1
|
Hijioka S, Yamashige D, Esaki M, Honda G, Higuchi R, Masui T, Shimizu Y, Ohtsuka M, Kumamoto Y, Katanuma A, Gotohda N, Akita H, Unno M, Endo I, Yokoyama Y, Yamada S, Matsumoto I, Ohtsuka T, Hirano S, Yasuda H, Kawai M, Aoki T, Nakamura M, Hashimoto D, Rikiyama T, Horiguchi A, Fujii T, Mizuno S, Hanada K, Tani M, Hatori T, Ito T, Okuno M, Kagawa S, Tajima H, Ishii T, Sugimoto M, Onoe S, Takami H, Takada R, Miura T, Kurita Y, Kamei K, Mataki Y, Okazaki K, Takeyama Y, Yamaue H, Satoi S. Factors Affecting Nonfunctioning Small Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms and Proposed New Treatment Strategies. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024:S1542-3565(24)00351-3. [PMID: 38615727 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2024.03.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Revised: 03/06/2024] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Despite previously reported treatment strategies for nonfunctioning small (≤20 mm) pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs), uncertainties persist. We aimed to evaluate the surgically resected cases of nonfunctioning small pNENs (NF-spNENs) in a large Japanese cohort to elucidate an optimal treatment strategy for NF-spNENs. METHODS In this Japanese multicenter study, data were retrospectively collected from patients who underwent pancreatectomy between January 1996 and December 2019, were pathologically diagnosed with pNEN, and were treated according to the World Health Organization 2019 classification. Overall, 1490 patients met the eligibility criteria, and 1014 were included in the analysis cohort. RESULTS In the analysis cohort, 606 patients (59.8%) had NF-spNENs, with 82% classified as grade 1 (NET-G1) and 18% as grade 2 (NET-G2) or higher. The incidence of lymph node metastasis (N1) by grade was significantly higher in NET-G2 (G1: 3.1% vs G2: 15.0%). Independent factors contributing to N1 were NET-G2 or higher and tumor diameter ≥15 mm. The predictive ability of tumor size for N1 was high. Independent factors contributing to recurrence included multiple lesions, NET-G2 or higher, tumor diameter ≥15 mm, and N1. However, the independent factor contributing to survival was tumor grade (NET-G2 or higher). The appropriate timing for surgical resection of NET-G1 and NET-G2 or higher was when tumors were >20 and >10 mm, respectively. For neoplasms with unknown preoperative grades, tumor size >15 mm was considered appropriate. CONCLUSIONS NF-spNENs are heterogeneous with varying levels of malignancy. Therefore, treatment strategies based on tumor size alone can be unreliable; personalized treatment strategies that consider tumor grading are preferable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susumu Hijioka
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Daiki Yamashige
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Minoru Esaki
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Goro Honda
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ryota Higuchi
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Toshihiko Masui
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Shimizu
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Masayuki Ohtsuka
- Department of General Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yusuke Kumamoto
- Department of General-Pediatric-Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Akio Katanuma
- Center for Gastroenterology, Teine Keijinkai Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Naoto Gotohda
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Hirofumi Akita
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Michiaki Unno
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Itaru Endo
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Yukihiro Yokoyama
- Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Suguru Yamada
- Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Ippei Matsumoto
- Department of Surgery, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takao Ohtsuka
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima, Japan
| | - Satoshi Hirano
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Yasuda
- Department of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Manabu Kawai
- Second Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Taku Aoki
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Masafumi Nakamura
- Department of Surgery and Oncology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | | | - Toshiki Rikiyama
- Department of Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| | - Akihiko Horiguchi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Fujita Health University School of Medicine Bantane Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Tsutomu Fujii
- Department of Surgery and Science, Faculty of Medicine, Academic Assembly, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
| | - Shugo Mizuno
- Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Mie University, Mie, Japan
| | - Keiji Hanada
- Department of Gastroenterology, Onomichi General Hospital, Onomichi, Japan
| | - Masaji Tani
- Department of Surgery, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Japan
| | - Takashi Hatori
- Digestive Diseases Center, International University of Health and Welfare, Mita Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tetsuhide Ito
- Neuroendocrine Tumor Center, Fukuoka Sanno Hospital, International University of Health and Welfare, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Masataka Okuno
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Shingo Kagawa
- Department of General Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Tajima
- Department of General-Pediatric-Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Ishii
- Center for Gastroenterology, Teine Keijinkai Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Motokazu Sugimoto
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Shunsuke Onoe
- Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Hideki Takami
- Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Ryoji Takada
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takayuki Miura
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Yusuke Kurita
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Keiko Kamei
- Department of Surgery, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yuko Mataki
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima, Japan
| | - Kazuichi Okazaki
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kansai Medical University Kori Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yoshifumi Takeyama
- Department of Surgery, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hiroki Yamaue
- Second Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Sohei Satoi
- Department of Surgery, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Criss CR, Makary MS. Liver-Directed Locoregional Therapies for Neuroendocrine Liver Metastases: Recent Advances and Management. Curr Oncol 2024; 31:2076-2091. [PMID: 38668057 PMCID: PMC11049250 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31040154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2024] [Revised: 03/27/2024] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a heterogeneous class of cancers, predominately occurring in the gastroenteropancreatic system, which pose a growing health concern with a significant rise in incidence over the past four decades. Emerging from neuroendocrine cells, these tumors often elicit paraneoplastic syndromes such as carcinoid syndrome, which can manifest as a constellation of symptoms significantly impacting patients' quality of life. The prognosis of NETs is influenced by their tendency for metastasis, especially in cases involving the liver, where the estimated 5-year survival is between 20 and 40%. Although surgical resection remains the preferred curative option, challenges emerge in cases of neuroendocrine tumors with liver metastasis (NELM) with multifocal lobar involvement, and many patients may not meet the criteria for surgery. Thus, minimally invasive and non-surgical treatments, such as locoregional therapies, have surfaced. Overall, these approaches aim to prioritize symptom relief and aid in overall tumor control. This review examines locoregional therapies, encompassing catheter-driven procedures, ablative techniques, and radioembolization therapies. These interventions play a pivotal role in enhancing progression-free survival and managing hormonal symptoms, contributing to the dynamic landscape of evolving NELM treatment. This review meticulously explores each modality, presenting the current state of the literature on their utilization and efficacy in addressing NELM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cody R. Criss
- Department of Internal Medicine, OhioHealth Riverside Methodist Hospital, Columbus, OH 43214, USA;
| | - Mina S. Makary
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43240, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hofland J, Refardt JC, Feelders RA, Christ E, de Herder WW. Approach to the Patient: Insulinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2024; 109:1109-1118. [PMID: 37925662 PMCID: PMC10940262 DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgad641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2023] [Revised: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 10/27/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023]
Abstract
Insulinomas are hormone-producing pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms with an estimated incidence of 1 to 4 cases per million per year. Extrapancreatic insulinomas are extremely rare. Most insulinomas present with the Whipple triad: (1) symptoms, signs, or both consistent with hypoglycemia; (2) a low plasma glucose measured at the time of the symptoms and signs; and (3) relief of symptoms and signs when the glucose is raised to normal. Nonmetastatic insulinomas are nowadays referred to as "indolent" and metastatic insulinomas as "aggressive." The 5-year survival of patients with an indolent insulinoma has been reported to be 94% to 100%; for patients with an aggressive insulinoma, this amounts to 24% to 67%. Five percent to 10% of insulinomas are associated with the multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 syndrome. Localization of the insulinoma and exclusion or confirmation of metastatic disease by computed tomography is followed by endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging for indolent, localized insulinomas. Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor positron emission tomography/computed tomography or positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging is a highly sensitive localization technique for seemingly occult, indolent, localized insulinomas. Supportive measures and somatostatin receptor ligands can be used for to control hypoglycemia. For single solitary insulinomas, curative surgical excision remains the treatment of choice. In aggressive malignant cases, debulking procedures, somatostatin receptor ligands, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, everolimus, sunitinib, and cytotoxic chemotherapy can be valuable options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Hofland
- ENETS Center of Excellence, Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, Erasmus MC and Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Julie C Refardt
- ENETS Center of Excellence, Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, Erasmus MC and Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- ENETS Center of Excellence, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Metabolism, University Hospital Basel, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Richard A Feelders
- ENETS Center of Excellence, Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, Erasmus MC and Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Emanuel Christ
- ENETS Center of Excellence, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Metabolism, University Hospital Basel, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Wouter W de Herder
- ENETS Center of Excellence, Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, Erasmus MC and Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
Gastric neuroendocrine tumors (G-NET) are rare tumors arising from enterochromaffin-like cells of the gastric mucosa. They belong to a larger group called gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and are classified as low, intermediate, or high-grade tumors based on their proliferative indices. They are further categorized into three subtypes based on their morphologic characteristics, pathogenesis, and behavior. Types 1 and 2 tumors are characterized by elevated serum gastrin and are usually multifocal. They typically occur in the setting of atrophic gastritis or MEN1/Zollinger Ellison syndrome, respectively. Type 2 tumors are associated with the most symptoms, such as abdominal pain and diarrhea. Type 3 tumors are associated with normal serum gastrin, are usually solitary, and occur sporadically. This type has the most aggressive phenotype and metastatic potential. Treatment and prognosis for G-NET is dependent on their type, size, and stage. Type 1 has the best prognosis, and Type 3 has the worst. This review discusses the presentation, workup, and surgical management of these tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin Sok
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Pranay S Ajay
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Vasileios Tsagkalidis
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - David A Kooby
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Mihir M Shah
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Stumpo S, Formelli MG, Persano I, Parlagreco E, Lauricella E, Rodriquenz MG, Guerrera LP, Zurlo IV, Campana D, Brizzi MP, Cives M, La Salvia A, Lamberti G. Extrapulmonary Neuroendocrine Carcinomas: Current Management and Future Perspectives. J Clin Med 2023; 12:7715. [PMID: 38137784 PMCID: PMC10743506 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12247715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2023] [Revised: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) are poorly differentiated and highly aggressive epithelial neuroendocrine neoplasms. The most common primary site is the lung, but they may arise in every organ. Approximately 37% of extrapulmonary NECs (EP-NECs) occur in the gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) tract, followed by the genitourinary (GU) system and gynecological tract. As a result of their rarity, there is scant evidence to guide treatment recommendations, and a multidisciplinary approach is essential for the management of such patients. Platinum-based chemotherapy currently represents the standard of care for EP-NECs of any site, mirroring the management of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), but further approaches are still under investigation. Indeed, ongoing trials evaluating targeted therapies, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), and radionuclide therapy could provide potentially breakthrough therapeutic options. Given the relative dearth of evidence-based literature on these orphan diseases, the aim of this review is to provide an overview of the pathology and current treatment options, as well as to shed light on the most pressing unmet needs in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Stumpo
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum–University of Bologna, Via Zamboni 33, 40126 Bologna, Italy; (S.S.); (M.G.F.); (D.C.); (G.L.)
| | - Maria Giovanna Formelli
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum–University of Bologna, Via Zamboni 33, 40126 Bologna, Italy; (S.S.); (M.G.F.); (D.C.); (G.L.)
| | - Irene Persano
- Medical Oncology, AO S. Croce e Carle, 12100 Cuneo, Italy; (I.P.); (E.P.)
| | - Elena Parlagreco
- Medical Oncology, AO S. Croce e Carle, 12100 Cuneo, Italy; (I.P.); (E.P.)
| | - Eleonora Lauricella
- Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Consorziale Policlinico di Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy; (E.L.); (M.C.)
| | - Maria Grazia Rodriquenz
- Oncology Unit, Ospedale IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, 71013 San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy;
| | - Luigi Pio Guerrera
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80131 Naples, Italy;
- Sarcomas and Rare Tumors Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS-Fondazione “G. Pascale”, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | | | - Davide Campana
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum–University of Bologna, Via Zamboni 33, 40126 Bologna, Italy; (S.S.); (M.G.F.); (D.C.); (G.L.)
- Medical Oncology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via P. Albertoni 15, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Maria Pia Brizzi
- Department of Oncology, A.O.U. San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, 10043 Orbassano, Italy;
| | - Mauro Cives
- Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Consorziale Policlinico di Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy; (E.L.); (M.C.)
- Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70121 Bari, Italy
| | - Anna La Salvia
- National Center for Drug Research and Evaluation, National Institute of Health (ISS), 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Lamberti
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum–University of Bologna, Via Zamboni 33, 40126 Bologna, Italy; (S.S.); (M.G.F.); (D.C.); (G.L.)
- Medical Oncology Unit, Vito Fazzi Hospital, 73100 Lecce, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|