1
|
Tanaka A, Ogawa M, Zhou Y, Namba K, Hendrickson RC, Miele MM, Li Z, Klimstra DS, Buckley PG, Gulcher J, Wang JY, Roehrl MHA. Proteogenomic characterization of primary colorectal cancer and metastatic progression identifies proteome-based subtypes and signatures. Cell Rep 2024; 43:113810. [PMID: 38377004 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.113810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2022] [Revised: 10/26/2023] [Accepted: 02/01/2024] [Indexed: 02/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Metastatic progression of colorectal adenocarcinoma (CRC) remains poorly understood and poses significant challenges for treatment. To overcome these challenges, we performed multiomics analyses of primary CRC and liver metastases. Genomic alterations, such as structural variants or copy number alterations, were enriched in oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes and increased in metastases. Unsupervised mass spectrometry-based proteomics of 135 primary and 123 metastatic CRCs uncovered distinct proteomic subtypes, three each for primary and metastatic CRCs, respectively. Integrated analyses revealed that hypoxia, stemness, and immune signatures characterize these 6 subtypes. Hypoxic CRC harbors high epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition features and metabolic adaptation. CRC with a stemness signature shows high oncogenic pathway activation and alternative telomere lengthening (ALT) phenotype, especially in metastatic lesions. Tumor microenvironment analysis shows immune evasion via modulation of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I/II and antigen processing pathways. This study characterizes both primary and metastatic CRCs and provides a large proteogenomics dataset of metastatic progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Atsushi Tanaka
- Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Makiko Ogawa
- Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yihua Zhou
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; ICU Department, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Kei Namba
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of General Thoracic Surgery and Breast and Endocrinological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Ronald C Hendrickson
- Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Matthew M Miele
- Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Zhuoning Li
- Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - David S Klimstra
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Paige.AI, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | - Michael H A Roehrl
- Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Verschuur AVD, Hackeng WM, Westerbeke F, Benhamida JK, Basturk O, Selenica P, Raicu GM, Molenaar IQ, van Santvoort HC, Daamen LA, Klimstra DS, Yachida S, Luchini C, Singhi AD, Geisenberger C, Brosens LAA. DNA Methylation Profiling Enables Accurate Classification of Nonductal Primary Pancreatic Neoplasms. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024:S1542-3565(24)00211-8. [PMID: 38382726 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2024.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2023] [Revised: 02/07/2024] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Cytologic and histopathologic diagnosis of non-ductal pancreatic neoplasms can be challenging in daily clinical practice, whereas it is crucial for therapy and prognosis. The cancer methylome is successfully used as a diagnostic tool in other cancer entities. Here, we investigate if methylation profiling can improve the diagnostic work-up of pancreatic neoplasms. METHODS DNA methylation data were obtained for 301 primary tumors spanning 6 primary pancreatic neoplasms and 20 normal pancreas controls. Neural Network, Random Forest, and extreme gradient boosting machine learning models were trained to distinguish between tumor types. Methylation data of 29 nonpancreatic neoplasms (n = 3708) were used to develop an algorithm capable of detecting neoplasms of non-pancreatic origin. RESULTS After benchmarking 3 state-of-the-art machine learning models, the random forest model emerged as the best classifier with 96.9% accuracy. All classifications received a probability score reflecting the confidence of the prediction. Increasing the score threshold improved the random forest classifier performance up to 100% with 87% of samples with scores surpassing the cutoff. Using a logistic regression model, detection of nonpancreatic neoplasms achieved an area under the curve of >0.99. Analysis of biopsy specimens showed concordant classification with their paired resection sample. CONCLUSIONS Pancreatic neoplasms can be classified with high accuracy based on DNA methylation signatures. Additionally, non-pancreatic neoplasms are identified with near perfect precision. In summary, methylation profiling can serve as a valuable adjunct in the diagnosis of pancreatic neoplasms with minimal risk for misdiagnosis, even in the pre-operative setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Vera D Verschuur
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Wenzel M Hackeng
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Florine Westerbeke
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jamal K Benhamida
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Olca Basturk
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Pier Selenica
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - G Mihaela Raicu
- Department of Pathology, St Antonius Hospital and Pathology DNA, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - I Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Pathology, St Antonius Hospital and Pathology DNA, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center and St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Hjalmar C van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center and St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Lois A Daamen
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center and St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | | | - Shinichi Yachida
- Department of Cancer Genome Informatics, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Claudio Luchini
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Aatur D Singhi
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Lodewijk A A Brosens
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang T, Askan G, Ozcan K, Rana S, Zehir A, Bhanot UK, Yantiss RK, Rao DS, Wahl SJ, Bagci P, Balci S, Balachandran V, Jarnagin WR, Adsay NV, Klimstra DS, Basturk O. Tumoral Intraductal Neoplasms of the Bile Ducts Comprise Morphologically and Genetically Distinct Entities. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2023; 147:1390-1401. [PMID: 36821179 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2022-0343-oa] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/16/2022] [Indexed: 02/24/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT.— Tumoral (grossly visible) intraductal neoplasms of the bile ducts are still being characterized. OBJECTIVE.— To investigate their morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular features. DESIGN.— Forty-one cases were classified as gastric-, intestinal-, pancreatobiliary-type intraductal papillary neoplasm (IPN), intraductal oncocytic papillary neoplasm (IOPN), or intraductal tubulopapillary neoplasm (ITPN) on the basis of histology. All neoplasms were subjected to targeted next-generation sequencing. RESULTS.— The mean age at diagnosis was 69 years (42-81 years); male to female ratio was 1.3. Most neoplasms (n = 23, 56%) were extrahepatic/large (mean size, 4.6 cm). The majority (n = 32, 78%) contained high-grade dysplasia, and 68% (n = 28) revealed invasion. All gastric-type IPNs (n = 9) and most ITPNs/IOPNs showed consistent colabeling for CK7/MUC6, which was less common among others (P = .004). Intestinal-type IPNs (n = 5) showed higher rates of CK20 expression than others (P < .001). Overall, the most commonly mutated genes included TP53 and APC, while copy number variants affected ELF3 and CDKN2A/B. All gastric-type IPNs contained an alteration affecting the Wnt signaling pathway; 7 of 9 (78%) showed aberrations in the MAPK pathway. Mutations in APC and KRAS were common in gastric-type IPNs as compared with others (P = .01 for both). SMAD4 was more frequently mutated in intestinal-type IPNs (P = .02). Pancreatobiliary-type IPNs (n = 14) exhibited frequent alterations in tumor suppressor genes including TP53, CDKN2A/B, and ARID2 (P = .04, P = .01 and P = .002, respectively). Of 6 IOPNs analyzed, 3 (50%) revealed ATP1B1-PRKACB fusion. ITPNs (n = 6) showed relatively few recurrent genetic aberrations. Follow-up information was available for 38 patients (median, 58.5 months). The ratio of disease-related deaths was higher for the cases with invasion (56% versus 10%). CONCLUSIONS.— Tumoral intraductal neoplasms of the bile ducts, similar to their counterparts in the pancreas, are morphologically and genetically heterogeneous.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tao Wang
- From the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (Wang, Askan, Ozcan, Rana, Zehir, Bhanot, Rao, Klimstra, Basturk), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Gokce Askan
- From the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (Wang, Askan, Ozcan, Rana, Zehir, Bhanot, Rao, Klimstra, Basturk), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Kerem Ozcan
- From the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (Wang, Askan, Ozcan, Rana, Zehir, Bhanot, Rao, Klimstra, Basturk), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Satshil Rana
- From the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (Wang, Askan, Ozcan, Rana, Zehir, Bhanot, Rao, Klimstra, Basturk), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Ahmet Zehir
- From the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (Wang, Askan, Ozcan, Rana, Zehir, Bhanot, Rao, Klimstra, Basturk), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Umeshkumar K Bhanot
- From the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (Wang, Askan, Ozcan, Rana, Zehir, Bhanot, Rao, Klimstra, Basturk), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Rhonda K Yantiss
- Department of Pathology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York (Yantiss)
| | - Deepthi S Rao
- From the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (Wang, Askan, Ozcan, Rana, Zehir, Bhanot, Rao, Klimstra, Basturk), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Samuel J Wahl
- Department of Pathology, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York (Wahl)
| | - Pelin Bagci
- Department of Pathology, Marmara University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey (Bagci)
| | - Serdar Balci
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Healthcare Group, Istanbul, Turkey (Balci)
| | - Vinod Balachandran
- The Department of Surgery (Balachandran, Jarnagin), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - William R Jarnagin
- The Department of Surgery (Balachandran, Jarnagin), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - N Volkan Adsay
- The Department of Pathology, Koç University Hospital and Koç University Research Center for Translational Medicine (KUTTAM), Istanbul, Turkey (Adsay)
| | - David S Klimstra
- From the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (Wang, Askan, Ozcan, Rana, Zehir, Bhanot, Rao, Klimstra, Basturk), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Olca Basturk
- From the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (Wang, Askan, Ozcan, Rana, Zehir, Bhanot, Rao, Klimstra, Basturk), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yavas A, Tan J, Ozkan HS, Yilmaz F, Reid MD, Bagci P, Shi J, Shia J, Adsay V, Klimstra DS, Basturk O. Solitary Fibrous Tumor of the Pancreas: Analysis of 9 Cases With Literature Review. Am J Surg Pathol 2023; 47:1230-1242. [PMID: 37573546 PMCID: PMC10592360 DOI: 10.1097/pas.0000000000002108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/15/2023]
Abstract
Solitary fibrous tumor (SFT) has been increasingly reported in various anatomic sites. However, it is still extremely rare in the pancreas. Herein, we present the first series of primary pancreatic SFTs. Nine cases of primary pancreatic SFTs were analyzed. The mean age was 60 years (36 to 76 y) with no sex predilection. Six tumors were in the head, 3 were in the tail. On imaging studies, tumors were described as a hypervascular mass, 2 revealed cystic areas, and 3 were favored to be neuroendocrine tumors. On biopsy, 2 cases were diagnosed as atypical spindle cell tumor; one was misdiagnosed as suspicious for sarcoma, and another case as metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Two were diagnosed as low-grade sarcoma and low-grade stromal tumor on frozen sections. Grossly, tumors were well-demarcated with a median size of 4 cm (0.9 to 15 cm). Microscopically, they were composed of ovoid to spindle tumor cells with no significant mitotic activity and were arranged in alternating hypercellular and hypocellular areas. Staghorn-like vessels and entrapped pancreatic parenchyma were also detected within all tumors. Tumor cells revealed diffuse/strong nuclear STAT6 expression in 7 of 8, CD34 in 7 of 9, and bcl-2 in 4 of 4 tested cases. One tested tumor harbored NAB2 - STAT6 fusion. Eight patients with available follow-up data were free of disease at a mean follow-up of 76 months (3 to 189 mo). SFT should be considered in the differential diagnoses of mesenchymal neoplasms of the pancreas. Immunohistochemical nuclear STAT6 expression is a characteristic feature of SFT. Primary pancreatic SFTs seem to have favorable biological behavior in our series.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aslihan Yavas
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Hulya Sahin Ozkan
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Funda Yilmaz
- Department of Pathology, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Michelle D Reid
- Department of Pathology, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Pelin Bagci
- Department of Pathology, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Jiaqi Shi
- Department of Pathology and Clinical Labs, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Jinru Shia
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Volkan Adsay
- Department of Pathology, Koc University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - David S. Klimstra
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Olca Basturk
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Raciti P, Sue J, Retamero JA, Ceballos R, Godrich R, Kunz JD, Casson A, Thiagarajan D, Ebrahimzadeh Z, Viret J, Lee D, Schüffler PJ, DeMuth G, Gulturk E, Kanan C, Rothrock B, Reis-Filho J, Klimstra DS, Reuter V, Fuchs TJ. Clinical Validation of Artificial Intelligence-Augmented Pathology Diagnosis Demonstrates Significant Gains in Diagnostic Accuracy in Prostate Cancer Detection. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2023; 147:1178-1185. [PMID: 36538386 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2022-0066-oa] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/28/2022] [Indexed: 09/29/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT.— Prostate cancer diagnosis rests on accurate assessment of tissue by a pathologist. The application of artificial intelligence (AI) to digitized whole slide images (WSIs) can aid pathologists in cancer diagnosis, but robust, diverse evidence in a simulated clinical setting is lacking. OBJECTIVE.— To compare the diagnostic accuracy of pathologists reading WSIs of prostatic biopsy specimens with and without AI assistance. DESIGN.— Eighteen pathologists, 2 of whom were genitourinary subspecialists, evaluated 610 prostate needle core biopsy WSIs prepared at 218 institutions, with the option for deferral. Two evaluations were performed sequentially for each WSI: initially without assistance, and immediately thereafter aided by Paige Prostate (PaPr), a deep learning-based system that provides a WSI-level binary classification of suspicious for cancer or benign and pinpoints the location that has the greatest probability of harboring cancer on suspicious WSIs. Pathologists' changes in sensitivity and specificity between the assisted and unassisted modalities were assessed, together with the impact of PaPr output on the assisted reads. RESULTS.— Using PaPr, pathologists improved their sensitivity and specificity across all histologic grades and tumor sizes. Accuracy gains on both benign and cancerous WSIs could be attributed to PaPr, which correctly classified 100% of the WSIs showing corrected diagnoses in the PaPr-assisted phase. CONCLUSIONS.— This study demonstrates the effectiveness and safety of an AI tool for pathologists in simulated diagnostic practice, bridging the gap between computational pathology research and its clinical application, and resulted in the first US Food and Drug Administration authorization of an AI system in pathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia Raciti
- From Paige (Raciti, Sue, Retamero, Ceballos, Godrich, Kunz, Casson, Thiagarajan, Ebrahimzadeh, Viret, Lee, Schüffler, Gulturk, Kanan, Rothrock, Klimstra, Fuchs), New York, New York
| | - Jillian Sue
- From Paige (Raciti, Sue, Retamero, Ceballos, Godrich, Kunz, Casson, Thiagarajan, Ebrahimzadeh, Viret, Lee, Schüffler, Gulturk, Kanan, Rothrock, Klimstra, Fuchs), New York, New York
| | - Juan A Retamero
- From Paige (Raciti, Sue, Retamero, Ceballos, Godrich, Kunz, Casson, Thiagarajan, Ebrahimzadeh, Viret, Lee, Schüffler, Gulturk, Kanan, Rothrock, Klimstra, Fuchs), New York, New York
| | - Rodrigo Ceballos
- From Paige (Raciti, Sue, Retamero, Ceballos, Godrich, Kunz, Casson, Thiagarajan, Ebrahimzadeh, Viret, Lee, Schüffler, Gulturk, Kanan, Rothrock, Klimstra, Fuchs), New York, New York
| | - Ran Godrich
- From Paige (Raciti, Sue, Retamero, Ceballos, Godrich, Kunz, Casson, Thiagarajan, Ebrahimzadeh, Viret, Lee, Schüffler, Gulturk, Kanan, Rothrock, Klimstra, Fuchs), New York, New York
| | - Jeremy D Kunz
- From Paige (Raciti, Sue, Retamero, Ceballos, Godrich, Kunz, Casson, Thiagarajan, Ebrahimzadeh, Viret, Lee, Schüffler, Gulturk, Kanan, Rothrock, Klimstra, Fuchs), New York, New York
| | - Adam Casson
- From Paige (Raciti, Sue, Retamero, Ceballos, Godrich, Kunz, Casson, Thiagarajan, Ebrahimzadeh, Viret, Lee, Schüffler, Gulturk, Kanan, Rothrock, Klimstra, Fuchs), New York, New York
| | - Dilip Thiagarajan
- From Paige (Raciti, Sue, Retamero, Ceballos, Godrich, Kunz, Casson, Thiagarajan, Ebrahimzadeh, Viret, Lee, Schüffler, Gulturk, Kanan, Rothrock, Klimstra, Fuchs), New York, New York
| | - Zahra Ebrahimzadeh
- From Paige (Raciti, Sue, Retamero, Ceballos, Godrich, Kunz, Casson, Thiagarajan, Ebrahimzadeh, Viret, Lee, Schüffler, Gulturk, Kanan, Rothrock, Klimstra, Fuchs), New York, New York
| | - Julian Viret
- From Paige (Raciti, Sue, Retamero, Ceballos, Godrich, Kunz, Casson, Thiagarajan, Ebrahimzadeh, Viret, Lee, Schüffler, Gulturk, Kanan, Rothrock, Klimstra, Fuchs), New York, New York
| | - Donghun Lee
- From Paige (Raciti, Sue, Retamero, Ceballos, Godrich, Kunz, Casson, Thiagarajan, Ebrahimzadeh, Viret, Lee, Schüffler, Gulturk, Kanan, Rothrock, Klimstra, Fuchs), New York, New York
| | - Peter J Schüffler
- From Paige (Raciti, Sue, Retamero, Ceballos, Godrich, Kunz, Casson, Thiagarajan, Ebrahimzadeh, Viret, Lee, Schüffler, Gulturk, Kanan, Rothrock, Klimstra, Fuchs), New York, New York
| | | | - Emre Gulturk
- From Paige (Raciti, Sue, Retamero, Ceballos, Godrich, Kunz, Casson, Thiagarajan, Ebrahimzadeh, Viret, Lee, Schüffler, Gulturk, Kanan, Rothrock, Klimstra, Fuchs), New York, New York
| | - Christopher Kanan
- From Paige (Raciti, Sue, Retamero, Ceballos, Godrich, Kunz, Casson, Thiagarajan, Ebrahimzadeh, Viret, Lee, Schüffler, Gulturk, Kanan, Rothrock, Klimstra, Fuchs), New York, New York
| | - Brandon Rothrock
- From Paige (Raciti, Sue, Retamero, Ceballos, Godrich, Kunz, Casson, Thiagarajan, Ebrahimzadeh, Viret, Lee, Schüffler, Gulturk, Kanan, Rothrock, Klimstra, Fuchs), New York, New York
| | - Jorge Reis-Filho
- The Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York (Reis-Filho, Reuter)
| | - David S Klimstra
- From Paige (Raciti, Sue, Retamero, Ceballos, Godrich, Kunz, Casson, Thiagarajan, Ebrahimzadeh, Viret, Lee, Schüffler, Gulturk, Kanan, Rothrock, Klimstra, Fuchs), New York, New York
| | - Victor Reuter
- The Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York (Reis-Filho, Reuter)
| | - Thomas J Fuchs
- From Paige (Raciti, Sue, Retamero, Ceballos, Godrich, Kunz, Casson, Thiagarajan, Ebrahimzadeh, Viret, Lee, Schüffler, Gulturk, Kanan, Rothrock, Klimstra, Fuchs), New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Paranal RM, Jiang Z, Hutchings D, Kryklyva V, Gauthier C, Fujikura K, Nanda N, Huang B, Skaro M, Wolfgang CL, He J, Klimstra DS, Brand RE, Singhi AD, DeMarzo A, Zheng L, Goggins M, Brosens LAA, Hruban RH, Klein AP, Lotan T, Wood LD, Roberts NJ. Somatic loss of ATM is a late event in pancreatic tumorigenesis. J Pathol 2023; 260:455-464. [PMID: 37345735 PMCID: PMC10524278 DOI: 10.1002/path.6136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2023] [Revised: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 05/05/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023]
Abstract
Understanding the timing and spectrum of genetic alterations that contribute to the development of pancreatic cancer is essential for effective interventions and treatments. The aim of this study was to characterize somatic ATM alterations in noninvasive pancreatic precursor lesions and invasive pancreatic adenocarcinomas from patients with and without pathogenic germline ATM variants. DNA was isolated and sequenced from the invasive pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas and precursor lesions of patients with a pathogenic germline ATM variant. Tumor and precursor lesions from these patients as well as colloid carcinoma from patients without a germline ATM variant were immunolabeled to assess ATM expression. Among patients with a pathogenic germline ATM variant, somatic ATM alterations, either mutations and/or loss of protein expression, were identified in 75.0% of invasive pancreatic adenocarcinomas but only 7.1% of pancreatic precursor lesions. Loss of ATM expression was also detected in 31.0% of colloid carcinomas from patients unselected for germline ATM status, significantly higher than in pancreatic precursor lesions [pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasms (p = 0.0013); intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms, p = 0.0040] and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (p = 0.0076) unselected for germline ATM status. These data are consistent with the second hit to ATM being a late event in pancreatic tumorigenesis. © 2023 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raymond M. Paranal
- Department of Pathology, the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Human Genetics Predoctoral Training Program, the McKusick-Nathans Department of Genetic Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, United States
| | - Zhengdong Jiang
- Department of Pathology, the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of General surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University Shaanxi, Xi’an, China
| | - Danielle Hutchings
- Department of Pathology, the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Valentyna Kryklyva
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Christian Gauthier
- Department of Pathology, the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Kohei Fujikura
- Department of Pathology, the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Neha Nanda
- Department of Pathology, the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Bo Huang
- Department of Pathology, the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Michael Skaro
- Department of Pathology, the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Jin He
- Department of Surgery, the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Oncology, the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - David S. Klimstra
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Current Affiliation: Paige AI, New York, NY, USA
| | - Randall E. Brand
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Aatur D. Singhi
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Angelo DeMarzo
- Department of Pathology, the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Lei Zheng
- Department of Oncology, the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Michael Goggins
- Department of Pathology, the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Lodewijk A. A. Brosens
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ralph H. Hruban
- Department of Pathology, the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Oncology, the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Alison P. Klein
- Department of Pathology, the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Oncology, the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Tamara Lotan
- Department of Pathology, the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Laura D. Wood
- Department of Pathology, the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Oncology, the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Nicholas J. Roberts
- Department of Pathology, the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Oncology, the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Javed AA, Pulvirenti A, Razi S, Zheng J, Michelakos T, Sekigami Y, Thompson E, Klimstra DS, Deshpande V, Singhi AD, Weiss MJ, Wolfgang CL, Cameron JL, Wei AC, Zureikat AH, Ferrone CR, He J. Grading Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Via Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine Needle Aspiration: A Multi-institutional Study. Ann Surg 2023; 277:e1284-e1290. [PMID: 35081574 PMCID: PMC9364076 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify factors associated with concordance between World Health Organization (WHO) grade on cytological analysis (c-grade) and histopathological analysis (h-grade) of surgical specimen in patients with PanNETs and examine trends in utilization and accuracy of EUS-FNA in preoperatively predicting grade. BACKGROUND WHO grading system is prognostic in pancreatic neuroendo-crine tumors (PanNETs). The concordance between c-grade and h-grade is reported to be between 50% and 92%. METHODS A multicenter retrospective study was performed on patients undergoing resection for PanNETs at four high-volume centers between 2010 and 2019. Patients with functional or syndrome-associated tumors, and those receiving neoadjuvant therapy were excluded. Factors associated with concordance between c-grade and h-grade and trends of utilization of EUS-FNA were assessed. RESULTS Of 869 patients included, 517 (59.5%) underwent EUS-FNA; 452 (87.4%) were diagnostic of PanNETs and WHO-grade was reported for 270 (59.7%) patients. The concordance between c-grade and h-grade was 80.4% with moderate concordance ( Kc = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.41-0.63). Significantly higher rates of concordance were observed in patients with smaller tumors (<2 vs. ≥2cm, 81.1% vs. 60.4%, P = 0.005). Highest concordance (98.1%) was observed in patients with small tumors undergoing assessment between 2015-2019 with a near-perfect concordance ( Kc = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.61-1.00). An increase in the utilization of EUS-FNA (56.1% to 64.1%) was observed over the last 2 decades ( P = 0.017) and WHO-grade was more frequently reported (44.2% vs. 77.6%, P < 0.001). However, concordance between c-grade and h-grade did not change significantly (P = 0.118). CONCLUSION Recently, a trend towards increasing utilization and improved diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA has been observed in PanNETs. Concordance between c-grade and h-grade is associated with tumor size with near-perfect agreement when assessing PanNETs <2cm in size.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ammar A. Javed
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alessandra Pulvirenti
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Samrah Razi
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jian Zheng
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - Yurie Sekigami
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Elizabeth Thompson
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - David S. Klimstra
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Vikram Deshpande
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Aatur D. Singhi
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | | | - John L. Cameron
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Alice C. Wei
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Amer H. Zureikat
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - Jin He
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Reid MD, Klimstra DS. Inflammatory Conditions of the Pancreatobiliary Tree. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2023; 147:265-266. [PMID: 36848528 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2022-0396-ed] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/22/2022] [Indexed: 03/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle D Reid
- From the Department of Pathology, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia (Reid)
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Javed AA, Pulvirenti A, Zheng J, Michelakos T, Sekigami Y, Razi S, McIntyre CA, Thompson E, Klimstra DS, Deshpande V, Singhi AD, Weiss MJ, Wolfgang CL, Cameron JL, Wei AC, Zureikat AH, Ferrone CR, He J. A novel tool to predict nodal metastasis in small pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: A multicenter study. Surgery 2022; 172:1800-1806. [PMID: 36192215 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.08.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2022] [Revised: 07/25/2022] [Accepted: 08/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors display a wide range of biological behavior, and nodal disease is associated with metastatic disease and poorer survival. The aim of this study was to develop a tool to predict nodal disease in patients with small (≤2 cm) nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. METHODS A multicenter retrospective study was performed on patients undergoing resection for small nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Patients with genetic syndromes, metastatic disease at diagnosis, neoadjuvant therapy, or positive resection margin were excluded. Factors associated with nodal disease were identified to develop a predictive model. Internal validation was performed using bootstrap with 1,000 resamples. RESULTS Nodal disease was observed in 39 (11.1%) of the 353 patients included. Presence of nodal disease was significantly associated with lower 5-year disease-free survival (71.6% vs 96.2%, P < .001). Two predictors were strongly associated with nodal disease: G2 grade (odds ratio: 3.51, 95% confidence interval: 1.71-7.22, P = .001) and tumor size (per mm increase, odds ratio: 1.14, 95% confidence interval: 1.03-1.25, P = .009). Adequate discrimination was observed with an area under the curve of 0.71 (95% confidence interval: 0.63-0.80). Based on risk distribution, 3 risk groups of nodal disease were identified; low (<5%), intermediate (≥5% to <20%), and high (≥20%) risk. The observed mean risk of nodal disease was 3.7% in the low-risk patients, 9.6% in the intermediate-risk patients, and 30.4% in the high-risk patients (P < .001). The 10-year disease-free survival in the low, intermediate, and high-risk groups was 100%, 88.8%, and 50.1%, respectively. CONCLUSION Our model using tumor grade and size can predict nodal disease in small nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Integration of this tool into clinical practice could help guide management of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ammar A Javed
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD. http://www.twitter.com/ammar_asrar
| | | | - Jian Zheng
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, PA
| | | | - Yurie Sekigami
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Samrah Razi
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Caitlin A McIntyre
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Elizabeth Thompson
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - David S Klimstra
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Vikram Deshpande
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Aatur D Singhi
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, PA
| | | | | | - John L Cameron
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Alice C Wei
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Amer H Zureikat
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, PA
| | | | - Jin He
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Schüffler PJ, Stamelos E, Ahmed I, Yarlagadda DVK, Ardon O, Hanna MG, Reuter VE, Klimstra DS, Hameed M. Efficient Visualization of Whole Slide Images in Web-based Viewers for Digital Pathology. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2022; 146:1273-1280. [PMID: 34979569 PMCID: PMC10060618 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2021-0197-oa] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT.— Wide adoption of digital pathology requires efficient visualization and navigation in Web-based digital slide viewers, which is poorly defined. OBJECTIVE.— To define and quantify relevant performance metrics for efficient visualization of cases and slides in digital slide viewers. DESIGN.— With a universal slide viewer used in clinical routine diagnostics, we evaluated the impact of slide caching, compression type, tile, and block size of whole slide images generated from Philips, Leica, and 3DHistech scanners on streaming performance on case, slide, and field of view levels. RESULTS.— Two hundred thirty-nine pathologists routinely reviewed 60 080 whole slide images over 3 months. The median time to open a case's slides from the laboratory information system was less than 4 seconds, the time to change to a slide within the case was less than 1 second, and the time to render the adjacent field of view when navigating the slide was less than one-quarter of a second. A whole slide image's block size and a viewer tile size of 1024 pixels showed best performance to display a field of view and was preferrable over smaller tiles due to fewer mosaic effects. For Philips, fastest median slide streaming pace was 238 ms per field of view and for 3DHistech, 125 ms. For Leica, the fastest pace of 108 ms per field of view was established with block serving without decompression. CONCLUSIONS.— This is the first study to systematically assess user-centric slide visualization performance metrics for digital viewers, including time to open a case, time to change a slide, and time to change a field of view. These metrics help to improve the viewer's configuration, leading to an efficient visualization baseline that is widely accepted among pathologists using routine digital pathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter J Schüffler
- From the Institute of Pathology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany (Schüffler)
| | - Evangelos Stamelos
- From the Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York (Schüffler, Stamelos, Ahmed, Yarlagadda, Ardon, Hanna, Reuter, Klimstra, Hameed)
| | - Ishtiaque Ahmed
- From the Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York (Schüffler, Stamelos, Ahmed, Yarlagadda, Ardon, Hanna, Reuter, Klimstra, Hameed)
| | - D Vijay K Yarlagadda
- From the Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York (Schüffler, Stamelos, Ahmed, Yarlagadda, Ardon, Hanna, Reuter, Klimstra, Hameed)
| | - Orly Ardon
- From the Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York (Schüffler, Stamelos, Ahmed, Yarlagadda, Ardon, Hanna, Reuter, Klimstra, Hameed)
| | - Matthew G Hanna
- From the Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York (Schüffler, Stamelos, Ahmed, Yarlagadda, Ardon, Hanna, Reuter, Klimstra, Hameed)
| | - Victor E Reuter
- From the Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York (Schüffler, Stamelos, Ahmed, Yarlagadda, Ardon, Hanna, Reuter, Klimstra, Hameed)
| | - David S Klimstra
- From the Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York (Schüffler, Stamelos, Ahmed, Yarlagadda, Ardon, Hanna, Reuter, Klimstra, Hameed)
| | - Meera Hameed
- From the Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York (Schüffler, Stamelos, Ahmed, Yarlagadda, Ardon, Hanna, Reuter, Klimstra, Hameed)
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Eads JR, Catalano PJ, Fisher GA, Rubin D, Iagaru A, Klimstra DS, Konda B, Kwong MS, Chan JA, De Jesus-Acosta A, Halfdanarson TR, Shaib WL, Soares HP, Hong SC, Wong TZ, O'Dwyer PJ. Randomized phase II study of platinum and etoposide (EP) versus temozolomide and capecitabine (CAPTEM) in patients (pts) with advanced G3 non-small cell gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEPNENs): ECOG-ACRIN EA2142. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.4020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
4020 Background: High grade (G3) GEPNENs are a rare and heterogeneous disease entity for which there is little prospective treatment data. EP chemotherapy is the treatment standard but this may not be appropriate for all G3 GEPNEN pts. CAPTEM has demonstrated activity in G3 GEPNENs and may be a promising alternative. EA2142 aimed to determine if CAPTEM was superior to EP in pts with G3 GEPNENs. Methods: This was a multicenter, randomized (1:1) phase II trial for pts with a locally advanced and unresectable or metastatic well differentiated G3 neuroendocrine tumor (NET) or a poorly differentiated, non-small cell G3 neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) of suspected gastrointestinal origin and an ECOG PS of 0-2. Pathology must have demonstrated a Ki-67 of 20-100% or at least 10 mitoses/10 high powered field. Pts were randomized to receive capecitabine 750 mg/m2 orally every 12 hours on days 1-14 and temozolomide 200 mg/m2 orally once daily on days 10-14 of a 28-day treatment cycle (Arm A) or etoposide 100 mg/m2 daily on days 1-3 with either cisplatin 25 mg/m2 daily on days 1-3 or carboplatin AUC 5 on day 1 of a 21-day treatment cycle (Arm B). Restaging scans were performed every 8 weeks and toxicity monitored per CTCAEv4. Final statistical plan was to accrue 80 pts to detect a 67% improvement in progression free survival (PFS) (primary endpoint) with CAPTEM as compared to EP, 80% power and one-sided significance level of 0.10. A planned interim analysis for efficacy and futility was conducted. Results: A total of 67 pts were enrolled (Arm A, n=32; Arm B, n=35). Male 58%, African American 4%, Asian 3%. Mean age 61. Among 63 eligible pts, primary tumor site pancreatic 56%, non-pancreatic 43%. Poorly differentiated 57%, well differentiated 33%, unknown 10%. Mean Ki-67 48% (Arm A), 60% (Arm B). The study was closed prior to full accrual due to futility at 57.7% information time. In the interim analysis, among 62 eligible pts, PFS, overall survival and response rate with CAPTEM were 2.43 months (mos) (95% CI 2.04, 7.72), 12.6 mos, 9% respectively vs 5.36 mos (95% CI 2.14, 7.23), 13.6 mos and 10% with EP. Toxicity was evaluable in 57 pts with Grade (G) 3/4 events occurring in 29% of pts on Arm A, 66% of pts on Arm B. G3/4 events occurring in more than 5% of pts on Arm A—febrile neutropenia (n=2); abdominal pain (n=2); diarrhea (n=2); nausea (n=2); neutropenia (n=2); dehydration (n=2) and on Arm B—anemia (n=8); febrile neutropenia (n=2); fatigue (n=2); lymphopenia (n=2); neutropenia (n=12); thrombocytopenia (n=4); leukopenia (n=6). There was one G5 event on Arm A due to sepsis. Conclusions: CAPTEM does not appear to be superior to EP chemotherapy as front-line treatment for pts with G3 NENs but does demonstrate a more favorable toxicity profile. Studies assessing G3 NET independently of G3 NEC are needed. Clinical trial information: NCT02595424.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Bhavana Konda
- The Ohio State University, James Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Peter J. O'Dwyer
- University of Pennsylvania, Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Parilla M, Chapel D, Hechtman JF, Wanjari P, Jabbour TE, Sharma A, Ritterhouse L, Segal J, Vanderbilt C, Klimstra DS, Setia N, Tang L. Recurrent Loss of Heterozygosity in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors. Am J Surg Pathol 2022; 46:823-831. [PMID: 35125451 PMCID: PMC9106831 DOI: 10.1097/pas.0000000000001860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Chromosomal aneuploidies are prognostic markers across a wide variety of tumor types, and recent literature suggests that pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are no different. In this study 214 patients with grade 1, 2, or 3 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors had their tissue examined for chromosomal copy number alterations using next-generation sequencing. Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses were performed with all-cause mortality and disease-specific mortality as the end comparators. As such, the cohort stratified into 3 different clinically relevant chromosomal subgroups: an indolent subgroup characterized by loss of chromosome 11 in relative isolation, an aggressive subgroup characterized by losses of chromosomes 1, 2, 3, 6, 10, 11, 16, and 22 and with no loss of chromosomes 4, 5, 7, 12, 14, 17, 19, and 20, and finally a heterogeneous third group with a subset of cases that behave even more aggressively than the aforementioned.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan Parilla
- Department of Pathology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Pathology, Loyola Univesity, Maywood, IL
| | - David Chapel
- Department of Pathology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
- Department of Pathology, University of Michigan - Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Jaclyn F. Hechtman
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Neogenomics Laboratories, Fort Myers, FL
| | | | - Tony El Jabbour
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Aarti Sharma
- Department of Pathology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Lauren Ritterhouse
- Department of Pathology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Jeremy Segal
- Department of Pathology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Chad Vanderbilt
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - David S. Klimstra
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Namrata Setia
- Department of Pathology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Laura Tang
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Wang H, Chetty R, Hosseini M, Allende DS, Esposito I, Matsuda Y, Deshpande V, Shi J, Dhall D, Jang KT, Kim GE, Luchini C, Graham RP, Reid MD, Basturk O, Hruban RH, Krasinskas A, Klimstra DS, Adsay V. Pathologic Examination of Pancreatic Specimens Resected for Treated Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Recommendations From the Pancreatobiliary Pathology Society. Am J Surg Pathol 2022; 46:754-764. [PMID: 34889852 PMCID: PMC9106848 DOI: 10.1097/pas.0000000000001853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Currently, there are no internationally accepted consensus guidelines for pathologic evaluation of posttherapy pancreatectomy specimens. The Neoadjuvant Therapy Working Group of Pancreatobiliary Pathology Society was formed in 2018 to review grossing protocols, literature, and major issues and to develop recommendations for pathologic evaluation of posttherapy pancreatectomy specimens. The working group generated the following recommendations: (1) Systematic and standardized grossing and sampling protocols should be adopted for pancreatectomy specimens for treated pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). (2) Consecutive mapping sections along the largest gross tumor dimension are recommended to validate tumor size by histology as required by the College of American Pathologists (CAP) cancer protocol. (3) Tumor size of treated PDACs should be measured microscopically as the largest dimension of tumor outer limits that is bound by viable tumor cells, including intervening stroma. (4) The MD Anderson grading system for tumor response has a better correlation with prognosis and better interobserver concordance among pathologists than does the CAP system. (5) A case should not be classified as a complete response unless the entire pancreas, peripancreatic tissues, ampulla of Vater, common bile duct, and duodenum adjacent to the pancreas are submitted for microscopic examination. (6) Future studies on tumor response of lymph node metastases, molecular and/or immunohistochemical markers, as well as application of artificial intelligence in grading tumor response of treated PDAC are needed. In summary, systematic, standardized pathologic evaluation, accurate tumor size measurement, and reproducible tumor response grading to neoadjuvant therapy are needed for optimal patient care. The criteria and discussions provided here may provide guidance towards these goals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huamin Wang
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Runjan Chetty
- Histopathology Department, Brighton & Sussex University Hospitals, Brighton, United Kingdom
| | - Mojgan Hosseini
- Department of Pathology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | | | - Irene Esposito
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital of Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Yoko Matsuda
- Oncology Pathology, Department of Pathology and Host-Defense, Kagawa University, Kagawa, Japan
| | - Vikram Deshpande
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jiaqi Shi
- Department of Pathology & Clinical Labs, Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Deepti Dhall
- Department of Pathology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Kee-Taek Jang
- Department of Pathology and Translational Genomics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Grace E. Kim
- Department of Pathology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Claudio Luchini
- Department of Pathology, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Rondell P. Graham
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Michelle D. Reid
- Department of Pathology, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Olca Basturk
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ralph H. Hruban
- The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Alyssa Krasinskas
- Department of Pathology, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - David S. Klimstra
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Volkan Adsay
- Department of Pathology, Koc University Hospital and KUTTAM Research Center, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle D Reid
- From the Department of Pathology, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia (Reid)
| | - David S Klimstra
- the Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York (Klimstra)
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Rindi G, Mete O, Uccella S, Basturk O, La Rosa S, Brosens LAA, Ezzat S, de Herder WW, Klimstra DS, Papotti M, Asa SL. Overview of the 2022 WHO Classification of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms. Endocr Pathol 2022; 33:115-154. [PMID: 35294740 DOI: 10.1007/s12022-022-09708-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 192] [Impact Index Per Article: 96.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
In this review, we detail the changes and the relevant features that are applied to neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) in the 2022 WHO Classification of Endocrine and Neuroendocrine Tumors. Using a question-and-answer approach, we discuss the consolidation of the nomenclature that distinguishes neuronal paragangliomas from epithelial neoplasms, which are divided into well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs). The criteria for these distinctions based on differentiation are outlined. NETs are generally (but not always) graded as G1, G2, and G3 based on proliferation, whereas NECs are by definition high grade; the importance of Ki67 as a tool for classification and grading is emphasized. The clinical relevance of proper classification is explained, and the importance of hormonal function is examined, including eutopic and ectopic hormone production. The tools available to pathologists for accurate classification include the conventional biomarkers of neuroendocrine lineage and differentiation, INSM1, synaptophysin, chromogranins, and somatostatin receptors (SSTRs), but also include transcription factors that can identify the site of origin of a metastatic lesion of unknown primary site, as well as hormones, enzymes, and keratins that play a role in functional and structural correlation. The recognition of highly proliferative, well-differentiated NETs has resulted in the need for biomarkers that can distinguish these G3 NETs from NECs, including stains to determine expression of SSTRs and those that can indicate the unique molecular pathogenetic alterations that underlie the distinction, for example, global loss of RB and aberrant p53 in pancreatic NECs compared with loss of ATRX, DAXX, and menin in pancreatic NETs. Other differential diagnoses are discussed with recommendations for biomarkers that can assist in correct classification, including the distinctions between epithelial and non-epithelial NENs that have allowed reclassification of epithelial NETs in the spine, in the duodenum, and in the middle ear; the first two may be composite tumors with neuronal and glial elements, and as this feature is integral to the duodenal lesion, it is now classified as composite gangliocytoma/neuroma and neuroendocrine tumor (CoGNET). The many other aspects of differential diagnosis are detailed with recommendations for biomarkers that can distinguish NENs from non-neuroendocrine lesions that can mimic their morphology. The concepts of mixed neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine (MiNEN) and amphicrine tumors are clarified with information about how to approach such lesions in routine practice. Theranostic biomarkers that assist patient management are reviewed. Given the significant proportion of NENs that are associated with germline mutations that predispose to this disease, we explain the role of the pathologist in identifying precursor lesions and applying molecular immunohistochemistry to guide genetic testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guido Rindi
- Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Section of Anatomic Pathology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
- Department of Woman and Child Health Sciences and Public Health, Anatomic Pathology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli - IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.
- ENETS Center of Excellence, Rome, Italy.
| | - Ozgur Mete
- Department of Pathology, University Health Network, University of Toronto, 200 Elizabeth Street, 11th floor, Toronto, ON, M5G 2C4, Canada.
| | - Silvia Uccella
- Unit of Pathology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Olca Basturk
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Stefano La Rosa
- Unit of Pathology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Lodewijk A A Brosens
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Shereen Ezzat
- Department of Medicine, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Wouter W de Herder
- Department of Internal Medicine, Sector of Endocrinology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, ENETS Center of Excellence Rotterdam, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - David S Klimstra
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Paige.AI, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mauro Papotti
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Sylvia L Asa
- Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ozcan K, Klimstra DS. A Review of Mucinous Cystic and Intraductal Neoplasms of the Pancreatobiliary Tract. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2022; 146:298-311. [PMID: 35192699 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2021-0399-ra] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT.— Although most pancreatic and bile duct neoplasms are solid, mucinous cystic neoplasms and intraductal neoplasms have been increasingly recognized even when clinically silent, thanks to the increased use of sensitive imaging techniques. Cystic and intraductal neoplasms of the pancreas are often resectable and curable and constitute about 5% of all pancreatic neoplasms. Owing to their preinvasive nature and different biology, recognition of these entities remains a major priority. Mucinous cystic neoplasms are histologically and clinically distinct from other cystic pancreatic neoplasms. Pancreatic intraductal neoplasms encompass 3 major entities: intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm, intraductal oncocytic papillary neoplasm, and intraductal tubulopapillary neoplasm. Intraductal papillary neoplasms of bile ducts are also preinvasive mass-forming neoplasms with both similarities and differences with their pancreatic counterparts. All of these pancreatobiliary neoplasms have diverse and distinctive clinicopathologic, genetic, and prognostic variations. OBJECTIVE.— To review the clinical, pathologic, and molecular features of mucinous cystic and intraductal neoplasms of the pancreatobiliary tract. DATA SOURCES.— Literature review, diagnostic manuals, and guidelines. CONCLUSIONS.— This review will briefly describe well-known clinical and pathologic features and will focus on selected recently described aspects of morphology, grading, classification, and genomic alterations of cystic and intraductal neoplasms of the pancreatobiliary tract.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kerem Ozcan
- From the Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - David S Klimstra
- From the Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Hanna MG, Ardon O, Reuter VE, Sirintrapun SJ, England C, Klimstra DS, Hameed MR. Integrating digital pathology into clinical practice. Mod Pathol 2022; 35:152-164. [PMID: 34599281 DOI: 10.1038/s41379-021-00929-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2021] [Revised: 09/03/2021] [Accepted: 09/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
The field of anatomic pathology has been evolving in the last few decades and the advancements have been largely fostered by innovative technology. Immunohistochemistry enabled a paradigm shift in discovery and diagnostic evaluation, followed by booming genomic advancements which allowed for submicroscopic pathologic characterization, and now the field of digital pathology coupled with machine learning and big data acquisition is paving the way to revolutionize the pathology medical domain. Whole slide imaging (WSI) is a disruptive technology where glass slides are digitized to produce on-screen whole slide images. Specifically, in the past decade, there have been significant advances in digital pathology systems that have allowed this technology to promote integration into clinical practice. Whole slide images (WSI), or digital slides, can be viewed and navigated comparable to glass slides on a microscope, as digital files. Whole slide imaging has increased in adoption among pathologists, pathology departments, and scientists for clinical, educational, and research initiatives. Integration of digital pathology systems requires a coordinated effort with numerous stakeholders, not only within the pathology department, but across the entire enterprise. Each pathology department has distinct needs, use cases and blueprints, however the framework components and variables for successful clinical integration can be generalized across any organization seeking to undergo a digital transformation at any scale. This article will review those components and considerations for integrating digital pathology systems into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew G Hanna
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Orly Ardon
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Victor E Reuter
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Christine England
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - David S Klimstra
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Meera R Hameed
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Hanna MG, Ardon O, Reuter VE, England C, Klimstra DS, Hameed MR. Publisher Correction: Integrating digital pathology into clinical practice. Mod Pathol 2022; 35:287. [PMID: 34645985 DOI: 10.1038/s41379-021-00948-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew G Hanna
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Orly Ardon
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Victor E Reuter
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Christine England
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - David S Klimstra
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Meera R Hameed
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Hanna MG, Ardon O, Reuter VE, Sirintrapun SJ, England C, Klimstra DS, Hameed MR. Correction: Integrating digital pathology into clinical practice. Mod Pathol 2022; 35:286. [PMID: 34754075 DOI: 10.1038/s41379-021-00968-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew G Hanna
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Orly Ardon
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Victor E Reuter
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Christine England
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - David S Klimstra
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Meera R Hameed
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Pourmaleki M, Jones CJ, Ariyan CE, Zeng Z, Pirun M, Navarrete DA, Li Y, Zhang M, Nandakumar S, Campos C, Nadeem S, Klimstra DS, Temple-Oberle CF, Brenn T, Lipson EJ, Schenk KM, Stein JE, Taube JM, White MG, Traweek R, Wargo JA, Kirkwood JM, Gasmi B, Goff SL, Corwin AD, McDonough E, Ginty F, Callahan MK, Schietinger A, Socci ND, Mellinghoff IK, Hollmann TJ. Tumor MHC Class I Expression Associates with Intralesional Interleukin-2 Response in Melanoma. Cancer Immunol Res 2022; 10:303-313. [PMID: 35013003 DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.cir-21-1083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2021] [Revised: 01/03/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Cancer immunotherapy can result in lasting tumor regression, but predictive biomarkers of treatment response remain ill-defined. Here, we performed single-cell proteomics, transcriptomics, and genomics on matched untreated and interleukin-2 (IL-2) injected metastases from patients with melanoma. Lesions that completely regressed following intralesional IL-2 harbored increased fractions and densities of non-proliferating CD8+ T cells lacking expression of PD-1, LAG-3 and TIM-3 (PD-1-LAG-3-TIM-3-). Untreated lesions from patients who subsequently responded with complete eradication of all tumor cells in all injected lesions (individuals referred to herein as "extreme responders") were characterized by proliferating CD8+ T cells with an exhausted phenotype (PD-1+LAG-3+TIM-3+), stromal B-cell aggregates, and expression of IFNgamma and IL-2 response genes. Loss of membranous MHC class I expression in tumor cells of untreated lesions was associated with resistance to IL-2 therapy. We validated this finding in an independent cohort of metastatic melanoma patients treated with intralesional or systemic IL-2. Our study suggests that intact tumor cell antigen presentation is required for melanoma response to IL-2 and describes a multi-dimensional and spatial approach to develop immuno-oncology biomarker hypotheses using routinely collected clinical biospecimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Zheng Zeng
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | - Mono Pirun
- Bioinformatics Core, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | | | - Yanyun Li
- Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | | | | | - Carl Campos
- Human Oncology & Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | | | | | | | - Thomas Brenn
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary
| | - Evan J Lipson
- Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
| | - Kara M Schenk
- Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
| | | | | | - Michael G White
- Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Raymond Traweek
- Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Jennifer A Wargo
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | - John M Kirkwood
- Medicine; Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh
| | - Billel Gasmi
- Laboratory of Pathology, National Cancer Institute
| | | | | | | | | | - Margaret K Callahan
- Melanoma and Immunotherapeutics Service, Dept. of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Klimstra DS, Young RH. Juan Rosai, MD (1940-2020): In Memoriam. Am J Surg Pathol 2021; 45:1729-1731. [PMID: 37739398 DOI: 10.1097/pas.0000000000001782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- David S Klimstra
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- James Homer Wright Pathology Laboratories, Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Robert H Young
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- James Homer Wright Pathology Laboratories, Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Klimstra DS, Young RH. Juan Rosai, MD (1940-2020): A Tribute. Am J Surg Pathol 2021; 45:e24-e34. [PMID: 34482334 DOI: 10.1097/pas.0000000000001799] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- David S Klimstra
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- James Homer Wright Pathology Laboratories, Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Robert H Young
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- James Homer Wright Pathology Laboratories, Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kenner BJ, Abrams ND, Chari ST, Field BF, Goldberg AE, Hoos WA, Klimstra DS, Rothschild LJ, Srivastava S, Young MR, Go VLW. Early Detection of Pancreatic Cancer: Applying Artificial Intelligence to Electronic Health Records. Pancreas 2021; 50:916-922. [PMID: 34629446 PMCID: PMC8542068 DOI: 10.1097/mpa.0000000000001882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2021] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT The potential of artificial intelligence (AI) applied to clinical data from electronic health records (EHRs) to improve early detection for pancreatic and other cancers remains underexplored. The Kenner Family Research Fund, in collaboration with the Cancer Biomarker Research Group at the National Cancer Institute, organized the workshop entitled: "Early Detection of Pancreatic Cancer: Opportunities and Challenges in Utilizing Electronic Health Records (EHR)" in March 2021. The workshop included a select group of panelists with expertise in pancreatic cancer, EHR data mining, and AI-based modeling. This review article reflects the findings from the workshop and assesses the feasibility of AI-based data extraction and modeling applied to EHRs. It highlights the increasing role of data sharing networks and common data models in improving the secondary use of EHR data. Current efforts using EHR data for AI-based modeling to enhance early detection of pancreatic cancer show promise. Specific challenges (biology, limited data, standards, compatibility, legal, quality, AI chasm, incentives) are identified, with mitigation strategies summarized and next steps identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Natalie D. Abrams
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Suresh T. Chari
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | - David S. Klimstra
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Sudhir Srivastava
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Matthew R. Young
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Vay Liang W. Go
- UCLA Center for Excellence in Pancreatic Diseases, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Pulvirenti A, Yamashita R, Chakraborty J, Horvat N, Seier K, McIntyre CA, Lawrence SA, Midya A, Koszalka MA, Gonen M, Klimstra DS, Reidy DL, Allen PJ, Do RKG, Simpson AL. Quantitative Computed Tomography Image Analysis to Predict Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Grade. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 2021; 5:679-694. [PMID: 34138636 DOI: 10.1200/cci.20.00121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The therapeutic management of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) is based on pathological tumor grade assessment. A noninvasive imaging method to grade tumors would facilitate treatment selection. This study evaluated the ability of quantitative image analysis derived from computed tomography (CT) images to predict PanNET grade. METHODS Institutional database was queried for resected PanNET (2000-2017) with a preoperative arterial phase CT scan. Radiomic features were extracted from the primary tumor on the CT scan using quantitative image analysis, and qualitative radiographic descriptors were assessed by two radiologists. Significant features were identified by univariable analysis and used to build multivariable models to predict PanNET grade. RESULTS Overall, 150 patients were included. The performance of models based on qualitative radiographic descriptors varied between the two radiologists (reader 1: sensitivity, 33%; specificity, 66%; negative predictive value [NPV], 63%; and positive predictive value [PPV], 37%; reader 2: sensitivity, 45%; specificity, 70%; NPV, 72%; and PPV, 47%). The model based on radiomics had a better performance predicting the tumor grade with a sensitivity of 54%, a specificity of 80%, an NPV of 81%, and a PPV of 54%. The inclusion of radiomics in the radiographic descriptor models improved both the radiologists' performance. CONCLUSION CT quantitative image analysis of PanNETs helps predict tumor grade from routinely acquired scans and should be investigated in future prospective studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandra Pulvirenti
- Department of Surgery, Hepatopancreatobiliary Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Rikiya Yamashita
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Jayasree Chakraborty
- Department of Surgery, Hepatopancreatobiliary Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Natally Horvat
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Kenneth Seier
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Caitlin A McIntyre
- Department of Surgery, Hepatopancreatobiliary Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Sharon A Lawrence
- Department of Surgery, Hepatopancreatobiliary Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Abhishek Midya
- Department of Surgery, Hepatopancreatobiliary Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Maura A Koszalka
- Department of Surgery, Hepatopancreatobiliary Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Mithat Gonen
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - David S Klimstra
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Diane L Reidy
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Peter J Allen
- Department of Surgery, Hepatopancreatobiliary Service, Duke, University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Richard K G Do
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Amber L Simpson
- School of Computing, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Schultheis AM, de Bruijn I, Selenica P, Macedo GS, da Silva EM, Piscuoglio S, Jungbluth AA, Park KJ, Klimstra DS, Wardelmann E, Hartmann W, Gerharz CD, von Petersdorff M, Buettner R, Reis-Filho JS, Weigelt B. Genomic characterization of small cell carcinomas of the uterine cervix. Mol Oncol 2021; 16:833-845. [PMID: 33830625 PMCID: PMC8847983 DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.12962] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2021] [Accepted: 04/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Small cell carcinoma (SCC) of the uterine cervix is a rare and aggressive form of neuroendocrine carcinoma, which resembles small cell lung cancer (SCLC) in its histology and poor survival rate. Here, we sought to define the genetic underpinning of SCCs of the uterine cervix and compare their mutational profiles with those of human papillomavirus (HPV)‐positive head and neck squamous cell carcinomas, HPV‐positive cervical carcinomas, and SCLCs using publicly available data. Using a combination of whole‐exome and targeted massively parallel sequencing, we found that the nine uterine cervix SCCs, which were HPV18‐positive (n = 8) or HPV16‐positive (n = 1), harbored a low mutation burden, few copy number alterations, and other than TP53 in two cases no recurrently mutated genes. The majority of mutations were likely passenger missense mutations, and only few affected previously described cancer‐related genes. Using RNA‐sequencing, we identified putative viral integration sites on 18q12.3 and on 8p22 in two SCCs of the uterine cervix. The overall nonsilent mutation rate of uterine cervix SCCs was significantly lower than that of SCLCs, HPV‐driven cervical adeno‐ and squamous cell carcinomas, or HPV‐positive head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Unlike SCLCs, which are reported to harbor almost universal TP53 and RB1 mutations and a dominant tobacco smoke‐related signature 4, uterine cervix SCCs rarely harbored mutations affecting these genes (2/9, 22% TP53; 0% RB1) and displayed a dominant aging (67%) or APOBEC mutational signature (17%), akin to HPV‐driven cancers, including cervical adeno‐ and squamous cell carcinomas and head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Taken together, in contrast to SCLCs, which are characterized by highly recurrent TP53 and RB1 alterations, uterine cervix SCCs were positive for HPV leading to inactivation of the suppressors p53 and RB, suggesting that these SCCs are convergent phenotypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne M Schultheis
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Pathology, University Hospital Cologne, Germany
| | - Ino de Bruijn
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Pier Selenica
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Gabriel S Macedo
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Edaise M da Silva
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Salvatore Piscuoglio
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Visceral Surgery Research Laboratory, Clarunis, Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Switzerland
| | - Achim A Jungbluth
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kay J Park
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - David S Klimstra
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eva Wardelmann
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Muenster, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | - Jorge S Reis-Filho
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Britta Weigelt
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Washington MK, Goldberg RM, Chang GJ, Limburg P, Lam AK, Salto-Tellez M, Arends MJ, Nagtegaal ID, Klimstra DS, Rugge M, Schirmacher P, Lazar AJ, Odze RD, Carneiro F, Fukayama M, Cree IA. Diagnosis of digestive system tumours. Int J Cancer 2021; 148:1040-1050. [PMID: 32674220 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2020] [Revised: 06/09/2020] [Accepted: 06/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The WHO Classification of Tumours provides the international standards for the classification and diagnosis of tumours. It enables direct comparisons to be made between different countries. In the new fifth edition, the series has gone digital with the launch of a website as well as a series of books, known widely as the WHO Blue Books. The first volume to be produced is on the classification of Digestive System tumours, replacing the successful 2010 version. It has been rewritten and updated accordingly. This article summarises the major diagnostic innovations that have occurred over the last decade and that have now been incorporated in the classification. As an example, it incorporates the recently proposed classification of neuroendocrine tumours, based on the recognition that neuroendocrine tumours and carcinomas differ substantially in the genetic abnormalities that drive their growth, findings relevant to treatment selection and outcome prediction. Several themes have emerged during the production process. One is the importance of the progression from hyperplasia to dysplasia to carcinoma in the evolution of the malignant process. Advances in imaging techniques and endoscopy have resulted in enhanced access to precancerous lesions in the gastrointestinal and biliary tract, necessitating both changes in classification schema and clinical practice. Diagnosis of tumours is no longer the sole purview of pathologists, and some patients now receive treatment before tissue is obtained, based on clinical, radiological and liquid biopsy results. This makes the classification relevant to many disciplines involved in the care of patients with tumours of the digestive system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Richard M Goldberg
- West Virginia University Cancer Institute and the Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
| | - George J Chang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Paul Limburg
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Alfred K Lam
- Pathology, School of Medicine, Gold Coast campus, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Manuel Salto-Tellez
- Queen's Precision Medicine Centre of Excellence, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast Health & Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| | - Mark J Arends
- Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, MRC Institute of Genetics & Molecular Medicine, The University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - David S Klimstra
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | | | | | - Alexander J Lazar
- Departments of Pathology, Genomic Medicine, and Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | | | - Masashi Fukayama
- Department of Pathology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ian A Cree
- WHO Classification of Tumours Group, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), World Health Organization, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Kenner B, Chari ST, Kelsen D, Klimstra DS, Pandol SJ, Rosenthal M, Rustgi AK, Taylor JA, Yala A, Abul-Husn N, Andersen DK, Bernstein D, Brunak S, Canto MI, Eldar YC, Fishman EK, Fleshman J, Go VLW, Holt JM, Field B, Goldberg A, Hoos W, Iacobuzio-Donahue C, Li D, Lidgard G, Maitra A, Matrisian LM, Poblete S, Rothschild L, Sander C, Schwartz LH, Shalit U, Srivastava S, Wolpin B. Artificial Intelligence and Early Detection of Pancreatic Cancer: 2020 Summative Review. Pancreas 2021; 50:251-279. [PMID: 33835956 PMCID: PMC8041569 DOI: 10.1097/mpa.0000000000001762] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Despite considerable research efforts, pancreatic cancer is associated with a dire prognosis and a 5-year survival rate of only 10%. Early symptoms of the disease are mostly nonspecific. The premise of improved survival through early detection is that more individuals will benefit from potentially curative treatment. Artificial intelligence (AI) methodology has emerged as a successful tool for risk stratification and identification in general health care. In response to the maturity of AI, Kenner Family Research Fund conducted the 2020 AI and Early Detection of Pancreatic Cancer Virtual Summit (www.pdac-virtualsummit.org) in conjunction with the American Pancreatic Association, with a focus on the potential of AI to advance early detection efforts in this disease. This comprehensive presummit article was prepared based on information provided by each of the interdisciplinary participants on one of the 5 following topics: Progress, Problems, and Prospects for Early Detection; AI and Machine Learning; AI and Pancreatic Cancer-Current Efforts; Collaborative Opportunities; and Moving Forward-Reflections from Government, Industry, and Advocacy. The outcome from the robust Summit conversations, to be presented in a future white paper, indicate that significant progress must be the result of strategic collaboration among investigators and institutions from multidisciplinary backgrounds, supported by committed funders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Suresh T. Chari
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - David S. Klimstra
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Stephen J. Pandol
- Basic and Translational Pancreas Research Program, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Anil K. Rustgi
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Adam Yala
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
- Jameel Clinic, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
| | - Noura Abul-Husn
- Division of Genomic Medicine, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Dana K. Andersen
- Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, MD
| | | | - Søren Brunak
- Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Marcia Irene Canto
- Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Yonina C. Eldar
- Department of Math and Computer Science, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
| | - Elliot K. Fishman
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - Vay Liang W. Go
- UCLA Center for Excellence in Pancreatic Diseases, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Bruce Field
- From the Kenner Family Research Fund, New York, NY
| | - Ann Goldberg
- From the Kenner Family Research Fund, New York, NY
| | | | - Christine Iacobuzio-Donahue
- David M. Rubenstein Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Debiao Li
- Biomedical Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Anirban Maitra
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | | | - Lawrence H. Schwartz
- Department of Radiology, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Uri Shalit
- Faculty of Industrial Engineering and Management, Technion—Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| | - Sudhir Srivastava
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Brian Wolpin
- Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Pulvirenti A, Raj N, Cingarlini S, Pea A, Tang LH, Luchini C, Chou JF, Grego E, Marinova I, Capanu M, Landoni L, Scarpa A, Allen PJ, Klimstra DS, Reidy-Lagunes DL. Platinum-Based Treatment for Well- and Poorly Differentiated Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms. Pancreas 2021; 50:138-146. [PMID: 33565789 PMCID: PMC7880539 DOI: 10.1097/mpa.0000000000001740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms include well-differentiated tumors (PanNETs) and poorly differentiated carcinomas (PanNECs). Previous reports suggested a role for platinum-based therapy largely in PanNEC. We sought to investigate the role of platinum-based therapy in pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms regardless of tumor grade and differentiation. METHODS Patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms treated with platinum-based therapy at Memorial Sloan Kettering (1994-2016) and Verona University Hospital (2008-2016) were retrospectively identified. Response to treatment by RECIST v1.1, overall survival, and progression-free survival were defined. Among patients with available tissue, DAXX, ATRX, Rb, and p53 expression was evaluated to support the histologic grade of differentiation. RESULTS Fifty PanNETs, 29 PanNECs, and 22 high-grade tumors with undeterminable differentiation were included. No patients achieved complete response. Overall rate of partial response was 31%, 41% for PanNEC, and 20% for PanNETs. Among PanNETs, partial response was achieved in 33% of G1 (2/6), 10% of G2 (2/19), and 24% of G3 (6/25) tumors. Median overall survival was 29.3 months for PanNETs and 10.9 months for PanNEC (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in median progression-free survival (P = 0.2). CONCLUSIONS Platinum-based therapies demonstrated increased activity in PanNEC; however, promising efficacy was also observed in PanNETs, irrespective of grade.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nitya Raj
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Sara Cingarlini
- Department of Oncology, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Antonio Pea
- Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Laura H Tang
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Claudio Luchini
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Joanne F Chou
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Elisabetta Grego
- Department of Oncology, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Ioana Marinova
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Marinela Capanu
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Luca Landoni
- Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Aldo Scarpa
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Peter J Allen
- Department of Surgery, Hepatopancreatobiliary Service, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - David S Klimstra
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Ardon O, Reuter VE, Hameed M, Corsale L, Manzo A, Sirintrapun SJ, Ntiamoah P, Stamelos E, Schueffler PJ, England C, Klimstra DS, Hanna MG. Digital Pathology Operations at an NYC Tertiary Cancer Center During the First 4 Months of COVID-19 Pandemic Response. Acad Pathol 2021; 8:23742895211010276. [PMID: 35155745 PMCID: PMC8819741 DOI: 10.1177/23742895211010276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2021] [Revised: 02/18/2021] [Accepted: 03/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Implementation of an infrastructure to support digital pathology began in 2006 at
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. The public health emergency and COVID-19
pandemic regulations in New York City required a novel workflow to sustain
existing operations. While regulatory enforcement discretions offered faculty
workspace flexibility, a substantial portion of laboratory and digital pathology
workflows require on-site presence of staff. Maintaining social distancing and
offering staggered work schedules. Due to a decrease in patients seeking health
care at the onset of the pandemic, a temporary decrease in patient specimens was
observed. Hospital and travel regulations impacted onsite vendor technical
support. Digital glass slide scanning activities onsite proceeded without
interruption throughout the pandemic, with challenges including staff who
required quarantine due to virus exposure, unrelated illness, family support, or
lack of public transportation. During the public health emergency, we validated
digital pathology systems for a remote pathology operation. Since March 2020,
the departmental digital pathology staff were able to maintain scanning volumes
of over 100 000 slides per month. The digital scanning team reprioritized
archival slide scanning and participated in a remote sign-out validation and
successful submission of New York State approval for a laboratory developed
test. Digital pathology offers a health care delivery model where pathologists
can perform their sign out duties at remote location and prevent disruptions to
critical pathology services for patients seeking care at our institution during
emergencies. Development of standard operating procedures to support digital
workflows will maintain turnaround times and enable clinical operations during
emergency or otherwise unanticipated events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Orly Ardon
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Victor E Reuter
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,The Warren Alpert Center for Digital and Computational Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Meera Hameed
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,The Warren Alpert Center for Digital and Computational Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lorraine Corsale
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Allyne Manzo
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sahussapont J Sirintrapun
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,The Warren Alpert Center for Digital and Computational Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Peter Ntiamoah
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Evangelos Stamelos
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Peter J Schueffler
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,The Warren Alpert Center for Digital and Computational Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Christine England
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - David S Klimstra
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,The Warren Alpert Center for Digital and Computational Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Matthew G Hanna
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Elvebakken H, Perren A, Scoazec JY, Tang LH, Federspiel B, Klimstra DS, Vestermark LW, Ali AS, Zlobec I, Myklebust TÅ, Hjortland GO, Langer SW, Gronbaek H, Knigge U, Tiensuu Janson E, Sorbye H. A Consensus-Developed Morphological Re-Evaluation of 196 High-Grade Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms and Its Clinical Correlations. Neuroendocrinology 2021; 111:883-894. [PMID: 33002892 DOI: 10.1159/000511905] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2020] [Accepted: 09/29/2020] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
High-grade gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) are classified according to morphology as well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) G3 or poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs). Little data exist concerning which morphological criteria this subdivision should be based on. Uncertainty exists if the NEC group should be further subdivided according to proliferation rate. Clinical data on NET G3 and NEC with a lower Ki-67 range are limited. A total of 213 patients with high-grade GEP-NEN (Ki-67 >20%) were included from the Nordic NEC Registries. Four experienced NET pathologists re-evaluated the cases to develop the best morphological criteria to separate NET G3 from NEC, assuming longer survival in NET G3. Organoid growth pattern, capillary network in direct contact to tumour cells, and absence of desmoplastic stroma were found to best separate NET G3 from NEC. Of 196 patients with metastatic disease, NET G3 was found in 12.3%, NEC with a Ki-67 <55% (NEC < 55) in 29.6%, and NEC with a Ki-67 ≥55% (NEC ≥ 55) in 56.6%. Only in 1.5%, the morphology was ambiguous. Of 164 patients receiving first-line chemotherapy, 88% received platinum/etoposide treatment. Response rate was higher for NEC ≥ 55 (44%) than that of NEC < 55 (25%) and NET G3 (24%) (p = 0.025 and p = 0.026). Median progression-free survival was 5 months for all groups. Median overall survival was 33 months for NET G3 compared to 11 months for both NEC < 55 and NEC ≥ 55 (p = 0.004 and 0.003). Specific morphological criteria can separate NET G3 from NECs and show prognostic significance. High-grade GEP-NEN patients stratified by morphology and proliferation rate demonstrate significant differences in response to chemotherapy and survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hege Elvebakken
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway,
- Department of Oncology, Ålesund Hospital, Møre og Romsdal Hospital Trust, Ålesund, Norway,
| | - Aurel Perren
- Institute of Pathology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Jean-Yves Scoazec
- Department of Biopathology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Laura H Tang
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Birgitte Federspiel
- Department of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - David S Klimstra
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Abir S Ali
- Department of Medical Sciences, Section of Endocrine Oncology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Inti Zlobec
- Institute of Pathology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Tor Å Myklebust
- Department of Research and Innovation, Møre and Romsdal Hospital Trust, Ålesund, Norway
- Department of Registration, Cancer Registry Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Seppo W Langer
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Henning Gronbaek
- Department of Hepatology & Gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital & ENETS Center of Excellence, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Ulrich Knigge
- Department of Surgery C and Endocrinology PE, Rigshospitalet, Faculty of Health Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Eva Tiensuu Janson
- Department of Medical Sciences, Section of Endocrine Oncology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Halfdan Sorbye
- Department of Oncology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Vyas M, Tang LH, Rekhtman N, Klimstra DS. Alterations in Ki67 Labeling Following Treatment of Poorly Differentiated Neuroendocrine Carcinomas: A Potential Diagnostic Pitfall. Am J Surg Pathol 2021; 45:25-34. [PMID: 33177340 PMCID: PMC8549487 DOI: 10.1097/pas.0000000000001602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Assessment of the Ki67 index is critical for grading well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (WD-NETs), which can show a broad range of labeling that defines the WHO grade (G1-G3). Poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (PD-NECs) have a relatively high Ki67 index, >20% in all cases and commonly exceeding 50%. After anecdotally observing PD-NECs with an unexpectedly low and heterogeneous Ki67 index following chemotherapy in 5 cases, we identified 15 additional cases of treated high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms (HG-NENs). The study cohort comprised 20 cases; 11 PD-NECs, 8 mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinomas, and 1 WD-NET, G3 from various anatomic sites (gastrointestinal tract, pancreas, larynx, lung, and breast). The Ki67 index was evaluated on pretreatment (when available) and posttreatment samples. Topographic heterogeneity in the Ki67 index was expressed using a semi-quantitative score of 0 (no heterogeneity) to 5 (>80% difference between maximal Ki67 and minimal Ki67 indices). Relative to the pretreatment group (n=9, mean Ki67 of 86.3%, range 80% to 100%), the neoplasms in the posttreatment group (n=20, mean Ki67 of 47.7%, range 1% to 90%) showed a significantly lower Ki67 index (18/20 cases). Of the 18 cases with a relatively low Ki67 index, 15 showed heterogeneous labeling (mean heterogeneity score of 2.3, range 1 to 5) and in 3 cases it was a homogeneously low. This phenomenon was observed in all subtypes of HG-NENs. In 6 cases, the alterations in Ki67 index following treatment were sufficient to place these HG-NENs in the WHO G1 or G2 grade, erroneously suggesting a diagnosis of WD-NET, and in 9 cases there was sufficient heterogeneity in the Ki67 index to suggest that a limited biopsy may sample an area of low Ki67, even though hotspot regions with a Ki67 index of >20% persisted. In 7 cases, the alterations in the Ki67 index were accompanied by morphologic features resembling a WD-NET. These observations suggest that there is a potential for misinterpretation of previously treated PD-NECs as WD-NETs, or for assigning a lower grade in G3 WD-NETs. While the prognostic significance of treatment-associated alterations in Ki67 index is unknown, awareness of this phenomenon is important to avoid this diagnostic pitfall when evaluating treated NENs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika Vyas
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Current affiliation: Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Laura H. Tang
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Vyas M, Firat C, Hechtman JF, Weiser MR, Yaeger R, Vanderbilt C, Benhamida JK, Keshinro A, Zhang L, Ntiamoah P, Gonzalez M, Andrade R, El Dika I, Markowitz AJ, Smith JJ, Garcia-Aguilar J, Vakiani E, Klimstra DS, Stadler ZK, Shia J. Discordant DNA mismatch repair protein status between synchronous or metachronous gastrointestinal carcinomas: frequency, patterns, and molecular etiologies. Fam Cancer 2020; 20:201-213. [PMID: 33033905 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-020-00210-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2020] [Accepted: 10/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
The widespread use of tumor DNA mismatch repair (MMR) protein immunohistochemistry in gastrointestinal tract (GIT) carcinomas has unveiled cases where the MMR protein status differs between synchronous/metachronous tumors from the same patients. This study aims at examining the frequency, patterns and molecular etiologies of such inter-tumoral MMR discordances. We analyzed a cohort of 2159 colorectal cancer (CRC) patients collected over a 5-year period and found that 1.3% of the patients (27/2159) had ≥ 2 primary CRCs, and 25.9% of the patients with ≥ 2 primary CRCs (7/27) exhibited inter-tumoral MMR discordance. We then combined the seven MMR-discordant CRC patients with three additional MMR-discordant GIT carcinoma patients and evaluated their discordant patterns and associated molecular abnormalities. The 10 patients consisted of 3 patients with Lynch syndrome (LS), 1 with polymerase proofreading-associated polyposis (PAPP), 1 with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), and 5 deemed to have no cancer disposing hereditary syndromes. Their MMR discordances were associated with the following etiologies: (1) PMS2-LS manifesting PMS2-deficient cancer at an old age when a co-incidental sporadic MMR-proficient cancer also occurred; (2) microsatellite instability-driven secondary somatic MSH6-inactivation occurring in only one-and not all-PMS2-LS associated MMR-deficient carcinomas; (3) "compound LS" with germline mutations in two MMR genes manifesting different tumors with deficiencies in different MMR proteins; (4) PAPP or FAP syndrome-associated MMR-proficient cancer co-occurring metachronously with a somatic MMR-deficient cancer; and (5) non-syndromic patients with sporadic MMR-proficient cancers co-occurring synchronously/metachronously with sporadic MMR-deficient cancers. Our study thus suggests that inter-tumoral MMR discordance is not uncommon among patients with multiple primary GIT carcinomas (25.9% in patients with ≥ 2 CRCs), and may be associated with widely varied molecular etiologies. Awareness of these patterns is essential in ensuring the most effective strategies in both LS detection and treatment decision-making. When selecting patients for immunotherapy, MMR testing should be performed on the tumor or tumors that are being treated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika Vyas
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Canan Firat
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jaclyn F Hechtman
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Martin R Weiser
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rona Yaeger
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Chad Vanderbilt
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jamal K Benhamida
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ajaratu Keshinro
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Liying Zhang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Peter Ntiamoah
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Marco Gonzalez
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rebecca Andrade
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Imane El Dika
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Arnold J Markowitz
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - J Joshua Smith
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Julio Garcia-Aguilar
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Efsevia Vakiani
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - David S Klimstra
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Zsofia K Stadler
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Jinru Shia
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Kim D, Pantanowitz L, Schüffler P, Yarlagadda DVK, Ardon O, Reuter VE, Hameed M, Klimstra DS, Hanna MG. (Re) Defining the High-Power Field for Digital Pathology. J Pathol Inform 2020; 11:33. [PMID: 33343994 PMCID: PMC7737490 DOI: 10.4103/jpi.jpi_48_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2020] [Revised: 08/04/2020] [Accepted: 09/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The microscope high-power field (HPF) is the cornerstone for histopathology diagnostic evaluation such as the quantification of mitotic figures, lymphocytes, and tumor grading. With traditional light microscopy, HPFs are typically evaluated by quantifying histologic events in 10 fields of view at × 400 magnification. In the era of digital pathology, new variables are introduced that may affect HPF evaluation. The aim of this study was to determine the parameters that influence HPF in whole slide images (WSIs). MATERIALS AND METHODS Glass slides scanned on various devices (Leica's Aperio GT450, AT2, and ScanScope XT; Philips UltraFast Scanner; Hamamatsu's Nanozoomer 2.0HT; and 3DHistech's P1000) were compared to acquired digital slides reviewed on each vendor's respective WSI viewer software (e.g., Aperio ImageScope, ImageScope DX, Philips IMS, 3DHistech CaseViewer, and Hamamatsu NDP.view) and an in-house developed vendor-agnostic viewer. WSIs were reviewed at "×40" equivalent HPF on different sized monitors with varying display resolutions (1900 × 1080-4500 × 3000) and aspect ratios (e.g., Food and Drug Administration [FDA]-cleared 27" Philips PS27QHDCR, FDA-cleared 24" Dell MR2416, 24" Hewlett Packard Z24n G2, and 28" Microsoft Surface Studio). Digital and microscopic HPF areas were calculated and compared. RESULTS A significant variation of HPF area occurred between differing monitor size and display resolutions with minor differences between WSI viewers. No differences were identified by scanner or WSIs scanned at different resolutions (e.g., 0.5, 0.25, 0.24, and 0.12 μm/pixel). CONCLUSION Glass slide HPF at × 400 magnification with conventional light microscopy was not equivalent to "×40" digital HPF areas. Digital HPF quantification may vary due to differences in the tissue area displayed by monitor sizes, display resolutions, and WSI viewers but not by scanner or scanning resolution. These findings will need to be further clinically validated with potentially new digital metrics for evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Kim
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Liron Pantanowitz
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Peter Schüffler
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Warren Alpert Center for Digital and Computational Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Orly Ardon
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Victor E. Reuter
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Warren Alpert Center for Digital and Computational Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Meera Hameed
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Warren Alpert Center for Digital and Computational Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - David S. Klimstra
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Warren Alpert Center for Digital and Computational Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Matthew G. Hanna
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Quezada-Marín JI, Lam AK, Ochiai A, Odze RD, Washington KM, Fukayama M, Rugge M, Klimstra DS, Nagtegaal ID, Tan PH, Arends MJ, Goldblum JR, Cree IA, Salto-Tellez M. Gastrointestinal tissue-based molecular biomarkers: a practical categorisation based on the 2019 World Health Organization classification of epithelial digestive tumours. Histopathology 2020; 77:340-350. [PMID: 32320495 DOI: 10.1111/his.14120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2020] [Revised: 03/25/2020] [Accepted: 04/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Molecular biomarkers have come to constitute one of the cornerstones of oncological pathology. The method of classification not only directly affects the manner in which patients are diagnosed and treated, but also guides the development of drugs and of artificial intelligence tools. The aim of this article is to organise and update gastrointestinal molecular biomarkers in order to produce an easy-to-use guide for routine diagnostics. For this purpose, we have extracted and reorganised the molecular information on epithelial neoplasms included in the 2019 World Health Organization classification of tumours. Digestive system tumours, 5th edn.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javier I Quezada-Marín
- Precision Medicine Centre of Excellence, Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
- Molecular Pathology Laboratory, Anatomical Pathology Service, Puerto Montt Hospital, Puerto Montt, Chile
| | - Alfred K Lam
- Cancer Molecular Pathology, School of Medicine, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Atsushi Ochiai
- Exploratory Oncology Research and Clinical Trial Centre, National Cancer Centre, Kashiwa, Japan
| | | | - Kay M Washington
- Department of Pathology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Masashi Fukayama
- Department of Pathology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Massimo Rugge
- Surgical Pathology and Cytopathology Unit, Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - David S Klimstra
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Puay-Hoon Tan
- Division of Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Mark J Arends
- Division of Pathology, Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - John R Goldblum
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Ian A Cree
- International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, Lyon, France
| | - Manuel Salto-Tellez
- Precision Medicine Centre of Excellence, Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
- Cellular Pathology, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Hayashi A, Yavas A, McIntyre CA, Ho YJ, Erakky A, Wong W, Varghese AM, Melchor JP, Overholtzer M, O'Reilly EM, Klimstra DS, Basturk O, Iacobuzio-Donahue CA. Genetic and clinical correlates of entosis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Mod Pathol 2020; 33:1822-1831. [PMID: 32350415 PMCID: PMC7452867 DOI: 10.1038/s41379-020-0549-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2020] [Revised: 04/05/2020] [Accepted: 04/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Entosis is a type of regulated cell death that promotes cancer cell competition. Though several studies have revealed the molecular mechanisms that govern entosis, the clinical and genetic correlates of entosis in human tumors is less well understood. Here we reviewed entotic cell-in-cell (CIC) patterns in a large single institution sequencing cohort (MSK IMPACT clinical sequencing cohort) of more than 1600 human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) samples to identify the genetic and clinical correlates of this cellular feature. After case selection, 516 conventional PDACs and 21 ASCs entered this study and ~45,000 HPFs (median 80 HPFs per sample) were reviewed; 549 entotic-CICs were detected through our cohort. We observed that entotic-CIC occurred more frequently in liver metastasis compared with primary in PDAC. Moreover, poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma or adenosquamous carcinoma had more entotic-CIC than well or moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma. With respect to genetic features TP53 mutations, KRAS amplification, and MYC amplification were significantly associated with entosis in PDAC tissues. From a clinical standpoint entotic CICs were independently associated with a poor prognosis by multivariate Cox regression analysis when considering all cases or primary PDACs specifically. These results provide a contextual basis for understanding entosis in PDAC, a highly aggressive cancer for which molecular insights are needed to improve survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akimasa Hayashi
- The David M. Rubenstein Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Aslihan Yavas
- The David M. Rubenstein Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Caitlin A McIntyre
- The David M. Rubenstein Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yu-Jui Ho
- Cancer Biology and Genetics Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Amanda Erakky
- The David M. Rubenstein Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Winston Wong
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Anna M Varghese
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jerry P Melchor
- The David M. Rubenstein Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael Overholtzer
- Cell Biology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eileen M O'Reilly
- The David M. Rubenstein Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - David S Klimstra
- The David M. Rubenstein Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Olca Basturk
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Christine A Iacobuzio-Donahue
- The David M. Rubenstein Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Springer S, Masica DL, Dal Molin M, Douville C, Thoburn CJ, Afsari B, Li L, Cohen JD, Thompson E, Allen PJ, Klimstra DS, Schattner MA, Schmidt CM, Yip-Schneider M, Simpson RE, Fernandez-Del Castillo C, Mino-Kenudson M, Brugge W, Brand RE, Singhi AD, Scarpa A, Lawlor R, Salvia R, Zamboni G, Hong SM, Hwang DW, Jang JY, Kwon W, Swan N, Geoghegan J, Falconi M, Crippa S, Doglioni C, Paulino J, Schulick RD, Edil BH, Park W, Yachida S, Hijioka S, van Hooft J, He J, Weiss MJ, Burkhart R, Makary M, Canto MI, Goggins MG, Ptak J, Dobbyn L, Schaefer J, Sillman N, Popoli M, Klein AP, Tomasetti C, Karchin R, Papadopoulos N, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Wolfgang CL, Hruban RH, Lennon AM. A multimodality test to guide the management of patients with a pancreatic cyst. Sci Transl Med 2020; 11:11/501/eaav4772. [PMID: 31316009 DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aav4772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 97] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2018] [Revised: 01/07/2019] [Accepted: 06/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Pancreatic cysts are common and often pose a management dilemma, because some cysts are precancerous, whereas others have little risk of developing into invasive cancers. We used supervised machine learning techniques to develop a comprehensive test, CompCyst, to guide the management of patients with pancreatic cysts. The test is based on selected clinical features, imaging characteristics, and cyst fluid genetic and biochemical markers. Using data from 436 patients with pancreatic cysts, we trained CompCyst to classify patients as those who required surgery, those who should be routinely monitored, and those who did not require further surveillance. We then tested CompCyst in an independent cohort of 426 patients, with histopathology used as the gold standard. We found that clinical management informed by the CompCyst test was more accurate than the management dictated by conventional clinical and imaging criteria alone. Application of the CompCyst test would have spared surgery in more than half of the patients who underwent unnecessary resection of their cysts. CompCyst therefore has the potential to reduce the patient morbidity and economic costs associated with current standard-of-care pancreatic cyst management practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simeon Springer
- Ludwig Center and Howard Hughes Medical Institute at the Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.,Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - David L Masica
- Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.,Institute for Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Marco Dal Molin
- Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.,Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Christopher Douville
- Ludwig Center and Howard Hughes Medical Institute at the Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.,Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.,Institute for Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Christopher J Thoburn
- Ludwig Center and Howard Hughes Medical Institute at the Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.,Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Bahman Afsari
- Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.,Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Lu Li
- Ludwig Center and Howard Hughes Medical Institute at the Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.,Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Joshua D Cohen
- Ludwig Center and Howard Hughes Medical Institute at the Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.,Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Elizabeth Thompson
- Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.,Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Peter J Allen
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - David S Klimstra
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Mark A Schattner
- Department of Gastroenterology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - C Max Schmidt
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - Michele Yip-Schneider
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - Rachel E Simpson
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | | | - Mari Mino-Kenudson
- Department of Histopathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - William Brugge
- Department of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Randall E Brand
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh PA 15213, USA
| | - Aatur D Singhi
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
| | - Aldo Scarpa
- ARC-Net Research Centre, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona 37134, Italy.,Department of Pathology and Diagnostics, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona 37134, Italy
| | - Rita Lawlor
- ARC-Net Research Centre, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona 37134, Italy.,Department of Pathology and Diagnostics, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona 37134, Italy
| | - Roberto Salvia
- General and Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Institute, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona 37134, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Zamboni
- Department of Pathology, Ospedale Sacro Cuore-Don Calabria, Negrar 37024, Italy
| | - Seung-Mo Hong
- Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, South Korea
| | - Dae Wook Hwang
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, South Korea
| | - Jin-Young Jang
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, South Korea
| | - Wooil Kwon
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, South Korea
| | - Niall Swan
- Department of Histopathology, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin D04 T6F4, Ireland
| | - Justin Geoghegan
- Department of Surgery, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin D04 T6F4, Ireland
| | - Massimo Falconi
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan 20132, Italy
| | - Stefano Crippa
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan 20132, Italy
| | - Claudio Doglioni
- Department of Pathology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan 20132, Italy
| | - Jorge Paulino
- Department of Surgery, Centro Hepatobiliopancreático e Transplantação, Hospital Curry Cabral, Lisbon 1050-099, Portugal
| | | | - Barish H Edil
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Walter Park
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA
| | - Shinichi Yachida
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Pathology and Cancer Genomics, National Cancer Center Hospital and National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan
| | - Susumu Hijioka
- Department of Gastroenterology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya 464-8681, Japan
| | - Jeanin van Hooft
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Medical Center, Amsterdam 1017 ZX, Netherlands
| | - Jin He
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Matthew J Weiss
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Richard Burkhart
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Martin Makary
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Marcia I Canto
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Michael G Goggins
- Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.,Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.,Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.,Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Janine Ptak
- Ludwig Center and Howard Hughes Medical Institute at the Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.,Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Lisa Dobbyn
- Ludwig Center and Howard Hughes Medical Institute at the Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.,Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Joy Schaefer
- Ludwig Center and Howard Hughes Medical Institute at the Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.,Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Natalie Sillman
- Ludwig Center and Howard Hughes Medical Institute at the Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.,Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Maria Popoli
- Ludwig Center and Howard Hughes Medical Institute at the Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.,Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Alison P Klein
- Ludwig Center and Howard Hughes Medical Institute at the Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.,Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.,Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Cristian Tomasetti
- Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA. .,Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Rachel Karchin
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.,Institute for Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.,Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.,Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
| | - Nickolas Papadopoulos
- Ludwig Center and Howard Hughes Medical Institute at the Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.,Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Kenneth W Kinzler
- Ludwig Center and Howard Hughes Medical Institute at the Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.,Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Bert Vogelstein
- Ludwig Center and Howard Hughes Medical Institute at the Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA. .,Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Christopher L Wolfgang
- Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA. .,Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.,Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Ralph H Hruban
- Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.,Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.,Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.,Ludwig Center and Howard Hughes Medical Institute at the Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
| | - Anne Marie Lennon
- Ludwig Center and Howard Hughes Medical Institute at the Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA. .,Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.,Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.,Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.,Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.,Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
El Dika I, Bowman AS, Berger MF, Capanu M, Chou JF, Benayed R, Zehir A, Shia J, O'Reilly EM, Klimstra DS, Solit DB, Abou-Alfa GK. Molecular profiling and analysis of genetic aberrations aimed at identifying potential therapeutic targets in fibrolamellar carcinoma of the liver. Cancer 2020; 126:4126-4135. [PMID: 32663328 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2020] [Revised: 03/23/2020] [Accepted: 04/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fibrolamellar carcinoma (FLC) is a rare primary liver cancer of young adults. A functional chimeric transcript resulting from the in-frame fusion of the DNAJ homolog, subfamily B, member 1 (DNAJB1), and the catalytic subunit of protein kinase A (PRKACA) genes on chromosome 19 is believed to be unique in FLC, with a possible role in pathogenesis, yet with no established therapeutic value. The objective of the current study was to understand the molecular landscape of FLC and to identify potential novel therapeutic targets. METHODS Archival fresh, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples from patients with FLC who prospectively consented to an institutional review board-approved protocol were analyzed using Memorial Sloan Kettering-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets (MSK-IMPACT), a next-generation sequencing assay encompassing up to 468 key cancer genes. Custom targeted RNA-Seq was performed in selected patients. Demographics, treatment, and outcome data were collected prospectively. Survival outcomes were estimated and correlated with mutation and/or copy number alterations. RESULTS A total of 33 tumor samples from 31 patients with FLC were analyzed. The median age of the patients at the time of diagnosis was 18 years and approximately 53% were women. The DNAJB1-PRKACA fusion transcript was detected in 100% of patients. In 10 of 31 patients in which MSK-IMPACT did not detect the fusion, its presence was confirmed by targeted RNA-Seq. TERT promoter mutation was the second most common, and was detected in 7 patients. The median follow up was 30 months (range, 6-153 months). The 3-year overall survival rate was 84% (95% CI, 61%-93%). CONCLUSIONS The DNAJB1-PRKACA fusion transcript is nonspecific and nonsensitive to FLC. Its potential therapeutic value currently is under evaluation. Opportunities currently are under development for therapy that may be driven or related to the DNAJB1-PRKACA fusion transcript or any therapeutic target identified from next-generation sequencing in patients with FLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Imane El Dika
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.,Weill Cornell College of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Anita S Bowman
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Michael F Berger
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.,Weill Cornell College of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Marinela Capanu
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Joanne F Chou
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ryma Benayed
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ahmet Zehir
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jinru Shia
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.,Weill Cornell College of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Eileen M O'Reilly
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.,Weill Cornell College of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - David S Klimstra
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.,Weill Cornell College of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - David B Solit
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.,Weill Cornell College of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ghassan K Abou-Alfa
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.,Weill Cornell College of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Alpert L, Al-Sabti R, Graham RP, Pai RK, Gonzalez RS, Zhang X, Smith V, Wang HL, Westbrook L, Goldblum JR, Bakhshwin A, Shetty S, Klimstra DS, Shia J, Askan G, Robert ME, Thomas C, Frankel WL, Alsomali M, Hagen C, Mostafa ME, Feely MM, Assarzadegan N, Misdraji J, Shih AR, Agostini-Vulaj D, Meis JM, Tang S, Chatterjee D, Kang LI, Hart J, Lee SM, Smith T, Yantiss RK, Hissong EM, Gao ZH, Wu J, Resnick MB, Wu EY, Pai RK, Zhao L, Doyle LA, Chopra S, Panarelli NC, Hu S, Longacre TA, Raghavan SS, Lauwers GY, Ghayouri M, Cooper HS, Nagarathinam R, Bellizzi AM, Kakar S, Hosseini M, Rong J, Greenson JK, Lamps LW, Dong Z, Bronner MP. Smooth muscle tumors of the gastrointestinal tract: an analysis of prognostic features in 407 cases. Mod Pathol 2020; 33:1410-1419. [PMID: 32051556 PMCID: PMC8405135 DOI: 10.1038/s41379-020-0492-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2019] [Revised: 01/15/2020] [Accepted: 01/27/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Smooth muscle tumors represent the second most common mural mesenchymal neoplasm in the gastrointestinal tract, but established criteria for prognostic assessment of these tumors are lacking. A large cohort of surgically resected intramural gastrointestinal smooth muscle tumors from 31 institutions was analyzed to identify potential prognostic features. Pathologic features were assessed by expert gastrointestinal and/or soft tissue pathologists at each center. Immunohistochemical confirmation was required. A total of 407 cases from the esophagus (n = 97, 24%), stomach (n = 180, 44%), small bowel (n = 74, 18%), and colorectum (n = 56, 14%) were identified. Patients ranged in age from 19 to 92 years (mean 55 years), with a slight female predominance (57%). Mean tumor size was 5.4 cm, with the largest tumor measuring 29 cm. Disease progression following surgery, defined as local recurrence, metastasis, or disease-related death, occurred in 56 patients (14%). Colorectal tumors were most likely to progress, followed by small bowel and gastric tumors. None of the esophageal tumors in this series progressed. Receiver operator characteristic analysis identified optimal cutoffs of 9.8 cm and 3 mitoses/5 mm2 for discriminating between progressive and non-progressive tumors. Histologic features strongly associated with progression by univariate analysis included moderate-to-severe atypia, high cellularity, abnormal differentiation (defined as differentiation not closely resembling that of normal smooth muscle), tumor necrosis, mucosal ulceration, lamina propria involvement, and serosal involvement (P < 0.0001 for all features). Age, sex, and margin status were not significantly associated with progression (P = 0.23, 0.82, and 0.07, respectively). A risk assessment table was created based on tumor site, size, and mitotic count, and Kaplan-Meier plots of progression-free survival for each subgroup revealed progression-based tiers. Based on our findings, it appears that nonesophageal gastrointestinal smooth muscle tumors measuring >10 cm and/or showing ≥3 mitoses/5 mm2 may behave aggressively, and therefore close clinical follow-up is recommended in these cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Rish K. Pai
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN and Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | | | | | | | - Hanlin L. Wang
- UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Jinru Shia
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Gokce Askan
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Wendy L. Frankel
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jeanne M. Meis
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sherry Tang
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Liang-I Kang
- Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - John Hart
- University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Theresa Smith
- Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Zu-hua Gao
- McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - JingBo Wu
- McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Murray B. Resnick
- Lifespan/The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Elizabeth Yiru Wu
- Lifespan/The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Reet K. Pai
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Lei Zhao
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Shefali Chopra
- Keck Medical Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Shaomin Hu
- Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Sanjay Kakar
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Juan Rong
- University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Tanaka A, Wang JY, Shia J, Zhou Y, Ogawa M, Hendrickson RC, Klimstra DS, Roehrl MHA. Maspin as a Prognostic Marker for Early Stage Colorectal Cancer With Microsatellite Instability. Front Oncol 2020; 10:945. [PMID: 32587829 PMCID: PMC7297950 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2019] [Accepted: 05/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancers are among the most common cancers and a leading cause of cancer death. In our pursuit to discover molecular markers for better characterization and precision theranostics of these cancers, we first conducted global deep proteome analyses and identified maspin (serpin B5, peptidase inhibitor 5) as an upregulated protein in tumor tissue. We then validated its expression in a large cohort of 743 patients with colorectal cancers of all stages and found that both cytoplasmic and nuclear expression varied widely between different patients. Comparison with clinicopathological features revealed that maspin expression levels correlate significantly only with mismatch repair (MMR) status but not with other features. To elucidate the prognostic significance of maspin, we analyzed two outcome-annotated cohorts, one of 572 early stage cancer patients and another of 93 late stage cancer patients. Kaplan–Meier survival, univariate, and multivariate analyses revealed that maspin overexpression predicts longer overall and disease-free survival for early stage microsatellite instability (MSI) subtype colorectal cancer, but there is no correlation with survival for patients with early stage cancer of the microsatellite stability (MSS) subtype or late stage cancer. Our study identifies maspin expression as an independent prognostic marker for risk stratification of early stage MSI subtype colorectal cancer and may provide guidance for improved therapeutic management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Atsushi Tanaka
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.,Department of Pathology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.,Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | | | - Jinru Shia
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Yihua Zhou
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.,ICU Department, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Makiko Ogawa
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.,Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Ronald C Hendrickson
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Sloan Kettering Institute, New York, NY, United States
| | - David S Klimstra
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Michael H A Roehrl
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.,Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Esposito I, Hruban RH, Verbeke C, Terris B, Zamboni G, Scarpa A, Morohoshi T, Suda K, Luchini C, Klimstra DS, Adsay V, Haeberle L, Saluja A, Fernandez-Del Castillo C, Sheel A, Neoptolemos JP, Isaji S, Shimosegawa T, Whitcomb DC, Campbell F. Guidelines on the histopathology of chronic pancreatitis. Recommendations from the working group for the international consensus guidelines for chronic pancreatitis in collaboration with the International Association of Pancreatology, the American Pancreatic Association, the Japan Pancreas Society, and the European Pancreatic Club. Pancreatology 2020; 20:586-593. [PMID: 32414657 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2020.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2019] [Revised: 03/26/2020] [Accepted: 04/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic pancreatitis is a complex multifactorial fibro-inflammatory disease. Consensus guidelines are needed for the histopathological evaluation of non-autoimmune chronic pancreatitis (CP). METHODS An international working group with experts on the histopathology of CP evaluated 15 statements generated from evidence on seven key clinically relevant questions. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to evaluate the level of evidence available for each statement. To determine the level of agreement, the working group voted on the statements for strength of agreement, using a nine-point Likert scale, and Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficients were calculated. RESULTS Strong consensus was obtained for 12 statements relating to all seven key questions including that: the cardinal features of CP are the triad of fibrosis, loss of acinar tissue and duct changes; there are no unique histopathological features that distinguish the different aetiologies of CP; clinical history and laboratory investigations, including genetic testing, are important in establishing the aetiology of CP; there is no reproducible and universally accepted histological grading system for assessing severity of CP, although classification as "mild", "moderate" and "severe" is usually applied; scoring systems for fibrosis are not validated for clinical use; asymptomatic fibrosis is a common finding associated with ageing, and not necessarily evidence of CP; there are no obvious diagnostic macroscopic features of early CP; histopathology is not the gold standard for the diagnosis of CP; and cytology alone is not a reliable method for the diagnosis of CP. CONCLUSIONS Cardinal histopathological features of CP are well-defined and internationally accepted and pathological assessment is relevant for the purpose of differential diagnosis with other pancreatic diseases, especially cancer. However, a reliable diagnosis of CP requires integration of clinical, laboratory and imaging features and cannot be made by histology alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene Esposito
- Institute of Pathology, Heinrich-Heine University and University Hospital, Duesseldorf, Germany.
| | - Ralph H Hruban
- The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Carnegie 417, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
| | - Caroline Verbeke
- Department of Pathology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Benoit Terris
- Service d'Anatomie Pathologique, Hôpital Cochin, 27, Rue Du Faubourg-Saint-Jacques, 75679, Paris Cedex 14, France.
| | - Giuseppe Zamboni
- Department of Pathology, University of Verona and Pathology, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, Italy.
| | - Aldo Scarpa
- ARC-Net Centre for Applied Research on Cancer, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy.
| | - Toshio Morohoshi
- First Department of Pathology, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Koichi Suda
- Department of Pathology, Tokyo-Nishi Tokushukai Hospital and Juntendo University, School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Claudio Luchini
- Policlinico G.B. Rossi, Piazzale L.A. Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, University of Verona, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health - Section of Pathology, Italy.
| | - David S Klimstra
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
| | - Volkan Adsay
- Department of Pathology, Koҫ University, Istanbul, Turkey.
| | - Lena Haeberle
- Institute of Pathology, Heinrich-Heine University and University Hospital, Duesseldorf, Germany.
| | - Ashok Saluja
- Department of Surgery, University of Miami, Florida, USA.
| | | | - Andrea Sheel
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, UK.
| | - John P Neoptolemos
- Department of General Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Shuiji Isaji
- Department of Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.
| | - Tooru Shimosegawa
- Division of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
| | - David C Whitcomb
- Departments of Medicine, Cell Biology & Molecular Physiology, and Human Genetics, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Pittsburgh and UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| | - Fiona Campbell
- Department of Pathology, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Attiyeh M, Zhang L, Iacobuzio-Donahue C, Allen P, Imam R, Basturk O, Klimstra DS, Sigel CS. Simple mucinous cysts of the pancreas have heterogeneous somatic mutations. Hum Pathol 2020; 101:1-9. [PMID: 32380013 DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2020.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2020] [Revised: 04/22/2020] [Accepted: 04/24/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Simple mucinous cysts of the pancreas have an epithelial lining resembling pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia but may have a clinical presentation similar to premalignant mucinous neoplasms such as intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms. Whether the epithelial lining shares genomic alterations with other pancreatic preinvasive neoplasms such as PanIN and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm has not been determined. We performed targeted sequencing analysis using a custom-designed MiSeq panel including the full coding regions of 18 pancreatic cancer genes on 13 clinically and pathologically well-characterized simple mucinous cysts. We detected 59 mutations in 15 genes in the cohort, with a median of 4 mutations per cyst (range = 0-16 mutations per cyst). The mutated genes and rate of detected mutations were as follows: KMT2C (MLL3) (62%), KRAS (15%), BRAF (8%), RNF43 (8%), CDKN2a (8%), TP53 (15%), and SMAD4 (8%). No GNAS mutations were detected. Four cases (31%) had no mutations detected. These findings place the majority of simple mucinous cysts of the pancreas in the spectrum of early, low-grade mucinous neoplasia, albeit with a different spectrum of genomic alterations compared with PanIN and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc Attiyeh
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10065, NY, USA
| | - Lance Zhang
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10065 NY, USA
| | | | - Peter Allen
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10065, NY, USA
| | - Rami Imam
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10065 NY, USA
| | - Olca Basturk
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10065 NY, USA
| | - David S Klimstra
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10065 NY, USA
| | - Carlie S Sigel
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10065 NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Tanaka A, Zhou Y, Ogawa M, Shia J, Klimstra DS, Wang JY, Roehrl MH. STAT1 as a potential prognosis marker for poor outcomes of early stage colorectal cancer with microsatellite instability. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0229252. [PMID: 32275681 PMCID: PMC7147729 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2019] [Accepted: 02/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Proteomic analyses indicate that STAT1 protein (signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 or transcription factor ISGF-3 components p91/p84) is upregulated in some colorectal cancers. This study examined 736 colorectal cancer patients for the expression of STAT1 protein in tissue specimens, including 614 early stage patients and 122 advanced stage patients. Tissue microarrays were constructed, and STAT1 expression was examined by immunohistochemistry and scored semi-quantitatively. Among all cases, 9% of cases displayed high levels of cytoplasmic expression of STAT1 and 15% of cases had positive nuclear expression. Based on statistical analyses of a cohort of 559 early stage patients with survival data and no neoadjuvant therapy, we found that high levels of cytoplasmic expression of STAT1 correlated with shorter survival time in early stage colorectal cancer, particularly of the microsatellite instability (MSI) subtype. Additional analysis of a 244-case cohort of colorectal cancers from the Cancer Genome Atlas found that STAT1 gene expression correlated positively with PD-L1 (CD274) and PD-1 (PDCD1) but had no correlation with KRAS or BRAF mutation status. STAT1 expression showed no clear correlation with any of the 4 clinical diagnostic markers of mismatch repair, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2, suggesting its potential as an independent outcome marker for MSI cancers. Our findings suggest that STAT1 may be used as a potential prognostic protein marker for stratifying the outcome risk of early stage MSI colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Atsushi Tanaka
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
- Department of Pathology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Yihua Zhou
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
- ICU Department, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Makiko Ogawa
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Jinru Shia
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - David S. Klimstra
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | | | - Michael H. Roehrl
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Wang Y, Wild AT, Turcan S, Wu WH, Sigel C, Klimstra DS, Ma X, Gong Y, Holland EC, Huse JT, Chan TA. Targeting therapeutic vulnerabilities with PARP inhibition and radiation in IDH-mutant gliomas and cholangiocarcinomas. Sci Adv 2020; 6:eaaz3221. [PMID: 32494639 PMCID: PMC7176409 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aaz3221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2019] [Accepted: 01/21/2020] [Indexed: 05/16/2023]
Abstract
Mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) genes occur in multiple cancer types, lead to global changes in the epigenome, and drive tumorigenesis. Yet, effective strategies targeting solid tumors harboring IDH mutations remain elusive. Here, we demonstrate that IDH-mutant gliomas and cholangiocarcinomas display elevated DNA damage. Using multiple in vitro and preclinical animal models of glioma and cholangiocarcinoma, we developed treatment strategies that use a synthetic lethality approach targeting the reduced DNA damage repair conferred by mutant IDH using poly(adenosine 5'-diphosphate) ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPis). The therapeutic effects are markedly enhanced by cotreatment with concurrent, localized radiation therapy. PARPi-buttressed multimodality therapies may represent a readily applicable approach that is selective for IDH-mutant tumor cells and has potential to improve outcomes in multiple cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuxiang Wang
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Aaron T. Wild
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
- Southeast Radiation Oncology, Charlotte, NC 28204, USA
| | - Sevin Turcan
- Max-Eder Junior Group on Lower Grade Gliomas, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Wei H. Wu
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Carlie Sigel
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - David S. Klimstra
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Xiaoxiao Ma
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Yongxing Gong
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Eric C. Holland
- Human Biology Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, DC 98109, USA
| | - Jason T. Huse
- Departments of Pathology and Translational Molecular Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Timothy A. Chan
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
- Immunogenomics and Precision Oncology Platform (IPOP), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
- Corresponding author.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Vyas M, Hechtman JF, Zhang Y, Benayed R, Yavas A, Askan G, Shia J, Klimstra DS, Basturk O. DNAJB1-PRKACA fusions occur in oncocytic pancreatic and biliary neoplasms and are not specific for fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma. Mod Pathol 2020; 33:648-656. [PMID: 31676785 PMCID: PMC7125037 DOI: 10.1038/s41379-019-0398-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2019] [Accepted: 10/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Recently discovered DNAJB1-PRKACA oncogenic fusions have been considered diagnostic for fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma. In this study, we describe six pancreatobiliary neoplasms with PRKACA fusions, five of which harbor the DNAJB1-PRKACA fusion. All neoplasms were subjected to a hybridization capture-based next-generation sequencing assay (MSK-IMPACT), which enables the identification of sequence mutations, copy number alterations, and selected structural rearrangements involving ≥410 genes (n = 6) and/or to a custom targeted, RNA-based panel (MSK-Fusion) that utilizes Archer Anchored Multiplex PCR technology and next-generation sequencing to detect gene fusions in 62 genes (n = 2). Selected neoplasms also underwent FISH analysis, albumin mRNA in-situ hybridization, and arginase-1 immunohistochemical labeling (n = 3). Five neoplasms were pancreatic, and one arose in the intrahepatic bile ducts. All revealed at least focal oncocytic morphology: three cases were diagnosed as intraductal oncocytic papillary neoplasms, and three as intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms with mixed oncocytic and pancreatobiliary or gastric features. Four cases had an invasive carcinoma component composed of oncocytic cells. Five cases revealed DNAJB1-PRKACA fusions and one revealed an ATP1B1-PRKACA fusion. None of the cases tested were positive for albumin or arginase-1. Our data prove that DNAJB1-PRKACA fusion is neither exclusive nor diagnostic for fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma, and caution should be exercised in diagnosing liver tumors with DNAJB1-PRKACA fusions as fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma, particularly if a pancreatic lesion is present. Moreover, considering DNAJB1-PRKACA fusions lead to upregulated protein kinase activity and that this upregulated protein kinase activity has a significant role in tumorigenesis of fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma, protein kinase inhibition could have therapeutic potential in the treatment of these pancreatobiliary neoplasms as well, once a suitable drug is developed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika Vyas
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, US
| | | | | | | | | | - Gokce Askan
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, US
| | - Jinru Shia
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, US
| | | | - Olca Basturk
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Basturk O, Weigelt B, Adsay V, Benhamida JK, Askan G, Wang L, Arcila ME, Zamboni G, Fukushima N, Gularte-Mérida R, Da Cruz Paula A, Selenica P, Kumar R, Pareja F, Maher CA, Scholes J, Oda Y, Santini D, Doyle LA, Petersen I, Flucke U, Koelsche C, Reynolds SJ, Yavas A, von Deimling A, Reis-Filho JS, Klimstra DS. Sclerosing epithelioid mesenchymal neoplasm of the pancreas - a proposed new entity. Mod Pathol 2020; 33:456-467. [PMID: 31383964 PMCID: PMC7000300 DOI: 10.1038/s41379-019-0334-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2019] [Revised: 06/24/2019] [Accepted: 06/26/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
We have encountered pancreatic tumors with unique histologic features, which do not conform to any of the known tumors of the pancreas or other anatomical sites. We aimed to define their clinicopathologic features and whether they are characterized by recurrent molecular signatures. Eight cases were identified; studied histologically and by immunohistochemistry. Selected cases were also subjected to whole-exome sequencing (WES; n = 4), RNA-sequencing (n = 6), Archer FusionPlex assay (n = 5), methylation profiling using the Illumina MethylationEPIC (850k) array platform (n = 6), and TERT promoter sequencing (n = 5). Six neoplasms occurred in females. The mean age was 43 years (range: 26-75). Five occurred in the head/neck of the pancreas. All patients were treated surgically; none received neoadjuvant/adjuvant therapy. All patients are free of disease after 53 months of median follow-up (range: 8-94). The tumors were well-circumscribed, and the median size was 1.8 cm (range: 1.3-5.8). Microscopically, the unencapsulated tumors had a geographic pattern of epithelioid cell nests alternating with spindle cell fascicles. Some areas showed dense fibrosis, in which enmeshed tumor cells imparted a slit-like pattern. The predominant epithelioid cells had scant cytoplasm and round-oval nuclei with open chromatin. The spindle cells displayed irregular, hyperchromatic nuclei. Mitoses were rare. No lymph node metastases were identified. All tumors were positive for vimentin, CD99 and cytokeratin (patchy), while negative for markers of solid pseudopapillary neoplasm, neuroendocrine, acinar, myogenic/rhabdoid, vascular, melanocytic, or lymphoid differentiation, gastrointestinal stromal tumor as well as MUC4. Whole-exome sequencing revealed no recurrent somatic mutations or amplifications/homozygous deletions in any known oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes. RNA-sequencing and the Archer FusionPlex assay did not detect any recurrent likely pathogenic gene fusions. Single sample gene set enrichment analysis revealed that these tumors display a likely mesenchymal transcriptomic program. Unsupervised analysis (t-SNE) of their methylation profiles against a set of different mesenchymal neoplasms demonstrated a distinct methylation pattern. Here, we describe pancreatic neoplasms with unique morphologic/immunophenotypic features and a distinct methylation pattern, along with a lack of abnormalities in any of key genetic drivers, supporting that these neoplasms represent a novel entity with an indolent clinical course. Given their mesenchymal transcriptomic features, we propose the designation of "sclerosing epithelioid mesenchymal neoplasm" of the pancreas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olca Basturk
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer
Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Britta Weigelt
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer
Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Volkan Adsay
- Department of Pathology, Koç University, Istanbul,
Turkey
| | - Jamal K. Benhamida
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer
Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Gokce Askan
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer
Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lu Wang
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer
Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Maria E. Arcila
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer
Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Giuseppe Zamboni
- Department of Pathology, University of Verona and IRCCS
Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | | | | | - Arnaud Da Cruz Paula
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer
Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Pier Selenica
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer
Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rahul Kumar
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer
Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Fresia Pareja
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer
Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - John Scholes
- Department of Pathology, St. Francis Hospital and Medical
Center, Hartford, CT, USA
| | - Yoshinao Oda
- Department of Pathology, Kyushu University, Fukuoka,
Fukuoka Prefecture, Japan
| | - Donatella Santini
- Department of Pathology, Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria
di Bologna, Italy
| | - Leona A. Doyle
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s
Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Iver Petersen
- Department of Pathology, SRH Poliklinik Gera GmbH, Gera,
Germany
| | - Uta Flucke
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical
Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Aslihan Yavas
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer
Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andreas von Deimling
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg
and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jorge S. Reis-Filho
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer
Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - David S. Klimstra
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer
Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Tanaka A, Zhou Y, Shia J, Ginty F, Ogawa M, Klimstra DS, Hendrickson RC, Wang JY, Roehrl MH. Prolyl 4-hydroxylase alpha 1 protein expression risk-stratifies early stage colorectal cancer. Oncotarget 2020; 11:813-824. [PMID: 32166002 PMCID: PMC7055541 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.27491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2019] [Accepted: 01/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most prevalent and lethal malignancies. Especially for early stage CRC, prognostic molecular markers are needed to guide therapy. In this study, we first extracted total proteomes from matched pairs of fresh cancer and benign mucosal tissues from 22 CRC patients. Global proteomic profiling with Fourier transform liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry sequencing and label free quantitation uncovered that P4HA1 (prolyl 4-hydroxylase alpha 1) was overexpressed in CRC relative to benign colonic mucosa. We then investigated expression by immunohistochemical staining with P4HA1-specific antibodies using CRC tissue microarrays. Independent validation cohorts of 599 cases of early stage CRC and 91 cases of late stage CRC were examined. Multivariate and univariate survival analyses revealed that high expression of P4HA1 protein was an independent poor prognostic marker for patients with early stage CRC, especially of the microsatellite stable subtype. Our study provides strong support for P4HA1 as a predictive protein marker for precision diagnostics, therapeutic decision-making, and drug development for early stage colorectal cancer and demonstrates the utility of proteomic profiling to identify novel protein biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Atsushi Tanaka
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Pathology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yihua Zhou
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- ICU Department, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Jinru Shia
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Fiona Ginty
- GE Global Research Center, Niskayuna, NY, USA
| | - Makiko Ogawa
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - David S. Klimstra
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ronald C. Hendrickson
- Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Michael H. Roehrl
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Hayashi A, Fan J, Chen R, Ho YJ, Makohon-Moore AP, Lecomte N, Zhong Y, Hong J, Huang J, Sakamoto H, Attiyeh MA, Kohutek ZA, Zhang L, Boumiza A, Kappagantula R, Baez P, Bai J, Lisi M, Chadalavada K, Melchor JP, Wong W, Nanjangud GJ, Basturk O, O'Reilly EM, Klimstra DS, Hruban RH, Wood LD, Overholtzer M, Iacobuzio-Donahue CA. A unifying paradigm for transcriptional heterogeneity and squamous features in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Nat Cancer 2020; 1:59-74. [PMID: 35118421 PMCID: PMC8809486 DOI: 10.1038/s43018-019-0010-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 101] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2019] [Accepted: 11/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer expression profiles largely reflect a classical or basal-like phenotype. The extent to which these profiles vary within a patient is unknown. We integrated evolutionary analysis and expression profiling in multiregion-sampled metastatic pancreatic cancers, finding that squamous features are the histologic correlate of an RNA-seq-defined basal-like subtype. In patients with coexisting basal and squamous and classical and glandular morphology, phylogenetic studies revealed that squamous morphology represented a subclonal population in an otherwise classical and glandular tumor. Cancers with squamous features were significantly more likely to have clonal mutations in chromatin modifiers, intercellular heterogeneity for MYC amplification and entosis. These data provide a unifying paradigm for integrating basal-type expression profiles, squamous histology and somatic mutations in chromatin modifier genes in the context of clonal evolution of pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akimasa Hayashi
- The David M. Rubenstein Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jun Fan
- The David M. Rubenstein Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ruoyao Chen
- Cell Biology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yu-Jui Ho
- Cancer Biology and Genetics Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alvin P Makohon-Moore
- The David M. Rubenstein Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nicolas Lecomte
- The David M. Rubenstein Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yi Zhong
- The David M. Rubenstein Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jungeui Hong
- The David M. Rubenstein Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jinlong Huang
- The David M. Rubenstein Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hitomi Sakamoto
- The David M. Rubenstein Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Marc A Attiyeh
- The David M. Rubenstein Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Zachary A Kohutek
- The David M. Rubenstein Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lance Zhang
- The David M. Rubenstein Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Aida Boumiza
- The David M. Rubenstein Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rajya Kappagantula
- The David M. Rubenstein Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Priscilla Baez
- The David M. Rubenstein Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jessica Bai
- The David M. Rubenstein Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Marta Lisi
- Cancer Biology and Genetics Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kalyani Chadalavada
- Cancer Biology and Genetics Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jerry P Melchor
- The David M. Rubenstein Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Winston Wong
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Gouri J Nanjangud
- Cancer Biology and Genetics Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Olca Basturk
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eileen M O'Reilly
- The David M. Rubenstein Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - David S Klimstra
- The David M. Rubenstein Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ralph H Hruban
- Department of Pathology, Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Laura D Wood
- Department of Pathology, Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Michael Overholtzer
- Cell Biology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Christine A Iacobuzio-Donahue
- The David M. Rubenstein Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Penson A, Camacho N, Zheng Y, Varghese AM, Al-Ahmadie H, Razavi P, Chandarlapaty S, Vallejo CE, Vakiani E, Gilewski T, Rosenberg JE, Shady M, Tsui DWY, Reales DN, Abeshouse A, Syed A, Zehir A, Schultz N, Ladanyi M, Solit DB, Klimstra DS, Hyman DM, Taylor BS, Berger MF. Development of Genome-Derived Tumor Type Prediction to Inform Clinical Cancer Care. JAMA Oncol 2020; 6:84-91. [PMID: 31725847 PMCID: PMC6865333 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.3985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2019] [Accepted: 06/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Diagnosing the site of origin for cancer is a pillar of disease classification that has directed clinical care for more than a century. Even in an era of precision oncologic practice, in which treatment is increasingly informed by the presence or absence of mutant genes responsible for cancer growth and progression, tumor origin remains a critical factor in tumor biologic characteristics and therapeutic sensitivity. OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether data derived from routine clinical DNA sequencing of tumors could complement conventional approaches to enable improved diagnostic accuracy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A machine learning approach was developed to predict tumor type from targeted panel DNA sequence data obtained at the point of care, incorporating both discrete molecular alterations and inferred features such as mutational signatures. This algorithm was trained on 7791 tumors representing 22 cancer types selected from a prospectively sequenced cohort of patients with advanced cancer. RESULTS The correct tumor type was predicted for 5748 of the 7791 patients (73.8%) in the training set as well as 8623 of 11 644 patients (74.1%) in an independent cohort. Predictions were assigned probabilities that reflected empirical accuracy, with 3388 cases (43.5%) representing high-confidence predictions (>95% probability). Informative molecular features and feature categories varied widely by tumor type. Genomic analysis of plasma cell-free DNA yielded accurate predictions in 45 of 60 cases (75.0%), suggesting that this approach may be applied in diverse clinical settings including as an adjunct to cancer screening. Likely tissues of origin were predicted from targeted tumor sequencing in 95 of 141 patients (67.4%) with cancers of unknown primary site. Applying this method prospectively to patients under active care enabled genome-directed reassessment of diagnosis in 2 patients initially presumed to have metastatic breast cancer, leading to the selection of more appropriate treatments, which elicited clinical responses. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE These results suggest that the application of artificial intelligence to predict tissue of origin in oncologic practice can act as a useful complement to conventional histologic review to provide integrated pathologic diagnoses, often with important therapeutic implications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Penson
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Niedzica Camacho
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Youyun Zheng
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Anna M. Varghese
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Hikmat Al-Ahmadie
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Pedram Razavi
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Sarat Chandarlapaty
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Christina E. Vallejo
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Efsevia Vakiani
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Teresa Gilewski
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | - Maha Shady
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Dana W. Y. Tsui
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Dalicia N. Reales
- Clinical Research Administration, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Adam Abeshouse
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Aijazuddin Syed
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Ahmet Zehir
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Nikolaus Schultz
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Marc Ladanyi
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - David B. Solit
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Weill Cornell Medical College, Department of Medicine, Cornell University, New York, New York
| | - David S. Klimstra
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Weill Cornell Medical College, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cornell University, New York, New York
| | - David M. Hyman
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Weill Cornell Medical College, Department of Medicine, Cornell University, New York, New York
| | - Barry S. Taylor
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Michael F. Berger
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Weill Cornell Medical College, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cornell University, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Hutchings D, Jiang Z, Skaro M, Weiss MJ, Wolfgang CL, Makary MA, He J, Cameron JL, Zheng L, Klimstra DS, Brand RE, Singhi AD, Goggins M, Klein AP, Roberts NJ, Hruban RH. Histomorphology of pancreatic cancer in patients with inherited ATM serine/threonine kinase pathogenic variants. Mod Pathol 2019; 32:1806-1813. [PMID: 31285527 PMCID: PMC7403604 DOI: 10.1038/s41379-019-0317-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2019] [Revised: 06/05/2019] [Accepted: 06/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Germline pathogenic variants in the ATM serine/threonine kinase (ATM) gene are associated with an increased risk of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. It is important to identify germline ATM pathogenic variants in pancreatic cancer patients because these alterations are potentially targetable with chemotherapeutic drugs and/or radiation and have implications for other family members. As germline pathogenic variants in other genes have been associated with distinct histologic subtypes of pancreatic cancer, we studied the histomorphology of pancreatic cancer in 23 patients with germline ATM pathogenic variants. The histologic subtype was ductal adenocarcinoma in 19/23 (83%) of the patients, adenosquamous carcinoma in 1/23 (4%), and colloid (mucinous non-cystic) carcinoma in 3/23 (13%). The percentage of colloid (mucinous non-cystic) carcinomas is higher than we have previously observed in patients with familial and sporadic pancreatic cancer (1 and 2% in prior reports, p < 0.01 and p < 0.01, respectively). Three carcinomas (2 colloid carcinomas, 1 ductal adenocarcinoma) arose in association with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms. Among the resected pancreata, non-invasive precursor lesions, including pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia and incipient intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms, were identified in 83%. We conclude that pancreatic cancers in patients with germline ATM pathogenic variants are more frequently of colloid (mucinous non-cystic) morphology but are overall morphologically diverse supporting the utility of universal germline genetic testing for patients with pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle Hutchings
- Department of Pathology, the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Zhengdong Jiang
- Department of Pathology, the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Michael Skaro
- Department of Pathology, the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Matthew J Weiss
- Department of Surgery, the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Oncology, the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Christopher L Wolfgang
- Department of Surgery, the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Oncology, the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Martin A Makary
- Department of Surgery, the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Oncology, the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jin He
- Department of Surgery, the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Oncology, the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - John L Cameron
- Department of Surgery, the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Oncology, the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Lei Zheng
- Department of Oncology, the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - David S Klimstra
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Randall E Brand
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Health System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Aatur D Singhi
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Health System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Michael Goggins
- Department of Pathology, the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Alison P Klein
- Department of Oncology, the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Nicholas J Roberts
- Department of Pathology, the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
- Department of Oncology, the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - Ralph H Hruban
- Department of Pathology, the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
- Department of Oncology, the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
McAuliffe JC, Tang LH, Kamrani K, Olino K, Klimstra DS, Brennan MF, Coit DG. Prevalence of False-Negative Results of Intraoperative Consultation on Surgical Margins During Resection of Gastric and Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma. JAMA Surg 2019; 154:126-132. [PMID: 30422226 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.3863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Importance Intraoperative consultation (IOC) on surgical margins during curative intent resection of gastric and gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma presents sampling and interpretive challenges. A false-negative (FN) IOC result can affect clinical care. Many factors may be associated with higher risk for an FN result of IOC on surgical margins. Objective To assess the prevalence and clinical implications of FN results of IOC on surgical margins during resection of gastric and gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective study assessed the results of IOC on surgical margins to determine the prevalence of FN results and the accuracy and clinical implications of the results for patients undergoing curative intent resection for gastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. The study examined patients with gastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma who underwent resection with curative intent at a single-institution referral center from January 1, 1992, to December 31, 2015. Interventions Curative intent gastric and/or esophageal resection. Main Outcomes and Measures False-negative results of IOC on surgical margins, accuracy of the results, factors associated with decreased accuracy of the results, and clinical implications of FN results. Results This study included 2002 patients (median age, 65 years; 1343 [67.1%] male; 1638 [81.8%] white) who received 3171 IOCs on surgical margins. Of the 3171 IOCs, the prevalence of FN results was 1.7%, with an accuracy of 98.1%. The prevalence of an FN IOC result was 1.2% for esophageal margins, 2.0% for gastric margins, and 2.5% for duodenal margins (P = .04). The prevalence of an FN IOC result was higher for patients with diffuse or signet ring disease compared with those without (2.6% vs 1.2%, P = .002) and for those not receiving neoadjuvant radiotherapy compared with those receiving neoadjuvant radiotherapy (1.4% vs 0.7%, P < .001). The prevalence of FN results of IOCs performed by nongastrointestinal pathologists was similar to that of IOCs performed by gastrointestinal pathologists (2.3% vs 1.9%, P = .60). The disease-specific survival was 34 months (95% CI, 20.7-47.2 months) for those with an FN result and 26.9 months (95% CI, 18.3-35.4; P = .72) for those with a true-positive result. Half of the patients with FN IOC results received further margin-directed therapy, including subsequent resection or radiotherapy. Conclusions and Relevance This study found that IOC on surgical margins was accurate at a specialty center. Signet ring or diffuse disease, duodenal margins, and not receiving neoadjuvant radiotherapy were challenging scenarios for IOC on surgical margins. The use of IOC on surgical margins may be optimal when it will affect intraoperative decision making framed by the stage of disease, tumor location, and surgical fitness of the patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John C McAuliffe
- Department of Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York
| | - Laura H Tang
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Kambiz Kamrani
- Department of Surgery, Monmouth Medical Center, Long Branch, New Jersey
| | - Kelly Olino
- Department of Surgery, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston
| | - David S Klimstra
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Murray F Brennan
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Daniel G Coit
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|