Contour abnormalities of the abdomen after breast reconstruction with abdominal flaps: the role of muscle preservation

Bilateral Autogenous Breast Reconstruction Using Perforator Free Flaps: A Single Center???s Experience

The authors present a single center's experience in bilateral breast reconstruction using perforator free flaps. The aim of this study was to show their indications, surgical technique, and results. A series of 53 patients underwent this procedure between February of 1996 and October of 2002. The surgical procedures were performed on patients with bilateral breast cancer (11 patients), patients with unilateral breast cancer and contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (22 patients), patients who had undergone bilateral prophylactic mastectomy (18 patients), a patient with Poland's syndrome, and a patient whose aesthetic breast augmentation had failed. Primary and secondary bilateral breast reconstructions were done in 18 and four patients, respectively. Eighteen patients who had earlier undergone breast reconstruction with implants had a tertiary breast reconstruction. Combined reconstruction (primary with secondary and primary with tertiary reconstruction) was done in 13 patients. Ninety-eight deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps and eight superior gluteal artery perforator flaps were used. The average operative time was 10 hours (range, 8 to 14.5 hours) for the simultaneous bilateral reconstruction. Total flap necrosis occurred in two cases (one deep inferior epigastric perforator flap and one superior gluteal artery perforator flap). Partial flap necrosis was not encountered, and fat necrosis was found in one deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (1 percent). Two pulmonary infections, one deep vein thrombosis, and one cardiac arrhythmia occurred as postoperative complications. The mean hospital stay was 9 days (range, 6 to 20 days). Abdominal bulging was reported in one patient. There were no recurrent disease or cancer manifestations, with an average follow-up of 3.5 years. This series clearly shows that perforator flaps are reliable and useful tools for bilateral breast reconstruction. This technique decreases the donor-site morbidity and offers an excellent aesthetic and long-term outcome and high patient satisfaction.

A 10-year retrospective review of 758 DIEP flaps for breast reconstruction

This study examined 758 deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps for breast reconstruction, with respect to risk factors and associated complications. Risk factors that demonstrated significant association with any breast or abdominal complication included smoking (p = 0.0000), postreconstruction radiotherapy (p = 0.0000), and hypertension (p = 0.0370). Ninety-eight flaps (12.9 percent) developed fat necrosis. Associated risk factors were smoking (p = 0.0226) and postreconstruction radiotherapy (p = 0.0000). Interestingly, as the number of perforators increased, so did the incidence of fat necrosis. There were only 19 cases (2.5 percent) of partial flap loss and four cases (0.5 percent) of total flap loss. Patients with 45 flaps (5.9 percent) were returned to the operating room before the second-stage procedure. Patients with 29 flaps (3.8 percent) were returned to the operating room because of venous congestion. Venous congestion and any complication were observed to be statistically unrelated to the number of venous anastomoses. Overall, postoperative abdominal hernia or bulge occurred after only five reconstructions (0.7 percent). Complication rates in this large series were comparable to those in retrospective reviews of pedicle and free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flaps. Previous studies of the free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap described breast complication rates ranging from 8 to 13 percent and abdominal complication rates ranging from 0 to 82 percent. It was noted that, with experience in microsurgical techniques and perforator selection, the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap offers distinct advantages to patients, in terms of decreased donor-site morbidity and shorter recovery periods. Mastery of this flap provides reconstructive surgeons with more extensive options for the treatment of postmastectomy patients.

Breast reconstruction in private practice

Comprehensive breast reconstruction can be performed in private practice. Our practice philosophy is that autogenous tissue provides the best substrate for breast reconstruction; the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap is our primary method of breast reconstruction. Microsurgical training and a group practice model permit routine use of all autogenous tissue techniques. Office, operating room, and hospital teams must be assembled; these teams follow clinical pathways, which make the execution of reconstructive procedures consistent and efficient. The practice must implement a plan for physician and patient education. The practice must review clinical outcomes, making adjustments in operative techniques and pre- and postoperative clinical pathways so that the best results can be achieved with a low complication rate. Breast reconstruction is a core service of our practice. We have accrued an economy of scale including these features: intraoperative and clinical efficiency, low practice overhead costs, and a high patient satisfaction rate.

Comparison of the Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap and Free Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Flap in Postmastectomy Reconstruction: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

This study compared the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap and the free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap in postmastectomy reconstruction using a cost-effectiveness analysis. A decision analytic model was used. Medical costs associated with the two techniques were estimated from the Ontario Ministry of Health Schedule of Benefits for 2002. Hospital costs were obtained from St. Joseph's Healthcare, a university teaching hospital in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. The utilities of clinically important health states related to breast reconstruction were obtained from 32 "experts" across Canada and converted into quality-adjusted life years. The probabilities of these various clinically important health states being associated with the DIEP and free TRAM flaps were obtained after a thorough review of the literature. The DIEP flap was more costly than the free TRAM flap ($7026.47 versus $6508.29), but it provided more quality-adjusted life years than the free TRAM flap (28.88 years versus 28.53 years). The baseline incremental cost-utility ratio was $1464.30 per quality-adjusted life year, favoring adoption of the DIEP flap. Sensitivity analyses were performed by assuming that the probabilities of occurrence of hernia, abdominal bulging, total flap loss, operating room time, and hospital stay were identical with the DIEP and free TRAM techniques. By assuming that the probability of postoperative hernia for the DIEP flap increased from 0.008 to 0.054 (same as for TRAM flap), the incremental cost-utility ratio changed to $1435.00 per quality-adjusted life year. A sensitivity analysis was performed for the complication of hernia because the DIEP flap allegedly diminishes this complication. Increasing the probability of abdominal bulge from 0.041 to 0.103 for the DIEP flap changed the ratio to $2731.78 per quality-adjusted life year. When the probability of total flap failure was increased from 0.014 to 0.016, the ratio changed to $1384.01 per quality-adjusted life year. When the time in the operating room was assumed to be the same for both flaps, the ratio changed to $4026.57 per quality-adjusted life year. If the hospital stay was assumed to be the same for both flaps, the ratio changed to $1944.30 per quality-adjusted life year. On the basis of the baseline calculation and sensitivity analyses, the DIEP flap remained a cost-effective procedure. Thus, adoption of this new technique for postmastectomy reconstruction is warranted in the Canadian health care system.

Do pre-operative abdominal exercises prevent post-operative donor site complications for women undergoing DIEP flap breast reconstruction? A two-centre, prospective randomised controlled trial

The deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is the gold standard for breast reconstruction using abdominal tissue. Unlike the transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap, no rectus abdominis muscle is removed with the flap, but intra-muscular scarring can still cause post-operative complications. Strong abdominal muscles have been advocated as a prerequisite for surgery, but without any evidence as to the potential benefits. This study aimed to investigate the effect of pre-operative abdominal exercises on inpatient pain levels, length of hospital stay, post-operative abdominal muscle strength and function following a DIEP flap.Ninety-three women undergoing delayed breast reconstruction with a DIEP flap between October 1999 and November 2000 were randomly allocated to either a control or exercise group. The exercise group performed pre-operative exercises using the Abdotrim abdominal exerciser. Pre-operatively, outcome measures included trunk muscle strength measured on an isokinetic dynamometer, SF-36, rectus muscle thickness measured using ultrasound, and submaximal fitness. Post-operative pain and length of hospital stay were recorded. Subjects were reassessed using the same outcome measures 1 year post-operatively. There was a statistically significant increase in static (isometric) muscle strength and thickness pre-operatively for the exercise group. One year following surgery, there was a significant decrease in dynamic (concentric and eccentric) flexion strength for both groups, although the clinical significance of this is questionable as the majority of women had returned to pre-operative fitness and the surgery had no impact on functional activities. The static flexion strength of the control group was reduced at 1 year, whereas it was maintained in the exercise group, although this was not statistically significant. One third of women in the control group complained of functional problems or abdominal pain post-operatively compared to one fifth of the exercise group. Overall, the DIEP flap had no major impact on abdominal muscle strength for either group, demonstrating its superiority over the TRAM flap. There was no statistically significant benefit to the exercise group of the pre-operative exercises 1 year following surgery. However, there was a subjective benefit, albeit statistically nonsignificant, in terms of reduced functional problems post-operatively and improved well-being prior to surgery.

Free flap complications: when is enough, enough?

The reconstruction of head and neck defects, be they traumatic, oncologic, or iatrogenic, has been revolutionized in the last two decades by the development and refinement of microvascular soft tissue transfer. What was once an onerous and often unpredictable procedure has become standardized and safe. The result is that free tissue transfer is becoming the standard of care for more and more patients, to the point that the profession must now readdress the role of more traditional techniques of reconstruction. This article reviews the recent literature on free flap-related complications to assess the appropriateness of widespread free flap reconstruction and discusses the changing indications and benefits of free tissue transfer and nonmicrovascular reconstruction.

The dissection of the rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap with complete preservation of the anterior rectus sheath

Harvesting the rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap results in defects in both the rectus abdominis muscle and the anterior rectus sheath, which may be circumvented by dissecting a perforator flap (DIEP flap) instead. However, the latter is associated with a reduction in the number of myocutaneous perforators nourishing the flap, which has been hypothesised to lead to an increased risk of partial flap failure. We present a technical modification that maintains all the feeding perforators within the flap while fully preserving the anterior rectus sheath. The anterior rectus sheath is incised along a line connecting the perforators. A muscle cuff including all the feeding perforators was raised with the flap. This technique was used in 20 consecutive patients. Nine patients underwent free TRAM flap transfers for breast reconstruction (10 flaps), and 11 patients underwent thoracic-wall reconstruction with a superiorly based pedicled flap. The median follow-up was 11 months. One patient with a pedicled flap developed a partial failure that required surgical revision; all other flaps healed spontaneously. One patient in each subset had preoperative abdominal-wall laxity that was partly corrected after surgery; no abdominal bulging or hernia occurred in the other patients. Our results suggest that the technical modification presented here may enable the surgeon to dissect a rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap with maximal perforator-related flap perfusion and minimal donor-site morbidity. An advantage over the DIEP flap is that this technique is applicable to both free and pedicled flaps.

Breast reconstruction in the elderly: preserving excellent quality of life

There is a paucity of information in the literature that focuses on quality-of-life issues after mastectomy with breast reconstruction in elderly women. The purpose of this study was to review the authors' experience with breast reconstruction after mastectomy in women older than 65 years of age. Emphasis was placed on the types of reconstructions, outcomes, and evaluation of issues related to quality of life. Between July 1997 and July 2001, 316 consecutive women (400 reconstructions) with breast cancer underwent mastectomy with reconstruction at the authors' institution. Of these women, 24 (28 reconstructions) were at least 65 years old. Mean patient age was 69.3 years (range, 65-77 years). Methods of breast reconstruction included two-stage implant reconstruction (50%), free tissue transfer (transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous or deep inferior epigastric perforator flap, 25%), pedicle transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap (14%), or a latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap (11%). Outcomes were assessed with the use of a self-reported questionnaire (SF-36) addressing health-related quality of life, body image, and physical functioning. With respect to overall quality-of-life issues after reconstruction, older patients with breast reconstruction scored higher (better outcomes) than age-matched general population patients and previously reported mastectomy-only patients (>55 years) in all surveyed areas. Specifically, study patients reported dramatic increases (better outcomes) in the subscales that are strongly influenced by one's mental health. However, when compared with prior data for younger patients undergoing mastectomy and reconstruction, the older patients scored lower (worse outcomes) in the areas related to physical function. The older patients maintained superior scores (better outcomes) over the younger patients in the subscales influenced by one's mental health.

Perforator flaps: evolution, classification, and applications

In this article, the authors review the literature regarding perforator flaps. Musculocutaneous perforator flaps have evolved from musculocutaneous flaps and offer several distinct advantages. By sparing muscle tissue, thus reducing donor site morbidity and functional loss, perforator flaps are indicated for a number of clinical problems. The versatility of the perforator flap makes it ideal for the reconstruction of three-dimensional defects such as breast reconstruction or as a thin flap for resurfacing shallow wounds when bulk is considered a disadvantage. The authors review the historical development of the perforator flap and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of perforator flaps compared with free and pedicled musculocutaneous flaps. The nomenclature traditionally used for perforator flaps is confusing and lacks a standardized anatomic basis. The authors present a method to describe all perforator flaps according to their artery of origin.

Breast Reconstruction with the free TRAM or DIEP flap: patient selection, choice of flap, and outcome

Recent reports of breast reconstruction with the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap indicate increased fat necrosis and venous congestion as compared with the free transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) flap. Although the benefits of the DIEP flap regarding the abdominal wall are well documented, its reconstructive advantage remains uncertain. The main objective of this study was to address selection criteria for the free TRAM and DIEP flaps on the basis of patient characteristics and vascular anatomy of the flap that might minimize flap morbidity. A total of 163 free TRAM or DIEP flap breast reconstructions were performed on 135 women between 1997 and 2000. Four levels of muscle sparing related to the rectus abdominis muscle were used. The free TRAM flap was performed on 118 women, of whom 93 were unilateral and 25 were bilateral, totaling 143 flaps. The DIEP flap procedure was performed on 17 women, of whom 14 were unilateral and three were bilateral, totaling 20 flaps. Morbidities related to the 143 free TRAM flaps included return to the operating room for 11 flaps (7.7 percent), total necrosis in five flaps (3.5 percent), mild fat necrosis in 14 flaps (9.8 percent), mild venous congestion in two flaps (1.4 percent), and lower abdominal bulge in eight women (6.8 percent). Partial flap necrosis did not occur. Morbidities related to the 20 DIEP flaps included return to the operating room for three flaps (15 percent), total necrosis in one flap (5 percent), and mild fat necrosis in two flaps (10 percent). Partial flap necrosis, venous congestion, and a lower abdominal bulge were not observed. Selection of the free TRAM or DIEP flap should be made on the basis of patient weight, quantity of abdominal fat, and breast volume requirement, and on the number, caliber, and location of the perforating vessels. Occurrence of venous congestion and total flap loss in the free TRAM and DIEP flaps appears to be independent of the patient age, weight, degree of muscle sparing, and tobacco use. The occurrence of fat necrosis is related to patient weight (p < 0.001) but not related to patient age or preservation of the rectus abdominis muscle. The ability to perform a sit-up is related to patient weight (p < 0.001) and patient age (p < 0.001) but not related to preservation of the muscle or intercostal nerves. The incidence of lower abdominal bulge is reduced after DIEP flap reconstruction (p < 0.001). The DIEP flap can be an excellent option for properly selected women.