Universal Parameters for Reporting Speech Outcomes in Individuals with Cleft Palate

Tailored Posterior Pharyngeal Fat Grafting Outcomes in Velopharyngeal Insufficiency Managed According to a Simplified Algorithm

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of posterior pharyngeal fat grafting for the management of velopharyngeal insufficiency using a simplified therapeutic algorithm and a tailored surgical technique.

METHODS

This was a prospective study of consecutive nonsyndromic patients with repaired cleft palate and velopharyngeal insufficiency who were stratified according to a simplified algorithm (minimally scarred palate, transverse orientation of levator veli palatini, and pinhole-to-small velopharyngeal gaps) and who underwent tailored posterior pharyngeal fat grafting. The patients were screened for obstructive sleep apnea before and after surgery. Three blinded evaluators randomly rated perceptual speech (hypernasality, audible nasal emission, and intraoral pressure) and nasoendoscopic (velopharyngeal active gap size) characteristics using audio and video recordings. Successful speech outcome was defined as normal or borderline sufficient velopharyngeal function at 15 months after surgery.

RESULTS

All included patients (n = 96) presented with a preoperative and postoperative low risk of obstructive sleep apnea. At 15 months after surgery, hypernasality (0.26 ± 0.53), audible nasal emissions (0.29 ± 0.48), intraoral pressure (0.1 ± 0.31), and velopharyngeal closure size (1.86 ± 0.34) were significantly decreased (all, P < 0.05) compared with the corresponding preoperative measurements (hypernasality, 2.17 ± 0.75; audible nasal emissions, 1.89 ± 0.82; intraoral pressure, 0.85 ± 0.35; and velopharyngeal closure size, 0.2 ± 0.49). In total, 84 (87.5%) patients showed successful speech outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Tailored posterior pharyngeal fat grafting is an effective and safe surgical strategy for the management of velopharyngeal insufficiency in a selected cohort of patients with repaired cleft palate.

Objective assessment of cleft lip and palate speech intelligibility using articulation and hypernasality measures

Assessment of intelligibility is required to characterize the overall speech production capability and to measure the speech outcome of different interventions for individuals with cleft lip and palate (CLP). Researchers have found that articulation error and hypernasality have a significant effect on the degradation of CLP speech intelligibility. Motivated by this finding, the present work proposes an objective measure of sentence-level intelligibility by combining the information of articulation deficits and hypernasality. These two speech disorders represent different aspects of CLP speech. Hence, it is expected that the composite measure based on them may utilize complementary clinical information. The objective scores of articulation and hypernasality are used as features to train a regression model, and the output of the model is considered as the predicted intelligibility score. The Spearman's correlation coefficient based analysis shows a significant correlation between the predicted and perceptual intelligibility scores (ρ = 0.77, p < 0.001).

Stages in the Development and Validation of a Belgian Dutch Outcome Tool for the Perceptual Evaluation of Speech in Patients With Cleft Palate

Objective:

To develop and validate a Belgian Dutch outcome tool for the perceptual evaluation of speech in patients with cleft palate.

Setting:

Cleft palate team in a tertiary university hospital.

Methods:

The tool was based on the Cleft Audit Protocol for Speech–Augmented (John et al., 2006; Sell et al., 2009), with adaptations to some of the speech variables and the structured listening protocol. Following a preliminary listening experiment in phase 1, the tool was optimized. In the second phase, a listening experiment with 4 experienced listeners was set up to assess face validity, inter- and intrarater reliability and criterion validity.

Results:

Results of phase 1 indicated good to very good inter- and intrarater reliability for the majority of the speech variables, good discriminant validity, and varying sensitivity and specificity based on a comparison with nasalance values and the Nasality Severity Index 2.0 (criterion validity). Results of phase 2 showed good to very good interrater reliability for 5 of the 14 variables and good intrarater reliability in 3 of the 4 experienced listeners. Sensitivity and specificity were sufficient, except the specificity of the hypernasality judgments in comparison with the nasalance values of the oral text. Overall, listeners positively judged the face validity of the tool.

Conclusion:

The 2-phase evaluation indicated varying validity and reliability results. Future studies will aim to optimize validity and reliability of the developed tool based on adaptations to the listening protocol, the addition of speech variables, and the inclusion of a more elaborate training.

Planning community-based intervention for speech for children with cleft lip and palate from rural South India: A needs assessment

Background and Aim:

A community-based rehabilitation programme, Sri Ramachandra University-Transforming Faces project, was initiated to provide comprehensive management of communication disorders in individuals with CLP in two districts in Tamil Nadu, India. This community-based programme aims to integrate hospital-based services with the community-based initiatives and to enable long-term care. The programme was initiated in Thiruvannamalai (2005) district and extended to Cuddalore (2011). The aim of this study was to identify needs related to speech among children with CLP, enroled in the above community-based programme in two districts in Tamil Nadu, India.

Design:

This was a cross–sectional study.

Participants and Setting:

Ten camps were conducted specifically for speech assessments in two districts over a 12-month period. Two hundred and seventeen individuals (116 males and 101 females) >3 years of age reported to the camps.

Methods:

Investigator (SLP) collected data using the speech protocol of the cleft and craniofacial centre. Descriptive analysis and profiling of speech samples were carried out and reported using universal protocol for reporting speech outcomes. Fleiss' Kappa test was used to estimate inter-rater reliability.

Results:

In this study, inter-rater reliability between three evaluators revealed good agreement for the parameters: resonance, articulatory errors and voice disorder. About 83.8% (n = 151/180) of the participants demonstrated errors in articulation and 69% (n = 124/180) exhibited abnormal resonance. Velopharyngeal port functioning assessment was completed for 55/124 participants.

Conclusion:

This study allows us to capture a “snapshot” of children with CLP, living in a specific geographical location, and assist in planning intervention programmes.

Effect of Prompts for Restructuring Oral Muscular Phonetic Targets (PROMPT) on Compensatory Articulation in Children With Cleft Palate/Lip

Objective. This investigation researched the effectiveness of the PROMPT (Prompts for Restructuring Oral Muscular Phonetic Targets) method to address compensatory articulation errors in children with cleft palate. Design. Single-subject AB multiple baselines across participants and behaviors. Setting. Pediatric outpatient rehabilitation department in a local hospital in a metropolitan city. Participants. The investigation consisted of 3 participants (ages = 4:4 to 12:8) born with bilateral complete cleft lip and palate. All participants underwent several reconstructive surgeries to repair their lips and palates. Interventions. The PROMPT treatment was provided for 45 minutes 3 times a week for 4 weeks (3 weeks for Participant 2). Main Outcome Measure. Therapy sessions addressed anterior lingual speech motor phonemes across 3 tiers (syllables, words, and phrases). Results. Direct visual observation of data obtained throughout this investigation indicate potential positive effects and significant correlation between improvements in sound production at 3 tiers and the implementation of the PROMPT technique. Speech intelligibility was judged by 3 blinded listeners who were unfamiliar with children with speech disorders or with cleft palate speech. All listeners identified and judged improvement in overall speech intelligibility over the course of this investigation. Listeners examined speech samples selected from sessions 3, 6, 9, and 12. Conclusion. The findings in this investigation provide a potential relationship on the effectiveness of the PROMPT method and attainment of accurate speech productions in children with cleft palate producing compensatory articulation errors, resulting in improvement in overall speech intelligibility.

HypernasalityNet: Deep recurrent neural network for automatic hypernasality detection

BACKGROUND

Cleft palate patients have inability to produce adequate velopharyngeal closure, which results in hypernasal speech. In clinic, hypernasal speech is assessed through subject assessment by speech language pathologists. Automatic hypernasal speech detection can provide aided diagnoses for speech language pathologists and clinicians.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to develop Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) based Deep Recurrent Neural Network (DRNN) system to detect hypernasal speech from cleft palate patients, thus to provide aided diagnoses for clinical operation and speech therapy. Meanwhile, the feature mining and classification abilities of LSTM-DRNN system are explored.

METHODS

The utilized speech recordings are 14,544 vowels in Mandarin. Speech data is collected from 144 children (72 children with hypernasality and 72 controls) with the age of 5-12 years old. This work proposes a LSTM based DRNN system to achieve automatic hypernasal speech detection, since LSTM-DRNN can learn short-time dependences of hypernasal speech. The vocal tract based features are fed into LSTM-DRNN to achieve deep mining of features. To verify the feature mining ability of LSTM-DRNN, features projected by LSTM-DRNN are fed into shallow classifiers instead of the following two fully connected layers and a softmax layer. And the features without the projecting process of LSTM-DRNN are directly fed into shallow classifiers as a comparison. Hypernasality-sensitive vowels (/a/, /i/, and /u/) are analyzed for the first time.

RESULTS

This LSTM-DRNN based hypernasal speech detection method reaches higher detection accuracy than that using shallow classifiers, since LSTM-DRNN mines features through time axis and network depth simultaneously. The proposed LSTM-DRNN based hypernasality detection system reaches the highest accuracy of 93.35%. According to the analysis of hypernasality-sensitive vowels, the experimental result concludes that vowels /i/ and /u/ are the most sensitive vowels to hypernasal speech.

CONCLUSIONS

The results show that LSTM-DRNN has robust feature mining ability and classification ability. This is the first work that applies the LSTM-DRNN technique to automatically detect hypernasality in cleft palate speech. The experimental results demonstrate the potential of deep learning on pathologist speech detection.

The relationship between health-related quality of life and speech in patients with cleft palate

INTRODUCTION

In health-care, current efforts focus on providing patient-centered care. Specifically for patients with velopharyngeal insufficiency, and by extent patients with cleft palate, the Velopharyngeal Insufficiency (VPI) Effects on Life Outcomes (VELO) questionnaire (Skirko et al., 2012; 2013) allows the clinician to map the impact of speech and swallowing difficulties on the patient's health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The current study evaluated the hypothesized association between this speech-related HRQoL measure and perceptually and instrumentally assessed speech variables, to provide evidence for the construct validity of the Dutch version of the VELO questionnaire.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty participants, twenty-five patients with cleft palate and five controls, were enrolled. Perceptual speech assessment was conducted following the recently developed Belgian Dutch outcome tool for perceptual speech assessment in patients with cleft palate. In addition, nasalance values and the Nasality Severity Index (NSI) 2.0 were determined. The relationship between these speech outcomes and the scores on the VELO parent report was determined using Spearman rank-order correlation coefficients.

RESULTS

Moderate to strong correlations were found between the total score on the VELO parent report and five speech variables: the VPC-SUM score (r_s = -0.476), speech understandability (r_s = -0.657), passive CSC's (r_s = -0.654), speech acceptability (r_s = -0.591) and the need for C(L)P-related speech therapy (r_s = -0.711). Furthermore, these variables were associated with at least one subscale of the VELO questionnaire.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Correlations between speech outcomes and the Dutch version of the VELO questionnaire provide evidence for the construct validity of this version of the instrument. Furthermore, insights in these associations may lead the way to efficient therapy approaches, targeting speech features with the greatest impact on the patient's health-related quality of life.

The Postoperative Speech Intelligibility Evaluation of Modified Z-Plasty Palatoplasty

The aim of the present study is to test the feasibility of modified Z-plasty palatoplasty for cleft palate repair in surgeries and provide a new surgical method. Forty cleft palate patients were selected as participants and divided into 2 groups in random. Twenty patients in the experiment group were treated by modified Z-plasty palatoplasty while the other 20 patients in the control group by double opposing Z-plasty and Sommerlad palatoplasty. By evaluating and observing postoperative velopharyngeal movement, speech intelligibility, nasal leaking, analysis of CSL (Computer Structure Language) and X-ray velopharyngeal lateral radiographs, Modified Z-plasty palatoplasty achieved better results than traditional operation. Satisfactory linguistic effects on incomplete cleft palate can be observed after modified Z-plasty palatoplasty treatment. So this method may be used as a clinical choice.

Protocols for Reporting Speech Outcomes following Palatoplasty or Velopharyngeal Surgery: A Literature Review

Background:

To determine best practices, surgeons who perform cleft palate surgery or surgery for velopharyngeal insufficiency need to be able to compare their outcomes in normalizing the velopharyngeal valve.

Methods:

We conducted a comprehensive review of articles that reported speech/resonance outcomes following palatoplasty or surgery for velopharyngeal insufficiency. We analyzed protocols that were used and how the results were reported. We found 170 articles, published between 1990 and 2014, that met our inclusion criteria.

Results:

Most studies (66%) had a sample size of <50 subjects, were retrospective (67%), were not blinded (83%), and did not report the use of reliability (68%). Most studies included 1 evaluator (27%) or 2 evaluators (30%). Only 80% of the articles specified that at least one speech pathologist was an evaluator. Most articles (56%) did not specify the speech samples used, and 65% used an informal test or did not specify the type of test used. Most studies used a perceptual rating scale for articulation (75%) and resonance (83%). Only 39% of the studies included an evaluation of velopharyngeal function. Finally, objective measures were used in only 28% of the studies (9% used aerodynamic measures and 19% used nasometry).

Conclusions:

Because these articles showed significant variability in how speech/resonance is evaluated and how the outcomes are reported, it is virtually impossible to compare results to determine best surgical procedures. Suggestions are given to standardize outcome measures to improve comparability of data.

Speech Phenotyping in Unaffected Family Members of Individuals With Nonsyndromic Cleft Lip With or Without Palate

OBJECTIVE

Subclinical phenotypes of nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate (CL ± P) may be identified from clinically "unaffected" relatives and could be associated with specific cleft-related gene mutations. It has been hypothesized that velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) may be a subclinical phenotype of interest in this population, but this has not been explored quantitatively with appropriate control cohorts. The aim of this case-control study was to compare VPI in at-risk clinically unaffected relatives of individuals with nonsyndromic CL ± P with a low-risk matched normative Australian cohort.

PARTICIPANTS

Clinically unaffected (ie, with no overt cleft) first-degree relatives of a proband with nonsyndromic CL ± P (n = 189) and noncleft controls (n = 207).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Perceptual measures of VPI encompassing resonance, nasal emission, and articulation were evaluated using the Great Ormond Street Speech Assessment. Quantitative measures of VPI were obtained from the Nasometer II using standardized adult and pediatric speech stimuli.

RESULTS

Both perceptual and instrumental measures showed no significant difference (P > .01) between the VPI in unaffected relatives and the noncleft comparison group. Mean nasalance scores for both groups were calculated and reported according to speech stimuli, age, and sex.

CONCLUSIONS

Results suggest that VPI, measured through speech, is not a significant subclinical phenotype of nonsyndromic CL ± P. Therefore, further familial genetic investigations exploring VPI may not yield meaningful results. Exploration across multiple subclinical phenotypes in larger cohorts may enable researchers to better understand the multifaceted nature of this complex and heterogeneous anomaly.

Orofacial myofunctional evaluation in cleft lip and palate: an integrative literature review

ABSTRACT Purpose: to identify the focus of scientific publications in the field of orofacial motricity in individuals with cleft lip and palate, as well as validated protocols used in speech and language evaluation. Methods: a study conducted using the following databases: Medline, SciELO, Lilacs and Google Scholar, through keywords including: cleft palate + cleft lip + evaluation + speech therapy + stomatognathic system + speech + phonation + chewing + swallowing + breathing + validation studies, in Portuguese and English. Results: a total of 572 articles that addressed the evaluation of the stomatognathic system was selected. The articles were published between 2012 and 2017, and examined for year of publication, subject area, focus, instrument used for evaluation, and type of study. Of these, 90 articles met the inclusion criteria, but only 5 used validated protocols. The greatest number of articles was published in 2014. The studies covered broad age groups, using subjective and objective methods, and instruments were often non-standardized. Conclusion: speech was the prevalent theme, while other orofacial functions were poorly investigated, demonstrating that studies with other approaches were lacking.

Escala de Borg: um novo método para avaliação da hipernasalidade de fala

RESUMO Objetivo Investigar a confiabilidade da escala Borg centiMax como método de avaliação perceptivo-auditiva da hipernasalidade e a influência do tipo de amostra de fala sobre a confiabilidade das avaliações. Método Quatro fonoaudiólogas experientes classificaram a hipernasalidade de 80 amostras de fala de pacientes com fissura de palato reparada (40 vocábulos e 40 sentenças) utilizando a escala ordinal de 5 pontos e a escala Borg centiMax. Os índices de concordância intra e interavaliadores foram estabelecidos para ambas as escalas e amostras. A comparação desses índices foi feita pelo teste Z e a comparação entre as escalas foi feita pelo coeficiente de correlação de Spearman (p<0,05). Resultados Verificou-se correlação muito alta e significante entre a Escala Borg centiMax e a escala ordinal, para ambas as amostras. Os índices de concordância intra-avaliadores (CCI) para a escala Borg centiMax variaram de excelente a bom e, para a escala ordinal (Kappa), de excelente a pobre, em ambas as amostras. A concordância interavaliadores (CCI) para a escala Borg centiMax variou de excelente a moderada e, para a escala ordinal (Kappa), variou de moderada a pobre, para vocábulos e sentenças. Diferença estatisticamente significante, com melhores índices de concordância intra e interavaliadores para vocábulos, foi obtida com a escala Borg centiMax. Para a escala ordinal, diferença significante entre vocábulos e sentenças foi observada apenas para a comparação interavaliador. Conclusão A escala Borg centiMax apresentou melhores índices de concordância intra e interavaliadores. A amostra contendo vocábulos mostrou melhores índices de concordância na maioria das comparações, para ambas as escalas.

Two Methods of Cleft Palate Repair in Patients With Complete Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare the surgical outcome between 2 patient groups with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate who underwent different types of palatoplasty.

METHODS

This is a cohort study between 2 groups of patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate who were operated using different surgical techniques from 2008 to 2011. About 28 patients were operated using a primary lip nose repair with vomer flap for hard palate single-layer closure and delayed soft palate repair (modified Oslo protocol) and 32 patients were operated using our protocol in Lima. Data collection was accomplished by evaluation of symptomatic oronasal fistulas, presence of velopharyngeal insufficiency and evaluation of dental arch relationships (scored using the 5-year-olds' index).

RESULTS

Our comparative study observed statistically significant differences between the 2 groups regarding the presence of oronasal fistulas and velopharyngeal insufficiency in favor of our palatoplasty technique. A statistically significant difference was not found in functional vestibular oronasal fistula development between the studied techniques for unilateral cleft palate repair. This comparative study did not observe significant differences in dental arch relationships between the studied techniques.

CONCLUSION

In this study, better surgical outcome than modified Oslo protocol regarding oronasal fistulas and velopharyngeal insufficiency on patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate was observed. The results arising from this study do not provide evidence that one technique is enough to obtain better functional closure of the alveolar cleft and dental arch relationship at 5 years.

Effect of One-Stage versus Two-Stage Palatoplasty on Hypernasality and Fistula Formation in Children with Complete Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Is one-stage or two-stage palatoplasty more effective for preventing fistula formation and hypernasality in patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate?

METHODS

This parallel blocked randomized controlled trial included 100 patients with nonsyndromic complete unilateral cleft lip and palate with a repaired cleft lip, divided into two equal groups. Group A had one-stage palatoplasty patients at age 12 to 13 months while group B had two-stage palatoplasty patients with soft palatoplasty at age 12 to 13 months and hard palatoplasty at age 24 to 25 months. Presence of a fistula was tested clinically at 3 years and speech was tested using nasometry and perceptual analyses at 6 years. Group C consisted of noncleft controls (n = 20, age 6 years) for speech using nasometry. Fistula rates, hypernasality ratings, and nasalance scores were compared between groups A and B. Nasometry recordings of groups A and B were compared with control group C.

RESULTS

There was no difference in fistula rates between groups A and B (p = 0.409; 95 percent CI, 0.365 to 11.9). Mean nasalance scores of group A showed higher nasalance than group B (p = 0.006; 95 percent CI, 1.16 to 6.53). Perceptual analysis showed no difference between groups A and B (p = 0.837 and p = 1.000). Group A showed higher mean nasalance than group C (p = 0.837 and p = 1.000), whereas group B showed no difference (p = 0.088; 95 percent CI, -0.14 to 2.02).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no difference in fistula rates between groups. Nasalance was slightly higher in patients in the one-stage palatoplasty group than two-stage palatoplasty group, but the difference was not clinically significant.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, II.

Improving the accuracy of automated cleft speech evaluation

An automated cleft speech evaluator, available globally, has the potential to dramatically improve quality of life for children born with a cleft palate, as well as eliminating bias for outcome collaboration between cleft centers in the developed world. Our automated cleft speech evaluator interprets resonance and articulatory cleft speech errors to distinguish between normal speech, velopharyngeal dysfunction and articulatory speech errors. This article describes a significant update in the efficiency of our evaluator. Speech samples from our Craniofacial Team clinic were recorded and rated independently by two experienced speech pathologists: 60 patients were used to train the evaluator, and the evaluator was tested on the 13 subsequent patients. All sounds from 6 of the CAPS-A-AM sentences were used to train the system. The inter-speech pathologist agreement rate was 79%. Our cleft speech evaluator achieved 85% agreement with the combined speech pathologist rating, compared with 65% agreement using the previous training model. This automated cleft speech evaluator demonstrates good accuracy despite low training numbers. We anticipate that as the training samples increase, the accuracy will match human listeners.

Perceptual evaluation of hypernasality, audible nasal airflow and speech understandability using ordinal and visual analogue scaling and their relation with nasalance scores

PURPOSE

Perceptual assessments remain the most commonly utilized procedure to diagnose and evaluate resonance disorders. However, the discussion continues about which rating scale has to be applied. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the reliability and validity of ordinal and visual analogue scales to rate hypernasality, audible nasal airflow and speech understandability.

METHODS

Four experienced speech-language pathologists rated 35 speech samples of children with a range of hypernasality, audible nasal airflow and speech understandability, using an ordinal scale and a visual analogue scale. Intraclass correlations coefficients determined intra- and inter-rater reliability. The model of best fit was determined by plotting both rating scales against each other. A Pearson correlation coefficient verified the relationship between both rating scales and nasalance scores determined by a Nasometer.

RESULTS

Good intra- and inter-rater reliability was found for both rating scales. A multiple regression analysis revealed a curvilinear relationship between both rating scales, indicating a slight preference to rate all parameters by a visual analogue scale. Comparable correlations with nasalance scores were found.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms that visual analogue scale ratings form a reliable and valid alternative for ordinal ratings in the perceptual judgments of hypernasality, audible nasal airflow and speech understandability. A combination of both rating scales may even combine the advantages and eliminate their limitations. However, further research is necessary to verify how this new approach can be implemented in available protocols for clinical practice, audits and research.

Importance of glottis landmarks for the assessment of cleft lip and palate speech intelligibility

The present work explores the acoustic characteristics of articulatory deviations near g(lottis) landmarks to derive the correlates of cleft lip and palate speech intelligibility. The speech region around the g landmark is used to compute two different acoustic features, namely, two-dimensional discrete cosine transform based joint spectro-temporal features, and Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients. Sentence-specific acoustic models are built using these features extracted from the normal speakers' group. The mean log-likelihood score for each test utterance is computed and tested as the acoustic correlates of intelligibility. Derived intelligibility measure shows significant correlation (ρ = 0.78, p < 0.001) with the perceptual ratings.

Buccinator myomucosal flap for the treatment of velopharyngeal insufficiency in patients with cleft palate and/or lip

INTRODUCTION

The interpretation of the speech results obtained with the buccinator myomucosal flap in the treatment of velopharyngeal insufficiency in patients with cleft palate has been limited by the restriction in the number of patients and the time of postoperative follow-up.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of the buccinator myomucosal flap on speech hypernasality in the treatment of patients with cleft palate and velopharyngeal insufficiency.

METHODS

Patients with repaired cleft palate (± lip) who were submitted to surgical correction of velopharyngeal insufficiency using the bilateral buccinator myomucosal flap were assessed. Hypernasality (scores 0 [absent], 1 [mild], 2 [moderate], or 3 [severe]) was analyzed by three evaluators by measuring the audiovisual records collected in early and late preoperative and postoperative periods (3 and 12 months, respectively). The values were considered significant for a 95% Confidence Interval (p<0.05).

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients with cleft palate (± lip) showing moderate (16.2%) or severe (83.8%) hypernasality in the preoperative period were included. Analyses of the late postoperative period showed that hypernasality (0.5±0.7) was significantly (p<0.05) lower than the hypernasality of the preoperative and recent postoperative periods (2.8±0.4 and 1.7±0.9, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The buccinator myomucosal flap is effective in reducing/eliminating hypernasality in patients with cleft palate (± lip) and velopharyngeal insufficiency.

Intelligibility assessment of cleft lip and palate speech using Gaussian posteriograms based on joint spectro-temporal features

Intelligibility is considered as one of the primary measures for speech rehabilitation of individuals with a cleft lip and palate (CLP). Currently, speech processing and machine-learning-based objective methods are gaining more research interest as a way to quantify speech intelligibility. In this work, joint spectro-temporal features computed from a time-frequency representation of speech are explored to derive speech representations based on Gaussian posteriograms. A comparative framework using dynamic time warping (DTW) is used to quantify the intelligibility of child CLP speech. The DTW distance is used to score sentence-level intelligibility and tested for correlation with perceptual intelligibility ratings obtained from expert speech-language pathologists. A baseline DTW system using the conventional Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCCs) is also developed to compare the performance of the proposed system. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient between the objective intelligibility scores and the perceptual intelligibility rating is studied. A Williams significance test is conducted to assess the statistical significance of the correlation difference between the methods. The results show that the system based on joint spectro-temporal features significantly outperforms the MFCC-based system.

Surgical treatment of velopharyngeal insufficiency

Velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) is a common complication after primary palatoplasty. Although the several surgical treatments of VPI have been introduced, there is no consensus guide to select the optimal surgical treatment for VPI patients. The selection of surgical treatment for VPI depends on a multimodal patient evaluation, such as perceptual speech evaluation, nasometery and nasoendoscopy. We can provide more adequate treatment for VPI through the deeper understanding of anatomy and physiology in VPI.

Effects of Surgical Intervention and Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Therapy on Velopharyngeal Structure and Function: A Case Report

Changes to the velum and velopharyngeal muscles following Furlow double-opposing Z-plasty in a 7-year-old female with submucous cleft palate and velopharyngeal dysfunction (VPD) were evaluated. Perceptual, instrumental (ie, nasometry and aerodynamic pressure flow), and research magnetic resonance imaging analyses were used during pre- and postsurgical time points at a university research clinic. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy was trialed following a failed surgery for residual VPD in the patient. Increases in velar length and thickness and decreases in levator veli palatini muscle angle of origin and contraction were observed following the Furlow double-opposing Z-plasty surgery. Variable improvements in residual hypernasality following the home-based CPAP therapy protocol were observed.

Nasometric Comparison Between Spanish–English Bilingual and English Monolingual Children

Objective:

It is well established in the literature that English diagnostic tests should not be directly applied to speakers whose primary language is Spanish. Normative nasalance data across word and sentence-level stimuli among Spanish–English bilingual children living in the United States have not been provided. The present study aims to (1) compare differences in nasalance between typically developing Spanish–English bilingual children and English-speaking monolingual children and (2) determine whether within-speaker nasalance differences exist in Spanish–English bilingual children when presented with English and Spanish speech stimuli.

Design:

Thirty-four typically developing children including 17 monolingual English speakers and 17 Spanish–English bilingual speakers with normal velopharyngeal anatomy between 5 and 7 years of age participated in the study. Speakers were recorded using a nasometer producing sets of stimulus items at the word and sentence level in English (English monolinguals) and in both Spanish and English for bilingual children.

Results:

Results indicated no statistically significant difference between nasalance values across the different stimuli between monolingual and bilingual participants. However, within-subject effects showed statistical significance between English and Spanish word stimuli among the bilingual group.

Conclusions:

These findings emphasize the importance of using language-specific diagnostic materials for nasalance testing, which would be of importance in the treatment of individuals with cleft palate.

Effect of motor-based speech intervention on articulatory placement in the treatment of a posterior nasal fricative: a preliminary MRI study on a single subject

BACKGROUND

Posterior nasal fricatives are a learned compensatory articulation error and commonly substituted for oral fricatives. Treatment of such articulation errors requires the modification or teaching of skilled movements. A motor-based approach is designed to teach the complex motor skill movement sequences required in the production of sounds. Although motor learning research is well established, little has been done to determine how the approach changes the underlying physiology of articulatory movements. While the underlying anatomical configuration of the posterior nasal fricative has been described, no studies have quantified anatomic and physiological changes pre- and post-treatment.

AIMS

To use magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to visualize and quantify the results of motor-based speech-intervention approach on articulatory placement for the treatment of the posterior nasal fricative.

METHODS & PROCEDURES

A 6-year-old male with a history of ear infections and posterior nasal fricative substitution for /s/ underwent six 1-h sessions of a motor-based treatment approach over the course of 2 weeks. Pre- and post-treatment evaluation included perceptual and instrumental assessment of speech and resonance. Perceptual resonance was rated by two speech-language therapists and articulation was assessed at the single-word level. Instrumental assessment included the See-Scape, Nasometer II and MRI during the sustained phonation of /s/. Amira v5.6 Visualization and Volume modelling software used the midsagittal and oblique coronal plane to measure dimensions of the articulatory anatomy.

OUTCOMES & RESULTS

Interrater reliability was assessed using a Pearson product moment correlation (α = .05) and ranged from r = .91 to .95. Intra-rater reliability was assessed using the intra-class correlation coefficient (.976) demonstrating a high degree of reliability with a 95% confidence interval. Articulation improved from 0% accuracy for /s/ in isolation at baseline to 100% for /s/ at the word level and 95% accuracy during conversational speech by session 6. Post-treatment results from this study revealed a greater shortening of the levator veli palatini (levator) muscle length during articulatory movements, more pronounced velar knee and dimple, decreased velar thickness, increased velar length and altered tongue position.

CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS

This study demonstrated the use of pre- and post-treatment imaging methodology to quantify articulatory changes following an intensive motor-based treatment approach. MRI demonstrated quantifiable changes in articulatory placement. Individuals who exhibit non-developmental and phoneme-specific articulation errors, such as the posterior nasal fricative, may be excellent candidates for short-term, intensive and frequent speech therapy sessions to remediate the production of the posterior nasal fricative.

Effect of vowel context on test-retest nasalance score variability in children with and without cleft palate

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine whether test-retest nasalance score variability differs between Korean children with and without cleft palate (CP) and vowel context influences variability in nasalance score.

PARTICIPANTS

Thirty-four 3-to-5-year-old children with and without CP participated in the study.

METHODS

Three 8-syllable speech stimuli devoid of nasal consonants were used for data collection. Each stimulus was loaded with high, low, or mixed vowels, respectively. All participants were asked to repeat the speech stimuli twice after the examiner, and an immediate test-retest nasalance score was assessed with no headgear change.

RESULTS

Children with CP exhibited significantly greater absolute difference in nasalance scores than children without CP. Variability in nasalance scores was significantly different for the vowel context, and the high vowel sentence showed a significantly larger difference in nasalance scores than the low vowel sentence. The cumulative frequencies indicated that, for children with CP in the high vowel sentence, only 8 of 17 (47%) repeated nasalance scores were within 5 points.

CONCLUSIONS

Test-retest nasalance score variability was greater for children with CP than children without CP, and there was greater variability for the high vowel sentence(s) for both groups.

Acoustic analysis of misarticulated trills in cleft lip and palate children

In this paper, acoustic analysis of misarticulated trills in cleft lip and palate speakers is carried out using excitation source based features: strength of excitation and fundamental frequency, derived from zero-frequency filtered signal, and vocal tract system features: first formant frequency (F1) and trill frequency, derived from the linear prediction analysis and autocorrelation approach, respectively. These features are found to be statistically significant while discriminating normal from misarticulated trills. Using acoustic features, dynamic time warping based trill misarticulation detection system is demonstrated. The performance of the proposed system in terms of the F1-score is 73.44%, whereas that for conventional Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients is 66.11%.

Detection of hypernasality based on vowel space area

This study proposes a method for differentiating hypernasal-speech from normal speech using the vowel space area (VSA). Hypernasality introduces extra formant and anti-formant pairs in vowel spectrum, which results in shifting of formants. This shifting affects the size of the VSA. The results show that VSA is reduced in hypernasal-speech compared to normal speech. The VSA feature plus Mel-frequency cepstral coefficient feature for support vector machine based hypernasality detection leads to an accuracy of 86.89% for sustained vowels and 89.47%, 90.57%, and 91.70% for vowels in contexts of high pressure consonants /k/, /p/, and /t/, respectively.

Problems With Reliability of Speech Variables for Use in Quality Registries for Cleft Lip and Palate—Experiences From the Swedish Cleft Lip and Palate Registry

Objective:

To test the reliability of the speech data in the Swedish quality registry for cleft lip and palate.

Design:

Retrospective study.

Setting:

Primary care university hospital.

Participants:

Ninety-four children born with cleft palate with or without cleft lip between 2005 and 2009 who had been assessed and registered in the quality registry at the age of 5 years.

Main Outcome Measures:

Data in the registry on percent oral consonants correct, percent oral errors, percent nonoral errors, perceived velopharyngeal function (PVPF), and intelligibility were compared with results based on reassessments by 3 independent raters from audio recordings. Agreement was calculated by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), quadratic weighted kappa, and percentage agreement.

Results:

Absolute agreement calculated by average measures ICC for percent oral consonants correct, percent oral errors, and percent nonoral errors was above >0.90. Single measures ICC for percent oral consonants correct was 0.82, for percent oral errors 0.69, and for percent nonoral errors 0.83. The kappa coefficient for PVPF was 0.5 to 0.59 and for intelligibility 0.65 to 0.77. Exact percentage agreement for PVPF was 33% and for intelligibility 47.8%.

Conclusions:

The data on oral consonants correct and nonoral errors in the quality registry seem to be reliable. The data on oral errors, PVPF, and intelligibility should be interpreted with caution. If differences among treatment centers are detected, one should go back and examine the collected raw data before drawing any definitive conclusions about treatment outcome.

Speech outcomes following Sommerlad primary palatoplasty: Results of the Ghent University Hospital

OBJECTIVE AND SUBJECTS

Speech outcomes were described for 16 patients with cleft palate (mean age: 5.4 years) following Sommerlad primary palatoplasty performed by a single surgeon of the Ghent University Hospital. These speech outcomes were compared with those of an age and gender matched control group without cleft palate (mean age: 5.3 years).

METHODS

Speech intelligibility/distinctiveness, resonance, nasal airflow and articulation, were perceptually evaluated. Additionally, nasalance values and the NSI 2.0 were determined.

RESULTS

In seven patients, speech intelligibility/distinctiveness was disordered. Hypernasality was present in twelve participants, whereas nasal emission and nasal turbulence were perceived in thirteen and five patients respectively. Both perceptual and instrumental speech evaluations were significantly poorer in the patient group in comparison to the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients still present with both obligatory and compensatory speech disorders following Sommerlad's palatoplasty. In the future, a Dutch speech assessment protocol will be developed in order to standardize follow-up of these patients and to allow for within-center and inter-center comparisons.

Behavioral Signs of (Central) Auditory Processing Disorder in Children with Nonsyndromic Cleft Lip and/or Palate: A Parental Questionnaire Approach

Objective

Children with nonsyndromic cleft lip and/or palate often have a high prevalence of middle ear dysfunction. However, there are also indications that they may have a higher prevalence of (central) auditory processing disorder. This study used Fisher's Auditory Problems Checklist for caregivers to determine whether children with nonsyndromic cleft lip and/or palate have potentially more auditory processing difficulties compared with craniofacially normal children.

Methods

Caregivers of 147 school-aged children with nonsyndromic cleft lip and/or palate were recruited for the study. This group was divided into three subgroups: cleft lip, cleft palate, and cleft lip and palate. Caregivers of 60 craniofacially normal children were recruited as a control group. Hearing health tests were conducted to evaluate peripheral hearing. Caregivers of children who passed this assessment battery completed Fisher's Auditory Problems Checklist, which contains 25 questions related to behaviors linked to (central) auditory processing disorder.

Result

Children with cleft palate showed the lowest scores on the Fisher's Auditory Problems Checklist questionnaire, consistent with a higher index of suspicion for (central) auditory processing disorder. There was a significant difference in the manifestation of (central) auditory processing disorder-linked behaviors between the cleft palate and the control groups. The most common behaviors reported in the nonsyndromic cleft lip and/or palate group were short attention span and reduced learning motivation, along with hearing difficulties in noise.

Conclusion

A higher occurrence of (central) auditory processing disorder-linked behaviors were found in children with nonsyndromic cleft lip and/or palate, particularly cleft palate. Auditory processing abilities should not be ignored in children with nonsyndromic cleft lip and/or palate, and it is necessary to consider assessment tests for (central) auditory processing disorder when an auditory diagnosis is made for this population.

Scandcleft randomised trials of primary surgery for unilateral cleft lip and palate: 5. Speech outcomes in 5-year-olds - consonant proficiency and errors

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Normal articulation before school start is a main objective in cleft palate treatment. The aim was to investigate if differences exist in consonant proficiency at age 5 years between children with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) randomised to different surgical protocols for primary palatal repair. A secondary aim was to estimate burden of care in terms of received additional secondary surgeries and speech therapy.

DESIGN

Three parallel group, randomised clinical trials were undertaken as an international multicentre study by 10 cleft teams in five countries: Denmark, Finland, Norway, Sweden, and the UK.

METHODS

Three different surgical protocols for primary palatal repair were tested against a common procedure in the total cohort of 448 children born with non-syndromic UCLP. Speech audio- and video-recordings of 391 children (136 girls and 255 boys) were available and transcribed phonetically. The main outcome measure was Percent Consonants Correct (PCC) from blinded assessments.

RESULTS

In Trial 1, arm A showed statistically significant higher PCC scores (82%) than arm B (78%) (p = .045). No significant differences were found between prevalences in Trial 2, A: 79%, C: 82%; or Trial 3, A: 80%, D: 85%. Across all trials, girls achieved better PCC scores, excluding s-errors, than boys (91.0% and 87.5%, respectively) (p = .01).

CONCLUSIONS

PCC scores were higher in arm A than B in Trial 1, whereas no differences were found between arms in Trials 2 or 3. The burden of care in terms of secondary pharyngeal surgeries, number of fistulae, and speech therapy visits differed.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN29932826.

Timing of Furlow Palatoplasty for Patients With Submucous Cleft Palate

Background:

Submucous cleft palate (SMCP) is the most common form of cleft involving the posterior palate, resulting in variable degrees of velar dysfunction and speech disturbance. Although early surgical intervention is indicated for patients with true cleft palate, the indications for palatoplasty and timing of surgical intervention for patients with SMCP remain controversial.

Methods:

Twenty-nine patients with SMCP were retrospectively reviewed. Patients treated with Furlow palatoplasty were dichotomized based on patient age at the time of surgical correction into early speech development and late speech development. Primary outcome measures included standardized assessments of hypernasal resonance and quantitative pre- and postoperative nasometry scores. Patients managed nonoperatively were included for comparison of early and late speech outcomes.

Results:

Both early and late groups demonstrated improvement in qualitative assessment of hypernasal resonance following Furlow palatoplasty. Early and late groups also had significant improvement in pre- to postoperative nasometry scores from 7.4 to 2.3 SD from norm ( P = .01) and 6.0 to 3.6 SD from norm ( P = .02), respectively. There was no difference in postoperative nasometry scores between early and late groups, 2.3 and 3.6 SD ( P = .12).

Conclusion:

Furlow palatoplasty significantly improves the degree of hypernasality in patients with SMCP based on pre- and postoperative nasometry scores and on qualitative assessment of hypernasality. There were no differences in speech outcomes based on early compared with late operative intervention. Therefore, early palatal repair is not obligatory for optimal speech outcomes in children with SMCP and palatoplasty should be deferred until the emergence of overt velopharyngeal insufficiency.

Comparing Methodologies in a Series of Speech Outcome Studies

Background:

Development of the speech audit tool Cleft Audit Protocol for Speech Augmented (CAPS-A) facilitated intercenter comparison of speech outcomes following cleft palate repair. The CAPS-A protocol recommends consensus listening by 3 speech and language therapists, 2 of whom must be CAPS-A trained. Allowing 15 minutes per sample, 15 to 20 samples can be assessed each day. Centers typically have resources to audit 15 to 75 samples per year but not to report speech outcomes of larger data sets for research. This 3-phased outcome study examines how the implementation of the CAPS-A protocol might be modified without compromising reliability.

Methodology:

In phase 1, 2 external listeners independently rated 42 speech samples; in phase 2, 2 external listeners consensus listened 25% of 140 samples before 1 listener independently rated the remainder; phase 3 compared 124 Great Ormond Street Speech Assessment (GOS.SP.ASS’98) records from live assessments with CAPS-A-rated video samples.

Results:

Hypernasality, nasal airflow, and passive cleft speech characteristics were rated to identify signs of velopharyngeal dysfunction across all phases. Phase 1 demonstrated suboptimal correlation, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) ranging between 0.39 and 0.72. However, the “modified” CAPS-A consensus listening process in phase 2 achieved a mean ICC of 0.91. Phase 3 revealed only moderate agreement between GOS.SP.ASS’98 and CAPS-A.

Conclusion:

A large data set of speech samples was successfully managed by establishing good interrater reliability on 25% of the data, which calibrated the listeners and validated a decision for only 1 of 2 listeners to rate the remaining speech samples. The recommended implementation of the CAPS-A protocol can therefore be modified for more efficient speech outcome reporting.

Nasalization Amplitude-Timing Characteristics of Speakers With and Without Cleft Palate

OBJECTIVES

To examine the amplitude-temporal relationships of acoustic nasalization in speakers with a range of nasality and to determine the extent to which each domain independently predicts the speaker's perceived oral-nasal balance.

DESIGN

Rate-controlled speech samples, consisting of /izinizi/, /azanaza/, and /uzunuzu/, were recorded from 18 participants (14 with repaired cleft palate and 4 without cleft palate) using the Nasometer. The mean nasalance of the entire mid-vowel-nasal consonant-vowel (mid-VNV) sequence (amplitude-domain) and the duration of the nasalized segment of the mid-VNV sequence (temporal-domain) were obtained based on nasalance contours.

RESULTS

Strong linear and vowel-dependent relationships were observed between the 2 domains of nasalization (adjusted R² = 71.5%). Both the amplitude- and temporal-domain measures were found to reliably predict the speaker's perceived oral-nasal balance, with better overall model fit and higher classification accuracy rates observed in /izinizi/ and /uzunuzu/ than in /azanaza/. Despite poor specificity, the temporal-domain measure of /azanaza/ was found to have a strong correlation with the participants' Zoo passage nasalance scores (r_s = .897, p < .01), suggesting its potential utility as a severity indicator of perceived nasality.

CONCLUSIONS

With the use of relatively simple speech tasks and measurements representing the amplitude and temporal domains of nasalization, the present study provided practical guidelines for using the Nasometer in assessing patients with oral-nasal resonance imbalance. Findings suggest that both domain measures of nasalization should be examined across different vowel contexts, given that each domain may provide clinically relevant, yet different, information.

A non-language-specific speech test to evaluate the speech of cleft patients from different language and cultural backgrounds - A pilot study

Cleft speech tests are not universally available. We developed a tool to fill this gap, especially in the context of a cleft mission setting. We performed a pilot study to evaluate the test's ability to differentiate between the speech of cleft patients and healthy individuals from three different language backgrounds. We used 78 made-up, nonsensical syllables to evaluate hypernasality, nasal emissions, and consonant errors. Cleft (n = 41) and non-cleft (n = 39) individuals from three countries were included in this study. Two speech and language pathologists, blinded to the examination, rated the audio recording independently. Patients from Germany (n = 12; mean age 15.2), Iran (n = 14; mean age 7), and India (n = 15; mean age 14.7 years) were evaluated. We observed a significant difference in each category (p < 0.05) between patients and control subjects of the same language and cultural background. Hypernasality was affected the most. The test proved to possess the correct phonetic characteristics to reveal and provoke relevant cleft speech pathologies independent of cultural and language backgrounds. The test sounds posed no articulatory difficulties to non-cleft individuals, with some exceptions regarding non-specific consonant errors. A comparison with other existing tests will further illuminate its value as a speech test.

Australian children with cleft palate achieve age-appropriate speech by 5 years of age

INTRODUCTION

Children with cleft palate demonstrate atypical speech sound development, which can influence their intelligibility, literacy and learning. There is limited documentation regarding how speech sound errors change over time in cleft palate speech and the effect that these errors have upon mono-versus polysyllabic word production. The objective of this study was to examine the phonetic and phonological speech skills of children with cleft palate at ages 3 and 5.

METHODS

A cross-sectional observational design was used. Eligible participants were aged 3 or 5 years with a repaired cleft palate. The Diagnostic Evaluation of Articulation and Phonology (DEAP) Articulation subtest and a non-standardised list of mono- and polysyllabic words were administered once for each child. The Profile of Phonology (PROPH) was used to analyse each child's speech.

RESULTS

N = 51 children with cleft palate participated in the study. Three-year-old children with cleft palate produced significantly more speech errors than their typically-developing peers, but no difference was apparent at 5 years. The 5-year-olds demonstrated greater phonetic and phonological accuracy than the 3-year-old children. Polysyllabic words were more affected by errors than monosyllables in the 3-year-old group only.

CONCLUSIONS

Children with cleft palate are prone to phonetic and phonological speech errors in their preschool years. Most of these speech errors approximate typically-developing children by 5 years. At 3 years, word shape has an influence upon phonological speech accuracy. Speech pathology intervention is indicated to support the intelligibility of these children from their earliest stages of development.

Speech in Adults Treated for Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate: Long-Term Follow-Up after One- or Two-Stage Palate Repair

Objective

To evaluate speech in adults treated for unilateral cleft lip and palate with one-stage or two-stage palate closure and compare the speech of the patients with that of a noncleft control group.

Design

Cross-sectional study with long-term follow-up.

Participants/Setting

All unilateral cleft lip and palate patients born from 1960 to 1987 and treated at Uppsala University Hospital, Sweden, were invited (n = 109). Participation rate was 67% (n = 73) at a mean of 35 years after primary surgery. Forty-seven had been treated according to one-stage palate closure and 26 according to two-stage palate closure. Pharyngeal flap surgery had been performed in 11 of the 73 patients (15%). The noncleft control group consisted of 63 age-matched volunteers.

Main Outcome Measure(s)

Speech-language pathologists rated perceptual speech characteristics from blinded audio recordings.

Results

Among patients, seven (10%) presented with hypernasality, 12 (16%) had audible nasal emission and/or nasal turbulence, five (7%) had consonant production errors, one (2%) had glottal reinforcements/substitutions, and one (2%) had reduced intelligibility. Controls had no audible signs of velopharyngeal insufficiency and no quantifiable problems with the other speech production variables. No significant differences were identified between patients treated with one-stage and two-stage palate closure for any of the variables.

Conclusions

The prevalence of speech outcome indicative of velopharyngeal insufficiency among adult patients treated for unilateral cleft lip and palate was low but higher compared with individuals without cleft. Whether palatal closure is performed in one or two stages does not seem to affect the speech outcome at a mean age of 35 years.

Bilateral buccinator myomucosal flap outcomes in nonsyndromic patients with repaired cleft palate and velopharyngeal insufficiency

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to assess speech outcomes and complication rate in nonsyndromic repaired cleft palate patients undergoing bilateral buccinator myomucosal flaps for velopharyngeal insufficiency management.

METHODS

A prospective study of consecutive repaired cleft palate patients with velopharyngeal insufficiency who underwent bilateral buccinator myomucosal flaps was conducted. Three experienced evaluators performed a blinded perceptual speech evaluation (hypernasality, audible nasal emission, and intraoral pressure). Successful speech outcome was defined as normal or borderline sufficient velopharyngeal function at 15 months postoperatively. Obstructive sleep apnea screening tools were applied preoperatively and postoperatively. Complication rate was also collected.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients were included. There were 11 (21%) surgical complications, with no complete flap loss, snoring, sleep disturbance, and/or mouth breathing. All patients presented low pre- and postoperative risk for obstructive sleep apnea. At 15 months postoperatively, hypernasality (0.4 ± 0.6), audible nasal emissions (0.2 ± 0.4), and intraoral pressure (0.1 ± 0.3) were significantly (all p < 0.05) lower than preoperative measurements (hypernasality: 2.7 ± 0.5; audible nasal emissions: 2.2 ± 0.8; and intraoral pressure: 0.9 ± 0.3). Forty-five (85%) patients presented successful speech outcome.

CONCLUSION

The bilateral buccinator myomucosal flap is an effective and safe surgical strategy for the management of persistent velopharyngeal insufficiency.

Perfil da fala de pacientes submetidos à palatoplastia primária

RESUMO Objetivo caracterizar o perfil e a fala de pacientes submetidos à palatoplastia primária em um hospital escola de São Paulo, levando-se em consideração a idade do paciente no momento da cirurgia (precoce até os 2 anos de idade e tardio após 2 anos). Método 97 indivíduos, de ambos os gêneros, com diagnóstico de fissura de palato associada ou não à de lábio, divididos em dois grupos: 1) grupo precoce (GP), composto por 43 indivíduos operados até o segundo ano de vida; 2) grupo tardio (GT), composto por 54 indivíduos operados após o segundo ano. Os participantes foram submetidos à avaliação clínica fonoaudiológica. Os parâmetros avaliados e considerados para o estudo foram: classificação da ressonância, presença de ronco nasal audível, ocorrência de fraca pressão intraoral, ocorrência de emissão nasal, classificação da inteligibilidade de fala e presença de distúrbios articulatórios compensatórios (DACs). Uma porcentagem randomicamente selecionada de participantes (30%) foi reavaliada por mais duas fonoaudiólogas e a comparação entre os juízes indicou alta concordância. Resultados (nível de significância de 5%): os grupos não se diferenciaram em relação à classificação da ressonância (p=0,067), grau de hipernasalidade (p=0,113), presença de ronco nasal (p=0,179), ocorrência de fraca pressão intraoral (p=0,152), ocorrência de emissão nasal (p=0,369) e classificação da inteligibilidade de fala (p=0,113). Em relação à presença de DACs, os grupos se diferenciaram (p=0,020), com maior ocorrência de fonemas alterados no GT. Conclusão foi possível caracterizar o perfil geral e de fala dos pacientes submetidos à palatoplastia primária do referido hospital escola. Concluiu-se que a realização da cirurgia precocemente traz melhores resultados em relação à fala.

Association of Velopharyngeal Insufficiency With Quality of Life and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Speech Surgery

IMPORTANCE

Patients with cleft palate and other causes of velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) suffer adverse effects on social interactions and communication. Measurement of these patient-reported outcomes is needed to help guide surgical and nonsurgical care.

OBJECTIVES

To further validate the VPI Effects on Life Outcomes (VELO) instrument, measure the change in quality of life (QOL) after speech surgery, and test the association of change in speech with change in QOL.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Prospective descriptive cohort including children and young adults undergoing speech surgery for VPI in a tertiary academic center. Participants completed the validated VELO instrument before and after surgical treatment.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The main outcome measures were preoperative and postoperative VELO scores and the perceptual speech assessment of speech intelligibility. The VELO scores are divided into subscale domains. Changes in VELO after surgery were analyzed using linear regression models. VELO scores were analyzed as a function of speech intelligibility adjusting for age and cleft type. The correlation between speech intelligibility rating and VELO scores was estimated using the polyserial correlation.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients (13 males and 16 females) were included. Mean (SD) age was 7.9 (4.1) years (range, 4-20 years). Pharyngeal flap was used in 14 (48%) cases, Furlow palatoplasty in 12 (41%), and sphincter pharyngoplasty in 1 (3%). The mean (SD) preoperative speech intelligibility rating was 1.71 (1.08), which decreased postoperatively to 0.79 (0.93) in 24 patients who completed protocol (P < .01). The VELO scores improved after surgery (P<.001) as did most subscale scores. Caregiver impact did not change after surgery (P = .36). Speech Intelligibility was correlated with preoperative and postoperative total VELO score (P < .01) and to preoperative subscale domains (situational difficulty [VELO-SiD, P = .005] and perception by others [VELO-PO, P = .05]) and postoperative subscale domains (VELO-SiD [P = .03], VELO-PO [P = .003]). Neither the VELO total nor subscale score change after surgery was correlated with change in speech intelligibility.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Speech surgery improves VPI-specific quality of life. We confirmed validation in a population of untreated patients with VPI and included pharyngeal flap surgery, which had not previously been included in validation studies. The VELO instrument provides patient-specific outcomes, which allows a broader understanding of the social, emotional, and physical effects of VPI.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2.

Delayed primary palatal closure in resource-poor countries: Speech results in Ugandan older children and young adults with cleft (lip and) palate

AIMS

Unrepaired clefts still regularly occur in resource-poor countries as a result of limited health-care access. The purpose of the present study was to report resonance, airflow and articulation characteristics following delayed (≥8years) primary palatal closure.

METHODS

Fifteen Ugandan participants with cleft (lip and) palate (CP±L) were included as well as 15 age- and gender-matched Ugandan subjects without clefts. Palatal closure was performed at a mean age of 15;10 years using the Sommerlad technique. Speech evaluations were carried out on a single occasion postoperatively (mean age: 18;10 years). Resonance and nasal airflow were perceptually evaluated and detailed phonetic and phonological assessments were carried out. Additionally, nasalance values were determined.

RESULTS

Nasal emission occurred postoperatively in only 27% (4/15) of the patients, whereas resonance disorders and articulation errors were prevalent in 87% (13/15) of the patient group. Compared with the control group, a significantly higher prevalence of hypernasality and significantly higher nasalance values for all oral and oronasal speech samples were obtained in the CP±L group. Moreover, significantly smaller consonant inventories and significantly more phonetic and phonological disorders were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Delayed palatal repair (≥8years) seems to be insufficient to eliminate nasal airflow errors, resonance abnormalities, and articulation disorders. In order to prevent patients' late presentation at specialized centers, the availability of high quality surgical cleft palate treatment should increase as well as people's awareness of the possibility and importance of early surgical intervention. Moreover, speech therapy following delayed palatal closure would be beneficial. Furthermore, a standardized and validated protocol for speech assessment in future studies is advocated.

A Standard Set of Outcome Measures for the Comprehensive Appraisal of Cleft Care

Care of the patient with cleft lip and/or palate remains complex. Prior attempts at aggregating data to study the effectiveness of specific interventions or overall treatment protocols have been hindered by a lack of data standards. There exists a critical need to better define the outcomes- particularly those that matter most to patients and their families-and to standardize the methods by which these outcomes will be measured. This report summarizes the recommendations of an international, multidisciplinary working group with regard to which outcomes a typical cleft team could track, how those outcomes could be measured and recorded, and what strategies may be employed to sustainably implement a system for prospective data collection. It is only by agreeing on a common, standard set of outcome measures for the comprehensive appraisal of cleft care that intercenter comparisons can become possible. This is important for quality-improvement endeavors, comparative effectiveness research, and value-based health-care reform.

Speech Perceptions and Health-Related Quality of Life Among Children With Cleft Lip and Palate

BACKGROUND

The association between perception of speech and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) among patients with cleft palate is not well understood. The purpose of this study was to determine: the agreement between patient and parent perception of speech, the correlation between patient/parent speech perception and objective analysis by a speech-language pathologist (SLP), and the relationship between objective speech analysis and HRQOL among children with cleft lip with or without palate (CLCP).

METHODS

The authors surveyed 108 CLCP patients who received treatment at a large tertiary medical center from 2013 to 2014. Patients and parents were queried regarding their difficulty with speech, and an SLP performed perceptual speech analysis with each patient. Patient-reported survey instruments were used to assess anxiety, depression, anger, peer relationships, stigma, and overall psychosocial health. The authors assessed the agreement between patients and SLP analysis as well as association between speech and HRQOL.

RESULTS

Patient and parent-reported speech quality demonstrated moderate agreement regarding the quality of the child's speech (r = 0.46-0.64). Parent and patient speech perception was not well associated with SLP analysis (V = 0.06-0.30). Patient speech perception was correlated with depression (P = 0.03), while SLP analysis was correlated with anger (P = 0.03, P = 0.004), depression (P = 0.007), and difficulty with peer relationships (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients and parents have different perceptions of the quality of the child's speech, and their ratings differ from SLP perceptual speech analysis. Both patient speech perception and SLP analysis are correlated with important aspects of quality of life, and should be considered when evaluating children with CLCP.

Assessment of nasalance and nasality in patients with a repaired cleft palate

In patients with a repaired cleft palate, nasality is typically diagnosed by speech language pathologists. In addition, there are various instruments to objectively diagnose nasalance. To explore the potential of nasalance measurements after cleft palate repair by NasalView®, we correlated perceptual nasality and instrumentally measured nasalance of eight speech items and determined the relationship between sensitivity and specificity of the nasalance measures by receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) analyses and AUC (area under the curve) computation for each single test item and specific item groups. We recruited patients with a primarily repaired cleft palate receiving speech therapy during follow-up. During a single day visit, perceptive and instrumental assessments were obtained in 36 patients and analyzed. The individual perceptual nasality was assigned to one of four categories; the corresponding instrumental nasalance measures for the eight specific speech items were expressed on a metric scale (1-100). With reference to the perceptual diagnoses, we observed 3 nasal and one oral test item with high sensitivity. However, the specificity of the nasality indicating measures was rather low. The four best speech items with the highest sensitivity provided scores ranging from 96.43 to 100%, while the averaged sensitivity of all eight items was below 90%. We conclude that perceptive evaluation of nasality remains state of the art. For clinical follow-up, instrumental nasalance assessment can objectively document subtle changes by analysis of four speech items only. Further studies are warranted to determine the applicability of instrumental nasalance measures in the clinical routine, using discriminative items only.