1
|
Clark AS, Hong F, Finn RS, DeMichele AM, Mitchell EP, Zwiebel J, Arnaldez FI, Gray RJ, Wang V, McShane LM, Rubinstein LV, Patton D, Williams PM, Hamilton SR, Copur MS, Kasbari SS, Thind R, Conley BA, Arteaga CL, O'Dwyer PJ, Harris LN, Chen AP, Flaherty KT. Phase II Study of Palbociclib (PD-0332991) in CCND1, 2, or 3 Amplification: Results from the NCI-MATCH ECOG-ACRIN Trial (EAY131) Subprotocol Z1B. Clin Cancer Res 2023; 29:1477-1483. [PMID: 36853016 PMCID: PMC10102836 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-2150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2022] [Revised: 10/07/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Cyclin D/CDK4/6 is critical in controlling the G1 to S checkpoint. CCND, the gene encoding cyclin D, is known to be amplified in a variety of solid tumors. Palbociclib is an oral CDK4/6 inhibitor, approved in advanced breast cancer in combination with endocrine therapy. We explored the efficacy of palbociclib in patients with nonbreast solid tumors containing an amplification in CCND1, 2, or 3. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with tumors containing a CCND1, 2, or 3 amplification and expression of the retinoblastoma protein were assigned to subprotocol Z1B and received palbociclib 125 mg once daily for 21 days of a 28-day cycle. Tumor response was assessed every two cycles. RESULTS Forty patients were assigned to subprotocol Z1B; 4 patients had outside assays identifying the CCND1, 2, or 3 amplification and were not confirmed centrally; 3 were ineligible and 2 were not treated (1 untreated patient was also ineligible), leaving 32 evaluable patients for this analysis. There were no partial responses; 12 patients (37.5%) had stable disease as best response. There were seven deaths on study, all during cycle 1 and attributable to disease progression. Median progression-free survival was 1.8 months. The most common toxicities were leukopenia (n = 21, 55%) and neutropenia (n = 19, 50%); neutropenia was the most common grade 3/4 event (n = 12, 32%). CONCLUSIONS Palbociclib was not effective at treating nonbreast solid tumors with a CCND1, 2, or 3 amplification in this cohort. These data do not support further investigation of single-agent palbociclib in tumors with CCND1, 2, or 3 amplification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy S. Clark
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Fangxin Hong
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute – ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Richard S. Finn
- University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | | | - Edith P. Mitchell
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - James Zwiebel
- Investigational Drug Branch, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, NCI, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Fernanda I. Arnaldez
- Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, NCI, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Robert J. Gray
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute – ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Victoria Wang
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute – ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lisa M. McShane
- Biometric Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, NCI, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Larry V. Rubinstein
- Biometric Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, NCI, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - David Patton
- Center for Biomedical Informatics and Information Technology, NCI, Bethesda, Maryland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Alice P. Chen
- Early Clinical Trials Development Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, NCI, Bethesda, Maryland
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sanoff HK, Goldberg RM, Ivanova A, O'Reilly S, Kasbari SS, Kim RD, McDermott R, Moore DT, Zamboni W, Grogan W, Cohn AL, Bekaii-Saab TS, Leonard G, Ryan T, Olowokure OO, Fernando NH, McCaffrey J, El-Rayes BF, Horgan AM, Sherrill GB, Yacoub GH, O'Neil BH. Multicenter, randomized, double-blind phase 2 trial of FOLFIRI with regorafenib or placebo as second-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. Cancer 2018; 124:3118-3126. [PMID: 29905927 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2018] [Revised: 03/20/2018] [Accepted: 04/11/2018] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Regorafenib, a multikinase inhibitor that inhibits angiogenesis, growth, and proliferation, prolongs survival as monotherapy in patients with refractory colorectal cancer. This international, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial assessed the efficacy of regorafenib with folinic acid, fluorouracil, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) as a second-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. METHODS Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who progressed on first-line oxaliplatin and fluoropyrimidine enrolled at 45 sites in the United States and Ireland. Patients, stratified by prior bevacizumab use, were randomized 2:1 to regorafenib or placebo. The treatment consisted of FOLFIRI on days 1 and 2 and days 15 and 16 with 160 mg of regorafenib or placebo on days 4 to 10 and days 18 to 24 of every 28-day cycle. Crossover was not allowed. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Under the assumption of a 75% event rate, 180 patients were required for 135 events to achieve 90% power to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.65 with a 1-sided α value of .1. RESULTS One hundred eighty-one patients were randomized (120 to regorafenib-FOLFIRI and 61 to placebo-FOLFIRI) with a median age of 62 years. Among these, 117 (65%) received prior bevacizumab or aflibercept. PFS was longer with regorafenib-FOLFIRI than placebo-FOLFIRI (median, 6.1 vs 5.3 months; HR, 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53-1.01; log-rank P = .056). The median overall survival was not longer (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.71-1.44). The response rate was higher with regorafenib-FOLFIRI (34%; 95% CI, 25%-44%) than placebo-FOLFIRI (21%; 95% CI, 11%-33%; P = .07). Grade 3/4 adverse events with a >5% absolute increase from regorafenib included diarrhea, neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, hypophosphatemia, and hypertension. CONCLUSIONS The addition of regorafenib to FOLFIRI as second-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer only modestly prolonged PFS over FOLFIRI alone. Cancer 2018. © 2018 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanna K Sanoff
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Richard M Goldberg
- Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, Ohio.,West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - Anastasia Ivanova
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | | | - Samer S Kasbari
- Southeastern Medical Oncology Center, Goldsboro, North Carolina
| | | | | | - Dominic T Moore
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - William Zamboni
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | | | | | - Tanios S Bekaii-Saab
- Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, Ohio.,Division of Hematology/Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | | | - Theresa Ryan
- New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, New York
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wakelee HA, Dahlberg SE, Keller SM, Tester WJ, Gandara DR, Graziano SL, Adjei AA, Leighl NB, Aisner SC, Rothman JM, Patel JD, Sborov MD, McDermott SR, Perez-Soler R, Traynor AM, Butts C, Evans T, Shafqat A, Chapman AE, Kasbari SS, Horn L, Ramalingam SS, Schiller JH. Adjuvant chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab in patients with resected non-small-cell lung cancer (E1505): an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2017; 18:1610-1623. [PMID: 29129443 PMCID: PMC5789803 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30691-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 114] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2017] [Revised: 08/23/2017] [Accepted: 08/23/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adjuvant chemotherapy for resected early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) provides a modest survival benefit. Bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody directed against VEGF, improves outcomes when added to platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced-stage non-squamous NSCLC. We aimed to evaluate the addition of bevacizumab to adjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage resected NSCLC. METHODS We did an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial of adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 and who had completely resected stage IB (≥4 cm) to IIIA (defined by the American Joint Committee on Cancer 6th edition) NSCLC. We enrolled patients from across the US National Clinical Trials Network, including patients from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ECOG-ACRIN) affiliates in Europe and from the Canadian Cancer Trials Group, within 6-12 weeks of surgery. The chemotherapy regimen for each patient was selected before randomisation and administered intravenously; it consisted of four 21-day cycles of cisplatin (75 mg/m2 on day 1 in all regimens) in combination with investigator's choice of vinorelbine (30 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8), docetaxel (75 mg/m2 on day 1), gemcitabine (1200 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8), or pemetrexed (500 mg/m2 on day 1). Patients in the bevacizumab group received bevacizumab 15 mg/kg intravenously every 21 days starting with cycle 1 of chemotherapy and continuing for 1 year. We randomly allocated patients (1:1) to group A (chemotherapy alone) or group B (chemotherapy plus bevacizumab), centrally, using permuted blocks sizes and stratified by chemotherapy regimen, stage of disease, histology, and sex. No one was masked to treatment assignment, except the Data Safety and Monitoring Committee. The primary endpoint was overall survival, analysed by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00324805. FINDINGS Between June 1, 2007, and Sept 20, 2013, 1501 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the two treatment groups: 749 to group A (chemotherapy alone) and 752 to group B (chemotherapy plus bevacizumab). 383 (26%) of 1458 patients (with complete staging information) had stage IB, 636 (44%) had stage II, and 439 (30%) had stage IIIA disease (stage of disease data were missing for 43 patients). Squamous cell histology was reported for 422 (28%) of 1501 patients. All four cisplatin-based chemotherapy regimens were used: 377 (25%) patients received vinorelbine, 343 (23%) received docetaxel, 283 (19%) received gemcitabine, and 497 (33%) received pemetrexed. At a median follow-up of 50·3 months (IQR 32·9-68·0), the estimated median overall survival in group A has not been reached, and in group B was 85·8 months (95% CI 74·9 to not reached); hazard ratio (group B vs group A) 0·99 (95% CI 0·82-1·19; p=0·90). Grade 3-5 toxicities of note (all attributions) that were reported more frequently in group B (the bevacizumab group) than in group A (chemotherapy alone) were overall worst grade (ie, all grade 3-5 toxicities; 496 [67%] of 738 in group A vs 610 [83%] of 735 in group B), hypertension (60 [8%] vs 219 [30%]), and neutropenia (241 [33%] vs 275 [37%]). The number of deaths on treatment did not differ between the groups (15 deaths in group A vs 19 in group B). Of these deaths, three in group A and ten in group B were considered at least possibly related to treatment. INTERPRETATION Addition of bevacizumab to adjuvant chemotherapy did not improve overall survival for patients with surgically resected early-stage NSCLC. Bevacizumab does not have a role in this setting and should not be considered as an adjuvant therapy for patients with resected early-stage NSCLC. FUNDING National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather A Wakelee
- Department of Medicine (Oncology), Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
| | - Suzanne E Dahlberg
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Steven M Keller
- Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Stephen L Graziano
- Division of Medical Oncology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | - Alex A Adjei
- Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | | | - Seena C Aisner
- Rutgers New Jersey Medical School and Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Newark, NJ, USA
| | | | - Jyoti D Patel
- Department of Medicine (Oncology), Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Sean R McDermott
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Anne M Traynor
- Department of Medicine (Oncology), University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Charles Butts
- Division of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Tracey Evans
- Department of Medicine (Oncology), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Atif Shafqat
- Heartland Cancer Research NCORP and Missouri Baptist Cancer Center, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Andrew E Chapman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Samer S Kasbari
- Southeast Clinical Oncology Research Consortium NCORP, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Leora Horn
- Department of Medicine (Oncology), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | | | - Joan H Schiller
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mustian KM, Janelsins MC, Peppone LJ, Sprod L, Palesh O, Kamen CS, Peoples AR, Heckler CE, Kasbari SS, Scalzo AJ, Reddy PS, Esparaz B, Morrow GR. Exercise for cancer-related fatigue and putative functional, inflammatory, and metabolic mechanisms in patients receiving chemotherapy: A URCC CCOP research base phase III RCT. J Clin Oncol 2013. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.tps9651] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
TPS9651 Background: Up to 100% of cancer patients report cancer-related fatigue (CRF) during chemotherapy which co-occurs with impaired cardiopulmonary (CPF) and neuromuscular function (NMF), chronically up-regulated inflammatory responses, and low metabolic energy expenditure. CRF interferes with completion of treatment, increases cancer morbidity and mortality, and impairs quality of life (QOL). Exercise is one of the most promising treatments available for CRF, but no large multicenter phase III RCTs have confirmed these findings and little is known about the mechanisms through which exercise may impact CRF. Methods: We are conducting a nationwide multicenter phase III RCT (N=692) through the URCC CCOP Research Base with 23 CCOP affiliates. The primary aim is to determine if exercise will significantly improve CRF, and secondarily, CPF, NMF, inflammation, energy expenditure, and QOL compared to standard care in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. The exercise intervention is our standardized, individually-tailored, home-based walking and progressive resistance program, “Exercise for Cancer Patients” (EXCAP, 7 days/wk, 6wks). To be eligible, patients must: 1) have a confirmed diagnosis of cancer with no leukemia or metastasis, 2) be chemotherapy naïve and scheduled to start, 3) not be receiving concurrent radiation, 4) have a KPS of >70, 5) be ≥21 years of age, 6) have no contraindications to exercise or functional testing, and 7) not be currently exercising. CRF and all secondary outcomes are assessed at baseline (pre-chemotherapy), 3 weeks (mid-intervention), and 6 weeks (post-intervention). Measures include: 1) CRF-Brief Fatigue Inventory, 2) CPF-6-minute walk test, 3) NMF-handgrip dynamometry, 4) inflammation-serum ELISA levels, 5) energy expenditure-actigraphy, and 6) quality of life-Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy. The DSMC reviewed the trial in October of 2012 and suggested it continue as planned. 532 participants have been enrolled in 36 months. Funding: NCI U10CA037420, U10CA37402-28, K07CA120025, K07CA132916, 1R25CA102618, ACS MRSG1300101CCE. Clinical trial information: NCT00924651.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Lisa Sprod
- University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | - Oxana Palesh
- Stanford University, School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|