1
|
Klatte DCF, Starr JS, Clift KE, Hardway HD, van Hooft JE, van Leerdam ME, Potjer TP, Presutti RJ, Riegert-Johnson DL, Wallace MB, Bi Y. Utilization and Outcomes of Multigene Panel Testing in Patients With Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. JCO Oncol Pract 2024:OP2300447. [PMID: 38621197 DOI: 10.1200/op.23.00447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2023] [Revised: 12/28/2023] [Accepted: 03/07/2024] [Indexed: 04/17/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Guidelines recommend germline genetic testing (GT) for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This study aims to evaluate the utilization and outcomes of multigene panel GT in patients with PDAC. METHODS This retrospective, multisite study included patients with PDAC diagnosed between May 2018 and August 2020 at Mayo Clinic Arizona, Florida, and Minnesota. Discussion, uptake, and outcomes of GT were compared before (May 1, 2018-May 1, 2019) and after (August 1, 2019-August 1, 2020) the guideline update, accounting for a transition period. RESULTS The study identified 533 patients with PDAC, with 321 (60.2%) preguideline and 212 (39.8%) postguideline. Patient characteristics did not differ between the preguideline and postguideline periods. GT was discussed in 34.3% (110 of 321) of preguideline and 39.6% (84 of 212) of postguideline patients (odds ratio [OR], 1.26 [95% CI, 0.88 to 1.80]) and subsequently performed in 80.9% (89 of 110) of preguideline and 75.0% (63 of 84) of postguideline patients (OR, 1.10 [95% CI, 0.75 to 1.61]). Of 152 tested patients, 26 (17.1%) had a pathogenic variant (PV), of whom 17 (11.2%; 17 of 152) were PDAC-associated. Over the entire study period, GT was more likely in younger patients (65 v 70 years; P < .001), those seen by a medical oncologist (82.9% v 69.0%; P < .001), and those surviving more than 12 months from diagnosis (70.4% v 43.4%; P < .001). Demographics and personal/family cancer history were comparable between patients with and without a PDAC PV. CONCLUSION GT remains underutilized despite National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline recommendations. Given the poor prognosis of PDAC and potential implications of GT, efforts to increase utilization are needed to provide surveillance and support to both patients with PDAC and at-risk family members.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derk C F Klatte
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Jason S Starr
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
| | - Kristin E Clift
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
| | - Heather D Hardway
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
| | - Jeanin E van Hooft
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Thomas P Potjer
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - R John Presutti
- Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
| | | | - Michael B Wallace
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sheikh Shakhbout Medical City, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| | - Yan Bi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Breekveldt ECH, Ykema BLM, Bisseling TM, Moons LMG, Spaander MCW, Huibregtse IL, van der Biessen-van Beek DT, Mulder SF, Saveur L, Kerst JM, Zweers D, Suelmann BB, de Wit R, Reijm A, van Baalen S, Butterly LF, Hisey WM, Robinson CM, van Vuuren AJ, Carvalho B, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Schaapveld M, van Leeuwen FE, Snaebjornsson P, van Leerdam ME. Prevalence of neoplasia at colonoscopy among testicular cancer survivors treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. Int J Cancer 2024; 154:1474-1483. [PMID: 38151749 PMCID: PMC10932931 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Revised: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Abstract
Testicular cancer survivors (TCS) treated with platinum-based chemotherapy have an increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). We determined the yield of colonoscopy in TCS to assess its potential in reducing CRC incidence and mortality. We conducted a colonoscopy screening study among TCS in four Dutch hospitals to assess the yield of colorectal neoplasia. Neoplasia was defined as adenomas, serrated polyps (SPs), advanced adenomas (AAs: ≥10 mm diameter, high-grade dysplasia or ≥25% villous component), advanced serrated polyps (ASPs: ≥10 mm diameter or dysplasia) or CRC. Advanced neoplasia (AN) was defined as AA, ASP or CRC. Colonoscopy yield was compared to average-risk American males who underwent screening colonoscopy (n = 24,193) using a propensity score matched analysis, adjusted for age, smoking status, alcohol consumption and body mass index. A total of 137 TCS underwent colonoscopy. Median age was 50 years among TCS (IQR 43-57) vs 55 years (IQR 51-62) among American controls. A total of 126 TCS were matched to 602 controls. The prevalence of AN was higher in TCS than in controls (8.7% vs 1.7%; P = .0002). Nonadvanced adenomas and SPs were detected in 45.2% of TCS vs 5.5% of controls (P < .0001). No lesions were detected in 46.0% of TCS vs 92.9% of controls (P < .0001). TCS treated with platinum-based chemotherapy have a higher prevalence of neoplasia and AN than matched controls. These results support our hypothesis that platinum-based chemotherapy increases the risk of colorectal neoplasia in TCS. Cost-effectiveness studies are warranted to ascertain the threshold of AN prevalence that justifies the recommendation of colonoscopy for TCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emilie C. H. Breekveldt
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Berbel L. M. Ykema
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Tanya M. Bisseling
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Leon M. G. Moons
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Manon C. W. Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Inge L. Huibregtse
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Sasja F. Mulder
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Lisette Saveur
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J. Martijn Kerst
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Danielle Zweers
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Britt B.M. Suelmann
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Ronald de Wit
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Agnes Reijm
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sophia van Baalen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lynn F. Butterly
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
- NH Colonoscopy Registry, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - William M. Hisey
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
- NH Colonoscopy Registry, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Christina M. Robinson
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
- NH Colonoscopy Registry, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Anneke J. van Vuuren
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Beatriz Carvalho
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Michael Schaapveld
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Flora E. van Leeuwen
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Petur Snaebjornsson
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- University of Iceland, Faculty of Medicine, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Monique E. van Leerdam
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bogdanski AM, van Hooft JE, Boekestijn B, Bonsing BA, Wasser MNJM, Klatte DCF, van Leerdam ME. Aspects and outcomes of surveillance for individuals at high-risk of pancreatic cancer. Fam Cancer 2024:10.1007/s10689-024-00368-1. [PMID: 38619782 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-024-00368-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 02/24/2024] [Indexed: 04/16/2024]
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths and is associated with a poor prognosis. The majority of these cancers are detected at a late stage, contributing to the bad prognosis. This underscores the need for novel, enhanced early detection strategies to improve the outcomes. While population-based screening is not recommended due to the relatively low incidence of PDAC, surveillance is recommended for individuals at high risk for PDAC due to their increased incidence of the disease. However, the outcomes of pancreatic cancer surveillance in high-risk individuals are not sorted out yet. In this review, we will address the identification of individuals at high risk for PDAC, discuss the objectives and targets of surveillance, outline how surveillance programs are organized, summarize the outcomes of high-risk individuals undergoing pancreatic cancer surveillance, and conclude with a future perspective on pancreatic cancer surveillance and novel developments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aleksander M Bogdanski
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - Jeanin E van Hooft
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Bas Boekestijn
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Bert A Bonsing
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Martin N J M Wasser
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Derk C F Klatte
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bogdanski AM, Onnekink AM, Inderson A, Boekestijn B, Bonsing BA, Vasen HFA, van Hooft JE, Boonstra JJ, Mieog JSD, Wasser MNJM, Feshtali S, Potjer TP, Klatte DCF, van Leerdam ME. THE ADDED VALUE OF BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING IN HIGH-RISK INDIVIDUALS UNDERGOING PANCREATIC CANCER SURVEILLANCE. Pancreas 2024:00006676-990000000-00147. [PMID: 38598368 DOI: 10.1097/mpa.0000000000002335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/12/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The study aimed to investigate the added value of blood glucose monitoring in high-risk individuals (HRIs) participating in pancreatic cancer surveillance. METHODS HRIs with a CDKN2A/p16 germline pathogenic variant (PV) participating in pancreatic cancer surveillance were included in this study. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess the relationship between new-onset diabetes (NOD) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). To quantify the diagnostic performance of NOD as a marker for PDAC, receiver operating characteristic curve with area under the curve (AUC) was computed. RESULTS In total, 220 HRIs were included between 2000-2019. Median age was 61 (IQR 53-71) years and 62.7% of participants were female. During the study period, 26 (11.8%) HRIs developed NOD, of whom 5 (19.2%) later developed PDAC. The other 23 (82.1%) PDAC cases remained NOD-free. Multivariable analysis showed no statistically significant relationship between NOD and PDAC (OR 1.21; 95% CI, 0.39-3.78) and four out of five PDAC cases appeared to have NOD within three months before diagnosis. Furthermore, NOD did not differentiate between HRIs with- and without PDAC (AUC 0.54; 95% CI, 0.46-0.61). CONCLUSIONS In this study we found no added value for longitudinal glucose monitoring in CDKN2A PV carriers participating in an imaging-based pancreatic cancer surveillance program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aleksander M Bogdanski
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Anke M Onnekink
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Akin Inderson
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Bas Boekestijn
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Bert A Bonsing
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Hans F A Vasen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Jeanin E van Hooft
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Jurjen J Boonstra
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - J Sven D Mieog
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Martin N J M Wasser
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Shirin Feshtali
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Thomas P Potjer
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Derk C F Klatte
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Meulen LWT, Bogie RMM, Siersema PD, Winkens B, Vlug MS, Wolfhagen FHJ, Baven-Pronk M, van der Voorn M, Schwartz MP, Vogelaar L, de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel WH, Seerden TCJ, Hazen WL, Schrauwen RWM, Alvarez Herrero L, Schreuder RMM, van Nunen AB, Stoop E, de Bruin GJ, Bos P, Marsman WA, Kuiper E, de Bièvre M, Alderlieste YA, Roomer R, Groen J, Bargeman M, van Leerdam ME, Roberts-Bos L, Boersma F, Thurnau K, de Vries RS, Ramaker JM, Vleggaar FP, de Ridder RJ, Pellisé M, Bourke MJ, Masclee AAM, Moons LMG. Standardised training for endoscopic mucosal resection of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps to reduce recurrence (*STAR-LNPCP study): a multicentre cluster randomised trial. Gut 2024; 73:741-750. [PMID: 38216328 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2023-330020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/14/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is the preferred treatment for non-invasive large (≥20 mm) non-pedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs) but is associated with an early recurrence rate of up to 30%. We evaluated whether standardised EMR training could reduce recurrence rates in Dutch community hospitals. DESIGN In this multicentre cluster randomised trial, 59 endoscopists from 30 hospitals were randomly assigned to the intervention group (e-learning and 2-day training including hands-on session) or control group. From April 2019 to August 2021, all consecutive EMR-treated LNPCPs were included. Primary endpoint was recurrence rate after 6 months. RESULTS A total of 1412 LNPCPs were included; 699 in the intervention group and 713 in the control group (median size 30 mm vs 30 mm, 45% vs 52% size, morphology, site and access (SMSA) score IV, 64% vs 64% proximal location). Recurrence rates were lower in the intervention group compared with controls (13% vs 25%, OR 0.43; 95% CI 0.23 to 0.78; p=0.005) with similar complication rates (8% vs 9%, OR 0.93; 95% CI 0.64 to 1.36; p=0.720). Recurrences were more often unifocal in the intervention group (92% vs 76%; p=0.006). In sensitivity analysis, the benefit of the intervention on recurrence rate was only observed in the 20-40 mm LNPCPs (5% vs 20% in 20-29 mm, p=0.001; 10% vs 21% in 30-39 mm, p=0.013) but less evident in ≥40 mm LNPCPs (24% vs 31%; p=0.151). In a post hoc analysis, the training effect was maintained in the study group, while in the control group the recurrence rate remained high. CONCLUSION A compact standardised EMR training for LNPCPs significantly reduced recurrences in community hospitals. This strongly argues for a national dedicated training programme for endoscopists performing EMR of ≥20 mm LNPCPs. Interestingly, in sensitivity analysis, this benefit was limited for LNPCPs ≥40 mm. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NTR7477.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lonne W T Meulen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Roel M M Bogie
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Peter D Siersema
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Bjorn Winkens
- Department of Methodology and Statistics, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Marije S Vlug
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dijklander Hospital, Hoorn, The Netherlands
| | - Frank H J Wolfhagen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Martine Baven-Pronk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Groene Hart Hospital, Gouda, The Netherlands
| | - Michael van der Voorn
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Haga Hospital, Den Haag, The Netherlands
| | - Matthijs P Schwartz
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Lauran Vogelaar
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Tom C J Seerden
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - Wouter L Hazen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Ruud W M Schrauwen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Bernhoven, Uden, The Netherlands
| | - Lorenza Alvarez Herrero
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | | | - Annick B van Nunen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands
| | - Esther Stoop
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Haaglanden Medical Centre, Den Haag, The Netherlands
| | - Gijs J de Bruin
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tergooi Hospital, Hilversum, The Netherlands
| | - Philip Bos
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital Gelderse Vallei, Ede, The Netherlands
| | - Willem A Marsman
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem, The Netherlands
| | - Edith Kuiper
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marc de Bièvre
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, VieCuri Medical Centre, Venlo, The Netherlands
| | - Yasser A Alderlieste
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rivas Zorggroep, Gorinchem, The Netherlands
| | - Robert Roomer
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Franciscus Gasthuis en Vlietland, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - John Groen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sint Jansdal Hospital, Harderwijk, The Netherlands
| | - Marloes Bargeman
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Linda Roberts-Bos
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Laurentius Hospital, Roermond, The Netherlands
| | - Femke Boersma
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Gelre Hospitals, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands
| | - Karsten Thurnau
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital group Twente, Almelo, The Netherlands
| | - Roland S de Vries
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, The Netherlands
| | - Jos M Ramaker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Elkerliek Hospital, Helmond, The Netherlands
| | - Frank P Vleggaar
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Rogier J de Ridder
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - María Pellisé
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Michael J Bourke
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ad A M Masclee
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Leon M G Moons
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Clement DSVM, van Leerdam ME, Tesselaar MET, Cananea E, Martin W, Weickert MO, Sarker D, Ramage JK, Srirajaskanthan R. The global leadership into malnutrition criteria reveals a high percentage of malnutrition which influences overall survival in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. J Neuroendocrinol 2024; 36:e13376. [PMID: 38389192 DOI: 10.1111/jne.13376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Revised: 01/23/2024] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024]
Abstract
Patients with neuroendocrine tumours located in the gastroenteropancreatic tract (GEP-NETs) and treatment with somatostatin analogues (SSA's) are at risk of malnutrition which has been reported previously evaluating weight loss or body mass index (BMI) only. The global leadership into malnutrition (GLIM) criteria include weight loss, BMI, and sarcopenia, for diagnosing malnutrition. These GLIM criteria have not been assessed in patients with GEP-NETs on SSA. The effect of malnutrition on overall survival has not been explored before. The aim of this study is to describe the presence of malnutrition in patients with GEP-NET on SSA based on the GLIM criteria and associate this with overall survival. Cross-sectional study screening all patients with GEP-NETs on SSA's for malnutrition using the GLIM criteria. Body composition analysis for sarcopenia diagnosis were performed. Bloods including vitamins, minerals, and lipid profile were collected. Overall survival since the date of nutrition screening was calculated. Uni- and multivariate Cox regression analysis were performed to identify malnutrition as risk factor for overall survival. A total of 118 patients, 47% male, with median age 67 years (IQR 56.8-75.0) were included. Overall, malnutrition was present in 88 patients (75%); based on low BMI in 26 (22%) patients, based on weight loss in 35 (30%) patients, and based on sarcopenia in 83 (70%) patients. Vitamin deficiencies were present for vitamin D in 64 patients (54%), and vitamin A in 29 patients (25%). The presence of malnutrition demonstrated a significantly worse overall survival (p-value = .01). In multivariate analysis meeting 2 or 3 GLIM criteria was significantly associated with worse overall survival (HR 2.16 95% CI 1.34-3.48, p-value = .002). Weight loss was the most important risk factor out of the 3 GLIM criteria (HR 3.5 95% CI 1.14-10.85, p-value = .03) for worse overall survival. A high percentage (75%) of patients with GEP-NETs using a SSA meet the GLIM criteria for malnutrition. Meeting more than 1 GLIM criterium, especially if there is weight loss these are risk factors for worse overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominique S V M Clement
- Kings Health Partners, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital London, London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, King's College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Margot E T Tesselaar
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Elmie Cananea
- Kings Health Partners, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital London, London, UK
| | - Wendy Martin
- Kings Health Partners, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital London, London, UK
| | - Martin O Weickert
- The ARDEN NET Centre, ENETS Centre of Excellence, University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK
| | - Debashis Sarker
- Department Medical Oncology, Guy's and St. Thomas Hospital, London, UK
| | - John K Ramage
- Kings Health Partners, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital London, London, UK
| | - Rajaventhan Srirajaskanthan
- Kings Health Partners, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital London, London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, King's College Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Helderman NC, van Leerdam ME, Kloor M, Ahadova A, Nielsen M. Emerge of colorectal cancer in Lynch syndrome despite colonoscopy surveillance: A challenge of hide and seek. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2024; 197:104331. [PMID: 38521284 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2024] [Revised: 03/09/2024] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Even with colonoscopy surveillance, Lynch syndromes (LS) carriers still develop colorectal cancer (CRC). The cumulative incidence of CRCs under colonoscopy surveillance varies depending on the affected mismatch repair (MMR) gene. However, the precise mechanisms driving these epidemiological patterns remain incompletely understood. In recent years, several potential mechanisms explaining the occurrence of CRCs during colonoscopy surveillance have been proposed in individuals with and without LS. These encompass biological factors like concealed/accelerated carcinogenesis through a bypassed adenoma stage and accelerated progression from adenomas. Alongside these, various colonoscopy-related factors may contribute to formation of CRCs under colonoscopy surveillance, like missed yet detectable (pre)cancerous lesions, detected yet incompletely removed (pre)cancerous lesions, and colonoscopy-induced carcinogenesis due to tumor cell reimplantation. In this comprehensive literature update, we reviewed these potential factors and evaluated their relevance to each MMR group in an attempt to raise further awareness and stimulate research regarding this conflicting phenomenon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noah C Helderman
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Matthias Kloor
- Department of Applied Tumor Biology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Clinical Cooperation Unit Applied Tumor Biology, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Aysel Ahadova
- Department of Applied Tumor Biology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Clinical Cooperation Unit Applied Tumor Biology, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Maartje Nielsen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Verschoor YL, van de Haar J, van den Berg JG, van Sandick JW, Kodach LL, van Dieren JM, Balduzzi S, Grootscholten C, IJsselsteijn ME, Veenhof AAFA, Hartemink KJ, Vollebergh MA, Jurdi A, Sharma S, Spickard E, Owers EC, Bartels-Rutten A, den Hartog P, de Miranda NFCC, van Leerdam ME, Haanen JBAG, Schumacher TN, Voest EE, Chalabi M. Author Correction: Neoadjuvant atezolizumab plus chemotherapy in gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: the phase 2 PANDA trial. Nat Med 2024:10.1038/s41591-024-02898-8. [PMID: 38448792 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-024-02898-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/08/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Yara L Verschoor
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joris van de Haar
- Department of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - José G van den Berg
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Johanna W van Sandick
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Liudmila L Kodach
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jolanda M van Dieren
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sara Balduzzi
- Biometrics department, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Cecile Grootscholten
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Alexander A F A Veenhof
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Koen J Hartemink
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marieke A Vollebergh
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Emilia C Owers
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Annemarieke Bartels-Rutten
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Peggy den Hartog
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - John B A G Haanen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
- Oncology Service, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Ton N Schumacher
- Department of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Hematology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Emile E Voest
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Myriam Chalabi
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Caspers IA, Eikenboom EL, Lopez-Yurda M, van Grieken NC, Bisseling TM, Dekker E, Bastiaansen BA, Cats A, van Leerdam ME. Gastric and duodenal cancer in individuals with Lynch syndrome: a nationwide cohort study. EClinicalMedicine 2024; 69:102494. [PMID: 38404296 PMCID: PMC10884743 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2023] [Revised: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 02/01/2024] [Indexed: 02/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Lynch syndrome increases the risk of gastric cancer (GC) and duodenal cancer (DC), particularly in individuals with MLH1 and MSH2 pathogenic variants (PVs). To provide further insight into whether, and from what age, esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) surveillance may be beneficial, we evaluated the cumulative incidence and tumour characteristics of GC and DC in a large nationwide cohort of Dutch individuals with LS. Methods For this retrospective nationwide cohort study, clinical data of individuals with LS registered at the Dutch Hereditary Cancer Registry were matched with pathology reports filed by the Dutch Pathology registry. All individuals registered between Jan 1, 1989 and Dec 31, 2021 with proven or putative PVs in one of the mismatch repair genes were included. Cumulative incidences of GC and DC were estimated for high-risk (MLH1, MSH2 and EpCAM) and low-risk (MSH6 and PMS2) PVs using competing risk methodology (Fine and Gray method) with death due to other causes as competing risk. Findings Among 1002 individuals with high-risk and 765 individuals with low-risk PVs, 29 GCs (1.6%) and 39 DCs (2.2%) were diagnosed. Cumulative incidence of GC and DC under the age of 50 was very low (≤1%) for all individuals. At age 70 and 75, cumulative incidence of GC was 3% [95% CI 1%-5%] and 5% [3%-8%] for high-risk PVs and 1% [0%-2%] and 1% [0%-2%] for low-risk PVs (p = 0.006). For DC, cumulative incidence at age 70 and 75 was 5% [3%-7%] and 6% [3%-8%] in high-risk, 1% [0%-1%] and 2% [0%-4%] in low-risk PVs, respectively (p = 0.01). Primary tumour resection was performed in 62% (18/29) of GCs and 77% (30/39) of DC cases. Early-stage GC, defined as TNM stage I, was found in 32% (9/28) of GCs. Early-stage DC, defined as TNM stage I-IIa, was found in 39% (14/36) of DCs. Interpretation Individuals with MLH1, MSH2, and EpCAM PVs have an increased risk of developing GC and DC at the age of 70 years, but this risk is very low before the age of 50 years. The age of onset of surveillance, the yield of GC and DC during EGD surveillance, and its cost-effectiveness should be subject of future studies. Funding None.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene A. Caspers
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ellis L. Eikenboom
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marta Lopez-Yurda
- Department of Biometrics, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nicole C.T. van Grieken
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Tanya M. Bisseling
- Department of Gastroenterology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Barbara A.J. Bastiaansen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Annemieke Cats
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Monique E. van Leerdam
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Netherlands Foundation for Detection of Hereditary Tumours Collaborative Investigators
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Biometrics, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wisse PHA, de Klaver W, van Wifferen F, van Maaren-Meijer FG, van Ingen HE, Meiqari L, Huitink I, Bierkens M, Lemmens M, Greuter MJE, van Leerdam ME, Spaander MCW, Dekker E, Coupé VMH, Carvalho B, de Wit M, Meijer GA. The multitarget faecal immunochemical test for improving stool-based colorectal cancer screening programmes: a Dutch population-based, paired-design, intervention study. Lancet Oncol 2024; 25:326-337. [PMID: 38346438 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00651-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2023] [Revised: 12/08/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The faecal immunochemical test (FIT) is widely employed for colorectal cancer screening. However, its sensitivity for advanced precursor lesions remains suboptimal. The multitarget FIT (mtFIT), measuring haemoglobin, calprotectin, and serpin family F member 2, has demonstrated enhanced sensitivity for advanced neoplasia, especially advanced adenomas, at equal specificity to FIT. This study aimed to prospectively validate and investigate the clinical utlitity of mtFIT versus FIT in a setting of population-based colorectal cancer screening. METHODS Individuals aged 55-75 years and who were eligible for the Dutch national FIT-based colorectal cancer screening programme were invited to submit both a FIT and mtFIT sample collected from the same bowel movement. Positive FIT (47 μg/g haemoglobin cutoff) or mtFIT (based on decision-tree algorithm) led to a colonoscopy referral. The primary outcome was the relative detection rate of mtFIT versus FIT for all advanced neoplasia. Secondary outcomes were the relative detection rates of colorectal cancer, advanced adenoma, and advanced serrated polyps individually and the long-term effect of mtFIT-based versus FIT-based programmatic screening on colorectal cancer incidence, mortality, and cost, determined with microsimulation modelling. The study has been registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05314309, and is complete. FINDINGS Between March 25 and Dec 7, 2022, 35 786 individuals were invited to participate in the study, of whom 15 283 (42·7%) consented, and 13 187 (86·3%) of 15 283 provided both mtFIT and FIT samples with valid results. Of the 13 187 participants, 6637 (50·3%) were male and 6550 (49·7%) were female. mtFIT showed a 9·11% (95% CI 8·62-9·61) positivity rate and 2·27% (95% CI 2·02-2·54) detection rate for advanced neoplasia, compared with a positivity rate of 4·08% (3·75-4·43) and a detection rate of 1·21% (1·03-1·41) for FIT. Detection rates of mtFIT versus FIT were 0·20% (95% CI 0·13-0·29) versus 0·17% (0·11-0·27) for colorectal cancer; 1·64% (1·43-1·87) versus 0·86% (0·72-1·04) for advanced adenoma, and 0·43% (0·33-0·56) versus 0·17% (0·11-0·26) for advanced serrated polyps. Modelling demonstrated that mtFIT-based screening could reduce colorectal cancer incidence by 21% and associated mortality by 18% compared with the current Dutch colorectal cancer screening programme, at feasible costs. Furthermore, at equal positivity rates, mtFIT outperformed FIT in terms of diagnostic yield. At an equally low positivity rate, mtFIT-based screening was predicted to further decrease colorectal cancer incidence by 5% and associated mortality by 4% compared with FIT-based screening. INTERPRETATION The higher detection rate of mtFIT for advanced adenoma compared with FIT holds the potential to translate into additional and clinically meaningful long-term colorectal cancer incidence and associated mortality reductions in programmatic colorectal cancer screening. FUNDING Stand Up to Cancer, Dutch Cancer Society, Dutch Digestive Foundation, and Health~Holland.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pieter H A Wisse
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Willemijn de Klaver
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Francine van Wifferen
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Huub E van Ingen
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Star-shl, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Lana Meiqari
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Iris Huitink
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Mariska Bierkens
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Margriet Lemmens
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marjolein J E Greuter
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastro-intestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Manon C W Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Veerle M H Coupé
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Beatriz Carvalho
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Meike de Wit
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Gerrit A Meijer
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
van der Schee L, Haasnoot KJC, Elias SG, Gijsbers K, Alderlieste YA, Backes Y, van Berkel AM, Boersma F, Ter Borg F, Breekveldt ECH, Kessels K, Koopman M, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, van Leerdam ME, Rasschaert G, Schreuder RM, Schrauwen RWM, Seerden TCJ, Spanier MBW, Terhaar Sive Droste JS, Toes-Zoutendijk E, Tuynman J, Vink GR, de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel WH, Vleggaar FP, Lacle MM, Moons LM. Oncological outcomes of screen-detected and non-screen-detected T1 colorectal cancers. Endoscopy 2024. [PMID: 38325403 DOI: 10.1055/a-2263-2841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS The incidence of T1 colorectal cancers (CRC) has increased with the implementation of CRC screening programs. It is unknown if outcomes and and risk models for T1 CRC patients, based on non-screen-detected cases, can be extrapolated to screen-detected T1 CRC. This study aims to compare stage distribution and oncological outcomes of T1 CRC patients within and outside the screening program. PATIENTS AND METHODS Data from T1 CRC patients diagnosed between 2014-2017 were collected from 12 hospitals in the Netherlands. The presence of lymph node metastasis (LNM) at diagnosis was compared between screen-detected and non-screen-detected patients using multivariable logistic regression. Cox proportional hazard regression was employed to analyze differences in time to recurrence (TTR), metastasis-free survival (MFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Additionally, the performance of conventional risk factors for LNM was evaluated in both groups. RESULTS 1803 patients were included, of which 1114 (62%) were screen-detected. Median follow-up was 51 months (IQR 30). The proportion of LNM did not significantly differ between screen- and non-screen-detected patients (12.6% vs 8.9%; OR 1.41; 95% CI 0.89-2.23), and a prediction model for LNM performed equally in both groups. Three and 5-year TTR, MFS, and CSS were similar for patients within and outside the screening program. However, OS was significantly higher in screen-detected T1 CRC patients (adjusted HR 0.51; 95% CI 0.38-0.68). CONCLUSIONS Screen-detected and non-screen-detected T1 CRCs have similar stage distributions and oncological outcomes and can therefore be treated equally. However, screen-detected T1 CRC patients exhibit a lower rate of non-CRC-related mortality, resulting in higher OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa van der Schee
- Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
- Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | - Sjoerd G Elias
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Kim Gijsbers
- Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, Netherlands
- Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Y A Alderlieste
- Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Beatrixziekenhuis, Gorinchem, Netherlands
| | - Yara Backes
- Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | - Femke Boersma
- Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Gelre Hospitals, Apeldoorn, Netherlands
| | - F Ter Borg
- Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, Netherlands
| | - Emilie C H Breekveldt
- Public Health, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Gastrointestinal Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Koen Kessels
- Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Sint Antonius Ziekenhuis, Nieuwegein, Netherlands
| | - Miriam Koopman
- Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Gastrointestinal Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | | | | | - R W M Schrauwen
- Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Bernhoven Hospital Location Uden, Uden, Netherlands
| | - Tom C J Seerden
- Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Jurriaan Tuynman
- Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Geraldine R Vink
- Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
- Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | - Frank P Vleggaar
- Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - M M Lacle
- Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Leon Mg Moons
- Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Helderman NC, Andini KD, van Leerdam ME, van Hest LP, Hoekman DR, Ahadova A, Bajwa-Ten Broeke SW, Bosse T, van der Logt EMJ, Imhann F, Kloor M, Langers AMJ, Smit VTHBM, Terlouw D, van Wezel T, Morreau H, Nielsen M. MLH1 Promotor Hypermethylation in Colorectal and Endometrial Carcinomas from Patients with Lynch Syndrome. J Mol Diagn 2024; 26:106-114. [PMID: 38061582 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2023.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Revised: 07/19/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Screening for Lynch syndrome (LS) in colorectal cancer (CRC) and endometrial cancer patients generally involves immunohistochemical staining of the mismatch repair (MMR) proteins. In case of MLH1 protein loss, MLH1 promotor hypermethylation (MLH1-PM) testing is performed to indirectly distinguish the constitutional MLH1 variants from somatic epimutations. Recently, multiple studies have reported that MLH1-PM and pathogenic constitutional MMR variants are not mutually exclusive. This study describes 6 new and 86 previously reported MLH1-PM CRCs or endometrial cancers in LS patients. Of these, methylation of the MLH1 gene promotor C region was reported in 30 MLH1, 6 MSH2, 6 MSH6, and 3 PMS2 variant carriers at a median age at diagnosis of 48.5 years [interquartile range (IQR), 39-56.75 years], 39 years (IQR, 29-51 years), 58 years (IQR, 53.5-67 years), and 68 years (IQR, 65.6-68.5 years), respectively. For 31 MLH1-PM CRCs in LS patients from the literature, only the B region of the MLH1 gene promotor was tested, whereas for 13 cases in the literature the tested region was not specified. Collectively, these data indicate that a diagnosis of LS should not be excluded when MLH1-PM is detected. Clinicians should carefully consider whether follow-up genetic MMR gene testing should be offered, with age <60 to 70 years and/or a positive family history among other factors being suggestive for a potential constitutional MMR gene defect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noah C Helderman
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Katarina D Andini
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Liselotte P van Hest
- Department of Human Genetics, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam and University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Daniël R Hoekman
- Department of Human Genetics, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam and University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Aysel Ahadova
- Department of Applied Tumor Biology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Clinical Cooperation Unit Applied Tumor Biology, German Cancer Research Centre, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sanne W Bajwa-Ten Broeke
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Tjalling Bosse
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | - Floris Imhann
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Matthias Kloor
- Department of Applied Tumor Biology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Clinical Cooperation Unit Applied Tumor Biology, German Cancer Research Centre, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Alexandra M J Langers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Vincent T H B M Smit
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Diantha Terlouw
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Tom van Wezel
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Hans Morreau
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Maartje Nielsen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Verschoor YL, van de Haar J, van den Berg JG, van Sandick JW, Kodach LL, van Dieren JM, Balduzzi S, Grootscholten C, IJsselsteijn ME, Veenhof AAFA, Hartemink KJ, Vollebergh MA, Jurdi A, Sharma S, Spickard E, Owers EC, Bartels-Rutten A, den Hartog P, de Miranda NFCC, van Leerdam ME, Haanen JBAG, Schumacher TN, Voest EE, Chalabi M. Neoadjuvant atezolizumab plus chemotherapy in gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: the phase 2 PANDA trial. Nat Med 2024; 30:519-530. [PMID: 38191613 PMCID: PMC10878980 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-023-02758-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024]
Abstract
Gastric and gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancers carry a poor prognosis, and despite recent advancements, most patients die of their disease. Although immune checkpoint blockade became part of the standard-of-care for patients with metastatic G/GEJ cancers, its efficacy and impact on the tumor microenvironment (TME) in early disease remain largely unknown. We hypothesized higher efficacy of neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy in patients with nonmetastatic G/GEJ cancer. In the phase 2 PANDA trial, patients with previously untreated resectable G/GEJ tumors (n = 21) received neoadjuvant treatment with one cycle of atezolizumab monotherapy followed by four cycles of atezolizumab plus docetaxel, oxaliplatin and capecitabine. Treatment was well tolerated. There were grade 3 immune-related adverse events in two of 20 patients (10%) but no grade 4 or 5 immune-related adverse events, and all patients underwent resection without treatment-related delays, meeting the primary endpoint of safety and feasibility. Tissue was obtained at multiple time points, allowing analysis of the effects of single-agent anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and the subsequent combination with chemotherapy on the TME. Twenty of 21 patients underwent surgery and were evaluable for secondary pathologic response and survival endpoints, and 19 were evaluable for exploratory translational analyses. A major pathologic response (≤10% residual viable tumor) was observed in 14 of 20 (70%, 95% confidence interval 46-88%) patients, including 9 (45%, 95% confidence interval 23-68%) pathologic complete responses. At a median follow-up of 47 months, 13 of 14 responders were alive and disease-free, and five of six nonresponders had died as a result of recurrence. Notably, baseline anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)+CD8+ T cell infiltration was significantly higher in responders versus nonresponders, and comparison of TME alterations following anti-PD-L1 monotherapy versus the subsequent combination with chemotherapy showed an increased immune activation on single-agent PD-1/L1 axis blockade. On the basis of these data, monotherapy anti-PD-L1 before its combination with chemotherapy warrants further exploration and validation in a larger cohort of patients with nonmetastatic G/GEJ cancer. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03448835 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yara L Verschoor
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joris van de Haar
- Department of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - José G van den Berg
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Johanna W van Sandick
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Liudmila L Kodach
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jolanda M van Dieren
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sara Balduzzi
- Biometrics department, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Cecile Grootscholten
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Alexander A F A Veenhof
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Koen J Hartemink
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marieke A Vollebergh
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Emilia C Owers
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Annemarieke Bartels-Rutten
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Peggy den Hartog
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - John B A G Haanen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
- Oncology Service, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Ton N Schumacher
- Department of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Hematology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Emile E Voest
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Myriam Chalabi
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Dang H, Verhoeven DA, Boonstra JJ, van Leerdam ME. Management after non-curative endoscopic resection of T1 rectal cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2024; 68:101895. [PMID: 38522888 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2024.101895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2023] [Revised: 02/03/2024] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 03/26/2024]
Abstract
Since the introduction of population-based screening, increasing numbers of T1 rectal cancers are detected and removed by local endoscopic resection. Patients can be cured with endoscopic resection alone, but there is a possibility of residual tumor cells remaining after the initial resection. These can be located intraluminally at the resection site or extraluminally in the form of (lymph node) metastases. To decrease the risk of residual cells progressing towards more advanced disease, additional treatment is usually needed. However, with the currently available risk stratification models, it remains challenging to determine who should and should not be further treated after non-curative endoscopic resection. In this review, the different management strategies for patients with non-curatively treated T1 rectal cancers are discussed, along with the available evidence for each strategy and relevant considerations for clinical decision making. Furthermore, we provide practical guidance on the management and surveillance following non-curative endoscopic resection of T1 rectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Dang
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | - Daan A Verhoeven
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Jurjen J Boonstra
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Terlouw D, Boot A, Ducarmon QR, Nooij S, Suerink M, van Leerdam ME, van Egmond D, Tops CM, Zwittink RD, Ruano D, Langers AMJ, Nielsen M, van Wezel T, Morreau H. Enrichment of colibactin-associated mutational signatures in unexplained colorectal polyposis patients. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:104. [PMID: 38238650 PMCID: PMC10797792 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-11849-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/05/2024] [Indexed: 01/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colibactin, a genotoxin produced by polyketide synthase harboring (pks+) bacteria, induces double-strand breaks and chromosome aberrations. Consequently, enrichment of pks+Escherichia coli in colorectal cancer and polyposis suggests a possible carcinogenic effect in the large intestine. Additionally, specific colibactin-associated mutational signatures; SBS88 and ID18 in the Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer database, are detected in colorectal carcinomas. Previous research showed that a recurrent APC splice variant perfectly fits SBS88. METHODS In this study, we explore the presence of colibactin-associated signatures and fecal pks in an unexplained polyposis cohort. Somatic targeted Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) was performed for 379 patients. Additionally, for a subset of 29 patients, metagenomics was performed on feces and mutational signature analyses using Whole-Genome Sequencing (WGS) on Formalin-Fixed Paraffin Embedded (FFPE) colorectal tissue blocks. RESULTS NGS showed somatic APC variants fitting SBS88 or ID18 in at least one colorectal adenoma or carcinoma in 29% of patients. Fecal metagenomic analyses revealed enriched presence of pks genes in patients with somatic variants fitting colibactin-associated signatures compared to patients without variants fitting colibactin-associated signatures. Also, mutational signature analyses showed enrichment of SBS88 and ID18 in patients with variants fitting these signatures in NGS compared to patients without. CONCLUSIONS These findings further support colibactins ability to mutagenize colorectal mucosa and contribute to the development of colorectal adenomas and carcinomas explaining a relevant part of patients with unexplained polyposis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diantha Terlouw
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, Leiden, 2333 ZA, The Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Arnoud Boot
- Department of Cancer and Stem Cell Biology, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Quinten R Ducarmon
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Sam Nooij
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Manon Suerink
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Demi van Egmond
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, Leiden, 2333 ZA, The Netherlands
| | - Carli M Tops
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Romy D Zwittink
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Dina Ruano
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, Leiden, 2333 ZA, The Netherlands
| | - Alexandra M J Langers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Maartje Nielsen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Tom van Wezel
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, Leiden, 2333 ZA, The Netherlands
| | - Hans Morreau
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, Leiden, 2333 ZA, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Onnekink AM, Michiels N, Klatte DCF, Oldenburg L, Mieog JSD, Vahrmeijer AL, van Hooft JE, van Leerdam ME, Bonsing BA. Surgical outcomes after pancreatic surgery in patients with a germline CDKN2A/p16 pathogenic variant under surveillance. Br J Surg 2024; 111:znad430. [PMID: 38156443 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znad430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2023] [Revised: 12/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 12/30/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Anke M Onnekink
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Nynke Michiels
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Derk C F Klatte
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Lotte Oldenburg
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J Sven D Mieog
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | - Jeanin E van Hooft
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bert A Bonsing
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Toes-Zoutendijk E, Breekveldt ECH, van der Schee L, Nagtegaal ID, Elferink MAG, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Moons LMG, van Leerdam ME. Differences in treatment of stage I colorectal cancers: a population-based study of colorectal cancers detected within and outside of a screening program. Endoscopy 2024; 56:5-13. [PMID: 37935373 PMCID: PMC10736105 DOI: 10.1055/a-2173-5989] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Accepted: 08/17/2023] [Indexed: 11/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Screen-detected colorectal cancers (CRCs) are often treated less invasively than stage-matched non-screen-detected CRCs, but the reasons for this are not fully understood. This study evaluated the treatment of stage I CRCs detected within and outside of the screening program in the Netherlands. METHODS : Data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry for all stage I CRCs diagnosed between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2020 were analyzed, comparing patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics of screen-detected and non-screen-detected stage I CRCs. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association between treatment (local excision only vs. surgical oncologic resection) and patient and tumor characteristics, stratified for T stage and tumor location. RESULTS Screen-detected stage I CRCs were relatively more often T1 than T2 compared with non-screen-detected stage I CRCs (66.9 % vs. 53.3 %; P < 0.001). When only T1 tumors were considered, both screen-detected colon and rectal cancers were more often treated with local excision only than non-screen-detected T1 cancers (odds ratio [OR] 2.19, 95 %CI 1.93-2.49; and OR 1.29, 95 %CI 1.05-1.59, respectively), adjusted for sex, tumor location, lymphovascular invasion (LVI) status, and tumor differentiation. CONCLUSIONS : Less invasive treatment of screen-detected stage I CRC is partly explained by the higher rate of T1 cancers compared with non-screen-detected stage I CRCs. T1 stage I screen-detected CRCs were also more likely to undergo less invasive treatment than non-screen-detected CRCs, adjusted for risk factors such as LVI and tumor differentiation. Future research should investigate whether the choice of local excision was related to unidentified cancer-related factors or the expertise of the endoscopists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esther Toes-Zoutendijk
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Emilie C. H. Breekveldt
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lisa van der Schee
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Iris D. Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marloes A. G. Elferink
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Leon M. G. Moons
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Monique E. van Leerdam
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
van de Schootbrugge-Vandermeer HJ, Kooyker AI, Wisse PHA, Nagtegaal ID, Geuzinge HA, Toes-Zoutendijk E, de Jonge L, Breekveldt ECH, van Vuuren AJ, van Kemenade FJ, Ramakers CRB, Dekker E, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Spaander MCW, van Leerdam ME. Interval post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer following a negative colonoscopy in a fecal immunochemical test-based screening program. Endoscopy 2023; 55:1061-1069. [PMID: 37793423 PMCID: PMC10684335 DOI: 10.1055/a-2136-6564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2022] [Accepted: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the Dutch colorectal (CRC) screening program, fecal immunochemical test (FIT)-positive individuals are referred for colonoscopy. If no relevant findings are detected at colonoscopy, individuals are reinvited for FIT screening after 10 years. We aimed to assess CRC risk after a negative colonoscopy in FIT-positive individuals. METHODS In this cross-sectional cohort study, data were extracted from the Dutch national screening information system. Participants with a positive FIT followed by a negative colonoscopy between 2014 and 2018 were included. A negative colonoscopy was defined as a colonoscopy during which no more than one nonvillous, nonproximal adenoma < 10 mm or serrated polyp < 10 mm was found. The main outcome was interval post-colonoscopy CRC (iPCCRC) risk. iPCCRC risk was reviewed against the risk of interval CRC after a negative FIT (FIT IC) with a 2-year screening interval. RESULTS 35 052 FIT-positive participants had a negative colonoscopy and 24 iPCCRCs were diagnosed, resulting in an iPCCRC risk of 6.85 (95 %CI 4.60-10.19) per 10 000 individuals after a median follow-up of 1.4 years. After 2.5 years of follow-up, age-adjusted iPCCRC risk was approximately equal to FIT IC risk at 2 years. CONCLUSION Risk of iPCCRC within a FIT-based CRC screening program was low during the first years after colonos-copy but, after 2.5 years, was the same as the risk in FIT-negative individuals at 2 years, when they are reinvited for screening. Colonoscopy quality may therefore require further improvement and FIT screening interval may need to be reduced after negative colonoscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Arthur I. Kooyker
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter H. A. Wisse
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Iris D. Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Hiltje A. Geuzinge
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Esther Toes-Zoutendijk
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lucie de Jonge
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Emilie C. H. Breekveldt
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anneke J. van Vuuren
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Christian R. B. Ramakers
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Manon C. W. Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Monique E. van Leerdam
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Eikenboom EL, Moen S, van Leerdam ME, Papageorgiou G, Doukas M, Tanis PJ, Dekker E, Wagner A, Spaander MCW. Metachronous colorectal cancer risk according to Lynch syndrome pathogenic variant after extensive versus partial colectomy in the Netherlands: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 8:1106-1117. [PMID: 37865103 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(23)00228-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2023] [Revised: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 07/03/2023] [Indexed: 10/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Extensive colectomy (subtotal or total colectomy) is often advised for carriers of Lynch syndrome with colorectal cancer. However, the risk of metachronous colorectal cancer might differ by Lynch syndrome variant, meaning that partial colectomy, which has better functional outcomes, might be adequate for some patients with low-risk variants. We aimed to assess the risk of metachronous colorectal cancer after partial colectomy and extensive colectomy in carriers of Lynch syndrome with different pathogenic variants. METHODS For this retrospective cohort study, carriers of Lynch syndrome with colorectal cancer in the Netherlands were identified by linkage of the Dutch Foundation for the Detection of Hereditary Tumors (StOET) database and the Dutch Nationwide Network and Registry of Histopathology and Cytopathology (PALGA) database. Data on demographics, Lynch syndrome variants, colorectal cancers, surgery types, mortality, and surveillance colonoscopies were extracted. Data on colorectal cancer and surveillance colonoscopies were updated until Feb 28, 2022. Data on survival status was updated until Feb 7, 2022. MLH1, MSH2, and EPCAM were classified as high-risk variants and MSH6 and PMS2 as low-risk variants. Patients for whom the type of surgery was unknown were excluded. Cox regression time-to-event analyses were done to assess the risk of metachronous colorectal cancer in four subgroups based on pathogenic variant (high-risk vs low-risk variants) and the extent of surgery (extensive colectomy vs partial colectomy). Sex, age at the time of primary colorectal cancer, primary colorectal cancer stage, performance of surveillance colonoscopies, adherence to the surveillance guidelines, and time period of primary colorectal cancer diagnosis were added to the model as possible confounders. Metachronous colorectal cancer was defined as colorectal cancer diagnosed more than 6 months after the primary colorectal cancer. Patients were censored at time of death or assembly of the database. FINDINGS Of 1908 carriers of Lynch syndrome registered in StOET, 532 with a history of colorectal cancer were identified after linkage with PALGA. Five carriers were excluded because of an unknown surgery type, leaving 527 in our sample (mean age at primary colorectal cancer 48·7 years [SD 12·1]; 274 [52%] male and 253 [48%] female). 121 (23%) patients developed metachronous colorectal cancer (median time from primary colorectal cancer to metachronous colorectal cancer 11·0 years [IQR 2·1-17·8]). Metachronous colorectal cancer occurred in 12 (12%) of 97 patients with high-risk variants and extensive colectomy, in 85 (32%) of 267 patients with high-risk variants and partial colectomy, in zero (0%) of 11 patients with low-risk variants and extensive colectomy, and in 24 (16%) of 152 patients with low-risk variants and partial colectomy. Partial colectomy was associated with a higher risk of metachronous colorectal cancer than extensive colectomy in the high-risk variant group (hazard ratio 1·97, 95% CI 1·04-3·73; p=0·039). The risk of metachronous colorectal cancer did not differ between carriers of low-risk variants who had partial colectomy and those of high-risk variants who had extensive colectomy (1·14, 0·55-2·36; p=0·72). INTERPRETATION The risk of metachronous colorectal cancer after partial colectomy in carriers of low-risk variants is similar to the risk after extensive colectomy in carriers of high-risk variants. This finding suggests that partial colectomy followed by endoscopic surveillance is an appropriate management approach to treat colorectal cancer in carriers of low-risk Lynch syndrome variants. FUNDING None.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellis L Eikenboom
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Sarah Moen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Grigorios Papageorgiou
- Department of Biostatistics, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Michail Doukas
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Pieter J Tanis
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Anja Wagner
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Manon C W Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
de Klaver W, van Leerdam ME, Dekker E. [Less surveillance colonoscopies needed: implications of the update of the Dutch colonoscopy surveillance guideline]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2023; 167:D7895. [PMID: 38175619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
Whether colonoscopy surveillance is useful depends on the impact of colonoscopy surveillance on colorectal cancer incidence and colorectal cancer related mortality. After the introduction of colorectal cancer screening programs, with improved colonoscopy quality, and the publication of new scientific literature, the European guideline for colonoscopy surveillance was revised in 2020. The new guideline is easy to follow and differentiates between individuals with a high- and low-risk profile. Individuals with a high-risk profile have an increased risk of colorectal cancer and colorectal cancer related mortality and should therefore undergo a surveillance colonoscopy. The new Dutch colonoscopy surveillance guideline is based on the European guideline. It is expected that, following the new guideline, less individuals will need to undergo colonoscopy surveillance without increasing their risk of colorectal cancer or colorectal cancer related mortality as compared to the general population. In our view, this is a good example of meaningful care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Nederlands Kanker Instituut, afd. Maag-darm-leveroncologie, Amsterdam
- Contact: Monique E. van Leerdam
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Amsterdam UMC, locatie AMC, afd. Maag-darm-leverziekten, Amsterdam
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Toes-Zoutendijk E, Breekveldt ECH, van der Schee L, Nagtegaal ID, Elferink MAG, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Moons LMG, van Leerdam ME. Correction: Differences in treatment of stage I colorectal cancers: a population-based study of colorectal cancers detected within and outside of a screening program. Endoscopy 2023. [PMID: 38016633 DOI: 10.1055/a-2217-6054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Esther Toes-Zoutendijk
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Emilie C H Breekveldt
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lisa van der Schee
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marloes A G Elferink
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Leon M G Moons
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Jodal HC, Akwiwu EU, Lemmens M, Delis-van Diemen PM, Klotz D, Leon LG, Lakbir S, de Wit M, Fijneman RJ, van Leerdam ME, Dekker E, Spaander MC, Meijer GA, Løberg M, Coupé VM, Kalager M, Carvalho B. Risk Prediction of Metachronous Colorectal Cancer from Molecular Features of Adenomas: A Nested Case-Control Study. Cancer Res Commun 2023; 3:2292-2301. [PMID: 37921412 PMCID: PMC10642372 DOI: 10.1158/2767-9764.crc-23-0186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2023] [Revised: 09/22/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023]
Abstract
Current morphologic features defining advanced adenomas (size ≥10 mm, high-grade dysplasia or ≥25% villous component) cannot optimally distinguish individuals at high risk or low risk of metachronous colorectal cancer (me-CRC), which may result in suboptimal surveillance. Certain DNA copy-number alterations (CNAs) are associated with adenoma-to-carcinoma progression. We aimed to evaluate whether these molecular features can better predict an individual's risk of me-CRC than the morphologic advanced adenoma features.In this nested case-control study, 529 individuals with a single adenoma at first colonoscopy were selected from a Norwegian adenoma cohort. DNA copy-number profiles were determined, by low-coverage whole-genome sequencing. Prevalence of CNAs in advanced and non-advanced adenomas and its association (OR) with me-CRC was assessed. For the latter, cases (with me-CRC) were matched to controls (without me-CRC) on follow-up, age and sex.CNAs associated with adenoma-to-carcinoma progression were observed in 85/267 (32%) of advanced adenomas and in 27/262 (10%) of non-advanced adenomas. me-CRC was statistically significantly associated, also after adjustment for other variables, with age at baseline [OR, 1.14; 95% confidence interval CI), 1.03-1.26; P = 0.012], advanced adenomas (OR, 2.46; 95% CI, 1.50-4.01; P < 0.001) and with the presence of ≥3 DNA copy-number losses (OR, 1.90; 95% CI. 1.02-3.54; P = 0.043).Molecularly-defined high-risk adenomas were associated with me-CRC, but the association of advanced adenoma with me-CRC was stronger. SIGNIFICANCE Identifying new biomarkers may improve prediction of me-CRC for individuals with adenomas and optimize surveillance intervals to reduce risk of colorectal cancer and reduce oversurveillance of patients with low risk of colorectal cancer. Use of DNA CNAs alone does not improve prediction of me-CRC. Further research to improve risk classification is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henriette C. Jodal
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Section of Oncology, Drammen Hospital, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Drammen, Norway
| | - Eddymurphy U. Akwiwu
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health Research Group, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Margriet Lemmens
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Dagmar Klotz
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Leticia G. Leon
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Soufyan Lakbir
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Bioinformatics Group, Department of Computer Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Meike de Wit
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Remond J.A. Fijneman
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Monique E. van Leerdam
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Manon C.W. Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gerrit A. Meijer
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Magnus Løberg
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Veerle M.H. Coupé
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health Research Group, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mette Kalager
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Beatriz Carvalho
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Terlouw D, Hes FJ, Suerink M, Boot A, Langers AMJ, Tops CM, van Leerdam ME, van Asperen CJ, Rozen SG, Bijlsma EK, van Wezel T, Morreau H, Nielsen M. APC mosaicism, not always isolated: two first-degree relatives with apparently distinct APC mosaicism. Gut 2023; 72:2186-2187. [PMID: 36307181 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-328540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2022] [Accepted: 10/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Diantha Terlouw
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Frederik J Hes
- Centre for Medical Genetics, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Manon Suerink
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Arnoud Boot
- Department of Cancer and Stem Cell Biology, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Alexandra M J Langers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Carli M Tops
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Christi J van Asperen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Steve G Rozen
- Department of Cancer and Stem Cell Biology, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Emilia K Bijlsma
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Tom van Wezel
- Department of Pathology, Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Hans Morreau
- Department of Pathology, Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Maartje Nielsen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Aelvoet AS, Karstensen JG, Bastiaansen BA, van Leerdam ME, Balaguer F, Kaminski M, Hompes R, Bossuyt PM, Ricciardiello L, Latchford A, Jover R, Daca-Alvarez M, Pellisé M, Dekker E. Cold snare polypectomy for duodenal adenomas in familial adenomatous polyposis: a prospective international cohort study. Endosc Int Open 2023; 11:E1056-E1062. [PMID: 37954110 PMCID: PMC10637860 DOI: 10.1055/a-2165-7436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims In patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), endoscopic resection of duodenal adenomas is commonly performed to prevent cancer and prevent or defer duodenal surgery. However, based on studies using different resection techniques, adverse events (AEs) of polypectomy in the duodenum can be significant. We hypothesized that cold snare polypectomy (CSP) is a safe technique for duodenal adenomas in FAP and evaluated its outcomes in our centers. Patients and methods We performed a prospective international cohort study including FAP patients who underwent CSP for one or more superficial non-ampullary duodenal adenomas of any size between 2020 and 2022. At that time, this technique was common practice in our centers for superficial duodenal adenomas. The primary outcome was the occurrence of intraprocedural and post-procedural AEs. Results In total, 133 CSPs were performed in 39 patients with FAP (1-18 per session). Median adenoma size was 10 mm (interquartile range 8-15 mm), ranging from 5 to 40 mm; 27 adenomas were ≥20 mm (20%). Of the 133 polypectomies, 109 (82%) were performed after submucosal injection. Sixty-one adenomas (46%) were resected en bloc and 72 (54%) piecemeal. Macroscopic radical resection was achieved for 129 polypectomies (97%). Deep mural injury type II occurred in three polyps (2%) with no delayed perforation after prophylactic clipping. There were no clinically significant bleeds, perforations or other post-procedural AEs. Histopathology showed low-grade dysplasia in all 133 adenomas. Conclusions CSP for (multiple) superficial non-ampullary duodenal adenomas in FAP seems feasible and safe. Long-term prospective research is needed to evaluate whether protocolized duodenal polypectomies prevent cancer and surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur S. Aelvoet
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - John G. Karstensen
- Gastrounit, Copenhagen University Hospital - Amager and Hvidovre, Danish Polyposis Registry, Hvidovre, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Barbara A.J. Bastiaansen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Monique E. van Leerdam
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Francesc Balaguer
- Department of Gastroenterology, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), University of Barcelona, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Michal Kaminski
- Department of Oncological Gastroenterology and Department of Cancer Prevention, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Roel Hompes
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Patrick M.M. Bossuyt
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Luigi Ricciardiello
- Policlinico di Sant'Orsola, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Andrew Latchford
- Polyposis Registry, St Mark's Hospital, Harrow, United Kingdom
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rodrigo Jover
- Instituto de Investigación Biomédica ISABIAL, Universidad Miguel Hernández, Servicio de Medicina Digestiva, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Alicante, Spain
| | - Maria Daca-Alvarez
- Department of Gastroenterology, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), University of Barcelona, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maria Pellisé
- Department of Gastroenterology, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), University of Barcelona, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Klatte DCF, Onnekink AM, Hinnen C, van Doorn R, Potjer TP, van Leerdam ME, Bleiker EMA. Psychosocial issues of individuals undergoing surveillance for increased risk of melanoma and pancreatic cancer due to a germline CDKN2A variant: A focus group study. J Genet Couns 2023. [PMID: 37876362 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1820] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Revised: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 10/26/2023]
Abstract
Individuals with a germline CDKN2A pathogenic variant (PV) are at high risk of developing melanoma and pancreatic cancer and are therefore offered surveillance. The potential advantages and disadvantages associated with genetic testing and surveillance are discussed during medical counseling, although little is known about the associated psychosocial factors that are relevant to this population. This study sought to provide a qualitative exploration of psychosocial factors related to genetic testing and participation in skin and pancreatic surveillance in (potential) carriers of a CDKN2A PV. Fifteen individuals-both at-risk individuals and confirmed variant carriers-participated in one of the three online focus groups. Pre-defined discussion topics, including genetic testing, cancer surveillance, influence on lifestyle and family planning, were discussed. Patients reported that important reasons to engage in genetic testing included the possibility to participate in surveillance to gain control over their cancer risk and to get clarification on the potential carrier status of their children. We observed considerable differences in risk perception and experienced burden of surveillance. Knowledge of the PV has had a positive influence on lifestyle factors and altered attitudes toward life in some. Most participants were not aware of preimplantation genetic testing. This focus group study provided insight into a variety of psychosocial themes related to (potential) carriership of a CDKN2A PV. Future efforts should focus on identifying those who may benefit from additional psychosocial support, development of a centralized source of information, and assessing the knowledge, needs, and timing of counseling for family planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derk C F Klatte
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Anke M Onnekink
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Chris Hinnen
- Department of Medical Psychology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Remco van Doorn
- Department of Dermatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas P Potjer
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eveline M A Bleiker
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Family Cancer Clinic, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Clement DSVM, Brown SE, Naghibi M, Cooper SC, Tesselaar MET, van Leerdam ME, Ramage JK, Srirajaskanthan R. Feasibility of Home Parenteral Nutrition in Patients with Intestinal Failure Due to Neuroendocrine Tumours: A Systematic Review. Nutrients 2023; 15:3787. [PMID: 37686819 PMCID: PMC10490066 DOI: 10.3390/nu15173787] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Revised: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Maintaining adequate nutritional status can be a challenge for patients with small bowel neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). Surgical resection could result in short bowel syndrome (SBS), whilst without surgical resection there is a considerable risk of ischemia or developing an inoperable malignant bowel obstruction (IMBO). SBS or IMBO are forms of intestinal failure (IF) which might require treatment with home parenteral nutrition (HPN). Limited data exist regarding the use of HPN in patients with small bowel neuroendocrine tumours, and it is not frequently considered as a possible treatment. METHODS A systematic review was performed regarding patients with small bowel NETs and IF to report on overall survival and HPN-related complications and create awareness for this treatment. RESULTS Five articles regarding patients with small bowel NETs or a subgroup of patients with NETs could be identified, mainly case series with major concerns regarding bias. The studies included 60 patients (range 1-41). The overall survival time varied between 0.5 and 154 months on HPN. However, 58% of patients were alive 1 year after commencing HPN. The reported catheter-related bloodstream infection rate was 0.64-2 per 1000 catheter days. CONCLUSION This systematic review demonstrates the feasibility of the use of HPN in patients with NETs and IF in expert centres with a reasonable 1-year survival rate and low complication rate. Further research is necessary to compare patients with NETs and IF with and without HPN and the effect of HPN on their quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominique S. V. M. Clement
- Kings Health Partners, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Institute of Liver Studies, King’s College Hospital, London SE5 9RS, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, King’s College Hospital, London SE5 9RS, UK
| | - Sarah E. Brown
- Kings Health Partners, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Institute of Liver Studies, King’s College Hospital, London SE5 9RS, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, King’s College Hospital, London SE5 9RS, UK
| | - Mani Naghibi
- Intestinal Rehabilitation Unit, St Mark’s and Northwick Park Hospitals, London HA1 3UJ, UK
| | - Sheldon C. Cooper
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham B75 7RR, UK
| | - Margot E. T. Tesselaar
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, ENETS Centre of Excellence, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Monique E. van Leerdam
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, ENETS Centre of Excellence, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - John K. Ramage
- Kings Health Partners, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Institute of Liver Studies, King’s College Hospital, London SE5 9RS, UK
| | - Rajaventhan Srirajaskanthan
- Kings Health Partners, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Institute of Liver Studies, King’s College Hospital, London SE5 9RS, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, King’s College Hospital, London SE5 9RS, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
van de Schootbrugge-Vandermeer HJ, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, de Jonge L, van Vuuren AJ, Dekker E, Spaander MCW, Ramakers CRB, Nagtegaal ID, van Kemenade FJ, van Leerdam ME, Toes-Zoutendijk E. Socio-demographic and cultural factors related to non-participation in the Dutch colorectal cancer screening programme. Eur J Cancer 2023; 190:112942. [PMID: 37406529 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.112942] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Revised: 05/24/2023] [Accepted: 06/08/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND High participation rates are essential for a screening programme to be beneficial. To reach non-participants in a targeted manner, insight in characteristics of non-participants is needed. We investigated demographic differences between participants and non-participants in the Dutch faecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programme. METHODS In this population-based cohort study, we included all invitees for CRC screening in 2018 and 2019. Participation status, birth year, and sex were extracted from the Dutch national screening information system and linked to demographic characteristics from Statistics Netherlands, including migration background, level of education, socioeconomic category, household composition, and household income. A multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association between demographic factors and participation. RESULTS A total of 4,383,861 individuals were invited for CRC screening in 2018 and 2019, of which 3,170,349 (72.3%) participated. Individuals were less likely to participate when they were single and/or living with others (single with other residents versus couple: odds ratio [OR] 0.34, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.31-0.38), had a migration background (e.g. Moroccan migrant versus Dutch background: OR 0.43, 95% CI: 0.42-0.44), or had a low income (lowest versus highest quintile: OR 0.45, 95% CI: 0.44-0.45). Although to a lesser extent, non-participation was also significantly associated with being male, being younger, receiving social welfare benefits and having a low level of education. CONCLUSION We found that individuals who were single and/or living with others, immigrants from Morocco or individuals with low income were the least likely to participate in the Dutch CRC screening programme. Targeted interventions are needed to minimise inequities in CRC screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lucie de Jonge
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Anneke J van Vuuren
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Manon C W Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Christian R B Ramakers
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Folkert J van Kemenade
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Esther Toes-Zoutendijk
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Toes-Zoutendijk E, de Jonge L, van Iersel CA, Spaander MCW, van Vuuren AJ, van Kemenade F, Ramakers CR, Dekker E, Nagetaal ID, van Leerdam ME, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I. Impact of delayed screening invitations on screen-detected and interval cancers in the Dutch colorectal cancer screening programme: individual-level data analysis. Gut 2023:gutjnl-2022-328559. [PMID: 37076272 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-328559] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 03/26/2023] [Indexed: 04/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the impact of delayed invitation on screen-detected and interval colorectal cancers (CRC) within a faecal immunochemical testing (FIT)-based CRC screening programme. DESIGN All individuals that participated in 2017 and 2018 with a negative FIT and were eligible for CRC screening in 2019 and 2020 were included using individual-level data. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to assess the association between either the different time periods (ie, 'before', 'during' and 'after' the first COVID-19 wave) or the invitation interval on screen-detected and interval CRCs. RESULTS Positive predictive value for advanced neoplasia (AN) was slightly lower during (OR=0.83) and after (OR=0.92) the first COVID-19 wave, but no significant difference was observed for the different invitation intervals. Out of all individuals that previously tested negative, 84 (0.004%) had an interval CRC beyond the 24 months since their last invitation. The time period of invitation as well as the extended invitation interval was not associated with detection rates for AN and interval CRC rate. CONCLUSION The impact of the first COVID-19 wave on screening yield was modest. A very small proportion of the FIT negatives had an interval CRC possibly due to an extended interval, which potentially could have been prevented if they had received the invitation earlier. Nonetheless, no increase in interval CRC rate was observed, indicating that an extended invitation interval up to 30 months had no negative impact on the performance of the CRC screening programme and a modest extension of the invitation interval seems an appropriate intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lucie de Jonge
- Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Manon C W Spaander
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anneke J van Vuuren
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Evelien Dekker
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Gastro-Intestinal Oncoloy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Breekveldt ECH, Toes-Zoutendijk E, van de Schootbrugge-Vandermeer HJ, de Jonge L, Kooyker AI, Spaander MCW, van Vuuren AJ, van Kemenade FJ, Ramakers C, Dekker E, Nagtegaal ID, van Leerdam ME, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I. Factors associated with interval colorectal cancer after negative FIT: Results of two screening rounds in the Dutch FIT-based CRC screening program. Int J Cancer 2023; 152:1536-1546. [PMID: 36444504 PMCID: PMC10107864 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2022] [Revised: 11/15/2022] [Accepted: 11/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
The interval colorectal cancer (CRC) rate after negative fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) is an important quality indicator of CRC screening programs. We analyzed the outcomes of two rounds of the FIT-based CRC screening program in the Netherlands, using data from individuals who participated in FIT-screening from 2014 to 2017. Data of individuals with one prior negative FIT (first round) or two prior negative FITs (first and second round) were included. Outcomes included the incidence of interval CRC in FIT-negative participants (<47 μg Hb/g feces [μg/g]), FIT-sensitivity, and the probability of detecting an interval CRC by fecal hemoglobin concentration (f-Hb). FIT-sensitivity was estimated using the detection method and the proportional incidence method (based on expected CRC incidence). Logistic regression analysis was performed to estimate whether f-Hb affects probability of detecting interval CRC, adjusted for sex- and age-differences. Incidence of interval CRC was 10.4 per 10 000 participants after the first and 9.6 after the second screening round. FIT-sensitivity based on the detection method was 84.4% (95%CI 83.8-85.0) in the first and 73.5% (95% CI 71.8-75.2) in the second screening round. The proportional incidence method resulted in a FIT-sensitivity of 76.4% (95%CI 73.3-79.6) in the first and 79.1% (95%CI 73.7-85.3) in the second screening round. After one negative FIT, participants with f-Hb just below the cut-off (>40-46.9 μg/g) had a higher probability of detecting an interval CRC (OR 16.9; 95%CI: 14.0-20.4) than had participants with unmeasurable f-Hb (0-2.6 μg/g). After two screening rounds, the odds ratio for interval CRC was 12.0 (95%CI: 7.8-17.6) for participants with f-Hb just below the cut-off compared with participants with unmeasurable f-Hb. After both screening rounds, the Dutch CRC screening program had a low incidence of interval CRC and an associated high FIT-sensitivity. Our findings suggest there is a potential for further optimizing CRC screening programs with the use of risk-stratified CRC screening based on prior f-Hb.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emilie C H Breekveldt
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Esther Toes-Zoutendijk
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Lucie de Jonge
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Arthur I Kooyker
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Manon C W Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anneke J van Vuuren
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Folkert J van Kemenade
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Christian Ramakers
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers-Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
van Leerdam ME. Colonoscopy surveillance: striving toward less is more? Endoscopy 2023; 55:432-433. [PMID: 36921610 DOI: 10.1055/a-2040-4112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/18/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Monique E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Krul MF, Elferink MAG, Kok NFM, Dekker E, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Meijer GA, Nagtegaal ID, Breekveldt ECH, Ruers TJM, van Leerdam ME, Kuhlmann KFD. Initial Impact of National CRC Screening on Incidence and Advanced Colorectal Cancer. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 21:797-807.e3. [PMID: 36116753 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.08.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Revised: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 08/26/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) aims to decrease CRC incidence and mortality. Biennial fecal immunochemical test screening started in the Netherlands in 2014 for individuals 55-75 years of age. This study investigated the effect of screening on stage-specific incidence, with focus on stage III and IV CRC. METHODS Inhabitants diagnosed with CRC in 2009-2018 were included. CRC incidence per stage, year, and detection method (ie, screen-detected vs clinically detected) was evaluated. Patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics, and survival of patients with stage III and IV CRC, were compared according to the detection method. RESULTS Included were 140,649 CRCs in 136,882 patients. An initial peak of stage I-III CRC diagnoses after initiation of screening was followed by a continuous decrease within screening-eligible ages. Total CRC incidence remained higher than before screening, although stage II and IV CRC incidence decreased below prescreening levels. Screen-detected CRCs were significantly more frequently located in the left-sided colon (stage III; 43.7% vs 30.9%; stage IV: 45.1% vs 36.1%), and the primary tumor resection rate was higher (stage III colon: 99.8% vs 99.0%, rectum: 97.3% vs 89.7%; stage IV colon: 65.4% vs 56.6%, rectum: 47.3% vs 33.5%). Patients with screen-detected stage IV CRC had significantly more often single-organ metastases (74.5% vs 57.0%; P < .001) and more frequently received treatment with curative intent (colon: 41.3% vs 27.4%; rectum: 33.8% vs 24.6%). Overall survival significantly improved for patients with screen-detected CRCs (stage III: P < .001; stage IV: P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Five years after the start of a nationwide CRC screening program, a decrease in stage II and IV CRC incidence was observed. Patients with screen-detected stage III and stage IV CRC had less extensive disease and improved survival compared with those with clinically detected CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Myrtle F Krul
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Marloes A G Elferink
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Niels F M Kok
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gerrit A Meijer
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Emilie C H Breekveldt
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Theo J M Ruers
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Koert F D Kuhlmann
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Breekveldt ECH, Toes-Zoutendijk E, de Jonge L, Spaander MCW, Dekker E, van Kemenade FJ, van Vuuren AJ, Ramakers CRB, Nagtegaal ID, van Leerdam ME, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I. Personalized colorectal cancer screening: study protocol of a mixed-methods study on the effectiveness of tailored intervals based on prior f-Hb concentration in a fit-based colorectal cancer screening program (PERFECT-FIT). BMC Gastroenterol 2023; 23:45. [PMID: 36814185 PMCID: PMC9948315 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-023-02670-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2014, the national population-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program was implemented in the Netherlands. Biennial fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) for hemoglobin (Hb) is used at a cut-off of 47 µg Hb per gram feces. The CRC screening program successfully started, with high participation rates and yield of screening. Now that the program has reached a steady state, there is potential to further optimize the program. Previous studies showed that prior fecal Hb (f-Hb) concentrations just below the FIT cut-off are associated with a higher risk for detection of advanced neoplasia (AN) at subsequent screening rounds. We aim to achieve a better balance between the harms and benefits of CRC screening by offering participants tailored invitation intervals based on prior f-Hb concentrations after negative FIT. METHODS This mixed-methods study will be performed within the Dutch national CRC screening program and will consist of: (1) a randomized controlled trial (RCT), (2) focus group studies, and (3) decision modelling. The primary outcome is the yield of AN per screened individual in personalized screening vs. uniform screening. Secondary outcomes are perspectives on, acceptability of and adherence to personalized screening, as well as long-term outcomes of personalized vs. uniform screening. The RCT will include 20,000 participants of the Dutch CRC screening program; 10,000 in the intervention and 10,000 in the control arm. The intervention arm will receive a personalized screening interval based on the prior f-Hb concentration (1, 2 or 3 years). The control arm will receive a screening interval according to current practice (2 years). The focus group studies are designed to understand individuals' perspectives on and acceptability of personalized CRC screening. Results of the RCT will be incorporated into the MISCAN-Colon model to determine long-term benefits, harms, and costs of personalized vs. uniform CRC screening. DISCUSSION The aim of this study is to evaluate the yield, feasibility, acceptability and (cost-) effectiveness of personalized CRC screening through tailored invitation intervals based on prior f-Hb concentrations. This knowledge may be of guidance for health policy makers and may provide evidence for implementing personalized CRC screening in The Netherlands and/or other countries using FIT as screening modality. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05423886, June 21, 2022, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05423886.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emilie C. H. Breekveldt
- grid.5645.2000000040459992XDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands ,grid.430814.a0000 0001 0674 1393Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Esther Toes-Zoutendijk
- grid.5645.2000000040459992XDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lucie de Jonge
- grid.5645.2000000040459992XDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Manon C. W. Spaander
- grid.5645.2000000040459992XDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Evelien Dekker
- grid.7177.60000000084992262Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre – Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Folkert J. van Kemenade
- grid.5645.2000000040459992XDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anneke J. van Vuuren
- grid.5645.2000000040459992XDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Christian R. B. Ramakers
- grid.5645.2000000040459992XDepartment of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Iris D. Nagtegaal
- grid.10417.330000 0004 0444 9382Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Monique E. van Leerdam
- grid.430814.a0000 0001 0674 1393Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands ,grid.10419.3d0000000089452978Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
- grid.5645.2000000040459992XDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Verschoor YL, Lambregts DMJ, van den Berg J, Grotenhuis BA, Aalbers A, Van Triest B, Beets-Tan RG, van de Belt M, Dokter S, Balduzzi S, Voest EE, Haanen JBAG, van Leerdam ME, Beets G, Chalabi M. Radiotherapy, atezolizumab, and bevacizumab in rectal cancers with the aim of organ preservation: The TARZAN study. J Clin Oncol 2023. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2023.41.4_suppl.158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
158 Background: Rectal cancer is traditionally treated with total mesorectal excision (TME), with/without neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy. This approach often leads to temporary or permanent colostomies and other long-term morbidity such as urinary and sexual dysfunction in over 60% of patients. Organ preservation is increasingly being pursued in patients with a clinical complete response (cCR) following neoadjuvant treatment, thereby aiming to avoid TME-surgery. Based on preclinical data suggesting immunomodulatory effects of RT, and the synergy of combined PD-L1/VEGF blockade in several tumor types, the TARZAN study (NCT04017455) combines these treatments aiming to increase chances of organ preservation in patients with mainly MMR proficient (pMMR) rectal cancer without the need for chemotherapy. Methods: Patients with clinical stage ≤T3ab N0-1 distal-mid rectal tumors without mesorectal fascia involvement underwent 5x5 Gy RT followed by 3 cycles of atezolizumab and bevacizumab. Response was evaluated by MRI and endoscopy. The primary endpoint was clinical complete and near-complete response (CR) rate at 12 weeks after RT. Secondary endpoints included safety, organ preservation, pathologic (near) CR in case of surgery, and relapse free survival. According to a Simon’s 2-stage design, ≥3 responders were needed in stage I (18 patients) to continue accrual into stage II. Here we report data from stage I. Results: Eighteen patients (14 male, median age 63), all with pMMR tumors, were treated. Six tumors were cN1 on MRI, 10/18 tumors were ≥4cm and for 10/18 patients abdominoperineal resection (APR) appeared necessary due to distal tumor location. At the time of response evaluation, (near-)CR was achieved in 10/18 (56%) patients according to the primary endpoint. With a median follow-up of 20 months, 9/18 (50%) patients remain without TME surgery. Of these 9 patients, 5 underwent local excision to achieve organ preservation and in 5 patients no additional intervention was needed (cCR). The remaining 9 patients underwent TME surgery (4 APR), and pathologic assessment revealed near-CR in two patients, and a pCR in one patient. Three patients developed distant recurrences, one in the organ-sparing group. Neoadjuvant treatment was well-tolerated with grade 3 study drug-related adverse events (AEs) in 1 (5%) patient. Grade 3 surgery-related AEs occurred in 5/9 (55%) patients, including 4 anastomotic leaks and 1 abscess. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant RT followed by atezolizumab and bevacizumab resulted in a promising rate of clinical (near-)CRs in 56% of patients without the need for chemotherapy, reaching the primary endpoint. Accrual is ongoing in stage II, in which an additional 20 patients will be treated. Clinical trial information: NCT04017455 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yara L. Verschoor
- Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital/Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - José van den Berg
- Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital/Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Arend Aalbers
- Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital/Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Baukelien Van Triest
- Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital/Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Regina G.H. Beets-Tan
- Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital/Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marieke van de Belt
- Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital/Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Simone Dokter
- Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital/Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Sara Balduzzi
- Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital/Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Emile E. Voest
- Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital/Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - John B. A. G. Haanen
- Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital/Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Geerard Beets
- Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital/Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Myriam Chalabi
- Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital/Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Klatte DC, Hardway HD, Starr JS, Riegert-Johnson DL, Clift KE, Potjer TP, van Leerdam ME, Presutti RJ, Wallace MB, Bi Y. Guideline compliance and outcomes of genetic testing in pancreatic cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 2023. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2023.41.4_suppl.688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
688 Background: Guidelines recommend patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) undergo genetic testing for germline pathogenic variants (PV). The aim of this study was to evaluate compliance with recently updated guidelines (May 2019) and assess subsequent uptake and outcomes of genetic testing in PDAC patients. In addition, social and clinical factors associated with genetic testing were assessed. Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients diagnosed with PDAC between May 2018 and August 2020 was performed. Discussion and subsequent uptake of genetic testing was reviewed and compared between a 12-month period before (pre-guideline) and a 12-month period after (post-guideline) guidelines were updated, accounting for a three-month transition period. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to assess factors predictive of undergoing genetic testing. Results: In total, 534 patients with PDAC were identified; 321 (60.1%) in the pre-guideline period and 213 (39.9%) in the post-guideline period. The mean age at diagnosis was 68 years and 47% were female. Genetic testing was discussed in 34% (109/321) of pre-guideline and in 39% (84/213) of post-guideline patients ( P = .23). Of those, 82% (89/109) of patients in pre-guideline and 75% (63/84) in post-guideline groups underwent subsequent genetic testing ( P = .71). In 26 (17.1%) of 152 tested patients, a PV was identified, of which 17 (11.2%; 17/152) had a PDAC-associated PV. Age, cancer stage at diagnosis, length of survival, and having a first-degree relative with pancreatic cancer were significant predictors of genetic testing on multivariate analysis. Conclusions: Adherence to recently updated guidelines is poor and germline genetic testing in PDAC patients remains insufficient. Efforts to increase awareness of benefits of testing, which include personalized therapies for patients and cascade testing in family members for subsequent enrollment in pancreatic cancer surveillance programs, could improve future uptake.[Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Yan Bi
- Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Klatte DC, Boekestijn B, Onnekink AM, Dekker FW, van der Geest LG, Wasser MN, Feshtali S, Mieog JSD, Morreau H, Potjer TP, Inderson A, Boonstra JJ, Vasen HF, Luelmo S, van Hooft JE, Bonsing BA, van Leerdam ME. Comparison of pancreatic cancer outcomes diagnosed in surveillance and the general population: A propensity score-matched analysis. J Clin Oncol 2023. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2023.41.4_suppl.690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
690 Background: Recent pancreatic cancer surveillance programs of high-risk individuals have reported improved outcomes. This study assessed to what extent outcomes of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in patients with a CDKN2A/p16 pathogenic variant (PV) diagnosed during surveillance are better as compared to PDAC patients diagnosed outside surveillance. Methods: In a propensity score matched cohort using data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry, we compared resectability, stage and survival between patients diagnosed in surveillance with non-surveillance PDAC patients. Survival analysis were repeated after adjustment for lead-time bias. Results: Between January 2000 and December 2020, 43 762 patients with PDAC were identified from the NCR. Thirty-one patients with PDAC in surveillance were matched in a 1:5 ratio with 155 non-surveillance patients based on age at diagnosis, sex, and year of diagnosis. In total, 71% of patients in surveillance, as compared to 16% of non-surveillance patients underwent a surgical resection (OR 14.03; 95% CI, 5.92 – 35.85). In surveillance, 39% of patients was diagnosed with stage I cancer, as compared to 6% of non-surveillance PDAC patients (OR 0.10; 95% CI, 0.04 – 0.21). Patients in surveillance had a better prognosis, reflected by a 3-year survival of 32.4% and a median overall survival (OS) of 26.8 months vs. 1.4% 3-year survival and 5.3 months median OS in non-surveillance patients (HR 0.22; 95% 0.14 – 0.36). After adjustment for lead time, PDAC diagnosis in surveillance remained strongly associated with improved survival. Conclusions: Surveillance for PDAC in carriers of a CDKN2A/p16 PV results in earlier detection, increased resectability and improved survival as compared to non-surveillance PDAC patients.[Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Hans Morreau
- Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | | | - Akin Inderson
- Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Saskia Luelmo
- Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
van Toledo DEFWM, Breekveldt ECH, IJspeert JEG, van Vuuren AJ, van Kemenade FJ, Ramakers C, Nagtegaal ID, van Leerdam ME, Spaander MCW, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Toes-Zoutendijk E, Dekker E. Advanced serrated polyps as a target of screening: detection rate and positive predictive value within a fecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening population. Endoscopy 2023; 55:526-534. [PMID: 36323332 DOI: 10.1055/a-1971-3488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND : Advanced serrated polyps (ASPs) have a comparable risk to advanced adenomas for progression to colorectal cancer (CRC). The yield of most CRC screening programs, however, is based on advanced adenomas and CRC only. We assessed the ASP detection rate, and positive predictive value (PPV) including ASPs in a fecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based screening program. METHODS : We analyzed the findings of follow-up colonoscopies of FIT-positive screenees in the Dutch CRC screening program from 2014 until 2020. Data were retrieved from the national screening and pathology database. An ASP was defined as any serrated polyp of ≥ 10 mm, sessile serrated lesion with dysplasia, or traditional serrated adenoma. The ASP detection rate was defined as the proportion of colonoscopies with ≥ 1 ASP. PPV was originally defined as the proportion of individuals with a CRC or advanced adenoma. The updated PPV definition included CRCs, advanced adenomas, and/or ASPs. RESULTS : 322 882 colonoscopies were included in the analyses. The overall detection rate of ASPs was 5.9 %. ASPs were detected more often in women than men (6.3 % vs. 5.6 %; P < 0.001). ASP detection rates in individuals aged 55-59, 60-64, 65-69, and 70 + were 5.2 %, 6.1 %, 6.1 %, and 5.9 %, respectively (P < 0.001). The PPV for CRCs and advanced adenomas was 41.1 % and increased to 43.8 % when including ASPs. The PPV increase was larger in women than in men (3.2 vs. 2.4 percentage points). CONCLUSIONS : 5.9 % of FIT-positive screenees had ASPs, but half of these were detected in combination with a CRC or advanced adenoma. Therefore, including ASPs results in a small increase in the yield of FIT-based screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David E F W M van Toledo
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology & Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Emilie C H Breekveldt
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Joep E G IJspeert
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology & Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anneke J van Vuuren
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Folkert J van Kemenade
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Christian Ramakers
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Department of Gastroenterology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Manon C W Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Esther Toes-Zoutendijk
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology & Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Meester RGS, van de Schootbrugge-Vandermeer HJ, Breekveldt ECH, de Jonge L, Toes-Zoutendijk E, Kooyker A, Nieboer D, Ramakers CR, Spaander MCW, van Vuuren AJ, Kuipers EJ, van Kemenade FJ, Nagtegaal ID, Dekker E, van Leerdam ME, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I. Faecal occult blood loss accurately predicts future detection of colorectal cancer. A prognostic model. Gut 2023; 72:101-108. [PMID: 35537811 PMCID: PMC9763180 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-327188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 04/16/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To examine the prognostic potential of repeated faecal haemoglobin (F-Hb) concentration measurements in faecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based screening for colorectal cancer (CRC). DESIGN Prognostic model. SETTING Dutch biennial FIT-based screening programme during 2014-2018. PARTICIPANTS 265 881 participants completing three rounds of FIT, with negative test results (F-Hb <47 µg Hb/g faeces) in rounds 1 and 2. INTERVENTIONS Colonoscopy follow-up in participants with a positive FIT (F-Hb ≥47 µg Hb/g faeces). MAIN OUTCOMES We evaluated prognostic models for detecting advanced neoplasia (AN) and CRC in round 3, with as predictors, participant age, sex, F-Hb in rounds 1 and 2, and categories/combinations/non-linear transformations of F-Hb. Primary evaluation criteria included: risk prediction accuracy (calibration), discrimination of participants with versus without AN or CRC (optimism-adjusted C-statistics, range 0.5-1.0), the degree of risk stratification and C-statistics in external validation. RESULTS Among study participants, 8806 (3.3%) had a positive FIT result, 3254 (1.2%) had AN detected and 557 (0.2%) had cancer. F-Hb concentrations in rounds 1 and 2 were the strongest outcome predictors, with adjusted ORs of up to 9.4 (95% CI 7.5 to 11.7) for the highest F-Hb category. Risk predictions matched the observed risk for most participants (calibration intercept -0.008 to -0.099; slope 0.982-0.998), and discriminated participants with versus without AN or CRC with C-statistics of 0.78 (95% CI 0.77 to 0.79) and 0.73 (95% CI 0.71 to 0.75), respectively. The predicted risk ranged from 0.4% to 36.7% for AN and from 0.0% to 5.5% for CRC across participants. In external validation, the model retained similar discrimination accuracy for AN (C-statistic 0.77, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.87) and CRC (C-statistic 0.78, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.91). CONCLUSION Participants at lower versus higher risk of future AN or CRC can be accurately identified based on their age, sex and particularly, prior F-Hb concentrations. Risk stratification should be considered based on this information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reinier G S Meester
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Emilie C H Breekveldt
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lucie de Jonge
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Esther Toes-Zoutendijk
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Arthur Kooyker
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daan Nieboer
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Christian R Ramakers
- Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Manon C W Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anneke J van Vuuren
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ernst J Kuipers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands,Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Custers PA, Geubels BM, Beets GL, Lambregts DMJ, van Leerdam ME, van Triest B, Maas M. Defining near-complete response following (chemo)radiotherapy for rectal cancer: systematic review. Br J Surg 2022; 110:43-49. [PMID: 36349555 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2022] [Revised: 08/09/2022] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A uniform definition of a clinical near-complete response (near-CR) after neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy for rectal cancer is lacking. A clear definition is necessary for uniformity in clinical practice and trial enrolment for organ-preserving treatments. This review aimed to provide an overview of the terminology, criteria, and features used in the literature to define a near-CR. METHODS A systematic review was performed based on the PRISMA statement. PubMed and Embase were searched up to May 2021 to identify the terminology, criteria, and features used to define a near-CR after (chemo)radiotherapy for rectal cancer. Studies with no clear cut-off point between a cCR and near-CR, studies using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours, and studies including only complete responders were excluded. RESULTS A total of 1876 articles were found, of which 23 were included. Patients were managed by watchful waiting and/or additional local treatment in 11 and 17 of 23 studies respectively. Response evaluation included digital rectal examination (DRE) and/or endoscopy with MRI in 18 studies. The majority of studies used the term 'near-complete response'. In most studies, minor irregularities or a smooth induration with DRE and a small flat ulcer on endoscopy were considered to indicate a near-CR. On MRI, five studies used features (obvious downstaging with or without heterogeneous/irregular fibrosis on T2-weighted MRI or small spot of high signal on diffusion-weighted imaging), five studies used TNM criteria (ycT2), and four used magnetic resonance tumour regression grade (mrTRG) (mrTRG1-2/mrTRG2) to describe a near-CR. CONCLUSION The terminology, criteria, and features used to describe a near-CR vary substantially, which can partly be explained by the different treatment strategies patients are selected for (watchful waiting or additional local treatment). A reproducible definition of near-CR is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petra A Custers
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Barbara M Geubels
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Geerard L Beets
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Doenja M J Lambregts
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastroenterology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Baukelien van Triest
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Monique Maas
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Ykema BL, Gini A, Rigter LS, Spaander MC, Moons LM, Bisseling TM, de Boer JP, Verbeek WH, Lugtenburg PJ, Janus CP, Petersen EJ, Roesink JM, van der Maazen RW, Aleman BM, Meijer GA, van Leeuwen FE, Snaebjornsson P, Carvalho B, van Leerdam ME, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I. Cost-Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Surveillance in Hodgkin Lymphoma Survivors Treated with Procarbazine and/or Infradiaphragmatic Radiotherapy. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2022; 31:2157-2168. [PMID: 36166472 PMCID: PMC9720424 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-22-0019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2022] [Revised: 05/19/2022] [Accepted: 09/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hodgkin lymphoma survivors treated with infradiaphragmatic radiotherapy (IRT) and/or procarbazine have an increased risk of developing colorectal cancer. We investigated the cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer surveillance in Dutch Hodgkin lymphoma survivors to determine the optimal surveillance strategy for different Hodgkin lymphoma subgroups. METHODS The Microsimulation Screening Analysis-Colon model was adjusted to reflect colorectal cancer and other-cause mortality risk in Hodgkin lymphoma survivors. Ninety colorectal cancer surveillance strategies were evaluated varying in starting and stopping age, interval, and modality [colonoscopy, fecal immunochemical test (FIT, OC-Sensor; cutoffs: 10/20/47 μg Hb/g feces), and multi-target stool DNA test (Cologuard)]. Analyses were also stratified per primary treatment (IRT and procarbazine or procarbazine without IRT). Colorectal cancer deaths averted (compared with no surveillance) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) were primary outcomes. The optimal surveillance strategy was identified assuming a willingness-to-pay threshold of €20,000 per life-years gained (LYG). RESULTS Overall, the optimal surveillance strategy was annual FIT (47 μg) from age 45 to 70 years, which might avert 70% of colorectal cancer deaths in Hodgkin lymphoma survivors (compared with no surveillance; ICER:€18,000/LYG). The optimal surveillance strategy in Hodgkin lymphoma survivors treated with procarbazine without IRT was biennial FIT (47 μg) from age 45 to 70 years (colorectal cancer mortality averted 56%; ICER:€15,000/LYG), and when treated with IRT and procarbazine, annual FIT (47 μg) surveillance from age 40 to 70 was most cost-effective (colorectal cancer mortality averted 75%; ICER:€13,000/LYG). CONCLUSIONS Colorectal cancer surveillance in Hodgkin lymphoma survivors is cost-effective and should commence earlier than screening occurs in population screening programs. For all subgroups, FIT surveillance was the most cost-effective strategy. IMPACT Colorectal cancer surveillance should be implemented in Hodgkin lymphoma survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Berbel L.M. Ykema
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Andrea Gini
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lisanne S. Rigter
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Manon C.W. Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Leon M.G. Moons
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Tanya M. Bisseling
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Jan Paul de Boer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Wieke H.M. Verbeek
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Cecile P.M. Janus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Eefke J. Petersen
- Department of Hematology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Judith M. Roesink
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Berthe M.P. Aleman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gerrit A. Meijer
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Flora E. van Leeuwen
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Petur Snaebjornsson
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Beatriz Carvalho
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Monique E. van Leerdam
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.,Corresponding Author: Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam 3015 GD, the Netherlands. Phone: 311-0703-8454; E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Burra P, Arvanitakis M, Dias JA, Bretthauer M, Dugic A, Hartmann D, Michl P, Seufferlein T, Torres J, Törnblom H, van Leerdam ME, Zelber‐Sagi S, Botos A. UEG position paper: Obesity and digestive health. United European Gastroenterol J 2022; 10:1199-1201. [PMID: 36457185 PMCID: PMC9752259 DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.12334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Patrizia Burra
- Multivisceral Transplant UnitDepartment of Surgery, Oncology and GastroenterologyPadua University HospitalPaduaItaly
| | - Marianna Arvanitakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and GI OncologyErasme University HospitalUniversité Libre de BruxellesBrusselsBelgium,Nutrition TeamErasme University HospitalUniversité Libre de BruxellesBrusselsBelgium
| | | | - Michael Bretthauer
- Department of Transplantation MedicineClinical Effectiveness Research GroupOslo University HospitalOsloNorway,Clinical Effectiveness Research GroupInstitute of Health and SocietyUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
| | - Ana Dugic
- Department of GastroenterologyFriedrich‐Alexander‐Universität Erlangen‐Nürnberg (FAU)Medizincampus OberfrankenBayreuthGermany,Department of MedicineKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
| | - Daniel Hartmann
- Department of SurgeryKlinikum rechts der Isar Technische Universität MunichMunichGermany
| | - Patrick Michl
- Department of Internal Medicine IMartin‐Luther University Halle‐WittenbergHalleGermany
| | | | - Joana Torres
- Division of GastroenterologyHospital Beatriz ÂngeloLouresPortugal,Faculdade de MedicinaUniversidade de LisboaLisboaPortugal
| | - Hans Törnblom
- Department of Molecular and Clinical MedicineInstitute of MedicineSahlgrenska AcademyUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
| | | | - Shira Zelber‐Sagi
- School of Public HealthFaculty of Social Welfare and Health SciencesUniversity of HaifaHaifaIsrael,Department of GastroenterologyTel Aviv Medical CenterTel AvivIsrael
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Dekkers N, Dang H, van der Kraan J, le Cessie S, Oldenburg PP, Schoones JW, Langers AMJ, van Leerdam ME, van Hooft JE, Backes Y, Levic K, Meining A, Saracco GM, Holman FA, Peeters KCMJ, Moons LMG, Doornebosch PG, Hardwick JCH, Boonstra JJ. Risk of recurrence after local resection of T1 rectal cancer: a meta-analysis with meta-regression. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:9156-9168. [PMID: 35773606 PMCID: PMC9652303 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09396-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND T1 rectal cancer (RC) patients are increasingly being treated by local resection alone but uniform surveillance strategies thereafter are lacking. To determine whether different local resection techniques influence the risk of recurrence and cancer-related mortality, a meta-analysis was performed. METHODS A systematic search was conducted for T1RC patients treated with local surgical resection. The primary outcome was the risk of RC recurrence and RC-related mortality. Pooled estimates were calculated using mixed-effect logistic regression. We also systematically searched and evaluated endoscopically treated T1RC patients in a similar manner. RESULTS In 2585 unique T1RC patients (86 studies) undergoing local surgical resection, the overall pooled cumulative incidence of recurrence was 9.1% (302 events, 95% CI 7.3-11.4%; I2 = 68.3%). In meta-regression, the recurrence risk was associated with histological risk status (p < 0.005; low-risk 6.6%, 95% CI 4.4-9.7% vs. high-risk 28.2%, 95% CI 19-39.7%) and local surgical resection technique (p < 0.005; TEM/TAMIS 7.7%, 95% CI 5.3-11.0% vs. other local surgical excisions 10.8%, 95% CI 6.7-16.8%). In 641 unique T1RC patients treated with flexible endoscopic excision (16 studies), the risk of recurrence (7.7%, 95% CI 5.2-11.2%), cancer-related mortality (2.3%, 95% CI 1.1-4.9), and cancer-related mortality among patients with recurrence (30.0%, 95% CI 14.7-49.4%) were comparable to outcomes after TEM/TAMIS (risk of recurrence 7.7%, 95% CI 5.3-11.0%, cancer-related mortality 2.8%, 95% CI 1.2-6.2% and among patients with recurrence 35.6%, 95% CI 21.9-51.2%). CONCLUSIONS Patients with T1 rectal cancer may have a significantly lower recurrence risk after TEM/TAMIS compared to other local surgical resection techniques. After TEM/TAMIS and endoscopic resection the recurrence risk, cancer-related mortality and cancer-related mortality among patients with recurrence were comparable. Recurrence was mainly dependent on histological risk status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nik Dekkers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - Hao Dang
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jolein van der Kraan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Saskia le Cessie
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Philip P Oldenburg
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jan W Schoones
- Directorate of Research Policy (Formerly: Walaeus Library), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Alexandra M J Langers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jeanin E van Hooft
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Yara Backes
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Katarina Levic
- Gastrounit-Surgical Division, Center for Surgical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Alexander Meining
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Giorgio M Saracco
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medical Sciences, Molinette Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Fabian A Holman
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Koen C M J Peeters
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Leon M G Moons
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Pascal G Doornebosch
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle Aan Den IJssel, The Netherlands
| | - James C H Hardwick
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jurjen J Boonstra
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Ykema BLM, Breekveldt ECH, Carvalho B, van Wezel T, Meijer GA, Kerst M, Schaapveld M, van Leeuwen FE, Snaebjornsson P, van Leerdam ME. Somatic hits in mismatch repair genes in colorectal cancer among non-seminoma testicular cancer survivors. Br J Cancer 2022; 127:1991-1996. [PMID: 36088508 PMCID: PMC9681876 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-022-01972-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2022] [Revised: 07/04/2022] [Accepted: 08/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Non-seminoma testicular cancer survivors (TCS) have an increased risk of developing colorectal cancer (CRC) when they have been treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. Previously we demonstrated that among Hodgkin lymphoma survivors (HLS) there is enrichment of rare mismatch repair (MMR) deficient (MMRd) CRCs with somatic hits in MMR genes. We speculate that this phenomenon could also occur among other cancer survivors. We therefore aim to determine the MMR status and its underlying mechanism in CRC among TCS (TCS-CRC). METHODS Thirty TCS-CRC, identified through the Dutch pathology registry, were analysed for MMR proteins by immunohistochemistry. Next-generation sequencing was performed in MMRd CRCs without MLH1 promoter hypermethylation (n = 4). Data were compared with a male cohort with primary CRC (P-CRC, n = 629). RESULTS MMRd was found in 17% of TCS-CRCs vs. 9% in P-CRC (p = 0.13). MMRd was more often caused by somatic double or single hit in MMR genes by mutation or loss of heterozygosity in TCS-CRCs (3/30 (10%) vs. 11/629 (2%) in P-CRCs (p < 0.01)). CONCLUSIONS MMRd CRCs with somatic double or single hit are more frequent in this small cohort of TCS compared with P-CRC. Exposure to anticancer treatments appears to be associated with the development of these rare MMRd CRC among cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Berbel L M Ykema
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Emilie C H Breekveldt
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Beatriz Carvalho
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Tom van Wezel
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Gerrit A Meijer
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Martijn Kerst
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Michael Schaapveld
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Flora E van Leeuwen
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Petur Snaebjornsson
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Levy S, Arthur JD, Banks M, Kok NFM, Fenwick SW, Diaz-Nieto R, van Leerdam ME, Cuthbertson DJ, Valk GD, Kuhlmann KFD, Tesselaar MET. ASO Visual Abstract: Primary Tumour Resection is Associated with Improved Disease-Specific Mortality in Patients with Stage IV Small Intestinal Neuroendocrine Tumours (NET)-A Comparison of Upfront Surgical Resection versus a Watch-and-Wait Strategy in Two Specialist NET Centres. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:7833-7834. [PMID: 35906323 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12080-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sonja Levy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - James D Arthur
- Department of Surgery, Liverpool University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Melissa Banks
- Department of Surgery, Liverpool University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Niels F M Kok
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Stephen W Fenwick
- Department of Surgery, Liverpool University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Rafael Diaz-Nieto
- Department of Surgery, Liverpool University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastroenterologic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daniel J Cuthbertson
- Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- Department of Endocrinology, Liverpool University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Gerlof D Valk
- Department of Endocrine Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Koert F D Kuhlmann
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Margot E T Tesselaar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Klatte DCF, Boekestijn B, Wasser MNJM, Feshtali Shahbazi S, Ibrahim IS, Mieog JSD, Luelmo SAC, Morreau H, Potjer TP, Inderson A, Boonstra JJ, Dekker FW, Vasen HFA, van Hooft JE, Bonsing BA, van Leerdam ME. Pancreatic Cancer Surveillance in Carriers of a Germline CDKN2A Pathogenic Variant: Yield and Outcomes of a 20-Year Prospective Follow-Up. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:3267-3277. [PMID: 35658523 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.00194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2022] [Revised: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 04/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Pancreatic cancer surveillance in high-risk individuals may lead to detection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) at an earlier stage and with improved survival. This study evaluated the yield and outcomes of 20 years of prospective surveillance in a large cohort of individuals with germline pathogenic variants (PVs) in CDKN2A. METHODS Prospectively collected data were analyzed from individuals participating in pancreatic cancer surveillance. Surveillance consisted of annual magnetic resonance imaging with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and optional endoscopic ultrasound. RESULTS Three hundred forty-seven germline PV carriers participated in surveillance and were followed for a median of 5.6 (interquartile range 2.3-9.9) years. A total of 36 cases of PDAC were diagnosed in 31 (8.9%) patients at a median age of 60.4 (interquartile range 51.3-64.1) years. The cumulative incidence of primary PDAC was 20.7% by age 70 years. Five carriers (5 of 31; 16.1%) were diagnosed with a second primary PDAC. Thirty (83.3%) of 36 PDACs were considered resectable at the time of imaging. Twelve cases (12 of 36; 33.3%) presented with stage I disease. The median survival after diagnosis of primary PDAC was 26.8 months, and the 5-year survival rate was 32.4% (95% CI, 19.1 to 54.8). Individuals with primary PDAC who underwent resection (22 of 31; 71.0%) had an overall 5-year survival rate of 44.1% (95% CI, 27.2 to 71.3). Nine (2.6%; 9 of 347) individuals underwent surgery for a suspected malignant lesion, which proved to not be PDAC, and this included five lesions with low-grade dysplasia. CONCLUSION This long-term surveillance study demonstrates a high incidence of PDAC in carriers of a PV in CDKN2A. This provides evidence that surveillance in such a high-risk population leads to detection of early-stage PDAC with improved resectability and survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derk C F Klatte
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Bas Boekestijn
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Martin N J M Wasser
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | - Isaura S Ibrahim
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - J Sven D Mieog
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Saskia A C Luelmo
- Department of Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Hans Morreau
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Thomas P Potjer
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Akin Inderson
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Jurjen J Boonstra
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Friedo W Dekker
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Hans F A Vasen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Jeanin E van Hooft
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Bert A Bonsing
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Buskermolen M, Naber SK, Toes-Zoutendijk E, van der Meulen MP, van Grevenstein WMU, van Leerdam ME, Spaander MCW, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I. Impact of surgical versus endoscopic management of complex nonmalignant polyps in a colorectal cancer screening program. Endoscopy 2022; 54:871-880. [PMID: 35130576 DOI: 10.1055/a-1726-9144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND When complex nonmalignant polyps are detected in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs, patients may be referred directly to surgery or may first undergo additional endoscopy for attempted endoscopic removal by an expert. We compared the impact of both strategies on screening effectiveness and costs. METHODS We used MISCAN-Colon to simulate the Dutch screening program, and projected CRC deaths prevented, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained, and costs for two scenarios: 1) surgery for all complex nonmalignant polyps; 2) attempted removal by an expert endoscopist first. We made the following assumptions: 3.9 % of screen-detected large nonmalignant polyps were complex; associated surgery mortality was 0.7 %; the rate of successful removal by an expert was 87 %, with 0.11 % mortality. RESULTS The screening program was estimated to prevent 11.2 CRC cases (-16.7 %) and 10.1 CRC deaths (-27.1 %), resulting in 32.9 QALYs gained (+ 17.2 %) per 1000 simulated individuals over their lifetimes compared with no screening. The program would also result in 2.1 surgeries for complex nonmalignant polyps with 0.015 associated deaths per 1000 individuals. If, instead, these patients were referred to an expert endoscopist first, only 0.2 patients required surgery, reducing associated deaths by 0.013 at the expense of 0.003 extra colonoscopy deaths. Compared with direct referral to surgery, referral to an expert endoscopist gained 0.2 QALYs and saved €12 500 per 1000 individuals in the target population. CONCLUSION Referring patients with complex polyps to an expert endoscopist first reduced some surgery-related deaths while substantially improving cost-effectiveness of the screening program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maaike Buskermolen
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Steffie K Naber
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Esther Toes-Zoutendijk
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Miriam P van der Meulen
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastroenterology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Manon C W Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Buskermolen M, Naber SK, Toes-Zoutendijk E, van der Meulen MP, van Grevenstein WMU, van Leerdam ME, Spaander MCW, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I. Correction: Impact of surgical versus endoscopic management of complex nonmalignant polyps in a colorectal cancer screening program. Endoscopy 2022; 54:C14. [PMID: 35231940 DOI: 10.1055/a-1773-7066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Maaike Buskermolen
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Steffie K Naber
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Esther Toes-Zoutendijk
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Miriam P van der Meulen
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastroenterology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Manon C W Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Rigter LS, Snaebjornsson P, Rosenberg EH, Altena E, van Grieken NCT, Aleman BMP, Kerst JM, Morton L, Schaapveld M, Meijer GA, van Leeuwen FE, van Leerdam ME. Molecular characterization of gastric adenocarcinoma diagnosed in patients previously treated for Hodgkin lymphoma or testicular cancer. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0270591. [PMID: 35877698 PMCID: PMC9312836 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The risk of developing gastric cancer is increased in patients treated with radiotherapy for Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) or testicular cancer (TC). This study aims to assess if gastric adenocarcinoma after treatment for HL/TC (t-GC) is molecularly different from gastric adenocarcinoma in the general population. Methods Patients were diagnosed with t-GC ≥5 years after treatment for HL/TC. Four molecular subtypes were identified using immunohistochemical and molecular analyses: Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency or microsatellite instability (MSI), aberrant p53 staining as surrogate for chromosomal instability (sCIN), and a surrogate for genomic stability (sGS) without these aberrations. Results were compared with gastric cancer in the general population (p-GC) described in literature. Results Molecular subtyping of 90 t-GCs resulted in 3% EBV, 8% MSI, 36% sCIN and 53% sGS. 3/6 of MSI t-GCs had MLH1 promoter methylation and 2/6 were explained by double somatic mutations in MMR genes. T-GCs were more frequently sGS than p-GCs (53% vs. 38%, p = 0.04). T-GC was more frequently sGS in HL/TC patients diagnosed before 1990, than after 1990 (63% vs. 38%, p = 0.03). T-GCs located in the antrum, an area that receives high irradiation doses, were more frequently sGS (61% vs. 28% in p-GCs, p = 0.02). Conclusion Our results demonstrate that t-GCs are more frequently of the sGS subtype than p-GCs. An association of t-GC of the sGS subtype with prior anticancer treatment is suggested by the high frequency in HL/TC patients who were treated before 1990, a time period in which HL/TC treatments were more extensive.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisanne S. Rigter
- Department of Gastroenterology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Petur Snaebjornsson
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Efraim H. Rosenberg
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Estelle Altena
- Department of Gastroenterology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Berthe M. P. Aleman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan M. Kerst
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lindsay Morton
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Michael Schaapveld
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gerrit A. Meijer
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Flora E. van Leeuwen
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Monique E. van Leerdam
- Department of Gastroenterology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- * E-mail:
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Levy S, Arthur JD, Banks M, Kok NFM, Fenwick SW, Diaz-Nieto R, van Leerdam ME, Cuthbertson DJ, Valk GD, Kuhlmann KFD, Tesselaar MET. Primary Tumor Resection is Associated with Improved Disease-Specific Mortality in Patients with Stage IV Small Intestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors (NETs): A Comparison of Upfront Surgical Resection Versus a Watch and Wait Strategy in Two Specialist NET Centers. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:7822-7832. [PMID: 35842528 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12030-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors (SI-NETs) often present with metastatic disease. An ongoing debate exists on whether to perform primary tumor resection (PTR) in patients with stage IV SI-NETs, without symptoms of the primary tumor and inoperable metastatic disease. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to compare a treatment strategy of upfront surgical resection versus a surveillance strategy of watch and wait. METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with stage IV SI-NETs at diagnosis, between 2000 and 2018, from two tertiary referral centers (Netherlands Cancer Institute [NKI] and Aintree University Hospital [AUH]) who had adopted contrasting treatment approaches: upfront surgical resection and watch and wait, respectively. Patients without symptoms related to the primary tumor were included. Multivariable intention-to-treat (ITT), per-protocol (PP), and instrumental variable (IV) analyses using 'institute' as an IV were performed to assess the influence of PTR on disease-specific mortality (DSM). RESULTS A total of 557 patients were identified, with 145 patients remaining after exclusion of stage I-III disease or symptoms of the primary tumor (93 from the NKI and 52 from AUH). The cohorts differed in performance status (PS; p = 0.006) and tumor grade (p < 0.001). PTR was independently associated with reduced DSM irrespective of statistical methods employed: ITT hazard ratio [HR] 0.60, p = 0.005; PP HR 0.58, p < 0.001; and IV HR 0.07, p = 0.019. Other factors associated with DSM were age, PS, high chromogranin A, and somatostatin analog treatment. CONCLUSION Taking advantage of contrasting institutional treatment strategies, this study identified PTR as an independent predictor of DSM. Future prospective studies should aim to validate these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonja Levy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - James D Arthur
- Department of Surgery, Liverpool University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Melissa Banks
- Department of Surgery, Liverpool University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Niels F M Kok
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Stephen W Fenwick
- Department of Surgery, Liverpool University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Rafael Diaz-Nieto
- Department of Surgery, Liverpool University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastroenterologic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daniel J Cuthbertson
- Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.,Department of Endocrinology, Liverpool University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Gerlof D Valk
- Department of Endocrine Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Koert F D Kuhlmann
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Margot E T Tesselaar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
de Jonge L, van de Schootbrugge-Vandermeer HJ, Breekveldt ECH, Spaander MCW, van Vuuren HJ, van Kemenade FJ, Dekker E, Nagtegaal ID, van Leerdam ME, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I. Modelling optimal use of temporarily restricted colonoscopy capacity in a FIT-based CRC screening program: Application during the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0270223. [PMID: 35749423 PMCID: PMC9231802 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2021] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The COVID-19 pandemic forced colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs to downscale their colonoscopy capacity. In this study, we assessed strategies to deal with temporary restricted colonoscopy capacity in a FIT-based CRC screening program while aiming to retain the maximum possible preventive effect of the screening program. Design We simulated the Dutch national CRC screening program inviting individuals between ages 55 and 75 for biennial FIT using the MISCAN-Colon model including the 3-month disruption in the first half of 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. For the second half of 2020 and 2021, we simulated three different strategies for the total target population: 1) increasing the FIT cut-off, 2) skipping one screening for specific screening ages, and 3) extending the screening interval. We estimated the impact on required colonoscopy capacity in 2020–2021 and life years (LYs) lost in the long-term. Results Increasing the FIT cut-off, skipping screening ages and extending the screening interval resulted in a maximum reduction of 25,100 (-17.0%), 16,100(-10.9%) and 19,000 (-12.9%) colonoscopies, respectively. Modelling an increased FIT cut-off, the number of LYs lost ranged between 1,400 and 4,400. Skipping just a single screening age resulted in approximately 2,700 LYs lost and this was doubled in case of skipping two screening ages. Extending the screening interval up to 34 months had the smallest impact on LYs lost (up to 1,100 LYs lost). Conclusion This modelling study shows that to anticipate on restricted colonoscopy capacity, temporarily extending the screening interval retains the maximum possible preventive effect of the CRC screening program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucie de Jonge
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- * E-mail:
| | | | - Emilie C. H. Breekveldt
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Manon C. W. Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hanneke J. van Vuuren
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Iris D. Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Monique E. van Leerdam
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Grobbee EJ, Wisse PHA, Schreuders EH, van Roon A, van Dam L, Zauber AG, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Bramer W, Berhane S, Deeks JJ, Steyerberg EW, van Leerdam ME, Spaander MC, Kuipers EJ. Guaiac-based faecal occult blood tests versus faecal immunochemical tests for colorectal cancer screening in average-risk individuals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2022; 6:CD009276. [PMID: 35665911 PMCID: PMC9169237 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd009276.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Worldwide, many countries have adopted colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programmes, often based on faecal occult blood tests (FOBTs). CRC screening aims to detect advanced neoplasia (AN), which is defined as CRC or advanced adenomas. FOBTs fall into two categories based on detection technique and the detected blood component: qualitative guaiac-based FOBTs (gFOBTs) and faecal immunochemical tests (FITs), which can be qualitative and quantitative. Screening with gFOBTs reduces CRC-related mortality. OBJECTIVES To compare the diagnostic test accuracy of gFOBT and FIT screening for detecting advanced colorectal neoplasia in average-risk individuals. SEARCH METHODS We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, BIOSIS Citation Index, Science Citation Index Expanded, and Google Scholar. We searched the reference lists and PubMed-related articles of included studies to identify additional studies. SELECTION CRITERIA We included prospective and retrospective studies that provided the number of true positives, false positives, false negatives, and true negatives for gFOBTs, FITs, or both, with colonoscopy as reference standard. We excluded case-control studies. We included studies in which all participants underwent both index test and reference standard ("reference standard: all"), and studies in which only participants with a positive index test underwent the reference standard while participants with a negative test were followed for at least one year for development of interval carcinomas ("reference standard: positive"). The target population consisted of asymptomatic, average-risk individuals undergoing CRC screening. The target conditions were CRC and advanced neoplasia (advanced adenomas and CRC combined). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently screened and selected studies for inclusion. In case of disagreement, a third review author made the final decision. We used the Rutter and Gatsonis hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic model to explore differences between tests and identify potential sources of heterogeneity, and the bivariate hierarchical model to estimate sensitivity and specificity at common thresholds: 10 µg haemoglobin (Hb)/g faeces and 20 µg Hb/g faeces. We performed indirect comparisons of the accuracy of the two tests and direct comparisons when both index tests were evaluated in the same population. MAIN RESULTS We ran the initial search on 25 June 2019, which yielded 63 studies for inclusion. We ran a top-up search on 14 September 2021, which yielded one potentially eligible study, currently awaiting classification. We included a total of 33 "reference standard: all" published articles involving 104,640 participants. Six studies evaluated only gFOBTs, 23 studies evaluated only FITs, and four studies included both gFOBTs and FITs. The cut-off for positivity of FITs varied between 2.4 μg and 50 µg Hb/g faeces. For each Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS)-2 domain, we assessed risk of bias as high in less than 20% of studies. The summary curve showed that FITs had a higher discriminative ability than gFOBTs for AN (P < 0.001) and CRC (P = 0.004). For the detection of AN, the summary sensitivity of gFOBTs was 15% (95% confidence interval (CI) 12% to 20%), which was significantly lower than FITs at both 10 μg and 20 μg Hb/g cut-offs with summary sensitivities of 33% (95% CI 27% to 40%; P < 0.001) and 26% (95% CI 21% to 31%, P = 0.002), respectively. Results were simulated in a hypothetical cohort of 10,000 screening participants with 1% CRC prevalence and 10% AN prevalence. Out of 1000 participants with AN, gFOBTs missed 850, while FITs missed 670 (10 μg Hb/g cut-off) and 740 (20 μg Hb/g cut-off). No significant differences in summary specificity for AN detection were found between gFOBTs (94%; 95% CI 92% to 96%), and FITs at 10 μg Hb/g cut-off (93%; 95% CI 90% to 95%) and at 20 μg Hb/g cut-off (97%; 95% CI 95% to 98%). So, among 9000 participants without AN, 540 were offered (unnecessary) colonoscopy with gFOBTs compared to 630 (10 μg Hb/g) and 270 (20 μg Hb/g) with FITs. Similarly, for the detection of CRC, the summary sensitivity of gFOBTs, 39% (95% CI 25% to 55%), was significantly lower than FITs at 10 μg and 20 μg Hb/g cut-offs: 76% (95% CI 57% to 88%: P = 0.001) and 65% (95% CI 46% to 80%; P = 0.035), respectively. So, out of 100 participants with CRC, gFOBTs missed 61, and FITs missed 24 (10 μg Hb/g) and 35 (20 μg Hb/g). No significant differences in summary specificity for CRC were found between gFOBTs (94%; 95% CI 91% to 96%), and FITs at the 10 μg Hb/g cut-off (94%; 95% CI 87% to 97%) and 20 μg Hb/g cut-off (96%; 95% CI 91% to 98%). So, out of 9900 participants without CRC, 594 were offered (unnecessary) colonoscopy with gFOBTs versus 594 (10 μg Hb/g) and 396 (20 μg Hb/g) with FITs. In five studies that compared FITs and gFOBTs in the same population, FITs showed a higher discriminative ability for AN than gFOBTs (P = 0.003). We included a total of 30 "reference standard: positive" studies involving 3,664,934 participants. Of these, eight were gFOBT-only studies, 18 were FIT-only studies, and four studies combined both gFOBTs and FITs. The cut-off for positivity of FITs varied between 5 µg to 250 µg Hb/g faeces. For each QUADAS-2 domain, we assessed risk of bias as high in less than 20% of studies. The summary curve showed that FITs had a higher discriminative ability for detecting CRC than gFOBTs (P < 0.001). The summary sensitivity for CRC of gFOBTs, 59% (95% CI 55% to 64%), was significantly lower than FITs at the 10 μg Hb/g cut-off, 89% (95% CI 80% to 95%; P < 0.001) and the 20 μg Hb/g cut-off, 89% (95% CI 85% to 92%; P < 0.001). So, in the hypothetical cohort with 100 participants with CRC, gFOBTs missed 41, while FITs missed 11 (10 μg Hb/g) and 11 (20 μg Hb/g). The summary specificity of gFOBTs was 98% (95% CI 98% to 99%), which was higher than FITs at both 10 μg and 20 μg Hb/g cut-offs: 94% (95% CI 92% to 95%; P < 0.001) and 95% (95% CI 94% to 96%; P < 0.001), respectively. So, out of 9900 participants without CRC, 198 were offered (unnecessary) colonoscopy with gFOBTs compared to 594 (10 μg Hb/g) and 495 (20 μg Hb/g) with FITs. At a specificity of 90% and 95%, FITs had a higher sensitivity than gFOBTs. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS FITs are superior to gFOBTs in detecting AN and CRC in average-risk individuals. Specificity of both tests was similar in "reference standard: all" studies, whereas specificity was significantly higher for gFOBTs than FITs in "reference standard: positive" studies. However, at pre-specified specificities, the sensitivity of FITs was significantly higher than gFOBTs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esmée J Grobbee
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Pieter HA Wisse
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Eline H Schreuders
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Aafke van Roon
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, Netherlands
| | - Leonie van Dam
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ann G Zauber
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Wichor Bramer
- Medical Library , Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Sarah Berhane
- NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust and University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jonathan J Deeks
- NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust and University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Ewout W Steyerberg
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Manon Cw Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ernst J Kuipers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|