1
|
Ozturk SK, Martinez CG, Mens D, Verhoef C, Tosetto M, Sheahan K, de Wilt JHW, Hospers GAP, van de Velde CJH, Marijnen CAM, van der Post RS, Nagtegaal ID. Lymph node regression after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer. Histopathology 2024; 84:935-946. [PMID: 38192084 DOI: 10.1111/his.15134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2023] [Revised: 11/23/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024]
Abstract
AIMS Lymph node metastases (LNM) are one of the most important prognostic indicators in solid tumours and a major component of cancer staging. Neoadjuvant therapy might influence nodal status by induction of regression. Our aim is to determine the prevalence and role of regression of LNM on outcomes in patients with rectal cancer. METHODS AND RESULTS Four independent study populations of rectal cancer patients treated with similar regimens of chemoradiotherapy were pooled together to obtain a total cohort of 469 patients. Post-treatment nodal status (ypN) and signs of tumour regression (Reg) were incorporated to form three-tiered (ypN- Reg+, ypN- Reg- and ypN+) and four-tiered (ypN- Reg+, ypN- Reg-, ypN+ Reg+ and ypN+ Reg-) classifications. In our cohort, 31% of patients presented with ypN+ rectal cancer. As expected, we found significantly worse overall survival (OS) in ypN+ patients compared to ypN- patients (P = 0.002). The percentage of ypN- patients with lymph nodes with complete regression was 20% in our cohort. While node-negative patients with and without regression had similar OS (P = 0.09), disease-free survival (DFS) was significantly better in node-negative patients with regression (P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS Regression in lymph nodes is frequent, and node-negative patients with evidence of lymph node regression have better DFS compared to node-negative patients without such evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonay K Ozturk
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Cristina G Martinez
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - David Mens
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Miriam Tosetto
- Department of Pathology, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Kieran Sheahan
- Department of Pathology, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Johannes H W de Wilt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Geke A P Hospers
- Department of Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Corrie A M Marijnen
- Department of Radiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Rachel S van der Post
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vink-Börger E, Dabir PD, Krekels J, van Kouwen MCA, Ligtenberg MJL, van der Post RS, Nagtegaal ID. Deficient mismatch repair screening of advanced adenomas in the population screening program for colorectal cancer is not effective. Histopathology 2024; 84:1056-1060. [PMID: 38275207 DOI: 10.1111/his.15150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2023] [Revised: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/13/2024] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
Abstract
AIM Currently, screening of colorectal cancers (CRC) by assessing mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) or microsatellite instability (MSI) is used to identify Lynch syndrome (LS) patients. Advanced adenomas are considered immediate precursor lesions of CRC. In this study we investigate the relevance of screening of advanced adenomas for LS in population screening. METHODS AND RESULTS Advanced adenomas (n = 1572) were selected from the Dutch colorectal cancer population screening programme, based on one or more of the criteria: tubulovillous (n = 848, 54%) or villous adenoma (n = 118, 7.5%), diameter ≥ 1 cm (n = 1286, 82%) and/or high-grade dysplasia (n = 176, 11%). In 86 cases (5%), all three criteria were fulfilled at the same time. MMR-IHC and/or MSI analyses were performed on all cases. Only five advanced adenomas (0.3%) showed dMMR and MSI, including two cases with hypermethylation. In at least two patients a germline event was suspected based on allelic frequencies. No pathogenic explanation was found in the last case. CONCLUSION Timely testing of precursor lesions would be preferable to detect new LS patients before CRC development. However, standard assessment of dMMR of advanced adenomas from the population screening is not effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisa Vink-Börger
- Department of Pathology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Parag D Dabir
- Institute of Pathology, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
| | - Joyce Krekels
- Department of Pathology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Mariëtte C A van Kouwen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg
- Department of Pathology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Rachel S van der Post
- Department of Pathology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zwart WH, Temmink SJD, Hospers GAP, Marijnen CAM, Putter H, Nagtegaal ID, Blomqvist L, Kranenbarg EMK, Roodvoets AGH, Martling A, van de Velde CJH, Glimelius B, Peeters KCMJ, van Etten B, Nilsson PJ. Oncological outcomes after a pathological complete response following total neoadjuvant therapy or chemoradiotherapy for high-risk locally advanced rectal cancer in the RAPIDO trial. Eur J Cancer 2024; 204:114044. [PMID: 38636289 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.114044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2024] [Revised: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 04/01/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A pathological complete response (pCR) following chemoradiation (CRT) or short-course radiotherapy (scRT) leads to a favourable prognosis in patients with rectal cancer. Total neo-adjuvant therapy (TNT) doubles the pCR rate, but it is unknown whether oncological outcomes remain favourable and whether the same characteristics are associated with pCR as after CRT. METHODS Comparison between patients with pCR in the RAPIDO trial in the experimental [EXP] (scRT, chemotherapy, surgery, as TNT) and standard-of-care treatment [STD] (CRT, surgery, postoperative chemotherapy depending on hospital policy) groups. Primary and secondary outcomes were time-to-recurrence (TTR), overall survival (OS) and association between patient, tumour, and treatment characteristics and pCR. RESULTS Among patients with a resection within six months after preoperative treatment, 120/423 (28%) [EXP] and 57/398 (14%) [STD] achieved a pCR. Following pCR, 5-year cumulative TTR and OS rates in the EXP and STD arms were 8% vs. 7% (hazard ratio 1.04, 95%CI 0.32-3.38) and 94% vs. 93% (hazard ratio 1.41, 95%CI 0.51-3.92), respectively. Besides the EXP treatment (odds ratio 2.70, 95%CI 1.83-3.97), pre-treatment carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) <5, pre-treatment tumour size <40 mm and cT2 were associated with pCR. Distance from the anal verge was the only characteristic with a statistically significant difference in association with pCR between the EXP and STD treatment (Pinteraction=0.042). pCR rates did not increase with prolonged treatment time. CONCLUSIONS The doubled pCR rate of TNT compared to CRT results in similar oncological outcomes. Characteristics associated with pCR are the EXP treatment, normal CEA, and small tumour size.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wouter H Zwart
- University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Medical Oncology, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | - Sofieke J D Temmink
- Karolinska Institutet, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Geke A P Hospers
- University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Medical Oncology, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Corrie A M Marijnen
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Hein Putter
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Radboud University Medical Centre, Department of Pathology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Lennart Blomqvist
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Annet G H Roodvoets
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Anna Martling
- Karolinska Institutet, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Bengt Glimelius
- Uppsala University, Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Koen C M J Peeters
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Boudewijn van Etten
- University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Surgery, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Per J Nilsson
- Karolinska Institutet, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dawson H, Bokhorst J, Studer L, Vieth M, Oguz Erdogan AS, Kus Öztürk S, Kirsch R, Brockmoeller S, Cathomas G, Buslei R, Fink D, Roumet M, Zlobec I, van der Laak J, Nagtegaal ID, Lugli A. Lymph node metastases and recurrence in pT1 colorectal cancer: Prediction with the International Budding Consortium Score-A retrospective, multi-centric study. United European Gastroenterol J 2024; 12:299-308. [PMID: 38193866 PMCID: PMC11017758 DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.12521] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 11/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting proposes histological tumour type, lymphovascular invasion, tumour grade, perineural invasion, extent, and dimensions of invasion as risk factors for lymph node metastases and tumour progression in completely endoscopically resected pT1 colorectal cancer (CRC). OBJECTIVE The aim of the study was to propose a predictive and reliable score to optimise the clinical management of endoscopically resected pT1 CRC patients. METHODS This multi-centric, retrospective International Budding Consortium (IBC) study included an international pT1 CRC cohort of 565 patients. All cases were reviewed by eight expert gastrointestinal pathologists. All risk factors were reported according to international guidelines. Tumour budding and immune response (CD8+ T-cells) were assessed with automated models using artificial intelligence. We used the information on risk factors and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regression to develop a prediction model and generate a score to predict the occurrence of lymph node metastasis or cancer recurrence. RESULTS The IBC prediction score included the following parameters: lymphovascular invasion, tumour buds, infiltration depth and tumour grade. The score has an acceptable discrimination power (area under the curve of 0.68 [95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.61-0.75]; 0.64 [95% CI 0.57-0.71] after internal validation). At a cut-off of 6.8 points to discriminate high-and low-risk patients, the score had a sensitivity and specificity of 0.9 [95% CI 0.8-0.95] and 0.26 [95% 0.22, 0.3], respectively. CONCLUSION The IBC score is based on well-established risk factors and is a promising tool with clinical utility to support the management of pT1 CRC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather Dawson
- Institute of Tissue Medicine and PathologyUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland
| | | | - Linda Studer
- Institute of Tissue Medicine and PathologyUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland
- Institute of Artificial Intelligence and Complex SystemsUniversity of Applied Sciences and Arts Western SwitzerlandFribourgSwitzerland
| | - Michael Vieth
- Institute of PathologyFriedrich‐Alexander‐University Erlangen‐NurembergKlinikum BayreuthBayreuthGermany
| | | | | | - Richard Kirsch
- Pathology and Laboratory MedicineMount Sinai HospitalUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Scarlett Brockmoeller
- Pathology and Data AnalyticsLeeds Institute of Medical Research at St. James's School of MedicineLeedsUK
| | - Gieri Cathomas
- Institute of PathologyKantonsspital BasellandLiestalSwitzerland
- Present address:
Institute of Tissue Medicine and PathologyUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland.
| | - Rolf Buslei
- Institut und Praxis für Pathologie, Neuropathologie, Molekulare Diagnostik und ZytologieSozialstiftung BambergBambergGermany
| | - David Fink
- Department of Pathology and ImmunologyBaylor College of MedicineHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Marie Roumet
- Clinical Trials UnitUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland
| | - Inti Zlobec
- Institute of Tissue Medicine and PathologyUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland
| | | | | | - Alessandro Lugli
- Institute of Tissue Medicine and PathologyUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Vos AM, Pijnenborg L, van Vliet S, Kodach LL, Ciompi F, van der Post RS, Simmer F, Nagtegaal ID. Biological background of colorectal polyps and carcinomas with heterotopic ossification: A national study and literature review. Hum Pathol 2024; 145:34-41. [PMID: 38367815 DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2024.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2023] [Revised: 02/12/2024] [Accepted: 02/14/2024] [Indexed: 02/19/2024]
Abstract
The biological mechanisms and potential clinical impact of heterotopic ossification (HO) in colorectal neoplasms are not fully understood. This study investigates the clinicopathological characteristics of colorectal neoplasms associated with HO and examines the potential role of the bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) pathway in development of HO. An artificial intelligence (AI) based classification of colorectal cancers (CRC) exhibiting HO and their association with consensus molecular subtypes (CMS) is performed. The study included 77 cases via the Dutch nationwide Pathology databank. Immunohistochemistry for BMP2, SMAD4, and Osterix was performed. An AI algorithm assessed the tumour-stroma ratio to approximate the CMS. A literature search yielded 96 case reports, which were analysed and compared with our cases for clinicopathological parameters. HO was more frequently observed in our cohort in traditional serrated adenomas (25%), tubulovillous adenomas (25%) and juvenile polyps (25%), while in the literature it was most often seen in juvenile polyps (38.2%) and inflammatory polyps (29.4%). In both cohorts, carcinomas were mostly conventional (>60%) followed by mucinous and serrated adenocarcinomas. Higher expression of BMP2, SMAD4, and Osterix was observed in tumour and/or stromal cells directly surrounding bone, indicating activation of the BMP pathway. The tumour-stroma analysis appointed >50% of the cases to the mesenchymal subtype (CMS4) (59%). HO has a predilection for serrated and juvenile/inflammatory polyps, mucinous and serrated adenocarcinomas. BMP signalling is activated and seems to play a role in formation of HO in colorectal neoplasms. In line with TGFβ/BMP pathway activation associated with CMS4 CRC, HO seems associated with CMS4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne-Marie Vos
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Lieke Pijnenborg
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Shannon van Vliet
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Liudmila L Kodach
- Department of Molecular Pathology, Dutch Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Francesco Ciompi
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Rachel S van der Post
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Femke Simmer
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kazemzadeh F, Snoek JAA, Voorham QJ, van Oijen MGH, Hugen N, Nagtegaal ID. Association of metastatic pattern in breast cancer with tumor and patient-specific factors: a nationwide autopsy study using artificial intelligence. Breast Cancer 2024; 31:263-271. [PMID: 38133738 DOI: 10.1007/s12282-023-01534-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Metastatic spread is characterized by considerable heterogeneity in most cancers. With increasing treatment options for patients with metastatic disease, there is a need for insight into metastatic patterns of spread in breast cancer patients using large-scale studies. METHODS Records of 2622 metastatic breast cancer patients who underwent autopsy (1974-2010) were retrieved from the nationwide Dutch pathology databank (PALGA). Natural language processing (NLP) and manual information extraction (IE) were applied to identify the tumors, patient characteristics, and locations of metastases. RESULTS The accuracy (0.90) and recall (0.94) of the NLP model outperformed manual IE (on 132 randomly selected patients). Adenocarcinoma no special type more frequently metastasizes to the lung (55.7%) and liver (51.8%), whereas, invasive lobular carcinoma mostly spread to the bone (54.4%) and liver (43.8%), respectively. Patients with tumor grade III had a higher chance of developing bone metastases (61.6%). In a subgroup of patients, we found that ER+/HER2+ patients were more likely to metastasize to the liver and bone, compared to ER-/HER2+ patients. CONCLUSION This is the first large-scale study that demonstrates that artificial intelligence methods are efficient for IE from Dutch databanks. Different histological subtypes show different frequencies and combinations of metastatic sites which may reflect the underlying biology of metastatic breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatemeh Kazemzadeh
- Department of Pathology 824, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Therapy Program, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - J A A Snoek
- Department of Pathology 824, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Martijn G H van Oijen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Therapy Program, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Niek Hugen
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology 824, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
- PALGA Foundation, Houten, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Woortman C, van Leenders GJLH, Hugen N, van Oijen MGH, Nagtegaal ID. Origin and outcome of metastatic tumours to the testes: a nationwide study. BJU Int 2024; 133:305-313. [PMID: 37877215 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To perform a retrospective cohort analysis for metastatic tumours in the testes to explore the timing, presentation and prognosis of this particular type of metastases and the factors that influence outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS A nationwide retrospective review of pathology reports of patients with pathologically confirmed metastases to the testis between 1991 and 2021 was performed. Data were collected from the Dutch nationwide pathology databank (PALGA) and the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Log-rank testing and Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to assess overall survival (OS), and Cox proportional hazard models were used for multivariate survival analysis. RESULTS A total of 175 patients with a testicular metastasis were included. The median (range) age at diagnosis of testicular metastasis was 67 (3-88) years. Testicular metastases originated from a variety of primary tumours, although most frequently from the prostate (40.6%), kidney (13.7%), colon (10.3%), bladder (7.4%) and skin (5.7%). Synchronous testicular metastasis was detected in 53 cases, while 114 metachronous lesions were found after a median (interquartile range) interval of 22 (1-53) months after the original cancer diagnosis. OS after the diagnosis of a testicular metastasis was poor, with a median survival of 14.2 months (95% confidence interval 10.2-18.3). Primary tumour origin was an independent factor for survival, with worst survival for patients with primary skin, bladder and colon cancer. CONCLUSION Testicular metastases are very uncommon and arise mainly from primary tumours anatomically close to the testes. Most patients develop metachronous testicular metastasis at an oligometastatic disease stage. These metastases are invariably associated with poor survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmen Woortman
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Geert J L H van Leenders
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Niek Hugen
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn G H van Oijen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- PALGA Foundation, Houten, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Derks MEW, van Lierop LMA, te Groen M, Kuijpers CCHJ, Nagtegaal ID, Hoentjen F. Long-Term Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Inflammatory Bowel Disease Healthcare Utilization: A 2-Year Nationwide Update. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2024; 30:146-149. [PMID: 37000678 PMCID: PMC10769775 DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izad055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 04/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Monica E W Derks
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Department of Gastroenterology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Lisa M A van Lierop
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Department of Gastroenterology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Maarten te Groen
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Department of Gastroenterology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Frank Hoentjen
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Department of Gastroenterology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Brouwer NPM, Khan A, Bokhorst JM, Ayatollahi F, Hay J, Ciompi F, Simmer F, Hugen N, de Wilt JHW, Berger MD, Lugli A, Zlobec I, Edwards J, Nagtegaal ID. The Complexity of Shapes: How the Circularity of Tumor Nodules Affects Prognosis in Colorectal Cancer. Mod Pathol 2024; 37:100376. [PMID: 37926423 DOI: 10.1016/j.modpat.2023.100376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Revised: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023]
Abstract
The current stratification of tumor nodules in colorectal cancer (CRC) staging is subjective and leads to high interobserver variability. In this study, the objective assessment of the shape of lymph node metastases (LNMs), extranodal extension (ENE), and tumor deposits (TDs) was correlated with outcomes. A test cohort and a validation cohort were included from 2 different institutions. The test cohort consisted of 190 cases of stage III CRC. Slides with LNMs and TDs were annotated and processed using a segmentation algorithm to determine their shape. The complexity ratio was calculated for every shape and correlated with outcomes. A cohort of 160 stage III CRC cases was used to validate findings. TDs showed significantly more complex shapes than LNMs with ENE, which were more complex than LNMs without ENE (P < .001). In the test cohort, patients with the highest sum of complexity ratios had significantly lower disease-free survival (P < .01). When only the nodule with the highest complexity was considered, this effect was even stronger (P < .001). This maximum complexity ratio per patient was identified as an independent prognostic factor in the multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 2.47; P < .05). The trends in the validation cohort confirmed the results. More complex nodules in stage III CRC were correlated with significantly worse disease-free survival, even if only based on the most complex nodule. These results suggest that more complex nodules reflect more invasive tumor biology. As most of the more complex nodules were diagnosed as TDs, we suggest providing a more prominent role for TDs in the nodal stage and include an objective complexity measure in their definition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nelleke P M Brouwer
- Department of pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Amjad Khan
- Institute of Tissue Medicine and Pathology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - John-Melle Bokhorst
- Department of pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Fazael Ayatollahi
- Department of pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Jennifer Hay
- Glasgow Tissue Research Facility, University of Glasgow, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Francesco Ciompi
- Department of pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Femke Simmer
- Department of pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Niek Hugen
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes H W de Wilt
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Martin D Berger
- Department of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, University Hospital of Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Alessandro Lugli
- Institute of Tissue Medicine and Pathology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Inti Zlobec
- Institute of Tissue Medicine and Pathology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Joanne Edwards
- School of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Department of pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Toes-Zoutendijk E, Breekveldt ECH, van der Schee L, Nagtegaal ID, Elferink MAG, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Moons LMG, van Leerdam ME. Differences in treatment of stage I colorectal cancers: a population-based study of colorectal cancers detected within and outside of a screening program. Endoscopy 2024; 56:5-13. [PMID: 37935373 PMCID: PMC10736105 DOI: 10.1055/a-2173-5989] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Accepted: 08/17/2023] [Indexed: 11/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Screen-detected colorectal cancers (CRCs) are often treated less invasively than stage-matched non-screen-detected CRCs, but the reasons for this are not fully understood. This study evaluated the treatment of stage I CRCs detected within and outside of the screening program in the Netherlands. METHODS : Data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry for all stage I CRCs diagnosed between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2020 were analyzed, comparing patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics of screen-detected and non-screen-detected stage I CRCs. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association between treatment (local excision only vs. surgical oncologic resection) and patient and tumor characteristics, stratified for T stage and tumor location. RESULTS Screen-detected stage I CRCs were relatively more often T1 than T2 compared with non-screen-detected stage I CRCs (66.9 % vs. 53.3 %; P < 0.001). When only T1 tumors were considered, both screen-detected colon and rectal cancers were more often treated with local excision only than non-screen-detected T1 cancers (odds ratio [OR] 2.19, 95 %CI 1.93-2.49; and OR 1.29, 95 %CI 1.05-1.59, respectively), adjusted for sex, tumor location, lymphovascular invasion (LVI) status, and tumor differentiation. CONCLUSIONS : Less invasive treatment of screen-detected stage I CRC is partly explained by the higher rate of T1 cancers compared with non-screen-detected stage I CRCs. T1 stage I screen-detected CRCs were also more likely to undergo less invasive treatment than non-screen-detected CRCs, adjusted for risk factors such as LVI and tumor differentiation. Future research should investigate whether the choice of local excision was related to unidentified cancer-related factors or the expertise of the endoscopists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esther Toes-Zoutendijk
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Emilie C. H. Breekveldt
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lisa van der Schee
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Iris D. Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marloes A. G. Elferink
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Leon M. G. Moons
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Monique E. van Leerdam
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
van de Schootbrugge-Vandermeer HJ, Kooyker AI, Wisse PHA, Nagtegaal ID, Geuzinge HA, Toes-Zoutendijk E, de Jonge L, Breekveldt ECH, van Vuuren AJ, van Kemenade FJ, Ramakers CRB, Dekker E, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Spaander MCW, van Leerdam ME. Interval post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer following a negative colonoscopy in a fecal immunochemical test-based screening program. Endoscopy 2023; 55:1061-1069. [PMID: 37793423 PMCID: PMC10684335 DOI: 10.1055/a-2136-6564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2022] [Accepted: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the Dutch colorectal (CRC) screening program, fecal immunochemical test (FIT)-positive individuals are referred for colonoscopy. If no relevant findings are detected at colonoscopy, individuals are reinvited for FIT screening after 10 years. We aimed to assess CRC risk after a negative colonoscopy in FIT-positive individuals. METHODS In this cross-sectional cohort study, data were extracted from the Dutch national screening information system. Participants with a positive FIT followed by a negative colonoscopy between 2014 and 2018 were included. A negative colonoscopy was defined as a colonoscopy during which no more than one nonvillous, nonproximal adenoma < 10 mm or serrated polyp < 10 mm was found. The main outcome was interval post-colonoscopy CRC (iPCCRC) risk. iPCCRC risk was reviewed against the risk of interval CRC after a negative FIT (FIT IC) with a 2-year screening interval. RESULTS 35 052 FIT-positive participants had a negative colonoscopy and 24 iPCCRCs were diagnosed, resulting in an iPCCRC risk of 6.85 (95 %CI 4.60-10.19) per 10 000 individuals after a median follow-up of 1.4 years. After 2.5 years of follow-up, age-adjusted iPCCRC risk was approximately equal to FIT IC risk at 2 years. CONCLUSION Risk of iPCCRC within a FIT-based CRC screening program was low during the first years after colonos-copy but, after 2.5 years, was the same as the risk in FIT-negative individuals at 2 years, when they are reinvited for screening. Colonoscopy quality may therefore require further improvement and FIT screening interval may need to be reduced after negative colonoscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Arthur I. Kooyker
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter H. A. Wisse
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Iris D. Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Hiltje A. Geuzinge
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Esther Toes-Zoutendijk
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lucie de Jonge
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Emilie C. H. Breekveldt
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anneke J. van Vuuren
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Christian R. B. Ramakers
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Manon C. W. Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Monique E. van Leerdam
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kus Ozturk S, Graham Martinez C, Sheahan K, Winter DC, Aherne S, Ryan ÉJ, van de Velde CJ, Marijnen CA, Hospers GA, Roodvoets AG, Doukas M, Mens D, Verhoef C, van der Post RS, Nagtegaal ID. Relevance of shrinkage versus fragmented response patterns in rectal cancer. Histopathology 2023; 83:870-879. [PMID: 37609761 DOI: 10.1111/his.15027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Revised: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 08/24/2023]
Abstract
AIMS Partial response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) presents with one of two main response patterns: shrinkage or fragmentation. This study investigated the relevance of these response patterns in rectal cancer, correlation with other response indicators, and outcome. METHODS AND RESULTS The study included a test (n = 197) and a validation cohort (n = 218) of post-CRT patients with rectal adenocarcinoma not otherwise specified and a partial response. Response patterns were scored by two independent observers using a previously developed three-step flowchart. Tumour regression grading (TRG) was established according to both the College of American Pathologists (CAP) and Dworak classifications. In both cohorts, the predominant response pattern was fragmentation (70% and 74%), and the scoring interobserver agreement was excellent (k = 0.85). Patients with a fragmented pattern presented with significantly higher pathological stage (ypTNM II-IV, 78% versus 35%; P < 0.001), less tumour regression with Dworak (P = 0.004), and CAP TRG (P = 0.005) compared to patients with a shrinkage pattern. As a predictor of prognosis, the shrinkage pattern outperformed the TRG classification and stratified patients better in overall (fragmented pattern, hazard ratio [HR] 2.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.19-3.50, P = 0.008) and disease-free survival (DFS; fragmented pattern, HR 2.50, 95% CI 1.23-5.10, P = 0.011) in the combined cohorts. The multivariable regression analyses revealed pathological stage as the only independent predictor of DFS. CONCLUSIONS The heterogeneous nature of tumour response following CRT is reflected in fragmentation and shrinkage. In rectal cancer there is a predominance of the fragmented pattern, which is associated with advanced stage and less tumour regression. While not independently associated with survival, these reproducible patterns give insights into the biology of tumour response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonay Kus Ozturk
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Kieran Sheahan
- Department of Pathology, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Desmond C Winter
- Department of Surgery, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Susan Aherne
- Department of Pathology, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Éanna J Ryan
- Department of Surgery, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Corrie Am Marijnen
- Department of Radiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Geke Ap Hospers
- Department of Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Annet Gh Roodvoets
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Michail Doukas
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - David Mens
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rachel S van der Post
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Brouwer NP, Webbink L, Haddad TS, Rutgers N, van Vliet S, Wood CS, Jansen PW, Lafarge MW, de Wilt JH, Hugen N, Simmer F, Jamieson NB, Tauriello DV, Kölzer VH, Vermeulen M, Nagtegaal ID. Transcriptomics and proteomics reveal distinct biology for lymph node metastases and tumour deposits in colorectal cancer. J Pathol 2023; 261:401-412. [PMID: 37792663 DOI: 10.1002/path.6196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Revised: 07/12/2023] [Accepted: 08/02/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023]
Abstract
Both lymph node metastases (LNMs) and tumour deposits (TDs) are included in colorectal cancer (CRC) staging, although knowledge regarding their biological background is lacking. This study aimed to compare the biology of these prognostic features, which is essential for a better understanding of their role in CRC spread. Spatially resolved transcriptomic analysis using digital spatial profiling was performed on TDs and LNMs from 10 CRC patients using 1,388 RNA targets, for the tumour cells and tumour microenvironment. Shotgun proteomics identified 5,578 proteins in 12 different patients. Differences in RNA and protein expression were analysed, and spatial deconvolution was performed. Image-based consensus molecular subtype (imCMS) analysis was performed on all TDs and LNMs included in the study. Transcriptome and proteome profiles identified distinct clusters for TDs and LNMs in both the tumour and tumour microenvironment segment, with upregulation of matrix remodelling, cell adhesion/motility, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in TDs (all p < 0.05). Spatial deconvolution showed a significantly increased abundance of fibroblasts, macrophages, and regulatory T-cells (p < 0.05) in TDs. Consistent with a higher fibroblast and EMT component, imCMS classified 62% of TDs as poor prognosis subtype CMS4 compared to 36% of LNMs (p < 0.05). Compared to LNMs, TDs have a more invasive state involving a distinct tumour microenvironment and upregulation of EMT, which are reflected in a more frequent histological classification of TDs as CMS4. These results emphasise the heterogeneity of locoregional spread and the fact that TDs should merit more attention both in future research and during staging. © 2023 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nelleke Pm Brouwer
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Loth Webbink
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Tariq S Haddad
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Natasja Rutgers
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Shannon van Vliet
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Colin S Wood
- Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, School of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, UK
- Academic Unit of Surgery, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, University of Glasgow, UK
| | - Pascal Wtc Jansen
- Department of Molecular Biology, Faculty of Science, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Oncode Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Maxime W Lafarge
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University and University Hospital of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Johannes Hw de Wilt
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Niek Hugen
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Femke Simmer
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Nigel B Jamieson
- Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, School of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, UK
- Academic Unit of Surgery, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, University of Glasgow, UK
| | - Daniele Vf Tauriello
- Department of Medical Biosciences, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Viktor H Kölzer
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University and University Hospital of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Michiel Vermeulen
- Department of Molecular Biology, Faculty of Science, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Oncode Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Toes-Zoutendijk E, Breekveldt ECH, van der Schee L, Nagtegaal ID, Elferink MAG, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Moons LMG, van Leerdam ME. Correction: Differences in treatment of stage I colorectal cancers: a population-based study of colorectal cancers detected within and outside of a screening program. Endoscopy 2023. [PMID: 38016633 DOI: 10.1055/a-2217-6054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Esther Toes-Zoutendijk
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Emilie C H Breekveldt
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lisa van der Schee
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marloes A G Elferink
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Leon M G Moons
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Bruggeling CE, te Groen M, Garza DR, van Heeckeren tot Overlaer F, Krekels JPM, Sulaiman BC, Karel D, Rulof A, Schaaphok AR, Hornikx DLAH, Nagtegaal ID, Dutilh BE, Hoentjen F, Boleij A. Bacterial Oncotraits Rather than Spatial Organization Are Associated with Dysplasia in Ulcerative Colitis. J Crohns Colitis 2023; 17:1870-1881. [PMID: 37243505 PMCID: PMC10673813 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Revised: 04/24/2023] [Accepted: 05/25/2023] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Colonic bacterial biofilms are frequently present in ulcerative colitis [UC] and may increase dysplasia risk through pathogens expressing oncotraits. This prospective cohort study aimed to determine [1] the association of oncotraits and longitudinal biofilm presence with dysplasia risk in UC, and [2] the relation of bacterial composition with biofilms and dysplasia risk. METHODS Faeces and left- and right-sided colonic biopsies were collected from 80 UC patients and 35 controls. Oncotraits [FadA of Fusobacterium, BFT of Bacteroides fragilis, colibactin [ClbB] and Intimin [Eae] of Escherichia coli] were assessed in faecal DNA with multiplex quantitative polymerase chain reaction [qPCR]. Biopsies were screened for biofilms [n = 873] with 16S rRNA fluorescent in situ hybridiation. Shotgun metagenomic sequencing [n = 265], and ki67-immunohistochemistry were performed. Associations were determined with a mixed-effects regression model. RESULTS Biofilms were highly prevalent in UC patients [90.8%] with a median persistence of 3 years (interquartile range [IQR] 2-5 years). Biofilm-positive biopsies showed increased epithelial hypertrophy [p = 0.025] and a reduced Shannon diversity independent of disease status [p = 0.015], but were not significantly associated with dysplasia in UC: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63-3.40. In contrast, ClbB independently associated with dysplasia [aOR 7.16, 95% CI 1.75-29.28], and FadA and Fusobacteriales were associated with a decreased dysplasia risk in UC [aOR 0.23, 95% CI 0.06-0.83, p <0.01]. CONCLUSIONS Biofilms are a hallmark of UC; however, because of their high prevalence are a poor biomarker for dysplasia. In contrast, colibactin presence and FadA absence independently associate with dysplasia in UC and might therefore be valuable biomarkers for future risk stratification and intervention strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlijn E Bruggeling
- Department of Pathology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences [RIMLS], Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten te Groen
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Department of Gastroenterology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Daniel R Garza
- Center for Molecular and Biomolecular Informatics [CMBI], Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences [RIMLS], Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- KU Leuven, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Rega Institute for Medical Research, Laboratory of Molecular Bacteriology, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Famke van Heeckeren tot Overlaer
- Department of Pathology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences [RIMLS], Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Joyce P M Krekels
- Department of Pathology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences [RIMLS], Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Basma-Chick Sulaiman
- Department of Pathology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences [RIMLS], Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Davy Karel
- Department of Pathology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences [RIMLS], Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Athreyu Rulof
- Department of Pathology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences [RIMLS], Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Anne R Schaaphok
- Department of Pathology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences [RIMLS], Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Daniel L A H Hornikx
- Department of Pathology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences [RIMLS], Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences [RIMLS], Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Bas E Dutilh
- Center for Molecular and Biomolecular Informatics [CMBI], Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences [RIMLS], Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Institute of Biodiversity, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Cluster of Excellence Balance of the Microverse, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany
- Theoretical Biology and Bioinformatics, Science for Life, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Frank Hoentjen
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Department of Gastroenterology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Annemarie Boleij
- Department of Pathology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences [RIMLS], Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Swillens JEM, Nagtegaal ID, Engels S, Lugli A, Hermens RPMG, van der Laak JAWM. Pathologists' first opinions on barriers and facilitators of computational pathology adoption in oncological pathology: an international study. Oncogene 2023; 42:2816-2827. [PMID: 37587332 PMCID: PMC10504072 DOI: 10.1038/s41388-023-02797-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2022] [Accepted: 07/26/2023] [Indexed: 08/18/2023]
Abstract
Computational pathology (CPath) algorithms detect, segment or classify cancer in whole slide images, approaching or even exceeding the accuracy of pathologists. Challenges have to be overcome before these algorithms can be used in practice. We therefore aim to explore international perspectives on the future role of CPath in oncological pathology by focusing on opinions and first experiences regarding barriers and facilitators. We conducted an international explorative eSurvey and semi-structured interviews with pathologists utilizing an implementation framework to classify potential influencing factors. The eSurvey results showed remarkable variation in opinions regarding attitude, understandability and validation of CPath. Interview results showed that barriers focused on the quality of available evidence, while most facilitators concerned strengths of CPath. A lack of consensus was present for multiple factors, such as the determination of sufficient validation using CPath, the preferred function of CPath within the digital workflow and the timing of CPath introduction in pathology education. The diversity in opinions illustrates variety in influencing factors in CPath adoption. A next step would be to quantitatively determine important factors for adoption and initiate validation studies. Both should include clear case descriptions and be conducted among a more homogenous panel of pathologists based on sub specialization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie E M Swillens
- Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare (IQ Healthcare), Radboud Institute for Health Sciences (RIHS), Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences (RIMLS), Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Sam Engels
- Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare (IQ Healthcare), Radboud Institute for Health Sciences (RIHS), Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Rosella P M G Hermens
- Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare (IQ Healthcare), Radboud Institute for Health Sciences (RIHS), Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Bokhorst JM, Ciompi F, Öztürk SK, Oguz Erdogan AS, Vieth M, Dawson H, Kirsch R, Simmer F, Sheahan K, Lugli A, Zlobec I, van der Laak J, Nagtegaal ID. Fully Automated Tumor Bud Assessment in Hematoxylin and Eosin-Stained Whole Slide Images of Colorectal Cancer. Mod Pathol 2023; 36:100233. [PMID: 37257824 DOI: 10.1016/j.modpat.2023.100233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2023] [Revised: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 05/20/2023] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
Tumor budding (TB), the presence of single cells or small clusters of up to 4 tumor cells at the invasive front of colorectal cancer (CRC), is a proven risk factor for adverse outcomes. International definitions are necessary to reduce interobserver variability. According to the current international guidelines, hotspots at the invasive front should be counted in hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained slides. This is time-consuming and prone to interobserver variability; therefore, there is a need for computer-aided diagnosis solutions. In this study, we report an artificial intelligence-based method for detecting TB in H&E-stained whole slide images. We propose a fully automated pipeline to identify the tumor border, detect tumor buds, characterize them based on the number of tumor cells, and produce a TB density map to identify the TB hotspot. The method outputs the TB count in the hotspot as a computational biomarker. We show that the proposed automated TB detection workflow performs on par with a panel of 5 pathologists at detecting tumor buds and that the hotspot-based TB count is an independent prognosticator in both the univariate and the multivariate analysis, validated on a cohort of n = 981 patients with CRC. Computer-aided detection of tumor buds based on deep learning can perform on par with expert pathologists for the detection and quantification of tumor buds in H&E-stained CRC histopathology slides, strongly facilitating the introduction of budding as an independent prognosticator in clinical routine and clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John-Melle Bokhorst
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Francesco Ciompi
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Sonay Kus Öztürk
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Michael Vieth
- Klinikum of Pathology, Bayreuth University, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Heather Dawson
- Institute of Tissue Medicine and Pathology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Richard Kirsch
- University of Toronto, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Femke Simmer
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Kieran Sheahan
- Department of Pathology, St Vincent's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Inti Zlobec
- Klinikum of Pathology, Bayreuth University, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Jeroen van der Laak
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Haddad TS, van den Dobbelsteen L, Öztürk SK, Geene R, Nijman IJ, Verrijp K, Jamieson NB, Wood C, van Vliet S, Reuvers L, Achouiti S, Rutgers N, Brouwer N, Simmer F, Zlobec I, Lugli A, Nagtegaal ID. Pseudobudding: ruptured glands do not represent true tumor buds. J Pathol 2023; 261:19-27. [PMID: 37403270 DOI: 10.1002/path.6146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Revised: 04/20/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 07/06/2023]
Abstract
Tumor budding (TB) is a strong biomarker of poor prognosis in colorectal cancer and other solid cancers. TB is defined as isolated single cancer cells or clusters of up to four cancer cells at the invasive tumor front. In areas with a large inflammatory response at the invasive front, single cells and cell clusters surrounding fragmented glands are observed appearing like TB. Occurrence of these small groups is referred to as pseudobudding (PsB), which arises due to external influences such as inflammation and glandular disruption. Using a combination of orthogonal approaches, we show that there are clear biological differences between TB and PsB. TB is representative of active invasion by presenting features of epithelial-mesenchymal transition and exhibiting increased deposition of extracellular matrix within the surrounding tumor microenvironment (TME), whereas PsB represents a reactive response to heavy inflammation where increased levels of granulocytes within the surrounding TME are observed. Our study provides evidence that areas with a strong inflammatory reaction should be avoided in the routine diagnostic assessment of TB. © 2023 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Sonay K Öztürk
- Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Robin Geene
- USEQ, CMM, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Isaäc J Nijman
- USEQ, CMM, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Kiek Verrijp
- Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Nigel B Jamieson
- University of Glasgow, Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, School of Cancer Sciences, Glasgow, UK
| | - Colin Wood
- University of Glasgow, Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, School of Cancer Sciences, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Luuk Reuvers
- Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Soumia Achouiti
- Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Natasja Rutgers
- Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Nelleke Brouwer
- Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Femke Simmer
- Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Inti Zlobec
- Institute of Tissue Medicine and Pathology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Alessandro Lugli
- Institute of Tissue Medicine and Pathology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Elze L, van der Post RS, Vos JR, Mensenkamp AR, de Hullu MSC, Nagtegaal ID, Hoogerbrugge N, de Voer RM, Ligtenberg MJL. Microsatellite instability in noncolorectal and nonendometrial malignancies in patients with Lynch syndrome. J Natl Cancer Inst 2023; 115:853-860. [PMID: 37018159 PMCID: PMC10323896 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djad063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2022] [Revised: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/02/2023] [Indexed: 04/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Individuals with Lynch syndrome are at increased hereditary risk of colorectal and endometrial carcinomas with microsatellite instability (MSI-H) and mismatch repair-deficiency (dMMR), which make these tumors vulnerable to therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Our aim is to assess how often other tumor types in these individuals share these characteristics. METHODS We retrieved the full tumor history of a historical clinic-based cohort of 1745 individuals with Lynch syndrome and calculated the standardized incidence ratio for all tumor types. MSI status, somatic second hit alterations, and immunohistochemistry-based MMR status were analyzed in 236 noncolorectal and nonendometrial malignant tumors. RESULTS In individuals with Lynch syndrome MSI-H/dMMR occurred both in Lynch-spectrum and in non-Lynch-spectrum malignancies (85% vs 37%, P < .01). MSI-H/dMMR malignancies were found in nearly all non-Lynch-spectrum tumor types. Almost all breast carcinomas had medullary features, and most of them were MSI-H/dMMR. Breast carcinoma with medullary features were shown to be associated with Lynch syndrome (standardized incidence ratio = 38.8, 95% confidence interval = 16.7 to 76.5). CONCLUSIONS In individuals with Lynch syndrome, MSI-H/dMMR occurs in more than one-half of the malignancies other than colorectal and endometrial carcinomas, including tumor types without increased incidence. The Lynch-spectrum tumors should be expanded to breast carcinomas with medullary features. All malignancies in patients with Lynch syndrome, independent of subtype, should be tested for MSI-H/dMMR in case therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors is considered. Moreover, Lynch syndrome should be considered an underlying cause of all MSI-H/dMMR malignancies other than colorectal and endometrial carcinomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Elze
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Rachel S van der Post
- Department of Pathology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Janet R Vos
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Arjen R Mensenkamp
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Mirjam S C de Hullu
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Nicoline Hoogerbrugge
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Richarda M de Voer
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Te Groen M, Derikx LAAP, van Lierop L, Ylstra B, Hoentjen F, Nagtegaal ID, Simmer F. Clonal Patterns Between Pouch Neoplasia and Prior Colorectal Neoplasia in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients: An Exploratory Cohort Study. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2023:izad112. [PMID: 37327081 PMCID: PMC10393204 DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izad112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
Lay Summary
Prior colorectal neoplasia is the strongest predictor of pouch neoplasia in inflammatory bowel disease, but the underlying mechanism is unknown. We observed clonality between colorectal and pouch neoplasia in 30% of patients, indicating that most pouch neoplasia develops clonally independent from prior colorectal lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maarten Te Groen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Lauranne A A P Derikx
- Department of Gastroenterology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lisa van Lierop
- Department of Gastroenterology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Bauke Ylstra
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Frank Hoentjen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Femke Simmer
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
van de Schootbrugge-Vandermeer HJ, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, de Jonge L, van Vuuren AJ, Dekker E, Spaander MCW, Ramakers CRB, Nagtegaal ID, van Kemenade FJ, van Leerdam ME, Toes-Zoutendijk E. Socio-demographic and cultural factors related to non-participation in the Dutch colorectal cancer screening programme. Eur J Cancer 2023; 190:112942. [PMID: 37406529 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.112942] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Revised: 05/24/2023] [Accepted: 06/08/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND High participation rates are essential for a screening programme to be beneficial. To reach non-participants in a targeted manner, insight in characteristics of non-participants is needed. We investigated demographic differences between participants and non-participants in the Dutch faecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programme. METHODS In this population-based cohort study, we included all invitees for CRC screening in 2018 and 2019. Participation status, birth year, and sex were extracted from the Dutch national screening information system and linked to demographic characteristics from Statistics Netherlands, including migration background, level of education, socioeconomic category, household composition, and household income. A multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association between demographic factors and participation. RESULTS A total of 4,383,861 individuals were invited for CRC screening in 2018 and 2019, of which 3,170,349 (72.3%) participated. Individuals were less likely to participate when they were single and/or living with others (single with other residents versus couple: odds ratio [OR] 0.34, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.31-0.38), had a migration background (e.g. Moroccan migrant versus Dutch background: OR 0.43, 95% CI: 0.42-0.44), or had a low income (lowest versus highest quintile: OR 0.45, 95% CI: 0.44-0.45). Although to a lesser extent, non-participation was also significantly associated with being male, being younger, receiving social welfare benefits and having a low level of education. CONCLUSION We found that individuals who were single and/or living with others, immigrants from Morocco or individuals with low income were the least likely to participate in the Dutch CRC screening programme. Targeted interventions are needed to minimise inequities in CRC screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lucie de Jonge
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Anneke J van Vuuren
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Manon C W Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Christian R B Ramakers
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Folkert J van Kemenade
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Esther Toes-Zoutendijk
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Derks ME, Te Groen M, Peters CP, Dijkstra G, de Vries AC, Romkens TE, Horjus CS, de Boer NK, Bemelman WA, Nagtegaal ID, Derikx LA, Hoentjen F. Endoscopic and surgical treatment outcomes of colitis-associated advanced colorectal neoplasia: a multicenter cohort study. Int J Surg 2023; Publish Ahead of Print:01279778-990000000-00436. [PMID: 37300890 PMCID: PMC10389479 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000000335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/05/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients are at increased risk of advanced neoplasia (high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or colorectal cancer (CRC)). We aimed to (1) assess synchronous and metachronous neoplasia following (sub)total or proctocolectomy, partial colectomy or endoscopic resection for advanced neoplasia in IBD and (2) identify factors associated with treatment choice. MATERIAL AND METHODS In this retrospective multicenter cohort study, we used the Dutch nationwide pathology databank (PALGA) to identify patients diagnosed with IBD and colonic AN between 1991 and 2020 in seven hospitals in the Netherlands. Logistic and Fine&Gray's subdistribution hazard models were used to assess adjusted subdistribution hazard ratios (asHR) for metachronous neoplasia and associations with treatment choice. RESULTS We included 189 patients (HGD n=81; CRC n=108). Patients were treated with proctocolectomy (n=33), (sub)total colectomy (n=45), partial colectomy (n=56) and endoscopic resection (n=38). Partial colectomy was more frequently performed in patients with limited disease and older age, with similar patient characteristics between Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Synchronous neoplasia was found in 43 patients (25.0%; (sub)total or proctocolectomy n=22, partial colectomy n=8, endoscopic resection n=13). We found a metachronous neoplasia rate of 6.1, 11.5 and 13.7 per 100 patient-years after (sub)total colectomy, partial colectomy and endoscopic resection, respectively. Endoscopic resection, but not partial colectomy, was associated with an increased metachronous neoplasia risk (asHR 4.16, 95% CI 1.64-10.54, P<0.01) compared to (sub)total colectomy. CONCLUSION After confounder adjustment, partial colectomy yielded a similar metachronous neoplasia risk compared to (sub)total colectomy. High metachronous neoplasia rates after endoscopic resection underline the importance of strict subsequent endoscopic surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Ew Derks
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Department of Gastroenterology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten Te Groen
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Department of Gastroenterology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Charlotte P Peters
- Department of Gastroenterology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gerard Dijkstra
- Department of Gastroenterology, Groningen University Medical Center, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Annemarie C de Vries
- Department of Gastroenterology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tessa Eh Romkens
- Department of Gastroenterology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, The Netherlands
| | - Carmen S Horjus
- Department of Gastroenterology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Nanne Kh de Boer
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, AGEM Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Willem A Bemelman
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Lauranne Aap Derikx
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Department of Gastroenterology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frank Hoentjen
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Department of Gastroenterology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Hofste LS, Geerlings MJ, Kamping EJ, Kouwenhoven ND, von Rhein D, Jansen EA, Garms LM, Nagtegaal ID, van der Post RS, de Wilt JH, Klarenbeek BR, Ligtenberg MJ. Clinical Validity of Tumor-Informed Circulating Tumor DNA Analysis in Patients Undergoing Surgery of Colorectal Metastases. Dis Colon Rectum 2023; 66:796-804. [PMID: 35857852 PMCID: PMC10191207 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000002443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Accurate biomarkers to monitor tumor load and response in metastatic colorectal cancer patients undergoing surgery could optimize treatment regimens. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to explore the clinical validity of tumor-informed quantification of circulating tumor DNA in blood using ultradeep sequencing. DESIGN Resection specimens from 53 colorectal cancer patients were analyzed for tumor-specific mutations in 15 genes. These mutations were used to measure the presence of circulating tumor DNA in preoperatively collected plasma samples using hybrid capture-based sequencing. Additional postoperative measurements were performed 1 week after surgery in 16 patients. SETTINGS The study was conducted at the Radboud University Medical Center. PATIENTS A total of 53 colorectal cancer patients undergoing surgery of metastases were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The detection of circulating tumor DNA. RESULTS At least 1 tumor-specific mutation was detected in all tumor samples. In preoperative plasma samples, circulating tumor DNA was detected in 88% (37/42) of systemic treatment-naïve patients and in 55% (6/11) of patients who received preoperative chemotherapy. More specifically, circulating tumor DNA was detected in 0% (0/3) of cases with a subtotal or partial pathologic response and in 75% (6/8) of cases without a pathologic response in the resection specimen ( p = 0.06). In postoperative plasma samples, circulating tumor DNA was detected in 80% (4/5) of patients with an incomplete resection and in 0% (0/11) of those with a complete resection ( p = 0.003). LIMITATIONS The study was limited by the heterogeneity of the cohort and the small number of postoperative plasma samples. CONCLUSIONS These data indicate that tumor-informed circulating tumor DNA detection in the plasma of patients undergoing surgery for metastatic colorectal cancer is feasible and may have clinical value in response monitoring and predicting residual disease. Prospective studies are needed to establish the clinical utility of circulating tumor DNA analysis to guide treatment decisions in these patients. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B990 . VALIDEZ CLNICA DEL ANLISIS DE ADN DEL TUMOR CIRCULANTE INFORMADO POR EL TUMOR EN PACIENTES SOMETIDOS A CIRUGA DE METSTASIS COLORRECTALES ANTECEDENTES:Los biomarcadores precisos para monitorear la carga tumoral y la respuesta en pacientes con cáncer colorrectal metastásico que se someten a cirugía podrían optimizar los regímenes de tratamiento.OBJETIVO:Este estudio explora la validez clínica de la cuantificación informada por el tumor del ADN tumoral circulante en sangre mediante secuenciación ultraprofunda.DISEÑO:Se analizaron muestras de resección de 53 pacientes con cáncer colorrectal en busca de mutaciones específicas del tumor en quince genes. Estas mutaciones se usaron para medir la presencia de ADN tumoral circulante en muestras de plasma recolectadas antes de la operación usando secuenciación basada en captura híbrida. Se realizaron mediciones postoperatorias adicionales una semana después de la cirugía en dieciséis pacientes.AJUSTES:El estudio se realizó en el centro médico de la universidad de Radboud.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron un total de 53 pacientes con cáncer colorrectal sometidos a cirugía de metástasis.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:La detección de ADN tumoral circulante.RESULTADOS:Se detectó al menos una mutación específica de tumor en todas las muestras de tumor. En muestras de plasma preoperatorias, se detectó ADN tumoral circulante en el 88% (37/42) de los pacientes sin tratamiento sistémico previo y en el 55% (6/11) de los pacientes que recibieron quimioterapia preoperatoria. Más concretamente, en el 0% (0/3) de los casos con respuesta patológica subtotal o parcial y en el 75% (6/8) de los casos sin respuesta patológica en la pieza de resección ( p = 0,06). En muestras de plasma postoperatorio se detectó ADN tumoral circulante en el 80% (4/5) de los pacientes con una resección incompleta y en el 0% (0/11) de los que tenían resección completa ( p = 0,003).LIMITACIONES:El estudio estuvo limitado por la heterogeneidad de la cohorte y el pequeño número de muestras de plasma postoperatorias.CONCLUSIONES:Estos datos indican que la detección de ADN tumoral circulante informado por el tumor en el plasma de pacientes sometidos a cirugía por cáncer colorrectal metastásico es factible y puede tener valor clínico en el control de la respuesta y la predicción de la enfermedad residual. Se necesitan estudios prospectivos para establecer la utilidad clínica del análisis de ADN tumoral circulante para guiar las decisiones de tratamiento en estos pacientes. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B990 . (Traducción-Dr. Mauricio Santamaria ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa S.M. Hofste
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Maartje J. Geerlings
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Eveline J. Kamping
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Daniel von Rhein
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Erik A.M. Jansen
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Linda M. Garms
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Iris D. Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Marjolijn J.L. Ligtenberg
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Bokhorst JM, Nagtegaal ID, Fraggetta F, Vatrano S, Mesker W, Vieth M, van der Laak J, Ciompi F. Deep learning for multi-class semantic segmentation enables colorectal cancer detection and classification in digital pathology images. Sci Rep 2023; 13:8398. [PMID: 37225743 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-35491-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2022] [Accepted: 05/18/2023] [Indexed: 05/26/2023] Open
Abstract
In colorectal cancer (CRC), artificial intelligence (AI) can alleviate the laborious task of characterization and reporting on resected biopsies, including polyps, the numbers of which are increasing as a result of CRC population screening programs ongoing in many countries all around the globe. Here, we present an approach to address two major challenges in the automated assessment of CRC histopathology whole-slide images. We present an AI-based method to segment multiple ([Formula: see text]) tissue compartments in the H &E-stained whole-slide image, which provides a different, more perceptible picture of tissue morphology and composition. We test and compare a panel of state-of-the-art loss functions available for segmentation models, and provide indications about their use in histopathology image segmentation, based on the analysis of (a) a multi-centric cohort of CRC cases from five medical centers in the Netherlands and Germany, and (b) two publicly available datasets on segmentation in CRC. We used the best performing AI model as the basis for a computer-aided diagnosis system that classifies colon biopsies into four main categories that are relevant pathologically. We report the performance of this system on an independent cohort of more than 1000 patients. The results show that with a good segmentation network as a base, a tool can be developed which can support pathologists in the risk stratification of colorectal cancer patients, among other possible uses. We have made the segmentation model available for research use on https://grand-challenge.org/algorithms/colon-tissue-segmentation/ .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John-Melle Bokhorst
- Department of pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Department of pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Filippo Fraggetta
- Pathology Unit Gravina Hospital, Gravina Hospital, Caltagirone, Italy
| | - Simona Vatrano
- Pathology Unit Gravina Hospital, Gravina Hospital, Caltagirone, Italy
| | - Wilma Mesker
- Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Michael Vieth
- Klinikum Bayreuth, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Jeroen van der Laak
- Department of pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Francesco Ciompi
- Department of pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Nagtegaal ID, Snoek JAA, Bult P, Tol J, Siesling S, Voorham QJ, Hugen N. The value of case reports in rare oncological scenarios: mixed method analysis of colorectal metastases from breast cancer. Clin Exp Metastasis 2023:10.1007/s10585-023-10207-9. [PMID: 37106226 DOI: 10.1007/s10585-023-10207-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 04/13/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023]
Abstract
With improved survival of cancer patients, we increasingly encounter infrequent metastatic locations. While for the common metastatic locations both prognostic information as well as evidence-based guidelines are available, for rare locations we have to rely on anecdotal case reports, the value of which is currently unknown. Therefore, we performed a systemic literature review and compare the results with a large national real-life cohort focussed on breast cancer patients with colorectal metastases. We performed a systematic literature search for breast cancer patients with colorectal metastases. Autopsy studies were excluded. Data on stage, histological factors, treatment and outcome were extracted. All identified cases were analysed as individual patients. The real-life cohort was extracted from the nationwide Dutch pathology databank. Linkage with the Netherlands Cancer Registry provided clinical characteristics, treatment and outcome data. Survival analyses and univariate regression were performed to identify relevant features for future treatment decisions. We identified 308 patients from 207 studies in the literature, and 454 patients in the real-life cohort. Colorectal metastases were the first metastatic event in 42.5% and 47.0% respectively. Cohorts were comparable for age, gender, location and hormone status, but differed in tumour type, stage and treatment. The time to colorectal metastases was similar in both cohorts (median of 68 months), and was dependent on presence of other metastases, nodal status, and primary breast surgery. The median overall survival after development of colorectal metastases was 20.6 months (95%CI 18.0-23.1 months). Despite a potential publication bias and lack of complete data for patients in the case report series, we have shown that an extensive systematic review can provide data that are comparable to real-life data, which can be used for decision-making and informing patients. Colorectal metastases are a late event in breast cancer patients, that is not associated with a detrimental survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I D Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboudumc, 812, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - J A A Snoek
- Department of Pathology, Radboudumc, 812, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- PAL, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
| | - P Bult
- Department of Pathology, Radboudumc, 812, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - J Tol
- Department of Medical Oncology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, The Netherlands
| | - S Siesling
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | | | - N Hugen
- Department of Surgery, Netherland Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Breekveldt ECH, Toes-Zoutendijk E, van de Schootbrugge-Vandermeer HJ, de Jonge L, Kooyker AI, Spaander MCW, van Vuuren AJ, van Kemenade FJ, Ramakers C, Dekker E, Nagtegaal ID, van Leerdam ME, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I. Factors associated with interval colorectal cancer after negative FIT: Results of two screening rounds in the Dutch FIT-based CRC screening program. Int J Cancer 2023; 152:1536-1546. [PMID: 36444504 PMCID: PMC10107864 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2022] [Revised: 11/15/2022] [Accepted: 11/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
The interval colorectal cancer (CRC) rate after negative fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) is an important quality indicator of CRC screening programs. We analyzed the outcomes of two rounds of the FIT-based CRC screening program in the Netherlands, using data from individuals who participated in FIT-screening from 2014 to 2017. Data of individuals with one prior negative FIT (first round) or two prior negative FITs (first and second round) were included. Outcomes included the incidence of interval CRC in FIT-negative participants (<47 μg Hb/g feces [μg/g]), FIT-sensitivity, and the probability of detecting an interval CRC by fecal hemoglobin concentration (f-Hb). FIT-sensitivity was estimated using the detection method and the proportional incidence method (based on expected CRC incidence). Logistic regression analysis was performed to estimate whether f-Hb affects probability of detecting interval CRC, adjusted for sex- and age-differences. Incidence of interval CRC was 10.4 per 10 000 participants after the first and 9.6 after the second screening round. FIT-sensitivity based on the detection method was 84.4% (95%CI 83.8-85.0) in the first and 73.5% (95% CI 71.8-75.2) in the second screening round. The proportional incidence method resulted in a FIT-sensitivity of 76.4% (95%CI 73.3-79.6) in the first and 79.1% (95%CI 73.7-85.3) in the second screening round. After one negative FIT, participants with f-Hb just below the cut-off (>40-46.9 μg/g) had a higher probability of detecting an interval CRC (OR 16.9; 95%CI: 14.0-20.4) than had participants with unmeasurable f-Hb (0-2.6 μg/g). After two screening rounds, the odds ratio for interval CRC was 12.0 (95%CI: 7.8-17.6) for participants with f-Hb just below the cut-off compared with participants with unmeasurable f-Hb. After both screening rounds, the Dutch CRC screening program had a low incidence of interval CRC and an associated high FIT-sensitivity. Our findings suggest there is a potential for further optimizing CRC screening programs with the use of risk-stratified CRC screening based on prior f-Hb.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emilie C H Breekveldt
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Esther Toes-Zoutendijk
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Lucie de Jonge
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Arthur I Kooyker
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Manon C W Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anneke J van Vuuren
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Folkert J van Kemenade
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Christian Ramakers
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers-Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Hermans KEPE, Kazemzadeh F, Loef C, Jansen RLH, Nagtegaal ID, van den Brandt PA, Schouten LJ. Risk factors for cancer of unknown primary: a literature review. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:314. [PMID: 37020279 PMCID: PMC10077635 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-10794-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2022] [Accepted: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 04/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Cancer of Unknown Primary (CUP) is metastatic cancer with an unidentifiable primary tumour origin during life. It remains difficult to study the occurrence and aetiology of CUP. Hitherto, it is unclear whether risk factors are associated with CUP, yet identifying these factors could reveal whether CUP is a specific entity or a cluster of metastasised cancers from various primary tumour origins. Epidemiological studies on possible CUP risk factors were systematically searched in PubMed and Web of Science on February 1st, 2022. Studies, published before 2022, were included if they were observational human-based, provided relative risk estimates, and investigated possible CUP risk factors. A total of 5 case-control and 14 cohort studies were included. There appears to be an increased risk for smoking in relation to CUP. However, limited suggestive evidence was found to link alcohol consumption, diabetes mellitus, and family history of cancer as increased risks for CUP. No conclusive associations could be made for anthropometry, food intake (animal or plant-based), immunity disorders, lifestyle (overall), physical activity, or socioeconomic status and CUP risk. No other CUP risk factors have been studied. This review highlights smoking, alcohol consumption, diabetes mellitus and family history of cancer as CUP risk factors. Yet, there remains insufficient epidemiological evidence to conclude that CUP has its own specific risk factor profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karlijn E P E Hermans
- Department of Epidemiology, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - Fatemeh Kazemzadeh
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Caroline Loef
- Department of Research, Comprehensive Cancer Organization the Netherlands, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Rob L H Jansen
- Department of Research, Comprehensive Cancer Organization the Netherlands, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Piet A van den Brandt
- Department of Epidemiology, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Leo J Schouten
- Department of Epidemiology, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
de Savornin Lohman EAJ, de Bitter TJJ, Hannink G, Wietsma MFT, Vink-Borger E, Nagtegaal ID, Hugh TJ, Gill AJ, Bhimani N, Ahadi MS, van der Post RS, de Reuver PR. Development and External Validation of a Model to Predict Overall Survival in Patients With Resected Gallbladder Cancer. Ann Surg 2023; 277:e856-e863. [PMID: 34387199 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to develop and validate a clinical prediction model to predict overall survival in patients with nonmetastatic, resected gallbladder cancer (GBC). BACKGROUND Although several tools are available, no optimal method has been identified to assess survival in patients with resected GBC. METHODS Data from a Dutch, nation-wide cohort of patients with resected GBC was used to develop a prediction model for overall survival. The model was internally validated and a cohort of Australian GBC patients who underwent resection was used for external validation. The performance of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system and the present model were compared. RESULTS In total, 446 patients were included; 380 patients in the development cohort and 66 patients in the validation cohort. In the development cohort median survival was 22 months (median follow-up 75 months). Age, T/N classification, resection margin, differentiation grade, and vascular invasion were independent predictors of survival. The externally validated C-index was 0.75 (95%CI: 0.69-0.80), implying good discriminatory capacity. The discriminative ability of the present model after internal validation was superior to the ability of the AJCC staging system (Harrell C-index 0.71, [95%CI: 0.69-0.72) vs. 0.59 (95% CI: 0.57-0.60)]. CONCLUSION The proposed model for the prediction of overall survival in patients with resected GBC demonstrates good discriminatory capacity, reasonable calibration and outperforms the authoritative AJCC staging system. This model can be a useful tool for physicians and patients to obtain information about survival after resection and is available from https:// gallbladderresearch.shinyapps.io/Predict_GBC_survival/.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elise A J de Savornin Lohman
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - T J J de Bitter
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute of Molecular Life Sciences, Department of Pathology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - G Hannink
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Operating Rooms, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - M F T Wietsma
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - E Vink-Borger
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute of Molecular Life Sciences, Department of Pathology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - I D Nagtegaal
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute of Molecular Life Sciences, Department of Pathology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - T J Hugh
- Royal North Shore Hospital, Upper GI Surgical Unit, University of Sydney, Australia
| | - A J Gill
- University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - N Bhimani
- Royal North Shore Hospital, Upper GI Surgical Unit, University of Sydney, Australia
| | - M Seyed Ahadi
- Royal North Shore Hospital, Upper GI Surgical Unit, University of Sydney, Australia
| | - R S van der Post
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute of Molecular Life Sciences, Department of Pathology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Philip R de Reuver
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Soons E, Siersema PD, van Lierop LMA, Bisseling TM, van Kouwen MCA, Nagtegaal ID, van der Post RS, Atsma F. Laboratory variation in the grading of dysplasia of duodenal adenomas in familial adenomatous polyposis patients. Fam Cancer 2023; 22:177-186. [PMID: 36401146 PMCID: PMC10020317 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-022-00320-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2022] [Accepted: 11/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
To prevent duodenal and ampullary cancer in familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) patients, a diagnosis of high grade dysplasia (HGD) plays an important role in the clinical management. Previous research showed that FAP patients are both over- and undertreated after a misdiagnosis of HGD, indicating unwarranted variation. We aimed to investigate the laboratory variation in dysplasia grading of duodenal adenomas and explore possible explanations for this variation. We included data from all Dutch pathology laboratories between 1991 and 2020 by retrieving histology reports from upper endoscopy specimens of FAP patients from the Dutch nationwide pathology databank (PALGA). Laboratory variation was investigated by comparing standardized proportions of HGD. To describe the degree of variation between the laboratories a factor score was calculated. A funnel plot was used to identify outliers. A total of 3050 specimens from 25 laboratories were included in the final analyses. The mean observed HGD proportion was 9.4%. The top three HGD-diagnosing laboratories diagnosed HGD 3.9 times more often than the lowest three laboratories, even after correcting for case-mix. No outliers were identified. Moderate laboratory variation was found in HGD diagnoses of duodenal tissue of FAP patients after adjusting for case-mix. Despite the fact that no outliers were observed, there may well be room for quality improvement. Concentration of these patients in expertise centers may decrease variation. To further reduce unwarranted variation, we recommend (inter)national guidelines to become more uniform in their recommendations regarding duodenal tissue sampling and consequences of HGD diagnoses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Soons
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - P D Siersema
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - L M A van Lierop
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - T M Bisseling
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - M C A van Kouwen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - I D Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - R S van der Post
- Department of Pathology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - F Atsma
- Department of IQ Healthcare, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Bokhorst JM, Nagtegaal ID, Zlobec I, Dawson H, Sheahan K, Simmer F, Kirsch R, Vieth M, Lugli A, van der Laak J, Ciompi F. Semi-Supervised Learning to Automate Tumor Bud Detection in Cytokeratin-Stained Whole-Slide Images of Colorectal Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15072079. [PMID: 37046742 PMCID: PMC10093661 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15072079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2023] [Revised: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 03/29/2023] [Indexed: 04/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Tumor budding is a histopathological biomarker associated with metastases and adverse survival outcomes in colorectal carcinoma (CRC) patients. It is characterized by the presence of single tumor cells or small clusters of cells within the tumor or at the tumor-invasion front. In order to obtain a tumor budding score for a patient, the region with the highest tumor bud density must first be visually identified by a pathologist, after which buds will be counted in the chosen hotspot field. The automation of this process will expectedly increase efficiency and reproducibility. Here, we present a deep learning convolutional neural network model that automates the above procedure. For model training, we used a semi-supervised learning method, to maximize the detection performance despite the limited amount of labeled training data. The model was tested on an independent dataset in which human- and machine-selected hotspots were mapped in relation to each other and manual and machine detected tumor bud numbers in the manually selected fields were compared. We report the results of the proposed method in comparison with visual assessment by pathologists. We show that the automated tumor bud count achieves a prognostic value comparable with visual estimation, while based on an objective and reproducible quantification. We also explore novel metrics to quantify buds such as density and dispersion and report their prognostic value. We have made the model available for research use on the grand-challenge platform.
Collapse
|
31
|
Ten Hoorn S, Mol L, Sommeijer DW, Nijman L, van den Bosch T, de Back TR, Ylstra B, van Dijk E, van Noesel CJM, Reinten RJ, Nagtegaal ID, Koopman M, Punt CJA, Vermeulen L. Long-term Survival Update and Extended RAS Mutational Analysis of the CAIRO2 Trial: Addition of Cetuximab to CAPOX/Bevacizumab in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2023; 22:67-75. [PMID: 36564280 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2022.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2022] [Revised: 11/16/2022] [Accepted: 11/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Here we present updated survival of the CAIRO2 trial and assessed whether the addition of anti-EGFR to anti-VEGF therapy could still be an effective treatment option for patients with extended RAS/BRAF wildtype and left-sided metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). MATERIALS AND METHODS Retrospective updated survival and extended RAS and BRAF V600E mutational analysis were performed in the CAIRO2 trial, a multicenter, randomized phase III trial on the effect of adding cetuximab to a combination of capecitabine, oxaliplatin (CAPOX), and bevacizumab in mCRC. RESULTS Updated survival analysis confirmed that the addition of cetuximab did not provide a benefit on either progression free (PFS) or overall survival (OS) in the intention-to-treat population. With the extended mutational analyses 31 KRAS, 31 NRAS and 12 BRAF V600E additional mutations were found. No benefit of the addition of cetuximab was observed within the extended wildtype group, even when selecting only left-sided tumors (PFS HR 0.96, p = 0.7775). However, compared to the original trial an increase of 6.5 months was seen for patients with both extended wildtype and left-sided tumors (median OS 28.6 months). CONCLUSION Adding cetuximab to CAPOX and bevacizumab does not provide clinical benefit in patients with mCRC, even in the extended wildtype group with left-sided tumors. However, in the extended wildtype group we did observe clinically relevant higher survival compared to the initial trial report, indicating that it is important to analyze a broader panel of RAS and BRAF variants using more recent sequencing techniques when assessing survival benefit after anti-EGFR therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanne Ten Hoorn
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Oncode Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Linda Mol
- Clinical Research Department, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Center (IKNL), Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Dirkje W Sommeijer
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Flevohospital, Department of Internal Medicine, Almere, The Netherlands
| | - Lisanne Nijman
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Oncode Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Tom van den Bosch
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Oncode Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Gastroenterology & Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tim R de Back
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Oncode Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Bauke Ylstra
- Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Erik van Dijk
- Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Carel J M van Noesel
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Department of Pathology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Roy J Reinten
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Department of Pathology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Miriam Koopman
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis J A Punt
- Department of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Louis Vermeulen
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Oncode Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Krul MF, Elferink MAG, Kok NFM, Dekker E, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Meijer GA, Nagtegaal ID, Breekveldt ECH, Ruers TJM, van Leerdam ME, Kuhlmann KFD. Initial Impact of National CRC Screening on Incidence and Advanced Colorectal Cancer. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 21:797-807.e3. [PMID: 36116753 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.08.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Revised: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 08/26/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) aims to decrease CRC incidence and mortality. Biennial fecal immunochemical test screening started in the Netherlands in 2014 for individuals 55-75 years of age. This study investigated the effect of screening on stage-specific incidence, with focus on stage III and IV CRC. METHODS Inhabitants diagnosed with CRC in 2009-2018 were included. CRC incidence per stage, year, and detection method (ie, screen-detected vs clinically detected) was evaluated. Patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics, and survival of patients with stage III and IV CRC, were compared according to the detection method. RESULTS Included were 140,649 CRCs in 136,882 patients. An initial peak of stage I-III CRC diagnoses after initiation of screening was followed by a continuous decrease within screening-eligible ages. Total CRC incidence remained higher than before screening, although stage II and IV CRC incidence decreased below prescreening levels. Screen-detected CRCs were significantly more frequently located in the left-sided colon (stage III; 43.7% vs 30.9%; stage IV: 45.1% vs 36.1%), and the primary tumor resection rate was higher (stage III colon: 99.8% vs 99.0%, rectum: 97.3% vs 89.7%; stage IV colon: 65.4% vs 56.6%, rectum: 47.3% vs 33.5%). Patients with screen-detected stage IV CRC had significantly more often single-organ metastases (74.5% vs 57.0%; P < .001) and more frequently received treatment with curative intent (colon: 41.3% vs 27.4%; rectum: 33.8% vs 24.6%). Overall survival significantly improved for patients with screen-detected CRCs (stage III: P < .001; stage IV: P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Five years after the start of a nationwide CRC screening program, a decrease in stage II and IV CRC incidence was observed. Patients with screen-detected stage III and stage IV CRC had less extensive disease and improved survival compared with those with clinically detected CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Myrtle F Krul
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Marloes A G Elferink
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Niels F M Kok
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gerrit A Meijer
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Emilie C H Breekveldt
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Theo J M Ruers
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Koert F D Kuhlmann
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Breekveldt ECH, Toes-Zoutendijk E, de Jonge L, Spaander MCW, Dekker E, van Kemenade FJ, van Vuuren AJ, Ramakers CRB, Nagtegaal ID, van Leerdam ME, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I. Personalized colorectal cancer screening: study protocol of a mixed-methods study on the effectiveness of tailored intervals based on prior f-Hb concentration in a fit-based colorectal cancer screening program (PERFECT-FIT). BMC Gastroenterol 2023; 23:45. [PMID: 36814185 PMCID: PMC9948315 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-023-02670-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2014, the national population-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program was implemented in the Netherlands. Biennial fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) for hemoglobin (Hb) is used at a cut-off of 47 µg Hb per gram feces. The CRC screening program successfully started, with high participation rates and yield of screening. Now that the program has reached a steady state, there is potential to further optimize the program. Previous studies showed that prior fecal Hb (f-Hb) concentrations just below the FIT cut-off are associated with a higher risk for detection of advanced neoplasia (AN) at subsequent screening rounds. We aim to achieve a better balance between the harms and benefits of CRC screening by offering participants tailored invitation intervals based on prior f-Hb concentrations after negative FIT. METHODS This mixed-methods study will be performed within the Dutch national CRC screening program and will consist of: (1) a randomized controlled trial (RCT), (2) focus group studies, and (3) decision modelling. The primary outcome is the yield of AN per screened individual in personalized screening vs. uniform screening. Secondary outcomes are perspectives on, acceptability of and adherence to personalized screening, as well as long-term outcomes of personalized vs. uniform screening. The RCT will include 20,000 participants of the Dutch CRC screening program; 10,000 in the intervention and 10,000 in the control arm. The intervention arm will receive a personalized screening interval based on the prior f-Hb concentration (1, 2 or 3 years). The control arm will receive a screening interval according to current practice (2 years). The focus group studies are designed to understand individuals' perspectives on and acceptability of personalized CRC screening. Results of the RCT will be incorporated into the MISCAN-Colon model to determine long-term benefits, harms, and costs of personalized vs. uniform CRC screening. DISCUSSION The aim of this study is to evaluate the yield, feasibility, acceptability and (cost-) effectiveness of personalized CRC screening through tailored invitation intervals based on prior f-Hb concentrations. This knowledge may be of guidance for health policy makers and may provide evidence for implementing personalized CRC screening in The Netherlands and/or other countries using FIT as screening modality. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05423886, June 21, 2022, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05423886.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emilie C. H. Breekveldt
- grid.5645.2000000040459992XDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands ,grid.430814.a0000 0001 0674 1393Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Esther Toes-Zoutendijk
- grid.5645.2000000040459992XDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lucie de Jonge
- grid.5645.2000000040459992XDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Manon C. W. Spaander
- grid.5645.2000000040459992XDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Evelien Dekker
- grid.7177.60000000084992262Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre – Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Folkert J. van Kemenade
- grid.5645.2000000040459992XDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anneke J. van Vuuren
- grid.5645.2000000040459992XDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Christian R. B. Ramakers
- grid.5645.2000000040459992XDepartment of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Iris D. Nagtegaal
- grid.10417.330000 0004 0444 9382Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Monique E. van Leerdam
- grid.430814.a0000 0001 0674 1393Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands ,grid.10419.3d0000000089452978Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
- grid.5645.2000000040459992XDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Verhage AR, Nagtegaal ID, van der Feen C, Wolfs TFW. Through the Looking Glass: A Child With Arthralgia, Malaise and Weight Loss. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2023:00006454-990000000-00347. [PMID: 36795585 DOI: 10.1097/inf.0000000000003869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/17/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Aline R Verhage
- From the Department of Pediatric infectious diseases, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht.,University Medical Center of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Tom F W Wolfs
- From the Department of Pediatric infectious diseases, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Ueno H, Nagtegaal ID, Quirke P, Sugihara K, Ajioka Y. Tumor deposits in colorectal cancer: Refining their definition in the
TNM
system. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2023; 7:225-235. [PMID: 36998291 PMCID: PMC10043773 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2022] [Revised: 11/23/2022] [Accepted: 12/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Tumor deposits (TDs) are discontinuous tumor spread in the mesocolon/mesorectum which is found in approximately 20% of colorectal cancer (CRC) and negatively affects survival. We have a history of repeated revisions on TD definition and categorization in the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) system leading to stage migration. Since 1997, TDs have been categorized as T or N factors depending on their size (TNM5) or contour (TNM6). In 2009, TNM7 provided the category of N1c for TDs in a case without positive lymph nodes (LNs), which is also used in TNM8. However, increasing evidence suggests that these revisions are suboptimal and only "partially" successful. Specifically, the N1c rule is certainly useful for oncologists who are having difficulty with TDs in a case with no positive LNs. However, it has failed to maximize the value of the TNM system because of the underused prognostic information of individual TDs. Recently, the potential value of an alternative staging method has been highlighted in several studies using the "counting method." For this method, all nodular type TDs are individually counted together with positive LNs to derive the final pN, yielding a prognostic and diagnostic value that is superior to existing TNM systems. The TNM system has long stuck to the origin of TDs in providing its categorization, but it is time to make way for alternative options and initiate an international discussion on optimal treatment of TDs in tumor staging; otherwise, a proportion of patients end up missing an opportunity to receive the optimal adjuvant treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hideki Ueno
- Department of SurgeryNational Defense Medical CollegeSaitamaJapan
| | - Iris D. Nagtegaal
- Department of PathologyRadboud University Medical CentreNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | - Philip Quirke
- Division of Pathology and Data AnalyticsUniversity of Leeds, St James's University HospitalLeedsUK
| | - Kenichi Sugihara
- Department of Surgical OncologyTokyo Medical and Dental University, Graduate School of Medical and Dental SciencesTokyoJapan
| | - Yoichi Ajioka
- Division of Molecular and Diagnostic PathologyNiigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental SciencesNiigataJapan
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
van Toledo DEFWM, Breekveldt ECH, IJspeert JEG, van Vuuren AJ, van Kemenade FJ, Ramakers C, Nagtegaal ID, van Leerdam ME, Spaander MCW, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Toes-Zoutendijk E, Dekker E. Advanced serrated polyps as a target of screening: detection rate and positive predictive value within a fecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening population. Endoscopy 2023; 55:526-534. [PMID: 36323332 DOI: 10.1055/a-1971-3488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND : Advanced serrated polyps (ASPs) have a comparable risk to advanced adenomas for progression to colorectal cancer (CRC). The yield of most CRC screening programs, however, is based on advanced adenomas and CRC only. We assessed the ASP detection rate, and positive predictive value (PPV) including ASPs in a fecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based screening program. METHODS : We analyzed the findings of follow-up colonoscopies of FIT-positive screenees in the Dutch CRC screening program from 2014 until 2020. Data were retrieved from the national screening and pathology database. An ASP was defined as any serrated polyp of ≥ 10 mm, sessile serrated lesion with dysplasia, or traditional serrated adenoma. The ASP detection rate was defined as the proportion of colonoscopies with ≥ 1 ASP. PPV was originally defined as the proportion of individuals with a CRC or advanced adenoma. The updated PPV definition included CRCs, advanced adenomas, and/or ASPs. RESULTS : 322 882 colonoscopies were included in the analyses. The overall detection rate of ASPs was 5.9 %. ASPs were detected more often in women than men (6.3 % vs. 5.6 %; P < 0.001). ASP detection rates in individuals aged 55-59, 60-64, 65-69, and 70 + were 5.2 %, 6.1 %, 6.1 %, and 5.9 %, respectively (P < 0.001). The PPV for CRCs and advanced adenomas was 41.1 % and increased to 43.8 % when including ASPs. The PPV increase was larger in women than in men (3.2 vs. 2.4 percentage points). CONCLUSIONS : 5.9 % of FIT-positive screenees had ASPs, but half of these were detected in combination with a CRC or advanced adenoma. Therefore, including ASPs results in a small increase in the yield of FIT-based screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David E F W M van Toledo
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology & Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Emilie C H Breekveldt
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Joep E G IJspeert
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology & Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anneke J van Vuuren
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Folkert J van Kemenade
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Christian Ramakers
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Department of Gastroenterology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Manon C W Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Esther Toes-Zoutendijk
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology & Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Mlecnik B, Lugli A, Bindea G, Marliot F, Bifulco C, Lee JKJ, Zlobec I, Rau TT, Berger MD, Nagtegaal ID, Vink-Börger E, Hartmann A, Geppert CI, Kolwelter J, Merkel S, Grützmann R, Van den Eynde M, Jouret-Mourin A, Kartheuser A, Léonard D, Remue C, Wang J, Bavi P, Roehrl MHA, Ohashi PS, Nguyen LT, Han S, MacGregor HL, Hafezi-Bakhtiari S, Wouters BG, Masucci GV, Andersson EK, Zavadova E, Vocka M, Spacek J, Petruzelka L, Konopasek B, Dundr P, Skalova H, Nemejcova K, Botti G, Tatangelo F, Delrio P, Ciliberto G, Maio M, Laghi L, Grizzi F, Fredriksen T, Buttard B, Lafontaine L, Maby P, Majdi A, Hijazi A, El Sissy C, Kirilovsky A, Berger A, Lagorce C, Paustian C, Ballesteros-Merino C, Dijkstra J, van de Water C, Vliet SVLV, Knijn N, Mușină AM, Scripcariu DV, Popivanova B, Xu M, Fujita T, Hazama S, Suzuki N, Nagano H, Okuno K, Torigoe T, Sato N, Furuhata T, Takemasa I, Patel P, Vora HH, Shah B, Patel JB, Rajvik KN, Pandya SJ, Shukla SN, Wang Y, Zhang G, Kawakami Y, Marincola FM, Ascierto PA, Fox BA, Pagès F, Galon J. Multicenter International Study of the Consensus Immunoscore for the Prediction of Relapse and Survival in Early-Stage Colon Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15020418. [PMID: 36672367 PMCID: PMC9856473 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15020418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2022] [Revised: 12/23/2022] [Accepted: 01/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The prognostic value of Immunoscore was evaluated in Stage II/III colon cancer (CC) patients, but it remains unclear in Stage I/II, and in early-stage subgroups at risk. An international Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) study evaluated the pre-defined consensus Immunoscore in tumors from 1885 AJCC/UICC-TNM Stage I/II CC patients from Canada/USA (Cohort 1) and Europe/Asia (Cohort 2). METHODS: Digital-pathology is used to quantify the densities of CD3+ and CD8+ T-lymphocyte in the center of tumor (CT) and the invasive margin (IM). The time to recurrence (TTR) was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), prognosis in Stage I, Stage II, Stage II-high-risk, and microsatellite-stable (MSS) patients. RESULTS: High-Immunoscore presented with the lowest risk of recurrence in both cohorts. In Stage I/II, recurrence-free rates at 5 years were 78.4% (95%-CI, 74.4−82.6), 88.1% (95%-CI, 85.7−90.4), 93.4% (95%-CI, 91.1−95.8) in low, intermediate and high Immunoscore, respectively (HR (Hi vs. Lo) = 0.27 (95%-CI, 0.18−0.41); p < 0.0001). In Cox multivariable analysis, the association of Immunoscore to outcome was independent (TTR: HR (Hi vs. Lo) = 0.29, (95%-CI, 0.17−0.50); p < 0.0001) of the patient’s gender, T-stage, sidedness, and microsatellite instability-status (MSI). A significant association of Immunoscore with survival was found for Stage II, high-risk Stage II, T4N0 and MSS patients. The Immunoscore also showed significant association with TTR in Stage-I (HR (Hi vs. Lo) = 0.07 (95%-CI, 0.01−0.61); P = 0.016). The Immunoscore had the strongest (69.5%) contribution χ2 for influencing survival. Patients with a high Immunoscore had prolonged TTR in T4N0 tumors even for patients not receiving chemotherapy, and the Immunoscore remained the only significant parameter in multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION: In early CC, low Immunoscore reliably identifies patients at risk of relapse for whom a more intensive surveillance program or adjuvant treatment should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernhard Mlecnik
- INSERM, Laboratory of Integrative Cancer Immunology, 75006 Paris, France
- Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, 75006 Paris, France
- Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris, 75006 Paris, France
- Inovarion, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Alessandro Lugli
- Institute of Pathology, University of Bern, 3008 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Gabriela Bindea
- INSERM, Laboratory of Integrative Cancer Immunology, 75006 Paris, France
- Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, 75006 Paris, France
- Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris, 75006 Paris, France
| | - Florence Marliot
- INSERM, Laboratory of Integrative Cancer Immunology, 75006 Paris, France
- Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, 75006 Paris, France
- Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris, 75006 Paris, France
- Immunomonitoring Platform, Laboratory of Immunology, AP-HP, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Carlo Bifulco
- Department of Pathology, Providence Portland Medical Center, Portland, OR 97213, USA
| | - Jiun-Kae Jack Lee
- Department of Biostatistics, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Inti Zlobec
- Institute of Pathology, University of Bern, 3008 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Tilman T. Rau
- Institute of Pathology, University of Bern, 3008 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Martin D. Berger
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Iris D. Nagtegaal
- Pathology Department, Radboud University, 6500 HC Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Elisa Vink-Börger
- Pathology Department, Radboud University, 6500 HC Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Arndt Hartmann
- Department of Pathology, University Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Carol I. Geppert
- Department of Pathology, University Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Julie Kolwelter
- Department of Pathology, University Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Susanne Merkel
- Department of Surgery, University Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Robert Grützmann
- Department of Surgery, University Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Marc Van den Eynde
- Institut Roi Albert II, Department of Medical Oncology, Cliniques Universitaires St-Luc, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
- Institut de Recherche Clinique et Experimentale (Pole MIRO), Université Catholique de Louvain, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Anne Jouret-Mourin
- Department of Pathology, Cliniques Universitaires St-Luc, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
- Institut de Recherche Clinique et Experimentale (Pole GAEN), Université Catholique de Louvain, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Alex Kartheuser
- Institut Roi Albert II, Department of Digestive Surgery, Cliniques Universitaires St-Luc Université Catholique de Louvain, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Daniel Léonard
- Institut Roi Albert II, Department of Digestive Surgery, Cliniques Universitaires St-Luc Université Catholique de Louvain, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Christophe Remue
- Institut Roi Albert II, Department of Digestive Surgery, Cliniques Universitaires St-Luc Université Catholique de Louvain, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Julia Wang
- Curandis, New York, NY 10583, USA
- Department of Pathology, Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, 11-E444, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada
| | - Prashant Bavi
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada
| | - Michael H. A. Roehrl
- Department of Pathology, Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, 11-E444, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | | | - Linh T. Nguyen
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON M5G 2C1, Canada
| | - SeongJun Han
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON M5G 2C1, Canada
| | | | - Sara Hafezi-Bakhtiari
- Department of Pathology, Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, 11-E444, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada
| | | | - Giuseppe V. Masucci
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Emilia K. Andersson
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Eva Zavadova
- Department of Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, General University Hospital in Prague, Charles University, 12808 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Michal Vocka
- Department of Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, General University Hospital in Prague, Charles University, 12808 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Jan Spacek
- Department of Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, General University Hospital in Prague, Charles University, 12808 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Lubos Petruzelka
- Department of Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, General University Hospital in Prague, Charles University, 12808 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Bohuslav Konopasek
- Department of Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, General University Hospital in Prague, Charles University, 12808 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Pavel Dundr
- Institute of Pathology, First Faculty of Medicine, General University Hospital in Prague, Charles University, 12808 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Helena Skalova
- Institute of Pathology, First Faculty of Medicine, General University Hospital in Prague, Charles University, 12808 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Kristyna Nemejcova
- Institute of Pathology, First Faculty of Medicine, General University Hospital in Prague, Charles University, 12808 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Gerardo Botti
- Department of Pathology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Napoli, Italy
| | - Fabiana Tatangelo
- Department of Pathology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Napoli, Italy
| | - Paolo Delrio
- Colorectal Surgery Department, Instituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Napoli, Italy
| | | | - Michele Maio
- Center for Immuno-Oncology, University Hospital, 53100 Siena, Italy
| | - Luigi Laghi
- Laboratory of Molecular Gastroenterology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, 20090 Milan, Italy
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43125 Parma, Italy
| | - Fabio Grizzi
- Department of Immunology and Inflammation, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, 20090 Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20072 Milan, Italy
| | - Tessa Fredriksen
- INSERM, Laboratory of Integrative Cancer Immunology, 75006 Paris, France
- Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, 75006 Paris, France
- Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris, 75006 Paris, France
| | - Bénédicte Buttard
- INSERM, Laboratory of Integrative Cancer Immunology, 75006 Paris, France
- Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, 75006 Paris, France
- Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris, 75006 Paris, France
| | - Lucie Lafontaine
- INSERM, Laboratory of Integrative Cancer Immunology, 75006 Paris, France
- Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, 75006 Paris, France
- Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris, 75006 Paris, France
| | - Pauline Maby
- INSERM, Laboratory of Integrative Cancer Immunology, 75006 Paris, France
- Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, 75006 Paris, France
- Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris, 75006 Paris, France
| | - Amine Majdi
- INSERM, Laboratory of Integrative Cancer Immunology, 75006 Paris, France
- Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, 75006 Paris, France
- Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris, 75006 Paris, France
| | - Assia Hijazi
- INSERM, Laboratory of Integrative Cancer Immunology, 75006 Paris, France
- Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, 75006 Paris, France
- Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris, 75006 Paris, France
| | - Carine El Sissy
- INSERM, Laboratory of Integrative Cancer Immunology, 75006 Paris, France
- Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, 75006 Paris, France
- Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris, 75006 Paris, France
- Immunomonitoring Platform, Laboratory of Immunology, AP-HP, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Amos Kirilovsky
- INSERM, Laboratory of Integrative Cancer Immunology, 75006 Paris, France
- Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, 75006 Paris, France
- Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris, 75006 Paris, France
- Immunomonitoring Platform, Laboratory of Immunology, AP-HP, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Anne Berger
- INSERM, Laboratory of Integrative Cancer Immunology, 75006 Paris, France
- Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, 75006 Paris, France
- Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris, 75006 Paris, France
- Digestive Surgery Department, AP-HP, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Christine Lagorce
- INSERM, Laboratory of Integrative Cancer Immunology, 75006 Paris, France
- Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, 75006 Paris, France
- Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris, 75006 Paris, France
- Department of Pathology, AP-HP, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Christopher Paustian
- Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - Carmen Ballesteros-Merino
- Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - Jeroen Dijkstra
- Pathology Department, Radboud University, 6500 HC Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Nikki Knijn
- Pathology Department, Radboud University, 6500 HC Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Ana-Maria Mușină
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Regional Institute of Oncology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Grigore T. Popa”, 700115 Iaşi, Romania
| | - Dragos-Viorel Scripcariu
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Regional Institute of Oncology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Grigore T. Popa”, 700115 Iaşi, Romania
| | - Boryana Popivanova
- Division of Cellular Signaling, Institute for Advanced Medical Research, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan
| | - Mingli Xu
- Division of Cellular Signaling, Institute for Advanced Medical Research, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan
| | - Tomonobu Fujita
- Division of Cellular Signaling, Institute for Advanced Medical Research, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan
| | - Shoichi Hazama
- Department of Translational Research and Developmental Therapeutics against Cancer, Yamaguchi University School of Medicine, Yamaguchi 755-8505, Japan
| | - Nobuaki Suzuki
- Department of Gastroenterological, Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi 753-8511, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Nagano
- Department of Gastroenterological, Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi 753-8511, Japan
| | - Kiyotaka Okuno
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Kindai University, Osaka-sayama 589-0014, Japan
| | - Toshihiko Torigoe
- Department of Pathology, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo 060-8556, Japan
| | - Noriyuki Sato
- Department of Pathology, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo 060-8556, Japan
| | - Tomohisa Furuhata
- Department of Surgery, Surgical Oncology, and Science, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo 060-8556, Japan
| | - Ichiro Takemasa
- Department of Surgery, Surgical Oncology, and Science, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo 060-8556, Japan
| | - Prabhu Patel
- The Gujarat Cancer & Research Institute, Asarwa, Ahmedabad 380016, India
| | - Hemangini H. Vora
- The Gujarat Cancer & Research Institute, Asarwa, Ahmedabad 380016, India
| | - Birva Shah
- The Gujarat Cancer & Research Institute, Asarwa, Ahmedabad 380016, India
| | | | - Kruti N. Rajvik
- The Gujarat Cancer & Research Institute, Asarwa, Ahmedabad 380016, India
| | - Shashank J. Pandya
- The Gujarat Cancer & Research Institute, Asarwa, Ahmedabad 380016, India
| | - Shilin N. Shukla
- The Gujarat Cancer & Research Institute, Asarwa, Ahmedabad 380016, India
| | - Yili Wang
- Institute for Cancer Research, School of Basic Medical Science, Xi’an 710061, China
- Health Science Center of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, China
| | - Guanjun Zhang
- Institute for Cancer Research, School of Basic Medical Science, Xi’an 710061, China
| | - Yutaka Kawakami
- Division of Cellular Signaling, Institute for Advanced Medical Research, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan
| | | | - Paolo A. Ascierto
- Melanoma Cancer Immunotherapy and Innovative Therapies Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione “G. Pascale”, 80131 Napoli, Italy
| | - Bernard A. Fox
- Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
- Laboratory of Molecular and Tumor Immunology, Earle A. Chiles Research Institute, Robert W. Franz Cancer Center, Providence Portland Medical Center, Portland, OR 97213, USA
| | - Franck Pagès
- INSERM, Laboratory of Integrative Cancer Immunology, 75006 Paris, France
- Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, 75006 Paris, France
- Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris, 75006 Paris, France
- Immunomonitoring Platform, Laboratory of Immunology, AP-HP, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Jérôme Galon
- INSERM, Laboratory of Integrative Cancer Immunology, 75006 Paris, France
- Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, 75006 Paris, France
- Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris, 75006 Paris, France
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +33-1-4427-9085
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Nagtegaal ID, Vink-Börger E, Kuijpers CCHJ, Dekker E, Shepherd NA. Incidental findings in the bowel cancer population screening program: other polyps and malignancies - A nationwide study. Histopathology 2023; 82:254-263. [PMID: 36156277 PMCID: PMC10092619 DOI: 10.1111/his.14805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2022] [Revised: 09/02/2022] [Accepted: 09/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The introduction of bowel cancer population screening programs has had a profound impact on gastrointestinal pathology. While the focus is mainly on quality assurance of diagnoses relevant for the outcome of these programs (colorectal cancer and its precursors), incidental findings are increasingly diagnosed. The incidence of such findings is largely unknown. Therefore, we investigated the incidence of incidental findings within the national screening program of the Netherlands. From the Dutch nationwide pathology databank (PALGA), we retrieved all histological diagnoses of patients participating in the national bowel cancer screening program from the start in 2014 until 1/1/2021. Descriptive statistics were used. During these 7 years, in total 9407 other polyps and malignancies (262 per 10,000 colonoscopies) were diagnosed. The majority (65%) were classified as inflammatory polyps. The most common malignancies were neuroendocrine tumours (n = 198, 6 per 10,000 colonoscopies); less common were lymphomas (n = 64) and metastases (n = 33). Mesenchymal polyps, such as leiomyomas and lipomas, were relatively common (27 and 16 per 10,000 colonoscopies, respectively), in comparison with neural polyps such as perineuriomas, ganglioneuromas, and neurofibromas (respectively 3, 2, and 1 per 10,000 colonoscopies). This is the largest study into the incidence of nonconventional colorectal polyps and malignancies in a homogeneous cohort of asymptomatic patients. Several of these diagnoses may have consequences for treatment and follow-up, in particular the malignancies and detection of patients with hereditary cancer syndromes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Neil A Shepherd
- Gloucestershire Cellular Pathology Laboratory, Cheltenham General Hospital, Cheltenham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
van Zwam PH, Vink-Börger EM, Bronkhorst CM, de Bruine AP, van der Wurff AA, Rutten HJT, Lemmens VEPP, Nagtegaal ID, Hugen N. Prognosis of mucinous colon cancer is determined by histological biomarkers rather than microsatellite instability. Histopathology 2023; 82:314-323. [PMID: 36217248 PMCID: PMC10100398 DOI: 10.1111/his.14818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2022] [Revised: 09/14/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
The prognostic value of microsatellite instability (MSI), as well as other histological characteristics such as lymphovascular invasion (LI), perineural invasion (PNI) and extramural vascular invasion (EMVI), is unclear in colorectal mucinous carcinoma (MC). This study aims to determine the relevance of these factors in MC patients and analyses the role of MSI in stage III MC patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. A cohort of 650 patients diagnosed with stages I-IV colonic MC from 2000 to 2010 was selected from PALGA, the nationwide Dutch pathology databank. Histopathology was revised and mismatch repair (MMR) status determined. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed. Deficient MMR (dMMR) was found in 33% of MCs and correlated with female gender and right-sidedness, but also with lower tumour stage (stages I/II: 73.2 versus 47%; P < 0.0001) and the absence of EMVI (9.7 versus 23.7%; P < 0.0001) and PNI (5.6 versus 12.7%; P = 0.005). On univariate analysis OS was better for dMMR MC than for proficient MMR (pMMR) MC (median OS of 9.7 versus 5.0 years; P = 0.009), but MMR status was no longer a relevant prognostic factor on multivariate analysis [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.70-1.18]. Stage III MC patients benefited from adjuvant chemotherapy, and dMMR status was associated with better OS in this group (HR = 0.35, 95% CI = 0.13-0.94). EMVI, LI and PNI, but not MMR, status are independent prognostic factors for survival in MC patients. Stage III MC patients benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy and dMMR status is associated with improved survival when adjuvant chemotherapy is given.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen
| | - Niek Hugen
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen.,Department of Surgery, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Meester RGS, van de Schootbrugge-Vandermeer HJ, Breekveldt ECH, de Jonge L, Toes-Zoutendijk E, Kooyker A, Nieboer D, Ramakers CR, Spaander MCW, van Vuuren AJ, Kuipers EJ, van Kemenade FJ, Nagtegaal ID, Dekker E, van Leerdam ME, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I. Faecal occult blood loss accurately predicts future detection of colorectal cancer. A prognostic model. Gut 2023; 72:101-108. [PMID: 35537811 PMCID: PMC9763180 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-327188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 04/16/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To examine the prognostic potential of repeated faecal haemoglobin (F-Hb) concentration measurements in faecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based screening for colorectal cancer (CRC). DESIGN Prognostic model. SETTING Dutch biennial FIT-based screening programme during 2014-2018. PARTICIPANTS 265 881 participants completing three rounds of FIT, with negative test results (F-Hb <47 µg Hb/g faeces) in rounds 1 and 2. INTERVENTIONS Colonoscopy follow-up in participants with a positive FIT (F-Hb ≥47 µg Hb/g faeces). MAIN OUTCOMES We evaluated prognostic models for detecting advanced neoplasia (AN) and CRC in round 3, with as predictors, participant age, sex, F-Hb in rounds 1 and 2, and categories/combinations/non-linear transformations of F-Hb. Primary evaluation criteria included: risk prediction accuracy (calibration), discrimination of participants with versus without AN or CRC (optimism-adjusted C-statistics, range 0.5-1.0), the degree of risk stratification and C-statistics in external validation. RESULTS Among study participants, 8806 (3.3%) had a positive FIT result, 3254 (1.2%) had AN detected and 557 (0.2%) had cancer. F-Hb concentrations in rounds 1 and 2 were the strongest outcome predictors, with adjusted ORs of up to 9.4 (95% CI 7.5 to 11.7) for the highest F-Hb category. Risk predictions matched the observed risk for most participants (calibration intercept -0.008 to -0.099; slope 0.982-0.998), and discriminated participants with versus without AN or CRC with C-statistics of 0.78 (95% CI 0.77 to 0.79) and 0.73 (95% CI 0.71 to 0.75), respectively. The predicted risk ranged from 0.4% to 36.7% for AN and from 0.0% to 5.5% for CRC across participants. In external validation, the model retained similar discrimination accuracy for AN (C-statistic 0.77, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.87) and CRC (C-statistic 0.78, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.91). CONCLUSION Participants at lower versus higher risk of future AN or CRC can be accurately identified based on their age, sex and particularly, prior F-Hb concentrations. Risk stratification should be considered based on this information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reinier G S Meester
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Emilie C H Breekveldt
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lucie de Jonge
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Esther Toes-Zoutendijk
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Arthur Kooyker
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daan Nieboer
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Christian R Ramakers
- Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Manon C W Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anneke J van Vuuren
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ernst J Kuipers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands,Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
van der Strate I, Kazemzadeh F, Nagtegaal ID, Robbrecht D, van de Wouw A, Padilla CS, Duijts S, Esteller M, Greco FA, Pavlidis N, Qaseem A, Snaebjornsson P, van Zanten SV, Loef C. International consensus on the initial diagnostic workup of cancer of unknown primary. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2023; 181:103868. [PMID: 36435296 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2022] [Revised: 11/04/2022] [Accepted: 11/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although the incidence of Cancer of Unknown Primary (CUP) is estimated to be 1-2 % of all cancers worldwide, no international standards for diagnostic workup are yet established. Such an international guideline would facilitate international comparison, provide adequate incidence and survival rates, and ultimately improve care of patients with CUP. METHODS Participants for a four round modified Delphi study were selected via a CUP literature search in PubMed and an international network of cancer researchers. A total of 90 CUP experts were invited, and 34 experts from 15 countries over four continents completed all Delphi survey rounds. FINDINGS The Delphi procedure resulted in a multi-layer CUP classification for the diagnostic workup. Initial diagnostic workup should at least consist of history and physical examination, full blood count, analysis of serum markers, a biopsy of the most accessible lesion, a CT scan of chest/abdomen/pelvis, and immunohistochemical testing. Additionally, the expert panel agreed on the need of an ideal diagnostic lead time for CUP patients. There was no full consensus on the place in diagnostic workup of symptom-guided MRI or ultrasound, a PET/CT scan, targeted gene panels, immunohistochemical markers, and whole genome sequencing. INTERPRETATION Consensus was reached on the contents of the first diagnostic layer of a multi-layer CUP classification. This is a first step towards full consensus on CUP diagnostics, that should also include supplementary and advanced diagnostics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iris van der Strate
- Department of Research and Development, Comprehensive Cancer Organization the Netherlands, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Fatemeh Kazemzadeh
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Debbie Robbrecht
- Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Agnes van de Wouw
- Department of Medical Oncology, VieCuri Medical Center, Venlo, the Netherlands
| | - Catarina S Padilla
- Department of Research and Development, Comprehensive Cancer Organization the Netherlands, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Saskia Duijts
- Department of Research and Development, Comprehensive Cancer Organization the Netherlands, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Medical Psychology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Manel Esteller
- Josep Carreras Leukemia Research Institute (IJC), Badalona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain; Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red Cancer (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain; Institucio Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain; Physiological Sciences Department, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - F Anthony Greco
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Cancer Center, Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Nicholas Pavlidis
- Medical School, University of Ioannina, Stavros Niarchou Avenue, 45110, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Amir Qaseem
- American College of Physicians, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Petur Snaebjornsson
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sophie Veldhuijzen van Zanten
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Caroline Loef
- Department of Research and Development, Comprehensive Cancer Organization the Netherlands, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
de Bitter TJJ, de Reuver PR, de Savornin Lohman EAJ, Kroeze LI, Vink-Börger ME, van Vliet S, Simmer F, von Rhein D, Jansen EAM, Verheij J, van Herpen CML, Nagtegaal ID, Ligtenberg MJL, van der Post RS. Comprehensive clinicopathological and genomic profiling of gallbladder cancer reveals actionable targets in half of patients. NPJ Precis Oncol 2022; 6:83. [DOI: 10.1038/s41698-022-00327-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2022] [Accepted: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
AbstractGallbladder cancer (GBC) is a rare, highly aggressive malignancy with a 5-year survival rate of 5–10% in advanced cases, highlighting the need for more effective therapies. The aim of this study was to identify potentially actionable therapeutic targets for GBC. Specimens and clinicopathological data of 642 GBC patients, diagnosed between 2000 and 2019 were collected using the Dutch Pathology Registry (PALGA) and the Netherlands Cancer Registry. All cases were histologically reviewed and a subset was subjected to a comprehensive next generation sequencing panel. We assessed mutations and gene amplifications in a panel of 54 actionable genes, tumor-mutational burden (TMB), and microsatellite instability (MSI). Additionally, the entire cohort was screened for HER2, PD-L1, pan-TRK, and p53 expression with immunohistochemistry. Histopathological subtypes comprised biliary-type adenocarcinoma (AC, 69.6%), intestinal-type AC (20.1%) and other subtypes (10.3%). The median total TMB was 5.5 mutations/Mb (range: 0–161.1) and 17.7% of evaluable cases had a TMB of >10 mutations/Mb. MSI was observed in two cases. Apart from mutations in TP53 (64%), tumors were molecularly highly heterogeneous. Half of the tumors (50%) carried at least one molecular alteration that is targetable in other tumor types, including alterations in CDKN2A (6.0% biallelically inactivated), ERBB2 (9.3%) and PIK3CA (10%). Immunohistochemistry results correlated well with NGS results for HER2 and p53: Pearson r = 0.82 and 0.83, respectively. As half of GBC patients carry at least one potentially actionable molecular alteration, molecular testing may open the way to explore targeted therapy options for GBC patients.
Collapse
|
43
|
Latacz E, Höppener D, Bohlok A, Leduc S, Tabariès S, Fernández Moro C, Lugassy C, Nyström H, Bozóky B, Floris G, Geyer N, Brodt P, Llado L, Van Mileghem L, De Schepper M, Majeed AW, Lazaris A, Dirix P, Zhang Q, Petrillo SK, Vankerckhove S, Joye I, Meyer Y, Gregorieff A, Roig NR, Vidal-Vanaclocha F, Denis L, Oliveira RC, Metrakos P, Grünhagen DJ, Nagtegaal ID, Mollevi DG, Jarnagin WR, D’Angelica MI, Reynolds AR, Doukas M, Desmedt C, Dirix L, Donckier V, Siegel PM, Barnhill R, Gerling M, Verhoef C, Vermeulen PB. Histopathological growth patterns of liver metastasis: updated consensus guidelines for pattern scoring, perspectives and recent mechanistic insights. Br J Cancer 2022; 127:988-1013. [PMID: 35650276 PMCID: PMC9470557 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-022-01859-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2020] [Revised: 04/19/2022] [Accepted: 05/11/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The first consensus guidelines for scoring the histopathological growth patterns (HGPs) of liver metastases were established in 2017. Since then, numerous studies have applied these guidelines, have further substantiated the potential clinical value of the HGPs in patients with liver metastases from various tumour types and are starting to shed light on the biology of the distinct HGPs. In the present guidelines, we give an overview of these studies, discuss novel strategies for predicting the HGPs of liver metastases, such as deep-learning algorithms for whole-slide histopathology images and medical imaging, and highlight liver metastasis animal models that exhibit features of the different HGPs. Based on a pooled analysis of large cohorts of patients with liver-metastatic colorectal cancer, we propose a new cut-off to categorise patients according to the HGPs. An up-to-date standard method for HGP assessment within liver metastases is also presented with the aim of incorporating HGPs into the decision-making processes surrounding the treatment of patients with liver-metastatic cancer. Finally, we propose hypotheses on the cellular and molecular mechanisms that drive the biology of the different HGPs, opening some exciting preclinical and clinical research perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Latacz
- grid.5284.b0000 0001 0790 3681Translational Cancer Research Unit, GZA Hospitals, Iridium Netwerk and University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Diederik Höppener
- grid.508717.c0000 0004 0637 3764Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ali Bohlok
- grid.418119.40000 0001 0684 291XDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Sophia Leduc
- grid.5596.f0000 0001 0668 7884Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sébastien Tabariès
- grid.14709.3b0000 0004 1936 8649Department of Medicine, Rosalind and Morris Goodman Cancer Research Institute, McGill University, Montreal, QC Canada
| | - Carlos Fernández Moro
- grid.4714.60000 0004 1937 0626Department of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden ,grid.24381.3c0000 0000 9241 5705Department of Clinical Pathology and Cancer Diagnostics, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden
| | - Claire Lugassy
- grid.418596.70000 0004 0639 6384Department of Translational Research, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Hanna Nyström
- grid.12650.300000 0001 1034 3451Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden ,grid.12650.300000 0001 1034 3451Wallenberg Centre for Molecular Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Béla Bozóky
- grid.24381.3c0000 0000 9241 5705Department of Clinical Pathology and Cancer Diagnostics, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden
| | - Giuseppe Floris
- grid.5596.f0000 0001 0668 7884Department of Imaging and Pathology, Laboratory of Translational Cell & Tissue Research and University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium ,grid.410569.f0000 0004 0626 3338Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Leuven, Campus Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Natalie Geyer
- grid.4714.60000 0004 1937 0626Department of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden
| | - Pnina Brodt
- grid.63984.300000 0000 9064 4811Department of Surgery, Oncology and Medicine, McGill University and the Research Institute, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC Canada
| | - Laura Llado
- grid.418284.30000 0004 0427 2257HBP and Liver Transplantation Unit, Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, IDIBELL, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Catalonia Spain
| | - Laura Van Mileghem
- grid.5284.b0000 0001 0790 3681Translational Cancer Research Unit, GZA Hospitals, Iridium Netwerk and University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Maxim De Schepper
- grid.5596.f0000 0001 0668 7884Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ali W. Majeed
- grid.31410.370000 0000 9422 8284Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Anthoula Lazaris
- grid.63984.300000 0000 9064 4811Cancer Research Program, McGill University Health Centre Research Institute, Montreal, QC Canada
| | - Piet Dirix
- grid.5284.b0000 0001 0790 3681Translational Cancer Research Unit, GZA Hospitals, Iridium Netwerk and University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Qianni Zhang
- grid.4868.20000 0001 2171 1133School of Electronic Engineering and Computer Science, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Stéphanie K. Petrillo
- grid.63984.300000 0000 9064 4811Cancer Research Program, McGill University Health Centre Research Institute, Montreal, QC Canada
| | - Sophie Vankerckhove
- grid.418119.40000 0001 0684 291XDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Ines Joye
- grid.5284.b0000 0001 0790 3681Translational Cancer Research Unit, GZA Hospitals, Iridium Netwerk and University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Yannick Meyer
- grid.508717.c0000 0004 0637 3764Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alexander Gregorieff
- grid.63984.300000 0000 9064 4811Cancer Research Program, McGill University Health Centre Research Institute, Montreal, QC Canada ,grid.14709.3b0000 0004 1936 8649Department of Pathology, McGill University, Montreal, QC Canada ,grid.14709.3b0000 0004 1936 8649Regenerative Medicine Network, McGill University, Montreal, QC Canada
| | - Nuria Ruiz Roig
- grid.411129.e0000 0000 8836 0780Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Catalonia Spain ,grid.418284.30000 0004 0427 2257Tumoral and Stromal Chemoresistance Group, Oncobell Program, IDIBELL, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Catalonia Spain ,grid.5841.80000 0004 1937 0247Human Anatomy and Embryology Unit, Department of Pathology and Experimental Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia Spain
| | - Fernando Vidal-Vanaclocha
- grid.253615.60000 0004 1936 9510GWU-Cancer Center, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, School of Medicine & Health Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Larsimont Denis
- grid.418119.40000 0001 0684 291XDepartment of Pathology, Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Rui Caetano Oliveira
- grid.28911.330000000106861985Pathology Department, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal ,grid.8051.c0000 0000 9511 4342Clinical Academic Center of Coimbra (CACC), Coimbra, Portugal ,grid.8051.c0000 0000 9511 4342Coimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research (iCBR) area of Environment Genetics and Oncobiology (CIMAGO), Institute of Biophysics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Peter Metrakos
- grid.63984.300000 0000 9064 4811Cancer Research Program, McGill University Health Centre Research Institute, Montreal, QC Canada
| | - Dirk J. Grünhagen
- grid.508717.c0000 0004 0637 3764Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Iris D. Nagtegaal
- grid.10417.330000 0004 0444 9382Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - David G. Mollevi
- grid.418284.30000 0004 0427 2257Tumoral and Stromal Chemoresistance Group, Oncobell Program, IDIBELL, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Catalonia Spain ,grid.418701.b0000 0001 2097 8389Program Against Cancer Therapeutic Resistance (ProCURE), Institut Català d’Oncologia, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Catalonia Spain
| | - William R. Jarnagin
- grid.51462.340000 0001 2171 9952Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY USA
| | - Michael I D’Angelica
- grid.51462.340000 0001 2171 9952Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY USA
| | - Andrew R. Reynolds
- grid.417815.e0000 0004 5929 4381Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
| | - Michail Doukas
- grid.5645.2000000040459992XDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Christine Desmedt
- grid.5596.f0000 0001 0668 7884Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Luc Dirix
- grid.5284.b0000 0001 0790 3681Translational Cancer Research Unit, GZA Hospitals, Iridium Netwerk and University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Vincent Donckier
- grid.418119.40000 0001 0684 291XDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Peter M. Siegel
- grid.14709.3b0000 0004 1936 8649Department of Medicine, Rosalind and Morris Goodman Cancer Research Institute, McGill University, Montreal, QC Canada ,grid.14709.3b0000 0004 1936 8649Departments of Medicine, Biochemistry, Anatomy & Cell Biology, McGill University, Montreal, QC Canada
| | - Raymond Barnhill
- grid.418596.70000 0004 0639 6384Department of Translational Research, Institut Curie, Paris, France ,Université de Paris l’UFR de Médecine, Paris, France
| | - Marco Gerling
- grid.4714.60000 0004 1937 0626Department of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden ,grid.24381.3c0000 0000 9241 5705Theme Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden
| | - Cornelis Verhoef
- grid.508717.c0000 0004 0637 3764Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Peter B. Vermeulen
- grid.5284.b0000 0001 0790 3681Translational Cancer Research Unit, GZA Hospitals, Iridium Netwerk and University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Swillens J, Voorham Q, Akkermans RP, Nagtegaal ID, Hermens R. Nationwide implementation of a multifaceted, tailored strategy to improve uptake of standardized structured reporting in oncological pathology: An effect and process evaluation. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.28_suppl.336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
336 Background: Implementation strategies improve guideline adherence. Effect and process evaluations are conducted to provide insights into success or failure of implementation strategies. We conducted both evaluations to determine nationwide implementation of standardized structured reporting (SSR) in pathology, to facilitate optimal treatment decisions in oncology care. Methods: We conducted an interrupted time series analysis to evaluate the effect of a fully digital nationwide implementation strategy on SSR use in pathology laboratories. We further conducted a process evaluation to evaluate the exposure to the strategy elements, the experiences of the users with the implementation strategy and remaining barriers of SSR implementation. We also tested whether being exposed to a specific element of the strategy resulted in more increase of average SSR use. Results: There was a significant increase in average SSR use directly after the strategy introduction for reporting of gastrointestinal ( p =.018) and urological ( p =.003) oncological diagnoses. A significant increase was present for all oncological resections as a group ( p =.007). The “Feedback button”, an option within the templates used for standardized structured reporting to provide feedback to the provider and one of the elements of the implementation strategy, was most frequently used by the SSR users and effectiveness results showed that it increased average SSR use after strategy introduction. Remaining barriers most related to rigidity, time consumption and content of SSR. Conclusions: Nationwide SSR implementation improved for specific tumor types and retrieval methods. Next step will be to further improve the use of SSR, and simultaneously, to further develop potential benefits of high SSR use, focusing on re-using discrete pathology data. In this way, we can eventually facilitate proper treatment decisions in oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Swillens
- Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare (IQ Healthcare), Radboud Institute for Health Sciences (RIHS), Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | | | - Reinier P. Akkermans
- Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare (IQ Healthcare), Radboud Institute for Health Sciences (RIHS), Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Iris D. Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Rosella Hermens
- Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Graham Martínez C, Barella Y, Kus Öztürk S, Ansems M, Gorris MA, van Vliet S, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID. The immune microenvironment landscape shows treatment-specific differences in rectal cancer patients. Front Immunol 2022; 13:1011498. [PMID: 36238289 PMCID: PMC9552175 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1011498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2022] [Accepted: 08/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Neoadjuvant therapy is the cornerstone of modern rectal cancer treatment. Insights into the biology of tumor responses are essential for the successful implementation of organ-preserving strategies, as different treatments may lead to specific tumor responses. In this study, we aim to explore treatment-specific responses of the tumor microenvironment. Patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the rectum who had received neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (CT), neo-adjuvant radiochemotherapy (RCT), neo-adjuvant radiotherapy with a long-interval (LRT) or short-interval (SRT) or no neoadjuvant therapy (NT) as control were included. Multiplex-immunofluorescence was performed to determine the presence of cytotoxic T-cells (T-cyt; CD3+CD8+), regulatory T-cells (T-reg; CD3+FOXP3+), T-helper cells (T-helper; CD3+CD8-FOXP3-), B cells (CD20+), dendritic cells (CD11c+) and tumor cells (panCK+). A total of 80 rectal cancer patients were included. Treatment groups were matched for gender, tumor location, response to therapy, and TNM stage. The pattern of response (shrinkage vs. fragmentation) was, however, different between treatment groups. Our analyses reveal that RCT-treated patients exhibited lower stromal T-helper, T-reg, and T-cyt cells compared to other treatment regimens. In conclusion, we demonstrated treatment-specific differences in the immune microenvironment landscape of rectal cancer patients. Understanding the underlying mechanisms of this landscape after a specific therapy will benefit future treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Graham Martínez
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
- *Correspondence: Cristina Graham Martínez,
| | - Yari Barella
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Sonay Kus Öztürk
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Marleen Ansems
- Radiotherapy & OncoImmunology Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Mark A.J Gorris
- Department of Tumor Immunology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Shannon van Vliet
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Corrie A.M Marijnen
- Department of Radiotherapy, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Mlecnik B, Torigoe T, Bindea G, Popivanova B, Xu M, Fujita T, Hazama S, Suzuki N, Nagano H, Okuno K, Hirohashi Y, Furuhata T, Takemasa I, Patel P, Vora H, Shah B, Patel JB, Rajvik KN, Pandya SJ, Shukla SN, Wang Y, Zhang G, Yoshino T, Taniguchi H, Bifulco C, Lugli A, Lee JKJ, Zlobec I, Rau TT, Berger MD, Nagtegaal ID, Vink-Börger E, Hartmann A, Geppert CI, Kolwelter J, Merkel S, Grützmann R, Van den Eynde M, Jouret-Mourin A, Kartheuser A, Léonard D, Remue C, Wang J, Bavi P, Roehrl MHA, Ohashi PS, Nguyen LT, Han S, MacGregor HL, Hafezi-Bakhtiari S, Wouters BG, Masucci GV, Andersson E, Zavadova E, Vocka M, Spacek J, Petruzelka L, Konopasek B, Dundr P, Skalova H, Nemejcova K, Botti G, Tatangelo F, Delrio P, Ciliberto G, Maio M, Laghi L, Grizzi F, Marliot F, Fredriksen T, Buttard B, Lafontaine L, Maby P, Majdi A, Hijazi A, El Sissy C, Kirilovsky A, Berger A, Lagorce C, Paustian C, Ballesteros-Merino C, Dijkstra J, Van de Water C, van Lent-van Vliet S, Knijn N, Mușină AM, Scripcariu DV, Marincola FM, Ascierto PA, Fox BA, Pagès F, Kawakami Y, Galon J. Clinical Performance of the Consensus Immunoscore in Colon Cancer in the Asian Population from the Multicenter International SITC Study. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14184346. [PMID: 36139506 PMCID: PMC9497086 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14184346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2022] [Revised: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 09/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In this study, we evaluated the prognostic value of Immunoscore in patients with stage I−III colon cancer (CC) in the Asian population. These patients were originally included in an international study led by the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) on 2681 patients with AJCC/UICC-TNM stages I−III CC. METHODS: CD3+ and cytotoxic CD8+ T-lymphocyte densities were quantified in the tumor and invasive margin by digital pathology. The association of Immunoscore with prognosis was evaluated for time to recurrence (TTR), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Immunoscore stratified Asian patients (n = 423) into different risk categories and was not impacted by age. Recurrence-free rates at 3 years were 78.5%, 85.2%, and 98.3% for a Low, Intermediate, and High Immunoscore, respectively (HR[Low-vs-High] = 7.26 (95% CI 1.75−30.19); p = 0.0064). A High Immunoscore showed a significant association with prolonged TTR, OS, and DFS (p < 0.05). In Cox multivariable analysis stratified by center, Immunoscore association with TTR was independent (HR[Low-vs-Int+High] = 2.22 (95% CI 1.10−4.55) p = 0.0269) of the patient’s gender, T-stage, N-stage, sidedness, and MSI status. A significant association of a High Immunoscore with prolonged TTR was also found among MSS (HR[Low-vs-Int+High] = 4.58 (95% CI 2.27−9.23); p ≤ 0.0001), stage II (HR[Low-vs-Int+High] = 2.72 (95% CI 1.35−5.51); p = 0.0052), low-risk stage-II (HR[Low-vs-Int+High] = 2.62 (95% CI 1.21−5.68); p = 0.0146), and high-risk stage II patients (HR[Low-vs-Int+High] = 3.11 (95% CI 1.39−6.91); p = 0.0055). CONCLUSION: A High Immunoscore is significantly associated with the prolonged survival of CC patients within the Asian population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernhard Mlecnik
- INSERM, Laboratory of Integrative Cancer Immunology, 75006 Paris, France
- Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris, 75006 Paris, France
- Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, 75006 Paris, France
- Inovarion, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Toshihiko Torigoe
- Department of Pathology, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo 060-8556, Japan
| | - Gabriela Bindea
- INSERM, Laboratory of Integrative Cancer Immunology, 75006 Paris, France
- Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris, 75006 Paris, France
- Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, 75006 Paris, France
| | - Boryana Popivanova
- Division of Cellular Signaling, Institute for Advanced Medical Research, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan
| | - Mingli Xu
- Division of Cellular Signaling, Institute for Advanced Medical Research, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan
| | - Tomonobu Fujita
- Division of Cellular Signaling, Institute for Advanced Medical Research, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan
| | - Shoichi Hazama
- Department of Translational Research and Developmental Therapeutics against Cancer, Yamaguchi University School of Medicine, Yamaguchi 755-8505, Japan
| | - Nobuaki Suzuki
- Department of Gastroenterological, Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi 753-8511, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Nagano
- Department of Gastroenterological, Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi 753-8511, Japan
| | - Kiyotaka Okuno
- Department of Surgery, Kindai University, School of Medicine, Osakasayama 589-0014, Japan
| | - Yoshihiko Hirohashi
- Department of Pathology, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo 060-8556, Japan
| | - Tomohisa Furuhata
- Department of Surgery, Surgical Oncology, and Science, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo 060-8556, Japan
| | - Ichiro Takemasa
- Department of Surgery, Surgical Oncology, and Science, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo 060-8556, Japan
| | - Prabhudas Patel
- The Gujarat Cancer & Research Institute, Asarwa, Ahmedabad 380016, India
| | - Hemangini Vora
- The Gujarat Cancer & Research Institute, Asarwa, Ahmedabad 380016, India
| | - Birva Shah
- The Gujarat Cancer & Research Institute, Asarwa, Ahmedabad 380016, India
| | | | - Kruti N. Rajvik
- The Gujarat Cancer & Research Institute, Asarwa, Ahmedabad 380016, India
| | - Shashank J. Pandya
- The Gujarat Cancer & Research Institute, Asarwa, Ahmedabad 380016, India
| | - Shilin N. Shukla
- The Gujarat Cancer & Research Institute, Asarwa, Ahmedabad 380016, India
| | - Yili Wang
- Institute for Cancer Research, School of Basic Medical Science, Xi’an 710061, China
- Health Science Center of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, China
| | - Guanjun Zhang
- Institute for Cancer Research, School of Basic Medical Science, Xi’an 710061, China
- Health Science Center of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, China
| | - Takayuki Yoshino
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa-shi 277-8577, Japan
| | - Hiroya Taniguchi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa-shi 277-8577, Japan
| | - Carlo Bifulco
- Department of Pathology, Providence Portland Medical Center, Portland, OR 97213, USA
| | - Alessandro Lugli
- Institute of Pathology, University of Bern, 3008 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Jiun-Kae Jack Lee
- Department of Biostatistics, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Inti Zlobec
- Institute of Pathology, University of Bern, 3008 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Tilman T. Rau
- Institute of Pathology, University of Bern, 3008 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Martin D. Berger
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Iris D. Nagtegaal
- Pathology Department, Radboud University, 6500 HC Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Elisa Vink-Börger
- Pathology Department, Radboud University, 6500 HC Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Arndt Hartmann
- Department of Pathology, University Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Carol I. Geppert
- Department of Pathology, University Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Julie Kolwelter
- Department of Pathology, University Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Susanne Merkel
- Department of Surgery, University Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Robert Grützmann
- Department of Surgery, University Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Marc Van den Eynde
- Institut Roi Albert II, Department of Medical Oncology, Cliniques Universitaires St-Luc, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
- Institut de Recherche Clinique et Experimentale (Pole MIRO), Université Catholique de Louvain, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Anne Jouret-Mourin
- Department of Pathology, Cliniques Universitaires St-Luc, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
- Institut de Recherche Clinique et Experimentale (Pole GAEN), Université Catholique de Louvain, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Alex Kartheuser
- Institut Roi Albert II, Department of Digestive Surgery, Cliniques Universitaires St-Luc Université Catholique de Louvain, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Daniel Léonard
- Institut Roi Albert II, Department of Digestive Surgery, Cliniques Universitaires St-Luc Université Catholique de Louvain, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Christophe Remue
- Institut Roi Albert II, Department of Digestive Surgery, Cliniques Universitaires St-Luc Université Catholique de Louvain, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Julia Wang
- Curandis, New York, NY 10583, USA
- Department of Pathology, Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, 11-E444, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada
| | - Prashant Bavi
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada
| | - Michael H. A. Roehrl
- Department of Pathology, Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, 11-E444, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | | | - Linh T. Nguyen
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON M5G 2C1, Canada
| | - SeongJun Han
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON M5G 2C1, Canada
| | | | - Sara Hafezi-Bakhtiari
- Department of Pathology, Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, 11-E444, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada
| | | | - Giuseppe V. Masucci
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Emilia Andersson
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Eva Zavadova
- Department of Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, General University Hospital in Prague, Charles University, 12808 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Michal Vocka
- Department of Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, General University Hospital in Prague, Charles University, 12808 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Jan Spacek
- Department of Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, General University Hospital in Prague, Charles University, 12808 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Lubos Petruzelka
- Department of Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, General University Hospital in Prague, Charles University, 12808 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Bohuslav Konopasek
- Department of Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, General University Hospital in Prague, Charles University, 12808 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Pavel Dundr
- Institute of Pathology, First Faculty of Medicine, General University Hospital in Prague, Charles University, 12808 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Helena Skalova
- Institute of Pathology, First Faculty of Medicine, General University Hospital in Prague, Charles University, 12808 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Kristyna Nemejcova
- Institute of Pathology, First Faculty of Medicine, General University Hospital in Prague, Charles University, 12808 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Gerardo Botti
- Department of Pathology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Fabiana Tatangelo
- Department of Pathology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Paolo Delrio
- Colorectal Surgery Department, Instituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | | | - Michele Maio
- Center for Immuno-Oncology, University Hospital, 53100 Siena, Italy
| | - Luigi Laghi
- Laboratory of Molecular Gastroenterology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, 20090 Milan, Italy
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43125 Parma, Italy
| | - Fabio Grizzi
- Department of Immunology and Inflammation, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, 20090 Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20072 Milan, Italy
| | - Florence Marliot
- INSERM, Laboratory of Integrative Cancer Immunology, 75006 Paris, France
- Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris, 75006 Paris, France
- Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, 75006 Paris, France
- Immunomonitoring Platform, Laboratory of Immunology, AP-HP, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Tessa Fredriksen
- INSERM, Laboratory of Integrative Cancer Immunology, 75006 Paris, France
- Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris, 75006 Paris, France
- Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, 75006 Paris, France
| | - Bénédicte Buttard
- INSERM, Laboratory of Integrative Cancer Immunology, 75006 Paris, France
- Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris, 75006 Paris, France
- Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, 75006 Paris, France
| | - Lucie Lafontaine
- INSERM, Laboratory of Integrative Cancer Immunology, 75006 Paris, France
- Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris, 75006 Paris, France
- Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, 75006 Paris, France
| | - Pauline Maby
- INSERM, Laboratory of Integrative Cancer Immunology, 75006 Paris, France
- Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris, 75006 Paris, France
- Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, 75006 Paris, France
| | - Amine Majdi
- INSERM, Laboratory of Integrative Cancer Immunology, 75006 Paris, France
- Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris, 75006 Paris, France
- Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, 75006 Paris, France
| | - Assia Hijazi
- INSERM, Laboratory of Integrative Cancer Immunology, 75006 Paris, France
- Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris, 75006 Paris, France
- Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, 75006 Paris, France
| | - Carine El Sissy
- INSERM, Laboratory of Integrative Cancer Immunology, 75006 Paris, France
- Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris, 75006 Paris, France
- Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, 75006 Paris, France
- Immunomonitoring Platform, Laboratory of Immunology, AP-HP, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Amos Kirilovsky
- INSERM, Laboratory of Integrative Cancer Immunology, 75006 Paris, France
- Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris, 75006 Paris, France
- Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, 75006 Paris, France
- Immunomonitoring Platform, Laboratory of Immunology, AP-HP, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Anne Berger
- INSERM, Laboratory of Integrative Cancer Immunology, 75006 Paris, France
- Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris, 75006 Paris, France
- Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, 75006 Paris, France
- Digestive Surgery Department, AP-HP, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Christine Lagorce
- INSERM, Laboratory of Integrative Cancer Immunology, 75006 Paris, France
- Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris, 75006 Paris, France
- Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, 75006 Paris, France
- Department of Pathology, AP-HP, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Christopher Paustian
- Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - Carmen Ballesteros-Merino
- Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - Jeroen Dijkstra
- Pathology Department, Radboud University, 6500 HC Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Nikki Knijn
- Pathology Department, Radboud University, 6500 HC Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Ana-Maria Mușină
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Regional Institute of Oncology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Grigore T. Popa”, 700115 Iaşi, Romania
| | - Dragos-Viorel Scripcariu
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Regional Institute of Oncology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Grigore T. Popa”, 700115 Iaşi, Romania
| | | | - Paolo A. Ascierto
- Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Innovative Therapies Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione “G. Pascale”, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Bernard A. Fox
- Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
- Laboratory of Molecular and Tumor Immunology, Earle A. Chiles Research Institute, Robert W. Franz Cancer Center, Providence Portland Medical Center, Portland, OR 97213, USA
| | - Franck Pagès
- INSERM, Laboratory of Integrative Cancer Immunology, 75006 Paris, France
- Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris, 75006 Paris, France
- Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, 75006 Paris, France
- Immunomonitoring Platform, Laboratory of Immunology, AP-HP, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Yutaka Kawakami
- Division of Cellular Signaling, Institute for Advanced Medical Research, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan
| | - Jérôme Galon
- INSERM, Laboratory of Integrative Cancer Immunology, 75006 Paris, France
- Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris, 75006 Paris, France
- Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, 75006 Paris, France
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +33-1-4427-9085
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Höppener DJ, Stook JLPL, Galjart B, Nierop PMH, Nagtegaal ID, Vermeulen PB, Grünhagen DJ, Verhoef C, Doukas M. The relationship between primary colorectal cancer histology and the histopathological growth patterns of corresponding liver metastases. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:911. [PMID: 35996090 PMCID: PMC9394040 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09994-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The histopathological growth patterns (HGPs) are a prognostic and predictive biomarker in colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM). This study evaluates the relationship between the HGP and primary colorectal cancer (CRC) histopathology. Methods A total of 183 treatment-naive patients with resected CRC and CRLM were included. Thirteen CRC histopathology markers were determined and compared between the desmoplastic and non-desmoplastic HGP; tumour sidedness, pT&pN stage, tumour grade, tumour deposits, perineural- (lympho-)vascular- and extramural venous invasion, peritumoural budding, stroma type, CRC growth pattern, Crohn’s-like lymphoid reaction, and tumour-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) density. Logistic regression analysis was performed using both CRC and CRLM characteristics. Results Unfavourable CRC histopathology was more frequent in non-desmoplastic CRLM for all markers evaluated, and significantly so for a lower TIL density, absent Crohn’s-like lymphoid reaction, and a “non-mature” stroma (all p < 0.03). The cumulative prevalence of unfavourable CRC histopathology was significantly higher in patients with non-desmoplastic compared to desmoplastic CRLM, with a median (IQR) of 4 (3–6) vs 2 (1–3.5) unfavourable characteristics observed, respectively (p < 0.001). Multivariable regression with 9 CRC histopathology markers and 2 CRLM characteristics achieved good discriminatory performance (AUC = 0.83). Conclusions The results of this study associates primary CRC histopathology with the HGP of corresponding liver metastases. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09994-3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diederik J Höppener
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jean-Luc P L Stook
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Boris Galjart
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Pieter M H Nierop
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Peter B Vermeulen
- Translational Cancer Research Unit (GZA Hospitals and University of Antwerp), Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Dirk J Grünhagen
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Michail Doukas
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Swillens JEM, Voorham QJM, Akkermans RP, Nagtegaal ID, Hermens RPMG. Nationwide implementation of a multifaceted tailored strategy to improve uptake of standardized structured reporting in pathology: an effect and process evaluation. Implement Sci 2022; 17:52. [PMID: 35907877 PMCID: PMC9338618 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-022-01224-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2022] [Accepted: 07/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Implementation strategies are aimed at improving guideline adherence. Both effect and process evaluations are conducted to provide insights into the success or failure of these strategies. In our study, we evaluate the nationwide implementation of standardized structured reporting (SSR) in pathology. Methods An interrupted time series analysis was conducted to evaluate the effect of a previously developed implementation strategy, which consisted of various digitally available elements, on SSR in pathology laboratories. A segmented regression analysis was performed to analyze the change in mean SSR percentages directly after the strategy introduction for pathology reporting and specific subcategories. In addition, we analyzed the change in trend in the weekly percentages after strategy introduction, also for subgroups of tumor groups, retrieval methods, and type of laboratory. The change in SSR use after the strategy introduction was determined for all pathology laboratories. We further conducted a process evaluation in which the exposure to the strategy elements was determined. Experiences of the users with all strategy elements and the remaining barriers and potential strategy elements were evaluated through an eSurvey. We also tested whether exposure to a specific element and a combination of elements resulted in a higher uptake of SSR after strategy introduction. Results There was a significant increase in an average use of SSR after the strategy introduction for reporting of gastrointestinal (p=.018) and urological (p=.003) oncological diagnoses. A significant increase was present for all oncological resections as a group (p=.007). Thirty-three out of 42 pathology laboratories increased SSR use after the strategy introduction. The “Feedback button”, an option within the templates for SSR to provide feedback to the provider and one of the elements of the implementation strategy, was most frequently used by the SSR users, and effectiveness results showed that it increased average SSR use after the strategy introduction. Barriers were still present for SSR implementation. Conclusions Nationwide SSR implementation improved for specific tumor groups and retrieval methods. The next step will be to further improve the use of SSR and, simultaneously, to further develop potential benefits of high SSR use, focusing on re-using discrete pathology data. In this way, we can facilitate proper treatment decisions in oncology. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13012-022-01224-5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie E M Swillens
- Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare (IQ Healthcare), Radboud Institute for Health Sciences (RIHS), Radboud University Medical Centre, Postbus 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, Kapittelweg 54 (route 160), Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | | | - Reinier P Akkermans
- Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare (IQ Healthcare), Radboud Institute for Health Sciences (RIHS), Radboud University Medical Centre, Postbus 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, Kapittelweg 54 (route 160), Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences (RIMLS), Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Rosella P M G Hermens
- Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare (IQ Healthcare), Radboud Institute for Health Sciences (RIHS), Radboud University Medical Centre, Postbus 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, Kapittelweg 54 (route 160), Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Kryklyva V, Luchini C, Stommel MWJ, Nagtegaal ID, Brosens LAA. Detecting Lynch syndrome in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma FNA cytology based on cancer history and immunocytochemistry. Gut 2022; 71:1450-1451. [PMID: 34667094 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-326033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 10/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Valentyna Kryklyva
- Department of Pathology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Claudio Luchini
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Martijn W J Stommel
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Lodewijk A A Brosens
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Swets M, Graham Martinez C, van Vliet S, van Tilburg A, Gelderblom H, Marijnen CAM, van de Velde CJH, Nagtegaal ID. Microsatellite instability in rectal cancer: what does it mean? A study of two randomized trials and a systematic review of the literature. Histopathology 2022; 81:352-362. [PMID: 35758193 PMCID: PMC9541309 DOI: 10.1111/his.14710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2022] [Revised: 04/06/2022] [Accepted: 05/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Currently, compelling evidence illustrates the significance of determining microsatellite instability (MSI) in colorectal cancer (CRC). The association of MSI with proximal CRC is well established, however, its implications in patients with rectal cancer remain undefined. We therefore aimed to determine the role of MSI with respect to incidence and outcome in patients with rectal cancer, by the examination of patients from two prospective phase III trials: TME trial and PROCTOR-SCRIPT trial (n=1250). No differences in terms of overall survival (HR 1.00, 95%CI 0.69-1.47) and disease-free survival (HR 1.00, 95%CI 0.68-1.45) were observed in patients with MSI compared to microsatellite stable (MSS) rectal cancer. In addition, we performed a literature review to evaluate the overall prevalence, the effect on survival and the response to neo-adjuvant treatment in patients with MSI rectal cancer compared with MSS rectal cancer. The total number of MSI cases in the included studies (including our own) was 1220 (out of 16526 rectal cancer patients), with an overall prevalence of 6.7% (SE 1.19%). Both for overall survival as for disease-free survival there was no impact of MSI status on prognosis (HR 1.00, 95%CI 0.77-1.29 and HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.60-1.22, respectively). The risk ratio for downstaging and pCR showed also no impact of MSI status (RR 1.15, 95% CI 0.86-1.55 and RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.54-1.22 respectively). In conclusion, rectal cancer patients with MSI form a distinct and rare subcategory, however, there is no prognostic effect of MSI in rectal cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marloes Swets
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | - Shannon van Vliet
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Arjan van Tilburg
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Hans Gelderblom
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Corrie A M Marijnen
- Department of Radiotherapy, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Radiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|