1
|
Basten M, Pan KY, van Tuijl LA, de Graeff A, Dekker J, Hoogendoorn AW, Lamers F, Ranchor AV, Vermeulen R, Portengen L, Voogd AC, Abell J, Awadalla P, Beekman ATF, Bjerkeset O, Boyd A, Cui Y, Frank P, Galenkamp H, Garssen B, Hellingman S, Huisman M, Huss A, Keats MR, Kok AAL, Krokstad S, van Leeuwen FE, Luik AI, Noisel N, Payette Y, Penninx BWJH, Rissanen I, Roest AM, Rosmalen JGM, Ruiter R, Schoevers RA, Soave D, Spaan M, Steptoe A, Stronks K, Sund ER, Sweeney E, Twait EL, Teyhan A, Verschuren WMM, van der Willik KD, Geerlings MI. Psychosocial factors, health behaviors and risk of cancer incidence: Testing interaction and effect modification in an individual participant data meta-analysis. Int J Cancer 2024; 154:1745-1759. [PMID: 38289012 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2023] [Revised: 11/30/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 03/14/2024]
Abstract
Depression, anxiety and other psychosocial factors are hypothesized to be involved in cancer development. We examined whether psychosocial factors interact with or modify the effects of health behaviors, such as smoking and alcohol use, in relation to cancer incidence. Two-stage individual participant data meta-analyses were performed based on 22 cohorts of the PSYchosocial factors and CAncer (PSY-CA) study. We examined nine psychosocial factors (depression diagnosis, depression symptoms, anxiety diagnosis, anxiety symptoms, perceived social support, loss events, general distress, neuroticism, relationship status), seven health behaviors/behavior-related factors (smoking, alcohol use, physical activity, body mass index, sedentary behavior, sleep quality, sleep duration) and seven cancer outcomes (overall cancer, smoking-related, alcohol-related, breast, lung, prostate, colorectal). Effects of the psychosocial factor, health behavior and their product term on cancer incidence were estimated using Cox regression. We pooled cohort-specific estimates using multivariate random-effects meta-analyses. Additive and multiplicative interaction/effect modification was examined. This study involved 437,827 participants, 36,961 incident cancer diagnoses, and 4,749,481 person years of follow-up. Out of 744 combinations of psychosocial factors, health behaviors, and cancer outcomes, we found no evidence of interaction. Effect modification was found for some combinations, but there were no clear patterns for any particular factors or outcomes involved. In this first large study to systematically examine potential interaction and effect modification, we found no evidence for psychosocial factors to interact with or modify health behaviors in relation to cancer incidence. The behavioral risk profile for cancer incidence is similar in people with and without psychosocial stress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maartje Basten
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Health Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Mental Health program, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Health Behaviors and Chronic Diseases program, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kuan-Yu Pan
- Amsterdam Public Health, Mental Health program, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Unit of Occupational Medicine, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Lonneke A van Tuijl
- Department of Health Psychology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Alexander de Graeff
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Joost Dekker
- Amsterdam Public Health, Mental Health program, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Adriaan W Hoogendoorn
- Amsterdam Public Health, Mental Health program, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Femke Lamers
- Amsterdam Public Health, Mental Health program, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Adelita V Ranchor
- Department of Health Psychology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Roel Vermeulen
- Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Lützen Portengen
- Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Adri C Voogd
- Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jessica Abell
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Philip Awadalla
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Aartjan T F Beekman
- Amsterdam Public Health, Mental Health program, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ottar Bjerkeset
- Faculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Nord University, Levanger, Norway
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Mental Health, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Andy Boyd
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Yunsong Cui
- Atlantic Partnership for Tomorrow's Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Philipp Frank
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Henrike Galenkamp
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bert Garssen
- Department of Health Psychology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Sean Hellingman
- Department of Mathematics, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Canada
| | - Martijn Huisman
- Department of Epidemiology & Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Sociology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Aging & Later Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anke Huss
- Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Melanie R Keats
- School of Health and Human Performance, Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Almar A L Kok
- Amsterdam Public Health, Mental Health program, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology & Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Aging & Later Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Steinar Krokstad
- HUNT Research Centre, Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Norway
- Levanger hospital, Nord-Trøndelag Hospital Trust, Levanger, Norway
| | - Flora E van Leeuwen
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Annemarie I Luik
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Brenda W J H Penninx
- Amsterdam Public Health, Mental Health program, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ina Rissanen
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Annelieke M Roest
- Department of Developmental Psychology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Judith G M Rosmalen
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Rikje Ruiter
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine, Maasstad, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Robert A Schoevers
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - David Soave
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Mathematics, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Canada
| | - Mandy Spaan
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andrew Steptoe
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Karien Stronks
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Center for Urban Mental Health, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Erik R Sund
- Faculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Nord University, Levanger, Norway
- HUNT Research Centre, Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Norway
- Levanger hospital, Nord-Trøndelag Hospital Trust, Levanger, Norway
| | - Ellen Sweeney
- Atlantic Partnership for Tomorrow's Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Emma L Twait
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Alison Teyhan
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - W M Monique Verschuren
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Centre for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - Kimberly D van der Willik
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mirjam I Geerlings
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Aging & Later Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of General Practice, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Personalized Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, and Mood, Anxiety, Psychosis, Stress, and Sleep, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lammers EMJ, Nijdam A, Zijlstra JM, Janus CPM, de Weijer RJ, Appelman Y, Manintveld OC, Teske AJ, van Leeuwen FE, Aleman BMP. Cardiovascular screening outcomes in the Dutch survivorship care program for Hodgkin lymphoma survivors. J Cancer Surviv 2024:10.1007/s11764-024-01561-y. [PMID: 38649650 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-024-01561-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) survivors are at increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) due to former lymphoma treatment. In 2013, cardiovascular screening for 5-year HL survivors according to national guidelines was implemented in Dutch survivorship clinics. We aim to assess the following: (1) adherence to screening guidelines and (2) the yield of (risk factors for) CVD in the screening program. METHODS The study population consisted of 5-year HL survivors who received survivorship care at three University Medical Centers from 2013 to 2016 through 2021. Patient characteristics, cardiovascular screening procedures, and outcomes were collected from the medical records. RESULTS In 186 survivors eligible for cardiovascular screening (mean age 47.8 years, 60.8% female), the following diagnostics were performed: complete blood tests (81.0%, median frequency: yearly instead of advised 5-yearly evaluation), electrocardiogram (93.0%), echocardiography (94.6%). Fifty-five percent of survivors had at least one modifiable cardiovascular risk factor (i.e., current smoking, overweight, new/insufficiently controlled hypertension, dyslipidemia, or diabetes). Screening detected ≥ 1 CVD in 31.1% of survivors. Among survivors with available echocardiography report (n = 106), screening detected new aortic and/or mitral valve dysfunction(s) in 51.0% (with grades 3-4 in 4.9%) and impaired left ventricular ejection fraction in 10.3%. CONCLUSIONS Adherence to the screening guidelines in the Dutch HL survivorship care program was reasonable to good and a substantial number of actionable (risk factors for) CVD were diagnosed. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Our findings inform HL survivors at high risk of late cardiotoxicity about cardiovascular screening findings and demonstrate appropriate therapeutic actions after diagnosis of (risk factors for) CVD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eline M J Lammers
- Department of Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Annelies Nijdam
- Department of Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Josée M Zijlstra
- Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Cécile P M Janus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Roel J de Weijer
- Department of Hematology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Yolande Appelman
- Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Arco J Teske
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Flora E van Leeuwen
- Department of Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Berthe M P Aleman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lammers EMJ, Zijlstra JM, Retèl VP, Aleman BMP, van Leeuwen FE, Nijdam A. Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Survivorship Care for Survivors of Hodgkin Lymphoma (INSIGHT Study): Protocol for a Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study With a Quasi-Experimental Design. JMIR Res Protoc 2024; 13:e55601. [PMID: 38635308 DOI: 10.2196/55601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2023] [Revised: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) occurs at young ages, with the highest incidence between 20 and 40 years. While cure rates have improved to 80%-90% over the past decades, survivors of HL are at substantial risk of late treatment-related complications, such as cardiovascular diseases, breast cancer, severe infections, and hypothyroidism. To reduce morbidity and mortality from late treatment effects, the Dutch Better care after lymphoma, Evaluation of long-term Treatment Effects and screening Recommendations (BETER) consortium developed a survivorship care program for 5-year survivors of HL that includes risk-based screening for and treatment of (risk factors for) late adverse events. Even though several cancer survivorship care programs have been established worldwide, there is a lack of knowledge about their effectiveness in clinical practice. OBJECTIVE The Improving Nationwide Survivorship care Infrastructure and Guidelines after Hodgkin lymphoma Treatment (INSIGHT) study evaluates whether Dutch BETER survivorship care for survivors of HL decreases survivors' burden of disease from late adverse events after HL treatment and associated health care costs and improves their quality of life. METHODS The INSIGHT study is a multicenter retrospective cohort study with a quasi-experimental design and prospective follow-up, embedded in the national BETER survivorship care infrastructure. The first BETER clinics started in 2013-2016 and several other centers started or will start BETER clinics in 2019-2024. This allows us to compare survivors who did and those who did not receive BETER survivorship care in the last decade. Survivors in the intervention group are matched to controls (n=450 per group) based on sex, age at diagnosis (±5 years), age in 2013 (±5 years), and treatment characteristics. The primary outcome is the burden of disease in disability-adjusted life years from cardiovascular disease, breast cancer, severe infections, and hypothyroidism. In a cost-effectiveness analysis, we will assess the cost of BETER survivorship care per averted or gained disability-adjusted life year and quality-adjusted life year. Secondary outcomes are BETER clinic attendance, adherence to screening guidelines, and knowledge and distress about late effects among survivors of HL. Study data are collected from a survivor survey, a general practitioner survey, medical records, and through linkages with national disease registries. RESULTS The study was funded in November 2020 and approved by the institutional review board of the Netherlands Cancer Institute in July 2021. We expect to finalize recruitment by October 2024, data collection by early 2025, and data analysis by May 2025. CONCLUSIONS INSIGHT is the first evaluation of a comprehensive survivorship program using real-world data; it will result in new information on the (cost-)effectiveness of survivorship care in survivors of HL in clinical practice. The results of this study will be used to improve the BETER program where necessary and contribute to more effective evidence-based long-term survivorship care for lymphoma survivors. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) PRR1-10.2196/55601.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eline M J Lammers
- Department of Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Josée M Zijlstra
- Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit, Cancer Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Valesca P Retèl
- Department of Health Technology Assessment, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Berthe M P Aleman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Flora E van Leeuwen
- Department of Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Annelies Nijdam
- Department of Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Streefkerk N, Teepen JC, Feijen EAM, Jóźwiak K, van der Pal HJH, Ronckers CM, De Vries ACH, Van der Heiden-van Der Loo M, Hollema N, van den Berg M, Loonen J, Grootenhuis MA, Bresters D, Versluys AB, van Dulmen-den Broeder E, van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM, van Leeuwen FE, Neggers SJCMM, Van Santen HM, Hawkins M, Hauptmann M, Yoneoka D, Korevaar JC, Tissing WJE, Kremer LCM. The cumulative burden of self-reported, clinically relevant outcomes in long-term childhood cancer survivors and implications for survivorship care: A DCCSS LATER study. Cancer 2024; 130:1349-1358. [PMID: 38100618 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Revised: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/27/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study is to evaluate how cumulative burden of clinically relevant, self-reported outcomes in childhood cancer survivors (CCSs) compares to a sibling control group and to explore how the burden corresponds to levels of care proposed by existing risk stratifications. METHODS The authors invited 5925 5-year survivors from the Dutch Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (DCCSS LATER) cohort and their 1066 siblings to complete a questionnaire on health outcomes. Health outcomes were validated by self-reported medication use or medical record review. Missing data on clinically relevant outcomes in CCSs for whom no questionnaire data were available were imputed with predictive mean matching. We calculated the mean cumulative count (MCC) for clinically relevant outcomes. Furthermore, we calculated 30-year MCC for groups of CCSs based on primary cancer diagnosis and treatment, ranked 30-year MCC, and compared the ranking to levels of care according to existing risk stratifications. RESULTS At median 18.5 years after 5-year survival, 46% of CCSs had at least one clinically relevant outcome. CCSs experienced 2.8 times more health conditions than siblings (30-year MCC = 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74-0.85 vs. 30-year MCC = 0.29; 95% CI, 0.25-0.34). CCSs' burden of clinically relevant outcomes consisted mainly of endocrine and vascular conditions and varied by primary cancer type. The ranking of the 30-year MCC often did not correspond with levels of care in existing risk stratifications. CONCLUSIONS CCSs experience a high cumulative burden of clinically relevant outcomes that was not completely reflected by current risk stratifications. Choices for survivorship care should extend beyond primary tumor and treatment parameters, and should consider also including CCSs' current morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Streefkerk
- Department Pediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jop C Teepen
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Katarzyna Jóźwiak
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Institute of Biostatistics and Registry Research, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Neuruppin, Germany
| | | | - Cecile M Ronckers
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Institute of Biostatistics and Registry Research, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Neuruppin, Germany
| | - Andrica C H De Vries
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, Sophia Children's Hospital/Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Nynke Hollema
- Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Marleen van den Berg
- Department of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jacqueline Loonen
- Department of Hematology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Dorine Bresters
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder
- Department of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marry M van den Heuvel-Eibrink
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, Sophia Children's Hospital/Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Flora E van Leeuwen
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Hanneke M Van Santen
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital/University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Mike Hawkins
- Centre for Childhood Cancer Survivor Studies, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Michael Hauptmann
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Institute of Biostatistics and Registry Research, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Neuruppin, Germany
| | - Daisuke Yoneoka
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Graduate School of Public Health, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Joke C Korevaar
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Wim J E Tissing
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, University of Groningen/University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Leontien C M Kremer
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Breekveldt ECH, Ykema BLM, Bisseling TM, Moons LMG, Spaander MCW, Huibregtse IL, van der Biessen-van Beek DT, Mulder SF, Saveur L, Kerst JM, Zweers D, Suelmann BB, de Wit R, Reijm A, van Baalen S, Butterly LF, Hisey WM, Robinson CM, van Vuuren AJ, Carvalho B, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Schaapveld M, van Leeuwen FE, Snaebjornsson P, van Leerdam ME. Prevalence of neoplasia at colonoscopy among testicular cancer survivors treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. Int J Cancer 2024; 154:1474-1483. [PMID: 38151749 PMCID: PMC10932931 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Revised: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Abstract
Testicular cancer survivors (TCS) treated with platinum-based chemotherapy have an increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). We determined the yield of colonoscopy in TCS to assess its potential in reducing CRC incidence and mortality. We conducted a colonoscopy screening study among TCS in four Dutch hospitals to assess the yield of colorectal neoplasia. Neoplasia was defined as adenomas, serrated polyps (SPs), advanced adenomas (AAs: ≥10 mm diameter, high-grade dysplasia or ≥25% villous component), advanced serrated polyps (ASPs: ≥10 mm diameter or dysplasia) or CRC. Advanced neoplasia (AN) was defined as AA, ASP or CRC. Colonoscopy yield was compared to average-risk American males who underwent screening colonoscopy (n = 24,193) using a propensity score matched analysis, adjusted for age, smoking status, alcohol consumption and body mass index. A total of 137 TCS underwent colonoscopy. Median age was 50 years among TCS (IQR 43-57) vs 55 years (IQR 51-62) among American controls. A total of 126 TCS were matched to 602 controls. The prevalence of AN was higher in TCS than in controls (8.7% vs 1.7%; P = .0002). Nonadvanced adenomas and SPs were detected in 45.2% of TCS vs 5.5% of controls (P < .0001). No lesions were detected in 46.0% of TCS vs 92.9% of controls (P < .0001). TCS treated with platinum-based chemotherapy have a higher prevalence of neoplasia and AN than matched controls. These results support our hypothesis that platinum-based chemotherapy increases the risk of colorectal neoplasia in TCS. Cost-effectiveness studies are warranted to ascertain the threshold of AN prevalence that justifies the recommendation of colonoscopy for TCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emilie C. H. Breekveldt
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Berbel L. M. Ykema
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Tanya M. Bisseling
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Leon M. G. Moons
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Manon C. W. Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Inge L. Huibregtse
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Sasja F. Mulder
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Lisette Saveur
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J. Martijn Kerst
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Danielle Zweers
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Britt B.M. Suelmann
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Ronald de Wit
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Agnes Reijm
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sophia van Baalen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lynn F. Butterly
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
- NH Colonoscopy Registry, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - William M. Hisey
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
- NH Colonoscopy Registry, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Christina M. Robinson
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
- NH Colonoscopy Registry, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Anneke J. van Vuuren
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Beatriz Carvalho
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Michael Schaapveld
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Flora E. van Leeuwen
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Petur Snaebjornsson
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- University of Iceland, Faculty of Medicine, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Monique E. van Leerdam
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Spoor J, Vrancken Peeters MJTDF, Oldenburg HSA, Bleiker EMA, van Leeuwen FE. Strategies to increase survey participation: a randomized controlled study in a population of breast cancer survivors. Ann Epidemiol 2024; 94:S1047-2797(24)00047-4. [PMID: 38609024 DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2024.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Revised: 03/04/2024] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data collection by mailing questionnaires to the study population is one of the main research methods in epidemiologic studies. As participation rates are decreasing, easy-to-implement and cost-effective strategies to increase survey participation are needed. In this study, we tested the effect of a pragmatic combination of evidence-based interventions. METHODS We conducted a two-armed randomized controlled trial, nested in a cohort of breast cancer survivors (n=1000) in the setting of a health outcomes survey. The intervention arm received a postal pre-notification, a non-monetary incentive (ballpoint with the study logo) and an alternative invitation letter in which several lay-out and textual adjustments were implemented according to behavioural science techniques. The alternative invitation letter also contained a QR-code through which an information video about the study could be accessed. The control arm was invited according to standard practice. Participants had the option to fill-out a questionnaire either on paper or online. A questionnaire with more than 50% of the questions answered classified as participation. RESULTS Overall participation rate was 62.9%. No significant difference in participation rate was observed between intervention and control arm (64.5% vs 61.3%, Risk Ratio (RR) 1.05, 95% CI [0.96 - 1.16]). Older age at study (>65 vs <51 years), and high socio-economic status (highest vs lowest quartile) were associated with higher participation rates (RR 1.30, 95% CI [1.07 - 1.57] and 1.24, 95% CI [1.09 - 1.42] respectively). In-situ carcinoma compared to invasive cancer and longer interval since treatment were associated with lower participation (RR 0.86, 95% CI [0.74 - 0.99] and RR 0.92, 95% CI [0.87 - 0.99] per 5 year increase, respectively). CONCLUSION Overall, the combination of four interventions tested in this study did not improve survey participation among breast cancer survivors. The overall participation rate was relatively high, possibly due to the study population of cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Spoor
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marie-Jeanne T D F Vrancken Peeters
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hester S A Oldenburg
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Eveline M A Bleiker
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Family Cancer Clinic, Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Flora E van Leeuwen
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Neppelenbroek SIM, Geurts YM, Aleman BMP, Lugtenburg PJ, Rademakers SE, de Weijer RJ, Schippers MGA, Ta BDP, Plattel WJ, Zijlstra JM, van der Maazen RWM, Nijziel MR, Ong F, Schimmel EC, Posthuma EFM, Kersten MJ, Böhmer LH, Muller K, Koene HR, Te Boome LCJ, Bilgin YM, de Jongh E, Janus CPM, van Leeuwen FE, Schaapveld M. Doxorubicin Exposure and Breast Cancer Risk in Survivors of Adolescent and Adult Hodgkin Lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2024:JCO2301386. [PMID: 38359378 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.01386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Revised: 11/17/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Female Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) survivors treated with chest radiotherapy (RT) at a young age have a strongly increased risk of breast cancer (BC). Studies in childhood cancer survivors have shown that doxorubicin exposure may also increase BC risk. Although doxorubicin is the cornerstone of HL chemotherapy, the association between doxorubicin and BC risk has not been examined in HL survivors treated at adult ages. METHODS We assessed BC risk in a cohort of 1,964 female 5-year HL survivors, treated at age 15-50 years in 20 Dutch hospitals between 1975 and 2008. We calculated standardized incidence ratios, absolute excess risks, and cumulative incidences. Doxorubicin exposure was analyzed using multivariable Cox regression analyses. RESULTS After a median follow-up of 21.6 years (IQR, 15.8-27.1 years), 252 women had developed invasive BC or ductal carcinoma in situ. The 30-year cumulative incidence was 20.8% (95% CI, 18.2 to 23.4). Survivors treated with a cumulative doxorubicin dose of >200 mg/m2 had a 1.5-fold increased BC risk (95% CI, 1.08 to 2.1), compared with survivors not treated with doxorubicin. BC risk increased 1.18-fold (95% CI, 1.05 to 1.32) per additional 100 mg/m2 doxorubicin (Ptrend = .004). The risk increase associated with doxorubicin (yes v no) was not modified by age at first treatment (hazard ratio [HR]age <21 years, 1.5 [95% CI, 0.9 to 2.6]; HRage ≥21 years, 1.3 [95% CI, 0.9 to 1.9) or chest RT (HRwithout mantle/axillary field RT, 1.9 [95% CI, 1.06 to 3.3]; HRwith mantle/axillary field RT, 1.2 [95% CI, 0.8 to 1.8]). CONCLUSION This study shows that treatment with doxorubicin is associated with increased BC risk in both adolescent and adult HL survivors. Our results have implications for BC surveillance guidelines for HL survivors and treatment strategies for patients with newly diagnosed HL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yvonne M Geurts
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Berthe M P Aleman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Pieternella J Lugtenburg
- Department of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Saskia E Rademakers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Roel J de Weijer
- Department of Hematology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Bastiaan D P Ta
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Wouter J Plattel
- Department of Hematology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Josée M Zijlstra
- Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Marten R Nijziel
- Catharina Cancer Institute, Department of Hemato-Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Francisca Ong
- Department of Radiotherapy, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - Erik C Schimmel
- Department of Radiotherapy, Radiotherapiegroep, Arnhem, the Netherlands
| | | | - Marie José Kersten
- Department of Hematology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lara H Böhmer
- Department of Hematology, Haga Teaching Hospital, Den Haag, the Netherlands
| | - Karin Muller
- Department of Radiotherapy, Radiotherapiegroep, Deventer, the Netherlands
| | - Harry R Koene
- Department of Hematology, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Liane C J Te Boome
- Department of Hematology, Haaglanden Medical Center, Den Haag, the Netherlands
| | - Yavuz M Bilgin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Admiraal De Ruyter Hospital, Goes, the Netherlands
| | - Eva de Jongh
- Department of Internal Medicine, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Cécile P M Janus
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Flora E van Leeuwen
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Michael Schaapveld
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Terra L, Heemskerk-Gerritsen BAM, Beekman MJ, Engelhardt E, Mourits MJE, van Doorn HC, de Hullu JA, Mom CH, Slangen BFM, Gaarenstroom KN, van Beurden M, Roeters Van Lennep JE, van Dorst EBL, van der Kolk LE, Collée JM, Wevers MR, Ausems MGEM, van Engelen K, van de Beek I, Berger LPV, van Asperen CJ, Gomez Garcia EB, Maas AHEM, Hooning MJ, Steensma AB, van Leeuwen FE. Urinary incontinence more than 15 years after premenopausal risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy: a multicentre cross-sectional study. BJOG 2024; 131:99-108. [PMID: 37394722 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.17591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2023] [Revised: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 06/16/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To study the impact of premenopausal risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO), compared with postmenopausal RRSO, on urinary incontinence (UI) ≥10 years later. DESIGN Cross-sectional study, nested in a nationwide cohort. SETTING Multicentre in the Netherlands. POPULATION 750 women (68% BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers) who underwent either premenopausal RRSO (≤45 years, n = 496) or postmenopausal RRSO (≥54 years, n = 254). All participants were ≥55 years at the time of the study. METHODS Urinary incontinence was assessed by the urinary distress inventory-6 (UDI-6); a score ≥33.3 indicated symptomatic UI. The incontinence impact questionnaire short form (IIQ-SF) was used to assess the impact on women's health-related quality of life (HR-QoL). Differences between groups were analysed using regression analyses adjusting for current age and other confounders. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Differences in UDI-6 scores and IIQ-SF scores between women with a premenopausal and a postmenopausal RRSO. RESULTS Women in the premenopausal RRSO group had slightly higher UDI-6 scores compared with women in the postmenopausal RRSO group (P = 0.053), and their risk of symptomatic UI was non-significantly increased (odds ratio [OR] 2.1, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.93-4.78). A premenopausal RRSO was associated with a higher risk of stress UI (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.2-10.0) but not with urge UI. The proportions of women with a significant impact of UI on HR-QoL were similar in the premenopausal and postmenopausal RRSO groups (10.4% and 13.0%, respectively; P = 0.46). CONCLUSIONS More than 15 years after premenopausal RRSO, there were no significant differences in overall symptomatic UI between women with a premenopausal and those with a postmenopausal RRSO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lara Terra
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Maarten J Beekman
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ellen Engelhardt
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marian J E Mourits
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Helena C van Doorn
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joanna A de Hullu
- Department for Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Constantijne H Mom
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Brigitte F M Slangen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Katja N Gaarenstroom
- Department of Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Marc van Beurden
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Eleonora B L van Dorst
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Lizet E van der Kolk
- Family Cancer Clinic, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Margriet Collée
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marijke R Wevers
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Margreet G E M Ausems
- Division Laboratories, Pharmacy and Biomedical Genetics, Department of Genetics, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Klaartje van Engelen
- Department of Human Genetics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Irma van de Beek
- Department for Human Genetics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lieke P V Berger
- Department of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Christi J van Asperen
- Department for Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Encarna B Gomez Garcia
- Department for Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Angela H E M Maas
- Department of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Maartje J Hooning
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anneke B Steensma
- Department of Gynaecologic Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Flora E van Leeuwen
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
van Barele M, Akdeniz D, Heemskerk-Gerritsen BAM, Andrieu N, Noguès C, van Asperen CJ, Wevers M, Ausems MGEM, de Bock GH, Dommering CJ, Gómez-García EB, van Leeuwen FE, Mooij TM, Easton DF, Antoniou AC, Evans DG, Izatt L, Tischkowitz M, Frost D, Brewer C, Olah E, Simard J, Singer CF, Thomassen M, Kast K, Rhiem K, Engel C, de la Hoya M, Foretová L, Jakubowska A, Jager A, Sattler MGA, Schmidt MK, Hooning MJ. Contralateral breast cancer risk in patients with breast cancer and a germline-BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant undergoing radiation. J Natl Cancer Inst 2023; 115:1318-1328. [PMID: 37369040 PMCID: PMC10637040 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djad116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2022] [Revised: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 05/27/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiation-induced secondary breast cancer (BC) may be a concern after radiation therapy (RT) for primary breast cancer (PBC), especially in young patients with germline (g)BRCA-associated BC who already have high contralateral BC (CBC) risk and potentially increased genetic susceptibility to radiation. We sought to investigate whether adjuvant RT for PBC increases the risk of CBC in patients with gBRCA1/2-associated BC. METHODS The gBRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers diagnosed with PBC were selected from the prospective International BRCA1/2 Carrier Cohort Study. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards models to investigate the association between RT (yes vs no) and CBC risk. We further stratified for BRCA status and age at PBC diagnosis (<40 and >40 years). Statistical significance tests were 2-sided. RESULTS Of 3602 eligible patients, 2297 (64%) received adjuvant RT. Median follow-up was 9.6 years. The RT group had more patients with stage III PBC than the non-RT group (15% vs 3%, P < .001), received chemotherapy more often (81% vs 70%, P < .001), and received endocrine therapy more often (50% vs 35%, P < .001). The RT group had an increased CBC risk compared with the non-RT group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 1.44; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.12 to 1.86). Statistical significance was observed in gBRCA2 (HR = 1.77; 95% CI = 1.13 to 2.77) but not in gBRCA1 pathogenic variant carriers (HR = 1.29; 95% CI = 0.93 to 1.77; P = .39 for interaction). In the combined gBRCA1/2 group, patients irradiated when they were younger than or older than 40 years of age at PBC diagnosis showed similar risks (HR = 1.38; 95% CI = 0.93 to 2.04 and HR = 1.56; 95% CI = 1.11 to 2.19, respectively). CONCLUSIONS RT regimens minimizing contralateral breast dose should be considered in gBRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark van Barele
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Delal Akdeniz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Genepso
- Département d’Anticipation et de Suivi des Cancers, Oncogénétique Clinique, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - Nadine Andrieu
- INSERM, U900, Paris, France
- Institut Curie, Paris, France
- PSL Research University, Paris, France
- Mines ParisTech, Fontainebleau, France
| | - Catherine Noguès
- Département d’Anticipation et de Suivi des Cancers, Oncogénétique Clinique, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes & Aix Marseille University, INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM, Marseille, France
| | - HEBON
- The Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Research Group Netherlands (HEBON), Coordinating Center, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Christi J van Asperen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Marijke Wevers
- Department for Clinical Genetics, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Margreet G E M Ausems
- Division of Laboratories, Pharmacy and Biomedical Genetics, Department of Genetics, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Geertruida H de Bock
- Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Charlotte J Dommering
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Flora E van Leeuwen
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute–Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Thea M Mooij
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute–Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - EMBRACE
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Douglas F Easton
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Antonis C Antoniou
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - D Gareth Evans
- The Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, The Nightingale Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Genomic Medicine, Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, The University of Manchester, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Manchester Breast Centre, Oglesby Cancer Research Centre, The Christie, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Louise Izatt
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Marc Tischkowitz
- Department of Medical Genetics, National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Program in Cancer Genetics, Departments of Human Genetics and Oncology, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Debra Frost
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Carole Brewer
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Royal Devon & Exeter Hospital, Exeter, UK
| | - Edit Olah
- Department of Molecular Genetics, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Jacques Simard
- Genomics Center, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, Université Laval Research Center, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | - Christian F Singer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Mads Thomassen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Centre for Personalized Response Monitoring in Oncology (PREMIO), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Karin Kast
- Center of Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Center of Integrated Oncology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Center of Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Center of Integrated Oncology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Christoph Engel
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Miguel de la Hoya
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Lenka Foretová
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Anna Jakubowska
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
- Independent Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Genetic Diagnostics, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Agnes Jager
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Margriet G A Sattler
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marjanka K Schmidt
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute–Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute–Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Maartje J Hooning
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lubberts S, van Leeuwen FE, Schaapveld M, Gietema JA. Reply to G. Wang et al. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:4939-4940. [PMID: 37579250 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.01336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2023] [Accepted: 06/23/2023] [Indexed: 08/16/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Sjoukje Lubberts
- Sjoukje Lubberts, MD, Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen and University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands; Flora E. van Leeuwen, PhD and Michael Schaapveld, PhD, Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; and Jourik A. Gietema, MD, PhD, Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen and University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Flora E van Leeuwen
- Sjoukje Lubberts, MD, Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen and University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands; Flora E. van Leeuwen, PhD and Michael Schaapveld, PhD, Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; and Jourik A. Gietema, MD, PhD, Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen and University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Michael Schaapveld
- Sjoukje Lubberts, MD, Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen and University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands; Flora E. van Leeuwen, PhD and Michael Schaapveld, PhD, Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; and Jourik A. Gietema, MD, PhD, Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen and University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Jourik A Gietema
- Sjoukje Lubberts, MD, Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen and University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands; Flora E. van Leeuwen, PhD and Michael Schaapveld, PhD, Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; and Jourik A. Gietema, MD, PhD, Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen and University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
van Tuijl LA, Basten M, Pan KY, Vermeulen R, Portengen L, de Graeff A, Dekker J, Geerlings MI, Hoogendoorn A, Lamers F, Voogd AC, Abell J, Awadalla P, Beekman ATF, Bjerkeset O, Boyd A, Cui Y, Frank P, Galenkamp H, Garssen B, Hellingman S, Huisman M, Huss A, de Jong TR, Keats MR, Kok AAL, Krokstad S, van Leeuwen FE, Luik AI, Noisel N, Onland-Moret NC, Payette Y, Penninx BWJH, Rissanen I, Roest AM, Ruiter R, Schoevers RA, Soave D, Spaan M, Steptoe A, Stronks K, Sund ER, Sweeney E, Twait EL, Teyhan A, Verschuren WMM, van der Willik KD, Rosmalen JGM, Ranchor AV. Depression, anxiety, and the risk of cancer: An individual participant data meta-analysis. Cancer 2023; 129:3287-3299. [PMID: 37545248 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2022] [Revised: 03/16/2023] [Accepted: 04/07/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Depression and anxiety have long been hypothesized to be related to an increased cancer risk. Despite the great amount of research that has been conducted, findings are inconclusive. To provide a stronger basis for addressing the associations between depression, anxiety, and the incidence of various cancer types (overall, breast, lung, prostate, colorectal, alcohol-related, and smoking-related cancers), individual participant data (IPD) meta-analyses were performed within the Psychosocial Factors and Cancer Incidence (PSY-CA) consortium. METHODS The PSY-CA consortium includes data from 18 cohorts with measures of depression or anxiety (up to N = 319,613; cancer incidences, 25,803; person-years of follow-up, 3,254,714). Both symptoms and a diagnosis of depression and anxiety were examined as predictors of future cancer risk. Two-stage IPD meta-analyses were run, first by using Cox regression models in each cohort (stage 1), and then by aggregating the results in random-effects meta-analyses (stage 2). RESULTS No associations were found between depression or anxiety and overall, breast, prostate, colorectal, and alcohol-related cancers. Depression and anxiety (symptoms and diagnoses) were associated with the incidence of lung cancer and smoking-related cancers (hazard ratios [HRs], 1.06-1.60). However, these associations were substantially attenuated when additionally adjusting for known risk factors including smoking, alcohol use, and body mass index (HRs, 1.04-1.23). CONCLUSIONS Depression and anxiety are not related to increased risk for most cancer outcomes, except for lung and smoking-related cancers. This study shows that key covariates are likely to explain the relationship between depression, anxiety, and lung and smoking-related cancers. PREREGISTRATION NUMBER: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=157677.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lonneke A van Tuijl
- Health Psychology Section, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Maartje Basten
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Kuan-Yu Pan
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Mental Health Program, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Unit of Occupational Medicine, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Roel Vermeulen
- Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Lützen Portengen
- Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Alexander de Graeff
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Joost Dekker
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Mental Health Program, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mirjam I Geerlings
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Department of General Practice, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Aging & Later Life and Personalized Medicine, Amsterdam Public Health, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Neurodegeneration and Mood, Anxiety, Psychosis, Stress, and Sleep, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Adriaan Hoogendoorn
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- GGZ inGeest Specialized Mental Health Care, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Femke Lamers
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Mental Health Program, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Adri C Voogd
- Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Jessica Abell
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Philip Awadalla
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Aartjan T F Beekman
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ottar Bjerkeset
- Faculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Nord University, Levanger, Norway
- Department of Mental Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Andy Boyd
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Yunsong Cui
- Atlantic Partnership for Tomorrow's Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Philipp Frank
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Henrike Galenkamp
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bert Garssen
- Health Psychology Section, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Sean Hellingman
- Department of Mathematics, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | - Martijn Huisman
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Sociology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Anke Huss
- Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Melanie R Keats
- School of Health and Human Performance, Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Almar A L Kok
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Steinar Krokstad
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Trøndelag Health Study Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
- Levanger Hospital, Nord-Trøndelag Hospital Trust, Levanger, Norway
| | - Flora E van Leeuwen
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Annemarie I Luik
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - N Charlotte Onland-Moret
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Yves Payette
- CARTaGENE, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Brenda W J H Penninx
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ina Rissanen
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Annelieke M Roest
- Department of Developmental Psychology, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Rikje Ruiter
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine, Maasstad, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Robert A Schoevers
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - David Soave
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Mathematics, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mandy Spaan
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Andrew Steptoe
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Karien Stronks
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Centre for Urban Mental Health, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Erik R Sund
- Faculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Nord University, Levanger, Norway
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Trøndelag Health Study Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
- Levanger Hospital, Nord-Trøndelag Hospital Trust, Levanger, Norway
| | - Ellen Sweeney
- Atlantic Partnership for Tomorrow's Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Emma L Twait
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Department of General Practice, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Aging & Later Life and Personalized Medicine, Amsterdam Public Health, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Alison Teyhan
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - W M Monique Verschuren
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Centre for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Utrecht Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - Kimberly D van der Willik
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Judith G M Rosmalen
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Adelita V Ranchor
- Health Psychology Section, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Harmeling JX, Woerdeman LAE, Ozdemir E, Schaapveld M, Oldenburg HSA, Janus CPM, Russell NS, Koppert LB, Krul IM, van Leeuwen FE, Mureau MAM. Surgical outcomes following breast reconstruction in patients with and without a history of chest radiotherapy for Hodgkin lymphoma: a multicentre, matched cohort study. Int J Surg 2023; 109:2896-2905. [PMID: 37037583 PMCID: PMC10583922 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000000063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2022] [Accepted: 11/12/2022] [Indexed: 04/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer is the most common treatment-related second malignancy among women with previous chest radiotherapy for Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Little is known about the effects of this kind of radiotherapy on the outcomes of postmastectomy breast reconstruction (BR). This study compared adverse outcomes of BR after HL-related chest radiotherapy to matched controls. METHODS The authors conducted a retrospective, matched cohort study in two expert cancer centres in the Netherlands. BRs after therapeutic or prophylactic mastectomy in HL survivors who received chest radiotherapy were matched with BRs in nonirradiated patients without HL on age at mastectomy date, date of BR, and type of BR. The primary outcome was complication-related BR failure or conversion and secondary outcomes were complication-related re-operation, capsular contracture, major donor-site complications, and complication-related ICU admission. The authors analyzed all outcomes univariably using Fisher's exact tests and the authors assessed reconstruction failure, complication-related re-operation, and capsular contracture with multivariable Cox regression analysis adjusting for confounding and data clustering. RESULTS Seventy BRs in 41 patients who received chest radiotherapy for HL were matched to 121 BRs in 110 nonirradiated patients. Reconstruction failure did not differ between HL survivors (12.9%) and controls (12.4%). The comparison groups showed no differences in number of reoperations, major donor-site complications, or capsular contractures. BR in HL survivors more often let to ICU admission due to complications compared with controls ( P =0.048). CONCLUSIONS We observed no increased risk of adverse outcomes following BR after previous chest radiotherapy for HL. This is important information for counselling these patients and may improve shared decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ezgi Ozdemir
- Departments of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
| | - Michael Schaapveld
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Cécile P M Janus
- Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre Rotterdam
| | | | - Linetta B Koppert
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam
| | - Inge M Krul
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Flora E van Leeuwen
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Wang Y, Ronckers CM, van Leeuwen FE, Moskowitz CS, Leisenring W, Armstrong GT, de Vathaire F, Hudson MM, Kuehni CE, Arnold MA, Demoor-Goldschmidt C, Green DM, Henderson TO, Howell RM, Ehrhardt MJ, Neglia JP, Oeffinger KC, van der Pal HJH, Robison LL, Schaapveld M, Turcotte LM, Waespe N, Kremer LCM, Teepen JC. Subsequent female breast cancer risk associated with anthracycline chemotherapy for childhood cancer. Nat Med 2023; 29:2268-2277. [PMID: 37696934 PMCID: PMC10504074 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-023-02514-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 07/26/2023] [Indexed: 09/13/2023]
Abstract
Anthracycline-based chemotherapy is associated with increased subsequent breast cancer (SBC) risk in female childhood cancer survivors, but the current evidence is insufficient to support early breast cancer screening recommendations for survivors treated with anthracyclines. In this study, we pooled individual patient data of 17,903 survivors from six well-established studies, of whom 782 (4.4%) developed a SBC, and analyzed dose-dependent effects of individual anthracycline agents on developing SBC and interactions with chest radiotherapy. A dose-dependent increased SBC risk was seen for doxorubicin (hazard ratio (HR) per 100 mg m-2: 1.24, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.18-1.31), with more than twofold increased risk for survivors treated with ≥200 mg m-2 cumulative doxorubicin dose versus no doxorubicin (HR: 2.50 for 200-299 mg m-2, HR: 2.33 for 300-399 mg m-2 and HR: 2.78 for ≥400 mg m-2). For daunorubicin, the associations were not statistically significant. Epirubicin was associated with increased SBC risk (yes/no, HR: 3.25, 95% CI: 1.59-6.63). For patients treated with or without chest irradiation, HRs per 100 mg m-2 of doxorubicin were 1.11 (95% CI: 1.02-1.21) and 1.26 (95% CI: 1.17-1.36), respectively. Our findings support that early initiation of SBC surveillance may be reasonable for survivors who received ≥200 mg m-2 cumulative doxorubicin dose and should be considered in SBC surveillance guidelines for survivors and future treatment protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuehan Wang
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Cécile M Ronckers
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Health Services Research, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
- Division of Childhood Cancer Epidemiology (EpiKiK), Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | - Florent de Vathaire
- Radiation Epidemiology Team, INSERM U1018, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Claudia E Kuehni
- Childhood Cancer Research Group, Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Children's Hospital Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Michael A Arnold
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Charlotte Demoor-Goldschmidt
- Radiation Epidemiology Team, INSERM U1018, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University-Hospital of Angers, Angers, France
- Radiotherapy Department, Francois Baclesse Center, Caen, France
| | | | - Tara O Henderson
- University of Chicago Medicine Comer Children's Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Rebecca M Howell
- University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Joseph P Neglia
- University of Minnesota Masonic Cancer Center, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Lucie M Turcotte
- University of Minnesota Masonic Cancer Center, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Nicolas Waespe
- Childhood Cancer Research Group, Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Children's Hospital Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- CANSEARCH research platform in pediatric oncology and hematology of the University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Leontien C M Kremer
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jop C Teepen
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
de Vries S, Krul IM, Schaapveld M, Janus CPM, Rademakers SE, Roesink JM, Nijziel MR, Bilgin YM, Aleman BMP, van Leeuwen FE. Risk of male breast cancer after Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood 2023; 142:806-811. [PMID: 37390297 DOI: 10.1182/blood.2023020940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Revised: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 06/09/2023] [Indexed: 07/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Female survivors of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) treated with chest radiotherapy have a strongly increased risk of breast cancer (BC), but the treatment-specific BC risk in male survivors of HL has not been evaluated. We assessed BC risk in a cohort of 3077 male survivors of 5-year HL treated at age ≤51 years in 20 Dutch hospitals between 1965 and 2013. We estimated standardized incidence ratios (SIRs), absolute excess risks per 10 000 person-years, and cumulative BC incidences. After a 20-year median follow-up, we observed 8 cases of male with BC. Male survivors of HL experienced a 23-fold (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.1-46.0) increased BC risk compared with the general population, representing 1.6 (95% CI, 0.7-3.3) excess BC incidences per 10 000 person-years. The 20- and 40-year cumulative BC incidences after HL treatment were 0.1% (95% CI, 0.02-0.3) and 0.7% (95% CI, 0.3-1.4), respectively. Treatment with chest radiotherapy without alkylating chemotherapy yielded a strongly increased SIR (20.7; 95% CI, 2.5-74.8), which was not significantly different for chest radiotherapy and alkylating chemotherapy (41.1; 95% CI, 13.4-96.0). Males treated with chest radiotherapy and anthracyclines had an SIR of 48.1 (95% CI, 13.1-123.1). Two patients died from BC (median follow-up, 4.7 years). To ensure early diagnosis and treatment, clinicians should be alert to BC symptoms in male survivors of HL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone de Vries
- Department of Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Inge M Krul
- Department of Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michael Schaapveld
- Department of Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Cecile P M Janus
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Saskia E Rademakers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Judith M Roesink
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marten R Nijziel
- Department of Hemato-Oncology, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Yavuz M Bilgin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Adrz, Goes, The Netherlands
| | - Berthe M P Aleman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Flora E van Leeuwen
- Department of Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Reulen RC, Winter DL, Diallo I, Veres C, Llanas D, Allodji RS, Bagnasco F, Bárdi E, Feijen EAM, Alessi D, Fidler-Benaoudia MM, Høgsholt S, Teepen JC, Linge H, Haddy N, Byrne J, Debiche G, Grabow D, Gudmundsdottir T, Fauchery R, Zrafi W, Michel G, Øfstaas H, Kaatsch P, Vu-Bezin G, Jenkinson H, Kaiser M, Skinner R, Cole T, Waespe N, Sommer G, Nordenfelt S, Jankovic M, Lähteenmäki Taalas T, Maule MM, van der Pal HJH, Ronckers CM, van Leeuwen FE, Kok JL, Terenziani M, Winther Gunnes M, Wiebe T, Sacerdote C, Jakab Z, Haupt R, Lähteenmäki PM, Zadravec Zaletel L, Kuehni CE, Winther JF, Kremer LCM, Hjorth L, de Vathaire F, Hawkins MM. Risk Factors for Primary Bone Cancer After Childhood Cancer: A PanCare Childhood and Adolescent Cancer Survivor Care and Follow-Up Studies Nested Case-Control Study. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:3735-3746. [PMID: 37235821 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.02045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Revised: 02/09/2023] [Accepted: 04/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Radiation to the bone and exposure to alkylating agents increases the risk of bone cancer among survivors of childhood cancer, but there is uncertainty regarding the risks of bone tissue radiation doses below 10 Gy and the dose-response relationship for specific types of chemotherapy. METHODS Twelve European countries contributed 228 cases and 228 matched controls to a nested case-control study within a cohort of 69,460 5-year survivors of childhood cancer. Odds ratios (ORs) of developing bone cancer for different levels of cumulative radiation exposure and cumulative doses of specific types of chemotherapy were calculated. Excess ORs were calculated to investigate the shape and extent of any dose-response relationship. RESULTS The OR associated with bone tissue exposed to 1-4 Gy was 4.8-fold (95% CI, 1.2 to 19.6) and to 5-9 Gy was 9.6-fold (95% CI, 2.4 to 37.4) compared with unexposed bone tissue. The OR increased linearly with increasing dose of radiation (Ptrend < .001) up to 78-fold (95% CI, 9.2 to 669.9) for doses of ≥40 Gy. For cumulative alkylating agent doses of 10,000-19,999 and ≥20,000 mg/m2, the radiation-adjusted ORs were 7.1 (95% CI, 2.2 to 22.8) and 8.3 (95% CI, 2.8 to 24.4), respectively, with independent contributions from each of procarbazine, ifosfamide, and cyclophosphamide. Other cytotoxics were not associated with bone cancer. CONCLUSION To our knowledge, we demonstrate-for the first time-that the risk of bone cancer is increased 5- to 10-fold after exposure of bone tissue to cumulative radiation doses of 1-9 Gy. Alkylating agents exceeding 10,000 mg/m2 increase the risk 7- to 8-fold, particularly following procarbazine, ifosfamide, and cyclophosphamide. These substantially elevated risks should be used to develop/update clinical follow-up guidelines and survivorship care plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raoul C Reulen
- Centre for Childhood Cancer Survivor Studies, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - David L Winter
- Centre for Childhood Cancer Survivor Studies, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Ibrahim Diallo
- Radiation Epidemiology Team, Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, INSERM U1018, University Paris Saclay, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Cristina Veres
- Radiation Epidemiology Team, Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, INSERM U1018, University Paris Saclay, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Damien Llanas
- Radiation Epidemiology Team, Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, INSERM U1018, University Paris Saclay, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Rodrigue S Allodji
- Radiation Epidemiology Team, Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, INSERM U1018, University Paris Saclay, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Edit Bárdi
- St Anna Children's Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Nadia Haddy
- Radiation Epidemiology Team, Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, INSERM U1018, University Paris Saclay, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Ghazi Debiche
- Radiation Epidemiology Team, Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, INSERM U1018, University Paris Saclay, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | | | | | - Romain Fauchery
- Radiation Epidemiology Team, Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, INSERM U1018, University Paris Saclay, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Wael Zrafi
- Radiation Epidemiology Team, Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, INSERM U1018, University Paris Saclay, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | | | | | | | - Giao Vu-Bezin
- Radiation Epidemiology Team, Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, INSERM U1018, University Paris Saclay, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jeanette F Winther
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health, Aarhus University and University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | | | - Florent de Vathaire
- Radiation Epidemiology Team, Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, INSERM U1018, University Paris Saclay, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Michael M Hawkins
- Centre for Childhood Cancer Survivor Studies, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lubberts S, Groot HJ, de Wit R, Mulder S, Witjes JA, Kerst JM, Groenewegen G, Lefrandt JD, van Leeuwen FE, Nuver J, Schaapveld M, Gietema JA. Cardiovascular Disease in Testicular Cancer Survivors: Identification of Risk Factors and Impact on Quality of Life. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:3512-3522. [PMID: 37071834 PMCID: PMC10306438 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.01016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2022] [Revised: 01/02/2023] [Accepted: 02/21/2023] [Indexed: 04/20/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Testicular cancer (TC) treatment is clearly associated with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. To enable development of preventive strategies for cardiovascular disease (CVD), we assessed cardiometabolic risk factors and quality of life (QoL) in TC survivors. METHODS Incidence of coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, and heart failure after TC treatment was assessed in a multicenter cohort comprising 4,748 patients treated at the age of 12-50 years between 1976 and 2007. Patients who had developed CVD and a random sample from the cohort (subcohort) received a questionnaire on cardiometabolic risk factors and QoL. A subgroup of responders in the subcohort additionally underwent clinical evaluation of cardiovascular risk factors. RESULTS After a median follow-up of 16 years, 272 patients had developed CVD. Compared with orchidectomy only, cisplatin combination chemotherapy was associated with an increased CVD risk (hazard ratio [HR], 1.9; 95% CI, 1.1 to 3.1). Patients who were obese or a smoker at diagnosis (HR, 4.6; 95% CI, 2.0 to 10.0 and HR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1 to 2.4, respectively), developed Raynaud's phenomenon (HR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.1 to 3.6) or dyslipidemia (HR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.6 to 4.7) or had a positive family history for CVD (HR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.7 to 4.9) had higher CVD risk. More TC survivors with CVD reported inferior QoL on physical domains than survivors who did not develop CVD. Of 304 TC survivors who underwent clinical evaluation for cardiovascular risk factors (median age at assessment: 51 years), 86% had dyslipidemia, 50% had hypertension, and 35% had metabolic syndrome, irrespective of treatment. CONCLUSION Cardiovascular events in TC survivors impair QoL. Many TC survivors have undetected cardiovascular risk factors. We advocate early lifestyle adjustments and lifelong follow-up with low-threshold treatment of cardiovascular risk factors, especially in obese and smoking patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sjoukje Lubberts
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Harmke J. Groot
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ronald de Wit
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sasja Mulder
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Johannes A. Witjes
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - J. Martijn Kerst
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gerard Groenewegen
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Joop D. Lefrandt
- Department of Vascular Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Flora E. van Leeuwen
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Janine Nuver
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Michael Schaapveld
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jourik A. Gietema
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Terra L, Lee Meeuw Kjoe PR, Agelink van Rentergem JA, Beekman MJ, Heemskerk-Gerritsen BAM, van Beurden M, Roeters van Lennep JE, van Doorn HC, de Hullu JA, Mourits MJE, van Dorst EBL, Mom CH, Slangen BFM, Gaarenstroom KN, van der Kolk LE, Collée JM, Wevers MR, Ausems MGEM, van Engelen K, van de Beek I, Berger LPV, van Asperen CJ, Gomez Garcia EB, Maas AHEM, Hooning MJ, van der Wall E, van Leeuwen FE, Schagen SB. Long-term effects of premenopausal risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy on cognition in women with high familial risk of ovarian cancer: A cross-sectional study. BJOG 2023; 130:968-977. [PMID: 36715559 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.17415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2022] [Revised: 12/18/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the effect of a premenopausal risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) in women at increased risk of ovarian cancer on objective and subjective cognition at least 10 years after RRSO. DESIGN A cross-sectional study with prospective follow-up, nested in a nationwide cohort. SETTING Multicentre in the Netherlands. POPULATION OR SAMPLE 641 women (66% BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers) who underwent either a premenopausal RRSO ≤ age 45 (n = 436) or a postmenopausal RRSO ≥ age 54 (n = 205). All participants were older than 55 years at recruitment. METHODS Participants completed an online cognitive test battery and a questionnaire on subjective cognition. We used multivariable regression analyses, adjusting for age, education, breast cancer, hormone replacement therapy, cardiovascular risk factors and depression. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The influence of RRSO on objective and subjective cognition of women with a premenopausal RRSO compared with women with a postmenopausal RRSO. RESULTS After adjustment, women with a premenopausal RRSO (mean time since RRSO 18.2 years) performed similarly on objective cognitive tests compared with women with a postmenopausal RRSO (mean time since RRSO 11.9 years). However, they more frequently reported problems with reasoning (odds ratio [OR] 1.8, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.1-3.1) and multitasking (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1-3.4) than women with a postmenopausal RRSO. This difference between groups disappeared in an analysis restricted to women of comparable ages (60-70 years). CONCLUSIONS Reassuringly, approximately 18 years after RRSO, we found no association between premenopausal RRSO and objective cognition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lara Terra
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Philippe R Lee Meeuw Kjoe
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Maarten J Beekman
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Marc van Beurden
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Helena C van Doorn
- Department for Gynaecologic Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joanna A de Hullu
- Department for Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marian J E Mourits
- Department for Gynaecologic Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Eleonora B L van Dorst
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Constantijne H Mom
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Brigitte F M Slangen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Katja N Gaarenstroom
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Lizet E van der Kolk
- Family Cancer Clinic, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Margriet Collée
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marijke R Wevers
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Margreet G E M Ausems
- Division Laboratories, Pharmacy and Biomedical Genetics, Department of Genetics, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Klaartje van Engelen
- Department of Human Genetics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Irma van de Beek
- Department of Human Genetics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lieke P V Berger
- Department of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Christi J van Asperen
- Department for Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Encarna B Gomez Garcia
- Department for Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Angela H E M Maas
- Department of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Maartje J Hooning
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Elsken van der Wall
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Flora E van Leeuwen
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sanne B Schagen
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kast K, John EM, Hopper JL, Andrieu N, Noguès C, Mouret-Fourme E, Lasset C, Fricker JP, Berthet P, Mari V, Salle L, Schmidt MK, Ausems MGEM, Garcia EBG, van de Beek I, Wevers MR, Evans DG, Tischkowitz M, Lalloo F, Cook J, Izatt L, Tripathi V, Snape K, Musgrave H, Sharif S, Murray J, Colonna SV, Andrulis IL, Daly MB, Southey MC, de la Hoya M, Osorio A, Foretova L, Berkova D, Gerdes AM, Olah E, Jakubowska A, Singer CF, Tan Y, Augustinsson A, Rantala J, Simard J, Schmutzler RK, Milne RL, Phillips KA, Terry MB, Goldgar D, van Leeuwen FE, Mooij TM, Antoniou AC, Easton DF, Rookus MA, Engel C. Associations of height, body mass index, and weight gain with breast cancer risk in carriers of a pathogenic variant in BRCA1 or BRCA2: the BRCA1 and BRCA2 Cohort Consortium. Breast Cancer Res 2023; 25:72. [PMID: 37340476 PMCID: PMC10280955 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-023-01673-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 06/10/2023] [Indexed: 06/22/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Height, body mass index (BMI), and weight gain are associated with breast cancer risk in the general population. It is unclear whether these associations also exist for carriers of pathogenic variants in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes. PATIENTS AND METHODS An international pooled cohort of 8091 BRCA1/2 variant carriers was used for retrospective and prospective analyses separately for premenopausal and postmenopausal women. Cox regression was used to estimate breast cancer risk associations with height, BMI, and weight change. RESULTS In the retrospective analysis, taller height was associated with risk of premenopausal breast cancer for BRCA2 variant carriers (HR 1.20 per 10 cm increase, 95% CI 1.04-1.38). Higher young-adult BMI was associated with lower premenopausal breast cancer risk for both BRCA1 (HR 0.75 per 5 kg/m2, 95% CI 0.66-0.84) and BRCA2 (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.65-0.89) variant carriers in the retrospective analysis, with consistent, though not statistically significant, findings from the prospective analysis. In the prospective analysis, higher BMI and adult weight gain were associated with higher postmenopausal breast cancer risk for BRCA1 carriers (HR 1.20 per 5 kg/m2, 95% CI 1.02-1.42; and HR 1.10 per 5 kg weight gain, 95% CI 1.01-1.19, respectively). CONCLUSION Anthropometric measures are associated with breast cancer risk for BRCA1 and BRCA2 variant carriers, with relative risk estimates that are generally consistent with those for women from the general population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karin Kast
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
| | - Esther M John
- Department of Epidemiology & Population Health and of Medicine (Oncology), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
- Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - John L Hopper
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Nadine Andrieu
- INSERM U900, Paris, France
- Institut Curie, Paris, France
- Mines Paris Tech, Fontainebleau, France
- PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Catherine Noguès
- Aix Marseille Université, INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM, Marseille, France
- Département d'Anticipation et de Suivi Des Cancers, Oncogénétique Clinique, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Lucie Salle
- Oncogénétique Poitou-Charentes, Niort, France
| | - Marjanka K Schmidt
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Margreet G E M Ausems
- Department of Genetics, Division Laboratories, Pharmacy and Biomedical Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Irma van de Beek
- Department of Human Genetics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marijke R Wevers
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - D Gareth Evans
- The Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, The Nightingale Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Genomic Medicine, Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, The University of Manchester, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Manchester Breast Centre, Oglesby Cancer Research Centre, The Christie, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Marc Tischkowitz
- Department of Medical Genetics, National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Fiona Lalloo
- Clinical Genetics Service, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Jackie Cook
- Sheffield Clinical Genetics Service, Sheffield Children's Hospital, Sheffield, UK
| | - Louise Izatt
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Vishakha Tripathi
- Clinical Genetics Service, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Katie Snape
- Department of Clinical Genetics, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Hannah Musgrave
- Yorkshire Regional Genetics Service, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Saba Sharif
- West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's Hospital Healthcare NHS Trust, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jennie Murray
- Yorkshire Regional Genetics Service, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
- West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's Hospital Healthcare NHS Trust, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
- South East of Scotland Regional Genetics Service, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
- MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Sarah V Colonna
- Department of Medicine and Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Irene L Andrulis
- Fred A. Litwin Center for Cancer Genetics, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute of Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mary B Daly
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Melissa C Southey
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at, Monash Health Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
- Department of Clinical Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Miguel de la Hoya
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IdISSC (Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos), Madrid, Spain
| | - Ana Osorio
- Familial Cancer Clinical Unit, Human Cancer Genetics Programme, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO) and Spanish Network On Rare Diseases (CIBERER), Madrid, Spain
| | - Lenka Foretova
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Dita Berkova
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Anne-Marie Gerdes
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Edith Olah
- Department of Molecular Genetics, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Anna Jakubowska
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
- Independent Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Genetic Diagnostics, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Christian F Singer
- Department of OB/GYN and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Yen Tan
- Department of OB/GYN and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Annelie Augustinsson
- Department of Oncology, Clinical Sciences in Lund, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | | | - Jacques Simard
- Genomics Center, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | - Rita K Schmutzler
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Roger L Milne
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Kelly-Anne Phillips
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mary Beth Terry
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health and the Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - David Goldgar
- Department of Dermatology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Flora E van Leeuwen
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thea M Mooij
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Antonis C Antoniou
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Douglas F Easton
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Matti A Rookus
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Christoph Engel
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Spaan M, Pontesilli M, van den Belt-Dusebout AW, Burger CW, van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM, Ravelli ACJ, Goddijn M, Lambalk CB, Roseboom TJ, van Leeuwen FE. Cancer risk in children, adolescents, and young adults conceived by ART in 1983-2011. Hum Reprod Open 2023; 2023:hoad027. [PMID: 37346246 PMCID: PMC10279651 DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoad027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2022] [Revised: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Do children, adolescents, and young adults born after ART, including IVF, ICSI and frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET), have an increased risk of cancer compared with children born to subfertile couples not conceived by ART and children from the general population? SUMMARY ANSWER After a median follow-up of 18 years, the overall cancer risk was not increased in children conceived by ART, but a slight risk increase was observed in children conceived after ICSI. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY There is growing evidence that ART procedures could perturb epigenetic processes during the pre-implantation period and influence long-term health. Recent studies showed (non-)significantly increased cancer risks after ICSI and FET, but not after IVF. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION A nationwide historical cohort study with prospective follow-up was carried out, including all live-born offspring from women treated with ART between 1983 and 2011 and subfertile women not treated with ART in one of the 13 Dutch IVF clinics and two fertility centers. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS Children were identified through the mothers' records in the Personal Records Database. Information on the conception method of each child was collected through the mother's medical record. In total, the cohort comprises 89 249 live-born children of subfertile couples, of whom 51 417 were conceived using ART and 37 832 were not (i.e. conceived naturally, through ovulation induction, or after IUI). Cancer incidence was ascertained through linkage with the Netherlands Cancer Registry for the period 1989-2019. Cancer risk in children conceived using ART was compared with risk in children born to subfertile couples but not conceived by ART (hazard ratio (HR)) and children from the general population (standardized incidence ratios (SIRs)). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE In total, 358 cancers were observed after a median follow-up of 18 years. Overall cancer risk was not increased in children conceived using ART, when compared with the general population (SIR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.81-1.12) or with children from subfertile couples not conceived by ART (HR = 1.06, 95% CI = 0.84-1.33). Compared with children from subfertile couples not conceived by ART, the use of IVF or FET was not associated with increased cancer risk, but ICSI was associated with a slight risk increase (HR = 1.58, 95% CI = 1.08-2.31). Risk of cancer after ART did not increase at older ages (≥18 years, HR = 1.26, 95% CI = 0.88-1.81) compared to cancer risk in children not conceived by ART. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION The observed increased risk among children conceived using ICSI must be interpreted with caution owing to the small number of cases. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS After a median follow-up of 18 years, children conceived using ART do not have an increased overall cancer risk. Many large studies with prolonged follow-up are needed to investigate cancer risk in (young) adults conceived by different types of ART. In addition, international pooling of studies is recommended to provide sufficient power to study risk of specific cancer sites after ART. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS This work was supported by The Dutch Cancer Society (NKI 2006-3631) that funded the OMEGA-women's cohort, Children Cancer Free (KIKA; 147) that funded the OMEGA-I-II offspring cohort. The OMEGA-III offspring cohort was supported by a Postdoc Stipend of Amsterdam Reproduction & Development, and the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R01HD088393. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. The authors declare no competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mandy Spaan
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Reproduction and Development, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martina Pontesilli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Curt W Burger
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Anita C J Ravelli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Reproduction and Development, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mariëtte Goddijn
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis B Lambalk
- Amsterdam Reproduction and Development, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tessa J Roseboom
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Reproduction and Development, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Flora E van Leeuwen
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Feijen EAM, Teepen JC, van Dulmen-den Broeder E, van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM, van der Heiden-van der Loo M, van der Pal HJH, de Vries ACH, Louwerens M, Bresters D, Versluys B, de Ridder H, Veening M, van Leeuwen FE, Grootenhuis M, Maurice-Stam H, van Santen HM, Neggers SJCMM, Pluijm S, den Hartogh J, Ronckers CM, Tissing WJE, Loonen JJ, Kremer LCM. Clinical evaluation of late outcomes in Dutch childhood cancer survivors: Methodology of the DCCSS LATER 2 study. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2023; 70:e30212. [PMID: 36651687 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.30212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2022] [Revised: 12/28/2022] [Accepted: 12/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Childhood cancer survivors face late health problems; despite advances in research, details on risk remain unclear. We describe the methodological aspects of the Dutch Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (DCCSS) cross-sectional clinical study (LATER 2 study). PROCEDURE From the multi-center DCCSS LATER cohort of 6165 five-year survivors diagnosed during 1963-2001, we invited 4735 eligible survivors in 2016, as well as siblings and parents of survivors. Gaps in evidence identified during development of surveillance guidelines were translated into clinical research questions for 16 outcome-specific subprojects. The regular care visit to the LATER outpatient clinic forms the backbone of outcome assessment complemented with research-defined measurements (physical examination, clinical tests, questionnaires). Furthermore, blood/saliva samples were taken for deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) extraction. RESULTS In total, 2519 (53.2%) survivors participated in the LATER 2 study. When comparing participants with nonparticipants, we observed that males, CNS survivors, and those treated with surgery only were less likely to participate. Of the participating survivors, 49.3% were female. Median time since childhood cancer diagnosis was 26.9 years (range 14.8-54.7 years) and median attained age was 34.4 years (range 15.4-66.6 years). CONCLUSIONS The high-quality data generated in the LATER 2 study will provide valuable insights into risks of and risk factors for clinical and physical and psychosocial health outcomes and factors for early recognition of those health outcomes in long-term childhood cancer survivors. This will contribute to fill in important gaps in knowledge and improve the quality of life and care for childhood cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jop C Teepen
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder
- Department of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Andrica C H de Vries
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marloes Louwerens
- Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Dorine Bresters
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Birgitta Versluys
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Hanneke de Ridder
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Margreet Veening
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Flora E van Leeuwen
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Hanneke M van Santen
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital/University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sebastian J C M M Neggers
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Medicine, Endocrinology Section, Pituitary Center Rotterdam, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Saskia Pluijm
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jaap den Hartogh
- Department VOX Survivors, Dutch Childhood Cancer Parent Organization VOKK Netherlands, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Cécile M Ronckers
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Brandenburg Medical School, Institute of Biostatistics and Registry Research, Neuruppin, Germany
| | - Wim J E Tissing
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Jacqueline J Loonen
- Radboudumc Center of Expertise for Cancer Survivorship, Department of Hematology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Leontien C M Kremer
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Spoor J, Mureau MAM, Hommes J, Rakhorst H, Dassen AE, Oldenburg HSA, Vissers YLJ, Heuts EM, Koppert LB, Zaal LH, van der Hulst RRWJ, Vrancken Peeters MJTFD, Bleiker EMA, van Leeuwen FE. The Areola study: design and rationale of a cohort study on long-term health outcomes in women with implant-based breast reconstructions. Ann Epidemiol 2023; 82:16-25. [PMID: 37028614 DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2023.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2022] [Revised: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/02/2023] [Indexed: 04/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Implant-based breast reconstructions contribute considerably to the quality of life of breast cancer patients. A knowledge gap exists concerning the potential role of silicone breast implants in the development of so called 'breast implant illness' and autoimmune diseases in breast cancer survivors with implant-based reconstructions. Breast implant illness (BII) is a constellation of non-specific symptoms reported by a small group of women with silicone breast implants. METHODS/DESIGN The Areola study is a multi-centre retrospective cohort study with prospective follow-up aiming to assess the risk of BII and autoimmune diseases in female breast cancer survivors with and without silicone breast implants. In this report, we set out the rationale, study design and methodology of this cohort study. The cohort consists of breast cancer survivors who received surgical treatment with implant-based reconstruction in six major hospitals across the Netherlands in the period between 2000 and 2015. As comparison group, a frequency-matched sample of breast cancer survivors without breast implants will be selected. An additional group of women who received breast augmentation surgery in the same years will be selected to compare their characteristics and health outcomes with those of breast cancer patients with implants. All women still alive will be invited to complete a web-based questionnaire covering health-related topics. The entire cohort including deceased women will be linked to population-based databases of Statistics Netherlands. These include a registry of hospital diagnostic codes, a medicines prescription registry and a cause-of-death registry, through which diagnoses of autoimmune diseases will be identified. Outcomes of interest are the prevalence and incidence of BII and autoimmune diseases. In addition, risk factors for the development of BII and autoimmune disorders will be assessed among women with implants. DISCUSSION The Areola study will contribute to the availability of reliable information on the risks of BII and autoimmune diseases in Dutch breast cancer survivors with silicone breast implants. This will inform breast cancer survivors and aid future breast cancer patients and their treating physicians to make informed decisions about reconstructive strategies after mastectomy. REGISTRATION This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on June 2nd 2022 (NCT05400954).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Spoor
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marc A M Mureau
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Juliëtte Hommes
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, the Netherlands
| | - Hinne Rakhorst
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Ziekenhuis Groep Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - Anneriet E Dassen
- Department of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - Hester S A Oldenburg
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Yvonne L J Vissers
- Department of Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, the Netherlands
| | - Esther M Heuts
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Linetta B Koppert
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Laura H Zaal
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Velthuis kliniek, Hilversum, the Netherlands
| | - Rene R W J van der Hulst
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Eveline M A Bleiker
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Family Cancer Clinic, Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Flora E van Leeuwen
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Juul SJ, Kicinski M, Schaapveld M, Rossetti S, Aleman BMP, Liu L, van Leeuwen FE, Meijnders P, Krol ADG, Janus CPM, Hutchings M, Maraldo MV. Comparison of outcomes between Hodgkin's lymphoma patients treated in and outside clinical trials: A study based on the EORTC-Dutch late effects cohort-linked data. Eur J Haematol 2023; 110:243-252. [PMID: 36369842 PMCID: PMC10098896 DOI: 10.1111/ejh.13899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Revised: 11/09/2022] [Accepted: 11/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Studies have shown higher survival rates for patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) treated within clinical trials compared to patients treated outside clinical trials. However, endpoints are often limited to overall survival (OS). In this retrospective cohort study, we investigated the effect of trial participation on OS, the incidence of relapse, second cancer, and cardiovascular disease (CVD). The study population consisted of patients with HL, aged between 14 and 51 years at diagnosis, who started their treatment between 1962 and 2002 at three Dutch cancer centres. Patients were either included in the EORTC Lymphoma Group trials (H1-H9) or treated according to standard guidelines at the time. After adjusting for differences in baseline characteristics, trial participation was associated with longer OS (median OS: 29.4 years [95%CI: 27.0-31.6] for treatment inside trials versus 27.4 years [95%CI: 26.0-28.5] for treatment outside trials, p = .046), a lower incidence of relapse (HR = 0.79, 95%CI: 0.63-0.98, p = .036) and a higher incidence of CVD (HR = 1.49, 95%CI: 1.23-1.79, p < .001). The trial effect for CVD was present only for patients treated before 1983. No evidence of differences in the incidence of second cancer was found. Consequently, essential results from clinical trials should be implemented into standard practice without undue delay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Michael Schaapveld
- Department of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sára Rossetti
- Department of Haematology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Berthe M P Aleman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Flora E van Leeuwen
- Department of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Paul Meijnders
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Network, University of Antwerp, Antwerpen, Belgium
| | - Augustinus D G Krol
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Cécile P M Janus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Maja V Maraldo
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Sandvei MS, Pinborg A, Gissler M, Bergh C, Romundstad LB, van Leeuwen FE, Spaan M, Tiitinen A, Wennerholm UB, Henningsen AK, Opdahl S. Risk of ovarian cancer in women who give birth after assisted reproductive technology (ART)-a registry-based Nordic cohort study with follow-up from first pregnancy. Br J Cancer 2023; 128:825-832. [PMID: 36550209 PMCID: PMC9977956 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-022-02097-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Revised: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 11/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is concern that assisted reproductive technology (ART) may increase ovarian cancer risk, but previous studies are inconclusive. We compared ovarian cancer risk for women who gave birth after ART vs natural conception. METHODS Through linkage of nationwide registry data, we followed 3,303,880 initially nulliparous women in Denmark (1994-2014), Finland (1990-2014), Norway (1984-2015) and Sweden (1985-2015) from first pregnancy ≥22 weeks to ovarian cancer, emigration, death or end of follow-up (2014/2015). We estimated hazard ratios (HRs), adjusting for age, parity, maternal birth year and country, and for body mass index and smoking in subsamples. RESULTS Mean age at first birth was 27.7 years. During a mean follow-up of 14.4 person-years, 2683 participants (0.08%) developed ovarian cancer; 135 after ART and 2548 after natural conception only (incidence rates 11.6 and 5.5 per 100,000 person-years, respectively). The risk was higher for women who ever gave birth after ART (HR 1.70, 95% confidence interval 1.42-2.03) compared to natural conception. Associations were stronger for conventional in vitro fertilisation than for intracytoplasmic sperm injection. CONCLUSIONS Among parous women, ART-conception was associated with a higher risk of ovarian cancer than natural conception. Further studies should decipher whether this is causal or confounded by infertility or other factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Søfteland Sandvei
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
- The Cancer Clinic, St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
| | - Anja Pinborg
- The Fertility Clinic, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mika Gissler
- Department of Knowledge Brokers, THL Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
- Academic Primary Health Care Centre, Region Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Christina Bergh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Liv Bente Romundstad
- Spiren Fertility Clinic, Trondheim, Norway
- Centre for Fertility and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - Flora E van Leeuwen
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mandy Spaan
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Aila Tiitinen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Ulla-Britt Wennerholm
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Anna-Karina Henningsen
- The Fertility Clinic, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Signe Opdahl
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Aleman BMP, Krul IM, Janus CPM, van der Maazen RWM, van Leeuwen FE. Reply to "Can we avoid thoracic radiotherapy in young females with Hodgkin lymphoma?". Cancer 2023; 129:1455-1456. [PMID: 36827428 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 02/26/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Berthe M P Aleman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Inge M Krul
- Department of Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Cécile P M Janus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus University MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Flora E van Leeuwen
- Department of Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Geurts YM, Shakir R, Ntentas G, Roberti S, Aznar MC, John KM, Ramroth J, Janus CPM, Krol ADG, Roesink JM, van der Maazen RWM, Zijlstra JM, Darby SC, Aleman BMP, van Leeuwen FE, Cutter DJ, Schaapveld M. Association of Radiation and Procarbazine Dose With Risk of Colorectal Cancer Among Survivors of Hodgkin Lymphoma. JAMA Oncol 2023; 9:481-489. [PMID: 36729438 PMCID: PMC9896374 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.7153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Importance Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) survivors have higher rates of colorectal cancer, which may be associated with subdiaphragmatic radiation therapy and/or alkylating chemotherapy. Although radiation dose-response associations with breast, lung, stomach, pancreatic, and esophageal cancer after HL have been demonstrated, the association of radiation therapy with colorectal cancer remains unclear. Objective To quantify the rate of colorectal cancer according to radiation dose to the large bowel and procarbazine dose among HL survivors. Design, Setting, and Participants A nested case-control study examined 5-year HL survivors at 5 hospital centers in the Netherlands. Participants had been diagnosed with HL in 1964 to 2000, when they were 15 to 50 years of age, and were followed for a median of approximately 26 years. Survivors of HL who developed colorectal cancer and survivors who were selected as controls were individually matched on sex, age at HL diagnosis, and date of HL diagnosis. Data were analyzed from July 2021 to October 2022. Exposures Mean radiation doses to the large bowel were estimated by reconstructing individual radiation therapy treatments on representative computed tomography data sets. Main Outcomes and Measures Excess rate ratios (ERRs) were modeled to evaluate the excess risk associated with each 1-gray increase in radiation dose, and potential effect modification by procarbazine was explored. Results The study population included 316 participants (mean [SD] age at HL diagnosis, 33.0 [9.8] years; 221 [69.9%] men), 78 of whom were HL survivors who developed colorectal cancer (cases) and 238 who did not (controls). The median (IQR) interval between HL and colorectal cancer was 25.7 (18.2-31.6) years. Increased colorectal cancer rates were seen for patients who received subdiaphragmatic radiation therapy (rate ratio [RR], 2.4; 95% CI, 1.4-4.1) and those who received more than 8.4 g/m2 procarbazine (RR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.3-5.0). Overall, colorectal cancer rate increased linearly with mean radiation dose to the whole large bowel and dose to the affected bowel segment. The association between radiation dose and colorectal cancer rate became stronger with increasing procarbazine dose: the ERR per gray to the whole bowel was 3.5% (95% CI, 0.4%-12.6%) for patients who did not receive procarbazine, and increased 1.2-fold (95% CI, 1.1-1.3) for each 1-g/m2 increase in procarbazine dose. Conclusions and Relevance This nested case-control study of 5-year HL survivors found a dose-response association between radiation therapy and colorectal cancer risk, and modification of this association by procarbazine. These findings may enable individualized colorectal cancer risk estimations, identification of high-risk survivors for subsequent screening, and optimization of treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yvonne M. Geurts
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Rebecca Shakir
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Georgios Ntentas
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK,Department of Medical Physics, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK,School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Sander Roberti
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marianne C. Aznar
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine, and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Katinka M. John
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Johanna Ramroth
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Cécile P. M. Janus
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Augustinus D. G. Krol
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Judith M. Roesink
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Josée M. Zijlstra
- Department of Hematology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sarah C. Darby
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Berthe M. P. Aleman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Flora E. van Leeuwen
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - David J. Cutter
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK,Oxford Cancer and Hematology Center, Oxford University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Michael Schaapveld
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
de Vries S, Haaksma ML, Jóźwiak K, Schaapveld M, Hodgson DC, Lugtenburg PJ, Krol ADG, Petersen EJ, van Spronsen DJ, Ahmed S, Hauptmann M, Aleman BMP, van Leeuwen FE. Development and Validation of Risk Prediction Models for Coronary Heart Disease and Heart Failure After Treatment for Hodgkin Lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:86-95. [PMID: 35947813 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.02613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Previous efforts to predict absolute risk of treatment-related cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) have mostly focused on childhood cancer survivors. We aimed to develop prediction models for risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) and heart failure (HF) for survivors of adolescent/adult Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). METHODS For model development, we used a multicenter cohort including 1,433 5-year HL survivors treated between 1965 and 2000 and age 18-50 years at HL diagnosis, with complete data on administered chemotherapy regimens, radiotherapy volumes and doses, and cardiovascular follow-up. Using cause-specific hazard models, covariate-adjusted cumulative incidences for CHD and HF were estimated in the presence of competing risks of death because of other causes than CHD and HF. Age at HL diagnosis, sex, smoking status, radiotherapy, and anthracycline treatment were included as predictors. External validation for the CHD model was performed using a Canadian cohort of 708 HL survivors treated between 1988 and 2004 and age 18-50 years at HL diagnosis. RESULTS After a median follow-up of 24 years, 341 survivors had developed CHD and 102 had HF. We were able to predict CHD and HF risk at 20 and 30 years after treatment with moderate to good overall calibration and moderate discrimination (areas under the curve: 0.68-0.74), which was confirmed by external validation for the CHD model (areas under the curve: 0.73-0.74). On the basis of our model including prescribed mediastinal radiation dose, 30-year risks ranged from 4% to 78% for CHD and 3% to 46% for HF, depending on risk factors. CONCLUSION We developed and validated prediction models for CHD and HF with good overall calibration and moderate discrimination. These models can be used to identify HL survivors who might benefit from targeted screening for CVD and early treatment for CVD risk factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone de Vries
- Department of Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Miriam L Haaksma
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Katarzyna Jóźwiak
- Institute of Biostatistics and Registry Research, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Neuruppin, Germany
| | - Michael Schaapveld
- Department of Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - David C Hodgson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Pieternella J Lugtenburg
- Department of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Augustinus D G Krol
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Eefke J Petersen
- Department of Hematology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Dick Johan van Spronsen
- Department of Hematology, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Sameera Ahmed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Michael Hauptmann
- Institute of Biostatistics and Registry Research, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Neuruppin, Germany
| | - Berthe M P Aleman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Flora E van Leeuwen
- Department of Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Krul IM, Boekel NB, Kramer I, Janus CPM, Krol ADG, Nijziel MR, Zijlstra JM, van der Maazen RWM, Roesink JM, Jacobse JN, Schaapveld M, Schmidt MK, Opstal-van Winden AWJ, Sonke GS, Russell NS, Aleman BMP, van Leeuwen FE. Breast cancer and cardiovascular outcomes after breast cancer in survivors of Hodgkin lymphoma. Cancer 2022; 128:4285-4295. [PMID: 36281718 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2021] [Revised: 02/25/2022] [Accepted: 03/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) survivors treated with chest radiotherapy have an increased risk of breast cancer (BC). Prior HL treatment and associated cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk may limit BC treatment options. It is unknown how treatment adaptations affect BC and CVD outcomes. METHODS The authors compared 195 BC patients treated with chest/axillary radiotherapy for HL (BC-HL) with 5988 age- and calendar year-matched patients with first primary BC (BC-1). Analyses included cumulative incidence functions and Cox regression models, accounting for tumor characteristics and BC treatment. RESULTS Compared to BC-1 patients, BC-HL patients received anthracycline-containing chemotherapy (23.7% vs. 43.8%, p < .001) and breast-conserving surgery followed by radiotherapy (7.1% vs. 57.7%, p < .001) less often. BC treatment considerations were reported for 71% of BC-HL patients. BC-HL patients had a significantly higher risk of 15-year overall mortality than BC-1 patients (61% vs. 23%). Furthermore, risks of BC-specific mortality and nonfatal BC events were significantly increased among BC-HL patients, also when accounting for tumor and treatment characteristics (2.2- to 4.5-fold). BC-HL patients with a screen-detected BC had a significantly reduced (61%) BC-specific mortality. One-third of BC-HL patients had CVD at BC-diagnosis, compared to <0.1% of BC-1 patients. Fifteen-year CVD-specific mortality and CVD incidence were significantly higher in BC-HL patients than in BC-1 patients (15.2% vs. 0.4% and 40.4% vs. 6.8%, respectively), which was due to HL treatment rather than BC treatment. CONCLUSIONS BC-HL patients experience a higher burden of CVD and worse BC outcomes than BC-1 patients. Clinicians should be aware of increased CVD risk when selecting BC treatment for HL survivors. LAY SUMMARY Patients with breast cancer after Hodgkin lymphoma (BC-HL) may have limited options for BC treatment, due to earlier HL treatment and an associated increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). BC treatment considerations were reported for 71% of BC-HL patients. We examined whether BC-HL patients have a higher risk of CVD or BC events (recurrences/metastases) compared to patients with breast cancer that had no earlier tumors (BC-1). We observed a higher burden of CVD and worse BC outcomes in HL patients compared to BC-1 patients. Clinicians should be aware of increased CVD risk when selecting BC treatment for HL survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inge M Krul
- Department of Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Naomi B Boekel
- Department of Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Iris Kramer
- Department of Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Cécile P M Janus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus University MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Augustinus D G Krol
- Department of Radiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Marten R Nijziel
- Department of Hematology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Josée M Zijlstra
- Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Judith M Roesink
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Judy N Jacobse
- Department of Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michael Schaapveld
- Department of Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marjanka K Schmidt
- Department of Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Gabe S Sonke
- Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nicola S Russell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Berthe M P Aleman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Flora E van Leeuwen
- Department of Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Teepen JC, Kok JL, Feijen EAM, Loonen JJ, van den Heuvel‐Eibrink MM, van der Pal HJ, Tissing WJE, Bresters D, Versluys B, Grootenhuis MA, Louwerens M, Neggers SJCMM, van Santen HM, de Vries A, Janssens GO, den Hartogh JG, van Leeuwen FE, Hollema N, Streefkerk N, Kilsdonk E, van der Heiden‐van der Loo M, van Dulmen‐den Broeder E, Ronckers CM, Kremer LCM. Questionnaire‐ and linkage‐based outcomes in Dutch childhood cancer survivors: Methodology of the
DCCSS LATER
study part 1. Cancer Med 2022; 12:7588-7602. [PMID: 36519590 PMCID: PMC10067029 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2022] [Revised: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 11/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Childhood cancer survivors are at risk for developing long-term adverse health outcomes. To identify the risk of and risk factors for specific health outcomes, well-established cohorts are needed with detailed information on childhood cancer diagnosis, treatment, and health outcomes. We describe the design, methodology, characteristics, and data availability of the Dutch Childhood Cancer Survivor Study LATER cohort (1963-2001) part 1; questionnaire and linkage studies. METHODS The LATER cohort includes 5-year childhood cancer survivors, diagnosed in the period 1963-2001, and before the age of 18 in any of the seven former pediatric oncology centers in the Netherlands. Information on health outcomes from survivors and invited siblings of survivors was collected by questionnaires and linkages to medical registries. RESULTS In total, 6165 survivors were included in the LATER cohort. Extensive data on diagnosis and treatment have been collected. Information on a variety of health outcomes has been ascertained by the LATER questionnaire study and linkages with several registries for subsequent tumors, health care use, and hospitalizations. CONCLUSION Research with data of the LATER cohort will provide new insights into risks of and risk factors for long-term health outcomes. This can enhance risk stratification for childhood cancer survivors and inform surveillance guidelines and development of interventions to prevent (the impact of) long-term adverse health outcomes. The data collected will be a solid baseline foundation for future follow-up studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jop C. Teepen
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology Utrecht The Netherlands
| | - Judith L. Kok
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology Utrecht The Netherlands
| | | | - Jacqueline J. Loonen
- Radboudumc Center of Expertise for Cancer Survivorship, Department of Hematology Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen The Netherlands
| | - Marry M. van den Heuvel‐Eibrink
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology Utrecht The Netherlands
- Department of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam The Netherlands
| | | | - Wim J. E. Tissing
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology Utrecht The Netherlands
- Department of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen Groningen The Netherlands
| | - Dorine Bresters
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology Utrecht The Netherlands
| | - Birgitta Versluys
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology Utrecht The Netherlands
| | | | - Marloes Louwerens
- Department of Internal Medicine Leiden University Medical Center Leiden The Netherlands
| | - Sebastian J. C. M. M. Neggers
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology Utrecht The Netherlands
- Department of Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam The Netherlands
| | - Hanneke M. van Santen
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology Utrecht The Netherlands
- Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht The Netherlands
| | - Andrica de Vries
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology Utrecht The Netherlands
- Department of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam The Netherlands
| | - Geert O. Janssens
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology Utrecht The Netherlands
- Department Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht The Netherlands
| | | | - Flora E. van Leeuwen
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics The Netherlands Cancer Institute Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Nynke Hollema
- Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein The Netherlands
| | - Nina Streefkerk
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology Utrecht The Netherlands
- Department of Pediatrics, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam The Netherlands
| | - Ellen Kilsdonk
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology Utrecht The Netherlands
| | | | - Eline van Dulmen‐den Broeder
- Department of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, Amsterdam UMC Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Cécile M. Ronckers
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology Utrecht The Netherlands
- Brandenburg Medical School Institute of Biostatistics and Registry Research Neuruppin Germany
| | - Leontien C. M. Kremer
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology Utrecht The Netherlands
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital Utrecht The Netherlands
- Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Ykema BL, Gini A, Rigter LS, Spaander MC, Moons LM, Bisseling TM, de Boer JP, Verbeek WH, Lugtenburg PJ, Janus CP, Petersen EJ, Roesink JM, van der Maazen RW, Aleman BM, Meijer GA, van Leeuwen FE, Snaebjornsson P, Carvalho B, van Leerdam ME, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I. Cost-Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Surveillance in Hodgkin Lymphoma Survivors Treated with Procarbazine and/or Infradiaphragmatic Radiotherapy. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2022; 31:2157-2168. [PMID: 36166472 PMCID: PMC9720424 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-22-0019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2022] [Revised: 05/19/2022] [Accepted: 09/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hodgkin lymphoma survivors treated with infradiaphragmatic radiotherapy (IRT) and/or procarbazine have an increased risk of developing colorectal cancer. We investigated the cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer surveillance in Dutch Hodgkin lymphoma survivors to determine the optimal surveillance strategy for different Hodgkin lymphoma subgroups. METHODS The Microsimulation Screening Analysis-Colon model was adjusted to reflect colorectal cancer and other-cause mortality risk in Hodgkin lymphoma survivors. Ninety colorectal cancer surveillance strategies were evaluated varying in starting and stopping age, interval, and modality [colonoscopy, fecal immunochemical test (FIT, OC-Sensor; cutoffs: 10/20/47 μg Hb/g feces), and multi-target stool DNA test (Cologuard)]. Analyses were also stratified per primary treatment (IRT and procarbazine or procarbazine without IRT). Colorectal cancer deaths averted (compared with no surveillance) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) were primary outcomes. The optimal surveillance strategy was identified assuming a willingness-to-pay threshold of €20,000 per life-years gained (LYG). RESULTS Overall, the optimal surveillance strategy was annual FIT (47 μg) from age 45 to 70 years, which might avert 70% of colorectal cancer deaths in Hodgkin lymphoma survivors (compared with no surveillance; ICER:€18,000/LYG). The optimal surveillance strategy in Hodgkin lymphoma survivors treated with procarbazine without IRT was biennial FIT (47 μg) from age 45 to 70 years (colorectal cancer mortality averted 56%; ICER:€15,000/LYG), and when treated with IRT and procarbazine, annual FIT (47 μg) surveillance from age 40 to 70 was most cost-effective (colorectal cancer mortality averted 75%; ICER:€13,000/LYG). CONCLUSIONS Colorectal cancer surveillance in Hodgkin lymphoma survivors is cost-effective and should commence earlier than screening occurs in population screening programs. For all subgroups, FIT surveillance was the most cost-effective strategy. IMPACT Colorectal cancer surveillance should be implemented in Hodgkin lymphoma survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Berbel L.M. Ykema
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Andrea Gini
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lisanne S. Rigter
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Manon C.W. Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Leon M.G. Moons
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Tanya M. Bisseling
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Jan Paul de Boer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Wieke H.M. Verbeek
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Cecile P.M. Janus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Eefke J. Petersen
- Department of Hematology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Judith M. Roesink
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Berthe M.P. Aleman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gerrit A. Meijer
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Flora E. van Leeuwen
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Petur Snaebjornsson
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Beatriz Carvalho
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Monique E. van Leerdam
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.,Corresponding Author: Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam 3015 GD, the Netherlands. Phone: 311-0703-8454; E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Terra L, Beekman MJ, Engelhardt EG, Heemskerk-Gerritsen BAM, van Beurden M, Roeters van Lennep JE, van Doorn HC, de Hullu JA, Van Dorst EBL, Mom CH, Slangen BFM, Gaarenstroom KN, van der Kolk LE, Collée JM, Wevers MR, Ausems MGEM, Van Engelen K, van de Beek I, Berger LPV, van Asperen CJ, Gomez Garcia EB, Maas AHEM, Hooning MJ, Aaronson NK, Mourits MJE, van Leeuwen FE. Sexual functioning more than 15 years after premenopausal risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022; 228:440.e1-440.e20. [PMID: 36403862 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.11.1289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2022] [Revised: 10/21/2022] [Accepted: 11/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Women with a BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant are advised to undergo premenopausal risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy after completion of childbearing, to reduce their risk of ovarian cancer. Several studies reported less sexual pleasure 1 to 3 years after a premenopausal oophorectomy. However, the long-term effects of premenopausal oophorectomy on sexual functioning are unknown. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to study long-term sexual functioning in women at increased familial risk of breast or ovarian cancer who underwent a risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy either before the age of 46 years (premenopausal group) or after the age of 54 years (postmenopausal group). Subgroup analyses were performed in the premenopausal group, comparing early (before the age of 41 years) and later (at ages 41-45 years) premenopausal risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy. STUDY DESIGN Between 2018 and 2021, 817 women with a high familial risk of breast or ovarian cancer from an ongoing cohort study were invited to participate in our study. Because of a large difference in age in the study between the premenopausal and postmenopausal salpingo-oophorectomy groups, we restricted the comparison of sexual functioning between the groups to 368 women who were 60 to 70 years old at completion of the questionnaire (226 in the premenopausal group and 142 in the postmenopausal group). In 496 women with a premenopausal risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy, we compared the sexual functioning between women in the early premenopausal group (n=151) and women in the later premenopausal group (n=345). Differences between groups were analyzed using multiple regression analyses, adjusting for current age, breast cancer history, use of hormone replacement therapy, body mass index, chronic medication use (yes or no), and body image. RESULTS Mean times since risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy were 20.6 years in the premenopausal group and 10.6 years in the postmenopausal group (P<.001). The mean age at questionnaire completion was 62.7 years in the premenopausal group, compared with 67.0 years in the postmenopausal group (P<.001). Compared with 48.9% of women in the postmenopausal group, 47.4% of women in the premenopausal group were still sexually active (P=.80). Current sexual pleasure scores were the same for women in the premenopausal group and women in the postmenopausal group (mean pleasure score, 8.6; P=.99). However, women in the premenopausal group more often reported substantial discomfort than women in the postmenopausal group (35.6% vs 20.9%; P=.04). After adjusting for confounders, premenopausal risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy was associated with substantially more discomfort during sexual intercourse than postmenopausal risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (odds ratio, 3.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-9.4). Moreover, after premenopausal risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy, more severe complaints of vaginal dryness were observed (odds ratio, 2.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-4.7). Women with a risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy before the age of 41 years reported similar pleasure and discomfort scores as women with a risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy between ages 41 and 45 years. CONCLUSION More than 15 years after premenopausal risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy, the proportion of sexually active women was comparable with the proportion of sexually active women with a postmenopausal risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy. However, after a premenopausal risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy, women experienced more vaginal dryness and more often had substantial sexual discomfort during sexual intercourse. This did not lead to less pleasure with sexual activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lara Terra
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten J Beekman
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ellen G Engelhardt
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Marc van Beurden
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Helena C van Doorn
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joanne A de Hullu
- Department of Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Eleonora B L Van Dorst
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Constantijne H Mom
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Brigitte F M Slangen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands; GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Katja N Gaarenstroom
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Lizet E van der Kolk
- Family Cancer Clinic, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Margriet Collée
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marijke R Wevers
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Margreet G E M Ausems
- Division of Laboratories, Pharmacy, and Biomedical Genetics, Department of Genetics, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Klaartje Van Engelen
- Department of Human Genetics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Irma van de Beek
- Department of Human Genetics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lieke P V Berger
- Department of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Christi J van Asperen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Encarna B Gomez Garcia
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Angela H E M Maas
- Department of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Maartje J Hooning
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Neil K Aaronson
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marian J E Mourits
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Flora E van Leeuwen
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Wang Y, Kremer LCM, van Leeuwen FE, Armstrong GT, Leisenring W, de Vathaire F, Hudson MM, Kuehni CE, Arnold MA, Haddy N, Demoor-Goldschmidt C, Diallo I, Howell RM, Ehrhardt MJ, Moskowitz CS, Neglia JP, van der Pal HJH, Robison LL, Schaapveld M, Turcotte LM, Waespe N, Ronckers CM, Teepen JC. Cohort profile: Risk and risk factors for female breast cancer after treatment for childhood and adolescent cancer: an internationally pooled cohort. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e065910. [PMID: 36344003 PMCID: PMC9644351 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065910] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The International Consortium for Pooled Studies on Subsequent Malignancies after Childhood and Adolescent Cancer was established in 2018 to address gaps in knowledge of risk and risk factors for breast cancer subsequent to childhood/adolescent cancer by pooling individual patient data from seven cohorts. Initially, the pooled cohort will focus on three clinically relevant questions regarding treatment-related subsequent breast cancer risk in female survivors, which are the risk related to low-dose radiotherapy exposure to the chest, specific chemotherapy agents and attained age. PARTICIPANTS The consortium database includes pooled data on 21 892 female survivors from seven cohorts in North America and Europe with a primary cancer diagnosis at <21 years of age, and survival ≥5 years from diagnosis. FINDINGS TO DATE This is a newly established pooled study. The cohort profile summarised the data collected from each included cohort, including childhood cancer diagnosis information and treatment details (ie, radiotherapy fields and cumulative doses, and chemotherapy agents and cumulative doses for each agent). Included cohorts' follow-up started 1951-1981 and ended 2013-2021, respectively, for a median follow-up duration of 24.3 (IQR 18.0-32.8) years since primary cancer diagnosis. The median age at primary cancer diagnosis was 5.4 (IQR 2.5-11.9) years. And the median attained age at last follow-up was 32.2 (IQR 24.0-40.4) years. In all, 4240 (19.4%) survivors were treated with radiotherapy to the chest and 9308 (42.5%) with anthracyclines. At the end of the follow-up, 835 females developed a first subsequent breast cancer, including 635 invasive breast cancer only, 184 carcinomas in situ only (172 ductal carcinomas in situ and 12 lobular carcinomas in situ), and 16 with both an invasive and in situ diagnosis at the same moment. The cumulative incidences of subsequent breast cancer (both invasive and in situ) 25 and 35 years after primary cancer diagnosis were 2.2% and 6.2%, respectively. FUTURE PLANS The consortium is intended to serve as a model and robust source of childhood/adolescent cancer survivor data for elucidating other knowledge gaps on subsequent breast cancer risk, and risk of other subsequent malignancies (including data on males) in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuehan Wang
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Leontien C M Kremer
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Wendy Leisenring
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Florent de Vathaire
- Radiation Epidemiology Team, INSERM U1018, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Claudia E Kuehni
- Childhood Cancer Research Group, Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Children's Hospital Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Michael A Arnold
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Nadia Haddy
- Radiation Epidemiology Team, INSERM U1018, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Charlotte Demoor-Goldschmidt
- Radiation Epidemiology Team, INSERM U1018, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University-Hospital of Angers, Angers, France
- Radiotherapy department, Francois Baclesse center, Caen, France
- Supportive care department, Francois Baclesse center, Caen, France
| | - Ibrahima Diallo
- Radiation Epidemiology Team, INSERM U1018, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Rebecca M Howell
- University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | | | - Joseph P Neglia
- University of Minnesota Masonic Cancer Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | | | | | | | - Lucie M Turcotte
- University of Minnesota Masonic Cancer Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Nicolas Waespe
- Childhood Cancer Research Group, Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Children's Hospital Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- CANSEARCH research platform in pediatric oncology and hematology, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Cécile M Ronckers
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Health Services Research, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Jop C Teepen
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Ykema BLM, Breekveldt ECH, Carvalho B, van Wezel T, Meijer GA, Kerst M, Schaapveld M, van Leeuwen FE, Snaebjornsson P, van Leerdam ME. Somatic hits in mismatch repair genes in colorectal cancer among non-seminoma testicular cancer survivors. Br J Cancer 2022; 127:1991-1996. [PMID: 36088508 PMCID: PMC9681876 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-022-01972-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2022] [Revised: 07/04/2022] [Accepted: 08/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Non-seminoma testicular cancer survivors (TCS) have an increased risk of developing colorectal cancer (CRC) when they have been treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. Previously we demonstrated that among Hodgkin lymphoma survivors (HLS) there is enrichment of rare mismatch repair (MMR) deficient (MMRd) CRCs with somatic hits in MMR genes. We speculate that this phenomenon could also occur among other cancer survivors. We therefore aim to determine the MMR status and its underlying mechanism in CRC among TCS (TCS-CRC). METHODS Thirty TCS-CRC, identified through the Dutch pathology registry, were analysed for MMR proteins by immunohistochemistry. Next-generation sequencing was performed in MMRd CRCs without MLH1 promoter hypermethylation (n = 4). Data were compared with a male cohort with primary CRC (P-CRC, n = 629). RESULTS MMRd was found in 17% of TCS-CRCs vs. 9% in P-CRC (p = 0.13). MMRd was more often caused by somatic double or single hit in MMR genes by mutation or loss of heterozygosity in TCS-CRCs (3/30 (10%) vs. 11/629 (2%) in P-CRCs (p < 0.01)). CONCLUSIONS MMRd CRCs with somatic double or single hit are more frequent in this small cohort of TCS compared with P-CRC. Exposure to anticancer treatments appears to be associated with the development of these rare MMRd CRC among cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Berbel L M Ykema
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Emilie C H Breekveldt
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Beatriz Carvalho
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Tom van Wezel
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Gerrit A Meijer
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Martijn Kerst
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Michael Schaapveld
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Flora E van Leeuwen
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Petur Snaebjornsson
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Rigter LS, Snaebjornsson P, Rosenberg EH, Altena E, van Grieken NCT, Aleman BMP, Kerst JM, Morton L, Schaapveld M, Meijer GA, van Leeuwen FE, van Leerdam ME. Molecular characterization of gastric adenocarcinoma diagnosed in patients previously treated for Hodgkin lymphoma or testicular cancer. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0270591. [PMID: 35877698 PMCID: PMC9312836 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The risk of developing gastric cancer is increased in patients treated with radiotherapy for Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) or testicular cancer (TC). This study aims to assess if gastric adenocarcinoma after treatment for HL/TC (t-GC) is molecularly different from gastric adenocarcinoma in the general population. Methods Patients were diagnosed with t-GC ≥5 years after treatment for HL/TC. Four molecular subtypes were identified using immunohistochemical and molecular analyses: Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency or microsatellite instability (MSI), aberrant p53 staining as surrogate for chromosomal instability (sCIN), and a surrogate for genomic stability (sGS) without these aberrations. Results were compared with gastric cancer in the general population (p-GC) described in literature. Results Molecular subtyping of 90 t-GCs resulted in 3% EBV, 8% MSI, 36% sCIN and 53% sGS. 3/6 of MSI t-GCs had MLH1 promoter methylation and 2/6 were explained by double somatic mutations in MMR genes. T-GCs were more frequently sGS than p-GCs (53% vs. 38%, p = 0.04). T-GC was more frequently sGS in HL/TC patients diagnosed before 1990, than after 1990 (63% vs. 38%, p = 0.03). T-GCs located in the antrum, an area that receives high irradiation doses, were more frequently sGS (61% vs. 28% in p-GCs, p = 0.02). Conclusion Our results demonstrate that t-GCs are more frequently of the sGS subtype than p-GCs. An association of t-GC of the sGS subtype with prior anticancer treatment is suggested by the high frequency in HL/TC patients who were treated before 1990, a time period in which HL/TC treatments were more extensive.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisanne S. Rigter
- Department of Gastroenterology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Petur Snaebjornsson
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Efraim H. Rosenberg
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Estelle Altena
- Department of Gastroenterology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Berthe M. P. Aleman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan M. Kerst
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lindsay Morton
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Michael Schaapveld
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gerrit A. Meijer
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Flora E. van Leeuwen
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Monique E. van Leerdam
- Department of Gastroenterology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- * E-mail:
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Roberti S, van Leeuwen FE, Ronckers CM, Krul IM, de Vathaire F, Veres C, Diallo I, Janus CPM, Aleman BMP, Russell NS, Hauptmann M. Radiotherapy-related dose and irradiated volume effects on breast cancer risk among Hodgkin lymphoma survivors. J Natl Cancer Inst 2022; 114:1270-1278. [PMID: 35771630 PMCID: PMC9468297 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djac125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2022] [Revised: 05/05/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Breast cancer (BC) risk is increased among Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) survivors treated with chest radiotherapy. Case-control studies showed a linear radiation dose-response relationship for estimated dose to the breast tumor location. However, these relative risks cannot be used for absolute risk prediction of BC anywhere in the breasts. Furthermore, the independent and joint effects of radiation dose and irradiated volumes are unclear. Therefore, we examined the effects of mean breast dose and various dose-volume parameters on BC risk in HL patients. Methods We conducted a nested case-control study of BC among 5-year HL survivors (173 case patients, 464 matched control patients). Dose-volume histograms were obtained from reconstructed voxel-based 3-dimensional dose distributions. Summary parameters of dose-volume histograms were studied next to mean and median breast dose, Gini index, and the new dose metric mean absolute difference of dose, using categorical and linear excess odds ratio (EOR) models. Interactions between dose-volume parameters and mean dose were also examined. Results Statistically significant linear dose-response relationships were observed for mean breast dose (EOR per Gy = 0.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.05 to 1.06) and median dose (EOR/Gy = 0.06, 95% CI = 0.02 to 0.19), with no statistically significant curvature. All metrics except Gini and mean absolute difference were positively correlated with each other. These metrics all showed similar patterns of dose-response that were no longer statistically significant when adjusting for mean dose. No statistically significant modification of the effect of mean dose was observed. Conclusion Mean breast dose predicts subsequent BC risk in long-term HL survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sander Roberti
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Flora E van Leeuwen
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Cécile M Ronckers
- Institute of Biostatistics and Registry Research, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Neuruppin, Germany
| | - Inge M Krul
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Florent de Vathaire
- Radiation Epidemiology Team, Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, INSERM U1018, Villejuif, France.,Research Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.,University Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Cristina Veres
- University Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France.,Molecular Radiation Therapy and Therapeutic Innovation, INSERM U1030, Villejuif, France.,Radiation Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Ibrahima Diallo
- University Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France.,Molecular Radiation Therapy and Therapeutic Innovation, INSERM U1030, Villejuif, France.,Radiation Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Cécile P M Janus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Berthe M P Aleman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nicola S Russell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Michael Hauptmann
- Institute of Biostatistics and Registry Research, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Neuruppin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Spoor J, de Jong D, de Boer M, Rakhorst H, van der Hulst RRJW, Vrancken Peeters MJTFD, Bleiker EMA, Mureau MAM, van Leeuwen FE. Bradford Hill and breast implant illness: no evidence for causal association with breast implants. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2022; 18:773-775. [PMID: 35702986 DOI: 10.1080/1744666x.2022.2090339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Spoor
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daphne de Jong
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mintsje de Boer
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Hinne Rakhorst
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Rene R J W van der Hulst
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Eveline M A Bleiker
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marc A M Mureau
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Flora E van Leeuwen
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Naaktgeboren WR, Groen WG, Jacobse JN, Steggink LC, Walenkamp AME, van Harten WH, Stuiver MM, Aaronson NK, Aleman BMP, van der Meer P, Schaapveld M, Sonke GS, Gietema JA, van Leeuwen FE, May AM. Physical Activity and Cardiac Function in Long-Term Breast Cancer Survivors: A Cross-Sectional Study. JACC CardioOncol 2022; 4:183-191. [PMID: 35818555 PMCID: PMC9270603 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccao.2022.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2021] [Accepted: 02/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Higher levels of physical activity are associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular disease in the general population. Whether the same holds for women who underwent treatment for breast cancer is unclear. Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between physical activity in a typical week in the past 12 months and cardiac dysfunction in breast cancer survivors. Methods We used data from a cohort of breast cancer survivors who were treated at ages 40 to 50 years (N = 559). The association between physical activity and global longitudinal strain (GLS) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was evaluated using both linear and modified Poisson regression analyses adjusted for relevant confounders. Results In total, 559 breast cancer survivors were included, with median age of 55.5 years and a median time since treatment of 10.2 years. GLS was less favorable in inactive survivors (−17.1%) than in moderately inactive (−18.4%), moderately active (−18.2%), and active survivors (−18.5%), with an adjusted significant difference for active versus inactive survivors (β = −1.31; 95% CI: −2.55 to −0.06)). Moderately active (n = 57/130) and active survivors (n = 87/124) had significantly lower risks of abnormal GLS (defined as >−18%) compared with inactive survivors (n = 17/26) (RR: 0.65 [95% CI: 0.45-0.94] and RR: 0.61 [95% CI: 0.43-0.87], respectively). LVEF, in normal ranges in all activity categories, was not associated with physical activity. Conclusions In long-term breast cancer survivors, higher physical activity levels were associated with improved GLS but not LVEF, with the relatively largest benefit for doing any activity versus none. This finding suggests that increasing physical activity may contribute to cardiovascular health benefits, especially in inactive survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Willeke R Naaktgeboren
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Wim G Groen
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Judy N Jacobse
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lars C Steggink
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Annemiek M E Walenkamp
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Wim H van Harten
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, the Netherlands.,Department of Health Technology and Services Research, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - Martijn M Stuiver
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Center for Quality of Life, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Centre of Expertise Urban Vitality, Faculty of Health, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Neil K Aaronson
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Berthe M P Aleman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Peter van der Meer
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Michael Schaapveld
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gabe S Sonke
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jourik A Gietema
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Flora E van Leeuwen
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Anne M May
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Thanarajasingam G, Minasian LM, Bhatnagar V, Cavalli F, De Claro RA, Dueck AC, El-Galaly TC, Everest N, Geissler J, Gisselbrecht C, Gormley N, Gribben J, Horowitz M, Ivy SP, Jacobson CA, Keating A, Kluetz PG, Kwong YL, Little RF, Matasar MJ, Mateos MV, McCullough K, Miller RS, Mohty M, Moreau P, Morton LM, Nagai S, Nair A, Nastoupil L, Robertson K, Sidana S, Smedby KE, Sonneveld P, Tzogani K, van Leeuwen FE, Velikova G, Villa D, Wingard JR, Seymour JF, Habermann TM. Reaching beyond maximum grade: progress and future directions for modernising the assessment and reporting of adverse events in haematological malignancies. Lancet Haematol 2022; 9:e374-e384. [PMID: 35483398 PMCID: PMC9241484 DOI: 10.1016/s2352-3026(22)00045-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2021] [Revised: 01/20/2022] [Accepted: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Remarkable improvements in outcomes for many haematological malignancies have been driven primarily by a proliferation of novel therapeutics over the past two decades. Targeted agents, immune and cellular therapies, and combination regimens have adverse event profiles distinct from conventional finite cytotoxic chemotherapies. In 2018, a Commission comprising patient advocates, clinicians, clinical investigators, regulators, biostatisticians, and pharmacists representing a broad range of academic and clinical cancer expertise examined issues of adverse event evaluation in the context of both newer and existing therapies for haematological cancers. The Commission proposed immediate actions and long-term solutions in the current processes in adverse event assessment, patient-reported outcomes in haematological malignancies, toxicities in cellular therapies, long-term toxicity and survivorship in haematological malignancies, issues in regulatory approval from an international perspective, and toxicity reporting in haematological malignancies and the real-world setting. In this follow-up report, the Commission describes progress that has been made in these areas since the initial report.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lori M Minasian
- National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Vishal Bhatnagar
- Oncology Center for Excellence, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Franco Cavalli
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - R Angelo De Claro
- Office of Oncologic Diseases, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Amylou C Dueck
- Division of Quantitative Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Tarec C El-Galaly
- Department of Haematology, Clinical Cancer Research Center, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Neil Everest
- Health Resourcing Group, Australian Government Department of Health, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Jan Geissler
- Leukaemia Patient Advocates Foundation, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Christian Gisselbrecht
- Haemato-Oncology Department, Hopital Saint-Louis, Institute Haematology, Paris Diderot University VII, Paris, France; European Medicines Agency, London, UK
| | - Nicole Gormley
- Office of Oncologic Diseases, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - John Gribben
- Centre for Haemato-Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, London, UK
| | - Mary Horowitz
- Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - S Percy Ivy
- National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | | | - Paul G Kluetz
- Oncology Center for Excellence, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Yok Lam Kwong
- Department of Haematology and Haematologic Oncology, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China
| | - Richard F Little
- National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Matthew J Matasar
- Lymphoma Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Robert S Miller
- CancerLinQ, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA, USA
| | - Mohamad Mohty
- Haematology and Cellular Therapy Department, Sorbonne University, Saint-Antoine Hospital (AP-HP), INSERM UMRs 938, Paris, France
| | - Philippe Moreau
- Department of Haematology, University Hospital Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Lindsay M Morton
- National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Sumimasa Nagai
- Department of Medical Development, Institute for Advancement of Clinical and Translational Science, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan; Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Abhilasha Nair
- Oncology Center for Excellence, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | | | - Kaye Robertson
- Office of Product Review, Therapeutic Goods Administration, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Surbhi Sidana
- Division of BMT and Cellular Therapy, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Karin E Smedby
- Department of Medicine Solna, Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Haematology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Pieter Sonneveld
- Department of Haematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Galina Velikova
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Diego Villa
- BC Cancer Centre for Lymphoid Cancer and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - John R Wingard
- Division of Haematology & Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - John F Seymour
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Schrijver LH, Mooij TM, Pijpe A, Sonke GS, Mourits MJE, Andrieu N, Antoniou AC, Easton DF, Engel C, Goldgar D, John EM, Kast K, Milne RL, Olsson H, Phillips KA, Terry MB, Hopper JL, van Leeuwen FE, Rookus MA. Oral Contraceptive Use in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers: Absolute Cancer Risks and Benefits. J Natl Cancer Inst 2022; 114:540-552. [PMID: 35048954 PMCID: PMC9002279 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djac004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2021] [Revised: 10/11/2021] [Accepted: 01/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To help BRCA1 and 2 mutation carriers make informed decisions regarding use of combined-type oral contraceptive preparation (COCP), absolute risk-benefit estimates are needed for COCP-associated cancer. METHODS For a hypothetical cohort of 10 000 women, we calculated the increased or decreased cumulative incidence of COCP-associated (breast, ovarian, endometrial) cancer, examining 18 scenarios with differences in duration and timing of COCP use, uptake of prophylactic surgeries, and menopausal hormone therapy. RESULTS COCP use initially increased breast cancer risk and decreased ovarian and endometrial cancer risk long term. For 10 000 BRCA1 mutation carriers, 10 years of COCP use from age 20 to 30 years resulted in 66 additional COCP-associated cancer cases by the age of 35 years, in addition to 625 cases expected for never users. By the age of 70 years such COCP use resulted in 907 fewer cancer cases than the expected 9093 cases in never users. Triple-negative breast cancer estimates resulted in 196 additional COCP-associated cases by age 40 years, in addition to the 1454 expected. For 10 000 BRCA2 mutation carriers using COCP from age 20 to 30 years, 80 excess cancer cases were estimated by age 40 years in addition to 651 expected cases; by the age of 70 years, we calculated 382 fewer cases compared with the 6156 cases expected. The long-term benefit of COCP use diminished after risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy followed by menopausal hormone therapy use. CONCLUSION Although COCP use in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers initially increases breast, ovarian, and endometrial cancer risk, it strongly decreases lifetime cancer risk. Risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and menopausal hormone therapy use appear to counteract the long-term COCP-benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lieske H Schrijver
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute,
Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Thea M Mooij
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute,
Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Anouk Pijpe
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute,
Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gabe S Sonke
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute,
Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marian J E Mourits
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen,
University of Groningen, Groningen, the
Netherlands
| | - Nadine Andrieu
- INSERM U900, Paris, France
- Institut Curie, Paris, France
- Mines Paris Tech, Fontainebleau, France
- PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Antonis C Antoniou
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and
Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Douglas F Easton
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and
Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University
of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Christoph Engel
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University
of Leipzig, Germany
| | - David Goldgar
- Department of Dermatology, University of Utah School of
Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Esther M John
- Department of Epidemiology & Population Health and Medicine, Stanford
Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA,
USA
| | - Karin Kast
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical Faculty and University
Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - Roger L Milne
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria,
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population
and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria,
Australia
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash
University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Håkan Olsson
- Department of Oncology, Lund University Hospital, Lund,
Sweden
| | - Kelly-Anne Phillips
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population
and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria,
Australia
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of
Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer
Centre, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mary Beth Terry
- Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University, New York,
NY, USA
| | - John L Hopper
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population
and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria,
Australia
| | - Flora E van Leeuwen
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute,
Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Matti A Rookus
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute,
Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Spoor J, de Jong D, van Leeuwen FE. [Silicone breast implants: the importance of nuanced reporting]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2022; 166:D6515. [PMID: 35499539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Silicone breast implants (SBIs) are frequently discussed in the media. Reporting on this topic is commonly characterised by sensationalism and a lack of nuance. SBIs have been linked to autoimmune disease and the controversial disease entity 'breast implant illness'. However, convincing evidence for this association is lacking because nearly all studies examining this association suffer from methodological weaknesses. Among the well-described long-term adverse effects of SBIs are implant ruptures, capsular contractures and the exceptionally rare breast implant-associated large cell lymphoma of the breast (BIA-ALCL). SBIs contribute significantly to the quality of life of many breast cancer patients and women with cosmetic implants. Any potential adverse effect of SBIs must therefore always be carefully weighed against the benefits of SBI-based procedures. In this consideration, evidence based on sound methodology is of vital importance. Oversimplified reporting based on deficient research leads to undue alarm among women with breast implants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Spoor
- Nederlands Kanker Instituut Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, afd. Epidemiologie, Amsterdam
- Contact: Jonathan Spoor
| | - Daphne de Jong
- Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, afd. Pathologie, Amsterdam
| | - Flora E van Leeuwen
- Nederlands Kanker Instituut Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, afd. Epidemiologie, Amsterdam
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Spoor J, de Jong D, van Leeuwen FE. Silicone Particle Migration: A Misleading Report. Aesthet Surg J 2022; 42:NP261-NP262. [PMID: 34695179 PMCID: PMC8922711 DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjab377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Spoor
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Corresponding Author: Dr Flora E. van Leeuwen, Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands. E-mail:
| | - Daphne de Jong
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Flora E van Leeuwen
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
de Bruijn L, Starreveld DEJ, Schaapveld M, van Leeuwen FE, Bleiker EMA, Berentzen NE. Single-item chronotype is associated with dim light melatonin onset in lymphoma survivors with fatigue. J Sleep Res 2022; 31:e13577. [PMID: 35238108 DOI: 10.1111/jsr.13577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Revised: 02/07/2022] [Accepted: 02/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Chronotype is frequently assessed in human observational studies using various morningness-eveningness questionnaires. An alternative single-item chronotype question has been proposed for its reduced administration time and its accessibility to all types of populations. We investigated whether this single-item chronotype is associated with dim light melatonin onset, the "gold standard" for estimating the endogenous circadian phase. We used data from a randomised trial in 166 (non-)Hodgkin lymphoma survivors with cancer-related fatigue. All participants completed a questionnaire, including a single-item chronotype question. A subsample of 47 participants also provided saliva samples before sleep onset for melatonin measurement. Using multiple linear regression, we examined whether chronotype based on a single question was associated with dim light melatonin onset. The subsample of 47 participants had a mean age of 44.6 years. The mean (SD) dim light melatonin onset was at 8:42 (1:19) p.m. and the most common chronotype was more evening than morning person (29.2%). A gradual increase in dim light melatonin onset with later chronotype (i.e. evening preference) was observed, with a mean ranging from 7:45 p.m. in definite morning persons to 9:16 p.m. in definite evening persons. Our study shows that single-item chronotype is associated with dim light melatonin onset as a marker of the endogenous circadian phase of fatigued lymphoma survivors. This type of chronotype assessment can therefore be a useful alternative for more extensive morningness-eveningness questionnaires.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linske de Bruijn
- Department of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Daniëlle E J Starreveld
- Department of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Michael Schaapveld
- Department of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Flora E van Leeuwen
- Department of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Eveline M A Bleiker
- Department of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Nina E Berentzen
- Department of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Kilsdonk E, van Dulmen-den Broeder E, van Leeuwen FE, van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM, Loonen JJ, van der Pal HJ, Bresters D, Versluys AB, Pieters R, Hauptmann M, Jaspers M, Neggers S, Raphael MF, Tissing WJE, Kremer LCM, Ronckers CM, Feijen EAM, Grootenhuis MA, den Hartogh J, van der Heiden-van der Loo M, Hollema N, Kok JL, Postma A, Schaapveld M, Teepen JC. Late Mortality in Childhood Cancer Survivors according to Pediatric Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Era in the Dutch LATER Cohort. Cancer Invest 2022; 40:413-424. [PMID: 35175864 DOI: 10.1080/07357907.2022.2034841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
This multi-center cohort-study examined late mortality among 6,165 Dutch five-year childhood cancer survivors diagnosed 1963-2001. Clinical details and cause of death were based on medical records. Mortality was 12-fold that of the general population, with 51.3 additional deaths per 10,000 person-years (21.9 yrs median follow-up). Cumulative mortality 15 yrs post-diagnosis was 6.9%, predominantly from late recurrences; thereafter the absolute contribution of other health outcomes increased. Cumulative all-cause and recurrence-related mortality were highest for Central Nervous System and bone tumor survivors. All-cause, but not subsequent tumor and circulatory disease-related cumulative mortality, was highest for patients diagnosed 1963-1979 vs. later (p-trend <0.001).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen Kilsdonk
- Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder
- Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Marry M van den Heuvel-Eibrink
- Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Erasmus Medical Center/Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Helena J van der Pal
- Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,UMC Amsterdam, Emma Children's Hospital/Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dorine Bresters
- Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Willem Alexander Children's Hospital/Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - A B Versluys
- Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Rob Pieters
- Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Michael Hauptmann
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane. Neuruppin, Germany
| | | | - Sebastian Neggers
- Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martine F Raphael
- Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,UMC Amsterdam, Emma Children's Hospital/Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Stichting KinderOncologie Nederland (SKION)/Dutch Childhood Oncology Group (DCOG), The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Wim J E Tissing
- Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,University of Groningen/University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Leontine C M Kremer
- Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,UMC Amsterdam, Emma Children's Hospital/Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Cécile M Ronckers
- Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,UMC Amsterdam, Emma Children's Hospital/Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane. Neuruppin, Germany
| | | | - Elizabeth A M Feijen
- Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,UMC Amsterdam, Emma Children's Hospital/Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martha A Grootenhuis
- Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,UMC Amsterdam, Emma Children's Hospital/Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jaap den Hartogh
- Dutch Childhood Cancer Parent Organisation (VOKK)/VOX, NieuwegeinThe Netherlands
| | | | - Nynke Hollema
- Stichting KinderOncologie Nederland (SKION)/Dutch Childhood Oncology Group (DCOG), The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Judith L Kok
- Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,UMC Amsterdam, Emma Children's Hospital/Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Aleida Postma
- Stichting KinderOncologie Nederland (SKION)/Dutch Childhood Oncology Group (DCOG), The Hague, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jop C Teepen
- Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,UMC Amsterdam, Emma Children's Hospital/Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Kubler K, Nardone A, Anand S, Gorvich D, Droog M, Hermida-Prado F, Akshi T, Feit AS, Cohen G, Dackus G, Pun M, Kuang Y, Cha J, Miller M, Gibson WJ, Paweletz CP, Van Allen EM, van Leeuwen FE, Nederlof P, Hollema H, Nguyen QD, Mourits MJE, Leshchiner I, Stewart C, Matulonis UA, Zwart W, Maruvka YE, Getz G, Jeselsohn R. Abstract GS2-09: Tamoxifen instigates uterine cancer development by activating PI3K signaling and supersedes PIK3CA driver mutations. Cancer Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs21-gs2-09] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Tamoxifen is widely used in the adjuvant treatment of estrogen receptor–positive (ER+) breast cancer and is an important drug for pre-menopausal women and post-menopausal patients who cannot tolerate aromatase inhibitors. Despite the clear clinical benefit in improving relapse-free and overall survival in these patients, an adverse effect of tamoxifen is a 2- to 7-fold increased risk of uterine cancer (UC) after 2-5 years of treatment. To date, the mechanism of tamoxifen-driven tumorigenesis is not well understood, and preventive approaches are lacking. Here, to molecularly characterize tamoxifen-associated uterine cancers (TA-UCs) and gain insights into their unique evolution, we performed whole-exome sequencing of 21 TA-UCs (discovery cohort) and droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) of an additional 40 TA-UCs (validation cohort) obtained from the ‘Tamoxifen Associated Malignancies: Aspects of Risk’ (TAMARISK) study. In addition, we used in vivo mouse models to: (i) further investigate tamoxifen-activated molecular pathways that may be involved in TA-UC tumorigenesis; and (ii) offer mechanistic insights. Overall, we discovered that TA-UCs were genomically similar to non–TA-UCs from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) project, with one profound exception: TA-UCs are characterized by a lower-than-expected frequency of mutations in two highly prevalent UC driver genes in the PI3K pathway: PIK3CA (14% [3/21] vs 48% [265/554] in non–TA-UC; P=0.003, Fisher’s exact test; Q=0.02, Benjamini-Hochberg FDR) and PIK3R1 (0%, [0/21] vs 31% [174/554]; P=0.001; Q=0.01). We used ddPCR in the independent TA-UC validation cohort and confirmed the low frequency of mutations in PIK3CA (7.5% [3/40] vs 21% [144/685] in control UCs from the Dana-Farber contribution to the AACR GENIE project; P=0.04). We next performed mouse in vivo studies and demonstrated that tamoxifen activated the PI3K pathway and increased cell proliferation in normal mouse uterine tissue through paracrine and autocrine effects, both of which were abrogated by the PI3K inhibitor alpelisib. Taken together, we describe a distinct and novel pathway of carcinogenesis in which tamoxifen acts as a driver event in the uterus and promotes tumor development in a mutation-independent manner. Indeed, tamoxifen may increase the risk of UC by activating the PI3K pathway, which can substitute for the early acquisition of oncogenic PIK3CA or PIK3R1 mutations observed in non–TA-UC tumors. Furthermore, the ability of a PI3K inhibitor to reduce cell proliferation in our mouse model raises the possibility that downregulating the PI3K pathway may prevent or significantly reduce TA-UC development, offering a potential future therapeutic and prevention strategy for specific high-risk patients undergoing tamoxifen therapy.
Citation Format: Kirsten Kubler, Agostina Nardone, Shankara Anand, Daniel Gorvich, Marjolein Droog, Francisco Hermida-Prado, Tara Akshi, Avery S Feit, Gabriella Cohen, Gwen Dackus, Matthew Pun, Yanan Kuang, Justin Cha, Mendy Miller, William J Gibson, Cloud P Paweletz, Eliezer M Van Allen, Flora E van Leeuwen, Petra Nederlof, Harry Hollema, Quang-Dé Nguyen, Marian JE Mourits, Ignaty Leshchiner, Chip Stewart, Ursula A Matulonis, Wilbert Zwart, Yosef E Maruvka, Gad Getz, Rinath Jeselsohn. Tamoxifen instigates uterine cancer development by activating PI3K signaling and supersedes PIK3CA driver mutations [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS2-09.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Tara Akshi
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | | | - Gwen Dackus
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Wilbert Zwart
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Ykema BLM, Rigter LS, Spaander MCW, Moons LMG, Bisseling TM, Aleman BMP, Dekker E, Verbeek WHM, Kuipers EJ, de Boer JP, Lugtenburg PJ, Janus CPM, Petersen EJ, Roesink JM, van der Maazen RWM, Meijer GA, Schaapveld M, van Leeuwen FE, Carvalho B, Snaebjornsson P, van Leerdam ME. Clinicopathological features and risk factors for developing colorectal neoplasia in Hodgkin's lymphoma survivors. Dig Endosc 2022; 34:163-170. [PMID: 33928678 PMCID: PMC9290704 DOI: 10.1111/den.14004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2021] [Revised: 04/22/2021] [Accepted: 04/26/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) survivors treated with abdominal radiotherapy and/or procarbazine have an increased risk of developing colorectal neoplasia. AIMS We evaluated the clinicopathological characteristics and risk factors for developing (advanced) neoplasia (AN) in HL survivors. METHODS In all, 101 HL survivors (median age 51 years, median age of HL diagnosis 25 years) underwent colonoscopy and 350 neoplasia and 44 AN (classified as advanced adenomas/serrated lesions or colorectal cancer), mostly right-sided, were detected, as published previously. An average-risk asymptomatic cohort who underwent screening colonoscopy were controls (median age 60 years). Clinicopathological characteristics of AN were evaluated in both groups. Mismatch repair (MMR) status was assessed using immunohistochemistry (MLH1/MSH2/MSH6/PMS2). Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the risk factors for AN in HL survivors, including age at HL diagnosis and interval between HL and colonoscopy. RESULTS In 101 colonoscopies in HL survivors, AN was primarily classified based on polyp size ≥10 mm, whereas (high-grade)dysplasia was more often seen in AN in controls. An interval between HL diagnosis and colonoscopy >26 years was associated with more AN compared with an interval of <26 years, with an odds ratio for AN of 3.8 (95% confidence interval 1.4-9.1) (p < 0.01). All 39 AN that were assessed were MMR proficient. CONCLUSIONS Colorectal neoplasia in HL survivors differ from average-risk controls; classification AN was primarily based on polyp size (≥10 mm) in HL survivors. Longer follow-up between HL diagnosis and colonoscopy was associated with a higher prevalence of AN in HL survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Berbel L. M. Ykema
- Department ofGastroenterology and HepatologyNetherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Lisanne S. Rigter
- Department ofGastroenterology and HepatologyNetherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Manon C. W. Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyErasmus Medical Center University HospitalRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Leon M. G. Moons
- Department ofGastroenterology and HepatologyUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Tanya M. Bisseling
- Department ofGastroenterology and HepatologyRadboud University Medical CenterNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | - Berthe M. P. Aleman
- Department ofRadiation OncologyNetherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyAmsterdam University Medical CentersAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Wieke H. M. Verbeek
- Department ofGastroenterology and HepatologyNetherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Ernst J. Kuipers
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyErasmus Medical Center University HospitalRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Jan Paul de Boer
- Department ofMedical OncologyNetherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | | | - Cecile P. M. Janus
- Department ofRadiation OncologyErasmus MC Cancer InstituteRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Eefke J. Petersen
- Department ofHematologyUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Judith M. Roesink
- Department ofRadiation OncologyUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | | | - Gerrit A. Meijer
- Department ofPathologyNetherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Michael Schaapveld
- Department ofEpidemiologyNetherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | | | - Beatriz Carvalho
- Department ofPathologyNetherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | | | - Monique E. van Leerdam
- Department ofGastroenterology and HepatologyNetherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands,Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyLeiden University Medical CenterLeidenThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
van der Velde N, Janus CP, Bowen DJ, Hassing HC, Kardys I, van Leeuwen FE, So-Osman C, Nout RA, Manintveld OC, Hirsch A. Detection of Subclinical Cardiovascular Disease by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Lymphoma Survivors. JACC CardioOncol 2021; 3:695-706. [PMID: 34988478 PMCID: PMC8702791 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccao.2021.09.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2021] [Revised: 09/12/2021] [Accepted: 09/15/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Long-term survivors of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and mediastinal non-Hodgkin lymphoma experience late adverse effects of radiotherapy and/or anthracycline-containing chemotherapy, leading to premature cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to identify markers for subclinical cardiovascular disease using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in survivors of HL and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. METHODS CMR was performed in 80 lymphoma survivors treated with mediastinal radiotherapy with or without anthracyclines, and results were compared with those among 40 healthy control subjects matched for age and sex. RESULTS Of the 80 lymphoma survivors, 98% had histories of HL, the mean age was 47 ± 11 years, and 54% were male. Median radiotherapy dose was 36 Gy (interquartile range: 36-40 Gy), and radiotherapy was combined with anthracyclines in 70 lymphoma survivors (88%). Mean time between diagnosis and CMR was 20 ± 8 years. Significantly lower left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (53% ± 5% vs 60% ± 5%; P < 0.001) and LV mass (47 ± 10 g/m2 vs 56 ± 8 g/m2; P < 0.001) and higher LV end-systolic volume (37 ± 8 mL/m2 vs 33 ± 7 mL/m2; P = 0.013) were found in lymphoma survivors. LV global strain parameters were also significantly worse in lymphoma survivors (P < 0.02 for all). Native myocardial T1 was significantly higher in lymphoma survivors compared with healthy control subjects (980 ± 33 ms vs 964 ± 25 ms; P = 0.007), and late gadolinium enhancement was present in 11% of the survivors. CONCLUSIONS Long-term lymphoma survivors have detectable changes in LV function and native myocardial T1 on CMR. Further longitudinal studies are needed to assess the implication of these changes in relation to treatment and clinical outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikki van der Velde
- Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Cécile P.M. Janus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Daniel J. Bowen
- Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - H. Carlijne Hassing
- Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Isabella Kardys
- Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Flora E. van Leeuwen
- Department of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Cynthia So-Osman
- Department of Hematology, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Remi A. Nout
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Olivier C. Manintveld
- Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Alexander Hirsch
- Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Roberti S, van Leeuwen FE, Hauptmann M, Pfeiffer RM. Bias correction for estimates from linear excess relative risk models in small case-control studies. Stat Med 2021; 40:5831-5852. [PMID: 34418146 DOI: 10.1002/sim.9158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2020] [Revised: 07/12/2021] [Accepted: 07/27/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Epidemiologic studies conducted to quantify the impact of radiation dose d on an outcome typically model the hazard ratio (HR) for association using a linear term, HR ( d ) = 1 + β d , via a linear excess relative risk (ERR) model, based on biological considerations. To study associations of risk of a second cancer with radiation treatment for a first cancer, several nested case-control designs to estimate β have been proposed that use refined doses received by different locations in the organ of interest. Here we first evaluated the small sample bias in maximum likelihood estimates of β for the linear ERR model using location-specific radiation doses in simulations. As we found substantial upward bias for studies of realistic sample sizes (more than 50% relative bias for studies with 75 cases), we also proposed and investigated several approaches to correct this bias. We studied first and second order jackknife bias corrections and we derived a modified set of score functions under retrospective case-control sampling, from which we directly obtained bias-corrected estimates. In simulations based on doses from a study of stomach cancer among testicular cancer survivors and synthetically generated data, neither the first nor second order jackknife bias correction performed well. Estimates based on the modified score equations corrected the bias much better, albeit not completely, and were numerically much more stable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sander Roberti
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Flora E van Leeuwen
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michael Hauptmann
- Institute of Biostatistics and Registry Research, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Neuruppin, Germany
| | - Ruth M Pfeiffer
- Biostatistics Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
van Deuren S, Penson A, van Dulmen-den Broeder E, Grootenhuis MA, van der Heiden-van der Loo M, Bronkhorst E, Blijlevens NMA, Streefkerk N, Teepen JC, Tissing WJE, van der Pal HJH, van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM, Versluys BAB, Bresters D, van Leeuwen FE, Ronckers CM, Kremer LCM, Knoop H, Loonen JJ. Prevalence and risk factors of cancer-related fatigue in childhood cancer survivors: A DCCSS LATER study. Cancer 2021; 128:1110-1121. [PMID: 34724201 PMCID: PMC9298343 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2021] [Revised: 08/10/2021] [Accepted: 08/30/2021] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
Background Cancer‐related fatigue is a debilitating late effect after treatment for childhood cancer. The prevalence of fatigue in childhood cancer survivors (CCSs) and associated factors for fatigue has varied widely in previous studies. Two important aspects of cancer‐related fatigue, its severity and chronicity, are often not assessed. This study investigated the prevalence of, and risk factors for, severe chronic fatigue (CF) in a national cohort of Dutch CCSs. Methods In this study, 2810 CCSs (5‐year survivors of all childhood malignancies diagnosed between 1963 and 2001 with a current age of 12‐65 years) and 1040 sibling controls were included. CF was assessed with the Short Fatigue Questionnaire and was defined as a score ≥ 18 and persistence of fatigue for ≥6 months. Cancer‐ and treatment‐related characteristics, current health problems, and demographic and lifestyle variables were assessed as potential risk factors for CF via multivariable logistic regression analyses. Results In adult CCSs and sibling controls (≥18 years old), the prevalence of CF was 26.1% and 14.1%, respectively (P < .001). In adolescent CCSs and sibling controls (<18 years old), the prevalence of CF was 10.9% and 3.2%, respectively. Female gender (odds ratio [OR], 2.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.73‐2.62), unemployment (OR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.67‐2.85), having 1 or more health problems (OR for 1‐2, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.18‐1.87; OR for >2, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.50‐3.21), and a central nervous system diagnosis (OR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.17‐2.60) were significantly associated with CF in adult CCSs. Conclusions This study shows that CCSs, regardless of their cancer diagnosis, report CF more often than sibling controls. This study provides new evidence for the prevalence of fatigue in CCSs. One in 4 childhood cancer survivors reports chronic fatigue. Current health problems increase the risk of reporting chronic fatigue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sylvia van Deuren
- Radboudumc Center of Expertise for Cancer Survivorship, Department of Hematology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Adriaan Penson
- Radboudumc Center of Expertise for Cancer Survivorship, Department of Hematology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder
- Department of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, VU University, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Ewald Bronkhorst
- Department for Health Evidence, Biostatistics Section, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Nicole M A Blijlevens
- Department of Hematology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Nina Streefkerk
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Jop C Teepen
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Wim J E Tissing
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Department of Pediatric Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Dorine Bresters
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Flora E van Leeuwen
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Cécile M Ronckers
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Institute of Biostatistics and Registry Research, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Neuruppin, Germany
| | | | - Hans Knoop
- Department of Medical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Expert Center for Chronic Fatigue, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jacqueline J Loonen
- Radboudumc Center of Expertise for Cancer Survivorship, Department of Hematology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
van Tuijl LA, Voogd AC, de Graeff A, Hoogendoorn AW, Ranchor AV, Pan KY, Basten M, Lamers F, Geerlings MI, Abell JG, Awadalla P, Bakker MF, Beekman ATF, Bjerkeset O, Boyd A, Cui Y, Galenkamp H, Garssen B, Hellingman S, Huisman M, Huss A, Keats MR, Kok AAL, Luik AI, Noisel N, Onland-Moret NC, Payette Y, Penninx BWJH, Portengen L, Rissanen I, Roest AM, Rosmalen JGM, Ruiter R, Schoevers RA, Soave DM, Spaan M, Steptoe A, Stronks K, Sund ER, Sweeney E, Teyhan A, Vaartjes I, van der Willik KD, van Leeuwen FE, van Petersen R, Verschuren WMM, Visseren F, Vermeulen R, Dekker J. Psychosocial factors and cancer incidence (PSY-CA): Protocol for individual participant data meta-analyses. Brain Behav 2021; 11:e2340. [PMID: 34473425 PMCID: PMC8553309 DOI: 10.1002/brb3.2340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2021] [Accepted: 08/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Psychosocial factors have been hypothesized to increase the risk of cancer. This study aims (1) to test whether psychosocial factors (depression, anxiety, recent loss events, subjective social support, relationship status, general distress, and neuroticism) are associated with the incidence of any cancer (any, breast, lung, prostate, colorectal, smoking-related, and alcohol-related); (2) to test the interaction between psychosocial factors and factors related to cancer risk (smoking, alcohol use, weight, physical activity, sedentary behavior, sleep, age, sex, education, hormone replacement therapy, and menopausal status) with regard to the incidence of cancer; and (3) to test the mediating role of health behaviors (smoking, alcohol use, weight, physical activity, sedentary behavior, and sleep) in the relationship between psychosocial factors and the incidence of cancer. METHODS The psychosocial factors and cancer incidence (PSY-CA) consortium was established involving experts in the field of (psycho-)oncology, methodology, and epidemiology. Using data collected in 18 cohorts (N = 617,355), a preplanned two-stage individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis is proposed. Standardized analyses will be conducted on harmonized datasets for each cohort (stage 1), and meta-analyses will be performed on the risk estimates (stage 2). CONCLUSION PSY-CA aims to elucidate the relationship between psychosocial factors and cancer risk by addressing several shortcomings of prior meta-analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lonneke A van Tuijl
- Department of Internal Medicine, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Adri C Voogd
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, GROW, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Epidemiology, GROW, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Alexander de Graeff
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center University Medical Center, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Adriaan W Hoogendoorn
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,GGZ inGeest Specialized Mental Health Care, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Adelita V Ranchor
- Department of Internal Medicine, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kuan-Yu Pan
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maartje Basten
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Femke Lamers
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mirjam I Geerlings
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Jessica G Abell
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Philip Awadalla
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marije F Bakker
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Aartjan T F Beekman
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ottar Bjerkeset
- Faculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Nord University, Bodø, Norway.,Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Mental Health, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Andy Boyd
- Bristol Medical School, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Yunsong Cui
- Atlantic Partnership for Tomorrow's Health, Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Henrike Galenkamp
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Bert Garssen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sean Hellingman
- Department of Mathematics, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Canada
| | - Martijn Huisman
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Epidemiology & Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Sociology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anke Huss
- Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Melanie R Keats
- School of Health and Human Performance, Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
| | - Almar A L Kok
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam UMC, Department of Epidemiology & Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Annemarie I Luik
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry/Psychology, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nolwenn Noisel
- CARTaGENE, CHU Sainte-Justine, 3175, Chemin de la Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - N Charlotte Onland-Moret
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Yves Payette
- CARTaGENE, CHU Sainte-Justine, 3175, Chemin de la Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Brenda W J H Penninx
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lützen Portengen
- Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ina Rissanen
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Annelieke M Roest
- Department of Developmental Psychology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Judith G M Rosmalen
- Departments of Psychiatry and Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Rikje Ruiter
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Internal Medicine, Maasstad, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Robert A Schoevers
- Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - David M Soave
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Mathematics, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Canada
| | - Mandy Spaan
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andrew Steptoe
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Karien Stronks
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Erik R Sund
- Faculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Nord University, Bodø, Norway.,Department of Public Health and Nursing, HUNT Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.,Levanger hospital, Nord-Trøndelag Hospital Trust, Levanger, Norway
| | - Ellen Sweeney
- Atlantic Partnership for Tomorrow's Health, Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Alison Teyhan
- Bristol Medical School, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Ilonca Vaartjes
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Kimberly D van der Willik
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Flora E van Leeuwen
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rutger van Petersen
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - W M Monique Verschuren
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Centre for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Frank Visseren
- Department of Vascular Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Roel Vermeulen
- Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Joost Dekker
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands.,Department of Rehabilitation Medicine and Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC - VUMC, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
van der Perk MEM, Broer L, Yasui Y, Robison LL, Hudson MM, Laven JSE, van der Pal HJ, Tissing WJE, Versluys B, Bresters D, Kaspers GJL, de Vries ACH, Lambalk CB, Overbeek A, Loonen JJ, Beerendonk CCM, Byrne J, Berger C, Clemens E, Dirksen U, Falck Winther J, Fosså SD, Grabow D, Muraca M, Kaiser M, Kepák T, Kruseova J, Modan-Moses D, Spix C, Zolk O, Kaatsch P, Krijthe JH, Kremer LCM, Brooke RJ, Baedke JL, van Schaik RHN, van den Anker JN, Uitterlinden AG, Bos AME, van Leeuwen FE, van Dulmen-den Broeder E, van der Kooi ALLF, van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM. Effect of Genetic Variation in CYP450 on Gonadal Impairment in a European Cohort of Female Childhood Cancer Survivors, Based on a Candidate Gene Approach: Results from the PanCareLIFE Study. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:4598. [PMID: 34572825 PMCID: PMC8470074 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13184598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2021] [Revised: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 09/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Female childhood cancer survivors (CCSs) carry a risk of therapy-related gonadal dysfunction. Alkylating agents (AA) are well-established risk factors, yet inter-individual variability in ovarian function is observed. Polymorphisms in CYP450 enzymes may explain this variability in AA-induced ovarian damage. We aimed to evaluate associations between previously identified genetic polymorphisms in CYP450 enzymes and AA-related ovarian function among adult CCSs. METHODS Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels served as a proxy for ovarian function in a discovery cohort of adult female CCSs, from the pan-European PanCareLIFE cohort (n = 743; age (years): median 25.8, interquartile range (IQR) 22.1-30.6). Using two additive genetic models in linear and logistic regression, nine genetic variants in three CYP450 enzymes were analyzed in relation to cyclophosphamide equivalent dose (CED) score and their impact on AMH levels. The main model evaluated the effect of the variant on AMH and the interaction model evaluated the modifying effect of the variant on the impact of CED score on log-transformed AMH levels. Results were validated, and meta-analysis performed, using the USA-based St. Jude Lifetime Cohort (n = 391; age (years): median 31.3, IQR 26.6-37.4). RESULTS CYP3A4*3 was significantly associated with AMH levels in the discovery and replication cohort. Meta-analysis revealed a significant main deleterious effect (Beta (95% CI): -0.706 (-1.11--0.298), p-value = 7 × 10-4) of CYP3A4*3 (rs4986910) on log-transformed AMH levels. CYP2B6*2 (rs8192709) showed a significant protective interaction effect (Beta (95% CI): 0.527 (0.126-0.928), p-value = 0.01) on log-transformed AMH levels in CCSs receiving more than 8000 mg/m2 CED. CONCLUSIONS Female CCSs CYP3A4*3 carriers had significantly lower AMH levels, and CYP2B6*2 may have a protective effect on AMH levels. Identification of risk-contributing variants may improve individualized counselling regarding the treatment-related risk of infertility and fertility preservation options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. E. Madeleine van der Perk
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands; (H.J.v.d.P.); (W.J.E.T.); (B.V.); (D.B.); (G.J.L.K.); (A.C.H.d.V.); (E.C.); (L.C.M.K.); (E.v.D.-d.B.); (A.-L.L.F.v.d.K.); (M.M.v.d.H.-E.)
| | - Linda Broer
- Department of Internal Medicine, Rotterdam, ErasmusMC University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (L.B.); (A.G.U.)
| | - Yutaka Yasui
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA; (Y.Y.); (L.L.R.); (M.M.H.); (R.J.B.); (J.L.B.)
| | - Leslie L. Robison
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA; (Y.Y.); (L.L.R.); (M.M.H.); (R.J.B.); (J.L.B.)
| | - Melissa M. Hudson
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA; (Y.Y.); (L.L.R.); (M.M.H.); (R.J.B.); (J.L.B.)
- Department of Oncology, Division of Survivorship, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA
| | - Joop S. E. Laven
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus MC–University Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Helena J. van der Pal
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands; (H.J.v.d.P.); (W.J.E.T.); (B.V.); (D.B.); (G.J.L.K.); (A.C.H.d.V.); (E.C.); (L.C.M.K.); (E.v.D.-d.B.); (A.-L.L.F.v.d.K.); (M.M.v.d.H.-E.)
| | - Wim J. E. Tissing
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands; (H.J.v.d.P.); (W.J.E.T.); (B.V.); (D.B.); (G.J.L.K.); (A.C.H.d.V.); (E.C.); (L.C.M.K.); (E.v.D.-d.B.); (A.-L.L.F.v.d.K.); (M.M.v.d.H.-E.)
| | - Birgitta Versluys
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands; (H.J.v.d.P.); (W.J.E.T.); (B.V.); (D.B.); (G.J.L.K.); (A.C.H.d.V.); (E.C.); (L.C.M.K.); (E.v.D.-d.B.); (A.-L.L.F.v.d.K.); (M.M.v.d.H.-E.)
| | - Dorine Bresters
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands; (H.J.v.d.P.); (W.J.E.T.); (B.V.); (D.B.); (G.J.L.K.); (A.C.H.d.V.); (E.C.); (L.C.M.K.); (E.v.D.-d.B.); (A.-L.L.F.v.d.K.); (M.M.v.d.H.-E.)
| | - Gertjan J. L. Kaspers
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands; (H.J.v.d.P.); (W.J.E.T.); (B.V.); (D.B.); (G.J.L.K.); (A.C.H.d.V.); (E.C.); (L.C.M.K.); (E.v.D.-d.B.); (A.-L.L.F.v.d.K.); (M.M.v.d.H.-E.)
- Department of Pediatric Oncology-Haematology, Emma Children’s Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andrica C. H. de Vries
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands; (H.J.v.d.P.); (W.J.E.T.); (B.V.); (D.B.); (G.J.L.K.); (A.C.H.d.V.); (E.C.); (L.C.M.K.); (E.v.D.-d.B.); (A.-L.L.F.v.d.K.); (M.M.v.d.H.-E.)
| | - Cornelis B. Lambalk
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (C.B.L.); (A.O.)
| | - Annelies Overbeek
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (C.B.L.); (A.O.)
| | - Jacqueline J. Loonen
- Department of Haematology, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands;
| | - Catharina C. M. Beerendonk
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands;
| | - Julianne Byrne
- Boyne Research Institute, 5 Bolton Square, East, Drogheda, A92 RY6K Co. Louth, Ireland;
| | - Claire Berger
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, University Hospital, 42 055 Saint-Etienne, France;
- Lyon University, Jean Monnet University, INSERM, U 1059, Sainbiose, 42023 Saint-Etienne, France
| | - Eva Clemens
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands; (H.J.v.d.P.); (W.J.E.T.); (B.V.); (D.B.); (G.J.L.K.); (A.C.H.d.V.); (E.C.); (L.C.M.K.); (E.v.D.-d.B.); (A.-L.L.F.v.d.K.); (M.M.v.d.H.-E.)
| | - Uta Dirksen
- University Hospital Essen, Pediatrics III, West German Cancer Centre, 45147 Essen, Germany;
- German Cancer Research Centre, DKTK, Site Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Jeanette Falck Winther
- Childhood Cancer Research Group, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark;
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health, Aarhus University and University Hospital, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Sophie D. Fosså
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, 0372 Oslo, Norway;
| | - Desiree Grabow
- Division of Childhood Cancer Epidemiology, German Childhood Cancer Registry, Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany; (D.G.); (M.K.); (C.S.); (P.K.)
| | - Monica Muraca
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit and DOPO Clinic, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, 16147 Genova, Italy;
| | - Melanie Kaiser
- Division of Childhood Cancer Epidemiology, German Childhood Cancer Registry, Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany; (D.G.); (M.K.); (C.S.); (P.K.)
| | - Tomáš Kepák
- University Hospital Brno, International Clinical Research Center (FNUSA-ICRC), Masaryk University, 656 91 Brno, Czech Republic;
| | | | - Dalit Modan-Moses
- The Edmond and Lily Safra Children’s Hospital, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, and the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 6997801, Israel;
| | - Claudia Spix
- Division of Childhood Cancer Epidemiology, German Childhood Cancer Registry, Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany; (D.G.); (M.K.); (C.S.); (P.K.)
| | - Oliver Zolk
- Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Immanuel Klinik Rüdersdorf, 16816 Neuruppin, Germany;
| | - Peter Kaatsch
- Division of Childhood Cancer Epidemiology, German Childhood Cancer Registry, Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany; (D.G.); (M.K.); (C.S.); (P.K.)
| | - Jesse H. Krijthe
- Department of Intelligent Systems, Delft University of Technology, 2628 BL Delft, The Netherlands;
| | - Leontien C. M. Kremer
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands; (H.J.v.d.P.); (W.J.E.T.); (B.V.); (D.B.); (G.J.L.K.); (A.C.H.d.V.); (E.C.); (L.C.M.K.); (E.v.D.-d.B.); (A.-L.L.F.v.d.K.); (M.M.v.d.H.-E.)
| | - Russell J. Brooke
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA; (Y.Y.); (L.L.R.); (M.M.H.); (R.J.B.); (J.L.B.)
| | - Jessica L. Baedke
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA; (Y.Y.); (L.L.R.); (M.M.H.); (R.J.B.); (J.L.B.)
| | - Ron H. N. van Schaik
- Department of clinical chemistry, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - John N. van den Anker
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Children’s National Hospital, Washington, DC 20010, USA;
| | - André G. Uitterlinden
- Department of Internal Medicine, Rotterdam, ErasmusMC University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (L.B.); (A.G.U.)
| | - Annelies M. E. Bos
- Department of Reproductive Medicine and Gynecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands;
| | - Flora E. van Leeuwen
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands; (H.J.v.d.P.); (W.J.E.T.); (B.V.); (D.B.); (G.J.L.K.); (A.C.H.d.V.); (E.C.); (L.C.M.K.); (E.v.D.-d.B.); (A.-L.L.F.v.d.K.); (M.M.v.d.H.-E.)
| | - Anne-Lotte L. F. van der Kooi
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands; (H.J.v.d.P.); (W.J.E.T.); (B.V.); (D.B.); (G.J.L.K.); (A.C.H.d.V.); (E.C.); (L.C.M.K.); (E.v.D.-d.B.); (A.-L.L.F.v.d.K.); (M.M.v.d.H.-E.)
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus MC–University Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Marry M. van den Heuvel-Eibrink
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands; (H.J.v.d.P.); (W.J.E.T.); (B.V.); (D.B.); (G.J.L.K.); (A.C.H.d.V.); (E.C.); (L.C.M.K.); (E.v.D.-d.B.); (A.-L.L.F.v.d.K.); (M.M.v.d.H.-E.)
| | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Schrijver LH, Antoniou AC, Olsson H, Mooij TM, Roos-Blom MJ, Azarang L, Adlard J, Ahmed M, Barrowdale D, Davidson R, Donaldson A, Eeles R, Evans DG, Frost D, Henderson A, Izatt L, Ong KR, Bonadona V, Coupier I, Faivre L, Fricker JP, Gesta P, van Engelen K, Jager A, Menko FH, Mourits MJE, Singer CF, Tan YY, Foretova L, Navratilova M, Schmutzler RK, Ellberg C, Gerdes AM, Caldes T, Simard J, Olah E, Jakubowska A, Rantala J, Osorio A, Hopper JL, Phillips KA, Milne RL, Beth Terry M, Noguès C, Engel C, Kast K, Goldgar DE, van Leeuwen FE, Easton DF, Andrieu N, Rookus MA. Oral contraceptive use and ovarian cancer risk for BRCA1/2 mutation carriers: an international cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2021; 225:51.e1-51.e17. [PMID: 33493488 PMCID: PMC8278569 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2020] [Revised: 10/30/2020] [Accepted: 01/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ovarian cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers has been shown to decrease with longer duration of oral contraceptive use. Although the effects of using oral contraceptives in the general population are well established (approximately 50% risk reduction in ovarian cancer), the estimated risk reduction in mutation carriers is much less precise because of potential bias and small sample sizes. In addition, only a few studies on oral contraceptive use have examined the associations of duration of use, time since last use, starting age, and calendar year of start with risk of ovarian cancer. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to investigate in more detail the associations of various characteristics of oral contraceptive use and risk of ovarian cancer, to provide healthcare providers and carriers with better risk estimates. STUDY DESIGN In this international retrospective study, ovarian cancer risk associations were assessed using oral contraceptives data on 3989 BRCA1 and 2445 BRCA2 mutation carriers. Age-dependent-weighted Cox regression analyses were stratified by study and birth cohort and included breast cancer diagnosis as a covariate. To minimize survival bias, analyses were left truncated at 5 years before baseline questionnaire. Separate analyses were conducted for each aspect of oral contraceptive use and in a multivariate analysis, including all these aspects. In addition, the analysis of duration of oral contraceptive use was stratified by recency of use. RESULTS Oral contraceptives were less often used by mutation carriers who were diagnosed with ovarian cancer (ever use: 58.6% for BRCA1 and 53.5% BRCA2) than by unaffected carriers (ever use: 88.9% for BRCA1 and 80.7% for BRCA2). The median duration of use was 7 years for both BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers who developed ovarian cancer and 9 and 8 years for unaffected BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers with ovarian cancer, respectively. For BRCA1 mutation carriers, univariate analyses have shown that both a longer duration of oral contraceptive use and more recent oral contraceptive use were associated with a reduction in the risk of ovarian cancer. However, in multivariate analyses, including duration of use, age at first use, and time since last use, duration of oral contraceptive use proved to be the prominent protective factor (compared with <5 years: 5-9 years [hazard ratio, 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.40-1.12]; >10 years [hazard ratio, 0.37; 95% confidence interval, 0.19-0.73]; Ptrend=.008). The inverse association between duration of use and ovarian cancer risk persisted for more than 15 years (duration of ≥10 years; BRCA1 <15 years since last use [hazard ratio, 0.24; 95% confidence interval, 0.14-0.43]; BRCA1 >15 years since last use [hazard ratio, 0.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.18-0.59]). Univariate results for BRCA2 mutation carriers were similar but were inconclusive because of limited sample size. CONCLUSION For BRCA1 mutation carriers, longer duration of oral contraceptive use is associated with a greater reduction in ovarian cancer risk, and the protection is long term.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lieske H Schrijver
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Antonis C Antoniou
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Håkan Olsson
- Department of Oncology, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Thea M Mooij
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marie-José Roos-Blom
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Leyla Azarang
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Julian Adlard
- Yorkshire Regional Genetics Service, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Munaza Ahmed
- North East Thames Regional Genetics Service, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel Barrowdale
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Rosemarie Davidson
- Department of Clinical Genetics, South Glasgow University Hospitals, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Alan Donaldson
- Department of Clinical Genetics, St. Michael's Hospital, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Ros Eeles
- Oncogenetics Team, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - D Gareth Evans
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, Department of Genomic Medicine, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester University, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Debra Frost
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Alex Henderson
- Centre for Life, Institute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Louise Izatt
- Clinical Genetics, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kai-Ren Ong
- West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Valérie Bonadona
- Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unités Mixtes de Recherche, Lyon, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Unité de Prévention et Epidémiologie Génétique, Lyon, France
| | - Isabelle Coupier
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve, Montpellier, France; Service de Génétique médicale et Oncogénétique, Montpellier, France; Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille Val d'Aurel, Montpellier, France
| | - Laurence Faivre
- Genomic and Immunotherapy Medical Institute, Hôpital d'Enfants, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Dijon, Dijon, France; Unité d'Oncogénétique, Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | | | - Paul Gesta
- Service d'Oncogénétique Régional Poitou-Charentes, Centre Hospitalier Georges Renon, Niort, France
| | - Klaartje van Engelen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Agnes Jager
- Department of Medical Oncology, Family Cancer Clinic, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Fred H Menko
- Family Cancer Clinic, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marian J E Mourits
- Department of Gynaecology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Christian F Singer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Yen Y Tan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Lenka Foretova
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Marie Navratilova
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Rita K Schmutzler
- Medical Faculty, University of Cologne and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Carolina Ellberg
- Division of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | | | - Trinidad Caldes
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Instituto de Investigación Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer, Martin Lagos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jacques Simard
- Genomics Center, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec - Université Laval Research Center, Québec City, Québec, Canada
| | - Edith Olah
- Department of Molecular Genetics, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Anna Jakubowska
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland; Independent Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Genetic Diagnostics, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Johanna Rantala
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ana Osorio
- Human Genetics Group, Centro Nacional De Investigaciones Oncologicas, Madrid, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras, Madrid, Spain
| | - John L Hopper
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kelly-Anne Phillips
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victoria, Australia
| | - Roger L Milne
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mary Beth Terry
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - Catherine Noguès
- Département d'Anticipation et de Suivi des Cancers, Oncogénétique Clinique, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France; Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Sciences Economiques and Sociales de la Santé and Traitement de l'Information Médicale, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
| | - Christoph Engel
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University of Leipzig, Germany
| | - Karin Kast
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - David E Goldgar
- Department of Dermatology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Flora E van Leeuwen
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Douglas F Easton
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Nadine Andrieu
- Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Paris, France; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Mines ParisTech, Fontainebleau, Paris, France; Paris Sciences et Lettres University, Paris, France
| | - Matti A Rookus
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|