Infliximab plus azathioprine for steroid-dependent Crohn's disease patients: a randomized placebo-controlled trial

Impact of concomitant immunomodulator use on long-term outcomes in patients receiving scheduled maintenance infliximab

The long-term benefits of combining scheduled infliximab with concomitant immunomodulators [azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP)] in patients with Crohn's disease are unclear. Historical cohort followed for 5 years after initiation of infliximab for active Crohn's disease. Data were available on 123 patients who received scheduled maintenance infliximab infusions, for up to 5 years after initiation of infliximab. Clinical remission rates in the entire cohort were 73% (82/113) at 1 year, 65% (65/100) at 2 years, and 58% (21/36) at 5 years. Remission rates with maintenance infliximab were significantly improved in those receiving concomitant immunomodulators at 1 year (86% versus 68%, P = 0.03), but not at 2 years (80% versus 72%, P = 0.4). In a multivariate logistic regression model, concomitant immunomodulator use was not associated with a significantly improved odds ratio of remission in patients on maintenance infliximab [odds ratio (OR) 1.1, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.9-1.2, P = 0.9]. The risk of surgery was significantly reduced in those receiving immunomodulators at the commencement of maintenance infliximab (OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.1-0.7, P = 0.01), but not in patients who continued maintenance concomitant therapy (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.1-1.5, P = 0.1). The combination of maintenance infliximab and an immunomodulator produced modest improvements in outcomes beyond maintenance infliximab alone in this cohort.

Optimal use of biologics in the management of Crohn's disease

Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic relapsing and remitting disorder of the gastrointestinal tract with no known cure. The inflammation that drives the disease can lead to debilitating symptoms and a number of complications that may lead to surgery. The introduction of biologic therapy a decade ago has offered a new option for patients failing conventional therapy. Over time, biologic therapy has also led to the desire to achieve treatment goals beyond the control of symptoms. In order to achieve short-term and long-term goals with these new agents, it is important to review how these therapies may be optimized for the best results.

Cystic fibrosis and Crohn's disease: successful treatment and long term remission with infliximab

The association of cystic fibrosis and Crohn's disease (CD) is well known, but to date, there are very few cases in the literature of patients suffering from mucoviscidosis who have required treatment with infliximab. We report the case of a 23-year-old patient suffering from cystic fibrosis and severe CD treated successfully with infliximab without any infective complications or worsening of the pulmonary disease and with a long term (2 years) complete remission.

Infliximab, azathioprine, or combination therapy for Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND

The comparative efficacy and safety of infliximab and azathioprine therapy alone or in combination for Crohn's disease are unknown.

METHODS

In this randomized, double-blind trial, we evaluated the efficacy of infliximab monotherapy, azathioprine monotherapy, and the two drugs combined in 508 adults with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease who had not undergone previous immunosuppressive or biologic therapy. Patients were randomly assigned to receive an intravenous infusion of 5 mg of infliximab per kilogram of body weight at weeks 0, 2, and 6 and then every 8 weeks plus daily oral placebo capsules; 2.5 mg of oral azathioprine per kilogram daily plus a placebo infusion on the standard schedule; or combination therapy with the two drugs. Patients received study medication through week 30 and could continue in a blinded study extension through week 50.

RESULTS

Of the 169 patients receiving combination therapy, 96 (56.8%) were in corticosteroid-free clinical remission at week 26 (the primary end point), as compared with 75 of 169 patients (44.4%) receiving infliximab alone (P=0.02) and 51 of 170 patients (30.0%) receiving azathioprine alone (P<0.001 for the comparison with combination therapy and P=0.006 for the comparison with infliximab). Similar numerical trends were found at week 50. At week 26, mucosal healing had occurred in 47 of 107 patients (43.9%) receiving combination therapy, as compared with 28 of 93 patients (30.1%) receiving infliximab (P=0.06) and 18 of 109 patients (16.5%) receiving azathioprine (P<0.001 for the comparison with combination therapy and P=0.02 for the comparison with infliximab). Serious infections developed in 3.9% of patients in the combination-therapy group, 4.9% of those in the infliximab group, and 5.6% of those in the azathioprine group.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease who were treated with infliximab plus azathioprine or infliximab monotherapy were more likely to have a corticosteroid-free clinical remission than those receiving azathioprine monotherapy. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00094458.)

Meta-analysis: the effect and adverse events of Lactobacilli versus placebo in maintenance therapy for Crohn disease

BACKGROUND

Lactobacilli are used in an attempt to maintain remission for Crohn disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and adverse events of Lactobacilli compared with placebo in maintenance therapy for Crohn disease.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, OVID and BIOSIS. All randomized trials comparing Lactobacilli with placebo in maintenance therapy for Crohn disease were included.

RESULTS

Six randomized controlled trials with a total of 359 participants met the inclusion criteria. From the meta-analyses, the relative risk (RR) of clinical relapse rate was 1.15 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.90-1.48) comparing Lactobacilli with placebo and RR of endoscopic relapse rate was 1.31 (95%CI 0.57-3.00). Subgroup analyses showed RR for clinical relapse rates of Lactobacilli versus placebo was 0.99 (95%CI 0.76-1.29) in adults, 1.85 (95%CI 1.00-3.41) in children, 1.68 (95%CI 1.07-2.64) in Lactobacillus rhamnosus strain GG and 0.91 (95%CI 0.68-1.23) in Lactobacillus johnsonii respectively. The pooled RR of adverse events was 0.83 (95%CI 0.61-1.12).

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis suggests that compared with placebo, administration of L. rhamnosus strain GG as maintenance therapy may increase the relapse rates of Crohn disease. L. johnsonii is inefficacious in reducing the incidence of relapse.

Infliximab reintroduction is not associated to a higher rate of immune-related adverse effects in patients with inflammatory bowel disease initially treated with a three-infusion induction regimen

BACKGROUND

Episodic infliximab (IFX) treatment is associated with a higher risk for acute infusion reactions (AIR) and secondary loss of response (SLR), but this has not been evaluated in patients initially treated with an induction regimen with 3 IFX infusions.

AIMS

To evaluate whether IFX reintroduction after > or = 4 months in patients treated with a 3-infusion induction regimen is associated with a higher incidence of AIR or SLR.

METHODS

Incidence of immunogenic adverse effects was assessed in patients with inflammatory bowel disease who received > or = 4 consecutive IFX infusions (3 infusions at weeks 0, 2, and 6, plus > or = 1 maintenance infusion) (Continuous, n=47) and patients who were treated with a successful initial 3-infusion induction scheme and in whom IFX was then discontinued because of a complete response but reintroduced > or = 4 months later (Reintro, n=29).

RESULTS

AIR rate was 17% in both groups, and SLR rate was 26% in the Continuous group and 15% in the Reintro group (not significant). The lack of concomitant immunomodulators and/or pretreatment with hydrocortisone were associated with AIR development (P=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients who completed a 3-infusion induction regimen, IFX can be safely reintroduced even after a long time from discontinuation.

Optimizing biologic therapies for inflammatory bowel disease (ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease)

The introduction of biologic agents and particularly of anti-tumor necrosis factor antibodies dramatically changed the therapeutic algorithm in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases. Although the efficacy of these agents has been demonstrated clearly, optimal treatment strategies are debated. Recent trials advocate the introduction of biologic agents at an early stage to prevent debilitating complications. However, significant adverse events have led to careful selection of patients who will benefit most from long-term treatment with biologic agents. Once on biologic therapy, scheduled maintenance therapy is recommended to minimize the risk of loss of response. Nevertheless, treatment adaptation is frequently necessary in patients who lose response. Interventions encompass strategies to increase drug exposure by increasing the dose or decreasing the dosing interval, or by changing to another biologic agent. Finally, it remains unclear if and when a biologic agent can be stopped in patients with long-standing remission.

Interventions for prevention of post-operative recurrence of Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND

Recurrence of Crohn's disease is common after intestinal resection. A number of agents have been studied in controlled trials with the goal of reducing the risk of endoscopic or clinical recurrence of Crohn's disease following surgery.

OBJECTIVES

To undertake a systematic review of the use of medical therapies for the prevention of post-operative recurrence of Crohn's disease

SEARCH STRATEGY

MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched to identify relevant studies. References from selected papers and abstracts from Digestive Disease Week were also searched.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials that compared medical therapy to placebo or other medical agents for the prevention of recurrence of intestinal Crohn's disease were selected for inclusion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors reviewed all abstracts containing search terms, and those meeting inclusion criteria were selected for full data abstraction. Dichotomous data were summarised using relative risk and 95% confidence intervals. A fixed-effects model was used, and sensitivity analysis performed.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-three studies were identified for inclusion. Probiotics were not superior to placebo for any outcome measured. The use of nitroimidazole antibiotics appeared to reduce the risk of clinical (RR 0.23; 95%CI 0.09 to 0.57, NNT=4) and endoscopic (RR 0.44; 95%CI 0.26 to 0.74, NNT = 4) recurrence relative to placebo. However, these agents were associated with higher risk of serious adverse events (RR 2.39, 95% CI 1.5 to 3.7). Mesalamine therapy was associated with a significantly reduced risk of clinical recurrence (RR 0.76; 95% CI 0.62 to 0.94, NNT = 12), and severe endoscopic recurrence (RR 0.50; 95% CI 0.29 to 0.84, NNT = 8) when compared to placebo. Azathioprine/6MP was also associated with a significantly reduced risk of clinical recurrence (RR 0.59; 95% CI 0.38 to 0.92, NNT = 7), and severe endoscopic recurrence (RR 0.64; 95% CI 0.44 to 0.92, NNT = 4), when compared to placebo. Neither agent had a higher risk than placebo of serious adverse events. When compared to azathioprine/6MP, mesalamine was associated with a higher risk of any endoscopic recurrence (RR 1.45, 95% CI 1.03 to 2.06), but a lower risk of serious adverse events (RR 0.51; 95% CI 0.30 to 0.89). There was no significant difference between mesalamine and azathioprine/6MP for any other outcome.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There are insufficient randomised controlled trials of infliximab, budesonide, tenovil and interleukin-10 to draw conclusions. Nitro-imidazole antibiotics, mesalamine and immunosuppressive therapy with azathioprine/6-MP or infliximab all appear to be superior to placebo for the prevention of post-operative recurrence of Crohn's disease. The cost, toxicity and tolerability of these approaches require careful consideration to determine the optimal approach for post-operative prophylaxis.

Endpoints for clinical trials evaluating disease modification and structural damage in adults with Crohn's disease

The management of Crohn's disease is rapidly changing. The advent of potent immunomodulatory and biologic therapies has led to more demanding endpoints for clinical trials than only clinical response and remission. Complete withdrawal of corticosteroids, healing of endoscopically visible lesions, and prevention of structural damage are only a few new endpoints that are finding their way into the clinical trials of today and those that are being developed for the future. Given the importance of selecting the most appropriate and relevant endpoints, the International Organization for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IOIBD) decided to develop guidelines that could be used by individual researchers, the pharmaceutical industry, and the regulatory bodies. The current document is to be read as a "position paper," which is the result of several years of discussion and consensus finding that was finally approved by the entire membership of the group. The proposed instruments will need further validation and standardization to demonstrate that they are reliable in stable disease and responsive to change, and to determine the cutoff points for response and remission.

Positioning biologic agents in the treatment of Crohn's disease

One decade after the emergence of biologic therapy for Crohn's disease (CD), our treatment algorithms are beginning to change. Once reserved for patients with refractory disease, disease unresponsive to conventional therapies, or those requiring multiple courses of corticosteroids, there is increasing evidence that early, aggressive interventions with immunosuppressants or biologic therapies targeting tumor necrosis factor-alpha or alpha-4 integrins can alter the natural history of CD by reducing the transmural complications of structuring and fistulization and the nearly inevitable requisite for surgical resections. More recent trials are beginning to suggest that intervention with combination therapy for selected patients with a poor prognosis may modify the long-term course of CD. Selection of patients with features predicting a complex or progressive course and early, combined intervention is now possible. Future studies are still needed to best identify predictors of response to individual agents with differing mechanisms of action, as well as to optimize the risk-benefit of long-term maintenance therapy.

Influence of standard treatment on ileal and colonic antimicrobial defensin expression in active Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND

Crohn's Disease (CD), a chronic intestinal inflammation, is currently treated primarily by therapeutics which are directed against inflammatory responses. Recent findings though suggest a central role of the innate immune barrier in the pathophysiology. Important factors providing this barrier are antimicrobial peptides like the alpha- and beta-defensins. Little is known about in vivo effects of common drugs on their expression.

AIM

To analyse the influence of corticosteroids, azathioprine and aminosalicylate treatment on ileal and colonic antimicrobial peptides in active CD and also assess the role of inflammation.

METHODS

We measured the expression of antimicrobial peptides and pro-inflammatory cytokines in 75 patients with active CD.

RESULTS

Ileal and colonic alpha- and beta-defensins as well as LL37 remained unaffected by corticosteroids, azathioprine or aminosalicylate treatment. Additionally, we did not observe a negative coherency between Paneth cell alpha-defensins and any measured cytokines. HBD2 and LL37 unlike HBD1 levels were linked to inflammatory cytokines and increased in highly inflamed samples.

CONCLUSIONS

Current oral drug treatment seems to have no major effect on the expression of antimicrobial peptides. In contrast to HBD2 and LL37, ileal levels of HD5 and HD6 and colonic HBD1 level are independent of current inflammation. Innovative drugs should aim to strengthen protective innate immunity.

Long term efficacy and safety of allopurinol and azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

We previously reported that IBD patients who are non-responders to thiopurines with preferential shunting of metabolites to hepatotoxic 6-methylmercaptopurine ribonucleotides compared to 6-thioguanine nucleotides can reverse the ratio of 6-MMP/6-TGN and respond to thiopurines with the addition of allopurinol. The objective of this study is to report long term efficacy and safety, along with results for an additional 11 patients.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of patients at the University of Chicago IBD Center treated with allopurinol in addition to thiopurines.

RESULTS

Twenty five patients with Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis were enrolled. Within the first month of therapy 6-TGN metabolite levels increased from a mean of 186.5±17.4 (SE) to 352.8±37.8 pmol/8×10(8) (p=0.0001). Over the same period 6-MMP levels decreased from a mean of 11,966±1697 to 2004±536 pmol/8×10(8) (p<0.0001). The mean daily dosage of prednisone decreased from 19.8±3.8 mg to 5.3±2.7 mg (p=0.03). Thirteen patients have a minimum of one year follow-up. Nine of these thirteen patients have continued on therapy for at least 2 years. All thirteen of these patients continue to be in clinical remission at the last follow-up visit. No patients have had evidence of sustained thrombocytopenia or abnormal liver enzymes.

CONCLUSIONS

In AZA/6-MP non-responders with increased 6-MMP/6-TGN ratios, addition of allopurinol continues to demonstrate safety and efficacy for long-term maintenance and steroid-sparing in IBD.

Risk of lymphoma associated with combination anti-tumor necrosis factor and immunomodulator therapy for the treatment of Crohn's disease: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Although anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy can effectively treat Crohn's disease (CD), there is concern that it might increase the risk of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). A meta-analysis was performed to determine the rate of NHL in adult CD patients who have received anti-TNF therapy and to compare this rate with that of a population-based registry and a population of CD patients treated with immunomodulators.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Collaboration, and Web of Science were searched. Inclusion criteria included randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, or case series reporting on anti-TNF therapy in adult CD patients. Standardized incidence ratios (SIR) were calculated by comparing the pooled rate of NHL with the expected rate of NHL derived from the Surveillance Epidemiology & End Results (SEER) database and a meta-analysis of CD patients treated with immunomodulators.

RESULTS

Twenty-six studies involving 8905 patients and 21,178 patient-years of follow-up were included. Among anti-TNF treated subjects, 13 cases of NHL were reported (6.1 per 10,000 patient-years). The majority of these patients had previous immunomodulator exposure. Compared with the expected rate of NHL in the SEER database (1.9 per 10,000 patient-years), anti-TNF treated subjects had a significantly elevated risk (SIR, 3.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-6.9). When compared with the NHL rate in CD patients treated with immunomodulators alone (4 per 10,000 patient-years), the SIR was 1.7 (95% confidence interval, 0.5-7.1).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of anti-TNF agents with immunomodulators is associated with an increased risk of NHL in adult CD patients, but the absolute rate of these events remains low and should be weighed against the substantial benefits associated with treatment.

How to manage difficult Crohn's disease: optimum delivery of anti-TNFs

Crohn's disease is a chronic inflammatory condition that can involve any portion of the GI tract, leading to disabling symptoms and complications. Standard treatment with 5-aminosalicylic acid, antibiotics, corticosteroids and immunosuppressives has limited efficacy and is associated with serious potential adverse events. The anti-TNF-alpha agents are effective in the induction and maintenance of remission in luminal and fistulizing Crohn's disease. Recent evidence suggests that early treatment with anti-TNF agents and immunosuppressives may alter the natural history of the disease and prevent late complications. In those patients who have lost response to, or are intolerant of, a single anti-TNF agent, increasing the dose of the medication or switching to alternate biologic agents, such as another anti-TNF drug or natalizumab, have been shown to be effective treatments.

Cost-effectiveness of biological therapy for Crohn's disease: Markov cohort analyses incorporating United Kingdom patient-level cost data

BACKGROUND

Anti-TNF-alpha agents for Crohn's disease (CD) have good clinical efficacy but high acquisition cost compared to rival drugs.

AIM

To assess the cost-effectiveness of infliximab and adalimumab for Crohn's disease from the perspective of the UK NHS, incorporating recent trial and observational data.

METHODS

Lifetime Markov analyses constructed to simulate quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and costs. CD was represented by four health-states representing: Full response, partial response, nonresponse, surgery and death. The course of CD under standard care was based on the Olmsted county cohort. Systematic review identified ACCENT I (infliximab) and CHARM (adalimumab) as sources for efficacy data. We modelled an intention-to-treat strategy for biologics including surgical rates based on observational data, cost estimates from our UK dataset and utilities from an algorithm converting CDAI to EQ-5D utilities.

RESULTS

The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) compared to standard care for 1-year of treatment with infliximab or adalimumab were 19,050 pounds and 7190 pounds per QALY gained, respectively. Lifetime therapy was dominated by standard care. Analyses over shorter time horizons, matched to treatment duration, resulted in unfavourable ICERs.

CONCLUSION

The model suggests acceptable ICERs for biological agents when considering a lifetime horizon with periods of up to 4 years continuous therapy. As with all economic evaluations, the results may not be generalizable beyond the perspective of analysis.

Incidence and clinical significance of immunogenicity to infliximab in Crohn's disease: a critical systematic review

BACKGROUND

Infliximab (IFX) is a chimeric (mouse/human) anti-TNF-alpha monoclonal antibody approved for the treatment of refractory luminal and fistulizing Crohn's disease (CD). It is a source of potential immunogenicity for humans, with the occurrence of anti-infliximab antibodies (ATIs), which are thought to interfere with the pharmacodynamics and/or pharmacokinetics of the compound. It remains unclear whether ATIs have any clinical importance for drug efficacy or safety. We review studies specifically evaluating the incidence of ATIs in CD and their impact on the efficacy and safety of IFX.

METHODS

A systematic review was undertaken by electronic searches of the PubMed and SCOPUS databases from earliest records to October 2008, as well as reference lists of all relevant articles and relevant abstracts from meetings.

RESULTS

The biological and clinical mechanisms of ATI development are poorly understood. The incidence of ATIs in vivo depends on multiple analytical and clinical factors, both patient- and treatment-related. The presence of ATIs is weakly and variably associated with clinical response or infusion reactions, but not with reactions relevant to clinical decision-making. Enormous variation in the methods of reporting ATIs and immunogenicity of IFX make almost any interpretation possible from different studies, but few have clinical relevance.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no clear evidence that ATIs have an impact on efficacy or safety, nor a need to measure or prevent them in clinical practice. Circulating drug concentration may be a more relevant measure of immunogenicity.

Intra-abdominal abscess develops during infliximab treatment of refractory Crohn's disease: a report of one case

A male patient who had recurrent abdominal pain and diarrhea for more than 12 years was admitted to our hospital because of symptom exacerbation and fever for 20 days. According to clinical, imaging and colonoscopic manifestations, he was diagnosed as refractory Crohn's disease. He was treated intravenously with infliximab at a dose of 5 mg/kg at weeks 0, 2, and 6 for induction therapy, followed by an 8-week interval maintenance treatment. Intra-abdominal abscess developed at week 21 after the first infliximab infusion, suggesting that infliximab treatment of refractory Crohn's disease may increase the risk of infection.

[Must immunomodulators be added to biological treatment in inflammatory bowel disease?]

Both biological agents and immunosuppressants are standard treatments in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and are frequently used in combination. Although this combination can increase therapeutic efficacy and help to prevent immunogenicity, concerns about the risk of adverse effects - particularly lymphoma - have been raised. IBD are obviously highly complex diseases, with many possible clinical scenarios, and there is no a universal treatment applicable to all patients. In this report we address this issue in a narrative review consisting of three parts. First, we provide a historical overview of the use of immunosuppressants and biological agents in IBD. Secondly, we review the available evidence, with both efficacy and safety considered in separate analyses. Thirdly, we propose different ways of using these drugs in the distinct clinical scenarios, both in Crohn's disease and in ulcerative colitis. Although the evidence is thoroughly reviewed, the main perspective is that of the practicing clinician.

Maintenance treatment with infliximab for the management of Crohn's disease in adults

Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic, relapsing disease, the continuous cycle of which deeply affects the long-term course which, eventually, leads to fibrosis and development of transmural complications. It is well known that CD is an immune-mediated clinical condition and that tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) plays a fundamental role in the pathogenesis of the disease. Current clinical guidelines recommend that patients with mild to moderate active CD should be treated initially with corticosteroids. Although this approach is effective in inducing remission, some patients may become dependent on, or refractory to, these drugs in the long term, thus increasing the risk of developing steroid-related adverse effects. A recent Cochrane systematic review established that infliximab (IFX) is effective in inducing remission in patients with CD. Although only a few published studies have assessed IFX for the maintenance of remission in the long term, there is evidence that IFX is superior to placebo in sustaining clinical remission and fistula healing; moreover, corticosteroid-sparing effects have been demonstrated. IFX is associated with the formation of antibodies to IFX which can lead to infusion reactions and shorter duration of response, but when comparing episodic vs scheduled maintenance treatment, the latter appears to sensibly reduce immunogenicity, thus offering improved efficacy and tolerance. The final point to consider is the best time to introduce IFX in the therapeutic algorithm of CD. Early use of IFX has been suggested to be more effective than late, and may potentially change the natural history of the disease. Effective induction and maintenance therapy with IFX is the only means with which to maintain long-lasting clinical and mucosal remission which, in turn, may modify the long-term course of the disease. Furthermore, when treating inflammatory bowel disease patients with IFX, an appropriate risk-benefit balance has to be taken into consideration, because the precise risk of serious adverse events associated with anti-TNF treatment in CD remains to be fully elucidated.

The tolerance and efficacy of a postponed retreatment with infliximab in Crohn's disease primary responders

BACKGROUND

In Crohn's disease (CD) patients naïve to immunomodulators primary responding to infliximab (IFX) induction, maintenance with scheduled IFX or with immunomodulators is possible. The benefit of additional IFX infusions after failure of maintenance with immunomodulators is not known.

AIM

To assess the efficacy and factors associated with efficacy of postponed IFX retreatment.

METHODS

All CD primary responders to an IFX induction regimen in maintenance with immunomodulators were retrospectively included when they received at least one additional IFX infusion after week 14. Efficacy was defined as clinical response at week 4 and absence of intolerance leading to discontinuation.

RESULTS

Sixty-one patients were retreated with IFX with a 38-week median time from induction. Efficacy was achieved in 80% patients. Twelve patients had no clinical benefit: seven acute hypersensitivity reactions and five loss of response. By multivariate analysis, the only factor associated with no efficacy was a median time >50 weeks from induction to retreatment (odds ratio = 7.38; 95%CI: 1.38-39.59; P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Postponed retreatment with IFX in CD primary responders should be administered within 50 weeks after induction, for better efficacy and tolerance.

Predictors of corticosteroid-dependent and corticosteroid-refractory inflammatory bowel disease: analysis of a Chinese cohort study

BACKGROUND

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who are corticosteroid-dependent or -refractory are at higher risk of developing disease- and treatment-related complications.

AIMS

To identify retrospectively clinical factors present at diagnosis that predict the occurrence of corticosteroid dependency and refractoriness in Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) patients.

METHODS

A total of 310 IBD patients (134 CD, 176 UC) were observed for 2140 person years and their use of systemic corticosteroids was determined. Outcomes of corticosteroid dependency and refractoriness were recorded. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the clinical factors associated with outcomes.

RESULTS

Seventy-seven (57.5%) CD and 95 (54.0%) UC patients had received corticosteroids during study period. In CD, thrombocytosis [Hazard ratio (HR):3.0] predicted, whereas colonic CD (HR:0.3) negatively predicted corticosteroid dependency. Stricturing phenotype (HR:4.5) predicted corticosteroid-refractory CD. For UC, thrombocytosis (HR:3.9) and extensive colitis (HR:1.7) predicted corticosteroid dependency. Presence of anaemia (HR:10.8) at diagnosis and initial requirement of total parenteral nutrition (TPN) (HR:18.8) predicted corticosteroid-refractory UC. The cumulative risks of surgery were 17.8% and 5.4% for CD and UC patients respectively at 1 year after starting corticosteroids.

CONCLUSIONS

Thrombocytosis at diagnosis predicted corticosteroid-dependency in IBD. Stricturing phenotype of CD and the presence of anaemia in UC predicted subsequent course of corticosteroid refractoriness.

Thalidomide and thalidomide analogues for induction of remission in Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND

Crohn's disease is a chronic relapsing condition of the alimentary tract with a high morbidity secondary to bowel inflammation. High levels of tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) have been associated with the development of intestinal inflammation in Crohn's disease.Thalidomide, has been demonstrated to have anti TNF-alpha properties in experimental and clinical studies.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of thalidomide and its analogue lenalidomide for induction of remission in Crohn's disease.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) Issue 3, 2008, PUBMED (1966 to August 2008), EMBASE (1984 to August 2008) and the Cochrane IBD/FBD Specialised Trial Register were searched. Manufacturers of thalidomide and leaders in the field were also contacted to identify any unpublished trials. Study references were also searched for additional trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared thalidomide or lenalidomide against placebo or any other intervention for induction of remission in Crohn's disease were eligible for inclusion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data extraction and assessment of methodological quality of included studies were independently performed by two authors. The main outcome measure was clinical remission. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for dichotomous outcomes.

MAIN RESULTS

No published RCTs on thalidomide for induction of remission in Crohn's disease were found. One RCT in paediatric patients is in progress. One RCT using lenalidomide (n = 89) met the inclusion criteria and was included in the review. Three parallel groups of patients on 25 mg of lenalidomide daily (n = 23) , 5 mg of lenalidomide daily (n = 33) or placebo (n = 28) were studied. The clinical remission rate in both treatment groups was not significantly different from that in the placebo group; 25 mg lenalidomide versus placebo (OR 0.29; 95% CI 0.05 to 1.54), 5 mg lenalidomide versus placebo (OR 1.30; 95% CI 0.42 to 4.05). There were no statistically significant differences in clinical response.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The results of one well designed study using lenalidomide did not show any statistically significant benefit over placebo. The use of thalidomide or lenalidomide for induction of remission in Crohn's disease is not recommended until data from a definitive study are available.

Biological therapies for inflammatory bowel diseases

Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis are chronic disabling inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs). Although the causes of IBD are unknown, defects in innate and adaptive immune pathways have been identified and biological therapies that target key molecules have been designed. Infliximab, a chimeric immunoglobulin (Ig)G1 monoclonal antibody to tumor necrosis factor, dramatically improved treatment of patients with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Infliximab has achieved treatment goals such as mucosal healing and decreasing the need for hospitalizations and surgeries. Although several anti-tumor necrosis factor therapies have been developed, there is a great need for drugs that target other pathways. Natalizumab, an antibody against the integrin alpha4 subunit, blocks leukocyte adhesion and has reached the clinic in the United States but has not been approved in the European Union; other anti-adhesion molecules currently are under development. Additional approaches under clinical development include therapeutics that target cytokines, such as interleukin-12/23, as well as those that block T-cell signaling. The use of recombinant human proteins, including immunoregulatory cytokines and growth factors, has not been successful so far. The efficacy of each therapy must be shown in carefully designed clinical programs. Biological therapies carry a definite safety risk, so their place in treatment algorithms must be defined carefully.

Upper gastrointestinal tract phenotype of Crohn's disease is associated with early surgery and further hospitalization

BACKGROUND

According to the Montreal Classification, upper gastrointestinal tract phenotype L4 is uncommon in Caucasian patients with Crohn's disease (CD) but carries excess risk of recurrence. We studied the clinical course of CD in Chinese patients presenting with the L4 phenotype and factors predicting its occurrence upon longitudinal follow-up.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study included 132 Chinese CD patients (median age at diagnosis, 30.0 years, range: 14.0-77.0 years) who were followed for 770 person-years. Demographic data including disease behavior and location, details of surgery, and hospitalization were collected. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the probabilities of further hospitalization and major surgery followed by Cox proportional hazards regression to determine if clinical variables independently predicted the endpoints.

RESULTS

The L4 phenotype was found in 30 (22.7%) patients at presentation. There were significantly more stricturing (46.7% versus 18.6%) and penetrating (30.0% versus 3.9%) phenotypes in the L4 group than in the non-L4 group (P < 0.0001). The 3-year cumulative probability of further hospitalization was 86.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 73.8%-100.0%) in the L4 group as compared with 49.3% (95% CI: 39.3%-59.3%) in the non-L4 group (log-rank test, P < 0.0001). The L4 phenotype independently predicted further hospitalization (adjusted hazards ratio [HR]: 2.1; 95% CI: 1.3-3.5). The cumulative probability of major surgery was significantly higher in the L4 than in the non-L4 group (P < 0.0001). Eighteen (17.6%) patients developed the L4 phenotype on follow-up and the stricturing phenotype predicted its occurrence (adjusted HR: 5.5; 95% CI: 2.2-14.0).

CONCLUSIONS

Chinese CD patients more often had the L4 phenotype, which predicted the need of subsequent hospitalization.

Azathioprine is superior to budesonide in achieving and maintaining mucosal healing and histologic remission in steroid-dependent Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND

The effects of azathioprine (AZA) and budesonide (BUD) on mucosal healing and histologic remission of Crohn's disease (CD) are insufficiently studied. In this prospective study we evaluated the comparative effects of AZA and BUD on endoscopic and histologic activity in patients with steroid-dependent Crohn's ileocolitis or proximal colitis who had achieved clinical remission on conventional steroids.

METHODS

Patients were randomized to AZA (2.0-2.5 mg/kg a day) or BUD (6-9 mg a day) for 1 year. The study protocol included clinical examination, laboratory tests, calculation of the Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI), completion of the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ), at baseline and then every 2 months for 1 year. Ileocolonoscopy with regional biopsies was performed at baseline and then at the end of the study to assess mucosal healing and the histologic activity of CD.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients were randomized to AZA and 39 to BUD. At the end of the study 32 and 25 patients in the AZA and BUD groups, respectively, were in clinical remission (P = 0.07). The Crohn's Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity (CDEIS) score fell significantly only in the AZA group (P < 0.0001). Complete or near complete healing was achieved in 83% of AZA-treated patients compared with only 24% of BUD-treated patients (P < 0.0001). Histologic activity as assessed by an average histology score (AHS) fell significantly only in the AZA group (P < 0.001 versus baseline) and was significantly lower than in the BUD group at the end of the study (P < 0.001). Eight patients in the AZA group were withdrawn for adverse events (n = 6) or relapse of disease compared with 14 patients in the BUD group who were withdrawn for relapse of disease.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with steroid-dependent inflammatory Crohn's ileocolitis or proximal colitis who achieve clinical remission with conventional steroids, a 1-year treatment with AZA was superior to BUD in achieving and maintaining mucosal healing and histologic remission.

Management of Crohn's disease in adults

Guidelines for clinical practice are intended to suggest preferable approaches to particular medical problems as established by interpretation and collation of scientifically valid research, derived from extensive review of published literature. When data that will withstand objective scrutiny are not available, a recommendation may be made based on a consensus of experts. Guidelines are intended to apply to the clinical situation for all physicians without regard to specialty. Guidelines are intended to be flexible, not necessarily indicating the only acceptable approach, and should be distinguished from standards of care that are inflexible and rarely violated. Given the wide range of choices in any health-care problem, the physician should select the course best suited to the individual patient and the clinical situation presented. These guidelines are developed under the auspices of the American College of Gastroenterology and its Practice Parameters Committee. Expert opinion is solicited from the outset for the document. The quality of evidence upon which a specific recommendation is based is as follows: Grade A: Homogeneous evidence from multiple well-designed randomized (therapeutic) or cohort (descriptive) controlled trials, each involving a number of participants to be of sufficient statistical power. Grade B: Evidence from at least one large well-designed clinical trial with or without randomization, from cohort or case-control analytic studies, or well-designed meta-analysis. Grade C: Evidence based on clinical experience, descriptive studies, or reports of expert committees. The Committee reviews guidelines in depth, with participation from experienced clinicians and others in related fields. The final recommendations are based on the data available at the time of the production of the document and may be updated with pertinent scientific developments at a later time.

TNF antagonists in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease: results of a survey of gastroenterologists in the French region of Lorraine

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

We conducted a survey of nonacademic gastroenterologists to evaluate the use of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

METHODS

A total of 100 questionnaires were sent by mail to a representative sample of gastroenterologists practicing in the French region of Lorraine.

RESULTS

Forty-six practitioners responded to the survey, of whom 95.5% prescribed scheduled infliximab treatment. After 6 months of infliximab in combination with azathioprine, 55% then prescribed infliximab as monotherapy. A complete pretherapeutic assessment was performed by only one fourth of the gastroenterologists. When the PPD skin test measured 7 mm, nearly half of the physicians introduced anti-TNF therapy without chemoprophylaxis (versus only 2.4% when the diameter was 11 mm). In the event of quiescent Crohn's disease (CD) after 1 year of anti-TNF treatment, 35.7% stopped the drug. In refractory CD, 72.7% prescribed infliximab as the first-line therapy (versus 27.3% who used adalimumab). In patients with urinary tract infection, 44.2% initiated antibiotics and delayed anti-TNF treatment, while 46.5% initiated anti-TNF therapy along with antibiotic therapy.

CONCLUSION

This study is the first survey upon the use of TNF antagonists by nonacademic gastroenterologists, and the findings suggest that physicians using these drugs may require more information about the pretherapeutic assessment and management of the infectious risk.

Are we giving azathioprine too late? The case for early immunomodulation in inflammatory bowel disease

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) includes two entities, Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. Both are chronic conditions with frequent complications and surgical procedures and a great impact on patient’s quality of life. The thiopurine antimetabolites azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine are widely used in IBD patients. Current indications include maintenance therapy, steroid-dependant disease, fistula closure, prevention of infliximab immunogenicity and prevention of Crohn’s disease recurrence. Surprisingly, the wide use of immunosuppressants in the last decades has not decreased the need of surgery, probably because these treatments are introduced at too late stages in disease course. An earlier use of immunossupressants is now advocated by some authors. The rational includes: (1) failure to modify IBD natural history of present therapeutic approach, (2) demonstration that azathioprine can induce mucosal healing, a relevant prognostic factor for Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, and (3) demonstration that early immunossupression has a very positive impact on pediatric, recently diagnosed Crohn’s disease patients. We are now awaiting the results of new studies, to clarify the contribution of azathioprine, as compared to infliximab (SONIC Study), and to demonstrate the usefulness of azathioprine in recently diagnosed adult Crohn’s disease patients (AZTEC study).

Are we giving biologics too late? The case for early versus late use

Corticosteroids and immunomodulators have been the mainstay therapies for Crohn’s disease. Corticosteroids are highly effective to control symptoms in the short-term, but they are not effective in maintaining remission, they heal the mucosa in a reduced proportion of cases, and long-time exposure is associated with an increased risk of infections and mortality. Immunomodulators, azathioprine and methotrexate, heal the mucosa in a higher proportion of patients that corticosteroids but their onset of action is slow and they benefit less than half of patients with Crohn’s disease. In the last decade, medical therapy for Crohn’s disease has experienced a remarkable change due to the introduction of biologic therapy, and particularly the use of anti-tumour necrosis factor-alpha agents. Infliximab, adalimumab, and certolizumab pegol have demonstrated efficacy for induction and maintenance of remission in active Crohn’s disease. These agents have raised the bar for what is a suitable symptomatic response in Crohn’s disease and modification of the natural history of the disease has become a major goal in the treatment of Crohn’s disease. There are several data in the literature that suggest that early use of biologic therapy and achievement of mucosal healing contribute to disease course modification. However, many questions on early biological therapy for Crohn’s disease remain still unanswered.

Are we giving biologics too much time? When should we stop treatment?

The optimal duration of biological treatment, particularly anti-TNF, in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a very important question both for patients and physicians. There is no published evidence to clearly and definitely answer this question. However data on natural history of IBD, long term safety of biologics, immunosuppressors (IS) cessation and some preliminary studies on biologics cessation may help us to discuss this topic. The decision to stop a biological treatment is currently based on a compromise between the benefits and risks associated with the prolongation of this treatment. IBD, more particularly CD, are characterized by the development of complications and the need for recurrent hospitalizations and surgeries in approximately 2/3 of cases. In these patients potentially in need of biological treatments, it is probable that, as it has been demonstrated for IS, the longer a stable remission has be achieved under treatment, the lower the risk of relapse is after treatment cessation. Further prospective studies should now aim at disclosing patient characteristics associated with a low risk of relapse to implement this strategy.

A multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial of everolimus versus azathioprine and placebo to maintain steroid-induced remission in patients with moderate-to-severe active Crohn's disease

OBJECTIVES

A prospective study was undertaken to compare the efficacy of everolimus versus azathioprine or placebo in maintaining steroid-induced remission in active Crohn's disease (CD) and assess the safety and pharmacokinetics of everolimus.

METHODS

This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, proof-of-concept study in adults with moderate-to-severe active CD. The patients received oral steroids for a rapid induction of remission plus everolimus 6 mg/day, azathioprine 2.5 mg/kg/day, or placebo as maintenance treatment. The main outcome measure was the treatment success, defined as a steroid-free remission by the end of month 3 and maintained until study cutoff without the use of prohibited efficacy treatments.

RESULTS

Following an interim analysis, the study was terminated before enrollment was completed due to the lack of efficacy. The full intent-to-treat population comprised 138 patients. Only 96 patients who entered the study > or =7 months prior to data cutoff were included in the primary efficacy population. The treatment success was achieved in 13 of 38 everolimus patients, 22 of 36 azathioprine patients, and 8 of 22 placebo patients. Using the Kaplan-Meier estimates at month 7, the incidence of treatment success was 22.0% with everolimus group (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.7-37.3%, P= 0.610 vs placebo), 38.3% with azathioprine group (95% CI 20.6-55.9%, P= 0.500 vs placebo), and 28.8% with placebo group (95% CI 7.7-49.9%). The type and incidence of adverse events in the everolimus cohort were similar to those reported in the approved transplantation indications.

CONCLUSIONS

The safety and tolerability of everolimus (6 mg/day) in patients with active CD were comparable to azathioprine. At this dose, everolimus is not more efficacious in achieving a steroid-free remission in active CD than the comparators.

Crohn's disease: beyond antagonists of tumour necrosis factor

In the past few years, antagonists of tumour necrosis factor have resulted in unforetold therapeutic benefits in Crohn's disease, but the magnitude and duration of responses are variable. New agents are therefore needed. Their development has benefited from advances in the understanding of the pathophysiology of this disease. Uncontrolled activation of the acquired immune system has an important role, and lymphocytes, cytokines, and adhesion molecules are broadly targeted for therapeutic intervention. With increasing evidence of an implication of the innate immune system and the intestinal epithelium, the therapeutic paradigm is also shifting from mere immunosuppression to the reinforcement of the intestinal barrier. We review mechanisms of actions of new drugs and the efficacy and adverse events from data from clinical trials. We discuss future directions, including new strategies with optimum endpoints.

Infliximab in Crohn's disease: early and long-term treatment

The natural history of Crohn's disease is characterized by a remitting and relapsing course that progresses to complications and surgery in the majority of patients. Current treatment guidelines advocate a stepwise approach according to disease location and severity at presentation, with goals mainly aimed at inducing and maintaining clinical remission. Major advances in the understanding of the pathogenesis of Crohn's disease offered significant opportunities for the development of new therapies over the past years. Infliximab and other biologic agents have shown impressive results in Crohn's disease patients refractory to standard therapy, suggesting a potential disease course-modifying action. These led to the proposal to reverse the traditional therapeutic algorithms using these agents early in the course of the disease. Preliminary data suggest that early intervention may be a more effective treatment strategy in some Crohn's disease patients. As yet, early and indiscriminate use of biologics remains to be supported by convincing evidence. Data on long-term treatment of Crohn's disease with infliximab or other biologics are even more scarce. Future studies aimed to identify predictors of complicated disease and long-term randomized studies aimed to compare "step-up" and "top-down" strategies in high-risk groups should help to answer if early introduction of biological therapy alters the natural history of Crohn's disease.

Alternative strategies for the use of infliximab in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease

Infliximab is approved for the induction and 1-year maintenance of remission in pediatric Crohn's disease unresponsive to conventional therapy. Despite significant experience with the use of this agent in children and adolescents who have inflammatory bowel disease, many questions about its optimal use remain. Recent safety concerns raised debate over the common practice of using infliximab in combination with conventional immunomodulatory agents. Additionally, although regularly scheduled administration maintains remission more effectively than episodic therapy, it is not known whether all patients who start infliximab must continue it for maintenance. Some patients may be able to use infliximab for induction and another agent for maintenance. Finally, the optimal placement of infliximab in the algorithm for the medical treatment of pediatric inflammatory bowel disease remains an open question.

Efficacy and safety of tumor necrosis factor antagonists in Crohn's disease: meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials

BACKGROUND & AIMS

We performed a meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials to evaluate safety and efficacy of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists for Crohn's disease.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE. The primary end points were clinical remission for luminal Crohn's disease and fistula closure at > or =2 consecutive visits. Deaths, serious infections, and malignancies were also analyzed by the methods of Peto and Der Simonian and Laird.

RESULTS

Fourteen luminal Crohn's disease trials enrolled 3995 patients. In overall analysis, anti-TNF therapy was effective for induction of remission at week 4 (mean difference, 11%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6%-16%; P < .001) and maintenance of remission at weeks 20-30 in patients who responded to induction therapy and in patients randomized before induction (mean difference, 23%; 95% CI, 18%-28% and mean difference, 8%; 95% CI, 3%-12%, respectively; P < .001 for all comparisons). Ten studies evaluated anti-TNF for treatment of fistulizing Crohn's disease, involving 776 patients. In overall analysis, anti-TNF therapy was effective for fistula closure only in maintenance trials after open-label induction (mean difference, 16%; 95% CI, 8%-25%; P < .001). In 21 studies enrolling 5356 individuals, anti-TNF therapy did not increase the risk of death, malignancy, or serious infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Infliximab, adalimumab, and certolizumab are effective in luminal Crohn's disease. Efficacy of anti-TNF agents other than infliximab in treating fistulizing Crohn's disease requires additional investigations. A longer duration of follow-up and a larger number of patients are required to better assess the safety profile of TNF antagonists in Crohn's disease.

Controversies in the treatment of Crohn’s disease: The case for an accelerated step-up treatment approach

The ideal treatment strategy for Crohn’s disease (CD) remains uncertain, as does the optimal endpoint of therapy. Top-down versus step-up describes two different approaches: early use of immunomodulators and biological agents in the former versus initial treatment with steroids in the latter, with escalation to immunomodulators or biological drugs in patients proven to be steroid refractory or steroid dependent. Top-down therapy has been associated with higher rates of mucosal healing. If mucosal healing proves to be associated with better long-term outcomes, such as a decreased need for hospitalization and surgery, top-down therapy may be the better approach for many patients. The main concern with the top-down approach is the toxicity of the immunomodulators and biological agents, which have been linked with infectious complications as well as an increased risk of lymphoma. It is unlikely that one strategy will be best for all patients given the underlying heterogeneity of CD presentation and severity. Ultimately, we must weigh the safety and efficacy of the therapies with the risks of the disease itself. Unfortunately our ability to risk stratify patients at diagnosis remains rudimentary. The purpose of this paper is to review the data that supports or refutes the differing treatment paradigms in CD, and to provide a rationale for an approach, termed the “accelerated step-up” approach, which attempts to balance the risks and benefits of our currently available therapies with the risk of disease related complications as we understand them in 2008.

Efficacy and safety of adalimumab for the treatment of Crohn's disease in adults

Biologic agents offer potentially disease-modifying benefits that address long-term symptom control. Adalimumab was developed to be a fully human monoclonal antibody and an advancement over previously developed biologics. Adalimumab induces and maintains long-term clinical response and remission in patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease (CD) who had failed to respond to conventional therapy. In addition, adalimumab is effective in patients who cannot tolerate or who have lost response to infliximab therapy. Clinical trials demonstrate that adalimumab reduces the risk of CD-related hospitalization, maintains rapid complete fistula closure and is steroid-sparing, especially when administered early in the course of the disease. Adalimumab is generally well-tolerated by patients with moderate-to-severe CD. Opportunistic infections occurred in approximately 2% of adalimumab-treated patients and malignant neoplasms occurred in approximately 1% of patients, with no differences compared with placebo during the randomized, placebo-controlled portions of the adalimumab trials. This article reviews the efficacy and safety of adalimumab in the treatment of adult patients with CD and discusses the role of adalimumab in the current and future management of CD.

Early combined immunosuppression or conventional management in patients with newly diagnosed Crohn's disease: an open randomised trial

BACKGROUND

Most patients who have active Crohn's disease are treated initially with corticosteroids. Although this approach usually controls symptoms, many patients become resistant to or dependent on corticosteroids, and long exposure is associated with an increased risk of mortality. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of early use of combined immunosuppression with conventional management in patients with active Crohn's disease who had not previously received glucocorticoids, antimetabolites, or infliximab.

METHODS

We did a 2-year open-label randomised trial at 18 centres in Belgium, Holland, and Germany between May, 2001, and January, 2004. We randomly assigned 133 patients to either early combined immunosuppression or conventional treatment. The 67 patients assigned to combined immunosuppression received three infusions of infliximab (5 mg/kg of bodyweight) at weeks 0, 2, and 6, with azathioprine. We gave additional treatment with infliximab and, if necessary, corticosteroids, to control disease activity. 66 patients assigned to conventional management received corticosteroids, followed, in sequence, by azathioprine and infliximab. The primary outcome measures were remission without corticosteroids and without bowel resection at weeks 26 and 52. Analysis was by modified intention to treat. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00554710.

FINDINGS

Four patients (two in each group) did not receive treatment as per protocol. At week 26, 39 (60.0%) of 65 patients in the combined immunosuppression group were in remission without corticosteroids and without surgical resection, compared with 23 (35.9%) of 64 controls, for an absolute difference of 24.1% (95% CI 7.3-40.8, p=0.0062). Corresponding rates at week 52 were 40/65 (61.5%) and 27/64 (42.2%) (absolute difference 19.3%, 95% CI 2.4-36.3, p=0.0278). 20 of the 65 patients (30.8%) in the early combined immunosuppression group had serious adverse events, compared with 19 of 64 (25.3%) controls (p=1.0).

INTERPRETATION

Combined immunosuppression was more effective than conventional management for induction of remission and reduction of corticosteroid use in patients who had been recently diagnosed with Crohn's disease. Initiation of more intensive treatment early in the course of the disease could result in better outcomes.

Inflammatory bowel diseases in the elderly

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in elderly individuals is associated with a unique set of challenges, some of which are related to age. This article examines the diagnosis and management of IBD in the context of recent advances in the understanding of its pathogenesis, and newer therapeutic modalities that have been possible from these advances.

Crohn's disease: a review of current treatment with a focus on biologics

Crohn's disease is a debilitating and expensive disease that is growing in incidence in both developing and developed countries. While conventional therapies, such as corticosteroids and immunosuppressants, continue to play a vital role in treating this condition, it is evident that many affected individuals do not respond to therapy or develop intolerable adverse effects. The addition of modern biological therapies to the Crohn's disease armamentarium is providing a change in expectations for disease outcome. Infliximab and adalimumab are currently the only biological agents approved for induction and maintenance treatment in adults (infliximab and adalimumab) and children (infliximab) with Crohn's disease. Furthermore, infliximab has a beneficial effect on perianal fistulas. Other tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha inhibitors, such as certolizumab pegol, also demonstrate promising results in adults with moderate to severe active disease. In addition, adalimumab and certolizumab pegol have shown clinical efficacy in patients who are intolerant to or lose response to infliximab, suggesting that switching between agents may allow response to be maintained over time. The primary safety concerns with TNFalpha inhibitors include increased risk of serious infection (including reactivation of tuberculosis), malignancy (particularly lymphoma) and demyelinating disease. Other agents in development include recombinant human anti-inflammatory cytokines, agents that target pro-inflammatory cytokines and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factors. Further prospective studies will provide interesting insight into different mechanisms by which factors involved in the pathophysiology of Crohn's disease can be modulated.

Azathioprine in inflammatory bowel disease: improved molecular insights and resulting clinical implications

Azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine represent important first-line immunosuppressive drugs in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Owing to 45 years of clinical experience with thiopurines in inflammatory bowel disease, there currently exist strong data from numerous clinical trials and meta-analyses, which clearly document the therapeutic efficacy of azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. However, the exact molecular mechanism of action of these drugs was insufficiently understood for a long time. During the last few years, important new insights into the intracellular effects of azathioprine have been gained and thiopurines have been identified as strong inducers of T-cell apoptosis. This article aims to summarize traditional and current concepts of azathioprine-mediated effects and endeavors to discuss the resulting clinical implications.

Tumor necrosis factor-alpha antibody for maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND

Crohn's disease may be refractory to conventional treatments including corticosteroids and immunosuppressives. Recent studies suggest TNF-alpha blocking agents may be effective in maintaining remission in Crohn's disease.

OBJECTIVES

To conduct a systematic review of the evidence for the effectiveness of TNF-alpha blocking agents in the maintenance of remission in patients with Crohn's disease.

SEARCH STRATEGY

MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and the IBD/FBD Review Group Specialized Trials Register were searched for relevant studies published between 1966-2007. Manual searches of references from potentially relevant papers were performed to identify additional studies. Experts in the field and study authors were contacted to identify unpublished data.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials involving patients > 18 years with Crohn's disease who had a clinical response or clinical remission with a TNF-alpha blocking agent, or patients with Crohn's disease in remission but unable to wean corticosteroids, who were then randomized to maintenance of remission with a TNF-alpha blocking agent or placebo

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two independent authors performed data extraction and assessment of the methodological quality of each trial. Outcome measures reported in the primary studies included clinical remission, clinical response, and steroid-sparing effects.

MAIN RESULTS

Nine studies met all inclusion criteria. Four different anti-TNF-alpha agents were evaluated (infliximab in 3 studies, CDP571 in 3 studies, adalimumab in 2 studies, and certolizumab in 1 study). There is evidence from three randomized controlled trials that infliximab maintains clinical remission (RR 2.50; 95% CI 1.64 to 3.80), maintains clinical response (RR 1.66; 95% CI 1.00 to 2.76), has corticosteroid-sparing effects (RR 3.13; 95% CI 1.25 to 7.81), and maintains fistula healing (RR 1.87; 95% CI 1.15 to 3.04) in patients with Crohn's disease with a response to infliximab induction therapy. There were no significant differences in remission rates between infliximab doses of 5 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg. There is evidence from two randomized controlled trials that adalimumab maintains clinical remission (RR 2.86; 95% CI 2.01 to 4.02), maintains clinical response (RR 2.69; 95% CI 1.88 to 3.86), and has corticosteroid-sparing effects (RR 2.81, 95% CI 1.46 to 5.43) in patients with Crohn's disease who have responded or entered remission with adalimumab induction therapy. There were no significant differences in remission rates between adalimumab 40 mg weekly or every other week. There is evidence from one randomized controlled trial that certolizumab pegol maintains clinical remission (RR 1.68; 95% CI 1.30 to 2.16) and maintains clinical response (RR 1.74; 95% CI 1.41 to 2.13) in patients who have responded to certolizumab induction therapy. There is no evidence to support the use of CDP571 for the maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Infliximab 5 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg, given every 8 weeks, is effective for the maintenance of remission and maintenance of fistula healing in patients who have responded to infliximab induction therapy. Adalimumab 40 mg weekly or every other week is effective for the maintenance of remission in patients who have responded to adalimumab induction therapy. Certolizumab pegol 400 mg every 4 weeks is effective for the maintenance of remission in patients who have responded to certolizumab induction therapy. No comparative trials have evaluated the relative efficacy of these agents. Adverse events are similar in the infliximab, adalimumab, and certolizumab groups compared with placebo, but study size and duration generally are insufficient to allow an adequate assessment of serious adverse events associated with long-term use.

Treatment of inflammatory bowel disease: a review of medical therapy

Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) are chronic inflammatory diseases of the gastrointestinal tract. While a cure remains elusive, both can be treated with medications that induce and maintain remission. With the recent advent of therapies that inhibit tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alpha the overlap in medical therapies for UC and CD has become greater. Although 5-ASA agents have been a mainstay in the treatment of both CD and UC, the data for their efficacy in patients with CD, particularly as maintenance therapy, are equivocal. Antibiotics may have a limited role in the treatment of colonic CD. Steroids continue to be the first choice to treat active disease not responsive to other more conservative therapy; non-systemic steroids such as oral and rectal budesonide for ileal and right-sided CD and distal UC respectively are also effective in mild-moderate disease. 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) and its prodrug azathioprine are steroid-sparing immunomodulators effective in the maintenance of remission of both CD and UC, while methotrexate may be used in both induction and maintenance of CD. Infliximab and adalimumab are anti-TNF agents approved in the US and Europe for the treatment of Crohn's disease, and infliximab is also approved for the treatment of UC.

Review article: the evidence base for interventions used to maintain remission in Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND

Crohn's disease is characterised by recurrent flare-ups alternating with periods of remission. A number of interventions are currently used in clinical practice to try and maintain remission in Crohn's disease but the evidence base for some of them may be questionable.

AIM

To review the available evidence on interventions, which are currently used to maintain remission in Crohn's disease.

METHODS

The Cochrane Library and Medline (Pubmed) were searched for level 1 evidence on specific interventions. Search terms included 'Crohn's disease or synonyms', 'remission or synonyms' and the names of specific interventions.

RESULTS

Azathioprine, infliximab and adalimumab are effective at maintaining remission in Crohn's disease. Natalizumab is also effective, but there are concerns about its potential association with progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. Long-term enteral nutritional supplementation, enteric-coated omega-3 fatty acids and intramuscular methotrexate may also be effective but the evidence for these is based on relatively small studies. The available evidence does not support the use of oral 5-aminosalicylates agents, corticosteroids, anti-mycobacterial agents, probiotics or ciclosporin as maintenance therapy in Crohn's disease.

CONCLUSION

A better understanding of the evidence base of existing interventions could result in the use of treatments, which are more likely to lead to improved patient outcomes.