MRI T2 mapping assessment of T2 relaxation time in desmoid tumors as a quantitative imaging biomarker of tumor response: preliminary results

Objectives

Because size-based imaging criteria poorly capture biologic response in desmoid-type fibromatosis (DF), changes in MRI T2 signal intensity are frequently used as a response surrogate, but remain qualitative. We hypothesized that absolute quantification of DF T2 relaxation time derived from parametric T2 maps would be a feasible and effective imaging biomarker of disease activity.

Methods

This IRB-approved retrospective study included 11 patients with DF, managed by observation or systemic therapy, assessed by 3T MRI. Tumor maximum diameter, volume, and T2-weighted signal intensity were derived from manual tumor segmentations. Tumor:muscle T2 signal ratios were recorded. Two readers measured tumor T2 relaxation times using a commercial T2 scanning sequence, manual ROI delineation and commercial calculation software enabling estimation of reader reliability. Objective response rates based on RECIST1.1 and best responses were compared between size-based and signal-based parameters.

Results

Median patient age was 52.6 years; 8 subjects were female (73%). Nine patients with longitudinal assessments were followed for an average of 314 days. Median baseline tumor diameter was 7.2 cm (range 4.4 - 18.2 cm). Median baseline T2 was 65.1 ms (range 40.4 - 94.8 ms, n=11); median at last follow-up was 44.3 ms (-32% from baseline; range 29.3 - 94.7 ms, n=9). T2 relaxation times correlated with tumor:muscle T2 signal ratios, Spearman p=0.78 (p<0.001). T2 mapping showed high inter-reader reliability, ICC=0.84. The best response as a percentage change in T2 values was statistically significant (mean -17.9%, p=0.05, paired t-test) while change in diameter was not (mean -8.9%, p=0.12).

Conclusions

Analysis of T2 relaxation time maps of DF may offer a feasible quantitative biomarker for assessing the extent of response to treatment. This approach may have high inter-reader reliability.

Discoidin Domain Receptor Tyrosine Kinase 1 (DDR1) Is a Novel Therapeutic Target in Liposarcoma: A Tissue Microarray Study

BACKGROUND

Liposarcoma is the most commonly diagnosed subtype of soft tissue sarcoma. As these tumors often arise near vital organs and neurovascular structures, complete resection can be challenging; consequently, recurrence rates are high. Additionally, available chemotherapeutic agents have shown limited benefit and substantial toxicities. There is, therefore, a clear and unmet need for novel therapeutics for liposarcoma. Discoidin domain receptor tyrosine kinase 1 (DDR1) is involved in adhesion, proliferation, differentiation, migration, and metastasis in several cancers. However, the expression and clinical importance of DDR1 in liposarcoma are unknown.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

The purposes of this study were to assess (1) the expression, (2) the association between DDR1 and survival, and (3) the functional roles of DDR1 in liposarcoma.

METHODS

The correlation between DDR1 expression in tumor tissues and clinicopathological features and survival was assessed via immunohistochemical staining of a liposarcoma tissue microarray. It contained 53 samples from 42 patients with liposarcoma and 11 patients with lipoma. The association between DDR1 and survival in liposarcoma was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier plots and log-rank tests. The DDR1 knockout liposarcoma cell lines were generated by CRISPR-Cas9 technology. The DDR1-specific and highly selective DDR1 inhibitor 7RH was applied to determine the impact of DDR1 expression on liposarcoma cell growth and proliferation. In addition, the effect of DDR1 inhibition on liposarcoma growth was further accessed in a three-dimensional cell culture model to mimic DDR1 effects in vivo.

RESULTS

The results demonstrate elevated expression of DDR1 in all liposarcoma subtypes relative to benign lipomas. Specifically, high DDR1 expression was seen in 55% (23 of 42) of liposarcomas and no benign lipomas. However, DDR1 expression was not found to be associated with poor survival in patients with liposarcoma. DDR1 knockout or treatment of 7RH showed decreased liposarcoma cell growth and proliferation.

CONCLUSION

DDR1 is aberrantly expressed in liposarcoma, and it contributes to several markers of oncogenesis in these tumors.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This work supports DDR1 as a promising therapeutic target in liposarcoma.

Circulating tumor DNA analysis of the phase III VOYAGER trial: KIT mutational landscape and outcomes in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor treated with avapritinib or regorafenib

BACKGROUND

The current treatment paradigm of imatinib-resistant metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) does not incorporate KIT/PDGFRA genotypes in therapeutic drug sequencing, except for PDGFRA exon 18-mutant GIST that is indicated for avapritinib treatment. Here, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) sequencing was used to analyze plasma samples prospectively collected in the phase III VOYAGER trial to understand how the KIT/PDGFRA mutational landscape contributes to tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) resistance and to determine its clinical validity and utility.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

VOYAGER (N = 476) compared avapritinib with regorafenib in patients with KIT/PDGFRA-mutant GIST previously treated with imatinib and one or two additional TKIs (NCT03465722). KIT/PDGFRA ctDNA mutation profiling of plasma samples at baseline and end of treatment was assessed with 74-gene Guardant360® CDx. Molecular subgroups were determined and correlated with outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 386/476 patients with KIT/PDGFRA-mutant tumors underwent baseline (pre-trial treatment) ctDNA analysis; 196 received avapritinib and 190 received regorafenib. KIT and PDGFRA mutations were detected in 75.1% and 5.4%, respectively. KIT resistance mutations were found in the activation loop (A-loop; 80.4%) and ATP-binding pocket (ATP-BP; 40.8%); 23.4% had both. An average of 2.6 KIT mutations were detected per patient; 17.2% showed 4-14 different KIT resistance mutations. Of all pathogenic KIT variants, 28.0% were novel, including alterations in exons/codons previously unreported. PDGFRA mutations showed similar patterns. ctDNA-detected KIT ATP-BP mutations negatively prognosticated avapritinib activity, with a median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 1.9 versus 5.6 months for regorafenib. mPFS for regorafenib did not vary regardless of the presence or absence of ATP-BP/A-loop mutants and was greater than mPFS with avapritinib in this population. Secondary KIT ATP-BP pocket mutation variants, particularly V654A, were enriched upon disease progression with avapritinib.

CONCLUSIONS

ctDNA sequencing efficiently detects KIT/PDGFRA mutations and prognosticates outcomes in patients with TKI-resistant GIST treated with avapritinib. ctDNA analysis can be used to monitor disease progression and provide more personalized treatment.

Optimized lentiviral vector transduction of adherent cells and analysis in sulforhodamine B proliferation and chromatin immunoprecipitation assays

Transduction with lentiviral vectors is a useful approach to study the molecular function of specific genes in mammalian cells. Here, we present a calcium phosphate-based transfection protocol that guarantees highly efficient production and delivery of lentiviral vectors in adherent cultured cells. We also describe in detail a direct lysis technique to measure protein expression, an optimized sulforhodamine B proliferation assay, and a step-by-step chromatin immunoprecipitation procedure to verify the binding of ETV5 to E2F1 first intron in SYO-1 sarcoma cells. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Kingston et al. (2003),1 Ireton et al. (2002),2 Brown et al. (2009),3 DeSalvo et al. (2021),4 Vichai and Kirtikara (2006),5 and Boyer et al. (2005).6.

Results from a phase 1a/1b study of botensilimab (BOT), a novel innate/adaptive immune activator, plus balstilimab (BAL; anti-PD-1 antibody) in metastatic heavily pretreated microsatellite stable colorectal cancer (MSS CRC)

LBA8

Background: BOT promotes optimized T cell priming, activation and memory formation by strengthening antigen presenting cell/T cell co-engagement. As an Fc-enhanced next-generation anti–CTLA-4 antibody, BOT also promotes intratumoral regulatory T cell depletion and reduces complement fixation. We present results from patients with MSS CRC treated with BOT + BAL in an expanded phase 1a/1b study; NCT03860272. Methods: Patients (pts) with metastatic MSS CRC received BOT 1 or 2 mg/kg every 6 weeks (Q6W) + BAL 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks. Crossover from monotherapy to combination therapy was permitted (rescue) as well as fixed-dosing (150 mg BOT Q6W + 450 mg BAL every 3 weeks). Results: Fifty-nine combination pts were evaluable for efficacy/safety (treated as of 19 May 2022 with ≥1 Q6W imaging assessment), including one rescue and one fixed-dose pt. Median pt age was 57 (range, 25-83), 58% were female, and 76% received at least three prior lines of therapy including prior immunotherapy (34%). Median follow-up was 6.4 months (range, 1.6-29.5). In all pts, objective response rate (ORR) was 22% (95% CI, 12-35), disease control rate (DCR) was 73% (95% CI, 60-84), and median duration of response (DOR) was not reached (NR), with 9/13 responses ongoing. The 12-month overall survival (OS) rate was 61% (95% CI, 42-75), with median OS NR. Of the 13 responders, 9 had RAS mutations (7 KRAS, 2 NRAS), 0 had BRAF mutations, 0/10 had a TMB of ≥10 mutations/Mb, and 1/7 was PD-L1 positive (≥1% combined positive score). A subgroup analysis was conducted by the dose of BOT received . In 1 mg/kg pts (n=8), ORR was 38% (3/8; 95% CI, 9-76) and DCR was 100% (8/8; 95% CI, 63-100); in 2 mg/kg pts (n=50), ORR was 20% (10/50; 95% CI, 10-34) and DCR was 70% (35/50; 95% CI, 55-82). All grade treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 88% of pts, including grade 3 in 32%, and grade 4 in 2% of pts. Diarrhea/colitis was the only grade 3/4 TRAE occurring in more than three pts (15% grade 3, 2% grade 4). The most common grade 3 TRAEs outside of diarrhea/colitis were fatigue (5%) and pyrexia (5%). There were no grade 5 TRAEs reported. Fifteen percent of pts had a TRAE leading to discontinuation of BOT alone and 12% had a TRAE leading to discontinuation of both BOT + BAL. Conclusions: In heavily pretreated metastatic MSS CRC pts, BOT + BAL continues to demonstrate promising clinical activity with durable responses and was well tolerated with no new immune-mediated safety signals. A larger pt set, analyses by subgroup, and additional translational data will be presented at the meeting. A randomized phase 2 trial in MSS CRC pts is enrolling (NCT05608044). Clinical trial information: NCT03860272 .

Mutational heterogeneity of imatinib resistance and efficacy of ripretinib vs sunitinib in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor: ctDNA analysis from INTRIGUE

397784

Background: Ripretinib, a switch-control tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), is indicated for patients (pts) with gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) who received prior treatment with ≥3 TKIs, including imatinib. Sunitinib is approved for advanced GIST after imatinib failure. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis may provide insight into the efficacy of these agents in second-line advanced GIST. Here, we present exploratory baseline ctDNA results from INTRIGUE. Methods: INTRIGUE is an open-label, phase 3 study that enrolled adult pts with advanced GIST who progressed on or had intolerance to imatinib (NCT03673501). Randomization was 1:1 to ripretinib 150 mg once daily (QD) or sunitinib 50 mg QD (4 wks on/2 wks off). Baseline peripheral whole blood was analyzed by Guardant360, a 74-gene ctDNA next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based assay. Only KIT mutations are reported here. Results: Of 453 pts in the overall intent-to-treat (ITT) population, 362 (80%) samples were analyzed. ctDNA was detected in 280/362 (77%), with KIT mutations detected in 213/280 (76%). Common resistance mutations were in the KIT activation loop (AL; exons 17/18; 89/213, 42%) and ATP-binding pocket (ATP-BP; exons 13/14; 81/213, 38%). Efficacy in pts with detectable ctDNA in the KIT exon 11 and overall ITT populations was consistent with the primary analysis based on tumor data used for randomization. Pts with KIT exon 11 + 17/18 (−9/13/14) mutations had superior progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and overall survival (OS) with ripretinib vs sunitinib, whereas pts with exon 11 + 13/14 (−9/17/18) mutations had better PFS, ORR, and OS with sunitinib vs ripretinib (Table). Subgroup safety profiles were consistent with the primary analysis. Conclusions: While KIT ATP-BP mutations predicted clinical benefit from sunitinib vs ripretinib, pts harboring resistance mutations in the KIT AL derived meaningful clinical benefit from ripretinib but not sunitinib. This study demonstrates the value of ctDNA NGS-based sequencing of the complex landscape of KIT mutations to predict the clinical benefit of ripretinib or sunitinib as second-line therapy in pts with advanced GIST. Clinical trial information: NCT03673501 . [Table: see text]

Systemic Chemotherapies Retain Antitumor Activity in Desmoid Tumors Independent of Specific Mutations in CTNNB1 or APC: A Multi-institutional Retrospective Study

PURPOSE

Determine whether specific CTNNB1 or APC mutations in patients with desmoid tumor were associated with differences in clinical responses to systemic treatments.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We established a multi-institutional dataset of previously treated patients with desmoid tumor across four U.S. sarcoma centers, including demographic and clinicopathologic characteristics, treatment regimens, and clinical and radiographic responses. CTNNB1 or APC mutation status was determined from prior pathology records, or archival tissue was requested and analyzed by Sanger sequencing and/or next-generation sequencing. Evaluable patients with mutation results were analyzed to determine clinical progression-free survival (cPFS), RECIST 1.1 PFS (rPFS), time to next treatment (TTNT), and overall survival (OS). Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression were performed to identify differences in cPFS, rPFS, TTNT, and OS by mutation subtype, desmoid tumor location, and treatment regimen.

RESULTS

A total of 259 evaluable patients were analyzed for at least one of the survival outcomes, with 177 patients having mutation data. First- and second-line cPFS, rPFS, and TTNT were not significantly affected by mutation subtype; however, APC-mutant desmoid tumors demonstrated nonstatistically significant inferior outcomes. Extremity/trunk desmoid tumor location and treatment with doxorubicin-based, methotrexate/vinca alkaloids and sorafenib regimens were associated with better clinical outcomes compared with surgery or "other" therapies, including estrogen-receptor blockade and imatinib. OS was significantly worse with APC or CTNNB1 negative/other mutations.

CONCLUSIONS

Mutation subtype did not affect responses to specific systemic therapies. APC mutations and nonextremity desmoid tumor locations remain prognostic for worse outcomes, and earlier initiation of systemic therapy for these higher-risk desmoid tumors should be prospectively evaluated. See related commentary by Greene and Van Tine, p. 3911.

Retrospective observational studies in ultra-rare sarcomas: A consensus paper from the Connective Tissue Oncology Society (CTOS) community of experts on the minimum requirements for the evaluation of activity of systemic treatments

BACKGROUND

In ultra-rare sarcomas (URS) the conduction of prospective, randomized trials is challenging. Data from retrospective observational studies (ROS) may represent the best evidence available. ROS implicit limitations led to poor acceptance by the scientific community and regulatory authorities. In this context, an expert panel from the Connective Tissue Oncology Society (CTOS), agreed on the need to establish a set of minimum requirements for conducting high-quality ROS on the activity of systemic therapies in URS.

METHODS

Representatives from > 25 worldwide sarcoma reference centres met in November 2020 and identified a list of topics summarizing the main issues encountered in ROS on URS. An online survey on these topics was distributed to the panel; results were summarized by descriptive statistics and discussed during a second meeting (November 2021).

RESULTS

Topics identified by the panel included the use of ROS results as external control data, the criteria for contributing centers selection, modalities for ensuring a correct pathological diagnosis and radiologic assessment, consistency of surveillance policies across centers, study end-points, risk of data duplication, results publication. Based on the answers to the survey (55 of 62 invited experts) and discussion the panel agreed on 18 statements summarizing principles of recommended practice.

CONCLUSIONS

These recommendations will be disseminated by CTOS across the sarcoma community and incorporated in future ROS on URS, to maximize their quality and favor their use as control data when results from prospective studies are unavailable. These recommendations could help the optimal conduction of ROS also in other rare tumors.

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analyses of the phase III VOYAGER trial: KIT mutational landscape and outcomes in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST)

101

Background: The genotype of primary mutations predicts imatinib response in untreated metastatic GIST. However, the sequence of salvage treatments in metastatic GIST is based solely on the chronological order of registration trials. ctDNA sequencing offers a powerful diagnostic tool to detect resistance mutations in GIST but has not been shown to correlate with outcomes in clinical trials of pretreated patients (pts). We analyzed ctDNA samples collected at baseline in the phase III VOYAGER trial (NCT03465722) to describe the landscape of KIT alterations and its association with outcomes of pts treated with avapritinib or regorafenib. Methods: In VOYAGER, 476 pts with advanced KIT-mutant GIST were randomly assigned to avapritinib (240 pts) or regorafenib (236 pts) in 3rd-4th line. Baseline plasma was collected and ctDNA analyzed with the Guardant 360 (G360), 74-gene panel. KIT molecular subgroups were determined and correlated with outcomes. PDGFRA-mutant GISTs were excluded from outcomes analysis. Results: Baseline ctDNA analysis was performed in 386/476 pts (81%). ctDNA was detected in 333 pts (86%), with 250 and 18 pts showing at least one KIT (75%) or PDGFRA (5%) variant, respectively. KIT primary mutations were detected in 71% pts (exon 11, 56%; exon 9, 14%; exon 13, 1%) and KIT secondary mutations in 55% of pts. Activation loop (AL, exons 17 and 18) was more commonly affected (44%) than the ATP-binding pocket (ABP, exons 13 and 14; 23%). Among KIT-mutant tumors, multiple KIT mutations were commonly detected within individual tumors (mean, 2.56; range, 1-14). Notably, 17% of pts had > 3 mutations (mean, 6.07; range, 4 to 14). Median PFS and OS were shorter for patients whose ctDNA was positive for V654A or T670I (ABP hot spots) when treated with avapritinib vs. regorafenib: mPFS, 1.9 mo vs. 7.4 mo; log-rank p <.001; mOS, 8.3 mo vs. 11.7 mo; log rank p =.0651. mPFS was shorter for patients with ctDNA positive for KIT exon 17 mutation if concurrently KIT V654A/T670I was absent when treated with avapritinib, with no difference in OS: mPFS, 4.7 mo vs. 6.7 mo; log-rank p =.03; mOS, 19.2 mo vs. NR; log-rank p =.628. mPFS on avapritinib was longer when ABP mutations were absent when compared to those with ABP present (5.6 vs. 1.9 mo; log-rank p <.001). There were no differences considering AL mutations vs. no AL mutations (3.8 vs. 3.9 mo; log-rank p =.622) when treated with avapritinib. Regorafenib showed similar activity regardless of KIT mutational status and the location of KIT mutation. Conclusions: Hybrid capture-based plasma sequencing detects ctDNA in the majority of patients with advanced TKI-resistant GIST, including heterogeneity of KIT mutations. This study is the first to show that ctDNA sequencing correlates with outcomes in pretreated GIST. Identification of ABP (exon13/14) KIT mutations negatively correlates with avapritinib activity.

Heterogeneity in treatment regimens for AYA bone sarcomas: A comparison of outcomes at a single sarcoma center

e23508

Background: Bone sarcomas account for about 5% of cancers in adolescents and young adults (AYA). Outcomes in this population are consistently inferior than children. It is poorly understood whether this is related to the tumor biology or the therapeutic approach. In addition, regimens used in AYAs are heterogeneous due to poor tolerance of pediatric regimens and lack of clinical trials specific to this population. We sought to study the therapeutic regimes and outcomes of AYA bone sarcoma patients (pts) to understand the optimal therapeutic approach better. Methods: From our institutional database, we extracted data of pts with the diagnosis of “osteosarcoma” (OS) and “Ewing sarcoma” (ES) in the AYA (15-39 yo) population from 2011-21. We included only pts with efficacy documented to different regimens. Descriptive statistics were used for patient demographics, presentation, regimens, and outcomes (Table). Objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the number of patients achieving a partial or complete response. Relapse rate (RR) was calculated for the pts that progressed after undergoing definitive curative intent treatment. Survival comparison between groups was made using the Kaplan Meier method and Log Rank Test. We used Fisher's exact test to compare differences in ORR between treatment groups. Results: We identified 30 ES and 44 OS pts. For both ES and OS, Kaplan Meier survival analysis showed no difference in presentation adjusted overall survival between treatment groups; ( x2 .351, p .55) for ES and ( x2 1.94 p .378) for OS. Importantly, in OS, ORR difference between Adria/IVCis and Adria/IACis was statistically significant ( p .0188). Conclusions: Our study shows the heterogeneity in first-line treatment strategies for AYA pts with bone sarcomas. For ES, response rates for VAC/IE and VAI were similar. In the OS cohort, we found ORR for Adria/IACis was 81% which was statistically different to pts receiving Adria/IVCis (ORR 30%). However, we saw relapses in 43% of pts treated with Adria/IACis. This indicates that the intra-arterial approach could be helpful for limb preservation but suggests the need for intense adjuvant chemotherapy to prevent relapses. There were no statistically significant differences in the survival outcomes of AYA bone sarcoma pts treated with pediatric versus adult regimens.[Table: see text]

Patient reported outcomes and tolerability in patients receiving ripretinib versus sunitinib after imatinib treatment in INTRIGUE: A phase 3 open-label study

11541

Background: Ripretinib (R) is a switch-control tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) indicated for the treatment of patients (pts) with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) after prior treatment with ≥3 TKIs. In the INTRIGUE study (NCT03673501) there was no significant difference in median PFS (primary endpoint) between R and sunitinib (S). We present exploratory analyses of tolerability data and selected pt reported outcomes (PROs). Methods: Pts were randomized 1:1 to R 150 mg QD or S 50 mg QD 4 weeks on/2 weeks off.Dose modification was allowed for toxicity management. The event of interest was severe or life-threatening (grade ≥3) treatment-related adverse event prior to progression (sTRAE). Days with at least one sTRAE were summed for all treated pts and for pts with ≥1 sTRAE event. PROs were assessed using questions from EORTC QLQ-C30 and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at cycle 1 (C1) day 1 (D1), D15, and D29; D1 and D29 of all other cycles; as well as at end of treatment. Differences in PRO scores between baseline and later assessments were calculated across visits. Long-term data will be presented. Results: Pts receiving R (n = 223) versus (vs) S (n = 221) experienced fewer sTRAEs (24% vs 51%, respectively). For all treated pts, the mean time with sTRAEs was 11 days for R and 42 days for S (ratio 0.27, P<0.0001). For pts with ≥1 sTRAE, the mean number of days with a sTRAE was 48 days for R vs 81 days for S (ratio 0.59, p = 0.037). Completion of PRO assessments across the two treatment arms was similar (baseline: R [n = 199], S [n = 199]; C1 D29: R [n = 167], S [n = 177]). Significant differences in self-reported functioning and symptoms were observed by C1 D29. For PROs relating to commonly reported sTRAEs, except constipation, pts in the R arm reported better outcomes than pts in the S arm. Pts in the R arm reported significantly (p<0.05) less decline compared to baseline in pt-reported role function as well as less increase, or improvement, in symptoms of fatigue, appetite loss, diarrhea, nausea/vomiting, and pain vs pts in the S arm. Moderate or severe effect of skin toxicity on pt life, as measured by DLQI in the R arm (n = 165) and in the S arm (n = 175), was observed in 6.6% of pts in the R arm vs 14.8% of pts in the S arm (p = 0.015). Conclusions: In the INTRIGUE study the total number of days with sTRAEs was fewer for pts receiving R vs S. Pts in the R arm also reported significantly less decline in pt-reported role function and less increase in symptoms related to commonly reported sTRAEs, except constipation, vs pts in the S arm. Medical writing provided by Costello Medical. Clinical trial information: NCT03673501.

DNA damage response pathways in synovial sarcoma

11580

Background: Synovial sarcomas (SS) harbor a specific, balanced, reciprocal translocation t(X;18) leading to the oncogenic SS18-SSX fusion. Defective DNA damage response (DDR) is a hallmark of cancer leading to genomic instability and is associated with chemosensitivity. Efforts have been made to identify a genetic signature that predicts SS progression, treatment response, and survival in order to identify more accessible and effective treatments. This investigation explores the role of DDR in pathogenesis of SS. Methods: Patients with the diagnosis of SS from 2013 to 2021 within the Caris Life Science database were included in the study. A combination of NGS of DNA and RNA at a CLIA-certified laboratory (Caris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ) was performed on archival tumors. Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) scores were calculated as a composite of loss of heterozygosity, telomeric allelic imbalance, and large-scale transitions, using a positive threshold of 42. This study was approved by the University of Miami (UM)-Sylvester IRB and all the data collected was de-identified. Results: A total of 120 patients were identified with 49 of these patients from UM-Sylvester. Mean age of diagnosis on the sample was 46 years old (range of 15-86) and 45.8% were female. Among the 49 patients from UM-Sylvester, mean age was 60 years old (range of 35-84), 28 patients had a gene alteration identified (57%) and 6 of them a homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) gene (12%). A total of 63 different genes were identified with the most common TP53 (49%), LOH (12.2%), ATRX (10.2%) and RB1 (6.1%). Other HRD genes identified were MLH1 (4%) and CHEK2 (4%). There was no correlation identified between the age (15-65 vs elderly ⩾ 65 years) or the gender (female vs male) and the presence of a mutated DDR (p = 0.615; p = 0.091 respectively). Within the entire Caris database (N = 120), we identified 11 patients (N = 120, 9%) whose tumor tested positive for any DDR gene alteration. The most common were ATM (2.6%), followed by ATRX (1.6%) and CHEK2 (0.9%). The median HRD score was 22 within the sample. Conclusions: We report here the most common genes altered on molecular profile for a large cohort of SS samples. The prevalence of predicted pathogenic DDR gene mutation carriers in our cohort (9%) suggests that constitutional defects in this pathway may be associated with SS. We found higher rates of positive DDR on the UM-Sylvester cohort, and this could be associated with specifics of our population, given high frequency of Hispanic patients. Work is ongoing to associate our findings with race, ethnicity, survival and response to treatments. Work is ongoing to associate our findings with race, ethnicity, survival and response to treatments. These correlations will be reported in the final abstract. Cytotoxic therapy remains gold standard for metastatic SS, but better understanding of the molecular profile can pave way for further options, including targeted therapy and immunotherapy.

KIT resistance mutations identified by circulating tumor DNA and treatment outcomes in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor

11514

Background: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the cornerstone treatment for advanced GIST via pharmacologic targeting of driver oncogenes such as KIT. Detection of KIT alterations through tissue-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) is common, but circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-based NGS is a less invasive alternative to identify driver and resistance mutations in advanced GIST. Patients (pts) with KIT-mutant GIST benefit from first-line (1L) imatinib; however, KIT resistance mutations may confer imatinib-resistance and differential sensitivity to subsequent TKIs. We sought to analyze ctDNA from GIST pts to determine whether certain resistance mutations were associated with superior outcomes with particular TKIs in the second-line and beyond (2L+). Methods: Under an approved institutional review board protocol, a retrospective analysis was performed with available ctDNA NGS results (Guardant360; Redwood City, CA) from pts (N = 104) who progressed on 1L imatinib between 2017-21. Using R statistical programming, we identified pts with primary KIT alterations (N = 64) and known resistance mutations in KIT exons 13 (N = 25) and 17 (N = 35). We studied the median time to treatment failure (mTTF), defined as the time from treatment start to treatment end (months) due to progressive disease or toxicity, for each 2L+ drug. Using Kaplan-Meier methods, we calculated Cox proportional-hazard ratios (HR) with confidence intervals (CI) and p-values for statistical significance. Results: 49% were male (median age 66; range, 31-94). Driver oncogenes were detected in 80% (N = 83), including KIT, NF1, PDGFRA and BRAF. Of those with a KIT alteration, 12 (19%) had KIT exon 9 mutations and 52 (81%) had KIT exon 11 mutations. KIT resistance mutations were observed in KIT exons 13 (N = 25; V654), 14 (N = 2; T670), and 17 (N = 45; D816, D820, N822, Y823). Pts with KIT resistance mutations received 2L+ therapy with avapritinib, dose-escalated imatinib, nilotinib, pazopanib, ponatinib, regorafenib, ripretinib, or sunitinib. mTTF for KIT exon 13 V654 pts treated with 2L+ sunitinib, imatinib 800mg, or other was 10.8, 7.5, and 3.7 months, respectively. TTF for sunitinib vs other 2L+ drugs showed a HR of 0.51 (CI 0.33-0.8), p = 0.003. mTTF for KIT exon 17 (non-V654) pts treated with 2L+ regorafenib, imatinib 800mg, or other was 4.6, 1.2, and 6.3 months, respectively. Comparison of mTTF for regorafenib vs other 2L+ drugs was not statistically significant. Conclusions: ctDNA is a noninvasive tool for detecting driver and resistance mutations in pts with advanced GIST. GIST pts with KIT exon 13 V654 resistance mutations had superior outcomes in the 2L+ setting with sunitinib. Regorafenib was not superior to other 2L+ TKIs in pts with KIT exon 17 resistance mutations, possibly due to their own activity against exon 17 resistance alterations. ctDNA-guided therapy warrants evaluation in a prospective clinical trial.

Impact of somatic SWI/SNF alterations on the genomic landscape of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and response to PARP and immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy

e16289

Background: The SWI/SNF (SWItch/Sucrose Non-Fermentable) chromatin remodeling complex is an adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-dependent group of proteins that controls the accessibility of transcription factors to DNA and is a dynamic epigenetic regulator of gene expression. This system is deranged in about 14% of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients (pts). A recent report suggested that SWI/SNF alterations are associated with response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Herein, we investigate the relationship between SWI/SNF alterations and genomic instability, prognosis and response to PARP inhibitors and ICIs. Methods: Tumor molecular profiling was performed on PDAC FFPE samples by NextGen Sequencing on DNA (592 genes or WES) and RNA (WTS) at Caris Life Sciences (Phoenix, AZ). MSI/MMR status was determined by IHC, NGS and fragment analysis. Tumor mutational burden high (TMB-H) was determined by a cutoff of 10mut/MB, PD-L1 was tested by IHC (SP142) with a cutoff of 2+, 5%. SWI/SNF mutant tumors (MT) were compared to wild-type (WT), and significance was determined by X2 or Fisher-Exact and p adjusted for multiple comparisons (q) of < 0.05 (Benjamini-Hochberg correction). Real-world overall survival was obtained from insurance claims data and calculated from tissue collection to last contact; time on treatment (TOT) was calculated from treatment start to finish and compared by the Kaplan-Meier test. Results: Among 5075 PDAC tumors, 311 (6.1%) harbored SWI/SNF alterations (186 ARID1A-mutant, 60 PBRM1, 65 SMARCA4 and 12 SMARCB1). The proportion with SWI/SNF alterations in MSI-H tumors (23/53 or 43%) was higher than MSS (287/4922 or 5.8%, p < 0.001). Since MSI-H PDAC have distinct genomic behavior compared to MSS, MSS tumors were analyzed separately. TMB-H (8.3% vs. 1.2%) and PD-L1-H (23% vs. 15%) were more prevalent in MT than WT (q < 0.05) but not different in MSS tumors (TMB-H: 2.9% vs. 0.6%, q = 0.09; PD-L1: 21.4% vs. 15.4%, q = 0.3). Among the 2268 WES-tested tumors, gLOH-high was not different in MT vs WT (9% vs. 12%, q = 1) in all or in MSS tumors (9.7% vs 11.9%, q = 1). Among the 3728 pts with outcome data, MT pts had worse prognosis (HR = 0.78, 95% CI [0.70-0.87], p < 0.00001), similarly in MSS cohort (HR = 0.734, [ 0.66-0.82], p < 0.00001). Among 50 PARPi-treated pts, no TOT difference was seen between MT vs WT (HR = 0.913, [0.309-2.701], p = 0.9), similarly in MSS pts (HR = 1.104 [0.426–2.86], p = 0.9). In the 38 ICI-treated pts, no difference was seen in TOT between MT vs WT (HR = 1.42 [0.73-2.8], p = 0.3], similarly in MSS pts (HR 1.175 [0.524–2.636], p = 0.7). Conclusions: In this real-world database, SWI/SNF alterations were associated with a significantly worse prognosis. There was no association with increased genomic instability of PDAC tumors, and in the cases with linked treatment data, there was no association with response to PARPi’s or ICI’s.

Comparative effectiveness of systemic treatments in desmoid tumors

e23534

Background: Many systemic treatment options are described for desmoid tumors, including hormonal therapies, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents, and most recently, tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Although many options are described, randomized data is scarce. The lack of comparative studies precludes a definitive sequence of the existing systemic treatments in the management of desmoid tumors. Here we retrospectively compare sorafenib with cytotoxic chemotherapy to generate objective data to guide treatment choice. Methods: We analyzed all patients with desmoid tumors treated with doxorubicin, dacarbazine, vinblastine, vinorelbine, methotrexate, or sorafenib in the first-line setting at a single center from 2000-2021. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival. The secondary endpoint was the rate of toxic effects recorded accordingly to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. We calculated progression-free survival (PFS) using the Kaplan-Meier method with Log-Rank Test to estimate the 95% confidence interval. Results: 79 patients ultimately received systemic therapies. Median follow-up was 5.6 years (0 to 7.9), 69% were women, and median age at diagnosis was 37 (range 5-77). Regarding race and ethnicity, 74% were White, 26%, Black and 45%, Latino. The tumor was in the lower extremity in 21 (27%) cases, trunk in 18 (23%) cases, abdominal wall in 13 (16%), intra-abdomen in 9 (11%), upper extremity in 7 (9%), head-neck in 7 (9%) and breast in 4 (5%). Surgery before systemic treatment was used in 20 (25%) patients. The regiments used were sorafenib (n = 32), doxorubicin with dacarbazine (n = 13), liposomal doxorubicin (n = 11), methotrexate with vinblastine (n = 11), methotrexate with vinorelbine (n = 8) and methotrexate monotherapy (n = 1). The 2-year progression-free survival rate was 80% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64 to 0.96) in the cytotoxic chemotherapy group and 66% (95% CI, 0.46 to 0.86) in the sorafenib group (P = 0.06). The most frequently reported adverse events on the cytotoxic group were grade 1 or 2 events of nausea (25%) and rash (15%), and on sorafenib were grade 1 or 2 events of palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (40%) and fatigue (25%). There were no treatment-related deaths reported. Conclusions: There was no statistical difference between the analyzed treatments, although there was a trend toward lower progression rates with cytotoxic therapy.

Complete pathological response after neoadjuvant treatment in soft tissue sarcoma: A single-institution experience

e23526

Background: Pathological complete response (pCR) to preoperative treatment has been reported as a prognostic factor for survival in the soft tissue sarcoma (STS) population. pCR evaluation has been demonstrated in breast and head and neck cancers widely associated with improved outcomes, including overall survival (OS). The assessment to pathological response is not easily subject to variability, can be globally equitable, and has the potential to serve as a surrogate endpoint for research and survival outcomes. Methods: This is a retrospective, single institution study. The inclusion criteria were: patients with STS diagnosed between 2011–2021, s/p neoadjuvant treatment, and pCR (defined as necrosis rate on surgical specimen ≥ 90%). This study was approved by the University of Miami-Sylvester IRB. Results: We identified a total of 39 patients that met our inclusion criteria. 43% of the population were women. Mean age at diagnosis was 59 years old (range 20-84). 90% of the population remains alive, with mean overall survival of 6.6 years. Disease recurrence (local and distant) was present only in 11 patients (28%) and 4 of these patients (36.3%) progressed to death. Median progression free survival (PFS) was 42.5 months (95% CI 33.9-53.1). 34% of the cohort had the myxofibrosarcoma histology, and this group had mean OS of 7.2 years and mean PFS of 5.8 years. 20% of the myxofibrosarcoma patients developed metastatic disease versus 21% among patient with different histology (p = 0.89). Among the neoadjuvant treatments delivered, 93% of the patients received a combination of chemotherapy and radiation. The most common neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen was the combination of Doxorubicin with Ifosfamide (66% of the patients) and their mean OS was 6.2 years vs 2.9 for the other regimens (p = 0.08). Among patients that received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the median number of preoperative cycles was 4 (SD = 1.1). The median time from the start of chemotherapy to surgery was 5 months (SD = 1.4 months). Conclusions: Treatment induced pathologic necrosis has been proven as a predictor of survival in patients with STS in multiple studies. Interestingly, the most common histology present was myxofibrosarcoma, suggesting a good response to neoadjuvant treatment in this group with a lower rate of metastatic disease after pCR, when compared to the literature (35%). Chemotherapy associated with radiation in the neoadjuvant setting was the most common treatment and Doxorubicin with Ifosfamide was associated with a longer OS. The rate of necrosis after surgery has been shown to be a prognostic factor for STS, therefore there is a need to evaluate which associated factors lead to pCR. Further research with the evaluation of the molecular profiling of STS with pCR is underwork to better understand the mechanisms behind treatment responses.

Pan-sarcoma analysis of DNA damage response pathway alterations and deficiency

11548

Background: Alterations in DNA damage response (DDR) pathways contribute to genomic instability and malignant progression and have been shown to be of clinical significance in several carcinomas and solid tumors. While some studies have identified ostensibly pathogenic variations in known and novel cancer genes with implications for sarcoma risk and treatment opportunities, there is limited information regarding the role of DDR pathway alterations in sarcoma. We identified a gene alteration in ERCC2, a gene that codes for a DNA helicase in the nucleotide excision repair pathway, in a patient with multiply relapsed epithelioid sarcoma (ES), prompting an investigation of DDR pathway alterations in sarcoma samples using a global next-generation sequencing (NGS) platform. Methods: Sarcoma patient samples (N = 5310), representing 38 pediatric and adult histologic subtypes, underwent NGS of DNA (592 gene panel or whole exome) and RNA (whole transcriptome sequencing, N = 3612) at a CLIA-certified laboratory (Caris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ). A threshold of 10 mut/Mb was used to identify high tumor mutational burden (TMB-H). IHC was performed for PD-L1 (SP142; 2+|5% = positive). Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) scores were calculated as a composite of loss of heterozygosity, telomeric allelic imbalance, and large-scale transitions, using a positive threshold of 42 (N = 2138). HRD score association with biomarker status was evaluated overall and in sarcoma subtypes. Results: A pathogenic DDR pathway mutation was noted in 842 (15.9%) of the total samples. ATRX was by far the most commonly altered DDR gene (10% of all samples), with mutations observed across 25 sarcoma subtypes (11 subtypes with > 10% mutation rate: leiomyosarcoma [LMS], perivascular epithelioid cell tumor [PEComa], pleomorphic sarcoma [PLSARC], uterine sarcoma [OUSARC], osteosarcoma, spindle cell sarcoma, angiosarcoma, mesenchymal chondrosarcoma, sarcoma NOS, fibrosarcoma and ES). CHEK2, ATM, and MUTYH mutations were observed in 1-2% of sarcoma samples. More than 20 histologic subtypes showed distinct gene signatures with mutations occurring in > 3% of the samples investigated. ERCC2 was mutated in 3% of ES and 6.5% in PEComa. Median HRD scores ranged between 20-58 across sarcoma subtypes. High rates of deficient HRD (HRDd ≥ 42) were observed in PLSARC (83.2%), OUSARC (73.7%), and dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma (71.4%), while low rates of HRDd were observed in Ewing sarcoma (0%) and clear cell sarcoma (10%). In the overall cohort, ERCC2, ATRX and BRCA2 were significantly associated with increased HRD scores (p = 0.01). Conclusions:DDR pathway alterations are present in numerous histologic subtypes of sarcoma. A more comprehensive analysis of individual histologic subtypes is in progress. Further research will evaluate the clinical implications of these known and novel mutations to guide risk stratification and potential therapeutic options.

Using pan-sarcoma multiomic analysis for identifying sarcoma subtypes with immunogenic potential

11551

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have limited efficacy for most sarcomas. Yet, responses are seen in particular sarcoma subtypes, highlighting the need for better predictive biomarkers. The T cell inflamed score (TIS), a gene expression signature reflective of an active tumor immune microenvironment, is associated with ICI response in multiple solid tumors. We evaluated the TIS across a large database of sarcomas to identify which histologic subtypes may benefit from ICI. Methods: Next generation sequencing of DNA (592 gene or whole exome)/RNA (whole transcriptome) was performed for 3605 sarcoma patient samples, representing 45 histologic subtypes (Caris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ). TIS (18 gene weighted coefficient composite value; Cristescu 2018) was calculated and the Microenvironment Cell Populations-counter tool (Becht 2016) was used to quantify immune cell populations. Results were compared to melanoma (n = 1255), a representative immunogenic tumor type. High TIS was defined as a score within the upper quartile of melanoma TIS (> 5.5). Percentage with high TIS are reported with 95% CI. Results: Median TIS was highest in inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT), epithelioid sarcoma (EPIS), myxofibrosarcoma (MFS), well differentiated liposarcoma, and solitary fibrous tumor (SFT). These did not differ significantly from melanoma (p > 0.06). Median TIS was lowest in embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma, desmoid tumor (DES), synovial sarcoma (SYNS), and Ewing sarcoma (ES). Histologic subtypes where > 10% of samples had a high TIS included IMT (29.9% ± 21.7%), MFS (23.3% ± 12.6%), pleomorphic sarcoma (PLSARC) (21.9% ± 5.8%), cutaneous angiosarcoma (ANGS) (18.4% ± 13.9%), spindle cell sarcoma (17.5% ± 7.6%), liposarcoma (LPS) (17% ± 10.7%), EPIS (15.4% ± 19.6%), visceral ANGS (13.2% ± 10.7%), pleomorphic LPS (13.6% ± 14.3%), fibrosarcoma (12.5% ± 13.2%), leiomyosarcoma (11.6%± 3.4%), malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST) (10.2% ± 7.7%), and perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa) (10% ± 10.7%). The relative abundance of immune and stromal cell populations was highly variable across sarcoma subtypes, yet a strong positive correlation between TIS and immune cell populations was observed for most subtypes (e.g. T cells, Spearman R range: 0.56 [P = 0.08] - 0.96 [P < 0.0001]). A notable exception was SFT, which had a relatively high median TIS but low abundance of CD8+ T cells and B cells. Conclusions: We found high median TIS and/or significant proportions of samples with a high TIS in sarcoma subtypes with previously demonstrated responsiveness to ICI, including MFS, PLSARC, LPS, and ANGS, while unresponsive tumor types such as RMS, DES, SYNS, and ES had low TIS. We further identified subtypes with high TIS but limited prior clinical data supporting ICI use, such as IMT, EPIS, MPNST, SFT, and PEComa. Our results warrant prospective exploration of TIS as a predictive biomarker for ICI use in sarcoma.

Age as a factor in the molecular landscape and the tumor-microenvironmental signature of osteosarcoma

11525

Background: Osteosarcoma (OS) incidence is characterized by a bimodal age distribution, with peaks in early adolescence and in adults > 65 years of age. In contrast to adolescents, OS in adults is frequently considered as a secondary neoplasm (i.e., transformation of Paget´s disease of the bone, radiation induced). Yet, the literature is scarce regarding the impact of age on the molecular landscape of OS. Herein, we sought to explore the association between age and the genomic profile as well as the tumor immune microenvironment (TME) in a large cohort of OS patients. Methods: 208 specimens were centrally analysed at the Caris Life Sciences laboratory with DNA seq (NextSeq, 592 gene panel or NovaSeq, whole-exome sequencing), RNA seq (Archer fusion panel or whole-transcriptome sequencing) and immunohistochemistry (IHC). RNA deconvolution and differential expression analyses were performed using the Microenvironment Cell Populations counter method for quantification of immune cell populations and gene expression profiling. The cohort was stratified into three distinct age groups (< 25 years [n = 83], 25-45 years [n = 58], > 45 years [67]). Results: Overall, the most frequently detected mutations were in TP53 (37%), RB1 (13%), ATRX (9%), TERT (6%), PTEN (5%), PIK3CA (4%) and KMT2D (3%). Copy number alterations were most frequently detected in CDK4 (12%), LRIG3 (11%), FLCN (11%), MDM2 (9%), CCND3 (9%), VEGFA (8%), TFEB (8%). Interestingly, age-based stratification revealed an increased frequency of FLCN (19.7 vs 4.7%, p < 0.01), CCND3 (13.9 vs 3.1%, p < 0.05), and HSP90AB1 (11.3 vs 0.0%, p < 0.01), alterations in patients < 25 years compared to > 45 years. TME analysis revealed that patients > 45 years have decreased B-cell abundance compared to patients < 25 years (2.9-fold decrease, p < 0.05) and 25-45 years (4.8-fold decrease, p < 0.05). Although not statistically significant, median transcriptional expression of PD-L1 was numerically increased in patients > 45 years (1.8-fold compared to 25-45 years, p = 0.17; 2.0-fold compared to < 25 years, p = 0.27), which was consistent with increasing rates of IHC PD-L1 expression with age (5.3%, 9.4%, and 17.5%, respectively, p = 0.06). Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, this study represents the largest cohort of molecularly characterized OS. Age-associated differences in the genetic landscape and TME composition, including increased gene amplifications observed in younger patients and decreased B-cell abundance in older patients, might suggest fundamental underlying molecular and biological differences.

Inhibition of CDK7-dependent transcriptional addiction is a potential therapeutic target in synovial sarcoma

Synovial sarcoma is typical aggressive malignant without satisfactory treatment outcome in adult series. Cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) in transcription have been considered promising molecular targets in cancer. Among these, CDK7 has been shown to play important roles in the pathogenesis of malignancies. However, the modulation mechanism of CDK7-regulated transcription in synovial sarcoma is unknown. In the present study, we aim to determine the expression and function of CDK7 in the transcription cycle of RNA polymerase II (RNAP II), and evaluate its prognostic and therapeutic significance in synovial sarcoma. Results showed that overexpression of CDK7 correlates with higher clinical stage and grade, and worse outcomes in clinic. High CDK7 expression was confirmed in all tested human synovial sarcoma cell lines and CDK7 was largely localized to the cell nucleus. Downregulation through siRNA or inhibition with the CDK7-targeting agent BS-181 exhibited dose-dependent cytotoxicity and prevented cell colony formation. Western blots demonstrated that inhibition of CDK7 paused transcription by a reduction of RNAP II phosphorylation. Blocking CDK7-dependent transcriptional addiction was accompanied by promotion of apoptosis. Furthermore, the CDK7-specific inhibitor reduced 3D spheroid formation and migration of synovial sarcoma. Collectively, our findings highlight the role of CDK7-dependent transcriptional addiction in human synovial sarcoma. CDK7-specific cytotoxic agents are therefore promising novel treatment options for synovial sarcoma.

What Clinical Trials Are Needed for Treatment of Leiomyosarcoma?

OPINION STATEMENT

Leiomyosarcoma is one of the most common subtypes of soft tissue sarcomas accounting for approximately 20% of sarcomas. As leiomyosarcoma patients frequently develop metastatic disease, effective systemic therapies are needed to improve clinical outcomes. The overall activity of the currently available conventional systemic therapies and the prognosis of patients with advanced and/or metastatic disease are poor. As such, the treatment of this patient population remains challenging. As a result, there is a clear unmet medical need, and designing and performing meaningful clinical studies are of utmost importance to improve the prognosis of this patient group. Therefore, the aim of this review is to briefly summarize state-of-the-art treatments for leiomyosarcoma patients and to describe trial characteristics needed for informative clinical studies.

INTRIGUE: A phase III, randomized, open-label study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ripretinib versus sunitinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor previously treated with imatinib

359881

Background: Sunitinib is approved for advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) after imatinib failure. Ripretinib, a broad-spectrum KIT and PDGFRA switch-control tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), is indicated for the treatment of adult patients (pts) with GIST who received prior treatment with 3 or more TKIs, including imatinib. We compared the efficacy and safety of ripretinib vs sunitinib in pts with advanced GIST who progressed on or were intolerant to imatinib. Methods: This multicenter, global, randomized, open-label phase 3 study (NCT03673501) enrolled adult pts with GIST who progressed on or had intolerance to imatinib. Pts were randomized 1:1 to ripretinib 150 mg once daily (QD) or sunitinib 50 mg QD (4 wks on/2 wks off). Randomization was stratified by KIT mutational status and imatinib intolerance. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) by independent radiologic review (IRR) using modified RECIST version 1.1. Key secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) by IRR and overall survival (OS). Hierarchical testing was performed for primary and key secondary endpoints in a prespecified sequence; testing pts with a KIT exon 11 primary mutation (Ex11 intention-to-treat [ITT] population) preceded the all-patient (AP) ITT population. Data cutoff was 1 Sep 2021; final analyses of PFS and ORR and the first interim analysis of OS were conducted. Results: A total of 453 pts were randomized to ripretinib (n = 226; Ex11 ITT, n = 163) or sunitinib (n = 227; Ex11 ITT, n = 164). Median age was 60 yrs (range 18–88) and most pts were white (66.2%) males (62.0%). PFS was not statistically different between ripretinib and sunitinib in the Ex11 ITT (hazard ratio [HR] 0.88, 95% CI 0.66, 1.16; P = 0.36; median 8.3 vs 7.0 mos) or in the AP populations (HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.82, 1.33; P = 0.72; median 8.0 vs 8.3 mos). ORR was numerically higher for ripretinib vs sunitinib in the Ex11 ITT (23.9% vs 14.6%; difference 9.3%, 95% CI 0.7, 17.8; nominal P = 0.03) and AP ITT populations (21.7% vs 17.6%; difference 4.2%, 95% CI −3.2, 11.5; nominal P = 0.27). OS data was highly immature; median OS was not reached in either arm. Fewer pts in the ripretinib arm experienced Grade 3-4 (G3-4) treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) vs sunitinib (41.3% vs 65.6%). Among G3-4 TEAEs with a difference ≥5% between arms, ripretinib had fewer events vs sunitinib (hypertension [8.5% vs 26.7%], palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia [1.3% vs 10.0%], neutropenia [0% vs 6.3%], and neutrophil count decreased [0% vs 7.2%]). Conclusions: The PFS in both arms was longer than PFS achieved by sunitinib in its pivotal phase 3 trial. While the PFS for ripretinib did not meet the primary endpoint of superiority vs sunitinib, meaningful clinical activity and fewer G3-4 TEAEs were observed in pts with advanced GIST treated with ripretinib after imatinib failure. Clinical trial information: NCT03673501.

Genomic Landscape of Angiosarcoma: A Targeted and Immunotherapy Biomarker Analysis

Simple Summary

Angiosarcomas (AS) are rare, highly aggressive sarcomas with limited therapeutic options. Genomic sequencing techniques have identified recurrent genetic abnormalities. Nevertheless, the association of these findings with etiology, site of origin, prognosis, and therapeutic implications is not well understood. We analyzed Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) and Whole Transcriptome Sequencing (WTS) data in a cohort of 143 AS cases. We identified distinct genomic biology according to the AS primary site. Head and neck AS cases primarily have Immunotherapy (IO) response markers and mutations in TP53 and POT1. On the other hand, breast AS is enriched for cell cycle alterations, predominately MYC amplification. Additionally, a microenvironment with abundant immune cells is present in a minority of cases but distributed evenly among primary sites. Our findings can facilitate the design and optimization of therapeutic strategies for AS according to its biology at different primary sites.

Abstract

We performed a retrospective analysis of angiosarcoma (AS) genomic biomarkers and their associations with the site of origin in a cohort of 143 cases. Primary sites were head and neck (31%), breast (22%), extremity (11%), viscera (20%), skin at other locations (8%), and unknown (9%). All cases had Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) data with a 592 gene panel, and 53 cases had Whole Exome Sequencing (WES) data, which we used to study the microenvironment phenotype. The immunotherapy (IO) response biomarkers Tumor Mutation Burden (TMB), Microsatellite Instability (MSI), and PD-L1 status were the most frequently encountered alteration, present in 36.4% of the cohort and 65% of head and neck AS (H/N-AS) (p < 0.0001). In H/N-AS, TMB-High was seen in 63.4% of cases (p < 0.0001) and PDL-1 positivity in 33% of cases. The most common genetic alterations were TP53 (29%), MYC amplification (23%), ARID1A (17%), POT1 (16%), and ATRX (13%). H/N-AS cases had predominantly mutations in TP53 (50.0%, p = 0.0004), POT1 (40.5%, p < 0.0001), and ARID1A (33.3%, p = 0.5875). In breast AS, leading alterations were MYC amplification (63.3%, p < 0.0001), HRAS (16.1%, p = 0.0377), and PIK3CA (16.1%, p = 0.2352). At other sites, conclusions are difficult to generate due to the small number of cases. A microenvironment with a high immune signature, previously associated with IO response, was evenly distributed in 13% of the cases at different primary sites. Our findings can facilitate the design and optimization of therapeutic strategies for AS.

Radiation Therapy for Treatment of Soft Tissue Sarcoma in Adults: Executive Summary of an ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline

PURPOSE

This guideline provides evidence-based recommendations addressing the indications for radiation therapy (RT), sequencing of local therapies, and appropriate dose and planning techniques for management of primary, operable, localized, soft tissue sarcoma (STS) in adults.

METHODS

The American Society for Radiation Oncology convened a task force to address 5 key questions focused on the use of RT for management of STS. These questions included indications for RT for STS of the extremity and superficial trunk; considerations for sequencing of RT with respect to surgery, dose of RT, appropriate treatment volumes and techniques; and the role of RT in management of retroperitoneal sarcoma. Recommendations were based on a systematic literature review and created using a predefined consensus-building methodology and system for grading evidence quality and recommendation strength.

RESULTS

Multidisciplinary evaluation and decision making are recommended for all cases of STS. RT is recommended for patients in whom there is increased risk of local recurrence of resected STS, particularly if close or microscopically positive margins are anticipated or have occurred. When RT is indicated, preoperative RT is strongly recommended over postoperative RT. Postoperative RT is conditionally recommended in specific clinical circumstances (eg, uncontrolled pain or bleeding) or when the risk of wound complications outweighs that of late toxicity from RT. Routine use of RT in addition to oncologic resection for retroperitoneal sarcoma is conditionally not recommended. When RT is used for retroperitoneal sarcoma, preoperative RT is recommended, whereas postoperative RT is not recommended.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on currently published data, the American Society for Radiation Oncology task force has proposed evidence-based recommendations regarding the use of RT for STS in adults. Future studies will ascertain whether alterations in dosing and sequencing may optimize outcomes and quality of life.

Association of Combination of Conformation-Specific KIT Inhibitors With Clinical Benefit in Patients With Refractory Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Phase 1b/2a Nonrandomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

Many cancer subtypes, including KIT-mutant gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), are driven by activating mutations in tyrosine kinases and may initially respond to kinase inhibitors but frequently relapse owing to outgrowth of heterogeneous subclones with resistance mutations. KIT inhibitors commonly used to treat GIST (eg, imatinib and sunitinib) are inactive-state (type II) inhibitors.

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether combining a type II KIT inhibitor with a conformation-complementary, active-state (type I) KIT inhibitor is associated with broad mutation coverage and global disease control.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A highly selective type I inhibitor of KIT, PLX9486, was tested in a 2-part phase 1b/2a trial. Part 1 (dose escalation) evaluated PLX9486 monotherapy in patients with solid tumors. Part 2e (extension) evaluated PLX9486-sunitinib combination in patients with GIST. Patients were enrolled from March 2015 through February 2019; data analysis was performed from May 2020 through July 2020.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants received 250, 350, 500, and 1000 mg of PLX9486 alone (part 1) or 500 and 1000 mg of PLX9486 together with 25 or 37.5 mg of sunitinib (part 2e) continuously in 28-day dosing cycles until disease progression, treatment discontinuation, or withdrawal.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Pharmacokinetics, safety, and tumor responses were assessed. Clinical efficacy end points (progression-free survival and clinical benefit rate) were supplemented with longitudinal monitoring of KIT mutations in circulating tumor DNA.

RESULTS

A total of 39 PLX9486-naive patients (median age, 57 years [range, 39-79 years]; 22 men [56.4%]; 35 [89.7%] with refractory GIST) were enrolled in the dose escalation and extension parts. The recommended phase 2 dose of PLX9486 was 1000 mg daily. At this dose, PLX9486 could be safely combined with 25 or 37.5 mg daily of sunitinib continuously. Patients with GIST who received PLX9486 at a dose of 500 mg or less, at the recommended phase 2 dose, and with sunitinib had median (95% CI) progression-free survivals of 1.74 (1.54-1.84), 5.75 (0.99-11.0), and 12.1 (1.34-NA) months and clinical benefit rates (95% CI) of 14% (0%-58%), 50% (21%-79%), and 80% (52%-96%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this phase 1b/2a nonrandomized clinical trial, type I and type II KIT inhibitors PLX9486 and sunitinib were safely coadministered at the recommended dose of both single agents in patients with refractory GIST. Results suggest that cotargeting 2 complementary conformational states of the same kinase was associated with clinical benefit with an acceptable safety profile.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02401815.

A nonrandom association of breast implants and the formation of desmoid tumors

BACKGROUND

Studies suggest that surgical breast augmentation with implants is a risk factor for breast desmoid tumors. The statistical strength of this correlation is unknown, as evidence is limited to anecdotal reports.

METHODS

Patients with breast desmoid tumors and a history of breast implants seen at a single center between 2000 and 2021 were identified via radiology, breast, and sarcoma databases. The standardized incidence ratio (SIR) was calculated to assess the correlation between breast desmoid tumors and breast implants. The cases were pooled with published cases for analyses. Progression-free survival curves and hazard ratios were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional-hazards modeling.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients from one institution and 66 cases in the literature were identified. All patients were female, and the mean age was 38 years old (range 20-66). 63 patients (82%) underwent resection, 9 (12%) received chemotherapy, 3 (4%) received sorafenib, 11 (14%) received hormonal therapy, and 3 (4%) underwent active surveillance. After resection, the 2-year recurrence-free survival rate was 77% (95% CI 65%-89%). The recurrence risk was lower for resection with no residual tumor (R0) compared to microscopic (R1) or macroscopic (R2) residual tumor (HR: 0.15; 95% CI 0.02-0.8; p < 0.05). The SIR was 482 (95% CI 259-775) to 823 (95% CI 442-1322), suggesting a 482-823 times higher risk of developing a breast desmoid tumor after breast augmentation than the general population.

CONCLUSION

We present a nonrandom association between breast implants and desmoid tumors. Whether the tumors arise from the surgical trauma or the implant's biomaterial is unknown. When surgery is indicated, negative margins reduce the risk of recurrence.

Immunotherapy Strategies for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are the most common mesenchymal soft tissue sarcoma of the gastrointestinal tract. The management of locally advanced or metastatic unresectable GIST involves detecting KIT, PDGFR, or other molecular alterations targeted by imatinib and other tyrosine kinase inhibitors. The role of immunotherapy in soft tissue sarcomas is growing fast due to multiple clinical and pre-clinical studies with no current standard of care. The potential therapies include cytokine-based therapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, anti-KIT monoclonal antibodies, bi-specific monoclonal antibodies, and cell-based therapies. Here we provide a comprehensive review of the immunotherapeutic strategies for GIST.

ETV4 and ETV5 drive synovial sarcoma through cell cycle and DUX4 embryonic pathway control

Synovial sarcoma is an aggressive malignancy with no effective treatments for patients with metastasis. The synovial sarcoma fusion SS18-SSX, which recruits the SWI/SNF-BAF chromatin remodeling and polycomb repressive complexes, results in epigenetic activation of FGF receptor (FGFR) signaling. In genetic FGFR-knockout models, culture, and xenograft synovial sarcoma models treated with the FGFR inhibitor BGJ398, we show that FGFR1, FGFR2, and FGFR3 were crucial for tumor growth. Transcriptome analyses of BGJ398-treated cells and histological and expression analyses of mouse and human synovial sarcoma tumors revealed prevalent expression of two ETS factors and FGFR targets, ETV4 and ETV5. We further demonstrate that ETV4 and ETV5 acted as drivers of synovial sarcoma growth, most likely through control of the cell cycle. Upon ETV4 and ETV5 knockdown, we observed a striking upregulation of DUX4 and its transcriptional targets that activate the zygotic genome and drive the atrophy program in facioscapulohumeral dystrophy patients. In addition to demonstrating the importance of inhibiting all three FGFRs, the current findings reveal potential nodes of attack for the cancer with the discovery of ETV4 and ETV5 as appropriate biomarkers and molecular targets, and activation of the embryonic DUX4 pathway as a promising approach to block synovial sarcoma tumors.

Outcomes of metastatic synovial sarcoma with doxorubicin, pazopanib, and ifosfamide therapy

e23552

Background: Synovial sarcoma (SS) accounts for 5-10% of all soft tissue sarcoma. SS are aggressive tumors with a median 5-year survival of 60-70% when localized disease but also a propensity for metastatic spread with 40-45% of patients developing metastasis within 5 years. It is considered a chemotherapy-sensitive sarcoma and treatment options are increasing. Herein, we present the outcomes of SS patients by systemic regimen and multimodality approach. Methods: This is a single institution, retrospective cohort of 79 patients with histopathologically confirmed SS treated at from 2004 to 2019. Clinical characteristics, treatment, response and survival were analyzed. We estimated medians of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) using the method of Kaplan-Meier along with the Log-Rank test. All tests were two-sided and statistical significance was considered when p<0.05. Results: Median follow-up was 3.7 years (range 3.13 to 4.33), 59.5% were women and median age at diagnosis was 41 (range 5-77). At presentation, 60 patients (75.9%) had localized disease and 19 (24.1%) presented with metastatic disease. Among the entire cohort the three-year OS rate was 78.9% (95%CI = 66.3-87.3) and five-year OS rate 68.7% (95%CI = 53.5-79.9). OS between localized disease (N = 45) and metastatic (N = 12) was not statistically significant (log-rank p = 0.098). When comparing different regimens, doxorubicin-based regimens (DBR) showed longest median PFS of 10.1 months (95%CI = 3.97-21.16), while pazopanib had a median PFS of 7.45 (95%CI = 2.63-12.3), high dose ifosfamide (HDI) 6.4 months (95%CI = 2.79-15.5) and trabectedin 3.12 months (95%CI = 0.99-6.97). Conversely, patients with metastatic disease treated with pazopanib experienced a median PFS of 11.47 months (95%CI = 2.63-32.9) while those treated with a DBR 8.15 months (95%CI = 1.08-35.8). Conclusions: SS is highly aggressive and, in our cohort, patients with local presentation had non-significant difference in OS to the metastatic disease, this could be due to a small sample size or the high probability for relapse this tumor has. Chemotherapy with DBRs showed superiority to other regimens and pazopanib showed to be slightly superior when evaluating only metastatic disease. Addition of pazopanib maintenance therapy may improve PFS and OS. Continuous evaluation of these patients with further inclusion of SS on immunotherapy is warranted.

Differential risk factors between uterine sarcomas and malignant mixed Müllerian tumors

e23551

Background: Uterine sarcomas are malignant tumors of the smooth muscle or connective tissue of the uterus. Its main histological types are leiomyosarcomas and endometrial stromal sarcomas, with recent classifications considering malignant mixed müllerian tumors (MMMT) as a dedifferentiated endometrial carcinoma rather than a primary uterine sarcoma. We hypothesize there are different risk factors which predispose to MMMT as compared to uterine sarcomas. This study investigates these risk factors to determine if they contribute to the development of either disease. Methods: Under an IRB-approved protocol, we identified patients with uterine sarcomas and MMMT treated at Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center and University of Miami Hospital between 2010 and 2020 by Patient Atlas (clinical database tool; Miami, FL). We compared the risk factors known to be associated with endometrial carcinomas between uterine sarcomas and MMMT using independent sample t-test, Chi Square, Spearman Rho and Pearson correlation. Results: A total of 59 patients with MMMT and 115 cases of uterine sarcoma were identified in our database. In the sarcoma group, the most common histology was leiomyosarcoma (n = 76, 66%). Upon analysis of the characteristics of the sarcoma and MMMT cohorts respectively, 38 (33%) vs 16 (27%) were Hispanics, 18 (15%) vs 13 (22%) had diabetes, 26 (22%) vs 20 (34%) used contraception or hormonal replacement therapy (HRT), 35 (30%) vs 17 (28%) were alcohol users, 26 (22%) vs 15 (25%) were smokers, and 54 (47%) vs 31 (52%) had a positive family history of cancer, with no statistically significant differences found (p > 0.05). The sarcoma group had a significantly lower age at diagnosis (AAD) (53 vs. 65, P < 0.001) and a larger tumor size (11.3 vs. 7.3 cm, p < 0.0005). Use of contraception or HRT was not significantly different among the 2 groups (χ(1) = 0.699, p = 0.4). Similarly, no significant difference was found in the mean age of menarche/menopause, patient’s weight, median gravidity and parity (p > 0.05). The patient’s weight and BMI negatively correlated with the AAD in the MMMT group (ρ = - 0.279, p = 0.043 and r = -0.274, p = 0.041 respectively). Older age at menopause was associated with older AAD in the sarcoma group (ρ = 0.571, p = 0.0001). Patients with higher gravidity and parity had an older AAD among the 2 groups (p ≤ 0.05). Conclusions: The uterine sarcoma patients had significantly younger AAD than the MMMT group, with the age at menopause being positively correlated with the AAD. The use of contraception or HRT were not significantly different among the 2 cohorts, suggesting that there could be an overlap of the risk factors of MMMT and uterine sarcomas. Interestingly, higher gravidity and parity were associated with an older AAD. In the MMMT group, patient’s weight and BMI were inversely associated with the AAD. Larger studies are needed to investigate whether similarities or discrepancies in the studied risk factors truly exist.

Demographics, outcomes, and risk factors for patients (Pts) with sarcoma and COVID-19: A multi-institutional cohort analysis

11523

Background: Sarcoma pts often receive aggressive, highly immunosuppressive therapy and may be at high risk for severe COVID-19. Demographics, outcomes and risk factors for pts with sarcoma and COVID-19 are unknown. We aimed to describe the course of COVID-19 in sarcoma pts and to identify factors associated with adverse outcomes. Methods: The COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (NCT04354701) is an international registry of pts with cancer and COVID-19. Adult pts (≥18 years old) with a diagnosis of sarcoma and laboratory confirmed SARS-CoV-2 were included from 50 participating institutions. Data including demographics, sarcoma diagnosis and treatment, and course of COVID-19 infection were analyzed. Primary outcome was the composite rate of hospitalization or death at 30 days from COVID-19 diagnosis. Secondary outcomes were 30 day all-cause mortality, rate of hospitalization, O2 need, and ICU admission. Descriptive statistics and univariate Fisher tests are reported. Results: From March 17, 2020 to February 6, 2021, N=204 pts were included. Median follow up was 42 days. Median age was 58 years (IQR 43-67). 97 (48%) were male. 30 (15%) had ECOG performance status ≥2. 104 (51%) received cancer treatment, including surgery or radiation, within 3 months of COVID-19 diagnosis. 153 (75%) had active cancer, of whom 34 (22%) had lung metastases. 100 (49%) pts met the composite primary endpoint; 96 (47%) were hospitalized and 18 (9%) died within 30 days from COVID-19 diagnosis. 64 (31%) required oxygen, and 16 (8%) required ICU admission. Primary endpoint rates were similar for pts who received cytotoxic chemotherapy (38/58, 66%) or targeted therapy (16/28, 57%). Pts with higher rates of the primary endpoint included patients ≥60 years old (59% vs 40%, OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.12-3.74, p=0.016), pts with ECOG PS ≥2 vs 0-1 (90% vs 41%, OR 12.2, 95% CI 3.44-66.8, p<0.001), pts receiving any systemic therapy within 3 months of COVID-19 diagnosis (62% vs 39%, OR 2.65, 95% CI 1.43-4.97, p=0.001), and pts with lung metastases (68% vs 42%, OR 2.77, 95% CI 1.19-6.79, p=0.013). Primary endpoint rates were similar across sarcoma subtypes (Table). Conclusions: This is the largest cohort study of pts with sarcoma and COVID-19 to date. Sarcoma pts have high rates of complications from COVID-19. Older patients, those with poor performance status, those recently receiving systemic cancer therapy, and those with lung metastases appear to have worse outcomes.[Table: see text]

Multiomic analysis to reveal distinct molecular profiles of uterine and nonuterine leiomyosarcoma

11555

Background: Leiomyosarcoma (LMS) is a rare group of mesenchymal malignancies found in the uterus, retroperitoneum, skin, or other soft-tissue sites. Treatment for LMS is extrapolated from trials including both uterine (uLMS) and non-uLMS subtypes, although whether they respond similarly and have similar outcomes from treatment is not clear. We examined the molecular composition of LMS by site of origin to better inform future drug development and trial design. Methods: We reviewed 1115 specimens with LMS histology tested by Caris Life Sciences for targeted exome (NextSeq, 592 gene panel), whole exome, and whole transcriptome sequencing (NovaSeq). Specimens were stratified into uLMS, rpLMS (retroperitoneal), and otherLMS (non-uterine/retroperitoneal) subgroups based on tumor origin sites. Genomic data was analyzed for mutations, copy number aberrations, and fusions. RNA expression profiling included evaluation of individual genes and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA). P-value adjustment performed by the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure. Results: The study cohort was comprised of 62.9% uLMS (n = 701), 14.9% rpLMS (n = 166) and 22.2% otherLMS (n = 248) specimens. Overall, LMS specimens most frequently harbored TP53 (64%, n = 612), ATRX (30%, n = 219), RB1 (22%, n = 156), and MED12 (16%, n = 94) mutations, with these genes accounting for 74.4% (n = 1044) of all observed pathogenic/likely pathogenic mutations. RB1 mutations were significantly less common in uLMS (15%) compared to rpLMS (30%, p < 0.05) and otherLMS (33%, p < 0.01), whereas MED12 mutations were almost exclusive to uLMS (22% vs 1% rpLMS, 3% otherLMS, p < 0.05). MAP2K4 copy number amplification were more common in rpLMS (22%, p < 0.001) and otherLMS (14%, p < 0.182) compared to uLMS (7%), with frequent co-amplification of nearby genes ( FLCN, GID4, SPECC1, GAS7, PER1, and AURKB) located at chr17p11-13. Actionable gene fusions involving ALK (2.1%, n = 11), FGFR1 (0.2%, n = 1), and NTRK1/2 (0.2%, n = 1 each) were rare overall, with similar prevalence across subtypes. Genomic alteration rates were not significantly different between rpLMS and otherLMS subtypes . RNA expression profiling identified significant upregulation of PI3K/AKT/mTOR, DDR, WNT/Beta-Catenin pathway genes in non-uLMS. GSEA indicated several immune-related gene sets were enriched in rpLMS and otherLMS compared to uLMS. Conclusions: Comprehensive molecular profiling suggests that LMS originating from the uterus represents a molecularly distinct disease compared to other primary sites of origin. We identified key genomic patterns which have potential for targeted therapy. These data provide insight for the framework of future clinical trials designed to separate uLMS from non-uLMS histologies, although further subdivision does not appear to be warranted.

A phase III study (APROMISS) of AL3818 (Catequentinib, Anlotinib) hydrochloride monotherapy in subjects with metastatic or advanced synovial sarcoma

11505

Background: AL3818 (Catequentinib, Anlotinib) is a novel, orally administered, small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor. The primary objective of this Phase 3 study is to evaluate the efficacy of AL3818 monotherapy in patients (pts) with synovial sarcoma (SS) comparing with dacarbazine in randomization setting. Methods: Patients with a diagnosis of synovial sarcoma requiring second line or further line treatment were eligible for enrollment. The regimen was a 21-day cycle with oral AL3818 administered on 14 days on and 7 days off. This phase 3 trial is randomized in 2:1 ratio of AL3818 comparing to dacarbazine with option of crossover after PD of dacarbazine treatment. Progression free survival (PFS) with Log Rank test is the primary endpoint and this trial for SS is currently completed enrolled in US and Italy. Results: Total 79 pts initiated treatment and are evaluable, 52 received AL3818 as treatment arm (T), and 27 received dacarbazine (D) as control arm (C). Arms T/C median ages were 40.5/42.0 years (range: 18-70+) and 20/16 (38.5%/59.3%) were male. Overall, PFS was 2.89 months (95% CI: 2.73 – 6.87) for AL3818 and 1.64 (95% CI: 1.45 – 2.70) for D. The PFS of study met the primary endpoint with a p-value of 0.0015 and a HR of 0.449 (95% CI: 0.270– 0.744). At the month 4, 6, and 12, the percentages of progression free patients for AL3818 were 48.1%, 42.3% and 26.9%; and for D were 14.85%, 11.1% and 3.7%. For grade 3 treatment-related adverse events, 12(23.1%) of pts experienced for AL3818 and 7(25.9%) of pts experienced for D. The most common AL3818 related grade 3 AEs were diarrhea (5.8%) and hypertension (3.8%). Conclusions: This phase III trial demonstrates improved disease control and superior progression free survival for AL3818 vs dacarbazine in advanced SS. In addition, the study further confirms the acceptable benefit-risk profile of AL3818 from the prior randomized Phase 2b soft tissue sarcoma study (NCT02449343). AL3818 is a meaningful treatment option for pts with advanced SS. Clinical trial information: NCT 03016819 Clinical trial information: NCT03016819.

Deciphering the molecular landscape and the tumor microenvironment of perivascular epitheloid cell neoplasma (PEComa)

11539

Background: PEComa is a rare mesenchymal neoplasm composed of perivascular epithelioid cells. Due to its rarity, diagnosis is challenging and no standardized treatment guidelines have been established. A subgroup of PEComas are characterized by a loss of function mutation in TSC1/2 that activates the PIK3-Akt-mTOR pathway. In the majority of patients, however, the molecular landscape and the composition of the tumor microenvironment (TME) remain largely unclear. Thus, we conducted this study to elucidate the genetic landscape of PEComas. A comparative analysis was performed with melanoma as a representative immunogenic tumor type. Methods: Thirty-five PEComa specimens were centrally analysed at the Caris Life Sciences laboratory. NextGen DNA sequencing (NextSeq, 592 gene panel or NovaSeq, whole-exome-sequencing), whole-transcriptome RNA sequencing (NovaSeq) and immunohistochemistry (Caris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ) were performed. Gene expression profiling (GEP) was performed by unsupervised hierarchical clustering. RNA deconvolution analysis was performed using the Microenvironment Cell Populations (MCP)-counter method to quantify immune cell populations (Becht 2016, Genome Biology). Results: The most common mutations detected in this cohort were TP53 (47%), ATRX (32%), TSC1/2 (11%/29%) and MSH3 (17%). Interestingly, TP53 mutations occurred less frequently (25 vs 60%, p = 0.055) in TSC1/2-mutated ( TSC1/2-mt) compared to TSC1/2-wildtype ( TSC1/2-wt) tumors, whereas MSH3 (25%, n = 1/4) and ERCC2 (14%, n = 2/14) mutations were exclusively observed in TSC1/2-mt cases. TSC1/2 mutations and other mTOR signalling pathway alterations, including two TFE gene fusion transcripts, were mutually exclusive. Of note, we found that 33.3% (n = 2) of TSC2-mt tumors were associated with high PIK3-Akt-mTOR pathway expression, while 100% (n = 3) of TSC1-mt tumors demonstrated lower expression. Deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability-high and high tumor mutational burden were rare (2.9%, n = 1 each) and observed concurrently in absence of PD-L1 expression. Overall, PD-L1 expression was observed in 21.9% (n = 7) of patients. An exploratory comparison with melanoma revealed that PEComa TMEs were characterized by a significant increase of NK cells and fibroblasts, as well as a relevant decrease of CD8+ T cells and B cells. Conclusions: Within this study we discovered a heterogeneous molecular landscape with a high prevalence of TSC1/2 mutations that were in part associated with transcriptional up-regulation of the PIK3-Akt-mTOR pathway. Furthermore, the relatively immune-cold TME compared to melanoma suggests increased lymphocyte infiltration may be required to increase the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors for PEComa.

Large scale multiomic analysis suggests mechanisms of resistance to immunotherapy in leiomyosarcoma

11512

Background: Leiomyosarcomas (LMS) have been reported to have immunohistochemical (IHC) and gene expression signatures suggestive of an immune-responsive tumor microenvironment. Despite this, immune checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated minimal activity in LMS. We examined molecular profiles of LMS specimens from multiple institutions to explore mechanisms of immunotherapy (IO) resistance. Methods: LMS specimens (n = 1115), including 701 uterine (uLMS) and 414 soft tissue site (stLMS) samples, underwent next-generation sequencing (NGS) of DNA (592-gene panel or whole exome) and RNA (whole transcriptome, n = 537) at Caris Life Sciences (Phoenix, AZ). A threshold of 10 mut/Mb was used to identify high tumor mutational burden (TMB-H). IHC was performed for PD-L1 (SP142; 2+|5% positive). Deficient mismatch repair (dMMR)/high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) was tested by IHC and NGS, respectively. RNA expression was analyzed using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis and Microenvironment Cell Populations-counter, with results compared to melanoma (n = 1255) as a representative immunogenic tumor type. P-values were adjusted for multiple hypothesis testing. Results: TMB-H was observed in 3.8% (n = 41) of LMS specimens, with a median of 5 mut/Mb (IQR 3.3-6.7). dMMR/MSI-H was rarely detected (1.5%, n = 17), whereas 8.2% (n = 88) were positive for PD-L1 expression. uLMS and stLMS did not differ in TMB-H (3.4 vs 4.5%, p = 0.277), PD-L1 expression (8.6 vs 7.4%, p = 0.322), or dMMR/MSI-H (2.0 vs 0.7% p = 0.207). stLMS demonstrated upregulation of immune-related gene sets, including interferon γ (p = 0.035) and α (p = 0.033) response, inflammatory response (p = 0.038), interleukin-6/STAT3 signaling (p = 0.030), and TNFα signaling (p = 0.026) compared to uLMS. Immune cell infiltration was increased in stLMS over uLMS, most notably for CD8 T-cell and B-cell abundance ( > 2-fold increase, p < 0.0001). Compared to melanoma, all LMS had lower abundance of CD8 T cells, cytotoxic lymphocytes, and B-cells ( > 2-fold decrease, p < 0.0001). Fibroblasts were more prevalent in LMS relative to melanoma (3.2-fold increase, p < 0.0001). Interestingly, while higher CD8 T-cell infiltration was positively associated with dMMR/MSI-H among LMS specimens (p = 0.032), TMB-H and PD-L1 expression were associated with lower CD8 T-cell infiltration (p < 0.01). Conclusions: Only a small proportion of LMS are TMB-H or MSI-H, suggesting that the neoantigen burden in LMS may be insufficient to promote a robust anti-tumor response, even in the presence of PD-L1 positive tumor cells. Traditional predictive biomarkers of response to IO are unlikely to be useful in LMS. Furthermore, both uLMS and stLMS have an immune microenvironment characterized by a high fibroblast and low T cell abundance relative to melanoma. Future IO trials in LMS should focus on combination therapies that may reverse the observed T-cell exclusion/desmoplastic phenotype.

Phase 1 trial of autologous dendritic cell vaccination with imiquimod immunomodulation in children and adults with refractory sarcoma

11542

Background: Sarcomas are rare, heterogeneous, and aggressive neoplasms that often affect otherwise healthy individuals. Patients with advanced or metastatic sarcomas have dismal outcomes. Immunotherapy presents promising new modalities to help treat sarcomas. One such therapy, autologous dendritic cell (DC) vaccines, using antigen-loaded DCs, intensify the adaptive immune response by enhancing T-cell activity and inducing tumor cell death through apoptosis and cytolysis. We present the results of a phase 1 study of DC vaccine for refractory sarcomas. Methods: A phase 1 dose-escalation study of autologous DC vaccination was conducted in children and adults with recurrent/refractory sarcomas who underwent surgical resection of a primary or metastatic tumor between 2014-2019. A 5+3 dose-escalation schema was chosen to determine safety and recommended phase 2 dose. Patient monocytes were collected by pheresis and incubated with GM-CSF plus IL-4 to generate immature DCs which were then loaded with autologous tumor lysates from the patient’s surgical resection. Three dose levels, 3, 6, and 12 million DCs per treatment were tested. The DC product was administered intradermally in imiquimod-treated skin to complete in situ maturation. Treatment consisted of four weekly injections of the DC product, followed by four monthly “boosters” of tumor lysate. The primary and secondary endpoints included safety/feasibility and preliminary clinical efficacy, respectively. Results: Nineteen patients were enrolled with a median age 50 years (13-75 years) and 47% female. Seven patients were treated on dose level 1 and six each on dose level 2 and 3. Thirteen patients received all planned injections while the remaining six patients progressed during treatment. There was no treatment related dose limiting toxicity. Grade 1-2 fever, headache, arthralgia, injection site reaction attributable to treatment were noted in four patients. There were no adverse events > grade 2. Disease progression before or after completion of study treatment was noted in 15 patients with a median PFS of 9.5 months (95%CI 5.6-28.7). The two-year PFS and OS was 36.8% and 68.1%, respectively. There were seven deaths due to disease, one patient was discharged to hospice and two patients have been lost to follow up. Five patients are currently receiving alternative therapy. Four patients remain in follow up without evidence of disease progression including three patients (pleomorphic myxofibrosarcoma, pleomorphic myosarcoma, and leiomyosarcoma) who are disease free over two years from initiating study therapy and one pediatric patient (Ewing sarcoma) disease free for over one year. Conclusions: Autologous DC vaccine with imiquimod immunomodulation for patients with relapsed/refractory sarcomas is feasible and well-tolerated. Refinement to augment initial and sustained antitumor activity is needed. Clinical trial information: NCT01803152.

Real-world pan-cancer landscape of frameshift mutations (FSM) and their role in predicting responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in patients (pts) with tumors with low tumor mutational burden (TMB)

2599

Background: Pembrolizumab was recently approved in tumors with TMB ≥10 mut/Mb. FSM can complement TMB in predicting ICI responses. We obtained a real-world dataset of genomic alterations from 250,813 samples to examine the distribution of TMB and FSM across a variety of malignancies. We then conducted a multi-institutional retrospective review of pts treated with ICI. Methods: Database samples were sequenced by Foundation Medicine using hybrid capture genomic profiling to evaluate all classes of genomic alterations in at least 315 genes. The clinical cohort included pts with metastatic solid malignancies who received ICI and had undergone commercial next-generation sequencing (NGS). Pts were classified into four distinct groups: TMB-L ( < 10mut/Mb)/ FS-A (absent FSM), TMB-H (≥10mut/Mb)/ FS-A, TMB-L /FS-P (present, ≥1 FSM) and TMB-H/FS-P. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and response rate (RR) were compared between the groups. Results: 246,252 MSS and 4,561 MSI-High samples were segregated by histology and divided into four distinct groups based on the TMB and FSM. For the MSS cohort the distribution was: TMB-L/FS-A (N = 111,065, 45%), TMB-H/FS-A(N = 15,313, 6%), TMB-L /FS-P (N = 98,389, 40%) and TMB-H/FS-P (N = 21,485, 9%). In the ICI-treated clinical cohort, there were 230 pts in 12 histology groups; 212 had information on TMB and FSM. The most common primary sites were GI (N = 39), melanoma (N = 37), GU (N = 32) and H&N cancer (N = 21). 159 pts received single ICI and 53 dual ICI. 196 tumors were MSS, 11 MSI, and 5 unknown. Group distribution: TMB-L/FS-A 80 pts (38%), TMB-L/FS-P 57pts (27%), TMB-H/FS-A 36pts (17%), TMB-H/FS-P 39pts (18%). FS-P was associated with higher RR 23.81 vs. 12.8 % (p = 0.02). Regardless of TMB, the median PFS for FS-P vs. FS-A was 7.9 and 4.0 mo, respectively (p < 0.01). TMB-L/FS-P had superior PFS (5.1 mo) compared to TMB-L/FS-A (3.6 mo) group (p < 0.01). The 15-month PFS probability was 12% for TMB-L/FS-A vs. 38% for TMB-L/FS-P. No statistically significant difference was detected in OS between the groups. From the pan-cancer cohort, histologies with more than 40% of samples in the TBM-L/FS-P (MSS) group were: CRC, RCC, PDAC, biliary, breast, esophageal, and endometrial cancers. Additional genomic data will be presented. Conclusions: FSM are frequently found on commercial NGS testing in tumors that are MSS and TMB-L. The presence of FSM may complement TMB in predicting benefit from immunotherapy. If validated in additional cohorts, FSM presence could be utilized to identify pts that may benefit from ICI, particularly for tumors with low TMB.

Severity of COVID-19 in Cancer patients versus patients without Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Purpose: Data are extremely limited with regards to the impact of COVID-19 on cancer patients. Our study explored the distinct clinical features of COVID-19 patients with cancer.

Experimental Design: 189 COVID-19 patients, including 16 cancer patients and 173 patients without cancer, were recruited. Propensity score 1:4 matching (PSM) was performed between cancer patients and patients without cancer based on age, gender and comorbidities. Survival was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and the difference was compared by the log-rank test.

Results: PSM analysis yielded 16 cancer patients and 64 propensity score-matched patients without cancer. Compared to patients without cancer, cancer patients tended to have leukopenia and elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and procalcitonin. For those with critical COVID-19, cancer patients had an inferior survival than those without cancer. Also, cancer patients with severe/critical COVID-19 tended to be male and present with low S_PO₂ and albumin, and high hs-CRP, lactate dehydrogenase and blood urea nitrogen on admission compared to those with mild COVID-19. In terms of risk factors, recent cancer diagnosis (within 1 year of onset of COVID-19) and anti-tumor treatment within 3 months of COVID-19 diagnosis were associated with inferior survival.

Conclusions: We found COVID-19 patients with cancer have distinct clinical features as compared to patients without cancer. Importantly, cancer patients with critical COVID-19 were found to have poorer outcomes compared to those without cancer. In the cancer cohort, patients with severe/critical COVID-19 presented with a distinct clinical profile from those with mild COVID-19; short cancer history and recent anti-cancer treatment were associated with inferior survival.

Utility of Circulating Tumor DNA in the Management of Patients With GI Stromal Tumor: Analysis of 243 Patients

PURPOSE

GI stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common sarcoma of the GI tract. Management of patients with GIST is determined by KIT, PDGFRA, or other genomic alterations. Tissue-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis is the standard approach for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment selection. However, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)–based NGS is a novel and noninvasive alternative.

METHODS

ctDNA sequencing results were evaluated in blood samples from 243 de-identified patients within the Guardant360 database. Under an approved institutional review board protocol, a retrospective analysis was performed on 45 single-institution patients.

RESULTS

Of 243 patients, 114 (47%) were women, and the median age was 59 years (range, 17-90 years). Patients with no alterations and variations of uncertain significance were excluded. Of the 162 patients with known pathogenic mutations, KIT was the most common (56%), followed by NF (7%), PDGFRA (6%), PI3KCA (6%), KRAS (5%), and others (6%). Most tumors harbored an actionable KIT or PDGFRA mutation. Our institutional cohort (n = 45) had 16 (35%) KIT exon 11 mutations, 3 (6%) KIT exon 9 mutations, and 1 (2%) PDGFRA mutation detected on ctDNA. Resistance mutations were observed in KIT exon 17 (8 patients), exon 13 (3 patients), and in both (3 patients). Our comparison of ctDNA with tissue NGS revealed a positive predictive value (PPV) of 100%. Failure of concordance was observed in patients with localized or low disease burden. From the time of ctDNA testing, the median overall survival was not reached, whereas the median progression-free survival was 7 months.

CONCLUSION

ctDNA provides a rapid, noninvasive analysis of current mutations with a high PPV for patients with metastatic GIST. ctDNA-based testing may help to define the optimal choice of therapy on the basis of resistance mutations and should be studied prospectively.

Identification of Genetic Alterations by Circulating Tumor DNA in Leiomyosarcoma: A Molecular Analysis of 73 Patients

Background

Leiomyosarcoma is a malignant mesenchymal tumor of cells of smooth muscle lineage arising commonly in retroperitoneum, uterus, large veins, and the limbs. The genetics of leiomyosarcomas are complex and there is very limited understanding of common driver mutations. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) offers a rapid and noninvasive method of next-generation sequencing (NGS) that could be used for diagnosis, therapy, and detection of recurrence.

Methods

ctDNA testing was performed using Guardant360, which detects single nucleotide variants, amplifications, fusions, and specific insertion/deletion mutations in 73 genes using NGS.

Results

Of 73 patients, 59 were found to have one or more cancer-associated genomic alteration. Forty-five (76%) were female with a median age of 63 (range, 38-87) years. All samples were designated metastatic. The most common alterations were detected in Tp53 (65%), BRAF (13%), CCNE (13%), EGFR (12%), PIK3CA (12%), FGFR1 (10%), RB1(10%), KIT (8%), and PDGFRA (8%). Some of the other alterations included RAF1, ERBB2, MET, PTEN TERT, APC, and NOTCH1. Potentially targetable mutations, by Food and Drug Administration-approved or clinical trials, were found in 24 (40%) of the 73 patients. Four patients (5%) were found to have incidental germline TP53 mutations.

Conclusion

NGS of ctDNA allows identification of genomic alterations in plasma from patients with leiomyosarcoma. Unfortunately, there is limited activity of current targeted agents in leiomyosarcomas. These results suggest opportunities to develop therapy against TP53, cell cycle, and kinase signaling pathways. Further validation and prospective evaluation is warranted to investigate the clinical utility of ctDNA for patients with leiomyosarcoma.

Genomic landscape of angiosarcoma: A targeted and immunotherapy biomarker analysis of 143 patients

11545

Background: Targeted therapies for angiosarcoma (AS) patients have limited efficacy. Although significant responses to immunotherapy (IO-therapy) have been observed in cutaneous AS, its efficacy across all types of AS is not known. Herein, we describe genetic and molecular biomarkers of AS in order to propose potential therapeutic options. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 143 AS tumors profiled by Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) 592-gene panel (Caris Life Sciences,Irving, TX, USA). Whole transcriptome sequencing (WTS) was performed on 53 tumors. Mutations and copy number amplifications (CNAs) were analyzed and grouped by pathway. Biomarkers potentially associated with response to IO-therapy (TMB-High [≥10/Mb], MSI-High, and PD-L1 [IHC ≥ 2+ and 5%]) were also analyzed. AS subtypes based on primary tumor site were compared. P-values were corrected using a Benjamini & Hochberg method. Results: Sample median age was 67 (range 22-89), 61% were female, and 29% were classified as metastatic/recurrent. The most commonly mutated genes were TP53 (29%), ARID1A (17%), POT1 (16%), and ATRX (13%); MYC CNA was found in 23% of cases. IO-therapy markers were present in 36.4% of cases (TMB-High in 26%, PD-L1+ 21.8%, MSI-High 0.7%). Pathway alterations were detected in 86% of AS cases. By pathway, TP53 was altered in 31%, cell cycle 30%, DNA damage repair (DDR) 21%, RAS 18%, PI3K 15% and chromatin remodeling 14%. By site, head/neck (HN) AS had the highest rate of IO-therapy markers (65%, p < 0.05) [TMB-High (63%, p < 0.0001)], TP53 mutation (51%, p = 0.07), and POT1A mutation (41%, p < 0.01). MYC CNA was highest in breast (63%) and extremity (40%) AS (p < 0.0001). DDR alterations were present in 56% (p = 0.09) of cutaneous AS and ranged from 12-27% in other subtypes (not significant, NS). RAS and PI3K alterations ranged from 6-27% across all subtypes (NS). Conclusions: Our findings suggest differential angiosarcoma biology across primary sites. HN AS had more frequent markers of potential IO-therapy response, as well as DDR alterations. Next in frequency, we found ARID1A which is possibly associated with overactive EZH2, a target of tazemetostat. MYC amplification suggests a role targeting cell cycle via cyclin-dependent kinase or bromodomain inhibitors in breast and extremity ASs. Finally, RAS and PI3K are mutated in a low percentage of cases, explaining the limited benefit of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in AS. Future AS clinical trials should be designed with consideration of primary site, IO-therapy response biomarkers, and activated pathway.

Clinical behavior and treatment outcomes in angiosarcoma: A 10-year retrospective review

e23555

Background: Angiosarcoma (AS) is a highly aggressive sarcoma. Five-year overall survival (OS) with local disease is only about 60% despite multimodality treatment. In advanced disease, responses to cytotoxic chemotherapy are common; however, median OS is only 3-12 mos. Targeted therapies (TT) have not been consistently effective. Early results for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are promising but their efficacy has not been compared to chemotherapy. Here we present the outcome of AS patients by systemic regimen and multimodality approach. Methods: We identified 39 patients with pathologically confirmed AS treated at Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center and Jackson Memorial Hospital from 2009 to 2019. Clinical characteristics, treatment, responses and survival were analized. We calculated OS using Kaplan-Meier method and statistical significance with Log-Rank Test and Cox regression to estimate hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval. Progression-free survival (PFS) was analyzed for different regimens in the palliative setting using same approach as for OS. Results: In our cohort, median follow-up is 2.3 years (95% CI = 2 to 3.3), 48% were women and median age at diagnosis was 63 (range 13-89). At presentation, 16 pts (41%) had local disease and 23 advanced or metastatic (59%). By location, 13 pts (33%) had primary cutaneous AS, 12 pts (31%) visceral AS, 5 pts (13%) primary breast AS, 2 (5%) extremity AS and 7 (18%) radiation associated AS. Multimodality treatment was used in 29 pts (74%). OS in the entire cohort at 3 years was 49% (95% CI = 28 to 67%). OS between local disease was (N = 16) and in advanced disease (N = 23) was not statistically significant (p = 0.485; HR = 1.1 [95% CI = 0.4 to 3.3]). In the neoadjuvant setting, objective response rates trended to favor doxorubicin-based regimen (DBR) over taxane-based regimens (TBR) (80% vs. 40%) but were not statistically different (p = 0.519). In the advanced setting, PFS for DBR was 3.9 mo (95% CI 1.1 to 4.9 mo), 5.9 mo for TBR (95% CI 2.3 to 10.9 mo), 6.1 mo for ICI (95% CI not estimable), and 2.4 mo for targeted therapy (TT) (95% CI 0.8 to 8.8 mo), most common TT agent was pazopanib (71% of TT agents). Conclusions: AS is highly aggressive and most patients with local presentation will relapse translating in similar OS to the advanced cohort. No significant activity was seen for TT. In the advanced setting, chemotherapy with TBR appears slightly superior to DBR. ICIs resulted in similar if not superior PFS despite its use in a later line setting. Studies incorporating ICIs into earlier lines of therapy are warranted.

Phase I Study of the Mutant IDH1 Inhibitor Ivosidenib: Safety and Clinical Activity in Patients With Advanced Chondrosarcoma

PURPOSE

Surgery is the primary therapy for localized chondrosarcoma; for locally advanced and/or metastatic disease, no known effective systemic therapy exists. Mutations in the isocitrate dehydrogenase 1/2 (IDH1/2) enzymes occur in up to 65% of chondrosarcomas, resulting in accumulation of the oncometabolite D-2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG). Ivosidenib (AG-120) is a selective inhibitor of mutant IDH1 approved in the United States for specific cases of acute myeloid leukemia. We report outcomes of patients with advanced chondrosarcoma in an ongoing study exploring ivosidenib treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This phase I multicenter open-label dose-escalation and expansion study of ivosidenib monotherapy enrolled patients with mutant IDH1 advanced solid tumors, including chondrosarcoma. Ivosidenib was administered orally (100 mg twice daily to 1,200 mg once daily) in continuous 28-day cycles. Responses were assessed every other cycle using RECIST (version 1.1).

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients (escalation, n = 12; expansion, n = 9) with advanced chondrosarcoma received ivosidenib (women, n = 8; median age, 55 years; range, 30-88 years; 11 had received prior systemic therapy). Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were mostly grade 1 or 2. Twelve patients experienced grade ≥ 3 AEs; only one event was judged treatment related (hypophosphatemia, n = 1). Plasma 2-HG levels decreased substantially in all patients (range, 14%-94.2%), to levels seen in healthy individuals. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.6 months (95% CI, 1.9 to 7.4 months); the PFS rate at 6 months was 39.5%. Eleven (52%) of 21 patients experienced stable disease.

CONCLUSION

In patients with chondrosarcoma, ivosidenib showed minimal toxicity, substantial 2-HG reduction, and durable disease control. Future studies of ivosidenib monotherapy or rational combination approaches should be considered in patients with advanced mutant IDH1 chondrosarcoma.

Progress in determining response to treatment in gastrointestinal stromal tumor

Introduction: Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common malignant mesenchymal tumor of the gastrointestinal system. Multiple advances in the management of GIST from the discovery of KIT/PDGRA and other genetic alterations have led to the development of multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Response assessment in GIST is determined with iRECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors), PERCIST (PET response criteria in solid tumors), or Choi criteria. Molecular genotyping of the tissue samples is the recent standard for diagnosis, treatment, and response to treatment.Areas covered: In this study, we provide a brief overview of the history of the GIST, molecular sequencing, available treatment options and clinical trials, radiologic response assessment, and the role of ctDNA in response evaluation.Expert opinion: Future GIST management is related to the development of sensitive assays to detect genetic alterations for initial diagnosis, treatment selection, monitoring the response to treatment, resistant mutations, and predicting survival.

Clinical activity of avapritinib in ≥ fourth-line (4L+) and PDGFRA Exon 18 gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST)

826

Background: Targeting oncogenic KIT and PDGFRA mutations revolutionized treatment of patients (pts) with advanced GIST; however, nearly all pts succumb to resistant disease. Avapritinib is a potent and selective kinase inhibitor with broad activity against oncogenic KIT/PDGFRA mutants, including PDGFRA D842V and other primary or secondary resistance mutations. Results from the phase 1 NAVIGATOR (NCT02508532) study of avapritinib in pts with advanced GIST are presented. Methods: Adult pts with unresectable PDGFRA D842V or other mutant GIST who progressed on imatinib and ≥1 other tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) were treated with oral, daily, continuous avapritinib. Adverse events (AE) and response by mRECIST 1.1 per central radiology were assessed. Overall population safety (30-600 mg starting doses) and efficacy in the response-evaluable 4L+ and PDGFRA Exon 18 (Ex 18) populations treated at the MTD (400 mg)/RP2D (300 mg) were analyzed. Results: As of 16 Nov 2018, 237 pts [172 KIT, 62 PDGFRA Ex 18 [56 D842V, 6 non-D842V), 2 PDGFRA N659K, 1 missing] were enrolled including 111 in the 4L+ population (primarily KIT, median 4 prior TKI) and 43 in the Ex 18 population (median 1 prior TKI). The 4L+ ORR was 22% [1 CR, 23 PR (1 pending)], and 52 SD with mDOR of 10.2 months (95% CI: 7.2–NE). The Ex 18 ORR was 86% [3 CR, 34 PR (1 pending)] and 5 SD; mDOR was not reached (95% CI: 11.3–NE). Most AEs were grade 1–2, most commonly nausea (63%), fatigue (58%), anemia (49%), periorbital edema (42%), diarrhea (40%), vomiting (40%), decreased appetite (38%), increased lacrimation (33%), peripheral edema (33%) and memory impairment (most common cognitive AE, 29%). 10% of pts discontinued due to a related AE. Grade 3–4 related AE ≥ 2% were anemia, fatigue, hypophosphatemia, hyperbilirubinemia, neutropenia, and diarrhea. Conclusions: Avapritinib has important clinical activity in pts with advanced GIST who have no effective therapies. The ORR and DOR of avapritinib in 4L+ exceeds that of approved 2nd and 3rd line therapies and shows impressive activity in D842V and other Ex 18 mutant PDGFRA GIST. Results suggest avapritinib has the potential to change the treatment paradigm of pts with advanced GIST. Clinical trial information: NCT02508532.

Correction to: Angiosarcoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a case series of seven patients from a single institution

Following publication of the original article [1], the authors have reported that the following sentence "While of the same IgG1 class as ipilimumab, preclinical data suggests this molecule may have enhanced activity against T regulatory cells".

Precision medicine in gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare soft tissue sarcomas of the gastrointestinal tract, with most carrying conserved driver mutations in the tyrosine kinase receptors KIT or PDGFRα. The use of targeted therapy against these mutations in GISTs is one of the most successful examples of precision medicine in solid tumors, beginning in 2002 with the development of imatinib, a small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) of KIT. In recent years, much progress has been made in understanding the molecular mechanisms of GISTs while unveiling their genetic heterogeneity. Since development of secondary mutations leads to imatinib resistance, the majority of research efforts have focused on identification of novel inhibitors to improve outcomes in imatinib-resistant GISTs. Sunitinib and regorafenib are two TKIs with demonstrated activity after failure of imatinib, which led to the U.S. FDA approval. Pivotal phase 3 clinical trials are ongoing with two novel agents, avapritinib and ripretinib, based on their remarkable activities in the 4th or greater line settings in phase 1/2 studies of these drugs. In this review, we will outline the remarkable diversity of genetic mutations in GISTs, and review the evidence for treatment options of genomic medicine in locally advanced or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors.