A phase I trial of SON-1010, a tumor-targeted, interleukin-12-linked, albumin-binding cytokine, shows favorable pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety in healthy volunteers

Background

The benefits of recombinant interleukin-12 (rIL-12) as a multifunctional cytokine and potential immunotherapy for cancer have been sought for decades based on its efficacy in multiple mouse models. Unexpected toxicity in the first phase 2 study required careful attention to revised dosing strategies. Despite some signs of efficacy since then, most rIL-12 clinical trials have encountered hurdles such as short terminal elimination half-life (T½), limited tumor microenvironment targeting, and substantial systemic toxicity. We developed a strategy to extend the rIL-12 T½ that depends on binding albumin in vivo to target tumor tissue, using single-chain rIL-12 linked to a fully human albumin binding (FHAB) domain (SON-1010). After initiating a dose-escalation trial in patients with cancer (SB101), a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-ascending dose (SAD) phase 1 trial in healthy volunteers (SB102) was conducted.

Methods

SB102 (NCT05408572) focused on safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic (PK), and pharmacodynamic (PD) endpoints. SON-1010 at 50-300 ng/kg or placebo administered subcutaneously on day 1 was studied at a ratio of 6:2, starting with two sentinels; participants were followed through day 29. Safety was reviewed after day 22, before enrolling the next cohort. A non-compartmental analysis of PK was performed and correlations with the PD results were explored, along with a comparison of the SON-1010 PK profile in SB101.

Results

Participants receiving SON-1010 at 100 ng/kg or higher tolerated the injection but generally experienced more treatment-emergent adverse effects (TEAEs) than those receiving the lowest dose. All TEAEs were transient and no other dose relationship was noted. As expected with rIL-12, initial decreases in neutrophils and lymphocytes returned to baseline by days 9-11. PK analysis showed two-compartment elimination in SB102 with mean T½ of 104 h, compared with one-compartment elimination in SB101, which correlated with prolonged but controlled and dose-related increases in interferon-gamma (IFNγ). There was no evidence of cytokine release syndrome based on minimal participant symptoms and responses observed with other cytokines.

Conclusion

SON-1010, a novel presentation for rIL-12, was safe and well-tolerated in healthy volunteers up to 300 ng/kg. Its extended half-life leads to a prolonged but controlled IFNγ response, which may be important for tumor control in patients.

Clinical trial registration

https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05408572, identifier NCT05408572.

The Combination of Methioninase and Ethionine Exploits Methionine Addiction to Selectively Eradicate Osteosarcoma Cells and Not Normal Cells and Synergistically Down-regulates the Expression of C-MYC

BACKGROUND/AIM

The fundamental and general hallmark of cancer cells, methionine addiction, termed the Hoffman effect, is due to overuse of methionine for highly-increased transmethylation reactions. In the present study, we tested if the combination efficacy of recombinant methioninase (rMETase) and a methionine analogue, ethionine, could eradicate osteosarcoma cells and down-regulate the expression of c-MYC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

143B osteosarcoma cells and Hs27 normal human fibroblasts were tested. The efficacy of rMETase alone and ethionine, alone and in their combination, on cell viability was determined with the WST-8 assay on 143B cells and Hs27 cells. c-MYC expression was examined with western immunoblotting and compared in 143B cells treated with/without rMETase, ethionine, or the combination of both rMETase and ethionine.

RESULTS

143B cells were more sensitive to both rMETase and ethionine than Hs 27 cells, with the following IC50s: rMETase (143B: 0.22 U/ml; Hs27: 0.82 U/ml); ethionine (143B: 0.24 mg/ml; Hs27: 0.42 mg/ml). The combination of rMETase and ethionine synergistically eradicated 143B cells, lowering the IC50 for ethionine 14-fold compared to ethionine alone (p<0.001). In contrast, Hs27 fibroblasts were relatively resistant to the combination. The expression of c-MYC was significantly down-regulated only by the combination of rMETase and ethionine in 143B cells (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

In the present study, we showed, for the first time, the synergistic combination efficacy of rMETase and ethionine on osteosarcoma cells in contrast to normal fibroblasts, which were relatively resistant. The combination of rMETase and ethionine down-regulated c-MYC expression in the cancer cells. The present results indicate the combination of rMETase and ethionine may reduce the malignancy of osteosarcoma cells and can be a potential future clinical strategy.

Preclinical Characterization and Phase I Trial Results of INBRX-109, A Third-Generation, Recombinant, Humanized, Death Receptor 5 Agonist Antibody, in Chondrosarcoma

PURPOSE

Patients with unresectable/metastatic chondrosarcoma have poor prognoses; conventional chondrosarcoma is associated with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of <4 months after first-line chemotherapy. No standard targeted therapies are available. We present the preclinical characterization of INBRX-109, a third-generation death receptor 5 (DR5) agonist, and clinical findings from a phase I trial of INBRX-109 in unresectable/metastatic chondrosarcoma (NCT03715933).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

INBRX-109 was first characterized preclinically as a DR5 agonist, with binding specificity and hepatotoxicity evaluated in vitro and antitumor activity evaluated both in vitro and in vivo. INBRX-109 (3 mg/kg every 3 weeks) was then evaluated in a phase I study of solid tumors, which included a cohort with any subtype of chondrosarcoma and a cohort with IDH1/IDH2-mutant conventional chondrosarcoma. The primary endpoint was safety. Efficacy was an exploratory endpoint, with measures including objective response, disease control rate, and PFS.

RESULTS

In preclinical studies, INBRX-109 led to antitumor activity in vitro and in patient-derived xenograft models, with minimal hepatotoxicity. In the phase I study, INBRX-109 was well tolerated and demonstrated antitumor activity in unresectable/metastatic chondrosarcoma. INBRX-109 led to a disease control rate of 87.1% [27/31; durable clinical benefit, 40.7% (11/27)], including two partial responses, and median PFS of 7.6 months. Most treatment-related adverse events, including liver-related events, were low grade (grade ≥3 events in chondrosarcoma cohorts, 5.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

INBRX-109 demonstrated encouraging antitumor activity with a favorable safety profile in patients with unresectable/metastatic chondrosarcoma. A randomized, placebo-controlled, phase II trial (ChonDRAgon, NCT04950075) will further evaluate INBRX-109 in conventional chondrosarcoma.

Early-stage CCNG1+ HR+ HER2+ Invasive Breast Carcinoma in Older Women: Current Treatment and Future Perspectives for DeltaRex-G, a CCNG1 Inhibitor

Women with HR+HER2+ early-stage breast cancer are disadvantaged by the lack of clinical trials focused on women ≥70 years of age. In the past years, there has been increasing controversy on the use of toxic chemotherapy as standard of care treatment for early- stage HR+ HER2+ breast carcinoma in older women. With precision medicine coming of age, molecular profiling of tumors and circulating tumor DNA has identified target oncogenes that could be used in designing an optimal treatment for this group of women. This article reviews the current treatment of early-stage triple receptor positive breast cancer, the risks of chemotherapy in older women, and CCNG1, a novel biomarker in development for the use of DeltaRex-G, a CCNG1 inhibitor. Further, future perspectives for DeltaRex-G in older women with early stage CCNG1+ HR+ HER2+ breast cancer are discussed.

Activity of TNT: a phase 2 study using talimogene laherparepvec, nivolumab and trabectedin for previously treated patients with advanced sarcomas (NCT# 03886311)

Background

Intratumoral injection of talimogene laherparepvec evokes a cytotoxic immune response. Therefore, the combination of talimogene laherparepvec with trabectedin and nivolumab may have synergistic effects in advanced sarcomas.

Patients and methods

This phase 2 trial was conducted from May 30, 2019 to January 31, 2022. Endpoints: Primary: Progression free survival rate at month 12. Secondary: Best overall response, progression free survival rate at 6 and 9 months, overall survival rate at 6, 9, and 12 months, incidence of conversion of an unresectable tumor to a resectable tumor, and incidence of adverse events. Eligible patients had to be ≥ 18 years of age, have advanced histologically proven sarcoma, at least 1 previous chemotherapy regimen, and at least one accessible tumor for intratumoral injection. Treatment: Trabectedin intravenously (1.2 mg/m² q3 weeks), nivolumab intravenously (3 mg/kg q2 weeks), and intratumoral talimogene laherparepvec (1x10⁸ plaque forming units/ml q2 weeks).

Results

Median time of follow-up: 15.2 months. Efficacy analysis: Thirty-nine patients who had completed at least one treatment cycle and had a follow-up computerized tomography were evaluable for efficacy analysis. Median number of prior therapies: 4 (range 1-11). Progression free survival rate at month 12, 36.7%. Confirmed Best Overall Response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1 = 3 partial responses, 30 stable disease, 6 progressive disease. Best Overall Response Rate, 7.7%, Disease Control Rate, 84.6%; median progression free survival, 7.8 (95% Confidence Intervals: 4.1-13.1) months; 6-, 9-, 12-month progression free survival rates, 54.5%/45.9%/36.7%; median overall survival 19.3 (95% Confidence Intervals: 12.8 -.) months; 6-, 9- and 12-month overall survival rate, 86.9%/73.3%/73.3%. One patient had a complete surgical resection. Fifty percent of patients had a ≥ grade 3 treatment related adverse events which included anemia (6%), thrombocytopenia (6%), neutropenia (4%), increased alanine transaminase (4%), decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (4%), dehydration (4%), hyponatremia (4%).

Conclusions

Taken together these data suggest that the TNT regimen is effective and safe for advanced previously treated sarcomas, and is worth being further studied in a randomized phase 3 trial as first- or second- line treatment for patients with advanced sarcomas.

Randomized Phase II Trial of Sunitinib or Cediranib in Alveolar Soft Part Sarcoma

PURPOSE

Alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS) is a rare, highly vascular tumor with few treatment options. We designed a phase II randomized trial to determine the activity and tolerability of single-agent cediranib or sunitinib in patients with advanced metastatic ASPS.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients 16 years of age and older were randomized to receive cediranib (30 mg) or sunitinib (37.5 mg) in 28-day cycles. Patients could cross over to the other treatment arm at disease progression. The primary endpoint was to measure the objective response rate (ORR) for each agent. Median progression-free survival (mPFS) for the two arms was also determined.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine of 34 enrolled patients were evaluable for response. One patient on each of the initial two treatment arms had a partial response (ORR: 6.7% and 7.1% for cediranib and sunitinib, respectively). Twenty-four patients had a best response of stable disease (86.7% and 78.6% for cediranib and sunitinib, respectively). There were no significant differences in mPFS for the two treatment arms. Clinical benefit (i.e., objective response or stable disease for a minimum of four or six cycles of therapy) on the first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy did not predict benefit on the second-line TKI. Both drugs were well tolerated. As of August 2021, 1 patient (unevaluable for ORR) remains on study.

CONCLUSIONS

The study did not meet its endpoints for ORR. Although both TKIs provided clinical benefit, the outcomes may have been attenuated in patients who had progressed ≤6 months before enrollment, potentially accounting for the low response rates. See related commentary by Wilky and Maleddu, p. 1163.

SAINT: A Phase I/Expanded Phase II Study Using Safe Amounts of Ipilimumab, Nivolumab and Trabectedin as First-Line Treatment of Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma

BACKGROUND

This Phase 1/2 study is based on the hypothesis that immune checkpoint inhibitors are more effective when given earlier in the course of the disease for advanced soft tissue sarcoma.

METHODS

Phase I endpoints-maximum tolerated dose in previously treated patients; Phase II endpoints-best response, progression free survival and overall survival and incidence of adverse events in previously untreated patients; Phase I treatments-escalating doses of trabectedin (1.0, 1.2, 1.5 mg/m²) as continuous intravenous infusion over 24 h every 3 weeks, 1 mg/kg of ipilimumab given intravenously every 12 weeks, and 3 mg/kg of nivolumab given intravenously every 2 weeks; Phase II treatments-maximum tolerated dose of trabectedin and defined doses of ipilimumab and nivolumab.

RESULTS

Phase I (n = 9)-the maximum tolerated dose of trabectedin was 1.2 mg/m²; Phase II (n = 79)-6 complete responses, 14 partial responses, 49 stable disease, 25.3% best response rate, 87.3% disease control rate; median progression-free survival, 6.7 months (CI 95%: 4.4-7.9), median overall survival, 24.6 months (CI 95%: 17.0-.); Grade 3/4 therapy-related adverse events (n = 92)-increased ALT (25%), fatigue (8.7%), increased AST (8.7%), decreased neutrophil count (5.4%) and anemia (4.6%).

CONCLUSION

SAINT is a safe and effective first-line treatment for advanced soft tissue sarcoma.

A phase II study of TAS-117 in patients with advanced solid tumors harboring germline PTEN-inactivating mutations

PTEN acts as a potent tumor suppressor within the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway. Germline mutations in the PTEN gene are a hallmark of PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome, which includes Cowden syndrome, where they appear to elevate lifetime risk of cancer. Targeted AKT directed therapy has been proposed as an effective approach in cancer patients having germline PTEN mutations. The mechanism of action, safety and dosing regimen for the novel allosteric AKT inhibitor TAS-117 have been explored in a phase I study in Japan in which activity was observed against certain tumor types. Here we describe the study protocol of an international, two-part phase II study evaluating the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and antitumor activity of TAS-117 in patients with advanced solid tumors harboring germline PTEN-inactivating mutations.

A phase II trial of regorafenib in patients with advanced Ewing sarcoma and related tumors of soft tissue and bone: SARC024 trial results

BACKGROUND

Regorafenib is one of several FDA-approved cancer therapies targeting multiple tyrosine kinases. However, there are few subtype-specific data regarding kinase inhibitor activity in sarcomas. We report results of a single arm, phase II trial of regorafenib in advanced Ewing family sarcomas.

METHODS

Patients with metastatic Ewing family sarcomas (age ≥ 18, ECOG 0-2, good organ function) who had received at least one line of therapy and experienced progression within 6 months of registration were eligible. Prior kinase inhibitors were not allowed. The initial dose of regorafenib was 160 mg oral days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle. The primary endpoint was estimating progression-free rate (PFR) at 8 weeks employing RECIST 1.1.

RESULTS

Thirty patients (median age, 32 years; 33% women [10 patients]; bone primary, 40%; extraskeletal primary, 60%) enrolled at 14 sites. The most common grade 3 or higher toxicities were hypophosphatemia (5 grade 3, 1 grade 4), hypertension (2 grade 3), elevated ALT (2 grade 3). Sixteen patients required dose reductions, most often for hypophosphatemia (n = 7 reductions in 6 patients); two stopped regorafenib for toxicity. There was one death unrelated to treatment in the 30-day post-study period. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 14.8 weeks (95% CI 7.3-15.9); PFR at 8 weeks by Kaplan-Meier analysis was 63% (95% CI 46-81%). The RECIST 1.1 response rate was 10%. Median OS was 53 weeks (95% CI 37-106 weeks).

CONCLUSIONS

Regorafenib has modest activity in the Ewing family sarcomas. Toxicity was similar to that seen in approval studies.

Results of NC-6300 (Nanoparticle Epirubicin) in an Expansion Cohort of Patients with Angiosarcoma

Background

NC-6300 is a novel epirubicin (EPI) drug conjugated polymeric micelle developed using cutting-edge micellar nanoparticle technology. The nanoparticle epirubicin conjugates EPI to a polymer via a pH-sensitive linker which enables the selective EPI release into tumor. Tumor activity was observed in a monotherapy phase Ib trial, where two of two patients with angiosarcoma achieved a partial response. To further explore the activity of NC-6300 in angiosarcoma, an expansion cohort was undertaken.

Methods

Ten patients with angiosarcoma were enrolled in the expansion cohort. Patients were dosed using the recommended dose of 150 mg/m² intravenously (IV) once every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival.

Results

The most common adverse events (AEs) of any grade, regardless of the causal relationship with NC-6300, were neutropenia (90%), fatigue, and thrombocytopenia (60% each) and nausea (50%). The most common grades 3 and 4 AEs were neutropenia (80%), thrombocytopenia (40%), and anemia and leukopenia (20% each). The median progression-free survival (mPFS) for all subjects was 5.4 months. The mPFS was 3.8 months in subjects with prior anthracycline treatment and 8.2 months in subjects without prior anthracycline treatment.

Conclusion

NC-6300 was well tolerated, showing promising activity in angiosarcoma patients without prior anthracycline treatment. NC-6300 warrants further investigation (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03168061).

Lurbinectedin in patients with pretreated neuroendocrine tumours: Results from a phase II basket study

BACKGROUND

Patients with neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) need alternative therapies after failure of first-line therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This phase II trial evaluated lurbinectedin, a selective inhibitor of oncogenic transcription, at 3.2 mg/m² as a 1-h intravenous infusion every 3 weeks in 32 NETs patients treated in the second- or third-line setting. The primary efficacy endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) according to RECIST v1.1 assessed by the investigators. Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety.

RESULTS

Two of 31 evaluable patients had confirmed partial responses (ORR = 6.5%; 95%CI, 0.8-21.4%). Median DoR was 4.7 months (95% CI, 4.0-5.4 months), median PFS was 1.4 months (95% CI, 1.2-3.0 months) and median OS was 7.4 months (95% CI, 3.4-16.2 months). Lurbinectedin showed an acceptable, predictable and manageable safety profile. The most common grade 3/4 toxicity was neutropenia (40.6%; grade 4, 12.4%; febrile neutropenia, 3.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the exploratory aim of this trial that evaluated a heterogeneous population of NETs patients, and the signs of antitumour activity observed (two confirmed partial responses and seven long disease stabilisations), further development of lurbinectedin is warranted in a more selected NETs population.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Sponsor Study Code: PM1183-B-005-14. EudraCT number: 2014-003773-42.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov reference: NCT02454972.

Antitumor Activity of Lurbinectedin, a Selective Inhibitor of Oncogene Transcription, in Patients with Relapsed Ewing Sarcoma: Results of a Basket Phase II Study

PURPOSE

Lurbinectedin suppresses the oncogenic transcription factor EWS-FLI1 through relocalization to the nucleolus, and delays tumor growth in mice bearing Ewing sarcoma xenografts. On the basis of this rationale, lurbinectedin was evaluated in patients with relapsed Ewing sarcoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This open-label, single-arm, Basket phase II trial included a cohort of 28 treated adult patients with confirmed Ewing sarcoma, measurable disease as per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) v.1.1, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤2, adequate organ function, no central nervous system metastasis, and pretreated with ≤2 chemotherapy lines for metastatic/recurrent disease. Patients received lurbinectedin 3.2 mg/m2 as a 1-hour infusion every 3 weeks. Primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) as per RECIST v.1.1. Secondary endpoints included time-to-event parameters and safety profile.

RESULTS

ORR was 14.3% [95% confidence interval (CI), 4.0%-32.7%], with median duration of response of 4.2 months (95% CI, 2.9-5.5 months). Median progression-free survival was 2.7 months (95% CI, 1.4-4.3 months), clinical benefit rate was 39.3%, and disease control rate was 57.1%. With 39% censoring, median overall survival was 12.0 months (95% CI, 8.5-18.5 months). Most common grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (57%), anemia, thrombocytopenia, and treatment-related febrile neutropenia (14% each). No deaths or discontinuations were due to toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Lurbinectedin was active in the treatment of relapsed Ewing sarcoma and had a manageable safety profile. Lurbinectedin could represent a valuable addition to therapies for Ewing sarcoma, and is currently being evaluated in combination with irinotecan in advanced Ewing sarcoma in a phase Ib/II trial.

Abstract CT235: MANTRA: A randomized, multicenter, phase 3 study of the MDM2 inhibitor milademetan versus trabectedin in patients with de-differentiated liposarcomas

Background: Murine double minute 2 (MDM2) is a negative regulator of tumor suppressor protein p53. MDM2 induces degradation of p53 and promotes tumorigenesis. MDM2 amplification occurs in many cancers but is documented in up to 100% of well-differentiated or de-differentiated liposarcomas (WD/DDLPS) [Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Cell 2017]. Inhibition of the MDM2-p53 interaction is a promising therapeutic approach to restore p53 tumor suppressor activity in WD/DDLPS. Milademetan (RAIN-32) is a small-molecule MDM2 inhibitor that inhibits the MDM2-p53 interaction and restores p53 function at nanomolar concentrations. In a phase 1 study, milademetan showed promising efficacy in 53 patients with WD/DDLPS when administered on an intermittent schedule (260 mg QD on Days 1-3 and 15-17 on a 28-day cycle), with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 7.4 months [Gounder et al. AACR-NCI-EORTC 2020]. WD/DDLS are relatively resistant to chemotherapy, and systemic treatment options for patients with advanced disease are limited. MANTRA (RAIN-3201) is a randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase 3 registration study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of milademetan versus trabectedin in patients with unresectable or metastatic DDLPS with disease progression on ≥1 prior systemic therapies.

Methods: Eligible patients are ≥18 years of age with histologically confirmed unresectable and/or metastatic DDLPS, with or without a WD component, who have received ≥1 prior systemic therapies, including ≥1 anthracycline-based regimen, with radiographic evidence of progression by RECIST v1.1 within 6 months before study entry. Prior treatment with trabectedin or an MDM2 inhibitor is not permitted. Patients will be randomly assigned (1:1) to receive milademetan (260 mg once daily orally Days 1-3 and 15-17 on a 28-day cycle) or trabectedin (1.5 mg/m2 as a 24-hour intravenous infusion every 3 weeks). Randomization is stratified by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (0 or 1) and number of prior treatments for WD/DDLPS (≤2 or &gt;2). Tumor response will be evaluated by RECIST v1.1 at Weeks 8, 16, 24, and 32, and then every 12 weeks. Primary endpoint: PFS by blinded independent central review. Secondary endpoints: overall survival; disease control rate; objective response rate; duration of response; PFS by investigator assessment; safety; health-related quality of life. Exploratory endpoints: molecular markers in peripheral blood and/or tumor tissue; milademetan pharmacokinetics. To demonstrate a 3-month increase in PFS (from 3 to 6 months) corresponding to a hazard ratio of 0.5, approximately 160 patients will be required to observe 105 events with 93.9% power and 2-sided significance level of 5%. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04979442.

Citation Format: Mrinal M. Gounder, Gary K. Schwartz, Robin L. Jones, Sant P. Chawla, Victoria S. Chua-Alcala, Silvia Stacchiotti, Andrew J. Wagner, Gregory M. Cote, Robert G. Maki, Hanna Kosela-Paterczyk, Dale R. Shepard, Naisargee Shah, Richard Bryce, Robert C. Doebele, Shreyaskumar Patel. MANTRA: A randomized, multicenter, phase 3 study of the MDM2 inhibitor milademetan versus trabectedin in patients with de-differentiated liposarcomas [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT235.

Abstract CT177: SQ3370 in advanced solid tumors: Interim phase 1 results

Background: SQ3370, a novel therapy, utilizes Shasqi’s proprietary Click Activated Protodrugs Against Cancer (CAPAC) platform where mutually-reactive click chemistry groups release Doxorubicin (Dox) at the tumor site while minimizing systemic exposure. In animals, SQ3370 enhanced T-cell infiltration, survival, and showed activity in both injected and non-injected lesions. Minimal to no toxicity, including no cardiotoxicity was seen in up to 9-fold dose increases in animals. Conventional Dox can induce cardiomyopathy with incidences of 6-20% for cumulative doses of 500 mg/m2 in humans. Here we report interim results of the Phase 1 trial (SQ3370-001; NCT04106492).

Methods: SQ3370 has 2 components: 1) Intratumoral injection of a protodrug-activating biopolymer (SQL70); 2) then 5 consecutive daily IV infusions of an attenuated protodrug of Dox (SQP33). Key criteria for enrollment include locally advanced to metastatic solid tumors, ≤300 mg/m2 prior exposure to DOX, ECOG status 0 or 1, and no limit to the number of prior systemic therapies. Primary objectives include safety and determining Phase 2 dose. Dose escalation was assessed in 2 stages: 1) accelerated titration; 2) 3+3 design. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was evaluated in cycle 1.

Results: As of 26NOV2021 data cut, 17 patients (pts) in 8 dose escalation cohorts have been enrolled. MTD has not been reached. Median age was 59 years (26-79), 53% were females, and were ECOG 1 (59%). Prior procedures included surgery (82%) and radiation (47%). At study entry, 82% of pts had metastases with a median number of metastatic sites being 2 (1-5). Solid tumors were sarcoma (65%), and cancers of the skin, breast, and gynecologic organs were 12% for each, respectively. Sixteen of 17 (94%) pts received prior chemotherapy with 47% receiving prior Dox. Median number of prior systemic therapies was 2 (1-7). Intratumoral injection sites include soft tissue and chest wall. Of the 17 pts, 65% received &gt;500 mg/m2, 53% (&gt;1000), and 29% (&gt;2000) cumulative Dox given as SQP33. Median duration of treatment was 3 cycles (1-10). No DLTs were observed. Most frequent AEs, regardless of causality, included nausea (n = 9), fatigue (n = 6) and anemia (n = 5). No signs of cardiomyopathy were seen in pts with an echo performed within 1 mo. of study start. Although &gt;50% of pts received &gt;1000 mg/m2, ejection fraction (LVEF) remained normal. No AEs that led to discontinuation or death were related to SQ3370. All pts were evaluable for response. At a median follow-up of 10 wks (4-30), 65% of pts had SD as best response. Median duration of SD was 80 days (37-186) with 64% sustaining SD for ≥60 days, corresponding to an overall disease control rate of 65%. The remainder of pts had PD as best response. Over 35% of pts remain on drug.

Conclusions: SQ3370 was well tolerated. No DLTs and normal LVEF were seen with pts receiving &gt;1000 mg/m2 Dox cumulative doses. Dose escalation is ongoing. Preliminary evidence of disease control was observed in this heavily pre-treated, high cancer burden, solid tumor pt population.

Citation Format: Sant P. Chawla, Kathleen Batty, Vivek Bhadri, Nam Bui, Alexander D. Guminski, Jose M. Mejia Oneto, Sangeetha Srinivasan, James F. Strauss, Vivek Subbiah, Mia C. Weiss, Rosalind Wilson, Nathan A. Yee, Michael Zacharian, Vineet Kwatra. SQ3370 in advanced solid tumors: Interim phase 1 results [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT177.

Abstract CT168: Randomized phase 2 trial of sunitinib or cediranib in alveolar soft part sarcoma

Background: Alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS) is a rare, highly vascular tumor with few effective treatment options. Cediranib (C) and sunitinib (S) are potent oral inhibitors of all 3 VEGF receptors. Cediranib showed substantial single-agent activity (objective response rate [ORR] = 35%) in our previous trial in patients (pts) with metastatic ASPS (NCT00942877). Here we report a phase 2 randomized multicenter trial of single agent C or S in pts with ASPS (NCT01391962).

Methods: We conducted a multicenter phase 2 trial with an optimal 2-stage design targeting an ORR of 40%. Enrolled pts were &gt;16 years with metastatic ASPS, previously not treated (N) and unresectable, or previously treated (T), who have progressed per RECIST 1 within the 6-month period preceding enrollment. Pts were randomized to receive C (30 mg) or S (37.5 mg) orally, once a day, in 28-day cycles and could crossover to the other treatment arm at disease progression. ORR (primary endpoint), median progression-free survival (mPFS), and PFS rate at 24 weeks for the 2 arms (C and S) were evaluated; T and N cohorts were assessed separately in each arm. Arm accrual closed if ≤ 1 of the first 10 enrolled pts responded to the first treatment.

Results: Thirty-four pts (47% white, 29.4% black, 17.6% Asian, 5.8% Pacific Islander) were enrolled; 29 pts were evaluable for response. One pt on each of the initial treatment arms had a confirmed partial response (PR), rates of 6.7% (1/154) and 7.1% (1/14) for C and S tx or tx-naive, respectively. Among pts who crossed over, there was 1 PR in a pt receiving C after initially responding (PR) on S (1/9; ORR 11.1%). Twenty-four pts had a best response of stable disease (86.7% and 78.6%) for C and S, respectively. The mPFS was 7.6 months (mo) (95% CI: 3.7-9.9 mo) and 5.5 mo (95% CI: 1.8-14.5 mo) for C and S, respectively administered as first therapy (p=0.92). PFS rate at 24 weeks was 62.5% (95% CI: 29.5-76.2%) and 50% (95% CI: 25.9-70.1%) for pts receiving C and S respectively, as initial therapy. There was no difference in mPFS between T or N pts in the C (6.7 mo [95% CI: 1.4-9.9 mo] vs 8.3 mo [95% CI: 2.7 - 16.6 mo]; P=0.35) arm, but some evidence of a potential difference in the S (4.8 mo [95% CI: 0.9-7.9 mo] vs 14.7 mo 95% CI: 1.8 - 21.6 mo]; P=0.058) arm. Overall, 43.7% (C) and 77.8% (S) of pts experienced grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) at least possibly related to the study drug. Common grade ≥3 AEs included: diarrhea (C), neutropenia (S), hypertension (C and S). AEs were in line with the known safety profiles of each agent. As of August 2021, 1 pt (unevaluable for ORR) remains on study.

Conclusions: The study did not meet its endpoints for ORR. There were no differences in mPFS for the 2 treatment arms. The selection of pts with more aggressive disease, who had progressed in the 6 months prior to enrollment, may account for the low patient response rates compared to our previous study of cediranib in ASPS.

Funded by NCI Contract No. HHSN261200800001E. The study was a collaboration between NCI and Pfizer.

Citation Format: Naoko Takebe, James Nguyen, Shivaani Kummar, Albiruni Abdul Razak, Sant P. Chawla, Suzanne George, Shreyaskumar R. Patel, Mary Louise Keohan, Sujana Movva, Geraldine O’Sullivan, Khanh Do, Larry Anderson, Lamin Juwara, Brooke Augustine, Seth Steinberg, Laura Kuhlmann, S. Percy Ivy, James H. Doroshow, Alice P. Chen. Randomized phase 2 trial of sunitinib or cediranib in alveolar soft part sarcoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT168.

Clinical genomic profiling in the management of patients with soft tissue and bone sarcoma

There are more than 70 distinct sarcomas, and this diversity complicates the development of precision-based therapeutics for these cancers. Prospective comprehensive genomic profiling could overcome this challenge by providing insight into sarcomas' molecular drivers. Through targeted panel sequencing of 7494 sarcomas representing 44 histologies, we identify highly recurrent and type-specific alterations that aid in diagnosis and treatment decisions. Sequencing could lead to refinement or reassignment of 10.5% of diagnoses. Nearly one-third of patients (31.7%) harbor potentially actionable alterations, including a significant proportion (2.6%) with kinase gene rearrangements; 3.9% have a tumor mutational burden ≥10 mut/Mb. We describe low frequencies of microsatellite instability (<0.3%) and a high degree of genome-wide loss of heterozygosity (15%) across sarcomas, which are not readily explained by homologous recombination deficiency (observed in 2.5% of cases). In a clinically annotated subset of 118 patients, we validate actionable genetic events as therapeutic targets. Collectively, our findings reveal the genetic landscape of human sarcomas, which may inform future development of therapeutics and improve clinical outcomes for patients with these rare cancers.

Preliminary analysis of a phase I study of SNK01 (Autologous Non-genetically Modified Natural Killer Cells With Enhanced Cytotoxicity) monotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumors

2644

Background: Natural killer (NK) cells play a key role as the main effector cells toward cancer in innate immunity. Thus, a leading approach is to boost NK-cell mediated anti-tumor activity using adoptive transfer of ex vivo activated NK cells. NK cells have always been challenging to grow ex vivo especially when derived from heavily pretreated donors, thus most have focused on universal allogenic donor derived products. SNK01 is a first-in-kind, autologous non-genetically modified NK cell product with significant anti-tumor cytotoxicity and over 90% expression of CD16, NKG2D, NKp46, and DNAM-1, that can be consistently produced even from heavily pre-treated cancer patients (pts). While most if not all NK cell therapy has focused on liquid malignancies, SNK01 has been found to have strong activity against both liquid and solid tumors preclinically. We hypothesized that SNK01 would be safe without need for lymphodepletion and may demonstrate activity against heavily pre-treated solid tumors. Methods: In this Phase 1 dose escalation study (NCT03941262), SNK01 was administered intravenously (IV) weekly for 5 consecutive weeks using a 3+3 design in pts with advanced solid tumors. The starting dose was 1 x 109SNK01 cells and the highest dose was 4 x 109 SNK01 cells. Primary endpoint was safety based on AEs, vitals, laboratory tests, and PEs. Individual NK cell expansion was characterized for increases in cytotoxicity and changes in activating receptor expression. Results: As of Feb 1, 2022, 10 pts with advanced refractory solid tumors have been enrolled. Median age is 50 (range 32 – 75) and 6 were male. Pts had a median 5.5 lines of prior therapy (range 2-10). The subtypes were 4 leiomyosarcoma, 1 chondrosarcoma, 1 NSCLC, 1 small round cell tumor, 1 colorectal, 1 synovial cell sarcoma, 1 angiosarcoma. NK cells were successfully activated and expanded, even from heavily pre-treated pts. Average cytotoxicity was increased over 400% and average activating receptor expression was greater than 90%. There were only two Grade 1 adverse events reported in the 50 total doses given. Best objective response of SD was demonstrated in 7 pts. Of patients who progressed in the dose escalation cohorts, several reported an overall improvement in their QOL. Based on this improvement, patients then became eligible to be treated with additional salvage chemotherapy to which some then showed additional response. Conclusions: SNK01 with high cytotoxicity and activating receptor expression can be consistently produced from heavily pretreated patients. SNK01 was very safe and appears to have some clinical activity against heavily pretreated solid tumors and may even sensitize tumors to additional chemotherapy. SNK01 will be studied further as monotherapy and in various combination regimens. Clinical trial information: NCT03941262.

A phase 1/2 dose-escalation and dose-expansion study of ZN-c3 in combination with gemcitabine in adult and pediatric subjects with relapsed or refractory osteosarcoma

TPS11584

Background: Osteosarcoma (OS) is the most common primary bone malignancy of childhood and adolescence with 5-year survival rates of 65-70% for localized disease and < 30% for de novo metastatic disease or recurrent disease. Pooled analysis of previous phase 2 trials by the Children’s Oncology Group has determined a 4-month event-free survival (EFS) of 12%. The Wee1 kinase helps regulate DNA damage repair at the G2-M checkpoint. In the presence of DNA damage, the Wee1 kinase is activated, arresting cells in the G2 phase and preventing entry into the M phase. Inhibition of the Wee1 kinase abrogates the G2-M checkpoint, forcing cancer cells to undergo unscheduled mitosis even in the presence of DNA damage, leading to mitotic catastrophe. However, the Wee1 kinase is often upregulated in OS, preserving the G2-M checkpoint and allowing tumor growth and metastases. Additionally, up to 90% of OS tumors have alterations in p53, a critical protein in the regulation of the G1-S checkpoint, especially in relapsed or refractory cases. With a dysfunctional G1-S checkpoint, cancer cells further rely on G2-M checkpoint to repair DNA damage and preserve genomic integrity. Prior studies have demonstrated that pharmacologic inhibition of the Wee1 kinase produced cell death in OS cell lines and patient-derived xenografts. While p53 mutational status appeared to modulate efficacy of the Wee1 kinase inhibitor, activity was observed in p53 wild type, mutant and null cell lines. Combination therapy studies have also been performed, demonstrating potential synergism with gemcitabine. As expected, by precipitating DNA damage, susceptibility to inhibition of the G2-M checkpoint is further increased. Methods: NCT04833582 is an ongoing, open label, multicenter, phase 1/2 clinical trial to evaluate the activity of ZN-c3, an oral Wee1 inhibitor, in combination with gemcitabine in subjects ≥12 years and ≥40 kg, with relapsed, refractory OS. Subjects are dosed once daily, continuously with ZN-c3 and receive gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Up to 18 subjects are expected to enroll in the phase 1 portion based on a typical 3 + 3 escalation design; ̃60 subjects will be enrolled in the phase 2 portion, consisting of three stages: futility, promising clinical activity, and improved precision for clinical activity. The first two stages follow a Simon two-stage optimal design with 30 subjects, to differentiate an EFS rate at 18 weeks between 12% and 36% (which may be considered a more suitable endpoint for OS, compared with radiographic response). Tumor and skin punch biopsies are incorporated into the trial to identify potential biomarkers of treatment response. Subjects must be able to swallow oral tablets and have measurable disease by RECIST v1.1; prior exposure to gemcitabine is allowed. Global enrollment began August 1, 2021, and is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT04833582.

Five-year results of a phase 2 trial using ipilimumab (I), nivolumab (N), and trabectedin (T) for previously untreated advanced soft tissue sarcoma (NCT03138161)

11573

Background: Understanding the bifunctional role that the immune system plays in tumor eradication vs growth promotion is critical in the design and timing of tumoricidal and immunologic therapies for sarcomas. Hypothesis: Immune checkpoint inhibitors that promote sustained T cell activation would be most effective when given as first line therapy, together with a tumoricidal agent. Methods: Eligible patients for this Phase 2 study are males or females ≥ 18 years of age with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma, previously untreated, with measurable disease by RECIST v1.1. Treatment protocol: (I) mg/kg i.v. q 12 wks, (N) 3 mg/kg i.v. q 2 wks, (T) 1.2 mg/m2 CIV q 3 wks. Treatment Outcome Parameters: (1) Best objective response rate by RECIST v1.1, (2) Progression-free survival (PFS), (3) Overall survival (OS), and (4) Incidence of treatment-related adverse events. Results: Ninety-nine patients were enrolled. Efficacy analysis (n = 88): There were 8CR (1 surgical CR), 11PR, 58SD, 11PD. Overall response rate was 21.6%, Disease Control Rate, 87.5%. The median PFS was 7 (range:1-44) months, median OS, 14 (range: 1-46) months. Grade 3 TRAEs include fatigue (n = 8), adrenal insufficiency (n = 1), dehydration (n = 1), hyponatremia (n = 2), increased AST (n = 8), increased ALT (n = 24), increased ALP (n = 2), port site infection (n = 2), psoriasis exacerbation (n = 1), anemia (n = 9), thrombocytopenia (n = 2), and neutropenia (n = 5). Grade 4 TRAES include anemia (n = 1), neutropenia (n = 1), thrombocytopenia (n = 2), increased AST (n = 2), increased ALT (n = 2), and increased CPK (n = 2). Grade 5 TRAES include rhabdomyolysis (n = 1). There was no incidence of alopecia nor cardiac toxicity reported. Conclusions: Taken together, these data indicate that first-line combinatorial therapy with Ipilimumab, Nivolumab, and Trabectedin (1) may be more effective than standard first line therapy (doxorubicin/ifosfamide/mesna), and (2) is safer than standard first line therapy for advanced soft tissue sarcoma. Clinical trial information: NCT03138161.

Interim phase 1 results for SQ3370 in advanced solid tumors

3085

Background: SQ3370, a novel therapy, utilizes Shasqi’s proprietary Click Activated Protodrugs Against Cancer (CAPAC) platform where mutually-reactive click chemistry groups release Doxorubicin (Dox) at the tumor site minimizing systemic exposure. In animals, SQ3370 enhanced survival, T-cell infiltration and antitumor responses in injected and non-injected tumors. Minimal to no toxicity, including no cardiotoxicity was seen in up to 9-fold dose increases in animals. Conventional Dox can induce cardiomyopathy at incidences of 1-20% for cumulative doses from 300-500 mg/m2 in humans and re-treatment with Dox is less effective in heavily pre-treated patients (pts). Here we report interim results of the Phase 1 ( NCT04106492 ). Methods: SQ3370 has 2 components: 1) Intratumoral injection of a protodrug-activating biopolymer (SQL70: 10 mL or 20 mL); 2) 5 consecutive daily IV infusions of an attenuated protodrug of Dox (SQP33). Key eligibility includes locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors, ≤300 mg/m2 prior exposure to Dox, ECOG 0-1 and no limit to prior systemic therapies. Primary objectives include safety and determining Phase 2 dose. Dose escalation was assessed in 2 stages: 1) accelerated titration; 2) 3+3 design. Results: As of 31JAN2022 data cut, 26 pts were treated, 21 with 10 mL biopolymer (bp) and 5 with 20 mL bp over 9 dose escalation protodrug cohorts. MTD has not been reached. Median age was 61 years (26-84), 62% were females, and 69% were ECOG 1. Prior procedures included surgery (89%) and radiation (62%). At study entry, 77% of pts had metastases with a median number of metastatic sites being 2 (1-5); most frequently lung (50%). Tumors were sarcoma (73%), breast cancer (7.7%), gyne (7.7%) and other (11.5%). Twenty-four of 26 (92%) pts received prior systemic therapies with 50% receiving prior Dox. Median number of prior systemic therapies was 2 (1-7). Of the 26 pts, 62% received > 500 mg/m2 cumulative Dox given as SQP33. Median duration of treatment was 2 cycles (1-12). Most frequent AEs, regardless of causality, for the 10 mL bp group included nausea (n = 11), fatigue (n = 9) and anemia (n = 6), and for the 20 mL bp group included anemia (n = 3) and nausea (n = 2). Ejection fraction (LVEF) remained normal during the study period. No AEs that led to discontinuation or death were related to SQ3370 by investigator. At a median follow-up of 9.2 wks (3-37), 21 pts were evaluable. SD was best response in 71%. Median duration of SD was 80-dys (37-186) corresponding to an overall disease control rate (CR+ PR+ SD x 30-dys) of 71% (68% in 10 mL bp; 100% in 20 mL bp). The remainder of pts had PD as best response. Over 38% of pts remain on drug. Conclusions: SQ3370 with 10 mL or 20 mL biopolymer was well tolerated in pts with half being re-treated with Dox. Although > 60% of pts received > 500 mg/m2 cumulative Dox given as SQP33, LVEF remained normal. Preliminary evidence of disease control was observed in pts despite heavy prior pre-treatment and high cancer burden. Dose escalation is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT04106492.

Interim analysis of a phase I study of SNK01 (Autologous Nongenetically Modified Natural Killer Cells with Enhanced Cytotoxicity) and avelumab in advanced refractory sarcoma

11517

Background: For patients (pts) with advanced sarcomas in the relapsed/refractory setting, there are very few if any effective salvage treatment options. The likelihood of response and/or tumor control only diminishes with each subsequent line of therapy. Monotherapy of PD-L1 inhibitors has shown modest to no activity in most sarcomas, especially in tumors that have little to no PD-L1 expression. Natural killer (NK) cells have recently been implicated in the antitumor response to immune checkpoint inhibitors with some evidence suggesting a role in PD-L1 negative tumors. SNK01 is a first-in-kind, autologous nongenetically modified NK cell therapy with highly enhanced cytotoxicity and over 90% activating receptor expression which can be consistently produced from heavily pretreated pts. Avelumab is an anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy with dual engagement of both the adaptive and innate immune systems. We hypothesized that this combination would be safe, and together better overcome the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Methods: In this Phase I study (NCT03941262), cohort 4 is comprised of up to 18 pts treated with 800 mg of avelumab + 4 x 109 SNK01 cells every two weeks via IV Infusion. Pts were eligible regardless of PD-L1 status and permitted to continue treatment indefinitely until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint is safety. The secondary endpoints include overall response rate (ORR), progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: As of February 1, 2022, 15 pts with advanced refractory sarcoma have been enrolled. Median age is 50 (range 20-75) and 8 were male. Pts had a median of 5 lines of prior therapy (range 1-8). The subtypes included 6 leiomyosarcoma, 2 osteosarcoma, 1 pleomorphic liposarcoma, 1 Ewing’s sarcoma, 1 epithelioid sarcoma, 1 epithelioid mesothelioma, 1 endometrial stromal sarcoma, and 1 sarcoma NOS. There were three Grade 2 or 3 adverse events related to avelumab, but unrelated to SNK01. Best objective response by RECIST 1.1 was PR in 2 pts (ORR of 13.3%) and SD in 3 pts. Median PFS is 11.14 weeks. Several pts had PD-L1 negative disease and response appears to be independent of PD-L1 status. Of pts who progressed in this cohort, several reported an overall improvement in their QoL and some pts became eligible to be treated with additional salvage chemotherapy, resulting in some additional clinical response. Conclusions: SNK01 combined with avelumab was safe and well tolerated and appears to have some clinical activity against several types of heavily pretreated advanced sarcoma, independent of PD-L1 status. It may also keep rapidly progressing disease stable enough to allow additional cytotoxic chemotherapy. A proposed study expansion is planned. Clinical trial information: NCT03941262.

Two year results of blessed: Expanded access for deltarex-g for an intermediate size population with advanced pancreatic cancer and sarcoma (NCT04091295) and individual use IND for EARLY-STAGE invasive carcinoma of breast (IND# 19130)

e15048

Background: Defects in cell cycle control are fundamental oncogenic drivers and targeting deregulated cell cycling is under intensive study. Cell cycle cyclin G1 (CCNG1) inhibitor therapy, exemplified by DeltaRex-G, a tumor-targeted retro vector encoding a cytocidal CCNG1 inhibitor gene, has been tested in over 280 cancer patients worldwide in early studies, inducing long term (10-13 years) survival in certain patients with intractable metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma, sarcoma, and breast cancer. Hence, further clinical development of DeltaRex-G for cancer patients who have few or no therapeutic options is apropos. Methods: Primary objective: To determine overall survival. Secondary objective: To evaluate disease control, best overall response, and incidence of treatment-related adverse events. Patient and Methods: Study 1 is entitled “Blessed: Expanded Access for DeltaRex-G for Advanced Pancreatic Cancer and Sarcoma (NCT04091295)”. Study 2 is entitled “Compassionate Use of DeltaRex-G for Advanced Cancers. In both studies, patients will receive DeltaRex-G at 1-3 x 10e11 cfu i.v. over 15-30 minutes, 3 x a week until significant disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurs. Results: Seventeen patients were enrolled, 9 sarcomas, 2 pancreatic adenocarcinomas, 1 non-small cell lung cancer, 2 breast carcinoma, 1 prostate cancer, 1 cholangiocarcinoma, and 1 basal cell carcinoma and actinic keratosis. Three patients were enrolled in Study 1 and 14 patients were enrolled in Study 2. Two patients were initially enrolled in Study 1 and later enrolled in Study 2. Twelve of 17 enrolled patients were treated with DeltaRex-G monotherapy or in combination with FDA-approved cancer therapies. Of the 12 treated patients, 5 are alive 10 to 30 months from DeltaRex-G treatment initiation. Two patients with early-stage triple receptor-positive and triple receptor-negative breast cancer who received DeltaRex-G as adjuvant/first-line therapy are alive one year in complete remission; 2 patients with chemo-resistant Stage 4 sarcoma are alive 2 1/2 years, and one patient with advanced basal cell carcinoma is alive 10 months from treatment initiation. There were no treatment-related adverse events reported. Conclusions: Taken together,the data suggest that (1) Adjuvant/first-line therapy with DeltaRex-G may reduce the incidence of recurrence of early-stage invasive carcinoma of the breast and (2) DeltaRex-G may evoke tumor growth stabilization after failing standard chemotherapy. Phase 2 studies are planned to evaluate if DeltaRex-G (1) will reduce the incidence of recurrence in early-stage invasive carcinoma of breast, (2) improve survival in pancreatic cancer, and (3) prolong progression-free survival and overall survival in advanced sarcoma. Clinical trial information: NCT04091295.

GALLANT: A phase 2 study using metronomic gemcitabine, doxorubicin, nivolumab, and docetaxel as second/third-line therapy for advanced sarcoma (NCT04535713)

11518

Background: In our experience, combinatorial therapy with lower doses of doxorubicin, gemcitabine, and docetaxel has been effective with a manageable toxicity profile in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas. Hypothesis: The addition of nivolumab will have synergistic effects and improve treatment outcomes. Methods: Primary objective: To assess progression-free survival; Secondary objectives: (1) To evaluate best overall response during treatment period confirmed in a 6-week follow-up, (2) PFS rate at 6 and 9 months, (3) Overall survival rate at 6, 12 months, and (4) Incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Inclusion criteria: Previously treated male and female subjects, > 18 years of age, pathologically confirmed diagnosis of locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic sarcoma, measurable disease by RECIST v1.1, and acceptable hematologic and organ functions. Exclusion Criteria: History of autoimmune disorder. Treatment schedule: Metronomic doses of gemcitabine (600 mg/m2 max:1000 mg), doxorubicin (18 mg/m2; max: 32 mg), docetaxel (25 mg/m2; max:42 mg) on Day 1 and Day 8, and nivolumab (240 mg) on Day 1 only. Repeat treatment cycles may be given every three weeks if toxicity grade is <1. Results: This is an Interim Report on the modified Intent-to-treat population (n = 43). This population completed at least one treatment cycle and had a follow-up CT or MRI scan at week 6. The most common histological subtypes in this group include leiomyosarcoma (n = 15), pleomorphic sarcoma (n = 4), synovial sarcoma (n = 4), liposarcoma (n = 3), osteosarcoma (n = 3) and other (n = 10). Best Overall Response = 2 CR (surgical CR), 6 PR, 30 SD, 5 PD. The disease control rate (CR+PR+SD) was 88.4%. Median PFS was > 4.6 (range: 1-27) months; 4 month PFS rate 60%. Median OS 6.2 months, with 4-month OS 74%. Historically, the median PFS on preceding lines of therapy was 2 (range: 1-14) months. There were no unexpected side effects noted in this study. The most common grade 3/4 TRAEs include Fatigue (n = 13), Nausea (n = 9), Neutropenia (n = 8), thrombocytopenia (n = 6), Anemia (n = 6). Conclusions: The GALLANT protocol using metronomic Gemcitabine, Doxorubicin (Adriamycin), Nivolumab, and Docetaxel (Taxotere) (1) is an effective regimen as second/third-line therapy for advanced sarcoma with no unexpected side effects, and (2) may have synergistic activity when this metronomic chemotherapy is combined with an immune checkpoint inhibitor. Clinical trial information: NCT04535713.

TTI-621-03: A phase I/II study of TTI-621 in combination with doxorubicin in patients with unresectable or metastatic high-grade leiomyosarcoma (LMS)

TPS11593

Background: Doxorubicin is a standard of care agent for patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma, with a response rate of around 15%, progression-free survival of 5-7 months and cumulative cardiac toxicity that limits its use. TTI-621 is a recombinant soluble fusion protein that combines the N-terminal portion of human SIRPα (the binding domain for CD47) with the Fc region of human IgG1, generating a decoy receptor for CD47 on the surface of tumor cells that both over-rides CD47-mediated inhibition of phagocytosis and provides a pro-phagocytic stimulation. Many solid tumors express high levels of CD47 which is associated with poor prognosis, thought to be the result of CD47-mediated inhibition of macrophage phagocytosis and escape of immune-mediated clearance. Interruption of the CD47-SIRPα signaling pathway using monoclonal antibodies to CD47 has shown anti-tumor activity in animal models and in some early clinical trials. The combination of doxorubicin with CD47-targeted antibodies results in enhanced anti-tumor activity and increased macrophage-mediated cell killing in animal models and macrophage-mediated phagocytosis of cancer cell lines in vitro, suggesting that combining TTI-621 with doxorubicin might be more effective than doxorubicin alone in tumor types that express CD47 and have high numbers of macrophages, such as LMS. Thus, a Phase 1/2 study was initiated to evaluate this combination in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma, including LMS. Methods: TTI-621-03 is a Phase 1/2, open-label study of TTI-621 in combination with doxorubicin in patients with anthracycline-naïve disease. The Phase 1 dose escalation evaluates doses of TTI-621 (0.2 to 2.0 mg/kg) in combination with doxorubicin at 75 mg/m2 in patients with high-grade soft tissue sarcomas. Expansion cohorts will evaluate TTI-621 (0.2 and 2.0 mg/kg) with doxorubicin in patients with LMS, with pathology confirmed at a central laboratory. The primary goals of this study are evaluation of safety of TTI-621 administered in combination with standard-of-care doxorubicin and to further evaluate clinical activity (ORR, PFS, OS), safety, PK and patient-reported quality of life in the LMS subpopulation. The dose escalation portion of the study has been completed without DLT. Enrollment to the expansion portion of the study is underway. Clinical trial information: NCT04996004.

A randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial of INBRX-109 in unresectable or metastatic conventional chondrosarcoma

TPS11582

Background: Chondrosarcomas (CS) are the third most common type of primary bone cancer after myeloma and osteosarcoma. Conventional CS represent 85–90% of all cases and are typically treated with surgical resection. However, there are no approved systemic treatment options for patients with unresectable or metastatic conventional CS, and outcomes remain poor. INBRX-109 is a precision-engineered, tetravalent death receptor 5 (DR5) agonist antibody designed to overcome the limitations of earlier-generation agonists and exploit the tumor-specific cell death induced by DR5 activation. DR5 is one of two pro-apoptotic receptors for the trimeric tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL). Early clinical activity of INBRX-109 was observed in an ongoing phase 1 trial and warrants further investigation. INBRX-109 has been granted an FDA fast-track designation for conventional CS. Methods: This is a multicenter, randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled phase 2 study in patients with unresectable or metastatic conventional CS, measurable disease by RECIST 1.1, and radiologic disease progression within 6 months prior to screening. Any number of prior lines of therapy are allowed, except for prior DR5 agonists. Patients must be ≥18 years of age and have an ECOG performance status of 0/1 and have archival or fresh tissue available. Approximately 201 patients will be randomized (2:1) to INBRX-109 (3 mg/kg intravenously, every 21 days) or placebo, stratified by histologic grade (Grade 1/2 vs 3), isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)1 R132/IDH2 R172 status (wildtype vs mutation), and line of systemic therapy (none vs prior). Treatment will continue until disease progression/unacceptable toxicity. Patients treated with a placebo will have the option to cross over to INBRX-109 upon disease progression. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS) by independent radiology review. Secondary endpoints are overall survival, PFS by investigator assessment, quality of life, overall response rate, duration of response, disease control rate, safety, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity. Adverse events will be recorded and graded by NCI CTCAE Version 5.0. Median PFS of 7.0 months is projected for INBRX-109 and 4.0 months for placebo (corresponding hazard ratio of 0.571); INBRX-109 will be declared superior if the 1-sided p-value from the stratified log-rank test is <0.025. More than 50 sites are planned across the US/Europe. The study is actively enrolling. Clinical trial information: NCT04950075.

MANTRA: A randomized, multicenter, phase 3 study of the MDM2 inhibitor milademetan versus trabectedin in patients with de-differentiated liposarcomas

TPS11589

Background: Murine double minute 2 (MDM2) is a negative regulator of tumor suppressor protein p53. MDM2 induces degradation of p53 and promotes tumorigenesis. MDM2 amplification occurs in many cancers but is documented in up to 100% of well-differentiated or dedifferentiated liposarcomas (WD/DDLPS) [Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Cell 2017]. Inhibition of the MDM2-p53 interaction is a promising therapeutic approach to restore p53 tumor suppressor activity in WD/DDLPS. Milademetan (RAIN-32) is a small-molecule MDM2 inhibitor that inhibits the MDM2-p53 interaction and restores p53 function at nanomolar concentrations. In a phase 1 study, milademetan showed promising efficacy in 53 patients with WD/DDLPS when administered on an intermittent schedule (260 mg QD on Days 1–3 and 15–17 on a 28-day cycle), with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 7.4 months [Gounder et al. AACR-NCI-EORTC 2020]. WD/DDLS are relatively resistant to chemotherapy, and systemic treatment options for patients with advanced disease are limited. MANTRA (RAIN-3201) is a randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase 3 registration study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of milademetan versus trabectedin in patients with unresectable or metastatic DDLPS with disease progression on ≥ 1 prior systemic therapies. Methods: Eligible patients are ≥ 18 years of age with histologically confirmed unresectable and/or metastatic DDLPS, with or without a WD component, who have received ≥ 1 prior systemic therapies, including ≥ 1 anthracycline-based regimen, with radiographic evidence of progression by RECIST v1.1 within 6 months before study entry. Prior treatment with trabectedin or an MDM2 inhibitor is not permitted. Patients will be randomly assigned (1:1) to receive milademetan (260 mg once daily orally Days 1–3 and 15–17 on a 28-day cycle) or trabectedin (1.5 mg/m2 as a 24-hour intravenous infusion every 3 weeks). Randomization is stratified by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (0 or 1) and number of prior treatments for WD/DDLPS (≤ 2 or > 2). Tumor response will be evaluated by RECIST v1.1 at Weeks 8, 16, 24, and 32, and then every 12 weeks. Primary endpoint: PFS by blinded independent central review. Secondary endpoints: overall survival; disease control rate; objective response rate; duration of response; PFS by investigator assessment; safety; health-related quality of life. Exploratory endpoints: molecular markers in peripheral blood and/or tumor tissue; milademetan pharmacokinetics. To demonstrate a 3-month increase in PFS (from 3 to 6 months) corresponding to a hazard ratio of 0.5, approximately 160 patients will be required to observe 105 events with 93.9% power and 2-sided significance level of 5%. Clinical trial information: NCT04979442.

Qualitative study to characterize patient experience and relevance of patient-reported outcome measures for patients with metastatic synovial sarcoma

Background

The outlook for patients with metastatic synovial sarcoma (mSS) is poor. Better understanding of patient experience in this setting, beyond clinical measures, may guide improvements in management. Validated patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments specific to many types of cancer exist, but for rare cancers this is often not the case.

Methods

This study aimed to characterize patient experiences of symptoms and impacts of mSS and evaluate the content validity and relevance of the novel European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Item Library 31 (EORTC IL31) Disease Symptoms PRO tool assessing synovial sarcoma symptoms. This tool comprises items from preexisting, validated cancer-specific PRO instruments from the EORTC Item Library. It was developed as an mSS-specific add-on to the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30), which evaluates general cancer and treatment-related symptoms and functioning. This was a non-interventional, qualitative interview study involving semi-structured, concept elicitation (CE) and cognitive debriefing (CD) telephone interviews in adults with mSS. CE explored symptoms and their impact on functioning and quality of life; CD assessed participant understanding and relevance of the PRO tools.

Results

Among the 8 participants, the most common disease-related symptoms reported during CE were fatigue and pain, while shortness of breath was one of the most bothersome. The greatest negative impacts of mSS occurred in domains of physical functioning and sleep. Key treatment priorities for patients were to improve disrupted sleep and ability to undertake strenuous activities.

Conclusions

The interviews showed that, when used together, the EORTC IL31 and EORTC QLQ-C30 covered symptoms and impacts of most relevance and importance to patients with mSS, with no notable gaps and good conceptual coverage. This study therefore supports the content validity of 2 tools in mSS, advocating their use in clinical trials to assess treatment impact on PRO measures of importance to these patients.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41687-022-00450-1.

Phase 1/2 study of topical submicron particle paclitaxel for cutaneous metastases of breast cancer

Purpose

This Phase 1/2 study evaluated safety and efficacy of a topical submicron particle paclitaxel (SPP) in an anhydrous ointment base (SOR007), primarily in breast cancer patients with cutaneous metastases (CM).

Methods

One of three concentrations of SOR007 SPP (0.15%, 1.0%, or 2.0%) was applied twice daily over an area of 50 cm² under a 3 + 3 phase 1 design for up to 28 days, with the option for expansion to an additional 28 days at the highest dose under a Phase 2a once safety was established. Efficacy was analyzed by lesion measurements and photographs to determine overall response rate (ORR), complete response (CR), and progression free survival by day 28 or 56.

Results

Twenty-three subjects were enrolled, 21 with cutaneous metastases of breast cancer (CMOBC). Four subjects received SOR007 0.15% for a median of 28 days (range = 17–29), three at a dose of 1.0% for a median of 28 days (range = 6–29), and sixteen at 2.0% for a median of  55 days (range = 6–60). All doses were well tolerated, and 19 subjects were evaluable for efficacy. At day 28 across all dose levels, 16% (95% CI 3.4 to 39.6%) of subjects achieved an ORR and another 63% (95% CI 34.9–96.8%) had stable disease (SD). The proportion of patients being progression free at 28 days across all treatments was 79% (95 CI 54–94%).

Conclusion

Application of SOR007 0.15%, 1.0%, and 2.0% to CM was safe and well tolerated with some reduction in lesion pain, and minimal systemic absorption of paclitaxel. Lesion stabilization was observed in most subjects over the study period. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial to confirm these findings is warranted.

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier

NCT03101358.

Updated Integrated Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Entrectinib in Patients With NTRK Fusion-Positive Solid Tumors

PURPOSE

Entrectinib potently inhibits tropomyosin receptor kinases (TRKAs)/B/C and ROS1, and previously induced deep [objective response rate (ORR) 57.4%] and durable [median duration of response (DoR) 10.4 months] responses in adults with NTRK fusion-positive solid tumors from three phase I/II trials. This article expands prior reports with additional patients and longer follow-up.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with locally advanced/metastatic NTRK fusion-positive solid tumors and ≥12 months' follow-up were included. Primary endpoints were ORR and DoR by blinded independent central review (BICR); secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), intracranial efficacy, and safety. The safety-evaluable populations included all patients who had received ≥1 entrectinib dose.

RESULTS

At clinical cut-off (August 31, 2020), the efficacy-evaluable population comprised 121 adults with 14 tumor types and ≥30 histologies. Median follow-up was 25.8 months; 61.2% of patients had a complete (n = 19) or partial response (n = 55). Median DoR was 20.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 13.0-38.2]; median PFS was 13.8 months (95% CI, 10.1-19.9). In 11 patients with BICR-assessed measurable central nervous system (CNS) disease, intracranial ORR was 63.6% (95% CI, 30.8-89.1) and median intracranial DoR was 22.1 (95% CI, 7.4-not estimable) months. The safety profile of entrectinib in adults and pediatric patients was aligned with previous reports. Most treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were grade 1/2 and manageable/reversible with dose modifications. TRAE-related discontinuations occurred in 8.3% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

With additional clinical experience, entrectinib continues to demonstrate durable systemic and intracranial responses and can address the unmet need of a CNS-active treatment in patients with NTRK fusion-positive solid tumors.

A Phase I Study of an MPS1 Inhibitor (BAY 1217389) in Combination with Paclitaxel Using a Novel Randomized Continual Reassessment Method for Dose Escalation

PURPOSE

Monopolar spindle 1 (MPS1) kinase inhibitor, BAY 1217389 (BAY) synergizes with paclitaxel. This phase I study assessed the combination of BAY with paclitaxel using a novel randomized continuous reassessment method (rCRM) to improve dose determination.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with solid tumors were randomized to receive oral BAY (twice daily 2-days-on/5-days-off) with weekly paclitaxel (90 mg/m²) or paclitaxel monotherapy in cycle 1. Dose escalation was guided by CRM modeling. Primary objectives were to assess safety, establish the MTD of BAY, and to evaluate the pharmacokinetic profiles for both compounds. Simulations were performed to determine the contribution of the rCRM for dose determination.

RESULTS

In total, 75 patients were enrolled. The main dose-limiting toxicities were hematologic toxicities (55.6%). The MTD of BAY was established at 64 mg twice daily with paclitaxel. Inclusion of a control arm enabled the definitive attribution of grade ≥3 neutropenia to higher BAY exposure [AUC_0-12 (P< 0.001)]. After determining the MTD, we included 19 patients with breast cancer at this dose for dose expansion. Other common toxicities were nausea (45.3%), fatigue (41.3%), and diarrhea (40.0%). Overall confirmed responses were seen in 31.6% of evaluable patients. Simulations showed that rCRM outperforms traditional designs in determining the true MTD.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of BAY with paclitaxel was associated with considerable toxicity without a therapeutic window. However, the use of the rCRM design enabled us to determine the exposure-toxicity relation for BAY. Therefore, we propose that the rCRM could improve dose determination in phase I trials that combine agents with overlapping toxicities.

An open-label single-arm phase II study of regorafenib for the treatment of angiosarcoma

PURPOSE

Angiosarcomas represents a diverse group of aggressive high-grade vascular tumours with limited therapeutic options. We sought to determine the safety and efficacy of regorafenib, a small-molecule multikinase inhibitor, in the treatment of metastatic or locally advanced unresectable angiosarcoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this single-arm multicentre, open-label phase II clinical trial, 31 patients were enrolled and received regorafenib 160 mg PO daily for 21 days of a 28-day cycle. The primary endpoint for the study was progression-free survival at 4 months. Secondary endpoints included overall survival, response rate, and safety. Patients (≥18 years) with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score of 0-1, a life expectancy of at least 4 months who had progressed on at least one but no more than 4 prior lines of therapy were eligible.

RESULTS

Of the 23 patients evaluable for efficacy, 2 had a complete response (8.7%), and 2 had a partial response (8.7%), for a total overall response rate of 17.4%. Median PFS was 5.5 months, and 12/23 patients (52.2%) had a PFS of greater than 4 months. 10/31 (32.3%) patients evaluable for toxicity had a grade 3 or higher adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Regorafenib is a safe and active treatment for refractory metastatic and unresectable angiosarcoma. Rates of adverse events were comparable to prior studies of regorafenib for other tumour types. Regorafenib, the single agent, could be considered as therapy for patients with metastatic or unresectable AS.

Phase II Randomized Study of CMB305 and Atezolizumab Compared With Atezolizumab Alone in Soft-Tissue Sarcomas Expressing NY-ESO-1

PURPOSE

CMB305 is a heterologous prime-boost vaccination regimen created to prime NY-ESO-1-specific CD8 T-cell populations and then activate the immune response with a potent TLR-4 agonist. This open-label randomized phase II trial was designed to investigate the efficacy and safety of adding the CMB305 regimen to atezolizumab (anti-programmed death ligand-1 therapy) in comparison with atezolizumab alone in patients with synovial sarcoma or myxoid liposarcoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with locally advanced, relapsed, or metastatic synovial sarcoma or myxoid liposarcoma (any grade) were randomly assigned to receive CMB305 with atezolizumab (experimental arm) or atezolizumab alone (control arm). The primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Safety and immune responses were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 89 patients were enrolled; 55.1% had received ≥ 2 prior lines of chemotherapy. Median PFS was 2.6 months and 1.6 months in the combination and control arms, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.6 to 1.3). Median OS was 18 months in both treatment arms. Patients treated with combination therapy had a significantly higher rate of treatment-induced NY-ESO-1-specific T cells (P = .01) and NY-ESO-1-specific antibody responses (P < .0001). In a post hoc analysis of all dosed patients, OS was longer (36 months) in the subset who developed anti-NY-ESO-1 T-cell immune response (hazard ratio, 0.3; P = .02).

CONCLUSION

Although the combination of CMB305 and atezolizumab did not result in significant increases in PFS or OS compared with atezolizumab alone, some patients demonstrated evidence of an anti-NY-ESO-1 immune response and appeared to fare better by imaging than those without such an immune response. Combining prime-boost vaccines such as CMB305 with anti-programmed death ligand-1 therapies merits further evaluation in other clinical contexts.

Tumor protein p53 mutation in archived tumor samples from a 12-year survivor of stage 4 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma may predict long-term survival with DeltaRex-G: A case report and literature review

DeltaRex-G is a replication-incompetent amphotropic murine leukemia virus-based retroviral vector that displays a collagen-matrix-targeting decapeptide on its surface envelope protein, gp70, and encodes a cytocidal ‘dominant negative’, i.e. a truncated construct of the executive cyclin G1 (CCNG1) oncogene. DeltaRex-G inhibits the CCNG1 function of promoting cell competence and survival through the commanding CCNG1/cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)/Myc/mouse double minute 2 homolog (Mdm2)/p53 axis. In 2009, DeltaRex-G was granted Fast Track designation from the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of pancreatic cancer. In 2019, the results of a phase 1/2 study that used DeltaRex-G as monotherapy for stage 4 chemotherapy-resistant pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) were published. A unique participant of the aforementioned phase 1/2 study is now an 84-year-old Caucasian woman with chemoresistant PDAC who was treated with DeltaRex-G, 3x10¹¹ colony forming units (cfu)/dose, 3 times/week for 4 weeks with a 2-week rest period, for 1.5 years. During the treatment period, the patient's tumors in the liver, lymph node and peritoneum exhibited progressive decreases in size, which were accompanied by a reduction and normalization of serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels, and the patient achieved complete remission after 8 months of DeltaRex-G therapy with minimal side effects (grade 2 fatigue). Henceforth, the patient has been in remission for 12 years with no evidence of disease, no late therapy-related adverse events, and no further cancer therapy following DeltaRex-G treatment. The present study reports a mutation of tumor protein p53 (TP53) (G199V) found retrospectively in the patient's archived tumor samples. TP53 is a well-characterized tumor suppressor gene, and a critical regulatory component of the executive CCNG1/CDK/Myc/Mdm2/p53 axis, which regulates proliferative cell competence, DNA fidelity and survival. Studies are underway to determine whether TP53 mutations in pancreatic cancer can help identify a subset of patients with advanced metastatic cancer with an otherwise poor prognosis who would respond favorably to DeltaRex-G, which would broaden the treatment options for patients with otherwise lethal PDAC.

Results of NC-6300 (nanoparticle epirubicin) in an expansion cohort of patients with angiosarcoma

11543

Background: NC-6300 is a polymeric micelle exhibiting increased tumor accumulation compared to small-molecule epirubicin through enhanced pharmacokinetics and controlled release within the tumor through a pH-sensitive linker conjugated to epirubicin. In a phase 1b trial, which accrued twenty-nine patients with various types of sarcoma as well as solid tumors, observed dose-limiting toxicities included thrombocytopenia, stomatitis, lung infection, and febrile neutropenia. The maximum tolerated dose and the recommended phase 2 dose were determined to be 185 mg/m2 and 150 mg/m2, respectively. The objective response rate (ORR) in soft tissue sarcoma subset (n = 17) was 18% with both angiosarcoma patients achieving partial response. To further evaluate the anti-tumor activity of NC-6300 in angiosarcoma, we conducted an expansion cohort of 10 additional angiosarcoma patients. Methods: Eligible patients, at least age 18 years old, with histologically confirmed angiosarcoma, including cutaneous and non-cutaneous variants, not amenable to curative treatment with surgery or radiotherapy were included. No more than two lines of prior systemic therapy were allowed. NC-6300 was administered at the dose of 150 mg/m2 intravenously on Day 1 of a 21-day cycle. Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Disease assessment was performed every 6 weeks using RECIST v1.1. The primary endpoint was median progression-free survival (mPFS). Results: Ten patients (cutaneous: 2 pts; non-cutaneous: 8 pts) were enrolled and deemed evaluable. Median line of prior systemic treatment in the advanced disease setting was 1.0 and seven patients (70%) received prior anthracycline therapy. Objective response rate (ORR) was 30% (cutaneous: 1 pt, non-cutaneous: 2 pts) and mPFS was 5.4 months (95% CI: 1.2-NA). Across all angiosarcoma patients included in the phase 1 portion and expansion cohort (phase 1b portion: 2 pts, expansion cohort: 10 pts), ORR and mPFS was 42% and 7.3 months (95%CI: 3.3-NA), respectively. All patients enrolled in the expansion cohort experienced grade 3/4 AEs and no treatment related death was observed. Most frequent grade 3/4 AEs were neutropenia without fever (80%), thrombocytopenia (40%), anemia (20%) and leukopenia (20%). AEs led to NC-6300 dose reduction and medication withdrawal were seen in 70% and 10% of patients, respectively. Conclusions: Promising anti-tumor activity was observed in this cohort of patients with cutaneous and non-cutaneous angiosarcoma. The safety profile of this expansion cohort was consistent with previous clinical study results of NC-6300. Our study results warrant further development of NC-6300 for angoisarcoma. Clinical trial information: NCT03168061.

A phase 2 study using ipilimumab, nivolumab, and trabectedin for previously untreated metastatic soft tissue sarcoma

11562

Background: Sarcoma cells are most immunogenic earlier in the disease course and before treatment when the immune system can recognize and destroy them. Hypothesis: Immune checkpoint inhibitors would be most effective when given to previously untreated patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma. Methods: Eligible patients for this Phase 2 study are previously untreated patients ≥ 18 years of age with unresectable or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma, with measurable disease by RECIST v1.1. Immune checkpoint inhibitors Ipilimumab (I) and Nivolumab (N) were given with Trabectedin (T), a marine derived alkaloid with defined doses of I (1 mg/kg i.v. q 12 weeks), N (3 mg/kg i.v. q 2 weeks), and T (1.2 mg/m2 i.v. q 3 weeks). Primary endpoints: (1) Objective response rate by RECIST v1.1 via CT scan or MRI, (2) Progression-free survival (PFS): from first day of treatment to disease progression or death due to any cause; otherwise, it is censored at the time of last follow-up, and (3) Overall survival: from first day of treatment to death due to any cause; otherwise, it is censored at the time of last follow-up. Results: There were eighty-two evaluable subjects, having completed the first cycle of I, N, and T and have had a CT or MRI scan at the 6-week follow-up period. Best Overall Response by RECIST v1.1 = 7 CR (2 surgical CR), 9 PR, 54 SD, and 12 PD. Disease control rate was 85.4%. The median PFS was >6.4 (range: 0-32) months; 6-month PFS rate: 57.3%. The median OS was >12.0 (0-38) months; 6-month OS rate: 78.8%. Safety analysis: The most common Grade 3 TRAEs include increased ALT (26), anemia (11), increased AST (9), and fatigue (8). Common Grade 4 TRAEs include thrombocytopenia (2), increased AST (2), increased ALT (2), and increased CPK (2). There was one Grade 5 TRAE of rhabdomyolysis (1). Conclusions: Taken together, these results suggest that first-line combinatorial therapy with I, N, and T are (1) synergistic, and (2) may be equal or superior to, and safer than, standard first line therapy for advanced/metastatic soft tissue sarcoma. Clinical trial information: NCT03138161.

Phase II trial of pegylated arginine deiminase in combination with gemcitabine and docetaxel for the treatment of soft tissue sarcoma

11508

Background: Soft tissue sarcoma (STS) is dependent on extracellular arginine as it often lacks expression of argininosuccinate synthase 1 (ASS1), the urea cycle enzyme needed to produce intracellular arginine. PEGylated arginine deiminase (ADI-PEG 20) is an extracellular arginine-degrading enzyme that causes ASS1 deficient tumors to enter the starvation state. Preclinical data demonstrated that addition of docetaxel (D) with ADI-PEG20 upregulates expression of the transporter for gemcitabine (G), overcoming transporter level resistance, and causing increased cell death. In vivo modeling demonstrated that the combination of ADI-PEG20 with G+D was superior to G+D alone. Therefore, we performed a phase 2 trial testing the addition of ADI-PEG20 to G+D. Methods: We performed an investigator-initiated, phase 2, multicenter, multi-arm clinical trial of ADI-PEG20 with G (90minute infusion)+D in STS, Ewing’s, osteosarcoma and small cell lung cancer. We are reporting Arm A, the STS arm. Eligible patients had STS that would be standardly treated with G+D that had progressed on at least one prior line of therapy with measurable disease by RECIST1.1 and had adequate organ function Based on a historic median PFS of 6.2 months for G+D, we targeted to enroll N = 75 patients in cohort A to detect a 2.8 month improvement with 80% power at a 5% alpha level. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), clinical benefit rate (CBR), safety, tolerability, cancer related mortality, and correlation with ASS1 expression by IHC. We evaluated PFS by Kaplan-Meier method and estimated overall response rate (ORR). Results: 75 patients were treated and deemed evaluable. The trial underwent two dose reductions by the data safety monitoring board due to prolonged neutropenia and thrombocytopenia preventing the use of day 8 G+D, consistent with preclinical mechanism of action data showing that ADI-PEG 20+D enhanced G uptake. Originally, the G dose was 900mg/m2 reduced first to 750mg/m2 then to 600mg/m2. D was dose reduced at the time of the second dose reduction from 75mg/m2 to 60mg/m2. ADI-PEG20 was given at a fixed intramuscular dose (36 mg/m2) weekly. The need for two dose reductions affected the PFS. The PFS/OS (months) were for the 600mg/m2 group (n = 31) was 6.0/N.D., leiomyosarcoma (LMS) (N = 33) 7.2/22.5, liposarcoma 5.1/17.4, and other (N = 36) 2.8/15.0. Responses were 8% complete (6/75) (3 LMS, 1 synovial and 2 angiosarcoma), 17% partial (13/75), and 43% stable disease (32/75), for an ORR of 25% (19/75) and CBR of 68% (51/75). There was a trend for ASS1 negative tumors to benefit more than ASS1 positive tumors. Conclusions: The combination of ADI-PEG20 with G+D can be safely and effectively given at a dose of 600mg/m2 G and 60mg/m2 D. Future randomized trials of ADI-PEG20 with G+D are planned. Clinical trial information: NCT03449901.

Preliminary efficacy from an ongoing phase 1 dose escalation study of seclidemstat (SP-2577) in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors (AST)

3073

Background: Lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) is an epigenetic enzyme that is aberrantly expressed in many solid tumors. High levels of LSD1 expression are often correlated with poor patient prognosis due to LSD1’s role in cancer cell proliferation, metastasis, and chemoresistance. Seclidemstat is a novel, selective, reversible and oral LSD1 inhibitor capable of inhibiting both LSD1’s catalytic and scaffolding functions. We report preliminary efficacy in AST from an ongoing phase 1 trial. Methods: SALA-003-AC19 (NCT03895684) is a phase 1 trial of single agent SP-2577 in pts with AST. All pts had progressive disease (PD) at time of study entry. Pts received oral SP-2577 twice a day under fasting condition, in 28-day cycles (C). The primary objective is safety and tolerability. Secondary objectives are to determine maximum-tolerated dose, preliminary efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics. Results: As of December 30, 2020, 19 pts with AST (10 sarcoma, 2 prostate, 2 ovarian, 2 pancreatic, 1 renal, 1 cervical, 1 breast) were enrolled. Pts received escalating doses of SP-2577 from 150 to 600 mg BID and the dose escalation is ongoing. The median age was 63 years (range, 21–79). 42% were male, and pts had received a median of 4 (range, 1–8) prior systemic therapies. The most common (>5%) grade 3 treatment-related adverse events were GI related including diarrhea (5.3%) and abdominal pain (5.3%). No grade 4 events were reported and there were no treatment-related deaths. Safety data will be presented after completion of phase 1. Three pts had at least one dose reduction. Among the 13 pts who were evaluable for response at end of C2, 7 pts (54%) had best response of stable disease (SD) with median time to progression (TTP) of 4.3 months (range, 2.1–11.5). Four of the 7 pts had genetic abnormalities that may demonstrate increased sensitization to SP-2577 according to preclinical studies. Characteristics of 7 pts with SD at C2 and beyond are shown in the table. Conclusions: Seclidemstat has shown activity among advanced sarcoma pts with a manageable safety profile. The dose escalation is ongoing and preliminary clinical data supports further exploration in FET-translocated sarcoma as single agent and in combination therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT03895684. [Table: see text]

Results of the phase 1b soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) portion of the global randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of tazemetostat (TAZ) plus doxorubicin (DOX) as frontline therapy for advanced epithelioid sarcoma (ES)

11563

Background: ES is a rare, aggressive subtype of STS for which cytotoxic chemotherapy has limited effectiveness. TAZ, an FDA-approved EZH2 inhibitor, has shown single-agent clinical activity and a favorable safety profile in patients with metastatic or locally advanced ES. In preclinical studies, TAZ has shown synergistic antitumor activity with DOX, which is often used as frontline treatment for STS. Here, we present results of the phase 1b study (NCT04204941), designed to assess the recommended phase 3 dose (RP3D), safety, and efficacy of TAZ + DOX in patients with advanced STS. Methods: The open-label, phase 1b portion of this study enrolled adult patients with previously untreated advanced STS. A standard 3 + 3 design was used to assess TAZ 400 mg, 600 mg, and 800 mg orally twice daily in combination with DOX (75 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 of each cycle, for up to 6 cycles) as frontline therapy. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were predefined in the protocol. The RP3D of TAZ was determined by Scientific Review Committee review of the safety and pharmacokinetic data from the phase 1b trial, with a target DLT rate of < 33%. Results: As of February 1, 2021, 16 patients are enrolled, including 2 with ES; 10 are still receiving TAZ + DOX and 6 have discontinued (5 due to disease progression, 1 due to patient withdrawal). The median age was 49.5 years (range, 29–82) and all had unresectable STS. Median (range) time on treatment was 13 (0.1–51.1+) weeks across all dose levels evaluated. Two DLTs, both of febrile neutropenia, were observed, one in the TAZ 600 mg + DOX cohort (n = 1/6, 17%), and one in the TAZ 800 mg + DOX cohort (n = 1/3, 33%). When used in combination with DOX, the RP3D of TAZ was 800 mg. Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TR-TEAEs) occurred in 13/16 (81.3%) patients. The most common (≥ 20%) TR-TEAEs were neutropenia (n = 11, 69%), anemia (n = 10, 63%), fatigue (n = 10, 63%), stomatitis (n = 9, 56%), nausea (n = 8, 50%), febrile neutropenia (n = 7, 44%), constipation (n = 6, 38%), vomiting (n = 6, 38%), and decreased appetite (n = 5, 31%). TR-TEAEs were defined as attributable to either study agent. Conclusions: The combination of TAZ + DOX was generally well tolerated in this dose finding study in patients with advanced STS. The RP3D to be tested in the phase 3 randomized, double blind, placebo controlled study is TAZ 800 mg twice daily + DOX. The safety profile of this combination is consistent with the respective safety information for TAZ and for DOX. The TR-TEAEs include known toxicities of DOX or TAZ. Further comparison with DOX + placebo in the phase 3 trial will aid in assessing efficacy and safety of the combination of TAZ + DOX. The global phase 3 confirmatory trial will enroll patients with ES who have unresectable disease and have had no prior systemic therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT04204941.

Trial in progress: A phase 1, multicenter, open-label, dose-exploration and dose-expansion study evaluating the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of AMG650 in subjects with advanced solid tumors

TPS5600

Background: KIF18A is a mitotic kinesin motor protein that regulates chromosome positioning during cell division and is overexpressed in a subset of human cancers. TP53 mutant unstable aneuploid cancer cells with chromosomal instability (CIN) features are dependent on KIF18A motor activity to prevent lethal multipolar cell division. Preclinical data demonstrate that treatment with AMG 650; an oral, first in class, selective small molecule inhibitor of KIF18A may be safe and tolerable. We are conducting a first-in-human phase 1 study with AMG 650 in adult subjects with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors with TP53MUT, triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), high grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) or serous like endometrial cancers and other solid tumors. Methods: In this phase 1, multicentric, dose escalation and dose expansion study we evaluate the safety and tolerability of AMG 650 monotherapy in patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors (NCT04293094). The main objective is to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) based on emerging safety, efficacy, and pharmacodynamics (PD) data prior to reaching the MTD. Key inclusion criteria include the presence of measurable disease and diagnosis of advanced/metastatic triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC), serous-like endometrial cancer or other solid tumors with documented TP53 mutations. In the dose expansion phase, participants with locally advanced or metastatic TNBC or HGSOC will be treated with the preliminary RP2D identified from the dose exploration part of the study. Primary endpoints include the incidence of Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs),Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-related Adverse Events and the evaluation of the number of participants who experience a clinically significant change from baseline in vital signs, electrocardiogram and laboratory tests parameters. Secondary endpoints include Objective Response Rate, Duration of Response, Progression-free Survival, Clinical Benefit Rate, Time to Response, Time to Progression, Overall Survival (OS), Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of AMG 650, Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of AMG 650 as well as Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC) Over the Dosing Interval for AMG 650. Continuous monitoring of toxicity is conducted. The study began enrolling pts in March 2020 and is ongoing. For more information, please contact Amgen Medical Information: medinfo@amgen.com Clinical trial information: NCT04293094.

Phase 1 expansion trial of the LSD1 inhibitor seclidemstat (SP-2577) with and without topotecan and cyclophosphamide (TC) in patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory Ewing sarcoma (ES) and select sarcomas

TPS11577

Background: Several sarcomas possess chromosomal translocations in FET family members ( FUS, EWSR1, and TAF15) responsible for cancer development. Sarcomas caused by FET family gene rearrangements include ES, desmoplastic round cell small tumors (DSRCT), myxoid liposarcoma (ML), and several others. Lysine specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) is a critical protein for sarcoma development and progression through its colocalization and/or association with several FET family oncogenic transcription factors. This suggests that pharmacologic inhibition of LSD1 may be a therapeutic strategy. Seclidemstat (SP-2577, Salarius Pharmaceuticals) is an oral, first-in-class, small molecule with reversible, noncompetitive inhibition of LSD1 (IC50: 25–50 nM). In vitro and in vivo data demonstrate seclidemstat, or analogs, modulate EWS/ETS transcriptional activity, down-regulating oncogene expression and up-regulating tumor-suppressor gene expression, leading to significant tumor growth inhibition in ES mouse xenograft studies. Seclidemstat has shown in in vitro ES cell lines near additivity efficacy when added to TC. In in vitro studies of other FET-translocated sarcomas, including ML (FUS/DDIT3 fusion) and clear cell sarcoma (EWS/ATF1 fusion), seclidemstat showed anti-proliferative activity. In an ongoing Phase 1 trial investigating single agent seclidemstat in advanced solid tumors (NCT03895684), three pts with metastatic FET-translocated sarcomas had a median progression-free survival of 5.7 months (range: 4.3–7.2) with a best response of stable disease despite having a median of 5 (range: 1–7) prior therapies. Methods: This dose expansion Phase 1 study (NCT03600649) assesses seclidemstat at 900 mg PO BID, the recommended Phase 2 dose, in two expansion cohorts: a single agent expansion in select sarcoma pts (n = 30) and a safety lead-in dose escalation and expansion (n = 24) of seclidemstat combined with TC in pts with ES. Pts must be ≥12 years old, have ECOG performance status of 0 or 1, with a life expectancy > 4 months. In the select sarcoma cohort, pts must have ML (n = 15) or other sarcomas with FET family translocations (n = 15) including DSRCT. One to 3 prior lines of therapy are allowed. In the ES combination cohort, up to 2 lines of prior therapy are allowed. Primary objective is safety/tolerability and secondary objective is efficacy. The trial is currently recruiting across 8 locations in the United States. Clinical trial information: NCT03600649.

A phase III study (APROMISS) of AL3818 (Catequentinib, Anlotinib) hydrochloride monotherapy in subjects with metastatic or advanced synovial sarcoma

11505

Background: AL3818 (Catequentinib, Anlotinib) is a novel, orally administered, small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor. The primary objective of this Phase 3 study is to evaluate the efficacy of AL3818 monotherapy in patients (pts) with synovial sarcoma (SS) comparing with dacarbazine in randomization setting. Methods: Patients with a diagnosis of synovial sarcoma requiring second line or further line treatment were eligible for enrollment. The regimen was a 21-day cycle with oral AL3818 administered on 14 days on and 7 days off. This phase 3 trial is randomized in 2:1 ratio of AL3818 comparing to dacarbazine with option of crossover after PD of dacarbazine treatment. Progression free survival (PFS) with Log Rank test is the primary endpoint and this trial for SS is currently completed enrolled in US and Italy. Results: Total 79 pts initiated treatment and are evaluable, 52 received AL3818 as treatment arm (T), and 27 received dacarbazine (D) as control arm (C). Arms T/C median ages were 40.5/42.0 years (range: 18-70+) and 20/16 (38.5%/59.3%) were male. Overall, PFS was 2.89 months (95% CI: 2.73 – 6.87) for AL3818 and 1.64 (95% CI: 1.45 – 2.70) for D. The PFS of study met the primary endpoint with a p-value of 0.0015 and a HR of 0.449 (95% CI: 0.270– 0.744). At the month 4, 6, and 12, the percentages of progression free patients for AL3818 were 48.1%, 42.3% and 26.9%; and for D were 14.85%, 11.1% and 3.7%. For grade 3 treatment-related adverse events, 12(23.1%) of pts experienced for AL3818 and 7(25.9%) of pts experienced for D. The most common AL3818 related grade 3 AEs were diarrhea (5.8%) and hypertension (3.8%). Conclusions: This phase III trial demonstrates improved disease control and superior progression free survival for AL3818 vs dacarbazine in advanced SS. In addition, the study further confirms the acceptable benefit-risk profile of AL3818 from the prior randomized Phase 2b soft tissue sarcoma study (NCT02449343). AL3818 is a meaningful treatment option for pts with advanced SS. Clinical trial information: NCT 03016819 Clinical trial information: NCT03016819.

A phase 2 study of talimogene laherparepvec, nivolumab, and trabectedin (TNT) in advanced sarcoma

11567

Background: Combination trabectidin (T) and nivolumab (N) has been shown to be a safe and effective therapy in soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Intratumoral injection of talimogene laherparepvec (TVEC) has a local oncolytic effect, and increases immune response via enhanced recruitment of antigen presenting cells, and thereby cytotoxic immune response. This study aims to determine if the addition of TVEC to combination trabectedin and nivolumab is effective and safe in advanced sarcoma. Methods: Eligible patients include patients ≥ 18 years of age with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic STS, measurable disease by RECIST v1.1, and at least one accessible tumor for TVEC intratumoral injection. N (3 mg/kg i.v. q 2 weeks), T (1.2 mg/m2 i.v. q 3 weeks) and TVEC (1x10e8 PFU/ml q 2 weeks depending on tumor size) were administered. A test dose of TVEC (1x10e6 PFU/ml) was initially given, followed three weeks later by full dose TVEC. Primary endpoint: Progression-free survival (PFS); Secondary endpoints: (1) Best overall response during treatment period, (2) PFS rate at 6 and 9 months, (3) Overall survival (OS) rate at 6, 9, and 12 months, (4) Incidence of conversion from unresectable to resectable tumor, and (5) Incidence of treatment-related adverse events. Interim. Results: There were 36 evaluable subjects under the Modified Intention-to-Treat (MITT) population, having completed the first cycle of TNT and a CT or MRI scan at the 6-week follow-up period. The most common histological subtypes include leiomyosarcoma (9), liposarcoma (5), spindle cell sarcoma (3), pleomorphic sarcoma (2), Ewing’s sarcoma (2), and other (5). Median number of prior lines of therapy was 4 (range 1-8). Best Overall Response by RECIST v1.1 = 3 PR, 27 SD, 5 PD. One patient, with previously unresectable disease was taken for resection and was found to have 100% necrosis on surgical pathology. Disease control rate (CR+PR+SD) was 86.1%. The median PFS was 5.5 (range: 1-18) months; 6-month PFS rate: 62.1%. Median PFS on therapy immediately preceding this trial was 2.0 months (range = 1-14 months). There were 47 evaluable subjects for OS analysis under the Intention-to-Treat (ITT) population having received at least one dose of T and N. The median OS was 9.0 (range 0-20) months; 6-month OS rate: 73%. Safety analysis: There were 47 evaluable subjects under the ITT population. 28% of these patients experienced ³1 SAE. The most common grade 3/4 TRAEs include anemia (12), increased ALT (8), fatigue (4), thrombocytopenia (4), neutropenia (4). There were no grade 3/4 TVEC injection site reactions. 22% of patients in the MITT cohort remain on study. Conclusions: These results suggest that combination therapy with TNT appears to be as effective as standard therapy, with no new safety signals seen. Furthermore, median PFS exceeded that of the immediately preceding lines of therapy in this heavily pre-treated cohort. As data matures, further data will be reported. Clinical trial information: NCT03886311.

Phase 1 trial of seclidemstat (SP-2577) in patients with relapsed/refractory Ewing sarcoma

11514

Background: Ewing sarcoma (ES), a rare bone and soft tissue sarcoma mainly of adolescents and young adults, is characterized by a chromosomal translocation resulting in a fusion oncoprotein. Lysine specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) has been shown to associate with the fusion oncoprotein and promote oncogenic transcriptional activity making LSD1 an attractive target for ES treatment. Seclidemstat is a novel, selective, reversible oral LSD1 inhibitor capable of inhibiting both LSD1’s catalytic and scaffolding functions. This is the first report of an LSD1 inhibitor in a Phase 1 trial focused exclusively on ES. Methods: SALA-002-EW16 is a Phase 1 trial of single agent seclidemstat in patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory (R/R) ES. This report describes the completed monotherapy dose escalation. Pts > 12 years received oral SP-2577 twice daily in 28-day cycles under fasting conditions at the assigned dose level. The primary objective was safety and tolerability. Secondary objectives include to determine maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D), preliminary efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics. Results: As of December 30, 2020, 27 pts with R/R ES were enrolled. Pts received escalating doses of SP-2577 at 75 (n = 1), 150 (n = 2), 300 (n = 4), 600 (n = 6), 900 (n = 8), or 1200 mg PO BID (n = 6). The median age was 25 years (range 15–68), 63% were male, and pts had received a median of 3 (range 2–12) prior systemic therapies. There were no treatment-related deaths. The most common ( > 5%) grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were vomiting (15%), abdominal pain (11%), and hypokalemia (11%). One pt (4%) with grade 3 pancreatitis reported a grade 4 AE of elevated lipase. All remaining grade 3 TRAEs, including hematological TRAEs, were reported in only one pt each. Four pts discontinued study for an AE (weight loss, pancreatitis, vomiting, abdominal pain). Three pts had a dose reduction. The first cycle dose-limiting toxicities were gastrointestinal-related AEs observed in 2 pts at 1200 mg BID. Thus, the MTD/RP2D was established as 900 mg BID. Peak plasma concentrations occurred at a median of 4 hours (h) post-dose and median terminal half-life was 6 h; exposure was dose proportional through 900 mg BID. One pt at 600 mg BID achieved a reduction in target lesions starting at end of C2 with further target lesion tumor shrinkage through end of C4 and C6 (maximum 76% tumor shrinkage) with coincident new non-target lesion appearance at end of C2. Of pts evaluable for response at the end of C2 (12 pts), two additional pts (16.7%) at 600 mg BID and 900 mg BID had overall stable disease. Conclusions: Seclidemstat has a manageable safety profile with proof-of-concept preliminary activity in heavily pretreated pts with relapsed/refractory ES. These data support the planned Phase 2 expansion of seclidemstat as single agent and in combination with chemotherapy in ES and other sarcomas that share similar translocations. Clinical trial information: NCT03600649.

Phase II study of SM-88 in Ewing's and other sarcomas

e23505

Background: Sarcomas are rare heterogeneous malignancies. Once recurrent, cure is uncommon. SM-88 (racemetyrosine) is an amino acid analogue with no known cross resistance to typical sarcoma regimens. Based on previous anecdotal experience in Ewing’s (EWS) we initiated a Phase 2 trial (HopES) in EWS and other sarcomas (Ss) after >1 prior systemic therapy. We now report preliminary data after having met prespecified continuation criteria. Methods: Open label prospective trial in 2 separate cohorts (EWS and Ss) of oral SM-88 used with MPS conditioning agents (SM-88 920 mg, methoxsalen 10 mg, phenytoin 50 mg, sirolimus 0.5 mg) all daily until progression. Results: As of Feb 5 2021, 10 pts with incurable sarcomas were enrolled; 4 had high risk but stable EWS. Average age 43.9 yrs (13–77); 70% white; 20% female. Median number of prior regimens 4 (1–9); 70% received prior RT; 50% prior surgery. Median time from initial diagnosis 39.5 months with 50% T2 (40% unknown), 30% M1 (30% unknown). Prespecified futility stopping was exceeded (i.e., >1 of first 5 subjects/cohort) upon achieving clinical benefit in each. Stable disease was achieved in 75.0% (6/8 with available data). Time on treatment (TTx) exceeded last known TTx in 80% (95% CI 44.4–97.5). Median SM-88 TTx was 4.9 vs 2.9 mo for prior TTx (logrank HR 0.53; p=0.12). One EWS subject had unresectable disease that became resectable, was completely resected, and remained disease-free for ≥ 6 months. Prior to SM-88, longest TTx was 12 mo (on IT*) and shortest TTx 1 mo (on IEV*) vs SM-88 TTx of 11.9 mo. An angiosarcoma subject had a 21% reduction in the sum of all target lesions and exceeded all prior TTx (including 8 mo on Ap/N* with 12+ mo duration of treatment of SM-88). There were no serious drug-related AEs. ECOG performance remained stable for all. Conclusions: SM-88 has exceeded pre-specified futility in both cohorts (EWS maintenance and Ss salvage). HopES continues to enroll toward the planned total of 12 subjects to more precisely define its benefit in this ultra-orphan, extremely recalcitrant disease. This trial now confirms the previously reported clinical utility of oral SM-88 in EWS and other high-risk sarcomas. Based on durable response (>6mo), SD and prolonged TTx, SM-88 warrants additional investigation in this setting. Clinical trial information: NCT03778996. [Table: see text]

Dose escalation and expansion phase I studies with the tumour-targeting antibody-tumour necrosis factor fusion protein L19TNF plus doxorubicin in patients with advanced tumours, including sarcomas

BACKGROUND

L19TNF is a recombinant fusion protein composed of a human antibody fragment and human tumour necrosis factor. L19TNF targets the EDB domain of oncofetal fibronectin highly expressed in tumour vasculature and induces tumour remission in mouse tumours. We summarise two phase I trials testing a combination of L19TNF with doxorubicin in patients with solid tumours, particularly soft tissue sarcomas (STS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The first study, an open-label, dose-escalation and expansion phase I study of L19TNF plus doxorubicin, enrolled 27 patients. Three cohorts (10.4-17 μg/kg L19TNF) of patients received L19TNF intravenously at days 1, 3, and 5 and doxorubicin (75 mg/m², then 60 mg/m²) on day 1 every 3 weeks. The expansion cohort enrolled patients with STS. The second study tried to re-escalate the doxorubicin dose to 75 mg/m² with 13 μg/kg L19TNF. Among primary objectives was the establishment of a recommended dose (RD).

RESULTS

The combination was safely applicable. Dose-limiting toxicity occurred either at 17 μg/kg L19TNF or at 75 mg/m² doxorubicin. RD is 13 μg/kg L19TNF plus 60 mg/m² doxorubicin. In 15 STS patients of the extension cohort evaluable for efficacy, antitumour activity was observed with complete remission in 1, partial remission in 1 and minor tumour shrinkage in 7 patients. The median overall survival for this heavily pretreated cohort was 14.9 months.

CONCLUSION

L19TNF can be safely applied in combination with doxorubicin and induces encouraging tumour remissions in patients with soft tissue sarcomas.

Health-related quality of life and pain with selinexor in patients with advanced dedifferentiated liposarcoma

Objective:

Compare health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of selinexor versus placebo in patients with dedifferentiated liposarcoma.

Materials & methods:

HRQoL was assessed at baseline and day 1 of each cycle using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 30-item core quality of life questionnaire. Results were reported from baseline to day 169 (where exposure to treatment was maximized while maintaining adequate sample size).

Results:

Pain scores worsened for placebo versus selinexor across all postbaseline visits, although differences in HRQoL at some visits were not significant. Other domains did not exhibit significant differences between arms; however, scores in both arms deteriorated over time.

Conclusion:

Patients treated with selinexor reported lower rates and slower worsening of pain compared with patients who received placebo.

The goal of this study was to compare the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients with advanced unresectable dedifferentiated liposarcoma treated with selinexor compared with those treated with placebo. HRQoL was measured prior to treatment initiation and at the first day of each cycle of their treatment using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 30-item core quality of life questionnaire. Pain scores worsened for placebo compared with selinexor across all visits after treatment, but differences at some visits were not significant. Other domains did not exhibit significant differences between arms; however, scores in both arms worsened over time reflecting the progressive disease burden in this patient population. As pain is one of the most devastating symptoms associated with advanced and progressing cancers, the significant reduction in pain in the selinexor arm, according to patient perception, represent a relevant added value of this drug in dedifferentiated liposarcoma.

Giant Cell Tumor of Bone: An Update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To highlight the new developments in the management of advanced giant cell tumor of bone, a rare locally aggressive benign tumor, which was traditionally managed with surgery alone by either curettage and local adjuvant therapy, wide resection, or marginal excision. Here, we review the current role of systemic therapy for management of locally advanced or metastatic giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB).

RECENT FINDINGS

The elucidation of the pathophysiology of giant cell tumor of bone, especially with regards to the role of nuclear factor kappa B ligand (RANKL), has led to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of denosumab in the management of locally advanced or metastatic GCTB. For advanced giant cell tumor where surgical resection alone can cause severe morbidity, the paradigm has shifted from local treatment alone to multidisciplinary management with the consideration of use of denosumab.