Prophylaxis in liver transplant recipients using a fixed dosing schedule of hepatitis B immunoglobulin

Liver transplantation for chronic viral hepatitis

A better understanding of the mechanism of viral replication and of viral transmission has led to improved results with OLTx for patients with end-stage liver disease caused by viral hepatitis. Patients with hepatitis-B-related liver disease who are HBV-DNA negative can expect excellent survival after OLTx with long-term HBIG therapy. Patients coinfected with HDV who are HBV-DNA negative can also expect an excellent rate of survival. HBV-DNA-positive patients may benefit from the addition of lamivudine to the prophylactic regimen both before and after OLTx. De novo HBV infections generally have a very benign course. Lamivudine has proven to be very effective in the treatment of both de novo and recurrent HBV infection after OLTx; however, resistance can develop. Allografts from donors with antibodies to HBV can be used most effectively when directed to recipients who also harbor HBV antibodies. The recurrence of HCV infection after OLTx is universal; however, the 5-year survival rate in patients who received OLTx for HCV-related liver disease is not diminished. Although a few patients experience an aggressive recurrence of HCV infection after OLTx, prognostic indicators have not been determined to allow for identification of these patients. Alpha-interferon does not seem to be effective in the treatment of recurrent HCV infection after OLTx. Trials with combination alpha-interferon-ribavirin are underway. Retransplantation for HCV-related allograft failure can be performed safely in patients if performed before the onset of other organ system failure. Finally, anti-HCV-positive recipients of allografts from anti-HCV-positive donors have an excellent 5-year survival rate.

Prophylaxis against hepatitis B recurrence following liver transplantation using combination lamivudine and hepatitis B immune globulin

Patients undergoing liver transplantation for hepatitis B-related liver disease are prone to recurrence. The mainstay of prophylaxis has been passive immunotherapy with hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG). Antiviral therapy with lamivudine has proven effective in lowering hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA and improving histology in patients with hepatitis B infection; its role in prophylaxis against hepatitis B recurrence following liver transplantation is under investigation. Viral breakthrough and resistance, however, are a significant problem with monotherapy with either HBIG or lamivudine. The efficacy of combination lamivudine/HBIG prophylaxis has not been reported. Fourteen patients underwent transplantation for decompensated liver disease owing to hepatitis B. Lamivudine (150 mg p.o./d) was begun before transplantation in 10 patients, including 4 who were HBV DNA-positive. In addition, 1 patient was HBV DNA-positive when transplanted. HBIG was given perioperatively and continued thereafter; treatment with lamivudine was maintained or initiated at the time of transplantation and continued indefinitely. The median follow-up was 387 days. Actuarial 1-year patient and graft survival was 93% (1 patient died of unrelated causes). At a median interval of 28 days following lamivudine treatment, all 5 HBV DNA-positive patients cleared HBV DNA from the serum; 1 went on to clear hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), before transplantation, at day 148 of lamivudine treatment. By the highly sensitive polymerase chain reaction (PCR), at a median of 346 days (range, 130-525 days) following transplantation, all 13 surviving patients had no detectable serum HBV DNA. Lamivudine suppresses HBV replication in patients awaiting liver transplantation. At a median follow-up of 1.1 years, combination prophylaxis with lamivudine and HBIG prevented hepatitis B recurrence following liver transplantation.

Incidence and clinical consequences of surface and polymerase gene mutations in liver transplant recipients on hepatitis B immunoglobulin

Mutations in the "a" determinant of the surface gene have been associated with failure of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIg) prophylaxis. We compared sequences from the surface and polymerase regions of hepatitis B virus (HBV) from 4 patients who failed high-dose HBIg therapy with two control groups: HBIg-treated patients who remained hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-negative (n = 4) and HBV-infected transplant recipients who never received HBIg (n = 4). Mutations within the surface and overlapping polymerase region were more common in patients failing HBIg than controls (P = .03), and mutations in the region of the "a" determinant were present only in patients failing HBIg. To examine the relationship between HBIg failure and duration of therapy, five additional treatment failures from a second transplantation center were sequenced (total with HBIg failure = 9). Mutations in the "a" determinant developed in 1 of 3 patients receiving HBIg for less than 6 months compared with 5 of 6 patients failing HBIg after 6 months of therapy (P = .23). The most frequently identified amino acid substitution was glycine to arginine at position 145 (present in 4 of 6 patients who failed HBIg after at least 6 months of treatment). A unique mutation within the YMDD motif (methionine to leucine) was present in 1 patient who failed HBIg treatment and who received a short course of ganciclovir. We conclude that the emergence of mutations in the "a" determinant accounts for some, but not all, treatment failures in patients receiving HBIg prophylaxis. Mutations in other regions of the S gene were more common in patients failing HBIg than controls, suggesting that domains other than the "a" determinant may be important.

Improved clinical outcomes with liver transplantation for hepatitis B-induced chronic liver failure using passive immunization

OBJECTIVE

The goals were to summarize the results of liver transplantation for chronic hepatitis B disease (HBV) at the University of Virginia, correlate pretransplant viral markers with posttransplant hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIg) requirements, and identify the relation between viral protein in the liver and clinical reinfection.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Liver transplantation is an accepted treatment for end-stage liver disease from chronic HBV infection, although lifelong antiviral treatment (with HBIg or antiviral agents) is still necessary. Patients with evidence of active viral replication (detectable serum HBV-DNA or e antigen) at the time of transplant have a higher rate of allograft infection. Whether clinically stable patients receiving HBIg immunoprophylaxis have detectable viral products in their grafts remains unknown.

METHODS

Forty-four transplants performed for HBV disease at the University of Virginia since March 1990 were reviewed. Most patients underwent aggressive passive immunoprophylaxis with HBIg to maintain serum HBV surface antibody (HBsAb) levels > or =500 IU/l for the first 6 months after the transplant, and > or =150 IU/l thereafter. Patients had viral markers quantified, underwent pharmacokinetic analysis of HBsAb levels to adjust dosing, and were biopsied routinely every 3 to 6 months and when indicated.

RESULTS

Forty-four transplants were performed in 39 patients. Actual 1-year and 3-year graft survival was 95% and 81%, respectively, and 1-year and 3-year patient survival was 98% and 96%, respectively. After the adoption of indefinite HBIg prophylaxis, nine grafts became infected (all in recipients positive for HBV e antigen). Three occurred within 8 weeks of transplantation and were associated with a short HBsAb half-life and a wild-type virus. Six occurred >8 months after the transplant, and most of these were associated with viral mutation. Quantification of pretransplant markers was an overall poor predictor of HBIg requirements after the transplant. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated transient low-level expression of core protein in the liver in 23% of patients without serum or clinical evidence of recurrent hepatitis.

CONCLUSIONS

An excellent outcome is possible after liver transplantation for chronic HBV disease using HBIg dosed by pharmacokinetic parameters. Currently, quantification of pretransplant serum markers of the HBV antigen load does not predict the intensity of posttransplant treatment required for good clinical outcomes. Because HBV is not eradicated from the patient, some form of indefinite antiviral therapy continues to be warranted.

Transmission of hepatitis B virus from hepatitis B core antibody-positive donors in living related liver transplants

BACKGROUND

In order to clarify the risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) transmission from hepatitis B core antibody-positive (HBcAb(+)) donors and to evolve a new strategy to counter such a risk, we undertook a retrospective (1990-1995) and prospective (1995-1996) analysis of our experience with living related liver transplantation involving HBcAb(+) donors.

METHODS

Between June 15, 1990, and June 30, 1995, HBcAb(+) individuals were not excluded as donor candidates at our institutions. For 171 liver transplants, 16 donors were HBcAb(+). Between July 1, 1995, and June 30, 1996, HBcAb(+) individuals were generally excluded as donor candidates; however, three recipients were given liver grafts from HBcAb(+) donors because other donor candidates presented even higher risks. In the latter period, recipients with transplants from HBcAb(+) donors underwent prophylactic passive immunization with hyperimmune hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG). The serum of 10 HBcAb(+) donors was examined by nested polymerase chain reaction for the presence of HBV-DNA, but it was not detected in any of them. However, the same examination of the liver tissue of five such donors yielded positive results in all cases.

RESULTS

In the first 5-year period, out of 16 recipients with HBcAb(+) donors, 15 became hepatitis B surface antigen-positive after transplant. The three recipients with HBcAb(+) donors during the second 1-year period, who were treated by prophylactic passive immunization with HBIG, remained hepatitis B surface antigen-negative and negative for serum HBV-DNA after transplant.

CONCLUSIONS

HBV exists in the liver of healthy HBcAb(+) individuals, but not in the blood. Therefore, HBV is thought to be transmitted to recipients by liver grafts from the HBcAb(+) donors at a significantly high rate. The prevention of viral activation and clinical disease development by means of passive immunization with HBIG seems promising, although the follow-up period in our study may be too short for any definitive conclusions.

Retransplantation of patients with severe posttransplant hepatitis B in the first allograft

BACKGROUND

The outcome of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLTX) in patients retransplanted for severe hepatitis B virus (HBV) in the first allograft has been poor due to high rates of HBV reinfection and even more aggressive disease in the second graft. Recent data suggest that hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIg) given after transplantation can be successful in delaying or preventing HBV reinfection in patients transplanted for chronic hepatitis B cirrhosis. We report the successful retransplantation of patients who developed recurrent or de novo hepatitis B after OLTXY.

METHODS

Using similar HBIg regimens, two centers retransplanted seven patients after they developed recurrent or de novo hepatitis B in the first allograft. At retransplantation all seven patients were HBs antigen (Ag) positive; four patients were positive for HBeAg and HBV DNA by immunoblot assay, two patients were negative for HBeAg and HBV DNA, and one patient was positive for HBV DNA and negative for HBeAg. All patients were either HDV Ag or anti-HDV negative. One patient was anti-HCV positive. All patients received HBIg infusions after retransplantation to maintain serum anti-HBs levels >500 IU/L indefinitely.

RESULTS

After retransplantation, six of seven patients are alive (86%): all are without evidence of HBV recurrence with serum negative for HBsAg, HBeAg, and HBV DNA by immunoblot assay. Liver biopsies are normal on routine studies with immunohistochemical stains for HBcAg and HBsAg also being negative. Mean follow-up of these six patients is 40.1 months (range 21-63 months). One patient (14%) developed HBV reinfection 7 months after his second transplant, in spite of maintaining target anti-HBs levels. He maintained stable liver function with minimal evidence of clinical hepatitis B, but died 8 months later from an unrelated stroke.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that patients with recurrent or de novo hepatitis B after OLTX can be successfully retransplanted using aggressive immunoprophylaxis to prevent HBV reinfection. The failure of HBIg therapy in one patient underscores the need for other effective adjunctive anti-HBV modalities.

Prophylaxis and treatment strategies for chronic viral hepatitis in liver transplant patients

This article highlights the importance of hepatotropic viruses as pathogens in patients undergoing liver transplantation, their contribution to morbidity and mortality after transplantation, and the approach to treatment of these pathogens when they cause disease. Although many advances have been made in the management of viral hepatitis in the transplant setting, there remain unanswered questions about the long-term natural history of the disease. An understanding of the pathogenesis of infection in the setting of transplantation is emerging slowly but requires further investigation. New approaches to treating disease in patients with either HBV or HCV infection are under development and will likely focus on the use of combinations of antiviral and immunomodulatory agents.