Prognostic factors for survival in previously treated patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Time to progression after first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor predicts survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma receiving second-line molecular-targeted therapy

OBJECTIVES

The effect of response to first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy on second-line survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who receive second-line molecular-targeted therapy (mTT) after first-line failure remains unclear.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty patients who developed disease progression after first-line TKI, without prior cytokine therapy, were enrolled. According to the median first-line time to progression (1L-TTP), patients were divided into 2 groups (i.e., short vs. long). Second-line progression-free survival (2L-PFS) and second-line overall survival (2L-OS) were defined as the time from second-line mTT initiation. Survival was calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test between patients with short and long 1L-PFS. Predictors for survivals were identified using Cox proportional hazards regression models.

RESULTS

The median 1L-TTP was 8.84 months. Thirty patients (50.0%) with short 1L-TTP (<8.84mo) had significantly shorter 2L-PFS and 2L-OS compared to patients with long 1L-TTP (2L-PFS: 4.96 vs. 10.2mo, P = 0.0002; 2L-OS: 9.6 vs. 28.0mo, P = 0.0036). Multivariable analyses for 2L-PFS and 2L-OS showed that 1L-TTP was an independent predictor both as a categorical classification (cutoff: 8.84mo) and as a continuous variable (both P<0.05). The median follow-up duration was 13.1 months (interquartile range: 6.56-24.7).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who achieve a long-term response after first-line TKI therapy could have a favorable prognosis with second-line mTT.

Real-life patterns of use, safety and effectiveness of sunitinib in first-line therapy of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: the SANTORIN cohort study

PURPOSE

To investigate sunitinib in the real-life first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

METHODS

SANTORIN is a French observational multicentre cohort. Patients initiating sunitinib in first-line mRCC therapy were included (January 2008 to April 2010) and followed for 24 months. Data were collected from medical files. The outcomes were 24-month overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), response and safety.

RESULTS

Three hundred two patients were included: median age, 64.8 years; male, 73.2%; clear cell mRCC, 83.1%; prior nephrectomy, 85.4%; >1 metastatic sites, 64.2%; brain metastases, 6.3%; ECOG-PS ≥ 2, 9.9%. Median duration of first-line therapy with sunitinib was 10.7 months. Initial sunitinib dose was 50 mg/day for 83.4% of patients; dose reduction occurred in 65.2%. Sunitinib was discontinued in 73.2% of the patients: for progression (61.1%), death (31.2%) or adverse events (6.8%). More than half (58.3%) had grade ≥3 adverse events, mainly hypertension (12.6%) and hand-foot syndrome (12.3%). The 24-month OS and PFS rates [95%CI] were 49.5% [43.7;55.0] and 16.4% [12.5;20.9], respectively. Median OS was 23.6 months [20.2;-] and median PFS 8.4 months [7.6;9.9]. Overall best response rate was 31.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

Results from this large observational study suggest that effectiveness of sunitinib in first-line mRCC as predicted by clinical trials is maintained in real-life clinical practice. The expected benefit in poor-prognosis patients that were not evaluated in the pivotal clinical trial remains; however, questionable and long-term safety monitoring is still warranted. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Hypoxia and renal cell carcinoma: The influence of HIF1A+1772C/T functional genetic polymorphism on prognosis

OBJECTIVES

Hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF-1) is a key regulator of the genes involved in the cellular response to hypoxia. Overexpression of HIF-1 has been implicated in the pathogenesis of renal cell carcinoma (RCC), and functional polymorphisms of the HIF1A gene may confer susceptibility to RCC. Our purpose was to assess the influence of HIF1A+1772C/T (rs11549465) polymorphism on RCC prognosis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This study evaluated the associations of the HIF1A+1772C/T (rs11549465) polymorphism with clinicopathologic prognostic factors, recurrence/progression, and survival in a cohort of 179 patients with RCC treated at Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto. Genotyping analysis, using DNA extracted from peripheral blood, was performed by real-time polymerase chain reaction allelic discrimination. The genotype associations with clinicopathologic parameters and recurrence/progression were analyzed by the chi-square or Fisher tests. Genotypes influencing cancer-specific survival were compared using Cox proportional hazard regression, Kaplan-Meier curves, and Breslow test.

RESULTS

None of the genotypes (CC, CT, or TT) were significantly associated with clinicopathologic prognostic factors. The TT genotype and T allele were associated with recurrence/progression (P = 0.042 and P = 0.02, respectively). Patients with CT and CT+TT genotypes tend to have an increased risk to RCC-related death (hazard ratio = 2.79; 95% CI: 0.88-8.82; P = 0.08 and hazard ratio = 2.76; 95% CI: 0.93-8.22; P = 0.07, respectively) and showed worse cancer-specific survival curves than those with the CC genotype (P = 0.012 and P = 0.018, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that HIF1A+1772C/T (rs11549465) polymorphism may have effects on RCC recurrence/progression and survival.

Is Change in Hemoglobin Level a Predictive Biomarker of Tyrosine Kinase Efficacy in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma? A Turkish Oncology Group Study

BACKGROUND

There are insufficient predictive markers for renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

METHODS

A total of 308 metastatic RCC patients were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

The increased hemoglobin (Hb) group had significantly higher progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) compared with the decreased Hb group at 11.5 versus 6.35 months (p < .001) and 21.0 versus 11.36 months (p < .001) respectively. The 1- and 3-year OS rates were higher in the Hb increased group, i.e., 84% versus 64% and 52% versus 35% respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study showed that increased Hb levels after tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy could be a predictive marker of RCC.

Genomic alterations as predictors of survival among patients within a combined cohort with clear cell renal cell carcinoma undergoing cytoreductive nephrectomy

PURPOSE

To establish prognostic genomic biomarkers for patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We identified 60 patients who presented with metastatic ccRCC at our institution between 2001 and 2015 and had genomic sequencing on their primary tumor. We pooled these patients with 107 other patients with the same inclusion criteria from three well-known public databases. Five commonly mutated genes were chosen for analysis: VHL, PBRM1, BAP1, SETD2, and KDM5C. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test was used for comparisons between groups.

RESULTS

Median OS in the cohort was 2.5 years. Higher Fuhrman grade was associated with decreased median OS (P<0.001). Mutations in SETD2 (P = 0.027) and KDM5C (P = 0.019) were associated with reduced risk of death (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.58 [95% CI: 0.35-0.94] and HR = 0.43 [95% CI: 0.22-0.85], respectively). BAP1 mutations (P = 0.008) were associated with increased risk of death (HR = 1.81 [95% CI: 1.16-2.83]). There were significantly more female patients with a BAP1 mutation than females in the overall cohort (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Mutations in BAP1 negatively affected OS, whereas SETD2 and KDM5C mutations were associated with prolonged OS in our pooled cohort of 167 patients with metastatic ccRCC. Our results expand upon efforts at understanding genomic biomarkers in localized disease. Those efforts set the stage for our novel investigation examining associations of select recurrent somatic mutations in stage IV patients with ccRCC.

Biomarkers to predict prognosis and response to checkpoint inhibitors

Nivolumab is a fully human immunoglobulin (Ig) G4 antibody that selectively inhibits the programmed death 1 (PD-1) immune checkpoint molecule, and has recently been launched for the treatment of renal cell cancer (RCC) in Japan. Based on its promising anti-tumor efficacy and manageable safety profile demonstrated in the phase III Checkmate 025 trial, nivolumab therapy is rapidly being introduced in metastatic RCC clinical practice. The phase Ia study of atezolizumab, which is a humanized anti-PD-ligand 1 (PD-L1) monoclonal IgG1 antibody, also demonstrated excellent treatment results. The identification of biomarkers to predict the response and side-effects of checkpoint inhibitor therapy is thus urgently needed. In this review, we introduce the current candidate biomarkers of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Based on the mechanism of efficacy, the number of neoantigens and expression of major histocompatibility complex molecules are strong candidate biomarkers. Despite the various interference factors, PD-L1 expression can be considered a potential biomarker. In terms of clinical factors, serum clinical factors and severity of adverse events are examined. Although further implementation in prospective studies is necessary, if validated, these biomarkers can be utilized to measure therapeutic response and design treatment strategies for metastatic RCC.

[When is cytoreductive nephrectomy not beneficial for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma?]

Primary tumor resection in patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma and a good performance status corresponds to a guideline recommendation which, however, is based on weak data from the era of cytokine therapy. This article presents arguments that weigh heavily against cytoreductive nephrectomy. From a molecular genetic viewpoint, the intervention eliminates only the easiest adversary but cannot prevent cancer-related death. Therefore, benefits and risks must be carefully and critically considered. Cytoreductive nephrectomy is not beneficial if treatment-induced morbidity will substantially affect the patient's quality of life and/or life expectancy or if the size and topography of the primary tumor renders it less dangerous than the metastases.

Knockdown of Collagen Triple Helix Repeat Containing-1 Inhibits the Proliferation and Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition in Renal Cell Carcinoma Cells

Collagen triple helix repeat containing-1 (CTHRC1), a secreted glycoprotein, is frequently upregulated in human cancers. However, the functional role of CTHRC1 in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains unclear. Thus, the aim of this study was to explore the role of CTHRC1 in RCC. Our results demonstrated that CTHRC1 was upregulated in RCC tissues and cell lines. Knockdown of CTHRC1 significantly inhibits the proliferation in RCCs. Furthermore, knockdown of CTHRC1 significantly inhibited the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) process in RCCs, as well as suppressed RCC cell migration and invasion. Mechanistically, knockdown of CTHRC1 inhibited the expression of β-catenin, c-Myc, and cyclin D1 in RCC cells. In conclusion, the results of the present study indicated that CTHRC1 downregulation inhibited proliferation, migration, EMT, and β-catenin expression in RCC cells. Therefore, CTHRC1 may be a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of RCC.

CheckMate 025 Randomized Phase 3 Study: Outcomes by Key Baseline Factors and Prior Therapy for Nivolumab Versus Everolimus in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The randomized, phase 3 CheckMate 025 study of nivolumab (n=410) versus everolimus (n=411) in previously treated adults (75% male; 88% white) with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) demonstrated significantly improved overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR).

OBJECTIVE

To investigate which baseline factors were associated with OS and ORR benefit with nivolumab versus everolimus.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Subgroup OS analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier methodology. Hazard ratios were estimated using the Cox proportional hazards model.

INTERVENTION

Nivolumab 3mg/kg every 2 wk or everolimus 10mg once daily.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

The minimum follow-up was 14 mo. Baseline subgroup distributions were balanced between nivolumab and everolimus arms. Nivolumab demonstrated an OS improvement versus everolimus across subgroups, including Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) and International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium risk groups; age <65 and ≥65 yr; one and two or more sites of metastases; bone, liver, and lung metastases; number of prior therapies; duration of prior therapy; and prior sunitinib, pazopanib, or interleukin-2 therapy. The benefit with nivolumab versus everolimus was noteworthy for patients with poor MSKCC risk (hazard ratio 0.48, 95% confidence interval 0.32-0.70). The mortality rate at 12 mo for all subgroups was lower with nivolumab compared with everolimus. ORR also favored nivolumab. The incidence of grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events across subgroups was lower with nivolumab. Limitations include the post hoc analysis and differing sample sizes between groups.

CONCLUSION

The trend for OS and ORR benefit with nivolumab for multiple subgroups, without notable safety concerns, may help to guide treatment decisions, and further supports nivolumab as the standard of care in previously treated patients with aRCC.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We investigated the impact of demographic and pretreatment features on survival benefit and tumor response with nivolumab versus everolimus in advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). Survival benefit and response were observed for multiple subgroups, supporting the use of nivolumab as a new standard of care across a broad range of patients with previously treated aRCC. The trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT01668784.

Presence of sarcomatoid differentiation as a prognostic indicator for survival in surgically treated metastatic renal cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

To assess the prognostic significance of sarcomatoid differentiation for surgically treated metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

METHODS

Patients undergoing cytoreductive nephrectomy for mRCC in our center between 2006 and 2014 were included. All enrolled patients were separated into two groups according to the presence of sarcomatoid differentiation. Clinical and pathological variables were recorded. Student's t test or Chi-square test was applied to compare them. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression were performed to determine independent prognostic factors for oncologic outcomes.

RESULTS

Of the 184 patients with mRCC included, 27 (14.7%) patients presented with sarcomatoid differentiation. The presence of sarcomatoid differentiation was associated with higher rates of non-clear cell histology (P = 0.009), higher Fuhrman grade (P < 0.001), higher rates of presenting tumor necrosis (P = 0.005), worse IMDC risk group (P = 0.022), and MSKCC risk group (P = 0.020). Patients with sarcomatoid differentiation showed shorter median progression-free survival and overall survival. Multivariate analysis identified that sarcomatoid differentiation was independently associated with progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.002, 95% CI 1.047-3.828; P = 0.036) and overall survival (HR: 1.922, 95% CI 1.073-3.445; P = 0.028). Sarcomatoid differentiation remained to be independently associated with inferior PFS (HR: 2.097, 95% CI 1.091-4.030; P = 0.026) and OS (HR: 2.245, 95% CI 1.276-3.951; P = 0.005) for clear cell mRCC.

CONCLUSION

The presence of sarcomatoid differentiation is independently associated with poor oncologic outcomes for surgically treated mRCC patients. The association remains significant when the subject of study is restricted to clear cell mRCC.

Primary Tumor Characteristics Are Important Prognostic Factors for Sorafenib-Treated Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Multicenter Study

We aimed to identify prognostic factors associated with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients treated with sorafenib. We investigated 177 patients, including 116 who received sorafenib as first-line therapy, using the Cox regression model. During a median follow-up period of 19.2 months, the PFS and OS were 6.4 and 32.6 months among all patients and 7.4 months and undetermined for first-line sorafenib-treated patients, respectively. Clinical T3-4 stage (hazard ratio [HR] 2.56) and a primary tumor size >7 cm (HR 0.34) were significant prognostic factors for PFS among all patients, as were tumor size >7 cm (HR 0.12), collecting system invasion (HR 5.67), and tumor necrosis (HR 4.11) for OS (p < 0.05). In first-line sorafenib-treated patients, ≥4 metastatic lesions (HR 28.57), clinical T3-4 stage (HR 4.34), collecting system invasion (univariate analysis HR 2.11; multivariate analysis HR 0.07), lymphovascular invasion (HR 13.35), and tumor necrosis (HR 6.69) were significant prognosticators of PFS, as were bone metastasis (HR 5.49) and clinical T3-4 stages (HR 4.1) for OS (p < 0.05). Our study thus identified a number of primary tumor-related characteristics as important prognostic factors in sorafenib-treated mRCC patients.

Effect of Systemic Inflammation on Survival in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Receiving Second-line Molecular-targeted Therapy

BACKGROUND

The role of systemic inflammatory markers, including C-reactive protein (CRP), the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and the platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), in predicting survival for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma receiving second-line molecular-targeted therapy (mTT) after first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor failure remains unclear. Thus, we investigated the relationship between systemic inflammation and survival in such patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty-three patients were evaluated. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) after second-line mTT initiation were evaluated according to the inflammatory marker levels. In addition, the prognostic factors for survival were examined.

RESULTS

The receiver operating characteristic curves for CRP, NLR, and PLR had areas under the curve of 0.779, 0.619, and 0.655, respectively; no significant differences were noted. The corresponding cutoff values were 0.48, 2.53, and 183. Patients with higher CRP (n = 40), NLR (n = 32), and PLR (n = 22) levels had significantly lower PFS and OS than those with lower CRP, NLR, and PLR levels. Multivariate analyses showed that CRP was the sole independent predictor for PFS and OS.

CONCLUSION

Systemic inflammation is associated with survival after second-line mTT. In particular, CRP was a strong independent predictive biomarker of prognosis.

Therapeutic approaches in clear cell and non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) accounts for 2.4% of all malignancies worldwide diagnosed with 338,000 estimated new cases globally in 2012. In the last decade, the therapeutic landscape for RCC patients has changed tremendously. In this review, we will summarize the treatment options currently available for clear-cell localized, advanced and metastatic RCC (mRCC); as stated in the ESMO clinical practice guidelines, the EAU guidelines and the NCCN guidelines. Furthermore, we will discuss the recommended therapies in patients diagnosed with non-clear cell tumours.

Review of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with reduced intensity conditioning in solid tumors excluding breast cancer

Solid tumors in adults constitute a heterogeneous group of malignancy originating from various organ systems. Solid tumors are not completely curable by chemotherapy, even though some subgroups are very chemo-sensitive. Recently, oncologists have focused on the use of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) with reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) for the treatment of some refractory solid tumors. After the demonstration of allogeneic graft-versus-leukemia effect in patients with hematological malignancies who received allo-HSCT, investigators evaluated this effect in patients with refractory metastatic solid tumors. According to data from experimental animal models and preliminary clinical trials, a graft-versus-tumor (GvT) effect may also be observed in the treatment of some solid tumors (e.g., renal cell cancer, colorectal cancer, etc.) after allo-HSCT with RIC. The use of RIC regimens offers an opportunity of achieving full-donor engraftment with GvT effect, as well as, a reduced transplant-related mortality. Current literature suggests that allo-HSCT with RIC might become a choice for elderly and medically fragile patients with refractory metastatic solid tumors.

First-line treatment options in metastatic renal cell cancer

The introduction of targeted therapy a decade ago revolutionized the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). The current standard of care focuses on the inhibition of angiogenesis through the targeting of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) and the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR). Currently recommended first-line treatments in Canada include sunitinib, pazopanib, and temsirolimus. With the heterogeneity of mRCC disease, the choice of treatment is driven largely by prognostic factors.

Sunitinib side effects as surrogate biomarkers of efficacy

With the proliferation of treatment options for the management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) over the past decade, predictive markers of response to therapy are becoming increasingly important. Sunitinib is commonly used in the first-line treatment of mRCC. Common mechanism-based adverse events, including hypertension, hypothyroidism, hand-foot syndrome, and neutropenia, have been explored as potential biomarkers of the clinical efficacy of sunitinib in mRCC and are reviewed in this article.

Case Discussion: Systemic Therapy for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

First-line systemic therapy for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma should largely entail the use of targeted agents. Depending on the clinical factors, VEGF- or mTOR-directed agents may be appropriate.

First-Line Treatments for Poor-Prognosis Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Experts' Prescribing Practices and Systematic Literature Review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

No head-to-head clinical trials are available to help physicians in the decision-making process of first-line therapy in poor-prognosis metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The objectives of our study were to identify experts' prescribing practices and to review available clinical data in first-line therapies for poor-prognosis metastatic RCC (mRCC).

METHODS

Thirteen RCC experts were asked to fill in a self-administered questionnaire evaluating prescribing practices. A systematic review was performed in July 2015 in MEDLINE for clinical trials evaluating first-line strategy in poor-prognosis mRCC.

RESULTS

Ten out of 13 experts completed the questionnaire (76.9%). Sunitinib was the most frequently prescribed first-line therapy (8/10; 80%). The main reason for prescribing sunitinib most frequently was the evidence of effectiveness for the majority (5/8 experts). A total of 21 articles were found suitable. Only one phase III randomized controlled trial in which all patients had a poor prognosis was retrieved. Temsirolimus increases progression-free survival and overall survival compared to IFN-alpha. Increased PFS with sunitinib in poor-prognosis patients was shown in a subgroup analysis of the pivotal trial. An expanded-access trial confirmed this result.

DISCUSSION

Experts tend to prefer sunitinib as first-line therapy even in poor-prognosis mRCC. In light of the systematic review, no targeted therapy appears to be more effective than another. The upcoming challenge is to discover more effective new drugs since the overall survival of poor-prognosis mRCC still remains extremely limited.

Sunitinib in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Sunitinib is an oral multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that targets various receptors, including vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFRs). Sunitinib received approval in 2006 and became a standard treatment option in the first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) after a phase III trial showed superiority compared with interferon alpha (IFN-α). Sunitinib has also shown activity in second-line treatment in several trials. Most of the combination trials with sunitinib with various agents have led to considerable toxicity without improving efficacy. Sunitinib alone causes significant side effects and has a distinct profile with diarrhoea, hypertension, skin effects hypothyroidism, fatigue and nausea of special interest. The recommended dose of sunitinib in mRCC is 50 mg orally daily for 4 weeks, followed by 2 weeks off treatment (4/2 schedule). An alternative 2 weeks on, 1 week off schedule (2/1 schedule) seems to be of similar efficacy and better tolerability and could be more widely used in the future. An intermittent treatment strategy with a stop in remission and re-induction after progression showed efficacy in smaller trials and is currently being evaluated in a phase III trial. Direct comparison of sunitinib with pazopanib in first-line treatment showed a similar efficacy for both TKIs with a distinct toxicity profile. Data from two phase II trials showed that sunitinib has also activity in non-clear cell cancer and is an option due to a lack of better alternatives. Currently, after immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown very promising results in the second-line treatment of RCC, they are being tested in a number of phase III trials in the first-line setting. The future will show the position of sunitinib in the first-line treatment of RCC in the era of the immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Cabozantinib for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Agents that target the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) or mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway as well as the PD-1 checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab are standard therapies for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Recently, cabozantinib, an inhibitor of MET, VEGF receptors, and AXL, was approved by the FDA and European Commission based on improved progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR) compared to standard of care treatment with everolimus in a randomized phase 3 trial in advanced RCC after prior VEGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. Areas covered:The preclinical development and scientific rationale, pharmacokinetics, and clinical efficacy and safety of cabozantinib for the treatment of advanced RCC are reviewed. The use of cabozantinib in clinical practice with the growing number of available treatments for advanced RCC is discussed. Expert opinion: Cabozantinib is the only therapy for advanced RCC that has improved PFS, ORR, and OS in a pivotal phase 3 trial after prior antiangiogenic therapy. While no clinical trials have been published comparing cabozantinib with another TKI, available clinical data suggest it could be the most efficacious TKI for second-line therapy. Preliminary encouraging results have also been reported in a phase 2 trial in untreated poor- and intermediate- risk patients with RCC, indicating that treatment with cabozantinib may also be beneficial in the first-line setting.

Everolimus in the management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: an evidence-based review of its place in therapy

Introduction

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common type of kidney cancer in adults, and its pathogenesis is strictly related to altered cellular response to hypoxia, in which mTOR signaling pathway is implicated. Everolimus, an mTOR serine/threonine kinase inhibitor, represents a therapeutic option for the treatment of advanced RCC.

Aim

The objective of this article is to review the evidence for the treatment of metastatic RCC with everolimus.

Evidence review

Everolimus was approved for second- and third-line therapy in patients with advanced RCC according to the results of a Phase III pivotal trial that demonstrated a benefit in median progression-free survival of ~2 months compared to placebo after failure of previous lines of therapy, of which at least one was an anti-VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). The role of this drug in first-line setting has been investigated in Phase II trials, with no significant clinical benefit, even in combination with bevacizumab. Everolimus activity in non-clear cell RCC is supported by two randomized Phase II trials that confirmed the benefit in second-line setting but not in first line. Recently, two randomized Phase III trials (METEOR and CheckMate 025) demonstrated the inferiority of everolimus in second-line setting compared to the TKI cabozantinib and to the immune checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab, respectively. Moreover, a recent Phase II study demonstrated a significant benefit for the second-line combination treatment with everolimus plus lenvatinib (a novel TKI) in terms of progression-free survival and overall survival compared to the single-agent everolimus. Basing on preclinical data, the main downstream effectors of mTOR cascade, S6RP and its phosphorylated form, could be good predictive biomarkers of response to everolimus. The safety profile of the drug is favorable, with a good cost-effectiveness compared to second-line sorafenib or axitinib, and no significant impact on the quality of life of treated patients has been found.

Conclusion

Everolimus still represents a current standard of treatment for RCC progressive to previous treatment lines with VEGFR-TKI. The evidence about two new molecules, cabozantinib and nivolumab, successfully tested head-to-head with everolimus in recently published Phase III trials, will determine the shift of everolimus to the third-line setting and subsequent lines of treatment.

Postoperative Changes in Skeletal Muscle Mass Predict Survival of Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Undergoing Cytoreductive Nephrectomy

BACKGROUND

Sarcopenia, or the degenerative loss of skeletal muscle mass, develops as a consequence of cancer-host interactions, including systemic inflammation and poor nutritional status, and is associated with a poor prognosis in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). We explored whether postoperative changes in skeletal muscle mass after cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) can predict the prognosis of patients with mRCC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The present retrospective study included 37 mRCC patients undergoing CN at a single cancer center. The skeletal muscle index (SMI) was calculated by measuring the skeletal muscle areas at the third lumbar vertebra level on computed tomography images taken ≤ 1 month before and 5 to 6 months after CN. The percentage of change in the SMI (ΔSMI) was calculated as [(postoperative SMI - preoperative SMI)/preoperative SMI] × 100, and the association with overall survival (OS) was analyzed.

RESULTS

During the follow-up period (median, 61 months for survivors), 16 patients (43%) died for a 3-year OS rate of 63%. The ΔSMI was significantly associated with OS (hazard ratio, 0.92; P < .001). When the patients were categorized into 3 groups according to the ΔSMI (decreased, 12 patients with ΔSMI ≤ -5; stabilized, 15 patients with ΔSMI < 5; and increased, 10 patients with ΔSMI ≥ 5), the OS curves were distinctly separate, with a 3-year OS rate of 19%, 76%, and 100%, respectively (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Postoperative changes in the SMI after CN predict OS for patients with mRCC. SMI kinetics is a novel biomarker that can serve as a useful surrogate for the prognosis of patients with mRCC undergoing CN.

A retrospective study of predictive factors for unexpectedly prolonged or shortened progression-free survival and overall survival among patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who received first-line targeted therapy

Background

To identify predictors of prolonged or shortened progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) among patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) who received first-line targeted therapies.

Methods

This retrospective study included 146 patients with mRCC who were treated during 2007–2015. These patients were divided into a group with the worst response (WG), an expected group (EG), and a group with the best response (BG), based on their PFS (≤3 monthsnths, 3–18 monthsnths, and >18 monthsnths, respectively) and OS (<1 year, 1–3 years, and >3 years, respectively). To identify significant predictive factors, the BG and WG were compared to the EG using the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Heng risk models.

Results

The overall PFS and OS were 9.3 months and 16.4 months, respectively. The median PFS for the WG (41.8 %), EG (45.9 %), and BG (12.3 %) were 2.7 months, 9.3 months, and 56.6 months, respectively, and the median OS for the WG (45.9 %), EG (35.6 %), and BG (18.5 %) were 5.5 months, 21.6 months, and 63.1 months, respectively; these outcomes were significantly different (p < 0.001). Nephrectomy (odds ratio [OR]: 7.15) was a significant predictor of PFS in the BG, and the significant predictors of OS in the BG were MSKCC intermediate risk (OR: 0.12), poor risk (OR: 0.04), and a disease-free interval of <1 year (OR: 0.23) (all, p < 0.05). Anemia (OR: 3.25) was a significant predictor of PFS in the WG, and the significant predictors of OS were age (OR: 1.05), anemia (OR: 4.13), lymphocytopenia (OR: 4.76), disease-free interval of <1 year (OR: 4.8), and synchronous metastasis (OR: 3.52) (all, p < 0.05).

Conclusion

We identified several significant predictors of unexpectedly good and poor response to first-line targeted therapy among patients with mRCC.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-016-2615-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Prognostic value of a systemic inflammatory response index in metastatic renal cell carcinoma and construction of a predictive model

Inflammation act as a crucial role in carcinogenesis and tumor progression. In this study, we aim to investigate the prognostic significance of systemic inflammatory biomarkers in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) and develop a survival predictive model. One hundred and sixty-one mRCC patients who had undergone cytoreductive nephrectomy were enrolled from January 2006 to December 2013. We created a systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) basing on pretreatment hemoglobin and lymphocyte to monocyte ratio (LMR), and evaluated its associations with overall survival (OS) and clinicopathological features. Pretreatment hemoglobin and LMR both remained as independent factors adjusted for other markers of systemic inflammation responses and conventional clinicopathological parameters. A high SIRI seems to be an independent prognosis predictor of worse OS and was significantly correlated with aggressive tumor behaviors. Inclusion of the SIRI into a prognostic model including Fuhrman grade, histology, tumor necrosis and targeted therapy established a nomogram, which accurately predicted 1-year survival for mRCC patients. The SIRI seems to be a prognostic biomarker in mRCC patients. The proposed nomogram can be applied to predict OS of patients with mRCC after nephrectomy.

Expression and prognostic significance of VEGF and mTOR pathway proteins in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients: a prognostic immunohistochemical profile for kidney cancer patients

PURPOSE

To identify prognostic molecular profiles in patients with mRCC treated with sunitinib, we performed immunohistochemical analysis for VEGF and PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway components.

METHODS

The immunohistochemical expression of VEGF, p85α, p110γ, PTEN, p-Akt, p-mTOR, p-4E-BP1 and p-p70S6K was studied in 79 patients with mRCC who received first-line treatment with sunitinib. Expression was correlated with clinicopathological features and survival.

RESULTS

VEGF was highly expressed (median H-Score 150), while positivity for the markers of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway was: p85α 43/66 (65 %), p110γ41/60 (68 %), PTEN 32/64 (50 %), p-Akt57/63 (90 %), p-mTOR48/64 (75 %), p-4E-BP1 58/64 (90 %) and p-p70S6K 60/65 (92 %). No single immunohistochemical marker was found to have prognostic significance. Instead, the combination of increased p-mTOR and low VEGF expression was adversely correlated with overall survival (OS) (3.2 vs. 16.9 months, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Immunohistochemistry for VEGF and p-mTOR proteins may discriminate patients refractory to first-line sunitinib with poor prognosis. Prospective validation of our findings is needed.

Safety and clinical activity of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors after programmed cell death 1 inhibitor treatment in patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Emerging agents blocking the programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) pathway show activity in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)/VEGF receptor (VEGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy after PD-1 inhibition.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with mRCC treated with anti-PD-1 antibody (aPD-1) monotherapy or in combination (with VEGFR-TKI or ipilimumab) that subsequently received VEGFR-TKI were retrospectively reviewed. The efficacy end points were objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) stratified by the type of prior PD-1 regimen. Safety by the type and PD-1 exposure was also evaluated.

RESULTS

Seventy patients were included. Forty-nine patients received prior therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) alone and 21 had combination therapy of aPD-1 and VEGFR-TKI. Overall, ORR to VEGFR-TKI after PD-1 inhibition was 28% (19/68) and the median PFS was 6.4 months (mo) (4.3-9.5). ORR to VEGFR-TKI after aPD-1 in combination with VEGFR-TKI was lower than that in patients treated with VEGFR-TKI after CPI alone (ORR 10% versus 36%, P = 0.039). In the multivariable analysis, patients treated with prior CPI alone were more likely to achieve an objective response than those treated with aPD-1 in combination with VEGFR-TKI (OR = 5.38; 95% CI 1.12-26.0, P = 0.03). There was a trend toward numerically longer median PFS in the VEGFR-TKI after the CPI alone group, 8.4 mo (3.2-12.4) compared with 5.5 mo (2.9-8.3) for those who had VEGFR-TKI after aPD-1 in combination with VEGFR-TKI (P = 0.15). The most common adverse events (AEs) were asthenia, hypertension, and diarrhea.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy and safety of VEGFR-TKIs after PD-1 inhibition were demonstrated in this retrospective study. The response rate was lower and the median progression-free survival was shorter in those patients who received prior PD-1 in combination with VEGFR-TKI. PD-1 exposure does not seem to significantly influence the safety of subsequent VEGFR-TKI treatment.

Complete metastasectomy for renal cell carcinoma: Comparison of five solid organ sites

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Patients with metastatic RCC can undergo metastasectomy to improve survival time. Our goal was to provide and compare characteristics and oncological outcomes of RCC patients who underwent complete metastasectomy at a single organ site.

METHODS

A total of 138 RCC patients were identified as undergoing complete metastasectomy at a single organ site including adrenal, lung, liver, pancreas, or thyroid. Competing risk regression analysis was used to assess RFS and CSS adjusting for several covariates.

RESULTS

In this highly selected cohort, RFS and CSS was 27% and 84% at 5 years following metastasectomy, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that removal of multiple tumors, younger age, and a shorter interval between nephrectomy and metastasis was associated with worse RFS. Larger tumors and sarcomatoid histology at nephrectomy was associated with worse CSS. We found no evidence that metastases at the time of RCC diagnosis influenced recurrence or survival. Tumor size, number of metastases resected, and time from nephrectomy to first recurrence was significantly different, but recurrence rates were not found to be significantly different, when compared across all organ sites.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings inform clinical and surgical management of select RCC patients with isolated metastasis to one of several organ sites. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;114:375-379. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Bone Metastasis from Renal Cell Carcinoma

About one-third of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) have bone metastasis that are often osteolytic and cause substantial morbidity, such as pain, pathologic fracture, spinal cord compression and hypercalcemia. The presence of bone metastasis in RCC is also associated with poor prognosis. Bone-targeted treatment using bisphosphonate and denosumab can reduce skeletal complications in RCC, but does not cure the disease or improve survival. Elucidating the molecular mechanisms of tumor-induced changes in the bone microenvironment is needed to develop effective treatment. The “vicious cycle” hypothesis has been used to describe how tumor cells interact with the bone microenvironment to drive bone destruction and tumor growth. Tumor cells secrete factors like parathyroid hormone-related peptide, transforming growth factor-β and vascular endothelial growth factor, which stimulate osteoblasts and increase the production of the receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand (RANKL). In turn, the overexpression of RANKL leads to increased osteoclast formation, activation and survival, thereby enhancing bone resorption. This review presents a general survey on bone metastasis in RCC by natural history, interaction among the immune system, bone and tumor, molecular mechanisms, bone turnover markers, therapies and healthcare burden.

Evaluation of response from axitinib per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors versus Choi criteria in previously treated patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Axitinib, a selective and potent tyrosine kinase inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors, was available to patients from Canada and Australia, prior to regulatory approval of axitinib in these countries, for treatment of clear-cell metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) after failure of one prior systemic regimen.

METHODS

This single-arm, open-label study of axitinib evaluated the efficacy, safety, and quality of life (QoL) in patients with mRCC whose disease progressed after one prior systemic first-line regimen. Primary objective was objective response rate evaluated per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) and Choi criteria. Progression-free survival, overall survival, safety, and QoL were secondary end points. Due to the small study size, analyses comprised of descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients were recruited, five from Canada and ten from Australia, over a limited recruitment period. Thirteen patients received sunitinib as prior therapy. All patients had clear-cell carcinoma, eleven had prior nephrectomy. Liver, lung, and lymph nodes were the most frequent sites of metastases; one patient had brain metastasis. Median time on axitinib was 118.0 days (range: 3.5-645.0 days); estimated survival probability at 12 months was 57.8%. Two (13.3%) patients had objective responses per RECIST versus nine (60.0%) per Choi criteria. Six patients had progressive disease based on RECIST versus three per Choi criteria. Nine (60.0%) events of progression or death occurred by the end of study, and three patients continued to receive the study drug. Fatigue (33%) and diarrhea (20%) were the most common grade ≥3 all-causality, treatment-emergent adverse events. The mean change in European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions score from baseline to end of treatment was -0.0837.

CONCLUSION

The small number of patients and lack of a comparator arm limit the ability to draw definitive conclusions; however, safety and efficacy profiles of axitinib were consistent with reports from previous studies in patients with mRCC, and patients generally maintained QoL. The sizeable difference observed in objective response rate by RECIST versus Choi criteria merits further research.

Cabozantinib versus everolimus in advanced renal cell carcinoma (METEOR): final results from a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Cabozantinib is an oral inhibitor of tyrosine kinases including MET, VEGFR, and AXL. The randomised phase 3 METEOR trial compared the efficacy and safety of cabozantinib versus the mTOR inhibitor everolimus in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma who progressed after previous VEGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitor treatment. Here, we report the final overall survival results from this study based on an unplanned second interim analysis.

METHODS

In this open-label, randomised phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned (1:1) patients aged 18 years and older with advanced or metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma, measurable disease, and previous treatment with one or more VEGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitors to receive 60 mg cabozantinib once a day or 10 mg everolimus once a day. Randomisation was done with an interactive voice and web response system. Stratification factors were Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center risk group and the number of previous treatments with VEGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitors. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival as assessed by an independent radiology review committee in the first 375 randomly assigned patients and has been previously reported. Secondary endpoints were overall survival and objective response in all randomly assigned patients assessed by intention-to-treat. Safety was assessed per protocol in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. The study is closed for enrolment but treatment and follow-up of patients is ongoing for long-term safety evaluation. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01865747.

FINDINGS

Between Aug 8, 2013, and Nov 24, 2014, 658 patients were randomly assigned to receive cabozantinib (n=330) or everolimus (n=328). The median duration of follow-up for overall survival and safety was 18·7 months (IQR 16·1-21·1) in the cabozantinib group and 18·8 months (16·0-21·2) in the everolimus group. Median overall survival was 21·4 months (95% CI 18·7-not estimable) with cabozantinib and 16·5 months (14·7-18·8) with everolimus (hazard ratio [HR] 0·66 [95% CI 0·53-0·83]; p=0·00026). Cabozantinib treatment also resulted in improved progression-free survival (HR 0·51 [95% CI 0·41-0·62]; p<0·0001) and objective response (17% [13-22] with cabozantinib vs 3% [2-6] with everolimus; p<0·0001) per independent radiology review among all randomised patients. The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were hypertension (49 [15%] in the cabozantinib group vs 12 [4%] in the everolimus group), diarrhoea (43 [13%] vs 7 [2%]), fatigue (36 [11%] vs 24 [7%]), palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome (27 [8%] vs 3 [1%]), anaemia (19 [6%] vs 53 [17%]), hyperglycaemia (3 [1%] vs 16 [5%]), and hypomagnesaemia (16 [5%] vs none). Serious adverse events grade 3 or worse occurred in 130 (39%) patients in the cabozantinib group and in 129 (40%) in the everolimus group. One treatment-related death occurred in the cabozantinib group (death; not otherwise specified) and two occurred in the everolimus group (one aspergillus infection and one pneumonia aspiration).

INTERPRETATION

Treatment with cabozantinib increased overall survival, delayed disease progression, and improved the objective response compared with everolimus. Based on these results, cabozantinib should be considered as a new standard-of-care treatment option for previously treated patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. Patients should be monitored for adverse events that might require dose modifications.

FUNDING

Exelixis Inc.

Novel therapeutic options for second-line therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has gained a variety of therapeutic options since the introduction of targeted therapy, starting in 2007. The basic molecular mechanisms included predominantly the targeting of vascular endothelial growth factor or the inhibition of the mammalian target of rapamycin. Recently, results from two randomized controlled trials, the CheckMate-25 and the METEOR trial, regarding therapy for RCC in the second-line setting have been published. In the present review, the current status of second-line therapy in mRCC is discussed, together with results from the two newly introduced substances, nivolumab and cabozantinib.

Evaluation of polymorphisms in angiogenesis-related genes as predictive and prognostic markers for sunitinib-treated metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients

PURPOSE

Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in angiogenesis-associated genes might play an important role in activity of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib and could affect survival of cancer patients treated with this drug. The aim of this retrospective study was to elucidate the role of 10 known SNPs in VEGFA, VEGFR1, VEGFR2 and VEGFR3 as potential prognostic and predictive markers in an independent cohort of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

METHODS

DNA from 121 mRCC patients treated with sunitinib was used to analyze SNPs by TaqMan genotyping assays. Disease control rate was evaluated according to RECIST. Adverse effects of sunitinib were registered from medical records. The results of Cox and logistic regression were verified by correction for multiple testing.

RESULTS

Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a reduced progression-free survival in patients with the wild-type (WT) allele of the VEGFA SNP rs699947 compared to variant alleles. Patients with the AA/AC-alleles of the VEGFR1 SNP rs9582036 had an improved median overall survival compared to those with the CC-WT allele what could be confirmed by multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analyses. No statistically significant associations between the analyzed SNPs and higher risk for adverse effects were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that most of the selected SNPs in angiogenesis-related genes are not associated with survival of mRCC patients after sunitinib therapy or with adverse effects. Only the VEGFR1 SNP rs9582036 showed a statistically significant association with overall survival. The potential of SNPs as prognostic and predictive markers for sunitinib-treated mRCC patients should be finally assessed by prospective studies.

Prognostic implications of sarcomatoid and rhabdoid differentiation in patients with grade 4 renal cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

Sarcomatoid and rhabdoid differentiation are associated with poor outcomes in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). We examined the impact of differentiation on cancer-specific survival (CSS) in surgically treated patients with grade 4 RCC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using our institutional database of 1176 nephrectomies from 2005 to 2013, we identified patients with grade 4 RCC or any grade and the presence of sarcomatoid or rhabdoid differentiation. We divided the cohort based on differentiation: no differentiation, rhabdoid only, sarcomatoid only, and sarcomatoid and rhabdoid. CSS was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards modeling.

RESULTS

Of 264 patients with grade 4 RCC, 159 (60.2 %) exhibited differentiation, including 45 (28.3 %) with rhabdoid only, 87 (54.7 %) with sarcomatoid only, and 27 (16.9 %) with rhabdoid and sarcomatoid. Sarcomatoid differentiation, either alone or with rhabdoid differentiation, was associated with worse median CSS than no differentiation (1.1 vs. 3.3 years, p < 0.01, and 0.9 vs. 3.3 years, p < 0.01, respectively). In patients with non-metastatic (HR 1.95, 95 % CI 1.19-3.19, p = 0.008) and metastatic (HR 2.22, 95 % CI 1.45-3.41, p < 0.001) RCC, sarcomatoid differentiation was associated with an increased risk of cancer-specific death. On multivariable analysis, sarcomatoid differentiation was an independent predictor of RCC death in patients with non-metastatic (HR 1.72, 95 % CI 1.04-2.84, p = 0.03) and metastatic (HR 1.74, 95 % CI 1.05-2.90, p = 0.03) disease. Rhabdoid differentiation alone was not associated with worse CSS (p = 0.55).

CONCLUSIONS

In grade 4 RCC, sarcomatoid differentiation is associated with increased mortality risk across all stages of disease. Rhabdoid differentiation is not associated with additional mortality risk.

The safety and efficacy of nivolumab for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Despite a variety of therapies for advanced advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) including vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors, outcomes for these patients are still not optimal. Immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors such as nivolumab, a fully human immunoglobulin (Ig) G4 PD-1 inhibitor antibody, is a promising development in RCC and provides a new therapeutic option for patients with advanced disease.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews safety and efficacy data from the phase I, II, and III clinical trials that have led to the approval of nivolumab for the treatment of patients with advanced RCC who have previously been treated with VEGF-directed therapy. Expert Commentary: Given the overall survival advantage with nivolumab compared to previously approved therapy, nivolumab is a new standard of care in the second-line setting for patients with advanced RCC. Additional studies are underway to answer important questions including the identification of biomarkes and the use of nivolumab in treatment-naïve patients.

Validation of a Prediction Tool for Chemotherapy Toxicity in Older Adults With Cancer

PURPOSE

Older adults are at increased risk for chemotherapy toxicity, and standard oncology assessment measures cannot identify those at risk. A predictive model for chemotherapy toxicity was developed (N = 500) that consisted of geriatric assessment questions and other clinical variables. This study aims to externally validate this model in an independent cohort (N = 250).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients age ≥ 65 years with a solid tumor, fluent in English, and who were scheduled to receive a new chemotherapy regimen were recruited from eight institutions. Risk of chemotherapy toxicity was calculated (low, medium, or high risk) on the basis of the prediction model before the start of chemotherapy. Chemotherapy-related toxicity was captured (grade 3 [hospitalization indicated], grade 4 [life threatening], and grade 5 [treatment-related death]). Validation of the prediction model was performed by calculating the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve.

RESULTS

The study sample (N = 250) had a mean age of 73 years (range, 65 to 94 [standard deviation, 5.8]). More than one half of patients (58%) experienced grade ≥ 3 toxicity. Risk of toxicity increased with increasing risk score (36.7% low, 62.4% medium, 70.2% high risk; P < .001). The area under the curve of the receiver-operating characteristic curve was 0.65 (95% CI, 0.58 to 0.71), which was not statistically different from the development cohort (0.72; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.77; P = .09). There was no association between Karnofsky Performance Status and chemotherapy toxicity (P = .25).

CONCLUSION

This study externally validated a chemotherapy toxicity predictive model for older adults with cancer. This predictive model should be considered when discussing the risks and benefits of chemotherapy with older adults.

Sixth BHD Symposium and First International Upstate Kidney Cancer Symposium: latest scientific and clinical discoveries

The Sixth BHD Symposium and First International Upstate Kidney Cancer Symposium concluded in September 2015, in Syracuse, NY, USA. The program highlighted recent findings in a variety of areas, including drug development, therapeutics and surgical management of patients with BHD and multi-focal renal tumors, as well as multidisciplinary approaches for patients with localized, locally advanced and metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Randomized Open-Label Phase II Trial of Apitolisib (GDC-0980), a Novel Inhibitor of the PI3K/Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Pathway, Versus Everolimus in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

PURPOSE

To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to compare dual inhibition of PI3K/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) by apitolisib (GDC-0980) against single inhibition of mTORC1 by everolimus in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with clear-cell mRCC who progressed on or after vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted therapy were randomly assigned to apitolisib 40 mg once per day or to everolimus 10 mg once per day. End points included progression-free survival, safety, overall survival, and objective response rate. Biomarker assessments were conducted.

RESULTS

Eighty-five patients were randomly assigned. After 67 events, stratified analysis revealed that median progression-free survival was significantly shorter for apitolisib than for everolimus (3.7 v 6.1 months; hazard ratio, 2.12 [95% CI, 1.23 to 3.63; P < .01]); apitolisib was not favored in any stratification subgroup. Median overall survival was not significantly different but trended in favor of everolimus (16.5 v 22.8 months; hazard ratio, 1.77 [95% CI, 0.97 to 3.24; P = .06]). The objective response rate was 7.1% for apitolisib and 11.6% for everolimus. Patients administered apitolisib with a greater incidence of grade 3 to 4 adverse events were more likely to discontinue treatment (31% v 12% for everolimus). No drug-related deaths were observed. Apitolisib in comparison with everolimus was associated with substantially more high-grade hyperglycemia (40% v 9%) and rash (24% v 2%). Apitolisib pharmacokinetics suggested a relationship between exposure, and rash and hyperglycemia. Retrospective biomarker analyses revealed a relationship between VHL mutation status and outcome with everolimus but not with apitolisib. High hypoxia-inducible factor 1α protein expression was associated with better outcome in both arms.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that dual PI3K/mTOR inhibition by apitolisib was less effective than was everolimus in mRCC, likely because full blockade of PI3K/mTOR signaling resulted in multiple on-target adverse events. VHL mutation and hypoxia-inducible factor 1α expression may be predictive of an mTOR inhibitor benefit, although prospective validation is required.