Patients Treated with Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation Have Long-Term Rates of Death, Stroke, and Dementia Similar to Patients Without Atrial Fibrillation

Clinical and Echocardiographic Risk Factors Predict Late Recurrence after Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

The benefits of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) significantly decrease with late recurrence (LR). We aimed to develop a scoring system to identify patients at high and low risk for LR following RFCA, based on a comprehensive evaluation of multiple risk factors for AF recurrence, including echocardiographic parameters. We studied 2,352 patients with AF undergoing first-time RFCA in a single institution. The LR-free survival rate up to 5 years was measured using a Kaplan-Meier analysis. The influence of clinical and echocardiographic parameters on LR was calculated with a Cox-regression analysis. Duration of AF ≥4 years (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.75; p < 0.001), non-paroxysmal AF (HR = 3.18; p < 0.001), and diabetes (HR = 1.34; p = 0.015) were associated with increased risk of LR. Left atrial (LA) diameter ≥45 mm (HR = 2.42; p < 0.001), E/e' ≥ 10 (HR = 1.44; p < 0.001), dense SEC (HR = 3.30; p < 0.001), and decreased LA appendage flow velocity (≤40 cm/sec) (HR = 2.35; p < 0.001) were echocardiographic parameters associated with increased risk of LR following RFCA. The LR score based on the aforementioned risk factors could be used to predict LR (area under curve = 0.717) and to stratify the risk of LR (HR = 1.45 per 1 point increase in the score; p < 0.001). In conclusion, LR after RFCA is affected by multiple clinical and echocardiographic parameters. This study suggests that combining these multiple risk factors enables the identification of patients with AF at high or low risk for having arrhythmia recurrence.

Effect of Catheter Ablation vs Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy on Mortality, Stroke, Bleeding, and Cardiac Arrest Among Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: The CABANA Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

Catheter ablation is effective in restoring sinus rhythm in atrial fibrillation (AF), but its effects on long-term mortality and stroke risk are uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether catheter ablation is more effective than conventional medical therapy for improving outcomes in AF.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

The Catheter Ablation vs Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation trial is an investigator-initiated, open-label, multicenter, randomized trial involving 126 centers in 10 countries. A total of 2204 symptomatic patients with AF aged 65 years and older or younger than 65 years with 1 or more risk factors for stroke were enrolled from November 2009 to April 2016, with follow-up through December 31, 2017.

INTERVENTIONS

The catheter ablation group (n = 1108) underwent pulmonary vein isolation, with additional ablative procedures at the discretion of site investigators. The drug therapy group (n = 1096) received standard rhythm and/or rate control drugs guided by contemporaneous guidelines.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary end point was a composite of death, disabling stroke, serious bleeding, or cardiac arrest. Among 13 prespecified secondary end points, 3 are included in this report: all-cause mortality; total mortality or cardiovascular hospitalization; and AF recurrence.

RESULTS

Of the 2204 patients randomized (median age, 68 years; 37.2% female; 42.9% had paroxysmal AF and 57.1% had persistent AF), 89.3% completed the trial. Of the patients assigned to catheter ablation, 1006 (90.8%) underwent the procedure. Of the patients assigned to drug therapy, 301 (27.5%) ultimately received catheter ablation. In the intention-to-treat analysis, over a median follow-up of 48.5 months, the primary end point occurred in 8.0% (n = 89) of patients in the ablation group vs 9.2% (n = 101) of patients in the drug therapy group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.86 [95% CI, 0.65-1.15]; P = .30). Among the secondary end points, outcomes in the ablation group vs the drug therapy group, respectively, were 5.2% vs 6.1% for all-cause mortality (HR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.60-1.21]; P = .38), 51.7% vs 58.1% for death or cardiovascular hospitalization (HR, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.74-0.93]; P = .001), and 49.9% vs 69.5% for AF recurrence (HR, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.45-0.60]; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among patients with AF, the strategy of catheter ablation, compared with medical therapy, did not significantly reduce the primary composite end point of death, disabling stroke, serious bleeding, or cardiac arrest. However, the estimated treatment effect of catheter ablation was affected by lower-than-expected event rates and treatment crossovers, which should be considered in interpreting the results of the trial.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00911508.

Linking Atrial Fibrillation with Alzheimer's Disease: Epidemiological, Pathological, and Mechanistic Evidence

Many studies have shown a relationship between atrial fibrillation (AF) and vascular dementia. AF is a major risk factor for stroke, and stroke is the greatest risk factor for vascular dementia. However, the relationship between Alzheimer's disease (AD), the leading cause of dementia, and AF remains unclear. At least four epidemiological studies have reported AF significantly raises the risk of AD 1.5- to 2.5-fold. Chronic cerebral hypoperfusion, resulting from persistent AF, could explain the link as hypoperfusion may mechanistically exacerbate amyloid-β (Aβ) neuropathology, such as senile plaques and amyloid angiopathy, by upregulating Aβ-producing enzymes and lowering Aβ clearance efficiency. In addition, hypoperfusion may exacerbate tau pathology directly through upregulation of tau-phosphorylating enzymes and indirectly via the amyloid cascade. However, most neuropathological studies do not support the direct link between AD pathology and AF but rather suggests vascular neuropathology is related to, or coexistent with, AF and lowers the threshold for clinically-evident AD. Vascular neuropathology may thus mediate the link between AD and AF. From a treatment perspective, an observational study has shown that catheter ablation is associated with less incidence of AD in AF patients, suggesting rhythm-control suppresses hypoperfusion-induced AD neuropathology. In addition, rate-control may lower the rate of cognitive decline in cognitively impaired elderly subjects with AF. Further studies are warranted to clarify the mechanisms underlying the linkage between AF and AD. However, anticoagulation and rhythm-/rate-control against AF may hold promise even for AD patients.

Atrial Fibrillation and Dementia: Exploring the Association, Defining Risks and Improving Outcomes

AF is strongly associated with a spectrum of cranial injuries including stroke and dementia. Dementia risk is seen in patients with and without a prior stroke and includes idiopathic forms of dementia, such as Alzheimer’s disease. The initiation, use and efficacy of anticoagulation have been shown in multiple observational trials to have an impact on dementia risk. Cerebral hypoperfusion during AF can result in cognitive decline and patients with cranial atherosclerosis may have unique susceptibility. Therapies to carefully control the ventricular rate and catheter ablation have been shown in observational trials to lower dementia risk. There is a need for further research in multiple areas and the observational trials will require prospective trials confirmation. Recent guidelines for AF have advocated the initiation of effective anticoagulation, the treatment of associated disease conditions that may influence the progression of AF and catheter ablation, with long-term management of risk factors to lower risk of dementia.

Role of Geriatric Syndromes in the Management of Atrial Fibrillation in Older Adults: A Narrative Review

OBJECTIVES

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common in older adults and associated with increased risk of cardiovascular events including thromboembolism. However, less is known about its association with noncardiovascular events, especially geriatric syndromes and conditions such as dementia, depression, impaired physical function, polypharmacy, falls, and poor quality of life. This review aims to help healthcare professionals integrate the special needs of older adults into their management of AF.

DESIGN

Nonsystematic review. A literature search on published articles on AF and geriatric syndromes and conditions was performed using the electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE and SCOPUS, and DARE until December 2017. Non-English articles were excluded.

SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS

Older adults with and without AF from different settings.

MEASURES

Various cognitive, mood, and functional measurements were used in these studies. In studies regarding polypharmacy, the Beers or PRISCUS criteria were used to identify inappropriate medications. In quality of life measurements studies, instruments like Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 and Atrial Fibrillation Quality of Life questionnaire were used.

RESULTS

This literature review finds that AF has a substantial association with geriatric syndromes and conditions and that AF is a risk factor for the development of geriatric syndromes and conditions. Evidence is limited regarding the potential benefit of long-term treatment of AF in lowering the risk of developing geriatric syndromes and conditions.

CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS

Considering the impact of AF on cardiovascular outcomes and geriatric syndromes and conditions in older adults, healthcare professionals need to consider these complex dynamics while managing AF in older adults. An individual approach to AF management is needed in older adults with multiple comorbidity and polypharmacy that may help lower the risk of disease-disease, disease-drug, and drug-drug interactions. Special consideration needs to be given to patients' cognitive and functional impairment and ability to adhere to therapy.

Catheter Ablation of Long-standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: a Reckless Challenge or a Way to Real Cure?

Long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (L-PeAF) is a category in which rhythm control is attempted while atrial fibrillation (AF) is maintained for more than 1 year. Because AF is a progressive disease and L-PeAF accompanies significant electrical and structural remodeling of atria, it is difficult to restore and maintain sinus rhythm in patients with L-PeAF. Nonetheless, the rhythm outcome is being increasingly improved by the development of sophisticated mapping devices, highly efficient catheters, and evidence-based ablation strategies, and the rational choice of patient selection criteria. This review discusses the evolution of the rhythm control outcome of L-PeAF and its future direction of development.

Dementia and Atrial Fibrillation: Pathophysiological Mechanisms and Therapeutic Implications

Atrial fibrillation increases the risk of stroke by a factor of four- to fivefold, and dementia is a common consequence of stroke. However, atrial fibrillation has been associated with cognitive impairment and dementia, even in patients without prior overt stroke. Nonischemic mechanisms include cerebral hypoperfusion, vascular inflammation, brain atrophy, genetic factors, and shared risk factors such as age or hypertension. Critical appraisal of studies evaluating the association between atrial fibrillation and dementia in stroke-free patients reveals that several suffer from methodological issues, such as not including silent stroke or anticoagulation therapy in multivariate analyses. Some studies show a close relationship between atrial fibrillation and dementia due to silent stroke, in the absence of overt stroke. Evidence is accumulating that anticoagulation may be effective to decrease the risk of dementia in atrial fibrillation patients. Overall, the pathogenesis linking atrial fibrillation to dementia is likely multifactorial. Cerebral infarctions, including silent stroke, play a central role. These findings underscore the importance of stroke prevention measures in atrial fibrillation patients.

Atrial Fibrillation: Possible Influences of Rate and Rhythm Control Strategy on Cognitive Performance

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether rate or rhythm control strategy may affect cognition in older adults with atrial fibrillation (AF).

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of the REgistro POliterapie SIMI database.

SETTING

Italian internal medicine and geriatric wards.

PARTICIPANTS

Individuals aged 65 and older (N=1,082, mean age 80.6 ± 7; 50% male) with AF before hospital admission (for any cause).

MEASUREMENTS

Evaluation of cognitive performance using the Short Blessed Test (SBT) according to rhythm and rate control strategy, anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy, age, education, and comorbidities.

RESULTS

Two hundred seventy-two participants (25%) received rhythm control therapy, 331 (30.6%) rate control therapy, and 479 (44.3%) no therapy of interest. Four hundred thirty-six (40.3%) in the total sample and in the different rhythm and rate control strategy groups were treated with an oral anticoagulant. Cognitive performance (mean SBT score) was found to be higher in the rhythm control group (7.5 ± 6.6) than in the no therapy (9.9 ± 7.9) and rate control (10.6 ± 8.3) (p<.001) groups. Logistic regression models adjusted for age, sex, education, anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy, and comorbidities found that the rhythm control strategy (adjusted odds ratio (aOR)=0.56, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.40-0.79, p=.001) and education (aOR 0.50, 95% CI=0.35-0.62; p<.001) were associated with less likelihood of cognitive impairment CONCLUSION: In the absence of anticoagulation, rhythm control of AF may protect against cognitive decline. J Am Geriatr Soc 66:2178-2182, 2018.

Withdrawal of oral anticoagulants 3 months after successful radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The best anticoagulation therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF) after radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) remains a challenge.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, Ovid, and Cochrane Library was conducted identifying at clinical trials which evaluated the differences between thromboembolism (TE) and hemorrhage in an off-oral anticoagulants (OACs) treatment group (the observation group) and an on-OACs treatment group (the control group), at 3 months after successful RFCA. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software, and the fixed effect model was used as a relevant statistical model. χ² test and I² were used to test for the presence of heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were also performed.

RESULTS

The results showed no significant differences between two groups in TE (relative risk [RR] 0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51-1.33, P = 0.42), and only mild heterogeneity (P = 0.22, I²  = 29%). No significant differences in TE between two subgroups were found according to < 3 years and ≥ 3 years follow-up analyses (RR 0.58, 95% CI, 0.26-1.28, P = 0.18; RR 1.00, 95% CI, 0.54-1.85, P = 1.00). Furthermore, there was a lower risk of TE in the observation subgroup (< 60 years) compared to the control group (RR 0.31, 95% CI, 0.12-0.78, P = 0.01). Also, there were no significant differences in TE between two subgroups (≥ 60 years, RR 1.24, 95% CI, 0.67-2.28, P = 0.49). The risk of hemorrhage in the observation group was significantly lower compared to the control group (RR 0.05, 95%CI, 0.02-0.14, P < 0.00001).

CONCLUSIONS

The withdrawal of OACs 3 months after successful radiofrequency catheter ablation for patients with AF may be safe and feasible. It needs to be tested by randomized controlled trial.

Catheter ablation for AF improves global thrombotic profile and enhances fibrinolysis

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are at increased risk of thrombotic events despite oral anticoagulation (OAC). Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) can restore and maintain sinus rhythm (SR) in patients with AF. To assess whether RFCA improves thrombotic status. 80 patients (71% male, 64 ± 12y) with recently diagnosed AF, on OAC and scheduled to undergo RFCA or DC cardioversion (DCCV) were recruited. Thrombotic status was assessed using the point-of-care global thrombosis test (GTT), before, and 4-6 weeks after DCCV and 3 months after RFCA. The GTT first measures the time taken for occlusive thrombus formation (occlusion time, OT), while the second phase of the test measures the time taken to spontaneously dissolve this clot through endogenous thrombolysis (lysis time, LT). 3 months after RFCA, there was a significant reduction in LT (1994s [1560; 2475] vs. 1477s [1015; 1878]) in those who maintained SR, but not in those who reverted to AF. At follow-up, LT was longer in those in AF compared to those in SR (AF 2966s [2038; 3879] vs. SR 1477s [1015; 1878]). RFCA resulted in no change in OT value, irrespective of rhythm outcome. Similarly, there was no change in OT or LT in response to DCCV, irrespective of whether SR was restored. Successful restoration and maintenance of SR following RFCA of AF is associated with improved global thrombotic status with enhanced fibrinolysis. Larger studies are required to confirm these early results and investigate whether improved thrombotic status translates into fewer thromboembolic events.

Ischemic stroke risk during long-term follow up in patients with successful catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in Korea

The interruption of oral anticoagulation therapy (OAC) after CA of atrial fibrillation (AF) is controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between successful long-term outcomes of catheter resection and SR maintenance and ischemic stroke risk in Korea. We studied 1,548 consecutive patients who were followed up for more than 2 years after CA of AF. We investigated the incidence of ischemic stroke during long-term follow-up. Compared to the AF recurrence group (n = 619), the sinus rhythm (SR) maintenance group (n = 929) had more paroxysmal AF (74.6% versus 44.4%, p<0.001), smaller LA size (39.9±5.7mm versus 42.3±6.0mm, p<0.001), and younger age (54.2±10.9 years versus 56.4±10.6 years, p<0.001). However, CHA₂DS₂-VASc scores were not significantly different between the two groups (0.9 vs. 1.1, p = 0.053). The overall incidence of ischemic stroke during the mean follow-up period of 54 months after CA was 0.6%, and was significantly lower in the SR group than the AF recurrence group (0.3% vs. 1.1%, log-rank test p<0.001). However, in sub-analysis in the SR group, the rate of ischemic stroke was significantly increasing in patients with a CHA₂DS₂-VASc score ≥ 4 compared to those with a CHA₂DS₂-VASc score < 4 (4.3% vs. 0.2%, log-rank test p<0.001). In conclusion, this long-term follow-up data in patients with AF who underwent successful CA showed that SR maintenance was correlated with a lower rate of ischemic stroke in Korea. However, it was only observed in patients with CHA₂DS₂-VASc score ≤3.

Atrial Fibrillation, Cognitive Decline, and Dementia: an Epidemiologic Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and dementia are both prevalent diseases in aging societies, which exert a great economic burden worldwide. Although a handful of epidemiologic studies have indicated that AF is independently associated with faster cognitive decline and a higher risk of dementia, there is still a lack of comprehensive understanding of the observed association. In this review, we summarize evidence from major epidemiologic studies concerning AF-related cognitive decline and dementia, the potential mechanisms underlying their association, and the cognitive benefits of treatment options.

RECENT FINDINGS

A large majority of population-based longitudinal studies have consistently shown an independent association of AF with cognitive decline and dementia with varying effect sizes, depending on the age of the study population and the presence of clinical stroke. The underlying pathways linking AF to cognitive phenotypes may involve systemic inflammation, cerebral hypoperfusion, and cerebral small vessel disease and microemboli. However, current evidence is insufficient to support the potential benefits of AF treatment in reducing risk of cognitive decline and dementia.

SUMMARY

Current epidemiologic research suggests that AF contributes to cognitive decline and dementia, independent of a history of stroke. Further work is warranted to elucidate the potential mechanisms underlying this association, and more well-designed studies are needed to explore the possible cognitive benefits of different therapeutic options in patients with AF.

Anticoagulant use in atrial fibrillation and risk of dementia: review of contemporary knowledge

INTRODUCTION

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is strongly associated with dementia, including idiopathic dementias such as Alzheimer's disease. The relative risk of dementia is highest in AF patients 70 years and younger, and the burden of exposure to arrhythmia appears to underlie part of the risk. Areas covered: Anticoagulation choices and approach influence dementia risk. In warfarin patients, inadequate time spent in therapeutic range is highly associated with the increased dementia risk long-term. This risk is further accentuated with frequent over anticoagulation in patients also receiving aspirin. Direct oral anticoagulant therapies in early observational studies show that there is potential for improving long-term risk of dementia when compared to warfarin, although prospective trials are needed. AF and dementia are end manifestations of systemic disease; a systemic approach is needed with early treatment of shared risk factors to prevent disease presentation altogether. Expert commentary: In this review, we will bring together available data with regards to the link between anticoagulant use for AF and dementia. Anticoagulation initiation timing, use, and efficacy remain critical risk factors for dementia in AF patients and consequently provide opportunities to decrease risk.

Stroke and Cardiovascular Events After Ablation or Antiarrhythmic Drugs for Treatment of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

Catheter ablation and antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) are the most common rhythm-control strategies for atrial fibrillation (AF). Data comparing the rate of stroke and cardiovascular events between the treatment strategies are limited. Therefore, this observational study uses claims data to compare rate of cardiovascular hospitalization and stroke for patients with AF treated with ablation or AADs. Patients in the MarketScan dataset with AF between January 2010 and December 2014 were categorized in the ablation group if an atrial catheter ablation was performed, or in the AAD group if a relevant AAD was prescribed for AF but no ablation was performed. One year of history was required, and the index event was selected as the most recent ablation or AAD prescription closest to January 1, 2013. A 2:1 propensity score match was performed for age, gender, co-morbidities, and total medical cost in the year before index event. Outcomes included thromboembolic event (ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, or systemic embolism) and all cardiovascular hospitalizations. Of the 164,639 patients in the AAD group, 29,456 were matched to the 14,728 ablation patients. There were no significant differences in age (64 ± 10 in both groups), gender (58% male), or CHA₂DS₂-VASc score (3.2 ± 1.3). Risk of hospitalization with primary diagnosis of thromboembolic event was 41% greater in the AADs group (p < 0.001), and cardiovascular hospitalizations were 13% more likely (p < 0.001). In conclusion, patients treated with catheter ablation of AF have lower risk of thromboembolic events and cardiovascular hospitalizations than a matched cohort of patients managed with AADs.

Anticoagulation use and clinical outcomes after catheter ablation in patients with persistent and longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation

INTRODUCTION

Whether successful catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) reduces risk of cerebrovascular events (CVEs) remains controversial and whether oral anticoagulation therapy (OAT) can be safely discontinued in patients rendered free of AF recurrences remains unknown. We evaluated OAT use patterns and examined long-term rates of CVEs (stroke/TIA) and major bleeding episodes (MBEs) in patients with nonparoxysmal AF treated with catheter ablation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Four hundred patients with nonparoxysmal AF (200 persistent, 200 longstanding persistent; mean age 60.3 ± 9.7 years, 82% male) undergoing first AF ablation were followed for 3.6 ± 2.4 years. OAT discontinuation during follow-up was permitted in selected patients per physician discretion. At last follow-up, allowing for multiple ablations, 172 (43.0%) patients were free of AF recurrence. Two hundred and seven (51.8%) discontinued OAT at some point; 174 (43.5%) were off OAT at last follow-up. Patients without AF recurrence were more likely to remain off OAT (HR 0.23 [95% CI 0.17-0.33]). Patients with persistent (versus longstanding persistent) AF type prior to ablation (HR 0.6 [CI 0.44-0.83]) and those with CHA₂ DS₂ -VASc score <2 (HR 0.56 [0.39-0.80]) were less likely to continue OAT. Seven patients had CVEs (incidence: 0.49/100 patient years) and 14 experienced MBE during follow-up (incidence: 0.98/100 patient years). Older age (P  =  0.001) and coronary artery disease (P  =  0.028) were associated with CVE.

CONCLUSION

Anticoagulation discontinuation in well selected, closely monitored patients following successful ablation of nonparoxysmal AF was associated with a low rate of clinical embolic CVEs. Prospective studies are required to confirm safety of OAT discontinuation after successful AF ablation.

Comparison of Rhythm and Rate Control Strategies for Stroke Occurrence in a Prospective Cohort of Atrial Fibrillation Patients

PURPOSE

Comparisons of rhythm and rate control strategies for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are still inconclusive. We compared differences in clinical outcomes between the rhythm and rate control strategies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The COmparison study of Drugs for symptom control and complication prEvention of Atrial Fibrillation (CODE-AF) registry prospectively enrolled 6000 patients who were treated for AF using real-world guideline adherence at multiple referral centers. In total, 2508 (41.8%) patients were clinically followed up for over six months. Of these, 1134 (45.2 %) patients treated by rhythm control and 1374 (54.8 %) patients treated by rate control were analyzed for clinical outcomes, including stroke and cardiovascular outcomes.

RESULTS

Among all patients (age, 68±10 years; male, 62.4%), those treated with the rhythm control strategy were significantly younger, had more symptomatic paroxysmal AF, and a shorter AF duration, and were less likely to have diabetes, renal dysfunction, and heart failure, compared to those treated with the rate control strategy (CHA₂DS₂-VASc score 2.4±1.5 vs. 3.1±1.7, p<0.001). Even though oral anticoagulation was similarly prescribed in both groups, occurrence of stroke was less likely to occur in the rhythm control strategy group (0.0% vs. 0.7%, p=0.015). Multivariate Cox hazard regression showed that only age, especially more than 75 years old, were significantly correlated with the occurrence of stroke, regardless of the strategy used for treatment.

CONCLUSION

In this prospective AF cohort, compared with the rate control strategy, the rhythm control strategy was associated with fewer cardiovascular events and strokes in a short-term period.

Alteration of cerebrovascular haemodynamic patterns due to atrial fibrillation: an in silico investigation

There has recently been growing evidence that atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common cardiac arrhythmia, is independently associated with the risk of dementia. This represents a very recent frontier with high social impact for the number of individuals involved and for the expected increase in AF incidence in the next 40 years. Although a number of potential haemodynamic processes, such as microembolisms, altered cerebral blood flow, hypoperfusion and microbleeds, arise as connecting links between the two pathologies, the causal mechanisms are far from clear. An in silico approach is proposed that combines in sequence two lumped-parameter schemes, for the cardiovascular system and the cerebral circulation. The systemic arterial pressure is obtained from the cardiovascular system and used as the input for the cerebral circulation, with the aim of studying the role of AF on the cerebral haemodynamics with respect to normal sinus rhythm (NSR), over a 5000 beat recording. In particular, the alteration of the haemodynamic (pressure and flow rate) patterns in the microcirculation during AF is analysed by means of different statistical tools, from correlation coefficients to autocorrelation functions, crossing times, extreme values analysis and multivariate linear regression models. A remarkable signal alteration, such as a reduction in signal correlation (NSR, about 3 s; AF, less than 1 s) and increased probability (up to three to four times higher in AF than in NSR) of extreme value events, emerges for the peripheral brain circulation. The described scenario offers a number of plausible cause-effect mechanisms that might explain the occurrence of critical events and the haemodynamic links relating to AF and dementia.

Efficacy of catheter ablation of focal sources in persistent atrial fibrillation

INTRODUCTION

Recent studies suggest that atrial fibrillation (AF) is maintained by electrical activity arising from focal sources. We sought to test whether catheter ablation that targets focal sources can improve on current ablation protocols for persistent AF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In patients with persistent AF whose AF did not terminate with pulmonary vein (PV) isolation, the left atrium was mapped with a 20-pole high-density mapping catheter using CARTO^® 3 navigation. If a site demonstrated centrifugal activation over at least three consecutive cycles, it was deemed a focal source and ablated. If AF remained, defragmentation was performed until AF was terminated. Freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia was compared between the study patients and propensity score matched historical controls who had undergone conventional stepwise ablation. Of the 68 study patients, 2.9 ± 1.9 focal sources were identified in 60 patients. Focal sources displayed transient centrifugal activation patterns for a median of six consecutive cycles. Total radiofrequency duration was shorter in the study group (62 ± 16 minutes vs. 75 ± 24 minutes, P = 0.0003). During a 1-year follow-up period, 39 (57%) and 26 (38%) patients were free from atrial tachyarrhythmias in the absence of antiarrhythmic drugs in the study and control groups, respectively (hazard ratio: 1.85, 95% confidence interval: 1.17-2.96, P = 0.009). Improvement of clinical outcome was mainly driven by a decrease in recurrence of atrial tachycardia in the study patients (22% vs. 40%, P = 0.047).

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest that focal sources are appropriate ablation targets in addition to the PVs in persistent AF.

Five-year impact of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with a prior history of stroke

BACKGROUND

Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) is an established therapeutic rhythm approach. Patients with a prior history of a stroke (CVA) represent a unique high-risk population for recurrent thromboembolic events. The role of antiarrhythmic treatment on the natural history of stroke recurrence in these patients is not fully understood.

METHODS

Three patient groups with a prior CVA and 5 years of follow-up were matched 1:3:3 by propensity score (±0.01): AF ablation patients receiving their first ablation (n  =  139), AF patients that did not receive an ablation (n  =  416), and CVA patients without clinical AF (n  =  416). Prior CVA was determined by medical chart review. Patients were followed for outcomes of recurrent CVA, heart failure, and death.

RESULTS

The average age of the population was 69 ± 11 years and 51% male. AF ablation patients had higher rates of hypertension and heart failure (P < 0.0001), but diabetes prevalence was similar between the groups (P  =  0.5). Note that 5-year risk of CVA (HR  =  2.26, P < 0.0001) and death (HR  =  2.43, P < 0.0001) were higher in the AF, no ablation group compared those that were ablated. When comparing AF, ablation to no AF patients, there was not a significant difference in 5-year risk of for CVA (HR  =  0.82, P  =  0.39) and death (HR  =  0.92, P  =  0.70); however, heart failure risk was increased (HR  =  3.08, P  =  0.001).

CONCLUSION

In patients with AF and a prior CVA, patients undergoing ablation have lower rates of recurrent stroke compared to AF patients not ablated. Although the full mechanisms of benefit are unknown, as CVA rates are similar to patients without AF these data are suggestive of a potential altering of the natural history of disease progression.

Randomised clinical trial of cryoballoon versus irrigated radio frequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation-the effect of double short versus standard exposure cryoablation duration during pulmonary vein isolation (CIRCA-DOSE): methods and rationale

INTRODUCTION

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is an effective therapy for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF), but it has limitations. The two most significant recent advances have centred on the integration of real-time quantitative assessment of catheter contact force into focal radio frequency (RF) ablation catheters and the development of dedicated ablation tools capable of achieving PVI with a single ablation lesion (Arctic Front cryoballoon, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA). Although each of these holds promise for improving the clinical success of catheter ablation of AF, there has not been a rigorous comparison of these advanced ablation technologies. Moreover, the optimal duration of cryoablation (freezing time) has not been determined.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Patients undergoing an initial PVI procedure for paroxysmal AF will be recruited. Patients will be randomised 1:1:1 between contact-force irrigated RF ablation, short duration cryoballoon ablation (2 min applications) and standard duration cryoballoon ablation (4 min applications). The primary outcome is time to first documented AF recurrence on implantable loop recorder. With a sample size of 111 per group and a two-sided 0.025 significance level (to account for the two main comparisons), the study will have 80% power (using a log-rank test) to detect a difference of 20% between contact force RF catheter ablation and either of the two cryoballoon ablation groups. Factoring in a 4% loss to follow-up, 116 patients per group should be randomised and followed for a year (total study population of 348).

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study was approved by the University of British Columbia Office of Research (Services) Ethics Clinical Research Ethics Board. Results of the study will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT01913522; Pre-results.

Should We Perform Catheter Ablation for Asymptomatic Atrial Fibrillation?

Since the original description of atrial fibrillation ablation, numerous studies have demonstrated the superiority of catheter ablation over pharmacological therapy for maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with both paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation. However, to date, no randomized studies have been powered to demonstrate a mortality or stroke reduction benefit of rhythm control with catheter ablation over a rate control strategy. The results of such ongoing studies are not expected until 2018 or 2019. Thus, the only indication for atrial fibrillation ablation in recent guidelines has been the presence of symptoms. However, up to 40% of an atrial fibrillation population may be asymptomatic. In 2017, in the absence of randomized studies, are there nevertheless data that support atrial fibrillation ablation in asymptomatic patients?

Atrial fibrillation, cognition and dementia: A review

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the most common types of cardiac arrhythmia, particularly among older adults. AF confers a 5-fold risk for thromboembolic stroke as well as a 2-fold higher risk for congestive heart failure, morbidity, and mortality. Although stroke remains an important and impactful complication of AF, recent studies have shown that AF is independently associated with other neurological disorders, including cognitive impairment and dementia, even after adjusting for prior ischemic stroke. We performed a review of the published literature on the association between AF and cognitive status. Further, we reviewed studies investigating the underlying mechanisms for this association and/or reporting the impact of AF treatment on cognitive function. While most published studies demonstrate associations between AF and impaired cognition, no AF treatment has yet been associated with a reduced incidence of cognitive decline or dementia.

Contemporary Atrial Fibrillation Management: A Comparison of the Current AHA/ACC/HRS, CCS, and ESC Guidelines

In this article we compare and contrast the current recommendations, and highlight the important differences, in the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/Heart Rhythm Society, European Society of Cardiology, and Canadian Cardiovascular Society atrial fibrillation (AF) guidelines. Although many of the recommendations of the various societies are similar, there are important differences in the methodologies underlying their development and the specific content. Specifically, key differences can be observed in: (1) the definition of nonvalvular AF, which subsequently affects anticoagulation choices and candidacy for non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants; (2) the symptom score used to guide management decisions and longitudinal patient profiling; (3) the stroke risk stratification algorithm used to determine indications for oral anticoagulant therapy; (4) the role of acetylsalicylic acid in stroke prevention in AF; (5) the antithrombotic regimens used in the context of coronary artery disease, acute coronary syndromes, and percutaneous coronary intervention; (6) the rate control target and medications recommended to achieve the target; and (7) the role of "first-line" catheter ablation, open surgical ablation, and left atrial appendage exclusion.

Mortality, stroke, and heart failure in atrial fibrillation cohorts after ablation versus propensity-matched cohorts

Background

We sought to determine from key clinical outcomes whether catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with increased survival.

Methods and results

Using routinely collected hospital data, ablation patients were matched to two control cohorts using direct and propensity score methodology. Four thousand nine hundred ninety-one ablation patients were matched 1:1 with general AF controls without ablation. Five thousand four hundred seven ablation patients were similarly matched to controls who underwent cardioversion. We examined the rates of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (stroke/TIA), heart failure hospitalization, and death. Matched populations had very similar comorbidity profiles, including nearly identical CHA₂DS₂-VASc risk distribution (p=0.6948 and p=0.8152 vs general AF and cardioversion cohorts). Kaplan–Meier models showed increased survival after ablation for all outcomes compared with both control cohorts (p<0.0001 for all outcomes vs general AF, p=0.0087 for stroke/TIA, p<0.0001 for heart failure, and p<0.0001 for death vs cardioversion). Cox regression models also showed improved survival after ablation for all outcomes compared with the general AF cohort (hazard ratio [HR]=0.4, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.3–0.6, p<0.0001 for stroke/TIA; HR=0.4, 95% CI: 0.2–0.6, p<0.0001 for heart failure; HR=0.1, 95% CI: 0.1–0.1, p<0.0001 for death) and the cardioversion cohort (HR=0.6, 95% CI: 0.4–0.9, p=0.0111 for stroke/TIA; HR=0.4, 95% CI: 0.3–0.6, p<0.0001 for heart failure; HR=0.3, 95% CI:0.2–0.5, p<0.0001 for death).

Conclusions

Catheter ablation of AF was associated with very significant reductions in mortality, stroke/TIA, and heart failure compared with a matched general AF population and a matched population who underwent cardioversion. Potential confounding of outcomes was minimized by very tight cohort matching.

Stroke rates before and after ablation of atrial fibrillation and in propensity-matched controls in the UK

BACKGROUND

We sought to determine whether catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with reduced occurrence of ischemic cerebrovascular events.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Using routinely collected hospital data, ablation patients were matched to two control cohorts via direct and propensity score matching. A total of 4,991 ablation patients were matched 1:1 to general AF controls with no ablation, and 5,407 ablation patients were similarly matched to controls who underwent cardioversion. Yearly rates of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (stroke/TIA) before and after an index date were compared between cohorts. Index date was defined as the first ablation, the first cardioversion, or the second AF event in the general AF cohort. Matched populations had very similar demographic and comorbidity profiles, including nearly identical CHA₂DS₂-VASc risk distribution (p-values 0.6948 and 0.8152 vs general AF and cardioversion cohorts). Statistical models of stroke/TIA risk in the preindex period showed no difference in annual event rates between cohorts (mean±standard error 0.30% ± 0.08% ablation vs 0.28% ± 0.07% general AF, p=0.8292; 0.37% ± 0.09% ablation vs 0.42% ± 0.08% cardioversion, p=0.5198). Postindex models showed significantly lower annual rates of stroke/TIA in ablation patients compared with each control group over 5 years (0.64% ± 0.11% ablation vs 1.84% ± 0.23% general AF, p<0.0001; 0.82% ± 0.15% ablation vs 1.37% ± 0.18% cardioversion, p=0.0222).

CONCLUSION

Matching resulted in cohorts having the same baseline risks and rates of ischemic cerebrovascular events. After the index date, there were significantly lower yearly event rates in the ablation cohort. These results suggest the divergence in outcome rates stems from variance in the treatment pathways beginning at the index date.