Clinical and Biological Correlates of Neurotoxicity Associated with CAR T-cell Therapy in Patients with B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Berberine-loaded MSC-derived sEVs encapsulated in injectable GelMA hydrogel for spinal cord injury repair

After spinal cord injury (SCI), local inflammatory response and fibrous scar formation severely hinder nerve regeneration. Berberine (Ber) has a powerful regulatory effect on the local microenvironment, but its limited solubility and permeability through the blood-brain barrier severely limit its systemic efficacy. Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (hUC-MSCs)-derived small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) are natural nanocarriers with high cargo loading capacity, and can cross the blood-brain barrier. Most importantly, sEVs can improve drug solubility and drug utilization. Therefore, they can overcome many defects of Ber application. This experiment aimed to design a Ber-carrying hUC-MSCs-derived sEVs and GelMA hydrogel. Ber was loaded into sEVs (sEVs-Ber) by ultrasonic co-incubation with a drug loading capacity (LC) of 15.07%. The unhindered release of up to 80% of sEVs-Ber from GelMA hydrogel was accomplished for up to 14 days. And they could be directly absorbed by local cells of injury, allowing for direct local delivery of the drug and enhancing its efficacy. The experimental results confirmed injecting GelMA-sEVs-Ber into spinal cord defects could exert anti-inflammatory effects by regulating the expression of inflammatory factors. It also demonstrated the anti-fibrotic effect of Ber in SCI for the first time. The modulatory effects of sEVs and Ber on the local microenvironment significantly promoted nerve regeneration and recovery of motor function in post-SCI rats. These results demonstrated that the GelMA-sEVs-Ber dual carrier system is a promising therapeutic strategy for SCI repair.

Molecular and Clinical Characteristics of Different Toxicity Rates in Anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells: Real-World Experience

Commercially available anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CARΤ cells) have offered long-term survival to a constantly expanding patient population. Given that novel toxicities including cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity (ICANS) have been observed, we aimed to document the safety and toxicity of this treatment in a real-world study. We enrolled 31 adult patients referred to our center for CAR T therapy. Tisagenlecleucel was infused in 12 patients, axicabtagene ciloleucel in 14, and brexucabtagene autoleucel in 5. Cytokine release syndrome was noted in 26 patients while neurotoxicity was observed in 7. Tocilizumab was administered for CRS in 18 patients, along with short-term, low-dose steroid administration in one patient who developed grade III CRS and, subsequently, grade I ICANS. High-dose steroids, along with anakinra and siltuximab, were administered in only two MCL patients. With a median follow-up time of 13.4 months, nine patients were then in CR. The progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 41.2% and 88.1% at one year, respectively. MCL diagnosis, which coincides with the administration of brexucabtagene autoleucel, was the only factor to be independently associated with poor OS (p < 0.001); meanwhile, increased LDH independently predicted PFS (p = 0.027).In addition, CRP at day 14 was associated with a poor OS (p = 0.001). Therefore, our real-world experience confirmed that commercial CAR T therapy can be administered with minimal toxicity.

Challenges and new technologies in adoptive cell therapy

Adoptive cell therapies (ACTs) have existed for decades. From the initial infusion of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes to the subsequent specific enhanced T cell receptor (TCR)-T and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapies, many novel strategies for cancer treatment have been developed. Owing to its promising outcomes, CAR-T cell therapy has revolutionized the field of ACTs, particularly for hematologic malignancies. Despite these advances, CAR-T cell therapy still has limitations in both autologous and allogeneic settings, including practicality and toxicity issues. To overcome these challenges, researchers have focused on the application of CAR engineering technology to other types of immune cell engineering. Consequently, several new cell therapies based on CAR technology have been developed, including CAR-NK, CAR-macrophage, CAR-γδT, and CAR-NKT. In this review, we describe the development, advantages, and possible challenges of the aforementioned ACTs and discuss current strategies aimed at maximizing the therapeutic potential of ACTs. We also provide an overview of the various gene transduction strategies employed in immunotherapy given their importance in immune cell engineering. Furthermore, we discuss the possibility that strategies capable of creating a positive feedback immune circuit, as healthy immune systems do, could address the flaw of a single type of ACT, and thus serve as key players in future cancer immunotherapy.

Immunotherapy in hematologic malignancies: achievements, challenges and future prospects

The immune-cell origin of hematologic malignancies provides a unique avenue for the understanding of both the mechanisms of immune responsiveness and immune escape, which has accelerated the progress of immunotherapy. Several categories of immunotherapies have been developed and are being further evaluated in clinical trials for the treatment of blood cancers, including stem cell transplantation, immune checkpoint inhibitors, antigen-targeted antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, tumor vaccines, and adoptive cell therapies. These immunotherapies have shown the potential to induce long-term remission in refractory or relapsed patients and have led to a paradigm shift in cancer treatment with great clinical success. Different immunotherapeutic approaches have their advantages but also shortcomings that need to be addressed. To provide clinicians with timely information on these revolutionary therapeutic approaches, the comprehensive review provides historical perspectives on the applications and clinical considerations of the immunotherapy. Here, we first outline the recent advances that have been made in the understanding of the various categories of immunotherapies in the treatment of hematologic malignancies. We further discuss the specific mechanisms of action, summarize the clinical trials and outcomes of immunotherapies in hematologic malignancies, as well as the adverse effects and toxicity management and then provide novel insights into challenges and future directions.

MICROGLIAL CELL EXPRESSION OF THE TYPE 2 CANNABINOID RECEPTOR REGULATES IMMUNE-MEDIATED NEUROINFLAMMATION

Neuroinflammation is a recognized complication of immunotherapeutic approaches such as immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment, chimeric antigen receptor therapy, and graft versus host disease (GVHD) occurring after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. While T cells and inflammatory cytokines play a role in this process, the precise interplay between the adaptive and innate arms of the immune system that propagates inflammation in the central nervous system remains incompletely understood. Using a murine model of GVHD, we demonstrate that type 2 cannabinoid receptor (CB2R) signaling plays a critical role in the pathophysiology of neuroinflammation. In these studies, we identify that CB2R expression on microglial cells induces an activated inflammatory phenotype which potentiates the accumulation of donor-derived proinflammatory T cells, regulates chemokine gene regulatory networks, and promotes neuronal cell death. Pharmacological targeting of this receptor with a brain penetrant CB2R inverse agonist/antagonist selectively reduces neuroinflammation without deleteriously affecting systemic GVHD severity. Thus, these findings delineate a therapeutically targetable neuroinflammatory pathway and has implications for the attenuation of neurotoxicity after GVHD and potentially other T cell-based immunotherapeutic approaches.

Cellular Therapy for Lung Cancer: Focusing on Chimeric Antigen Receptor T (CAR T) Cells and Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocyte (TIL) Therapy

Lung cancer is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States and worldwide. The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors has led to a marked improvement in the outcomes of lung cancer patients. Despite these advances, there is a huge unmet need for therapeutic options in patients who are not candidates for targeted or immunotherapy or those who progress after first-line treatment. With its high mutational burden, lung cancer appears to be an attractive target for novel personalized treatment approaches. In this review, we provide an overview of two adoptive cell therapy approaches-chimeric antigen receptors (CAR) T-cell therapy and Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in lung cancer with an emphasis on current challenges and future perspectives. While both these therapies are still in the early phases of development in lung cancer and need more refinement, they harbor the potential to be effective treatment options for this group of patients with otherwise poor prognoses.

Harnessing the potential of CAR-T cell therapy: progress, challenges, and future directions in hematological and solid tumor treatments

Traditional cancer treatments use nonspecific drugs and monoclonal antibodies to target tumor cells. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy, however, leverages the immune system's T-cells to recognize and attack tumor cells. T-cells are isolated from patients and modified to target tumor-associated antigens. CAR-T therapy has achieved FDA approval for treating blood cancers like B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, large B-cell lymphoma, and multiple myeloma by targeting CD-19 and B-cell maturation antigens. Bi-specific chimeric antigen receptors may contribute to mitigating tumor antigen escape, but their efficacy could be limited in cases where certain tumor cells do not express the targeted antigens. Despite success in blood cancers, CAR-T technology faces challenges in solid tumors, including lack of reliable tumor-associated antigens, hypoxic cores, immunosuppressive tumor environments, enhanced reactive oxygen species, and decreased T-cell infiltration. To overcome these challenges, current research aims to identify reliable tumor-associated antigens and develop cost-effective, tumor microenvironment-specific CAR-T cells. This review covers the evolution of CAR-T therapy against various tumors, including hematological and solid tumors, highlights challenges faced by CAR-T cell therapy, and suggests strategies to overcome these obstacles, such as utilizing single-cell RNA sequencing and artificial intelligence to optimize clinical-grade CAR-T cells.

Fine-Tuning through Generations: Advances in Structure and Production of CAR-T Therapy

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy is a promising form of immunotherapy that has seen significant advancements in the past few decades. It involves genetically modifying T cells to target cancer cells expressing specific antigens, providing a novel approach to treating various types of cancer. However, the initial success of first-generation CAR-T cells was limited due to inadequate proliferation and undesirable outcomes. Nonetheless, significant progress has been made in CAR-T cell engineering, leading to the development of the latest fifth-generation CAR-T cells that can target multiple antigens and overcome individual limitations. Despite these advancements, some shortcomings prevent the widespread use of CAR-T therapy, including life-threatening toxicities, T-cell exhaustion, and inadequate infiltration for solid tumors. Researchers have made considerable efforts to address these issues by developing new strategies for improving CAR-T cell function and reducing toxicities. This review provides an overview of the path of CAR-T cell development and highlights some of the prominent advances in its structure and manufacturing process, which include the strategies to improve antigen recognition, enhance T-cell activation and persistence, and overcome immune escape. Finally, the review briefly covers other immune cells for cancer therapy and ends with the discussion on the broad prospects of CAR-T in the treatment of various diseases, not just hematological tumors, and the challenges that need to be addressed for the widespread clinical application of CAR-T cell therapies.

Neurological adverse effects of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy

INTRODUCTION

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell is among the most prevalent approaches that act by directing T-cells toward cancer; however, they need to be optimized to minimize side effects and maximize efficacy before being used as standard treatment for malignancies. Neurotoxicity associated with CAR T-cell therapy has been well-documented in recent works.

AREAS COVERED

In this regard, two established syndromes exist. Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), previously called cytokine release encephalopathy syndrome (CRES), is a neuropsychiatric condition which can occur after therapy by immune effector cells (IEC) and T-lymphocytes utilizing treatments. Another syndrome is cytokine release syndrome (CRS), which may overlap with ICANS.

EXPERT OPINION

ICANS clinical manifestations include cerebral edema, mild lethargy, aphasia, and seizures. Notably, ICANS is associated with changes to EEG and neuroradiological findings. Therefore, it is necessary to make a timely and accurate diagnosis of neurological complications of CAR T-cells by clinical presentations, neuroimaging, and EEG. Since neurological events by different CAR T-cell products are heterogeneous, guides should be developed according to each product. Here, we provide an updated review of general information on CAR T-cell therapies and applications, neurological syndromes associated with their use, and risk factors contributing to ICANS.

Anakinra for Refractory Cytokine Release Syndrome or Immune Effector Cell-Associated Neurotoxicity Syndrome after Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy

Chimeric antigen receptor-engineered (CAR)-T cell therapy remains limited by significant toxicities, including cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). The optimal management of severe and/or refractory CRS/ICANS remains ill-defined. Anakinra has emerged as a promising agent based on preclinical data, but its safety and efficacy in CAR-T therapy recipients are unknown. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the safety of anakinra to treat refractory CRS and ICANS after CAR-T therapy. The secondary objective was to evaluate the impact of key treatment-, patient-, and disease-related variables on the time to CRS/ICANS resolution and treatment-related mortality (TRM). We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of 43 patients with B cell or plasma cell malignancies treated with anakinra for refractory CRS or ICANS at 9 institutions in the United States and Spain between 2019 and 2022. Cause-specific Cox regression was used to account for competing risks. Multivariable cause-specific Cox regression was used to estimate the effect of anakinra dose on outcomes while minimizing treatment allocation bias by including age, CAR-T product, prelymphodepletion (pre-LD) ferritin, and performance status. Indications for anakinra treatment were grade ≥2 ICANS with worsening or lack of symptom improvement despite treatment with high-dose corticosteroids (n = 40) and grade ≥2 CRS with worsening symptoms despite treatment with tocilizumab (n = 3). Anakinra treatment was feasible and safe; discontinuation of therapy because of anakinra-related side effects was reported in only 3 patients (7%). The overall response rate (ORR) to CAR-T therapy was 77%. The cumulative incidence of TRM in the whole cohort was 7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2% to 17%) at 28 days and 23% (95% CI, 11% to 38%) at 60 days after CAR-T infusion. The cumulative incidence of TRM at day 28 after initiation of anakinra therapy was 0% in the high-dose (>200 mg/day i.v.) recipient group and 47% (95% CI, 20% to 70%) in the low-dose (100 to 200 mg/day s.c. or i.v.) recipient group. The median cumulative incidence of CRS/ICANS resolution from the time of anakinra initiation was 7 days in the high-dose group and was not reached in the low-dose group, owing to the high TRM in this group. Univariate Cox modeling suggested a shorter time to CRS/ICANS resolution in the high-dose recipients (hazard ratio [HR], 2.19; 95% CI, .94 to 5.12; P = .069). In a multivariable Cox model for TRM including age, CAR-T product, pre-LD ferritin level, and pre-LD Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), higher anakinra dose remained associated with lower TRM (HR, .41 per 1 mg/kg/day increase; 95% CI, .17 to .96; P = .039. The sole factor independently associated with time to CRS/ICANS resolution in a multivariable Cox model including age, CAR-T product, pre-LD ferritin and anakinra dose was higher pre-LD KPS (HR, 1.05 per 10% increase; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.09; P = .02). Anakinra treatment for refractory CRS or ICANS was safe at doses up to 12 mg/kg/day i.v. We observed an ORR of 77% after CAR-T therapy despite anakinra treatment, suggesting a limited impact of anakinra on CAR-T efficacy. Higher anakinra dose may be associated with faster CRS/ICANS resolution and was independently associated with lower TRM. Prospective comparative studies are needed to confirm our findings.

CD19 CAR T-cell therapy and prophylactic anakinra in relapsed or refractory lymphoma: phase 2 trial interim results

In preclinical models, anakinra, an IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra), reduced immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) without compromising anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell efficacy. We initiated a phase 2 clinical trial of anakinra in patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma treated with commercial anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy. Here we report a non-prespecified interim analysis reporting the final results from cohort 1 in which patients received subcutaneous anakinra from day 2 until at least day 10 post-CAR T-cell infusion. The primary endpoint was the rate of severe (grade ≥3) ICANS. Key secondary endpoints included the rates of all-grade cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and ICANS and overall disease response. Among 31 treated patients, 74% received axicabtagene ciloleucel, 13% received brexucabtagene ciloleucel and 4% received tisagenlecleucel. All-grade ICANS occurred in 19%, and severe ICANS occurred in 9.7% of patients. There were no grade 4 or 5 ICANS events. All-grade CRS occurred in 74%, and severe CRS occurred in 6.4% of patients. The overall disease response rate was 77% with 65% complete response rate. These initial results show that prophylactic anakinra resulted in a low incidence of ICANS in patients with lymphoma receiving anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy and support further study of anakinra in immune-related neurotoxicity syndromes.

Chimeric Antigen Receptor-T Cell Mediated Bilateral Facial Nerve Palsy: A Case Report

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR-T) cell therapy is highly effective against hematological cancers but is associated with immune mediated side effects, including neurotoxicity. The most commonly described presentations of immune cell mediated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) include cortical symptoms and generally localize to the central nervous system. In this report, we present a patient with acute onset of bilateral facial nerve palsy following CAR-T cell therapy, followed by a complete clinical recovery. Aside from a temporary anisocoria, he had no other neurologic symptoms and no encephalopathy or seizures. MRI Brain was non-contributory and cerebrospinal fluid revealed a modest increase in lymphocytes without systemic leukocytosis and viral studies were all negative. He was diagnosed with bilateral facial nerve palsy secondary to CAR-T cell therapy and subsequently treated with a course of steroids. Several weeks after presentation he returned to his neurological baseline. The presentation of CAR-T cell mediated facial nerve palsy is both clinically and scientifically relevant for physicians, patients, and researchers.

Current and potential roles of immuno-PET/-SPECT in CAR T-cell therapy

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies have evolved as breakthrough treatment options for the management of hematological malignancies and are also being developed as therapeutics for solid tumors. However, despite the impressive patient responses from CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapies, ~ 40%-60% of these patients' cancers eventually relapse, with variable prognosis. Such relapses may occur due to a combination of molecular resistance mechanisms, including antigen loss or mutations, T-cell exhaustion, and progression of the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. This class of therapeutics is also associated with certain unique toxicities, such as cytokine release syndrome, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome, and other "on-target, off-tumor" toxicities, as well as anaphylactic effects. Furthermore, manufacturing limitations and challenges associated with solid tumor infiltration have delayed extensive applications. The molecular imaging modalities of immunological positron emission tomography and single-photon emission computed tomography (immuno-PET/-SPECT) offer a target-specific and highly sensitive, quantitative, non-invasive platform for longitudinal detection of dynamic variations in target antigen expression in the body. Leveraging these imaging strategies as guidance tools for use with CAR T-cell therapies may enable the timely identification of resistance mechanisms and/or toxic events when they occur, permitting effective therapeutic interventions. In addition, the utilization of these approaches in tracking the CAR T-cell pharmacokinetics during product development and optimization may help to assess their efficacy and accordingly to predict treatment outcomes. In this review, we focus on current challenges and potential opportunities in the application of immuno-PET/-SPECT imaging strategies to address the challenges encountered with CAR T-cell therapies.

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Immunotherapy Treatment: Now, Next, and Beyond

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is a blood cancer that primarily affects children but also adults. It is due to the malignant proliferation of lymphoid precursor cells that invade the bone marrow and can spread to extramedullary sites. ALL is divided into B cell (85%) and T cell lineages (10 to 15%); rare cases are associated with the natural killer (NK) cell lineage (<1%). To date, the survival rate in children with ALL is excellent while in adults continues to be poor. Despite the therapeutic progress, there are subsets of patients that still have high relapse rates after chemotherapy or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and an unsatisfactory cure rate. Hence, the identification of more effective and safer therapy choices represents a primary issue. In this review, we will discuss novel therapeutic options including bispecific antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-based therapies, and other promising treatments for both pediatric and adult patients.

CAR-T cells neurotoxicity from consolidated practice in hematological malignancies to fledgling experience in CNS tumors: fill the gap

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR-T) therapy has marked a paradigm shift in the treatment of hematological malignancies and represent a promising growing field also in solid tumors. Neurotoxicity is a well-recognized common complication of CAR-T therapy and is at the forefront of concerns for CAR-based immunotherapy widespread adoption, as it necessitates a cautious approach. The non-specific targeting of the CAR-T cells against normal tissues (on-target off-tumor toxicities) can be life-threatening; likewise, immune-mediate neurological symptoms related to CAR-T cell induced inflammation in central nervous system (CNS) must be precociously identified and recognized and possibly distinguished from non-specific symptoms deriving from the tumor itself. The mechanisms leading to ICANS (Immune effector Cell-Associated Neurotoxicity Syndrome) remain largely unknown, even if blood-brain barrier (BBB) impairment, increased levels of cytokines, as well as endothelial activation are supposed to be involved in neurotoxicity development. Glucocorticoids, anti-IL-6, anti-IL-1 agents and supportive care are frequently used to manage patients with neurotoxicity, but clear therapeutic indications, supported by high-quality evidence do not yet exist. Since CAR-T cells are under investigation in CNS tumors, including glioblastoma (GBM), understanding of the full neurotoxicity profile in brain tumors and expanding strategies aimed at limiting adverse events become imperative. Education of physicians for assessing individualized risk and providing optimal management of neurotoxicity is crucial to make CAR-T therapies safer and adoptable in clinical practice also in brain tumors.

Neutralizing IFNγ improves safety without compromising efficacy of CAR-T cell therapy in B-cell malignancies

Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy may achieve long-lasting remission in patients with B-cell malignancies not responding to conventional therapies. However, potentially severe and hard-to-manage side effects, including cytokine release syndrome (CRS), neurotoxicity and macrophage activation syndrome, and the lack of pathophysiological experimental models limit the applicability and development of this form of therapy. Here we present a comprehensive humanized mouse model, by which we show that IFNγ neutralization by the clinically approved monoclonal antibody, emapalumab, mitigates severe toxicity related to CAR-T cell therapy. We demonstrate that emapalumab reduces the pro-inflammatory environment in the model, thus allowing control of severe CRS and preventing brain damage, characterized by multifocal hemorrhages. Importantly, our in vitro and in vivo experiments show that IFNγ inhibition does not affect the ability of CD19-targeting CAR-T (CAR.CD19-T) cells to eradicate CD19+ lymphoma cells. Thus, our study provides evidence that anti-IFNγ treatment might reduce immune related adverse effect without compromising therapeutic success and provides rationale for an emapalumab-CAR.CD19-T cell combination therapy in humans.

CD22 CAR T-cell associated hematologic toxicities, endothelial activation and relationship to neurotoxicity

BACKGROUND

Hematologic toxicities, including coagulopathy, endothelial activation, and cytopenias, with CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies correlate with cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity severity, but little is known about the extended toxicity profiles of CAR T-cells targeting alternative antigens. This report characterizes hematologic toxicities seen following CD22 CAR T-cells and their relationship to CRS and neurotoxicity.

METHODS

We retrospectively characterized hematologic toxicities associated with CRS seen on a phase 1 study of anti-CD22 CAR T-cells for children and young adults with relapsed/refractory CD22+ hematologic malignancies. Additional analyses included correlation of hematologic toxicities with neurotoxicity and exploring effects of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis-like toxicities (HLH) on bone marrow recovery and cytopenias. Coagulopathy was defined as evidence of bleeding or abnormal coagulation parameters. Hematologic toxicities were graded by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events V.4.0.

RESULTS

Across 53 patients receiving CD22 CAR T-cells who experienced CRS, 43 (81.1%) patients achieved complete remission. Eighteen (34.0%) patients experienced coagulopathy, of whom 16 had clinical manifestations of mild bleeding (typically mucosal bleeding) which generally subsided following CRS resolution. Three had manifestations of thrombotic microangiopathy. Patients with coagulopathy had higher peak ferritin, D-dimer, prothrombin time, international normalized ratio (INR), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), tissue factor, prothrombin fragment F1+2 and soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (s-VCAM-1). Despite a relatively higher incidence of HLH-like toxicities and endothelial activation, overall neurotoxicity was generally less severe than reported with CD19 CAR T-cells, prompting additional analysis to explore CD22 expression in the central nervous system (CNS). Single-cell analysis revealed that in contrast to CD19 expression, CD22 is not on oligodendrocyte precursor cells or on neurovascular cells but is seen on mature oligodendrocytes. Lastly, among those attaining CR, grade 3-4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were seen in 65% of patients at D28.

CONCLUSION

With rising incidence of CD19 negative relapse, CD22 CAR T-cells are increasingly important for the treatment of B-cell malignancies. In characterizing hematologic toxicities on CD22 CAR T-cells, we demonstrate that despite endothelial activation, coagulopathy, and cytopenias, neurotoxicity was relatively mild and that CD22 and CD19 expression in the CNS differed, providing one potential hypothesis for divergent neurotoxicity profiles. Systematic characterization of on-target off-tumor toxicities of novel CAR T-cell constructs will be vital as new antigens are targeted.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02315612.

Strategies for Reducing Toxicity and Enhancing Efficacy of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy in Hematological Malignancies

Chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy in hematologic malignancies has made great progress, but there are still some problems. First, T cells from tumor patients show an exhaustion phenotype; thus, the persistence and function of the CAR-Ts are poor, and achieving a satisfactory curative effect is difficult. Second, some patients initially respond well but quickly develop antigen-negative tumor recurrence. Thirdly, CAR-T treatment is not effective in some patients and is accompanied by severe side effects, such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity. The solution to these problems is to reduce the toxicity and enhance the efficacy of CAR-T therapy. In this paper, we describe various strategies for reducing the toxicity and enhancing the efficacy of CAR-T therapy in hematological malignancies. In the first section, strategies for modifying CAR-Ts using gene-editing technologies or combining them with other anti-tumor drugs to enhance the efficacy of CAR-T therapy are introduced. The second section describes some methods in which the design and construction of CAR-Ts differ from the conventional process. The aim of these methods is to enhance the anti-tumor activity of CAR-Ts and prevent tumor recurrence. The third section describes modifying the CAR structure or installing safety switches to radically reduce CAR-T toxicity or regulating inflammatory cytokines to control the symptoms of CAR-T-associated toxicity. Together, the knowledge summarized herein will aid in designing better-suited and safer CAR-T treatment strategies.

How I treat refractory CRS and ICANS after CAR T-cell therapy

The clinical use of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is growing rapidly because of the expanding indications for standard-of-care treatment and the development of new investigational products. The establishment of consensus diagnostic criteria for cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), alongside the steady use of both tocilizumab and corticosteroids for treatment, have been essential in facilitating the widespread use. Preemptive interventions to prevent more severe toxicities have improved safety, facilitating CAR T-cell therapy in medically frail populations and in those at high risk of severe CRS/ICANS. Nonetheless, the development of persistent or progressive CRS and ICANS remains problematic because it impairs patient outcomes and is challenging to treat. In this case-based discussion, we highlight a series of cases of CRS and/or ICANS refractory to front-line interventions. We discuss our approach to managing refractory toxicities that persist or progress beyond initial tocilizumab or corticosteroid administration, delineate risk factors for severe toxicities, highlight the emerging use of anakinra, and review mitigation strategies and supportive care measures to improve outcomes in patients who develop these refractory toxicities.

How I treat unique and difficult-to-manage cases of CAR T-cell therapy-associated neurotoxicity

With growing indications for chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, toxicity profiles are evolving. There is an urgent and unmet need of approaches to optimally manage emerging adverse events that extend beyond the standard paradigm of cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). Although management guidelines exist for ICANS, there is little guidance on how to approach patients with neurologic comorbidities, and how to manage rare neurotoxicity presentations, such as CAR T-cell therapy-related cerebral edema, severe motor complications or late-onset neurotoxicity. In this study, we present 3 scenarios of patients treated with CAR T cells who develop unique types of neurotoxicity, and we describe an approach for the evaluation and management based on experience because objective data are limited. The goal of this study is to develop an awareness of emerging and unusual complications, discuss treatment approaches, and help institutions and health care providers establish frameworks to navigate how to best address unusual neurotoxicities to ultimately improve patient outcomes.

Management and Prevention of Cellular-Therapy-Related Toxicity: Early and Late Complications

Chimeric Antigen Receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy has dramatically changed prognosis and treatment of relapsed and refractory hematologic malignancies. Currently the 6 FDA approved products target various surface antigens. While CAR-T therapy achieves good response, life-threatening toxicities have been reported. Mechanistically, can be divided into two categories: (1) toxicities related to T-cell activation and release of high levels of cytokines: or (2) toxicities resulting from interaction between CAR and CAR targeted antigen expressed on non-malignant cells (i.e., on-target, off-tumor effects). Variations in conditioning therapies, co-stimulatory domains, CAR T-cell dose and anti-cytokine administration, pose a challenge in distinguishing cytokine mediated related toxicities from on-target, off-tumor toxicities. Timing, frequency, severity, as well as optimal management of CAR T-cell-related toxicities vary significantly between products and are likely to change as newer therapies become available. Currently the FDA approved CARs are targeted towards the B-cell malignancies however the future holds promise of expanding the target to solid tumor malignancies. Further highlighting the importance of early recognition and intervention for early and late onset CAR-T related toxicity. This contemporary review aims to describe presentation, grading and management of commonly encountered toxicities, short- and long-term complications, discuss preventive strategies and resource utilization.

Paraneoplastic Neurological Syndromes of the Central Nervous System: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment

Paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (PNS) include any symptomatic and non-metastatic neurological manifestations associated with a neoplasm. PNS associated with antibodies against intracellular antigens, known as "high-risk" antibodies, show frequent association with underlying cancer. PNS associated with antibodies against neural surface antigens, known as "intermediate- or low-risk" antibodies, are less frequently associated with cancer. In this narrative review, we will focus on PNS of the central nervous system (CNS). Clinicians should have a high index of suspicion with acute/subacute encephalopathies to achieve a prompt diagnosis and treatment. PNS of the CNS exhibit a range of overlapping "high-risk" clinical syndromes, including but not limited to latent and overt rapidly progressive cerebellar syndrome, opsoclonus-myoclonus-ataxia syndrome, paraneoplastic (and limbic) encephalitis/encephalomyelitis, and stiff-person spectrum disorders. Some of these phenotypes may also arise from recent anti-cancer treatments, namely immune-checkpoint inhibitors and CAR T-cell therapies, as a consequence of boosting of the immune system against cancer cells. Here, we highlight the clinical features of PNS of the CNS, their associated tumors and antibodies, and the diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. The potential and the advance of this review consists on a broad description on how the field of PNS of the CNS is constantly expanding with newly discovered antibodies and syndromes. Standardized diagnostic criteria and disease biomarkers are fundamental to quickly recognize PNS to allow prompt treatment initiation, thus improving the long-term outcome of these conditions.

CAR t-cell therapy in BOlogNa-NEUrotoxicity TReatment and Assessment in Lymphoma (CARBON-NEUTRAL): proposed protocol and results from an Italian study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate neurotoxicity clinical and instrumental features, incidence, risk factors, and early and long-term prognosis in lymphoma patients who received CAR T-cell therapy.

METHODS

In this prospective study, consecutive refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients who received CAR T-cell therapy were included. Patients were comprehensively evaluated (neurological examination, EEG, brain MRI, and neuropsychological test) before and after (two and twelve months) CAR T-cells. From the day of CAR T-cells infusion, patients underwent daily neurological examinations to monitor the development of neurotoxicity.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients were included in the study. The median age was 56.5 years, and 13 (28%) were females. Seventeen patients (37%) developed neurotoxicity, characterized by encephalopathy frequently associated with language disturbances (65%) and frontal lobe dysfunction (65%). EEG and brain FDG-PET findings also supported a predominant frontal lobe involvement. The median time at onset and duration were five and eight days, respectively. Baseline EEG abnormalities predicted ICANS development in the multivariable analysis (OR 4.771; CI 1.081-21.048; p = 0.039). Notably, CRS was invariably present before or concomitant with neurotoxicity, and all patients who exhibited severe CRS (grade ≥ 3) developed neurotoxicity. Serum inflammatory markers were significantly higher in patients who developed neurotoxicity. A complete neurological resolution following corticosteroids and anti-cytokines monoclonal antibodies was reached in all patients treated, except for one patient developing a fatal fulminant cerebral edema. All surviving patients completed the 1-year follow-up, and no long-term neurotoxicity was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

In the first prospective Italian real-life study, we presented novel clinical and investigative insights into ICANS diagnosis, predictive factors, and prognosis.

CAR T-cell therapy: Reprogramming patient's immune cell to treat cancer

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy is a game changer in cancer treatment. Although CAR-T cell therapy has achieved significant clinical responses in specific subgroups of B cell leukaemia or lymphoma, various difficulties restrict CAR-T cell therapy's therapeutic effectiveness in solid tumours and haematological malignancies. Severe life-threatening toxicities, poor anti-tumour effectiveness, antigen escape, restricted trafficking, and limited tumour penetration are all barriers to successful CAR-T cell treatment. Furthermore, CAR-T cell interactions with the host and tumour microenvironment have a significant impact on their activity. Furthermore, developing and implementing these therapies necessitates a complicated staff. Innovative methodologies and tactics to engineering more potent CAR-T cells with greater anti-tumour activity and less toxicity are required to address these important difficulties.

Patients' experience with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for DLBCL in China: a qualitative study

PURPOSE

The experiences of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) treated with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy have received little attention. This study aimed to explore the treatment experiences of patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) B-cell lymphoma during CAR T-cell therapy in China.

METHODS

This descriptive qualitative study was conducted using face-to-face semi-structured interviews with 21 DLBCL patients 0-2 years after CAR-T infusion. Two researchers independently coded the interviews in MAXQDA 2022, and the original data were analyzed by conventional content analysis.

RESULTS

Four themes emerged from the transcripts: (1) physiological distress, (2) functional impacts, (3) psychological experience, and (4) support requirement. Participants expressed 29 short-term or long-term symptoms related to their disease and treatment, influencing their daily life and function in a social setting. The participants expressed different negative emotions, polarized expectations about efficacy, and over-reliance on authoritative medical care. Their major concerns and hopes were achieving life goals, being treated with respect, obtaining more information about CAR T-cell therapy, and receiving government financial sponsorship.

CONCLUSIONS

The patients experienced short-term and long-term symptoms of physical distress. Patients who have experienced failure in CAR T-cell therapy also experience strong negative emotions, such as dependency and guilt. They also require authentic spiritual and financial information that is authentic. Our study may guide the development of standardized and comprehensive nursing care for R/R DLBCL patients undergoing CAR T-cell therapy in China.

Advances in treatments of patients with classical and emergent neurological toxicities of anticancer agents

The neurotoxicity associated to the anticancer treatments has received a growing body of interest in the recent years. The development of innovating therapies over the last 20years has led to the emergence of new toxicities. Their diagnosis and management can be challenging in the clinical practice and further research is warranted to improve the understanding of their pathogenic mechanisms. Conventional treatments as radiation therapy and chemotherapy are associated to well-known and under exploration emerging central nervous system (CNS) and peripheral nervous system (PNS) toxicities. The identification of the risk factors and a better understanding of their pathogeny through a "bench to bedside and back again" approach, are the first steps towards the development of toxicity mitigation strategies. New imaging techniques and biological explorations are invaluable for their diagnosis. Immunotherapies have changed the cancer treatment paradigm from tumor cell centered to immune modulation towards an efficient anticancer immune response. The use of the immune checkpoints inhibitors (ICI) and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR-T cells) lead to an increase in the incidence of immune-mediated toxicities and new challenges in the neurological patient's management. The neurological ICI-related adverse events (n-irAE) are rare but potentially severe and may present with both CNS and PNS involvement. The most frequent and well characterized, from a clinical and biological standpoint, are the PNS phenotypes: myositis and polyradiculoneuropathy, but the knowledge on CNS phenotypes and their treatments is expanding. The n-irAE management requires a good balance between dampening the autoimmune toxicity without impairing the anticancer immunity. The adoptive cell therapies as CAR-T cells, a promising anticancer strategy, trigger cellular activation and massive production of proinflammatory cytokines inducing frequent and sometime severe toxicity known as cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurologic syndrome. Their management requires a close partnership between oncologist-hematologists, neurologists, and intensivists. The oncological patient's management requires a multidisciplinary clinical team (oncologist, neurologist and paramedical) as well as a research team leading towards a better understanding and a better management of the neurological toxicities.

Bispecific NK-cell engager targeting BCMA elicits stronger antitumor effects and produces less proinflammatory cytokines than T-cell engager

Bispecific antibodies have attracted more attention in recent years for the treatment of tumors, in which most of them target CD3, which mediates the killing of tumor cells by T cells. However, T-cell engager may cause serious side effects, including neurotoxicity and cytokine release syndrome. More safe treatments are still needed to address unmet medical needs, and NK cell-based immunotherapy is a safer and more effective way to treat tumors. Our study developed two IgG-like bispecific antibodies with the same configuration: BT1 (BCMA×CD3) attracted T cells and tumor cells, while BK1 (BCMA×CD16) attracted NK cells and tumor cells. Our study showed that BK1 mediated NK cell activation and upregulated the expression of CD69, CD107a, IFN-γ and TNF. In addition, BK1 elicited a stronger antitumor effect than BT1 both in vitro and in vivo. Combinatorial treatment (BK1+BT1) showed a stronger antitumor effect than either treatment alone, as indicated by in vitro experiments and in vivo murine models. More importantly, BK1 induced fewer proinflammatory cytokines than BT1 both in vitro and in vivo. Surprisingly, BK1 reduced cytokine production in the combinatorial treatment, suggesting the indispensable role of NK cells in the control of cytokine secretion by T cells. In conclusion, our study compared NK-cell engagers and T-cell engagers targeting BCMA. The results indicated that NK-cell engagers were more effective with less proinflammatory cytokine production. Furthermore, the use of NK-cell engagers in combinatorial treatment helped to reduce cytokine secretion by T cells, suggesting a bright future for NK-cell engagers in clinical settings.

CAR T-cell-associated neurotoxicity in central nervous system hematologic disease: Is it still a concern?

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell systemic immunotherapy has revolutionized how clinicians treat several refractory and relapsed hematologic malignancies. Due to its peculiar mechanism of action, CAR T-cell-based therapy has enlarged the spectrum of neurological toxicities. CAR T-cell-associated neurotoxicity-initially defined as CAR T-cell-related encephalopathy syndrome (CRES) and currently coined within the acronym ICANS (immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome)-is perhaps the most concerning toxicity of CAR T-cell therapy. Importantly, hematologic malignancies (especially lymphoid malignancies) may originate in or spread to the central nervous system (CNS) in the form of parenchymal and/or meningeal disease. Due to the emergence of deadly and neurological adverse events, such as fatal brain edema in some patients included in early CAR T-cell trials, safety concerns for those with CNS primary or secondary infiltration arose and contributed to the routine exclusion of individuals with pre-existing or active CNS involvement from pivotal trials. However, based primarily on the lack of evidence, it remains unknown whether CNS involvement increases the risk and/or severity of CAR T-cell-related neurotoxicity. Given the limited treatment options available for patients once they relapse with CNS involvement, it is of high interest to explore the role of novel clinical strategies including CAR T cells to treat leukemias/lymphomas and myeloma with CNS involvement. The purpose of this review was to summarize currently available neurological safety data of CAR T-cell-based immunotherapy from the clinical trials and real-world experiences in adult patients with CNS disease due to lymphoma, leukemia, or myeloma. Increasing evidence supports that CNS involvement in hematologic disease should no longer be considered per se as an absolute contraindication to CAR T-cell-based therapy. While the incidence may be high, severity does not appear to be impacted significantly by pre-existing CNS status. Close monitoring by trained neurologists is recommended.

CAR-T Cell Therapy: the Efficacy and Toxicity Balance

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy is an immunotherapy that has resulted in tremendous progress in the treatment of patients with B cell malignancies. However, the remarkable efficacy of therapy is not without significant safety concerns. Herein, we will review the unique and potentially life-threatening toxicities associated with CAR-T cell therapy and their association with treatment efficacy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Currently, CAR-T cell therapy is approved for the treatment of B cell relapsed or refractory leukemia and lymphoma, and most recently, multiple myeloma (MM). In these different diseases, it has led to excellent complete and overall response rates depending on the patient population and therapy. Despite promising efficacy, CAR-T cell therapy is associated with significant side effects; the two most notable toxicities are cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). The treatment of CAR-T-induced toxicity is supportive; however, as higher-grade adverse events occur, toxicity-directed therapy with tocilizumab, an IL-6 receptor antibody, and steroids is standard practice. Overall, a careful risk-benefit balance exists between the efficacy and toxicities of therapies. The challenge lies in the underlying pathophysiology of CAR-T-related toxicity which relies upon the activation of CAR-T cells. Some degree of toxicity is expected to achieve an effective response to therapy, and certain aspects of treatment are also associated with toxicity. As progress is made in the investigation and approval of new CARs, novel toxicity-directed therapies and toxicity-limited constructs will be the focus of attention.

Neurological Adverse Effects of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPIs) and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell constitute recently approved novel therapies targeted to treat a wide number of malignancies. Both the treatments modulate the immune system and can cause a number of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), including polyendocrinopathies, gastrointestinal and neurological complications. This literature review focuses on the neurological side effects of these therapies as these are uncommon and alter the course of the treatment. Neurological complications involve the peripheral and central nervous system, including polyneuropathy, myositis, myasthenia gravis, demyelinating polyradiculopathy, myelitis, and encephalitis. If early recognized, the neurological complications can be treated effectively with steroids to reduce the potential of short-term and long-term complications. Therefore, early identification and treatment of irAEs are needed to optimize the outcomes associated with ICPI and CAR T-cell therapies.

Lymphodepleting chemotherapy practices and effect on safety and efficacy outcomes in patients with solid tumours undergoing T cell receptor-engineered T cell (TCR-T) Therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

T cell receptor-engineered T cell (TCR-T) therapy has shown promising efficacy in advanced solid tumours. Lymphodepleting (LD) chemotherapy improves TCR-T cell therapy efficacy but is associated with significant toxicities. Evidence is sparse regarding the optimum LD regimen for TCR-T cell therapy in solid tumours.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted of interventional, prospective clinical trials describing LD practices prior to TCR-T cell therapy in patients with advanced solid tumours. The objective was to define LD regimens administered prior to TCR-T cell therapy and their effects on specific safety and efficacy outcomes in this patient population.

RESULTS

Searches returned 484 studies, 19 (231 patients) met the eligibility criteria. Cyclophosphamide (cyclo) 60 mg/kg daily (2 days), plus fludarabine (fludara) 25 mg/m2 daily (5 days) was the most common LD regimen (38% of studies). Higher dose LD regimens were associated with increased pooled incidence rates of febrile neutropaenia compared to low dose (0.64, [95% Confidence interval (CI): 0.50-0.78], vs. 0.39 [95% CI: 0.25-0.53], respectively) but were not significantly associated with higher objective responses (odds ratio: 1.05, 95%CI: 0.60-1.82, p = 0.86). A major shortfall in safety data reporting was identified; determination of LD regimen effects on many safety outcomes was not possible.

CONCLUSION

Standard consensus guidelines for the design and reporting of adoptive cell therapy (ACT) studies would facilitate accurate risk-benefit analysis for optimising LD regimens in patients with advanced solid tumours.

CAR T Cell Therapy: A Versatile Living Drug

After seeing a dramatic increase in the development and use of immunotherapy and precision medicine over the past few decades, oncological care now embraces the start of the adoptive cell therapy (ACT) era. This impulse towards a new treatment paradigm has been led by chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells, the only type of ACT medicinal product to be commercialized so far. Brought about by an ever-growing understanding of cellular engineering, CAR T cells are T lymphocytes genetically modified with an appropriate DNA construct, which endows them with expression of a CAR, a fusion protein between a ligand-specific recognition domain, often an antibody-like structure, and the activating signaling domain of the T cell receptor. Through this genetic enhancement, CAR T cells are engineered from a cancer patient’s own lymphocytes to better target and kill their cancer cells, and the current amassed data on clinical outcomes point to a stream of bright developments in the near future. Herein, from concept design and present-day manufacturing techniques to pressing hurdles and bright discoveries around the corner, we review and thoroughly describe the state of the art in CAR T cell therapy.

Impact of Preemptive Use of Tocilizumab on Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Outcomes in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Despite the impressive results of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell treatment for lymphomas, adverse events such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), and infections are major issues that can lead to intensive care unit (ICU) admission and death. Current guidelines recommend tocilizumab for treating patients with CRS grade (G) ≥2; however, the optimal timing of intervention has yet to be determined. Our institution adopted the preemptive use of tocilizumab in cases of persistent G1 CRS, defined as fever (≥38 °C) for >24 hours. This preemptive tocilizumab treatment aimed to reduce evolution to severe (G≥3) CRS, ICU admission, or death. We report on 48 prospectively collected consecutive patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma treated with autologous CD19-targeted CAR T cells. In total, 39 patients (81%) developed CRS. CRS started as G1 in 28 patients, as G2 in patients, and as G3 in 1 patient. Tocilizumab was administered in 34 patients, including 23 patients who received "preemptive" tocilizumab and 11 patients who received tocilizumab for G2 or G3 CRS from the onset of symptoms. CRS resolved without worsening severity in 19 patients out of 23 (83%) who received preemptive tocilizumab; 4 patients (17%) progressed from G1 to G2 for the development of hypotension and quickly responded to the introduction of steroids. No patients treated with a preemptive approach developed G3 or G4 CRS. Ten out of 48 patients (21%) were diagnosed with ICANS, including 5 patients with G3 or G4. Six infectious events occurred. The overall ICU admission rate was 19%. ICANS management was the most relevant reason for ICU admission (7 patients), and no patient required ICU to manage CRS. No deaths from CAR-T toxicity were observed. Our data indicate that preemptive tocilizumab use is feasible and useful in reducing severe CRS and CRS-related ICU admission, with no impact on neurotoxicity or infection rate. Therefore, early use of tocilizumab can be considered, especially for patients at high risk of CRS.

Associations of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor with toxicities and efficacy of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma

BACKGROUND AIMS

Few studies have reported the associations of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) with cytokine release syndrome (CRS), neurotoxic events (NEs) and efficacy after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for relapsed or refractory (R/R) multiple myeloma (MM). We present a retrospective study performed on 113 patients with R/R MM who received single anti-BCMA CAR T-cell, combined with anti-CD19 CAR T-cell or anti-CD138 CAR T-cell therapy.

METHODS

Eight patients were given G-CSF after successful management of CRS, and no CRS re-occurred thereafter. Of the remaining 105 patients that were finally analyzed, 72 (68.6%) received G-CSF (G-CSF group), and 33 (31.4%) did not (non G-CSF group). We mainly analyzed the incidence and severity of CRS or NEs in two groups of patients, as well as the associations of G-CSF timing, cumulative dose and cumulative time with CRS, NEs and efficacy of CAR T-cell therapy.

RESULTS

Both groups of patients had similar duration of grade 3-4 neutropenia, and the incidence and severity of CRS or NEs.There were also no differences in the incidence and severity of CRS or NEs between patients with the timing of G-CSF administration ≤3 days and those >3 days after CAR T-cell infusion. The incidence of CRS was greater in patients receiving cumulative doses of G-CSF >1500 μg or cumulative time of G-CSF administration >5 days. Among patients with CRS, there was no difference in the severity of CRS between patients who used G-CSF and those who did not. The duration of CRS in anti-BCMA and anti-CD19 CAR T-cell-treated patients was prolonged after G-CSF administration. There were no significant differences in the overall response rate at 1 and 3 months between the G-CSF group and the non-G-CSF group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results showed that low-dose or short-time use of G-CSF was not associated with the incidence or severity of CRS or NEs, and G-CSF administration did not influence the antitumor activity of CAR T-cell therapy.

CAR T-cells and macrophages in large B-cell lymphoma: impact on toxicity and efficacy

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy targeting CD19 is the current standard of care for the treatment of relapsed refractory large B cell lymphoma, demonstrating impressive response rates in the second- and third-line setting. Despite these advances, this treatment strategy can result in significant toxicities, such as cytokine release syndrome or immune effector cell associated neurotoxicity syndrome. While the exact mechanisms of these immune-mediated toxicities are not clearly understood, emerging pre-clinical and clinical studies have revealed the pivotal role of myeloid cells, particularly macrophages, as key contributors to the efficacy of treatments and as crucial mediators of toxicity. In this review, we discuss the current understanding of how macrophages mediate these effects, highlighting specific mechanisms of macrophage biology relevant to CAR T-cell therapy activity and side effects. These findings are resulting in novel treatment strategies that target macrophages, and able to mitigate toxicity while preserving CAR T-cell therapy efficacy.

Exploring the mechanism of physcion-1-O-β-D-monoglucoside against acute lymphoblastic leukaemia based on network pharmacology and experimental validation

Objective

To explore the mechanism of PG against acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) by network pharmacology and experimental verification in vitro.

Methods

First, the biological activity of PG against B-ALL was determined by CCK-8 and flow cytometry. Then, the potential targets of PG were obtained from the PharmMapper database. ALL-related genes were collected from the GeneCards, OMIM and PharmGkb databases. The two datasets were intersected to obtain the target genes of PG in ALL. Then, protein interaction networks were constructed using the STRING database. The key targets were obtained by topological analysis of the network with Cytoscape 3.8.0 software. In addition, the mechanism of PG in ALL was confirmed by protein‒protein interaction, gene ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway enrichment analyses. Furthermore, molecular docking was carried out by AutoDock Vina. Finally, Western blotting was performed to confirm the effect of PG on NALM6 cells.

Results

PG inhibited the proliferation of NALM6 cells. A total of 174 antileukaemic targets of PG were obtained by network pharmacology. The key targets included AKT1, MAPK14, EGFR, ESR1, LCK, PTPN11, RHOA, IGF1, MDM2, HSP90AA1, HRAS, SRC and JAK2. Enrichment analysis found that PG had antileukaemic effects by regulating key targets such as MAPK signalling, and PG had good binding activity with MAPK14 protein (-8.9 kcal/mol). PG could upregulate the expression of the target protein p-P38, induce cell cycle arrest, and promote the apoptosis of leukaemia cells.

Conclusion

MAPK14 was confirmed to be one of the key targets and pathways of PG by network pharmacology and molecular experiments.

Chimeric antigen receptor T cells therapy in solid tumors

Chimeric antigen receptor T cells therapy (CAR-T therapy) is a class of ACT therapy. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) is an engineered synthetic receptor of CAR-T, which give T cells the ability to recognize tumor antigens in a human leukocyte antigen-independent (HLA-independent) manner and enables them to recognize more extensive target antigens than natural T cell surface receptor (TCR), resulting in tumor destruction. CAR-T is composed of an extracellular single-chain variable fragment (scFv) of antibody, which serves as the targeting moiety, hinge region, transmembrane spacer, and intracellular signaling domain(s). CAR-T has been developing in many generations, which differ according to costimulatory domains. CAR-T therapy has several limitations that reduce its wide availability in immunotherapy which we can summarize in antigen escape that shows either partial or complete loss of target antigen expression, so multiplexing CAR-T cells are promoted to enhance targeting of tumor profiles. In addition, the large diversity in the tumor microenvironment also plays a major role in limiting this kind of treatment. Therefore, engineered CAR-T cells can evoke immunostimulatory signals that rebalance the tumor microenvironment. Using CAR-T therapy in treating the solid tumor is mainly restricted by the difficulty of CAR-T cells infiltrating the tumor site, so local administration was developed to improve the quality of treatment. The most severe toxicity after CAR-T therapy is on-target/on-tumor toxicity, such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Another type of toxicity is on-target/off-tumor toxicity which originates from the binding of CAR-T cells to target antigen that has shared expression on normal cells leading to damage in healthy cells and organs. Toxicity management should become a focus of implementation to permit management beyond specialized centers.

A systematic framework for predictive biomarkers in immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy has revolutionized the management of several life-threatening malignancies, often achieving durable sustained responses. The number of patients treated with this new class of cell-based therapy, along with the number of Food and Drug Association (FDA) approved indications, are growing significantly. Unfortunately Immune Effector Cell-Associated Neurotoxicity Syndrome (ICANS) can often occur after treatment with CAR-T cells, and severe ICANS can be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Current standard treatments are mainly steroids and supportive care, highlighting the need for early identification. In the last several years, a range of predictive biomarkers have been proposed to distinguish patients at increased risk for developing ICANS. In this review, we discuss a systematic framework to organize potential predictive biomarkers that builds on our current understanding of ICANS.

Assessment of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell-Associated Toxicities Using an Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Patient-derived Xenograft Mouse Model

Chimeric antigen receptor T (CART) cell therapy has emerged as a powerful tool for the treatment of multiple types of CD19+ malignancies, which has led to the recent FDA approval of several CD19-targeted CART (CART19) cell therapies. However, CART cell therapy is associated with a unique set of toxicities that carry their own morbidity and mortality. This includes cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neuroinflammation (NI). The use of preclinical mouse models has been crucial in the research and development of CART technology for assessing both CART efficacy and CART toxicity. The available preclinical models to test this adoptive cellular immunotherapy include syngeneic, xenograft, transgenic, and humanized mouse models. There is no single model that seamlessly mirrors the human immune system, and each model has strengths and weaknesses. This methods paper aims to describe a patient-derived xenograft model using leukemic blasts from patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia as a strategy to assess CART19-associated toxicities, CRS, and NI. This model has been shown to recapitulate CART19-associated toxicities as well as therapeutic efficacy as seen in the clinic.

Case report: Reversible punctate inflammatory foci in the corpus callosum: A novel radiological finding of CAR T-cell therapy-related neurotoxicity

Introduction

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy-related neurotoxicity is a novel cytokine-mediated neurological syndrome that may present with a broad spectrum of manifestations. Descriptions of novel distinctive features are pivotal to untangling this condition's clinical and instrumental signature in order to inform diagnosis and pathophysiology.

Case

A 27-year-old female patient received anti-CD19 CAR T cells for a refractory primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma. At 6 days after the infusion, she developed mild ideo-motor slowing, dysgraphia, and drowsiness. Despite specific treatment with dexamethasone, her neurological status progressively worsened to a comatose state within 24 h. EEG and CSF analyses were non-specific, showing background slowing and inflammatory findings. Brain MRI revealed multiple focal punctate areas of T2-weighted hyperintensity localized in the body and isthmus of the corpus callosum. Following the administration of high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone, her neurological status resolved within 48 h. Notably, the follow-up brain MRI did not reveal any abnormalities in the corpus callosum, except for a reduction of fractional anisotropy.

Conclusion

Reversible punctate inflammatory foci of the body and isthmus of the corpus callosum may represent a novel radiological finding of CAR T-cell therapy-related neurotoxicity.

[Management of neurotoxicity following CAR-T cell therapy: Recommendations of the SFGM-TC]

The immune effector cell-associated syndrome (ICANS) has been described as the second most frequent specific complication following CAR-T cell therapy. The median time to the onset of neurological symptoms is five days after CAR-T infusion. ICANS can be concomitant to cytokine release syndrome but often follows the resolution of the latter. However, 10 % of patients experience delayed onset after 3 weeks of CAR-T cell infusion. The duration of symptoms is usually short, around five days if an early appropriate treatment is given. Symptoms are heterogeneous, ranging from mild symptoms quickly reversible (alterations of consciousness, deterioration in handwriting) to more serious forms with seizures or even a coma. The ICANS severity is currently based on the ASTCT score. The diagnosis of ICANS is clinical but EEG, MRI and lumbar punction can help ruling out alternative diagnoses. The first line treatment consists of high-dose corticosteroids. During the twelfth edition of practice harmonization workshops of the Francophone Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (SFGM-TC), a working group focused its work on updating the SFGM-TC recommendations on the management of ICANS. In this review we discuss the management of ICANS and other neurological toxicities in patients undergoing of CAR-T cell therapy. These recommendations apply to commercial CAR-T cells, in order to guide strategies for the management neurological complications associated with this new therapeutic approach.

CAR-T Cell Therapy and the Gut Microbiota

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) - T cell cancer therapy has yielded promising results in treating hematologic malignancies in clinical studies, and a growing number of CAR-T regimens are approved for clinical usage. While the therapy is considered of great potential in expanding the cancer immunotherapy arsenal, more than half of patients receiving CAR-T infusions do not respond, while others develop significant adverse effects, collectively indicating a need for optimization of CAR-T treatment to the individual. The microbiota is increasingly suggested as a major modulator of immunotherapy responsiveness. Studying causal microbiota roles possibly contributing to CAR-T therapy efficacy, adverse effects reduction, and prediction of patient responsiveness constitutes an exciting area of active research. Herein, we discuss the latest developments implicating human microbiota involvement in CAR-T therapy, while highlighting challenges and promises in harnessing the microbiota as a predictor and modifier of CAR-T treatment towards optimized efficacy and minimization of treatment-related adverse effects.

Switching from salvage chemotherapy to immunotherapy in adult B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

About one-half of adults with acute B-cell lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) who do not achieve molecular complete remission or who subsequently relapse are not cured by current chemo- or targeted therapies. Previously, the sole therapeutic option for such persons was a hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Recently, several immune therapies including monoclonal antibodies, bispecific T-cell engagers (BiTEs), antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), and chimeric antigen receptor T-cells (CARs) have been shown safe and effective in this setting. In this manuscript, we summarize data on US FDA-approved immune therapies of advanced adult B-ALL including rituximab, blinatumomab, inotuzumab ozogamicin, tisagenlecleucel and brexucabtagene autoleucel. We consider the results of clinical trials focusing on efficacy, safety, and quality of life (QoL). Real-world evidence is presented as well. We also briefly discuss pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacoeconomics followed by risk-benefit analyses. Lastly, we present future directions of immune therapies for advanced B-ALL in adults.

Peripheral blood cellular profile at pre-lymphodepletion is associated with CD19-targeted CAR-T cell-associated neurotoxicity

Background

Infusion of second generation autologous CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells in patients with R/R relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphoma (BCL) is affected by inflammatory complications, such as Immune Effector Cell-Associated Neurotoxicity Syndrome (ICANS). Current literature suggests that the immune profile prior to CAR-T infusion modifies the chance to develop ICANS.

Methods

This is a monocenter prospective study on 53 patients receiving approved CAR T-cell products (29 axi-cel, 24 tisa-cel) for R/R-BCL. Clinical, biochemical, and hematological variables were analyzed at the time of pre-lymphodepletion (pre-LD). In a subset of 21 patients whose fresh peripheral blood sample was available, we performed cytofluorimetric analysis of leukocytes and extracellular vesicles (EVs). Moreover, we assessed a panel of soluble plasma biomarkers (IL-6/IL-10/GDF-15/IL-15/CXCL9/NfL) and microRNAs (miR-146a-5p, miR-21-5p, miR-126-3p, miR-150-5p) which are associated with senescence and inflammation.

Results

Multivariate analysis at the pre-LD time-point in the entire cohort (n=53) showed that a lower percentage of CD3⁺CD8⁺ lymphocytes (38.6% vs 46.8%, OR=0.937 [95% CI: 0.882-0.996], p=0.035) and higher levels of serum C-reactive protein (CRP, 4.52 mg/dl vs 1.00 mg/dl, OR=7.133 [95% CI: 1.796-28], p=0.005) are associated with ICANS. In the pre-LD samples of 21 patients, a significant increase in the percentage of CD8⁺CD45RA⁺CD57⁺ senescent cells (median % value: 16.50% vs 9.10%, p=0.009) and monocytic-myeloid derived suppressor cells (M-MDSC, median % value: 4.4 vs 1.8, p=0.020) was found in ICANS patients. These latter also showed increased levels of EVs carrying CD14⁺ and CD45⁺ myeloid markers, of the myeloid chemokine CXCL-9, as well of the MDSC-secreted cytokine IL-10. Notably, the serum levels of circulating neurofilament light chain, a marker of neuroaxonal injury, were positively correlated with the levels of senescent CD8⁺ T cells, M-MDSC, IL-10 and CXCL-9. No variation in the levels of the selected miRNAs was observed between ICANS and no-ICANS patients.

Discussion

Our data support the notion that pre-CAR-T systemic inflammation is associated with ICANS. Higher proportion of senescence CD8⁺ T cells and M-MDSC correlate with early signs of neuroaxonal injury at pre-LD time-point, suggesting that ICANS may be the final event of a process that begins before CAR-T infusion, consequence to patient clinical history.

Effects of preventive care on psychological state and complications in leukemia patients receiving chemotherapy

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of preventive care on the psychological state and complications in patients with leukemia undergoing chemotherapy.

METHODS

Retrospectively, 85 patients with leukemia undergoing chemotherapy in Xinchang People's Hospital from April 2019 to September 2021 were collected, including 47 patients who received preventive care as an observation group and 38 patients who received routine care as a control group. The incidence of chemotherapy-related complications, the scores of Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) before and after nursing intervention, and the General Comfort Questionnaire (GCQ) and nursing satisfaction were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The complication rate in the control group was higher than that of the observation group (P<0.05). The SAS and SDS scores of the control group were higher than those of the observation group after care (P<0.05). The GCQ score of the observation group was higher than that of the control group after care (P<0.05), and the care satisfaction of the control group was lower than that of the observation group (P<0.05). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that age over 65 years old, platelet count less than 50 × 10⁹/L and white blood cell count over 100 × 10⁹/L were risk factors for complications in leukemia patients receiving chemotherapy (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Preventive care helps to improve the negative emotions of patients with leukemia undergoing chemotherapy and reduces complications.

Pattern of brexucabtagene autoleucel-related neurotoxicity on magnetic resonance imaging of the brain in a patient with relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia and prior leptomeningeal disease

Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) secondary to chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy is common in adult patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), but imaging findings during neurologic toxicity and their meaning have yet to be systematically described in this patient population. Brexucabtagene autoleucel (brexu-cel) is a CD19-directed autologous T-cell immunotherapy for the treatment of adult patients with R/R B-cell ALL that can enter the central nervous system. We present a case of an adult patient with R/R B-cell ALL and prior leptomeningeal disease who developed neurologic toxicity and new findings on magnetic resonance imaging of the brain while receiving brexu-cel. We interpret the patient's neuroimaging studies within clinical context to differentiate ICANS from active treatment of residual leukemia.

Immunotherapy for Meningiomas

Systemic treatment approaches are urgently needed for a subset of meningioma patients who do not achieve local tumor control with surgery and radiotherapy. Classical chemotherapy or anti-angiogenic agents exert only very limited activity in these tumors. Long-term survival of patients with advanced metastatic cancer following treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors, i.e., monoclonal antibodies designed to unleash suppressed anticancer immune responses, has fostered hopes for benefit from similar approaches in patients with meningiomas that recur after standard local therapy. Moreover, a plethora of immunotherapy approaches beyond these drugs have entered clinical development or clinical practice for other cancer entities, including (i) novel immune checkpoint inhibitors that may act independently of T cell activity, (ii) cancer peptide or dendritic cell vaccines to induce anticancer immunity utilizing cancer-associated antigens, (iii) cellular therapies utilizing genetically modified peripheral blood cells to directly target cancer cells, (iv) T cell engaging recombinant proteins that link tumor antigen-binding sites to effector cell activating or recognition domains, or to immunogenic cytokines, and (v) oncolytic virotherapy utilizing attenuated viral vectors designed to specifically infect cancer cells, seeking to elicit systemic anticancer immunity. This chapter provides an overview of the principles of immunotherapy, summarizes ongoing immunotherapy clinical trials in meningioma patients, and discusses the applicability of established and emerging immunotherapy concepts to meningioma patients.

An Overview of Cytokine Release Syndrome and Other Side Effects of CAR-T Cell Therapy

Oncology has been rapidly evolving over the past decade with tremendous therapeutic development. Engineered cell therapies such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells are increasingly used in daily practice, and provided a paradigm change especially for hematological malignancies. Their development is a scientific and technological achievement, but their toxicities can be life-threatening. As their utilization expands, better understanding of pathophysiology leads to better management. In this article we present a general overview of cell-therapy toxicities and their management.

Continuous EEG monitoring detects nonconvulsive seizure and Ictal-Interictal Continuum abnormalities in moderate to severe ICANS following systemic CAR-T therapy

Background and Purpose

Immune Cell Effector Associated Neurotoxicity Syndrome (ICANS) is common amongst patients receiving CD19 targeted Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy. The purpose of this study is to characterize the incidence of seizures and ictal-interictal continuum (IIC) abnormalities in patients with ICANS.

Methods

Retrospective review of consecutive patients treated with axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) for recurrent high-grade systemic lymphoma at Stanford Medical Center between 2/2016-6/2019. Electronic medical records (EMR) were reviewed for clinical features, treatment information, EEG data, CRS (cytokine release syndrome)/ICANS severity, and clinical outcomes.

Results

Fifty-six patients met inclusion criteria. 85.7% of patients developed CRS, and 58.9% developed ICANS. Twenty-eight patients had EEG monitoring, of whom 26 had ICANS. Median duration of EEG monitoring was 30 hours (range .5-126 hours). Four patients (7.1%) had seizures (1 patient had a clinical generalized seizure, 2 patients had clinical and nonconvulsive seizures, and 1 patient had an isolated non-convulsive seizure). Ictal-interictal continuum abnormalities were common, of which generalized periodic discharges (GPDs) with triphasic morphology and GPDs with epileptiform morphology were most frequently seen. Generalized periodic discharges with triphasic wave morphology were found across Grade 2-3 peak ICANS severity, however the majority (86%) of patients with epileptiform GPDs had Grade 3 peak ICANS severity.

Conclusions

Among patients receiving axi-cel, seizure occurred in 7.1% of the total cohort, representing 12% of patients with ICANS. Ictal-interictal continuum abnormalities are also seen in patients with ICANS, most commonly GPDs. 75% of patients with seizures had nonconvulsive seizures supporting the use of continuous video EEG monitoring in this population.