1
|
Purchla J, Ghabi EM, Burns WR, Lafaro KJ, Burkhart RA, Cameron JL, Yarchoan M, Shubert CR, Baretti M, He J. Exploring the Clinical Use of Molecular Profiling of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma in a Comprehensive Multidisciplinary Clinic. J Am Coll Surg 2024; 238:532-540. [PMID: 38189646 DOI: 10.1097/xcs.0000000000000948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Molecular profiling of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) can detect actionable molecular alterations and guide targeted therapies. We explore the clinical use of molecular profiling of ICC in our comprehensive multidisciplinary clinic. STUDY DESIGN Patients with a tissue diagnosis of ICC seen between 2019 and 2023 were identified. A retrospective review was performed to identify their molecular profiles and targeted therapy. The association between the detection of actionable molecular alterations and overall survival (OS) from the first clinic visit date was studied. Patients with an OS of less than 2 months were excluded. RESULTS Among 194 patients with ICC, 125 had molecular profiling. Actionable molecular alterations were detected in 56 (45%) patients, including microsatellite instability (n = 3), high tumor mutational burden (>10 muts/mb; n = 5), isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 mutations (n = 22 and 6, respectively), BRAF V600E mutations (n = 2), phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase, catalytic subunit alpha mutations (n = 7), breast cancer 1 and breast cancer 2 mutations (n = 5), mesenchymal epithelial transition amplification (n = 2), fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 and 3 fusions (n = 13), erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 overexpression (n = 6), and receptor tyrosine kinase 1 fusion (n = 1). Twenty-one patients received targeted therapies during their treatment course. Survival analysis revealed that for 120 patients with molecular profiling, the detection of an actionable molecular alteration was associated with improved mean OS (34.1 vs 23.6 months, p = 0.008). Among 70 patients with nonmetastatic ICC, the detection of an actionable molecular alteration was associated with improved mean OS (32.1 vs 27.5 months, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS Actionable molecular alterations were frequently observed in patients with ICC. Detection of actionable alterations was associated with improved OS. The role of targeted therapy needs further exploration in prospective multicenter studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Purchla
- From the Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Purchla, Ghabi, Burns, Lafaro, Burkhart, Cameron, Shubert, He)
| | - Elie M Ghabi
- From the Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Purchla, Ghabi, Burns, Lafaro, Burkhart, Cameron, Shubert, He)
| | - William R Burns
- From the Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Purchla, Ghabi, Burns, Lafaro, Burkhart, Cameron, Shubert, He)
| | - Kelly J Lafaro
- From the Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Purchla, Ghabi, Burns, Lafaro, Burkhart, Cameron, Shubert, He)
| | - Richard A Burkhart
- From the Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Purchla, Ghabi, Burns, Lafaro, Burkhart, Cameron, Shubert, He)
| | - John L Cameron
- From the Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Purchla, Ghabi, Burns, Lafaro, Burkhart, Cameron, Shubert, He)
| | - Mark Yarchoan
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Yarchoan, Baretti)
| | - Christopher R Shubert
- From the Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Purchla, Ghabi, Burns, Lafaro, Burkhart, Cameron, Shubert, He)
| | - Marina Baretti
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Yarchoan, Baretti)
| | - Jin He
- From the Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Purchla, Ghabi, Burns, Lafaro, Burkhart, Cameron, Shubert, He)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ghabi EM, Habib JR, Shoucair S, Javed AA, Sham J, Burns WR, Cameron JL, Ali SZ, Shin EJ, Arcidiacono PG, Doglioni C, Falconi M, Yu J, Partelli S, He J. Detecting Somatic Mutations for Well-Differentiated Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors in Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration with Next-Generation Sequencing. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:7720-7730. [PMID: 37488390 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13965-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2023] [Accepted: 07/03/2023] [Indexed: 07/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) exhibit heterogenous behavior, whereby some small tumors are aggressive with a propensity for metastasis. Detection of somatic mutations associated with aggressive biology may help with patient stratification and surgical decision-making in patients with well-differentiated PanNETs. Using next-generation sequencing (NGS), we investigated the feasibility of detecting somatic mutations in endoscopic ultrasound-guided, fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) specimens and determining the mutational concordance between the EUS-FNA specimens and the primary tumors. METHODS Thirty-eight patients with well-differentiated, nonfunctioning PanNETs were obtained from two tertiary referral centers. Patient demographic characteristics and tumor, clinicopathologic features were collected. Tissue from both the EUS-FNA specimen and the primary tumor was extracted from archival tissue blocks. NGS using a panel of ten genes was performed on both samples. RESULTS In our series, the median age was 61.1 years. Tumors were predominantly left-sided (60.5%) and unifocal (94.7%). The median tumor size was 2.2 cm. NGS detected somatic mutations in 29% of primary tumors and 36.8% of EUS-FNA specimens. In primary tumors, DAXX/ATRX mutations were predominantly detected (63.6%). In EUS-FNA specimens, MEN1 mutations were predominantly detected (64.3%). Among non-wild-type specimens, mutational concordance was achieved in 31.6% of cases. In 11 patients with a detectable mutation in the primary tumor, a mutation was detected in the EUS-FNA specimen in 45.5% of cases, with a mutational concordance of 54.5%. CONCLUSIONS NGS can detect somatic mutations in EUS-FNA specimens of well-differentiated PanNETs. Efforts to improve detection sensitivity and mutational concordance are required to overcome current technical limitations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elie M Ghabi
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Joseph R Habib
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Sami Shoucair
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ammar A Javed
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jonathan Sham
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - William R Burns
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - John L Cameron
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Syed Z Ali
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Eun Ji Shin
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono
- Pancreato-Biliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute IRCCS, Vita Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Claudio Doglioni
- Pathology Unit, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, ENETS Center of Excellence, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Falconi
- Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery Unit, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, ENETS Center of Excellence, Milan, Italy
| | - Jun Yu
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Stefano Partelli
- Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery Unit, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, ENETS Center of Excellence, Milan, Italy
| | - Jin He
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ghabi EM, Habib JR, Shoucair S, Javed AA, Sham J, Burns WR, Cameron JL, Ali SZ, Shin EJ, Arcidiacono PG, Doglioni C, Falconi M, Yu J, Partelli S, He J. ASO Visual Abstract: Detecting Somatic Mutations for Well-Differentiated Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors in Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration with Next-Generation Sequencing. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:7772-7773. [PMID: 37610495 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14180-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/24/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Elie M Ghabi
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Joseph R Habib
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Sami Shoucair
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ammar A Javed
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jonathan Sham
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - William R Burns
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - John L Cameron
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Syed Z Ali
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Eun Ji Shin
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono
- Pancreato-Biliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute IRCCS, Vita Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Claudio Doglioni
- Pathology Unit, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, ENETS Center of Excellence, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Falconi
- Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery Unit, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, ENETS Center of Excellence, Milan, Italy
| | - Jun Yu
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Stefano Partelli
- Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery Unit, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, ENETS Center of Excellence, Milan, Italy
| | - Jin He
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chang Wu B, Wlodarczyk J, Nourmohammadi Abadchi S, Shababi N, Cameron JL, Harmon JW. Revolutionary transformation lowering the mortality of pancreaticoduodenectomy: a historical review. eGastroenterology 2023; 1:e100014. [PMID: 38292831 PMCID: PMC10827342 DOI: 10.1136/egastro-2023-100014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2024]
Abstract
The History Maker paper focuses on the extraordinary revolution that dramatically improved the surgical results for the Whipple procedure (pancreaticoduodenectomy) in the 1980s and identifies Dr. Cameron as the leader of this revolution, who reported a mortality rate of approximately 1%. The revolutionary reduction of postoperative mortality for the Whipple procedure was achieved by adherence to gentle and precise Halstedian surgical techniques with adequate drainage of pancreatico-jejunal anastomosis with closed-suction silastic drains, along with the development of high-volume surgeons and hospitals. Excellent teamwork in patient care, including but not limited to preoperative evaluation by multidisciplinary teams, intraoperative communication between surgeons and anaesthesiologists, and postoperative management, contributed to a successful Whipple procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bo Chang Wu
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Jakub Wlodarczyk
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | | | - Niloufar Shababi
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - John L Cameron
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - John W Harmon
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rowe SP, Fishman EK, Chu LC, Johnson PT, Cameron JL. An Approach to Leadership in Academic Medicine: Lessons Learned From the Experience of Dr. John L. Cameron. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2023; 52:313-314. [PMID: 37438230 DOI: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2023.06.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2023] [Revised: 05/20/2023] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 07/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Dr. John L. Cameron was appointed the chair of surgery at Johns Hopkins in 1984. He subsequently built the largest group of clinician-scientists anywhere in the world who were focused on pancreatic cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Trainees were selected over the decades to join the group based on characteristics including self-confidence, a sense of humor, a collegial and congenial personality, and a strong previous track record. Resume items such as prior leadership positions, academic achievements, and participation in team sports can all prove to be important predictors for future success. RESULTS Many of the trainees that were molded by that group have perpetuated its ideals by pursuing academic careers. Dr Cameron's approach can be distilled to 3 key points: work hard and lead by example, make diamonds by applying the right amount of pressure, and serve your people and give the impression that you are working for your trainees and junior people. CONCLUSIONS With those leadership principles, it should still be possible to build successful academic programs, despite the significant challenges that have arisen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven P Rowe
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
| | - Elliot K Fishman
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Linda C Chu
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Pamela T Johnson
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - John L Cameron
- Department of Surgery, John Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Nagai M, Wright MJ, Ding D, Thompson ED, Javed AA, Weiss MJ, Hruban RH, Yu J, Burkhart RA, He J, Cameron JL, Wolfgang CL, Burns WR. Oncologic resection of pancreatic cancer with isolated liver metastasis: Favorable outcomes in select patients. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2023; 30:1025-1035. [PMID: 36652559 PMCID: PMC10548446 DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.1303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2022] [Revised: 12/23/2022] [Accepted: 01/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and liver metastasis are treated with palliative chemotherapy, whereas similar patients with metastatic colorectal cancer are considered for aggressive surgery. METHODS Using an institutional database, PDAC patients undergoing liver resection for isolated metastasis were identified. Their overall survival (OS), treatment factors, and clinicopathological variables associated with survival were also evaluated. RESULTS Forty-seven patients underwent curative-intent surgery for metastatic PDAC to the liver between 2000 and 2019. Median OS was 21.9 months from diagnosis. Fourteen patients underwent unplanned resection of radiographically occult liver metastasis during pancreatectomy with median OS of 8.7 months. On the other hand, 29 patients received systemic chemotherapy followed by planned resection; this cohort had the most favorable prognosis following aggressive surgery with median OS being 38.1 months from diagnosis and 24.1 months from surgery. Preoperative chemotherapy (HR = 7.1; p = .002) and moderate to well differentiation of the primary tumor (HR = 3.7; p = .003) were associated with prolonged survival in multivariate analysis, whereas lymph node metastases, response to preoperative therapy, number of liver metastasis, and extent of liver surgery were not. CONCLUSIONS In select patients with PDAC and isolated liver metastasis, curative-intent surgery can result in meaningful survival. This aggressive approach seems most beneficial in patients following induction chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minako Nagai
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan
| | - Michael J. Wright
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Ding Ding
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Elizabeth D. Thompson
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Ammar A. Javed
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Matthew J. Weiss
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Pancreas, Oncology, Northwell Health Cancer Institute, New Hyde Park, New York, USA
| | - Ralph H. Hruban
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Jun Yu
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Richard A. Burkhart
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Jin He
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - John L. Cameron
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Christopher L. Wolfgang
- Department of Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine and NYU-Langone Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - William R. Burns
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kinny-Köster B, Habib JR, van Oosten F, Javed AA, Cameron JL, Burkhart RA, Burns WR, He J, Wolfgang CL. Conduits in Vascular Pancreatic Surgery: Analysis of Clinical Outcomes, Operative Techniques, and Graft Performance. Ann Surg 2023; 278:e94-e104. [PMID: 35838419 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We analyze successes and failures of pushing the boundaries in vascular pancreatic surgery to establish safety of conduit reconstructions. BACKGROUND Improved systemic control from chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer is increasing the demand for surgical solutions of extensive local vessel involvement, but conduit-specific data are scarce. METHODS We identified 63 implanted conduits (41% autologous vessels, 37% allografts, 18% PTFE) in 56 pancreatic resections of highly selected cancer patients between October 2013 and July 2020 from our prospectively maintained database. Assessed parameters were survival, perioperative complications, operative techniques (anatomic and extra-anatomic routes), and conduit patency. RESULTS For vascular reconstruction, 25 arterial and 38 venous conduits were utilized during 39 pancreatoduodenectomies, 14 distal pancreatectomies, and 3 total pancreatectomies. The median postoperative survival was 2 years. A Clavien-Dindo grade ≥IIIa complication was apparent in 50% of the patients with a median Comprehensive Complication Index of 29.6. The 90-day mortality in this highly selected cohort was 9%. Causes of mortality were conduit related in 3 patients, late postpancreatectomy hemorrhage in 1 patient, and early liver metastasis in 1 patient. Image-based patency rates of conduits were 66% and 45% at postoperative days 30 and 90, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Our perioperative mortality of vascular pancreatic surgery with conduits in the arterial or venous system is 9%. Reconstructions are technically feasible with different anatomic and extra-anatomic strategies, while identifying predictors of early conduit occlusion remains challenging. Optimizing reconstructed arterial and venous hemodynamics in the context of pancreatic malignancy will enable long-term survival in more patients responsive to chemotherapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benedict Kinny-Köster
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MA
- Department of Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine and NYU-Langone Health, New York, NY
| | - Joseph R Habib
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MA
| | - Floortje van Oosten
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MA
| | - Ammar A Javed
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MA
- Department of Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine and NYU-Langone Health, New York, NY
| | - John L Cameron
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MA
| | - Richard A Burkhart
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MA
| | - William R Burns
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MA
| | - Jin He
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MA
| | - Christopher L Wolfgang
- Department of Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine and NYU-Langone Health, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Javed AA, Ding D, Hasanain A, van Oosten F, Yu J, Cameron JL, Burkhart RA, Zheng L, He J, Wolfgang CL. Persistent Circulating Tumor Cells at 1 Year After Oncologic Resection Predict Late Recurrence in Pancreatic Cancer. Ann Surg 2023; 277:859-865. [PMID: 36111892 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of the study was to assess the association between persistent circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and subsequent recurrence in patients who were clinically recurrence free ~12 months postoperatively. BACKGROUND Circulating tumor cells have been proposed as biomarkers to predict survival in pancreatic cancer. Some patients demonstrate persistent CTCs postoperatively, which could represent minimal residual disease. METHODS Patients from previously published prospective circulating tumor cell in pancreatic cancer trial without clinical evidence of recurrence 12 months postoperatively and CTC testing performed 9 to 15 months postoperatively were included. The presence of epithelial and transitional CTCs (trCTCs) was evaluated as predictor of recurrence. Kaplan-Meier curve, log-rank test, and Cox model were used for survival analysis. RESULTS Thirty-three of 129 eligible patients (circulating tumor cell in pancreatic cancer trial) were included. The trCTC-positive and negative patients were well balanced in clinicopathologic features. Patients with trCTCs had a recurrence rate per-person-month of 10.3% compared with 3.1% in trCTCs-negative patients with a median time to recurrence of 3.9 versus 27.1 months, respectively. On multivariable analysis, trCTCs positivity was associated with higher risk of late recurrence (hazard ratio: 4.7, 95% CI, 1.2-18.3, P =0.024). Fourteen (42.4%) patients recurred during the second postoperative year. One-year postoperative trCTCs positivity was associated with a higher rate of recurrence during the second year (odds ratio:13.1, 95% CI, 1.6-1953.4, P =0.028, area under curve=0.72). Integrating clinicopathologic features with trCTCs increased the area under curve to 0.80. A majority of trCTCs-positive patients (N=5, 62.5%) had multisite recurrence, followed by local-only (N=2, 25.0%) and liver-only (N=1, 12.5%) recurrence. This was in striking contrast to trCTCs-negative patients, where a majority (N=6, 66.7%) had a local-only recurrence, followed by liver-only (N=2, 22.2%) and multisite (N=1, 11.1%) recurrence. CONCLUSIONS In patients deemed to be clinically disease-free 12 months postoperatively, trCTCs positivity is associated with higher rates of subsequent recurrence with distinct patterns of recurrence. CTCs could be used a putative biomarker to guide patient prognostication and management in pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ammar A Javed
- Department of Surgery, New York University Langone Hospital, New York City, NY
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Ding Ding
- Department of Surgery, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Manhasset, NY
- Department of Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Alina Hasanain
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Floortje van Oosten
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht University, The Netherlands
| | - Jun Yu
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - John L Cameron
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Richard A Burkhart
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Lei Zheng
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Jin He
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Javed AA, Floortje van Oosten A, Habib JR, Hasanain A, Kinny-Köster B, Gemenetzis G, Groot VP, Ding D, Cameron JL, Lafaro KJ, Burns WR, Burkhart RA, Yu J, He J, Wolfgang CL. A Delay in Adjuvant Therapy Is Associated With Worse Prognosis Only in Patients With Transitional Circulating Tumor Cells After Resection of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg 2023; 277:866-872. [PMID: 36111839 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of the study was to assess the association of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) with survival as a biomarker in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) within the context of a delay in the initiation of adjuvant therapy. BACKGROUND Outcomes in patients with PDAC remain poor and are driven by aggressive systemic disease. Although systemic therapies improve survival in resected patients, factors such as a delay in the initiation of adjuvant therapy are associated with worse outcomes. CTCs have previously been shown to be predictive of survival. METHODS A retrospective study was performed on PDAC patients enrolled in the prospective CircuLating tUmor cellS in pancreaTic cancER trial (NCT02974764) on CTC-dynamics at the Johns Hopkins Hospital. CTCs were isolated based on size (isolation by size of epithelial tumor cells; Rarecells) and counted and characterized by subtype using immunofluorescence. The preoperative and postoperative blood samples were used to identify 2 CTC types: epithelial CTCs (eCTCs), expressing pancytokeratin, and transitional CTCs (trCTCs), expressing both pancytokeratin and vimentin. Patients who received adjuvant therapy were compared with those who did not. A delay in the receipt of adjuvant therapy was defined as the initiation of therapy ≥8 weeks after surgical resection. Clinicopathologic features, CTCs characteristics, and outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS Of 101 patients included in the study, 43 (42.5%) experienced a delay in initiation and 20 (19.8%) did not receive adjuvant therapy. On multivariable analysis, the presence of trCTCs ( P =0.002) and the absence of adjuvant therapy ( P =0.032) were associated with worse recurrence-free survival (RFS). Postoperative trCTC were associated with poorer RFS, both in patients with a delay in initiation (12.4 vs 17.9 mo, P =0.004) or no administration of adjuvant chemotherapy (3.4 vs NR, P =0.016). However, it was not associated with RFS in patients with timely initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy ( P =0.293). CONCLUSIONS Postoperative trCTCs positivity is associated with poorer RFS only in patients who either experience a delay in initiation or no receipt of adjuvant therapy. This study suggests that a delay in the initiation of adjuvant therapy could potentially provide residual systemic disease (trCTCs) a window of opportunity to recover from the surgical insult. Future studies are required to validate these findings and explore the underlying mechanisms involved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ammar A Javed
- Department of Surgery, New York University Langone Hospital, New York City, NY
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Anne Floortje van Oosten
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht University, The Netherlands
| | - Joseph R Habib
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Alina Hasanain
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Benedict Kinny-Köster
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Georgios Gemenetzis
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Vincent P Groot
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Ding Ding
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Surgery, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/ Northwell, Manhasset, NY
| | - John L Cameron
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Kelly J Lafaro
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - William R Burns
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Richard A Burkhart
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Jun Yu
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Jin He
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Javed AA, Pulvirenti A, Razi S, Zheng J, Michelakos T, Sekigami Y, Thompson E, Klimstra DS, Deshpande V, Singhi AD, Weiss MJ, Wolfgang CL, Cameron JL, Wei AC, Zureikat AH, Ferrone CR, He J. Grading Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Via Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine Needle Aspiration: A Multi-institutional Study. Ann Surg 2023; 277:e1284-e1290. [PMID: 35081574 PMCID: PMC9364076 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify factors associated with concordance between World Health Organization (WHO) grade on cytological analysis (c-grade) and histopathological analysis (h-grade) of surgical specimen in patients with PanNETs and examine trends in utilization and accuracy of EUS-FNA in preoperatively predicting grade. BACKGROUND WHO grading system is prognostic in pancreatic neuroendo-crine tumors (PanNETs). The concordance between c-grade and h-grade is reported to be between 50% and 92%. METHODS A multicenter retrospective study was performed on patients undergoing resection for PanNETs at four high-volume centers between 2010 and 2019. Patients with functional or syndrome-associated tumors, and those receiving neoadjuvant therapy were excluded. Factors associated with concordance between c-grade and h-grade and trends of utilization of EUS-FNA were assessed. RESULTS Of 869 patients included, 517 (59.5%) underwent EUS-FNA; 452 (87.4%) were diagnostic of PanNETs and WHO-grade was reported for 270 (59.7%) patients. The concordance between c-grade and h-grade was 80.4% with moderate concordance ( Kc = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.41-0.63). Significantly higher rates of concordance were observed in patients with smaller tumors (<2 vs. ≥2cm, 81.1% vs. 60.4%, P = 0.005). Highest concordance (98.1%) was observed in patients with small tumors undergoing assessment between 2015-2019 with a near-perfect concordance ( Kc = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.61-1.00). An increase in the utilization of EUS-FNA (56.1% to 64.1%) was observed over the last 2 decades ( P = 0.017) and WHO-grade was more frequently reported (44.2% vs. 77.6%, P < 0.001). However, concordance between c-grade and h-grade did not change significantly (P = 0.118). CONCLUSION Recently, a trend towards increasing utilization and improved diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA has been observed in PanNETs. Concordance between c-grade and h-grade is associated with tumor size with near-perfect agreement when assessing PanNETs <2cm in size.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ammar A. Javed
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alessandra Pulvirenti
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Samrah Razi
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jian Zheng
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - Yurie Sekigami
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Elizabeth Thompson
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - David S. Klimstra
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Vikram Deshpande
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Aatur D. Singhi
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | | | - John L. Cameron
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Alice C. Wei
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Amer H. Zureikat
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - Jin He
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Leonhardt CS, Kinny-Köster B, Hank T, Habib JR, Shoucair S, Klaiber U, Cameron JL, Hackert T, Wolfgang CL, Büchler MW, He J, Strobel O. ASO Visual Abstract: Resected Early-Onset Pancreatic Cancer-Practices and Outcomes in an International Dual-Center Study. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:2446-2447. [PMID: 36720834 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-13037-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Carl-Stephan Leonhardt
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Visceral Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Benedict Kinny-Köster
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine and NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Thomas Hank
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Visceral Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Joseph R Habib
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Sami Shoucair
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ulla Klaiber
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Visceral Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - John L Cameron
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christopher L Wolfgang
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine and NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Markus W Büchler
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jin He
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Oliver Strobel
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
- Division of Visceral Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Leonhardt CS, Kinny-Köster B, Hank T, Habib JR, Shoucair S, Klaiber U, Cameron JL, Hackert T, Wolfgang CL, Büchler MW, He J, Strobel O. Resected Early-Onset Pancreatic Cancer: Practices and Outcomes in an International Dual-Center Study. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:2433-2443. [PMID: 36479659 PMCID: PMC10027827 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12901-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2022] [Accepted: 11/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early-onset pancreatic cancer (EOPC), defined as age ≤ 45 years at diagnosis, accounts for 3% of all pancreatic cancer cases. Although differences in tumor biology have been suggested, available data are sparse and specific treatment recommendations are lacking. This study explores the clinicopathological features and oncologic outcomes of resected EOPC. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with EOPC undergoing resection between 2002 and 2018 were identified from the Heidelberg University Hospital and Johns Hopkins University registries. Median overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were analyzed, and prognostic factors were identified. RESULTS The final cohort included 164 patients, most of whom had pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC, n = 136; 82.9%) or IPMN-associated pancreatic cancer (n = 17; 10.4%). Twenty (12.1%) patients presented with stage 1 disease, 42 (25.6%) with stage 2, 75 (45.7%) with stage 3, and 22 (13.4%) with oligometastatic stage 4 disease. Most patients underwent upfront resection (n = 113, 68.9%), whereas 51 (31.1%) individuals received preoperative treatment. Median OS and RFS were 26.0 and 12.4 months, respectively. Stage-specific median survival was 70.6, 41.8, 23.8, and 16.9 months for stage 1, 2, 3, and 4 tumors, respectively. Factors independently associated with shorter OS and RFS were R1 resections and AJCC stages 3 and 4. Notably, AJCC 3-N2 and AJCC 3-T4 tumors had a median OS of 20 months versus 29.5 months, respectively. CONCLUSION Despite frequently presenting with advanced disease, oncologic outcomes in EOPC patients are satisfactory even in locally advanced cancers, justifying aggressive surgical approaches. Further research is needed to tailor current guidelines to this rare population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carl-Stephan Leonhardt
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Visceral Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Benedict Kinny-Köster
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
- Department of Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine and NYU Langone Health, New York, USA
| | - Thomas Hank
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Visceral Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Joseph R Habib
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | - Sami Shoucair
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | - Ulla Klaiber
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Visceral Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - John L Cameron
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christopher L Wolfgang
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
- Department of Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine and NYU Langone Health, New York, USA
| | - Markus W Büchler
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jin He
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | - Oliver Strobel
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Visceral Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ghabi EM, Shoucair S, Ding D, Javed AA, Thompson ED, Zheng L, Cameron JL, Wolfgang CL, Shubert CR, Lafaro KJ, Burkhart RA, Burns WR, He J. Tailoring Adjuvant Chemotherapy to Biologic Response Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Impacts Overall Survival in Pancreatic Cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 27:691-700. [PMID: 36280632 PMCID: PMC10079604 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-022-05476-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 09/16/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of postoperative chemotherapy in patients with resected pancreatic cancer who receive neoadjuvant treatment is unknown. Clinicians use changes in CA19-9 and histopathologic scores to assess treatment response. We sought to investigate if CA19-9 normalization in response to NAT can help guide the need for postoperative treatment. METHODS Patients with elevated baseline CA19-9 (CA19-9 > 37U/mL) who received NAT followed by surgery between 2011 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Treatment response was determined by CA19-9 normalization following NAT and histopathologic scoring. The role of postoperative chemotherapy was analyzed in light of CA19-9 normalization and histopathologic response. RESULTS We identified and included 345 patients. Following NAT, CA19-9 normalization was observed in 125 patients (36.2%). CA19-9 normalization was associated with a favorable histopathologic response (41.6% vs 23.2%, p < 0.001) and a lower ypT (p < 0.001) and ypN stage (p = 0.003). Receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved overall survival in patients in whom CA19-9 did not normalize following NAT (26.8 vs 16.4 months, p = 0.008). In patients who received 5FU-based NAT and in whom CA19-9 did not normalize, receipt of 5FU-based adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved OS (p = 0.014). CONCLUSION CA19-9 normalization in response to NAT was associated with favorable outcomes and can serve as a biomarker for treatment response. In patients where CA19-9 did not normalize, receipt of postoperative chemotherapy was associated with improved OS. These patients also benefited from additional 5FU-based postoperative chemotherapy following 5FU-based NAT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elie M Ghabi
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Blalock 685, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Sami Shoucair
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Blalock 685, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Ding Ding
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Blalock 685, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Ammar A Javed
- Department of Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Elizabeth D Thompson
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Lei Zheng
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - John L Cameron
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Blalock 685, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | | | - Christopher R Shubert
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Blalock 685, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Kelly J Lafaro
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Blalock 685, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Richard A Burkhart
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Blalock 685, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - William R Burns
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Blalock 685, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Jin He
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Blalock 685, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Margonis GA, Pulvirenti A, Morales-Oyarvide V, Buettner S, Andreatos N, Kamphues C, Beyer K, Wang J, Kreis ME, Cameron JL, Weiss MJ, Soares K, Fernández-Del Castillo C, Allen PJ, Wolfgang CL. Performance of the 7 th and 8 th Editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System in Patients with Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm-Associated PDAC : A Multi-institutional Analysis. Ann Surg 2023; 277:681-688. [PMID: 34793353 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To validate the 7 th and 8 th editions of the AJCC staging system for patients with invasive carcinomas arising in association with IPMN (IPMN-associated PDAC). BACKGROUND DATA Although several studies have validated AJCC systems in patients with conventional PDAC, their applicability to IPMN-associated PDAC has not been assessed. METHODS Two hundred seventy-five patients who underwent resection for IPMN-associated PDAC between 1996 and 2015 at 3 tertiary centers and had data on the size of the invasive component and lymph node status were identified. Concordance probability estimates (CPE) were calculated and recursive partitioning analysis was employed to identify optimal prognostic cutoffs for T and N. RESULTS The CPE for the 7 th and 8 th editions of the AJCC schema were relatively good (0.64 for both) and similar for colloid and tubular subtypes (0.64 for both). The 8 th edition introduced T1a sub-staging and a new distinction between N1 and N2. The utility of the former was confirmed, although the latter did not improve prognostic discrimination. The successful validation of the 8th edition of the AJCC criteria in patients with tubular and colloid subtypes allowed us to compare these patients in early vs late T and N stages which showed that with advanced disease, the prognostic superiority of colloid tumors over their tubular counterparts diminishes. CONCLUSIONS Our findings support the use of the AJCC 8 th edition in the IPMN-associated PDAC population, but suggest that certain cutoffs may need to be revisited. In advanced AJCC stages, patients with colloid vs tubular subtypes have comparable prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgios Antonios Margonis
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Charite Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | - Stefan Buettner
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - Carsten Kamphues
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Charite Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Katharina Beyer
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD
| | - Jane Wang
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD
| | - Martin E Kreis
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Charite Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| | - John L Cameron
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD
| | - Matthew J Weiss
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD
| | - Kevin Soares
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Peter J Allen
- Department of Surgery, Hepatopancreatobiliary Service, Duke, University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Christopher L Wolfgang
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery, New York University Langone, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Habib JR, Kinny-Köster B, Bou-Samra P, Alsaad R, Sereni E, Javed AA, Ding D, Cameron JL, Lafaro KJ, Burns WR, He J, Yu J, Wolfgang CL, Burkhart RA. Surgical Decision-Making in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Modeling Prognosis Following Pancreatectomy in the Era of Induction and Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. Ann Surg 2023; 277:151-158. [PMID: 33843794 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000004915] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop a predictive model of oncologic outcomes for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) undergoing resection after neoadjuvant or induction chemotherapy use. BACKGROUND Early recurrence following surgical resection for PDAC is common. The use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to resection may increase the likelihood of long-term systemic disease control. Accurately characterizing an individual's likely oncologic outcome in the perioperative setting remains challenging. METHODS Data from patients with PDAC who received chemotherapy prior to pancreatectomy at a single high-volume institution between 2007 and 2018 were captured in a prospectively collected database. Core clinicopathologic data were reviewed for accuracy and survival data were abstracted from the electronic medical record and national databases. Cox-proportional regressions were used to model outcomes and develop an interactive prognostic tool for clinical decision-making. RESULTS A total of 581 patients were included with a median overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) of 29.5 (26.5-32.5) and 16.6 (15.8-17.5) months, respectively. Multivariable analysis demonstrates OS and RFS were associated with type of chemotherapeutic used andthe number of chemotherapy cycles received preoperatively. Additional factors contributing to survival models included: tumor grade, histopathologic response to therapy, nodal status, and administration of adjuvant chemotherapy. The models were validated using an iterative bootstrap method and with randomized cohort splitting. The models were well calibrated with concordance indices of 0.68 and 0.65 for the final OS and RFS models, respectively. CONCLUSION We developed an intuitive and dynamic decision-making tool that can be useful in estimating OS, RFS, and location-specific disease recurrence rates. This prognostic tool may add value to patient care in discussing the benefits associated with surgical resection for PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph R Habib
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - Patrick Bou-Samra
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Ranim Alsaad
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Elisabetta Sereni
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Ammar A Javed
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Ding Ding
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - John L Cameron
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Kelly J Lafaro
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - William R Burns
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Jin He
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Jun Yu
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Christopher L Wolfgang
- Department of Surgery, New York University School of Medicine and NYU-Langone Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Richard A Burkhart
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Javed AA, Pulvirenti A, Zheng J, Michelakos T, Sekigami Y, Razi S, McIntyre CA, Thompson E, Klimstra DS, Deshpande V, Singhi AD, Weiss MJ, Wolfgang CL, Cameron JL, Wei AC, Zureikat AH, Ferrone CR, He J. A novel tool to predict nodal metastasis in small pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: A multicenter study. Surgery 2022; 172:1800-1806. [PMID: 36192215 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.08.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2022] [Revised: 07/25/2022] [Accepted: 08/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors display a wide range of biological behavior, and nodal disease is associated with metastatic disease and poorer survival. The aim of this study was to develop a tool to predict nodal disease in patients with small (≤2 cm) nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. METHODS A multicenter retrospective study was performed on patients undergoing resection for small nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Patients with genetic syndromes, metastatic disease at diagnosis, neoadjuvant therapy, or positive resection margin were excluded. Factors associated with nodal disease were identified to develop a predictive model. Internal validation was performed using bootstrap with 1,000 resamples. RESULTS Nodal disease was observed in 39 (11.1%) of the 353 patients included. Presence of nodal disease was significantly associated with lower 5-year disease-free survival (71.6% vs 96.2%, P < .001). Two predictors were strongly associated with nodal disease: G2 grade (odds ratio: 3.51, 95% confidence interval: 1.71-7.22, P = .001) and tumor size (per mm increase, odds ratio: 1.14, 95% confidence interval: 1.03-1.25, P = .009). Adequate discrimination was observed with an area under the curve of 0.71 (95% confidence interval: 0.63-0.80). Based on risk distribution, 3 risk groups of nodal disease were identified; low (<5%), intermediate (≥5% to <20%), and high (≥20%) risk. The observed mean risk of nodal disease was 3.7% in the low-risk patients, 9.6% in the intermediate-risk patients, and 30.4% in the high-risk patients (P < .001). The 10-year disease-free survival in the low, intermediate, and high-risk groups was 100%, 88.8%, and 50.1%, respectively. CONCLUSION Our model using tumor grade and size can predict nodal disease in small nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Integration of this tool into clinical practice could help guide management of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ammar A Javed
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD. http://www.twitter.com/ammar_asrar
| | | | - Jian Zheng
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, PA
| | | | - Yurie Sekigami
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Samrah Razi
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Caitlin A McIntyre
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Elizabeth Thompson
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - David S Klimstra
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Vikram Deshpande
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Aatur D Singhi
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, PA
| | | | | | - John L Cameron
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Alice C Wei
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Amer H Zureikat
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, PA
| | | | - Jin He
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Habib JR, Kinny-Köster B, Amini N, Shoucair S, Cameron JL, Thompson ED, Fishman EK, Hruban RH, Javed AA, He J, Wolfgang CL. Predictors, Patterns, and Timing of Recurrence Provide Insight into the Disease Biology of Invasive Carcinomas Arising in Association with Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms. J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 26:2311-2320. [PMID: 35915375 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-022-05428-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2022] [Accepted: 07/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify predictors, patterns, and timing of recurrence after resection of invasive carcinomas arising in association with an IPMN. BACKGROUND Postoperative management of an invasive carcinoma arising in association with an intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN), a biologically distinct entity from PanIN-derived pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), remains largely based on guidelines for PanIN-derived PDAC. To minimize treatment failure and inform disease-specific management, cancer recurrence must be better characterized. METHODS Patients were identified from a prospectively maintained registry between 1996 and 2018. Predictors of recurrence were evaluated by employing Cox regression models to determine risk-adjusted hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). The patterns and timing of recurrence were recognized and compared utilizing a log-rank test, respectively. RESULTS Of the 213 patients included, 92 (43.2%) recurred with a median RFS of 23.7 months (16.7-30.7). The predominant pattern of recurrence included any systemic (65.2%). The median time to local recurrence was longer than systemic (21.6 versus 11.4 months, p = 0.05). Poor differentiation [HR: 3.01, 95%CI (1.06-8.61)] and nodal disease [N1, HR: 2.23, 95%CI (1.12-4.60); and N2, HR: 5.67 95%CI (2.93-10.99)] emerged as independent predictors of systemic recurrence. For local-specific recurrences, poor differentiation [HR: 3.73, 95%CI (1.04-13.45)] and an R1 margin [high-grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma; HR: 2.66, 95%CI (1.14-6.21)] emerged as independent predictors. CONCLUSIONS The predominant pattern of recurrence after resection of invasive carcinomas arising in association with IPMNs is systemic, and occurs earlier than local recurrence. Poor differentiation and nodal disease are associated with systemic recurrence while poor differentiation and an R1 margin are associated with local recurrence. Future studies should investigate the role of systemic (chemotherapy) versus local (radiation) therapies and surveillance strategies in a personalized manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph R Habib
- Department of Surgery, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Benedict Kinny-Köster
- Department of Surgery, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Neda Amini
- Department of Surgery, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Sami Shoucair
- Department of Surgery, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - John L Cameron
- Department of Surgery, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Elizabeth D Thompson
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Elliot K Fishman
- Department of Radiology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ralph H Hruban
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ammar A Javed
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Jin He
- Department of Surgery, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Christopher L Wolfgang
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ivey GD, Shoucair S, Delitto DJ, Habib JR, Kinny-Köster B, Shubert CR, Lafaro KJ, Cameron JL, Burns WR, Burkhart RA, Thompson EL, Narang A, Zheng L, Wolfgang CL, He J. Postoperative Chemotherapy is Associated with Improved Survival in Patients with Node-Positive Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma After Neoadjuvant Therapy. World J Surg 2022; 46:2751-2759. [PMID: 35861852 PMCID: PMC9532378 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-022-06667-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/30/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative chemotherapy following pancreatic cancer resection is the standard of care. The utility of postoperative chemotherapy for patients who receive neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is unclear. METHODS Patients who underwent pancreatectomy after NAT with FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine-based chemotherapy for non-metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (2015-2019) were identified. Patients who received less than 2 months of neoadjuvant chemotherapy or died within 90 days from surgery were excluded. RESULTS A total of 427 patients (resectable, 22.2%; borderline resectable, 37.9%; locally advanced, 39.8%) were identified with the majority (69.3%) receiving neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX. Median duration of NAT was 4.1 months. Following resection, postoperative chemotherapy was associated with an improved median overall survival (OS) (28.7 vs. 20.4 months, P = 0.006). Risk-adjusted multivariable modeling showed negative nodal status (N0), favorable pathologic response (College of American Pathologists score 0 & 1), and receipt of postoperative chemotherapy to be independent predictors of improved OS. Regimen, duration, and number of cycles of NAT were not significant predictors. Thirty-four percent (60/176) of node-positive and 50.1% (126/251) of node-negative patients did not receive postoperative chemotherapy due to poor functional status, postoperative complications, and patient preference. Among patients with node-positive disease, postoperative chemotherapy was associated with improved median OS (27.2 vs. 10.5 months, P < 0.001). Among node-negative patients, postoperative chemotherapy was not associated with a survival benefit (median OS, 30.9 vs. 36.9 months; P = 0.406). CONCLUSION Although there is no standard NAT regimen for patients with pancreatic cancer, postoperative chemotherapy following NAT and resection appears to be associated with improved OS for patients with node-positive disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel D Ivey
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Sami Shoucair
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Daniel J Delitto
- Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Joseph R Habib
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Christopher R Shubert
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Kelly J Lafaro
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - John L Cameron
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - William R Burns
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Richard A Burkhart
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Elizabeth L Thompson
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Amol Narang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Lei Zheng
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Jin He
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Seppälä TT, Zimmerman JW, Suri R, Zlomke H, Ivey GD, Szabolcs A, Shubert CR, Cameron JL, Burns WR, Lafaro KJ, He J, Wolfgang CL, Zou YS, Zheng L, Tuveson DA, Eshleman JR, Ryan DP, Kimmelman AC, Hong TS, Ting DT, Jaffee EM, Burkhart RA. Precision Medicine in Pancreatic Cancer: Patient-Derived Organoid Pharmacotyping Is a Predictive Biomarker of Clinical Treatment Response. Clin Cancer Res 2022; 28:3296-3307. [PMID: 35363262 PMCID: PMC9357072 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-4165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2021] [Revised: 01/24/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patient-derived organoids (PDO) are a promising technology to support precision medicine initiatives for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). PDOs may improve clinical next-generation sequencing (NGS) and enable rapid ex vivo chemotherapeutic screening (pharmacotyping). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN PDOs were derived from tissues obtained during surgical resection and endoscopic biopsies and studied with NGS and pharmacotyping. PDO-specific pharmacotype is assessed prospectively as a predictive biomarker of clinical therapeutic response by leveraging data from a randomized controlled clinical trial. RESULTS Clinical sequencing pipelines often fail to detect PDAC-associated somatic mutations in surgical specimens that demonstrate a good pathologic response to previously administered chemotherapy. Sequencing the PDOs derived from these surgical specimens, after biomass expansion, improves the detection of somatic mutations and enables quantification of copy number variants. The detection of clinically relevant mutations and structural variants is improved following PDO biomass expansion. On clinical trial, PDOs were derived from biopsies of treatment-naïve patients prior to treatment with FOLFIRINOX (FFX). Ex vivo PDO pharmacotyping with FFX components predicted clinical therapeutic response in these patients with borderline resectable or locally advanced PDAC treated in a neoadjuvant or induction paradigm. PDO pharmacotypes suggesting sensitivity to FFX components were associated with longitudinal declines of tumor marker, carbohydrate-antigen 19-9 (CA-19-9), and favorable RECIST imaging response. CONCLUSIONS PDOs established from tissues obtained from patients previously receiving cytotoxic chemotherapies can be accomplished in a clinically certified laboratory. Sequencing PDOs following biomass expansion improves clinical sequencing quality. High in vitro sensitivity to standard-of-care chemotherapeutics predicts good clinical response to systemic chemotherapy in PDAC. See related commentary by Zhang et al., p. 3176.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toni T. Seppälä
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
- Applied Tumor Genomics Research Program, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Jacquelyn W. Zimmerman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Cancer Convergence Institute, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Reecha Suri
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Haley Zlomke
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Gabriel D. Ivey
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Annamaria Szabolcs
- The Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Christopher R Shubert
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Cancer Convergence Institute, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - John L. Cameron
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Cancer Convergence Institute, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - William R. Burns
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Cancer Convergence Institute, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Kelly J Lafaro
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Cancer Convergence Institute, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jin He
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Cancer Convergence Institute, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Ying S. Zou
- Cancer Convergence Institute, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Lei Zheng
- Department of Medical Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Cancer Convergence Institute, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - David A. Tuveson
- Lustgarten Foundation Pancreatic Cancer Research Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA
| | - James R. Eshleman
- Cancer Convergence Institute, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - David P. Ryan
- The Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alec C. Kimmelman
- Department of Radiation Oncology at New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Theodore S. Hong
- The Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David T. Ting
- The Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Elizabeth M. Jaffee
- Department of Medical Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Cancer Convergence Institute, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Richard A. Burkhart
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Medical Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Cancer Convergence Institute, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Lustgarten Foundation Pancreatic Cancer Research Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Maeda S, Mederos MA, Chawla A, Moore AM, Shoucair S, Yin L, Burkhart RA, Cameron JL, Park JY, Girgis MD, Wainberg ZA, Hines OJ, Fernandez-Del Castillo C, Qadan M, Lillemoe KD, Ferrone CR, He J, Wolfgang CL, Burns WR, Yu J, Donahue TR. Pathological treatment response has different prognostic implications for pancreatic cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. Surgery 2022; 171:1379-1387. [PMID: 34774289 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.10.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2021] [Revised: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 10/04/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pathological treatment effect of resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant therapy has prognostic implications. The impact for patients who received chemotherapy alone or chemoradiotherapy is not well defined. METHODS Patients with localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma who had pancreatectomy after neoadjuvant therapy at 3 centers from 2011 to 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. The chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy groups were evaluated separately. RESULTS Of 525 patients, 148 received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 377 received chemoradiotherapy. The chemoradiotherapy group had a better treatment effect (score 0: 10%, score 1: 30%, score 2: 42%, and score 3: 18%) than the chemotherapy group (score 0: 2%, score 1: 8%, score 2: 35%, and score 3: 55%) (P < .001). Median overall survival was similar between the 2 groups (25.8 vs 26.4 months). Median overall survival for score 0/1, 2, or 3 was 72.2, 38.5, and 20.0 months in the chemotherapy group and 37.9, 24.5, and 19.0 months in the chemoradiotherapy group. Score 2 in the chemotherapy group was associated with better overall survival compared to score 3 (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.49, P = .005), whereas only combined score 0/1 reached significance over score 2 for the chemoradiotherapy group (hazard ratio: 0.63, P = .006). CONCLUSION The prognostic significance of pathological treatment effect for localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma differs for patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy or neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shimpei Maeda
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Michael A Mederos
- Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Akhil Chawla
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Northwestern Medicine Regional Medical Group, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Alexandra M Moore
- Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Sami Shoucair
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Lingdi Yin
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Richard A Burkhart
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - John L Cameron
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Joon Y Park
- Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Mark D Girgis
- Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Zev A Wainberg
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
| | - O Joe Hines
- Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Motaz Qadan
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Keith D Lillemoe
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | | | - Jin He
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - William R Burns
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Jun Yu
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Timothy R Donahue
- Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Blair AB, Beckman RM, Habib JR, Griffin JF, Lafaro K, Burkhart RA, Burns W, Weiss MJ, Cameron JL, Wolfgang CL, He J. Should non-invasive diffuse main-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms be treated with total pancreatectomy? HPB (Oxford) 2022; 24:645-653. [PMID: 34610896 PMCID: PMC8940727 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.09.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2021] [Revised: 05/28/2021] [Accepted: 09/15/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Main-duct (MD) intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) is associated with malignancy risk. There is a lack of consensus on treatment (partial or total pancreatectomy) when the MD is diffusely involved. We sought to characterize the pancreatic remnant fate after partial pancreatectomy for non-invasive diffuse MD-IPMN. METHODS Consecutive patients with partial pancreatectomy for non-invasive MD-IPMN from 2004 to 2016 were analyzed. Diffuse MD-IPMN was defined by preoperative imaging as dilation of the MD in the head of the pancreas more than 5 mm and involving the whole gland. RESULTS Of 127 patients with resected non-invasive MD-IPMN, 47 (37%) had diffuse MD involvement. Eleven of 47(23%) patients developed imaging evidence of progression or new cystic disease in the pancreatic remnant. Patients with diffuse MD-IPMN were older (73yrs vs 67yrs, p = 0.009), more likely to receive a pancreaticoduodenectomy (96% vs 56%, p < 0.001) and have high-grade dysplasia (51% vs 31%, p = 0.025) than those with focal MD involvement. Diffuse MD involvement was not associated with shorter PFS following partial pancreatectomy (p = 0.613). CONCLUSION Partial pancreatectomy is an appropriate surgical approach for diffuse MD-IPMN, and is not associated with earlier progression after surgery as compared to partial pancreatectomy for focal dilation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex B. Blair
- Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions and the Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Center of Excellence Program. Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ross M. Beckman
- Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions and the Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Center of Excellence Program. Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Joseph R. Habib
- Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions and the Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Center of Excellence Program. Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - James F. Griffin
- Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions and the Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Center of Excellence Program. Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Kelly Lafaro
- Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions and the Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Center of Excellence Program. Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Richard A. Burkhart
- Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions and the Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Center of Excellence Program. Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - William Burns
- Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions and the Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Center of Excellence Program. Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - John L. Cameron
- Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions and the Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Center of Excellence Program. Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Jin He
- Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions and the Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Center of Excellence Program. Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Javed AA, Habib JR, Kinny-Köster B, Hodgin M, Parish L, Cunningham D, Hacker-Prietz A, Burkhart RA, Burns WR, Shubert CR, Cameron JL, Zaheer A, Chu LCH, Kawamoto S, Thompson ED, Shin EJ, Narang A, Zheng L, Laheru DA, Hruban RH, He J, Wolfgang CL, Fishman EK, Lafaro K. The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Multidisciplinary Clinics: A High-Volume Pancreatic Cancer Center Experience. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2022; 51:675-679. [PMID: 35750529 PMCID: PMC9131444 DOI: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2022.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2022] [Accepted: 05/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
The unprecedented impact of the Sars-CoV-2 pandemic (COVID-19) has strained the healthcare system worldwide. The impact is even more profound on diseases requiring timely complex multidisciplinary care such as pancreatic cancer. Multidisciplinary care teams have been affected significantly in multiple ways as healthcare teams collectively acclimate to significant space limitations and shortages of personnel and supplies. As a result, many patients are now receiving suboptimal remote imaging for diagnosis, staging, and surgical planning for pancreatic cancer. In addition, the lack of face-to-face interactions between the physician and patient and between multidisciplinary teams has challenged patient safety, research investigations, and house staff education. In this study, we discuss how the COVID-19 pandemic has transformed our high-volume pancreatic multidisciplinary clinic, the unique challenges faced, as well as the potential benefits that have arisen out of this situation. We also reflect on its implications for the future during and beyond the pandemic as we anticipate a hybrid model that includes a component of virtual multidisciplinary clinics as a means to provide accessible world-class healthcare for patients who require complex oncologic management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ammar A Javed
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Joseph R Habib
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Benedict Kinny-Köster
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Mary Hodgin
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Lindsay Parish
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Dea Cunningham
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Amy Hacker-Prietz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Richard A Burkhart
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - William R Burns
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Christopher R Shubert
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - John L Cameron
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Atif Zaheer
- Department of Radiology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Linda C H Chu
- Department of Radiology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Satomi Kawamoto
- Department of Radiology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Elizabeth D Thompson
- Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Eun J Shin
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Amol Narang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Lei Zheng
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Daniel A Laheru
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ralph H Hruban
- Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jin He
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Elliot K Fishman
- Department of Radiology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - Kelly Lafaro
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Montalvo-Jave EE, Ayala-Moreno EA, Soper NJ, Ashley SW, Stain S, Pawlik TM, Pellegrini C, Cameron JL, Vauthey JN, Jones D, Sarr MG, Callery MP, Chaba SS. Mexico: the Inaugural International Chapter of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract. J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 26:519-522. [PMID: 35023032 PMCID: PMC8754071 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-022-05244-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 12/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Eduardo E. Montalvo-Jave
- grid.414716.10000 0001 2221 3638HPB Clinic, Department of General Surgery, Hospital General de Mexico “Dr. Eduardo Liceaga”, Dr. Balmis 148, Colonia Doctores, Alcaldia Cuahtemoc, Mexico City, Mexico ,grid.9486.30000 0001 2159 0001Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, UNAM, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Edwin A. Ayala-Moreno
- grid.9486.30000 0001 2159 0001Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, UNAM, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Nathaniel J. Soper
- Department of Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ USA
| | - Stanley W. Ashley
- grid.62560.370000 0004 0378 8294Department of Surgery, Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA USA
| | - Steven Stain
- grid.415731.50000 0001 0725 1353Department of Surgery, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA USA
| | - Timothy M. Pawlik
- grid.261331.40000 0001 2285 7943Department of Surgery, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH USA
| | - Carlos Pellegrini
- grid.34477.330000000122986657Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA USA
| | - John L. Cameron
- grid.21107.350000 0001 2171 9311Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | - Jean N. Vauthey
- grid.240145.60000 0001 2291 4776Department of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | - Daniel Jones
- grid.239395.70000 0000 9011 8547Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA USA
| | - Michael G. Sarr
- grid.66875.3a0000 0004 0459 167XDepartment of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN USA
| | - Mark P. Callery
- grid.239395.70000 0000 9011 8547Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Gemenetzis G, Blair AB, Nagai M, Groot VP, Ding D, Javed AA, Burkhart RA, Fishman EK, Hruban RH, Weiss MJ, Cameron JL, Narang A, Laheru D, Lafaro K, Herman JM, Zheng L, Burns WR, Wolfgang CL, He J. Anatomic Criteria Determine Resectability in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:401-414. [PMID: 34448965 PMCID: PMC8688211 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10663-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2021] [Accepted: 08/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The introduction of multi-agent chemotherapy and radiation therapy has facilitated potential resection with curative intent in selected locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) patients with excellent outcomes. Nevertheless, there remains a remarkable lack of consensus on the management of LAPC. We sought to describe the outcomes of patients with LAPC and objectively define the multidisciplinary selection process for operative exploration based on anatomical factors. METHODS Consecutive patients with LAPC were evaluated for pancreatic surgery in the multidisciplinary clinic of a high-volume institution, between 2013 and 2018. Prospective stratification (LAPC-1, LAPC-2, and LAPC-3), based on the involvement of regional anatomical structures, was performed at the time of presentation prior to the initiation of treatment. Resection rates and patient outcomes were evaluated and correlated with the initial anatomic stratification system. RESULTS Overall, 415 patients with LAPC were included in the study, of whom 84 (20%) were successfully resected, with a median overall survival of 35.3 months. The likelihood of operative exploration was associated with the pretreatment anatomic LAPC score, with a resection rate of 49% in patients classified as LAPC-1, 32% in LAPC-2, and 11% in LAPC-3 (p < 0.001). Resected patients with improvement of the LAPC score at the time of exploration had significantly longer median overall survival compared with those with no change or progression of LAPC score (60.7 vs. 29.8 months, p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS Selected patients with LAPC can undergo curative-intent surgery with excellent outcomes. The proposed Johns Hopkins anatomic LAPC score provides an objective system to anticipate the probability of eventual surgical resection after induction therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgios Gemenetzis
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Surgery, Royal Infirmary Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
| | - Alex B Blair
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Minako Nagai
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan
| | - Vincent P Groot
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ding Ding
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ammar A Javed
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Richard A Burkhart
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Elliot K Fishman
- Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ralph H Hruban
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Matthew J Weiss
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Surgery, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, USA
| | - John L Cameron
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Amol Narang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Daniel Laheru
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Kelly Lafaro
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Joseph M Herman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, USA
| | - Lei Zheng
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - William R Burns
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Jin He
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Pulvirenti A, Margonis GA, Morales-Oyarvide V, McIntyre CA, Lawrence SA, Goldman DA, Gonen M, Weiss MJ, Ferrone CR, He J, Brennan MF, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD, Kingham TP, Balachandran V, Qadan M, D’Angelica MI, Jarnagin WR, Wolfgang CL, Castillo CFD, Allen PJ. Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms: Have IAP Consensus Guidelines Changed our Approach?: Results from a Multi-institutional Study. Ann Surg 2021; 274:e980-e987. [PMID: 31804389 PMCID: PMC8503800 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000003703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the influence of consensus guidelines on the management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN) and the subsequent changes in pathologic outcomes. BACKGROUND Over time, multiple guidelines have been developed to identify high-risk IPMN. We hypothesized that the development and implementation of guidelines should have increased the percentage of resected IPMN with high-risk disease. METHODS Memorial Sloan-Kettering (MSK), Johns Hopkins (JH), and Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) databases were queried for resected IPMN (2000-2015). Patients were categorized into main-duct (MD-IPMN) versus branch-duct (BD-IPMN). Guideline-specific radiographic/endoscopic features were recorded. High-risk disease was defined as high-grade dysplasia/carcinoma. Fisher's exact test was used to detect differences between institutions. Logistic regression evaluated differences between time-points [preguidelines (pre-GL, before 2006), Sendai (SCG, 2006-2012), Fukuoka (FCG, after 2012)]. RESULTS The study included 1210 patients. The percentage of BD-IPMN with ≥1 high-risk radiographic feature differed between centers (MSK 69%, JH 60%, MGH 45%; P < 0.001). In MD-IPMN cohort, the presence of radiographic features such as solid component and main pancreatic duct diameter ≥10 mm also differed (solid component: MSK 38%, JH 30%, MGH 18%; P < 0.001; duct ≥10 mm: MSK 49%, JH 32%, MGH 44%; P < 0.001). The percentage of high-risk disease on pathology, however, was similar between institutions (BD-IPMN: P = 0.36, MD-IPMN: P = 0.48). During the study period, the percentage of BD-IPMN resected with ≥1 high-risk feature increased (52% pre-GL vs 67% FCG; P = 0.005), whereas the percentage of high-risk disease decreased (pre-GL vs FCG: 30% vs 20%). For MD-IPMN, there was not a clear trend towards guideline adherence, and the rate of high-risk disease was similar over the time (pre-GL vs FCG: 69% vs 67%; P = 0.63). CONCLUSION Surgical management of IPMN based on radiographic criteria is variable between institutions, with similar percentages of high-risk disease. Over the 15-year study period, the rate of BD-IPMN resected with high-risk radiographic features increased; however, the rate of high-risk disease decreased. Better predictors are needed.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous/diagnostic imaging
- Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous/pathology
- Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous/surgery
- Adenocarcinoma, Papillary/diagnostic imaging
- Adenocarcinoma, Papillary/pathology
- Adenocarcinoma, Papillary/surgery
- Adult
- Aged
- Aged, 80 and over
- Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/diagnostic imaging
- Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/pathology
- Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/surgery
- Female
- Humans
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Neoplasm Grading
- Neoplasm Staging
- Pancreatic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging
- Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology
- Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery
- Practice Guidelines as Topic
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Georgios A Margonis
- Department of Surgery, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - Caitlin A McIntyre
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Sharon A Lawrence
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Debra A Goldman
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Mithat Gonen
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Matthew J Weiss
- Department of Surgery, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Cristina R Ferrone
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Jin He
- Department of Surgery, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Murray F Brennan
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - John L Cameron
- Department of Surgery, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Keith D Lillemoe
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - T Peter Kingham
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Vinod Balachandran
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Motaz Qadan
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | - William R Jarnagin
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Christopher L Wolfgang
- Department of Surgery, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - Peter J Allen
- Department of Surgery, Hepatopancreatobiliary Service, Duke, University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Bertsimas D, Margonis GA, Huang Y, Andreatos N, Wiberg H, Ma Y, Mcintyre C, Pulvirenti A, Wagner D, van Dam JL, Gavazzi F, Buettner S, Imai K, Stasinos G, He J, Kamphues C, Beyer K, Seeliger H, Weiss MJ, Kreis M, Cameron JL, Wei AC, Kornprat P, Baba H, Koerkamp BG, Zerbi A, D'Angelica M, Wolfgang CL. Toward an Optimized Staging System for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Clinically Interpretable, Artificial Intelligence-Based Model. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 2021; 5:1220-1231. [PMID: 34936469 PMCID: PMC9848537 DOI: 10.1200/cci.21.00001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2021] [Revised: 08/16/2021] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) eighth edition schema for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma treats T and N stage as independent factors and uses positive lymph nodes (PLNs) to define N stage, despite data favoring lymph node ratio (LNR). We used artificial intelligence-based techniques to compare PLN with LNR and investigate interactions between tumor size and nodal status. METHODS Patients who underwent pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma resection between 2000 and 2017 at six institutions were identified. LNR and PLN were compared through shapley additive explanations (SHAP) analysis, with the best predictor used to define nodal status. We trained optimal classification trees (OCTs) to predict 1-year and 3-year risk of death, incorporating only tumor size and nodal status as variables. The OCTs were compared with the AJCC schema and similarly trained XGBoost models. Variable interactions were explored via SHAP. RESULTS Two thousand eight hundred seventy-four patients comprised the derivation and 1,231 the validation cohort. SHAP identified LNR as a superior predictor. The OCTs outperformed the AJCC schema in the derivation and validation cohorts (1-year area under the curve: 0.681 v 0.603; 0.638 v 0.586, 3-year area under the curve: 0.682 v 0.639; 0.675 v 0.647, respectively) and performed comparably with the XGBoost models. We identified interactions between LNR and tumor size, suggesting that a negative prognostic factor partially overrides the effect of a concurrent favorable factor. CONCLUSION Our findings highlight the superiority of LNR and the importance of interactions between tumor size and nodal status. These results and the potential of the OCT methodology to combine them into a powerful, visually interpretable model can help inform future staging systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitris Bertsimas
- Operations Research Center, Massachusetts
Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
| | - Georgios Antonios Margonis
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan
Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins
University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Yifei Huang
- Operations Research Center, Massachusetts
Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
| | - Nikolaos Andreatos
- Department of Internal Medicine and
Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Holly Wiberg
- Operations Research Center, Massachusetts
Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
| | - Yu Ma
- Operations Research Center, Massachusetts
Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
| | - Caitlin Mcintyre
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan
Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Alessandra Pulvirenti
- Section of Pancreatic Surgery, Humanitas
Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Doris Wagner
- Department of General Surgery, Medical
University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - J. L. van Dam
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC,
University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Francesca Gavazzi
- Section of Pancreatic Surgery, Humanitas
Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefan Buettner
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC,
University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Katsunori Imai
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery,
Graduate School of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | | | - Jin He
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins
University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Carsten Kamphues
- Department of General, Visceral and
Vascular Surgery, Charité Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Katharina Beyer
- Department of General, Visceral and
Vascular Surgery, Charité Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Hendrik Seeliger
- Department of General, Visceral and
Vascular Surgery, Charité Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Martin Kreis
- Department of General, Visceral and
Vascular Surgery, Charité Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| | - John L. Cameron
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins
University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Alice C. Wei
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan
Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Peter Kornprat
- Department of General Surgery, Medical
University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Hideo Baba
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery,
Graduate School of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC,
University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Alessandro Zerbi
- Section of Pancreatic Surgery, Humanitas
Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Michael D'Angelica
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan
Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Javed AA, Mirza MB, Sham JG, Ali DM, Jones GF, Sanjeevi S, Burkhart RA, Cameron JL, Weiss MJ, Wolfgang CL, He J. Postoperative biliary anastomotic strictures after pancreaticoduodenectomy. HPB (Oxford) 2021; 23:1716-1721. [PMID: 34016543 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2021] [Revised: 03/21/2021] [Accepted: 04/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Biliary anastomotic stricture (BAS) is an uncommon complication of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). As PDs are performed more frequently, BAS may become a more common pathologic entity requiring clinical engagement. The aim of this study was to report the incidence of BAS in the modern era of pancreatic surgery and identify risk factors associated with it. METHODS Patients undergoing PD at the Johns Hopkins Hospital between 2007 and 2016 were identified using an institutional registry and clinicopathological features were analyzed to identify risk factors associated with BAS. RESULTS Of 2125 patients identified, 103 (4.9%) developed BAS. Factors independently associated with BAS included laparoscopic approach (HR:2.83,95%CI:1.35-5.92, p = 0.006), postoperative pancreatic fistula (HR:2.45,95%CI:1.56-4.16,p < 0.001), postoperative bile leak (BL) (HR:5.26,95%CI:2.45-11.28,p < 0.001), and administration of adjuvant radiation therapy (HR:6.01,95%CI:3.19-11.34,p < 0.001). Malignant pathology was associated with lower rates of BAS (HR:0.52,95%CI:0.30-0.92, p = 0.025). BL was associated with higher rates of early-BAS (HR:16.49,95%CI:3.28-82.94, p = 0.001) while use of Vicryl suture for biliary enteric anastomosis was associated with lower rates of early-BAS (HR:0.20,95%CI:0.05-0.93, p = 0.041). CONCLUSION Approximately 5% of patients undergoing PD experience BAS. Multiple factors are associated with the development and timing of BAS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ammar A Javed
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Muhammad B Mirza
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jonathan G Sham
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Daniyal M Ali
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - George F Jones
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Srinivas Sanjeevi
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Richard A Burkhart
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - John L Cameron
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | | | - Jin He
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Gemenetzis G, Blair AB, Nagai M, Groot VP, Ding D, Javed AA, Burkhart RA, Fishman EK, Hruban RH, Weiss MJ, Cameron JL, Narang A, Laheru D, Lafaro K, Herman JM, Zheng L, Burns WR, Wolfgang CL, He J. ASO Visual Abstract: Anatomic Criteria Determine Resectability in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2021. [PMID: 34515887 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10739-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Georgios Gemenetzis
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Department of Surgery, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
| | - Alex B Blair
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Minako Nagai
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan
| | - Vincent P Groot
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ding Ding
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ammar A Javed
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Richard A Burkhart
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Elliot K Fishman
- Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ralph H Hruban
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Matthew J Weiss
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Department of Surgery, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, USA
| | - John L Cameron
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Amol Narang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Daniel Laheru
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Kelly Lafaro
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Joseph M Herman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, USA
| | - Lei Zheng
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - William R Burns
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Jin He
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Pu N, Gao S, Beckman R, Ding D, Wright M, Chen Z, Zhu Y, Hu H, Yin L, Beckman M, Thompson E, Hruban RH, Cameron JL, Gage MM, Lafaro KJ, Burns WR, Wolfgang CL, He J, Yu J, Burkhart RA. Defining a minimum number of examined lymph nodes improves the prognostic value of lymphadenectomy in pancreas ductal adenocarcinoma. HPB (Oxford) 2021; 23:575-586. [PMID: 32900612 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.08.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2020] [Revised: 06/30/2020] [Accepted: 08/21/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lymph node (LN) metastasis is associated with decreased survival following resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). In N0 disease, increasing total evaluated LN (ELN) correlates with improved outcomes suggesting patients may be understaged when LNs are undersampled. We aim to assess the optimal number of examined lymph nodes (ELN) following pancreatectomy. METHODS Data from 1837 patients undergoing surgery were prospectively collected. The binomial probability law was utilized to analyze the minimum number of examined LNs (minELN) and accurately characterize each histopathologic stage. LN ratio (LNR) was compared to American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) guidelines. RESULTS As ELN total increased, the likelihood of finding node positive disease increased. An evaluation based upon the binomial probability law suggested an optimal minELN of 12 for accurate AJCC N staging. As the number of ELNs increased, the discriminatory capacity of alternative strategies to characterize LN disease exceeded that offered by AJCC N stage. CONCLUSION This is the first study dedicated to optimizing histopathologic staging in PDAC using models of minELN informed by the binomial probability law. This study highlights two separate cutoffs for ELNs depending upon prognostic goal and validates that 12 LNs are adequate to determine AJCC N stage for the majority of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ning Pu
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shanshan Gao
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Interventional Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ross Beckman
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ding Ding
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Michael Wright
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Zhiyao Chen
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Yayun Zhu
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Haijie Hu
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Lingdi Yin
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Michael Beckman
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Elizabeth Thompson
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center and The Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Program of Excellence, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ralph H Hruban
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center and The Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Program of Excellence, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - John L Cameron
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Oncology, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Michele M Gage
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Oncology, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Kelly J Lafaro
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Oncology, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - William R Burns
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Oncology, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Christopher L Wolfgang
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center and The Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Program of Excellence, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Oncology, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jin He
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Oncology, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jun Yu
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Oncology, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - Richard A Burkhart
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Oncology, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Javed AA, Wright MJ, Ding D, Javed ZN, Faghih M, Rozich NS, Fishman EK, Burns WR, Cameron JL, Weiss MJ, He J, Singh VK, Wolfgang CL, Burkhart RA. Autoimmune Pancreatitis: A Critical Analysis of the Surgical Experience in an Era of Modern Diagnostics. Pancreas 2021; 50:556-563. [PMID: 33939669 DOI: 10.1097/mpa.0000000000001812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to critically analyze the surgical experience of managing autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) in an era of modern diagnostics and compare these patients with those who were managed conservatively. METHODS Two prospectively maintained databases were used to retrospectively identify patients with AIP who were either managed conservatively or underwent pancreatectomy. RESULTS Eighty-eight patients were included in the study, of which 56 (63.6%) underwent resection and 32 (36.4%) were managed conservatively. Patients who underwent resection were more likely to present with jaundice (64.3% vs 18.1%, P < 0.001) and weight loss (53.6% vs 15.6%, P = 0.005). The cohort who underwent resection had a significantly higher median carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (40.0 vs 18.6 U/mL, P = 0.034) and was less likely to have elevated immunoglobulin G4 (26.1% vs 50.0%, P < 0.001). The most frequent initial diagnosis in the cohort who underwent resection was ductal adenocarcinoma (82.1%). Nine patients (28.1%) in the conservatively managed cohort experienced AIP relapse compared with 6 patients (10.7%) in the cohort who underwent resection. CONCLUSIONS The most frequent reason for surgical resection of AIP is concern for malignancy. Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 elevations were more common than immunoglobulin G4 in our cohort, suggesting that this laboratory profile is suboptimal for this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Mahya Faghih
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Jin He
- From the Department of Surgery
| | - Vikesh K Singh
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Ding D, Javed AA, Yuan C, Wright MJ, Javed ZN, Teinor JA, Ye IC, Burkhart RA, Cameron JL, Weiss MJ, Wolfgang CL, He J. Role of Lymph Node Resection and Histopathological Evaluation in Accurate Staging of Nonfunctional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: How Many Are Enough? J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 25:428-435. [PMID: 32026333 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-020-04521-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2019] [Accepted: 01/14/2020] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nodal involvement has been identified as one of the strongest prognostic factors in patients with nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-PanNETs). Sufficient lymphadenectomy and evaluation is vital for accurate staging. The purpose of this study was to identify the optimal number of examined lymph nodes (ELN) required for accurate staging. METHODS The SEER database was used to identify patients with resected NF-PanNETs between 2004 and 2014. The distributions of positive lymph nodes (PLN) ratio and total lymph nodes were used to develop a mathematical model. The sensitivity of detecting nodal disease at each cutoff of ELN was estimated and used to identify the optimal cutoff for ELN. RESULTS A total of 1098 patients were included in the study of which 391 patients (35.6%) had nodal disease. The median ELN was 12 (interquartile range [IQR]: 7-19.5), and the median PLN was 2 (IQR: 1-4) for patients with nodal disease. With an increase in ELN, the sensitivity of detecting nodal disease increased from 12.0% (ELN: 1) to 92.2% (ELN: 20), plateauing at 20 ELN (< 1% increase in sensitivity with an additional ELN). This sensitivity increase pattern was similar in subgroup analyses with different T stages. CONCLUSIONS The sensitivity of detecting nodal disease in patients with NF-PanNETs increases with an increase in the number of ELN. Cutoffs for adequate nodal assessment were defined for all T stages. Utilization of these cutoffs in clinical settings will help with patient prognostication and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ding Ding
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Halsted 614, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
- The Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ammar A Javed
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Halsted 614, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
- The Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Chunhui Yuan
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Halsted 614, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
- The Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Michael J Wright
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Halsted 614, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
- The Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Zunaira N Javed
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Halsted 614, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
- The Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jonathan A Teinor
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Halsted 614, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
- The Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - I Chae Ye
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Halsted 614, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Richard A Burkhart
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Halsted 614, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
- The Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - John L Cameron
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Halsted 614, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
- The Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Matthew J Weiss
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Halsted 614, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
- The Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Christopher L Wolfgang
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Halsted 614, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
- The Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jin He
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Halsted 614, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
- The Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Ding D, Javed AA, Cunningham D, Teinor J, Wright M, Javed ZN, Wilt C, Parish L, Hodgin M, Ryan A, Judkins C, McIntyre K, Klein R, Azad N, Lee V, Donehower R, De Jesus-Acosta A, Murphy A, Le DT, Shin EJ, Lennon AM, Khashab M, Singh V, Klein AP, Roberts NJ, Hacker-Prietz A, Manos L, Walsh C, Groshek L, Brown C, Yuan C, Blair AB, Groot V, Gemenetzis G, Yu J, Weiss MJ, Burkhart RA, Burns WR, He J, Cameron JL, Narang A, Zaheer A, Fishman EK, Thompson ED, Anders R, Hruban RH, Jaffee E, Wolfgang CL, Zheng L, Laheru DA. Challenges of the current precision medicine approach for pancreatic cancer: A single institution experience between 2013 and 2017. Cancer Lett 2021; 497:221-228. [PMID: 33127389 PMCID: PMC8375587 DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2020.10.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2020] [Revised: 10/15/2020] [Accepted: 10/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Recent research on genomic profiling of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has identified many potentially actionable alterations. However, the feasibility of using genomic profiling to guide routine clinical decision making for PDAC patients remains unclear. We retrospectively reviewed PDAC patients between October 2013 and December 2017, who underwent treatment at the Johns Hopkins Hospital and had clinical tumor next-generation sequencing (NGS) through commercial resources. Ninety-two patients with 93 tumors tested were included. Forty-eight (52%) patients had potentially curative surgeries. The median time from the tissue available to the NGS testing ordered was 229 days (interquartile range 62-415). A total of three (3%) patients had matched targeted therapies based on genomic profiling results. Genomic profiling guided personalized treatment for PDAC patients is feasible, but the percentage of patients who receive targeted therapy is low. The main challenges are ordering NGS testing early in the clinical course of the disease and the limited evidence of using a targeted approach in these patients. A real-time department level genomic testing ordering system in combination with an evidence-based flagging system for potentially actionable alterations could help address these shortcomings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ding Ding
- The Pancreatic Cancer "Precision Medicine" Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Surgery the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA; Department of Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Ammar A Javed
- The Pancreatic Cancer "Precision Medicine" Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Surgery the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Dea Cunningham
- The Pancreatic Cancer "Precision Medicine" Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jonathan Teinor
- The Pancreatic Cancer "Precision Medicine" Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Surgery the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Michael Wright
- The Pancreatic Cancer "Precision Medicine" Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Surgery the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Zunaira N Javed
- The Pancreatic Cancer "Precision Medicine" Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Surgery the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Cara Wilt
- The Pancreatic Cancer "Precision Medicine" Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Lindsay Parish
- The Pancreatic Cancer "Precision Medicine" Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Mary Hodgin
- The Pancreatic Cancer "Precision Medicine" Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Amy Ryan
- The Pancreatic Cancer "Precision Medicine" Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Carol Judkins
- The Pancreatic Cancer "Precision Medicine" Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Keith McIntyre
- The Pancreatic Cancer "Precision Medicine" Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Rachel Klein
- The Pancreatic Cancer "Precision Medicine" Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Nilo Azad
- The Pancreatic Cancer "Precision Medicine" Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Valerie Lee
- The Pancreatic Cancer "Precision Medicine" Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Ross Donehower
- The Pancreatic Cancer "Precision Medicine" Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Ana De Jesus-Acosta
- The Pancreatic Cancer "Precision Medicine" Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Adrian Murphy
- The Pancreatic Cancer "Precision Medicine" Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Dung T Le
- The Pancreatic Cancer "Precision Medicine" Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Eun Ji Shin
- The Pancreatic Cancer "Precision Medicine" Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Gastroenterology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Anne Marie Lennon
- The Pancreatic Cancer "Precision Medicine" Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA; Department of Radiology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA; Department of Gastroenterology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Mouen Khashab
- The Pancreatic Cancer "Precision Medicine" Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Gastroenterology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Vikesh Singh
- The Pancreatic Cancer "Precision Medicine" Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Gastroenterology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Alison P Klein
- Department of Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA; The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Nicholas J Roberts
- Department of Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA; The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Amy Hacker-Prietz
- The Pancreatic Cancer "Precision Medicine" Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Lindsey Manos
- The Pancreatic Cancer "Precision Medicine" Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Surgery the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Christi Walsh
- The Pancreatic Cancer "Precision Medicine" Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Surgery the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Lara Groshek
- The Pancreatic Cancer "Precision Medicine" Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Surgery the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Caitlin Brown
- The Pancreatic Cancer "Precision Medicine" Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Surgery the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Chunhui Yuan
- The Pancreatic Cancer "Precision Medicine" Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Surgery the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Alex B Blair
- The Pancreatic Cancer "Precision Medicine" Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Surgery the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Vincent Groot
- The Pancreatic Cancer "Precision Medicine" Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Surgery the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Georgios Gemenetzis
- The Pancreatic Cancer "Precision Medicine" Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Surgery the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Jun Yu
- The Pancreatic Cancer "Precision Medicine" Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Surgery the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Matthew J Weiss
- The Pancreatic Cancer "Precision Medicine" Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Surgery the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Richard A Burkhart
- The Pancreatic Cancer "Precision Medicine" Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Surgery the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - William R Burns
- The Pancreatic Cancer "Precision Medicine" Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Surgery the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Jin He
- The Pancreatic Cancer "Precision Medicine" Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Surgery the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - John L Cameron
- The Pancreatic Cancer "Precision Medicine" Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Surgery the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Amol Narang
- The Pancreatic Cancer "Precision Medicine" Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Atif Zaheer
- The Pancreatic Cancer "Precision Medicine" Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Radiology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Elliot K Fishman
- The Pancreatic Cancer "Precision Medicine" Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Radiology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Elizabeth D Thompson
- The Pancreatic Cancer "Precision Medicine" Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Robert Anders
- The Pancreatic Cancer "Precision Medicine" Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Ralph H Hruban
- The Pancreatic Cancer "Precision Medicine" Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Elizabeth Jaffee
- The Pancreatic Cancer "Precision Medicine" Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Christopher L Wolfgang
- The Pancreatic Cancer "Precision Medicine" Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Surgery the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
| | - Lei Zheng
- The Pancreatic Cancer "Precision Medicine" Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
| | - Daniel A Laheru
- The Pancreatic Cancer "Precision Medicine" Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Hill C, Rosati LM, Wang H, Tsai HL, Sehgal S, Bernard V, Cameron JL, He J, Hacker-Prietz A, Laheru DA, Zheng L, Burkhart RA, De Jesus-Acosta A, Le DT, Weiss MJ, Wolfgang CL, Narang A, Herman JM. Long-term outcomes of a prospective single institution study with multiagent chemotherapy and stereotactic body radiation therapy in locally advanced or recurrent pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.3_suppl.440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
440 Background: We previously reported a multi-center study in which gemcitabine and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) were shown to be safe with outcomes comparable to chemoradiation in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). This prospective clinical trial was developed to evaluate the efficacy of adding SBRT to multi-agent chemotherapy in LAPC. Herein, we report on the long-term survival outcomes. Methods: From 2012 to 2015, 48 patients (pts) were prospectively enrolled after multidisciplinary evaluation at a single high-volume pancreatic center. Pts received multi-agent chemotherapy (CTX) with modified mFOLFIRINOX (mFFX) or gemcitabine/abraxane followed by 5 fractions of SBRT (median 33 Gy; range, 25-33 Gy). At the time of fiducial placement, biopsies were obtained and DNA extracted for targeted sequencing using MSK-IMPACT. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to compare survival outcomes by sub-group. Multivariate analysis (MVA) was performed to identify factors prognostic for survival. Results: 44 pts (91.7%) had LAPC disease and 4 (8.3%) had locally recurrent disease. The median follow-up interval was 21.5 months (mo) from diagnosis. CTX consisted of mFFX in 25 pts (52.1%) with 24 pts (50.0%) receiving therapy for a duration ≥4 mo. Of 44 pts with LAPC, 15 (34.1%) were surgically explored, and 11 (73.3%) achieved a margin-negative resection. From diagnosis and after completion of SBRT, respectively, the median overall survival (OS) was 21.6 (95% CI 16-29.7 mo) and 14.6 mo (95% CI: 11.6-23.0 mo); median progression free survival (PFS) was 13.2 (95% CI 11.9-18.1mo) and 6.4 mo (95% CI: 5-12.7 mo); median local PFS (LPFS) was 23.9 (95% CI 18.9-56.9 mo) and 15.8 mo (95% CI: 12.9-27.6 mo); and median distant metastasis free survival (DMFS) was 18.4 (95% CI 12.6-29.3 mo) and 8.5 mo (95% CI: 6.3-17.2 mo). Resected pts experienced better DMFS at 1-year (78% vs. 34%, p= 0.004) with an improved trend for 1-year OS (73% vs. 52%, p= 0.331). If CTX duration was ≥4 mo, 1-year OS (75% vs. 42%, p= 0.018), PFS (50% vs. 21%, p= 0.022), and DMFS (72% vs. 29%, p= 0.031) were significantly improved. In 44 LAPC pts, MVA confirmed ≥4 mo duration of CTX was associated with OS, PFS, and DMFS. Surgical resection was associated with improved DMFS, and CA19-9 level prior to SBRT was associated with PFS and LPFS. The most common mutations detected from biopsy specimens were KRAS (64.3%) , TP53 (50%), and SMAD4 (16.7%). Conclusions: In a prospective trial of pts with LAPC receiving multiagent CTX and SBRT, clinical outcomes were improved with longer durations of CT ( > 4 mo). A high proportion of LAPC pts underwent margin negative resection with favorable outcomes. Future studies should focus on which pts are most likely to benefit from SBRT and surgery following multiagent CTX. In pts who cannot undergo resection, escalated doses of SBRT may be indicated. Clinical trial information: NCT01781728.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colin Hill
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - Hao Wang
- Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - Hua-Ling Tsai
- Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - Shuchi Sehgal
- Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Vincent Bernard
- Sheikh Ahmed Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - John L. Cameron
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Jin He
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Amy Hacker-Prietz
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Daniel A. Laheru
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center and Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD
| | - Lei Zheng
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center and Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD
| | - Richard A. Burkhart
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Ana De Jesus-Acosta
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center and Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD
| | - Dung T. Le
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center and Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD
| | | | | | - Amol Narang
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Schmocker RK, Delitto D, Wright MJ, Ding D, Cameron JL, Lafaro KJ, Burns WR, Wolfgang CL, Burkhart RA, He J. Impact of Margin Status on Survival in Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. J Am Coll Surg 2020; 232:405-413. [PMID: 33338577 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.11.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2020] [Accepted: 11/25/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Historically, a positive margin after pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) was associated with decreased survival. In an era when neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is being used frequently, the prognostic significance of margin status is unclear. STUDY DESIGN Patients with localized PDAC who received NAC and underwent pancreatectomy from 2011 to 2018 were identified from a single-institution database. Patients with fewer than 2 months of NAC, R2 resection, or fewer than 90 days of follow-up were excluded. A positive margin included tumors within 1 mm of the surgical margin. RESULTS Four hundred and sixty-eight patients met inclusion criteria. Median age was 65 years and 53% were female. Preoperative clinical staging demonstrated that most had locally advanced (n = 222 [47%]) or borderline resectable (n = 172 [37%]) disease. Median follow-up was 18.5 months (interquartile range 10.6 to 30.0 months). Median duration of NAC was 119 days (interquartile range 87 to 168 days). FOLFIRINOX was first-line therapy for 67%, and 73% received neoadjuvant radiotherapy. Most underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (69%). Forty percent were node-positive and 80% had an R0 resection. Fifty-six percent received at least 1 cycle of adjuvant therapy. Median overall survival and recurrence-free survival were 22.0 months (95% CI, 19.4 to 25.1 months) and 11.0 months (95% CI, 10.0 to 12.1 months). On multivariate analysis, margin status was not a significant predictor of overall survival or recurrence-free survival. Factors associated with overall survival included clinical stage, duration of NAC, nodal status, histopathologic treatment response score, and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS Microscopic margin positivity is not associated with recurrence and survival in localized PDAC patients resected after treatment with NAC. Aggressive surgical extirpation in high-volume centers should be considered in selected patients after extensive NAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan K Schmocker
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine, Knoxville, TN
| | - Daniel Delitto
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Michael J Wright
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Ding Ding
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - John L Cameron
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Kelly J Lafaro
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - William R Burns
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Christopher L Wolfgang
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Richard A Burkhart
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Jin He
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Zheng L, Ding D, Edil BH, Judkins C, Durham JN, Thomas DL, Bever KM, Mo G, Solt SE, Hoare JA, Bhattacharya R, Zhu Q, Osipov A, Onner B, Purtell KA, Cai H, Parkinson R, Hacker-Prietz A, Herman JM, Le DT, Azad NS, De Jesus-Acosta AMC, Blair AB, Kim V, Soares KC, Manos L, Cameron JL, Makary MA, Weiss MJ, Schulick RD, He J, Wolfgang CL, Thompson ED, Anders RA, Sugar E, Jaffee EM, Laheru DA. Vaccine-Induced Intratumoral Lymphoid Aggregates Correlate with Survival Following Treatment with a Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Vaccine in Patients with Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2020; 27:1278-1286. [PMID: 33277370 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-2974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2020] [Revised: 10/05/2020] [Accepted: 12/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Immunotherapy is currently ineffective for nearly all pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC), largely due to its tumor microenvironment (TME) that lacks antigen-experienced T effector cells (Teff). Vaccine-based immunotherapies are known to activate antigen-specific Teffs in the peripheral blood. To evaluate the effect of vaccine therapy on the PDAC TME, we designed a neoadjuvant and adjuvant clinical trial of an irradiated, GM-CSF-secreting, allogeneic PDAC vaccine (GVAX). PATIENTS AND METHODS Eighty-seven eligible patients with resectable PDAC were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive GVAX alone or in combination with two forms of low-dose cyclophosphamide. Resected tumors following neoadjuvant immunotherapy were assessed for the formation of tertiary lymphoid aggregates (TLA) in response to treatment. The clinical endpoints are disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS The neoadjuvant treatment with GVAX either alone or with two forms of low-dose cyclophosphamide is safe and feasible without adversely increasing the surgical complication rate. Patients in Arm A who received neoadjuvant and adjuvant GVAX alone had a trend toward longer median OS (35.0 months) than that (24.8 months) in the historical controls who received adjuvant GVAX alone. However, Arm C, who received low-dose oral cyclophosphamide in addition to GVAX, had a significantly shorter DFS than Arm A. When comparing patients with OS > 24 months to those with OS < 15 months, longer OS was found to be associated with higher density of intratumoral TLA. CONCLUSIONS It is safe and feasible to use a neoadjuvant immunotherapy approach for PDACs to evaluate early biologic responses. In-depth analysis of TLAs is warranted in future neoadjuvant immunotherapy clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lei Zheng
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. .,Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Skip Viragh Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research and Clinical Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Center of Excellence Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Ding Ding
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Center of Excellence Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Barish H Edil
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Skip Viragh Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research and Clinical Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Carol Judkins
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Skip Viragh Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research and Clinical Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jennifer N Durham
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Skip Viragh Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research and Clinical Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Dwayne L Thomas
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Center of Excellence Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Katherine M Bever
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Skip Viragh Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research and Clinical Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Center of Excellence Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Guanglan Mo
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Skip Viragh Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research and Clinical Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Center of Excellence Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Sara E Solt
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Skip Viragh Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research and Clinical Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jessica A Hoare
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Skip Viragh Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research and Clinical Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Raka Bhattacharya
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Skip Viragh Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research and Clinical Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Qingfeng Zhu
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Skip Viragh Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research and Clinical Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Center of Excellence Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Arsen Osipov
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Skip Viragh Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research and Clinical Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Center of Excellence Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Beth Onner
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Skip Viragh Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research and Clinical Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Katrina A Purtell
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Skip Viragh Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research and Clinical Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Hongyan Cai
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Skip Viragh Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research and Clinical Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Rose Parkinson
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Skip Viragh Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research and Clinical Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Amy Hacker-Prietz
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Skip Viragh Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research and Clinical Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Center of Excellence Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Joseph M Herman
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Skip Viragh Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research and Clinical Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Dung T Le
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Skip Viragh Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research and Clinical Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Center of Excellence Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Nilofer S Azad
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Skip Viragh Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research and Clinical Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Center of Excellence Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Ana M C De Jesus-Acosta
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Skip Viragh Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research and Clinical Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Center of Excellence Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Alex B Blair
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Skip Viragh Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research and Clinical Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Center of Excellence Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Victoria Kim
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Skip Viragh Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research and Clinical Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Center of Excellence Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Kevin C Soares
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Skip Viragh Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research and Clinical Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Lindsey Manos
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Skip Viragh Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research and Clinical Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Center of Excellence Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - John L Cameron
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Skip Viragh Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research and Clinical Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Center of Excellence Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Martin A Makary
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Skip Viragh Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research and Clinical Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Center of Excellence Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Matthew J Weiss
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Skip Viragh Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research and Clinical Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Center of Excellence Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Richard D Schulick
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Skip Viragh Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research and Clinical Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,Department of Surgery and Cancer Center, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Jin He
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Skip Viragh Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research and Clinical Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Center of Excellence Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Christopher L Wolfgang
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Skip Viragh Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research and Clinical Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Center of Excellence Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Elizabeth D Thompson
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Skip Viragh Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research and Clinical Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Center of Excellence Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Robert A Anders
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Skip Viragh Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research and Clinical Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Center of Excellence Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Elizabeth Sugar
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Skip Viragh Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research and Clinical Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Elizabeth M Jaffee
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Skip Viragh Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research and Clinical Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Center of Excellence Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Daniel A Laheru
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Skip Viragh Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research and Clinical Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Center of Excellence Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Schmocker RK, Wright MJ, Ding D, Javed AA, Cameron JL, Lafaro K, Burns WR, He J, Wolfgang CL, Burkhart RA. Duodenal, ampullary, and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: Oncologic outcomes are driven by tumor biology and tissue of origin. J Surg Oncol 2020; 123:416-424. [PMID: 33125737 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2020] [Revised: 10/09/2020] [Accepted: 10/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Periampullary neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) arise from the duodenum, ampulla, and periampullary pancreas. Duodenal and ampullary NETs are rare and may have distinct biologic behavior from pancreatic NETs (P-NETs). We examined the outcomes of these entities. METHODS An institutional database was queried for patients undergoing resection for pancreatic head, duodenal, or ampullary NETs from 2000 to 2018. Patients with MEN1 syndrome or follow up less than 12 months were excluded. RESULTS Three hundred and ten patients were identified. Tumor locations were ampulla (n = 15), duodenum (n = 35) and pancreas (n = 260). Median follow-up and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were 60.9 (interquartile range [IQR]: 34.8-99.3) and 171.7 (IQR: 84.0-NR) months. Clinicopathologic data and survival outcomes were similar for duodenal and ampullary NETs (RFS: p = .347 and overall survival [OS]: p = .246) and were combined into an intestinal subtype (IS) group. There were no differences in OS or RFS when comparing IS-NET and P-NET. On multivariate analysis, tissue of origin was not associated with risk of recurrence. The current American Joint Committee on Cancer staging guidelines, which account for origin tissue, were predictive of outcomes for all subtypes. CONCLUSION Tissue of origin does not appear to impact long-term outcomes when comparing IS-NETs and P-NETs. The AJCC staging system offers good discriminatory capacity in the context of the tissue type.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan K Schmocker
- The Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.,Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Michael J Wright
- The Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Ding Ding
- The Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Ammar A Javed
- The Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - John L Cameron
- The Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Kelly Lafaro
- The Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - William R Burns
- The Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Jin He
- The Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Christopher L Wolfgang
- The Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Richard A Burkhart
- The Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Schmocker RK, Wright MJ, Ding D, Beckman MJ, Javed AA, Cameron JL, Lafaro KJ, Burns WR, Weiss MJ, He J, Wolfgang CL, Burkhart RA. An Aggressive Approach to Locally Confined Pancreatic Cancer: Defining Surgical and Oncologic Outcomes Unique to Pancreatectomy with Celiac Axis Resection (DP-CAR). Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 28:3125-3134. [PMID: 33051739 PMCID: PMC8041923 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-09201-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2020] [Accepted: 08/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Background: Modern chemotherapeutics have led to improved systemic disease control for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Surgical strategies such as distal pancreatectomy with celiac axis resection (DP-CAR) are increasingly entertained. Herein we review procedure specific outcomes and assess biologic rationale for DP-CAR. Methods: A prospectively maintained single-institution database of all pancreatectomies was queried for patients undergoing DP-CAR. We excluded all patients for whom complete data were not available and those who were not treated with contemporary multi-agent therapy. Data was supplemented with dedicated chart review and outreach for long-term oncologic outcomes. Results: Fifty-four patients underwent DP-CAR between 2008–2018. The median age was 62.7 years. 98% received induction chemotherapy. Arterial reconstruction was performed in 17% and concomitant visceral resection in 30%. R0 resection rate was 87%. Postoperative complications were common (43%) with chyle leak being the most frequent (17%). Length of stay was 8 days, readmission occurred in one-third, and ninety-day mortality was 2%. Disease recurrence occurred in 74% during a median follow up of 17.4 months. Median recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were 9 and 25 months, respectively. Conclusions: Following modern induction paradigms, DP-CAR can be performed with low mortality, manageable morbidity, and excellent rates of margin-negative resection in high volume settings. The profile of complications of DP-CAR is distinct from pancreaticoduodenectomy and simple distal pancreatectomy. OS and RFS are similar to those undergoing resection of borderline resectable and resectable disease. Improved systemic disease control will likely lead to increasing utilization of aggressive surgical approaches to LAPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan K Schmocker
- The Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Michael J Wright
- The Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ding Ding
- The Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Michael J Beckman
- The Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ammar A Javed
- The Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - John L Cameron
- The Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Kelly J Lafaro
- The Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - William R Burns
- The Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Matthew J Weiss
- The Division of Surgical Oncology, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, New Hyde Park, NY, USA
| | - Jin He
- The Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Christopher L Wolfgang
- The Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Richard A Burkhart
- The Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Habib JR, Kinny-Köster B, van Oosten F, Javed AA, Cameron JL, Lafaro KJ, Burkhart RA, Burns WR, He J, Thompson ED, Fishman EK, Wolfgang CL. Periadventitial dissection of the superior mesenteric artery for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: Surgical planning with the "halo sign" and "string sign". Surgery 2020; 169:1026-1031. [PMID: 33036782 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.08.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2020] [Accepted: 08/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Most patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer are classified as nonoperative candidates based on the contemporary guidelines of resectability. The advent of more potent control of systemic disease using neoadjuvant chemotherapy has enabled more aggressive operative interventions. In our multidisciplinary practice, patients with Stage III, locally advanced pancreatic cancer and superior mesenteric artery (SMA) encasement are now carefully triaged with high quality, preoperative imaging to determine if they can be considered candidates for operative resection with periadventitial dissection of the SMA. Patients displaying a "halo sign," where the encased SMA remains fully patent and free from arterial invasion, are now candidates for SMA periadventitial dissection. This procedure involves the surgical stripping of the infiltrated neurolymphatic tissue off the SMA leaving behind a bare "skeletonized artery." Alternatively, the "string sign" involving the SMA confers a more likely case of arterial invasion, where a complete oncologic resection cannot be achieved successfully. This method of patient selection in case of SMA involvement abandons the traditional metrics of circumferential degrees of the arterial encasement to guide surgical decisions. Our institutional approach has allowed us to meaningfully expand our operative methods of resection with the potential for improved longitudinal outcomes to pancreatic cancer patients who were deprived historically from the more effective and possibly curative treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph R Habib
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - Floortje van Oosten
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Ammar A Javed
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - John L Cameron
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Kelly J Lafaro
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Richard A Burkhart
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - William R Burns
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Jin He
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Elizabeth D Thompson
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Elliot K Fishman
- Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Kinny-Köster B, van Oosten F, Habib JR, Javed AA, Cameron JL, Lafaro KJ, Burkhart RA, Burns WR, He J, Fishman EK, Wolfgang CL. Mesoportal bypass, interposition graft, and mesocaval shunt: Surgical strategies to overcome superior mesenteric vein involvement in pancreatic cancer. Surgery 2020; 168:1048-1055. [PMID: 32951905 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.07.054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2020] [Accepted: 07/30/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In pancreatic cancer, extensive tumor involvement of the mesenteric venous system poses formidable challenges to operative resection. Such involvement can result from cavernous collateral veins leading to increased intraoperative blood loss or long-segment vascular defects of not only just the superior mesenteric vein but also even jejunal/ileal branches. Strategies to facilitate margin-free resection and safe vascular reconstruction in pancreatic surgery are important, particularly because systemic control of the tumor is improving with multi-agent chemotherapy regimens. METHODS We describe a systematic, multidisciplinary assessment for patients with pancreatic cancer that involves the superior mesenteric vein, as well as the preoperative planning of those undergoing operative resection. In addition, detailed descriptions of operative approaches and technical strategies, which evolved with increasing experience at a high-volume center, are presented. RESULTS For the preoperative evaluation of tumor-free, vascular locations for potential reconstruction and collateralization, computed tomographic imaging with high-resolution of vascular structures (used with 3-dimensional or cinematic rendering) allows a precise calibration of radiographic data with intraoperative findings. From an operative perspective, we identified 5 potential strategies to consider for resection: collateral preservation, mesoportal bypass (preresection), mesoportal interposition graft (postresection), mesocaval shunt, and various combinations of these strategies. Many of these techniques use interposition grafts, making it essential to assess autologous veins (preferred conduit for reconstruction) or to prepare cryopreserved vascular allografts (an alternative conduit, which must be thawed and should be matched for size and blood type). CONCLUSION Herein we share operative strategies to overcome involvement of the superior mesenteric vein in pancreatic cancer. Improvements in preoperative planning and operative technique can address common barriers to resection with curative intent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Floortje van Oosten
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Surgery, Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Joseph R Habib
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Ammar A Javed
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - John L Cameron
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Kelly J Lafaro
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Richard A Burkhart
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - William R Burns
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Jin He
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Elliot K Fishman
- Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Seppälä TT, Zimmerman JW, Rozich N, Blair A, Javed A, Cameron JL, Burns WR, He J, Tuveson D, Wolfgang CL, Ryan DP, Kimmelman A, Herman JM, Messersmith W, Hong TS, Ting DT, Burkhart RA. Abstract LB-011: Patient-derived organoids may facilitate precision medicine in pancreatic cancer: Demonstrating feasibility in the context of a multi-center clinical trial. Cancer Res 2020. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2020-lb-011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Systemic disease control is the principle driver of prognosis in patients with pancreatic cancer (PDAC). Currently, there are no predictive biomarkers of clinical response to guide selection of an optimal treatment approach. Our work explores the logistics and feasibility of generating patient tumor-derived models to serve as biomarkers. Methods: Patients with borderline resectable or locally advanced PDAC enrolled to participate in a multi-institutional prospective, randomized, trial were eligible. Pretreatment core needle biopsies from diagnostic endoscopy were shipped via commercial post to a centralized organoid laboratory. Patient-specific organoids (PDO) were established as previously described by our group. Putative predictive biomarkers of clinical treatment response, including whole-exome sequencing (WES), RNA-sequencing, and pharmacotyping (chemotherapeutic sensitivity testing) were performed prospectively. Putative predictive biomarkers will be compared to clinical outcomes when approved by the trial's Data Safety Monitoring Board. Results: Approximately 40% (42/98) of patients participated in tissue acquisition for organoid development. Culture maturation can be described in three relevant phases: establishment, expansion, and characterization. The establishment phase describes the emergence of viable ductal organoid development in the setting of a culture being cleared of other components of the tumor microenvironment. During these first 3-5 passages, there are numerous potential pitfalls, including technical and logistical challenges. Out of 42, 26 (62%) PDOs were successfully established. Notably, the establishment phase appears to be an area of the greatest improvement, as the rates of successful establishment improve while the collaborative team builds experience. Expansion involves biomass accumulation in clean culture. Of those that succeeded in establishment, 77% (20/26) entered in expansion phase. We can currently report 15 PDOs having reached the characterization phase (WES, RNA-seq with subtyping, and/or pharmacotyping). Based on RNA expression profile, 10/14 were classified as classical and 4 as basal-like subtype. Mean time to pharmacotyping was 179 days. The PDOs showed a variable population distribution of sensitivity to standard-of-care chemotherapeutics (gemcitabine, paclitaxel, irinotecan, 5-FU, oxaliplatin). Conclusions: Developing a living organoid biobank from PDAC biopsies in a multi-center trial setting is a tractable approach in precision medicine initiatives. Amongst a collaborative team of physician scientists, the establishment phase is critical. PDOs from pre-treatment biopsies can be individually characterized within a clinically relevant time frame and unique tumor-specific ex vivo-derived therapeutic sensitivities can be assessed.
Citation Format: Toni T. Seppälä, Jacquelyn W. Zimmerman, Noah Rozich, Alex Blair, Ammar Javed, John L. Cameron, William R. Burns, Jin He, David Tuveson, Christopher L. Wolfgang, David P. Ryan, Alec Kimmelman, Joseph M. Herman, Wells Messersmith, Theodore S. Hong, David T. Ting, Richard Andrew Burkhart. Patient-derived organoids may facilitate precision medicine in pancreatic cancer: Demonstrating feasibility in the context of a multi-center clinical trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-011.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Alex Blair
- 1Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | | | | | | | - Jin He
- 1Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - David Tuveson
- 2Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Sham JG, Guo S, Ding D, Shao Z, Wright M, Jing W, Yin LD, Zhang Y, Gage MM, Zhou Y, Javed A, Burkhart RA, Zhou X, Weiss MJ, He T, Li G, Cameron JL, Hu X, Wolfgang CL, Jin G, He J. Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy versus standard distal pancreatosplenectomy for pancreatic cancer, a dual-institutional analysis. Chin Clin Oncol 2020; 9:54. [PMID: 32576018 DOI: 10.21037/cco-20-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2020] [Accepted: 05/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) has been adopted by some surgeons in the treatment of left-sided pancreatic cancer (PDAC). Low disease incidence and heterogenous disease biology make robust prospective comparison of RAMPS and standard distal pancreatosplenectomy (DPS) difficult. METHODS Consecutive cases of chemo-naïve patients undergoing open RAMPS and DPS for PDAC between 2010-2017 at two international high-volume pancreatectomy centers were compared. Cox proportional hazard modeling was utilized for multivariate analysis. RESULTS We identified 193 DPS and 253 RAMPS during the study period. DPS was associated with higher rates of median estimated blood loss (500 vs. 300 cc, P<0.001), median total harvested lymph nodes (18 vs. 12, P<0.001) and R0 resection (94.3% vs. 88.9%, P=0.013). There were no differences in rates of postoperative pancreatic fistula (16.5% vs. 17.8%, P=1) or postoperative hemorrhage (5.9% vs. 3.6%, P=0.385) (DPS vs. RAMPS). After controlling for significant clinical pathological parameters, RAMPS was associated with non-superior recurrence-free survival (RFS) (HR 0.29; 95% CI, 0.07-1.27, P=0.101) and overall-survival (HR 1.03; 95% CI, 0.71-1.49, P=0.895) compared with DPS. Similar results were observed in node-positive patients. CONCLUSIONS RAMPS is safe and effective in the treatment of PDAC, but is not associated with an improvement in either RFS or overall-survival over DPS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan G Sham
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Shiwei Guo
- Department of Surgery, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Ding Ding
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Zhuo Shao
- Department of Surgery, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Michael Wright
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Wei Jing
- Department of Surgery, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Ling-Di Yin
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Yijie Zhang
- Department of Surgery, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Michele M Gage
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Yingqi Zhou
- Department of Surgery, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Ammar Javed
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Xuyu Zhou
- Department of Surgery, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Matthew J Weiss
- Northwell Health Cancer Institute, Lake Success, New York, USA
| | - Tianlin He
- Department of Surgery, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Gang Li
- Department of Surgery, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - John L Cameron
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Xiangui Hu
- Department of Surgery, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | | | - Gang Jin
- Department of Surgery, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China.
| | - Jin He
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Wright MJ, Overton HN, Teinor JA, Ding D, Burkhart RA, Cameron JL, He J, Wolfgang CL, Weiss MJ, Javed AA. Disparities in the Use of Chemotherapy in Patients with Resected Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 2020; 24:1590-1596. [PMID: 31270718 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-019-04311-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2019] [Accepted: 06/13/2019] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Introduction of effective systemic therapies for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has demonstrated survival benefit. However, chemotherapy remains underutilized in these patients. We sought to investigate the implications of disparities on the trends in utilization of chemotherapy. METHODS A retrospective study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database identified patients who underwent surgical resection for PDAC from 1998 to 2014. Clinicopathologic, demographic, racial, and geographical factors were analyzed to assess associations with receipt of chemotherapy and disease-specific survival. RESULTS A total of 15,585 patients were included in the study. A majority (N = 9953, 63.9%) received chemotherapy. Factors associated with poorer odds of receiving chemotherapy included older age (p < 0.001), African-American race (p = 0.003), and living in the Southwest region of the USA (p < 0.001). Married patients were at higher odds of receiving chemotherapy (all p < 0.001). Receipt of chemotherapy was independently associated with improved disease-specific survival (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Receipt of chemotherapy results in an improved survival in patients with resected PDAC. Demographic, racial, and geographic factors influence the rate of receipt of chemotherapy. Despite prior reports, these trends have not changed over the recent decades.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J Wright
- The John L. Cameron Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 N. Wolfe St. / Blalock 1222A, Baltimore, MD, 2I287, USA
| | - Heidi N Overton
- The John L. Cameron Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 N. Wolfe St. / Blalock 1222A, Baltimore, MD, 2I287, USA
| | - Jonathan A Teinor
- The John L. Cameron Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 N. Wolfe St. / Blalock 1222A, Baltimore, MD, 2I287, USA
| | - Ding Ding
- The John L. Cameron Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 N. Wolfe St. / Blalock 1222A, Baltimore, MD, 2I287, USA
| | - Richard A Burkhart
- The John L. Cameron Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 N. Wolfe St. / Blalock 1222A, Baltimore, MD, 2I287, USA
| | - John L Cameron
- The John L. Cameron Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 N. Wolfe St. / Blalock 1222A, Baltimore, MD, 2I287, USA
| | - Jin He
- The John L. Cameron Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 N. Wolfe St. / Blalock 1222A, Baltimore, MD, 2I287, USA
| | - Christopher L Wolfgang
- The John L. Cameron Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 N. Wolfe St. / Blalock 1222A, Baltimore, MD, 2I287, USA
| | - Matthew J Weiss
- The John L. Cameron Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 N. Wolfe St. / Blalock 1222A, Baltimore, MD, 2I287, USA
| | - Ammar A Javed
- The John L. Cameron Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 N. Wolfe St. / Blalock 1222A, Baltimore, MD, 2I287, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Wright MJ, Javed AA, Saunders T, Zhu Y, Burkhart RA, Yu J, He J, Cameron JL, Makary MA, Wolfgang CL, Weiss MJ. Surgical Resection of 78 Pancreatic Solid Pseudopapillary Tumors: a 30-Year Single Institutional Experience. J Gastrointest Surg 2020; 24:874-881. [PMID: 31073801 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-019-04252-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2019] [Accepted: 04/25/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Solid pseudopapillary tumors (SPTs) are rare, benign tumors of the pancreas that present as heterogeneous masses. We sought to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of surgical resected SPTs. Patients managed via initial surveillance were compared to those who underwent upfront resection. METHODS A prospectively maintained institutional database was used to identify patients who underwent surgical resection for a SPT between 1988 and 2018. Data on clinicopathological features and outcomes were collected and analyzed. RESULTS Seventy-eight patients underwent surgical resection for SPT during the study period. The mean age was 34.0 ± 14.6 years and a majority were female (N = 67, 85.9%) and white (N = 46, 58.9%). Thirty patients (37.9%) were diagnosed incidentally. Imaging-based presumed diagnosis was SPT in 49 patients (62.8%). A majority were located in the body or tail of the pancreas (N = 47, 60.3%), and 48 patients (61.5%) underwent a distal pancreatectomy. The median tumor size was 4.0 cm (IQR, 3.0-6.0), nodal disease was present in three patients (3.9%), and R0 resection was performed in all patients. No difference was observed in clinicopathological features and outcomes between patients who were initially managed via surveillance and those who underwent upfront resection. None of the patients under surveillance had nodal disease or metastasis at the time of resection; however, one of them developed recurrence of disease 95.1 months after resection. At a median follow-up of 36.1 months (IQR, 8.1-62.1), 77 (%) patients were alive and one patient (1.3%) had a recurrence of disease at 95.1 months after resection and subsequently died due to disease. CONCLUSIONS SPTs are rare pancreatic tumors that are diagnosed most frequently in young females. While a majority are benign and have an indolent course, malignant behavior has been observed. Surgical resection can result in exceptional outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J Wright
- The John L. Cameron Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ammar A Javed
- The John L. Cameron Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Tyler Saunders
- The John L. Cameron Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Yayun Zhu
- The John L. Cameron Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Richard A Burkhart
- The John L. Cameron Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jun Yu
- The John L. Cameron Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jin He
- The John L. Cameron Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - John L Cameron
- The John L. Cameron Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Martin A Makary
- The John L. Cameron Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Christopher L Wolfgang
- The John L. Cameron Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Matthew J Weiss
- The John L. Cameron Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA. .,Pancreas Cancer Multidisciplinary Clinic, Liver Cancer Multidisciplinary Clinic, Surgical Oncology Fellowship, Miller Coulson Academy of Clinical Excellence, Johns Hopkins University, 600 N. Wolfe St. / Blalock 685, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Javed AA, Wright MJ, Hasanain A, Chang K, Burkhart RA, Hruban RH, Thompson E, Fishman EK, Cameron JL, He J, Wolfgang CL, Weiss MJ. Pancreatic Nerve Sheath Tumors: a Single Institutional Series and Systematic Review of the Literature. J Gastrointest Surg 2020; 24:841-848. [PMID: 30941687 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-019-04201-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2018] [Accepted: 03/05/2019] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Improvement in imaging has resulted in frequent diagnosis of benign and premalignant pancreatic tumors. Pancreatic nerve sheath (PNS) tumors are one of the rarest pancreatic tumors. Literature on PNS is limited and their biology is poorly understood. Here, we report the largest series of PNS tumors to date and review the literature to evaluate the current data available on PNS tumors. METHODS An institutional database was used to identify patients who underwent resection for PNS tumors. Clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes of these patients were reported. Furthermore, a review of literature was performed. RESULTS From January 1994 through December 2016, seven patients underwent resection for PNS tumors. The median age was 57.7 years (IQR, 44.9-61.9) and the sex was approximately equally distributed (male = 4; 57.1%). Three (42.9%) patients were diagnosed incidentally and six (85.7%) were misdiagnosed as having other pancreatic tumors. The median tumor size was 2.1 (IQR 1.8-3.0) cm and six (85.7%) had no nodal disease. At a median follow-up of 15.5 (IQR 13.7-49.3) months, six patients were alive without evidence of disease and one patient was lost to follow-up. The literature review identified 49 studies reporting 54 patients with PNS tumors. Forty-six were misdiagnosed as having other pancreatic tumors. The median tumor size was 3.6 (range 1-20) cm, nodal disease was present in six patients (22.2%), and no patient had distant metastatic disease. At the time of last follow-up, all patients were free of disease. CONCLUSION This is the largest single institution series on PNS tumors reported to date. These tumors are rare and are often misdiagnosed, given their radiological characteristics. PNS tumors have a benign course of disease and surgical resection results in favorable long-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ammar A Javed
- Departments of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Michael J Wright
- Departments of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Alina Hasanain
- Departments of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Kevin Chang
- Departments of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Ralph H Hruban
- Departments of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Elliot K Fishman
- Departments of Radiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - John L Cameron
- Departments of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jin He
- Departments of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Matthew J Weiss
- Departments of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA.
- , Baltimore, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Kang JS, Higuchi R, He J, Yamamoto M, Wolfgang CL, Cameron JL, Han Y, Son D, Lee S, Choi YJ, Byun Y, Kim H, Kwon W, Kim SW, Park T, Jang JY. Proposal of the minimal number of retrieved regional lymph nodes for accurate staging of distal bile duct cancer and clinical validation of the three-tier lymph node staging system (AJCC 8th edition). J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2019; 27:75-83. [PMID: 31633308 DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The minimal required number of retrieved lymph nodes (MNRLNs) to enable accurate staging of distal bile duct (DBD) adenocarcinoma remains unclear. The three-tier 8th N staging system of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) for DBD adenocarcinoma has been recently released. The present study is aimed at proposing the MNRLNs for accurate staging and validating the 8th N stage. METHODS Between 1991 and 2015, patients with pathologically confirmed DBD adenocarcinoma who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy were enrolled. MNRLN was calculated via a log-rank test based on cut-off values. The concordance index (C-index) was utilized to compare the discrimination capability of the two- and three-tier N stages. RESULTS A total of 780 patients were enrolled. Lymph node (LN) positivity and 5-year overall survival (5-YOS) rates stabilized and significant survival differences between node-negative and -positive patients were observed when ≥12 LNs were retrieved. 5-YOS rates between each 8th N stage significantly differ (N0 vs. N1, P = 0.037; N1 vs. N2, P = 0.003). The C-index of the 8th N stage was higher than that of the 7th (0.59 vs. 0.57). CONCLUSIONS For accurate staging, at least 12 LNs should be retrieved. The three-tier N staging system is valid for clinical practice and has a more accurate prognostic predictability than the two-tier system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jae Seung Kang
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ryota Higuchi
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jin He
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Masakazu Yamamoto
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - John L Cameron
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Youngmin Han
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Donghee Son
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Sejong University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seungyeon Lee
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Sejong University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yoo Jin Choi
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yoonhyeong Byun
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hongbeom Kim
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Wooil Kwon
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sun-Whe Kim
- Center for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, National Cancer Center, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
| | - Taesung Park
- Department of Statistics and Interdisciplinary Program in Biostatistics, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin-Young Jang
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
He S, Ding D, Wright MJ, Groshek L, Javed AA, Ka-Wan Chu K, Burkhart RA, Cameron JL, Weiss MJ, Wolfgang CL, He J. The impact of high body mass index on patients undergoing robotic pancreatectomy: A propensity matched analysis. Surgery 2019; 167:556-559. [PMID: 31837833 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2019] [Revised: 11/01/2019] [Accepted: 11/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with high body mass index are associated with a higher risk of complications after open pancreatectomy. We aimed to investigate the perioperative outcome for patients with high body mass index after robotic pancreatectomy. METHODS This is a retrospective, propensity-score matched cohort analysis. From our prospectively maintained database, we identified consecutive patients with body mass index >25 who underwent robotic pancreatectomy between January 2016 and December 2018. Propensity score matching with open pancreatectomy was applied in 1:2 fashion based on age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, surgery type, histology, neoadjuvant therapy, and body mass index during the same study period. RESULTS A total of 127 patients were included. The mean age for all patients was 61.7 ± 12.8 years and 65 (51.2%) were male. Median body mass index was 29.9 (interquartile range, 27.0-31.8) for both groups. Propensity score matching provided equally distributed general demographic and clinicopathological factors. Robotic pancreatectomy was associated with decreased blood loss (100 mL vs 300 mL, P < .001) and shorter hospital stay (7 vs 9 days, P = .019). CONCLUSION Robotic pancreatectomy is associated with decreased blood loss and shorter length of hospital stay in overweight patients. Robotic approach may help alleviate morbidity in overweight patients undergoing pancreatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shengliang He
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Ding Ding
- Department of Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; The Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Center of Excellence Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Michael J Wright
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; The Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Center of Excellence Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Lara Groshek
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Ammar A Javed
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Kevin Ka-Wan Chu
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, China
| | - Richard A Burkhart
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; The Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Center of Excellence Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - John L Cameron
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; The Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Center of Excellence Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Matthew J Weiss
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; The Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Center of Excellence Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Christopher L Wolfgang
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; The Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Center of Excellence Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Jin He
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; The Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Center of Excellence Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Hutchings D, Jiang Z, Skaro M, Weiss MJ, Wolfgang CL, Makary MA, He J, Cameron JL, Zheng L, Klimstra DS, Brand RE, Singhi AD, Goggins M, Klein AP, Roberts NJ, Hruban RH. Histomorphology of pancreatic cancer in patients with inherited ATM serine/threonine kinase pathogenic variants. Mod Pathol 2019; 32:1806-1813. [PMID: 31285527 PMCID: PMC7403604 DOI: 10.1038/s41379-019-0317-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2019] [Revised: 06/05/2019] [Accepted: 06/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Germline pathogenic variants in the ATM serine/threonine kinase (ATM) gene are associated with an increased risk of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. It is important to identify germline ATM pathogenic variants in pancreatic cancer patients because these alterations are potentially targetable with chemotherapeutic drugs and/or radiation and have implications for other family members. As germline pathogenic variants in other genes have been associated with distinct histologic subtypes of pancreatic cancer, we studied the histomorphology of pancreatic cancer in 23 patients with germline ATM pathogenic variants. The histologic subtype was ductal adenocarcinoma in 19/23 (83%) of the patients, adenosquamous carcinoma in 1/23 (4%), and colloid (mucinous non-cystic) carcinoma in 3/23 (13%). The percentage of colloid (mucinous non-cystic) carcinomas is higher than we have previously observed in patients with familial and sporadic pancreatic cancer (1 and 2% in prior reports, p < 0.01 and p < 0.01, respectively). Three carcinomas (2 colloid carcinomas, 1 ductal adenocarcinoma) arose in association with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms. Among the resected pancreata, non-invasive precursor lesions, including pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia and incipient intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms, were identified in 83%. We conclude that pancreatic cancers in patients with germline ATM pathogenic variants are more frequently of colloid (mucinous non-cystic) morphology but are overall morphologically diverse supporting the utility of universal germline genetic testing for patients with pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle Hutchings
- Department of Pathology, the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Zhengdong Jiang
- Department of Pathology, the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Michael Skaro
- Department of Pathology, the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Matthew J Weiss
- Department of Surgery, the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Oncology, the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Christopher L Wolfgang
- Department of Surgery, the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Oncology, the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Martin A Makary
- Department of Surgery, the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Oncology, the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jin He
- Department of Surgery, the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Oncology, the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - John L Cameron
- Department of Surgery, the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Oncology, the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Lei Zheng
- Department of Oncology, the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - David S Klimstra
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Randall E Brand
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Health System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Aatur D Singhi
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Health System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Michael Goggins
- Department of Pathology, the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Alison P Klein
- Department of Oncology, the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Nicholas J Roberts
- Department of Pathology, the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
- Department of Oncology, the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - Ralph H Hruban
- Department of Pathology, the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
- Department of Oncology, the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Groot VP, Blair AB, Gemenetzis G, Ding D, Burkhart RA, Yu J, Borel Rinkes IH, Molenaar IQ, Cameron JL, Weiss MJ, Wolfgang CL, He J. Recurrence after neoadjuvant therapy and resection of borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2019; 45:1674-1683. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2018] [Revised: 03/14/2019] [Accepted: 04/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
|
49
|
Groot VP, Blair AB, Gemenetzis G, Ding D, Burkhart RA, van Oosten AF, Molenaar IQ, Cameron JL, Weiss MJ, Yang SC, Wolfgang CL, He J. Isolated pulmonary recurrence after resection of pancreatic cancer: the effect of patient factors and treatment modalities on survival. HPB (Oxford) 2019; 21:998-1008. [PMID: 30777697 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2018.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2018] [Accepted: 12/11/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The literature suggests favorable survival for patients with isolated pulmonary recurrence after resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) as compared to other recurrence patterns. Within this cohort, it remains unclear what factors are associated with improved survival. METHODS Patients who developed pulmonary recurrence after pancreatectomy were selected from a prospective database. Predictors for post-recurrence survival (PRS) were analyzed using a multivariable Cox regression model. RESULTS Ninety-six patients were included. Median recurrence-free survival (RFS), PRS and overall survival (OS) were 16.3, 18.8 and 39.6 months, respectively. Further systemic treatment and/or metastasectomy (n = 64, 67%) was associated with significantly improved PRS and OS when compared to best supportive care (n = 35, 22%) (26.3 vs. 5.3 and 48.1 vs. 18.4, respectively; both P < 0.001). Patients who were able to undergo metastasectomy (n = 19) achieved a PRS and OS of 35.0 and 68.9 months, respectively. More than 5 pulmonary lesions, symptoms and CA 19-9 ≥100 U/mL at time of recurrence were predictive of decreased PRS. A recurrence-free interval of >16 months and treatment for recurrence were independently associated with improved PRS. CONCLUSIONS Isolated pulmonary recurrence occurs in 13% of patients with recurrent PDAC and is associated with a median OS of 40 months. Aggressive treatment in highly selected patients was correlated with improved survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent P Groot
- Department of Surgery, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Alex B Blair
- Department of Surgery, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Georgios Gemenetzis
- Department of Surgery, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ding Ding
- Department of Surgery, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Richard A Burkhart
- Department of Surgery, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - A Floortje van Oosten
- Department of Surgery, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - I Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - John L Cameron
- Department of Surgery, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Matthew J Weiss
- Department of Surgery, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Stephen C Yang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Christopher L Wolfgang
- Department of Surgery, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jin He
- Department of Surgery, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Pulvirenti A, Pea A, Rezaee N, Gasparini C, Malleo G, Weiss MJ, Cameron JL, Wolfgang CL, He J, Salvia R. Perioperative outcomes and long-term quality of life after total pancreatectomy. Br J Surg 2019; 106:1819-1828. [PMID: 31282569 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2018] [Revised: 12/17/2018] [Accepted: 03/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Total pancreatectomy is required to treat diseases involving the entire pancreas, and is characterized by high morbidity rates and impaired long-term quality of life (QoL). To date, risk factors associated with perioperative and long-term outcomes have not been determined fully. METHODS Data from patients undergoing total pancreatectomy between 2000 and 2014 at two high-volume centres were analysed retrospectively to assess risk factors for major surgical complications. Short Form (SF) 36, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-PAN26 and Audit of Diabetes Dependent questionnaires, as well as an original survey were used to investigate factors influencing QoL. RESULTS A total of 329 consecutive patients underwent total pancreatectomy in the two centres. Overall, total pancreatectomy was associated with a morbidity rate of 59·3 per cent and a 30-day mortality rate of 2·1 per cent. Age over 65 years and long duration of surgery (more than 420 min) were independently associated with major complications (at least Clavien-Dindo grade III). QoL analysis was available for 94 patients (28·6 per cent) with a median follow-up of 63 (i.q.r. 20-109) months; the most common indication for total pancreatectomy in these patients was intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (46 per cent). Both physical (PCS) and mental (MCS) component summary scores of SF-36® were lower after total pancreatectomy compared with scores for a normative population (P = 0·020 and P < 0·001 respectively). Linear regression analysis showed that young age, abdominal pain and worse perception of body image were negatively associated with the PCS, whereas diabetes, sexual satisfaction and perception of body image affected MCS. CONCLUSION Total pancreatectomy can be performed with acceptable morbidity and mortality rates. Older patients had a higher risk of postoperative complications but reported better QoL than younger patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Pulvirenti
- Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - A Pea
- Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - N Rezaee
- Department of Surgery, Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - C Gasparini
- Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - G Malleo
- Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - M J Weiss
- Department of Surgery, Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - J L Cameron
- Department of Surgery, Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - C L Wolfgang
- Department of Surgery, Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - J He
- Department of Surgery, Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - R Salvia
- Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|