptosis was quantified by manual count of stained cells in several fields (n=5). Graph represents the percentage of cells stained with Annexin. EtBr-stained nuclei showed lower count and almost always coincided with Annexin stain (suggesting late apoptosis), and only showed slighter higher count (1-2% more cells with only EtBr staining) where marked by a dot. *, P<0.05. Figure S5. Following hypoxia/reoxygenation treatment (24+24 hours, 5 mM of oxaliplatin), autophagy still inhibited in JNK1-deficient cell line, but apoptosis is activated equivalently in all cell lines, most likely due to persistent stress, exacerbated by ROS formation, after oxygen supply is restored. Figure S6. Acridine orange staining of Bcl-XL-deficient HT29 cells shows slightly lower accumulation of acidic vesicles, when compared to parental cell line, earlier during hypoxia. By 24 hours of hypoxic exposure, however, this difference is no longer detectable. Scale bar - 100 mm. Table S1. Cytotoxic interactions between autophagy inhibitor (CQ) and JNK inhibitor (CC-401) in colon cancer cells.</p>
Collapse
|
17
|
Wisinski KB, Flamand Y, Wilson MA, Luke JJ, Tawbi HA, Hong F, Mitchell EP, Zwiebel JA, Chen H, Gray RJ, Li S, McShane LM, Rubinstein LV, Patton D, Williams PM, Hamilton SR, Behrens RJ, Pennington KP, Conley BA, Arteaga CL, Harris LN, O'Dwyer PJ, Chen AP, Flaherty KT. Trametinib in Patients With NF1-, GNAQ-, or GNA11-Mutant Tumors: Results From the NCI-MATCH ECOG-ACRIN Trial (EAY131) Subprotocols S1 and S2. JCO Precis Oncol 2023; 7:e2200421. [PMID: 37053535 PMCID: PMC10309549 DOI: 10.1200/po.22.00421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2022] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 04/15/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE NCI-MATCH is a precision medicine trial using genomic testing to allocate patients with advanced malignancies to targeted treatment subprotocols. This report combines two subprotocols evaluating trametinib, a MEK1/2 inhibitor, in patients with Neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1[S1] or GNA11/Q [S2]) altered tumors. METHODS Eligible patients had tumors with deleterious inactivating NF1 or GNA11/Q mutations by the customized Oncomine AmpliSeq panel. Prior MEK inhibitor treatment was excluded. Glioblastomas (GBMs) were permitted, including malignancies associated with germline NF1 mutations (S1 only). Trametinib was administered at 2 mg once daily over 28-day cycles until toxicity or disease progression. Primary end point was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months, PFS, and overall survival. Exploratory analyses included co-occurring genomic alterations and PTEN loss. RESULTS Fifty patients were eligible and started therapy: 46 with NF1 mutations (S1) and four with GNA11 mutations (S2). In the NF1 cohort, nonsense single-nucleotide variants were identified in 29 and frameshift deletions in 17 tumors. All in S2 had nonuveal melanoma and GNA11 Q209L variant. Two partial responses (PR) were noted in S1, one patient each with advanced lung cancer and GBM for an ORR of 4.3% (90% CI, 0.8 to 13.1). One patient with melanoma in S2 had a PR (ORR, 25%; 90% CI, 1.3 to 75.1). Prolonged stable disease (SD) was also noted in five patients (four in S1 and one in S2) with additional rare histologies. Adverse events were as previously described with trametinib. Comutations in TP53 and PIK3CA were common. CONCLUSION Although these subprotocols did not meet the primary end point for ORR, significant responses or prolonged SD noted in some disease subtypes warrants further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kari B. Wisinski
- Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI
| | - Yael Flamand
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute—ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | - Melissa A. Wilson
- Department of Oncology, Division of Hematology/Medical Oncology, St Luke's University Health Network, Easton, PA
| | - Jason J. Luke
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | - Fangxin Hong
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute—ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | | | - James A. Zwiebel
- Investigational Drug Branch, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Helen Chen
- Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Robert J. Gray
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute—ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | - Shuli Li
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute—ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | - Lisa M. McShane
- Biometric Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Lawrence V. Rubinstein
- Biometric Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - David Patton
- Center for Biomedical Informatics & Information Technology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | | | | | | | | | - Barbara A. Conley
- Cancer Diagnosis Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | | | - Lyndsay N. Harris
- Cancer Diagnosis Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | | | - Alice P. Chen
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Dotan E, Catalano P, Lenchik L, Boutin R, Yao X, Marques HS, Ioffe D, Zhen DB, Li D, Wagner LI, Simon MA, Wong TZ, O'Dwyer PJ. The GIANT trial (ECOG-ACRIN EA2186) methods paper: A randomized phase II study of gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel compared with 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and liposomal irinotecan in older patients with treatment-naïve metastatic pancreatic cancer - defining a new treatment option for older vulnerable patients. J Geriatr Oncol 2023; 14:101474. [PMID: 36963200 PMCID: PMC10425127 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2023.101474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 03/26/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death in the US with an increasing incidence in older adults (OA) over age 70. There are currently no treatment guidelines for OA with metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPCA) and selecting a chemotherapy regimen for these patients is subjective, based largely on chronologic age and performance status (PS). Geriatric screening tools provide a more objective and accurate evaluation of a patient's overall health but have not yet been validated in patient selection for mPCA treatment. This study aims to elucidate the optimal chemotherapy treatment of vulnerable OA with mPCA and understand the geriatric factors that affect outcomes in this population. METHODS/DESIGN The GIANT (ECOG-ACRIN EA2186) study is multicenter, randomized phase II trial enrolling patients over age 70 with newly diagnosed mPCA. This study utilizes a screening geriatric assessment (GA) which characterizes patients as fit, vulnerable, or frail. Patients with mild abnormalities in functional status and/or cognition, moderate comorbidities, or over age 80 are considered vulnerable. Enrolled patients are randomized to one of two dose-reduced treatment regimens (gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel every other week, or dose-reduced 5-fluoruracil (5FU)/ liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) every other week). GA and quality of life (QoL) evaluations are completed prior to treatment initiation and at each disease evaluation. Overall survival (OS) is the primary endpoint, with secondary endpoints including progression free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR). Enrolled patients will be stratified by age (70-74 vs ≥75) and ECOG PS (0-1 vs 2). Additional endpoints of interest for OA include evaluation of risk factors identified through GA, QoL evaluation, and toxicities of interest for older adults. Correlative studies include assessment of pro-inflammatory biomarkers of aging in the blood (IL-6, CRP) and imaging evaluation of sarcopenia as predictors of treatment tolerance. DISCUSSION The GIANT study is the first randomized, prospective national trial evaluating vulnerable OA with mPCA aimed at developing a tailored treatment approach for this patient population. This trial has the potential to establish a new way of objectively selecting vulnerable OA with mPCA for modified treatment and to establish a new standard of care in this growing patient population. TRIAL REGISTRATION This trial is registered with ClinicalTrial.gov Identifier NCT04233866.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Efrat Dotan
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - Paul Catalano
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute - ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Leon Lenchik
- Department of Radiology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Robert Boutin
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Xin Yao
- ThedaCare Regional Cancer Center-Appelton, WI, USA
| | - Helga S Marques
- Department of Biostatistics and Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Dina Ioffe
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - David B Zhen
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Daneng Li
- Department of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Lynne I Wagner
- Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Melissa A Simon
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Health Equity Transformation, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Terence Z Wong
- Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine and Radiotheranostics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Peter J O'Dwyer
- University of Pennsylvania and Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Selvakumaran M, Amaravadi RK, Vasilevskaya IA, O'dwyer PJ. Data from Autophagy Inhibition Sensitizes Colon Cancer Cells to Antiangiogenic and Cytotoxic Therapy.. [DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.c.6522138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
<div>Abstract<p><b>Purpose:</b> Autophagy is a critical survival pathway for cancer cells under conditions of nutrient or oxygen limitation, or cell stress. As a consequence of antiangiogenic therapy, solid tumors encounter hypoxia induction and imbalances in nutrient supply. We wished to determine the role of autophagy in protection of tumor cells from the effects of antiangiogenic therapy and chemotherapy. We examined the effect of inhibiting autophagy on hypoxic colon cancer cells <i>in vitro</i> and on bevacizumab- and oxaliplatin-treated mouse xenografts <i>in vivo</i>.</p><p><b>Experimental Design:</b> The autophagic response to hypoxia and DNA-damaging agents was assessed by fluorescent microscopic imaging, autophagy-related gene expression, and by electron microscopic ultrastructural analysis. Pharmacologic and molecular approaches to autophagy inhibition were taken in a panel of colon cancer cell lines. Mouse xenograft models were treated with combinations of oxaliplatin, bevacizumab, and chloroquine to assess effects on tumor growth reduction and on pharmacodynamic markers of autophagy inhibition.</p><p><b>Results:</b> Autophagy was induced in colon cancer models by exposure to both hypoxia and oxaliplatin. Inhibition of autophagy, either with chloroquine or by downregulation of beclin1 or of ATG5, enhanced sensitivity to oxaliplatin under normal and hypoxic conditions in a synergistic manner. Both bevacizumab and oxaliplatin treatments activate autophagy in HT29 murine xenografts. The addition of chloroquine to bevacizumab-based treatment provided greater tumor control in concert with evidence of autophagy inhibition.</p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> These findings implicate autophagy as a mechanism of resistance to antiangiogenic therapies and support investigation of inhibitory approaches in the management of this disease. <i>Clin Cancer Res; 19(11); 2995–3007. ©2013 AACR</i>.</p></div>
Collapse
|
20
|
Selvakumaran M, Amaravadi RK, Vasilevskaya IA, O'dwyer PJ. Data from Autophagy Inhibition Sensitizes Colon Cancer Cells to Antiangiogenic and Cytotoxic Therapy.. [DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.c.6522138.v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
<div>Abstract<p><b>Purpose:</b> Autophagy is a critical survival pathway for cancer cells under conditions of nutrient or oxygen limitation, or cell stress. As a consequence of antiangiogenic therapy, solid tumors encounter hypoxia induction and imbalances in nutrient supply. We wished to determine the role of autophagy in protection of tumor cells from the effects of antiangiogenic therapy and chemotherapy. We examined the effect of inhibiting autophagy on hypoxic colon cancer cells <i>in vitro</i> and on bevacizumab- and oxaliplatin-treated mouse xenografts <i>in vivo</i>.</p><p><b>Experimental Design:</b> The autophagic response to hypoxia and DNA-damaging agents was assessed by fluorescent microscopic imaging, autophagy-related gene expression, and by electron microscopic ultrastructural analysis. Pharmacologic and molecular approaches to autophagy inhibition were taken in a panel of colon cancer cell lines. Mouse xenograft models were treated with combinations of oxaliplatin, bevacizumab, and chloroquine to assess effects on tumor growth reduction and on pharmacodynamic markers of autophagy inhibition.</p><p><b>Results:</b> Autophagy was induced in colon cancer models by exposure to both hypoxia and oxaliplatin. Inhibition of autophagy, either with chloroquine or by downregulation of beclin1 or of ATG5, enhanced sensitivity to oxaliplatin under normal and hypoxic conditions in a synergistic manner. Both bevacizumab and oxaliplatin treatments activate autophagy in HT29 murine xenografts. The addition of chloroquine to bevacizumab-based treatment provided greater tumor control in concert with evidence of autophagy inhibition.</p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> These findings implicate autophagy as a mechanism of resistance to antiangiogenic therapies and support investigation of inhibitory approaches in the management of this disease. <i>Clin Cancer Res; 19(11); 2995–3007. ©2013 AACR</i>.</p></div>
Collapse
|
21
|
Peehl DM, Badea CT, Chenevert TL, Daldrup-Link HE, Ding L, Dobrolecki LE, Houghton AM, Kinahan PE, Kurhanewicz J, Lewis MT, Li S, Luker GD, Ma CX, Manning HC, Mowery YM, O'Dwyer PJ, Pautler RG, Rosen MA, Roudi R, Ross BD, Shoghi KI, Sriram R, Talpaz M, Wahl RL, Zhou R. Animal Models and Their Role in Imaging-Assisted Co-Clinical Trials. Tomography 2023; 9:657-680. [PMID: 36961012 PMCID: PMC10037611 DOI: 10.3390/tomography9020053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2023] [Revised: 03/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/08/2023] [Indexed: 03/19/2023] Open
Abstract
The availability of high-fidelity animal models for oncology research has grown enormously in recent years, enabling preclinical studies relevant to prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of cancer to be undertaken. This has led to increased opportunities to conduct co-clinical trials, which are studies on patients that are carried out parallel to or sequentially with animal models of cancer that mirror the biology of the patients' tumors. Patient-derived xenografts (PDX) and genetically engineered mouse models (GEMM) are considered to be the models that best represent human disease and have high translational value. Notably, one element of co-clinical trials that still needs significant optimization is quantitative imaging. The National Cancer Institute has organized a Co-Clinical Imaging Resource Program (CIRP) network to establish best practices for co-clinical imaging and to optimize translational quantitative imaging methodologies. This overview describes the ten co-clinical trials of investigators from eleven institutions who are currently supported by the CIRP initiative and are members of the Animal Models and Co-clinical Trials (AMCT) Working Group. Each team describes their corresponding clinical trial, type of cancer targeted, rationale for choice of animal models, therapy, and imaging modalities. The strengths and weaknesses of the co-clinical trial design and the challenges encountered are considered. The rich research resources generated by the members of the AMCT Working Group will benefit the broad research community and improve the quality and translational impact of imaging in co-clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donna M Peehl
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
| | - Cristian T Badea
- Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Thomas L Chenevert
- Department of Radiology and the Center for Molecular Imaging, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Heike E Daldrup-Link
- Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS), Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Li Ding
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Lacey E Dobrolecki
- Advanced Technology Cores, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | | | - Paul E Kinahan
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105, USA
| | - John Kurhanewicz
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
| | - Michael T Lewis
- Departments of Molecular and Cellular Biology and Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Shunqiang Li
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Gary D Luker
- Department of Radiology and the Center for Molecular Imaging, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Cynthia X Ma
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - H Charles Manning
- Department of Cancer Systems Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Yvonne M Mowery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27708, USA
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| | - Peter J O'Dwyer
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Robia G Pautler
- Department of Integrative Physiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Mark A Rosen
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Raheleh Roudi
- Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS), Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Brian D Ross
- Department of Radiology and the Center for Molecular Imaging, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Department of Biological Chemistry, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Kooresh I Shoghi
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology (MIR), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Renuka Sriram
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
| | - Moshe Talpaz
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Richard L Wahl
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology (MIR), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Rong Zhou
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Kunz PL, Graham NT, Catalano PJ, Nimeiri HS, Fisher GA, Longacre TA, Suarez CJ, Martin BA, Yao JC, Kulke MH, Hendifar AE, Shanks JC, Shah MH, Zalupski MM, Schmulbach EL, Reidy-Lagunes DL, Strosberg JR, O'Dwyer PJ, Benson AB. Randomized Study of Temozolomide or Temozolomide and Capecitabine in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (ECOG-ACRIN E2211). J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:1359-1369. [PMID: 36260828 PMCID: PMC9995105 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.01013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2022] [Revised: 08/10/2022] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) have few treatment options that yield objective responses. Retrospective and small prospective studies suggest that capecitabine and temozolomide are associated with high response rates (RRs) and long progression-free survival (PFS). PATIENTS AND METHODS E2211 was a multicenter, randomized, phase II trial comparing temozolomide versus capecitabine/temozolomide in patients with advanced low-grade or intermediate-grade pancreatic NETs. Key eligibility criteria included progression within the preceding 12 months and no prior temozolomide, dimethyl-triazeno-imidazole-carboxamide or dacarbazine, capecitabine or fluorouracil. The primary end point was PFS; secondary endpoints were overall survival, RR, safety, and methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) by immunohistochemistry and promoter methylation. RESULTS A total of 144 patients were enrolled between April 2013 and March 2016 to temozolomide (n = 72) or capecitabine and temozolomide (n = 72); the primary analysis population included 133 eligible patients. At the scheduled interim analysis in January 2018, the median PFS was 14.4 months for temozolomide versus 22.7 months for capecitabine/temozolomide (hazard ratio = 0.58), which was sufficient to reject the null hypothesis for the primary end point (stratified log-rank P = .022). In the final analysis (May 2021), the median overall survival was 53.8 months for temozolomide and 58.7 months for capecitabine/temozolomide (hazard ratio = 0.82, P = .42). MGMT deficiency was associated with response. CONCLUSION The combination of capecitabine/temozolomide was associated with a significant improvement in PFS compared with temozolomide alone in patients with advanced pancreatic NETs. The median PFS and RR observed with capecitabine/temozolomide are the highest reported in a randomized study for pancreatic NETs. MGMT deficiency was associated with response, and although routine MGMT testing is not recommended, it can be considered for select patients in need of objective response (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01824875).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Halla S. Nimeiri
- Robert H. Lurie Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | | | | | | | | | - James C. Yao
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Andrew E. Hendifar
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Manisha H. Shah
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | | | | | | | | | - Peter J. O'Dwyer
- University of Pennsylvania Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Al B. Benson
- Robert H. Lurie Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Ducreux M, Tabernero J, Grothey A, Arnold D, O'Dwyer PJ, Gilberg F, Abbas A, Thakur MD, Prizant H, Irahara N, Tahiri A, Schmoll HJ, Van Cutsem E, de Gramont A. Clinical and exploratory biomarker findings from the MODUL trial (Cohorts 1, 3 and 4) of biomarker-driven maintenance therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 2023; 184:137-150. [PMID: 36921494 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.01.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2022] [Revised: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE MODUL is an adaptable, signal-seeking trial of biomarker-driven maintenance therapy following first-line induction treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We report findings from Cohorts 1 (BRAFmut), 3 (human epidermal growth factor 2 [HER2]+) and 4 (HER2‒/high microsatellite instability, HER2‒/microsatellite stable [MSS]/BRAFwt or HER2‒/MSS/BRAFmut/RASmut). METHODS Patients with unresectable, previously untreated mCRC without disease progression following standard induction treatment (5-fluorouracil/leucovorin [5-FU/LV] plus oxaliplatin plus bevacizumab) were randomly assigned to control (fluoropyrimidine plus bevacizumab) or cohort-specific experimental maintenance therapy (Cohort 1: vemurafenib plus cetuximab plus 5-FU/LV; Cohort 3: capecitabine plus trastuzumab plus pertuzumab; Cohort 4: cobimetinib plus atezolizumab). The primary efficacy end-point was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS Cohorts 1, 3 and 4 did not reach target sample size because of early study closure. In Cohort 1 (n = 60), PFS did not differ between treatment arms (hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% confidence intervals 0.50-1.82; P = 0.872). However, Cohort 1 exploratory biomarker data showed preferential selection for mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway mutations (mainly KRAS, NRAS, MAP2K1 or BRAF) in the experimental arm but not the control arm. In Cohort 3 (n = 5), PFS ranged from 3.6 to 14.7 months versus 4.0 to 5.4 months in the experimental and control arms, respectively. In Cohort 4 (n = 99), PFS was shorter in the experimental arm (hazard ratio, 1.44; 95% confidence intervals 0.90-2.29; P = 0.128). CONCLUSIONS Vemurafenib plus cetuximab plus 5-FU/LV warrants further investigation as first-line maintenance treatment for BRAFmut mCRC. MAPK-pathway emergent genomic alterations may offer novel therapeutic opportunities in BRAFmut mCRC. Cobimetinib plus atezolizumab had an unfavourable benefit:risk ratio in HER2‒/MSS/BRAFwt mCRC. New strategies are required to increase the susceptibility of MSS mCRC to immunotherapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02291289.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michel Ducreux
- Université Paris-Saclay, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
| | - Josep Tabernero
- Vall D'Hebron Hospital Campus and Institute of Oncology (VHIO), IOB-Quiron, UVic-UCC, Barcelona, Spain.
| | | | - Dirk Arnold
- Asklepios Tumorzentrum Hamburg, AK Altona, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Peter J O'Dwyer
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | | | | | | | - Hen Prizant
- F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.
| | | | | | | | - Eric Van Cutsem
- University Hospitals Gasthuisberg, Leuven and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Maithel SK, Hong SC, Ethun CG, Ferrone CR, Rocha FG, Staley CA, O'Dwyer PJ. Optimal perioperative therapy for incidental gallbladder cancer (OPT-IN): A randomized phase II/III trial—ECOG-ACRIN EA2197. J Clin Oncol 2023. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2023.41.4_suppl.tps620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/25/2023] Open
Abstract
TPS620 Background: Gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) is a rare disease with a poor prognosis, with an overall estimated 5-year survival rate of 5-13%. Approximately 70% of gallbladder cancers in the US are found incidentally on pathologic analysis after elective cholecystectomy for presumed benign disease. Current management guidelines for incidental gallbladder cancer (IGBC) recommend re-resection for T1b, T2, and T3 lesions, which entails a partial hepatectomy and lymph node dissection. Up to 75% of patients have residual locoregional disease and 20% have disseminated disease at the time of re-resection, both factors strongly associated with poor prognosis and inoperability, respectively. For those who undergo re-resection, the recurrence rate at one year can be as high as 40%. Therefore we designed a Phase II/III trial to assess the benefit of a perioperative chemotherapy approach around the re-resection procedure compared to standard of care adjuvant therapy alone. Methods: We have enrolled 18 of 186 planned patients (Phase III design) on study NCT 04559139/EA2197. Current eligibility criteria include: Incidentally diagnosed T2 / T3 gallbladder cancer with no evidence of metastatic disease or inoperable locoregional disease. At randomization, patients must be within 12 weeks of their index cholecystectomy. Patients are randomized 2:1 to receive perioperative chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin vs adjuvant therapy alone. The primary endpoint is overall survival. Secondary endpoints include resectability, presence of residual disease, and progression-free survival. Clinical trial information: 04559139 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Peter J. O'Dwyer
- University of Pennsylvania, Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Reiss KA, Hong SC, Kasi A, O'Reilly EM, Maithel SK, Yao X, Hamilton SR, Boursi B, Pishvaian MJ, Klempner SJ, Domchek SM, Catalano PJ, Chiorean EG, Philip PA, O'Dwyer PJ. APOLLO: A randomized phase II double-blind study of olaparib versus placebo following curative intent therapy in patients with resected pancreatic cancer and a pathogenic BRCA1, BRCA2 or PALB2 mutation—ECOG-ACRIN EA2192. J Clin Oncol 2023. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2023.41.4_suppl.tps763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
TPS763 Background: A meaningful subset of PDAC is characterized by a homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). The most well-defined patients within this group are those with pathogenic variants in BRCA1, BRCA2 and PALB2. In the metastatic setting, PARP inhibitor maintenance provides a progression-free survival benefit after a period of platinum based chemotherapy1,2, but the role of PARP inhibitors in the curative intent setting is undefined. The OlympiA study established one year of olaparib as the standard of care for patients with BRCA-related, early stage breast cancer who completed all other curative-intent treatment3. Therefore, we have designed a randomized, phase II double-blind study of one year of olaparib vs placebo in patients with pancreatic cancer and a germline or somatic variant in BRCA or PALB2 who have completed all curative intent therapy. Methods: We have enrolled and treated 23 of 152 planned patients on study NCT 04858334/EA2192. Eligibility criteria include: a pathogenic germline or somatic variant in BRCA1, BRCA2 or PALB2 as determined by local laboratory (central review required); completion of curative-intent resection and ≥ three months of multi-agent chemotherapy; no evidence of recurrent disease. At enrollment, patients must be within 12 weeks of their last anti-cancer intervention. Patients are randomized 2:1 to receive oral olaparib 300 mg twice daily or placebo for 12 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint is relapse-free survival. Overall survival is a secondary endpoint. Tumor tissue, fecal material (for microbiome analysis) and serial ctDNA samples are being collected. 1.Golan T, Locker GY, Kindler HL: N Engl J Med 381:1492-1493, 2019. 2. Reiss KA, Mick R, O'Hara MH, et al: J Clin Oncol 39:2497-2505, 2021. 3. Tutt ANJ, Garber JE, Geyer CE, Jr.: N Engl J Med 385:1440, 2021. Clinical trial information: NCT04858334 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Anup Kasi
- University of Kansas Medical Center, Westwood, KS
| | | | | | - Xin Yao
- ThedaCare Regional Medical Center, Appleton, WI
| | | | - Ben Boursi
- Institute of Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | | | | | - Susan M. Domchek
- University of Pennsylvania, Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | | | - Peter J. O'Dwyer
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Heumann TR, Baretti M, Sugar EA, Durham JN, Linden S, Lopez-Vidal TY, Leatherman J, Cope L, Sharma A, Weekes CD, O'Dwyer PJ, Reiss KA, Monga DK, Ahuja N, Azad NS. A randomized, phase II trial of oral azacitidine (CC-486) in patients with resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma at high risk for recurrence. Clin Epigenetics 2022; 14:166. [PMID: 36463226 PMCID: PMC9719150 DOI: 10.1186/s13148-022-01367-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Of the only 20% of patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (rPDA), cancer recurs in 80% of cases. Epigenetic dysregulation is an early hallmark of cancer cells acquiring metastatic potential, and epigenetic modulators may reactivate tumor suppressor genes, delay recurrence, and sensitize PDA to future chemotherapy. METHODS This was a randomized phase II study (NCT01845805) of CC-486 (oral DNA methyltransferase inhibitor azacitidine) vs. observation (OBS) in rPDA patients harboring high-risk features (stage pN1-2, R1 margins, or elevated CA 19-9 level) with no evidence of disease following standard adjuvant therapy. Patients were randomized to oral CC-486 treatment (300 mg daily on days 1-21 on a 28-day cycle) or OBS for up to 12 cycles or until disease relapse/unacceptable toxicities. Following recurrence, records of next-line therapies, imaging, and survival were obtained. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS)-time from randomization to recurrence (imaging/biopsy confirmed or death). Secondary endpoints included OS and PFS and ORR and metastatic PFS with subsequent next-line systemic therapy in metastatic setting. RESULTS Forty-nine patients (24 in CC-486 arm, 25 in OBS arm) were randomized: median age 66 (range 36-81), 53% male, 73% node positive, 49% elevated CA 19-9, 20% R1 resection, 63% and 100% received perioperative concurrent chemoradiation and chemotherapy, respectively. Median time from surgery to randomization was 9.6 mo (range 2.9-36.8). For the CC-486 arm, median treatment duration was 5.6 mo (range 1.3 to 12.8) with 14 treatment-related grade 3 or 4 AEs among 5 patients (22%) resulting in dose-reduction. Four patients (17%) discontinued therapy due to AEs. With median follow-up of 20.3mo (IQR 12.8, 41.4), 38 (79%) of evaluable patients recurred (34 imaging-confirmed, 4 clinically). Median PFS in imagining-confirmed cases was 9.2 and 8.9mo (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.46-1.87, p = 0.85) for CC-486 and OBS patients, respectively. Median OS (2-yr OS%) was 33.8 (50%) and 26.4 mo (61%) in CC-486 and OBS patients, respectively. (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.46-2.05, p = 0.96). ORR with subsequent chemotherapy in the metastatic setting was minimal in both arms. CONCLUSIONS Treatment with CC-486 following adjuvant therapy did not prolong time-to-relapse in patients with high-risk rPDA or improve disease response on 1st-line metastatic therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thatcher R Heumann
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Marina Baretti
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Sugar
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Departments of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, The Bloomberg School of Public Health at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jennifer N Durham
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Sheila Linden
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Tamara Y Lopez-Vidal
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - James Leatherman
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Leslie Cope
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Anup Sharma
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Colin D Weekes
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Peter J O'Dwyer
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Kim A Reiss
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Dulabh K Monga
- Medical Oncology, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Nita Ahuja
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Nilofer S Azad
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Rajdev L, Lee JW, Libutti SK, Benson AB, Fisher GA, Kunz PL, Hendifar AE, Catalano P, O'Dwyer PJ. A phase II study of sapanisertib (TAK-228) a mTORC1/2 inhibitor in rapalog-resistant advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNET): ECOG-ACRIN EA2161. Invest New Drugs 2022; 40:1306-1314. [PMID: 36264382 PMCID: PMC9795724 DOI: 10.1007/s10637-022-01311-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2022] [Accepted: 10/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
This was a two-stage phase II trial of a mTORC1/2 inhibitor (mTORC: mammalian target of rapamycin complex) Sapanisertib (TAK228) in patients with rapalog-resistant pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) (NCT02893930). Approved rapalogs such as everolimus inhibit mTORC1 and have limited clinical activity, possibly due to compensatory feedback loops. Sapanisertib addresses the potential for incomplete inhibition of the mTOR pathway through targeting of both mTORC1 and mTORC2, and thus to reverse resistance to earlier rapamycin analogues. In stage 1, patients received sapanisertib 3 mg by mouth once daily on a continuous dosing schedule in 28-day cycle. This trial adopted a two-stage design with the primary objective of evaluating objective tumor response. The first stage would recruit 13 patients in order to accrue 12 eligible and treated patients. If among the 12 eligible patients at least 1 patient had an objective response to therapy, the study would move to the second stage of accrual where 25 eligible and treated patients would be enrolled. This study activated on February 1, 2017, the required pre-determined number of patients (n = 13) had entered by November 5, 2018 for the first stage response evaluation. The accrual of this trial was formally terminated on December 27, 2019 as no response had been observed after the first stage accrual. Treatment-related grade 3 adverse events were reported in eight (61%) patients with hyperglycemia being the most frequent, in three patients (23%). Other toxicities noted in the trial included fatigue, rash diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting. The median PFS was 5.19 months (95% CI [3.84, 9.30]) and the median OS was 20.44 months (95% CI [5.65, 22.54]). Due to the lack of responses in Stage 1 of the study, the study did not proceed to stage 2. Thus the potential to reverse resistance was not evident.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lakshmi Rajdev
- Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra, Hempstead, NY, USA.
| | - Ju-Whei Lee
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute - ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Paul Catalano
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute - ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Peter J O'Dwyer
- University of Pennsylvania/Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
O'Hara MH, Bear AS, Wattenberg MM, Teitelbaum UR, Reiss KA, Karasic TB, Schneider CJ, O'Dwyer PJ, Ben-Josef EH, Wojcieszynski AP, Maity AH, Mick RH, Vonderheide RH. Abstract A016: Phase 1 study of hypofractionated radiation in combination with tremelimumab and durvalumab in refractory metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Cancer Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.panca22-a016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors have limited clinical activity in pancreatic cancer. Based on preclinical data, we hypothesized that hypofractionated radiation may cooperate with dual checkpoint inhibition in patients (Rech AJ, et al, Cancer Research, 2018). We therefore designed a phase 1 study to evaluate the safety and feasibility of two schedules of hypofractionated radiation with durvalumab (anti-PDL1) and tremelimumab (anti-CTLA-4) in patients with metastatic pancreatic, lung, and breast cancers and melanoma. Here, we present the data for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Methods: Patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer treated with at least one prior line of therapy with measurable disease by RECIST in addition to an index lesion amenable to hypofractionated radiation were enrolled sequentially to two cohorts – cohort A evaluating 3 fractions of 8 Gy or cohort B evaluating 1 fraction of 17 Gy. Patients received 4 cycles of tremelimumab 1 mg/kg IV and durvalumab 20 mg/kg IV every 4 weeks for 4 doses followed by durvalumab 10 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks until progression. Radiation was given in week 2 of treatment. Patients were replaced if they did not receive week 5 of therapy on trial, but were included in safety/feasibility analysis. Blood and, when feasible, baseline and on-treatment biopsies were obtained for exploratory biomarker evaluation. Results: 10 patients were treated in cohort A and 21 patients in cohort B. All patients were included in the safety and feasibility assessment. Overall, treatment was well tolerated in both cohorts. The most common adverse events were grade 1 or 2 fatigue (A 30%, B 23.8%), diarrhea (A 10%, B 14.3%), pruritis (A 10%, B 14.3%), AST/ALT elevation and constipation (each A 10%, B 9.5%). Grade 3 diarrhea, elevated bilirubin, pneumonitis, and syncope were noted in 1 patient each, all in cohort B. Grade 5 pneumothorax occurred after baseline biopsy in 1 patient. Grade 2 hyperthyroidism (A) and pneumonitis (B) were noted each in 1 patient. 8 patients in cohort A and 13 patients in cohort B were evaluable for response. In cohort A, 50% of patients had stable disease as best response, and median overall survival was 4.9 months. In cohort B, 23.1% had PR and 30.8% had SD as best response and mOS was 5.2 months. Responses occurred more frequently when metastatic lung nodules were radiated – SD in 3/5 (60%) patients in cohort A, PR in 3/10 (30%) and SD in 4/10 (40%) patients in cohort B, compared to SD in 1/3 (33%) patients in cohort A and 0/3 (0%) patients in cohort B who underwent radiation to a liver lesion. Biomarker analysis will be presented. Conclusions: The combination of durvalumab, tremelimumab with hypofractionated radiation is safe and feasible in a refractory pancreatic adenocarcinoma patient population. Encouraging clinical activity warrants further evaluation, especially when hypofractionated radiation is delivered to lung nodules.
Citation Format: Mark H. O'Hara, Adham S. Bear, Max M. Wattenberg, Ursina R. Teitelbaum, Kim A. Reiss, Thomas B. Karasic, Charles J. Schneider, Peter J. O'Dwyer, Edgar H. Ben-Josef, Andrzej P. Wojcieszynski, Amit H. Maity, Rosemarie H. Mick, Robert H. Vonderheide. Phase 1 study of hypofractionated radiation in combination with tremelimumab and durvalumab in refractory metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Pancreatic Cancer; 2022 Sep 13-16; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(22 Suppl):Abstract nr A016.
Collapse
|
29
|
Bedard PL, Li S, Wisinski KB, Yang ES, Limaye SA, Mitchell EP, Zwiebel JA, Moscow JA, Gray RJ, Wang V, McShane LM, Rubinstein LV, Patton DR, Williams PM, Hamilton SR, Conley BA, Arteaga CL, Harris LN, O'Dwyer PJ, Chen AP, Flaherty KT. Phase II Study of Afatinib in Patients With Tumors With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Activating Mutations: Results From the National Cancer Institute-Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice ECOG-ACRIN Trial (EAY131) Subprotocol EAY131-B. JCO Precis Oncol 2022; 6:e2200165. [PMID: 35939768 PMCID: PMC9384949 DOI: 10.1200/po.22.00165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2022] [Revised: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE National Cancer Institute-Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice is a multicohort trial that assigns patients with advanced cancers to targeted therapies on the basis of central tumor genomic testing. Arm B evaluated afatinib, an ErbB family tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with ERBB2-activating mutations. METHODS Eligible patients had selected ERBB2 single-nucleotide variants or insertions/deletions detected by the National Cancer Institute-Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice next-generation sequencing assay. Patients had performance status ≤ 1, left ventricular ejection fraction > 50%, grade ≤ 1 diarrhea, and no prior human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) therapy. Patients received afatinib 40 mg once daily in 28-day cycles. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary end points were 6-month progression-free survival, overall survival, toxicity, and molecular correlates. RESULTS A total of 59 patients were assigned and 40 were enrolled. The median age was 62 years, 78% were female, 68% had performance status = 1, and 58% had received > 3 prior therapies. The confirmed ORR was 2.7% (n = 1 of 37; 90% CI, 0.14 to 12.2), and 6-month progression-free survival was 12.0% (90% CI, 5.6 to 25.8). A confirmed partial response occurred in a patient with adenocarcinoma of extra-mammary Paget disease of skin who progressed after cycle 6. Two unconfirmed partial responses were observed (low-grade serous gynecological tract and estrogen receptor-positive/HER2-negative immunohistochemistry breast ductal carcinoma). Of 12 patients with breast cancer, 1 additional patient with lobular carcinoma (estrogen receptor-positive/HER2 fluorescent in situ hybridization) had a 51% reduction in target lesions but progressed because of a new lesion at cycle 6. The most common (> 20%) treatment-related adverse events were diarrhea (68%), mucositis (43%), fatigue (40%), acneiform rash (30%), dehydration (27%), vomiting (27%), nausea (27%), anemia (27%), and anorexia (22%). Four patients (11%) discontinued because of adverse events. CONCLUSION Although afatinib did not meet the prespecified threshold for antitumor activity in this heavily pretreated cohort, the response in a rare tumor type is notable. The safety profile of afatinib was consistent with prior studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Shuli Li
- E-A Biostatistical Center, Boston, MA
| | | | - Eddy S. Yang
- University of Alabama-Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | | | | | - James A. Zwiebel
- Investigational Drug Branch, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Jeffrey A. Moscow
- Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Robert J. Gray
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute—ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | - Victoria Wang
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute—ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | - Lisa M. McShane
- Biometric Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Larry V. Rubinstein
- Biometric Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - David R. Patton
- Center for Biomedical Informatics & Information Technology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | | | | | - Barbara A. Conley
- Cancer Diagnosis Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | | | - Lyndsay N. Harris
- Cancer Diagnosis Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | | | - Alice P. Chen
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Chapin WJ, Till JE, Hwang WT, Eads JR, Karasic TB, O'Dwyer PJ, Schneider CJ, Teitelbaum UR, Romeo J, Black TA, Christensen TE, Redlinger Tabery C, Anderson A, Slade M, LaRiviere M, Yee SS, Reiss KA, O'Hara MH, Carpenter EL. Multianalyte Prognostic Signature Including Circulating Tumor DNA and Circulating Tumor Cells in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. JCO Precis Oncol 2022; 6:e2200060. [PMID: 35939771 PMCID: PMC9384952 DOI: 10.1200/po.22.00060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Revised: 03/24/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is associated with a poor prognosis. Multianalyte signatures, including liquid biopsy and traditional clinical variables, have shown promise for improving prognostication in other solid tumors but have not yet been rigorously assessed for PDAC. MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed a prospective cohort study of patients with newly diagnosed locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) or metastatic PDAC (mPDAC) who were planned to undergo systemic therapy. We collected peripheral blood before systemic therapy and assessed circulating tumor cells (CTCs), cell-free DNA concentration (cfDNA), and circulating tumor KRAS (ctKRAS)-variant allele fraction (VAF). Association of variables with overall survival (OS) was assessed in univariate and multivariate survival analysis, and comparisons were made between models containing liquid biopsy variables combined with traditional clinical prognostic variables versus models containing traditional clinical prognostic variables alone. RESULTS One hundred four patients, 40 with LAPC and 64 with mPDAC, were enrolled. CTCs, cfDNA concentration, and ctKRAS VAF were all significantly higher in patients with mPDAC than patients with LAPC. ctKRAS VAF (cube root; 0.05 unit increments; hazard ratio, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.21; P = .01), and CTCs ≥ 1/mL (hazard ratio, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.34 to 3.69; P = .002) were significantly associated with worse OS in multivariate analysis while cfDNA concentration was not. A model selected by backward selection containing traditional clinical variables plus liquid biopsy variables had better discrimination of OS compared with a model containing traditional clinical variables alone (optimism-corrected Harrell's C-statistic 0.725 v 0.681). CONCLUSION A multianalyte prognostic signature containing CTCs, ctKRAS, and cfDNA concentration outperformed a model containing traditional clinical variables alone suggesting that CTCs, ctKRAS, and cfDNA provide prognostic information complementary to traditional clinical variables in advanced PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William J. Chapin
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Jacob E. Till
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Wei-Ting Hwang
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Jennifer R. Eads
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Thomas B. Karasic
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Peter J. O'Dwyer
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Charles J. Schneider
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Ursina R. Teitelbaum
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Janae Romeo
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Taylor A. Black
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Theresa E. Christensen
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Colleen Redlinger Tabery
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | - Michael LaRiviere
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Stephanie S. Yee
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Kim A. Reiss
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Mark H. O'Hara
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Erica L. Carpenter
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Subbiah V, Fengmin F, Kudchadkar R, Sullivan RJ, Mitchell EP, Wright JJ, Chen HX, Gray RJ, Wang XV, McShane LM, Rubinstein LV, Patton D, Williams PM, Sundaresan TK, Conley BA, Arteaga CL, Harris LN, O'Dwyer PJ, Chen AP, Flaherty KT. Abstract CT160: BVD-523FB (Ulixertinib) in Patients with Tumors with BRAF Fusions, or with Non-V600E, Non-V600K BRAF Mutations: Results from the NCI-MATCH ECOG-ACRIN Trial (EAY131) Sub-protocol EAY131-Z1L. Cancer Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2022-ct160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose: Mutations in BRAF at codons other than V600 (non-V600) and BRAF fusions confer dependence on RAF-MEK-ERK pathway. BVD-523FB (ulixertinib) is a small molecule that potently inhibits both ERK1 and ERK2 protein kinases in the sub-nanomolar range. Based on the reports of early clinical activity in the phase 1 trial, including in non-V600 BRAF mutations, subprotocol Z1L (EAY131-Z1L) sought to investigate the clinical activity of ulixertinib in patients with tumors harboring these alterations. Methods: In this single-arm study, patients with BRAF non-V600 mutation or BRAF fusion were given ulixertinib orally at a dose of 600 mg twice daily, continuously for each 28-day cycle until progression or intolerability. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), 6-month PFS, and overall survival (OS). BRAF mutation status was determined by an analytically validated assay in a CLIA-certified laboratory for all patients. Results: From August 2019 to July 2020, 35 patients were enrolled and received protocol treatment on the trial. Among the 34 patients who were eligible, median age was 66.5; 50% were female, 88% were white, 9% black, 1% Asian. Performance status was ECOG PS 1 in 74% of patients, with remaining PS 0. Median number of prior therapies was >3.Tumor types included multiple gastrointestinal malignancies (N=16), lung cancer (N=3), and melanoma (N=3), among others. Mutations were centrally confirmed in 26 patients who were deemed analyzable per protocol. Twenty-two patients had a single nucleotide variant (SNV) in BRAF; one patient had an insertion/deletion (indel) in BRAF, and three patients harbored BRAF fusions. No patients achieved CR or PR, resulting in ORR = 0%. Stable disease was the best response in 7/26 centrally confirmed cases. Median PFS was 1.8 months (90% CI: 1.6, 2.2), 6-month PFS rate was 11% (90% CI: 4%, 22%), and median OS was 4.0 months (90% CI: 2.8, 7.4). Twenty patients (57%) had grade 3 toxicities, and one patient (3%) had grade 4 toxicity; there were no grade 5 toxicities. Most common toxicities include anemia (n=11), diarrhea (n=16), nausea (n=16), vomiting (n=11), fatigue (n=16), increased creatinine (n=12), and acneiform rash (n=14). Conclusion: BVD-523FB (ulixertinib) had no demonstrable evidence of clinical activity in this small, heavily pre-treated population of patients with tumors harboring BRAF fusions, or with non-V600E, non-V600K BRAF mutations
Citation Format: Vivek Subbiah, Fengmin Fengmin, Ragini Kudchadkar, Ryan J. Sullivan, Edith P. Mitchell, John J. Wright, Helen X. Chen, Robert J. Gray, Xin Victoria Wang, Lisa M. McShane, Larry V. Rubinstein, David Patton, P. Mickey Williams, Tilak K. Sundaresan, Barbara A. Conley, Carlos L. Arteaga, Lyndsay N. Harris, Peter J. O'Dwyer, Alice P. Chen, Keith T. Flaherty. BVD-523FB (Ulixertinib) in Patients with Tumors with BRAF Fusions, or with Non-V600E, Non-V600K BRAF Mutations: Results from the NCI-MATCH ECOG-ACRIN Trial (EAY131) Sub-protocol EAY131-Z1L [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT160.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Robert J. Gray
- 8Dana Farber Cancer Institute – ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | - Xin Victoria Wang
- 8Dana Farber Cancer Institute – ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | - Lisa M. McShane
- 9Biometric Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Houston, TX
| | - Larry V. Rubinstein
- 10Biometric Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Besthesda, MD
| | - David Patton
- 11Center for Biomedical Informatics & Information Technology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | | | | | - Barbara A. Conley
- 14Cancer Diagnosis Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | | | - Lyndsay N. Harris
- 14Cancer Diagnosis Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | | | - Alice P. Chen
- 17Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
O'Dwyer PJ, Kostakoglu L. Precision Medicine Clinical Trials: A Conversation Between Peter O'Dwyer and Lale Kostakoglu. J Nucl Med 2022; 63:808-811. [PMID: 35649662 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.264320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Peter J O'Dwyer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and
| | - Lale Kostakoglu
- Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Virginia Health Systems, Charlottesville, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Schoenfeld JD, Azad NS, Lee J, Gross J, Overman MJ, Kao K, Steinfeld A, Brunnquell D, Bu X, Guan P, Weirather JL, Pfaff KL, Ranasinghe S, Wang V, O'Dwyer PJ, Wu CJ, Rodig SJ, Patton DR, Harris L. Molecular predictors of response among patients with MMRd tumors treated on NCI-MATCH Arm Z1D. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.2616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
2616 Background: On arm Z1D of the NCI-MATCH trial, the PD-1 inhibitor nivolumab was found to have activity among patients with mismatch repair-deficient (MMRd) tumors as defined by complete loss of MLH1 or MSH2 nuclear expression determined by immunohistochemistry, with 6-month progression free survival of 51%. We aimed to identify molecular predictors of response in this population. Methods: Among patients treated on NCI-MATCH Z1D, we evaluated genomic and tissue predictors of clinical benefit (CB), defined as patients with RECIST v1.1 complete or partial response or stable disease for ≥ 6months. WES files were processed and filtered using GATK best practices preceding TMB and MSI calculations according to MSI sensor score, a WES-based MSI rating system. Cutoffs were set to define TMB (TMB-Low: ≤10 mutation/Mb; TMB-High: >10) and MSI (MSS: ≤10% unstable loci; MSI-Low: 10 > x ≤ 20; MSI-High: >20). Multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) used formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded slides stained using a BOND RX automated stainer. Expression analyses followed normalization in DEseq2's median of ratios method. Gene set enrichment analysis was conducted by “empirical phenotype-based permutation test.” Additional RNA, WES, and mIF comparisons used the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Results: Among 36 patients accrued to NCI-MATCH Z1D with pretreatment correlative samples available, 7 were unevaluable for response, and 1 was misclassified as having an MMRd tumor. Of the remaining 28, 15 had CB (2 CR, 10 PR, 3 SD ≤ 6 months) and correlative data were available for 26 (WES), 27 (RNAseq), and between 10-20 for mIF based on the marker assessed. According to MSI-sensor score, 11 were MSI-high, 8 were MSI-low, and 7 were MSS. MSI-sensor status, but not TMB was associated with CB (p=0.037 and p=0.185, respectively). Similar results were seen when using CR+PR vs SD+PD evaluation. Using RNAseq gene set enrichment analyses, CB patients had increased expression of interferon alpha (p=0.01), interferon gamma (p=0.03), PI3K-AKT-mTOR (p=0.02), cytotoxicity (p=0.05) and antigen processing (p=0.01) gene sets, while hedgehog signaling genes were increased in non-CB patients (p=0.04). The ESTIMATE immune index and infiltration of CD4+/PD1+/Ki67+ cell populations as determined by mIF were nominally higher in patients with CB (p=0.051 and p=0.075). Conclusions: Among patients with MMRd tumors treated with PD-1 checkpoint blockade, correlative analyses demonstrate associations between CB and MSI-sensor score as well as biomarkers indicative of immune infiltration and antigen presentation. This suggests that these measures may help differentiate patient response in MSI tumors. Clinical trial information: NCT02465060.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nilofer Saba Azad
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Ping Guan
- National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | | | | | | | | | - Peter J. O'Dwyer
- University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Hospital, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Scott J. Rodig
- Department of Pathology and Center for Immuno-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - David R. Patton
- Center for Biomedical Informatics & Information Technology, NCI, NIH, Bethedsa, MD
| | - Lyndsay Harris
- Cancer Diagnosis Program, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Eads JR, Catalano PJ, Fisher GA, Rubin D, Iagaru A, Klimstra DS, Konda B, Kwong MS, Chan JA, De Jesus-Acosta A, Halfdanarson TR, Shaib WL, Soares HP, Hong SC, Wong TZ, O'Dwyer PJ. Randomized phase II study of platinum and etoposide (EP) versus temozolomide and capecitabine (CAPTEM) in patients (pts) with advanced G3 non-small cell gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEPNENs): ECOG-ACRIN EA2142. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.4020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
4020 Background: High grade (G3) GEPNENs are a rare and heterogeneous disease entity for which there is little prospective treatment data. EP chemotherapy is the treatment standard but this may not be appropriate for all G3 GEPNEN pts. CAPTEM has demonstrated activity in G3 GEPNENs and may be a promising alternative. EA2142 aimed to determine if CAPTEM was superior to EP in pts with G3 GEPNENs. Methods: This was a multicenter, randomized (1:1) phase II trial for pts with a locally advanced and unresectable or metastatic well differentiated G3 neuroendocrine tumor (NET) or a poorly differentiated, non-small cell G3 neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) of suspected gastrointestinal origin and an ECOG PS of 0-2. Pathology must have demonstrated a Ki-67 of 20-100% or at least 10 mitoses/10 high powered field. Pts were randomized to receive capecitabine 750 mg/m2 orally every 12 hours on days 1-14 and temozolomide 200 mg/m2 orally once daily on days 10-14 of a 28-day treatment cycle (Arm A) or etoposide 100 mg/m2 daily on days 1-3 with either cisplatin 25 mg/m2 daily on days 1-3 or carboplatin AUC 5 on day 1 of a 21-day treatment cycle (Arm B). Restaging scans were performed every 8 weeks and toxicity monitored per CTCAEv4. Final statistical plan was to accrue 80 pts to detect a 67% improvement in progression free survival (PFS) (primary endpoint) with CAPTEM as compared to EP, 80% power and one-sided significance level of 0.10. A planned interim analysis for efficacy and futility was conducted. Results: A total of 67 pts were enrolled (Arm A, n=32; Arm B, n=35). Male 58%, African American 4%, Asian 3%. Mean age 61. Among 63 eligible pts, primary tumor site pancreatic 56%, non-pancreatic 43%. Poorly differentiated 57%, well differentiated 33%, unknown 10%. Mean Ki-67 48% (Arm A), 60% (Arm B). The study was closed prior to full accrual due to futility at 57.7% information time. In the interim analysis, among 62 eligible pts, PFS, overall survival and response rate with CAPTEM were 2.43 months (mos) (95% CI 2.04, 7.72), 12.6 mos, 9% respectively vs 5.36 mos (95% CI 2.14, 7.23), 13.6 mos and 10% with EP. Toxicity was evaluable in 57 pts with Grade (G) 3/4 events occurring in 29% of pts on Arm A, 66% of pts on Arm B. G3/4 events occurring in more than 5% of pts on Arm A—febrile neutropenia (n=2); abdominal pain (n=2); diarrhea (n=2); nausea (n=2); neutropenia (n=2); dehydration (n=2) and on Arm B—anemia (n=8); febrile neutropenia (n=2); fatigue (n=2); lymphopenia (n=2); neutropenia (n=12); thrombocytopenia (n=4); leukopenia (n=6). There was one G5 event on Arm A due to sepsis. Conclusions: CAPTEM does not appear to be superior to EP chemotherapy as front-line treatment for pts with G3 NENs but does demonstrate a more favorable toxicity profile. Studies assessing G3 NET independently of G3 NEC are needed. Clinical trial information: NCT02595424.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Bhavana Konda
- The Ohio State University, James Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Peter J. O'Dwyer
- University of Pennsylvania, Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Kunz PL, Graham N, Catalano PJ, Nimeiri H, Fisher GA, Longacre TA, Suarez CJ, Rubin D, Yao JC, Kulke MH, Hendifar AE, Shanks JC, Shah MH, Zalupski M, Schmulbach EL, Reidy DL, Strosberg JR, Wong TZ, O'Dwyer PJ, Benson AB. A randomized study of temozolomide or temozolomide and capecitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: Final analysis of efficacy and evaluation of MGMT (ECOG-ACRIN E2211). J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.4004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
4004 Background: Patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) have few treatment options that yield objective tumor response. Retrospective and small, prospective studies suggest that the combination of capecitabine and temozolomide is associated with high response rates (RR) and relative long progression-free survival (PFS). This trial was conducted to establish a role for the combination of capecitabine and temozolomide. Methods: E2211 was a multicenter, randomized, phase II trial comparing temozolomide (200 mg/m2 PO QD days 1-5) vs. capecitabine/temozolomide (capecitabine 750 mg/m2 PO BID days 1-14; temozolomide 200 mg/m2 PO QD days 10-14) in patients with advanced pancreatic NETs. Eligibility criteria included: metastatic or unresectable, low or intermediate grade pancreatic NETs, progression within preceding 12 months, and no prior temozolomide, DTIC, capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil. The primary endpoint was PFS; secondary endpoints were Overall Survival (OS), RR, safety, and MGMT as evaluated by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and promoter methylation. Allowing for 5% ineligibility, 145 randomized patients were required to obtain 138 eligible patients to detect a difference in median PFS of 9 versus 14 months (hazard ratio of 0.64) using a two-sided log-rank test at the overall 0.20 significance level with 81% power. Results: 144 patients were enrolled between 4/2013 to 3/2016 to temozolomide (n = 72) or capecitabine/temozolomide (n = 72); the efficacy analysis population included 133 eligible patients. At the scheduled interim analysis in January 2018, median PFS was 14.4 months for temozolomide vs. 22.7 months for capecitabine/temozolomide (HR = 0.58), which was sufficient to reject the null hypothesis for this final primary endpoint (stratified log rank p = 0.022. In the final analysis (5/2021), median OS was 53.8 months for temozolomide and 58.7 months for capecitabine/temozolomide (HR = 0.82, p = 0.42) and RR was 34% for temozolomide and 40% for capecitabine/temozolomide (p = 0.59). Capecitabine/temozolomide was associated with higher rates of grade 3-4 AEs (45% vs. 22%, p = 0.005). MGMT deficiency, defined as either low IHC or positive promoter methylation, was associated with greater odds of response (OR [95% CI] = 6.38 [2.19, 18.60] and 9.79 [1.09, 87.71], respectively). Conclusions: E2211 is the first prospective randomized trial of capecitabine/temozolomide and shows the longest PFS and highest RR reported for patients with pancreatic NETs in a prospective randomized study. MGMT deficiency was associated with greater odds of objective response. Clinical trial information: NCT01824875.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pamela L. Kunz
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | | | | | | | - George A. Fisher
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | | | | | | | - James C. Yao
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | - Manisha H. Shah
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Peter J. O'Dwyer
- University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Hospital, Philadelphia, PA
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Tsao AS, Song Z, Ho AL, Mehnert JM, Mitchell EP, Wright JJ, Takebe N, Gray RJ, Wang V, McShane L, Rubinstein LV, Patton DR, Williams PM, Hamilton SR, Conley BA, Arteaga CL, Harris L, O'Dwyer PJ, Chen AP, Flaherty K. Phase II study of vismodegib in patients with SMO or PTCH1 mutated tumors: Results from NCI-MATCH ECOG-ACRIN Trial (EAY131) Subprotocol T. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.3010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
3010 Background: NCI-MATCH (EAY131) is a platform trial enrolling patients (pts) with solid tumors, lymphomas, or multiple myeloma to targeted therapies based on matching genomic alterations (NCT02465060). Subprotocol Arm T evaluated vismodegib (GDC0449), a hedgehog signaling pathway inhibitor with anti-tumor activity in pts with tumors harboring PTCH1 and SMO mutations. Methods: Pts whose tumors had SMO or PTCH1 mutations were eligible; results were confirmed by NCI-MATCH central labs if possible. Pts received oral vismodegib (150 mg daily) for 4-week cycles until progression/toxicity. Tumor response was assessed every 2 cycles. Primary endpoint was ORR; secondary endpoints included PFS, 6-month PFS, OS, and predictive biomarkers. Cutaneous basal cell carcinomas were excluded. Results: Of 34 pts enrolled (6/20/16 – 9/22/20); 2 were ineligible and 1 did not start therapy. The 31 analyzable pts’ demographics were primary tumor sites/histology [gastrointestinal (n = 9), skin/soft tissue (n = 7), gynecologic (n = 5), lung (n = 4), unknown primary (n = 4), ductal breast (n = 1), meningioma (n = 1)]; median age 64 (range 19-81); 48.4% women; 61.3% (19/31) > 3 lines of prior therapy; 74% (23/31) > 1 co-occurring mutation [median 2 co-alterations (range 1-20)]. 8/31 > 4 co-occurring alterations. 9 pts had SMO mutant tumors (all SNVs); 5/9 had > 1 co-occurring gene alterations. 22 pts had PTCH1 alterations (7 SNVs and 15 indels); 18/22 pts had > 1 additional gene alteration. Of 31 analyzable pts, 22 were MATCH-confirmed (i.e. had central confirmation of tumor PTCH1/SMO mutations). MATCH-confirmed pts had ORR 9.1% (2/22) while all analyzable pts had ORR 6.5% (2/31). 2 PRs were seen in pts with a skin/soft tissue sarcoma ( PTCH) and a meningioma ( SMO) with a median duration of response 14 months. The 6-month PFS rate was similar in MATCH-confirmed and analyzable pts (22.4% and 23.2% respectively) and median PFS was identical at 1.8 months. Median OS was 9.1 months in MATCH-confirmed and 7.3 months in analyzable pts. Within analyzable SMO variants: 1 PR, 3 SD, 4 PD, and 1 unevaluable responses were documented. Within analyzable PTCH1 variants: 1 PR, 7 SD, 10 PD, and 4 unevaluable responses were seen. 4 pts (12.9%) discontinued therapy due to AE. Among 33 pts starting therapy, 18 (54.5%) had grade 1-2 toxicity, while 2 (6.1%) had grade 3 treatment-related toxicity. Most common toxicities: grade 1-2 fatigue (n = 11), anorexia (n = 8), weight loss (n = 7), alopecia (n = 7), and dysgeusia (n = 6). There were 4 on-study deaths, but none were treatment related. Conclusions: Although the primary endpoint was not reached, vismodegib was well-tolerated with mostly grade 1-2 toxicities and substantial responses were seen in patients with SMOPro641Ala and PTCHGlu947Ter alterations. Further study of the impact of concomitant molecular alterations may yield additional insights into vismodegib mechanisms of response. Clinical trial information: NCT02465060.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne S. Tsao
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Alan Loh Ho
- Solid Tumor Oncology Division, Head and Neck Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Edith P. Mitchell
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - John Joseph Wright
- National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Naoko Takebe
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Robert James Gray
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute-ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | | | - Lisa McShane
- Biometric Research Program, DCTD, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD
| | - Larry V. Rubinstein
- Biometric Research Branch, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - David R. Patton
- Center for Biomedical Informatics & Information Technology, NCI, NIH, Bethedsa, MD
| | | | | | - Barbara A. Conley
- Cancer Diagnosis Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | | | - Lyndsay Harris
- Cancer Diagnosis Program, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| | - Peter J. O'Dwyer
- University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Hospital, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Alice P. Chen
- Developmental Therapeutics Clinic, DCTD, NCI, Bethesda, MD
| | - Keith Flaherty
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Harvard Medical School/Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Uboha NV, Graham N, Rajdev L, Gibson MK, Fisher GA, Lin SH, Chakravarthy B, O'Dwyer PJ. EA2183: A phase III study of consolidative radiotherapy in patients with oligometastatic HER2-negative esophageal and gastric adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.tps4162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
TPS4162 Background: Advanced esophageal and gastric adenocarcinomas (EGA) have poor prognosis. Doublet chemotherapy with fluoropyrimidine and platinum agents in combination with nivolumab for PD-L1 positive tumors is now the standard first-line approach, but overall survival (OS) remains < 1.5 years. A subset of EGA patients have limited burden of metastatic disease. There is accumulating evidence that patients with oligometastatic states across disease types may benefit from locoregional ablative therapies during the course of their treatment. EA2183 is the first prospective study to evaluate the potential benefits of consolidative radiotherapy (XRT) in oligometastatic EGA. Methods: This is a prospective, randomized phase 3 study evaluating the role of consolidative XRT in oligometastatic EGA. Patients with ≤3 metastases at the time of diagnosis of advanced disease are eligible for enrollment. After completion of 4 months of systemic therapy, patients whose disease has not progressed are randomized to consolidation with XRT to all sites of disease followed by continuation of systemic therapy or continuation of systemic therapy alone. Patients are able to enroll in the study at the time of diagnosis of advanced disease or after completion of induction therapy. Systemic therapy is left to the discretion of the treating physician and can include FOLFOX (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin) or CAPOX (capecitabine, oxaliplatin) in combination with nivolumab. Unless there are contraindications to immunotherapy or a history of prior treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors, nivolumab use is mandatory if tumor has PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥5. The goal of radiation is to consolidate gains made by chemotherapy by delivering the highest dose that maintains the greatest tumor control probability that is also safe to deliver given the anatomic and normal tissue constraints. Specific radiation dose and fractionation are recommended in the protocol but is left to the discretion of the treating radiation oncologist to choose the course that is most suitable. Radiation must be administered over a maximum of 15 treatment days to minimize systemic therapy treatment breaks. Primary endpoint is OS from the time of randomization. Secondary endpoints include progression free survival from the time of randomization and safety and tolerability of consolidative XRT. We hypothesize that consolidative XRT will prolong OS from 10 to 15.6 months (an increase in median OS of 55.6%). The study is planning to enroll 314 patients with the goal of randomizing 204 patients in a 2:1 fashion. Stratification factors include number of metastatic sites, choice of immunotherapy with relation to PD-L1 CPS, as well as time of registration to the protocol (before or after systemic therapy initiation). Enrollment to the study is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT04248452.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Lakshmi Rajdev
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY
| | - Michael K. Gibson
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center/Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN
| | - George A. Fisher
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Steven H. Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Peter J. O'Dwyer
- University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Hospital, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Qandeel H, Chew C, Young D, O'Dwyer PJ. Subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue in patients with primary and recurrent incisional hernia. Hernia 2022; 26:953-957. [PMID: 33886018 PMCID: PMC9200868 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-021-02416-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Visceral obesity rather than body mass index has been reported to be associated with a higher incidence of incisional hernias. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between CT measured adipose tissue and muscle in primary and recurrent incisional hernia. METHODS Patients with a 'Primary' or 'Recurrent incisional hernia' were obtained from a prospective cohort of patients who were being assessed for incisional hernia repair over a 2-year period. Computerised tomography (CT)-images were analysed using NIH Image-J software to quantify adipose tissue and skeletal muscle cross-sectional areas at the level of lumber vertebra 3/4 using standard Hounsfield units. To test inter-observer 'absolute agreement', each parameter was measured independently by two investigators and reliability analysis performed. RESULTS Thirty-six patients were included in the study: 15 had a Primary while 21 had a Recurrent incisional hernia. Both groups had similar baseline characteristics. Reliability analysis for CT-measured areas showed very high interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between observers. Patients in the recurrent group had significantly greater subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) [median = 321.9cm2 vs 230.9cm2, p = 0.04] and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) [median = 221.1cm2 vs 146.8cm2, p = 0.03] than those in the primary group. There was no difference in skeletal muscle areas for right [median = 2.8cm2 vs 2.9cm2] and left [median = 3.7cm2 vs 4.1cm2] rectus muscles between groups. CONCLUSION Our study shows that patients with a recurrent incisional hernia have significantly more subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue than those with a primary incisional hernia. Further studies in this area are required if we are to reduce the burden of recurrent hernia following repair of a primary incisional hernia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Qandeel
- Department of Surgery, Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan
| | - C Chew
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Hairmyres, Glasgow, UK
| | - D Young
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Strathclyde University, Glasgow, UK
| | - P J O'Dwyer
- School of Medicine, Dentistry and Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Ciombor KK, Hong SC, Eng C, Yao X, Cho MT, You YN, Das P, Chakravarthy AB, O'Dwyer PJ. EA2201: An ECOG-ACRIN phase II study of neoadjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab and short course radiation in MSI-H/dMMR rectal tumors. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.tps3644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
TPS3644 Background: Trimodality therapy including chemoradiation, chemotherapy and surgical resection is standard for patients with T3-4 and/or node-positive (N+) rectal adenocarcinomas. Pathologic complete response (pCR) rates after neoadjuvant chemoradiation approach 15% in all-comers and 27% in patients with microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) or deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) rectal cancer. Additionally, preclinical data suggest that hypofractionated radiation (large dose per fraction) may enhance immunogenicity. Given high response rates to immunotherapy in MSI-H/dMMR early stage and metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC), we hypothesized that neoadjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab and short course radiation in locally advanced MSI-H/dMMR rectal cancer (LARC) would result in increased pCR rates. Methods: EA2201 (NCT04751370) is an NCTN phase II clinical trial for patients with treatment-naïve locally advanced (T3-4Nx or TxN+) rectal adenocarcinoma that is dMMR or MSI-H. Patients receive nivolumab (480 mg) and ipilimumab (1 mg/kg) every 28 days for 2 cycles, followed by short course radiation (5 Gy x 5 fractions; total 25 Gy) and an additional 2 cycles of nivolumab and ipilimumab prior to disease reassessment and TME. The primary endpoint is pCR at TME. Secondary endpoints include 5-year disease-free survival, overall survival, treatment-related toxicities, and sphincter preservation rate for low-lying tumors. This study has a single-arm, two-stage design; a pCR rate of 50% or more will be taken as evidence of promising activity in this patient population. We plan to enroll 31 patients, with accrual currently ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT04751370.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Cathy Eng
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Xin Yao
- Fox Valley Hem Onc, Appleton, WI
| | | | - Y. Nancy You
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Prajnan Das
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Peter J. O'Dwyer
- University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Hospital, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Dotan E, Catalano PJ, Lenchik L, Boutin R, Yao X, Beg SS, Vijayvergia N, Gatsonis C, Zhen DB, Li D, Wagner LI, Simon MA, Wong TZ, O'Dwyer PJ. A randomized phase II study of gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel compared with 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and liposomal irinotecan in older patients with treatment-naïve metastatic pancreatic cancer (GIANT): ECOG-ACRIN EA2186—Trials in progress. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.tps4185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
TPS4185 Background: Evidence-based data is lacking to guide the care of older adults with newly diagnosed metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPCA). As a result, treatment approach and the selection of chemotherapy regimens are often extrapolated from data from younger patients. Furthermore, vulnerable older adults are often treated with dose adjusted regimens with limited data to support this practice. EA2186 is a phase II randomized controlled trial, and the first prospective study aiming to define the optimal treatment approach of vulnerable older adults with newly diagnosed mPCA. Methods: Patients aged 70 years and over with histologically confirmed pancreatic adenocarcinoma, evidence of metastatic disease, ECOG PS 0-2 and adequate organ function, who are considered vulnerable are eligible for this trial (accrual target 184). This study utilizes a screening geriatric assessment which characterize patients as fit, vulnerable or frail by evaluating functional status, cognition and co-morbidities. Vulnerable patients according to this screening assessment are those with mild abnormalities in functional status, comorbidities and/or cognition, or older than 80 years of age. Those patients will be randomized to receive either modified Gemcitabine/Nab-Paclitaxel or dose-reduced 5-Fluorouracil Leucovorin and Liposomal Irinotecan every 2 weeks. A comprehensive geriatric assessment (GA) and quality of life (QOL) evaluation are completed prior to initiation of therapy for all randomized patients. Follow up will continue until disease progression or withdrawal, with repeated GA and QOL assessments at each disease evaluation. Overall survival is the primary objective, with secondary objectives including progression free survival, and response rate. Enrolled patients will be stratified by age 70-74 vs ≥75, and ECOG PS 0-1 vs 2. Additional endpoints of interest for older adults include: evaluation of risk factors identified through GA, and capturing toxicities of interest for this patient population (i.e. hospitalization, deterioration in PS, and falls). Correlative studies include assessment of pro-inflammatory biomarkers or aging in the blood (IL-6 and CRP) as well as imaging evaluation of sarcopenia and body composition as predictors of treatment tolerance. Clinical trial information: NCT04233866.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Xin Yao
- Fox Valley Hem Onc, Appleton, WI
| | | | | | | | - David Bing Zhen
- University of Washington/Fred Hutchison Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Daneng Li
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA
| | | | - Melissa A. Simon
- Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | | | - Peter J. O'Dwyer
- University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Hospital, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Damodaran S, Zhao F, Deming DA, Mitchell EP, Wright JJ, Gray RJ, Wang V, McShane LM, Rubinstein LV, Patton DR, Williams PM, Hamilton SR, Suga JM, Conley BA, Arteaga CL, Harris LN, O'Dwyer PJ, Chen AP, Flaherty KT. Phase II Study of Copanlisib in Patients With Tumors With PIK3CA Mutations: Results From the NCI-MATCH ECOG-ACRIN Trial (EAY131) Subprotocol Z1F. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:1552-1561. [PMID: 35133871 PMCID: PMC9084438 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.01648] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2021] [Revised: 11/15/2021] [Accepted: 01/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Activating mutations in PIK3CA are observed across multiple tumor types. The NCI-MATCH (EAY131) is a tumor-agnostic platform trial that enrolls patients to targeted therapies on the basis of matching genomic alterations. Arm Z1F evaluated copanlisib, an α and δ isoform-specific phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor, in patients with PIK3CA mutations (with or without PTEN loss). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients received copanlisib (60 mg intravenous) once weekly on days 1, 8, and 15 in 28-day cycles until progression or toxicity. Patients with KRAS mutations, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancers, and lymphomas were excluded. The primary end point was centrally assessed objective response rate (ORR); secondary end points included progression-free survival, 6-month progression-free survival, and overall survival. RESULTS Thirty-five patients were enrolled, and 25 patients were included in the primary efficacy analysis as prespecified in the Protocol. Multiple histologies were enrolled, with gynecologic (n = 6) and gastrointestinal (n = 6) being the most common. Sixty-eight percent of patients had ≥ 3 lines of prior therapy. The ORR was 16% (4 of 25, 90% CI, 6 to 33) with P = .0341 against a null rate of 5%. The most common reason for protocol discontinuation was disease progression (n = 17, 68%). Grade 3/4 toxicities observed were consistent with reported toxicities for PI3K pathway inhibition. Sixteen patients (53%) had grade 3 toxicities, and one patient (3%) had grade 4 toxicity (CTCAE v5.0). Most common toxicities include hyperglycemia (n = 19), fatigue (n = 12), diarrhea (n = 11), hypertension (n = 10), and nausea (n = 10). CONCLUSION The study met its primary end point with an ORR of 16% (P = .0341) with copanlisib showing clinical activity in select tumors with PIK3CA mutation in the refractory setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Fengmin Zhao
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute-ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | | | - Edith P. Mitchell
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - John J. Wright
- Investigational Drug Branch, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Robert J. Gray
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute-ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | - Victoria Wang
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute-ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | - Lisa M. McShane
- Biometric Research Branch, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Larry V. Rubinstein
- Biometric Research Branch, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - David R. Patton
- National Cancer Institute/Center for Biomedical Informatics & Information Technology, Rockville, MD
| | - P. Mickey Williams
- Molecular Characterization Laboratory, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
| | | | | | - Barbara A. Conley
- Cancer Diagnosis Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | | | - Lyndsay N. Harris
- Cancer Diagnosis Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Peter J. O'Dwyer
- University of Pennsylvania Abramson Cancer Center, Division of Medical Oncology, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Alice P. Chen
- Developmental Therapeutics Clinic/Early Clinical Trials Development Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Keith T. Flaherty
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Harvard Medical School/Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Patnaik A, Gadgeel S, Papadopoulos KP, Rasco DW, Haas NB, Der-Torossian H, Faltaos D, Potvin D, Tassell V, Tawashi M, Chao R, O'Dwyer PJ. Phase I Study of Glesatinib (MGCD256) in Combination with Erlotinib or Docetaxel in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors. Target Oncol 2022; 17:125-138. [PMID: 35347559 DOI: 10.1007/s11523-022-00875-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/03/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oncogenic drivers in solid tumors include aberrant activation of mesenchymal epithelial transition factor (MET) and AXL. OBJECTIVE This study investigated the safety and antitumor activity of glesatinib, a multitargeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor that inhibits MET and AXL at clinically relevant doses, in combination with erlotinib or docetaxel. PATIENTS AND METHODS The phase I portion of this open-label, multicenter study included two parallel arms in which ascending doses of oral glesatinib (starting dose 96 mg/m2) were administered with erlotinib or docetaxel (starting doses 100 mg once daily and 50 mg/m2, respectively) using a modified 3 + 3 design. Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was based on dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) during the first 21-day treatment cycle. Enrollment focused on patients with solid tumor types typically associated with MET aberration and/or AXL overexpression. The primary objective was to determine the safety profile of the treatment combinations. Antitumor activity and pharmacokinetics (PK) were also assessed. RESULTS Ten dose levels of glesatinib across three glycolate formulations (unmicronized, micronized, or micronized version 2 [V2] tablets) available during the course of the study were investigated in 14 dose-escalation cohorts (n = 126). MTDs of unmicronized glesatinib plus erlotinib or docetaxel, and micronized glesatinib plus erlotinib were not reached. Micronized glesatinib 96 mg/m2 plus docetaxel exceeded the MTD. Further dosing focused on glesatinib micronized V2: maximum administered dose (MAD) was 700 mg twice daily with erlotinib 150 mg once daily or docetaxel 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. DLTs, acceptable at lower glesatinib (micronized V2) dose levels, occurred in two of five and two of six patients at the MADs of glesatinib + erlotinib and glesatinib + docetaxel, respectively. Across all cohorts, the most frequent treatment-related adverse events were diarrhea (glesatinib + erlotinib: 84.1%; glesatinib + docetaxel: 45.6%), fatigue (46.4%, 70.4%), and nausea (30.4%, 35.1%). The objective response rate was 1.8% and 12.0% in all glesatinib + erlotinib and glesatinib + docetaxel cohorts, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The safety profile of glesatinib plus erlotinib or docetaxel was acceptable and there were no PK interactions. MADs of glesatinib 700 mg twice daily (micronized V2) with erlotinib 150 mg once daily or docetaxel 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks exceeded the MTD by a small margin. Modest signals of efficacy were observed with these treatment combinations in non-genetically selected patients with advanced solid tumors. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00975767; 11 September 2009.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amita Patnaik
- START, 4383 Medical Drive, Suite 4026, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.
| | - Shirish Gadgeel
- Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, USA.,Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | | | - Drew W Rasco
- START, 4383 Medical Drive, Suite 4026, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA
| | - Naomi B Haas
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Demiana Faltaos
- Mirati Therapeutics Inc., San Diego, CA, USA.,Olema Therapeutics, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Manal Tawashi
- Mirati Therapeutics Inc., San Diego, CA, USA.,HUYABIO International, San Diego, CA, USA
| | | | - Peter J O'Dwyer
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Krop IE, Jegede OA, Grilley-Olson JE, Lauring JD, Mitchell EP, Zwiebel JA, Gray RJ, Wang V, McShane LM, Rubinstein LV, Patton D, Williams PM, Hamilton SR, Kono SA, Ford JM, Garcia AA, Sui XD, Siegel RD, Slomovitz BM, Conley BA, Arteaga CL, Harris LN, O'Dwyer PJ, Chen AP, Flaherty KT. Phase II Study of Taselisib in PIK3CA-Mutated Solid Tumors Other Than Breast and Squamous Lung Cancer: Results From the NCI-MATCH ECOG-ACRIN Trial (EAY131) Subprotocol I. JCO Precis Oncol 2022; 6:e2100424. [PMID: 35138919 PMCID: PMC8865530 DOI: 10.1200/po.21.00424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2021] [Revised: 11/12/2021] [Accepted: 01/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE PIK3CA mutations frequently contribute to oncogenesis in solid tumors. Taselisib, a potent and selective inhibitor of phosphoinositide 3-kinase, has demonstrated clinical activity in PIK3CA-mutant breast cancer. Whether PIK3CA mutations predict sensitivity to taselisib in other cancer types is unknown. National Cancer Institute-Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice Arm EAY131-I is a single-arm, phase II study of the safety and efficacy of taselisib in patients with advanced cancers. METHODS Eligible patients had tumors with an activating PIK3CA mutation. Patients with breast or squamous cell lung carcinoma, or whose cancer had KRAS or PTEN mutations, were excluded. Patients received taselisib 4 mg, orally once daily continuously, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was objective response rate. Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), 6-month PFS, overall survival (OS), and identification of predictive biomarkers. RESULTS Seventy patients were enrolled, and 61 were eligible and initiated protocol therapy. Types of PIK3CA mutations included helical 41 of 61 (67%), kinase 11 of 61 (18%), and other 9 of 61 (15%). With a median follow-up of 35.7 months, there were no complete or partial responses. Six-month PFS was 19.9% (90% CI, 12.0 to 29.3) and median PFS was 3.1 months (90% CI, 1.8 to 3.7). Six-month OS was 60.7% (90% CI, 49.6 to 70.0) and median OS was 7.2 months (90% CI, 5.9 to 10.0). Individual comutations were too heterogeneous to correlate with clinical outcome. Fatigue, diarrhea, nausea, and hyperglycemia were the most common toxicities, and most were grade 1 and 2. CONCLUSION In this study, taselisib monotherapy had very limited activity in a heterogeneous cohort of heavily pretreated cancer patients with PIK3CA-mutated tumors; the presence of a PIK3CA mutation alone does not appear to be a sufficient predictor of taselisib activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian E. Krop
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Opeyemi A. Jegede
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | | | - Robert J. Gray
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | - Victoria Wang
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Mita AC, Wei Z, Mayer IA, Cheng H, Mitchell EP, Wright JJ, Ivy P, Gray RJ, Wang V, McShane LM, Rubinstein LV, Patton DR, Williams M, Hamilton SR, Conley BA, Arteaga CL, Harris LN, O'Dwyer PJ, Chen AP, Flaherty KT. Abstract LBA003: Erdafitinib in patients with tumors harboring FGFR gene mutations or fusions: Results from the NCI-MATCH ECOG-ACRIN Trial (EAY131) Sub-protocol K2. Mol Cancer Ther 2021. [DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.targ-21-lba003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: The NCI-MATCH precision medicine trial assigns patients (pts) with solid tumors, lymphoma, or multiple myeloma whose cancers have progressed on prior treatment to a targeted therapy based on genetic alterations identified in pre-treatment biopsies. Arm K2 (EAY131-K2) evaluated the pan-FGFR inhibitor erdafitinib (E) in pts with FGFR mutations or fusions. Patients and methods: Pts with bladder or urothelial cancers were excluded. Pts received E 8 mg PO daily (28-day cycle) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity; dose reduction for toxicities was allowed; imaging was performed every 2 cycles. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR); secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), 6-month PFS, and overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 35 pts were enrolled to this arm from 07/2018-07/2019; one was ineligible and one did not receive treatment. Nine distinct tumor histologies were represented, most common being pancreatobiliary (11), CNS (7) and gynecological tumors (5). 73% of pts were female, with median age of 59y (range 26-83y), 70% were Caucasian, and 61% of pts had received at least 3 prior therapies (range 0-22). Alterations in FGFR1, FGFR2 and FGFR3 were recorded in 6, 18, and 9 evaluable pts, respectively. 18 pt tumors had fusions and 15 had mutations in an FGFR gene. The confirmed ORR was 12% (90% CI 4%, 26%), with a median duration of response (DoR) of 7.3 months (mo), range 4.2-11.7 mo. Responses were seen in cholangiocarcinoma (2 pts), Brenner ovarian tumor and adenoid cystic carcinoma (1 pt each). Two (50%) of these 4 tumors harbored FGFR fusions and 2 FGFR mutations. 13 pts had stable disease (SD). Median PFS was 3.9 mo, and 6-mo PFS was 32.8% (90% CI 21.2%, 50.6%). Median OS was 11.0 mo. Of the 6 pts with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, 2 had PR and 2 SD. The most frequent grade 3 treatment-related AEs were oral mucositis/pain (5 pts), paronychia, electrolyte disorders, and anemia/lymphopenia (2 pts each). There were no treatment-related grade 4-5 toxicities. Toxicities were reversible and manageable with E dose interruptions and/or dose reduction. Conclusions: In this pre-treated, mixed histology cohort with tumors harboring FGFR somatic alterations, E showed activity with durable responses and disease stabilizations outside of currently approved FDA indications, although the pre-specified criterion that the primary endpoint, ORR, be significantly greater than 16% was not reached. Toxicities were consistent with E safety profile. Responses were observed in tumors harboring FGFR fusions as well as in those with mutations of FGFR; further correlative analyses are planned.
Citation Format: Alain C Mita, Zihan Wei, Ingrid A Mayer, Heather Cheng, Edith P Mitchell, John J Wright, Percy Ivy, Robert J Gray, Victoria Wang, Lisa M McShane, Larry V Rubinstein, David R Patton, Mickey Williams, Stanley R Hamilton, Barbara A Conley, Carlos L Arteaga, Lyndsay N Harris, Peter J O'Dwyer, Alice P Chen, Keith T Flaherty. Erdafitinib in patients with tumors harboring FGFR gene mutations or fusions: Results from the NCI-MATCH ECOG-ACRIN Trial (EAY131) Sub-protocol K2 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC Virtual International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2021 Oct 7-10. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2021;20(12 Suppl):Abstract nr LBA003.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Zihan Wei
- 2Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA,
| | - Ingrid A Mayer
- 3Vanderbilt University Medical Center/Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN,
| | | | | | | | - Percy Ivy
- 6National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Peter J O'Dwyer
- 10University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA,
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Cousin S, Blay JY, Garcia IB, de Bono JS, Le Tourneau C, Moreno V, Trigo J, Hann CL, Azad AA, Im SA, Cassier PA, French CA, Italiano A, Keedy VL, Plummer R, Sablin MP, Hemming ML, Ferron-Brady G, Wyce A, Khaled A, Datta A, Foley SW, McCabe MT, Wu Y, Horner T, Kremer BE, Dhar A, O'Dwyer PJ, Shapiro GI, Piha-Paul SA. Safety, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and clinical activity of molibresib for the treatment of nuclear protein of the testis carcinoma and other cancers: Results of a Phase I/II open-label, dose escalation study. Int J Cancer 2021; 150:993-1006. [PMID: 34724226 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2021] [Revised: 07/01/2021] [Accepted: 07/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Molibresib is an orally bioavailable, selective, small molecule BET protein inhibitor. Results from a first time in human study in solid tumors resulted in the selection of a 75 mg once daily dose of the besylate formulation of molibresib as the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D). Here we present the results of Part 2 of our study, investigating safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and clinical activity of molibresib at the RP2D for nuclear protein in testis carcinoma (NC), small cell lung cancer, castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), triple-negative breast cancer, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer and gastrointestinal stromal tumor. The primary safety endpoints were incidence of adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs; the primary efficacy endpoint was overall response rate. Secondary endpoints included plasma concentrations and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA). Molibresib 75 mg once daily demonstrated no unexpected toxicities. The most common treatment-related AEs (any grade) were thrombocytopenia (64%), nausea (43%) and decreased appetite (37%); 83% of patients required dose interruptions and 29% required dose reductions due to AEs. Antitumor activity was observed in NC and CRPC (one confirmed partial response each, with observed reductions in tumor size), although predefined clinically meaningful response rates were not met for any tumor type. Total active moiety median plasma concentrations after single and repeated administration were similar across tumor cohorts. GSEA revealed that gene expression changes with molibresib varied by patient, response status and tumor type. Investigations into combinatorial approaches that use BET inhibition to eliminate resistance to other targeted therapies are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Cousin
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Jean-Yves Blay
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Irene Braña Garcia
- Medical Oncology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Institut of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Johann S de Bono
- The Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - Christophe Le Tourneau
- Department of Drug Development and Innovation (D3i), INSERM U900 Research Unit, Institut Curie, Paris-Saclay University, Paris and Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Victor Moreno
- Medical Oncology, START Madrid-FJD, Fundación Jiménez Díaz Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jose Trigo
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria y Regional, IBIMA, Málaga, Spain
| | - Christine L Hann
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Arun A Azad
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victoria, Australia
| | - Seock-Ah Im
- Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | - Christopher A French
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Antoine Italiano
- Early Phase Trials and Sarcoma Units, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Vicki L Keedy
- Department of Medicine, Hematology and Oncology, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Ruth Plummer
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Marie-Paule Sablin
- Department of Drug Development and Innovation (D3i), INSERM U900 Research Unit, Institut Curie, Paris-Saclay University, Paris and Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Matthew L Hemming
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Yuehui Wu
- GSK, Collegeville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | | | | | - Peter J O'Dwyer
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Geoffrey I Shapiro
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sarina A Piha-Paul
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Abstract
Background Repair of a ventral hernia is increasingly being performed by a laparoscopic approach despite lack of good long term follow up data on outcomes. The aim of this study was to examine the long term performance of a polyester mesh and to assess its elastic properties in patients undergoing laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Methods All patients being assessed for a ventral hernia repair between August 2011 and November 2013 were placed on a prospective database. Those undergoing laparoscopic repair with a polyester mesh were seen at clinic at one month and one year, while their electronic records were assessed at 34 months (range 24–48 months) and 104 months (range 92–116 months). In addition, CT scans of the abdomen and pelvis performed for any reason on these patients during the follow up period were reviewed by a consultant gastrointestinal radiologist. Mechanical failure testing of the mesh was also performed. Results Thirty-two of the 100 patients assessed for ventral hernia repair had a laparoscopic repair with a polyester mesh. Nineteen (59%) had CT scans performed during the follow-up period. No recurrence was recorded at 34 months, while three (9.4%) had a recurrence at 104 months. Two had central breakdown of the mesh at 81 and 90 months, while 1 presented acutely at 116 months after operation. Mesh had stretched across the defect by an average of 21% (range 5.7–40%) in nine patients. Mechanical testing showed that this mesh lost its elasticity at low forces ranging between 1.8 and 3.2 N/cm.
Conclusion This study shows that late recurrence is a problem following laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with polyester mesh. The mesh loses it elasticity at a low force. This combined with degradation of mesh seems the most likely cause of failure. This is unlikely to be a unique problem of polyester mesh and further long-term studies are required to better assess this operative approach to ventral hernia repair.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P J O'Dwyer
- School of Medicine, Dentistry and Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
| | - C Chew
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Hairmyres, Glasgow, UK
| | - H Qandeel
- Department of Surgery, Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Chew C, O'Dwyer PJ. Letter to the Editor Re: Evaluation of appendicitis risk prediction model in adults with suspected appendicitis. Br J Surg 2021; 108:e182. [PMID: 33659977 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2021] [Accepted: 01/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Cindy Chew
- Consultant Radiologist, Honorary Clinical Associate Professor, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - P J O'Dwyer
- Emeritus Professor of Gastrointestinal Surgery, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Jhaveri KL, Wang XV, Makker V, Luoh SW, Mitchell EP, Zwiebel JA, Sharon E, Gray RJ, Li S, McShane LM, Rubinstein LV, Patton D, Williams PM, Hamilton SR, Conley BA, Arteaga CL, Harris LN, O'Dwyer PJ, Chen AP, Flaherty KT. Corrigendum to 'Ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in patients with HER2-amplified tumors excluding breast and gastric/gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinomas: results from the NCI-MATCH trial (EAY131) subprotocol Q': [Annals of Oncology 30 (2019) 1821-1830]. Ann Oncol 2021; 32:1068. [PMID: 34099371 PMCID: PMC8929237 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.05.797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- K L Jhaveri
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Center, New York, USA.
| | - X V Wang
- Biostatistics, E-A Biostatistical Center, Boston, USA
| | - V Makker
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - S-W Luoh
- Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health Science University, Portland, USA
| | - E P Mitchell
- Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, USA
| | - J A Zwiebel
- Investigational Drug Branch, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, USA
| | - E Sharon
- Medical Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, USA
| | - R J Gray
- Department of Biostatistics, Dana Farber Cancer Institutes, Boston, USA
| | - S Li
- Department of Biostatistics, Dana Farber Cancer Institutes, Boston, USA
| | - L M McShane
- Biometric Research Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, USA
| | - L V Rubinstein
- Biometric Research Branch, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, USA
| | - D Patton
- Center for Biomedical, Informatics & Information Technology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, USA
| | - P M Williams
- Molecular Characterization Laboratory, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, USA
| | - S R Hamilton
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - B A Conley
- Cancer Diagnosis Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, USA
| | - C L Arteaga
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, USA
| | - L N Harris
- Cancer Diagnosis Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, USA
| | - P J O'Dwyer
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - A P Chen
- CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, USA
| | - K T Flaherty
- Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Cleary JM, Wang V, Heist RS, Kopetz ES, Mitchell EP, Zwiebel JA, Kapner KS, Chen HX, Li S, Gray RJ, McShane LM, Rubinstein LV, Patton DR, Meric-Bernstam F, Dillmon MS, Williams PM, Hamilton SR, Conley BA, Aguirre AJ, O'Dwyer PJ, Harris LN, Arteaga CL, Chen AP, Flaherty KT. Differential Outcomes in Codon 12/13 and Codon 61 NRAS-Mutated Cancers in the Phase II NCI-MATCH Trial of Binimetinib in Patients with NRAS-Mutated Tumors. Clin Cancer Res 2021; 27:2996-3004. [PMID: 33637626 PMCID: PMC8542423 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-0066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2021] [Revised: 01/11/2021] [Accepted: 02/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Preclinical and clinical data suggest that downstream inhibition with an MEK inhibitor, such as binimetinib, might be efficacious for NRAS-mutated cancers. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients enrolled in the NCI-MATCH trial master protocol underwent tumor biopsy and molecular profiling by targeted next-generation sequencing. Patients with NRAS-mutated tumors, except melanoma, were enrolled in subprotocol Z1A, a single-arm study evaluating binimetinib 45 mg twice daily. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). A post hoc analysis examined the association of NRAS mutation type with outcome. RESULTS In total, 47 eligible patients with a refractory solid tumor harboring a codon 12, 13, or 61 NRAS mutation were treated. Observed toxicity was moderate, and 30% of patients discontinued treatment because of binimetinib-associated toxicity. The ORR was 2.1% (1/47 patients). A patient with malignant ameloblastoma harboring a codon 61 NRAS mutation achieved a durable partial response (PR). A patient with NRAS codon 61-mutated colorectal cancer had an unconfirmed PR, and two other patients with NRAS codon 61-mutated colorectal had stable disease for at least 12 months. In an exploratory analysis, patients with colorectal cancer bearing a NRAS codon 61 mutation (n = 8) had a significantly longer OS (P = 0.03) and PFS (P = 0.007) than those with codon 12 or 13 mutations (n = 16). CONCLUSIONS Single-agent binimetinib did not show promising efficacy in NRAS-mutated cancers. The observation of increased OS and PFS in patients with codon 61 NRAS-mutated colorectal cancer merits further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James M Cleary
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| | | | - Rebecca S Heist
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - E Scott Kopetz
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Edith P Mitchell
- Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - James A Zwiebel
- Investigational Drug Branch, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, NCI, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Kevin S Kapner
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Helen X Chen
- Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, NCI, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Shuli Li
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Lisa M McShane
- Biometric Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, NCI, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Larry V Rubinstein
- Biometric Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, NCI, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - David R Patton
- Center for Biomedical Informatics and Information Technology, NCI, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Funda Meric-Bernstam
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - P Mickey Williams
- Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland
| | | | - Barbara A Conley
- Cancer Diagnosis Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, NCI, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Andrew J Aguirre
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Lyndsay N Harris
- Cancer Diagnosis Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, NCI, Bethesda, Maryland
| | | | - Alice P Chen
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, NCI, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Keith T Flaherty
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Jackman DM, Jegede O, Zauderer MG, Mitchell EP, Zwiebel J, Gray RJ, Li S, McShane L, Rubinstein L, Patton DR, Williams PM, Hamilton SR, Conley BA, Arteaga CL, Harris L, O'Dwyer PJ, Chen AP, Flaherty K. A phase 2 study of defactinib (VS-6063) in patients with NF2 altered tumors: Results from NCI-match (EAY131) subprotocol U. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.3087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
3087 Background: The NCI-MATCH trial assigns patients (pts) with solid tumors, lymphomas, or multiple myeloma to targeted therapies based on genetic alterations identified in tumor biopsies. Neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2)-inactivated tumors demonstrate increased sensitivity to FAK inhibition in preclinical models. Arm U evaluated the FAK inhibitor defactinib in pts with NF2 altered tumors. Methods: Patients found to harbor an inactivating NF2 mutation on NGS were assigned to the ARM U substudy MATCH. Defactinib 400 mg was given by mouth twice daily until progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS), and 6-month PFS. Results: Of 5,548 cases with sufficient tissue for genomic analysis, 51 pts were found to have NF2 alterations (< 1% of the total analyzed). While NF2 alterations are known to occur more commonly in meningiomas and mesotheliomas, alterations were also detected in an array of other tumor types, including renal cell carcinomas and ovarian cancers. Thirty-five pts were ultimately enrolled; 33 patients were started on therapy, with 2 of those determined to be ineligible for outcome analysis. All pts had received at least one prior therapy, with 52% (16/31) having received 3 or more prior lines of therapy. Median follow-up was 35.9 months. ORR [90% CI] was 3% (1/31, [0.16, 14.86]), with the one partial response in a pt with choroid meningioma. Of the twelve pts whose best response was stable disease (39%, 12/31), 8 demonstrated some degree of tumor shrinkage (Table) with a disease control rate of 42% (13/31). Median PFS was 1.9 months for the 31 eligible pts who received study treatment, with median PFS of 9.3 months for the 9 patients who had a best response of stable disease or better. Six pts achieved a PFS of greater than 5.5 months. Among all treated pts (n=33), the most common treatment-related toxicities were fatigue (36%), nausea (33%), and hyperbilirubinemia (27%). There were no grade 4 or 5 toxicities; 27% of pts had grade 3 toxicities. No correlation could be made between clinical outcomes and tumor histology or specific NF2 genotype. Conclusions: Defactinib monotherapy had limited clinical activity in this cohort of previously treated patients with solid tumors exhibiting NF2 loss. Clinical trial information: NCT04439331. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Edith P. Mitchell
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Robert James Gray
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute-ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | - Shuli Li
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute – ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | | | - Lawrence Rubinstein
- Biometric Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - David R Patton
- National Cancer Institute/Center for Biomedical Informatics & Information Technology, Rockville, MD
| | - Paul M. Williams
- Molecular Characterization Laboratory, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
| | | | - Barbara A. Conley
- Cancer Diagnosis Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | | | - Lyndsay Harris
- Cancer Diagnosis Program, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| | - Peter J. O'Dwyer
- University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Hospital, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Alice P. Chen
- Developmental Therapeutics Clinic/Early Clinical Trials Development Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Keith Flaherty
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Harvard Medical School/Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|