A randomized controlled trial on pharmacological preconditioning in liver surgery using a volatile anesthetic. Ann Surg. 2008;248:909-918. [PMID: 19092335 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0b013e31818f3dda]

Hepatic ischaemia-reperfusion injury from bench to bedside

BACKGROUND

Vascular occlusion to prevent haemorrhage during liver resection causes ischaemia-reperfusion (IR) injury. Insights into the mechanisms of IR injury gathered from experimental models have contributed to the development of therapeutic approaches, some of which have already been tested in randomized clinical trials.

METHODS

The review was based on a PubMed search using the terms 'ischemia AND hepatectomy', 'ischemia AND liver', 'hepatectomy AND drug treatment', 'liver AND intermittent clamping' and 'liver AND ischemic preconditioning'; only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included.

RESULTS

Twelve RCTs reported on ischaemic preconditioning and intermittent clamping. Both strategies seem to confer protection and allow extension of ischaemia time. Fourteen RCTs evaluating pharmacological interventions, including antioxidants, anti-inflammatory drugs, vasodilators, pharmacological preconditioning and glucose infusion, were identified.

CONCLUSION

Several strategies to prevent hepatic IR have been developed, but few have been incorporated into clinical practice. Although some pharmacological strategies showed promising results with improved clinical outcome there is not sufficient evidence to recommend them.

Up-regulation of heme oxygenase-1 by sevoflurane is not dependent on Kupffer cells and associates with ERK1/2 and AP-1 activation in the rat liver

Sevoflurane is a potent non-toxic inducer of the hepatoprotective enzyme heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1). So far, little is known about the underlying molecular mechanism. Therefore the aim of this study was to characterize the respective signal transduction pathway and in particular to elucidate the role of Kupffer cells in this context. Rats were treated with or without sevoflurane. The effects on hepatic HO-1 gene expression, mitogen-activated protein kinases and transcription factors were studied by Northern and Western blot analyses, immunostaining, electrophoretic mobility shift assays, and enzymatic activity assays. Kupffer cells were depleted by administration of clodronate liposomes in vivo to characterize their role in HO-1 signal transduction. In additional in vitro experiments, HO-1 mRNA expression in primary rat hepatocytes and HepG2 cells was assessed. Sevoflurane up-regulated HO-1 gene expression in pericentral hepatocytes and increased HO enzyme activity in vivo. This was associated with activation of ERK1/2 and activator protein-1. We identified c-jun/AP-1, JunD, c-fos, and Fra-1 as active subunits of the activator protein-1 complex. Administration of clodronate liposomes to rats led to depletion of Kupffer cells without affecting sevoflurane induced HO-1 expression. Moreover, sevoflurane up-regulated HO-1 mRNA in primary rat hepatocytes but not in HepG2 cells. Our results suggest that sevoflurane induced HO-1 gene expression in pericentral hepatocytes does not depend on Kupffer cells and is associated with activation of ERK1/2 and activator protein-1. Since we could recently demonstrate significant hepatoprotective effects of HO-1 induced by isoflurane, the present results may help to establish new concepts in hepatic organ protection.

A comparison of liver function after hepatectomy with inflow occlusion between sevoflurane and propofol anesthesia

BACKGROUND

In this study, we compared liver function tests after hepatectomy with inflow occlusion as a function of propofol versus sevoflurane anesthesia.

METHODS

One hundred patients undergoing elective liver resection with inflow occlusion were randomized into a sevoflurane group or a propofol group. General anesthesia was induced with 3 μg/kg fentanyl, 0.2 mg/kg cisatracurium, and target-controlled infusion of propofol, set at a plasma target concentration of 4 to 6 μg/mL, or sevoflurane initially started at 8%. Anesthesia was maintained with target-controlled infusion of propofol (2-4 μg/mL) or sevoflurane (1.5%-2.5%). The primary end point was postoperative liver injury assessed by peak values of liver transaminases.

RESULTS

Transaminase levels peaked between the first and the third postoperative day. Peak alanine aminotransferase was 504 and 571 U/L in the sevoflurane group and the propofol group, respectively. Peak aspartate aminotransferase was 435 U/L after sevoflurane and 581 U/L in the propofol group. There were no significant differences in peak alanine aminotransferase or peak aspartate aminotransferase between groups. Other liver function tests including bilirubin and alkaline phosphatase, and peak values of white blood cell counts and creatinine, were also not different between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Sevoflurane and propofol anesthetics resulted in similar patterns of liver function tests after hepatectomy with inflow occlusion. These data suggest that the 2 anesthetics are equivalent in this clinical context.

Biological modulation of liver ischemia-reperfusion injury

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review gives a broad overview of the key factors of ischemic injury to the liver and presents the current modifications of preservation solutions and the few strategies of biological modulation in clinical use today.

RECENT FINDINGS

Protective effects in human-liver transplantation were shown by methylprednisolone treatment in decreased donors, and by inhalation of a nontoxic dose of nitric oxide in recipients. In addition, recent results showed rescue of pig livers, donated after cardiac death by application of a cocktail of substances addressing several previously identified mechanisms of ischemia-reperfusion injury.

SUMMARY

The future of a pharmacological approach attenuating or preventing ischemia-reperfusion injury lies in a combination of drugs acting simultaneously on several steps of the injury cascades. Applying these substances during flush, before, and during implantation appears as an attractive strategy to protect extended criteria liver grafts.

Intermittent ischaemia maintains function after ischaemia reperfusion in steatotic livers

BACKGROUND

Ischaemic preconditioning (IPC) and intermittent ischaemia (INT) reduce liver injury after ischaemia reperfusion (IR). Steatotic livers are at a higher risk of IR injury, but the protection offered by IPC and INT is not well understood. The aim of the present study was to determine the effectiveness of IPC and INT in maintaining liver function in steatotic livers.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A model of segmental hepatic ischaemia (45 min) and reperfusion (60 min) was employed using lean and obese Zucker rats. Bile flow recovery was measured to assess dynamic liver function, hepatocyte fat content quantified and blood electrolytes, metabolites and bile calcium measured to assess liver and whole body physiology. Liver marker enzymes and light and electron microscopy were employed to assess hepatocyte injury.

RESULTS

IPC was not effective in promoting bile flow recovery after IR in either lean or steatotic livers, whereas INT promoted good bile flow recovery in steatotic as well as lean livers. However, the bile flow recovery in steatotic livers was less than that in lean livers. In steatotic livers, ischaemia led to a rapid and substantial decrease in fat content. Steatotic livers were more susceptible to IR injury than lean livers, as indicated by increased blood ALT concentrations and major histological injury.

CONCLUSION

INT is more effective than IPC in restoring liver function in the acute phase of IR in steatotic livers. In obese patients, INT may be useful in promoting better liver function after IR after liver resection.

Systematic review of randomized controlled trials of pharmacological interventions to reduce ischaemia-reperfusion injury in elective liver resection with vascular occlusion

BACKGROUND

Vascular occlusion during liver resection results in ischaemia-reperfusion (IR) injury, which can lead to liver dysfunction. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the benefits and harms of using various pharmacological agents to decrease IR injury during liver resection with vascular occlusion.

METHODS

Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating pharmacological agents in liver resections conducted under vascular occlusion were identified. Two independent reviewers extracted data on population characteristics and risk of bias in the trials, and on outcomes such as postoperative morbidity, hospital stay and liver function.

RESULTS

A total of 18 RCTs evaluating 17 different pharmacological interventions were identified. There was no significant difference in perioperative mortality, liver failure or postoperative morbidity between the intervention and control groups in any of the comparisons. A significant improvement in liver function was seen with methylprednisolone use. Hospital and intensive therapy unit stay were significantly shortened with trimetazidine and vitamin E use, respectively. Markers of liver parenchymal injury were significantly lower in the methylprednisolone, trimetazidine, dextrose and ulinastatin groups compared with their respective controls (placebo or no intervention).

DISCUSSION

Methylprednisolone, trimetazidine, dextrose and ulinastatin may have protective roles against IR injury in liver resection. However, based on the current evidence, they cannot be recommended for routine use and their application should be restricted to RCTs.

The effects of desflurane and sevoflurane on hepatic and renal functions after right hepatectomy in living donors*

We compared postoperative hepatic and renal functions between the two inhalational anesthetics, desflurane and sevoflurane in living donors undergoing right hepatectomy. Seventy-four adult donors were randomly allocated into Des group (n = 37) and sevo group (n = 37). Before the induction of anesthesia, morphine sulfate 400 microg was injected intrathecally. Anesthesia was maintained with one minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of deflurane or sevoflurane plus continuous intravenous remifentanil. Liver and renal function tests were performed and analysed at preoperative period, immediately after operation, and on 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 5th, 7th, and 30th postoperative days (PODs). Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) showed significant elevations from the day of surgery to POD 3 and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) was significantly elevated on POD 1 and POD 3 in the sevo group. Albumin level was significantly lower on POD 2 in the sevo group. Creatinine was significantly higher on POD 3 and POD 30 and estimated glomerular filtration ratio was significantly lower on POD 3 and POD 30 in the sevo group. No patient developed hepatic or renal failures. The results of our study showed better postoperative hepatic and renal function test with desflurane than sevoflurane at equivalent dose of 1 MAC in living donors undergoing right hepatectomy, but further study is required to evaluate clinical importance.

Brain death and its implications for management of the potential organ donor

The systemic physiologic changes that occur during and after brain death affect all organs suitable for transplantation. Major changes occur in the cardiovascular, pulmonary, endocrine, and immunological systems, and, if untreated may soon result in cardiovascular collapse and somatic death. Understanding these complex physiologic changes is mandatory for developing effective strategies for donor resuscitation and management in such a way that the functional integrity of potentially transplantable organs is maintained. This review elucidates these physiological changes and their consequences, and based on these consequences the rationale behind current medical management of brain-dead organ donors is discussed.

Pharmacological interventions versus no pharmacological intervention for ischaemia reperfusion injury in liver resection surgery performed under vascular control

BACKGROUND

Vascular occlusion to reduce blood loss is used during elective liver resection but results in significant ischaemia reperfusion injury. This, in turn, might lead to significant postoperative liver dysfunction and morbidity. Various pharmacological drugs have been used with an intention to ameliorate the ischaemia reperfusion injury in liver resections.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of different pharmacological agents versus no pharmacological interventions to decrease ischaemia reperfusion injury during liver resections where vascular occlusion was performed during the surgery.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Science Citation Index Expanded until January 2009.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised clinical trials, irrespective of language or publication status, comparing any pharmacological agent versus placebo or no pharmacological agent during elective liver resections with vascular occlusion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently identified trials for inclusion and independently extracted the data. We analysed the data with both the fixed-effect and the random-effects models using RevMan Analysis. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) based on intention-to-treat analysis or available case analysis.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified a total of 15 randomised trials evaluating 11 different pharmacological interventions (methylprednisolone, multivitamin antioxidant infusion, vitamin E infusion, amrinone, prostaglandin E1, pentoxifylline, mannitol, trimetazidine, dextrose, allopurinol, and OKY 046 (a thromboxane A2 synthetase inhibitor)). All trials had high risk of bias. There were no significant differences between the groups in mortality, liver failure, or perioperative morbidity. The trimetazidine group had a significantly shorter hospital stay than control (MD -3.00 days; 95% CI -3.57 to -2.43). There were no significant differences in any of the clinically relevant outcomes in the remaining comparisons. Methylprednisolone improved the enzyme markers of liver function and trimetazidine, methylprednisolone, and dextrose reduced the enzyme markers of liver injury compared with controls. However, there is a high risk of type I and type II errors because of the few trials included, the small sample size in each trial, and the risk of bias.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Trimetazidine, methylprednisolone, and dextrose may protect against ischaemia reperfusion injury in elective liver resections performed under vascular occlusion, but this is shown in trials with small sample sizes and high risk of bias. The use of these drugs should be restricted to well-designed randomised clinical trials before implementing them in clinical practice.

Pharmacological interventions for ischaemia reperfusion injury in liver resection surgery performed under vascular control

BACKGROUND

Vascular occlusion used during elective liver resection to reduce blood loss results in significant ischaemia reperfusion (IR) injury. This in turn leads to significant postoperative liver dysfunction and morbidity. Various pharmacological drugs have been used in experimental settings to ameliorate the ischaemia reperfusion injury in liver resections.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the relative benefits and harms of using one pharmacological intervention versus another pharmacological intervention to decrease ischaemia reperfusion injury during liver resections where vascular occlusion was performed during the surgery.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Science Citation Index Expanded until January 2009.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised clinical trials, irrespective of language or publication status, comparing one pharmacological agent versus another pharmacological agent during elective liver resections with vascular occlusion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently identified trials for inclusion and independently extracted data. We analysed the data with both the fixed-effect and the random-effects models using RevMan Analysis. We planned to calculate the risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) based on intention-to-treat analysis or available case analysis. However, all outcomes were only reported on by single trials, and meta-analysis could not be performed. Therefore, we performed Fisher's exact test on dichotomous outcomes.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified a total of five randomised trials evaluating nine different pharmacological interventions (amrinone, prostaglandin E1, pentoxifylline, dopexamine, dopamine, ulinastatin, gantaile, sevoflurane, and propofol). All trials had high risk of bias. There was no significant difference between the groups in mortality, liver failure, or perioperative morbidity. The ulinastatin group had significantly lower postoperative enzyme markers of liver injury compared with the gantaile group. None of the other comparisons showed any difference in any of the other outcomes. However, there is a high risk of type I and type II errors because of the few trials included, the small sample size in each trial, and the risk of bias.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Ulinastatin may have a protective effect against ischaemia reperfusion injury relative to gantaile in elective liver resections performed under vascular occlusion. The absolute benefit of this drug agent remains unknown. None of the drugs can be recommended for routine clinical practice. Considering that none of the drugs have proven to be useful to decrease ischaemia reperfusion injury, such trials should include a group of patients who do not receive any active intervention whenever possible to determine the pharmacological drug's absolute effects on ischaemia reperfusion injury in liver resections.

Preconditioning, organ preservation, and postconditioning to prevent ischemia-reperfusion injury to the liver

Ischemia and reperfusion lead to injury of the liver. Ischemia-reperfusion injury is inevitable in liver transplantation and trauma and, to a great extent, in liver resection. This article gives an overview of the mechanisms involved in this type of injury and summarizes protective and treatment strategies in clinical use today. Intervention is possible at different time points: during harvesting, during the period of preservation, and during implantation. Liver preconditioning and postconditioning can be applied in the transplant setting and for liver resection. Graft optimization is merely possible in the period between the harvest and the implantation. Given that there are 3 stages in which a surgeon can intervene against ischemia-reperfusion injury, we have structured the review as follows. The first section reviews the approaches using surgical interventions, such as ischemic preconditioning, as well as pharmacological applications. In the second section, static organ preservation and machine perfusion are addressed. Finally, the possibility of treating the recipient or postconditioning is discussed.

Update on inhalational anaesthetics

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Inhalational anaesthetic agents are a cornerstone in modern anaesthetic practice. The currently used compounds are very effective and have a good safety profile. In addition, it has been demonstrated that they possess organ-protective properties that might provide an additional tool in the treatment or prevention of the consequences of organ ischaemia-reperfusion injury or both. The present review summarizes some of the most recent findings on this subject.

RECENT FINDINGS

The mechanisms underlying the organ-protective effects of inhalational anaesthetics continue to be further unravelled. The main challenge, however, is to determine the clinical importance of these protective effects and their potential benefits for patients. Initial observations in cardiac surgery are encouraging, and the first clinical studies on other organ systems are being published. Noble gases share these organ-protective properties and may provide an additional tool for this purpose both in situations in which anaesthesia is needed (xenon) or in cases in which anaesthesia is not necessary (helium).

SUMMARY

In the experimental setting, inhalational anaesthetics have protective effects against ischaemia-reperfusion injury. Initial perioperative data suggest that these effects may also result into clinically relevant improved organ function. However, further research will be needed to reveal whether these organ-protective properties will ultimately translate into an improved short-term and long-term postoperative outcome.

The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The lack of consensus on how to define and grade adverse postoperative events has greatly hampered the evaluation of surgical procedures. A new classification of complications, initiated in 1992, was updated 5 years ago. It is based on the type of therapy needed to correct the complication. The principle of the classification was to be simple, reproducible, flexible, and applicable irrespective of the cultural background. The aim of the current study was to critically evaluate this classification from the perspective of its use in the literature, by assessing interobserver variability in grading complex complication scenarios and to correlate the classification grades with patients', nurses', and doctors' perception.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Reports from the literature using the classification system were systematically analyzed. Next, 11 scenarios illustrating difficult cases were prepared to develop a consensus on how to rank the various complications. Third, 7 centers from different continents, having routinely used the classification, independently assessed the 11 scenarios. An agreement analysis was performed to test the accuracy and reliability of the classification. Finally, the perception of the severity was tested in patients, nurses, and physicians by presenting 30 scenarios, each illustrating a specific grade of complication.

RESULTS

We noted a dramatic increase in the use of the classification in many fields of surgery. About half of the studies used the contracted form, whereas the rest used the full range of grading. Two-thirds of the publications avoided subjective terms such as minor or major complications. The study of 11 difficult cases among various centers revealed a high degree of agreement in identifying and ranking complications (89% agreement), and enabled a better definition of unclear situations. Each grade of complications significantly correlated with the perception by patients, nurses, and physicians (P < 0.05, Kruskal-Wallis test).

CONCLUSIONS

This 5-year evaluation provides strong evidence that the classification is valid and applicable worldwide in many fields of surgery. No modification in the general principle of classification is warranted in view of the use in ongoing publications and trials. Subjective, inaccurate, or confusing terms such as "minor or major" should be removed from the surgical literature.

Clamping techniques and protecting strategies in liver surgery

The use of vascular occlusion during liver resection is still a matter of debate. The aim of this review was to assess the advantages and disadvantages of portal triad occlusion as a protective strategy during elective liver resection and liver transplantation. Newer strategies such as pharmacological preconditioning are also discussed. A systematic literature search was conducted to detect randomized controlled trials assessing the effectiveness and safety of portal triad clamping, ischaemic preconditioning and pharmacological preconditioning during liver surgery. Vascular clamping cannot be systematically recommended. When used, portal triad clamping is associated with a tendency towards reduced blood loss and blood transfusion without having an impact on morbidity. Intermittent clamping appears to be better tolerated than continuous clamping, especially in patients with chronic liver disease. Ischaemic preconditioning before continuous portal triad clamping reduces reperfusion injury after warm ischaemia, particularly in steatotic patients. Ischaemic preconditioning has unclear effects in transplantation and there is currently no evidence to support or refute the use of ischaemic preconditioning in the donor. There are emerging alternative conditioning strategies, including the use of volatile anaesthetics, which may provide new and easily applicable therapeutic options to protect the liver.