Psychological consequences of predictive genetic testing: a systematic review

Psychosocial aspects of genetic counseling and testing

OBJECTIVES

To highlight areas where persons who undergo BRCA1/2 mutation testing may benefit from psychosocial or behavioral support and intervention.

DATA SOURCES

Published scientific literature, cal, and research experiences.

CONCLUSION

Key psychosocial areas that deserve attention by clinicians and researchers include: indeterminate or inconclusive test results, selection of risk management strategies in unaffected BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, and genetic testing in minority communities.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

By addressing the psychosocial issues faced by patients undergoing genetic testing for cancer, nurses have the potential to maximize opportunities for prevention, early detection, and healthy coping.

Should children and adolescents undergo genetic testing?

Genetic testing comes in many shapes and sizes. The decision to undergo genetic testing must involve consideration of the medical, psychosocial, and reproductive benefits and risks of testing. The evaluation of risks and benefits varies significantly both between and within families. Pediatricians should keep up with the rapid advances in genetic medicine and the myriad of tests that are being developed and marketed. They also need to be familiar with the psychosocial risks and benefits that these new tests generate for individuals, families and communities. In some situations, genetic testing is merely another diagnostic tool; in other situations, genetic testing offers information about the risks for future diseases. Pediatricians need to be knowledgeable about tests that are indicated clinically and their potential psychosocial implications to best serve children, adolescents, and their families.

Patients' Knowledge of Cystic Fibrosis: Genetic Determinism and Implications for Treatment

This paper uses the self-regulation model of illness perceptions (Leventhal et al. , 1984) to consider the implications of different ways of thinking about the causes of illness. The relationship between anxiety/depression and knowledge or denial of illness is also considered. These issues are explored using adherence to treatment in cystic fibrosis (CF) as an example. Twenty-six CF patients took part in semistructured interviews and completed a standardized anxiety and depression scale (HAD, Zigmond and Snaith, 1983). Interview data were analyzed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (Chapman and Smith, 2002). HAD data were analyzed using SPSS. The respondents displayed widely differing levels of knowledge of their condition. Some deterministic comments were also reported. Findings are discussed in relation to the information that physicians might provide to patients and families in the light of increasing knowledge about genetics in society and the genotyping of individuals with genetic conditions specifically. Any important gaps in patient knowledge could usefully be discussed at transition from pediatric to adult care and issues relating to control and genetic determinism discussed with the patients individually.

Anticipated reactions to genetic testing for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer susceptibility*

Genetic testing for cancer susceptibility (e.g. hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer) is available for some families with a history of colon cancer. Our aim was to investigate participants' anticipated emotional and behavioral reactions to genetic testing for colon cancer and whether gender or clinical risk influences these reactions. 437 asymptomatic participants with a colorectal cancer family history completed a questionnaire about anticipated emotions and actions, under different genetic testing scenarios. More women than men anticipated feeling worried, regretful, and angry if tested positive. People at lower-risk anticipated more surprise and disbelief than those at higher-risk. People anticipated feeling more guilt, regret and less relief if they were not tested than if they were. High-risk results were anticipated to increase depression and worry. Most people still wanted screening if at low risk, anticipated leading healthier lifestyles whatever the result, but would make more plans for the future if they were at high risk. Clinical implications are that as anticipated emotional effects of not being tested may be more severe than having a test, people choosing to forgo testing should feel able to reconsider their decision anytime. Most people did not anticipate strong emotional reactions but thought it would change their lifestyle and would like continued clinical surveillance whatever the result.

Individuals with an increased risk of colorectal cancer: perceived benefits and psychological aspects of surveillance by means of regular colonoscopies

PURPOSE

To evaluate the psychological consequences of genetic counseling followed by a surveillance program using colonoscopy among individuals with increased risk of colorectal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two hundred sixty-five individuals, participating in a surveillance program with colonoscopy, were mailed a survey questionnaire that assessed their experience of the surveillance program and their perception of the risk of colorectal cancer. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale and the Swedish Short Form-36 Health Survey was also included.

RESULTS

Two hundred forty individuals completed the questionnaire and were divided into the following risk groups: risk group 1, an individual with a mutation in hMLH1 or hMSH2 and a lifetime colorectal cancer risk of 80% (n = 28); risk group 2, a lifetime colorectal cancer risk of 40% (n = 129); and risk group 3, a lifetime colorectal cancer risk of 20% (n = 83). Among all individuals, the mean for perceived benefit was 8.0, and the perception of discomfort was 3.3 on the visual analog scale (1-10). In risk group 1, 61% underestimated personal risks as being 40% or less. Approximately 50% of the subjects in risk groups 2 and 3 either under- or overestimated their lifetime risk. According to the Swedish Short Form-36 Health Survey and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale, the study sample resembled the reference population.

CONCLUSION

A majority of the study sample understood why they were under surveillance, and regular colonoscopies were well-tolerated. The wide range of risk perception as well as low-risk perception in mutation positive subjects is acceptable, as long as these individuals adhere to surveillance programs and do not demonstrate increased levels of anxiety or depression.

Assessment of genetic testing and related counseling services: current research and future directions

With the recent completion of the sequencing of the Human Genome, genetic testing will increasingly become available for a greater number of medical conditions, many of which are those that manifest in adulthood (e.g., various cancers, cardiovascular disease, diabetes) or for which little or no treatments are available (e.g., Alzheimer disease). Genetic services, defined here as those relating to genetic testing and counseling, will be with helping more individuals deal with medical information that affects their health directly, as opposed to affecting primarily the health of their offspring. This paper reviews the existing research in the genetic testing and counseling literature and presents an evaluation framework outlining the intended outcomes of genetic services. The purpose of this framework is to provide an overview of the potential outcomes of these services and highlight constructs for future research in this area. In addition, other issues that will affect the assessment of genetic services are raised, using examples from the existing literature. Ultimately, the goal of this paper is to highlight and suggest directions researchers can take to produce the information needed to guide genetic testing and counseling practice. Moreover, as genetic knowledge is increasingly applied towards the prevention and treatment of various common, chronic disease conditions, genetic information will have implications for providers outside of the traditional medical genetics realm, such as primary care providers and public health practitioners. A better understanding of the outcomes of genetic testing and counseling will provide a basis from which to ensure an appropriate application of genetic information by all those who eventually provide care and "genetic" services.

Psychological impact of genetic testing for familial hypercholesterolemia within a previously aware population: A randomized controlled trial

This trial tests the hypothesis that confirming a clinical diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) by finding a genetic mutation reduces patients' perceptions of control over the disease and adherence to risk-reducing behaviors. Three hundred forty-one families, comprising 341 hypercholesterolemia probands and 128 adult relatives, were randomized to one of two groups: (a) routine clinical diagnosis; (b) routine clinical diagnosis plus genetic testing (mutation searching in probands and direct gene testing in relatives). The main outcome measures were perceptions of control over hypercholesterolemia, adherence to cholesterol-lowering medication, diet, physical activity, and smoking. There was no support for the main hypothesis: finding a mutation had no impact on perceived control or adherence to risk-reducing behavior (all P-values > 0.10). While all groups believed that lowering cholesterol was an effective way of reducing the risk of a heart attack, participants in whom a mutation was found believed less strongly in the efficacy of diet in reducing their cholesterol level (P = 0.02 at 6 months) and showed a trend in believing more strongly in the efficacy of cholesterol-lowering medication (P = 0.06 at 6 months). In conclusion, finding a mutation to confirm a clinical diagnosis of FH in a previously aware population does not reduce perceptions of control or adherence to risk-reducing behaviors. The pattern of findings leads to the new hypothesis that genetic testing does not affect the extent to which people feel they have control over a condition, but does affect their perceptions of how control is most effectively achieved. Further work is needed to determine whether similar results will be obtained in populations with little previous awareness of their risks.

Adverse Effects of Predictive Testing for Huntington Disease Underestimated: Long-Term Effects 7-10 Years After the Test

The 7-10-year psychological effects of presymptomatic testing for Huntington disease are described in 142 individuals and 104 partners. Questionnaires included the Beck Hopelessness Scale (A. T. Beck, A. Weissman, D. Lester, & L. Trexler, 1974), the Impact of Event Scale (M. J. Horowitz, N. Wilner. & W. Alvarez. 1979). and the General Health Questionnaire (D. P. Goldberg. 1972). Carriers and their partners were more distressed immediately after the test result, although their outlooks improved somewhat in the 2-3-year posttest period. However, they became more pessimistic thereafter, when approaching the age of onset. Carriers, who were lost to follow-up after disclosure of test results, reported more distress pretest than did retained carriers. This demonstrates that studies that report few harmful effects may have underestimated the real impact. Moreover, follow-up studies need to investigate time effects for longer than a few years.

Predictive testing for Huntington's disease: relationship with partners after testing

This study focuses on the partner relationship of tested persons, 5 years after their predictive test result for Huntington's disease (HD). We describe changes in marital status, quality of the relationship, and perceived changes in the relationship. Twenty-six carriers, 14 of their partners, 33 non-carriers, and 17 of their partners participated in the study. Qualitative and quantitative methods were used. For the majority of tested persons (about 70%), the marital status was unchanged 5 years post test. Overall, carriers rated the quality of the relationship higher than their partners did and they perceived more positive changes. Qualitative data show that a test result leading to changed roles may induce significant marital distress. Another consequence of the test may be the changes in dynamics in asymptomatic carrier couples. A pre-test discussion of the possible impact of the test result on the relationship should result in a better preparation for and more understanding of the reactions after testing. Counselling after testing should stimulate an open communication between partners with consideration of needs and anxieties of both partners.

The experience of loss and anticipation of distress in colorectal cancer patients undergoing genetic testing

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this paper is to describe pretest psychological functioning in a sample of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients undergoing genetic testing. We also explored the relationship among demographic, medical, family history and loss variables and current pretest distress, and those related to anticipated posttest distress.

METHODS

This paper reports pretest findings from a prospective, longitudinal psychosocial survey. Data are presented on 220 CRC patients at pretest.

RESULTS

We found a subgroup of CRC patients that are currently distressed and anticipate becoming depressed if they receive a positive genetic test result. There were significant associations among pretest distress, family history of CRC and loss related to CRC and anticipation of becoming depressed at posttest.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest that a subgroup of CRC patient's experience or anticipate distress that may warrant attention. Family history of CRC and losses related to CRC may be important indicators of posttest adjustment.

Long-Term Psychological Impact of Carrying a BRCA1/2 Mutation and Prophylactic Surgery: A 5-Year Follow-Up Study

Purpose: To explore long-term psychosocial consequences of carrying a BRCA1/2 mutation and to identify possible risk factors for long-term psychological distress.

Patients and Methods: Five years after genetic test disclosure, 65 female participants (23 carriers, 42 noncarriers) of our psychological follow-up study completed a questionnaire and 51 participants were interviewed. We assessed general and hereditary cancer-related distress, risk perception, openness to discuss the test result with relatives, body image and sexual functioning.

Results: Carriers did not differ from noncarriers on several distress measures and both groups showed a significant increase in anxiety and depression from 1 to 5 years follow-up. Carriers having undergone prophylactic surgery (21 of 23 carriers) had a less favorable body image than noncarriers and 70% reported changes in the sexual relationship. A major psychological benefit of prophylactic surgery was a reduction in the fear of developing cancer. Predictors of long-term distress were hereditary cancer-related distress at blood sampling, having young children, and having lost a relative to breast/ovarian cancer. Long-term distress was also associated with less open communication about the test result within the family, changes in relationships with relatives, doubting about the validity of the test result, and higher risk perception.

Conclusion: Our findings support the emerging consensus that genetic predisposition testing for BRCA1/2 does not pose major mental health risks, but our findings also show that the impact of prophylactic surgery on aspects such as body image and sexuality should not be underestimated, and that some women are at risk for high distress, and as a result, need more attentive care.

Likelihood of attending bowel screening after a negative genetic test result: the possible influence of health professionals

This study was undertaken to determine the extent to which the reported likelihood of attending future bowel screening following negative genetic testing results for familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) varies between the type of health professional providing care and the country of testing. The study subjects were 103 unaffected adults at risk for FAP who received negative results following predictive DNA testing. Our study indicates that the reported likelihood of attending bowel screening was higher in those given results by nongenetics physicians, rather than by genetics professionals; the reported likelihood of attending bowel screening under these circumstances was also higher in the UK than in Australia. Both of these results were affected by the perceived chances of developing FAP, and, in the case of the country of testing, by the perceived accuracy of the genetic test result and the perceived seriousness of the disease. How and what health professionals communicate with patients about genetic testing may explain the differences between type of health professional and country of testing and attitudes toward bowel screening. If this is the case, training in communication may change patients' perceptions and, in turn, their behavioral intentions and actions following a negative test result.

Ethics and practice: two worlds? The example of genetic counselling

The aim of this paper is to work out the relationship between ethics and practice with reference to genetic counselling. First, the most important principles with respect to genetic counselling and to counsellor-client-interaction, are explained briefly. Then, we discuss what these principles might mean, when applied to the practice of counselling. To do so, we also look at some empirical data. Finally, we draw some conclusions.

Pre-counseling education materials for BRCA testing: does tailoring make a difference?

Although tailored print materials (TPMs) have been assessed for a variety of behavioral targets, their effectiveness as decision aids for genetic testing had not been evaluated at the time this study began. We compared TPMs and non-tailored print material (NPMs) that included similar content about genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility. TPMs were prepared especially for an individual based on information from and about her. We mailed baseline surveys to 461 women referred by physicians or identified through a tumor registry. All had personal and family histories of breast and/or ovarian cancer and, on the basis of these histories, an estimated > or =10% probability of carrying a mutation in the breast/ovarian cancer genes BRCA1 or BRCA2. The 325 (70%) who responded were randomly assigned to receive TPM or NPM. Followup surveys, mailed 2 weeks following receipt of print materials, were returned by 262 women (81% of baseline responders). Participants were predominately white (94%) and well-educated (50% college graduates). The mean age was 49 years. At follow-up, TPM recipients exhibited significantly greater improvement in percent of correct responses for the 13-item true/false measure of knowledge (24% increase for TPM vs. 16% for NPM; p < 0.0001) and significantly less over-estimation of risk of being a mutation carrier (40% TPM group overestimated vs. 70% NPM; p < 0.0001). Anxiety did not differ significantly between groups. Reactions to materials differed on two items: "seemed to be prepared just for me" (76% TPM vs. 52% NPM; p < 0.001) and "told me what I wanted to know about BRCA1 and 2 testing" (98% TPM vs. 91% NPM; p < 0.05). TPMs showed an advantage in increasing knowledge and enhancing accuracy of perceived risk. Both are critical components of informed decision making.

Prospective assessment in newborns of diabetes autoimmunity (PANDA): maternal understanding of infant diabetes risk

PURPOSE

To assess accuracy of mothers' understanding of their newborns' genetic risk for type 1 diabetes and to identify predictors of the comprehension and retention of genetic information.

METHODS

Mothers of 435 newborns genetically screened at birth were informed of the infant's risk for type 1 diabetes using a standard script that provided both categorical and numerical risk information. The mothers' comprehension and retention of this information were assessed by structured interview on two occasions, approximately 3.6 weeks and approximately 3.9 months postnotification.

RESULTS

At the initial interview, 73.1% of mothers gave a correct estimate of their child's genetic risk, 3.2% overestimated risk, 13.3% underestimated risk, and 10.3% could not recall risk at all. At the follow-up interview, fewer mothers (61.9%) correctly estimated their child's risk and more mothers (24.4%) underestimated their child's risk. Maternal accuracy was associated with maternal education, ethnic minority status, infant risk status, maternal ability to spontaneously recall both categorical and numerical risk estimates, and length of time since risk notification. Underestimation of risk was associated with maternal education, family history of diabetes, time since risk notification, and maternal anxiety about the baby's risk.

CONCLUSION

The accuracy of mothers' recall of infant risk declines over time, with an increasing number of mothers underestimating the infant's risk. Effective risk communication strategies need to be developed and incorporated into genetic screening programs.

Genetic counselling protocols for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer: a survey of UK regional genetics centres

Predictive testing for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is typically offered within an extended genetic counselling protocol, originally developed in the context of Huntington's Disease. We conducted a questionnaire survey of 20 UK regional genetics centres to obtain evidence regarding current approaches to HNPCC pre-test counselling. Centres were asked to describe the structure and content of pre-test counselling and their views on shortening the protocol. Sixteen centres responded to the survey. Four centres were considering shortening the protocol or had already done so. The remaining centres followed an extended protocol of two sessions separated by a 1-month period for reflection, although two centres conceded that the protocol had been reduced in certain cases. Different centres used different terminology to describe the content of pre-test counselling. Although content areas relating to education or impact of test results were covered more frequently than those relating to reflection, there was a marked tendency to consider all three areas as essential and to use both educational and reflective counselling, even in those centres that favoured a shortened protocol. This apparent dilemma highlights both the practical difficulty of how to shorten HNPCC pre-test counselling protocols and the need for controlled trials of different approaches.

Achieving utility with family history: colorectal cancer risk

Family history of chronic disease is rapidly becoming a research tool for targeting participants at increased risk. Its current usefulness in clinical practice remains unknown. This paper details the possible utility and complications in using family history in a primary care setting, using colorectal cancer risk as the health issue. Where available, we cite data to support the issues that could arise. Where there are no studies, we invite further research. The potential of family history as a health improvement tool is still under review.

Testing the test--why pursue a better test for Huntington disease?

In 1993, the gene mutation for Huntington disease (HD) was identified and testing became possible with a reliability of >99%, without the need for co-operation of relatives. In 1997, a systematic information program offered the mutation retest to individuals who had earlier received a linkage test result for HD, which has a residual uncertainty of 1-9%. The characteristics of 129 individuals tested by linkage analysis for HD are reported on, as well as the reasons for their reassessment by mutation testing. Three groups were compared: (1) people who were retested between 1993 and 1997, before this study had started, (2) people who were retested after we provided information, and (3) persons who refrained from retesting. Nearly half of the linkage-tested individuals were retested, with the exception of noncarriers with a residual risk of 1 or 2%. Of them, less than one out of five were retested. Carriers with a hopeful view on the future (BHS) and a better sense of well-being (GHQ) were more likely to have the retest. Female carriers were also more likely to have the retest before we contacted them. Noncarriers who were retested were more anxious (HADS) than noncarriers who refrained from the retest. Retestees were younger at the time of testing. No risk reversals were revealed by this study.

Psychological distress in the 5-year period after predictive testing for Huntington's disease

The paper reports on a 5-year longitudinal study on psychological distress after predictive testing for Huntington's disease (HD) and on correlates of post-test distress. Psychometric tests and questionnaires were used. The tested persons were invited to participate in the follow-up study; the uptake rate was 75% (24 carriers, 33 non-carriers). Three time points were included: baseline, 1 year and 5 years post-test. Five years after the test, mean distress scores of both carriers and non-carriers were within the normal range. Carriers did not differ from non-carriers with regard to mean general distress. Compared to non-carriers, however, carriers had significantly less positive feelings (P<0.001) and were more consciously avoiding HD-related situations and thoughts (P<0.01). These findings reflect the carriers' conscious and unconscious attempt to escape from pessimism and to minimise negative consequences of the test result. Psychological distress 5 years post-test was significantly associated with ego-strength (P<0.05 to P<0.001). Except for intrusion and avoidance, distress was also associated with test motivation (P<0.05 to P<0.01). Compared with baseline level, mean depression, general and specific anxiety had significantly decreased 1 year and 5 years post-test (P<0.05 to 0.01). This evolution was independent of the test result. However, based on test motivation, a subgroup of tested persons having long lasting psychological distress could be identified, also irrespective of test result. Persons who asked the test to get rid of the uncertainty, without being able to specify implications for substantial life areas, had more psychological distress before and after the test than those who wanted the test for specific reasons (P<0.001 to P<0.0001). Moreover, the pattern of post-test anxiety differed over time, depending on the test motivation (P<0.05). The findings suggest that pre- and post-test counselling should pay special attention to persons with lower ego-strength and with an unspecified test motivation, because they are at higher risk for long-term psychological distress, independently of the test result.

To test or not to test: interest in genetic testing for Alzheimer's disease among middle-aged adults

Based on a hypothetical scenario positing 100 percent accuracy in test results, we examined interest in genetic testing for Alzheimer's disease (AD) among adult children, 40-60 years of age, who have a living parent with a diagnosis of probable AD (N = 108), and a matched comparison group of persons with no parental history of AD (N = 150). For both groups, planning for the future was the most important reason cited for being tested; lack of good treatment options and concerns about losing health insurance were the most important reasons for not being tested. Hierarchical regression was used to examine the effects of sociodemographic characteristics, subjective perceptions of memory functioning, concerns about having and developing AD, and mastery on interest in being tested. Personal concerns about developing AD and mastery emerged as significant predictors and subsample membership approached significance, although the full model explained just 18 percent of the variance. Because persons in the comparison group were more likely to report an interest in being tested, educational efforts about genetic testing should not be restricted only to family members of persons with a diagnosis of AD.

Genetic testing and genetic counselling in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: the French experience

AIMS

A major breakthrough in the molecular genetics of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) has made genetic testing now available in clinical practice, raising new questions about its implications, potential benefits, and the organisation of the procedure. The aim of this work was (1) to discuss the different questions related to genetic testing in HCM, and propose guidelines for the different situations, (2) to report our preliminary experience with a specific procedure.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The main questions asked by patients and relatives concern presymptomatic diagnosis and prenatal counselling/diagnosis, while clinicians sometimes discuss diagnostic and prognostic testing. To take into account the complex medical and psychological implications of this new approach, we developed a specific, multidisciplinary, and multiple step procedure, including a cardiologist, a geneticist, and a psychologist. Seventy subjects were examined, including (1) 29 adults for presymptomatic diagnosis (of whom 10 left the procedure after the first visit and 19 continued, among whom six had a mutation and two experienced negative psychological impact, observed during follow up), (2) nine couples of parents for presymptomatic diagnosis in their children (the procedure was stopped after the first visit in eight and continued in one), (3) 22 couples for prenatal counselling (no prenatal genetic testing was asked for after the first visit), and (4) 10 subjects for diagnostic testing. We decided to perform no prognostic testing.

CONCLUSION

Our preliminary experience confirms the complexity of the situation and suggests the necessity for a specific procedure to ensure good practice in genetic testing of HCM.

Ethical dilemmas in testing for late onset conditions: reactions to testing and perceived impact on other family members

This paper examines some of the ethical dilemmas that arise when testing for the late onset, untreatable condition of Huntington disease (HD) specifically now that technology allows us to test younger generations of the family for the mutant gene. Drawing on interview data from families with Huntington disease, the reactions to testing and perceived impact on other family members are considered. These are discussed in the light of the possible lowering of the age of test applicants. This potentially raises problems for a younger generation as they are confronted with reproductive decisions that the older generation did not have to face. It also means that individuals have the prospect of living with knowledge of a future illness for much longer.

Gesundheit durch Gentests?

Zusammenfassung. Prä- und postnatale genetische Diagnostik zur Ermittlung eines individuellen Erkrankungsrisikos gewinnt zunehmend an Bedeutung. Dementsprechend sind genetische Untersuchungen des menschlichen Erbgutes sowie damit verbundene Anwendungsbereiche Gegenstand intensiver gesellschaftlicher Diskussion. Zu den möglichen Vor- und Nachteilen genetischer Untersuchungen wurde eine deutschlandrepräsentative Stichprobe (N = 2.076 Personen) befragt. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass genetische Untersuchungen insgesamt auf eine große Akzeptanz in der Bevölkerung stoßen, ca. zwei Drittel stehen ihnen befürwortend gegenüber. Jedoch werden auch mögliche Nachteile solcher diagnostischer Maßnahmen, wie z.B. Schwangerschaftsabbrüche oder Diskriminierung, benannt. Faktorenanalytisch ließen sich aus den 13 Items des eingesetzten Fragebogens drei Skalen (Positive Aspekte, Negative Aspekte, Befürchtungen) bilden. Eine Varianzanalyse erbrachte Unterschiede in den Skalen zwischen verschiedenen soziodemographischen Gruppen: Während Geschlecht und Lebensalter keinen bzw. wenig Einfluss haben (Ältere sehen mehr negative Aspekte als Jüngere), finden sich deutliche Unterschiede zwischen konfessionsgebundenen und konfessionslosen Personen. Die Befragten, die einer Religionsgemeinschaft angehören, sehen genetische Untersuchungen wesentlich kritischer. Hinsichtlich des Bildungsstandes ist festzustellen: Personen mit höherer Bildung sehen mehr positive und weniger negative Aspekte hinsichtlich genetischer Untersuchungen. Die Ergebnisse werden mit internationalen Studien verglichen. Abschließend werden Überlegungen zur Relevanz genetischer Untersuchungen und der sich abzeichnenden weiteren Entwicklungen für die Gesundheitspsychologie angestellt.

Genetic testing for disease susceptibilities: consequences for genetic counseling

The role of genetic counseling in future testing for inherited susceptibilities for common diseases is debated. Currently, genetic testing, ideally supported by genetic counseling, is most often used to modify the assessment of genetic risk of Mendelian-inherited disease in high-risk individuals for the purpose of personal decision-making. By contrast, it is anticipated that genetic testing will be used to identify increased disease susceptibility in low-risk individuals for the purpose of instituting medical or lifestyle interventions to modify risk for future disease.

Genetic testing for cancer predisposition

The onslaught of genetic innovations in the past decade has resulted in the ongoing identification of a spectrum of genes, some of which, when mutated, result in cancer susceptibility. The impact of these discoveries on healthcare provides an opportunity to enhance health promotion and long-term health outcomes by identifying at-risk individuals before cancer develops. This provides the healthcare provider with the potential to intervene much earlier to either reduce the risk or diagnose a cancer early when the chances for effective treatment are greatest. Even though genetic testing is increasingly being employed clinically, there remains a gap between the technology and effective interventions. Genetic tests also provide information that is distinct from other tests used routinely in health promotion, because of the personal and family nature of the information. This results in unique clinical, ethical, legal, and social issues that further affect the effective diffusion of this technology clinically. This article provides an overview of the distinguishing characteristics of genetic testing, outlines the essential components of informed consent, and discusses the potential implications of testing on individuals' lives and the nurse's role in offering genetic testing.

Predictive genetic testing: high risk expectations in the face of low risk information

The aims of this cross-sectional, questionnaire study were (1) to estimate the proportion of those receiving negative ("low risk") results following predictive genetic testing who expect to undergo clinically unnecessary future screening and (2) to examine the factors associated with this expectation. Of 127 adults receiving negative results following predictive genetic testing for familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), 54 people (42%) were expected to attend for future bowel screening. The main predictor was doubt about the accuracy of genetic test results. Expecting to attend was also associated univariately with perceiving the chance of developing FAP as higher, being more worried about this, perceiving the test result to be more uncertain and threatening, and holding a behavioral model of the cause of FAP. Attendance for health screening may be influenced by people's perception of the accuracy of genetic tests that they have undergone. Future research should investigate test presentation and influences on test perception.

Predictive genetic testing: mediators and moderators of anxiety

Mediators and moderators of anxiety following predictive genetic testing were investigated in a cross-sectional study of 208 individuals at risk for familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Receiving a positive test result was associated with increased anxiety. The relationship between test result and anxiety was mediated by how threatened individuals felt by their test results. The impact of a positive test result was greater for those who felt distressed about FAP in their families, perceived FAP to be more serious, and perceived the genetic test to be more accurate. The results suggest that assessing, and possibly modifying, people's appraisals of the condition and of its impact on the family and of the threat of the genetic test may help to reduce subsequent anxiety. This has implications for the practice of genetic counseling.

Psychological consequences of predictive genetic testing for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC): a prospective follow-up study

Predictive genetic testing for cancer allows identification of those with the mutation (mutation positive) who should undergo cancer surveillance aiming at early detection of cancer and those without the mutation (mutation negative), whose unnecessary worry can be alleviated and who need not undergo frequent surveillance. However, there is a risk that predictive testing might have a harmful emotional impact on an individual. In the course of a predictive genetic testing protocol, we assessed general anxiety (by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory [STAI]), fear of cancer and death, satisfaction with life and attitude to the future using a questionnaire survey in 271 individuals tested for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC). Measurements were made before the first counseling (baseline), at the test disclosure session (STAI only) and 1 and 12 months after disclosure. Although at every measurement, the mutation-positive individuals were more afraid of cancer than those who were mutation negative, in both groups fear of cancer decreased significantly from baseline after disclosure. The mutation-positive subjects were more anxious than their counterparts immediately after the test disclosure, but the differences had disappeared at the follow-ups. In other variables, neither differences between the groups defined by mutation status nor changes with time were detected. Our findings suggest that counseling and testing relieve fear of cancer; no harmful emotional impact was detectable at the 1-year follow-up. To confirm these findings, however, the impact of testing should be studied after a longer interval. Furthermore, to evaluate the ultimate interpretation of these results, studies are needed to investigate the impact of fear of cancer on surveillance behavior among the mutation-positive subjects.

Predictive genetic testing in children and adults: a study of emotional impact

AIM

To determine whether, following predictive genetic testing for familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), children or adults receiving positive results experience clinically significant levels of anxiety or depression, and whether children receiving positive results experience higher levels of anxiety or depression than adults receiving positive results.

DESIGN

Two studies, one cross sectional and one prospective.

SAMPLE

208 unaffected subjects (148 adults and 60 children) at risk for FAP who have undergone genetic testing since 1990.

MAIN MEASURES

DEPENDENT VARIABLES

anxiety, depression; independent variables: test results, demographic measures, psychological resources (optimism, self-esteem).

RESULTS

Study 1. In children receiving positive results, mean scores for anxiety and depression were within the normal range. There was a trend for children receiving positive results to be more anxious and depressed than those receiving negative results. In adults, mean scores for anxiety were within the normal range for those receiving negative results, but were in the clinical range for those receiving positive results, with 43% (95% CI 23-65) of the latter having scores in this range. Regardless of test result, adults were more likely to be clinically anxious if they were low in optimism or self-esteem. Children receiving positive or negative results did not experience greater anxiety or depression than adults. Study 2. For children receiving a positive test result, mean scores for anxiety, depression, and self-esteem were unchanged over the year following the result, while mean anxiety scores decreased and self-esteem increased after receipt of a negative test result over the same period of time.

CONCLUSION

Children, as a group, did not show clinically significant distress over the first year following predictive genetic testing. Adults were more likely to be clinically anxious if they received a positive result or were low in optimism or self-esteem, with interacting effects. The association between anxiety, self-esteem, and optimism suggests that counselling should be targeted, not only at those with positive test results, but also at those low in psychological resources.