Care of patients coinfected with HIV and hepatitis C virus: 2007 updated recommendations from the HCV-HIV International Panel

Hepatitis C virus treatment rates and outcomes in HIV/hepatitis C virus co-infected individuals at an urban HIV clinic

OBJECTIVES

The factors associated with hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment uptake and responses were assessed among HCV/HIV co-infected individuals referred for HCV therapy at an urban HIV clinic.

METHODS

Retrospective review of HIV/HCV patients enrolled in the HCV treatment program at the John Ruedy Immunodeficiency Clinic in Vancouver. The factors associated with treatment uptake were assessed using multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 134 HCV/HIV co-infected individuals were recalled for assessment for HCV therapy. Overall 64 (48%) initiated treatment, and of those treated 49 (76.6%) attained end treatment response, whereas 35 (57.8%) achieved sustained virological response (SVR). When evaluated by genotype, 53% (17/32) of those with genotype 1, and 65% (20/31) of those with genotype 2 or 3 infections attained SVR. In treated individuals, alanine aminotransferase dropped significantly after treatment (P<0.001). During treatment, CD4 counts dropped significantly (P<0.001) in all patients. The counts recovered to baseline in patients who achieved SVR, but remained lower in patients who failed the therapy (P=0.015). On multivariate analysis, history of injection drug use (odds ratio: 3.48; 95% confidence interval: 1.37-8.79; P=0.009) and low hemoglobin levels (odds ratio: 4.23; 95% confidence interval: 1.36-13.10; P=0.013) were associated with those who did not enter the treatment.

CONCLUSION

Only half of treatment-eligible co-infected patients referred for the therapy initiated treatment. Of those referred for the therapy, history of injection drug use was associated with lower rates of treatment uptake. Treated HIV/HCV co-infected individuals benefitted from both decreased alanine aminotransferase (independent of SVR), and rates of SVR similar to those described in HCV monoinfected patients.

HIV, alcohol dependence, and the criminal justice system: a review and call for evidence-based treatment for released prisoners

BACKGROUND

People with both HIV and alcohol use disorders (AUDs) are disproportionately concentrated within the U.S. criminal justice system; approximately one-quarter of all people with HIV cycle through the system each year. HIV-infected prisoners with AUDs face many obstacles as they transition back to the community. Specifically, although they have impressive HIV treatment outcomes during the period of incarceration while they are free from alcohol; upon [corrected] release, however, they face inordinate challenges including relapse to alcohol use resulting in significant morbidity and mortality.

OBJECTIVE

To review the existing literature regarding the relationship of HIV and treatment for AUDs within the criminal justice system in an effort to determine "best practices" that might effectively result in improved treatment of HIV and AUDs for released prisoners.

METHODS

PubMed, PsychInfo and Medline were queried for articles published in English from 1990 to 2009. Selected references from primary articles were also examined.

RESULTS

Randomized controlled trials affirm the role of pharmacotherapy using naltrexone (NTX) as the therapeutic option conferring the best treatment outcome for AUDs in community settings. Absent from these trials were inclusion of released prisoners or HIV-infected individuals. Relapse to alcohol abuse among HIV-infected prisoners is associated with reduced retention in care, poor adherence to antiretroviral therapy with consequential poor HIV treatment outcomes and higher levels of HIV risk behaviors.

CONCLUSIONS AND SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE

Untreated alcohol dependence, particularly for released HIV-infected prisoners, has negative consequences both for the individual and society and requires a concentrated effort and rethinking of our existing approaches for this vulnerable population.

Treatment of acute hepatitis C in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients: the HEPAIG study

Acute hepatitis C continues to be a concern in men who have sex with men (MSM), and its optimal management has yet to be established. In this study, the clinical, biological, and therapeutic data of 53 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected MSM included in a multicenter prospective study on acute hepatitis C in 2006-2007 were retrospectively collected and analyzed. The mean hepatitis C virus (HCV) viral load at diagnosis was 5.8 ± 1.1 log(10) IU/mL (genotype 4, n = 28; genotype 1, n = 14, genotype 3, n = 7). The cumulative rates of spontaneous HCV clearance were 11.0% and 16.5% 3 and 6 months after diagnosis, respectively. Forty patients were treated, 38 of whom received pegylated interferon and ribavirin. The mean duration of HCV therapy was 39 ± 17 weeks (24 ± 4 weeks in 14 cases). On treatment, 18/36 (50.0%; 95% confidence interval 34.3-65.7) patients had undetectable HCV RNA at week 4 (RVR), and 32/39 (82.1%; 95 confidence interval 70.0-94.1) achieved sustained virological response (SVR). SVR did not correlate with pretreatment parameters, including HCV genotype, but correlated with RVR (predictive positive value of 94.4%) and with effective duration of HCV therapy (64.3% for 24 ± 4 weeks versus 92.0% for longer treatment; P = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

The low rate of spontaneous clearance and the high SVR rates argue for early HCV therapy following diagnosis of acute hepatitis C in HIV-infected MSM. Pegylated interferon and ribavirin seem to be the best option. The duration of treatment should be modulated according to RVR, with a 24-week course for patients presenting RVR and a 48-week course for those who do not, irrespectively of HCV genotype.

Differences in liver fibrosis and response to pegylated interferon plus ribavirin in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients with normal vs elevated liver enzymes

Severity of liver fibrosis and response to pegylated interferon plus ribavirin (pegIFN-RBV) are not well known in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients with persistently normal alanine aminotransferase (PNALT). All HIV/HCV-coinfected patients who had been assessed for liver fibrosis using elastometry during 2005 at our clinic were evaluated. Those with at least 1 year with three prior consecutive ALT measurements below the upper limit of normality were compared with patients with elevated ALT. Response to pegIFN-RBV was assessed in a subset of these patients. We analysed 87 patients with PNALT and 122 with elevated ALT. Compared to patients with elevated ALT, those with PNALT were significantly more often women (42%vs 26%), had greater mean CD4 counts (565 vs 420 cells/mm³), had lower mean serum HCV-RNA (5.8 vs 6.2 log IU/ml) and were infected by HCV genotype 4 (33%vs 6%). Liver fibrosis was considered as severe (Metavir F3) in 10% of patients with PNALT, and another 4% had cirrhosis based on stiffness values. These numbers were 16% and 35% in patients with elevated ALT. Treatment with pegIFN-RBV was given to 22 and 45 patients with PNALT and elevated ALT, respectively. Sustained virological response was achieved in 50% and 29% of them. In the multivariate analysis, PNALT was independently associated with response (OR: 7.9; 95% CI: 1.4-45.2; P = 0.02). Nearly 15% of HIV/HCV-coinfected patients with PNALT showed advanced liver fibrosis (Metavir F3-F4 estimates by elastometry). In summary, response to pegIFN-RBV is higher in patients with PNALT than in those with elevated ALT. Therefore, treatment should not be denied in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients with PNALT.

Infectious disease comorbidities adversely affecting substance users with HIV: hepatitis C and tuberculosis

The linkage between drug use, particularly injection drug use, and HIV/AIDS, hepatitis C (HCV), and tuberculosis (TB) has been recognized since the beginning of the HIV pandemic. These comorbid conditions affect drug users worldwide and act synergistically, with resultant adverse biologic, epidemiologic, and clinical consequences. Prevention, care, and treatment of TB and HCV can be successful, and both diseases can be cured. Special clinical challenges among drug users, however, can result in increased morbidity, mortality, and decreased therapeutic success. Among these are limited disease screening, inadequate and insensitive diagnostics, difficult treatment regimens with varying toxicities, and complicated pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic drug interactions. These may result in delayed diagnosis, deferred treatment initiation, and low completion rates, with the potential for generation and transmission of drug resistant organisms. Strategies to address these challenges include outreach programs to engage substance abusers in nonmedical settings, such as prisons and the streets, active screening programs for HIV, HCV, and TB, increased and broadened clinician expertise, knowledge and avoidance of drug interactions, attention to infection control, use of isoniazid preventive therapy, and creative strategies to insure medication adherence. All of these require structural changes directed at comprehensive prevention and treatment programs and increased collaboration and integration of needed services for substance abusers.

Polymorphism in tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand receptor 1 is associated with poor viral response to interferon-based hepatitis C virus therapy in HIV/hepatitis C virus-coinfected individuals

OBJECTIVE(S)

HIV/hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection causes accelerated liver disease compared to HCV monoinfection, and only 30-60% of HIV/HCV-coinfected individuals respond to HCV therapy with pegylated interferon and ribavirin. There are currently no biomarkers that predict treatment response in these coinfected patients.

DESIGN

We investigated whether there is an association between HCV treatment response and SNPs of apoptosis-related genes during HIV/HCV coinfection.

METHOD

Genomic DNA from 53 HIV/HCV-coinfected individuals was analyzed for 82 SNPs of 10 apoptosis-related genes.

RESULTS

We found that the presence of the rs4242392 SNP in tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 10a (TNFRSF10A), which encodes for tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand receptor 1, predicts poor outcome to HCV therapy, in HIV/HCV-co-infected patients [odds ratio 5.91 (95% confidence interval 1.63-21.38, P = 0.007)].

CONCLUSION

The rs4242392 SNP of the tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand receptor 1 gene predicted poor interferon-based HCV treatment response in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients.

The prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in HIV-positive individuals in the UK - trends in HCV testing and the impact of HCV on HIV treatment outcomes

We examined the prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection among HIV-positive individuals in the UK, trends in HCV testing and the impact of HCV on HIV treatment outcomes. Trends over time in HCV prevalence were calculated using each patient's most recent HCV status at the end of each calendar year. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with having a HCV antibody test, and Cox regression was used to determine whether HCV status was associated with the time to experiencing an immunological response to highly active antiretroviral treatment (HAART), time to virological response and viral rebound. Of the 31,765 HIV-positive individuals seen for care between January 1996 and September 2007, 20,365 (64.1%) individuals were tested for HCV, and 1807 (8.9%) had detectable HCV antibody. The proportion of patients in follow-up ever tested for HCV increased over time, from 782/8505 (9.2%) in 1996 to 14,280/17,872 (79.9%) in 2007. Nine thousand six hundred and sixty-nine individuals started HAART for the first time in or after January 2000, of whom, 396 (4.1%) were HCV positive. Presence of HCV infection did not affect initial virological response, virological rebound or immunological response. The cumulative prevalence of HCV in the UK CHIC Study is 8.9%. Despite UK guidelines, over 20% of HIV-positive individuals have not had their HCV status determined by 2007. HCV infection had no impact on HIV virological outcomes or immunological response to HIV treatment. The long-term impact on morbidity and mortality remain to be determined.

Acute hepatitis C in HIV-infected men who have sex with men: an emerging sexually transmitted infection

Since 2000 outbreaks of acute hepatitis C virus (HCV) among HIV-positive men who have sex with men (MSM) who denied injecting drug use have been reported from Europe, the United States, Canada and Australia. Given the burden of liver disease, in particular HCV, on the morbidity and mortality in HIV patients in the era of combination antiretroviral therapy, the rapid and significant rise in the incidence of HCV in the HIV-infected MSM population in high-income countries is alarming. This relates to a significant change in the epidemiology of HCV that has occurred, with HCV emerging as a sexually transmitted infection within this population. Work to date suggests that this permucosal HCV transmission results from high-risk sexual and noninjecting drug use behaviours, reopening the discussion on the importance of sexual transmission. Given this occurs almost exclusively in HIV-infected MSM, HIV probably has a critical role mediated either through behavioural and/or biological factors. Finally, the management of acute HCV in HIV infection is complicated by concomitant HIV infection and combination antiretroviral therapy. This review will synthesize the most recent epidemiological, immunological and management issues that have emerged as a result of the epidemic of acute HCV among HIV-infected MSM.

HIV diagnostics: challenges and opportunities

Accurate HIV diagnostic testing continues to pose challenges, but there are also opportunities for assay performance improvements in key areas for specific intended-use settings. The genetic diversity of HIV can result in false and discordant results in assays that fail to detect new variant strains. The use of antiretroviral therapies has resulted in drug-resistant variants that require monitoring by sequencing and genotyping methods. Nucleic acid testing is the most sensitive and reliable platform for detection, but it is costly and limited to centralized testing facilities, making implementation difficult in resource-limited settings where HIV has hit the hardest. Rapid antibody tests suitable for point-of-care use are becoming more accessible in resource-limited settings, but these tests may not detect HIV during the acute infection stage. Emerging antigen/antibody combination assays are viable alternatives to nucleic acid testing for diagnosis of recent infections. Although patient monitoring (e.g., via CD4+ T-cell count and viral load determination) and infant diagnoses still rely on clinical laboratory-based testing, point-of-care options are being developed. There are other technical challenges to HIV diagnostic testing and emerging biodetection technologies that may be able to address them, but they are not yet proven.

[AIDS Study Group/Spanish AIDS Plan consensus document on antiretroviral therapy in adults with human immunodeficiency virus infection (updated January 2010)]

OBJECTIVE

This consensus document is an update of antiretroviral therapy recommendations for adult patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection.

METHODS

To formulate these recommendations a panel made up of members of the Grupo de Estudio de Sida (Gesida, AIDS Study Group) and the Plan Nacional sobre el Sida (PNS, Spanish AIDS Plan) reviewed the advances in the current understanding of the pathophysiology of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, the efficacy and safety of clinical trials, and cohort and pharmacokinetic studies published in biomedical journals or presented at scientific meetings. Three levels of evidence were defined according to the data source: randomized studies (level A), cohort or case-control studies (level B), and expert opinion (level C). The decision to recommend, consider or not to recommend ART was established in each situation.

RESULTS

Currently, the treatment of choice for chronic HIV infection is the combination of three drugs of two different classes, including 2 nucleosides or nucleotide analogs (NRTI) plus 1 non-nucleoside (NNRTI) or 1 boosted protease inhibitor (PI/r), but other combinations are possible. Initiation of ART is recommended in patients with symptomatic HIV infection. In asymptomatic patients, initiation of ART is recommended on the basis of CD4 lymphocyte counts, plasma viral load and patient co-morbidities, as follows: 1) therapy should be started in patients with CD4 counts below 350 cells/microl; 2) When CD4 counts are between 350 and 500 cells/microl, therapy should be started in case of cirrhosis, chronic hepatitis C, high cardiovascular risk, HIV nephropathy, HIV viral load above 100,000 copies/ml, proportion of CD4 cells under 14%, and in people aged over 55; 3) Therapy should be deferred when CD4 are above 500 cells/microl, but could be considered if any of previous considerations concurs. Treatment should be initiated in case of hepatitis B requiring treatment and should be considered for reduce sexual transmission. The objective of ART is to achieve an undetectable viral load. Adherence to therapy plays an essential role in maintaining antiviral response. Therapeutic options are limited after ART failures but undetectable viral loads maybe possible with the new drugs even in highly drug experienced patients. Genotype studies are useful in these situations. Drug toxicity of ART therapy is losing importance as benefits exceed adverse effects. Criteria for antiretroviral treatment in acute infection, pregnancy and post-exposure prophylaxis are mentioned as well as the management of HIV co-infection with hepatitis B or C.

CONCLUSIONS

CD4 cells counts, viral load and patient co-morbidities are the most important reference factors to consider when initiating ART in asymptomatic patients. The large number of available drugs, the increased sensitivity of tests to monitor viral load, and the ability to determine viral resistance is leading to a more individualized therapy approach in order to achieve undetectable viral load under any circumstances.

Association of a single nucleotide polymorphism near the interleukin-28B gene with response to hepatitis C therapy in HIV/hepatitis C virus-coinfected patients

BACKGROUND

Given that peginterferon-ribavirin treatment is poorly tolerated, there is interest in the identification of predictors of response, particularly in HIV/hepatitis C virus (HCV)-coinfected patients that respond less than HCV-monoinfected individuals. A single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) near the IL28B gene (rs12979860) has been shown to predict treatment response in HCV-monoinfected patients carrying genotype 1. Information is lacking for HIV/HCV-coinfected individuals and/or other HCV genotypes.

METHODS

From 650 HIV/HCV-coinfected patients, we identified those who had completed a course of peginterferon-ribavirin therapy with a validated outcome and available repository DNA. The rs12979860 SNP was examined in a blinded fashion.

RESULTS

A total of 164 patients were included in the final IL28B genotyping analysis, 90 (55%) of whom achieved sustained virological response (SVR). HCV genotype distribution was as follows: HCV-1 58%, HCV-3 31% and HCV-4 11%. Overall, the SVR rate was higher in patients with CC than in those CT/TT genotypes: 56 of 75 (75%) versus 34 of 89 (38%) (P < 0.0001). The effect of the SNP was seen in HCV genotypes 1 and 4 but not in HCV genotype 3 carriers. In the multivariable analysis (odds ratio; 95% confidence interval; P value), the rs12979860 CC genotype was a strong predictor of SVR (3.7; 1.6-8.5; 0.002), independent of HCV genotype 3 (8.0; 3.1-21.0; <0.001), serum HCV-RNA less than 600,000 IU/ml (11.9; 3.8-37.4; <0.001) and lack of advanced liver fibrosis (3.5; 1.4-8.9; 0.009).

CONCLUSION

The rs12979860 SNP located near the IL28B gene is associated with HCV treatment response in HIV-infected patients with chronic hepatitis C due to genotypes 1 or 4. Thus, IL28B genotyping should be considered as part of the treatment decision algorithm in this difficult-to-treat population.

Noncirrhotic portal hypertension in HIV-infected patients: unique clinical and pathological findings

BACKGROUND

Liver disease of unknown cause in HIV-infected persons is rare but increasingly being reported. Noncirrhotic portal hypertension is the main feature in a subset of these patients, in whom gastrointestinal bleeding is the most frequent and potentially life-threatening clinical presentation.

METHODS

We describe the epidemiological, clinical and histological features of 12 HIV-positive individuals presenting with noncirrhotic portal hypertension.

RESULTS

An interpretable liver biopsy was available in 11, and cirrhosis was absent in all patients. Three patients had nodular regenerative hyperplasia of the liver, whereas eight showed morphological features previously described as 'hepatoportal sclerosis'. In four of the later group, a distinctive lesion was noted characterized by massive absence of portal veins along with focal fibrous obliteration of small portal veins. All patients had been treated with didanosine for long periods and inflammatory and thrombotic processes hypothetically triggered by this purine analogue in the hepatic microvasculature might result in this form of obliterative portal venopathy.

CONCLUSION

Noncirrhotic portal hypertension is a rare but unique entity presenting in HIV-positive individuals generally with prior prolonged exposure to didanosine, which shows an obliteration of portal veins as the most distinctive histological finding in the liver.

Lessons from HIV therapy applied to viral hepatitis therapy: summary of a workshop

Therapies for hepatitis B virus (HBV) have continued to evolve, and new therapies for hepatitis C virus (HCV) will soon be available in clinical practice. These medications for hepatitis C will mark the first time that direct antivirals that target HCV functions have been used. When such drugs are used as single agents, previously existing mutants with reduced susceptibility to them are rapidly selected. The relationship between these drug-resistant mutants and "wild-type" virus is unclear, but resistant strains likely have the potential to maintain the progression of liver disease despite successful treatment of "wild-type" virus. Resistant HBV and now HCV are already a clinical problem. The same issue was recognized very early in the development of therapy against HIV, with azidothymidine-resistant mutants detected within the first weeks of therapy. Clinical investigation and a progressive understanding of the pathogenesis of the disease overcame this challenge and led to the substantial and durable benefits of antiretroviral therapy that are evident today. To bring experts from the fields of HIV and viral hepatitis virology and therapy together for interactive discussions about how to apply the lessons from HIV to the further development of viral hepatitis therapy, the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases held a single-topic conference entitled "Viral Hepatitis Therapy: Lessons to be Learned From HIV" on 24-26 July 2008. This article summarizes that conference.

Ability of treatment week 12 viral response to predict long-term outcome in genotype 1 hepatitis C virus/HIV coinfected patients

OBJECTIVE

Guidelines recommendation to extend treatment duration in genotype 1 hepatitis C virus (HCV)/HIV-coinfected patients who clear the virus later than treatment week 4 is not evidence-based. Our main objective was to study the ability of week 12 viral response [early virologic response (EVR)] to predict long-term outcome in patients treated for 48 weeks.

DESIGN

Multicenter retrospective cohort analysis.

METHODS

Genotype 1 HCV treatment-naive, HIV-coinfected adult patients with compensated liver disease who started combination therapy with fixed-dose pegylated-interferon (pegIFN) alfa-2a or weight-based pegIFN alfa-2b plus ribavirin were included. Univariate and forward stepwise logistic regression analysis were used to identify predictors of sustained viral response (SVR) and relapse.

RESULTS

By intention-to-treat analysis, 31.3% (87/278) of patients achieved an SVR. SVR rate was more than three-fold higher in patients who cleared the virus by week 12 of treatment compared with late responders. Among 123 end-of-treatment responders, 36 (29.3%) relapsed. Relapse risk increased in patients with cirrhosis, in those with ribavirin dose reductions and in late responders: more than 65% of patients who cleared the virus between weeks 12 and 24 relapsed following 48 weeks of treatment compared with 10% of those attaining a complete EVR (<15 IU/ml) at treatment week 12 (risk ratio 6.4, 95% confidence interval 2.9-14.4).

CONCLUSION

Viral response at treatment week 12 is a strong predictor of long-term outcome. Genotype 1 HCV/HIV-coinfected patients who achieve a complete EVR (<15 IU/ml) are at low risk of viral relapse after completing the standard 48 weeks of therapy.

Preemptive erythropoietin plus high ribavirin doses to increase rapid virological responses in HIV patients treated for chronic hepatitis C

Chronic hepatitis C affects one-third of HIV(+) patients worldwide. High ribavirin (RBV) exposure is crucial to maximize the response to hepatitis C therapy in this population, although it may increase the risk for hemolytic anemia. PERICO is a prospective multicenter trial in which HIV/HCV-coinfected patients are randomized to receive peginterferon (pegIFN) alfa-2a 180 microg/week plus either weight-based RBV (1000-1200 mg/day) or RBV 2000 mg/day, the latest along with erythropoietin alfa (EPO) 30,000 IU/week from the first day until week 4. A total of 149 patients were assessed in a planned interim analysis at week 4. In both arms, 22% of patients achieved negative HCV-RNA (rapid virological response, RVR). Multivariate analysis [OR (IC 95%), p] showed that factors associated with RVR were HCV genotypes 2/3 vs. 1/4 [20 (5-100), <0.01] and baseline HCV-RNA [0.16 (0.07-0.37) per log IU/ml, <0.01]. The occurrence of severe anemia (hemoglobin <10 g/dl) did not differ when comparing RBV vs. high RBV + EPO (7% vs. 3%; p = 0.4). Moreover, RBV plasma trough levels were comparable at week 4 (1.9 vs. 2.4 microg/ml; p = 0.2). Use of high RBV doses with preemptive EPO during the first 4 weeks of hepatitis C therapy is safe, but fails to enhance significantly RBV plasma exposure and RVR rates. Extensive intraerythrocyte accumulation of RBV following boosted production of red blood cells by EPO could explain these findings.

Antiretroviral therapy hepatotoxicity: Prevalence, risk factors, and clinical characteristics in a cohort of Han Chinese

AIM

To investigate the incidence and risk factors of hepatotoxicity in Han Chinese patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome on combined anti-retroviral therapy (cART).

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted.

RESULTS

Among 330 subjects on cART in the cohort, 75.2% infected HIV due to improper plasma donations, 67.3% was either hepatitis C virus (HCV) or hepatitis B virus (HBV) co-infected and 46.4% had at least one episode of ALT elevation during a median 23 months follow-up time. Baseline alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevation (P = 0.004, OR = 9.560), receiving nevirapine (NVP) based cART regimen (P = 0.007, OR = 2.470), HCV co-infection (P = 0.000, OR = 3.433) were risk factors for cART related hepatotoxicity, while greater increased CD4(+) T(CD4) cell count was protective against hepatotoxicity development (P = 0.000, OR = 0.996). Patients co-infected with HCV who received NVP based cART had the greatest probability of hepatotoxicity (Log rank: x(2) = 27.193, P = 0.000). Twenty-five of the 153 subjects (16.3%) with cART related hepatotoxicity discontinued cART temporarily or shifted NVP to efavirenz (EFV). There was no difference in CD4 cell count (t = 0.526, P = 0.599), CD4 cell count change from baseline (t = 0.442, P = 0.659) and all-cause mortality (x(2) = 0.259, P = 0.611) between subjects with and without hepatotoxicity during a median 38 months of follow-up time.

CONCLUSION

cART induced hepatotoxicity was common among subjects in this cohort. Baseline ALT elevation, HCV co-infection and the use of NVP based cART regimens were associated statistically with the development of hepatotoxicity. Hepatotoxicity, led to some of the subjects discontinuing cART temporarily or switching to other regimens, had no impact on immune restore and survival in this cohort of patients during a median 38 months of follow-up time.

Comparison of transient elastography and liver biopsy for the assessment of liver fibrosis in HIV/hepatitis C virus-coinfected patients and correlation with noninvasive serum markers

Transient elastography (FibroScan) is a novel, rapid and noninvasive technique to assess liver fibrosis. Our objective was to compare transient elastography (TE) and other noninvasive serum indexes as alternatives to liver biopsy in HIV/hepatitis C virus (HCV)-coinfected patients. The fibrosis stage (METAVIR Score), TE, the aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index, the Forns fibrosis index, FIB-4 and HGM-2 indexes were assessed in 100 patients between January 2007 and January 2008. The diagnostic values were compared by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs). Using TE, the AUROC (95% CI) of liver stiffness was 0.80 (0.72-0.89) when discriminating between F <or= 1 and F > 2, 0.93 (0.85-1.00) when discriminating between F <or= 2 and F > 3 and 0.99 (0.97-1.00) when discriminating between F <or= 3 and F4. For the diagnosis of F >or= 3, the AUROCs of TE were significantly higher than those obtained with the other four noninvasive indexes. Based on receiver operating characteristic curves, three cutoff values were chosen to identify F <or= 1 (<7 kPa), F >or= 3 (>or=11 kPa) and F4 (>or=14 kPa). Using these best cutoff scores, the negative predictive value and positive predictive value were 81.1% and 70.2% for the diagnosis of F <or= 1, 96.3% and 60% for the diagnosis of F >or= 3 and 100% and 57.1% for the diagnosis of F4. Thus, Transient elastography accurately predicted liver fibrosis and outperformed other simple noninvasive indexes in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients. Our data suggest that TE is a helpful tool for guiding therapeutic decisions in clinical practice.

Rate and predictors of success in the retreatment of chronic hepatitis C virus in HIV/hepatitis C Virus coinfected patients with prior nonresponse or relapse

BACKGROUND

In hepatitis C virus (HCV)/HIV-coinfected patients who failed a course of suboptimal hepatitis C therapy, retreatment with adequate doses and duration of pegylated interferon (pegIFN) plus ribavirin (RBV) is advisable in the presence of compensated advanced liver fibrosis.

METHODS

The efficacy and safety of pegIFN-alpha2a (180 microg/wk) plus RBV (<75 kg: 1000 mg/d; > or = 75 kg: 1200 mg/d) given for 12 months was prospectively assessed in HIV/HCV patients with nonresponse or relapse to a prior course of suboptimal hepatitis C therapy. The main endpoint was the achievement of sustained virological response (SVR).

RESULTS

A total of 52 patients were enrolled in the study (78% HCV genotypes 1 or 4; 56% with advanced liver fibrosis). Prior suboptimal regimens were IFN monotherapy (20%), IFN plus RBV (29%), and pegIFN plus RBV 800 mg/d (51%). Overall, 61% were nonresponders and 39% relapsers. Retreatment provided SVR in 30.8% of patients (19.5% for genotypes 1/4 vs. 72.7% for genotypes 2/3; P = 0.002). In multivariate analysis, HCV genotypes 2/3 [OR 22.2, 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.9-166.7, P = 0.003] and RBV plasma trough concentrations at week 4 [OR 3.9 (95% CI, 1.3-11.8), P = 0.01] were the only independent predictors of SVR.

CONCLUSIONS

Retreatment with pegIFN-alpha2a plus weight-based RBV for 12 months permits to achieve HCV clearance in nearly onethird of HIV/HCV-coinfected patients who failed a prior suboptimal course of hepatitis C therapy. Patients with HCV genotypes 2/3 and those with RBV plasma trough levels above 2.07 microg/mL show the highest chances of SVR.

Management of acute hepatitis C

The World Health Organization estimates that about 170 million people are infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV). Blood transfusions from unscreened donors and unsafe therapeutic procedures are the major modes of HCV transmission in the developing world, and injection drug use accounts for most newly diagnosed HCV infections in the developed countries. Acute infection with HCV leads to symptomatic hepatitis in only a minority of patients, and recent studies suggest that spontaneous clearance of virus is higher in symptomatic acute hepatitis C infection. Pooled data from various studies suggest that higher sustained viral clearance rates could be achieved with a shorter course of antiviral treatment in the early stages of chronic HCV infection. This article examines the diagnosis of acute infection and critically appraises the various treatment regimens.

The influence of abacavir and other antiretroviral agents on virological response to HCV therapy among antiretroviral-treated HIV-infected patients

BACKGROUND

It remains unclear if certain antiretroviral medications, particularly abacavir, compromise response to HCV therapy. Such data could inform the selection of appropriate antiretrovirals in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients. The aim of this study was to determine if use of abacavir, as well as other antiretrovirals, was associated with reduced response to pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) plus ribavirin.

METHODS

A cohort study was performed among antiretroviral-treated HIV/HCV-coinfected patients initiating PEG-IFN plus ribavirin between January 2001 and June 2007 at six sites in the United States. Abacavir and other antiretrovirals represented exposures of interest. Study outcomes included an early virological response (> or =2 log IU/ml decrease in HCV viral load at 12 weeks) and sustained virological response (undetectable HCV viral load 24 weeks after treatment discontinuation).

RESULTS

Among 212 patients, 74 (35%) received abacavir. For patients infected with HCV genotype 1 or 4, no differences were observed between abacavir users and non-users in early virological response (26 [40%] versus 53 [44%]; adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50-2.00) or sustained virological response (8 [13%] versus 13 [12%]; adjusted OR 1.34; 95% CI 0.50-3.62). Among genotype 2 and 3 patients, rates of early virological response (7 [78%] versus 16 [89%]; OR 0.44; 95% CI 0.05-3.76) and sustained virological response (3 [33%] versus 8 [44%]; OR 0.63; 95% CI 0.12-3.32) were also similar between abacavir users and non-users. No association was found between other antiretrovirals and a lack of early or sustained response.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of abacavir or other antiretroviral medications was not associated with reduced early or sustained virological response rates.

MELD score is an important predictor of pretransplantation mortality in HIV-infected liver transplant candidates

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection accelerates liver disease progression in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) and could shorten survival of those awaiting liver transplants. The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score predicts mortality in HIV-negative transplant candidates, but its reliability has not been established in HIV-positive candidates.

METHODS

We evaluated predictors of pretransplantation mortality in HIV-positive liver transplant candidates enrolled in the Solid Organ Transplantation in HIV: Multi-Site Study (HIVTR) matched 1:5 by age, sex, race, and HCV infection with HIV-negative controls from the United Network for Organ Sharing.

RESULTS

Of 167 HIVTR candidates, 24 died (14.4%); this mortality rate was similar to that of controls (88/792, 11.1%, P = .30) with no significant difference in causes of mortality. A significantly lower proportion of HIVTR candidates (34.7%) underwent liver transplantation, compared with controls (47.6%, P = .003). In the combined cohort, baseline MELD score predicted pretransplantation mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.27; P < .0001), whereas HIV infection did not (HR, 1.69; P = .20). After controlling for pretransplantation CD4(+) cell count and HIV RNA levels, the only significant predictor of mortality in the HIV-infected subjects was pretransplantation MELD score (HR, 1.2; P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Pretransplantation mortality characteristics are similar between HIV-positive and HIV-negative candidates. Although lower CD4(+) cell counts and detectable levels of HIV RNA might be associated with a higher rate of pretransplantation mortality, baseline MELD score was the only significant independent predictor of pretransplantation mortality in HIV-infected liver transplant candidates.

New therapeutic strategies for raltegravir

Raltegravir (Isentress) is the first approved HIV integrase inhibitor. Agents in this class target a different viral enzyme compared with agents inhibiting reverse transcriptase and protease. A wide number of patients are currently susceptible to integrase inhibitors, including heavily antiretroviral-experienced patients harbouring drug-resistant viruses. The good tolerability and convenience of raltegravir have recently begun to be appreciated, leading to the consideration of other indications for the drug. Data recently released using the drug as first-line therapy or in switch strategies are very promising and the role of raltegravir in intensification therapy is currently under investigation. Altogether, the current information supports a broad use of raltegravir beyond its initial approval for antiretroviral-experienced HIV-infected patients.

[ANRS HC 02 RIBAVIC: histo-pathological impact]

Anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapy allows complete recovery of HCV infection (sustained virologic response). Reduction of necro-inflammation results usually in a stabilization then in a reduction of fibrosis and even of cirrhosis at least in patients with sustained virologic response. The randomised controlled RIBAVIC ANRS HC02 trial comparing the combination ribavirin-pegylated interferon-alpha2b versus ribavirine-standard interferon-alpha2b as first treatment in HIV-HCV co-infected patients allowed an analysis of 205 paired (pre- and post-treatment) biopsies using the Metavir and Ishak scores. A significant reduction was associated with sustained virologic response and non response with stabilization. There was no positive impact on fibrosis despite sustained virologic response and a deterioration in non responders. In multivariate analysis, didanosine and non response were significantly associated with fibrosis deterioration. The absence of fibrosis reversal in co-infected patients is related to virologic non response and probably to co-factors of fibrosis worsening, like the mitochondrial toxicity of antiretrovirals and especially of didanosine. In the RIBAVIC cohort (prospective followup of 383 co-infected HIV-HCV treated patients) with a median of 60 months, 21 patients (5 %) had a liver event: all were non responders and 20 had fibrosis score > or = F3. In multivariate analysis, factors associated with survival were virologic response to antiviral therapy, fibrosis score < F3 and baseline CD 4 count > 350/mL. These results emphasize the need of early therapeutic interventions to increase the rate of sustained virologic response and to decrease the rate of liver complications in the most severe patients.

Viral hepatitis and HIV co-infection

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is overall recognised in 10% of HIV+ persons worldwide, with large differences according to geographical region. Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection affects 25% of HIV+ individuals, with greater rates ( approximately 75%) in intravenous drug users and persons infected through contaminated blood or blood products. HIV-hepatitis co-infected individuals show an accelerated course of liver disease, with faster progression to cirrhosis. The number of anti-HBV drugs has increased in the last few years, and some agents (e.g. lamivudine, emtricitabine, tenofovir) also exert significant activity against HIV. Emergence of drug resistance challenges the long-term benefit of anti-HBV monotherapy, mainly with lamivudine. The results using new more potent anti-HBV drugs (e.g. tenofovir) are very promising, with prospects for stopping or even revert HBV-related liver damage in most cases. With respect to chronic hepatitis C, the combination of pegylated interferon plus ribavirin given for 1 year permits to achieve sustained HCV clearance in no more than 40% of HIV-HCV co-infected patients. Thus, new direct anti-HCV drugs are eagerly awaited for this population. Although being a minority, HIV+ patients with delta hepatitis and those with multiple hepatitis show the worst prognosis. Appropriate diagnosis and monitoring of chronic viral hepatitis, including the use of non-invasive tools for assessing liver fibrosis and measurement of viral load, may allow to confront adequately chronic viral hepatitis in HIV+ patients, preventing the development of end-stage liver disease, for which the only option available is liver transplantation. This article forms part of a special issue of Antiviral Research marking the 25th anniversary of antiretroviral drug discovery and development, Vol 85, issue 1, 2010.

Liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C and persistently normal liver enzymes: influence of HIV infection

Liver fibrosis progress slowly in patients with chronic hepatitis C and persistently normal alanine aminotransferase (PNALT) compared to subjects with elevated aminotransferases. Differences in liver fibrosis according to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) status in this population have not been examined. All patients with serum hepatitis C virus (HCV)-RNA and PNALT who underwent liver fibrosis assessment using elastometry since 2004 at three different European hospitals were evaluated. Patients previously treated with interferon were excluded. PNALT was defined as ALT below the upper limit of normality in at least three consecutive determinations within the last 12 months. Fibrosis stage was defined as mild (Metavir F0-F1) if stiffness < or =7.1 kPa; moderate (F2) if 7.2-9.4 kPa; severe (F3) if 9.5-14 kPa, and cirrhosis (F4) if >14 kPa. A total of 449 HIV-negative and 133 HIV-positive patients were evaluated. HIV-negative patients were older (mean age 51.8 vs 43.5 years) and more frequently females (63%vs 37%) than the HIV counterparts. Mean serum HCV-RNA was similar in both the groups (5.9 vs 5.8 log IU/mL). Overall, 78.8% of the HIV patients were on HAART and their mean CD4 count was 525 (+/-278) cells/microL. In HIV-negatives, liver fibrosis was mild in 84.6%; moderate in 8.7%, severe in 3.3% and cirrhosis was found in 3.3%. In HIV patients, these figures were 70.7%, 18.8%, 6%, and 4.5%, respectively. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, older age (odds ratio or OR: 1.04; 95% confidence interval or CI: 1.02-1.07; P < 0.001) and being HIV+ (OR: 2.6; 95% CI: 1.21-5.85; P < 0.01) were associated with severe liver fibrosis or cirrhosis (F3-F4). Thus, severe liver fibrosis and cirrhosis are seen in 6.6% of the HCV-monoinfected and in 10.5% of HCV-HIV co-infected patients with PNALT. Some degree of liver fibrosis that justifies treatment is seen in 15% of the HCV-monoinfected but doubles to nearly 30% in HIV-HCV co-infected patients with PNALT.

Primary Care Guidelines for the Management of Persons Infected with Human Immunodeficiency Virus: 2009 Update by the HIV Medicine Association of the Infectious Diseases Society of America

Evidence-based guidelines for the management of persons infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) were prepared by an expert panel of the HIV Medicine Association of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. These updated guidelines replace those published in 2004. The guidelines are intended for use by health care providers who care for HIV-infected patients or patients who may be at risk for acquiring HIV infection. Since 2004, new antiretroviral drugs and classes have become available, and the prognosis of persons with HIV infection continues to improve. However, with fewer complications and increased survival, HIV-infected persons are increasingly developing common health problems that also affect the general population. Some of these conditions may be related to HIV infection itself and its treatment. HIV-infected persons should be managed and monitored for all relevant age- and gender-specific health problems. New information based on publications from the period 2003–2008 has been incorporated into this document.

Review article: adherence to medication for chronic hepatitis C - building on the model of human immunodeficiency virus antiretroviral adherence research

BACKGROUND

Treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection with pegylated interferon/ribavirin achieves sustained virological response in up to 56% of HCV mono-infected patients and 40% of HCV/human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-co-infected patients. The relationship of patient adherence to outcome warrants study.

AIM

To review comprehensively research on patient-missed doses to HCV treatment and discuss applicable research from adherence to HIV antiretroviral therapy.

METHODS

Publications were identified by PubMed searches using the keywords: adherence, compliance, hepatitis C virus, interferon and ribavirin.

RESULTS

The term 'non-adherence' differs in how it is used in the HCV from the HIV literature. In HCV, 'non-adherence' refers primarily to dose reductions by the clinician and early treatment discontinuation. In contrast, in HIV, 'non-adherence' refers primarily to patient-missed doses. Few data have been published on the rates of missed dose adherence to pegylated interferon/ribavirin and its relationship to virological response.

CONCLUSIONS

As HCV treatment becomes more complex with new classes of agents, adherence will be increasingly important to treatment success as resistance mutations may develop with suboptimal dosing of HCV enzyme inhibitors. HIV adherence research can be applied to that on HCV to establish accurate methods to assess adherence, investigate determinants of non-adherence and develop strategies to optimize adherence.

Interferon convencional versus interferon peguilado associados à ribavirina no tratamento de pacientes coinfectados pelo vírus da hepatite C (genótipo 1) e da imunodeficiência humana

CONTEXTO: Tem sido sugerido que os pacientes coinfectados por vírus da hepatite C e da imunodeficiência humana (VHC/HIV) devam ser tratados com interferon peguilado associado à ribavirina (PEG+RBV) porque as taxas de resposta virológica sustentada seriam maiores do que aquelas obtidas com interferon convencional associado à ribavirina (IFN+RBV). No entanto, há escassez de trabalhos na literatura comparando as duas opções de tratamento nesta população de pacientes, em especial fora do cenário de ensaios clínicos. OBJETIVO: Avaliar a resposta virológica sustentada ao tratamento com IFN+RBV versus PEG+RBV em pacientes coinfectados pelo vírus da hepatite C genótipo 1 e vírus da imunodeficiência humana (VHC-1/HIV), no âmbito do programa do Ministério da Saúde. MÉTODOS: Trata-se de estudo de coorte misto, onde foram revisados prontuários de pacientes coinfectados por VHC-1/HIV tratados com IFN+RBV (antes de 2002) ou PEG+RBV (a partir de 2002) pelo período de 48 semanas, no âmbito da Secretaria da Saúde do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul. Foram avaliadas as características demográficas (idade, gênero e peso), contagem de células CD4 e histopatologia - atividade inflamatória (A) e fibrose - segundo classificação METAVIR. O nível de significância adotado na análise estatística foi de 5%. RESULTADOS: Foram avaliados 81 pacientes coinfectados por VHC-1/HIV, 22 que utilizaram IFN+RBV e 59 que utilizaram PEG+RBV por 48 semanas. Os grupos eram semelhantes no que tange à média de idade, gênero, peso, contagem de células CD4 e grau de fibrose. Os pacientes que utilizaram IFN+RBV apresentaram maior atividade histológica com proporção de A2+A3 que superava aqueles que utilizaram PEG+RBV (P<0,01). A resposta virológica sustentada foi 14% no grupo que utilizou IFN+RBV e 23% naqueles que utilizaram PEG+RBV (P = 0,54), com Odds Ratio de 1,9 (0,5 a 7,3). CONCLUSÃO: Os pacientes coinfectados por HCV-1/HIV tratados com PEG+RBV apresentaram chance 1,9 vezes maior de obter resposta virológica sustentada do que aqueles tratados com IFN+RBV, no entanto, este resultado não apresentou significância estatística.

[Role of tenofovir in HIV and hepatitis C virus coinfection]

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is common in HIV-infected individuals, especially if the route of infection is intravenous (e.g. intravenous drug use or blood transfusion). Prognosis is poorer in patients with HCV and HIV coinfection than in those with HCV monoinfection, mainly due to the immunodepression caused by HIV infection and probably also to a direct effect of HIV on the liver. Moreover, although antiretroviral therapy can cause liver damage, there is little doubt about the net benefits obtained with triple therapy in coinfected individuals, since suppression of HIV replication and immune recovery help to halt liver damage. However, not all antiretroviral agents are equal and those with the lowest hepatotoxicity and best metabolic profile should be used in coinfected patients, since hepatic steatosis accelerates progression of hepatic fibrosis and insulin resistance hampers the success of treatment with interferon and ribavirin. Tenofovir is currently one of the safest nucleos(t)ide analogues, due to its low hepatotoxicity and its lack of negative interference on treatment of HCV infection.

Co-infections and co-therapies: treatment of HIV in the presence of hepatitis C and hepatitis B

An increasing number of people are chronically infected with HIV and HCV, and/or HBV owing to shared routes of transmission. With the advent of HAART, liver disease secondary to hepatitis co-infections has emerged as a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in HIV-infected persons. There is increasing need to manage dual infection, but treatment is complicated by co-morbidities, overlapping toxicities, drug activities and resistance. A model of treatment that builds on the lessons learned from the treatment of HIV has evolved to maximize success of treating dual infections. This review will address current strategies for the management of HIV in the setting of HCV and HBV co-infection and discuss future treatment directions and challenges.

Accuracy of simple biochemical tests in identifying liver fibrosis in patients co-infected with human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C virus

BACKGROUND & AIMS

We assessed the ability of 3 simple biochemical tests to stage liver fibrosis in patients co-infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV).

METHODS

We analyzed liver biopsy samples from 324 consecutive HIV/HCV-positive patients (72% men; mean age, 38 y; mean CD4+ T-cell counts, 548 cells/mm(3)). Scheuer fibrosis scores were as follows: 30% had F0, 22% had F1, 19% had F2, 23% had F3, and 6% had F4. Logistic regression analyses were used to predict the probability of significant (>or=F2) or advanced (>or=F3) fibrosis, based on numeric scores from the APRI, FORNS, or FIB-4 tests (alone and in combination). Area under the receiver operating characteristic curves were analyzed to assess diagnostic performance.

RESULTS

Area under the receiver operating characteristic curves analyses indicated that the 3 tests had similar abilities to identify F2 and F3; the ability of APRI, FORNS, and FIB-4 were as follows: F2 or greater: 0.72, 0.67, and 0.72, respectively; F3 or greater: 0.75, 0.73, and 0.78, respectively. The accuracy of each test in predicting which samples were F3 or greater was significantly higher than for F2 or greater (APRI, FORNS, and FIB-4: >or=F3: 75%, 76%, and 76%, respectively; >or=F2: 66%, 62%, and 68%, respectively). By using the lowest cut-off values for all 3 tests, F3 or greater was ruled out with sensitivity and negative predictive values of 79% to 94% and 87% to 91%, respectively, and 47% to 70% accuracy. Advanced liver fibrosis (>or=F3) was identified using the highest cut-off value, with specificity and positive predictive values of 90% to 96% and 63% to 73%, respectively, and 75% to 77% accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

Simple biochemical tests accurately predicted liver fibrosis in more than half the HIV/HCV co-infected patients. The absence and presence of liver fibrosis are predicted fairly using the lowest and highest cut-off levels, respectively.

HIV-related liver disease: ARV drugs, coinfection, and other risk factors

Highly-active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has proven remarkably effective for prolonging the life of patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). However, while most HAART agents are safe, many have the potential to cause liver toxicity. Physicians must therefore consider the possibility of drug-induced liver injury in the management of HIV-infected patients, especially those with certain risk factors such as coinfection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV), female gender, alcohol abuse, older age, or obesity. Understanding how, when, and why drug-related liver damage occurs is key to managing these patients safely and effectively. Knowledge of HAART-related liver effects will help ensure that patients receive the most benefit with the least toxicity from any given drug regimen. As more information about the mechanisms of drug related liver injury is known, clinicians will be better able to tailor therapies to suit individual situations, resulting in greater patient safety and outcomes.

[Hepatitis B in patients with HIV infection]

Chronic hepatitis B virus infection affects approximately 10% of HIV-infected patients. There are an estimated 4 million patients with HIV/HBV coinfection. HIV infection has a deleterious effect on the natural history of chronic hepatitis B and increases the risk of progression to cirrhosis and terminal liver disease. Since the widespread use of highly active antiviral therapy (HAART), liver disease has emerged as one of the main causes of morbidity and mortality in HIV-positive patients. Therefore, all patients with HIV/HBV coinfection should be evaluated for treatment of hepatitis B, independently of the CD4 lymphocyte count. Six drugs are currently authorized for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: standard interferon-alpha (2a and 2b), pegylated interferon alpha-2a, lamivudine, adefovir, entecavir and telbivudine. Other drugs with activity against HBV, such as tenofovir and emtricitabine, are used for the treatment of HIV infection. In patients not requiring HAART, treatment of hepatitis B should preferably consist of drugs without activity against HIV, such as pegylated interferon or adefovir. In contrast, in patients requiring HAART, a combination of drugs with activity against both viruses should be used, such as lamivudine, emtricitabine and tenofovir, with the aim of achieving maximal viral suppression and avoiding the development of resistance. Patients with HIV/HBV coinfection require periodic clinical and virological monitoring. Patients with cirrhosis should undergo ultrasonography and alphafetoprotein determination every 6 months for the early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Spontaneous viral clearance, viral load, and genotype distribution of hepatitis C virus (HCV) in HIV-infected patients with anti-HCV antibodies in Europe

BACKGROUND

Variables influencing serum hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA levels and genotype distribution in individuals with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection are not well known, nor are factors determining spontaneous clearance after exposure to HCV in this population.

METHODS

All HCV antibody (Ab)-positive patients with HIV infection in the EuroSIDA cohort who had stored samples were tested for serum HCV RNA, and HCV genotyping was done for subjects with viremia. Logistic regression was used to identify variables associated with spontaneous HCV clearance and HCV genotype 1.

RESULTS

Of 1940 HCV Ab-positive patients, 1496 (77%) were serum HCV RNA positive. Injection drug users (IDUs) were less likely to have spontaneously cleared HCV than were homosexual men (20% vs. 39%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.36 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.24-0.53]), whereas patients positive for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) were more likely to have spontaneously cleared HCV than were those negative for HBsAg (43% vs. 21%; aOR, 2.91 [95% CI, 1.94-4.38]). Of patients with HCV viremia, 786 (53%) carried HCV genotype 1, and 53 (4%), 440 (29%), and 217 (15%) carried HCV genotype 2, 3, and 4, respectively. A greater HCV RNA level was associated with a greater chance of being infected with HCV genotype 1 (aOR, 1.60 per 1 log higher [95% CI, 1.36-1.88]).

CONCLUSIONS

More than three-quarters of the HIV- and HCV Ab-positive patients in EuroSIDA showed active HCV replication. Viremia was more frequent in IDUs and, conversely, was less common in HBsAg-positive patients. Of the patients with HCV viremia analyzed, 53% were found to carry HCV genotype 1, and this genotype was associated with greater serum HCV RNA levels.

Differences in Virological Response to Pegylated Interferon and Ribavirin between Hepatitis C Virus (Hcv)-Monoinfected and HCV–Hiv-Coinfected Patients

Background

Suboptimal doses of ribavirin have been suggested to explain the diminished efficacy of pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) plus ribavirin in hepatitis C virus (HCV)–HIV-coinfected patients.

Methods

A cohort of 104 coinfected patients and an age-, sex- and genotype-matched cohort of HCV-monoinfected patients ( n=104) were compared. All patients received PEG-IFN-α2a 180 μg/week plus ribavirin 800–1,200 mg daily (HCV genotype 2/3 patients received 800 mg daily and those with genotype 1/4 received 1,000–1,200 mg daily) for 48 weeks (24 weeks for monoinfected patients with genotypes 2/3). HCV RNA levels were determined qualitatively at weeks 4, 12, 24, 48 and 72 and quantified monthly until week 12.

Results

The coinfected cohort had more advanced liver disease and lower body weight. HCV genotype 1 patients coinfected with HIV showed higher levels of HCV RNA than monoinfected patients. A significantly higher proportion of coinfected patients interrupted the prescribed treatment period prematurely (84% versus 98%). During the first 12 weeks, smaller decreases in HCV RNA levels were observed in coinfected patients. Among patients with HCV genotype 1, coinfected patients achieved lower rates of early virological response (64% versus 87%), end-of-treatment response (47.3% versus 80%) and sustained virological response (SVR; 27.3% versus 56.4%), but not rapid virological response (RVR). HCV–HIV-coinfected patients with HCV genotype 2/3 achieved significantly lower rates of RVR (52% versus 88%). Multivariate analysis identified RVR, gender and liver fibrosis as independent predictors of SVR.

Conclusions

Differences in efficacy of PEG-IFN-α2a plus ribavirin treatment between HCV–HIV-coinfected and HCV-monoinfected patients were maintained despite optimized ribavirin dose.

Efficacy of pegylated interferon plus ribavirin treatment in HIV/hepatitis C virus co-infected patients receiving abacavir plus lamivudine or tenofovir plus either lamivudine or emtricitabine as nucleoside analogue backbone

OBJECTIVES

To compare the response to hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapy among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/HCV co-infected patients receiving a nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitor [N(t)RTI] backbone consisting of abacavir plus lamivudine with that observed in subjects who receive tenofovir plus lamivudine or emtricitabine.

METHODS

A total of 256 subjects, enrolled in a cohort of 948 HIV-infected patients who received pegylated interferon and ribavirin from October 2001 to January 2006, were included in this study. All patients were taking one protease inhibitor or one non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor and abacavir plus lamivudine or tenofovir plus lamivudine or emtricitabine as N(t)RTI backbone during HCV therapy. Sustained virological response (SVR) rates in both backbone groups were compared.

RESULTS

In an intention-to-treat analysis, 20 out of 70 (29%) individuals under abacavir and 83 out of 186 (45%) under tenofovir showed SVR (P = 0.02). N(t)RTI backbone containing tenofovir was an independent predictor of SVR in the multivariate analysis [adjusted odds ratio (95% CI), 2.6 (1.05-6.9); P = 0.03]. The association between abacavir use and lower SVR was chiefly seen in patients with plasma HCV-RNA load higher than 600 000 IU/mL and genotype 1 or 4. Among patients treated with ribavirin dose <13.2 mg/kg/day, 3 (20%) of those under abacavir versus 22 (52%) under tenofovir reached SVR (P = 0.03), whereas the rates were 31% and 38% (P = 0.4), respectively, in those receiving >/=13.2 mg/kg/day.

CONCLUSIONS

HIV-infected patients who receive abacavir plus lamivudine respond worse to pegylated interferon plus ribavirin than those who are given tenofovir plus lamivudine or emtricitabine as N(t)RTI backbone, especially in those receiving lower ribavirin doses.

Abacavir does not Influence the Rate of Virological Response in HIV–HCV-Coinfected Patients Treated with Pegylated Interferon and Weight-Adjusted Ribavirin

Background

The combination of pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) plus ribavirin (RBV) is the standard of care for hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment in HIV-coinfected individuals. In 2007, abacavir (ABC)-based antiretroviral therapy was, for the first time, reported to be associated with early virological failure during HCV treatment. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effect of ABC on the response rate to HCV therapy.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of HIV–HCV- coinfected patients treated with PEG-IFN and weight-adjusted RBV in four hospitals in Spain was performed. An analysis of baseline descriptive variables was conducted. Logistic regression models were used to test possible associations between non-response and pretreatment characteristics, including antiretroviral drugs.

Results

A total of 244 HIV–HCV-coinfected patients treated with PEG-IFN and RBV were included. Overall, 85% of patients were on highly active antiretroviral therapy; of these patients, 24% received ABC-based regimens. The most frequent genotypes were 1 and 3. RBV dosing was ≥13.2 mg/kg/day in 97% of the patients. In the global intent-to-treat analyses, 46.3% of patients reached a sustained virological response (SVR; 46.2% in ABC group versus 46.7% in non-ABC group, P=1). The only two factors in the multivariate analysis that were statistically associated with an increased risk of failure to achieve SVR were HCV genotypes 1 or 4 and older age. The use of ABC was not associated with failure to achieve SVR at any of the other time points evaluated.

Conclusions

Our data suggest that the use of ABC-based regimens in the context of HCV therapy does not negatively affect the outcome of this treatment.

Response to pegylated interferon plus ribavirin in HIV-infected patients with chronic hepatitis C due to genotype 4

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes 1 and 4 respond less well to pegylated interferon (pegIFN) plus ribavirin (RBV) therapy. For this reason most studies merge these two genotypes when assessing virological response. However, in most trials the HCV genotype 4 population is rather small, and conclusions are mainly derived from what occurs in HCV-1 patients. All HCV-4 patients coinfected with HIV who received pegIFN plus RBV in two different multicentre studies, PRESCO and ROMANCE, conducted respectively in Spain and Italy, were retrospectively analyzed. Baseline plasma HCV-RNA, proportion of patients with HCV-RNA <10 IU / mL at week 4 (rapid virological response), and HCV-RNA declines >2 logs at week 12 (early virological response, EVR) were all assessed as predictors of sustained virological response (SVR). Overall, 75 patients (60 men) were evaluated. Median age was 40 years and median CD4 count 598 cells / mm(3); 49% had plasma HIV-RNA <50 copies / mL; 71% had elevated liver enzymes and 31% had advanced liver fibrosis (Metavir F3-F4). Median serum HCV-RNA was 5.7 log IU / mL. Rapid virological response was attained by 10 (20%) patients and EVR by 26 (42%). Using intention-to-treat and on-treatment (OT) analyses, SVR was achieved by 21 / 75 (28%) and 21 / 62 (34%) of HCV-4 patients, respectively. In the multivariate analysis (OT), baseline HCV-RNA (OR 0.09 for every log increment; 95% CI: 0.01-0.7) and EVR (OR: 7.08; 95% CI: 1.8-27.2) were significantly and independently associated with SVR. This is the largest series of HIV-infected patients with chronic hepatitis C due to HCV-4 treated with pegIFN plus RBV examined so far and the results show that HCV-4 behaves similarly to HCV-1. Therefore, these patients should be considered as difficult to treat population. Baseline serum HCV-RNA and EVR are the best predictors of SVR in HCV-4 / HIV-coinfected patients.