Intrinsically Disordered Regions Direct Transcription Factor In Vivo Binding Specificity

Speed-Specificity Trade-Offs in the Transcription Factors Search for Their Genomic Binding Sites

Transcription factors (TFs) regulate gene expression by binding DNA sequences recognized by their DNA-binding domains (DBDs). DBD-recognized motifs are short and highly abundant in genomes. The ability of TFs to bind a specific subset of motif-containing sites, and to do so rapidly upon activation, is fundamental for gene expression in all eukaryotes. Despite extensive interest, our understanding of the TF-target search process is fragmented; although binding specificity and detection speed are two facets of this same process, trade-offs between them are rarely addressed. In this opinion article, we discuss potential speed-specificity trade-offs in the context of existing models. We further discuss the recently described 'distributed specificity' paradigm, suggesting that intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) promote specificity while reducing the TF-target search time.

Genome-Wide Profiling of Protein-DNA Interactions with Chromatin Endogenous Cleavage and High-Throughput Sequencing (ChEC-Seq )

Interactions between regulatory proteins and specific genomic regions are critical for all chromatin-based processes, including transcription, DNA replication, and DNA repair. Genome-wide mapping of such interactions is most commonly performed with chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by high-throughput sequencing (ChIP-Seq), but a number of orthogonal methods employing targeted enzymatic activity have also been introduced. We previously described a genome-wide implementation of chromatin endogenous cleavage (ChEC-Seq), wherein a protein of interest is fused to micrococcal nuclease (MNase) to enable targeted, calcium-dependent genomic cleavage. Here, we describe the ChEC-Seq protocol for use in budding yeast though it can be used in other organisms in conjunction with appropriate methods for introduction of an MNase fusion protein.

αα-Hub domains and intrinsically disordered proteins: A decisive combo

Hub proteins are central nodes in protein-protein interaction networks with critical importance to all living organisms. Recently, a new group of folded hub domains, the αα-hubs, was defined based on a shared αα-hairpin supersecondary structural foundation. The members PAH, RST, TAFH, NCBD, and HHD are found in large proteins such as Sin3, RCD1, TAF4, CBP, and harmonin, which organize disordered transcriptional regulators and membrane scaffolds in interactomes of importance to human diseases and plant quality. In this review, studies of structures, functions, and complexes across the αα-hubs are described and compared to provide a unified description of the group. This analysis expands the associated molecular concepts of "one domain-one binding site", motif-based ligand binding, and coupled folding and binding of intrinsically disordered ligands to additional concepts of importance to signal fidelity. These include context, motif reversibility, multivalency, complex heterogeneity, synergistic αα-hub:ligand folding, accessory binding sites, and supramodules. We propose that these multifaceted protein-protein interaction properties are made possible by the characteristics of the αα-hub fold, including supersite properties, dynamics, variable topologies, accessory helices, and malleability and abetted by adaptability of the disordered ligands. Critically, these features provide additional filters for specificity. With the presentations of new concepts, this review opens for new research questions addressing properties across the group, which are driven from concepts discovered in studies of the individual members. Combined, the members of the αα-hubs are ideal models for deconvoluting signal fidelity maintained by folded hubs and their interactions with intrinsically disordered ligands.

Insights into gene regulation: From regulatory genomic elements to DNA-protein and protein-protein interactions

Transcription is orchestrated by non-coding regulatory elements embedded in chromatin, which exist within the larger context of chromosome topology. Here, we review recent insights into the functions of non-coding regulatory elements and their protein interactors during transcription control. A picture emerges in which the topological environment constraints enhancer-promoter interactions and specific enhancer-bound proteins with distinct promoter-compatibilities refine target promoter choice. Such compatibilities are encoded within the sequences of enhancers and promoters and realized by diverse transcription factors and cofactors with distinct biochemical activities. An emerging property of transcription factors and cofactors is the formation of nuclear microenvironments or membraneless compartments that can have properties of phase-separated liquids. These environments are able to selectively enrich certain proteins and small molecules over others. Further investigation into the interaction of transcriptional regulators with themselves and regulatory DNA elements will help reveal the complexities of gene regulation within the context of the nucleus.

Intrinsic Disorder in Plant Transcription Factor Systems: Functional Implications

Eukaryotic cells are complex biological systems that depend on highly connected molecular interaction networks with intrinsically disordered proteins as essential components. Through specific examples, we relate the conformational ensemble nature of intrinsic disorder (ID) in transcription factors to functions in plants. Transcription factors contain large regulatory ID-regions with numerous orphan sequence motifs, representing potential important interaction sites. ID-regions may affect DNA-binding through electrostatic interactions or allosterically as for the bZIP transcription factors, in which the DNA-binding domains also populate ensembles of dynamic transient structures. The flexibility of ID is well-suited for interaction networks requiring efficient molecular adjustments. For example, Radical Induced Cell Death1 depends on ID in transcription factors for its numerous, structurally heterogeneous interactions, and the JAZ:MYC:MED15 regulatory unit depends on protein dynamics, including binding-associated unfolding, for regulation of jasmonate-signaling. Flexibility makes ID-regions excellent targets of posttranslational modifications. For example, the extent of phosphorylation of the NAC transcription factor SOG1 regulates target gene expression and the DNA-damage response, and phosphorylation of the AP2/ERF transcription factor DREB2A acts as a switch enabling heat-regulated degradation. ID-related phase separation is emerging as being important to transcriptional regulation with condensates functioning in storage and inactivation of transcription factors. The applicative potential of ID-regions is apparent, as removal of an ID-region of the AP2/ERF transcription factor WRI1 affects its stability and consequently oil biosynthesis. The highlighted examples show that ID plays essential functional roles in plant biology and has a promising potential in engineering.

In search of function: nuclear bodies and their possible roles as plant environmental sensors

Plants must adjust their physiology, development and reproductive decisions in response to a fluctuating environment. Understanding how these adjustments are achieved is fundamental for predicting plant reactions to global environmental changes and for designing mitigation strategies. An often overlooked plant-environmental response is the formation of intranuclear membrane-less organelles known as 'nuclear bodies'. Currently, the functional role of nuclear bodies remains largely unclear. However, in recent years, they have received increased attention as possible hubs or integrators of environmental signals, and for possibly being part of the sensing machinery itself. Here, we will explore the formation of nuclear bodies under changing light, osmotic, and temperature conditions. We will then hypothesize on their potential functions in facilitating environmentally driven plant responses.

Towards Decoding the Sequence-Based Grammar Governing the Functions of Intrinsically Disordered Protein Regions

A substantial portion of the proteome consists of intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) that do not fold into well-defined 3D structures yet perform numerous biological functions and are associated with a broad range of diseases. It has been a long-standing enigma how different IDRs successfully execute their specific functions. Further putting a spotlight on IDRs are recent discoveries of functionally relevant biomolecular assemblies, which in some cases form through liquid-liquid phase separation. At the molecular level, the formation of biomolecular assemblies is largely driven by weak, multivalent, but selective IDR-IDR interactions. Emerging experimental and computational studies suggest that the primary amino acid sequences of IDRs encode a variety of their interaction behaviors. In this review, we focus on findings and insights that connect sequence-derived features of IDRs to their conformations, propensities to form biomolecular assemblies, selectivity of interaction partners, functions in the context of physiology and disease, and regulation of function. We also discuss directions of future research to facilitate establishing a comprehensive sequence-function paradigm that will eventually allow prediction of selective interactions and specificity of function mediated by IDRs.

Innovation of heterochromatin functions drives rapid evolution of essential ZAD-ZNF genes in Drosophila

Contrary to dogma, evolutionarily young and dynamic genes can encode essential functions. We find that evolutionarily dynamic ZAD-ZNF genes, which encode the most abundant class of insect transcription factors, are more likely to encode essential functions in Drosophila melanogaster than ancient, conserved ZAD-ZNF genes. We focus on the Nicknack ZAD-ZNF gene, which is evolutionarily young, poorly retained in Drosophila species, and evolves under strong positive selection. Yet we find that it is necessary for larval development in D. melanogaster. We show that Nicknack encodes a heterochromatin-localizing protein like its paralog Oddjob, also an evolutionarily dynamic yet essential ZAD-ZNF gene. We find that the divergent D. simulans Nicknack protein can still localize to D. melanogaster heterochromatin and rescue viability of female but not male Nicknack-null D. melanogaster. Our findings suggest that innovation for rapidly changing heterochromatin functions might generally explain the essentiality of many evolutionarily dynamic ZAD-ZNF genes in insects.

Evolutionary Study of Disorder in Protein Sequences

Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) contain regions lacking intrinsic globular structure (intrinsically disordered regions, IDRs). IDPs are present across the tree of life, with great variability of IDR type and frequency even between closely related taxa. To investigate the function of IDRs, we evaluated and compared the distribution of disorder content in 10,695 reference proteomes, confirming its high variability and finding certain correlation along the Euteleostomi (bony vertebrates) lineage to number of cell types. We used the comparison of orthologs to study the function of disorder related to increase in cell types, observing that multiple interacting subunits of protein complexes might gain IDRs in evolution, thus stressing the function of IDRs in modulating protein-protein interactions, particularly in the cell nucleus. Interestingly, the conservation of local compositional biases of IDPs follows residue-type specific patterns, with E- and K-rich regions being evolutionarily stable and Q- and A-rich regions being more dynamic. We provide a framework for targeted evolutionary studies of the emergence of IDRs. We believe that, given the large variability of IDR distributions in different species, studies using this evolutionary perspective are required.

Search and Capture: Disorder Rules Gene Promoter Selection

Intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) are preponderant in transcription factors (TFs) and are evolutionarily less conserved vis-à-vis DNA-binding domains (DBDs). Unexpected findings from Barkai and colleagues, which demonstrate that promoter selectivity is determined by IDRs, should significantly enhance our understanding of gene expression regulation.