Clinical significance of oncogenic KIT and PDGFRA mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumours

Spectrum of KIT/PDGFRA/BRAF mutations and Phosphatidylinositol-3-Kinase pathway gene alterations in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST)

Pathogenetic pathways of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) lacking mutations in KIT and PDGFRA (∼15%) are still poorly studied. Nearly nothing is known about PI3K alterations in GISTs and only a few GISTs with BRAF mutations have been reported. BRAF mutations (V600E) were found in 3/87 tumors (3.5%) concomitantly were wild type for KIT and PDGFRA. No mutations were detected in KRAS, NRAS, and FGFR3. For the first-time we demonstrated a PIK3CA mutation (H1047L) simultaneously occurring with a 15-bp deletion in KIT exon 11 in one tumor. We suggest that BRAF mutations are of pathogenetic significance in wild type GISTs. The PI3K pathway should be assessed in future studies.

Evaluation of prognostic factors and their capacity to predict biological behavior in gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are c-KIT-signaling-driven mesenchymal tumors of the human digestive tract, many of which have c-KIT or PDGFRα activating mutations. The authors studied the immunohistochemical markers, c-KIT and PDGFRα mutations, in GISTs and their association with the clinicopathological and clinical follow-up in 145 GISTs. Tumors were located mainly in the stomach, the median tumor size being 7.5 cm. The mitotic index was ≤5 mitoses per 50 high-power fields in 61% of cases, 96% expressed CD117, and c-KIT or PDGFRα mutations were detected in 68% of cases. The median follow-up of the series was 52 months (range = 1 to 244.9 months). Tumor size, cell morphology, mitotic index, incomplete resection, Fletcher's risk classification, Ki-67 overexpression, and c-KIT mutations were associated with progression-free survival. Incomplete resection and mitotic activity also provide information about overall survival. In conclusion, complete clinicopathological, immunohistochemical, and genetic descriptions are necessary to characterize this disease and optimize its clinical management.

Mechanisms of drug resistance in kinases

INTRODUCTION

because of their important roles in disease and excellent 'druggability', kinases have become the second largest drug target family. The great success of the BCR-ABL inhibitor imatinib in treating chronic myelogenous leukemia illustrates the high potential of kinase inhibitor (KI) therapeutics, but also unveils a major limitation: the development of drug resistance. This is a significant concern as KIs reach large patient populations for an expanding array of indications.

AREAS COVERED

we provide an up-to-date understanding of the mechanisms through which KIs function and through which cells can become KI-resistant. We review current and future approaches to overcome KI resistance, focusing on currently approved KIs and KIs in clinical trials. We then discuss approaches to improve KI efficacy and overcome drug resistance and novel approaches to develop less drug resistance-prone KI therapeutics.

EXPERT OPINION

although drug resistance is a concern for current KI therapeutics, recent progress in our understanding of the underlying mechanisms and promising technological advances may overcome this limitation and provide powerful new therapeutics.

Validation of the Joensuu risk criteria for primary resectable gastrointestinal stromal tumour - the impact of tumour rupture on patient outcomes

BACKGROUND

Approval of imatinib for adjuvant treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) raised discussion about accuracy of prognostic factors in GIST and the clinical significance of the available risk stratification criteria.

METHODS

We studied the influence of a new modification of the NIH Consensus Criteria (the Joensuu risk criteria), NCCN-AFIP criteria, and several clinicopathological factors, including tumour rupture, on relapse-free survival (RFS) in a prospectively collected tumour registry series consisting of 640 consecutive patients with primary, resectable, CD117-immunopositive GIST. The median follow-up time after tumour resection was 39 months. None of the patients received adjuvant imatinib.

RESULTS

The median RFS time after surgery was 50 months. In univariable analyses, high Joensuu risk group, tumour mitotic count >5/50 HPF, size >5 cm, non-gastric location, tumour rupture (7% of cases; P = 0.0014) and male gender had adverse influence on RFS. In a multivariable analysis mitotic count >5/50HPF, tumour size >5 cm and non-gastric location were independent adverse prognostic factors. Forty, 151, 86 and 348 patients were assigned according to the Joensuu criteria to very low, low, intermediate and high risk groups and had 5-year RFS of 94%, 94%, 86% and 29%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The Joensuu criteria, which include 4 prognostic factors (tumour size, site, mitotic count and rupture) and 3 categories for the mitotic count, were found to be a reliable tool for assessing prognosis of operable GIST. The Joensuu criteria identified particularly well high risk patients, who are likely the proper candidates for adjuvant therapy.

Targeted therapy in GIST: in silico modeling for prediction of resistance

Elucidation of the genetic processes leading to neoplastic transformation has identified cancer-promoting molecular alterations that can be selectively targeted by rationally designed therapeutic agents. Protein kinases are druggable targets and have been studied intensively. New methodologies--including crystallography and three-dimensional modeling--have allowed the rational design of potent and selective kinase inhibitors that have already reached the clinical stage. However, despite the clinical success of kinase-targeted therapies, most patients that respond eventually relapse as a result of acquired resistance. Darwinian-type selection of secondary mutations seems to have a major role in this resistance. The emergence and/or expansion of tumor clones containing new mutations in the target kinase and that are drug-insensitive have been observed after chronic treatment. The resistance mechanisms to tyrosine kinase inhibitors, in particular secondary resistant mutations as a consequence of treatment, will be discussed in detail. In particular, this Review will focus on KIT and PDGFRA mutations, which are involved in the pathogenesis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Harnessing the selection of mutated variants developed to overcome these resistance mechanisms is an ongoing goal of current research and new strategies to overcome drug resistance is being envisaged.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours--an update for histopathologists

This review aims to summarize recent knowledge gained about gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) of particular relevance to histopathologists. KIT and PDGFRA mutation analyses can be useful for confirming a diagnosis of GIST, but there are some diagnostic limitations to these analyses, and so immunohistochemical markers currently remain crucial to the diagnostic process. Of these markers, CD117 and Discovered on GIST 1 (DOG1) are currently the most sensitive and specific markers of GIST, and recent data appear to disprove the fear that antigen retrieval causes false-positive CD117 immunostaining. The accurate prognostication of GIST has been greatly helped by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP) classification systems, although both systems still have limitations, and the behaviours of certain GIST subgroups are less well predicted by both systems. KIT and PDGFRA mutation analyses can help to predict the response of GISTs to receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and both GISTs that respond and those that show resistance to these inhibitors may show characteristic pathological changes. Some GIST subgroups (e.g. Carney syndrome and paediatric GISTs) have had recently described clinicopathological and/or molecular characteristics which may help with the diagnosis and/or treatment of these specific neoplasms.

Current and emerging pharmacological treatments for gastrointestinal stromal tumour

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) are the most common mesenchymal tumours of the gastrointestinal tract, previously classified as leiomyosarcomas. Most GIST express KIT and the majority have mutations in the KIT gene. The most common KIT mutation occurs in the juxtamembrane domain of exon 11. These mutations lead to cellular proliferation and survival. GIST with exon 11 mutations respond better to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) than those with exon 9 mutations. Most KIT-negative GIST express platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR)-α; however, a small percentage of GIST are negative for both KIT and PDGFRα. Imatinib and other TKIs have dramatically improved the outcome of patients with metastatic GIST. Newer and more advanced TKIs are under intense investigation as eventually all GIST patients develop resistant tumours. In addition, these drugs can be utilized in the preoperative setting for patients with unresectable localized tumours or those at high risk for surgical morbidity. TKIs have been given in the adjuvant setting for patients with resected tumours at high risk for recurrence. The duration of adjuvant therapy is currently under evaluation; however, it is possible that these patients would need to continue therapy indefinitely.

The role of mutational analysis of KIT and PDGFRA in gastrointestinal stromal tumors in a clinical setting

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. Most GIST harbor a mutation affecting either the KIT or PDGFRA genes, whereas a small subgroup of tumors is wild type for mutations.Mutation of tyrosine kinase receptors is a mechanism of drug resistance that can occur either at the beginning of treatment (primary resistance) or during the course of therapy (secondary resistance). In addition, mutational status can predict the response to treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors, but the role of mutational status as a prognostic factor remains controversial.Evidence of a potential role of mutational status as a prognostic factor has emerged over the past decade. The presence of KIT exon 11 insertion/deletion involving either one or both Trp557-Lys558 amino acids correlates with a poorer clinical outcome if compared to patients with tumors wild type for KIT exon 11 mutations. A malignant clinical behavior has also been documented for KIT exon 13 and KIT exon 9 mutant GIST. Patients with GIST harboring a PDGFRA mutation seem to have a better prognosis than the others.The aim of this paper is to review the clinical significance of tyrosine kinase mutational status.

A quality control program for mutation detection in KIT and PDGFRA in gastrointestinal stromal tumours

BACKGROUND

Although most gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) carry oncogenic mutations in KIT exons 9, 11, 13 and 17, or in platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA) exons 12, 14 and 18, around 10% of GIST are free of these mutations. Genotyping and accurate detection of KIT/PDGFRA mutations in GIST are becoming increasingly useful for clinicians in the management of the disease.

METHOD

To evaluate and improve laboratory practice in GIST mutation detection, we developed a mutational screening quality control program. Eleven laboratories were enrolled in this program and 50 DNA samples were analysed, each of them by four different laboratories, giving 200 mutational reports.

RESULTS

In total, eight mutations were not detected by at least one laboratory. One false positive result was reported in one sample. Thus, the mean global rate of error with clinical implication based on 200 reports was 4.5%. Concerning specific polymorphisms detection, the rate varied from 0 to 100%, depending on the laboratory. The way mutations were reported was very heterogeneous, and some errors were detected.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that such a program was necessary for laboratories to improve the quality of the analysis, because an error rate of 4.5% may have clinical consequences for the patient.

Molecular Diagnostics of Soft Tissue Tumors

Context.—Soft tissue pathology encompasses a remarkably diverse assortment of benign and malignant soft tissue tumors. Rendering a definitive diagnosis is complicated not only by the large volume of existing histologic subtypes (>100) but also frequently by the presence of overlapping clinical, histologic, immunohistochemical, and/or radiographic features. During the past 3 decades, mesenchymal tumor–specific, cytogenetic and molecular genetic abnormalities have demonstrated an increasingly important, ancillary role in mesenchymal tumor diagnostics.

Objectives.—To review molecular diagnostic tools available to the pathologist to further classify specific soft tissue tumor types and recurrent aberrations frequently examined. Advantages and limitations of individual approaches will also be highlighted.

Data Sources.—Previously published review articles, peer-reviewed research publications, and the extensive cytogenetic and molecular diagnostic experience of the authors to include case files of The University of Nebraska Medical Center.

Conclusions.—Cytogenetic and molecular genetic assays are used routinely for diagnostic purposes in soft tissue pathology and represent a powerful adjunct to complement conventional microscopy and clinicoradiographic evaluation in the formulation of an accurate diagnosis. Care should be taken, however, to recognize the limitations of these approaches. Ideally, more than one technical approach should be available to a diagnostic laboratory to compensate for the shortcomings of each approach in the assessment of individual specimens.

Small-Intestinal Rhabdoid Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST)

Rhabdoid features in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare. To the authors’ knowledge, only 51 cases have been reported. Most of these reports consist of case series in which the rhabdoid GISTs comprise a small proportion of the tumors studied. Information regarding site of origin and clinical behavior is sparse. Although the stomach is the only site of origin documented, most reports do not include this data. Malignancy has not been reported, though follow-up is inadequate in most cases to comment on tumor behavior. Exon 11 mutations comprise all previously described KIT mutations, the majority of which are deletions. The authors present the case of a malignant small-intestinal rhabdoid GIST that recurred twice following resection and treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. The tumor harbored a KIT exon 11, 579-580 LY insertion that, to the authors’ knowledge, has not been previously reported. This case is the first rhabdoid GIST described in the small intestine and is the first to show documented evidence of malignancy.

Prognostic value of KIT/PDGFRA mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST): Polish Clinical GIST Registry experience

BACKGROUND

Majority of gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) are characterised by KIT-immunopositivity and the presence of KIT/platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA) activating mutations.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Spectrum and frequency of KIT and PDGFRA mutations were investigated in 427 GISTs. Univariate and multivariate analysis of relapse-free survival (RFS) was conducted in relation to tumours' clinicopathologic features and genotype.

RESULTS

Mutations were found in 351 (82.2%) cases, including 296 (69.3%) KIT and 55 (12.9%) PDGFRA isoforms. Univariate analysis revealed higher 5-year RFS rate in women (37.9%; P = 0.028) and in patients with gastric tumours (46.3%; P < 0.001). In addition a better 5-year RFS correlated with smaller tumour size ≤ 5 cm (62.7%; P < 0.001), tumours with mitotic index ≤ 5/50 high-power fields (60%; P < 0.001), and characterised by (very) low/moderate risk (70.2%; P = 0.006). Patients with GISTs bearing deletions encompassing KIT codons 557/558 had worse 5-year RFS rate (23.8%) than those with any other KIT exon 11 mutations (41.8%; P < 0.001) or deletions not involving codons 557/558 (33.3%; P = 0.007). Better 5-year RFS characterised patients with KIT exon 11 point mutations (50.7%) or duplications (40%). By multivariate analysis, tumours with PDGFRA mutations and KIT exon 11 point mutations/other than 557/558 deletions had lower risk of progression than with KIT exon 11 557/558 deletions (both Ps = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

KIT/PDGFRA mutational status has prognostic significance for patients' outcome and may help in management of patients with GISTs.

A Malignant Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor of the Gallbladder Immunoreactive for PDGFRA and Negative for CD 117 Antigen (c-KIT)

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) compose the largest category of well-recognized nonepithelial neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract (GI). GISTs of the gallbladder are extremely rare tumors. Only four malignant, two benign and one GIST-like tumor of the gall bladder have ever been described. The four malignant GISTs were all positive for CD 117 antigen (c-kit). We present for the first time a malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the gallbladder, immunoreactive for platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA) and negative for CD 117 antigen (c-KIT).

A case of mast cell leukaemia with exon 9 KIT mutation and good response to imatinib

BACKGROUND

Mastocytosis is a myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by the excessive proliferation of mast cells. Mast cell leukaemia (MCL), the aggressive form of this disease, requires cytoreductive therapy, such as cladribine, interferon-alpha-2b and, most recently, tyrosine kinase inhibitors - dasatinib or imatinib.

PATIENT AND METHODS

We present a case of a 56-yr-old female patient with aleukaemic MCL in whom the typical KIT-D816V mutation was not detected. Sequencing of the entire coding sequence of KIT gene revealed a somatic mutation in exon 9 (p.A502_Y503dup). This mutation was previously reported in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST). Considering the good response to imatinib in such patients, therapy with imatinib was attempted in our patient. The treatment tolerance and outcomes were very good, with reduced mast cell infiltration of the bone marrow, normalization of the serum tryptase concentration and resolution of the clinical signs and symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

In the absence of the KIT-D816V in systemic forms of mast cell proliferation, a search for other mutations is indicated, preferably by sequencing the entire KIT gene, as this can influence the choice of treatment. The finding of the p.A502_Y503dup in exon 9, a mutation which has been observed in GIST but not previously reported in any form of aggressive mastocytosis, can be associated with a good response to imatinib in both diseases.

[Multilayer analysis of signal transduction and cell cycle control in GIST. Identifying new interaction partners with differential regulation]

To identify new interactions as well as diagnostically, prognostically and therapeutically relevant differences in the regulation of gene expression in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), we analyzed the methylation status, mRNA expression, microRNA expression, protein expression and protein phosphorylation in parallel in identical tumor tissue samples. The data were analyzed in a multilayer approach and were correlated to each other and to clinico-pathological parameters. Differentially regulated genes were mapped to signal transduction pathways which are already known to play a major role in GISTs. A functionally orientated overview of the different data layers was constructed, which enabled new insights into gene regulation in GISTs.

Mutational status of KIT and PDGFRA and expression of PDGFRA are not associated with prognosis after curative resection of primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs)

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to investigate if immunohistochemical expression and mutational status of KIT and PDGFRA in GISTs are associated with the clinical course and disease-free survival after curative resection of the primary tumor without adjuvant systemic therapy.

METHODS

Paraffin-embedded tumor sections of 95 GISTs were analyzed for KIT and PDGFRA expression by immunohistochemistry. PDGFRA expression was judged using a scoring system subdividing tumors in negative/weak and strong immunoreactivity groups. For mutation analysis, exons 9, 10, 11, 13, and 17 of KIT and exons 10, 12, 14, and 18 of PDGFRA were sequenced.

RESULTS

Of 95 R0-resected GISTs, 69% showed strong PDGFRA immunoreactivity. Gastric GISTs revealed a significantly higher rate of strong PDGFRA immunoreactivity (P = 0.01) and longer DFS (P = 0.015) than GISTs of the small intestine. KIT mutations were detected in 43 of 63 (68.3%) completely sequenced cases while PDGFRA mutations were identified in 6 cases (10%). In multivariate analysis, neither KIT/PDGFRA expression nor mutational status of KIT or PDGFRA were independent prognostic factors. Only mitotic rate predicted recurrence independently.

CONCLUSION

Our data do not support the notion that expression of PDGFRA or mutations in KIT or PDGFRA are independent prognostic factors after curative resection of primary GIST.

Mutational spectrum and therapy response of metastasized GIST in Central Switzerland - a population-based study

BACKGROUND

Until now, no population-based studies investigated the mutational status of primary GIST (PT) and corresponding metastases and correlated these data with response to Imatinib or Sunitinib therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a retrospective observation study, all metastatic GISTs of the last 15years of our institution were investigated for mutations in c-kit and in PDGFRα gene in each PT and corresponding metastasis. Correlation with clinical outcome and response to Imatinib or Sunitinib therapy was performed.

RESULTS

In 13 PT c-kit mutations in exon 9 (3), exon 11 (7) and exon 13 (1), 2 wild type genotypes, and no PDGFRα mutation were detected. In three metastases a switch from heterozygosity to homozygosity and one additional exon 13 mutation was observed. All 10 persons with available follow-up received Imatinib as first-line chemotherapy. Five of them (3 exon 9 mutations, 1 wild type, 1 additional exon 13 mutation) stopped Imatinib due to tumour progression. In three cases, Sunitinib as second-line chemotherapy was ended due to the same reasons.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data support previous observations, that PDGFRα mutations play no important role in metastasized GISTs. The influence of Imatinib and Sunitinib therapy in metastasized GISTs with wild type genotype and c-kit exon 9 mutations needs further investigation.

Succinate Dehydrogenase Subunit B (SDHB) Is Expressed in Neurofibromatosis 1-Associated Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (Gists): Implications for the SDHB Expression Based Classification of Gists

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST) is the most common mesenchymal tumor of the digestive tract. GISTs develop with relatively high incidence in patients with Neurofibromatosis-1 syndrome (NF1). Mutational activation of KIT or PDGFRA is believed to be a driving force in the pathogenesis of familial and sporadic GISTs. Unlike those tumors, NF1-associated GISTs do not have KIT or PGDFRA mutations. Similarly, no mutational activation of KIT or PDGFRA has been identified in pediatric GISTs and in GISTs associated with Carney Triad and Carney-Stratakis Syndrome. KIT and PDGFRA-wild type tumors are expected to have lesser response to imatinib treatment. Recently, Carney Triad and Carney-Stratakis Syndrome -associated GISTs and pediatric GISTs have been shown to have a loss of expression of succinate dehydrogenase subunit B (SDHB), a Krebs cycle/electron transport chain interface protein. It was proposed that GISTs can be divided into SDHB- positive (type 1), and SDHB-negative (type 2) tumors because of similarities in clinical features and response to imatinib treatment. In this study, SDHB expression was examined immunohistochemically in 22 well-characterized NF1-associated GISTs. All analyzed tumors expressed SDHB. Based on SDHB-expression status, NF1-associated GISTs belong to type 1 category; however, similarly to SDHB type 2 tumors, they do not respond well to imatinib treatment. Therefore, a simple categorization of GISTs into SDHB-positive and-negative seems to be incomplete. A classification based on both SDHB expression status and KIT and PDGFRA mutation status characterize GISTs more accurately and allow subdivision of SDHB-positive tumors into different clinico-genetic categories.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: morphological, immunohistochemical and molecular changes associated with kinase inhibitor therapy

Recurrent or metastatic GISTs are currently treated with kinase inhibitors since they achieves disease control in 70-85% of patients but this response depend on KIT and PDGFRA gene mutation status. We review the morfological and molecular findings associated to kinase inhibitors administration in GISTs based on the literature on Medline and authors' own experience. The initial response to kinase inhibitors (imatinib mesylate, Gleevec, Novartis) usually is partial and depend on the mutational KIT or PDGFRA state. Amongst patients wih KIT mutations, the best results are achived in those harboring exon 11 (85%) and exon 9 (45%) mutations. GISTs harboring PDGFRA gene mutations generally respond favorably except those involving the Asp842Val mutation. In the absence of KIT/PDGFRA gene mutations, partial response or disease stabilization is reported in 23% and 50% of patients, respectively, and disease progression in 19%. Histological examination of tumors displaying an initial response to imatinib reveals a highly-variable reduction in the number of tumor cells, a decline in the proliferative index, myxohyaline or sclerohyaline stroma, and a varying degree of bleeding and edema, necrosis and cystification. 72% of patients with initial good response to imatinib, display metastases or new nodule growth within an existing clinically-quiescent tumor after 12-36 months of treatment. This secondary resistance is characterized by a number of well-defined morphological and molecular changes. Histologically, the new growths display increased mitotic activity, pleomorphism, an epithelioid or mixed phenotype and persistent KIT expression although more rarely, dedifferentiation and loss of KIT expression (Fig. 4), as well as trans-differentiation into a rhabdomyosarcoma or epithelial phenotype has been reported. Molecularly, 46-67% of patients present additional KIT mutations, generally in the kinase domain (exons 13, 14 and 17) but also in the ATP-binding domain (exons 15,16) of the same allele. Secondary PDGFRA mutations are very rare. Secondary mutations have not been observed in GISTs not harboring KIT/PDGFRA mutations, or in tumors displaying an unusual morphology or loss of CD117 expression. A number of studies highlight the presence of different resistance mutations within different new tumor nodules, as well as the simultaneous development of distinct resistant tumor subclones within a single lesion (acquired polyclonal resistance). Secondary mutation in genes other than KIT/PDGFRA has only been reported in BRAF (Val600Glu).

Perspective on updated treatment guidelines for patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract and present predominantly in middle-aged and older individuals. Historically, the outlook for patients with GISTs was very poor because of the general lack of efficacy of conventional chemotherapy and the often limited surgical options. However, the recognition of the role of mutations of the v-kit Hardy/Zuckerman 4 feline sarcoma viral oncogene homolog KIT and the platelet derived growth factor receptor alpha gene PDGFRα in the development of GISTs led to the evaluation of potential antitumor effects of the tyrosine kinase inhibitors imatinib and, more recently, sunitinib. Consequently, these molecularly targeted therapies were introduced into clinical practice, and the outcome for patients with GISTs improved considerably. In the last few years, the European Society of Medical Oncology, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, and the Canadian Advisory Committee on GIST each published a major set of guidelines or practice recommendations for the management of patients with GIST. In the current review, the latest recommendations from each organization are summarized in terms of diagnosis and risk assessment, tumor staging, surgical and/or drug treatment of primary resectable and recurrent metastatic disease, and patient follow-up and assessment. In addition, areas of consensus and points of divergence among the guidelines are highlighted along with any unresolved issues.

A decade of tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy: Historical and current perspectives on targeted therapy for GIST

The introduction of molecularly targeted therapies has ushered in a considerable transformation in the management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) that currently defines the paradigm of targeted therapy for solid tumors. Indeed, in the past decade the management of GIST has evolved from a disease only effectively treatable by surgery to the archetype of a tumor treatable with a molecularly targeted therapy. Better understanding of the molecular and genetic characteristics that underlie the aberrant behavior of GIST has increased the accuracy of its diagnosis and allowed for the identification of distinct genetic hallmarks, prognostic groups, and treatment strategies. Collectively, this has resulted in the development of the targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) imatinib and sunitinib, and continues to prompt studies of novel agents in this disease. Since approval in 2002, imatinib has been shown to provide a high level of clinical efficacy in patients with advanced GIST, including a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 2 years and median overall survival approaching 5 years, with some patients progression-free after 10 years of treatment. Imatinib is now also approved in adult patients following resection of KIT-positive GIST. In 2006, sunitinib was approved for the treatment of advanced GIST after failure of imatinib. Sunitinib provides significant benefit in this setting, with a median PFS close to 6 months after imatinib failure. Following progression on these agents, patients have limited treatment options. This critical unmet need is being addressed by the development of new TKIs and the use of novel regimens with approved agents.

Downsizing treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors improved resectability

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) express the receptor tyrosine kinase KIT. Most GISTs have mutations in the KIT or PDGFRA gene, causing activation of tyrosine kinase. Imatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), is the first-line palliative treatment for advanced GISTs. Sunitinib was introduced for patients with mutations not responsive to imatinib. The aim was to compare the survival of patients with high-risk resected GISTs treated with TKI prior to surgery with historical controls and to determine if organ-preserving surgery was facilitated.

METHODS

Ten high-risk GIST-patients had downsizing/adjuvant TKI treatment: nine with imatinib and one with sunitinib. The patients were matched with historical controls (n = 89) treated with surgery alone, from our population-based series (n = 259). Mutational analysis of KIT and PDGFRA was performed in all cases. The progression-free survival was calculated.

RESULTS

The primary tumors decreased in mean diameter from 20.4 cm to 10.5 cm on downsizing imatinib. Four patients with R0 resection and a period of adjuvant imatinib had no recurrences versus 67% in the historical control group. Four patients with residual liver metastases have stable disease on continuous imatinib treatment after surgery. One patient has undergone reoperation with liver resection. The downsizing treatment led to organ-preserving surgery in nine patients and improved preoperative nutritional status in one patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Downsizing TKI is recommended for patients with bulky tumors with invasion of adjacent organs. Sunitinib can be used for patients in case of imatinib resistance (e.g., wild-type GISTs), underlining the importance of mutational analysis for optimal surgical planning.

qPCR in gastrointestinal stromal tumors: Evaluation of reference genes and expression analysis of KIT and the alternative receptor tyrosine kinases FLT3, CSF1-R, PDGFRB, MET and AXL

Background

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) represent the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. About 85% carry an activating mutation in the KIT or PDGFRA gene. Approximately 10% of GIST are so-called wild type GIST (wt-GIST) without mutations in the hot spots. In the present study we evaluated appropriate reference genes for the expression analysis of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded and fresh frozen samples from gastrointestinal stromal tumors. We evaluated the gene expression of KIT as well as of the alternative receptor tyrosine kinase genes FLT3, CSF1-R, PDGFRB, AXL and MET by qPCR. wt-GIST were compared to samples with mutations in KIT exon 9 and 11 and PDGFRA exon 18 in order to evaluate whether overexpression of these alternative RTK might contribute to the pathogenesis of wt-GIST.

Results

Gene expression variability of the pooled cDNA samples is much lower than the single reverse transcription cDNA synthesis. By combining the lowest variability values of fixed and fresh tissue, the genes POLR2A, PPIA, RPLPO and TFRC were chosen for further analysis of the GIST samples. Overexpression of KIT compared to the corresponding normal tissue was detected in each GIST subgroup except in GIST with PDGFRA exon 18 mutation. Comparing our sample groups, no significant differences in the gene expression levels of FLT3, CSF1R and AXL were determined. An exception was the sample group with KIT exon 9 mutation. A significantly reduced expression of CSF1R, FLT3 and PDGFRB compared to the normal tissue was detected. GIST with mutations in KIT exon 9 and 11 and in PDGFRA exon 18 showed a significant PDGFRB downregulation.

Conclusions

As the variability of expression levels for the reference genes is very high comparing fresh frozen and formalin-fixed tissue there is a strong need for validation in each tissue type. None of the alternative receptor tyrosine kinases analyzed is associated with the pathogenesis of wild-type or mutated GIST. It remains to be clarified whether an autocrine or paracrine mechanism by overexpression of receptor tyrosine kinase ligands is responsible for the tumorigenesis of wt-GIST.

All-trans retinoic acid inhibits KIT activity and induces apoptosis in gastrointestinal stromal tumor GIST-T1 cell line by affecting on the expression of survivin and Bax protein

BACKGROUND

Imatinib, a selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has been used as a standard first-line therapy for irresectable and metastasized gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) patients. Unfortunately, most patients responding to imatinib will eventually exhibit imatinib-resistance, the cause of which is not fully understood. The serious clinical problem of imatinib-resistance demands alternative therapeutic strategy. This study was conducted to investigate the effect of all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) on GIST cell lines.

METHODS

Cell proliferation was determined by trypan blue dye exclusion test. Western blot analysis was performed to test the expression of activated KIT, its downstream proteins, and apoptosis associated proteins. The cytotoxic interactions of imatinib with ATRA were evaluated using the isobologram of Steel and Peckham.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

In this work, for the first time we have demonstrated that ATRA affected on cell proliferation of GIST-T1 and GIST-882 cell line through inhibition of cell growth in a dose dependent manner and induced apoptosis. High dose of ATRA induced morphologic change in GIST-T1 cells, rounded-up cells, and activated the caspase-3 protein. In further examination, we found that the ATRA-induced apoptosis in GIST-T1 cells was accompanied by the down-regulated expression of survivin and up-regulated expression of Bax protein. Moreover, ATRA suppressed the activity of KIT protein in GIST-T1 cells and its downstream signal, AKT activity, but not MAPK activity. We also have demonstrated that combination of ATRA with imatinib showed additive effect by isobologram, suggesting that the combination of ATRA and imatinib may be a novel potential therapeutic option for GIST treatment. Furthermore, the scracht assay result suggested that ATRA was a potential reagent to prevent the invasion or metastasis of GIST cells.

Systemic Mastocytosis

An unusual disease, mastocytosis challenges the pathologist with a variety of morphologic appearances and heterogeneous clinical presentations ranging from skin manifestations (pruritus, urticaria, dermatographism) to systemic signs and symptoms indicative of mast cell mediator release, including flushing, hypotension, headache, and anaphylaxis among others. In this article, we focus on recognizing the cytology, histopathology, clinical features, and prognostic implications of systemic mastocytosis, a clonal and neoplastic mast cell proliferation infiltrating extracutaneous organ(s) with or without skin involvement. Diagnostic pitfalls are reviewed with ancillary studies to help unmask the mast cell and exclude morphologic mimics.

Implications of mutational analysis for the management of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors and the application of targeted therapies

The receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors, imatinib and sunitinib, have significantly improved the prognosis for patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Most GISTs exhibit mutations in the genes encoding the stem cell factor receptor (KIT) or platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA). Imatinib is more effective in patients with KIT exon 11 mutations compared with KIT exon 9 mutations and wild-type genotype, while sunitinib confers greater in vitro efficacy in patients with KIT exon 9 mutants and wild-type genotype than in KIT exon 11 mutants. This review examines the potential role of mutational analysis to optimize therapy with imatinib and sunitinib for GIST.

Synergistic induction of apoptosis by the Bcl-2 inhibitor ABT-737 and imatinib mesylate in gastrointestinal stromal tumor cells

BACKGROUND

Although imatinib mesylate has revolutionized the management of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), resistance and progression almost inevitably develop with long-term monotherapy. To enhance imatinib-induced cytotoxicity and overcome imatinib-resistance in GIST cells, we examined the antitumor effects of the pro-apoptotic Bcl-2/Bcl-x(L) inhibitor ABT-737, alone and in combination with imatinib.

METHODS

We treated imatinib-sensitive, GIST-T1 and GIST882, and imatinib-resistant cells with ABT-737 alone and with imatinib. We determined the anti-proliferative and apoptotic effects by cell viability assay, flow cytometric apoptosis and cell cycle analysis, immunoblotting, and nuclear morphology. Synergism was determined by isobologram analysis.

RESULTS

The IC(50) of single-agent ABT-737 at 72 h was 10 μM in imatinib-sensitive GIST-T1 and GIST882 cells, and 1 μM in imatinib-resistant GIST48IM cells. ABT-737 and imatinib combined synergistically in a time- and dose-dependent manner to inhibit the proliferation and induce apoptosis of all GIST cells, as evidenced by cell viability and apoptosis assays, caspase activation, PARP cleavage, and morphologic changes. Isobologram analyses revealed strongly synergistic drug interactions, with combination indices <0.5 for most ABT-737/imatinib combinations. Thus, clinically relevant in vitro concentrations of ABT-737 have single-agent antitumor activity and are synergistic in combination with imatinib.

CONCLUSION

We provide the first preclinical evidence that Bcl-2/Bcl-x(L) inhibition with ABT-737 synergistically enhances imatinib-induced cytotoxicity via apoptosis, and that direct engagement of apoptotic cell death may be an effective approach to circumvent imatinib-resistance in GIST.

Molecular and clinicopathologic characterization of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) of small size

Although Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) affect about 0.0014% of the population, GISTs smaller than 1 cm (microGISTs) are detectable in about 20% to 30% of elderly individuals. This suggests that microGISTs likely represent premalignant precursors that evolve only in a minute fraction of cases toward overt GISTs. We sought histopathologic and molecular explanations for the infrequent clinical progression in small GISTs. To investigate the mechanisms of GIST progression and identify subsets with differential malignant potential, we carried out a thorough characterization of 170 GISTs <2 cm and compared their KIT/PDGFRA status with overt GISTs. The proliferation was lower in microGISTs compared with GISTs from 1 to 2 cm (milliGISTs). In addition, microGISTs were more frequently incidental, gastric, spindle, showed an infiltrative growth pattern, a lower degree of cellularity, and abundant sclerosis. The progression was limited to 1 ileal and 1 rectal milliGISTs. KIT/PDGFRA mutations were detected in 74% of the cases. The overall frequency of KIT/PDGFRA mutation and, particularly, the frequency of KIT exon 11 mutations was significantly lower in small GISTs compared with overt GISTs. Five novel mutations, 3 in KIT (p.Phe506Leu, p.Ser692Leu, p.Glu695Lys) 2 in PDGFRA (p.Ser847X, p.Ser667Pro), plus 4 double mutations were identified. Small GISTs share with overt GIST KIT/PDGFRA mutation. Nevertheless, microGISTs display an overall lower frequency of mutations, particularly canonical KIT mutations, and also carry rare and novel mutations. These molecular features, together with the peculiar pathologic characteristics, suggest that the proliferation of these lesions is likely sustained by weakly pathogenic molecular events, supporting the epidemiologic evidence that microGISTs are self-limiting lesions.

High resolution analysis of follicular lymphoma genomes reveals somatic recurrent sites of copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity and copy number alterations that target single genes

A multiplatform approach, including conventional cytogenetic techniques, BAC array comparative genomic hybridization, and Affymetrix 500K SNP arrays, was applied to the study of the tumor genomes of 25 follicular lymphoma biopsy samples with paired normal DNA samples to characterize balanced translocations, copy number imbalances, and copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity (cnLOH). In addition to the t(14;18), eight unique balanced translocations were found. Commonly reported FL-associated copy number regions were revealed including losses of 1p32-36, 6q, and 10q, and gains of 1q, 6p, 7, 12, 18, and X. The most frequent regions affected by copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity were 1p36.33 (28%), 6p21.3 (20%), 12q21.2-q24.33 (16%), and 16p13.3 (24%). We also identified by SNP analysis, 45 aberrant regions that each affected one gene, including CDKN2A, CDKN2B, FHIT, KIT, PEX14, and PTPRD, which were associated with canonical pathways involved in tumor development. This study illustrates the power of using complementary high-resolution platforms on paired tumor/normal specimens and computational analysis to provide potential insights into the significance of single-gene somatic aberrations in FL tumorigenesis.

[Molecular biological evaluation of prognostic parameters in GIST. Development of an integrative model of tumor progression]

Prognosis evaluation in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) is currently based on tumor diameter, mitotic counts and anatomic localisation. There are two risk classifications as well as the first ever TNM classification for GISTs, whereby the risk classification according to the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP) has the best correlation with clinical follow-up according to own experiences. "Very low/low risk" GISTs are almost benign, while the majority of "high risk" GISTs metastasize and benefit from adjuvant therapy. Careful evaluation of mitotic counts in 50 high-power fields is of particular relevance for correct risk classification. Apart from these classical prognostic factors, many molecular genetic parameters with correlation to follow-up have been evaluated and may help to improve prognosis evaluation of GISTs in the future. Since most of the molecular genetic parameters are associated or even determined by the clinico-pathological parameters, an integrated model for tumor progression of GISTs is helpful to interpret the different factors in correlation to one another. In particular for "intermediate risk" GISTs, additional parameters are needed for improved prognosis evaluation.

Familial gastrointestinal stromal tumor with germ line mutation of the juxtamembrane domain of the KIT gene observed in relatively young women

Familial gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is an extremely rare autosomal dominant disorder, and approximately 20 families have been reported to date. In this article, we present one additional family. A 25-year-old Japanese woman presented with abdominal pain, and subsequent image analyses disclosed multiple tumors measuring 12 cm in maximum diameter in the lower digestive tract. The postoperative histologic examination showed multiple GISTs and diffuse hyperplasia of interstitial cells of Cajal. Her mother had a history of GIST in the digestive tract. Three members of this family including her younger sister and mother had cutaneous hyperpigmentation of external genitalia and axilla. Their DNA samples showed identical missense mutation at exon 11 in the juxtamembrane domain of the KIT gene, and this mutation site was considered to be a hot spot in familial GIST. One year after, her younger sister suffered from multiple GISTs in the digestive tract at the age of 25 years. To correctly diagnose familial GIST, mutual information should be exchanged among clinicians, pathologists, and molecular scientists.

Pitfalls in mutational testing and reporting of common KIT and PDGFRA mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumors

BACKGROUND

Mutation analysis of KIT and PDGFRA genes in gastrointestinal stromal tumors is gaining increasing importance for prognosis of GISTs and for prediction of treatment response. Several groups have identified specific mutational subtypes in KIT exon 11 associated with an increased risk of metastatic disease whereas GISTs with PDGFRA mutations often behave less aggressive. Furthermore, in advanced GIST disease with proven KIT exon 9 mutation the doubled daily dose of 800 mg imatinib increases the progression free survival and is now recommended both in the European and the American Guidelines. In Germany, there are still no general rules how to perform mutational analysis.

METHODS

When comparing results from six different molecular laboratories we recognized the need of standardisation. Six German university laboratories with experience in mutation analysis in GISTs joined together to develop recommendations for the mutation analysis of the most common and clinically relevant hot spots, i. e. KIT exons 9 and 11 and PDGFRA exon 18. We performed a three-phased interlaboratory trial to identify pitfalls in performing molecular analysis in GISTs.

RESULTS

We developed a design for a continuous external laboratory trial. In 2009 this external trial was conducted by 19 laboratories via the initiative for quality assurance in pathology (QuiP) of the German Society of Pathology and the Professional Association of German Pathologists.

CONCLUSIONS

By performing a three-phased internal interlaboratory trial and conducting an external trial in Germany we were able to identify potential pitfalls when performing KIT and PDGFRA mutational analysis in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. We developed standard operation procedures which are provided with the manuscript to allow other laboratories to prevent these pitfalls.

Molecular basis and management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Molecularly targeted agents have dramatically impacted the management of several cancers. Targeting KIT has led to a new treatment paradigm in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). KIT is a cell surface receptor with tyrosine kinases that, upon binding of its ligand, stem cell factor, activates various signaling pathways. Imatinib and sunitinib, both tyrosine kinase inhibitors directed to KIT, were approved for first- and second-line treatment of metastatic and unresectable GISTs. In this article, we will review the molecular pathogenesis of GISTs followed by a discussion of imatinib and sunitinib’s role in the treatment of GISTs. Finally, we will introduce novel therapeutic options for imatinib- and sunitinib-resistant GISTs.

NCCN Task Force report: update on the management of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors

The standard of care for managing patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) rapidly changed after the introduction of effective molecularly targeted therapies involving tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), such as imatinib mesylate and sunitinib malate. A better understanding of the molecular characteristics of GISTs have improved the diagnostic accuracy and led to the discovery of novel immunomarkers and new mechanisms of resistance to TKI therapy, which in turn have resulted in the development of novel treatment strategies. To address these issues, the NCCN organized a task force consisting of a multidisciplinary panel of experts in the fields of medical oncology, surgical oncology, molecular diagnostics, and pathology to discuss the recent advances, identify areas of future research, and recommend an optimal approach to care for patients with GIST at all stages of disease. The task force met for the first time in October 2003 and again in December 2006 and October 2009. This supplement describes the recent developments in the field of GIST as discussed at the October 2009 meeting.

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Guide to the Diagnosis

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) have emerged from being a poorly understood and therapeutically refractory sarcoma to a tumor whose biology has not only provided insight into a mechanism of oncogenesis but has also led to a rational basis for therapy. Most GISTs are characterized by KIT protein (CD117) expression and constitutive activating mutations in either the c-kit or platelet-derived growth factor receptor α genes. This information can now be obtained from routine formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue. Because the correct diagnosis is the key to successful treatment of this tumor, it is incumbent on the pathologist to be familiar with the various gross and histologic patterns shown by these tumors. GISTs range from small incidental stromal nodules to large cystic and solid tumor masses. GISTs show a variety of microscopic patterns and therefore several other tumors enter the differential diagnosis. Fortunately, with an understanding of GIST histology, and with the proper use of immunohistochemistry and molecular analysis, a correct diagnosis can usually be made. In addition to the correct diagnosis, several key attributes of the tumor need to be determined because they provide the basis for proper clinical management. This article summarizes the gross, microscopic, and molecular findings of GISTs, and discusses the differential diagnosis and key attributes of this interesting group of neoplasms.

Chromosome copy number changes carry prognostic information independent of KIT/PDGFRA point mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumors

BACKGROUND

Oncogenic point mutations in KIT or PDGFRA are recognized as the primary events responsible for the pathogenesis of most gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), but additional genomic alterations are frequent and presumably required for tumor progression. The relative contribution of such alterations for the biology and clinical behavior of GIST, however, remains elusive.

METHODS

In the present study, somatic mutations in KIT and PDGFRA were evaluated by direct sequencing analysis in a consecutive series of 80 GIST patients. For a subset of 29 tumors, comparative genomic hybridization was additionally used to screen for chromosome copy number aberrations. Genotype and genomic findings were cross-tabulated and compared with available clinical and follow-up data.

RESULTS

We report an overall mutation frequency of 87.5%, with 76.25% of the tumors showing alterations in KIT and 11.25% in PDGFRA. Secondary KIT mutations were additionally found in two of four samples obtained after imatinib treatment. Chromosomal imbalances were detected in 25 out of 29 tumors (86%), namely losses at 14q (88% of abnormal cases), 22q (44%), 1p (44%), and 15q (36%), and gains at 1q (16%) and 12q (20%). In addition to clinico-pathological high-risk groups, patients with KIT mutations, genomic complexity, genomic gains and deletions at either 1p or 22q showed a significantly shorter disease-free survival. Furthermore, genomic complexity was the best predictor of disease progression in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to KIT/PDGFRA mutational status, our findings indicate that secondary chromosomal changes contribute significantly to tumor development and progression of GIST and that genomic complexity carries independent prognostic value that complements clinico-pathological and genotype information.

Carbonic anhydrase II. A novel biomarker for gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are clinically distinct mesenchymal tumors, which generally result from expression of mutant KIT or PDGFRA receptor tyrosine kinase oncogenes. Most GISTs feature strong expression of KIT that serves as a crucial diagnostic adjunct. However, a subset of tumors lacks KIT expression and otherwise may also be difficult to distinguish from other sarcomas, including leiomyosarcoma. Because various carbonic anhydrase (CA) isozymes have been identified as potential treatment targets against different cancers, we evaluated CA II expression in 175 GISTs. Western blotting experiments indicated that CA II is highly expressed in GIST cell lines. Immunohistochemically, 95% of GISTs showed positive signal. The CA II expression in GISTs did not correlate with particular KIT or PDGFRA mutation types. CA II immunoreactivity was absent or low in other mesenchymal tumor categories analyzed. High CA II expression was associated with a better disease-specific survival rate than low or no expression (Mantel-Cox test, P<0.0001). The present results indicate that CA II is overexpressed in most GISTs, is quite selective to this tumor type among mesenchymal tumors, and therefore might be a useful biomarker in diagnostics.

Pleomorphic phenotypes of gastrointestinal stromal tumors at metastatic sites with or without imatinib treatment

Secondary resistance of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) to tyrosine kinase inhibitors occurs after several years' administration. However, the mechanism of resistance has not been fully clarified. In this study, we analyzed the genotypes and the histologic and immunohistochemical phenotypes of metastatic GISTs with and without imatinib treatment, and clarified the pleomorphic nature of metastatic GISTs. We examined 31 autopsy cases in which the patients died of multiple metastases of GISTs, and two surgically resected specimens with and without imatinib treatment. A total of 152 primary and metastatic lesions in 33 cases of GISTs were examined for histologic and immunohistochemical expression of KIT and CD34. We analyzed the expression of other receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) in KIT-negative lesions, including human EGFR-related 2 (HER2), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), hepatocyte growth factor receptor (MET), platelet-derived growth factor receptor-alpha (PDGFRA), and platelet-derived growth factor receptor-beta (PDGFRB). Fifteen lesions in seven cases (9.9%) lacked KIT expression, and 74 (49%) in 22 cases lacked CD34 expression. Eight KIT-negative lesions in five cases expressed PDGFRB, one of which also expressed EGFR, and three lesions in one case expressed MET. Results for the other RTKs were negative. Missense point mutations at PDGFRB gene exon 12 were detected in one PDGFRB-positive case. Our results indicate that histomorphology, immunohistochemical phenotypes, and genotypes of metastatic GISTs vary among lesions, even in cases without imatinib treatment. A KIT-independent mechanism, such as activation of other RTKs, might participate in the proliferation of late-stage GISTs and might be a cause of secondary imatinib resistance.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor and gastric adenocarcinoma collision tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors sometimes occur together with gastric carcinoma, but true collision tumors featuring these 2 components are very rare. The authors describe here 2 collision tumors containing a gastrointestinal stromal tumor with intermingling elements of gastric adenocarcinoma. The gastrointestinal stromal tumors were 5.5 to 6 cm spindle cell tumors, and one patient had an additional prepyloric stromal tumor (2.5 cm). All gastrointestinal stromal tumors had low mitotic counts less than 5/50 high-power fields and were positive for KIT, DOG1, and CD34. Different KIT exon 11 mutations (single nucleotide substitution, complex insertion-duplication) in all tumors indicated that the 2 gastrointestinal stromal tumors in one patient were independent primary tumors. The adenocarcinoma components displayed gland-forming intestinal type to signet ring cell morphology with focally accompanying dysplastic epithelium, immunohistochemical positivity for CDX2, and varying keratin 7/20 expression. We hypothesize that development of gastric adenocarcinoma within a gastrointestinal stromal tumor may be based on displaced gastric epithelium in a long-standing stromal tumor with events of intermittent ulceration and epithelial regeneration.

NCCN Task Force report: update on the management of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors

The standard of care for managing patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) rapidly changed after the introduction of effective molecularly targeted therapies involving tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), such as imatinib mesylate and sunitinib malate. A better understanding of the molecular characteristics of GISTs have improved the diagnostic accuracy and led to the discovery of novel immunomarkers and new mechanisms of resistance to TKI therapy, which in turn have resulted in the development of novel treatment strategies. To address these issues, the NCCN organized a task force consisting of a multidisciplinary panel of experts in the fields of medical oncology, surgical oncology, molecular diagnostics, and pathology to discuss the recent advances, identify areas of future research, and recommend an optimal approach to care for patients with GIST at all stages of disease. The task force met for the first time in October 2003 and again in December 2006 and October 2009. This supplement describes the recent developments in the field of GIST as discussed at the October 2009 meeting.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a bridge between bench and bedside

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is considered to be driven by a gain-of-function mutation in the KIT or PDGFRA gene. Cure can be obtained only by complete surgical removal of the GIST; however, imatinib, an inhibitor of KIT and PDGFRA, is indicated for advanced, recurrent, and/or metastatic GISTs. Imatinib exhibited remarkable clinical effects on advanced GISTs, with substantial tolerability. Its efficacy greatly depends on the genotype of GIST. The drug, however, met intrinsic or acquired resistance during the treatment, of which the molecular mechanisms were mostly dependent on the genotype of GIST, including primary mutations or secondary mutations in the kinase domains of the corresponding target genes, respectively. Although sunitinib had substantial effects on imatinib-resistant GIST, this drug also encountered primary or secondary resistance depending on the genotype. Thus, advanced GIST may require multidisciplinary treatment. Because resistance mechanisms show some regularity, it is hoped that, in the near future, we may be able to develop a new drug to which resistance does not occur easily, based on scientific evidence.